Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12102003HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CRA) (CITY COUNCIL) MEETING A G E N D A WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 10, 2003 - 6:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 2. 3. 4. 5. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF THE 9/10/03 CRA MINUTES NEW BUSINESS A. CRA Master Plan Presentation - Recommendation to City Council ADJOURN Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Agency at a later date as result of this meeting, will need a record of the proceedings and may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be heard. (286.0105 F.S.) In comp#ance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting should contact the City's ADA coordinator at 589-5330 at least 48 hours in advance of this meeting. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES Wednesday September 10, 2003, 6:00 p.m. City Council Chambers 1225 Main Street, Sebastian, Florida Mayor Barnes called the Community Redevelopment Agency Meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL City Council Present: Mayor Walter Barnes Vice-Mayor Raymond Coniglio Councilmember Joe Barczyk Councilmember James Hill Councilmember Nathan McCollum Staff Present: City Manager, Terrence Moore City Attorney, Rich Stringer City Clerk, Sally Maio Deputy City Clerk, Jeanette Williams City Engineer, David Fisher Growth Management Director, Tracy Hass Growth Management Manager, Jan King The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - 8/28/02 MOTION by Hill/Coniglio "Move approval." Mr. Coniglio -aye Mr. Barczyk - aye Mr. Hill - aye Mr. McCollum - aye Mayor Bames- aye Roll Call carried 5-0 Community Redevelopment Agency Meeting September 10, 2003 Page Two 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - 2/26/03 MOTION by Hill/Coniglio "Move approval." Mr. Barczyk - aye Mr.. Hill - aye Mr. McCollum - aye Mayor Barnes - aye Mr. Coniglio - aye Roll Call carried 5-0 5. PRESENTATION OF THE FINDING OF NECESS/TY REPORT Henry Iler, Iler Planning Group, provided an update on the implementation of an expanded Community Redevelopment District to include the Sebastian Boulevard "triangle" and enhancements to the existing plan. (see the lPG powerpoint presentation attached to these minutes). City Council discussion followed. Mr. Coniglio recommended a reconfiguration of traffic in the area of Riverview Park. Mr. Hill questioned the impact of the FEC Railroad and Mr. Iler said he would bring some recommendations back to subsequent meetings in regard to this issue. Mr. Hill concurred with the possibility of combining the parks for safety reasons while maintaining traffic flow. Mr. McCollum concurred with the concept of the park issue. 6. CRA ACTION It was the consensus of City Council to proceed as recommended by Iier Planning Group. Being no further business, Mayor Barnes adjourned the CRA Meeting at 6:40 p.m. Approved at the CRA Meeting. Walter W. Barnes, Mayor ATTEST: Sally A. Maio, CMC, City Clerk HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND City of Sebastian, Florida Subject: Adoption of the revised Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Master Plan, compiled by the Iler Planning Group, IPG Inc. AgendaNo. 693. 0 5 3 Department Origin: Growth Management Tracy E. Hass Date Submitted: December 4, 2003 For Agenda of: December 10, 2003 Exhibits:, * '" , Ordinance No. O-03-28 EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: IAMOUNT BUDGETED: APPROPRIATION REQUIRED: SUMMARY Consistent with direction specified by the City Council, and the provisions as contained in the Finding of Necessity Report, the Iler Planning Group (IPG Inc.) commenced with implementation of the CRA expansion project, which incorporates the 512 triangle within the CRA boundaries. Further to this, IPG Inc. also embarked upon the task of updating and enhancing the existing CRA doctrines to provide more specific goals and objectives, along with guidelines, to govern implementation of the CRA plan (CRA Master Plan). The subject area generally includes the area between the CR 512 eastbound and westbound roadway split, terminating at the eastern right-of-way line of the Florida East Coast (FEC) Railroad. The subject area also includes a large tract of land south of Woodmere Road, properties located between Harrison (2nd) street and CR 512 eastbound and other property south of (and fronting on) CR 512 eastbound. The total size of the subject area is approximately 106 acres. In the interim please review the previously presented draft master plan as the final master plan documents will not be available for review until Monday December 8, 2003. RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends the Community Redevelopment Agency forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council with reference to the CRA Master Plan. ORDINANCE 0-03-28 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, MODIFYING THE EXISTING REDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND AND BOUNDARIES FOR THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN'S COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO INCLUDE THE SEBASTIAN BOULEVARD "TRIANGLE" PER FLORIDA STATUTES 163.387; PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council has, by Resolution R-95-17 a Community Redevelopment Plan for the City, which has been modified by Resolution R-03-51. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Sebastian has by Resolution R-02-57 established a finding of blight for additional lands (hereinafter called the "Sebastian Boulevard Triangle") adjacent to and adjoining the lands subject to the initial Community Redevelopment Plan; and, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to provide for the removal of such blighted areas and redevelop such areas, pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969, hereafter referred to as the "CRA", as contained in Florida Statutes, Chapter 163, Part III, by expansion of the boundaries of the existing redevelopment area; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, as follows: Section 1. That the Community Redevelopment Trust Fund, hereafter referred to as the "Fund", as set forth in City Code section 78-30, is hereby reaffirmed and designated as the repository of revenues for the expanded redevelopment area including the Sebastian Boulevard Triangle. Section 2. That section 78-30 of the Code of Ordinances, City of Sebastian, Florida is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 78-30. Community redevelopment trust fund. (a) There is hereby established and created, in accordance with the provisions of F.S. §163.387, a community redevelopment trust fund, hereafter referred to as the "Fund". (b) The monies allocated to and deposited into the Fund are hereby appropriated to the City of Sebastian Community Redevelopment Agency, hereafter referred to as the "Agency", to finance projects within the community redevelopment district as established by Resolution No. R-95-12, hereafter referred to as the "District". The Agency shall utilize the monies and the revenue paid into and earned by the Fund for all and every community development purpose delegated to it by the established community redevelopment plan as modified, and as further provided by law. The Fund is to exist for thirty (30) years from the date the redevelopment district is last expanded, or until legally terminated by ordinance. Said monies shall be held by the city for and on behalf of the Agency and distributed to the Agency in accordance with a subsequent agreement to be established between the city and the Agency. (c) There shall be paid into the Fund each year by all taxing authorities within the District, excluding the following entities: Florida Inland Navigation District Indian River County Mosquito Control District Indian River County Hospital Maintenance District School District, and associated general obligation debt funded by ad valorem taxes Indian River County Land Acquisition Bond General Obligation Debt Emergency Services Dependent Taxing District St. Johns River Water Management District Sebastian Inlet Taxing District the. incremental increase in ad valorem taxes levied each year by the non-exempt taxing authorities over the mount of ad valorem taxes levied by the non-exempt taxing authorities in the base'year, as established in subsection (e) below. (d) For the area covered bv the original redevelopment district, the tax roll used in connection with the taxation of such property for the base year shall be the tax roll of 1994 in Indian River County. All deposits into the Fund shall begin with the incremental increases in ad valorem tax revenues received subsequent to November 1, 1995. For the ext)ansion area of the Sebastian Boulevard Triangle, the tax roll used in connection with the taxation of such t~ror~ertv for the base year shall be the tax roll of 2003 in Indian River County. All der~osits into the Fund shall be~in with the incremental increases in ad valorem tax revenues received subsequent to November 1.2004. (e) The tax increment shall be determined and appropriated annuallY in an amount equal to the difference between: (1)That amount of ad valorem taxes levied each year by all non-exempt taxing authorities on taxable real property contained within the geographic boundaries of the District; and (2) That mount of ad valorem taxes which would have been produced by the rate upon which the tax is levied each year by or for all non- exempt taxing authorities upon the total of the assessed value of the taxable property in the District as shown upon the 4.994 base year assessment roll used in connection with the taxation of such property by all non-exempt taxing authorities If any conflict occurs between the provisions of this section and the provisions of F.S. Chapter 163, Part III, concerning tax increment financing, the statutory provisions shall control and apply to this section. (f) The tax increment shall be computed by using the assessed value of taxable property in the District for the an__plicable base year'"~'~ ~ Ar.^ t.~, and in subsequent years using the assessment value of property in the District for that current year as the second factor in determining the amount of tax increment in that year. (g) All non-exempt taxing authorities will annually appropriate to the Fund the aforestated sum at the beginning of their fiscal year. The Fund shall receive the tax increment above described no later than December 31 of each year as provided by Florida Statute. The taxing authorities' obligation to annually appropriate to the Fund shall commence immediately upon the effective date of Ordinance No.0-95-08 and continue for thirty (30~ years from the effective date of Ordinance 0-03-28, or such other time as extended or shortened by law. (h) The Agency with the approval of the city council is directed to establish and set up the Fund and to develop and promulgate rules, regulations and criteria whereby the Fund may be promptly and effectively administered, including the establishment and the maintenance of books and records and adoption of procedures whereby the Agency may, expeditiously and without undue delay, utilize said monies for their allocated statutory purpose. (i) The Agency accepts full responsibility for the receipt,' custody, disbursement, accountability; management and proper application of all monies paid into the Fund subject to the provisions of subsection (b) of this section. Section 3. If any part of this Ordinance is held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, such holding shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remainder, which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 4. Any and all ordinances or parts of ordinances that are in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Except where direct conflict exists with the provisions hereof, the provisions of Ordinance 0-95-08, as modified by Ordinance O-00-16, shall continue in full effect. The foregoing Ordinance was moved for adoption by Councilmember The motion was seconded by Councilmember vote, the vote was as follows: Mayor Walter Barnes Vice-Mayor Ray Coniglio Councilmember Joe Barczyk Councilmember James Hill Councilmember Nathan B. McCollum The Mayor thereupon declared this Ordinance duly December, 2003. and, upon being put to a passed and adopted this l0th day of CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA ATTEST: By: Mayor Walter Barnes Approved as to form and legality for reliance by the City of Sebastian only: Sally A. Maio, CMC City Clerk Rich Stringer, City Attorney HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND SEBASTIAN CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 10, 2003 - 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA ALL AGENDA ITEMS MA Y BE INSPECTED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK - 1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA Individuals will address the City Council with respect to agenda items immediately before deliberation of the item by the City Council - limit often minutes per speaker (R-99-21) 03.236 03.237 03.238 03.232 03.098 9-10 2. 3. 4. 5. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE INVOCATION-Father Morrissey, St. Sebastian Catholic Church ROLL CALL AGENDA MODIFICATIONS (ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS) Items not on the written agenda may be added only upon a unanimous vote of City Council members (R-03-14) PROCLAMATIONS~ ANNOUNCEMENTS AND/OR PRESENTATIONS A. Presentations - Pride in Sebastian Awards Program B. Presentation by Paul Tritaik, Refuge Manager, Pelican Island and U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Certificates of Appreciation for Pelican Island Centennial Celebration C. Proclamation for United Way Mental Health Collaborative D. Presentation by Pastor Kobus Geldenhuys, My Father's House Proposal for New Year's Eve Celebration at Riverview Park E. Presentations by Parks & Recreation Committee Members (Public Works Transmittal 12/2/03, Letter) 7. ELECTION MATTERS 03.231 11 03.231 13-16 17-30 03.190 31-36 03.202 37-48 03.232 49-52 03.233 53-54 03.234 55-56 03.235 57-60 A. Proclamation Calling 3/9/04 General Election (Proclamation) Resolution No. R-03-56 - 3/9/04 General Election Matters (City Clerk Transmittal 11/18/03, R-03-56) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, DESIGNATING THE OFFICIAL POLLING PLACES AND OFFICES TO BE FILLED DURING, AS WELL AS AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF NOTICE AND DELEGATION OF ADMINISTRATION FOP,, THE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON MARCH 9, 2004; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF RESOLUTIONS OR PARTS OF RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. CONSENT AGENDA All items on the consent agenda ara considerad routine and will be enacted by one motion. Thera will be no separate discussion of consent agenda items unless a member of City Council so raquests; in which event, the item will be ramoved and acted upon separately. A. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes - 11112/03 Approve First Amendment to Barbour Multimedia, Inc. Special Events Videotaping Agreement (City Manager/Clerk Transmittal 11/19/03, Amendment, Agreement) Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Cooperative Agreement Between the St. Johns River Water Management District and the City of Sebastian for the Stormwater Park (City Manager Transmittal 12/3/03, Agreement) Approve My Father's House Christian Congregation New Years Eve Celebration at Riverview Park on Wednesday, December 31st, 2003 from 2:00 pm until 10:00 pm (Parks Transmittal 12/3/03, Letter, Application, Check Copy) Eo Authorize Recycled Southern Based on the Purchase of Twenty Recycled Plastic Trash Receptacles, Eight Plastic Park Benches and Six Recycled Plastic Picnic Tables from Park and Play Systems of Melbourne for the Total Price of $10,455.20 St. John's County Bid (Public Works Transmittal 12/1/03, Quote) Authorize the First Year Renewal of Three Year Agreement Between the City of Sebastian and Total Print, Inc. for Printing Services of Quarterly Pelican Brief Community Newsletter in the Amount of $8,700.00 Per Year (City Manager Transmittal 12/3/03) Approve Award of Amended Contract with Regan Masonry & Concrete, Inc. for Construction of Concrete Sidewalks and Other Miscellaneous Concrete Work on an as Needed Basis, Subject to Terms and Conditions of the Contract for a Period of One Year with Provisions to Renew Contract on Year-to-Year Basis for Up to Total Amended Contract Period of Three Years Upon Mutual Agreement of of Both Parties (Engineering Transmittal 12/1/03, Letter) 9. COMMrl-rEE REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS 10. PUBLIC HEARING Procedures for public hearings: (R-99-21) · Mayor opens headng · Attorney reads ordinance of resolution · Staff Presentation · Public input - Limit of 10 minutes per speaker · Staff summation · Mayor closes hearing · Council action Anyone wishing to speak is asked to sign up before the meeting, when called go to the podiumand state his or her name for the record. 03.053 61-64 ResolUtion No. R-03-51 Modifying the Community Redevelopment Plan (GMD Transmittal 12/4/03, R-03-51 ) 03.053 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 63 FLORIDA STATUTES APPROVING A MODIFIED COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR, AND EXPANDING THE AREA OF, THE SEBASTIAN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. (Legal Ad 11/30/03) Public Hearing and Adoption Hearing Ordinance No. O-03-28 Presentation of CRA Trust Fund Modification (GMD Transmittal 12/4/03, 0-03-28) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, MODIFYING THE EXISTING REDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND AND BOUNDARIES FOR THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN'S COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO INCLUDE THE SEBASTIAN BOULEVARD "TRIANGLE" PER FLORIDA STATUTES 163.387; PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (1~ Reading 11/12/03, Legal Ad 11/30/03) O3.O98 71-76 Co Public Hearing and Adoption Hearing Ordinance No. O-03-29 - Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee (City Attorney Transmittal 11/3/03, 0-03-29) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE IV, ADMINISTRATION: BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES, TO CREATE DIVISION 3, PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE. (1~t Reading Consent Agenda 11/12/03, Legal Ad 11/26/03) 11. INTRODUCTION OF NEW BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC Item that has occurred or was discovered within the previous six months which is not otherwise on the agenda - sign-up required - limit of ten minutes for each speaker 12. OLD BUSINESS 03.093 77-88 Resolution No. R-03-57 Removing the Funding for the Southside Recreation Complex Project from the Five Year Capital Improvement Budget (City Manager, Finance, GMD Transmittal 12/3/03, R-03-57, Exhibit A) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA ADOPTING AN AMENDED BUDGET FOR THE FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AS PROVIDED FOR IN EXHIBIT "A"; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 03.235 8~90 13. 14. 15. 03.191 91-92 16. NEW BUSINESS A. City Clerk Performance Evaluation (HR Transmittal 11/19/03~. CITY ATTORNEY MATTERS CITY MANAGER MATTERS A. Acknowledgements and Compliments from Residents (no backup) CITY CLERK MATTERS 03.235 17. CITY COUNCIL MATTERS a. Mayor Barnes b. Mr. Hill c. Mr. Coniglio i. Assignment to IRC Commission Meetings d. Mr. McCollum e. Mr. Barczyk 18. ADJOURN (A/I meetings shall adjourn at 10:30 pm unless extended for up to one half hour by a majorfty vote of City Council) Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the City Council at a later date as result of this meeting, will need a record of the proceedings and may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be heard. (286.0105 F.S.) In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting should contact the City's ADA coordinator at 589-5330 at least 48 hours in advance of this meeting. HOMI~ O~ PF.,LICRN ~ City of Sebastian, Florida Subject: Parks and Recreation Presentations Approved lo'Submittal h,~ n'e e, ce Agenda No. ~, ~? ? ~ Department Origin: Public Works Dept. Head: Finance: General Services: Date Submitted: December 2, 2003 For Agenda of: December 10, 2003 Exhibits: Letter from Committee EXPENDITURE [ BUDGET REMAINING: REQUIRED: None [ None APPROPRIATION REQUIRED: None BACKGROUND SUMMARY The Parks and Recreation Committee meet once a month on the fourth Monday of the month. At the meetings discussions regarding the City's parks facilities come to play and concerns from members or residents are brought before the committee. At the July meeting, a member of the committee Wayne LeBoeuf voiced some concerns regarding pedestrian safety on Indian River Drive. He will be giving a short presentation at the meeting regarding this matter and looking for guidance from the Council to rectify the situations. Also, another member of the committee Jeanne Jessup will be giving the committees concurrence that the Southside Recreation Park should remain an environmental area and not be developed. This park is in her district. The Parks and Recreation committee thanks you for this opportunity to voice their concerns and comments. July 31, 2003 Mr. Terrance Moore, City Manager Mayor and Council Members City of Sebastian 122,5 Main Street Sebastian, FL 3295B Gentlemen: At the July 2Bth's meeting of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee it was unanimously agreed to recommend to you that you institute a long term study of the boat ramps within our city limits to determine, control and plan on what action to take to ensure the following: · The immediate and long-term safety of the pedestrians walking and enjoying the scenic beauty, · · The immediate and long-term safety of vehicular traffic that is expected to grow as our community.grows. · The' immediate and long-term safety'of the boaters and families using the boat ramps. · That the planning results ensure we retain the image .of the area.as a scenic fishing village. · The planning.should address the growing issues of adequate and safe parking for all users of · the area. We encourage you to solve the following issues as it relates directly to the boaters, pedestrians and vehicle traffic. · Can the ramps and/or Indian River BOulevard be redesigned or safety lanes be added to possibly increase safety for all concerned users of the area? · Can meetings and discussions be held with.the EPA, the State and both-indian River and Brevard Counties to see what they can do to expand their public ramps in the no[th Indian River County and in the deep southern area of I~revard County? it was mentioned that our ramps are l'ieevily used because of the proximity to sebastian Inlet. Again, What can be done on A-1-A to open public access boat ramps and increase safety by boaters not having to navigate the Sebastian Inlet? We understand the enormity of the problem and suggest the time is right to institute a study and resulting'action plan to achieve the utmost'in safety for ali. You should know, we the Parks and Recreation Committee are here to assist you towards that end. Respectfully, Parks and Re~draafion Committee of the  City o~Sebastian · SE, HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND ELECTION PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, Section 4.05 of the Charter of the City of Sebastian, Indian River County, Florida requires that all elections shall be called by a proclamation of the Mayor issued not less than thirty (30) days before such election; and WHEREAS, Section 2.03(a) of the Charter of the City of Sebastian states that there shall be held a general election of two (2) council members on the second Tuesday in March of each even-numbered year and of three (3) council members in each odd-numbered year. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Walter W. Barnes, Mayor of the City of Sebastian, in accordance with Charter Section 4.05, do hereby proclaim that a general election of the City of Sebastian will be held in the City of Sebastian on the 9th day of March, 2003. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Sebastian this 10th day of December, 2003. Sally A.~aio, CM(~ City Clerk Walter W. Barnes, Mayor HOME OF'PELICAN ISLAND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA TRANSMITTAL SUBJECT: March 9, 2004 General Election Matters AGENDA NO: DEPT. ORIGIN: City Clerk DATE SUBMITTED: 11/18/03 12/10/03 MEETING DATE: APPROVED F~)R SUBMITTAL: EXHIBITS: City Managel~~:~~~ Expenditure Required: I Amount Budgeted: Not At This Time I * Election Proclamation * R-03-56 Appropriation Required: SUMMARY STATEMENT Provisions of the City Charter require specific actions of the Mayor and City Council in regard to the general election conducted each year in the City of Sebastian. Charter Section 4.05 requires the Mayor to call the election by proclamation. Charter Section 4.07 requires City Council to adopt a resolution stating where the election will be held, offices to be filled and questions to be decided. Section 4.07 also provides for the City Council to authorize the City Clerk to advertise the election in accordance with Florida Law. Florida Statutes 100.021 requires advertisement twice in the thirty-day period prior to qualifying. By Charter Section 4.02, the City's qualifying period runs from January 9, 2004 to January 23, 2004 (no more than 60 nor less than 45 days prior to the election). The resolution also contains a provision authorizing the Supervisor of Elections to administer the election and approves payment for costs incurred. RECOMMENDATION Upon reading of the proclamation: "Move to adopt Resolution No. R-03-56. ~wp-form ~transmt l. wpd RESOLUTION NO. R-03-56 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, DESIGNATING THE OFFICIAL POLLING PLACES AND OFFICES TO BE FILLED DURING, AS WELL AS AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF NOTICE AND DELEGATION OF ADMINISTRATION FOR, THE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON MARCH 9, 2004; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF RESOLUTIONS OR PARTS OF RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Mayor of the City of Sebastian has called, by proclamation, a General Election to be held within the City of Sebastian, Indian River County, Florida on Tuesday, March 9, 2004. WHEREAS, Section 4.07 of the Charter of the City of Sebastian, Florida, requires the City Council of the City of Sebastian to adopt a Resolution upon the calling of an election stating where the election shall take place, naming the offices to be filled and questions to be decided; and to cause notice of election to be published in accordance with Florida Law. WHEREAS, Section 2.03 of the Charter of the City of Sebastian, Florida, calls for the election of two (2) council members for two year terms on the second Tuesday in March of each even- numbered year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA as follows: Section 1. POLLING PLACES. shall be held at the following polling places: Precinct 103 1'04 105 106 107 109 201 203 204 The March 9, 2004 City of Sebastian General Election Location Sebastian Community Center, 1805 N. Central Avenue, Sebastian VFW Post 10210, 815 Louisiana Avenue, Sebastian Sebastian Elks Lodge No. 2714, 731 South Fleming Street, Sebastian North Indian River County Library, 1001 CR 512, Sebastian Sebastian Elementary School, 400 CR 512, Sebastian. North Indian River County Library, 1001 CR 512, Sebastian Wabasso School, 8895 U.S. Highway 1, Wabasso Calvary Baptist Church, 123 Thunderbird Drive, Sebastian Sebastian Christian Church, 190 Day Drive, Sebastian Section 2. OFFICES. The two (2) Council member positions expiring in March 2004, shall be filled at said general election for two (2) year terms. Section 3. NOTICE. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause notice of this election to be published in accordance with Florida Law. Section 4. DELEGATION. City Council hereby requests that the Indian River County Supervisor of Elections administer said election, and hereby delegates the conduct of such election to said officer and further authorizes payment to the Supervisor of Elections to reimburse the costs thereof. Section 5. REPEAL. All Resolutions or parts of Resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall take effective immediately upon its adoption. The foregoing Resolution was moved for adoption by Councilmember The motion was seconded by Councilmember and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Mayor Walter Barnes Vice Mayor Ray Coniglio Councilmember Joseph Barczyk Councilmember James Hill Councilmember Nathan McCollum The Mayor thereupon declared this Resolution duly passed and adopted this 10th day of December, 2003. CiTY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 'ATTEST: Sally A. Maio, CMC City Clerk Walter Barnes, Mayor Approved as to Form and Content for Reliance by the City of Sebastian Only: Rich Stringer, City Attorney 2 HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND SEBASTIAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2003 - 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA Vice Mayor Coniglio, on behalf of Mayor Barnes who was participating in the meeting by telephone, called the Regular Meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. There was a moment of silence. ROLL CALL City Council Present: Mayor Walter W. Barnes (participating by telephone from 7 pm to 8:10 p.m.) Vice-Mayor Raymond Coniglio Councilmember Joe Barczyk Councilmember James Hill Councilmember Nathan McCollum Staff Present: City Manager, Terrence Moore City Attorney, Rich Stringer City Clerk, Sally Maio Deputy City Clerk, Jeanette Williams Airport Director, Jason Milewski Stormwater Engineer, Ken Jones Finance Director, Shai Francis Assistant Finance Director, Debra Krueger Golf Course Director, Greg Gardner Growth Management Director, Tracy Hass Growth Management Manager, Jan King Human Resources Director, Jim Sexton Police Chief, James Davis Public Works Director, Terry Hill Traffic Engineering Technician, Brian Grecziak Regular City Council Meeting November 12, 2003 Page Two The City Attorney explained the Mayor's participation by telephone, citing'a 2003 Attorney General Opinion, and noted the meeting would be chaired by the Vice Mayor. AGENDA MODIFICATIONS (ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS) Items not on the written agenda may be added only upon a unanimous vote of City Council members (R-03-14) Vice Mayor Coniglio, at this time, called for a motion to reconsider Resolution No. R-03-47, additional bond for City Hall Complex. MOTION by Hill/Coniglio "I'd move to reconsider R-03-47 and bring it up for further discussion relative." Mr. McCollum said, for the record, in the past it was quite common to vote on an issue and then bring it back again. He said he must respect the vote of the Council from last week, that those on the prevailing side of the vote can move to reconsider, and out of respect for them he could not support bringing this issue back unless both of them vote for reconsideration. Vice Mayor Coniglio said he understands but also understands protocol. Mr. Barczyk asked why this agenda item was being considered at this time. Mr. Hill explained his no vote was based on a need for additional information which he believes he has received. Mayor Barnes - aye Mr. Coniglio - aye Mr. Barczyk - aye Mr. Hill - aye Mr. Mc¢ollum - aye Roll Call carried 5-0 At this time the Vice Mayor requested that the bond resolution be moved up on the agenda. MOTION by Hill/McCollum "So moved." Mr. Coniglio - aye Mr. Barczyk - aye Mr. Hill - aye Mr. McCollum - aye Mayor Barnes - aye Roll Call carried 5-0 Regular City Council Meeting November 12, 2003 Page Three 03.070 A. 101-210 Reconsideration of Resolution No. R-03-47 (City Manager Transmittal 11/6/03, R-03-47, Estimated Cost Analysis) A RESOLUTION OF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING RESOLUTION NO R-03-08 OF THE CITY; AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF NOT TO EXCEED $2,125,000 IN AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF INFRASTUCTURE SALES SURTAX REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2003A IN ORDER TO FINANCE THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IN AND FOR THE CITY, TOGETHER WITH CAPITALIZED INTEREST, IF ANY, AND CERTAIN COSTS ASSOCIATED THEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR THE RIGHTS OF THE HOLDERS OF SUCH BONDS; PROVIDING FOR PAYMENT OF PRINCIPAL OF, PREMIUM, IF ANY, AND INTEREST ON SUCH BONDS;MAKING CERTAIN OTHER CONVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE OF SUCH BONDS; PROVIDING CERTAIN TERMS AND DETAILS OF SUCH BONDS, INCLUDING AUTHORIZING A NEGOTIATED SALE OF SAID BONDS AND THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF A BOND PURCHASE CONTRACT WITH RESPECT THERETO; ESTABLISHING A BOOK- ENTRY SYSTEM OF REGISTRATION FOR THE BONDS; APPOINTING THE PAYING AGENT AND REGISTRAR WITH RESPECT TO SAID BONDS; AUTHORIZING THE USE OF A PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT AND THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF A FINAL OFFICIAL STATEMENT WITH RESPECT THERETO; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO TAKE CERTAIN ACTIONS AND TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER CERTAIN DOCUMENTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The City Attorney read Resolution No. R-03-47 by title, he then noted needed corrections for the record, i.e, Council terms (circle page 178) and City Council elections every year (circle page 189). The City Manager briefly explained the project's evolution since it's beginning. The Finance Director explained the analysis (see Municipal Complex Project Estimated Costs Analysis" and Major Funding Changes Since Spatial Analysis Study attached to these minutes), which compares estimates from April 2003 and July 2003, and July 2003 and September 2003, and further described specific changes. The City Manager continued with his recommendation to proceed with adoption of the bond resolution and to eliminate funding for development on the proposed Southside Recreation Complex from the 2003/2004 budget and designate the $200,000 to a reserve account to help finance future capital projects. He said representatives of Kirkpatrick Pettis, Suffolk Construction, and REG Architects were present to respond to concerns. Mr. Barczyk said his concern was that there were so many different figures given and that although staff had the figures they did not present them to the public in a good way. Mr. Hill said citing the park as the reason for the needed increase was very misleading, and that ultimately the City is $2.1 million over budget from what was originally anticipated for the total project. The City Manager agreed that soft costs were not included in total costs in the beginning. Mr. Hill said more due diligence should have been used in the beginning and then the public would have embraced the $11.5 million, and he hoped that we have learned from mistakes made. Mr. McCollum said project costs will be evolving costs, that funding will come from discretionary sales tax, and talked about future unfunded mandates. He commended the public for the way they handled this, citing that these are the types of issues the public should be involved in. Regular City Council Meeting November 12, 2003 Page Four Mayor Barnes said this is the biggest project the City has undertaken and there are bound to be some bumps, but he believes that everyone involved wants this to be a success. He commended Mr. Hill for his thorough research and referred to this as a learning experience, and is a project he highly supports. Vice Mayor Coniglio concurred with all sentiments expressed. Damian Gilliams, said copies of what he presented at the last meeting were available in Chambers tonight. Vice Mayor Coniglio said the subject tonight was the funding of the complex only. Mr. Gilliam continued, inquiring where funds for specific items from certain columns of the agenda item had gone. He stated, in his opinion, the City is now $4.1 million short rather than $2.1 million, and asked where the 15% contingency had gone. He read from a statement by the City Manager from a verbatim transcript he had prepared from the last meeting. Al Vilardi, 445 Georgia Boulevard, asked why the City is paying impact fees, suggested doing the police department first then City Hall, then if necessary do the park. Sal Neglia, Sebastian, said this was a shambles from the beginning, should not have been rushed, asked what would happen to the "sick" furniture, and said the public knows there was not misappropriation but that Council should watch over this for the people of Sebastian. Baxter Coston, 660 Balboa Street, Sebastian, said he was mad because Council is not listening to the people, agreed with the Mayor that this is the biggest project the City will do, and said Council needs to tell the public exactly where the money is going. He offered eight minutes of his time to Mr. Gilliams. Lisanne Monier, Sebastian, said Sebastian should be the best it can be and needs a Manager like Mr. Moore to be the best it can be, said the scope of the project will change as it progresses, and with the goal of making the project the best it can be the Planning and Zoning Commission made changes that will cost more money and will benefit the public. Lonnie Powell, 1565 Emerson Lane, Sebastian, said this is a project that is needed, however, that Mr. Gilliams had some good points relative to the deletion of portions of the overall project. He said someone should step up and say a mistake was made, and inquired what happened to the $2.7 million for New City Hall from April to July. The City Attomey pointed out on the last page of the agenda document (circle page 105) if a line is drawn before the last three items, the subtotal net project increase does add up to 4.529 million. The deductions were taken to show why the additional money is needed. The City Manager responded to removal of the Public Works and Engineering buildings for which grants have been obtained, and said the initial cost for the park was $400,000. Regular City Council Meeting November 12, 2003 Page Five MOTION by Coniglio/Barnes "1 make a motion that we adopt Resolution R-03-47." Mr. Barczyk - nay Mr. Hill - aye Mr. McCollum - aye Mayor Barnes - aye Mr. Coniglio - aye Roll Call carried 4-1 (Barczyk - nay) Mayor Barnes thanked everyone for their good wishes. It was the consensus of City Council to direct staff to proceed with an amendment to the capital improvement element of the comp plan relative to the Southside Park. Mayor Barnes was excused from participation at this time (8:10 p.m.) 03.218 03.070 1-2 PROCLAMATIONS~ ANNOUNCEMENTS AND/OR PRESENTATIONS A. Presentation of Historic Photoqraph by Sebastian Resident Kay DiStephano Kay DiStephano presented City Council with an original photograph of the old train station from Florida East Coast Railway archives. B. Presentation by Jeff Larson, Senior Vice President, Kirkpatrick Pettis Update Reqardin.q Sebastian Stormwater Utility Revenue Bond, Series 2003 Pricin.q (Summary Pricing Memorandum) 03.209 Jeff Larson, Senior Vice President, Kirkpatrick Pettis, said he would proceed with pricing on the Municipal Complex bond based on tonight's action. Bill Spivey, Kirkpatrick Pettis reported on the stormwater utility bond (see Summary Pricing Memorandum attached). Co Presentation by Roland DeBIois, AICP, Environmental Planning and Code Enforcement Section Chief for Indian River County Board of Commissioners Conservation Area Improvements to be Implemented by Indian River County and Sebastian (no backup) Roland DeBIois updated City Council on the North County Conservation Area, citing a $206,000 grant applied for with County match of $103,000 for access improvements. He said the conceptual plan included mountain bikes and possible equestrian trails. Regular City Council Meeting November 12, 2003 Page Six CONSENT AGENDA All items on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of consent agenda items unless a member of City Council so requests; in which event, the item will be removed and acted upon separately. 3-14 A. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes - 10122/03 03.197 15-20 Bo Appoint A. L. Rappy Perez as Fifth Member to Police Pension Board in Accordance with F.S. 185.05 (City Clerk Transmittal 11/5/03, FS, List) 03.219 21-22 Authorize Vice Mayor Coniglio Travel to FLC Legislative Conference in Orlando on November 14, 2003 (City Clerk Transmittal 11/5/03, FLC Info) 03.220 23-26 Authorize the Acceptance of the LLEBG Funds in the Amount of $10,000 and Fund the Grant Match in the Amount of $1,112.00 from the Law Enforcement Forfeiture Fund (PD Transmittal 10/29/03, Attachment A & B) 03.221 27-30 Approve the Renewal of Annual Materials Contracts with Fischer & Sons and Blackhawk Quarry for Second Year of Three-Year Contract, with an Increase in Cost of Coquina Rock from Blackhawk Quarry from $4.75 to $5.55 with All other Terms and Conditions Remaining Unchanged (Public Works Transmittal 11/12/03, Contract, Letters) 03.222 31-34 Approve Award of Contract to PAVCO Construction, Inc. for Construction of Concrete Sidewalks and Other Related Work on As Needed Basis, Not to Exceed $180,000 Subject to Terms and Conditions of Brevard County Term Contract #B-3-04-03 (Engineering Transmittal 11/4/03, Contract, Agreement) 03.223 35-38 Go Approve Award of Contract for Trenchless Conduit Installation at Sebastian Municipal Airport to Young's Communication Company, Inc. in the Amount of $6,863.00 (Airport Transmittal 11/4/03, Bid Tab) 03.224 39-42 Approve Amendment One Waiving Annual Contract Escalation & Decreasing Amount of Performance Bond to Agreement Between City of Sebastian and One Source Landscape & Golf Services, Inc. (Golf Course Transmittal 11/6/03, Letter, Amendment) 03.225 43-58 Resolution No. R-03-52 - Vacation of Easement - Cable - Lots 34 & 35, Block 194, Sebastian Highlands Unit 8 (GMD Transmittal 11/3/03, R-03-52, Site Map, Staff Report, Application, Utility Letters) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, VACATING CERTAIN EASEMENTS OVER LOTS 34 AND 35, BLOCK 194, SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS UNIT 8; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR RECORDING; PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE. Regular City Council Meeting November 12, 2003 Page Seven 03.226 J, 59-64 03.227 K. 6~68 03.228 L. 69-70 03.098 M. 71-74 Resolution No. R-03-53 - Final Plat for Park Place Phase II (GMD Transmittal 11/5/03, R-03-53, Application, Plat) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT FOR A SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS PARK PLACE PHASE II; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. Approve Alcohol Use for Wagner Party at Community Center on Saturday, November 29, 2003, from 6:30 pm to 10:30 p.m. (Parks Transmittal 11/5/03, Application) Approve the Closing of Indian River Drive from Cleveland Street South to Harrison Street from 4 to 9 p.m. on Saturday, December 6, 2003 and Approve the Closing of the Yacht Club Boat Ramp from 4 to 9 p.m. on Saturday, December 6, 2003 and Approve the Chamber Reservation of the Yacht Club on Friday and Saturday, December 5 & 6, 2003 for the Santa Sail-In (Public Works Transmittal 11/4/03, Letter) First Reading Ordinance No. O-03-29 - Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee - Schedule Public Hearing 12/10/03 (City Attorney Transmittal 11/3/03, 0-03-29) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE IV, ADMINISTRATION: BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES, TO CREATE DIVISION 3, PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMIq-I'EE; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE. The City Attorney read titles for Resolution Nos. R-03-52, and R-03-53. Vice Mayor Coniglio removed items A, B and M for clarification. MOTION by Hill/Barczyk "Mr. Vice Mayor, I move approval of consent agenda items C through L." Mayor Barnes - absent Mr. Coniglio - aye Mr. Barczyk - aye Mr. Hill - aye Mr. McCollum - aye Roll Call carried 4-0 Item A- 10/22/03 Minutes It was noted, for the record, that there were two typographical errors corrected and one roll call vote corrected which noted Mayor Barnes as present and voting, when he was in fact absent. Regular City Council Meeting November 12, 2003 Page Eight MOTION by Coniglio/McCollum "1 would move that we approve item A on the consent agenda." Mr. Coniglio - aye Mr. Barczyk - aye Mr. Hill - aye Mr. McCollum - aye Mayor Barnes - absent Roll Call carried 4-0 Item B - Police Retirement Board of Trustees Appointment It was noted, for the record, that Mr. Perez was a resident of Micco, which in the opinion of the City Attorney is acceptable since this is a statutory board and not a City board. MOTION by Coniglio/Barczyk "1 would move to approve item B on the consent agenda." Mr. Barczyk - aye Mr. Hill - aye Mr. McCollum - aye Mayor Bames- absent Mr. Coniglio - aye Roll Call carried 4-0 Item M - Ordinance No. O-03-29 - Parks and Recreation Committee The City Attorney explained the changes to the ordinance since submittal of the agenda packet, i.e., three year terms instead of two, and district representation. MOTION by Coniglio/Barczyk "1 make a motion that we move to approve item M on the consent agenda." (pass on Ist reading and schedule public heating for 12/10/03) Mr. Hill - aye Mr. McCollum - aye Mayor Barnes - absent Mr. Coniglio - aye Mr. Barczyk - aye Roll Call carried 4-0 Regular City Council Meeting November 12, 2003 Page Nine 8. COMMITTEE REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS 03.070 75-96 Ao Construction Board i. Interview, Unless Waived and APpoint As Far As Practical, Contractor Re.qular Member Position (City Clerk Transmittal 10/30/03, Letter, Code, Applications, List, Ad) The City Clerk noted that Mr. Crane did not submit an application for this specific board, therefore, the only applicant under consideration was Mr. Morris. Mr. Morris was automatically appointed. Vice Mayor Coniglio called recess at 8:33 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 8:45 p.m. All members, with the exception of Mayor Barnes were present. PUBLIC HEARING Procedures for public hearings: (R-99-21) · Mayor opens hearing · Attorney reads ordinance of resolution · Staff Presentation · Public input- Limit of 10 minutes per speaker · Staff summation · Mayor closes hearing · Council action Anyone wishing to speak is asked to sign up before the meeting, when called go to the podiumand state his or her name for the record. 03.187 97-100 Second Readinq Ordinance No. O-03-15- Control of Open Burning (City Attorney Transmittal 11/3/031 O-03-15) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 42.48 CONTROL OF OPEN BURNING; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE. (1~ Reading 10/8/03, Legal Ad 10/29/03) The City Attorney read Ordinance No. O-03-15 by title and explained the ordinance. Vice Mayor Coniglio opened the public hearing at 8:46 p.m. There being no public input, he closed the hearing. MOTION by Barczyk/Hill "Move to pass Ordinance O-03-15." Mr. McColium - aye Mayor Barnes - absent Mr. Coniglio - aye Mr. Barczyk - aye Mr. Hill - aye Roll Call carried 4-0 Regular City Council Meeting November 12, 2003 Page Ten 03.053 10. 11. 12. INTRODUCTION OF NEW BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC Item that has occurred or was discovered within the previous six months which is not otherwise on the agenda - sign-up required - limit of ten minutes for each speaker Damian Gilliams read a statement from his restaurant general manager, Mr. Holmes, which offers free meals to individuals who cannot afford to pay on Thanksgiving Day and he called for volunteers. Ed Holmes could be contacted at 589-2628. The hours will be from 11 am to 6 pm on Thanksgiving. Al Vilardi, 445 Georgia Boulevard, Sebastian, expressed concern for certain aspects of development of the new gym on CR512, specifically outdoor racquetball and tennis courts, which he said he believed were not permitted. He asked if Planning and Zoning Commission members being members of the gym was a conflict of interest. Vice Mayor Coniglio suggested Mr. Vilardi schedule a meeting with the City Manager. Baxter Coston, 660 Balboa Street, Sebastian, reported that the Post Office had decided to donate the large banner of the Pelican Island commemorative stamp to the City of Sebastian. Mr. Coston said he was putting his house up for sale tonight based on what occurred tonight. OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS A. First Readinq Ordinance No. O-03-28 Presentation of CRA Master Plan - Schedule 211-214 Public Hearinq 12/10/03 (GMD Transmittal 11/6/03, O-03-28, Master Plan under separate cover) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, MODIFYING THE EXISTING REDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND AND BOUNDARIES FOR THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN'S COMMUNITY' REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO INCLUDE THE SEBASTIAN BOULEVARD '"TRIANGLE" PEr FLORIDA STATUTES 163.387; PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The City Attorney read Ordinance No. O-03-28 by title and noted that this ordinance is in fact a first reading of the trust fund ordinance, and that the redevelopment plan will be acted upon at the December 10, 2003 meeting. Henry Iler, Iler Planning Group, presented the draft amended Community Redevelopment Plan dated November 5, 2003 (which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk). He introduced Craig Benz, David Woodward, and Andy Dolhart. Vice Mayor Coniglio commended Mr. Iler for the report. He then responded to questions from Council regarding including Louisiana Avenue in the report, including areas outside the district in its market study, grandfathering of existing businesses, and loan programs. Regular City Council Meeting November 12, 2003 Page Eleven Warren Dill, discussed reducing the City's workload by appointing a citizen's group to be the Community Redevelopment Agency. He cited the success of Delray Beach's citizen's agency. The City Attorney stated non-residents could serve on a citizen's board per Florida Statute. Larry Paul agreed with Mr. Dill that citizen participation would enhance the project. The City Attorney noted that there will be a minor change in the body of the ordinance at its second reading. MOTION by Hill/Barczyk "1 move to pass Ordinance 0-03-28 on first reading and schedule a second reading and adoption hearing for December 10, 2003." Mayor Barnes - absent Mr. Coniglio - aye Mr. Barczyk - aye Mr. Hill - aye Mr. McCollum - aye Roll Call carried 4-0 03.229 215-218 Resolution No. R-03-54 - Temporarily Designating a Portion of Laconia Street for One-Way Traffic (Engineering Transmittal 11/5/03) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, TEMPORARILY DESIGNATING A PORTION OF LACONIA STREET FOR ONE-WAY TRAFFIC; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The City Attorney read Resolution No. R-03-54 by title. Corrections in the roll call list of the submitted resolution were noted for the record. MOTION by McCollum/Barczyk "Move approval of the minute." Mr. Coniglio - aye Mr. Barczyk - aye Mr. Hill - aye Mr. McCollum - aye Mayor Barnes - absent Roll Call carried 4-0 Regular City Council Meeting November 12, 2003 Page Twelve 03.230 C. Resolution No. R-03-55 Establishment of Content Policies for City Website and 219.224 Television Channel (City Clerk Transmittal 11/6/03, R-03-55, Clerk Survey) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING CONTENT POLICIES FOR CITY WEBSITE AND TELEVISION CHANNEL; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT. The City Attorney read Resolution No. R-03-55 by title. The City Manager offered a brief presentation and alternative language. Mr. McCollum expressed concern about what would be determined to be non-profit, noting that the Ku Kiux Klan would have to be accommodated as a non-profit organization. He said it should be strictly governmental information for both Channel 25 and the website, and non-profit groups should be referred to Channel 29 public access. Larry Paul, Sebastian, recommended listing non-profit events on the sites Mr. McCollum again suggested that this be done on Channel 29 and not on the government channel. Vice Mayor Coniglio agreed that only city-sponsored events be listed. MOTION by Hill/Barczyk "Mr. Vice Mayor, I'd move to adopt Resolution No. R-03-55." Mr. Barczyk - aye Mr. Hill - aye Mr. McCollum - aye Mayor Barnes - absent Mr. Coniglio - aye Roll Call carried 4-0 13. CITY ATTORNEY MATTERS Discussed planned implementation of the stormwater bond projects. 14. CITY MANAGER MATTERS The City Manager said he has been requested by the Substance Abuse Council to waive the $150 fee for community center rental on November 22, 2003 for a fundraising event. The City Attorney said that since adopted by Resolution, the provision could be waived. A motion was made to add this item to the agenda. Regular City Council Meeting November 12, 2003 Page Thirteen MOTION by McCollum/Hill "Mr. Mayor I vote to add this to the agenda." Mr. Hill - aye Mr. McCollum - aye Mayor Barnes - absent Mr. Coniglio - aye Mr. Barczyk - aye Roll Call carried 4-0 MOTION by Hill/McCollum "1 move to waive the fee for the Community Center for the Substance Abuse Council." The City Clerk noted that the Council must also approve the door charge. MOTION by Hill/McCollum "1 would amend that to include the ability for them to charge at the door." Mr. McCollum - aye Mayor Barnes - absent Mr. Coniglio - aye Mr. Barczyk - aye Mr. Hill - aye Roll Call carried 4-0 The City Manager reported on Waste Management holiday pickup; and said Mrs. DiStephano's photograph will be framed and displayed. 03.191 A. Acknowled,qements and Compliments from Residents (no backup) Will save for next meeting. 15. CITY CLERK MATTERS None. 16. CITY COUNCIL MATTERS A. Mr. Barczyk Received consensus to send a letter to state legislators relating to water management. Asked that the school board ballfield contract be checked because the fields can't be used on the weekend. The City Manager stated arrangement were being worked on. Regular City Council Meeting NOvember 12, 2003 Page Fourteen Stated the subcontractor who cut down the trees in his neighborhood had parked in the swales and left ruts in the berm. Asked when more lighting will be added to the Riverview Park. The City Manager stated the contractor selection process has begun and will come back with recommendations. B. Mayor Barnes Absent. C. Mr. Hill Noted the citywide years of progress taking place. D. Mr. Coni,qlio Asked how 2nd Street was coming. The City Manager stated a partnership with the County will soon take place. Stated Riverview Park looked great on Veterans Day and commended staff on flags along U.S. 1. Wished everyone a Happy Thanksgiving. E. Mr. McCollum Stated at the Land Acquisition Committee meeting there was a majority vote to place a bond for land acquisition on ballot. Stated he would like to bring up rules for lightening at a future meeting. The Vice Mayor stated the Mayor anticipates returning in December and thanked staff for their assistance. Mr. McCollum requested the December 17, 2003 special meeting time be changed to 6 p.m., and City Council concurred. 17. Being no further business, Vice Mayor Coniglio adjourned the Regular Meeting at 10:25 p.m. Approved at the December 10, 2003 Regular City Council Meeting. Walter W. Barnes, Mayor ATTEST: Sally A. Maio, CMC, City Clerk HOM~ OF PELICAN I$~ City of Sebastian 1225 Main Street Sebastian, Florida 32958 Subject: First Amendment to Barbour Multimedia, Inc, Special Events Videotaping Agreement A ed ,.. u ' y: Agenda No. 0~,/~0 Department Origin: City Manager City Clerk~ Date Submitted: 11/19/03 For Agenda of 12/10/03 Exhibits: First Amendment, Original Agreement Expenditure Required: Amount Budgeted: $5,000 IAppropriation Required: SUMMARY STATEMENT The City of Sebastian entered into an agreement with Barbour Multimedia, Inc. to videotape and produce 30 minutes TV programs of City of Sebastian special events in January 2003. This programming has been completed in a professional manner and is well received by the public. Bob Barbour has requested an increase from $800 to $1000 per program and staff concur.~ with his request. RECOMMENDED ACTION Move to approve the first amendment to the agreement between the City and Barbour Multimedia, Inc. to become effective January 1,2004. FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR VIDEOTAPING SERVICES This First Amendment to Agreement for Videotaping Services entered into this 10th day of December and effective on January 1, 2004, between the CITY OF SEBASTIAN, a Florida municipal corporation (hereinafter called "CITY"), and Barbour Multimedia, Inc. d/b/a Barbour Multimedia Productions (hereinafter called "BARBOUR") provides: WHEREAS, CITY and BARBOUR entered into an Agreement for Videotaping Services on January 15, 2003 for the videotaping of City of Sebastian sponsored special public events; and WHEREAS, BARBOUR has requested an increase in the rate for this service to $1000.00 per thirty-minute program; and WHEREAS, CITY agrees that the rate for thirty-minute programs should be increased to $1000.00 with any additional length to be pro-rated, effective January 1, 2004. THEREFORE, it is agreed that: BARBOUR will perform videotaping service in accordance with guidelines set out in the Agreement for Videotaping Services as attached to that agreement dated January 15, 2003 as Exhibit "A" and this amendment thereto which provides that Barbour Multimedia, Inc. will receive payment for videotaping and editing a TV program for the City of Sebastian special events based on a rate of $1000.00 per thirty-minute TV show and that additional length to the standard thirty-minute program will be prorated with payment to be made promptly upon receipt of invoice, effective January 1, 2004. AGREED to this 10th day of December, 2003. CITY OF SEBASTIAN, A Florida municipal corporation Approved as to Form and Content for Reliance by the City of Sebastian Only: By:. Terrence R. Moore, City Manager Rich Stringer, City Attorney ATTEST: Sally A. Maio, CMC, City Clerk (SEAL) Barbour Multimedia, Inc. D/b/a Barbour Multimedia Productions By:. AGREEMENT FOR VIDEOTAPING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT entered into this ] ~ day of January, 2003, between the CITY OF SEBASTIAN, a Florida municipal corporation (hereinafter called "CITY"), and Barbour Multimedia, Inc. d/b/a Barbour Multimedia Productions (hereinafter called "BARBOUR"), provides that WI:IEREAS, CITY is in need of a professional specialist to videotape designated public events of the City of Sebastian; and WItEREAS, due to the nature of this assignment, a local business can best serve this need; and WHEREAS, BARBOUR provides such services for the CITY in taping designated public meetings and has the professional expertise required to perform these additional services; THEREFORE, IN AND FOR CONSIDERATION of the mutual benefits and promises provided herein, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by the parties, it is agreed: 1. BARBOUR will videotape designated City of Sebastian activities and events as requested by the City Manager and City Council, and edit the same into thirty minute informational TV programming. 2. BARBOUR shall provide all necessary audio and video recording equipment for use in the performance of this Agreement. 3. The term of this Agreement shall be for one year, with automatic annual extensions unless either party gives thirty days written notice prior to any annual renewal date. 4. Notwithstanding the term described above, either party can terminate this Agreement for any reason with ninety days written notice to the other party. 5. BARBOUR will deliver to the City's designated liaison the final videotaped product labeled with event and date information. 6. BARBOUR is an independent contractor, and the personnel performing these services shall be employees of BARBOUR and not the CITY. BARBOUR shall provide any required worker's compensations coverage for said employees as well as any required licenses or other regulatory requirements. BARBOUR agrees to indemnify, defend and hold CITY harmless from any and all claims of any nature brought by its employees or agents in the course of performing BARBOUR's obligations under this Agreement, or from any claims by any persons arising from the wrongful acts of BARBOUR's employees or agents whatsoever arising from the exercise of the privileges and obligations set forth hereunder. Nothing herein shall be deemed a waiver of sovereign immunity. 7. BARBOUR shall be compensated at the rate of $800 for each thirty minute TV program for a special event videotaped and edited for the CITY. AGREED to on the date first set forth above. CITY OF SEBASTIAN, a Florida municipal corporation Approved as to Form and Content for Reliance by the City of Sebastian Only: Rich Stringer, City Atto/'fiey Attest: Sally A. M~, CMC City Clerk/ (Seal) Barbour Multimedia, Inc. dgo/a Barbour Multimedia Productions Video Production · Interactive CDROMs · Graphic & Web Design · Photography Visit our website at BarbourMultimedia.com 8360 97th Ave. Vero Beach, Florida 32967-3875 ° Phone (561) 388-3774 ° Fax (561) 388-5354 Assignment Proposal: Barbour Multimedia Inc. (a.k.a.: Barbour Multimedia Productions) Client City of Sebastian Address 1225 Main Street, Sebastian, Flodda 32958 Client Contacts Terrence R. Moore, City Mana.qer City of Sebastian Sally A. Maio, CMC City Clerk City of Sebastian Phone Number 772-589-5330 Date December 12, 2002 Assignment Description Barbour Multimedia Inc. will videotape the City of Sebastian designated activities and events as requested by the City Manager and City Council and provide trained personnel to operate the equipment to accomplish in a professional manner the videotaping of these special events. Barbour Multimedia Inc. will provide necessary video & audio recording equipment to professionally videotape the special events designated by the City of Sebastian. Barbour Multimedia Inc. will be responsible for the safety of its operational personnel and special events participants and attendees insofar as that safety is related to the set-up, videotaping, and removal of equipment at these special events. Barbour Multimedia Inc. will deliver to appropriate liaison(s) the videotape(s) marked with special event and date information. Barbour Multimedia Inc. will receive payment for videotaping and editing a TV program for the City of Sebastian special events based on a rate of $800.00 per thirty-minute TV show. Additional length to the standard thirty-minute program will be prorated as follows. Program length sixty (60) minutes Rate - $1200, ninety (90) minutes Rate - $1400. Two hours Rate - $1600. Payment to be made promptly upon receipt of invoice. Robert Barbour Authorized Signature, Title CEO Barbour Multimedia Inc. Date ClI'/OF SEBASTIAN HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND 1225 MAIN STREET · SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE: (772) 589-5330 · FAX (772) 589-5570 Subject: Cooperative Agreement for the Sebastian Stormwater Park AgendaNo. fi)_3. ~_d)_~_~_ Department Origin: Date Submitted: 12/03/03 -For-Agenda-of:-- 12/10/03 Exhibits: Cooperative Agreement Sebastian Stormwater Park EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: AMOUNT BUDGETED: APPROPRIATION REQUIRED: SUMMARY Attached for your review is the Cooperative Agreement for the Sebastian Stormwater Park between the St. Johns River Water Management District and the City of Sebastian. As the Agreement explains, St. Johns Water Management District is responsible for the construction and interim management of the property while the ~ stormwater system becomes functional. Once the interim period has passed, the City of Sebastian will assume primary .management responsibilities. In addition, the 18.54 acres site set aside for Florida scrub-jay management will be managed by St. Johns Water Management District during the duration of the cooperative agreement. Once the construction is complete and the stormwater system is functioning, the City can begin to develop passive recreation on-site. RECOMMENDED ACTION Move to authorize the City Manager to execute the Cooperative Agreement between the St. Johns Water Management District and the City of Sebastian for the Sebastian Stomwater Park. "An Equal Opportunity Employer" Celebrating Our 75th Anniversary COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT SEBASTIAN STORMWATER PARK (145.13 acres) THIS MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT is made and entered into this __ day of ., 2003, between the Governing Board of the St. Johns River Water Management District, hereinafter called the DISTRICT and the City of Sebastian, hereinafter called the CITY. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the DISTRICT holds title to certain lands, formerly known as the Adams I parcel, which shall be utilized pursuant to this Agreement to construct the stormwater park (hereinafter called the PARK) in the City of Sebastian and 2 miles west of the Indian River Lagoon Indian River County, as is more specifically described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, the CITY and DISTRICT wish to address water quality concerns for the Indian River Lagoon and Sebastian River; and WHEREAS, the PARK has the potential to provide mnltiple opportunities for stormwater, Florida scrub-jay habitat and resource-based public recreation activities if properly managed; and WHEREAS, the CITY possesses the personnel, ability, interest and willingness to assist the District in management of the PARK; and WHEREAS, the DISTRICT and the CITY desire to enter into a cooperative management agreement to set forth the terms and conditions for management of the PARK. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, for and in consideration of the premises, which are hereby made a part of this Agreement, and the mutual covenants, terms and conditions hereinafter contained, hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. The initial term of this Agreement is for a period of five (5) years, commencing on ,2003, and ending on ,2008. Thereafter, this Agreement will be automatically renewed in five-year increments, unless terminated as otherwise set forth herein. 2. As parcels located in proximity to the PROPERTY are acquired by the DISTRICT or the CITY, each individual parcel may be automatically incorporated into the definition of the PROPERTY herein, subject only to written request for such addition being made by either party and confirmed and accepted in writing by the other. 3. A Land Management Plan (the "Plan") for the property shall be written by the C1TY and approved by the DISTRICT within one year after the effective date of this Agreement. The Plan will include a component for the development of resource- based recreational opportunities and a maintenance/control plan for invasive exotic species. The Plan shall be updated every five years. Amendments to the Plan may be proposed by either party to this Agreement at any time; however, both parties must agree in writing to the amendments. 4. The CITY shall assume primary management responsibilities that are consistent with the Plan, and shall include the following: a. Maintain the stormwater management system beginning 2 years after initial construction of the PARK is completed by the District. Cooperative Agreement Page 1 of 11 Adams Property b. Provide signs establishing the boundary of the PARK, and provide routine surveillance and security for the PARK through coordination with local law enforcement officers and contracted security services. c. Provide resource-based recreational opportunities. d. Develop a Land Management Plan for the PARK, as identified in paragraph 3. e. Provide maintenance control of exotic and invasive plants and animals. 5. The DISTRICT shall have the following responsibilities: a. Secure the property. b. Design and construct the stormwater management system. c. Develop an instruction/maintenance manual for the stormwater portion of the PARK to provide to the CITY. d. Maintenance and repair of the stormwater project for up to two (2) years after construction. e. h]stall fencing around the 18.54-acre Florida scrub jay habitat area as shown on Exhibit "A." f. Maintain the Florida scrub jay area according to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and United States Fish and Wildlife Service guidelines (Exhibit "B"). 6. The CITY may, consistent with the Plan, construct nature trails on the PARK. 7. The CITY and the DISTRICT mutually agree that any use or development of the PARK shall be subject to the following conditions: a. The function of the PARK, with respect to water management, will be to serve as a stormwater park. b. Any development of the PARK shall be set forth in the Plan and no deviation from such Plan shall occur without prior written approval of both parties. c. Historical and archaeological resources shall be preserved. 8. The CITY may enter into agreements with third parties to develop and implement the Plan or to subcontract day-to-day management responsibilities to environmental, educational or governmental organizations and agencies consistent with the approved Plan; provided however that any such third party agreements shall be subject to the prior written approval of the DISTRICT, and such third parties shall agree to comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The DISTRICT shall not unreasonably withhold approval of such third party agreements. 9. The CITY shall pay all lawful debts incurred by it with respect to the PARK and shall satisfy all liens of contractors, sub-contractors, mechanics, laborers, and materialmen regarding any construction, alteration and repair ordered by it in and on the PARK, and any improvements thereon. Furthermore, the CITY shall not have authority to create any mortgages on PARK or liens for labor or material on or against the PARK. All persons contracting with the CITY for the construction or removal of any structure, or for the erection, installation, alteration or repair of any structure or improvement on the PARK, including all materialmen, contractors, mechanics and laborers involved in such work, shall be notified that they must look to the CITY only to secure the payment of any bill or account for work done, material furnished, or money owed during the term of this Agreement. Cooperative Agreement Page :2 of 1 l Adams Property 10. The DISTRICT and the CITY shall not use or permit the PARK to be used in violation of any valid present or future laws, ordinances, mles or regulations of any public or governmental authority at any time applicable thereto relating to sanitation or the public health, safety or welfare, or relating to the management activities in, and use of, the PARK during development of improvements to the PARK. It is understood and agreed by the parties that there shall be no facilities except those directly related to the operation and maintenance of the PARK as a stormwater park and for passive public recreational and educational purposes as set forth in the Plan. 11. The DISTRICT, the CITY and any other governmental agencies or organizations involved in management related activities on the PARK shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, provide, maintain, and keep in force a program of insurance or self- insurance covering its liabilities as prescribed by Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. The DISTRICT's liability is further limited by the provisions of Section 373.1395, Florida Statutes. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as a waiver of the DISTRICT's or CITY's sovereign immunity under Section 768.28, Florida Statutes, or any other provision of law. 12. This agreement and any and all rights and privileges contained herein are for the sole use of the DISTRICT and the CITY and shall not be assigned or transferred to another party without the written consent of both the DISTRICT and the CITY. 13. The DISTRICT reserves the right for itself, its agents, consultants and employees to enter upon the PARK for the purpose of inspecting the PARK and determining compliance with the terms of this Agreement, so long as such entry or use does not unreasonably interfere with the CITY's use of the pARK for the purposes set forth herein. The DISTRICT, it's agents, consultants or employees shall be responsible for promptly closing and locking any gates through which they may pass in the exercise of such right of entry. 14. Either party may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, at any time upon ninety (90) days written notice to the other party. In the event of termination all improvements that are affixed to the realty shall become the property of the DISTRICT. 15. All notices, consents, approvals, waivers and elections which any party shall be required or shall desire to make or give under this Agreement shall be in writing and/or shall be sufficiently made or given only when mailed by Certified Mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows to the parties listed below or to such other address as any party hereto shall designate by like notice given to the other parties hereto: DISTRICT: ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT P.O. BOX 1429 PALATKA, FL 32178-1429 ATTENTION: DIRECTOR DIVISION OF LAND MANAGEMENT CITY OF SEBASTIAN 1225 MAIN STREET SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 ATTENTION: CITY MANAGER Cooperative Agreement Adams Property Page 3 of 11 Notices, consents, approvals, waivers and elections given or made as aforesaid shall be deemed to have been given and received on the date of the mailing thereof as aforesaid. 16. Wherever used herein, the terms "DISTRICT" and "CITY" include all parties to this instrument, their employees, and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations, partnerships, public bodies, and quasi-public bodies. 17. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties, and there are no understandings dealing with the subject matter of this Agreement other than those contained herein. This Agreement may not be modified, changed or amended, except in writing signed by the parties hereto or their authorized representatives. 18. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted according to the laws of the State of Florida. 19. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as a waiver of or contract with respect to the regulatory or pern~tting authority of the DISTRICT on the CITY as they now or hereafter exist under applicable laws, roles and regulations. 20. Nothing in this Agreement shall create any rights for the benefit of any persons not a party to this Agreement. 21. For all purposes of this Agreement, the Effective Date hereof shall mean the date when the last of the DISTRICT or the CITY has executed the same, and that date shall be inserted at the top of the first page hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement, on the date and year first above written. ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT APPROVED: By:. Kirby B. Green III Executive Director By authority of Section 373.083 (5), Florida Statutes, and SJRWMD Policy Number 90-16 (Cooperative Agreements). Stanley J. Niego, Esquire Office of General Counsel SJRWMD Cooperative Agreement Adams Property Page 4 of 11 CITY OF SEBASTIAN ATTEST: By: Title: By: Title: Executed on ,2003 APPROVED BY: CITY ATTORNEY Cooperative Agreement Adams Property Page 5 of I 1 Cooperative Agreement Adams Property Page 6 of I 1 Exhibit "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION ADAMS PROPERTY, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY DESCRIPTION: A portion of the West one-half of Section 19, Township 31 South, Range 39 East, City of Sebastian, Indian River County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows. For a Point of Beginning begin at the Northeast corner of Lot i, Block 545, Sebastian Highlands Unit 16, as recorded in Plat Book 8, Page 45H, Public Records of Indian River County, Florida, thence run S 0 degrees 05 minutes 08 seconds E, along the East line of the West one-half of said Section 19, a distance of 3787.84, to the North right of way line of Collier Waterway; thence along Collier Waterway of the following courses: West a distanceof 136.02 feet to the Point of Curvature of a curve concave to the Northeast; thence along said curve having a radius of 235.69 feet, a central angle of 90 degrees, an arc distance of 370.22 feet to a Point of Tangency; thence NORTH a distance of 511.25 feet to the Point of Curvature of a curve concave to the Southwest, thence along said curve having a radius of 50.0 feet a central angle of 90 degrees, an arc distance of 78.54 feet to a Point of Tangency thence run WEST a distance of 89.40 feet to the Point of Curvature of a curve concave to the Northeast, thence along said curve having a radius of 225.0. feet, a central angle of 90 degrees, an arc distance of 353.43 feet to a Point of Tangency, thence run NORTH a distance of 59.81 feet to the Point of Curvature of a curve concave to the East, thence along said curve having a radius of 350.0 feet, a central angle of 22 degrees 27 minutes 45 seconds, an arc distance of 137.22 feet to a Point of Reverse curve concave to the West; thence along said curve having a radius of 50.0 feet, a central angle of 67 degrees 28 minutes 10 seconds, an arc distance of 58.88 feet to a Point of Tangency; thence run N 45 degrees W a distance of 214.96 feet,; thence run S 45 degrees W a distance of 82.41 feet to the Point of Curvature of a curve concave to the Northwest, thence along said curve having a radius of 362.13 feet, a central angle of 45 degrees, an arc distance of 284.42 feet tO a Point of Tangency; thence run WEST a distance of 1243.72 feet to the Point of Curvature of a curve concave to the Northeast, thence along said curve having a radius of 225.0 feet, a central, angle of 89 degrees 56 minutes 41 seconds, an arc distance of 353.21 feet to a Point of Tangency; thence run N 0 degrees 03 minutes 24 seconds W a distance of 2240.46 feet to the South line of Lot 1, Block 535 of aforesaid Sebastian Highlands Unit 16, thence departing aforesaid Collier Waterway, run EAST a distance of 182.73 feet to the West line of Lot 7, Block 534, said Sebastian Highlands Unit 16, thence run SOUTH a distance of 20.0 feet, thence run EAST, along the South line of Lots 1 through 7, said Block 534, a distance of 650.0 feet, thence run NORTH a distance of 102.56 feet to the Point of Curvature of a curve concave to the Southeast, thence along said curve having a radius of 25.0 feet, a central angle of 89 degrees 59 minutes 36 seconds an arc distance of 39.27 feet to a Point of Compound curve concave to the South, thence run along said curve having a radius of 1255.64 feet, a central angle of 9 degrees 21 minutes 11 seconds, an arc distance of 204.97 feet to a Point of Compound curve to the Southwest, thence along said curve having a radius of 25.0 feet, a acentral angle of 80 degrees 39 minutes 14 seconds, an arc distance of 35.19 feet to a Point of Tangency; thence run SOUTH a distance of 126.39 feet; thence run N 89 degrees 59 minutes 35 seconds E a distance of 230.01 feet; thence run N 0 degrees 00 minutes 25 seconds W a distance of 125.07 feet to a Point on a curve concave to the North; thence along said curve having a radius of 1335.64 feet, a central angle of 0 degrees 35 minutes 27 seconds, an arc distance of 13.77 feet to a Point of Tangency, thence run N 89 degrees 59 minutes 35 seconds E a distance of 66.22 feet; thence mn S 0 degrees 00 minutes 25 seconds E a distance of 250.0 feet; thence run N 89 degrees 59 minutes 35 seconds E a distance of 80.0 feet, thence run NORTH a distance of 125.0 feet; thence run N 89 degrees 59 minutes 35 seconds E along the South line Of Lots 1 through 11, Block 551, said Sebastian Highlands Unit 16, a distance of 955.07 feet, thence run North a distance of 125.0 feet; thence run N 89 degrees 59 minutes 35 seconds E a distance of 224.21 feet to the Point of Beginning, LESS Lots I, 2, 5, 8, 11, 16, 17, 18, Block 389; Sebastian Highlands Unit I 1, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 56, Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. TOGETHER WITH Portions of the Plat of Sebastian Highlands Unit 17 as recorded in Plat Book 8 at Pages 46, 46A through 46P of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows Lots 6 through 9, 11 through 15, 17, and 18, Block 553; Lots 15 through 19, Block 584; Lots 1 and 2, Block Cooperative Agreement Page 7 of 11 Adams Property 585; Lots 5 through 22, Block 586; and Lots 2 through 12, Block 587, Losts 2 through 15, Block 588; AI.$O TOGETHER WITH ail rights of way adjacent to the lots listed above Said lands situate, lying and being in the City of Sebastian, Indian River County, Florida LEGAL DESCRIPTION FLORIDA SCRUB JAY HABITAT AREA Parcel 1 A parcel of land being a portion of Lot I of the plat of "C.C., UNIT ONE, A SUBDIVISION" as recorded in Plat Book 15, Pages 88 and 88A, Public Records of Indian River County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Northeast corner of said Lot 1 of the plat of "C.C., UNIT ONE, A SUBDIVISION",'thence along the North line of said Lot 1 for the following five (5) courses and distances; mn S.89°59'35"W. for 249.21 feet; S.00°00'00"E. 125.00 feet; S.89°59'35"W. for 929.72; S.00°00'25"E. for 125.00 feet; thence S.89°59'35"W. for 80.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence departing said North line Lot 1, mn S.31 °49'42"W. for 11.85 feet to a non-tangent curve concave Southeasterly; thence Southwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 61.00 feet and a chord bearing of S.34°22'03"W., through a central angle of 72°37'33'', for 77.32 feet; thence S.20°22'03"E. for 57.23 feet to a non-tangent curve concave Northwesterly; thence Southwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 149.00 feet and a chord bearing of S.24°25'50"W., through a central angle of 61°25'00'', for 159.72 feet; thence S.58°14'02"W. for 3.41 feet; thence N.66°15'02"W. for 218.38 feet; thence N.23°23'07"W. for 164.03 feet; thence N. 18°26'06"E. for 154.4t feet; thence N.45°00'00"E. for 5.75 feet; thence S.88°52'05"E. for 20.06 feet to a point on aforesaid North line of Lot 1; thence along said North line for the following five (5) courses and distances; mn N.89°59'35"E. for 204.98 feet; N.00°00'25"W. for 125.07 feet to a non- tangent curve concave Northerly; Easterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 1335.64 feet and a chord bearing of S.89°42'41 "E., through a central angle of 00°35'17'', for 13,77 feet to the point of tangency; N. 89°59'35"E. for 66.22 feet; S.00°00'25"E. for 250.00 feet more or less to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 2.655 acres (115630 square feet), more or less. 04-19-2003 Parcel 2 A parcel of and being a portion of Lot I of the plat of "C.C., UNIT ONE, A SUBDIVISION" as recorded in Plat Book 15, Pages 88 and 88A, Public Records of Indian County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of said Lot 1 of the plat of "C.C., UNIT ONE, A SUBDIVISION"; thence S.00°05'08"E. along the East line of said Lot 1 for 815.10 feet; thence departing said East line mn S.89°54'52"W. for 35.57 feet to a non-tangent curve concave Westerly; thence Northerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 171.52 feet and a chord bearing of N.03°49'26"W., through a central angle of 06°00'35", for 17.99 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Westerly; thence Northerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 37.35 feet, through a central angle of 12°53'57'', for 8.41 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Southwesterly; thence Northwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 5.78 feet, through a central angle of 77°13'58'', for 7.80 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Southeasterly; thence Southwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 7.02 feet, through a central angle of 69°0 I'I 1", for 8.46 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Easterly; thence Southerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 31.79 feet, through a central angle of 20°20'09'', for 11.28 feet to the point of reverse curvature of a curve concave Westerly; thence Southerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 113.60 feet, through a central angle of 10°43'00", for 21.25 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Westerly; thence Southerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 403.87 feet, through a central angle of 01 °37'47", for 11.49 feet to the point of compound curvature of Cooperative Agreement Page 8 of 11 Adams Property a curve concave Westerly; thence Southerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 124.52 feet, through a central angle of 02°56'07", for 6.38 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Northwesterly; thence Southwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 13.04 feet, through a central angle of 81°02'17'', for 18.44 feet to the point of reverse curvature of a curve concave Southeasterly; thence Southwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 29.81 feet, through a central angle of 50053'32", for 26.48 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Easterly; thence Southerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 57.22 feet, through a central angle of 35o36'57", for 35.57 feet to the point of reverse curvature of a curve concave Northwesterly; thence Southwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 41.20 feet, through a central angle of 42°15'18", for 30.38 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Northwesterly; thence Southwesterly along the are of said curve, having a radius of 317.79 feet, through a central angle of 02°55'49", for 16.25 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Northwesterly; thence Southwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 110.43 feet, through a central angle of 04°58'18", for 9.58 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Northwesterly; thence Southwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 180.26 feet, through a central angle of 06°06'00", for 19.19 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Northwesterly; thence Southwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 940.02 feet, th'ough a central angle of 02°40'12", for 43.81 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Northwesterly; thence Southwesterly along the are of said curve, having a radius of 176.70 feet, through a central angle of 09059'50", for 30.83 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Northerly; thence Westerly along the are of said curve, having a radius of 136.88 feet, through a central angle of 1 l°21'47", for 27.15 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Northeasterly; thence Northwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 15.73 feet, through a central angle of 114°41f35'', for 31.50 feet to a non-tangent curve concave Southerly; thence Westerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 11.25 feet and a chord bearing of N.76°47'53"W., through a central angle of 190°32'52", for 37.41 feet to a point on a compound curvature concave Easterly; thence Southerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 441.05 feet and a chord bearing of S.07°25'56"W., through central angle of 00°59'3 I", for 7.64 feet to a point of compound curvature of a curve concave Easterly; thence Southerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 1927.65 feet and a chord bearing of S.06°41'56"W., through a central angle of 00°28'28", for 15.96 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Easterly; thence Southerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 1249.67 feet, through a central angle of 01 °12'53", for 26.49 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Easterly; thence Southerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 1336.14 feet, through a central angle of 01°10'29", for 27.40 feet to a non-tangent curve concave Southwesterly; thence Northwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 17.36 feet and a chord bearing of N.56°45'48"W., through a central angle of 37°25'34'', for 11.34 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Southerly; thence Westerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 16.83 feet, through a central angle of 38°01'42", for 11.17 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Southeasterly; thence Southwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 8.99 feet, through a central angle of 26o46'04'', for 4.20 feet to the point of reverse curvature of a curve concave Northwesterly; thence Southwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 7.89 feet, through a central angle of 28°36'27'', for 3.94 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Northeasterly; thence Northwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 6.06 feet, through a central angle of 161 °37'32", for 17. I 1 feet to the point of reverse curvature of a curve concave Westerly; thence Northerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 8.69 feet, through a central angle of I 11 °06'28", for 16.85 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Southerly; thence Westerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 17.26 feet, through a central angle of 51°42'59", for 15.58 feet to the point of reverse curvature of a curve concave Northerly; thence Westerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 24.51 feet, through a central angle of 42°55'55", for 18.37 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Northeasterly; thence Northwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 81.20 feet, through a central angle of 10°31'27", for 14.91 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Northeasterly; thence Northwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 3.44 feet, through a central angle of 52o53, 17", for 3.18 feet to the point of compound Cooperative Agreement Page 9 of l 1 Adams Property curvature of a curve concave Southeasterly; thence Northeasterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 10.90 feet, through a central angle of 70°02'58", for 13.33 feet to the point of reverse curvature of a curve concave Northwesterly; thence Northeasterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 52.17 feet, through a central angle of 30°25'14", for 27.70 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Northwesterly; thence Northeasterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 213.35 feet, through a central angle of 03°05'51'', for 11.53 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Northwesterly; thence Northeasterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 196.78 feet, through a central angle of 03 °I 3'31 ", for 11.08 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Westerly; thence Northerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 21.73 feet, through a central angle of 70°09'50'', for 26.61 feet to the point of reverse curvature of a curve concave Easterly; thence Northerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 17.42 feet, through a central angle of 79°52'21", for 24.28 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Southerly; thence Easterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 14.77 feet, through a central angle of 64°22'19", for 16.59 feet to the point of reverse curvature of a curve concave Northerly; thence Easterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 15.32 feet, through a central angle of 63°03'47", for 16.87 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Northwesterly; thence Northeasterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 60.05 feet, through a central angle of 12°57'11", for 13.58 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Westerly; thence Northerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 2.04 feet, through a central angle of 75°23'18'', for 2.69 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Southerly; thence Westerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 18.39 feet, through a central angle of 58 °21 '43", for 18.74 feet to the point of reverse curvature of a curve concave Northerly; thence Westerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 209.14 feet, through a central angle of 16°37'41", for 60.70 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Northerly; thence Westerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 984.37 feet, through a central angle of 02°16'01", for 38.94 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Northerly; thence Westerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 136.76 feet, through a central angle of 06005'02'', for 14.52 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Northeasterly; thence Northwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 26.42 feet, through a central angle of 69°06'52", for 31.87 feet to the point of reverse curvature of a curve concave Southwesterly; thence Northwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 97.30 feet, through a central angle of 34°22'59'', for 58.39 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Southerly; thence Westerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 86.75 feet, through a central angle of 39°07'57", for 59.25 feet to the point of reverse curvature of a curve concave Northeasterly; thence Northwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 30.26 feet, through a central angle of 69°05'11", for 36.49 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Easterly; thence Northerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 28.61 feet, through a central angle of 45°24'56", for 22.68 feet to the point of reverse curvature of a curve concave Westerly; thence Northerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 32.84 feet, through a central angle of 42° 14'37", for 24.21 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Westerly; thence Northerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 127.65 feet, through a central angle of 09006'57'', for 20.31 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Southwesterly; thence Northwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 71.96 feet, through a central angle of 12°09'06", for 15.26 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Southwesterly; thence Northwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 26.04 feet, through a central angle of 37°52'29", for 17.21 feet to the point of reverse curvature of a curve concave Northeasterly; thence Northwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 38.40 feet, through a central angle of 30059'59'', for 20.78 feet to the point of compound curvature of a cra'ye concave Easterly; thence Northerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 20.17 feet, through a central angle of 93°50'24", for 33.03 feet to the point of reverse curvature of a curve concave Westerly; thence Northerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 12.60 feet, through a central angle of 135°04'29'', for 29.70 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Southerly; thence Westerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 136.43 feet, through a central angle of 07°30'53", for 17.89 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Southerly; thence Westerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 489.49 feet, Cooperative Agreement Page 10 of 11 Adams Property through a central angle of 03°57'55'', for 33.88 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Southerly; thence Westerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 207.40 feet, through a central angle of 05°02'39", for 18.26 feet to the point of reverse curvature of a curve concave Northerly; thence Westerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 99.85 feet, through a central angle of 07°16'20", for 12.67 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Northeasterly; thence Northwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 24.93 feet, through a central angle of 86°37'59'', for 37.69 feet to the point of reverse curvature of a curve concave Southwesterly; thence Northwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 75.89 feet, through a central angle of 46°18'20", for 61.34 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Southwesterly; thence Northwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 399.13 feel through a central angle of 07005'05'', for 49.35 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Southerly; thence Westerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 93.92 feet, through a central angle of 14038'08'', for 23.99 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Southerly; thence Westerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 58.06 feet, through a central angle of 30°27'40'', for 30.87 feet to the point of reverse curvature of a curve concave Northerly; thence Westerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 58.93 feet, through a central angle of 30° 13'47", for 31.09 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Northerly; thence Westerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 57.22 feet, through a central angle of 13053'55'', for 13.88 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Northeasterly; thence Northwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 145.37 feet, through a central angle of 08°42'25", for 22.09 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Northeasterly; thence Northwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 51.76 feet, through a central angle of 43°29'30", for 39.29 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Easterly; thence Northerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 72.38 feet, through a central angle of 36°30'53", for 46.13 feet; thence N.07°01'41 "W. for 21.05 feet; thence N.44° 17'25"E. for 37.13 feet; thence N.60°27'55"W. for 21.56 feet; thence S.66°24'57"W. for 34.98 feet; thence S.88°45'57"W. for 25.57 feet; thence N.41°41'55"W. for 90.60 feet; thence N.19°35'38"W. for 23.66 feet; thence N.41°I 1'25"W. for 25.58 feet; thence N.40°21'36"W. for 40.17 feet; thence S.84°23'30"W. for 14.47 feet; thence S.25°41'55"E. for 46.30 feet; thence S.02°42'59"W. for 23.02 feet; thence S.63°04'27"W. for 19.09 feet to a non-tangent curve concave Northerly; thence Westerly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 64.48 feet and a chord bearing of N.78°27' 10"W., through a central angle of 21°18'48", for 23.99 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Northeasterly; thence Northwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 63.48 feet, through a central angle of 21°29'02", for 23.80 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Northeasterly; thence Northwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 76.89 feet, through a central angle of 07°23'01", for 9.91 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Northeasterly; thence Northwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 38.80 feet, through a central angle of 10°24'05'', for 7.04 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Southeasterly; thence Northeasterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 11.25 feet, through a central angle of 124037'04", for 24.46 feet to the point of reverse curvature of a curve concave Northwesterly; thence Northeasterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 12.83 feet, through a central angle of 112°00'37'', for 25.08 feet to the point of compound curvature of a curve concave Southwesterly; thence Northwesterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of 25.66 feet, through a central angle of 38°20'31'', for 17.17 feet; thence N.8 I°51'5 I"W. for 37.14 feet to a point on the North line of aforesaid Lot 1 of the plat of "C.C., UNIT ONE, A SUBDIVISION"; thence along said North line of Lot 1 for the following four (4) courses and distances; run N.00°00'25"W. for 125.00 feet; N.89°59'35"E. for 929.72 feet; N.00°00'00"E. for 125.00 feet; N.89°59'35"E. for 249.21 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 15.8866 acres (692020 square feet), more or less. 04-29-2003 Cooperative Agreement Page I 1 of 11 Adams Property City of Sebastian, Florida Subject: Park Event approval for My Father's House Christian Congregation for a New Years Eve celebration. Approved for~Submittal, by: T nce ore,~.~ nager Agenda No. Dept. Head: Finance: # General Services: Date Submitted: December 3, 2003 For Agenda of: December 10, 2003 Exhibits: Letter from Pastor Geldenhuys, application and check. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: None BUDGET AVAILABLE: N/A APPROPRIATION REQUIRED: None Back.qround Pastor Kobus Geldenhuys from My Father's House Christian Congregation is seeking Council approval for a New Years Eve Celebration at Riverview Park. The festivities will begin at 3 PM and conclude at 8:30 PM with cleanup from 8:30 to 9:45 PM. The goal of the Church is to offer afamily alternative to News Years Eve celebrations. This is not a fundraiser and is funded by the churches involved. Staff has met with Pastor Geldenhuys and discussed all logistics involved with the event. The attached letter from Pastor Geldenhuys outlines the activities planned for the evening. SUMMARY Move to approve My Father's House Christian Congregation New Years Eve CelebratiOn at Riverview Park on Wednesday, December 31, 2003 from 2PM until 10 PM. My F 'sH PO Box 780997 Sebastian, FL 32957 Senior Pastor Kobus Geldenhuys 569-7174 "lr~ Ma' Fat:i3e~'s House a~e mama' mar. zefor.~s .... place ,co~ a'ord." I go Go p'nepane a John 14:;2 November 9, 2003 Chris McCarthy Parks & Recreation Sebastian, FL Dear Mr. McCarthy, We are a Christian congregation that holds services at Pelican Island Elementary on Sundays, and we would like to request the use of Riverview Park on December 31, 2003. Our goal is to work with various area churches to offer a family alternative to New Years celebrations. The festivities will begin at 3 ? ~ and will conclude ~' ~'.~o er~ u~, ~K c~¢~,,,,~.e F,-~,.,,,. ~:~'o -~:~5¢r~most of the day prior to ~ PM ~. s needed for set up & preparation. Food, soda, & water will be providecl, along with children's games such as a moonwalk, football toss, face painting & others. Also local Christian bands will be performing as will Sebastian area youth groups presenting dance, skits & dramas. Our goal is to provide the entire function at no cost to the public, funded totally by the churches involved. We sincerely thank you for your time and consideration on this matter, and you may contact me at 569-7174 or you may contact our youth directors, .loe& Grace Thorpe, at 589-4744. Also enclosed please find a check for $100. to cover the fee for over 300 people. Sincerely, K~~~enior Pastor HOME OF PELIC_~N 1225 Main Street, Sebastian, Fl 32958 Telephone (772)589-533~3- Fax (772)589~557~3 CZTY OF SEBASTZAN PARK'USE PER~IZT APPL ICA TXOIV Park Event - 50 to 300 Attendees $50.00 Application/Permit Fee Please check the appropriate Box: OT ~----~.,, Special Event - 301 or More Attendees $100.00 Application Fee Name of Permittee' Permits May Only De issue~ in the Name of an A~ult or Legally Or~ize~ Organization Hailfing Address' /~.0. ~'o2( 7~0 997 Telephone' 772- / Name of Organization or Group: Requested Date(s) ~C~~ Rain Date' Time of Use: From: ~_ F~rY1 To: 1,~ rmUr3 Will there be any sale of goods? Yes No ~/ If yes, please describe type of goods on back. Food or other types of vendors? Yes ~/ No if yes, please iist name, address ana type of vendors and schematic of any structures to be erected or otherwise assembled on back. appticant or the fi'utho~/zed agent of the applicant. I further acknowtedge that ! am aware of the provisions of the City of Sebastian Codes in respect to this apptication and the use of the City facitities for which I have applied for a permit to arrow a Park Event or a Speciat Event. I have made mysetf famitiar with the Eenerat rutes and regutations prescribed by the City and agree to the terms of the permit.  "gnature Off~ce Use Only: l)ermil Fee Pa~d Dale Initials ark Application Continued - If Required List.'any vendor information and/or schematics on this paBe. NAME, ADDRESS TYPE ~'// --/¢ - DATE 2~ ~ ORDER OF . FOR. ~ ~ .'OOOO:tS.' ~: Er, ;i,:t:t~: ;~r,O000 ;~O/~/OCl 5 ;~," OFFICE USE ONLY: Special Conditions of Permit as Requested by City ManaF=er City of Sebastian, Florida Subject: Purchase recycled plastic trash receptacles, park benches and picnic tables / ~pproved fo/r/gubmi.Ra~!~y: Agenda No. 0~ ~--3~ Department blifmW0f' Dept. Head: Finance: General Services: Date Submitted: For Agenda of: December 1, 2003 December 10, 2003 Exhibits: Price Quote from Southern Park and Play Systems Inc. EXPENDITURE BUDGET REMAINING: APPROPRIATION REQUIRED: $10,455.20 $26,000.00 REQUIRED: None BACKGROUND SUMMARY Staff is currently replacing Park amenities at the Barber Street Sports Complex, Riverview Park and Easy Street Park and installing new amenities in new Parks such as George Street and Filbert Street. We are seeking Council approval to purchase recycled plastic trash receptacles (20), Park benches (8) and. picnic tables (6). We can purchase Pilot Rock Park amenities from Southern Park and Play Systems, Inc. located in Melbourne, Florida with pricing from ST. John's County Catalog Term Bid # 03-43. The price for 20 trash receptacles, 8 benches and 6 picnic tables is $10,455.20. The pricing reflects a 5% discount offthe Pilot Rock catalog price. We have purchased Park amenities from Southern Park and Play Systems before and they are a reputable company. RECOMMENDATION Move to purchase twenty (20) recycled plastic trash receptacles, eight (8) recycled plastic park benches and six (6) recycled plastic picnic tables from Southern Park and Play Systems Inc of Melbourne, Florida for the total of $10,455.20. Pricing from St. John's County Catalog Term Bid #03 -43. 761 S:Apollo Blvd. Melbourne, FL 32901-1457 (321) 729-9700 (321) 729-8357 Fax Federal I.D. #59-3013776 1-800-247-1545 QUOTATION DATE 11/24/03 City of Sebastian Purchasing Dept. 1225 Main Street Sebastian, FL 32958 (772)633-2801 (772)589-6209 Fax SHIPTO City of Sebastian Parks & Recreation Attn: Chris McCarthy 1225 Main Street Sebastian, FL 32958 APPROX. 30 DAYS .J COMMON CARRIER I PREPAID & ADDED ..... ...... ..... ........ ...... ...... 6 ea. 8 ea. 20 ea. Pilot Rock #AT/W-6PC - A-frame 6' recycled plastic picnic tables (brown 2" x 10" x 6' top and seat boards in recycled plastic, hot dipped galvanized hardware and support L-angles for tops and seats) Pilot Rock #RBB/N-6C26 - 6' portable recycled plastic park bench with ~hree 3" recycled plastic frame supports in green, 2" x 6" x 6' cedar color recycled plastic Seat and back boards, stainless steel hardware Pilot Rock #TRH/G-32PN24 - 32 gallon portable trash receptacle holder (2" x 4" green recycled plastic slats, hot dipped galvanized frames and hardware) Pilot Rock #M1/G - TRH receptacle holder strap anchor mount for ground level installation NOTE: Discount based on St. Johns County catalog term bid #03-43, Price Agreement for Playground/ Park Equipment, expires 1/31/04. 20 ea. NET 30 $406.00 $2,436.00 $345.00 $2,760.00 $212.00 $4,240.00 $ 6.00 $ 120.00 Subtotal $9,556.00 5Z Disc. -477.80 Freight $1,377.00 TOTAL .... $10,455.20 E ARE PLEASED TO SUBMIT THE ABOVE QUOTATION FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. SHOULD YOU PLACE AN ORDER, SE ASSURED IT WILL RECEIVE OUR*PROMPT ATTENTION. 'lis QUOTATION IS VALID FOR '~ DAYS. THEREAFTER IT IS S~U~JEOT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. ALL MATERIALS ARE DROP-SHIPPED FROM THE FACTORY IN .... .Lo-~a AND WiLL SHIP IN APPROXIMATELY J~l DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF ORDER. .L RETURNS SUBJECT TO MANUFACTURER'S AUTHORIZATION AND APPLICABLE RESTOCKING qLOADIN~SSEMBLY, IN~,AL/~TION AND SURFACING NOT INCLUDED, CHARGES. ¢ .,~Z~ ..,~;' (Z:~-~,~ f_. / ACCEPTED _..~.-- ,--- '"'~- ~ v -- . · DATE ~ 0F SEBASTIAN HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND 1225 MAIN STREET · SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE: (772) 589-5330 · FAX (772) 589-5570 Subject: Community Newsletter/Printing (Pelican Brief) Manager ~errence R. Mo6~e Agenda No. ~3. c~ Department Origin: City. _Manager Finance Department: General Services: '-'"' Date Submitted: 12/03/02 For Agenda of: 12/10/03 Exhibits: EXPENDITURE AMOUNT BUDGETED: APPROPRIATION REQUIRED: 010099- 534700- $8,700.00 REQUIRED: N/A $8,700.00 SUMMARY Last year the City of Sebastian awarded Total Print, Inc., Sebastian, FL a three (3) year agreemem, renewable each year for printing services of the quarterly Pelican Brief Community Newsletter. Total Print, Inc., continues to offer excellent printing services and therefore, staff recommends the first year renewal of the three (3) year agreement in the amount of $8,700.00 per year. RECOMMENDED ACTION Move to authorize the first year renewal of the three (3) year agreement between Total Print, Inc., and the City of Sebastian for printing services of the quarterly Pelican Brief Community Newsletter in the amount of $8,700.00 per year. "An Equal Opportunity Employer" Celebrating Our 75th Anniversary HOMF. OF PF..U~ ISLAND City of Sebastian, Florida Subject: Amendment to Annual Concrete Work Contract Approved for Subm}~al by: Terren~~,~.... \ AgendaNo. c/')~, ~-~._~__~ Department Origin: Engineering Dept. Head: Finance: General Servmes: Date Submitted: 12/01/03 For Agenda of: 12/10/03 Exhibits: Letter from Regan Masonry & Cement, inc dated 11/24103; Amendment #1 EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: BUDGET AVAILABLE: APPROPRIATION: $180,000.00 $180,1)00.00 REQUIRED: SUMMARY The Engineering Department has budgeted $180,000 this fiscal year 03 ! 04 for the construction and/or replacement of sidewalks within the City of Sebastian. In January 2001 the City entered into a 3-year contract with Regan Masonry to perform pour and finish concrete work including driveways, sidewalks and miscellaneous items. This contract will expire in January 2004. In anticipation of the budgeted sidewalk construction for the 2003-04 budget year, the City has held discussions with Regan Masonry resulting in a recommendation to extend the Regan Masonry contract with the following amendments: 1. To extend the Regan Masonry contract for one (1) year to January 2005 with a provision that enables renewal of the contract at that time upon mutual agreement by both parties. 2. To reflect the price of $2.35 per square foot for a 4" thick concrete section that will now include the cost of forming as well as pouring and finishing the concrete. This price also reflects the increases in materials costs over the past three years. (Note: Regan Masonry has held its prices for the last three years and, in addition, this quote is less than the Brevard County piggyback supplemental contract pdce with PAVCO of $2.44 per square foot approved by Council on November 12, 2003. The City intends to use PAVCO for the installation of curbing, an item of work not included in the Regan agreement.) 3. To include in the contract the option of sidewalk site preparation to clear and grade the sidewalk site by Regan to elevations provided by the City and for Regan to perform cleanup grading after construction, all at an additional cost of $2.30 per lineal foot of sidewalk. The Engineering Department has reviewed the changes and pricing and is recommending approval of the amendments and the contract as amended. RECOMMENDED ACTION Move to approve award of the amended contract to Regan Masonry & Concrete, Inc., for the construction of concrete sidewalks and other miscellaneous concrete work on an as needed basis, subject to the terms and conditions of the contract for a pedod of one year (to January 2005) with provisions to renew the contract on a year to year basis for up to a total amended contract pedod of three years upon mutual agreement of both parties. Regan Masonry & Cement Inc PO Box 780533 Sebastian, FL. 32978 Phone: 772-589-3088 November 24, 2003 Mr. David Fisher City of Sebastian 1125 Main Street Sebastian, FL 32958 Dear Mr. Fisher: For the past two years I have held my contract price at $1.60 per square foot. However, due to flue increase in the cost of materials I will have to raise my price to $2.35 per square foot. That price includes labor and material ~or a 4".sidewalk, 3000 psi with fibermesh. A 5" tlfick sidewalk will be adjusted by material price only, resulting in a price of $2.60 per square foot. The city will set all grades for sidewalks. At the meeting of November 19, 2003 the city requested that I remove the sod, grade the sidewalk mad rough grade the sidewalk when completed. The price for this is $2.30 pm' lineal foot. The city will provide any fill needed. Any material that I am responsible for removing fi-om the site will be dumped on city owned property (airport). The above prices do ~ot include any grading or sod work in swales. Sincerely, Jolm J. Regan, President AGREEMENT AMENDMENT ONE THIS AMENDMENT, made this ~ day of December, 2003, to that certain AGREEMENT by and between the City of Sebastian, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (hereinafter called the "City"), and REAGAN MASONRY & CEMENT, INC., (hereinafter called "Contractor") dated January 10, 2001, as modified by Change Order #1 dated March 7, 2003, provides as follows: WITNESSETH: The City and Contractor for good and valuable consideration as hereinafter set forth, do mutually agree as follows: 1. That Paragraph 1 of the Agreement, Scope of Services, is amended to include additional services for sidewalk site preparation to include clearing and grading the sidewalk site to elevations provided by the City as well as cleanup grading after construction. 2. That Paragraph 2 of the Agreement, Contract Sum and Payment to Contractor, is amended to provide the following pricing: Form, Pour and Finish only Sidewalk Site Prep $2.35 per square foot $2.30 per lineal foot of sidewalk 3. That Paragraph 6 of the Agreement, Term, is hereby amended to provide that the Agreement shall remain in effect until January 10, 2005, with the parties having the option to renew the same on a year-to-year basis through a maximum effective date of January 10, 2007. 4. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement, as modified, shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has hereunto subscribed and Contractor has affixed its name on the date first set forth above. ATTEST: THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN Sally A. Maio, CMC City Clerk Terrence R. Moore, City Manager Approved as to Form and Legality for Reliance by the City of Sebastian only: Rich Stringer, City Attorney REAGAN MASONRY & CEMENT, INC., CORPORATE SEAL: By: Jack Reagan Its: President Secretary HO~E O~ PF.~N City of Sebastian, Florida Subject: Adoption of the revised Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Master Plan, compiled by the Iler Planning Group, IPG Inc. Agenda No. {93, 03,3' Department Origin: Growth Management Tracy E. I-lass Date Submitted ' December 4, 2003 For Agenda of.' December 10, 2003 Exhibits: Resolution R-03-51. AMOUNT BUDGETED: EXPENDITURE REQUIR_ED: IAPPROPRIATION REQUIRED: SI.rMMA~Y Resolution No. R-03-51 outlines the expanded CPA District which generally includes the area between the CR 512 eastbound and westbound roadway split, terminating at the eastern right-of- way line of the Florida East Coast (FEC) Railroad. The subject area also includes a large tract of land south of Woodmere Road, properties located between Harrison (2®) street and CR 512 eastbound and other property south of (and fronting on) CR 512 eastbound. The total size of the subject area is approximately 106 acres. RBCO/vIMENDBD ACTION Staff recommends the City Council adopt _Resolution No. 03-5]. "Move to adopt Resolution No. R-03-51." RESOLUTION R-03-51 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 63 FLORIDA STATUTES APPROVING A MODIFIED COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR, AND EXPANDING THE AREA OF, THE SEBASTIAN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council has, by Resolution R-95-17, adopted a Community Redevelopment Plan for the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Sebastian has by Resolution R-02-57 established a finding of blight for additional lands (hereinafter called the "Sebastian Boulevard Triangle') adjacent to and adjoining the lands subject to the initial Community Redevelopment Plan; and, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to provide for the removal of such blighted areas and redevelop such areas, pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969, hereafter referred to as the "CRA", as contained in Florida Statutes, Chapter 163, Part 1II, by expansion of the boundaries of the existing redevelopment area; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is in the best interest of the citizens to modify the entire Community Redevelopment Plan to address development patterns that have emerged since adoption of the initial Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council affirms its earlier findings of blight for these areas; and WHEREAS, the Council affirmatively finds that all the prerequisites of F.S. 163.360(7), which are adopted hereto by reference, exist; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the Land Planning Agency for the City of Sebastian, has reviewed the modified Plan and found it to be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: Section 1. FINDINGS. The City Council has determined that the findings set forth above are true and correct and adopt the same. Section 2. MODIFIED PLAN. The Community Redevelopment Plan as adopted by Resolution R- 95-17 is hereby superceded by that modified Community Redevelopment Plan (hereinafter called the "Modified Plan") prepared by the Iler Planning Group on behalf of the Community Redevelopment Agency, a copy being enclosed herewith as Exhibit "A", which shall be implemented in accordance with the requirements of law. Section 3. APPLICATION. The Modified Plan shall govern rehabilitation, conservation and redevelopment of the blighted areas designated in Resolutions R-95-12 and R-02-57, and the area of the Community Redevelopment District is hereby expanded to include all of said lands. Section 4. CONFLICT. All resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 5. SEVERABILITY. In the event a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold or determine that any part of this resolution is invalid or unconstitutional, the remainder of the resolution shall not be affected and it shall be presumed that the City Council of the City of Sebastian did not intend to enact such invalid or unconstitutional provisions. It shall further be assumed that the City Council would have enacted the remainder of this resolution without said invalid or unconstitutional provision, thereby causing said remainder to remain in full force and effect. Section 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. This resolution shall take effect as provided by law. The foregoing resolution was moved for adoption by Councilmember seconded by Councilmember Mayor Walter Barnes Vice-Mayor Ray Coniglio Councilmember Joe Barczyk Councilmember James Hill Councilmember Nathan McCollum The Vice-Mayor thereupon declared this resolution duly passed and adopted this l0th day of December, 2003. The motion was and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA ATTEST: Sally A. Maio, CMC City Clerk By: Vice-Mayor Ray Coniglio Approved as to form and legality for reliance by the City of Sebastian: Rich Stringer, City Attomey lOSS CHRYSLER ' Cai Iml: B00.226-Tr/8 UNCOLN -. Con~ '00, load- ed, Perfect! Warranty. . Continental Exc Coal' LIHCOLN Mark vii - TC '97 Signs, ext. cont. loaded TC 'CZ, Jacd & took I)OLH T/C L~NCOLH ' 'lC Cartier a/c S695Dn We '771~.30B0 DAB ~50/WK. 2nd bwnr Mov g ~ ob0 7'/2-4SS-688! SL Town Car Series~ si Carl's Suburban. Today's a great clay to sell your mercl~andtse. Treasure Coast Classified · Twncsr ~1.' toP, AZ DODGE Runs' ~ $2S00., DODGE- Neon '02 ' ~20 Sedan, · 4clr, AT, Affordable k mi, lire new, (12689) sa,gaB ' 772-221-41~2 TOYOTA Verc , · B68o26~758~ DODGE - Shaflow ~J2; A/T, · cold e/.c, S~,B00 OBO. MERCEDSS .SL500 (772) 532-7Z39 IR Starmsrked,.slt grey le~tt~er, hard '. ~ ~ /soft top, JmmacL Call 3-686-304-2222 772-794~0553 Sunciay, Novernbe~ 301 2003 The Press Journal Bonneville '89 Must Seal iR Grand. Am 'g?, AmJOO, SATURN - SATURN ISATURN pw ~'~-2324 5L W9' mETING '. · PUBLIC NOTICE ' ' CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA · COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT '. AGENCY (CRA) MEETING '. TO. ADDRESSRECOMMENDATIONB AS TO · ORDINANCE NO, 0-03;28 & ' · . .RESOLUTION NO. R-03-51' : ~ DECEMBER'I O, 2003 - 6:00 pM · · COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FL22958 ' CITY.OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA · NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO MODIFY THE . ." SEBASTIAN COMMUNri'Y REDEVELOPMENT' AGENCY (CRA) REDEVELORMENTTRUST FUND , ;. ' . AND BOUNDAR ES . i inierested persons and agencies are hereby noti~ f ed of the following' public hearings du¥ing the City - ,Council meeting .o~ .Wednesday, December 10,,r. 2003 at 7:00,p.m. at which time the following may- bo adopted: - . ' ' .' . . Ordinance No. 0-03-28 ' ' ' AN' ORDINANCE' OF THE CITY 03: SEBASTIAN',?g FLORIDA, MODIFYING THE EXIST1NG REDEVELOP- {UST FUND AND BOUNDARIES FOR THE . OF' SEBASTrAN'S COMMUNITY REDEVELOP? "-' DISTRICT TO INCLUDE. THE. SEBASTIAN BOULEVARD' ,TR ANGLE~ PER FLORIDA STATUTES .163.387;' PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT; PROVID- · :lNG FOR SEVERABILITy; AND PROVIDING.FOR AN '= EFFECTIVE DATE. ' .'. , ' Resolution N~. R-03-51 A, RESOLUTION OF .THE CiTY OF S~BASTIAN,,i, · 'FLORIDA'PURSUANT'TO CHAPTER 163'FLORIDA · STATUTES APPROVING A MODIFIED' COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT pLAN FOR, AND EXPANDING.. THE AREA'OF, TH~ SEBASTIAN COMIVI_U_N_ITY__R?'.'" 'DEVELOPMENT AREA; PROVIDING FOt~ FLIC3~ AND EFFECTIVE DATE ' ' T. he subject' area l~enerally includes the area be .... twean the CR512 eastbound and .westbound' road-.'"" way s~llt terminating at the eastern r chi.of-way. line bfthe Rorida East Coast. (FEe) Ra'i med..Tbs ' subject area a so nciudes 8 large tract of land south ..:' of'.Woodmere Road, properties located bewveen Harrison (2nd),Straet and' CR512 eastbound, and. other property south, of [and fronting orl) CR512 eastbound. ,The total size ~f the subject area is ap-' ' 106 acres. · hearings on ss d matters are'being held .... City Council Chambers, 1225 Main Street, Se~=~ 'bestien, FL..32958. 'of the proposed Ordinance sad R~ealution available for viewing at' the GroWth Manage- ' ment Debertment et City Ball, 1225 Main Street, Se- bastian, Florida between the. ho. Mrs of ~00. a.m .and, 4:30 pm, or additional informatmn can Ge ommnsc . (7'/2) 589-5518. desiring ~ appeal 'any 'decision '~f the CR~'*'~ .City Councit must arrange for a verbum record of the prodeadinga, including test mony and avl- which any'appeal may be Uaead. compliance with .the '~meficens witi~ Disabilities &ct (ADAI, anyone who needs e special accommO- dation for thi~ meeting should contact the City's ADA Coordinator at ~533D at least 48 hours in. advance of this mee~ nD, . . Hearing assistance headphones ere .evaimme In council chambers for all government meetings.. , , Maio, CMC '*' City of Sebastian, Florida Subject: Adoption of the revised Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Master Plan, compiled by the net Planning Group, IPG Inc. Exhibits: ff~ ? . Ordinance No. 0-03-28 Agenda No. [) Department Origin: Growth Management Tracy E. Hass Date Submitted: December 4, 2003 For Agenda of: December 10, 2003 EXPENDITURE AMOUNT BUDGETED: APPROPRIATION REQUIRED: REQUIRED: SUMMARY Consistent with direction specified by the City Council, and the provisions as contained in the Finding of Necessity Report, the Iler Planning Group (IPG Inc.) commenced with implementation of the CRA expansion project, which incorporates the 512 triangle within the CRA boundaries. Further to this, IPG Inc. also embarked upon the task of updating and enhancing the existing CRA doctrines to provide more specific goals and objectives, along with guidelines, to govern implementation of the CRA plan (CRA Master Plan). The subject area generally includes the area between the CR 512 eastbound and westbound roadway split, terminating at the eastern right-of-way line of the Florida East Coast (FEC) Railroad. The subject area also includes a large tract of land south of Woodmere Road, properties located between Harrison (2na) street and CR 512 eastbound and other property south of (and fronting on) CR 512 eastbound. The total size of the subject area is approximately 106 acres. RECOMMENDED ACTION Conduct the final public hearing for Ordinance No. 0-03-28. Staff recommends the City Council hold the final public hearing and adopt this ordinance. "Move to adopt Ordinance No. 0-03-28." ORDINANCE O-03-28 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, MODIFYING THE EXISTING REDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND AND BOUNDARIES FOR THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN'S COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO INCLUDE THE SEBASTIAN BOULEVARD "TRIANGLE" PER FLORIDA STATUTES 163.387; PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council has, by Resolution R-95-17 a Community Redevelopment Plan for the City, which has been modified by Resolution R-03-51. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Sebastian has by Resolution R-02-57 established a finding of blight for additional lands (hereinafter called the "Sebastian Boulevard Triangle") adjacent to and adjoining the lands subject to the initial Community Redevelopment Plan; and, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to provide for the removal of such blighted areas and redevelop such areas, pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969, hereafter referred to as the "CRA", as contained in Florida Statutes, Chapter 163, Part IH, by expansion of the boundaries of the existing redevelopment area; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, as follows: Section 1. That the Community RedevelOPment Trust Fund, hereafter referred to as the "Fund", as set forth in City Code section 78-30, is hereby reaffirmed and designated as the repository of revenues for the expanded redevelopment area including the Sebastian Boulevard Triangle. Section 2. That section 78-30 of the Code of Ordinances, City of Sebastian, Florida is hereby amended to read as follows: See. 78-30. Community redevelopment trust fund. (a) There is hereby established and created, in accordance with the provisions of F.S. § 163.387, a community redevelopment trust fund, hereafter referred to as the "Fund". (b) The monies allocated to and deposited into the Fund are hereby appropriated to the City of Sebastian Community Redevelopment Agency, hereafter referred to as the "Agency", to finance projects within the community redevelopment district as established by Resolution No. R-95-12, hereafter referred to as the "District". The Agency shall utilize the monies and the revenue paid into and earned by the Fund for all and every community development purpose delegated to it by the established community redevelopment plan as modified, and as further provided by law. The Fund is to exist for thirty (30) years from the date the redevelopment district is last expanded, or until legally terminated by ordinance. Said monies shall be held by the city for and on behalf of the Agency and distributed to the Agency in accordance with a subsequent agreement to be established between the city and the Agency. (c) There shall be paid into the Fund each year by all taxing authorities within the District, excluding the following entities: Florida Inland Navigation District Indian River County Mosquito Control District Indian River County Hospital Maintenance District School District, and associated general obligation debt funded by ad valorem taxes Indian River County Land Acquisition Bond General Obligation Debt Emergency Services Dependent Taxing District St. Johns River Water Management District Sebastian Inlet Taxing District the incremental increase in ad valorem taxes levied each year by the non-exempt taxing authorities over the amount of ad valorem taxes levied by the non-exempt taxing authorities in the base year, as established in subsection (e) below. (d) For the area covered by the original redevelooment district, the tax roll used in connection with the taxation of such property for the base year shall be the tax roll of 1994 in Indian River County. All deposits into the Fund shall begin with the incremental increases in ad valorem tax revenues received subsequent to November 1, 1995. For the expansion area of the Sebastian Boulevard Trian~,le. the tax roll used in connection with the taxation of such r~ror~ertv for the base year shall be the tax roll of 2003 in Indian River County. All deposits into the Fund shall be[in with the incremental increases in ad valorem tax revenues received subseauent to November 1.. 2004. (e) The tax increment shall be determined and appropriated annually in an amount equal to the difference between: (1)That amount of ad valorem taxes levied each year by all non-exempt taxing authorities on taxable real property contained within the geographic boundaries of the District; and (2) That amount of ad valorem taxes which would have been produced by the rate upon which the tax is levied each year by or for all non- exempt taxing authorities upon the total of the assessed value of the taxable property in the District as shown upon the 4-9¢4 base year assessment roll used in connection with the taxation of such property by all non-exempt taxing authorities If any conflict occurs between the provisions of this section and the provisions of F.S. Chapter 163, Part III, concerning tax increment financing, the statutory provisions shall control and apply to this section. (f) The tax increment shall be computed by using the assessed value of taxable property in the District for the ar)r~licable base year 199~ az '&: ~:.a:., and in subsequent years using the assessment value of property in the District for that cun'ent year as the second factor in determining the amount of tax increment in that year. (g) All non-exempt taxing authorities will annually appropriate to the Fund the aforestated sum at the beginning of their fiscal year. The Fund shall receive the tax increment above described no later than December 31 of each year as provided by Florida Statute. The taxing authorities' obligation to annually appropriate to the Fund shall commence immediately upon the effective date of Ordinance No.0-95-08 and continue for thirty (30) years from the effective date of Ordinance 0-03-28, or such other time as extended or shortened by law. (h) The Agency with the approval of the city council is directed to establish and set up the Fund and to develop and promulgate rules, regulations and criteria whereby the Fund may be promptly and effectively administered, including the establishment and the maintenance of books and records and adoption of procedures whereby the Agency may, expeditiously and without undue delay, utilize said monies for their allocated statutory purpose. (i) The Agency accepts full responsibility for the receipt, custody, disbursement, accountability; management and proper application of all monies paid into the Fund subject to the provisions of subsection (b) of this section. Section 3. If any part of this Ordinance is held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, such holding shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remainder, which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 4. Any and all ordinances or parts of ordinances that are in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Except where direct conflict exists with the provisions hereof, the provisions of Ordinance 0-95-08, as modified by Ordinance O-00-16, shall continue in full effect. The foregoing Ordinance was moved for adoption by The motion was seconded by Councilmember vote, the vote was as follows: Mayor Walter Bames Vice-Mayor Ray Coniglio Councilmember Joe Barczyk Councilmember James Hill Councilmember Nathan B. McCollum The Mayor thereupon declared this Ordinance duly December, 2003. Councilmember and, upon being put to a passed and adopted this l0th day of CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA ATTEST: By: Mayor Walter Barnes Approved as to form and legality for reliance by the City of Sebastian only: Sally A. Maio, CMC City Clerk Rich Stringer, City Attorney ! II u~ou-sJea~o~u~u 6z0r-69S-~:Z.Z oqo006~:$ q3eaqwl;d )t~T '~3elq ')~aJ~ sun~ ~ao3o~ ~e~m~d ~css 'S6, IDS.SCI - ~ONC~ 66~$ 'lOUl ~3Ud 'gL~'~$ 6l~6-:9Z (PIZ) · nun~ ~3~Jad "lw N6~ ~(ZZL) '0SZ~$ 'J~l~ po ~HRYSLER I ! I i I I I I I er the -t511 IR LINCOLN -. Cont. '00, IoaO- -a o-rfect! WarrantY. UNCOLN 32R, La $[3,500. LINCOLN · Mark VII '90 runs great $180o obo 772-563-2286 Iv msg IR LINCOLN - TC '97 Signa- ture, exc. cond. loaded ! ownr $8k772-871-9408 TC T/C '96; Ex~c wht~ Ithr, 287-1855 Store 800-226-7878 ¢HRYSLER- Sebring conv '00 Limited, extra clean $9000'obo 772~528-3292. ~INCOLN - TC Sig. '95, 86K 2nd 0wnr Moving $6500 Sebring obo 772-485-5681SL Town Car PONTIAC Ti Sunaay, November 30, 2003 The Press Journal W9 Grand Am Am -'00, $7990, carl's Suburban · C~.II 888-471-3509 'OYOTA Vero 866-264-7582 Today's a great day to sell your merchandise. DODGE - Aries Wagon Treasure Coast 4 cyh .A(~, ~,x.~ Classified $1395 ol3o .~ 563-0104 Dealer UNCOLN - Twncar var; vinyl, top, DODGE Runs' $2500. DOOGE- Neon '02 MERCEDES - E320 Sedan, · 4dr, AT, Affordable '01, 16+k mi, like new, (12689) $$.988 $36.800. 7-/2.221-4842 III __~ DODGE - Shadow '92,, cold a/c $1,800 OBO. RCEDES -S! (772) 532-7239 R tarmarked leather, DOD(~E ~ SPIRIT '91 a/c, (772) TURN SL2 - '95, SL NIEE11NG PUBLIc NOTICE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT ' AGENCY (CRA) MEETING TO ADDRESS RECOMMENDATIONS AS TO ORDINANCE NO. 0-03:28 & RESOLUTION NO. R-03-51' DECEMBER 10, 2003 - 6:00 PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FL 32958 CITY.OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO MODIFY THE SEBASTIAN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT _ AGENCY (CRA) REDEVELOPMENT TRUST FUND ~. · AND BOUNDAR ES ~1 nterested persons and agencies are hereby noti; ~ ed of the following 'public hearings du'ring the CiW Council meet ng on Wednesday, December 10, ;~ 2003 at 7:00' p.m. at which time the following may- be adopted: Ordinance No. 0-03-28 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN',· ~ FLORIDA, MODIFYING THE EXISTING REDEVELOP- MENT TRUST FUND AND BOUNDARIES FOR THE . CITY OF' SEBASTtAN'S COMMUNITY REDEVELOP~ :: MENT DISTRICT TO NCLUDE THE SEBASTIAN BOULEVARD "TRIANGLE~' PER FLORIDA STATUTES 163.387;' PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT; PROVID- · lNG FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN' EFFECTIVE DATE. Resolution No. R-03-51 A. RESOLUTION OF ~HE CITY OF SEBASTIAN 'FLORIDA' PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 163 'FLORIDA STATUTES APPROVING A MODIFIED COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FO~, AND EXPANDING THE AREA OF, THE SEBASTIAN COMMUNITY RE- , DEVELOPMENT AREA; PROVIDING FOR CON- FLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE The subjoin area .genera y includes ~he area be tween the CR612 eastbound and westbound road-. way split, mrrninating a~ the eastern right-of-way line bf the F orida East Coast (FEC1 Railroad..The ub'ect area also ncludes a large traCt of land south- s, ) ...... ~ ~ronerties located between. o~ wooomere nu~u, ~ Harrison (2ndl Street and CR§12 eastbound, and omar property south.of (and fronting onl CR512 eastbound. The total size of the subjeCt area is prox rnately 106 acres. ublic hear ngs on said matters are' being held. Tihnet~e~ CiW Council Chambers, 1225 Main S~reet, Se-~ ~astian, FL. 32958. as of ~he proposed Crdinance and Resolution avai able for viewing at the Growth Manage- ment Department at CW Hall, 1225 Main Street, Se- bastian, Florida, bewveen ti~e. nours of 8:00 am and 4:30 pm, or additional information can be obtained one at (772) 589-5518. desiring to appeal'any decision of the CRA Council must arrange for a verbatim record of tt~e oroc'eedings, including testimony and evi- dence upo which any appem may be 13ased.-' liance with .the Americans with Disabilities anyone who needs a specie accommo-. dation for this meeting should contact ~he Cit¥'.s ADA Coordinator at 589-5330 at least 48 hours m. advance of this meeting. Hearing assistance headphones are .available counciLchambers for all government meetings.. , MaiD, CMC , Clerk nber 30, 2003 399703 City of Sebastian, Florida OFFI¢~ OF TH~ ¢I~g ATTORNEY AGENDA TRANSMITTAL ~da No. O3.0q ~ Subject: Permanent Parks & Reereqation Committee; Date Submitted: Ordinance 0-03-29 For Agenda of: SUMMARY: The temporary Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee has reached the end of its term. Now that the course of the City in recreational matters has been established, per direction of Council the Committee is being m-established as a permanent committee of the City. RECOMMENDED ACTION: At Council's discretion - Move to pass Ordinance O-03-29 AUTHORIZI*,D PLACEMENT ON AGENDA BY CITY MANAGER: ORDINANCE 0-03-29 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE IV, ADMINISTRATION: BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES, TO CREATE DMSION 3, PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has recently committed to a long-term program of expanding and improving passive park facilities, as well as active recreation, through establishment of the Sebastian Recreational Impact Fee; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Sebastian determines that it would be in the public interest to have a permanent committee of citizens to advise the City Council as it develops a long-term policy on recreational activities and the development of the City park system; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: Section 1. That Chapter 2, Article IV of the City Code, City of Sebastian, Florida, ADMINISTRATION: Boards, Commissions, Committees, is hereby amended to create Division 3, PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE consisting of Sections 2-211 through 2-214, to read as follows: Sec. 2-211. Establishment. The City Council of the City of Sebastian hereby establishes a Parks 0~rtd Recreation Advisory Committee. The oumose of the Committee shall be to study and orovide recommendations to City Council: ~ As to the develooment of the park system,, and ~ As to the orovision of active recreation oroarams and facilities Membership on the Committee shall be through appointment by City Council. $¢¢. 2-212. Panel Comnosition. The Committee shall be comoosed of five residents, with one member from each of the four recreational imoact fee districts and one at-laree member. In the event that no suitable anolicants are available from a district, another at-large member may be aovointed in their place, Sec. 2-213. Terms. Followine avoointment of the initial Committee members, the reoresentatives of odd-numbered districts shall serve until May 31, 2005~ and the representatives of even-numbered districts and the at-laree member shall serve until May 31. 2006. Thereafter: Committee member terms shall be two years in length. Sec. 2-214. Procedures. At the rcmtlar meeting of June of each calendar year: or at thc first remfiar meetine thereafter, the Committee shall select a chairman and vice- chairman. The Committee shall adopt rules of procedure and a meeting schedule. Section 2. CONFLICT. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 3. SEVERABILITY. In the event a court of competent jurisdiction shall determine that any part of this Ordinance is invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance shall not be affected and it shall be presumed that the City Council of the City of Sebastian did not intend to enact such invalid or unconstitutional provisions. It shall further be assumed that the City Council would have enacted the remainder of this Ordinance without said invalid or unconstitutional provision, thereby causing said remainder to remain in full force and effect. Section 4. immediately. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective The foregoing Ordinance was moved for adoption by Councilmember The motion was seconded by Councilmember and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Mayor Walter Barnes Vice-Mayor Ray Coniglio Cotmcilmember Joe Barczyk Councilmember James Hill Councilmember Nathan B. McCollum The Mayor thereupon declared this Ordinance duly passed and adopted this 10th day of December, 2003. CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA ATTEST: By: Mayor Walter Barnes Approved as to form and legality for reliance by the City of Sebastian only: Sally A. Maio, CMC City Clerk Rich Stringer, City Attorney SCRIPPS HOWARD SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS Vero Beach Press Journal 1801 U.S. 1, Vero Beach, FL 32960 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, Karen Trego, who on oath says that she is Legal Advertising Representative of the Vero Beach Press Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement was publshed in the Vero Beach Press Journal in the following issues below. Affiant further says that the said Vere Beach Press Journal is a newspaper published in Vere Beach in said Indian River County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, daily and distributed in Indian River County, Florida, for a pedod of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid or promised any person, firm or coporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. The Vero Beach Press Journal has been entered as second class matter at the Post Offices in Vero Beach, indian River County, Florida and has been for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement. Customer CITY OF SEBASTIAN/CITY CLE Ad Pub Number Date Copyline 395527 11/26/2003 ORD. O-03-29/JEANETTE Subscribed and sworn to me before this date: Nove~er 26, 2003 Notary Public PO # NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF SEBASTIAN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA ORDINANCE NO. O-03-29 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CiTY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE iV, .ADMINiS- TRATION: BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, COM- MITTEES, TO CREATE DIVISION 3. PARKS AND RECREATION ADVI- SORY COMMITTEE: PROVIDING FOR CON- FLICT: PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE~ The City Council ot the City of Sebastian, indian River.County, Florida,. will hold a public hear- ~ng concerning the adootion of the Ordi- nance with the title as shown apove 'on Wednesday, December 10th. 2003 .at 7:00 o.m. in the Oitv Council Chambers, City Hall, 1225 Main Street, Se- bastian, Florida. At the conclusion of this meet- ing, the City 'Council may enact this Ordi- nance into law. Interest- ea parties may inspect the proposed Ordinance ;,in the Office of the City Clerk at City Hall and may appear at the hear- ing and be heard with respect to the proposed Ordinance. Any person who may wish ~o appem any deci- sion which may be made by me City Coun- cil at this hearing will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings ,s made which recora includes the testimon'y and evi- den'ce u,pon which the appeal will be based. (F.S. 286.0105) in compliance with the Americans-with Disabili- ties Act (ADA), anyone .who needs a special commodatio'n for' this meeting should contact the Citv's ADA Coordina~ tor at 589-5330 at least 48 hours in advance of · the meeting. By Salty A. Maio, CMC City Clerk November 26, 2003 395527 HO~E OF Pr~LICAN tSL~ID City of Sebastian, Florida Subject: Resolution R-03-57. Regarding the removal of funding for Southside Recreation Complex Project from Five Year Capital Improvement Budget Exhibits: · Agenda No. 03, 0 ~,,~ Department Origin: Office of City Manager, Department of Finance, and Growth Management Department Date Submitted: December 3, 2003 For Agenda of: December 10, 2003 Resolution R-03-57 regarding the removal of funding for Southside Recreation Complex Project from Five Year Capital Improvement Budget Exhibit A EXPENDITURE AMOUNT BUDGETED: APPROPRIATION REQUIRED: N/A $200,000 REQUIRED: N/A SUMMARY On November 12, 2003 City Council approved the elimination of funding for construction/development of park facilities on a 33-acre City owned parcel in the southeastern section of the community from the FY 2003/2004 budget and to designate said mount totaling $200,000 for a reserve account to help finance other future capital projects. Implementation of the Municipal Complex Park in addition to Indian River County's plans to expand facilities at the North County Regional Park will substantively satisfy the City of Sebastian's Parks and recreational facility requirements as governed by State of Florida comprehensive planning criteria supported by the Growth Management Act of 1985. In the City's 2004 to 2009 Five Year Capital Improvement Program, $200,000 per year in future discretionary sales tax funding proceeds was programmed for a Southside Recreation Complex each year. Since there is no urgency relative to the construction of active park features on this site, the necessity of allocating future funds for this project is alleviated. Therefore, staff recommends removal of Southside Recreation Complex Project from the City's aforementioned Five-Year Capital Improvement Budget and the City of Sebastian Comprehensive Plan. Additionally, completion of the revised'Comprehensive Development Plan, including removal of the Southside Recreation Complex, is anticipated to occur during the second quarter (summer) of 2004. RECOMMENDED ACTION Move to approve Resolution R-03-57. RESOLUTION NO. R-03-57 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA ADOPTING A_N AMENDED BUDGET FOR THE FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AS PROVIDED FOR IN EXHIBIT "A"; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WI:IEREAS, on September 24, 2003, the City of Sebastian adopted Resolution No. R-03-38 providing for the adoption of the City's 2003-04 budget; and WHEREAS, on November 12, 2003 City Council approved the elimination of funding for construction/development of park facilities on a 33-acre City owned parcel in the southeastern section of the community from the FY 2003/2004 budget and to designate said amount totaling $200,000 for a reserve account to help finance other future capital projects. NOW, TltEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY TI:IE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, THAT: Section 1. The Capital Improvement Program budget of the City of Sebastian, Indian River County, Florida for the Fiscal Year beginning October 1, 2003 and ending September 30, 2004 be amended, a copy of which is attached hereto and more particularly identified as Exhibit "A", which are hereby adopted. Section 2. All resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 3. This resolution shall be come effective on December 10, 2003. It was moved for adoption by Councilmember The motion was seconded by Councilmember vote, the vote was as follows: and, upon being put to a Mayor Walter Barnes Vice-mayor Ray Coniglio Councilmember Joe Barczyk Councilmember Nathan B. McCollum Councilmember James A. Hill The Mayor thereupon declared this Resolution duly passed and adopted this 10th day of December, 2003. By: CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA Mayor Walter Barnes ATTEST: Sally A. Maio, CMC City Clerk Approved as to form and content for reliance by the City of Sebastian only: Rich Stringer, City Attorney [CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 2003/2004 ANNUAL BUDGET1 "EXHIBIT A" This Fund includes all of the City's "Pay as you go" and loan funded Capital Improvement Projects. Funding for Capital Improvement Projects is provided from other City funds, loan proceeds and miscellaneous revenue. Capital project expenditures are accounted for in Capital Project Funds, the Golf Course Projects Fund and the Airport Projects Fund, but they are presented in a consolidated manner in the budget document to facilitate review of capital projects as a whole. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND REVENUES BY SOURCE Local Option Gas Tax Fund Discretionary Sales Tax Fund Recreation Impact Fee Fund Grants and Other Revenues TOTAl, $ 150,000 $ 1,059,693 $ 70,000 $ - $ 1,279,693 EXPENDITURES BY TYPE The proposed Capital Improvement Program for 2003 - 2004 is as follows Roads Sidewalks Recreation Public Facilities Sub-total Capital Projects Debt Service Reserve TOTAL 300,000 180,000 270,000 175,000 $ 925,000 154,693 200,000 1,279,693 104 CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 2003/2004 ANNUAL BUDGET Total Ri~rviewPark?mse W (Zero B) Public F~lities PW~P, decatim DdX SaUce 175,000 175,000 105 FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM This is the anticipated Capital Improvement Program Project Schedule for the General Fund, Golf Course Fund, and Airport Fund. It also includes projects funded by the Local Option Gas Tax, Discretionary Sales Tax, and the Recreation Impact Fee. It is a listing of projects needed for replacement or improvement of the City's major facilities, roadways, and structures. The list is categorized by the nature of the project. Funding for Capital Improvement Projects is provided from other City funds, bond issues, notes and miscellaneous sources. Capital project expenditures are accounted for in the Capital Projects Funds, Airport Fund and Golf Course Fund. Funding for the 2003-04 projects is identified and included in the proposed 2003-04 Capital Improvement Budget. For the years 2005-2009 the projects have been identified along with their anticipated funding sources. Although, potential funding, has been provided, changes may be made in conjunction with alternative sources as they become available in each of these subsequent years. As with the annual Capital Improvement Program, funding will be provided in a combination of pay- as-you-go and bond/grant financed sources. The timing of projects identified may be altered from year to year to meet changing circumstances. The Five Year Capital Improvement Schedule is consolidated as follows: Roads $ 4,135,000 Sidewalks~ikeways $ 720,000 Recreation $ 2,279,000 Public Buildings $ 1,000,000 Golf Course $ 47,000 Airpo~ $ 5,665,305 Debt Service 2,431,085 $ 17,077,390 TOTAL 129 C. TYOF.SEBAST N?.FLO DA.2003./2004..PROPOSED.BUDGETI FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT October 1, 2007 ~ 1,2004to October 1,2005to October 1,20061o to Septem~ 30, October 1,2008to Septen~ 30, 2005 Septerr~ 30, 2006 Septen'~ 30, 2007 2008 Septm'~ 30, 2009 Total Revenues: CashFonmrd $ 567,463 $ 1,737,347 $ 2,059,088 $ 969,7091 $ 657,082 $ 5,990,689 lGen~Fund $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,0t30 $ 100,0t30 $ 500,000 Local OpficnGasTax $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 750,000 Discretionary Sales Surtax $ 1,275,318 $ 1,370,957 $ 470,900 $ 1,575,340 $ 2,534,481 $ 7,226,996 RivwfrontRedevelopmmtDistfict $ 134,357 $ 138,388 $ 142,539 $ 146,816 $ 151,220 $ 713,320 ReelnlmetFee $ 200,850 $ 206,876 $ 213,082i $ 219,474 $ 226,058 $ 1,066,3,10 Stom~t~rUtilityFee $ 599,086 $ 605,077 $ 611,128~ $ 617,239 $ 623,411 $ 3,055,941 GolfCot~Fund $ 200,000 $ 47,000 $ $ - $ 247,000 Airl~ $ 220,000 $ 188,125 $ 179,936 $ 320,000 $ 908,061 OtherFundingtBonds, C~ants, etc.) $ 2,005,000 ~ $ 536,500 $ 719,744 $ 1,480,000 $ 4,741,244 lnterestlncome $ 69,490 $ 67,661 $ 44,190 $ 75,722 $ 67,112 $ 324,174 Total Revenues $ 5,521,564 $ 5,147,930 $ 4,690,606 $ 5,654,299i$ 4,509,365 $ 25,523,764 FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005: R~ad Improvements: P, md Paving Main Street Enhancen~ts ~dewalks and Bil~eways: Annual Si~ Program Recreation Facilities: Keen Terr/S. Wimbrow Park (Zone Blossom Park (Zone A) ~t Access Rinds Ctmsm~t Taxiway C Reserve $ 150,000 $ 349,000 $ 180,O00 $ 123,000 $ 41,000 $ 30,000 $ 625,000 $ 154,693 $ 331,524 $ 200,000 $ 15o, ooo $ 349,000 $ 18o,o0o $ 123,000 $ 41,000 $ 30,00O 625,000 1OO,000 1,500,000 154,693 331,524 200,000 130 ]CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 2003/2004 PROPOSED BUDGET] FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PR~ Septmt~ 30, 2005 Septmtm' 30, 2006 Septerrtxx 30, 2007 2008 September 30, 2009 Total Road Paving $ 150,000 $ 150,000 Sidewalks and Bii~-a~aVs: Annnal Sidewalk Program $ 180,000 $ 180,000 Recreation Facilities: Periwinkle/Seashore Park (Zone D) $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Stonecrop Suect Park- Bcauhealk $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $. Wimbrow/Azine Text Park $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Public Facilities: Land (Wetlmd iV~tigafic~ Bank) $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 Rebuild Golf Cotusc ~ $ 47,000 $ 47,000 Catsm~t Mnlti-airc~t Hangars Phase I $ 390,625 $ 390,625 /~he Land $ 250,000 $ 250,00O Install Taxiway Lights $ 300,000 $ 300,000 Heavy Equipment Lease $ 154,693 $ 154,693 City Hall $ 331,524 $ 331,524 Reserve $ 200,000 $ 200,000 Road Impmvermnts: Laconia Street Enhancements $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Fleming Street Enha/wam'ents $ 1,305,000 $ 1,305,000 Read Paving $ 150,000 $ 150,000 Sidewalks and Bikeway: Annual Sidewalk Program $ 180,000 $ 180,000 Conduct Master Plan Update $ 300,000 $ 300,000 Cxama~ct Mmlti Aircn~ Hangars Phase II $ 234,375 $ 234,375 Consm~ct Apron $ 365,305 $ 365,305 Heavy Equipment Lease $ 154,693 $ 154,693 City Hall $ 331,524 $ 331,524 Reserve $ 200,000 $ 200,000 131 CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 2003/2004 PROPOSED BUDGETI October 1, 2007 Octeberl, 2004to Octoberl, 2005to Oc~erl, 2006to to Scptcrnber 30,Octoberl, 2008to Scptentxx 30, 2005 September 30, 2006 September 30, 2007 2008 September 30, 2009 Total FISCAL YEAR 2007/2008: Road Improvenmts: Laconia Street F_nhancamnts $ 731,000 $ 731,000 F~ring Su~t ~ts $ 650,0O0 $ 650,000 P,~ad Paving $ 150,000 $ 150,000 Sidewalks and Bikeways: Ann~ Si&-~a~ Pro, ram $ 180,000 $ 1~0,000 Recreation Facilities: Sd~m Civic Cen~ (Zme C) $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 Carnet Pa'irm~ P, md $ 800,000 $ 800,000 Debt Service: Heavy Equiprreat ~se $ 154,693 $ 1~4,693 Cfty Hall $ 331,524! $ 331,524 Reserve $ 200,000' $ 200,000 Recreation Facilities: Scbastim Ovic Center (Za'~ C) $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 Ccnsm~t ~ P, md Carnet Access P, oad Debt Service: Heavy P~pmmt Dase $ 154,693 $ 154,693 C~ty I-lall $ 331,524 $ 331,524 l~otalExpenditures $ 3,784,217 $ 3,088,842 $ 3,720,897 $ 4,997,217 $ 1,486,217 $ 17,077,390 132 FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BY FUNDING SOURCE Local Discretionary Recreation Golf Option Sales Impact Course Airport Other Gas Tax Tax Fe.__~e Fund Fund Sources Total FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005 Road Improvements Road Paving 150,000 150,000 Main Street Enhancements 349,000 349,000 Sidewalks and Bikeways Annual Sidewalk Program 180,000 180,000 123,000 123,000 41,000 41,000 30,000 30,000 Recreation Facilities Purchase Land in Park Zone A Keen Terr/S. Wimbrow Park (Zone B) Blossom Park (Zone A) Airport Construct Access Roads Install Vertical Guidance System Construct Taxiway C 125,000 500,000 625,000 20,000 80,000 100,000 75,000 1,425,000 1,500,000 Debt Service Heavy Equipment Lease City Hall 154,693 154,693 331,524 331,524 Reserve Total Fiscal Year 2004/2005 200,000 200,000 150,000 1,215,217 194,000 0 220,000 2,005,000 3,784,217 FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006 Road Improvements Road Paving 150,000 150,000 Sidewalks and Bikeways Annual Sidewalk Program 180,000 180,000 Recreation Facilities Periwinkle/Seashore Park (Zone D) Stonecrop Street Park S. Wimbmw/Azine Terr Park 10,000 10,000 60,000 60,000 15,000 15,000 Public Facilities Land (Wetland Mitigation Bank) 1,000,000 1,000,000 Golf Course Rebuild Golf Course Restrooms 47,000 47,000 Airport ConstmctMulti-aimraR Hanga~ Acquire Land Install TaxiwayLights 78,125 312,500 390,625 50,000 200,000 250,000 60,000 240,000 300,000 Debt Service Heavy Equipment Lease City Hall 154,693 154,693 331,524 331,524 Reserve Total Fiscal Year 2005/2006 200,000 200,000 150,000 1,866,217 85,000 47,000 188,125 752,500 3,088,842 133 ]ciTy 0F 'SEBASTi'AN, FLORIDA 2003/2004 PRopOs'ED' BUDG~'~'[ FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BY FUNDING SOURCE FISCAL YEAR 2006/2007 Local Discretionary Recreation Golf Option Sales Impact Course Airport Other Gas Tax Ta._..~x Fe.~e Fund Fund Sources Total Road Improvements Laconia Street Enhancements 500,000 500,000 Fleming Street Enhancements 1,305,000 1,305,000 Road Paving 150,000 150,000 Sidewalks and Bikeways Annual Sidewalk Program 180,000 180,000 Airport Conduct Master Plan Update 60,000 240,000 300,000 Construct Perimeter Road 46,875 187,500 234,375 Construct Apron 73,061 292,244 365,305 Debt Service Heavy Equipment Lease 154,693 154,693 City Hall 331,524 331,524 Reserve 200,000 200,000 150,000 2,671,217 0 0 179,936 719,744 3,720,897 Total Fiscal Year 2006/2007 FISCAL YEAR 2007/2008 Road Improvements Laconia Street Enhancements 731,000 731,000 Fleming Street Enhancements 650,000 650,000 Road Paving 150,000 150,000 Sidewalks and Bikeways Annual Sidewalk Program 180,000 180,000 Recreation Facilities Sebastian Civic Center (Zone C) 1,000,000 1,000,000 Airport Construct Perimeter Road 160,000 640,000 800,000 Construct Access Roads 160,000 640,000 800,000 Debt Service Heavy Equipment Lease 154,693 154,693 City Hall 331,524 331,524 Reserve 200,000 200,000 150,000 3,247,217 0 0 320,000 1,280,000 4,997,217 Total Fiscal Year 2007/2008 134 [CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 2003/2004 PROPOSED BUDGET~ FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BY FUNDING SOURCE FISCAL YEAR 2008/2009 Recreation Facilities Sebastian Civic Center (Zone C) Local Discretionary Recreation Golf Option Sales Impact Course Airport Other Gas Tax Ta..~x Fe.~e Fund Fund Sources Total 1,000,000 1,000,000 Debt Service Heavy Equipment Lease 154,693 City Hall 331,524 154,693 331,524 Total Fiscal Year 2008/2009 Total Five Year Capital Plan $ $ 1,486,217 $ $ $ $ - $ 1,486,217 $ 600,000 $ 10,486,085 $ 279,000 $ 47,000 $ 908,061 $ 4,757,244 $ 17,077,390 135 HOME City of Sebastian 1225 Main Street Sebastian, Florida 32958 Subject: City Clerk Performance Agenda No. C~. Evaluations Department Origin: Human ! Approved for Submittal by: City Mar~3er~- Date Submitted: 11/19/03 -/ For Agenda of: 12/10/03 Terrence Moore, City Manager Exhibits: Expenditure Required: Amount Budgeted: Appropriation Required: SUMMARY STATEMENT As a result of all performance evaluations being received from City Councilmembers for the City Clerk, Ms. Sally Maio, staff submits this transmittal to place her appraisal on the agenda. 09105/2003 11:05 561-978-1822 IRC ADNIN PAGE 02 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: Ail Employees Margaret Gunter S~tcmber 4, 2003 BCC Meeting Dates - FY 2003/2004 FYI, the following are the dates the County Commission till October 7, 2003 October 14, 2003 October 2 I, 2003 November 4, 2003 November 18, 2003 December 2, 2003 December 9, 2003 December 16, 2003 January 6, 2004 January 13, 2004 January 20, 2004 February 3, 2004 February 10, 2004 Febmary 17, 2004 February 24, 2004 March 9, 2004 March 16, 2004 March 23, 2004 April 6, 2004 will meet in FY 2003 / 2004. April 13, 2004 April 20, 2004 May 4, 2004 May 11, 2004 May 18, 2004 June l, 2004 June 8, 2004 June 15, 2004 June 22, 2004 July 6, 2004 July I3, 2004 July 20, 2004 August 3, 2004 August 10, 2004 August 17, 2004 August 24, 2004 Septcnnber 7, 2004 September 14, 2004 September 21, 2004 Please contact me if you have any questions. OS, [7 4 City of Sebastian Community Redevelopment Master Plan December 3, 2003 CITY COUNCIL Walter Barnes, Mayor Ray Coniglio, Vice-Mayor Joseph Barczyk Jim Hill Nathan McCollum CITY MANAGER Terrence Moore GROWTH MANAGEMENT Tracy Hass, Director Jan King, Manager CRA Master Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... iv INTRODUCTION & HISTORY .................................................................... Page A. Redevelopment Planning Process B. Public Participation Program II. EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE REDEVELOPMENT AREA ............................................................................................................... Page 4 B. C. D. E. F. G. Regional Relationships Sebastian Community Redevelopment Area Land Use and Zoning Performance Overlay Districts Public Facilities and Environmental Features Redevelopment Needs Economic and Market Conditions III. PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN ...............................................Page 13 B. C. D. E. F. G. H. J. K. L. M. Primary Public Involvement Findings Guiding Principles Conceptual Planning Districts Overall Concept Plan Transportation and Pedestrian Improvements Greenways, Parks, and Trails Urban Design Recommendations Infrastructure Improvements Land Use and Zoning Recommendations Program and Policy Recommendations Neighborhood Impact and Affordable Housing Element Land and Building Acquisition Conformance with Sebastian and Indian River County Comprehensive Plans Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 CRA Master Plan IV. FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY ........................................................................ Page 36 A. Tax Increment Revenues B. Capital Improvements Program C. Project Financing V= OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES ............................................................. Page 42 A. CRA Term B. Annual Reporting C. Plan Update and Amendments APPENDIX ................................................................................................................. Page 44 B. C. D. E. F. City of Sebastian CRA Expansion Finding of Necessity City of Sebastian Resolution R-02-57 Revised CRA Legal Description Existing LDC - Performance Overlay Districts Economic Analysis Site Development Regulations and Permitted Uses Summary Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 CRA Master Plan FIGURES 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Redevelopment Plan Summary Map Regional Location Map CRA Context Map Vacant Land Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Map Conceptual Districts Map a. Park District b. Sebastian Boulevard Mixed-Use District c. U.S.-1 Commercial District d. Riverfront District e. Sebastian Boulevard South District Major Thoroughfares (Transportation) Parks, Sidewalks, and Bikeways Map Existing Parking Map Land Use/Zoning Recommendations Map Riverview Park District Short-Range Plan Riverview Park District Future Vision Plan Riverview Park District Typical Roadway Cross-Section Sebastian Boulevard "Triangle" Concept Plan Sebastian Boulevard Eastbound Typical Roadway Cross-Section Sebastian Boulevard Westbound Typical Roadway Cross-Section U.S. Highway One Typical Roadway Cross-Section Sebastian, Florida Ill 12-3-03 CRA Master Plan Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background This Community Redevelopment Master Plan is intended to guide the redevelopment of Sebastian's downtown and adjacent areas delineated within the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Area boundaries (Figure 3). The City originally created the CRA in 1995 for an area generally east of the FEC Railroad right-of-way to the eastern City limits, and subsequently adopted a redevelopment plan for that area. The purpose of this Plan is to address the changing conditions in the original CRA, and expand it to include a 106 acre area generally encompassing the "Sebastian Boulevard Triangle" west of the FEC Railroad right-of-way. This Plan unifies the 1995 CRA boundary and the expansion area as one cohesive CRA, and presents conceptual district recommendations, potential policy amendments, and capital improvements intended to meet the City's redevelopment goals. Implementable recommendations form the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council's (TCRPC) 2000 and 2001 charettes have also been incorporated into the redevelopment recommendations'that follow. These charettes were conducted with extensive community involvement, and were well received by the City. The City of Sebastian originally created a CRA as a means to ensure that the downtown and surrounding vicinity would develop with a coherent community vision, and to encourage reinvestment throughout the CRA. CRAs have three primary benefits in promoting redevelopment. These include: 1. Tax Increment Financing (TIF), which diverts future property tax revenues from Indian River County and the City of Sebastian to a trust fund specifically intended for redevelopment projects and programs; 2. Increased eligibility for federal and state grants that can be used for infrastructure improvements, business development, and property acquisition; and 3. A master planning approach and implementation strategy for the CRA. It should be noted that although the Sebastian CRA will bring outside tax revenues into the City, it will not increase the property tax millage rate on any CRA properties. Economic Trends The recommendations contained within this Plan are based on recent economic analysis of the Sebastian Market Area, which reveals: Property value increases within Downtown Sebastian increased from $45.83 million to $66.17 million between Fiscal Years 2001 and 2004, indicating that the area is positively perceived by the market; Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 CRA Master Plan Executive Summary · There will be an estimated demand for between 600 and 700 new residential units in the Market Area annually through 2010; · Higher value single-family attached (townhouse) development should be encouraged for the Sebastian Boulevard Triangle Area, and will create land values substantially higher than under current industrial zoning; · The market area could support the development of approximately 100,000 square feet of new retail space annually through 2010, in addition to approximately 150,000 square feet of retail space in the vicinity of Riverview Park; and · Office development and hospitality uses will not likely play a significant role in redevelopment. Redevelopment Concept Plan The Redevelopment Plan Summary Map (Figure 1) provides an overview of proposed redevelopment concepts within the CRA. These concepts include the following: · Improvements to Riverview Park and the surrounding vicinity, utilizing public- private partnerships to create improvements to the park and surrounding streetscape, while also encouraging development of retail space adjacent to the park on privately-owned land; · Creation of a mixed-use district within the Sebastian Boulevard Triangle Area, incorporating single-family attached (townhouse) development and complementary retail and commercial space, in addition to creating a new "lake" and park within the district; · Enhancement of the streetscape on Riverside Drive, including the installation of waterfront pedestrian "pocket parks" where feasible; · Considering the future creation of a Main Street activity center, increasing the usability of the City-owned park and capitalizing on the historical museum as a cultural amenity; · Streetscape enhancements along US-1 throughout the CRA, including enhanced pedestrian lighting, trees and vegetation, and well-delineated pedestrian crossing areas; · Encouraging commercial developers of land fronting on US-1 to "build to the street" to create a more defined urban edge; · Installation of gateway treatments at major points of entry to the City along Sebastian Boulevard and US-l; and · Retaining current building height and density requirements within the CRA to reinforce the "Old Florida Fishing Village" design theme. The linchpins of this Plan are the eventual redevelopment of the Sebastian Boulevard Triangle Area, as well as the redevelopment of Riverview Park and the surrounding vicinity. The Sebastian Boulevard Triangle Area serves as an important gateway to Downtown Sebastian, and the concepts presented within this plan will create a vibrant small-town neighborhood within this area that integrates well into the adjacent residential Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 CRA Master Plan Executive Summary communities. Riverview Park is already a magnet for the southern portion of the CRA. Redevelopment of the park and surrounding vicinity will create additional recreational opportunities for residents of Sebastian, and will provide attractive opportunities for complementary retail and commercial development oriented to the park. In addition to the above, numerous urban design recommendations are proposed throughout the CRA, infrastructure improvements are proposed to allow for anticipated future development, and other improvements are proposed that maintain the small-town feel of Sebastian while also providing a demand and population base for the Downtown. These policy changes and improvements, coupled with continued public involvement as redevelopment takes place, should ensure the success of the CRA throughout its 30- year term. Revenue Projections In 2003, the CRA is expected to receive a total payment of approximately $250,000, which includes City and County tax increment revenues. With the addition of the Sebastian Boulevard Triangle Area, the CRA is projected to generate approximately $1 million in annual increment by 2012. This continued growth will provide the City with considerable bonding leverage for large-scale projects such as streetscape and infrastructure improvements. Sebastian, Florida 'vi 12-3-03 Legend CRA Boundary Gateway Treatment Areawide Recommendations 1. Retain 2-3 story maximum building height. 2. Modify community design guidelines to reinforce "Old Florida Fishing Village" design theme. 3. Future study to further address parking needs in the CRA. Capital Improvements 1. Riverview Park improvements. 2. Streetscape improvements to US-1, Riverside Drive, and Sebastian Boulevard (east and westbound). 3. Reconfigure boat trailer parking. 4. Develop a stormwater park. Trian Riverside Drive Streetscapes and Pocket Parks Street Activity Center Scale: 1" = 800' 0 400 800 1 Streetscape Enhancements and "Build to Street" Park Activity Center CRA Exg to mprove ~/ Park Gateway Gateway Treatment , Treatment Redevelopment Plan Summary Map l City of Sebastian CRA ,,.~,,,,,,~o~,. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Figure 1 ©2003 HO/VIE OF PELICAN ISLAND CRA Master Plan Introduction & History I. INTRODUCTION & HISTORY The City of Sebastian has recognized for many years that significant areas of the downtown and surrounding community are in need of redevelopment, as evidenced by the City's initial efforts in the early 1990's towards the establishment of a Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA). In 1990, the Riverfront Study Committee was created, and was charged with developing recommendations regarding the future development of the riverfront area. In 1995, the City of Sebastian completed a study to identify and delineate the boundaries of a redevelopment area, which resulted in the adoption of a CRA and a Redevelopment Plan for the waterfront and U.S.-1 area. In 2000 and 2001, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) conducted two (2) urban design visioning charettes with the community to create conceptual designs for the Sebastian Boulevard corridor as well as the Riverfront area. In 2002, the City renewed its commitment to redevelopment by completing a study (Appendix A) to assess the feasibility of adding approximately 106 acres of land generally centered around the Sebastian Boulevard Triangle just west of U.S.-1 ("Triangle Area"), and further resolved to update and rewrite the 1995 Redevelopment Plan to reflect existing conditions and community needs and incorporate this expansion area. The City Council subsequently passed Resolution R-02-57 (Appendix B) in December 2002, making a finding of necessity for redevelopment and directing the amendment of existing CRA boundaries to include the Triangle Area. This Plan presents a unified vision for the redevelopment of Sebastian's CRA. It has been developed with the intent that it be reevaluated and updated on a five (5) year basis to reflect current conditions, and uses a ten (10) year planning horizon for capital projects and Tax Increment Financing (TIF) revenue projections. The urban design recommendations, development of conceptual districts, and specific site recommendations presented herein are intended to be phased throughout the life of the CRA to ensure gradual and progressive redevelopment of the area as funding becomes available. A Brief History of the Sebastian Area The following early historical timeline is adapted from A Guide to Historic Sebastian and Roseland, published by the Sebastian Area Historical Society, Inc: · 1882: Reverend Thomas New opened a post office in the Sebastian area, naming it "Newhaven". · 1884: Silvanus Kitching takes over the post office, renaming it "Sebastian". · Late 1880's: The first road in Sebastian, Louisiana Road, is created on the sand ridge. Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 1 of 49 CRA Master Plan Introduction & History · 1893: The Jacksonville, St. Augustine and Indian River Railroad is completed, spurring shipping and commerce. A railroad station is subsequently built in Sebastian. · 1903: Pelican Island is designated the nation's first National Wildlife Refuge. · 1905: The area's first schoolhouse is constructed on Louisiana Avenue. · 1920: The population of the Sebastian-Roseland area increases to over 200. Sebastian is considered an "established fishing center". · 1924: Sebastian is incorporated as a municipality. By this time, the City had "a municipal power and light plant, a telephone company and an ice plant." · 1926: The land boom ends as the Great Depression begins. The City recently completed a study delineating a National Register of Historic Places District in the downtown area, including portions of the CRA. Approximately 13 contributing historic structures were identified within the part of the District boundary inside the CRA, as well as several contributing structures not within the District boundaries but within or adjacent to the CRA. A. Redevelopment Planning Process This Community Redevelopment Master Plan is intended to serve as a guide for the effective redevelopment and enhancement of the redevelopment area. The following ten step planning process was employed in the preparation of this Plan: 1. Assess existing conditions in the proposed Sebastian CRA Area; 2. Conduct stakeholder interviews and distribute a survey, and subsequently establish a community vision; 3. Use Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council charettes, public input, and' staff input to define guiding principles; 4. Identify problems and opportunities; 5. Outline land use and zoning changes necessary to facilitate appropriate development; 6. Identify public projects to help solve problems and spur redevelopment; 7. Review private development plans for consistency with redevelopment efforts; 8. Identify opportunities for public/private partnerships; 9. Prepare a realistic Redevelopment Plan oriented to effective implementation; and 10. Provide for Redevelopment Plan updating as conditions change. This process proved effective in the preparation of this Community Redevelopment Master Plan, as well as in helping community participants understand the steps involved and how they fit together. Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 2 of 49 CRA Master Plan Introduction & History B. Public Participation Program Community involvement was an essential component in the planning process for this Redevelopment Plan. Stakeholder interviews were held with community leaders and CRA property owners to identify key redevelopment issues in the proposed CRA Area. The Sebastian community provided opinions regarding building height, traffic circulation and parking, zoning issues, density and intensity of development, and redevelopment opportunities. Additionally, CRA and City Council workshops were held on September 10 and November 12, 2003 to present preliminary Plan concepts and solicit comment. The Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) conducted two community visioning charettes with the City of Sebastian in November 2000 and March 2001. The community feedback resulting from these charettes was incorporated into two reports, entitled County Road 512, A Citizen's Master Plan, and Riverfront District, a Waterfront Town, respectively. With the guidance of City leadership and the community, implementable design recommendations from each of these documents have been incorporated into this Redevelopment Master Plan. A community redevelopment area opinion survey was included in the June edition of the Sebastian River Area Chamber of Commerce's newsletter. A cross-section of community citizens and business owners responded to this survey, providing additional community input to help guide the Plan's principles and recommendations. Through this process, City staff and the consulting team were able to develop a Redevelopment Master Plan for the City of Sebastian tailored to the community's vision for this very unique area. Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 3 of 49 CRA Master Plan Existing Conditions I1. EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE REDEVELOPMENT AREA A. Regional Relationships Figure 2 shows the geographic relationship of the Sebastian Redevelopment Area to the rest of Sebastian and Indian River County. Sebastian's most significant natural resource is the Indian River, with which the City shares the majority of its eastern boundary. The City of Vero Beach lies near the southern boundary of Indian River County, and the Town of Fellsmere is located generally west of Sebastian along C.R. 512. Sebastian also lies between the unincorporated communities of Roseland to the north and Wabasso to the south, and has nearby access to Interstate 95, Florida's Turnpike, and U.S. Highway 1, the latter of which bisects the redevelopment area. B. Sebastian Community Redevelopment Area The boundaries of the Sebastian Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) are delineated in Figure 3. A legal description of the CRA is located in Appendix C. The CRA, including the Triangle Area, is generally bound by the Indian River to the east, City limits to the north and south, and the Florida East Coast Railroad right-of-way to the west. The Sebastian Boulevard Triangle Area is centered on the east and westbound split of Sebastian Boulevard. For the purposes of this Plan, that part of the Indian River included in the City and the CRA are excluded from all calculations and analyses. This area, zoned "Conservation", makes up approximately 437 acres. Lessing out the "Conservation" zoned area overlaying the Indian River, the gross area of the Sebastian CRA Area is 401 acres (including the Sebastian Boulevard Triangle Area), comprising 4.6% of the City of Sebastian's total land area. Excluding road rights-of-way, the acreage decreases to 299 acres ("net area"). Approximately 66% (196 acres) of the net area is developed and supports a variety of uses including residential, commercial retail, heavy commercial/light industrial (typically automobile repair facilities, self-storage facilities, etc.), parks and recreation, public/institutional, and marine-related uses. Approximately 34% (103 acres) of the net area is undeveloped, excluding existing parklands. Vacant land is depicted on Figure 4. C. Land Use and Zoning Figures 5 and 6 show the land use and zoning patterns, respectively, in the Redevelopment Area. The City's Future Land Use and Zoning are nearly identical Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 4 of 49 Figure 2. Sebastian CRA Regional Location Map Legend CRA Boundary Scale: 1" = 800' 0 400 800 City of Sebastian CRA il~ ~~~ SEBA~S~TIAN ... ..,..,.,.,, ,,.~,, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Figure 3 ©2003 Legend Vacant Residential Vacant Commercial Vacant Industrial CRA Boundary Scale: t" = 800' 0 400 800 SEBASTIAN crl~ LIMrTS KUMOUAT AVENUE VaCant Land o City of Sebastian CRA .~,~...o.,o., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Figure 4 ©2003 HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND CRA Master Plan Existing Conditions overlays in the CRA, with the exception of approximately 15 parcels within the 1995 CRA boundaries. The land use in the CRA is predominantly "Commercial Riverfront" (109.7 acres), which accounts for 36.7% of the land in the CRA (lessing out road right- of-ways) and provides for a broad mix of uses including residential, recreational, marine- related uses, restaurants, and other commercial uses. An additional 20.2% (60.3 acres) of the land in the CRA is zoned for "Commercial Waterfront Residential" use, which is similar to the "Commercial Riverfront" designation, providing a variety of opportunities for recreational, residential and commercial uses. A mix of residential, commercial, and industrial land uses shares the balance of the remaining 299 net acres within the CRA. Zoning designations within the CRA closely resemble land use patterns, with the three most predominant designations being "Commercial Riverfront" at 107.8 acres (36%), 60.4 acres (20.2%) zoned "Commercial Waterfront Residential", and 55 acres (18.4%) zoned for Industrial use. The tables below provide a breakdown of land use and zoning in the CRA. Sebastian CRA Land Use within CRA Boundaries, 2003 Zoning/ Land Use Net Acres* % of total Commercial Riverfront 109.7 36.7% Commercial Waterfront Residential 60.3 20.2% Industrial 55.3 18.5% Public Service 42.7 14.3% Commercial General 14.6 4.9% Medium Density Multiple Family Residential 12.7 4.2% Commercial-512 3.5 1.2% Source: City of Sebastian, Iler Planning Group, 2003. * Acreages are approximate. Inaccuracies are the result of rounding. Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 5 of 49 CRA Master Plan Existing Conditions Sebastian CRA Zoning within CRA Boundaries, 2003 Zoning/ Land Use Net Acres* % of total Commercial Riverfront 107.8 36.0% Commercial Waterfront Residential 60.4 20.2% Industrial 55.0 18.4% Public Service 46.2 15,4% Commercial General 14.6 4.9% Medium Density Multiple Family Residential 11.3 3.8% Commercial-512 3.5 1.2% TOTAL, 299 ~10:0~, Source: City of Sebastian, Iler Planning Group, 2003. * Acreages are approximate. Inaccuracies are the result of rounding. Sebastian, Florida Page 6 of 49 12-3-03 E2 Legend Commercial Waterfront Residential Medium Density Multifamily Public Service Commercial River Front Commercial 512 Commercial Industrial CRA Boundary Scale: 1" = 800' 0 400 800 SE~kSTIAN C/l'Y LIMITS Future Land Use o City of Sebastian CRA ~,~...a~.o., Kimley-Horn an~ssociates, Inc. Figure 5 HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND Leg Commercial Waterfront Residential Medium Density Multifamily [-~ Public Service Commercial River Front Commercial 512 Commercial General Industrial Conservation CRA Boundary Scale: 1" = 800' 0 400 800 SEBAStiAN CFF~ UMFFS Zoning Map o City of Sebastian CRA ,~.,.,.~...~.=.o., Kimley-Horn and Associates, inc. Figure 6 ©2003 HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND CRA Master Plan Existing ConditiOns D. Performance Overlay Districts The City of Sebastian currently has two adopted Performance Overlay Districts in place in the City's Land Development Code: the Riverfront Overlay District, and the CR512 Overlay District. The purpose of these performance overlay zones, which encompass the entire CRA, is to provide for special protective measures in these areas by "impos(ing) additional or different development standards than those that would otherwise apply." The following are brief descriptions of each Performance Overlay District, as well as their respective site design requirements. Section III of this Plan presents recommendations for additional regulations within these districts. Riverfront Overlay District Regulations The Riverfront Overlay District was created to "encourage development and redevelopment within the Riverfront District that includes promotion of traditional building types with arcades, balconies, and porches." Moreover, the District is intended to encourage architectural design consistent with the "Old Florida Fishing Village" theme of Sebastian. This District covers all of the CRA east of the Florida East Coast Railroad. Design criteria within the District are summarized as follows: · Buildings with facades fronting on more than one street should have consistent detailing on all building elevations on street frontages; · Porches are encouraged; · Wood picket fences, wrought iron fences, or landscape buffers are encouraged along property lines; · Buildings with larger facades are required to provide an open vista through which to view adjacent water bodies; · Flat, blank, unarticulated, or"massive" building facades are prohibited; · Lighting may not follow the form of a building, and neon lighting, fiber optics, and similar systems are prohibited; · Accessory structures should be consistent in design to the site's primary building; · Whites, earth tones, and subdued gray building colors are encouraged, while fluorescent and bright colors are prohibited. In addition to the above, the District regulations contain guidelines for roof slopes, landscaping, exterior wall finishes, signage, and other relevant site design considerations. Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 7 of 49 CRA Master Plan Existing Conditions CR512 Overlay District Regulations The CR512 Overlay District includes all properties abutting Sebastian Boulevard within the Sebastian Boulevard Triangle Area. This District does not include properties within the CRA west of the FEC Railroad right-of-way that do not have lot frontage on Sebastian Boulevard. The purpose of the CR512 Overlay District is to provide an "attractive, will maintained, orderly and uncluttered appearance" to the corridor through the installation and maintenance of landscaping, appropriate building architecture, and through encouragement of multi-modal transportation accommodating mass transit, and pedestrians in addition to the automobile. A summary of site design criteria within this District is as follows: · Corporate signature architecture is prohibited, including flat roofed convenience stores, gas stations, and canopies for gas stations, car washes, and drive- through facilities; · "Kitsch" architecture (buildings not resembling a typical structure) is prohibited; · Materials, finishes, signage, and colors of shopping centers and structures developed on shopping center out-parcels shall be compatible with each other; · Buildings with facades fronting on more than one street shall have similar design considerations and consistent detailing on all street frontages; · Flat, blank, unarticulated, or "massive" facades fronting on a roadway are prohibited; · Advertising is prohibited on any exposed amenity or facility (e.g. benches, trash containers); · "Visually offensive elements" (e.g. walk-in coolers, electrical equipment, etc.) as well as "nuisance elements" must be screened form view on all sides; · Base building colors must related to wall and parapet wall areas and shall be limited to white and light neutral colors in the warm range. For complete Land Development Code language for each Performance Overlay District, please see Appendix D. E. Public Facilities and Environmental Features Boat access in the CRA Area occurs via the Indian River, which runs east of and contiguous to the CRA Area. In addition, passive recreation opportunities are provided at Riverview Park in the southern portion of the CRA, and through riverfront pedestrian trails and observation areas. A park housing the Chamber of Commerce and the Sebastian Historical Museum is located on the south side of Main Street between Indian River Drive and U.S.-1. Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 8 of 49 CRA Master Plan Existing Conditions Municipal facilities within the CRA Area include the City's Public Works compound, located between the Sebastian Boulevard east and westbound split. The City also maintains boat and vehicle parking facilities throughout the CRA, and is in the process of building a boat-docking pier east of Riverview Park. Critical environmental resources within the CRA Area include the rich habitat provided by the Indian River. In addition, a small lake between the Sebastian Boulevard east and westbound split provides potential recreational opportunities in the westernmost section of the CRA. F. Redevelopment Needs A number of significant factors indicating a need for redevelopment were identified in the 1995 Sebastian Community Redevelopment Plan as well as the 2002 City of Sebastian CRA Expansion Finding of Necessity. A summary of these blighting factors is presented as follows: 1. Evidence of deterioration and a decrease in the CRA Area's relative share of the tax base; 2. Presence of dilapidated and/or deteriorated structures; 3. Evidence of insufficient or deteriorated infrastructure (as of 1995), including sidewalks, paved roadways, drainage, water facilities, and sewer facilities; 4. Parking deficiencies; 5. Faulty lot layout, due mostly to small lot sizes not meeting current zoning code requirements; 6. A diversity of land ownership, which necessitates substantial parcel assembly for ne,X, development to take place; and 7. Land use conflicts, where incompatible existing uses conflict with commercial and industrial-zoned areas. The City has made great strides towards improving conditions within the CRA since the completion of the original plan in 1995, particularly with regard to infrastructure deficiencies. The purpose of this Redevelopment Plan is to provide the vision, strategies, and implementation necessary to provide for continued appropriate and effective redevelopment of the Sebastian CRA. Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 9 of 49 CRA Master Plan Existing Conditions G. Economic and Market Conditions Key Market Findings The key findings of a recent economic analysis of the Sebastian Market Area performed by the consultant is as follows. For the purpose of this analysis, the Sebastian Market Area was defined to include the City of Sebastian and the unincorporated 'areas surrounding it within Zip Code 32958. It also includes other nearby unincorporated areas such as Vero Lakes Estates, as well as the portion of the barrier island lying north of Wabasso Road. While in-flow into the market can be expected from areas outside that just defined, redevelopment will be primarily defined by the market forces at work within the defined Sebastian Market Area. Existing Economic Conditions Review of the tax rolls for Downtown Sebastian reveals that the between Fiscal Years 2001 and 2004 the taxable value of property contained therein increased from $45.83 million to $66.17 million. While a portion of the increase was due to the record levels of appreciation experienced by real property generally in recent years, it also indicates that the area is positively perceived by the market and that some amounts of new development have been occurring even in the absence of a formal redevelopment plan. The Sebastian Market area is characterized by strong growth in terms of population and income. Between now and 2010, population within the area is expected to increase by approximately 4 percent a year with the result that the area should have about 45,000 residents by the latter date compared to the slightly more than 32,600 it had at the time of the 2000 Census. Median household income is expected to increase from approximately $52,500 in 2000 to in excess of $75,000 in 2010. It should be noted that income varies greatly throughout the Market Area with the households on the north end of the barrier island as a group being considerably more affluent than those on the mainland. From a retail perspective, this makes it essential that island households be made to a feel a part of the Sebastian community. During the 1990's, private sector employment in Indian River County increased by approximately 1,000 workers on an average annual basis. Specific data for the Sebastian Market Area is not available. Private sector employment within the County --- also apparently within the Market Area -~- is dominated by the Retail Trade, Health Care Services and Leisure and Hospitality sectors. Manufacturing and Wholesale Trade, which are the prototypical users of industrial space, are significantly smaller employment sectors and not growing at significant rates. As a result the small amounts of industrial space added since 1998 have primarily been occupied by service establishments such a repair shops. There has also Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 10 of 49 CRA Master Plan Existing Conditions been only minor amounts of office development because with the exception of Health Care Services, the sectors of the economy that typically use such space like Finance, Insurance and Real Estate and Professional Services have also not being growing quickly. Future Economic Trends There will be an estimated demand for between 600 and 700 new residential units in the Market Area annually though 2010. Historically, residential demand for new residential units within Sebastian has been overwhelmingly oriented toward single-family homes, which would be inappropriate in the Downtown area. The area is essentially zoned to accommodate Iow-density multi-family units such as townhouses. It is likely that approximately 50 such higher value --- $200,000 and above .... units could be absorbed annually along the riverfront if the land were available. It is recommended that such development be particularly encouraged to occur along the portion of the riverfront south of Main Street where it would benefit from proximity to Riverfront Park while, in turn, serving to energize the park. The preceding estimate of absorption is based on a number of factors including: The successful development of multi-family units on the barrier island's riverfront; and A segmentation analysis of the market represents a significant portion of prospective demand will be comprised of households headed by persons over the age of 55 with incomes in excess of $75,000. Higher value residential development of the townhouse type should be encouraged in the portion of the area targeted for redevelopment that is located within the Sebastian Boulevard Triangle Area. Residential units developed on this property could also potentially benefit from excellent water views. This area is in relatively close proximity to the FEC right-of-way; however, development of the type proposed has been successfully undertaken in locations equally close the FEC line in the Cities of Boynton Beach and Delray Beach in Palm Beach County. In fact, the opportunity to buffer the proposed development from the impacts of rail traffic is greater in this instance than in those other locations. It is recognized that property within the Sebastian Boulevard Triangle Area is currently zoned for industrial uses but sufficient land is likely available for all foreseeable industrial development within the redevelopment target area exists south of Sebastian Boulevard. Based on data relating to sales of industrial land in the area, designation of land within the Triangle Area to residential, inclusive of the parcel that the City will soon be disposing of, would produce higher land values than its current designation. Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 11 of 49 CRA Master Plan Existing Conditions As a result of the population and income growth already discussed, it is estimated that the Sebastian Market Area could support the development of approximately 100,000 square feet of new retail space annually through 2010. It is recommended that up to 150,000 square feet of retail space be encouraged to occur in the vicinity of Riverfront Park at eventual build out and be designed for specialty shops, entertainment uses, and restaurants. Such development should serve as a catalyst for the higher value townhouse development in the area south of Main Street previously discussed. It could also serve to attract residents of the barrier island to Downtown Sebastian. Office development will not likely play a significant role in redevelopment, and current office uses in the City (e.g. medical offices) meet primarily local needs. The demand for hospitality uses in the City will be modest, due to current demand and the potential for new hotel development, which is limited by the City's three-story height limit for all new development. More detailed information regarding the economic potential of the CRA is provided in Appendix E. Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 12 of 49 CRA Master Plan Proposed Redevelopment Plan III.PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN A. Primary Public Involvement Findings The Community Redevelopment Planning process utilized an extensive program of public involvement to ascertain the constraints, opportunities, and future vision for the area from the people that live, work, and play there. Stakeholder interviews were conducted along with two CRA/Council workshops. In addition, the findings of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) Riverfront and Sebastian Boulevard Charettes have been integrated into the recommendations contained within this Plan. These charettes were well attended, and provided ample opportunity for community involvement in shaping the conceptual design of the riverfront and Sebastian Boulevard areas. Consensus comments resulting from public involvement are summarized below. Downtown Character Stakeholders and community leaders agree that the "Old Florida Fishing Village" design theme needs to be maintained in Sebastian, while still providing opportunities for appropriate residential and commercial growth. There is consensus that development should give deference to the historic character of the City, and redevelopment efforts should ensure that Sebastian retains a "small town feel". This can be accomplished through the use of effective urban design, integrating appropriate architectural styles and uses to create a vibrant and successful downtown. Building Height and Density Stakeholders and City leaders agree that maintaining a three (3) story building height limit throughout the CRA is essential to preserving the "Old Florida Fishing Village" ambiance of Sebastian. In addition, there is broad support for maintaining a two (2) story height limit on the east side of Indian River Drive. The City's Land Development Code currently (as of 2003) allows a maximum residential development density of eight (8) dwelling units per acre. The recommendations presented in this Plan use this density as a guideline for new residential development within the CRA. Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 13 of 49 CRA Master Plan Proposed Redevelopment Plan Zoning and Land Use The community is generally pleased with the existing mix of land uses along the riverfront. Community opinions regarding land use and zoning included the following: · Encouragement of mixed-use development throughout the CRA; · Maintaining heavy commercial/light industrial land uses in appropriate areas; · Encouragement of additional complementary retail, restaurant, and entertainment-type uses along the riverfront; and · Allowance of mixed-use residential development in appropriate parts of the Sebastian Boulevard Triangle Area. · Traffic and Circulation Traffic and circulation concerns in the community generally include the following: · Creating connections between Indian River Drive and U.S.-l; · Traffic calming on U.S.-l; · Streetscape beautification. In particular, pedestrian links between U.S.-1 and Indian River drive should be strengthened so the districts can benefit from each other. Additionally, slowing down traffic on U.S.-1 is a priority, as well as providing additional streetscape enhancements to both U.S.-1 and Indian River Drive. Parks and Recreation Stakeholders support the creation of additional parkland within the CRA, including the enhancement of existing facilities. Creating connectivity between greenspaces through a pedestrian pathway system, greenway connectors, and bicycle paths may provide future recreation enhancement opportunities. Parking There is community support for creating additional parking in the downtown area, particularly in along the riverfront in the vicinity of Main Street to Riverview Park. This plan provides recommendations to provide additional parking, which include reconfiguring existing parking, identifying opportunities for additional parking, and modifying some east-west streets connecting U.S.-1 and Indian River Drive to provide supplementary on-street parking. Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 14 of 49 CRA Master Plan Proposed Redevelopment Plan B. Guiding Principles Using the public involvement findings and background data and analysis as a basis, the following principles were developed to guide plan preparation and implementation. I_and Use · Encourage residential and mixed-use development in the Sebastian Boulevard Triangle Area. · Encourage retail uses adjacent to Riverview Park. · Create an "Institutional" land use designation to include civic, non-profit, and related uses. l_and Development Regulations · "Double Front" buildings on Riverview Drive. · Provide for expedited approval for development furthering the redevelopment goals of the City. · Recommend amendments to the City's existing Performance Overlay Districts as appropriate to encourage appropriate redevelopment. · Consider implementing regulations that will encourage primary and out-parcel structures built to property lines along U.S.-1. Architectural Style · Enhance the character of Downtown Sebastian with architecture that addresses the community's "Fishing Village" scale and feel. · Create conceptual land use districts with distinct recommendations for character, architectural style, and community identity. · Create CRA entry features at west end of Sebastian Boulevard Triangle Area and on U.S.-1. Vehicular Traffic and Circulation · Make U.S.-1 a more pedestrian and bicycle friendly streetscape environment. Provide visual linkages between the riverfront and U.S.-1. · Improve bicycle and pedestrian linkages from west Sebastian to the Riverfront. Parking · Address public and private parking needs in the Riverfront area. · Increase public parking in Downtown. · Establish additional on-street parking adjacent to recreation areas. Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 15 of 49 CRA Master Plan Proposed Redevelopment Plan · Ensure that private redevelopment projects provide an appropriate number of public parking spaces. Riverfront · Maximize access potential of the Indian River with the addition of additional marine-related uses and residential development. · Implement water-based uses, such as a water"taxi". Parks and Open Space · Enhance existing recreation land in the CRA through appropriate adjacent urban design. · Provide for connectivity of recreation land throughout the CRA. · Redesign Riverview Park. · Enhance the design of Sebastian City Park on the south side of Main Street between US-1 and Riverside Drive. Neighborhoods · Preserve and enhance the character of existing CRA neighborhoods. · Ensure proper landscaping, lighting, sidewalks and signage in neighborhoods. · Encourage compatible infill development. Infrastructure · Address infrastructure needs relative to water and wastewater treatment. · Provide for enhanced stormwater management requirements in the CRA. Tax Base Generate the greatest possible growth in the area tax base consistent with the redevelopment vision established in the plan. This will be maximized through effective implementation of the land use policies, incentive programs and capital projects. C. Conceptual Planning Districts To simplify urban design and land use recommendations, the CRA has been divided into five (5) conceptual planning districts. Figure 7 depicts the division of these districts throughout the CRA, and Figures 7-a through 7-e show land use and zoning within each conceptual district. The following table shows a breakdown of zoning and land use acreages within each conceptual planning district. Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 16 of 49 CRA Master Plan Proposed Redevelopment Plan Sebastian Conceptual Planning Districts Land Use/Zoning Calculations Area (sq. ft.) Sebastian Blvd. Mixed-Use District Commercial General Industrial Public Service Acres Riverfront District Public Service Commercial Waterfront 635,456 15 617,760 14 361,562 8 Park District Commercial Riverfront Commercial Waterfront Residential Medium Density Multifamily Residential Public Service 43,539 1 2,229,228 53 US-1 Commercial District Commercial Riverfront Commercial Waterfront Residential Public Service 105,577 2 142,522 3 508,227 12 473,036 11 Sebastian Blvd. South District Industrial Commercial 512 3,589,268 86 191,163 4 1,096,646 25 1,587,767 36 152,020 3 Source: Iler Planning Group, 2003. These Districts are further referenced with specific recommendations in the urban design and land use and zoning recommendations portions of this Plan. Sebastian, Florida Page 17 of 49 12-3-03 CRA Master Plan Proposed Redevelopment Plan D. Overall Concept Plan In using the Guiding Principles as a planning framework, a Redevelopment Plan for the Sebastian CRA has been formulated to enhance the character of downtown Sebastian and to embrace opportunities that exist in the CRA. This Plan is introduced in the Executive Summary, and is shown in Figure 1. Opportunities include: · Improvement of Riverview Park and a "local activity center" surrounding the park, to include complementary retail uses, connectivity to the riverfront, and streetscape improvements. · Improvement of the Sebastian Boulevard Triangle Area to provide for mixed- use development, connectivity to adjacent residential communities, and streetscape improvements; · Enhancement of the U.S.-1 streetscape to provide for greater pedestrian and bicycle usability, as well as the installation of mature landscaping and trees; · Creation of a Main Street activity center, incorporating improvements to the City park and on-site buildings; · Potential CRA/municipal boundary expansion to include the underutilized parcel just south of the City; and · Installation of gateway treatments at entrances to the City/CRA along Sebastian Boulevard and US-1. Additional opportunities for redevelopment are identified and further discussed throughout this Plan. E. Transportation and Pedestrian Improvements Figure 8 depicts existing major transportation facilities within the CRA. Recommended transportation and pedestrian improvements include: · Creation of new street(s) in Riverview Park, per Figures 12 and 13. · New sidewalk construction in all districts as necessary to continuous sidewalk network throughout the CRA; · Streetscape improvements to U.S.-l, Sebastian Boulevard westbound, and Indian River Drive; and · Creation of new streets in the Sebastian Boulevard Mixed-Use District. provide a east and Cost estimates are provided for these projects in Section IV(B). Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 18 of 49 Legend Signalized Intersections 4 Lane Principal Arterial I Minor Arterial Existing Bus Route CRA Boundary SEBAS~RAN CITY HALL STRF. ET Scale: 1" = 800' 0 400 800 Illl[lllllll Ill II I,,,,, Major Thoroughfares o City of Sebastian CRA ~.,o,~o~, Kimley-H0rn and Associates, Inc. Figure 8 ©2003 HOME OF PEUCAN ISLAND CRA Master Plan Proposed Redevelopment Plan F. Greenways, Parks, and Trails Some of the most desirable amenities within a community are its recreation facilities. The CRA's existing parks, sidewalks, and bikeways are depicted on Figure 9. Recommended greenway, parks and trails features include: Implementation of the Riverview Park conceptual plan; and Enhancing connectivity between recreation areas throughout the CRA with improved pedestrian and bikeway connections. G. Urban Design Recommendations Urban design guidelines and projects are recommended for development and codification based on the design recommendations contained herein. Specific components of several of the conceptual improvement projects introduced herein are further discussed in additional sections (e.g. infrastructure) in this Plan. The following conceptual projects and design issues, which are organized by conceptual planning district, should be addressed. Park District (Figure 7-a) The Park District is the "heart" of the CRA, and should define the character of the City. Proposed physical design improvements within this district are shown on Figures 12 through 14. These improvements include the following short-term (5-year) improvements (Figure 12): · Roadway improvements and streetscape for all roads within the immediate vicinity of Riverview Park, including closing the western half of Harrison Street between US-1 and Riverside Drive; · Reconfiguration of the existing boat ramp parking area at the northwest corner of Sebastian Boulevard and Riverside Drive; · Upgrades and renovations to Riverview Park; · Expanding the park to include picnic pavilions, a participatory fountain, and a new parking lot; · Creating a pedestrian connection to Sebastian Square; · Creating a mid-block pedestrian/vehicular "spine" to improve circulation and create development "blocks"; · Reconfiguration of Harrison Street, including vacating the eastern half of the road right-of-way; and · Installation of new recreational piers, a proposed band shell, and restroom facilities. Specific urban design enhancements within this district will address: Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 19 of 49 Parks Legend -- --. Sidewalks Bike Lanes CRA Boundary Scale: 1" = 800' 0 400 800 SEBASTLM~ CITY LIMITS illllllllllllll Parks, Sidewalks & Bikeways o City of Sebastian CRA .~,~..~o.o., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Figure 9 ©2003 HOME OF PELICAN ISI.AND CRA Master Plan Proposed Redevelopment Plan · Parallel on-street parking; · Curb and gutter installation; · Pedestrian and roadway lighting; · Sidewalks; · Street trees; · Street furniture; · Raised Pedestrian Intersections; · Traffic circles with public art or architectural features; and · Underground utilities. Long-term (10 year) improvements are shown in Figure 13, and emphasize infill commercial development adjacent to the park, and other large-scale redevelopment initiatives in the district. Please note that while retail uses are encouraged adjacent to the park, no commercial or other privately owned land use is recommended for the park itself. Additionally, the development of this district (and generally, the CRA) should be considered a public-private partnership. That is, infrastructure and physical improvements to publicly owned land will be completed by the City, and complementary retail and related uses will be developed by the private sector in cooperation with the City to ensure redevelopment goals are met. Figure 14 shows a typical roadway cross-section within the Riverview Park District. This cross-section features wide pedestrian arcades to provide shade for shoppers, a 16 feet wide landscaped pedestrian zone adjacent to the roadway, and on-street parallel parking. Conceptual improvements to Sebastian City Park, located on the south side of Main Street between US-1 and Riverside Drive, should also be considered within this district. Creation of a future Main Street activity center may increase the usability of the park. The City should also capitalize on the historical museum as a cultural amenity, and investigate the feasibility of developing an expanded facility in the future. Sebastian Boulevard Mixed-Use District (Figure 7-b) The Sebastian Boulevard Triangle Area Concept Plan is shown in Figure 15, and is predicated on significant land use and zoning changes, which are presented in Subsection I of this Section. Urban design and other conceptual improvements presented in this plan are summarized as follows: · Creation of mixed-use commercial areas and single-family attached (townhouse) uses throughout the district; · Creation of City gateway features at the Sebastian Boulevard east and westbound split and at Sebastian Boulevard westbound and U.S.-l, to provide: Architectural features and/or flags; Signature landscaping; Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 20 of 49 CRA Master Plan Proposed Redevelopment Plan Specialty feature lighting; and A fountain feature at the conceptual new lake. · Modification of the existing lake in order to create a park; · Creation of pedestrian and visual connections between the commercial, mixed, and residential multi-family uses; · Realignment of property boundaries (e.g. parcel assembly) to create more usable parcel configurations; · Streetscape Sebastian Boulevard: o Double rows of large shade trees; o 10 feet wide pedestrian/bikeway; o Placing structures between the roadway and parking areas; o Installation of pedestrian and roadway streetlights; o Specialty paving at key intersections; o A 25 feet wide proposed parkway zone; and o Pedestrian and vehicular connections to adjacent residential use. · Creation of a connection to South Wimbrow Drive: o Traffic roundabout and focal point; and o Vehicular and pedestrian connection to adjacent residential land use. Figures 16 and 17 provide conceptual roadway cross-sections for Sebastian Boulevard east and westbound, respectively. U.S.-1 Commercial District (Figure 7-c) The U.S.-1 Commercial District is characterized by larger-scale auto-oriented development, such as auto parts stores, big box development, drive-through restaurants, and other linear strip development common to arterial highways. Figures 12 and 13 primarily show improvements to Riverview Park, but also call for the following improvements along U.S.-1. These improvements are shown as a typical roadway cross-section in Figure 18. · Streetscape enhancement: Large specimen Medjool Date Palms in median statement; Decorative lighting in median where possible; Washington Palms along roadside; Decorative pedestrian-scale lighting along roadside; Bury existing utility lines; and Existing trees to remain. for scale and visual Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 21 of 49 CRA Master Plan Proposed Redevelopment Plan · Gateway features at the northern and southern entrance to the City along U.S.-l; · Development of a stormwater park on the west side of U.S.-1 at the southern boundary of the CRA to accommodate installation of drainage improvements in the Downtown and to serve as a gateway statement; and · Infill commercial development (Figure 13) to complement improvements to Riverview Park and provide a linkage to the riverfront. The Florida Department of Transportation recently completed streetscape improvements to U.S.-1. However, the CRA may provide adequate funding to install additional features, such as mature landscaping (larger trees), street furniture, delineated pedestrian crosswalks, a way finding system with banners and/or pedestrian kiosks, and other functional improvements. Riverfront District (Figure 7-d) The Riverfront District extends along the river from Main Street to the northern boundary of the CRA. Urban design considerations should be complementary to projects completed in the Park District, and may include the following: · Installation of picnic tables, covered seating areas, wildlife observation areas, and "pocket parks" along the east side of Indian River Drive; · Mature vegetation and tree plantings to provide continuous shade along pedestrian paths; · Installation of a grade-separated bicycle and pedestrian path with a vegetative buffer between the path and the roadway; · Pedestrian kiosks with information pertaining to upcoming events, local businesses, and recreation opportunities; and · Pedestrian-scale lighting along the sidewalk to support evening use of recreation facilities. Sebastian Boulevard South District (Figure 7-e) This district will continue to support light industrial land use; through market and development trends, these uses have primarily resulted in heavy commercial uses (e.g. automotive repair, storage, etc.). This district will be buffered from the Sebastian Boulevard Mixed-Use District with adequate setbacks and vegetative landscaping. No other significant urban design changes are recommended. Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 22 of 49 CRA Master Plan Proposed Redevelopment Plan H. Infrastructure Improvements The Sebastian CRA is fortunate in that the majority of the infrastructure in the area is suitable to support existing development as well as limited redevelopment in the CRA, which frees up Tax Increment Financing (TIF) funds to be used on other redevelopment projects and programs. The 1995 Sebastian Community Redevelopment Plan included a narrative providing a brief analysis of infrastructure issues in the CRA. A brief summary of this information as well as an updated analysis is as follows. Sidewalks The original Riverfront Study, completed in the early 1990s, identified pedestrian access as a major development concern in enhancing the riverfront. The study recommended the creation of a "linear park" along the eastern side of Indian River Drive, extending the length of the CRA. The City has accomplished this goal. A wide, linear pedestrian path has been constructed along the length of the riverfront in Downtown Sebastian, and has been enhanced by the installation of landscaping, trees, seating areas and the improvement of points of interest along the path, such as the City park on Main Street and Riverview Park in the southern end of the CRA. As the CRA continues to redevelop, emphasis should be placed on providing a connected grid of pedestrian walks along existing City rights-of-way throughout the Downtown, as well as the Sebastian Boulevard Triangle Area. The installation of additional landscaped sidewalks could provide a means of pedestrian connectivity between U.S.-1 and the riverfront, and connect the CRA's parks and green spaces. Water, Sewer, and Drainage Facilities The City has made substantial infrastructure improvements within the CRA since the adoption of the original Community Redevelopment Plan. Additional visual and functional improvements within the CRA may include the following: · Installation of stormwater facilities, including treatment ponds, in the areas of the CRA currently not being served; · Infrastructure improvements in the Sebastian Boulevard Triangle Area to support redevelopment efforts as presented herein; · Upgrading water lines, as necessary, to provide for additional demand in commercial and residential fire-flow requirements. Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 23 of 49 CRA Master Plan Proposed Redevelopment Plan Parking Public parking is perhaps the most visible deficiency in the Downtown, particularly during weekends and during events, when demand for parking facilities close to the riverfront typically exceeds current capacity. The City has been addressing this issue through the development of public parking facilities throughout the CRA; there are now approximately 250 public parking spaces in the Downtown area east of U.S.-l, not counting parallel on-street parking, private lots, or unpaved boat trailer lots. Approximately 168 parking spaces are provided in the northern CRA at a paved public parking lots located at the southwest corner of Jackson Street and Riverside Drive (Indian River Drive). Thirteen spaces are provided on Main Street adjacent to Sebastian City Park, 25 spaces are provided in a linear public lot along Riverview Drive between Fellsmere Boulevard and Coolidge Street, and 44 angled spaces are available adjacent to Riverview Park. An inventory of these parking locations is provided in Figure 10, Existing Parking. Recommendations for providing additional parking in the Downtown are as follows: · Require new development east of U.S.-1 to set aside part of their total parking as public; · Address public parking needs in the Land Development Code by adopting public parking requirements in the City's Performance Overlay Districts; · Consider entering discussions to annex the underutilized land parcel and structure ("Bealls") south of and contiguous to the City and CRA boundary between U.S.-1 and Riverside Drive. A cooperative agreement may be reached with the owner of this development to provide occasional public parking; · Provide a shuttle service during high demand periods (e.g. weekends and during events) so that satellite parking lots may be utilized. · Consider developing additional parking in the Riverview Park Expansion Area, as indicated on Figure 12. Clearly, it is not in the best interest of the City to provide a large number of public parking lots along prime Riverfront property within the CRA. The recommendations above provide alternatives to meet the demand for public parking, while maintaining the integrity and development potential of the CRA and Riverfront. Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 24 of 49 CRA Master Plan Proposed Redevelopment Plan I. Land Use and Zoning Recommendations Land use and zoning recommendations are included herein to address proposed land uses according to the redevelopment concept plan, building height, mixed-use development, urban design guidelines, and building setbacks. These recommendations are shown on Figure 11. Proposed Land Uses/Zoning by Conceptual Planning District Existing site development regulations and permitted uses for each zoning/land use district throughout the CRA are presented in Appendix F. Specific land use/zoning recommendations presented below, and are organized by conceptual planning district. Park District. No changes are proposed. Sebastian Boulevard Mixed-Use District. Currently the Sebastian Boulevard Triangle Area is zoned for Public Service, Industrial, and Commercial General. The land uses in the industrial-zoned areas is typically commercial in nature, and includes equipment rental, automotive-based uses, and other similar uses. The land use/zoning throughout this District should be changed to a new zoning/land use designation closely resembling the requirements of the Commercial Waterfront Residential district (e.g. Commercial/Residential Mixed Use), which will provide for appropriate mixed-use development throughout the area such as single-family attached (townhouse) and commercial mixed uses, and will support the existing clubs and lodges within the district. U.S.-1 Commercial District. No land use or zoning amendments are proposed. However, the City should complete further study of how to mitigate the impacts of large commercial development setback considerably from U.S.-1. These developments have large amounts of parking in the front, and can create the image of a "sea of parking" when traveling down the highway. The City should investigate adopting regulations for an overlay area including all commercial parcels adjacent to U.S.-1 requiring a reasonable part of a large development's out parcel space be dedicated to buildings built close to (or on) the properly line, with parking behind the structure. This helps create a more pedestrian-friendly urban edge throughout the district. Riverfront District. No changes are proposed. Sebastian Boulevard South District. No changes are proposed, with exception of changing the land use/zoning of all property fronting Boulevard to Commercial 512. the possible on Sebastian Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 25 of 49 Legend · - ,.. On Street Parking Parking Lots CRA Boundary Spaces ~TREET ~ · - ' Spaces Scale: 1" = 800' 0 400 800 SEBASTI~ CITY UMITS Spaces Spaces (on street) Existing Parking o City of Sebastian CRA ~.,.,,,..o,=o~. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Figure l 0 ©2003 HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND + + +4+ +/' + +~ Legend US 1 Commercial District 512 Mixed Use District 512 South District CRA Boundary Area Wide Recommendations 1. Modify community design guidelines to reinforce "Old Florida Fishing Village" design theme. 2. Continue to require "double frontage" for buildings backing up to Riverside Drive. 3. Retain 2-3 story maximum building height. 4. Retain 8 dwelling units per acre maximum development density. projects to construe lot line. SEBASTIAN Cl'Pr' UMITS mg US-1 ScaLe: 1" [] 800' 0 400 800 Change all land zoning designations 1~ toCommercial ~ - - ~ /Residential Mixeu- !Use Water Feature ~onsider Land Use/Zonin Recommendations l City of Sebastian CRA ,,..,,.,.,.,.,, .o,., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Figure 11 HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND CRA Master Plan Proposed Redevelopment Plan Building Height 8, Density Stakeholders and City leadership are in favor of maintaining the current three-story building height limit (two stories east of Indian River Drive) and eight dwelling unit per- acre maximum zoning density throughout the CRA. The recommendations in this plan are compliant with these regulations. The City may wish to reexamine this issue as part of the three to five-year update of this Plan to ensure compatibility with future needs. Hotel and related development often necessitates taller building heights and greater density and/or intensity, and the current regulations may limit the tourism potential of Downtown Sebastian. Urban Design Guidelines The City's current urban design guidelines have been successful in promoting appropriate development within the CRA. These guidelines should be reevaluated concurrent with redevelopment to ensure their continued effectiveness. Issues that should be addressed immediately include the following: The CR 512 Overlay District regulations only apply to those properties with frontage on Sebastian Boulevard. The zoning overlay should be expanded to include all property within the CRA west of U.S.-1; and The CR 512 Overlay District regulations limit building awnings to a maximum of 30% of the length of any single fa~;ade, which limits the ability to create covered sidewalks. The City should revisit this requirement in those areas suitable for commercial mixed-use zoning in the Sebastian Boulevard Triangle Area. Implementation Schedule Zoning/land use changes and amendments to the City's urban design guidelines should be completed within one year following Plan adoption. Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 26 of 49 2. Organize existing boat ramp parking area · Pave and Stripe Lot · Decorative fence/colunms to add urban edge 3. Upgrade/Renovate Riverview Park 4. Riverview Park Expansion · Veterans Memorial · Proposed Participatory Fountain · Restroom · Picnic Pavilions · New Parking Lot 5. Streetscape Enhancement of U.S. 1 6. City Gateway feature · Storm Water Park 7. Pedestrian Connection to Sebastian Square 8. Potential to create mid-block pedestrian/vehicular "spine" to improve circulation and create development "Blocks" · Note: If any buildings are removed as a result of redevelopment, Chapter 163, F.S. requires the owner to be fully compensated, including relocation costs. Angler's Inn ~ Riverview Park I i Public Boat Ramp 1. Roadway improvements and streetscape for all roads within immediate vicinity of Riverview Park · Parallel on-street parking · Curb & Gutter · Pedestrian/Roadway Lighting · Sidewalks · Street Trees · Street Furniture · Raised Pedestrian Intersections · Traffic circles with public art or architectural feature · 'Underground power lines Indian River Park 9. Portion of Harrison Street vacated · East half of ROW vacated to create a contiguous public open space along riverfxont 10. New recreational piers, proposed band shell, observation deck, restroom Riverview Park District "Short-Range" Plan City of Sebastian CRA ,L~ P~.~.,.o o~o,,P Kimley-.orn a.Jo~o~i~to~, ~.~. Figure 12 HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND Angler'~ Public Boat Ramp Riverview Park Park 1. Infill commercial development ·Encourage consolidation of lots into' blocks · Buildings addressing the street · 10' setback at groUnd floor w/covered arcades · Pedestrian scale architecture · · Outdoor caf6 s/window shopping 2. Encourage redevelopment of Sebastian Square · Activity center/Southern anchor to Riverview Park District · Restaurants, Shops, Entertainment · Festival overflow parking 3. City_Gate ~way ~Feature _ · Stormwater Park · Potential to create opposing "bookend" to City Gateway Feature · Visual connection to traffic roundabout and Riverview Park bom US 1. Note: If any buildings are removed as a result of redevelopment, Chapter 163, F.S. requires the owner to be fully compensated, including relocation costs. Riverview Park District "Future Vision" Plan · City of Sebastian CRA 'L~-'U".,.O OnOU~' Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Figure13 ~'2003 HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND Arcade 16' L?.t 10' qq Pedestrian/ Parallel Landscape (Parking Zone --C.G. 12' 12' Two Way 80' R.O.W. Parallel Pedestrian/IArcade Parking) LandscapeZone C.G: II.~R PLANNING GRQ~/P Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ~2003 Typical Roadway Cross Section Riverview Park District Figure 14 HOME 01: PELICAN ISLAND 1. Creation of City Gateway Features · Architectural Feature/Flags · Signature Landscaping · Specialty Feature Lighting · Fountain Feature at New Lake 2. Modification to Existing Lake to Create Park · Pedestrian and visual connection between commercial mixed and multi-family · Reallocate property boundaries to create better parcel configuration 3. Streetscape Sebastian Boulevard · Double rows of large shade trees · 10' wide pedestrian/bikeway · Parkway zone (25') · Buildings between roadway and parking · Pedestrian and roadway streetlights · Specialty paying at key intersections · Pedestrian and vehicular connections to adjacent residential 4. South Wimbrow Drive Connection · Traffic roundabout and focal point · Vehicular and pedestrian connection to adjacent residential Medium Residential Single Family Attached (Townhomes) Community Institutional Single Family Attached (Townhomes) Single Family Attached (Townhomes) Sebastian Elementary School Commercial Mixed Mixed Mixed Lake Commercial Mixed Industrial , : ,1 Sebastian Boulevard "Trian ..E~ ~NmO C~OUP Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ~2003 City of Sebastian CRA Figure 15 SEBASTIAN HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND Ped./ Bikewa~ 25' Proposed Parkway Zone 10' Shade Trees: 15' 1 $' Swale Swale 15' I 15' Roadway Eastbound 80' R.O.W. Sebastian Boulevard Eastbound Lighting 10' )osed Ped./ Bikeway 25' Proposed Parkway Zone Ikl~R PLAIOIING GROUP Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ~2003 Typical Roadway Cross Section Sebastian Boulevard Triangle District (Eastbound) Figure 16 HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND 15' P~./ I Bikeway I 25' ~L - - Parkway Zone 3ff 2 Lane Westbound 100' R.O.W. Sebastian Boulevard Wes'd:~und 45' Swale Ped./| Bikew'aI 25' Two Way 50' R.O.W. Temple Avenue 15' ~L~ P~m.~ ¢~OU. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ~2003 Typical Roadway Cross Section Sebastian Boulevard Triangle District (Westbound) Figure 17 HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND Introduce Washington Palms Decorative where t roadside) Washington ~Palms along roadside for more scale and impact g multi- trunk trees to · Knuckle , 5' 6-6'" 5' 22' 15' 22' 5' 6'-6" 5' 11 I 11 I ,e walk scape ~l~ne ~ Median ] Lane) scape walk Stripx, C.G. C.G. C.G.J" C.G. / Strip or or / Knuckle 100' R.O.W. / ~ ~ o..ou~, Kirnley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ~2003 Typical Roadway Cross Section U.S. Highway One (Looking North) Figure 18 HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND CRA Master Plan Proposed Redevelopment Plan J. Program and Policy Recommendations Successful CRAs typically put programs in place to attract business, encourage private reinvestment in the CRA, and market the area locally and regionally to support tourism and solicit visitors and residents to "rediscover" the redeveloped Downtown. The following programs are recommended to address the existing needs and goals for the CRA. Business Assistance Programs Business assistance programs are vital to attracting and retaining desirable commercial, retail, and hospitality uses to the CRA. Each of the programs introduced below should be implemented with the qualification that all assistance provided should further redevelopment goals. CRA Commercial FaEade Improvements Program: Existing commercial facades in the CRA would benefit from the initiation of a fa(;ade improvements program to restore or improve existing building facades in a manner consistent with adopted urban design guidelines. This program could be funded through Tax Increment Financing (TIF) and/or a cash match from participating business owners. Local Business Expansion Program: The CRA has an opportunity to partner with local business and professional organizations in providing grant or loan funding for qualified business expansions within the CRA Area. Qualifying criteria for programs similar to this typically include the project's consistency with redevelopment goals, business income, potential for growth, and a commitment to maintain the current business address for a certain time period after improvements are completed. Typical projects may include: · Building fa~;ade enhancements, in partnership with the Commercial Fa(;ade Improvements Program; · Signage enhancements; · Landscaping and greenspace improvements; and · Other site improvements resulting in enhanced property values. Historic Building Rehabilitation Program: Part of the City's National Register of Historic Places District is located within the boundaries of the CRA. This program will provide matching funds, a loan, or a grant to owners of historic structures within the CRA for building rehabilitation and restoration activities. This program will encourage adaptive reuse of historic structures, and may also provide partial funding for new construction adjacent to historic structures that are built in a complementary architectural form and scale. Development Liaison/Expedited Permitting Program: Provides expedited service and processing of development permits to encourage a particular location, expansion, or redevelopment of properties within targeted CRA areas. Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 27 of 49 CRA Master Plan Proposed Redevelopment Plan Facility Location Program: Provides a mechanism for assisting in the recruitment of business to the CRA and provides desirable businesses with mapping and market information, a list of market-ready sites, links to other federal, state and local programs associated with economic development, and a liaison with the area's real estate professionals and chambers of commerce. Commercial Code Compliance Program: Provides assistance to owners of commercial properties within the CRA to address Code compliance issues, including parking/drainage deficiencies, structural improvements, and property maintenance issues. General Program Recommendations Main Street Program: The Main Street program involves addressing redevelopment needs through a four-point approach that includes economic restructuring, promotions, marketing, and design as tools to address redevelopment needs within a designated program area. The City of Sebastian is encouraged to explore the Main Street program as a parallel program towards revitalizing the commercial component of the downtown. Downtown Marketing Program: Sebastian has an opportunity to market itself online, through newspapers and magazines, and at regional travel hubs (e.g. airports) to bring in additional tourism. Advertising 1-95: The CRA is close enough in proximity to 1-95 to benefit from billboard advertising for the DOwntown area. Neighborhood Infill Program: This program will allow for CRA Area incentives for residential infill housing, and provide additional incentive for Iow- and middle-income affordable housing construction within the CRA Area. Any number of incentives can be used by the City to promote residential infill within the CRA Area, including waivers for certain permit and development review fees, or providing for an expedited development review process for residential infill developments. Additionally, the CRA may choose to utilize TIF funds to demolish abandoned and dilapidated structures to create opportunities for infill within the CRA Area. In addition to the CRA programs recommended above, several policy recommendations have been discussed throughout this Plan: These policy recommendations include: · Zoning and Land Use changes, where applicable; and · Enforcement and modifications to existing architectural design guidelines. Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 28 of 49 CRA Master Plan Proposed Redevelopment Plan K. Neighborhood Impact and Affordable Housing Element Community Housing Demographics The portion of the CRA located east of U.S.-1 is located within U.S. Census Tract 508.01, Block Group 1. This Census Block Group extends from Fellsmere Boulevard north to include Roseland, with U.S.-1 forming a western boundary. According to 2000 Census data, there are a total of 402 housing units in this Block Group, 337 (84%) of which are occupied. Nearly 74% (249) of the occupied housing units are owner- occupied, and 26% (88) are renter-occupied. Block Group 1, U.S. Census Tract 508.01 No housing units in the area lack plumping or kitchen facilities, although 28 units report lacking landline telephone service. The median home value was $110,300 in year 2000, median household income was $25,720, and average household size was reported as 1.84 persons per unit. The comparatively Iow median household income is a result of a large population of retired persons in the area; 205 (53%) households reported no income. Affordable and Replacement Housing This Plan is not expected to significantly impact households in the Iow to moderate- income range. No acquisition of housing units is proposed, and potential acquisition needs of conceptual improvements (e.g. commercial/retail uses adjacent to Riverview Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 29 of 49 CRA Master Plan Proposed Redevelopment Plan park) cannot be addressed until a detailed design plan is completed for the project. The CRA and City Council may wish to adopt a formal policy requiring future project designs to avoid any residential property acquisition, or putting into a place a formal policy to address potential acquisition needs. Traffic Circulation No alternations to the arterial traffic circulation pattern within the CRA are recommended within this Plan. Recommended transportation improvements within the CRA -in Riverview Park and in the Sebastian Boulevard Triangle Area - are proposed to create greater community connectivity, and are limited to local collector roadways. Environmental Quality This Plan should have a positive impact on environmental quality in the residential neighborhoods within the CRA through streetscape improvements, the installation of future bicycle and pedestrian improvements, and future infrastructure improvements if deemed necessary. Availability of Community Facilities and Services Improvements have been suggested in this Plan that will enhance the availability of facilities and services within the CRA. Provisions for additional public parking, local traffic circulation improvements, and enhancement of existing community facilities (e.g. parkS) will provide a higher level of service to the residential community. Effect on School Population Development of the Sebastian Boulevard Triangle Area as a mixed-use community will likely create additional demand on schools in the area. The following is a list of schools serving the City of Sebastian, their current enrollment, and total student capacity. Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 30 of 49 CRA Master Plan Proposed Redevelopment Plan School Name Public Schools Serving the City of Sebastian 2003 Address Enrollment Capacity* Pelican Island Elementary Sebastian Elementary Liberty Magnet School Sebastian River Middle School Sebastian High School 1355 Schumann Drive 656 students 862 students 400 CR 512 592 students 878 students 8955 85th Street 506 students 674 students 9400 CR 512 1,250 students 1,601 students 9001 90th Avenue 1,764 students 2,025 students Source: Indian River County School District, 2003 * Includes permanent capacity and portable classroom space. As indicated in the table above, Sebastian's schools have considerable additional student capacity as of 2003. Concurrency requirements for new developments and continued coordination with the school board will ensure adequate student capacity to serve the CRA. Other Matters Affecting the Physical and Social Quality of the Neighborhood This Plan proposes improvements that will have a positive impact on the quality of life for existing residences within the CRA through the provision of improved parkland, landscaping, lighting improvements, and traffic circulation improvements. Over time, these improvements will increase property values in the area, boost tourism, and provide a stronger commercial base, while maintaining a viable sense of place for residents of Sebastian. Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 31 of 49 CRA Master Plan Proposed Redevelopment Plan L. Land and Building Acquisition The proposed CRA Area Plan may necessitate land acquisition and building demolition. It is intended that private market land and building transactions be used to the maximum extent possible in the implementation of this Plan. Eminent domain will only be utilized for the most critical redevelopment projects and when all concerted efforts to acquire key properties and/or buildings through private market transactions have failed. As design plans for proposed CRA Area projects are developed in the future, the CRA will document specific building and/or land acquisition needs and attempt to acquire necessary lands and/or buildings through public/private development partnerships or private market purchases. As discussed above, eminent domain may be used in a manner consistent with applicable State laws and regulations. Chapter 163, Florida Statutes provides for the relocation of any homes and/or businesses that may be impacted by redevelopment. The CRA and City intend to approach future relocation issues proactively, and will work towards mutually beneficial agreements with affected property owners to mitigate the impact of redevelopment projects. Additional consideration to land and building acquisition, including preliminary cost estimates, is provided in Section IV of this Plan Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 32 of 49 CRA Master Plan Proposed Redevelopment Plan Conformance with Sebastian and Indian River County Comprehensive Plans Indian River County Land Use Plan The proposed Plan has been developed in a manner consistent with the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan. The Sebastian Community Redevelopment Master Plan meets the intent of several important goals, objectives, and policies in the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan as follows: FLUE Policy 4.1 Land use districts shall be located in a manner which concentrates urban uses, thereby discouraging urban sprawl. FLUE Policy 4.2. By January 2000, Indian River County shall identify and map target areas for redevelopment and infill development. FLUE Policy 4.3 For the areas targeted for redevelopment and infill development... Indian River County shall...assess the potential for future development, review infrastructure capabilities and needs, and develop special overlay or use districts and regulations, if warranted. FLUE Policy 4.4 Indian River County shall work with property owners, developers, and the public to develop and implement a plan to promote development of the areas targeted for redevelopment and infill development... FLUE Objective 5 Diversity of Development. Indian River County will have a diverse mix of land uses, development patterns, housing densities, and housing types. By 2010, thirty percent of the County's housing units will be in multiple-family or traditional neighborhood design projects. FLUE Objective 8 Protection of Historic Resources. Through 2005, at least 95% of unincorporated Indian River County's historic properties...will continue to be preserved in fair, good, or excellent condition. FLUE Objective 9 Promote Aesthetic Development. Through the implementation of land development regulations, Indian River County will have aesthetically pleasing buildings, signs, landscaping, parking areas, and roads. Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 33 of 49 Legend Park District Riverfront District US 1 Cornmercial District 512 Mixed Use District 512 South District CRA Boundary Scale: 1" = 800' 0 400 800 IIIIl[[llll[l[ __ I~]lll Sebastian CRA Conceptual Districts [ City of Sebastian CRA ~.~,..,~,oo, Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. Figure 7 HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND LEGEND N PARKDISTRICT BOUNDARY Land Use Legend Commercial Riverfont ~ Public Service Commercial Waterfront Residential ~---] Medium Density Multifamily 300 0 300 600 Feet Figure 7-a: Park District Date: 10/08/2003 City of Sebastian CRA HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND LEGEND NSEBASTIAN BOULEVARD MIXED USE DISTRICT BOUNDARY NFEC RAILWAY Land Use Legend IPublic Service Industrial Commercial General 200 0 200 400 Feet , Figure 7-b: Sebastian Boulevard Mixed Use District Date: 10/08/2003 City of Sebastian CRA HOME OF I~ELICAN iSLAND LEGEND NUS 1 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT BOUNDARY 1000 Land Use Legend Public Service Commercial Waterfront Residential Commercial Riverfront 0 1000 2000 Feet Figure 7-c: US 1 Commercial District Date: 10/08/2003 City of Sebastian CRA SEBASTIAN HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND SEBASTIAN CITY LIMIT LEGEND RIVERFRONT DISTRICT BOUNDARY Land Use Legend Public Service Commercial Waterfront Residential 400 0 400 800 Feet MAIN STREET Figure 7-d: Riverfront District Date: 10/08~Z003 City of Sebastian CRA HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND SEBASTIAN CITY UMITS LEGEND SEBASTION BOULEVARD SOUTH DISTRICT BOUNDARY FEC RAILWAY FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY Land Use Legend Commercial 512 Industrial 2O0 0 200 400 600 Feet Figure 7-e: Sebastian Boulevard South District Date: 10/08/2003 City of Sebastian CRA HOME OF P[LIC~N BLAND CRA Master Plan Proposed Redevelopment Plan FLUE Objective 11 Blighted Areas. Indian River County will...(take) action to encourage redevelopment in at least three blighted areas. FLUE Objective 18 Traditional Neighborhood Design (TND) Communities. Ten percent of new residential development (dwelling units) occurring in unincorporated Indian River County will be located in Traditional Neighborhood Design projects. These objectives and policies from the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan support the preparation and implementation of Community Redevelopment Master Plans such as that proposed for the City of Sebastian CRA. The Indian River County Comprehensive Plan also favors the use of innovative planning techniques such as mixed-use and traditional neighborhood development to eliminate incompatible uses, promote economic development, increase affordable housing, and encourage infill and redevelopment. The proposed City of Sebastian CRA Area is in conformance with, and furthers, a number of these objectives and policies adopted in the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan. In addition, no inconsistencies with the County's Land Use Plan were found in this review. Sebastian Comprehensive Plan The Sebastian Community Redevelopment Plan furthers several important goals, objectives, and policies in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Comprehensive Plan as follows: FLUE Policy 1-1.2.4 Prepare a Redevelopment plan for Enhancing the Identity, Design, and Vitality of the City's Riverfront Corridor. The Riverfront corridor shall be the subject of periodic special planning and management studies as determined by the City Council, which shall be coordinated closely with the residents, Chamber of Commerce and other interest groups concerned with promoting improvements along this waterfront corridor... FLUE Objective 1-1.5 Promote Community Appearance, Natural Amenities and Urban Design Principles. The appearance of major transportation corridors serving as gateways to the City, as well as major activity centers such as the Downtown, the Indian River and St. Sebastian River shoreline, public parks and other public grounds and institutions shall be managed and enhanced through application of the site plan review process. FLUE Policy 1-1.5.1 Reinforce and Enhance the City's Community Appearance. Major attributes shall be preserved through application of design review standards and management of Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 34 of 49 CRA Master Plan Proposed Redevelopment Plan signs, landscaping, open space, tree protection, and other urban design amenities... FLUE Objective 1-3.3 Encourage Redevelopment and Renewal. The portion of the City along the Indian River has a unique history, style and look which the City seeks to preserve. By January, 1998, the City of Sebastian shall adopt amended land development regulations for the Riverfront area, including performance standards which ensure that land development activities, resource conservation and infrastructure issues are managed in a manner that will consider the needs of the citizens of Sebastian... FLUE Policy 1-3.3.4 Waterfront Theme. The overall theme of the Riverfront District is an "Old Florida Fishing Village." All City facilities and projects shall complement that theme in term of design... FLUE Policy 1-3.3.6 Preservation of Existing Assets. The protection, restoration, and enhancement of existing assets, including historical structures, is important in implementing the "Old Florida Fishing Village" theme. The City shall adopt...procedures and ordinances to protect, encourage restoration and to provide for enhancement of existing assets in the Riverfront District through the land development code... FLUE Policy 1-3.3.7 Reinforce and Enhance Appearance of City Gateways along U.S.-1 and CR 512. The City, together with the private sector, shall consider introducing landscaping and urban design amenities along gateways to the City, particularly the U.S.-1 and CR 512 corridors... In addition to the above, a number of related objectives and policies throughout the Comprehensive Plan support the design recommendations presented in this Plan, including policies related to historic preservation, bicycle, pedestrian and vehicular circulation, recreation, and housing, among others. These selected objectives and policies from the adopted Sebastian Comprehensive Plan all emphasize the need for the City to redevelop older areas on a priority basis. The Redevelopment plan can be accomplished by continuing to use innovative planning techniques such as mixed-uses, and enhance the land use plan, aesthetic character, employment opportunities, public safety, affordable housing, and tax base of such areas. The proposed Sebastian Community Redevelopment Plan is in conformance with, and furthers, a number of these objectives and policies adopted in the City's Comprehensive plan. In addition, no inconsistencies with the Sebastian Comprehensive Plan were found in this review. Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 35 of 49 CRA Master Plan Financial Feasibility IV. FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY A significant benefit of any Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) is the ability to manage future incremental ad valorem tax revenues within the CRA Area from both County and City sources. Following the first year of the CRA (base year), 95% of ad valorem taxes collected annually on the incremental growth in property values since the base year are returned to the CRA by eligible authorities including, but not limited to, Indian River County and the City of Sebastian for use in implementing the approved Community Redevelopment Master Plan. This increment, which has been collected since 2000, will be supplemented in 2004 to include the Sebastian Boulevard Triangle Area. Tax Increment Financing (TIF) revenues can be combined with other funding sources such as grants to help finance initial projects prioritized by the Redevelopment Plan. After three to four years of positive tax base growth - which the City has already experienced -- the incremental tax revenues of the CRA Area should also be "bondable". This enables the Agency to receive a large up-front infusion of funds to implement public and public/private projects designed to "grow" the tax base and repay the bonds with future tax revenues. This section will use past TIF revenues and annual property value growth trends to provide estimated projections of incremental tax base growth in the Sebastian CRA and resulting tax revenues that may be received by the Agency. Other potential revenue sources will also be discussed to complete the ten-year CRA revenue picture. Fulfilling the vision of the Sebastian Community Redevelopment Plan is contingent upon the ability to obtain funds to finance the public improvements and revitalization program. A combination of potential funding mechanisms has been identified to realize the vision of the plan. Redevelopment Trust Fund: Subsequent to the approval of the original Redevelopment Plan, the Sebastian City Council established and approved the fund by ordinance in order to allocate future tax increments to the fund. This fund will be supplemented in 2004 by the addition of the Sebastian Boulevard Triangle Area to the CRA. Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 36 of 49 CRA Master Plan Financial Feasibility A. Tax Increment Revenues The tables below show the annual taxable and assessed value for the Sebastian CRA Area over the past five years, as well as for the Sebastian Boulevard Triangle Area. Sebastian CRA -- Tax Increment Financing Revenue Projections Taxable Value Growth, 1998-2003 Year Indian River Co. Annual City of Sebastian Annual Existing CRA Annual Taxable Value % Growth Taxable Value % Growth Area Taxable % Growth Value** *** 1998 $6,420,215,433 $441,507,089 not available -. 1999 $6,995,096,857 8.95% $484,360,012 9.71% not available - 2000 $7,440,896,735 6.37% $507,026,049 4.68% $45,834,920 -- 2001 $8,541,205~140 14.79% $584,427,432 15.27% $58,263,740 27.12% 2002 $9,500,891,213 11.24% $623,616,811 6.71% $58,844,190 1.00% 2003' $10,705,869,127 12.68% $700,797,392 12.38% $66,174,320 12:46% GrOwth, 19~.2003 40;03% Source: Indian River County, City of Sebastian, 2003. Note: Proposed CRA taxable value not available for 2001. CRA area growth percentage based on 1996-2000. Estimated. Sebastian Boulevard CRA Expansion Area not included in total. CRA base year (1994) taxable value = $34,959,870. Sebastian Boulevard CRA Expansion Area Taxable Value Growth, 1998-2003 Year Indian River Co. Annual Taxable Value % Growth 2000 $4,978,630 -- 2001 $5,433,040 9.13% 2002 $5,929,680 9.14% 2003* $6,46.3,351 9.00% Gro,wth;-~20.00~20~3 ~?'-: :,~2~;82% Source: Indian River County, City of Sebastian, 2003. Projected (data not available as of September 15, 2003). 'As indicated in the tables above, the CRA grew more than 27% between 2000 and 2001. This is likely due to new development within the CRA. Taxable value grew only 1% the following year before leveling off at 12.5% growth rate. Growth within the Sebastian Boulevard Triangle Area has been more predictable, with a 9% annual growth rate between 2000 and 2003 (estimated). Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 37 of 49 CRA Master Plan Financial Feasibility In order to project future tax increment revenues that may be available to the CRA Area, an overall tax base growth rate will be assumed based primarily on historical growth. A conservative growth rate of 10% is assumed for the existing CRA, which was originally adopted in 1995. A growth rate of 9% is maintained for the Sebastian Boulevard Triangle Area, maintaining the annual growth rate over the past several years. The table below presents the projected annual incremental growth in CRA Area tax base as well as estimated City and County revenues available to the CRA Area through year 2013. The projected increment value is actual for years 2000 through 2002, estimated for 2003, and projected for years 2004 through 2013, including the Sebastian Boulevard Triangle Area beginning in 2004. Sebastian CRA Revenue Projections Year Projected Increment County Tax City Tax Total Tax Value** Revenues*** Revenues**** Revenues 2000 $10,875,050 $42,373 $51,656 $94,029 2001 $23,303,870 $89,664 $101,625 $191,289 2002 $23,884,320 $87,877 $104,157 $192,033 2003 $31,214,450 $114,846 $136,122 $250,968 2004* $38,413,583.59 $141,333 $167,517 $308,850 2005 $46,326,813.52 $170,448 $202,026 $372,474 2006 $55,025,025.90 $202,451 $239,958 $442,409 2007 $64,586,148.32 $237,629 $281,652 $519,281 2008 $75,095,849.78 $276,297 $327,484 $603,781 2009 $86,648,310.19 $318,801 $377,863 $696,664 2010 $99,347,066.44 $365,523 $433,241 $798,764 2011 $113,305,942.60 $416,881 $494,114 $910,995 2012 $128,650,072.65 $473,336 $561,028 $1,034,364 2013 $145,517,024,93 $535~394 $634,582 $1,169,977 Source: Indian River County, City of Sebastian, I/er Planning Group, 2003. Note: 2000-2003 data are actual/estimated taxable values and revenues. Assumes CRA boundaries amended to include Sebastian Boulevard Expansion Area and 2003 millage rates 1994 CRA Base Year taxable value = $34.96 million. Incremental taxable values shown based on taxable value of 9% for Sebastian Boulevard Expansion Area, and 10% for remaining CRA. Revenues reduced by 5%. Estimates based on County millage of 3.8729. Revenues reduced by 5%. Estimates based on City millage of 4.5904. Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 38 of 49 CRA Master Plan Financial Feasibility B. Capital Improvements Program Estimated capital improvements costs for CRA projects are depicted in the following table. It should be noted that the cost figures are for long-range planning and may vary considerably based on specific project details at time of construction. Sebastian CRA - Capital Improvements Implementation Timeframe I Cost Estimates Improvement Priority Timeframe Cost Estimate* Comments Park District Improvements Streetscape Improvements: High 5 years Curb and Gutter InStallation - - $1691000 Stormwater System -- $901,000 Pedestrian and ROadWay Lighting - $687,000 Street Trees -- $380,000 Street Furniture - $228,000 Reconfig. Boat Parking - $231,000 New Sidestreet Parking - $554,000 Specialty Paving at Intersections - $304,000 SideWalk - $389i000 Buded Utilities -- $1,599,000 $1 million per mile P°cEet P~s - $69;000 6 @ $'10000 EA Earthwork & Sodding - - $334,000 UpgYades and Renovatfons to Park: High 3 years Participatory Fountain - $575,000 Restr0om - $230,'000 Pavillions - $35,000 Pedestrian Connection to sebastian Square - $115;000 Installation of New Parking - $125,000 Sebastian Boulevard Mixed-Use District Gateway Treatment: High 3 years $460,000 2 @ $200,000 EA ArChitectUral Features and/or Flags Included Signature Landscaping Included SPeCieltY,L!gl~ting - inclUded Fountain at Conceptual New Lake $17.000 Modification of Existing Lake to Create Park Medium 10 years $633,000 Sebastian Boulevard Streetscape: High 7 years DOuble RoWs of large Shade Trees $358,000 10-Feet Wide Pedestrian/Bikeway $323,000 Pedestrian and R0ed~ay Ligh!!ng $1,052;000 Eadhwork & Sodding - $323,000 Street Furniture - $2i7;000 sPecialty Paving at Key Intersections - $212,000 Traffic Roundabout Connecting Triangle 'to South Wimb(ow Medium 10+ years $161 000 US-f Commercial District US-1 Streetscape: Medium 8 years Large Specimen Medjool Date Palms - $506;000 $5000 per Date Palm Decorative Lighting in Median .- $207,000 washington P~lms':along ROadside - $421,000 Pedestrian-Scale Lighting along Roadside -- $959,000 Buried Utilities - $2;4'15;000 $1 million per mile Gateway Features High 3 years $460,000 2 @ $200,000 EA DevelOpment of Stormwater Park (Feasibility Study) High 2,years $115,000 Inflll Commercial Development (Feasibility/Design Study) Medium 10+ years $58,000 (continued) Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 39 of 49 CRA Master Plan Financial Feasibility Improvement Sebastian CRA -- Capital Improvements Implementation Timeframe I Cost Estimates (cont'd. from previous page) Priority Timeframe Cost Estimate* Comments Riverfront District Curb and Gutter Installation High Stormwater System High Pedestrian and Roadway Lighting High Street Trees High Street Furniture High Installation of New Parking High Sidewalk High Buried Utilities High Pocket Parks High Picnic Tables High Covered Seating Areas High Wildlife Observation Area(s) High Pedestrian Kiosks High $1 million per mile 6 @ $10000 EA 6 @ $1000 EA 2 @ $15,000 EA 7 years $208,000 7 years $684i000 7 years $790,000 7 Years $521,000 7 years $3i2,000 7 years $686,000 7 years $463,000 7 years $1,967.000 7 years $69,000 7 years $7,000 7 years $35,000 7 Years $23,000 7 years $9,000 5 @ $1500 EA TOTAL ~ $21 596~0~10 '15% contingency added to all cost estimates. 20% additional has been added to storm system improvements, and 5% additional has been added to roadway improvements. Note: The information contained herein is approximate. This table will be amended during regular Redevelopment Plan updates to reflect current needs, and is intended to introduce initial projects for a 30-year ptan. Tax Increment Financing (TIF) revenues for the CRA are projected to be approximately $6.9 million over the next ten years. The projects included herein are generally feasible, assuming bonding, public-private partnerships, grants, and other funding sources available to the CRA are utilized in addition to Tax Increment Financing funds. Please note that the capital improvements cost estimates provided above are for a ten- year time period, and are only initial projects for consideration. Generation of additional projects through regular Plan updates will ensure success of the CRA through its 30- year period. C. Project Financing CRA Tax Increment Revenues: The CRA will continue to accumulate the tax increment generated within the district, which may be used to secure bonds for public improvements or be expended directly on CRA projects. The tax increment is that portion of tax revenue that has increased from the year the CRA was established and the year the bonds are issued. All improvements funded through bonds must be located within the CRA Area district. State of Florida: The State of Florida has various funding sources for improvements in the CRA Area, including: Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 40 of 49 CRA Master Plan Financial Feasibility Historic preservation matching grants are available for building restoration and educational projects (e.g. walking/driving tours, brochures). These funds may help increase tourism in the area, create community awareness of the National Register of Historic Places District, and provide a mechanism by which to restore designated historic structures to their original appearance. The Secretary of State maintains a grant program for local parks and recreation improvements, which may be utilized in the CRA Area for improvements to the park areas and greenway connections. · Urban and community forestry grants for special landscape improvements, which may include improvements within the CRA Area. Florida Inland Navigation District provides funds for waterway improvements., These funds may be used in the CRA Area to create and expand marina facilities, to create additional recreational opportunities focusing on the river, and to create or improve docking facilities. City of Sebastian: City funding sources include: · Community Development Block Grant funds, which may be utilized for infrastructure improvements. · Special assessments may be utilized to fund improvements through taxes levied on benefiting properties in the CRA Area. · General fund reserves may be used on a loan basis to initially fund the CRA. · City water and sewer funds may be allocated for water and sewer improvements in the CRA Area. · City bond issues can be utilized for capital improvements in the CRA Area, including streetscaping, parking, and related improvements. · Gas tax funds may be used for transportation improvements. Non-Profit Corporation: The establishment of a tax-exempt organization may provide funds for district improvements, such as buy-a-brick or adopt-a-tree programs for streetscape improvements. Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 41 of 49 CRA Master Plan Operational Procedures V. OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES A. CRA Term The term of the Sebastian Community Redevelopment Master Plan will be thirty years from the date of Plan adoption, which is expected to occur in December 2003. This length of operational term is absolutely necessary to provide the best opportunity for the CRA to successfully complete the redevelopment process within the redevelopment area and ensure the greatest potential property value enhancement resulting from initial public-sponsored projects and programs. This does not mean the entire CRA Area will be redeveloped within that timeframe, but rather that the major principles and associated improvements envisioned in the Redevelopment Plan, as amended and updated in the future, will be fully implemented and private development will be well on the way toward helping the City of Sebastian attain its vision for the restoration of its historical downtown. Although the initial capital improvements process is estimated over a ten-year period, the Plan will be updated periodically over the thirty-year CRA term to reflect changed financial and development conditions in Sebastian. In addition, the CRA may engage in bond financing after three to five years of operation in order to provide an up-front infusion of dollars for public improvements with repayment from enhanced tax increment proceeds over an extended period, typically twenty to twenty-five years. Obviously, bond underwriters will require that the term of the CRA extend through and beyond the final payoff of any bonds they sponsor. It is also not unusual for successful CRAs to implement multiple bond issues over the thirty-year redevelopment period, and second and third issues would also need long-term payback periods to keep interest rates within reason for the Agency. Another areas of Plan implementation where the thirty-year term is crucial include the development of public/private partnerships. CRAs have been appropriately referred to as "developers in the public interest", and this aspect of the CRA role is very important to realize the tax base enhancements expected from publicly funded improvements. Expedited approval of development consistent with the Redevelopment plan may be the difference between a high or Iow growth of tax base in the redevelopment area. In addition, successful CRAs often enter into long-term agreements with developers to address issues such as parking; these issues typically extend far into the future. Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 42 of 49 CRA Master Plan Operational Procedures B. Annual Reporting The Sebastian CRA will prepare an annual budget for consideration and approval prior to October 1st of the fiscal year in which the budget will be implemented. In addition, an annual report will also be prepared, which will outline progress made toward achieving Plan goals, objectives and policies. This report will also include a comparison of current- year tax base in contrast to the base year value. In addition, financial statements will be prepared according to Florida Statutes. C. Plan Update and Amendments The Sebastian Community Redevelopment Master Plan will be updated and revised to reflect changing conditions every three to five years. The standard updating process will involve the following steps: 1. Updated data and analysis; 2. Revised capital improvements program and recommendations; 3. Review by Local Planning Agency; and 4. Consideration by CRA Board and City Council. other redevelopment strategy Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 43 of 49 CRA Master Plan Appendix Appendix A City of Sebastian CRA Expansion Finding of Necessity Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 44 of 49 City of S tian Find'rog of NecessiO~' Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. HOM~, Of PE[,I~ IS~ Cicy of Sebasdan DRAFT Finding of Necessity for Redevelopment Prepared by: ) ? \ in association with ILER PLANNING GROUP Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. November, 2002 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................... , ................................................................. iii II. IH. IV. Ve Introduction ......................................................................................... 1 CRA Criteria - State Requirements .................................................4 Methodology ........................................................................................ 7 Proposed Community Redevelopment Area .................................... 8 A. Area Characteristics ..................................................................................... 8 B. Land Use ...................................................................................................... 8 Need for Redevelopment .................................................................. 15 A. Deteriorating Structures ......................... i ................................................... i 6 B. Deteriorating of Site or Other Improvements ............................................ 22 1. Vacancy .......................................................................................... 22 2. Junk, Trash and Debris .................................................................. 22 3. Faulty Lot Layout/Diversity of Ownership .................................... 23 C. Code Enforcement Violations .................................................................... 25 D. Inadequate Transportation Facilities ........................................................... 26 1. Defective or Inadequate Street Layout .......................................... 26 E. Tax Base Growth ....................................................................................... 27 VI. Conclusions ........................................................................................ 28 Finding of Necessity for Redevelopment ~ City of Sebastian, Florida i Figure 1: Figure 2: Figure 3: Figure 4: Figure 5: Figure 6: List of Figures Regional Location Map ......................................................................... 2 Existing CRA and Proposed Expansion Area .................................. 3 Future Land Use Map ............................................................................ 9 Zoning Map ............................................................................................ 10 Existing Land Use Map ....................................................................... 11 Deteriorating Conditions Map ........................................................... 14 Finding of Necessity for Redevelopment N City of Sebastian, Florida ii Executive Summary The City of Sebastian created a Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) for its waterfront/U.S. 1 area in 1995. Recently, the City has identified a small redevelopment expansion area (see Figure 2) to determine if sufficient deteriorated conditions exist in the area to warrant the enlargement of the current Community Redevelopment Area (CRA). The purpose of a CRA is to bolster the economy in a qualified area which has been selected based on its need for redevelopment and its ability to meet State criteria for designation of CRAs. There are three primary benefits of a CRA in Sebastian: ° Tax increment financing, which diverts future property tax revenues from Indian River County and the City to a trust fund for redevelopment projects; Increased eligibility for federal and state grants that can be used for infrastructure improvements, business development and property acquisition; and A master planning approach and implementation strategy for the area. The City is pursuing the possible expansion of the existing CRA to ensure that the older commercial and industrial areas of the City do not experience further decline and to encourage reinvestment in these areas. The expansion area is also integrally related to the existing CRA, serving as the "gateway" to the existing CRA. The proposed CRA expansion area generally includes the area between the CR 512 eastbound and westbound roadway split, terminating at the eastern boundary of Old Dixie Highway's right-of-way. The proposed expansion area also includes a large tract of land south of Woodmere Road, properties located between Harrison (2ha) Street and CR 512 eastbound, and other property south of (and fronting on) CR 512 eastbound. The total size of the proposed CRA expansion area is approximately 104 acres. This report finds that over 50 percent of the proposed CRA area is exhibiting deteriorated conditions such as damaged structures and declining site conditions. In addition, nearly one-quarter of the proposed area is 'vacant land, and approximately .43 percent of all existing structures in the area are nonconforming residential uses. The redevelopment study area meets the criteria set forth by the State of Florida for the creation of a CRA. If the City adopts these findings, the next step of the process is to incorporate this new area into an updated redevelopment master plan for the entire Sebastian CRA. Finding of Necessity for Redevelopment ~ City of Sebastian, Florida iii I. Introduction The City of Sebastian, located in Indian River County, was incorporated in 1925. Figure 1 provides a regional perspective of the City, showing Indian River County and its municipalities. Sebastian is located along the Indian River Lagoon between the cities of Melbourne and Vero Beach, and had a population of 16,181 in 2000. The City is transected by US Highway One and CR 512, and has nearby acceSs to both Interstate 95 and the Florida Turnpike. In addition, the City has a municipal airport just east of CR 505 (Roseland Road). The City of Sebastian originally formed a CRA in 1995 through Ordinance No. 95-05. This existing CRA is generally linear in geographic shape, and is centered around US 1 and downtown Sebastian. To continue to encourage redevelopment and growth in the downtown and its surrounding areas, the City is examining the feasibility of expanding the CRA to include 103.74 acres of land generally located contiguous to and southwest of the existing CRA boundary. The purpose of a CRA is to bolster the economy in a qualified area that has been selected based on its need for redevelopment and its ability to meet state statutory criteria for slum and/or blight. There are three primary benefits of a CRA. First, CRAs allow for the utilization of tax increment financing (TIF). To employ TIF, the latest year's taxable assessment is used as the base or starting point. From that year forward, for a period of up to 30 years, any increase in taxable property assessment (known as an increment) is collected and placed into a trust fired for the redevelopment area and then reinvested in that area according to an approved master plan. The increment comes fi:om both municipal and county property tax revenues. In addition to 'TIF, the CRA increases the City's eligibility for a variety of state and federal grants. The grants available can be used for development of affordable housing, business development programs, small business loans and property acquisition. The end result is an increase of the money available for public investment in the specified area over what would have been available prior to the establishment of the CRA. Lastly, the redevelopment area benefits due to the application of a master planning approach which creates a vision for the area and specifies an implementation program to accomplish that vision. Finding of Necessity for Redevelopment ~ City of Sebastian, Florida 1 CALAMI VIN[NG Figure 1 Prqject Location Map City of Sebastian CRA Expansion Key Existing CRA Boundary Proposed CRA Expansion Boundary Figure 2 Existing and Proposed CRA Expansion Area City of Sebastian CRA Expansion II. CRA Criteria- State Requirements Chapter 163 allows municipalities to designate a Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) as a special district where Future County and City property tax increment revenues can be used to find infrastructure improvement and development, as well as new redevelopment initiatives. The initial step in the process of designating a CRA is the "finding of necessity for redevelopment." This finding is made pursuant to a City resolution that one or more slum or blighted areas, or areas exhibiting a shortage of affordable housing, exist in the municipality; and that the rehabilitation, conservation, or redevelopment of these areas are necessary in the interest of the public health, safety, morals, or welfare of the residents of the City [F.S. 163.355]. Subsequent to making this legislative finding, the City can then establish a Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) and prepare a Community Redevelopment Plan for the designated Area. Finally, the City CRA can begin accumulating tax increment finding (TIF) revenues and implementing the adopted CRA Plan. It is important to note that a CRA does not increase the millage rate on properties located within its boundaries. Qualification for designation as a CRA requires that the identified geographic area meet one or more of the criteria set forth in Chapter 163, Part III, Florida Statutes. These criteria are listed below: "Slum area" means an area having physical or economic conditions conducive to disease, infant mortality; juvenile delinquency, poverty or crime because there is a predominance of buildings or improvements, whether residential or nonresidential, which are impaired by reason of dilapidation, deterioration, age, or obsolescence, and exhibiting one or more of the following factors: ao Co Inadequate provision for ventilation, light, air, sanitation, or open spaces; High density of population, compared to the population density of adjacent areas within the county or municipality; and overcrowding, as indicated by government-maintained statistics or other studies and the requirements of the Florida Building Code; or The existence of conditions that endanger life or property by fire or other causes [F.S. 163.340(7)]. Finding of Necessity for Redevelopment ~ City of Sebastian, Florida 4 "Blighted area" means an area in which there are a substantial number of deteriorated, or deteriorating structures, in which conditions, as indicated by government-maintained statistics or other studies, are leading to economic distress or endanger life property, and in which two or more of the following factors are present: Co do Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout, parking facilities, roadways, bridges, or public transportation facilities; Aggregate assessed values of real property in the area for ad valorem tax purposes have failed to show any appreciable increase over the 5 years prior to the fmding of such conditions; Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness; Unsanitary or unsafe conditions; Deterioration of site or other improvements; Inadequate and outdated building density patterns; Falling lease rates per square foot of office, commercial, or industrial space compared to the remainder of the county or municipality; Tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land; Residential and commercial vacancy rates higher in the area than in the remainder of the county or municipality. Incidence of crime in the area higher than in the remainder of the county or municipality; Fire and emergency medical service calls to the area proportionately higher than in the remainder of the county or municipality; A greater number of violations of the Florida Building Code in the area than the number of violations recorded in the remainder of the county or municipality; Diversity of ownership or defective or unusual conditions of title which prevent the free alienability of land within the deteriorated or hazardous area; or Governmentally owned property with adverse environmental conditions caused by a public or private entity. Finding of Necessity for Redevelopment ~ City of Sebastian, Florida 5 o However, the term "blighted area" also means any area in which at least one of the factors identified in paragraphs (a) through (n) are present and all taxing authorities subject to s.163.387(2)(a) agree, either by interlocal agreement or agreements with the agency or by resolution, that the area is blighted [F.S. 163.340(8)]. There is a shortage of housing affordable to residents of low or moderate income, including the elderly. [F.S. 163.355(1)] Finding of Necessity for Redevelopment ~ City of Sebastian, Florida 6 III. Methodology A number of information sources and analytical techniques were used in the determination of the need for redevelopment. Field surveys were conducted between October and November 2002 to provide accurate assessments of physical conditions in and around the proposed CRA Area. Initial fieldwork focused on the appropriate boundary of the expansion area. Field data gathered included visual surveys of conditions of infrastructure, vacant lots, debris piles, building structures and facades, roads and traffic, parking, property maintenance, lighting, and other potential blighting influences. Land use conflicts were also noted. City and County records and analyses by technical staff were utilized to provide important background information on code enforcement trends, infrastructure deficiencies, property tax values and trends, land subdivision and ownership, programmed public improvements, and other factors. The existing Sebastian Community Redevelopment Plan, completed in 1995, was also utilized as a basis of information for this report. The information collected was assessed against the criteria presented previously in this report to determine the existence of slum and/or blighting conditions, the overall need for redevelOpment, and to finalize the boundary for the proposed CRA expansion area. Finding of Necessity for Redevelopment ~ City of Sebastian, Florida 7 IV. A® Proposed Community Redevelopment Area Area Characteristics Based on field surveys, the recommended boundaries for Sebastian's proposed CRA expansion area are shown in Figure 2. The area being considered for expansion of the existing redevelopment area (hereafter referred to as "the proposed expansion area") generally includes the area between the CR 512 eastbound and westbound roadway split, terminating at the eastern boundary of Old Dixie Highway's right-of-way. The proposed expansion area also includes a large tract of land south of Woodmere road, properties located between Harrison (2aa) Street and CR 512 eastbound, and other property south of (and fronting on) CR 512 eastbound. The gross area of the proposed CRA expansion area is 103.74 acres, including road rights-of-way. Excluding road right-of-way, the area for proposed expansion is approximately 80 acres. Approximately 22.4 percent (23.21 acres) of the gross area is undeveloped. The remaining land area is intended to support commercial (31.50 acres), industrial (56.51 acres), and institutional (15.73 acres) uses. B. Land Use This section provides an overview of the future land use designations, zoning districts and existing land uses within the proposed CRA area. This analysis is based on Figures 3 through 6 on the following pages and the tables presented throughout the section. The discussion begins with future land use, as this is the controlling factor in land development. Finding of Necessity for Redevelopment ~ City of Sebastian, Florida 8 Key ] Commercial Waterfront Residential i ... Med Density Multi Family ] Public Service · Commercial Riverfront Commercial Industrial Existing CRA Boundary Proposed CRA Expansion Boundary %'.,,. ~',~ Figure 3 Future Land Use City of Sebastian CRA Expansion ~ {10,~. FT.} ~ CWR IHDU~L } FA~LY (8 UNI~ tN MOBmE HO~ ~ E~IIN'O CICA BOUNDARY ---- PROPOgED C~A ~XPAI~ION BOUnDARy Figure ~ Zoning Map City of Sebastian CRA Expansion Figure 5 Existing Land Use City of Sebastian CRA Expansion Key .Residential Institutional Commercial 512 Commercial Industrial Vacant Table 1 shows a breakdown of the future land use and zoning designations within the proposed CRA expansion area, while Figure 3 graphically depicts these designations. Future land use and zoning designations are identical within the proposed CRA expansion area. Table 1. Future Land Use/Zoning Percent of Future Land Use Designation Acres Proposed CRA Area Commercial-512 District (C-512) 6.24 6.0% Public Service District (PS) 15.73 15.2% Industrial District (IN) 56.51 54.5% Commercial General District (CG) 25.26 24.3% Source: City of Sebastian Future Land Use/Zoning Maps As indicated in Table 1 above, the majority (54.5 percent) of the property within the proposed CRA expansion area is designated for industrial use. Figure 3 shows that these industrial designated lands are concentrated in the eastern and northeastern portions of the proposed expansion area. Land designated for general commercial development is the second most common designation, with 24.3 percent of the proposed CRA expansion area. Approximately 15.2 percent of the area is designated for institutional development (PS District). Finally, 6.24 acres are designated for commercial development along CR 512. Table 2 summarizes the existing land uses, which are shown on Figure 5, in the proposed CRA area. Table 2. Existing Land Use Percent of Existing Use Acres Proposed CRA Area Institutional 12.07 11.6% Industrial 7.24 7.0% Commercial 10.1 9.7% Residential 27.25 26.3% Finding of Necessity for Redevelopment ~ City of Sebastian, Florida 12 Road Right-of-Way 23.87 23.0% Vacant 23.21 22.4% Source: Kimley-Hom & Associates, Inc. ) The character of the existing land use in the proposed CRA expansion area is predominantly residential. Table 2 indicates that 23.0 percent of the area is made up of road right-of-way, and an additional 22.4 percent of the area is undeveloped land. Institutional land uses are the next most prevalent uses, representing 11.6 percent (12.07 acres) of the proposed CRA expansion area. The majority of the area is zoned commercial and industrial; however, these two uses make up the smallest share of existing land uses in the area, accounting for 9.7 percent and 7.0 percent of the area, respectively. Industrial land uses in the area include storage facilities and auto-oriented businesses such as auto repair and parts. There are a substantial number of instances of noncomforming uses in the proposed CRA expansion area, Of 40 total structures surveyed in the area, 17 (42~5 percent) represent residential uses, which are nonconforming uses in the area according to future land use and zoning designations. Of the 17 nonconforming residential uses, 16 are located in the industrial land use zone, and the remaining residential use lies within a commercial land use zone. This information is shown in more detail in Table 3 of this study. Finding of Necessity for Redevelopment ~ City of Sebastian, Florida 13 AREAS WI3~I DETERIORATED BUILDING CONDITIONS (~.60 ACRES) AREAS WITH DETERIORATED LOT CONDITIONS (25.36 ACRES) AREAS WITH BOTH DETERIORATED BUILDING CONDITIONS AND WITH DETERIORATED LOT CONDITIONS (24.05 ACRES) LOT WITH NON-CONFORMING USAGE (27.90 ACRES) DIRT ROAD (0.5d: ACRE) Ftgl~e 6 DETERIORATING CONDITIONS YAP City of Sebastian C1~ Expansion V. Need for Redevelopment Based on field surveys and information provided by the City, Figure 6 presents a composite analysis of the deteriorating conditions within the proposed CRA expansion area. More specifically, Figure 6 delineates the areas with deteriorated building conditions, deteriorated lot conditions, nonconforming uses, and inadequate street layout, and deteriorated site improvements, all of which are prerequisites for establishing (and expanding) a CRA. The gross acreage of the proposed CRA expansion area, including road rights-of-way, is approximately 103.74 acres. Using this gross acreage, the conditions illustrated on Figure 7 account for the following proportions of the study area: · Deteriorating Structures · Deteriorating Property Conditions · Both Deteriorating Stmctures/Prop. Conditions -- · Inadequate Roadways __ 4.6 acres (4.4%) 25.36 acres (24.5%) 24.05 acres (23.2%) 0.5 acres (0.5%) When combined and adjusted for overlapping conditions, these six conditions represent 54.51 acres, or 52.5 percent of the gross proposed CRA expansion area. Excluding road right-of-ways, the percentage increases to nearly 70 percent of the land area in the proposed CRA expansion area. The following sections of this report will discuss each of these conditions, including other zoning deficiencies and blighting influences present in the proposed CRA expansion area. Finding of Necessity for Redevelopment ~ City of Sebastian, Florida 15 A. Deteriorating Structures Table 3, below, is a visual inventory of building and lot conditions within the proposed CRA expansion area. The location of each building and lot surveyed is shown in Figure 6, and cross-referenced by Map ID number on Table 3 below. Building and lot conditions have been rated according to the following scale: Building Conditions Lot Conditions 1 - Standard 2 - Slightly Deteriorated 3 - Deteriorated 4 -- Dilapidated 1 - Good Condition 2 - Standard: tall grass, etc. 3 - Poor: overgrown, minor debris 4 - Very poor: Dumping, unmaintained, etc. Table 3 - Building and Lot ~Conditions Survey Map General Building Lot ID # Address Use Condition Condition Non-Conforming Use? 1 High Residential - 1 1 Yes; single family home Street SF in Industrial Land Use 2 High Residential - 3 1 Yes; single family home Street SF in Industrial Land Use 3 High Residential - 1 2 Yes; single family home Street SF in Industrial Land Use 4 High Residential - 3 2 Yes; single family home Street SF in Industrial Land USe 5 High Residential - 4 3 Yes; single family home Street SF in Industrial Land Use 6 High Rental 1 1 No Street Business 7 High Vacant N/A 4 No Street 8 High Vacant N/A 3 No Street 10 Louisiana Residential - 2 1 Yes; single family home Ave SF in Industrial Land Use 11 Louisiana Residential - 2 1 Yes; single family home Ave SF in Industrial Land Use 12 Louisiana Residential - 2 1 Yes; single family home Ave SF in Industrial Land Use Finding of Necessity for Redevelopment ~ City of Sebastian, Florida 16 13 Louisiana Residential - 2 1 Yes; single family home Ave SF in Industrial Land Use 14 Louisiana VFW 1 1 No Ave 15 Louisiana American 1 1 No Ave Legion 16 Louisiana Residential - 2 1 Yes; single family home Ave SF in Industrial Land Use 17 Louisiana Residential - 1 1 Yes; single family home Ave SF in Industrial Land Use 18 Louisiana Residential - 3 2 Yes; single family home Ave SF in Industrial Land Use 19 Louisiana Vacant N/A 3 No Ave 20 First Residential 2 2 Yes; single family home (Taft) St SF in Industrial Land Use 21 First Residential 3 2 Yes; single family home (Taft) St SF in Industrial Land Use 22 CR 512 Vacant N/A 3 No 23 CR 512 Public Works 1 1 No 24 CR 512 Vacant N/A 3 No 25 CR512 Residential - 4 3 Yes; single family home SF in Commercial Land Use 26 CR 512 Commercial & 1 1 No Office Building 27 CR 512 Office I 1 No Building 28 CR 512 Vacant N/A 3 No 29 CR 512 Vacant N/A 3 No 30 CR 512 Carpet Store I 1 No 31 CR 512 Vacant N/A 3 No 32 CR 512 "FoUntain 1 1 No Plaza" - Retail 33 CR 512 Vacant N/A 3 No 34 CR 512 Storage 1 1 No Facility 35 CR 512 Vacant N/A 3 No 36 Second Storage 1 2 No Finding of Necessity for Redevelopment ~ City of Sebastian, Florida 17 (Harrison) Facility Street ' 37 SecOnd Automotive 1 2 No (Harrison) Body Shop Street 38 Second Storage 1 3 No (Harrison) Facility Street 39 Second Storage 1 2 No (Harrison) Facility Street 40 CR 512 Restaurant 1 1 No (Jerry's .Sub & Pub) 41 CR 512 Automotive 2 1 No Repair 42 CR 512 Outside N/A 2 No Storage Area- Boats 43 CR 512 Service Center 1 1 No 44 High Storage 1 1 No Street Facility 45 High Storage 2 3 No Street Facility 46 Old Dixie Sheet Metal 3 2 No Hwy Roofing 47 Old Dixie Automotive 1 1 No Hwy Repair (Transmission) 48 Old Dixie Automotive 2 1 No Hwy Sales 49 Old Dixie Storage 1 1 No Hwy Facility 50 Old Dixie Storage 2 1 No Hwy Facility 51 Old Dixie Residential - 3 4 Yes; single family home Hwy SF in Industrial Land Use Source: Iler Planning Group, 2002 Finding °f Necessity for Redevelopment ~ City of Sebastian, Florida 18' As indicated above, 40 of the properties surveyed in the proposed CRA expansion area currently have structures on them. Of the 40 structures surveyed, nearly half (47.5 perCent - 19 structures) are "slightly deteriorated" to "dilapidated" in condition. In addition, 49 percent of the lots within the proposed CRA expansion are rated "standard" to "very poor". Nearly 30 percent of the lots within the area are rated "poor" or "very poor" in condition. The following graphics depict deteriorated structures within the CRA expansion area: Photograph 1 depicts a dilapidated residential structure on the north side of CR 512 eastbound west of Louisiana Avenue. The stmcture is a nonconforming use located within a commercial zone, and appears to be in significant disrepair. This structure is one of the first properties seen entering the City of Sebastian from the west on CR 512. Photo. 1 -- Dilapidated home on north side of CR 512 East Photograph 2 depicts a mobile home near the northern terminus of High Street and Louisiana Avenue at CR 512 westbound. This home is typical to the majority of nonconforming residential uses in the proposed CRA expansion area. Photo. 2 - Mobile home at intersection of High Street and Louisiana Avenue Finding of Necessity for Redevelopment ~ City of Sebastian, Florida 19 Photograph 3 depicts an industrial land use on the north side of Harrison (2aa) Street in the northeastem area of the proposed expansion area. Photo. 3 - Industrial use on north side of Harrison (2ha) Street Photographs 4 through 7 show an additional nonconforming mobile homes generally located between CR 512 eastbound and CR 512 westbound east of Louisiana Avenue. Photo. 4 - Mobile home on the east side of Louisiana Avenue south of Taft Avenue Photo. 5 - Northwest corner of Louisiana Avenue and Photo. 6 - West side of High Street north of Taft (1st) Street Taft (?9 Street Finding of Necessity for Redevelopment ~ City of Sebastian, Florida 20 Photo. 7- Mobile home on the west side of High Street south of Tafl (lS9 Street Photograph 8 depicts an outdoor storage area on the north side of Harrison (2na) Street just east of Hewlett Drive. Photo. 8 - Outdoor storage facility on north side of Harrison (2~) Street Finding of Necessity for Redevelopment N City of Sebastian, Florida 21 Be Deterioration of Site or Other Improvements Vacancy Another indication of depressed conditions in the proposed CRA area is the amount of vacant undeveloped land. As mentioned in the previous section on existing land uses, 22.4 percent (23.21 acres) of the proposed CRA expansion area is comprised of vacant land. Vacant land is dispersed throughout the propoSed CRA expansion area, with no significant concentration occurring in any specific location. The existence of vacant land is evidence of lack of investment throughout the area. 2. Junk, Trash and Debris Accumulation of litter and debris is not a significant issue for the commercial and portions of the proposed CRA expansion area. This may be due in' part to the lack of landscaping and vegetation in these areas in which trash and debris may be thrown as well as due to diligent code enforcement officers and property owners. In the industrial areas, however, there is more of a problem with junk, trash and debris. Of the 38 code enforcement cases in the proposed CRA expansion area between 1990 and 2000, 22 (57.9%) were for junk, trash and debris. The photograph to the right is just one example of litter in the proposed CRA area. This photograph shows a pile of discarded materials adjacent to an industrial use located on the northern side of Harrison (2nd) Street at Hewlett Drive. Debris pile adjacent to industrial land use. .Finding of Necessity for Redevelopment ~ City of Sebastian, Florida 22 The photograph below shows a vacant lot being used for storage of truck trailers at the southeast comer of Taft (1 st) Street and High Street. This not only demonstrates property owner disinvestment in the proposed CRA expansion area, but also shows that much of the land within the area is not being utilized for its highest and best use. Truck trailer storage on vacant lot at southeast comer of Tafi (lS9 Street and High Street 3. Faulty Lot Layout/Diversity of Ownership Faulty lot layout due to lot size is a significant problem within the proposed CRA expansion area for industrial areas. The City's zoning code requires a minimum lot width of 100 feet and a minimum lot area of 15,000 square feet for industrial uses (City of Sebastian Zoning Regulations, § 54-2-5.6). Lot sizes in the industrial-zoned areas of the northeastern Part of the proposed CRA expansion area typically range from 6,500 square feet to 9,375 square feet, and appear to have been originally platted for residential uses. Accordingly, diversity of ownership prevents the free alienability of land within the proposed CRA expansion area. Commercial development within the City's C-512 District calls for a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet, and a minimum lot width of 125 feet. This commercial zoning exists in the southwestern part of the proposed CRA exPansion area south of CR 512 eastbound. Finding of Necessity for Redevelopment ~ City of Sebastian, Florida 23 Lot sizes in this area typically do not exceed 10,000 square feet, with a 40~foot average lot width. ACcordingly, commercial and industrial development within current code is not feasible (without significant parcel assembly) due to diversity of ownership and small lot sizes, each of which prevent the free alienability of land within the proposed CRA expansion area. Finding of Necessity for Redevelopment ~ City of Sebastian, Florida 24 C. Code Enforcement Violations ? ') Approximately 38 Code violations have been issued since 1990 in the proposed CRA expansion area for one or more of the following: · Building maintenance; · Property maintenance; · Landscape maintenance; or · Public nuisance (junk, trash, abandoned/untagged vehicles). or debris, overgrown vegetation or Table 4 displays the number and nature of violations issued between 1990 and 2000. Table 4. Proposed CRA Area Code Enforcemen Cases by Violation Type of Violation Number of Instances Building maintenance 1 Property maintenance 11 Public nuisance 24 Prohibited signs 1 Failure to obtain occupational license 1 As indicated in Table 4, violations for public nuisance (such as abandoned vehicles, junk, trash or debris, or overgrown vegetation) are the most prevalent in the proposed CRA expansion area, followed by property maintenance issues. Public nuisance cases represent more than 63 percent of all cases. This is an indicator of the blighted conditions that exist within the proposed CRA area. Finding of Necessity for Redevelopment N City of Sebastian, Florida 25 De Inadequate Transportation Facilities Defective or Inadequate Street Layout Figure 6 depicts an unpaved roadway that travels directly adjacent to and south of the C-512 commercial district in the southwest area of the proposed CRA expansion. This dirt road has numerous potholes and ruts, and becomes largely impassable in inclement weather. The road system south of CR 512 in the proposed CRA expansion area is inadequate and unpaved in many instances. The system is insufficient to serve the land uses presently adopted for the area. Finding of Necessity for Redevelopment ~ City of Sebastian, Florida 26 Tax Base Growth Table 5 shows the total taxable value growth between 2000 and 2002 in the City of Sebastian, Indian River County, and the proposed CRA expansion area. Table 5 --Tax Base Growth 2000 2002 Growth CRA Expansion Area $4,978,630 $5,929,680 19.1% City of Sebastian $508,508,759 $623,616,811 22.6% Indian River County $6,995,948,262 $8,896,057,701 27.2% Source: City of Sebastian, Indian River County As shown in the table, the growth of the total taxable value of the proposed CRA expansion area lagged by three percent between 2000 and 2002 in comparison with the City of Sebastian. Moreover, the proposed CRA expansion area's total taxable value growth lagged by more than eight percent behind Indian River County, indicating blighting influences in the area and a need for redevelopment. Finding of Necessity for Redevelopment ~ City of Sebastian, Florida 27 VI. Conclusions Based on the information presented in this report, the City of Sebastian's proposed CRA expansion area meets the state requirements for a Community Redevelopment Agency. The proposed CRA area meets the following criteria: o ° Over half of the properties'in the proposed area exhibit deteriorating building and site conditions. This clearly meets state requirements that call for a "substantial number of deteriorated, or deteriorating structures" within a proposed CRA (F.S. 163.340(8)); The "deterioration of site or other improvements" (F.S. 163.340(8)(e)) has been demonstrated by the existence of 23.21 acres of vacant land within the proposed CRA area, which accounts for 22.4 percent of the total proposed expansion area. Additionally, deterioration of site has been demonstrated through the accumulation of litter and debris in the area. Between 1990 and 2000, nearly 60 percent of all code enforcement citations in the proposed CRA expansion area involved the accumulation of junk, trash, and debris. Finally, as stated above, nearly half of the stmctures and lots within the CRA are deteriorating or deteriorated; "Faulty lot layout" (F.S. 163.340(2)(c)) exists in nearly all of the C-512 commercial and industrial zoned properties in the proposed CRA expansion area due to small lot sizes that do not meet current zoning code requirements; A "diversity of ownership...prevent(ing) the free alienability of land''' (F.S. 163.340(2)(m)) within the proposed CRA expansion area has been demonstrated within the C-512 commercial and industrial zoned properties, as new development in these .areas would require significant assembly of parcels; Several. instances of inadequate road layout occur throughout the proposed CRA expansion area; Land use conflicts occur where residential uses exist in commercial and industrial zoned areas. Over 40 percent of the existing structures in the proposed expansion area are nonconforming residential uses; and The total taxable value of the expansion area lags behind the rest of the City of Sebastian and Indian River County, indicating disinvestment in the area and a need for redevelopment. These findings and the other detailed conclusions contained herein clearly indicate a very strong need for redevelopment in the Sebastian CRA expansion area. 'Finding of Necessity for Redevelopment ~ City of Sebastian, Florida 28 CRA Master Plan Appendix Appendix B City of Sebastian Resolution R-02-57 Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 45 of 49 NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, FINDING BLIGHT IN THE CR $12 TRIANGLE AREA AND DECLARING A NECIISSITY FOR REHABILITATION AND REDEVELOPMENT; PROVIDING FOR EFI~ECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Sebastian commissioned the Treasure Coast Regional Council to host a charette over the future de, velopm~t of tho County Road 512 corridor throul/h the City; and WHEREAS, the City of S~oastiau rooeived thc Charetto Report (thc "Development Master Plan") dated November 3, 2000, sad adopted it as the conceptual basis for tho polioios gover~in§ development in tho CR $ I2 corridor within the City af Sebastian; and WItEREAS, the Master Plan r~ommzn& various enhancements ~o the Sebastian Boulevard roadway, other public inf~astruoture/mprovem~at projoct~, as welt as ~hau§~s hi the zoning laws and development staudards for the corridor; and WHEREAS, tho Master Plan recommends various enhancoracuts to the Sebastian Boulevard roadway, other public in~astmctur~ improwm~ut projects, as well as changes in tho zoning laws a~d dw,,olopmont standards/'or the oorridor; and WHEREAS, durillg tho charette precis col~oms arose over the ne§at/ye eft©vis as to traffic patterns, livability and developability tllat th= divided right-of-way for CR 512 had brought to tho area of land betwovn those "twin pairs"; and WHEREAS~ a key element of the Sebastian Boulevard Dovdopmmt Master Plan became radovelopment of the land located between the divided right-of, way for the corridor under a '~New Town C~nt~r" concept; and WI-~REAR, it was detonnined that the City should retain a planning professional further examine the feasibility of ~his triangle arco between tho rights-of-way, and thc firm of lPG, Inc.; and WI:IV. REAS, IP~, Inc., has issued aIqndi~g of Necessity ttel~orr, which is hereby adopted as th~/indkigs ofth~ City of $obastiatl; ~:30PM BLDG DEP'¥ SEBASTIAN NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED ]BY T~._ · COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, as follows: ._.S.._e_.cgon 1. That the City has determined the area Iooatecl between the dividcd eastbound and Westbound rilhts-of-way for County Road ~12, and up to the eastern edge of the FEC RaJlroad ri§hr-of-way, meets the criterin of Fla. Stat, 163.340((1) and constitutes a "blighted area' within tho param~ers of state law; and Section_ 2__~, In the inl~rest of public health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the City of Sebastian, the rehabilitation and redevelopment of aa/d area is necessary. ~ It/s the /ntent of the City to proceed with the n¢cessal'y a~ions to incorporate the described area illto thc existing S~astian Community Redevelopment area located adjacent ~ immediately to thc cast. Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This resolution shall take effect immediately tipon its adoption. Th~ foreto/ng R~oluflon was moved for adoption by Councihuember tla.~ che~: The motion was s~onded by Coun~m~b~r s~__rc_~¥k and, upon heine put into a vote, tho vote was as follows: Maym: Walter Barnes ave Vice Mayor lames Hill ._a~ . Councilmcmber Jo~ Barczyk aw Counoilmember Bdwaid I. Majcher, Jr. aye Councilm~mber Ray Coniglio . a?e ---_ .... Thc Msyor thereupon decla~ed this Resohtion duly passe~, and adopted this 11 ~ day olD,comber, 2002, CITY OF SN, BASTIAN. FLORIDA ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor Walter Barnes Approved as to form and lelality for CRA Master Plan Appendix Appendix C Revised CRA Legal Description Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 46 of 49 Legal Description Sebastian CRA Begin at the northeast comer of the municipal limits of the City of Sebastian; mn west following the city limits to a point of intersection of the eastern right-of-way line of the Florida East Coast Railroad; run southeast following the east right-of-way line of the Florida East Coast Railroad to the point of intersection of the City of Sebastian's southern municipal limits; run east following the City of Sebastian's municipal limits; run northwest following the same city limits to the point of beginning. Expansion area legal description Begin at the intersection of the east right-of-way line of the Florida East Coast Railroad and the western right-of-way line of westbound Sebastian Boulevard (CR 512 west); run southwest along the western right-of-way line of westbound Sebastian Boulevard (CR 512 west) to the southeast point of intersection of the right-of-way lines of Calamondin Street and Temple Avenue; run west along the south right-of-way line.of Calamondin Street to its southwest limit; mn west following the north boundary of Parcel # 1 of the Coy A. Clark Company Plat; run south following the west boundary of Parcel # 1 of the Coy A. Clark Company Plat to the western right-of-way line of Sebastian Boulevard (CR 512 west); mn southwest along the western right-of-way line of Sebastian Boulevard (CR 512 west) approximately 200 feet; run southeast perpendicular to the right-of-way of Sebastian Boulevard (CR 512) to the northernmost limit of the boundary between Lots 48 and 49, Sebastian Highlands Unit 12 subdivision, Plat Book 7, Page 57A, of the Public Records of Indian County, Florida; run northeast along the eastern right-of-way of Sebastian Boulevard (CR 512 east) to the easternmost right-of-way of the alley running through Lot 58, Sebastian Highlands Unit 12 subdivision; run southeast along said alley right-of-way line to a point of intersection at the southernmost boundary of Lot 58; run northeast along the southernmost boundary of Lots 58-71, Sebastian Highlands Unit 12 subdivision to a point of intersection with the west right-of-way line of South Wimbrow Drive; continue northeast from the right-of-way of South Wimbrow Drive to the southwest comer of Lot 5, Sebastian Highlands Unit 12 subdivision; continue northeast along the southernmost boundary of Lots 5 through 12, Sebastian Highlands Unit 12 subdivision and continue to a point of intersection at the eastern right-of-way line of the drainage right-of-way, as identified on Plat Book 8, Page 44D, of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida; run south along the east side of the drainage right-of-way line and continue following the said right-of-way eastward; continue to follow the same right-of-way southward to a point of intersection at the southern municipal limits of the City of Sebastian; run east following the southern municipal limits of the City of Sebastian to a point of intersection with the western right-of-way line of the Florida East Coast Railroad; run northwest following the municipal limits of the City of Sebastian; continue westward following the said municipal limits of the City of Sebastian; continue northward following the same municipal limits of the City of Sebastian; continue northeast following the municipal limits of the City of Sebastian to a point of intersection of the eastern right-of-way line of the Florida East Coast Railroad; follow the east right-of-way line of the Florida East Coast Railroad to the point of beginning. CRA Master Plan Appendix Appendix D Existing Land Development Code Performance Overlay Districts Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 47 of 49 ARTICLE XXI. PERFORMANCE OVERLAY DISTRICTS Sec. 54.4-21.1. Intent. The intent of this section is to describe certain Performance Overlay zones used to impose special development restrictions on identified areas. The location of Performance Overlay zones is established by the City of Sebastian based on the need for special protective measures in that area. The underlying uses inthe area, as determined in.chapter II of this code, remain undisturbed by the creation of the Performance Overlay zone. The Performance Overlay zone merely imposes-additional or different development standards than those that would other- wise apply: SeC~ 54-4-21.2. Purpose. The overall purpose of these regulations is to: (a) Promote an attractive and inviting corridor; (b) Provide for 'a sufficient amount of attractive and well-maintained landscaping to complement buildings and structures within the corridor;. (c) Encourage development of attractive buildings within the Corridor; (d) Ensure unobtrusive and orderly signage that averts a garish and visually cluttered appearance along the corridor; (e) Encourage creative designs and buildings of quality; (D Foster creative approaches that result in buildings of enduring character through use of quality design and building materials; and (g) Make the Overlay Districts consistent with their vision statements. SeC~ 54-4-21.3. Special regulations and exemptions. (a) Exemptions. Within the Performance Overlay Districts, the following exemptions shall apply: (1) Single-family development and redevelopment shall be exempt from all Performance Overlay District special'development regulations. (2) Industrial and storage buildings located within an industrial district shall be ex- erupted from foUndation planting landscaping requirements and architectural/ building requirements only if no building facades abut a residentially zoned area or front on public or platted roads. All industrial buildings shall satisfy the color requirements. (3) Electrical substations and similar public or quasi-public facilities that prohibit access by the public onto the site may be exempted from architectural/building requirements, if the exempted building(s) and equipment will be visuallY screened from adjacent properties and roadways. LDC21:I § 54-4-21.3 SEBASTIAN LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (b) Uses. With the following exceptions, uses 'within the Performance Overlay Districts shall be as specified in article V of this cede. (1) Outdoor displays. No outdoor displays shah be permitted unless approved by the planning and zoning commission pursuant to section 54-3.10.2(d). . (2) Uses with vehicle and service bays."Uses involving Vehicle and service bays that are oriented perpendicular'to CR 512 are allowed only if a Type "B" bUffer with afoUr-foot high opaque feature is provided along the site's CR 512 frontage. (3) Underground utilities services required. Where new utilities services (e.g~ electrical, phone, cable) are provided to project sites, such service shall be installed underground. (4) Connection to pedestrisn systems: PrOjects fronting on roads with existingor planned/ required sidewalks and/or bikeways shall provide a pedestrian path from the p~oject to the existing or future sidewalk and/or bikeway. Said pedestrian path shall have a minimum width of five feet, shall consist'of a rigid surface meeting Florida Accessi- bility Code requirements, and may include properly marked areas that cross parking lots and driveways. See. 54-4.21.4. Plan approval In the Performance Overlay Districts, development and redeveloPment requiring adminis- trative, minor modification or site plan approval and exterior renovations shall comply with the districts plan requirements. The area of development for such projects shall be the area of the site containing buildings, additions, structures, facilities or improvements proposed by the applicant or required to serve those items propOSed by the applicant. Sec. 54-4-21.5. Supplementary requirements for site plan submittal and review. (a) Preliminary review of site plans. Preliminary staff review of site plans is mandatory, including review of landscaping and tree preservation plans; architectural plans,' lighting plans, and color and exterior finish' .samples. (b) Site plan review. The drawings listed below are to be submitted in a minimum 24-inch by 36-inch format, and are to be the largest scale, whiCh will fit on a 24-inch by 36-inch format. In addition to normal site plan review submittal requirements, the following are to be submitted, at the time of site plan review: (1) Site plan. This plan' shah indicate setbacks and all site development as required by the site plan ordinance, and shall depict: building orientation; locations of signage, location of service areas, dumpsters, loading zones, mechanical equipment~ and any other 'k, isually offensive elements" as described in these requirements, including locations and specifications of screening devices. (2) Tree plan. This plan shall indicate location, diameter at breast height (dbh) four and one-half feet above grade, and species of all trees six-inch caliper (measured at dbh) and larger. LDC21:2 PERFORMANCE OVERLAY DISTRICTS § 54-4.21.5 (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) Landscape plan. The landscape plan may be incorporated into the site plan. It shall include calculations demonstrating compliance with article XIV and the special landscaping requirements as established within each district. Building floor plans. This plan shall depict general location of entries and exits, restrooms, and general uses. Roof plan. This plan shall indicate roof type, slope, and any offensive elements (as described in these requirements) and descriptions of screening, devices. Building elevations. This plan shall inclUde all exterior-building elevations, including all items affecting the appearance of the building, including roof deSign, complete description of exterior building materials, exterior building colors, . all loading zones, mechanical and electrical equipment locations and their required sCreening devices, and signs attached to buildings. Certifications. The plan shall include certifications from the project architect or engineer that proposed roof plans ~and elevation plans satisfy the Overlay Districts architectural/building standards. Other requirements. Prior to site plan release, applicants shall submit to planning and growth management department three sets of the following and shah obtain planning- staff approval of each component: Site lighting plan. The site lighting plan may be incorporated into the site plan. It must indicate the site lighting plan, as well as a light fixture schedule with cut sheets (written specifications and pictorial representation including photometric chart) for all site lighting fixtures. This includes any site lighting fixtures attached to buildings. b. Sign elevations (minimum scale: three-quarters inch equals one foot). These are to be detailed drawings of building and site signage including all' items affecting the appearance of signs, including but not limited to: dimensions, area .in square feet, complete description of finish materials and their colors, color samples (minimum size three inches by five inches, using Pantone Matching System® numbers with color number on back of each sample) and method Of illumination. This is required for 'all outdoor signs except those which cannot be determined because the occupancy of the space is not known. Any signs not reviewed at site' plan review time for this reason must be reviewed under these requirements prior to the issuance of a sign permit. c. Building color samples (minimum sample sizes: three by five inches): Exterior and exterior signage color samples shall be submitted. d. Certification. Certification from the project architect or engineer that the proposed site and exterior building lighting, proposed signage, and proposed building and signage colors satisfy the OverlaY District's lighting, signage and color standards. LDC21:3 § 54-4-21.5 SEBASTIAN LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (c) Approval for change of exterior design required. Changes to the exterior of any structUre in the Overlay Districts shall require review and approval by the planning and growth management department. Such changes shall include, but not be limited .to, colors, building materials, roof finishes and signage. Routine maintenance and replacement of materials which do not affect the approved exterior design shall be exempt from such review and approval. See. 54.4.21.6. Waivers. As part of an application for development, a request may be'made for a waiver of any of the provisions of this article. The request shall be heardbY the planning and zoning commission in determlrdng if any such provision be waived, modified or applied as written. The planning and zoning commission shall hold a quasi-judicial hearing on .the requested waiver. The criterion for granting a waiver or modification of any of the provisions of this article is whether the strict interpretation of the requirements of this.article places ,an inordinate burden on the property owner as defined by Florida Statutes. The waiver procedure .herein is the exclusive remedy to the application of the provisions of this article and is to be utilized in lieu of an application for a variance. Historic buildings. The planning and. zoning commission may waive the requirements of the performance overlay districts for the purpose of preserving a historic building, DIVISION A. RIVERFRONT OVERLAY DISTRICT REGULATIONS Sec. 54-4.21,A.1 Intent. This Riverfront Overlay District is designed to encourage development and redevelopment within the Riverfront District-that includes promotion of traditional building types with arcades, balconies, and porches. Additionally, the intent of the district is to create a sense of place and promote social interaction on the streets of the Riverfront District and encourage durable construction that is harmonioUs with the architectural heritage known as ithe "Old Florida Fishing Village" of Sebastian. Sec. 54-4-21~k.2. Boundaries. (a) Established: A special Performance Overlay District is hereby established to be known as the "Old Florida Fishing Village" Riverfront District. (b) Boundaries:' The Riverfront District shall include that portion of the City of Sebastian locat~ed east of the Florida East Coast Rgilroad to and including the Indian River, north to the city limits and south to the south city limits located approximately at the south section line of Section 6, Township 31S, Range 39E. (c) Riverfront District requirements: All development in the Riverfront District shall comply with the requirements of this article. The standards and. requirements set forth below shall applY to new development, conversion in use from residential to commercial, and to building exterior refinishing. LDC21:4 PERFORMANCE.OVERLAY DISTRICTS §54-4-21.A.3 Sec. 54-4-21~L3. General. (a) Scope: The design of all structures in the Riverfront District shall comply with the requirements of this code. This pertains to any building, group of buildings, Site development, alterations affecting building's exterior, parking lots, and vehicular use areas. Compliance with the provisions in this code shall be reviewed by the growth management department, planning and zoning commission and the city council as appropriate.. Precedence shall not' be set by any project or variances apprOVed by the ~growth management department, planning and zoning commission, city Council, or the board of adjustment. (b) Approval for change of exterior design required: Any 'eXterior change of any structure in the Riverfront District shall require review by the growth management department. Such changes shall include, but not be limited to, colors, building'materials, roof finishes, and signage. Changes to the architectural features or Style, landscaping, or. signs shall be approved by the growth management director. Modifications to the site plan shah be approved in compliance with the site plan modification process in article X. ROutine maintenance and replacement of materials which does not affect the approved exterior design shall be exempt from this paragraph. (c) Prohibited architectural styles: The following are not considered to be consistent with the "Old Florida Fishing Village" architectural style nor appropriate for the Riverfront District and are prohibited: (1) Corporate signature or commercial prototype architecture, unless such is consistent with all requirements of this code. Examples of such include, but are not limited to, flat roOfed convenience stores and gas stations. (2) Buildings which are of symbolic design for reasons of advertising and buildings which are not compatible to the atmosphere of Riverfront District. Examples of Such include "A frome" style roofs, garishly colored .roofs, translucent architectura] elements, and the like. Symbols attached to buildings will not be allowed unless they are secondary in appearance to the building and landscape~ and are an aesthetic asset to the building project and neighborhood. (3) Any kitsch architecture (pretentious bad taste) which does not resemble a typical structure. Examples of such include, but are not limited to, structures that resemble an exaggerated plant, fish, edible food, or other such items such as giant oranges, ice cream cones, dinosaurs. (4) (5) Any architecture having a historical reference that is so unique and different from current design philosophy of an "Old Florida Fishing Village" that such reference is inconsistent and/or incompatible with surrounding structures. Examples of such include, but are not limited to, igloos, domes or geodesic domes, Quonset style structures, teepees, log cabins, medieval castle, caves. Styles that are not in the "Old Florida Fishing Village" theme. Art Deco style is prohibited. LDC21:5 § 54-4-21.A.4 SEBASTIAN LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE Sec. §4-4-21~..4. Special provisions. (a) Provisions: The "uses" below must follow all criteria set forth in this code. The following are added criteria for each specific "use"~ (1) Residentially designated properties. The following materials are approved for use in residentially designated areas: fiberglass or asphalt shingle-style roofing, for sloped roofs and visible roof structures, and textured plywood as a finish product. Rooftop screening devices shall not be required for attic ventilators or plumbing roof vents on residentially designated properties. However, roOf ventilators, roof vents, and the like shall be located where they will be least visible from roadways. (2) Commercial centers and oUt-parcels. The materials, exterior finishes, signage and colors of shopping centers and structures developed on Shopping center outparcels shall be comPatible, and harmonious with each other as determined by which structures are developed first. This requirement may be waived by the planning and zoning commission if: a. The initial shopping center or outparcel was built prior to the enactment of the Riverfront District special regulations; and b. It is determined by the planning and growth management department that enforcement of this requirement would conflict with the intent of these Riverfront District special requirements. see. 54.4-21.,4,5. Design criteria. (a) General design criteria: (1) Buildings with facades fronting on more than one street should have equal design considerations and consistent detailing on all street frontages. (2) Porches on the front building facade.are encouraged. (3) Wood picket fences, wrought iron fences or landscape buffers are encouraged along the front property line, on corner lots and along the side property line. Arbors and trellises are permitted in the front yard. Except for arbors and trellises, the minimum height of fences shall be three feet and the maximum height shall be four feet. The maximum height for arbors and trellises shall be ten feet. Above fences, architectural features of up to 12 inches shall be allowed. Such features shall be spaced a minimum of ten feet apart. Chain link fences are not permitted in the front yards. Walls are discouraged. All walls shall be constructed of brick or other decorative materials and shall not exceed four feet in height. (4) If a building facade is 100 feet or more in width measured parallel to the nearest body of water, an open vista of at least ten feet in width and eight feet in height shall be required within the building's facade to allow a visual corridor from the public right-of-way to the adjacent body of water. LDC21:6 PERFORMANCE OVERLAY DISTRICTS §54-4-21.A.5 (b) General items which are prohibited: (1) Flat, blank, unarticulated, or massive facades are prohibited on front facades. Facades located within view of a roadway are to incorporate architectural elements Providing breaks in the planes of exterior wails and/or roofs. Facades located within view of roadway are to be designed to lessen the appearance of excessive bulk (this is especially important for large:scaie commerciai'structures). Facades can be divided by use of: proportionai expression of structure, openings, arcades, canopies, fenestration, changes of the building, and the like. (Stepping or sloping of a parapet wall in Conjunction With a low sloped roof is prohibited.) Flat, blank, unarticulated, or massive facades will be permitted on the sides and rear of a building where "Blank Facade Foundation Planting" is utilized .(see landscape section for requirements). (2) The following materiais or systems for siding are prohibited as a finish and/or exposed product: corrugated or ribbed panels, smooth finish concrete block (standard concrete masonry units), precast concrete tee systems; plywood or textured plywood (except vertical board and batten). Plywood will be allowed for soffit materiai. (3) Any canopy (such as for a gas station, car wash, or drive-through facility) that is wholly or partially within 75 feet of a thoroughfare plan road right-of-way shall meet the following requirements concerning maximum fascia height (This pertains to all fascia on the above described canopy including any canopy fascia that continues beYond the 75-foot limit.): tRoof Slope Distance Less than 10 feet 10 to 20 feet . Greater than 20 feet IMaximum FaScia Height 8 inches 12 inches 16 inches (4) Plastic or metal is prohibited as a finish materiai for walls or trim. Plastic is prohibited as a finish material for sloped roofs, visible roof structures, and fascias. Although prohibited in generai, certain metai and plastic construction products may be 'approved by the planning and zoning commission, upon a written request and product sample submitted by the applicant. The planning and zoning commission may approve use of the material if the folloWing criteria are satisfied: i. The product shail appear authentic from the closest distance that it will be viewed by the general public. ii. The product shall be substantiai. Thin and flimsy imitations are unacceptable. iii. The product shail hold up as well as the product it is imitating. That is,' it must be fabricated in such a way that it will retain its originai shape, appearance, and color, as well as the product it is imitating. iv. The product's color shall resemble the color of the product it is imitating. (5) Any exposed masonry in a stack bond is prohibited. LDC21:7 § 54-4-21.A.5 SEBASTIAN LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (6) Lighting that follows the form of the building, parts of the building,, or building elements is prohibited. (7) Neon lighting, fiber optics, or s/mi]ar system trim where the neon tube, fiber optics or similar system is visible is prohibited (This restriction includes site signage) (8) Backlit transparent architectural.elements, backlit architectural elements, as well as illuminated or backlit awnings and.roof elements are prohibited. This does not prohibit the use of glass blocks or the use of an illuminated sign attached to a building. (9) Facades'that appear to-be primarily awnings are prohibited. An awning shall not run continuously for more than 30% percent of the length of any single, facade. Placement of awning 'segments shall relate to building features (e.g. doorways and windows), where possible. Awning segments shall not exceed 25% of the length of any single facade~ (10) (11) "Drive-up" Windows or ,'amusement loud speakers" located on a building facade that faces a residential use are prohibited. They shall not be located on a building facade that faces Indian River Drive except for special events as permitted by the city council. Accessory structures~ including sheds, out-buildings, dumpster enclosures, and screen- lng structures, shall match the style, finish, and color of the site's main building. Metal utility sheds and temporary car canopies are prohibited. (c) Roofs and parapets: (1) Slope roofs: Gable, hip, and shed s~le roofs shall .have a slope no less than 5:12 (rise:run) and not greater than 10:12 (riSe:run). Mansard style roofs with a slope greater than 10:12 (rise:run) are prohibited. Generous eaves on sloped roofs are encouraged. Any roof with a slope less than 5:12 (rise:run) ("low sloped roof'), shall not be Visible from a roadway. Low sloped roofs 'must be screened with a visible roof structure or parapet wall Sheds, porches and balcony roofs shall have a slope no less than 3:12 (rise:run). (2) Visible' roof structures: Visible .roof structures shall be of such height, bulk, and mass, so as to appear structural, even where the design is non-structUral. Visible roof structures shall have a rnin/m~rn vertical rise of six feet (not including fascia). Visible roof structures shall have a slope no less than 5:12 an// not greater than 10:12 (rise:run). Mansard style visible roof structures with a slope greater than 10:12 (rise:run) are prohibited. Where visible roof structures are Utilized in 'a building design, they shall be continuous around all sides of the structure, except where incorporated with a parapet wall or other architectural element (this does not allow "stuck-on" roofs). Any.facade that is not visible from a roadway~ will not require a continuous visible roof structure, on that facade. Any building with less than 3,500 square feet of enclosed space and utilizing a low sloped roof must have a visible roof structure on all facades which are visible from a roadway. LDC21:8 PERFORMANCE OVERLAY DISTRICTS §54-4-21.A.5 (3) The following roof styles are prohibited. "A~frame," bowstring, domes gambrel, non- symmetrical gable or hip (different slope on each side of ridge), quonset, and polynesian. Gable or hip roof with up to a 10:12 (rise:run) m~x-imum pitch with a "skirted" or"flared" lower portion at a 3:12 (rise:run) minimum pitch is allowed. (4) The ridge or plane of a roof (or visible roof structure); that runs parallel (or slightly parallel) with a roadway shall not run continuous for more-than 100' feet without offsetting or jogging the roof ridge or plane a minimum of 16 inches with dormer windows or other architectural feature that breaks uP the roof. Low sloped roofs are excluded from this requirement. (5) Roofing on sloped roofs and visible roof structures shall be limited to the following systems: a. Cedar shingles or shakes, slate, clay tile, or cement tile. Steel, copper, and factory painted al~minum standing sesm roofing. c. 5-V crimp roof. Galvanized metal or copper shingles of Victorian or diamond shape or pattern. Three dimensional fiberglass or asphalt shingle. Architectural standing seam roofs shall be limited to the. following systems: fiat metal panels with narrow raised seAm~ running 12 to 20 inches apart, which are secured with continuous seam covers or mechanically seamed. Light and natural colors, as well as mill finish metal roofs are encouraged. Mixing panel colors is prohibited and all building roofs shall be of one color. (6) Roofing materials are prohibited for use as.a finish'material on parapets or any surface with a slope greater than 10:12 (rise:run), up to and including vertical surfaces. This pertains only to thOse surfaces visible from adjacent property, exclusive of access drives or roadways. This does not exclude the use of metal fascia six inches or less in height, This does not exclude the use of typical metal flashing, Wall cap, drip edge, and the like. This does not exclude the use of roofing materials as a screening device, as long as it does not function as a building's parapet, iThis does not exclude the use of Cedar shingles or shakes as a wall materiel used below the roof line. (7) Plastic or metal roOf panels or systems, corrugated or ribbed roof panels, hot mopped systems, built-up, gravel, torched on, foam or fluid applied, roll or membrane roofing, and the like are prohibited on any roof which is visible from any roadway and/or residentially designated area. This does not exclude the .use of architectural standing seam metal roofing or galvanized 5-V crimp metal roOfing. (8) Partial parapet walls are not permitted. If a parapet wall is used on a building, then a parapet wall of the same style and material is to be Continuous around all sides of the structure, except where incorporated with a visible roof structure or other architec- tural element. Introduction of any visible roof structure shall not appear "fake". Any LDC21:9 § 54-4-21.A.5 SEBASTIAN LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE facade that is not visible from a roadWay. Will not require a continuous parapet wall on that facade. Stepping or. sloping of a parapet wall in conjunction.with a loWsloped roof is prohibited. (d) Site: (1) All 'telephones, vending machines, or any facilitY dispensing merchandise or a service on private property, shall be confined to a space built into the building or buildings, or enclosed in a separate structure compatible with the main building~s architecture. These areas are to be designed with the safety of the user in mind~ PUblic phones and ATMs should have 24-hour access. (2) No advertising will be allowed on any exposed amenity or facility such as benches and trash containers. (3~ When feasible, existing specimen trees should ~be preserved in place or relocated on site. Use of tree wells, as well as adaptation and variations of siting in order to conserve native vegetation, is encouraged. (4) The use of thematic and decorative site lighting is encouraged. Low lights of a modest scale can be used along with feature lighting that emphasizes plants,' trees, entrances, and exits. Light bollards are encouraged along pedestrian paths. The color of the light sources (lamp) should be consistent throughout the project. Color of site lighting luminaries, poles, and the like shall be limited to dark bronze, black, or dark green (decorative fixtures attached to buildings are exempt froTM the fixture color require- ment). .Lighting is not to be used as a form of advertising or in a manner that draws considerably more attention to the'building or grounds at night than in the day. Site lighting shall be designed to direct light into the property. Lighting shall avoid any annoyance to the neighbors from brightness or glare. (5) Roadway style luminaries (fixtures) such ascobra heads, Nema heads, and the like are prohibited. Wall pads and flood light.luminaries are prohibited where the light source would be visible from a roadway¥ parking area and/or residentially designated area. High intensity discharge (e.g~ high pressure sodium, metal halide, mercury vapor, tungsten halogen) lighting fixturesmounted on buildings and poles higher than 18 feet above the Parking lot grade, and under canopies, shall 'be directed perpendicular to the ground. Other than decorative and low level/low height lighting; no light source or lens shall project above or below a fixture, box, shield, or canopy. (e) Screening devices: (1) '~v-isually Offensive elements," whether freestanding, mounted on roofs, or located anywhere on a structure shall be concealed from view on all sides. Individual screens, building elements, or appropriate landscaping, are to be used to completely screen the offensive elements from view from adjacent roads, properties, and parking areas. Parapet walls,' visible roof structures, individual screens, or building elements shall be used to Completely screen roof mounted, visually offensive elements fr°m view from LDC21:10 PERFORMANCE OVERLAY DISTRICTS § 54-4-21.A.5 any point around the entire building perimeter. Screening devices shall relate to the building's style of architecture and materials. All screening devices shall be designed so that no part of the offensive element extends beyond th~ top of the screen, measured vertically. Rooftop screening devices shall not be required for plumbing roof vents which are less than four inches in diameter and less than 12 inches ab°ve roof penetration. These roof vents are to be located where they will be least visible from roadways. (2) (3) "Nuisance elements" shall be visually screened from adjacent roadways and/or residentially designated areas with solid walls in addition to any required landscaping. Loading dockbuffering shall meet standards of the landscaPe ordinance (article XIV). Ail other walls shall be a minimum of six feet in height. All dumpster ;and trash container areas shall be completelY screened on all sides. A noise abatement enclosure shall 'be used on HVAC equipment. Individual screens and walls shall relate to'the buildings style of architecture and materials. A durable material such as reinforced concrete masonry units is recom- mended with an architecturally compatible £mish. Wood fences as a screening-device are encouraged~ (4) Chain link fencing, with. or without slats, is prohibited as a screening device for screening visually offensive elements and nuisance elements. Where chain' link ~or similar fencing is allowed to be used (e.g, around storm water ponds), sUch fencing shall be green or black and shall be located and landscaped so as to visually screen the fencing from public view. (fi Building walls. The eXterior walls of the principal building shall be constructed of any of the following materials and in the following sPecified manner. All materials shall be used over the entire building or as continuous horizontal blends only. No panelizing shall be permitted or other simulations. (1) Stucco with a "float finishf smooth or coarse, machine spray, dash and troweled. (2) Wood clapboard fiVe inches to the weather. (3) Wood shingles seven inches to the weather. (4) WoOd board or batten board of a board width from eight to 18 inches. (5) Wood shiplap siding smooth face seven inches to the Weather. (6) Coral, keystone or tabby. (7) Ashlar pattern, flush sawn finish. (8) Split face block. (g) Arcades and porches: Arcades, balconies, or porches shall be constructed of materials either.of wood or conform to the construction of the principal~building; LDC21:ll § 54-4-21.A.5 SEBASTIAN LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (h) Garden walls: The garden walls of the principal building shall be constructed of either wood, wrought iron, or PVC lattice, or shall conform to the construction materials of the principal building, including stone, brick, and stucco. Chain link fence concealed by landscap- ing may' be used along the .side and rear of the property. No simulations 'shall be permitted. (i) Accessory buildings: Accessory structures~ including sheds, out-buildings~ dUmpster enClosures, and Screening structureS, Shall match the. s~yle, finish, and color of the ~site's main building~ Metal utility sheds and temporary car canopies are prohibited. Sec. 54-4-21J~.6. Colors. (a) Intent. The intent is to use Colors that complement the adopted "Old Florida Fishing Village" theme. Bright and garish colors, as a means of attracting attention to a business are not characteristic of the Riverfront District and are not compatible with this code's objectives. (1) Whites, earthtones, and subdued greys are encouraged. These colors can be described as being "softer", "older", "subdued"., and "antique looking". (2) Fluorescent and bright colors are prohibited. (b) Color standards. Ali buildings and accessory structures within the Riverfront Overlay District shall be limited to the colors listed in the Overlay Districts master color list, (c) Roof colors (requirements for roofs that are visible from a roadway): Metal roof colors shall consist of natural mill finish, white, light neutral colors in the warm range, and a limited number of earth-tone colors. Mixing or alternating 'colors of metal panels is prohibited. For remaining roofs, the following shall dictate: Other than natural variations in color or color blends within a tile, the mixing or alternating of roof color, in the same roof. material is prohibited. Colors and color blends shall not be contrary to the intent of this code. Color for roofing which is glazed, slurry coated, or artificially colored on the surface by any other means shall be limited to the same colors as approved for metal roofS. (d) Natural finish materials: The color requirements listed above shall not apply to the colors of true natural finish materials such as brick, stone, terra c0tta, concrete roof tiles, slate, integrally colored concrete masonry units, copper, and wood finishes. Colors commonly found in natural materials are encouraged, unless such material has been artificially colored in a manner which would be contrary to the intent of this code. (e) Awning colors: 'Awning colors shall be consistent with item (a) abOVe. (f) Overlay District master color list. The Overlay Districts master color list and approved color board shall be maintained and made available by the planning and growth management staff. The list can be mailed or faxed upon request. Sec. 54-4-21~.7. Landscape requirements. (a) Purpose: The purpose of the Riverfront District Landscape Code is to emphasize the impact of landscape design and maintenance on the health of the Indian River Lagoon and to enhance the beauty of the. Riverfront District. LDC21:I2 PERFORMANCE OVERLAY DISTRICTS § 54-4-21.A.7 (b) Intent: The intent of the Riverfront Landscape Code is to promote wise landscape design that can benefit the Indian River Lagoon with reduced irrigation, fertilization, and pest control needs. (1) Encourage the use of native plants. Large o~lr~ and cabbage Palms are among the many native plants which can give the feel of "Old Florida Fishing Village". Native plants properly sited can minimize maintenance costs and compliment the historic appeal of the Riverfront District. (2) Put the right plant in the right place. Encourage the use of plants suited t° the soil conditions rather than the use of soil amendments. (3) Native plant list. This list of native plants is intended to assist the landowner in choosing indigenous landscaping that will have a minimal impact on the Indian.River Lago°n. (c) Requirements: All development'in the Riverfront District shall comply with the landscaping requirements as described in article XIV and shall comply with the following additional requirements: (1) Landscape strips. a. The width of the perimeter landscape strips shall be determined bY the required front, side and rear setbacks as described in the underlying zoning district. For. residential uses, the perimeter landscape strips shall be 25% of those setbacks. For' community facilities and commercial uses, the perimeter landscape strips shall be 50% of those Setbacks, but not less than ten feet. When a zero front setback is allowed and is used, a front perimeter landscape strip between the building and the property line isnot reqUired. b. Required perimeter and interior landscaPe strips shall'not be used for any other uses including stormwater management. c. No more than 25% of the'required perimeter and 'interior landscape strips shall be covered in sod or grass. d. All required perimeter and interior landscape strips not sodded or grassed shall be covered in recYcled .or environmentally friendly mulch. Lava 'rocks or other dark rocks may be used in areas of high pedestrian traffic. River rock, gravel~ pea rock, or similar material is encouraged for use in the required perimeter .and interior landscape strips. e. Within the perimeter landscape strips, the following landscaping shall be provided per 100 (lineal feet): 1. Five canopy trees. ~ 2. Six understory trees. 3. Continuous hedge: Three to three and one-half feet high at planting. NOTE: The'hedge shall provide a visual screen three feet high above.the.grade of the project site parking area. Hedge material shall provide full screening to the LDC21:13 § 54-4-2LA.7 SEBASTIAN LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (2) ground; therefore, myrtles and shrubs with similar leafing characteristics shall not be used for hedge material~ unless a double row .arrangement is used. At the time Of a certificate of occupancy (CO) for the project site, the hedging' shall provide a three-foot visual screen, subjectto citY.sight distance requirements. Clustering of trees along the bUffer strip is encouraged, and ~uniform spacing of trees is discouraged, except where used to emphasize a particular planting theme or development' style. Foundation plantings; Foundation plantings .shall be required as stated below for buildings in commercial and industrial areas and for. businesses allowed in residential areas. However, for industrial and storage buildings located in the commercial, industrial and' mixed use zoning distriCts, foundation planting strips shall be exempt for sides of buildings not fronting on a residentially designated area, or public or platted road. a. Along the front, sides and rear of buildings, 'the following foundation planting landscape strips shall be provided in accordance with the building height: I BUilding Height Foundation Planting I Strip DepthZ i IUp to 12 feet high ' [5 feet depth ' 112 feet to 25 feet high Il0 feet depth . lover 25 feet high [15 feet depth distance measured perpendicular to, the building, from the foundation outWard. b. Within such foundation planting landscape strips, the following landsCaping shall be provided: 1. 40% of the foundation perimeter (.exclUding entranceways and overhead doors) along all building faces shall be landscaped, as follows: Building Height Landscape Specifications · 1 p~lm.tree or.appropriate.canopy tree ' for every 10 lineal feet of planting strip (clustered) · i 'understory tree for every. 20 lineal feet of required Planting strip. · 3 shrubs for every 10 square feet of required planting area. · Ground cover, flowering plants or sod in the remaining planting area Minimum plant .material re- quired: For buildings of 12 to 25 feet in height: 10 feet minimum planting area depth · I canopy tree for every 10 .lineal feet of planting-strip (3 palms with a minimum height of 12 feet each may be substituted for each canopy tree). · i understory tree for every 20 lineal feet of required planting striP. LDC21:14 PERFORMANCE OVERLAY DISTRICTS § 54-4-21.A.7 Building Height Landscape Specifications · 3 shrubs for every 10 square feet of required planting area. · Ground cover, flowering plants or sod in the remaining planting area · 15 feet minimum planting area depth For buildings over 25 feet in height: · 1 canopy tree for every 7 lineal feet of planting strip (3 palms with a minimum height of 16 feet each may be substituted for each canopy tree). · I understory tree for every 10 lineal feet of required .planting strip. · 3 shrubs for every 10 Square feet of required planting area. · Ground cover, flowering plants or'sod in the remaining planting area The following modifications are allowed upon approval from the planning and growth management director or other designee: i. Foundation planting strips may be located away from buildings to avoid conflicts with architectural features (e.g., roof overhangs), drive- ways, and vehicular areas serving drive-up windows. ii. The depth of foundation planting striPs may be modified if the overall minimum area covered by the foundation 'plantings proposed meets or exceeds the area encompassed by the required foundation planting area. (d) Increased foundation plantings for "blank facade" building faces. As referenced in the architectural/building standards section of this plan, "blank facade" building faces that are unarticulated are allowed if foUndation plantings are provided as specified above with a 100% increase (doubling) in required plant material quantities (as specified above). (e) Increased canopy tree size. All canopy trees required under normal landscaping and buffering requirements and special Riverfront corridor plan requirements for projects within the corridor shall have a mioimum height of 12 feet and minimum spread of six feet at time of planting.' P~lm tree clusters may be uSed as canopy trees as specified in the landscape ordinance. However, Such palm trees shall have a minimum clear trunk height of 12 feet. (f) Other requirements. For parcels east of Indian River Drive, the landscape plan shall include a description of the existing and proposed shoreline and wetland vegetation. (g) Native plants for the sebastian ri-verfront district. Native plants can help to preserve and foster the feeling of an "Old Florida Fishing V~fllage". These plants are well-adapted to Florida life and, properly sited, thrive with minimal irrigation, fertilization, and pest control. The AssOciation of Florida Native Nurseries can assist with availability information. The following Plants are encouraged in the Riverfront District. LDC21:15 § 54-4-21.A. 7 SEBASTIAN LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE Canopy Trees Red maple ............................................. Acer rubrum Paurotis palm .......................................... Acoelorraphe wrightii Southern red Cedar ...................................... Juniperus silicicola Southern magnolia ..................................... Magnolia grandiflora Red mulberry .......................................... Morus rubra Redbay ........................... . ...................... Persea borbonia Sand pine .. ................................ . ............. Pinus clausa South Florida slash pine ................................. Pinus elliotti var. densa Live oak ............................... . ................ Quercus virginiana Sabal palm ............................................. Sabal palmetto Cypress ...................... ~ .......................... Taxodium sp. Hercules club ........................................... Zanthoxylum clava-herculis Understory trees Tough bumelia ......................................... Bumelia tenax Buttonwood ............................................. Conocarpus erectus Coralbean ..... ..................................... . ..... Erythrina herbacea Florida privet .......................................... Forestiera segregata Dahoon holly ... ~.. ...................................... Ilex cassine Black ironwood ............................ . ............. Krugiodendron ferreum Simpsons stopper ....................................... Myrcianthes fragrans simpsoni Wax myrtle ........................... ~ ................ Myrica cerifera Sand live oak ............ , .............................. Quercus geminata Shrubs/hedges Beautyberry ................................... ......... callicarpa 'americana Jamaica caper ........................................... Capparis cynophallophora Fiddlewood ........................... . .................. Citharexyl~m fruiticosum Seagrape ................................................ Coccoloba uvifera Varnish leaf ...................... ...................... Dodonaea Viscosa Firebush ............................................... Hammelia patens Florida privet ' Forestiera segregata Yaupon holly ........................................... Ilex vomitoria Simpsons stopper ....................................... Myrcianthes l~agrans simpsoni Wild coffee ......................... ...... . .............. Psychotria nervosa Needle palm ............................................ Rhapidophyllum hystrix Saw palmetto .......................................... Serenoa repens Necklace pod ........................................... Sophora tomentosa Walters viburnum ...................................... ViburnUm Obovatum Spanish bayonet ........................................ Yucca aloifolia LDC21:16 PERFORMANCE OVERLAY DISTRICTS § 54-4-21.A.8 Canopy Trees Ground covers Beach bean ............................................. Canavalia rosea Golden creeper ......................................... Ernodea littoralis Yellowtop .............................................. Flaveria linearis Blanket flower .......................................... Gaillardia pulchella Beach dune sunflower ..................................... Helianthus debilis Spider lily ..................... . ......................... Hymenocallis latifolia Dwarf yaupon hollY ....................................... Ilex vomitoria var Schellings Beach morning glory .................................... Ipomoea pes-capre Beach elder ............................................ Iva imbricata Coral honeysuckle ...................................... Lonicera sempervirens Muhly grass ............................................ Muhlenbergia capillaris Boston fern ............................................ Neprolepsis biserrata Wild petunia ........................................... Ruellia caroliniensis Red sage ................................. .... ~ ......... Salvia coccinea Spiderwort ........................................ ..... Tradescantia ohiensis Coontie ................................................ Zamia pumila Along the shoreline Giant leather fern ...................................... Acrostichum danaeifoliUm Black mangrove .............................. . .......... Avicennia germinans Sea-oxeye daisy ......................................... Borrichia frutescens Railroad vine ............................................ Ipomoea pes-capre White mangrove ........................................ Laguncularia racemosa Christmas berry ......................................... Lycium carolinianum Red mangrove .......................... . ................ Rhizophora mangle Cordgrass ............................................... Spartina sp. (h) Approval for changes of landscape plan required: Any change of a landscape plan .in the Riverfront District, originally required to comply with these landscape requirements, shah require review and approval by the growth management department. Such changes shah include, but notbe limited to, changes of plant material, height, Iocation,~ colors, or hardscape materials. Routine maintenance and replacement of materials which does not affect the approved landscape plan shall be exempt from this paragraph. Sec. 54-4.21Jk.8. Sign regulations. (a) Scope: These special regulations consist of additional requirements above and beyond the city's sign ordinance and shall supersede any less restrictive provisions found in the sign ordinance. All signage shall comply with the requirements of the sign ordinance except as modified by these special sign regulationS. All signs within the district are intended to be consistent with and further the "Old Florida 'Fishing Village" theme~ LDC21:17 § 54-4-21.A.8 SEBASTIAN LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (b) Prohibited signs. The provisions stated herein are in addition to prohibitions listed in article XVI, Signage and Advertising. The following are prohibited: (1) Lights or illuminations that flash, move, rotate, scintillate, blink, flicker, or vary in intensity or color, except for time-temperature-date signs. Public signs permitted. pursuant to article XVI, Signage and Advertising provisions, are excluded' from this prohibition and are allowed. (2) Electronic message boards and message centers, electronic adjustable alternation displays, or any sign that automatically displays words, numerals, and or characters in a programmed manner. Traffic regulatory and directional signs permitted pursuant to article XVI, Signage.and Advertising provisions, are excluded from this prohibition and are allowed. (3) Portable or trailer style changeable copy signs, excepting approved special event signs. (4) Signs with the optical illusions of movement by means of a design that presents a pattern capable of giving the illusion of motion or changing of copy. (5) Strings of light bulbs used on nonresidential structures for commercial purposes, other than traditional, holiday decorations at the appropriate time of the year. (6) Signs that emit audible sound,' odor, or visible matter, such as smoke or steam. (7) Neon lighting, fiber optics or similar systems, which exceed six square feet in area, and where the neon tube, fiber optic or similar system is visible from the outside is prohibited. Neon lighting, fiber optics and siml]ar systems shall not be Used for outlining the building including the windows. (8) Rough plywood used for permanent signs. (9) Any material used in such a manner for a permanent sign that results in a sign. having a semblance to the look of a temPorary sign but intended by the owner to be permanent. (10) Installation of an additional sign (or signs) that does not harmonize with the design or materials of the initial sign, sUch as: a. Attachment or mounting of signs where mounting hardware is lef~ exposed. b. Signs with different color cabinets, frames, or structure. (11) Appliques or letters of vinyl and similar materials for use on any permanent monument sign. They are also prohibited for use on. any permanent wall or facade signs that exceed three square feet. Window signs as allowed in this article are excluded from this prohibition. Regardless of size, appliques or vinyl letters are prohibited for use on plastic sign faceS. (12) Changeable copy signs for office, industrial, commercial and residential uses, unless such sign is incorporated within the allowable monument sign area. LDC21:18 PERFORMANCE OVERLAY DISTRICTS § 54-4-21.A.8 (c) Items that are encouraged: (1) Attractive and durable materials such as the following are consistent with the "Old Florida Fishing Village" theme and are encouraged: a. Shaped and fashioned "wood look" multi-level signs are encouraged (i.e.: sand blasted or carved). Low maintenance, durable materials such as high density polyurethane, PVC, and high performance vinyl are encouraged and preferred over actual wood or medium density overlay (MDO) plywood. b. Internally illuminated aluminum cabinet with textured finish, and cut-out inset or push through acrylic' letters. c. Backlit reverse pan channel letters (opaque faced) mounted on sign that is harmonious with the project's architecture.· (2) Encourage consistency in materials and continuity of the sign design for a permanent sign. (3) Signage that relates to the building's style of architecture and materials is encouraged. (d) Modifications of sign regulations. (1) Maximum copy area: Reduce to 50% of what is allowed in article XVI, Signage. (2)' Required setbacks from property lines or right-of-way: No change. (3) Distance separating signs: No change. (e) ColOrs: (1)The following colors are encouraged for signage: a. Use of earth-tone colors and pastels. b. Darker backgrounds with light color sign copy. c. Use of colors that match or are compatible with the project's architecture. d. Colors such as medium or dark bronze are acceptable and encouraged. Polished or weathered true bronze, brass, or copper metal finished are acceptable and encouraged. PreCious metal colors are allowed on sand blasted or carved "wood look" style signs. (2) The following colors are prohibited for signage: a. The use of shiny or bright metallic or mill finish colors (i.e.: gold, silver, bronze, chrome, aluminum, stainless steel, etc.). b. The use of garish colors .(including but not limited to: purple, chartreuse and/or fluorescent colors), unless such colors are part of a state or federal registered trademark. (f) Approval for change of sign design required: Any exterior change of signage in the Riverfront District, originally required to comply with this sign ordinance, shall require review and approval by the community development department. Such changes shall include, but not LDC21:19 § 54-4-21.A.8 SEBASTIAN.LAND. DEVELOPMENT CODE be limited to, changes of'. sign area (square footage), sign copy area (square footage), sign copy (this does not apply, to "changeable copy" signage), height, shape, style, location, colors, materials, or method of illumination. Routine maintenance and replacement of materials which does not affect the approved design shall be exempt from this paragraph. (g) Special provisions. (1) Multi-tenant spaces: Multi-tenant spaces such as shopping centers, out parcels, commercial complexes and parks, and office complexes and parks will be reqUired to submit to the .growth management department a sign. program for review and approval. This sign program shall communicate the coordination and consistency of design, colors, materials, illumination, and locations of signage. In multi-tenant spaces where no established pattern exists as described above, the owner of the multi-tenant spaces shall be required to submit a sign program for approval prior to issuance of any new sign permits. (2) Wall' signage: a. The maximum vertical dimension of a facade or wall sign shall not exceed 25% of the building height, not to exceed four feet. b. Awnings with lettering shall be considered a wall sign. Where lettering is used on an awning, the area of lettering shall be inclUded in the percentage limitation of a project's sign area. c. Wall signs (facade signs) are prohibited on roofs. (3) Changeable copy signs: Changeable copy signs shall be regulated under the following guidelines. a. Changeable copy signs shall not comprise more than 50% of the permitted sign area and shall be included as part of the permitted sign area, except as described herein below. b. Motor vehicle service stations and convenience stores with gas pumps may utilize up to 100% of permitted sign area for changeable prices of gasolines only (or as regulated by federal law). c. Movie theaters may utilize up to 80% of permitted.sign area for display of names of films, plays or other performances currentlY, showing. Such changeable copy areas shall be included as part of the permitted sign area. (4) Illumination: Ail external flood sign illumination shall be mounted at grade, directly in front of the sign area. Light source shall be completely 'shielded from oncoming motorist's view. (5) Nonconforming signs: It is the intent of this section to allow nonconforming signs permitted before the adoption of this code to continue until they are no longer used, or become hazardous, but not to encourage their survival. SUch signs are hereby declared to be incompatible with the' overall intent of this section. a. Removal of nonconforming signs: All nOnconforming signs, .except as provided for ~ herein, shall be removed. LDC21:20 PERFORMANCE oVERLAY DISTRICTS § 54-4-21.A.9 b. Continuance of nonconforming signs: A nonconforming sign may be continued, subject to the following provisions: 1. A nonconforming sign shall not be .enlarged or increased in any way from its lawful size at the time of the adoption of this code. 2. Nonconforming signs, or nonconforming sign strUctures that are defined as abandoned Signs shall not be permitted for reuse. 3. Except as Otherwise provided herein, there may be a change of tenancy or ownership of a nonconforming sign, WithOUt the loss of nonconforming status, if the property' is not abandoned~ c. Repairs, maintenance, and improvements: Normal repairs, msintenance, and improvements may be made. d. Reconstruction: If any nonconforming sign is destroyed bY fire, flood, explosion, collapse, wind, or other catastrophe, it shall not be used. or reconstructed except in full cOnformity with the provisions of these special regulations. e. Casual, temporary, or [[legal Use: The casual, temporary, . or illegal use of any sign shall not be sufficient to establish the existence of a nonconforming use or to' create any rights in. the continuance of such use. Sec. 54-4-21~.9. Nonconformities. Within the Riverfront Overlay District, legally established existing development and uses that do not comply with these special regulations are grandfathered-in. Ail nonconforming uses and strUctures are governed by article VIII. In addition, Within the Riverfront District, the following, nonconformities regulations shall apply: (a) (b) Nonconforming property: It is the intent of this chapter to allow nonconforming properties to continue, but also encourage their conformity to what extent is possible considering the existing site conditions and characteristiCs." A'"compatible property, shall be considered in compliance With the intent of the .Riverfront District special regulations. Continuance of nonconforming property: A nonconforming property may be continued, subject to the following provisions: (1) Use of nonconforming strUctures abandoned .for a period of six or more consecu- tive months located on a nonconforming property shall not be permitted until the property is brought into compliance with the requirements of a compatible property. (2) Except as otherwise provided herein, there may be a Change Of tenancy or ownership of a nonconforming property, Without the loss of nonconforming status, if use of the nonconforming strUctures is not abandoned for a period of six or more consecutive months. LDC21:21 § 54-4-21.A.9 SEBASTIAN LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (3) Colors of s structure located On a nonconforming property shall not be changed from those existing at the time of the adoption of these special regulations, unless the new, to-be-painted colors comply with the Riverfront District special color regulations. · (4) Projects on nonconforming properties requiring a building permit (excluding permits for roofs or minor repairs) shall be required to bring the property into compliance as a "compatible property." (5) A structure located on a nonconforming property shall not be enlarged or increased in any way from its lawful size at the time of the adoption of these special regulations. Where such changes are made, a building permit and compliance with the requirements of a "compatible property" are required for the enlargement or addition. DIVISION B. CR512 OVERLAY DISTRICT REGULATIONS Sec. 54-4-21.B.1. Intent. As a significant business and residential center and a major entranceway into the City of Sebastian, the corridor will have an attractive, well maintained, orderly and uncluttered appearance. The corridor will be characterized by impressive vegetation and landscaping; complementary buildings and signs with enhanced designs and aesthetic aPPearances; and a safe transportation system that accommodates mass transit, pedestrians, bicycles, and other transportation alternatives, as well as automobiles~ Sec. 54-4,21.B.2. Boundaries of the CR 512 Corridor. i.. The boundaries of the CR 512 Overlay District shall include all the properties which abut CR 512 and that are located within the city limits of the City of Sebastian. If any additional segments of CR 512 are subseqUently dUly annexed into the city, land develOpment along the said newly annexed segment shall be' consistent With'the City's land development code, including this article. In the CR 512 Overlay District~ the following special regulations and exemptions shall apply to new development and redeVelopment. Sec. §4-4-21.B.3. Architectural/building standards. (a) Prohibited architectural styles. The following are prohibited: (1) Corporate signature or commercial prototype arChitecture, unlesS such is consistent with these special corridor requirements. Examples of such prohibited architecture include fiat roofed convenience stores, gas stations, and canopies for gas stations, ·car washes, and drive through facilities. ~ (2) Any kitsch architecture (such as a building that does not resemble a typical structure), including strUctures or elements· that resemble an exaggerated plant, fish, edible food, or other such items such as giant oranges, ice cream cones, dinosaurs. ' LDc21:22 PERFORMANCE OVERLAY DISTRICTS § 54-4-21.B.3 (3) Any architecture having a thematic reference that is so different from current design philosophy that such reference is inconsistent and/or incompatible With surrounding structures. Examples of such include: Igloos, domes or geodesic domes, quonset style structures~ teepees, log cabins, western "false fronts"; medieval Castles, caves, and the like. ' (b) Special provisions. (1) Industrial and storage uses in commercial and industrial districts. Compliance shall be required only for those facades fronting on residentially designated areas or public or platted roads. However, industrial buildings shall satisfy the color requirements. (2) Residentially designated properties. The following materials are approved fOr use in residentially designated areas: fiberglass or asphalt shingle-style roofing for sloped roofs and visible roof structures~ and textured plywood as a finish product. Rooftop screening devices shall not be required for attic ventilators or plumbing roof vents on residentially designated properties. However, roof ventilators, roof vents, and the like shall be located where they will be least visible from roadways: (3) Shopping centers and out-parcels. The materials, exterior finishes, signage and colors of shopping centers and structures developed on shopping center outparcels shall be compatible and .harmonious with each other as determined by which structures are developed first. This requirement may be waived by the planning and growth management department if: a. The initial shopping center or outparcel was built prior to the enactment of the CR 512, special regulations; and b. It is determined by the planning and growth management department that enforcement of this requirement would conflict with the intent of these CR 512 special requirements. (4) Electrical substations and similar uses. Electrical substations and similar uses that prohibit access by the public into the site may be exempted from all architectural/ building requirements by the planning and growth management director if the exempted building(s) and equipment will be visually screened from adjacent properties and roadways. (c) General design criteria. (1) Buildings with facades fronting on more than one street shall have similar design considerations (e.g. roof treatment, building articulation, entrance features, and window placement) and consistent detailing on all street frontages. (2) General prohibitions and restrictions: a. Flat, blank, unarticulated, or massive facades fronting on a roadway, exclusive access drive or residentially designated areas are prOhibited. Facades fronting such roads, drives, or areas shall be designed to incorporate architectural elements providing breaks in the planes of exterior walls and/or roofs to LDC21:23 § 54-4-21.B.3 SEBASTIAN LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE eo articulate the building and to lessen the appearance of excessive mass. Facades should incorporate elements relating to human scale, and can be divided by use at proportional expression of structure, openings, arcades, canopies, fenestration, changes in materials, cornice details, .molding details, changes in the heights of different sections of the building, and the like (stepping or sloping of a parapet wall in conjunction with a low sloped roof is prohibited). Flat, blank, unarticulated, or massive facades will be permitted on the sides of a building when building is constructed to the alloWable zero foot side setback. The following matei:ials or systems are prohibited as a finish and/or exposed product: corrugated or ribbed metal panels, smooth finish concrete block (stan- dard concrete masonry units),~ precast concrete tee systems, plywood or textured plywood~ Plywood shall be allowed for soffit material. Any canopy (such as for a gas station, car wash, or drive-through facility) that is wholly or-partially within 75 feet of a thoroughfare plan road right-of-way shall meet 'the following requirements concerning maximum fascia height (This pertains to all fascia on the above described canopy including any. canopy fascia that continues beyond the 75-foot llmlt.): Roof Slope Distance ILess than 10 feet to 20 feet IGreater than 20 feet IMaxirnum Fascia Height 8 inches 12 inches 16 inches Plastic or metal is prohibited as a finiSh material for walls or trim. Plastic is prohibited as a finish material for sloped roofs, visible roof structures, and fascias. Although prohibited in general, certain metal and plastic construction products may be approved by the planning and zoning commission, upon a written request and product sample submitted by the applicant. The planning and zoning commission may approve use of the material if the following Criteria are satisfied: i. The product shall appear authentic from the closest-distance that it will be viewed by. the general public. ii. The product shah be substantial. Thin and flimsy imitations are unaccept- able. iii. The product shall hold up as well as the product it is imitating. That is, it must be fabricated in such a way that it will retain its original shape, appearance, and color, as well as the prodUct it is imitating. iv. The product's color shall resemble the color of the product it is imitating. Any exposed masonry in a stack bond is prohibited. Lighting structures or strip lighting that follows the form of the building, parts of the building, or building elements is prohibited. LDC21:24 PERFORMANCE OVERLAY DISTRICTS § 54-4-21.B.3 g. Neon lighting, fiber optics or similar systems, which exceed six square feet in area, and Where the neon tube, fiber optic or similar system .is visible from the outside is prohibited. Neon lighting, fiber optics and similar systems shall not be used for outlining the building including the windows. h. Backlit transparent or translucent.architeCtural elements, backlit architectural elements, as well as illuminated or backlit awningS ~ and roof mounted 'elements are prohibited. This does not prohibit the use of glass blocks. This does not prohibit the use of an illuminated sign attached to a building: i. Facades that appear to be primarily awnings are prohibited. An awning Shall not run continuously for more than 30%.of the length of any single facade. Placement of awning segments shall relate to building features (e.g. doorways and windows), where possible. ,~wnings shall not exceed 25% of the area of any single facade. j. Drive-up windows shall not be located on a building facade that faces a residential area or a roadway unless architecturally integrated into the building and screened by landscaping equivalent'to the landscape material required in. a local road buffer and mUst run the length of the drive,through lane.. Speakers shall be oriented so as not to project sound, toward residential areas. k. Accessory structures, including sheds, out-buildings, dumpster enclosures, and' . ~ screening structures, shall match the style, finish, and color of the Site's main building. Metal utility sheds and temporar~ car canopies are prohibited. (d) Roofs (1) (2) and parapets: Sloped roofs. Gable, hip, and shed style roOfs shall have a slope no less than 5~12 (rise:run)~ Mansard 'style roOfs with a slope greater than 30:12 (rise:run) are prohib- ited. Generous eaves on sloped roofs are encouraged. Any roof with a slope less than 5:12 (rise:run) ("low sloPed roof') shall not be visible froTM a roadway and/or residen- tially designated area. LoW sloped roofs must be screened with a visibleroof structure or parapet wall. Visible roof structures. Visible roof structures shall be of such height, bulk, and mass, so as to appear structural, even where the design is non-structural and shall have a minimum vertical rise of six feet (not including fascia). Visible roof structures shall have a slope no less than 5:12 (rise:run). Mansard style visible roof structures with a slope greater than 10:12 (rise:run) are prohibited. Where Visible roof structures are utilized in a building design, they shah be continuous around all sides ofthe structure, except where incorporated with a parapet wall or other architectural element (this does not allow !'stuck-on" roofs). Any facade that is not visible from a roadway, exclusive access drive or residentially designated area, such as facades that are interior to a tightly spaced compound of buildings, will not require, a continuous visible roof structure on that facade. Any building with less than 3,500 square feet of ground floor area shall have a visible roof structure an all facades. LDC21:25 § 54-4-21.B.3 SEBASTIAN LAND DEIz-ELOPMENT CODE (3) The following roof styles' are prohibited~ "A-frame," bowstring, dome, gambrel, non- symmetrical gable or hip (different slope on each side of ridge), quOnset, and polynesian. Gable or hip roof with up to a 10:12 (rise:run) maximum pitch with a "skirted" or "flared" lower portion at a 3:12 (rise:rUn) minimum pitch is allowed. (4) The ridge or plane of a roof (or visible roof structure), that rUns parallel (or slightly parallel) with a roadway shall not run continuous for more than 100 feet Without offsetting or jogging (vertically or horizontally) the roof ridge or plane a m½nlm~m of 16 inches. Low sloped roofs and parapet walls are excluded from this requirement. (5) Roofing on sloped roofs and visible roof strUctures shall be limited to the following systems: a. Cedar shingles or shakes, slate, clay tile, or cement tile. b. Steel, copper, and factory painted aluminum standing se_am roofing. c. 5-V crimp roof. d. Galvanized metal or copper shingles of Victorian or diamond shape or pattern. e. Three dimensional fiberglass or asphalt shingle. ArchitectUral standing seam roofs shall be limited to the following systems: fiat metal panels with narrow raised seams rUnning 12 to 20 inches apart, which are secured with continuous seam covers or mechanically seamed. Light and natural colors, as well as mill finish metal roofs are encouraged. Mi~dng colors of metal panels is prohibited. Roofs on any one site shall' be of one color. (6) Roofing materials are prohibited for use as a finish material on parapets or any surface with a' slOPe greater than 10:12 (rise:run) up to and including vertical surfaces. This pertains only to those surfaces visible from adjacent property, exclusive of access drives or roadways. This does not exclude the use of metal fascia six inches or less in height, use of typical metal flashing, wall cap, drip .edge, and the like, use of roofing.materials as a screening device (as long as it does notfunction as a building's parapet), and use of cedar' shingles or shakes as a wall material used below the roof line. (7) Plastic or metal roof panels or systems, corrugated or ribbed roof panels, hot mopped systems, built-up, graVel, torched on foam or fluid applied, roll or membrane roofing, and the like are prohibited on any roof which is visible from any roadway and/or residentially designated area. This does not exclude the use of architectural standing seam metal roofing or galvanized 5-V crimp metal roofing. Use of metal or plastic tooling materials may be apprOVed as specified under the section as finish materials for walls, fascia, and trim. (8) Partial parapet walls are prohibited. If a parapet wall is used. on a building, then a parapet wall of the same style and material is to be continuous around, all sides of the strUcture, except where incorporated with a visible ro°f strUcture or other architec- tural element.' Introduction of any visible roof strUcture shall not apPear "faker Any LDC21:26 PERFORMANCE OVERLAY DISTRICTS § 54-4-21.B.3 facade that is not visible from a roadway and/or residentially designated area shall not require a continuous parapet wall on that facade. Stepping orsloping of a parapet wall in conjunction with a low sloped roof is prohibited. (e) Site elements: -(1) All telephones, vending machines, or any facility dispensing merchandise or a service on private property shall be confined to a space built into the building or buildings, or enclosed in a separate structure compatible with the main building's architecture. These areas are to be designed with the safety of the user in mind. Public phones and ATMs should have 24-hour access:. (2) No advertising will be allowed on any exposed smenity or facility such as benches or trash containers. (3) When feasible, existing specimen trees should be preserved in place or relocated on site. Use of tree .wells, as well as adaptation and variations of siting in order to conserve native vegetation, is encouraged. (4) The use of thematic and decorative site' lighting is encouraged. Low lights' of a modest scale can be used along with feature lighting that emphasizes plants, trees, entrances, and exits. Light bollards are encouraged along pedestrian paths. The color of the light sources (lamp) should be consistent throughout the project.. Color of site lighting l,,minaries, poles, and the like shall be limited to dark bronze, black, or dark green (decorative fixtures attached to buildings are exempt from the fixture color require- ment). Lighting is not to be used .as a form of advertising or in a manner that draws considerably more attention to the building or grounds at night than in the day. Site lighting shall be designed to direct light into the proPerty. Lighting shall avoid any annoyance to the neighbors from brightness or glare. Roadway style luminaries (fixtures) such as cobra heads, Nema heads, and the like are prohibited. Wall pads and flood light luminaries are prohibited where the light source would be visible from a roadway, parking area and/or residentially designated area. High. intensity discharge (e.g. high pressure sodium, metal halide, mercury vapor, tungsten halogen) lighting fixtures mounted on buildings and poles higher than 18 feet above the parkinglot grade, and under canopies, shah be directed perpendicular to the ground. Other than decorative and low level/low height lighting, no light source or lens shall project above .or below a fixture, box, shield, or canopy. (f) Screening devices.. (1) "V~sually offensive elements", whether freestanding, mounted on roofs, or anywhere on a structure, shall be concealed from view on aH sides. "Visually offensive elements'. consist of: Walk-in coolers/freezers, transformers, electrical equipment (including panels and meters), water or waste piping and valves, pumps, fans, exhaust vents, compressors, generators, tanks, and similar equipment. Individual screens, building elements, or appropriate landscaping, are to be used to completely screen the offensive LDC21;27 § 54-4-21.B.3 SEBASTIAN LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (2) (3) (4) elements. Parapet walls, visible roof structures, individual screens, or building elements, are to be used to completely screen roof mounted, visually offensive elements. They are to be screened from view from any point around the entire building perimeter. Screening devices shall relate to the building's style of architecture and materials. All screening devices shall be designed so that no part of the offensive element extends beyond the top of the screen, measured horizontally. Rooftop screen- ing devices will not be required for plumbing roof vents which are less than four inches in diameter and less than 12 inches above roof penetration. These roof vents should be located where .they will be least visible from roadways. Where chain link or similar fencing is allowed to be' used (e-g., around storm water Ponds), such fencing shall be green or black and shall be located and landscaped so as to visually screen the fencing from public view. "Nuisance elements" shall be visually screened from adjacent roadways and/or residentially designated areas with solid walls in addition to any required landscaping. Loading dock buffering shall meet standards, of the landscape ordinance (article XIV). All other walls shall be a minim,,m of six feet in height. Ail d,,mpster and trash container areas shall be 'completelY screened on ali sides. Acoustical material shall be used on the inside face of walls around HVAC equipment. Individual screens and walls shall relate to the building's style of architecture and materials. A durable material such as reinforced concrete-masonry units is recom- mended with an architecturally compatible finish. Wood fences are encouraged. Chain link fencing, with or withoUt slats, is prohibited as a screening device for screening visually offensive elements and nuisance elements. Sec. 54-4-21.B.4. Colors and building graphics. (a) The following building graphics are prohibited. Polka dots, circles, vertical stripes, diagonal stripes or lines, plaids, animals, and symbols such as lightning bolts. HoWever, legally registered trademarks which directly relate to the building occupant (not .trademarks of products or services sold or displayed) are allowed, subject to applicable sign and color regulations. (b) Color standards. All buildings and accessory structures within the CR-512 Overlay District shall be limited to the colors listed in the Overlay Districts master color list. (1) Base building colors. Base building colors relate .to wall and parapet wall areas and shall be limited to colors consisting of white and light neutral colors in the warm range. (2) Secondary building colors. Secondary building colors relate to larger trim areas and shall not exceed 30% of the area of any one building facade elevation. These colors consist of a mid-range intensity of the base building colors and complementary colors, and include all base building colors. (3) Trim colors. Trim colors are used for accent of smaller trim areas, are .the brightest groUp of colors allowed, and include all base building and secondary building cOlors. LDC21:28 PERFORMANCE OVERLAY DISTRICTS § 54-4-21.B.5 Use of metallic Colors (i.e.: gold, silver, bronze, chrome, and other extraordinarily bright colors) and use of garish colors, such as fluorescent colors (e.g. hot pink, shocking.yellow), is prohibited. Trim colors shall not exceed ten percent of the surface area of any one building facade elevation. (4) Roof colors (requirements for roofs that are visible from a roadway and/or residentially designated area). These colors consist of natural mill finish, white, light neutral colors in the warm range, blue, and a limited number of earth-tone colors. MiXing or alternating colors of metal panels is prohibited. For non-metal roofs, other than natural variations in color or color blends within a tile, the mixing or alternating of roof color in the same roof material is prohibited. Colors and color blends shall not be contrary to the intent of this Code. Color for roofing which is glared, slurry coated, or artificially Colored on the surface by any other means shall 'be limited to the same colors as approved for metal roofs. (5) Natural finish materials. The color regiments listed above shall not apply to the colors of true natural finish materials such as brick, stone, terra cotta, concrete rOof tiles, slate, integrally colored concrete masonry units, copper, and wood. Color commonly found in natural materials are acceptable, unless such material has been artificially colored in a manner which would be contrary to the intent of these requirements. Black, gray, blue, or extremely dark colors for brick, concrete masonry units, roofing, wood or stone is prohibited. This provision shall not prohibit the use of colors for natural finish roofing materials that match those colors approved for metal (6) Awning colors. Awning colors may include base building colors and/or secondary building colors and/or trim colors. However, secondary building colors and trim color. area used for awnings shall be included in the percentage ]imitation on the secondary building color and trim color surface area of a facade. (7) Overlay Districtmaster color list. The Overlay Districts master color list and'approved color board shall be maintained and made available by the planning and growth management staff. The list can be mailed or faxed upon request~ Sec. 54-4-21.B.5. Landscaping. The (a) city landscaping requirements of article XIV apply except as noted herein. Increased canopy tree size. All canopy trees required under normal landscaping and buffering requirements and special CR 512 corridor plan requirements for projects within the corridor shall have a minimum height of 12 feet and minimum spread of six feet at time of planting. Palm tree clusters may be used as canopy trees as.specified in the landscape ordinance. However, such palm trees shall have a minimum clear trunk of 12 feet. (b) CR 512 and thoroughfare plan road buffer. Within the corridor plan area, the follOwing landscape buffer shall be provided along the entire length of a site's CR 512 frontage, excePt for approved driveways: LDC21:29 § 54-4-21.B.5 SEBASTIAN LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE Minimum Planting/Berm CR-512 Frontage Buffer Depth Requirements per 100' Over 400 feet 10 feet 5 canoPY trees 6 Understory trees · Continuous hedge!: 2.5-3 feet high'at plant- ~ng · Berm: 1,_1.5, high~. · 250 to 400 feet 10' feet . 4.5 Canopy trees 5.5 UnderstorY trees .. · Continuous hedge~: L5-2.5 feet high at plant- Berm-.' 1.5'~2.5',high Less than 250 feet 10 feet 4 Canopy trees . 5 Understory trees · Continuous hedge~: 1.5-21.5 feet high at plant- mg Berm,: 1.5 '-3'. high! NOTE: The hedge and berm combination shall provide a visual screen four feet high above the grade of the project site parking area. Hedge material shall provide full screening to the ground; therefore, a mix of myrtles and shrubs with similar leafing characteristics shall not be used for hedge material unless a 'double row arrangement is used. At the time of a certificate of occupancy (CO) for the project site, the combination of berming and hedging shall provide a four-foot visual screen, subject to city sight·distance requirements. Undulations in the berm and corresponding hedge height are encouraged. Hedge shrubs shall be planted no further apart than 24 inches on center along the length of the buffer strip, to form a hedge that appears continuous as viewed from the roadway being buffered. Berms shall have a slope no steeper than three horizontal to one vertical, and shall be continuous along the length of the buffer strip, except where berm modifications·may be necessary for tree preservation as determined by the planning and growth management director or his designee. Clustering of trees along the buffer strip is encouraged, and uniform spacing of trees is discouraged, except where used to emphasize a particular planting theme or development style. Hedge plantings may be asymmetrical, and a buffer wall not to exceed four feet in height except as specified below, is allOwed within the middle one-third of the buffer strip's width (measured perpendicular to the road being buffered) if landscaping material is planted on each side of the wall. (c) Special buffer for multifamily projects. Multifamily projects shall provide the 'CR512 and thoroughfare plan road buffer as described above, with the additional requirement that the buffer shall include a six-foot opaque screen consistent with specifications in LDC21:30 PERFORMANCE OVERLAY DISTRICTS § §4-4-21.B.6 (d) article XIV. Where a wall or fence is used, such wall or fence shall' be located With the middle one-third of the buffer strip's width (measured perp.endicular to the road being buffed), and landscaping material shall be planted on each side of the wall or fence. Landscape islands.. Landscape islands shall be baCkfilled at least to the. top of curb or protective barrier, and may be bermed to a maximum .height of 24 inches above the adjacent parking lot grade. Sec. 54.4-21.B.6. SpeCial sign regulations. (a) Scope. These special regulations are in addition to the city's sign ordinance, and shall supersede any less restrictive provisions foUnd in the sign'ordinance. All signage shall comply with the requirements of the sign ordinance except as modified by these special sign regulations. (b) Approval or change of sign design required. Any exterior change to CR 512 OVerlay District signage shall, require review and approval by the planning and growth management department. Such changes shall include, but not be 'limited to, changes of sign area (square footage), sign copy area (sqUare footage), sign copy (this. does nor apply to "changeable copy" signage), height, shape, style, location, colors, materials, or method of illumination. Routine .maintenance and replacement of materials which does not affect the approved design shall be exempt from this review and approval. Changes to signs not originally required to comPly with these special sign. regulations are addressed in the "nonconforming signs" section of these regulations. (c) Prohibited signs. The provisions stated herein are in addition to prohibitions listed in article XVI, Signage and Advertising, The following are prohibited: (1) Lights or illuminations that flash, move, rotate, scintillate, blink, flicker, or varyin intensity or color, except for. time-temperature-date signs. Public signs permitted pursuant to article' XVI, Signage and Advertising provisions, are excluded, from this prohibition and are allowed. (2) Electronic message boards and message centers, electronic adjustable alternation displays, or any sign that automatically displays words, numerals, and/or characters in a programmed manner. Traffic regUlatory and directional signs permitted pursuant to article XVI, Signage and Advertising Provisions, are excluded from this prohibition and are allowed. (3) Portable or trailer style changeable copy signs, excepting approved special event signs. (4) Signs with the optical illusions of movement by means' of a design that presents a pattern capable of giving the illusion of motion or changing of copy, (5) Strings of light bulbs used on nonresidential structures for Commercial purposes, other than traditional holiday decorations at the appropriate time of the year. (6) Signs.that emit audible sound, odor, or visible matter, such as smokeor steara. LDC21:31 § 54-4-21.B.6 SEBASTIAN LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (7) Neon lighting, fiber optics or similar systems~ which exceed six square feet in area, and where the neon tube, fiber 'optic or similar system is visible from the'outside is prohibited. Neon lighting~ fiber optics and similar systems shall not be used for outlining the building including the windows. (8) Rough plywood used for permanent signs. (9) Any material used in such a manner for a permanent sign that results in a sign having a semblance to the look of a temporary sign but intended by the owner to be permanent. (10) Installati°n of an additional sign (or signs) that does not.harmonize with the design or materials of tho initial sign, such as: a. Attachment or mounting of Signs where mounting hardware is left exposed. b. Signs with different color cabinets, frames, or structure. (11) Appliques or letters of vinyl and' similar materials for use on any permanent monument sign. They are also prohibited for use on any permanent wall or facade signs that exceed three square feet. Window signs as allowed in this article are excluded from this prohibition. Regardless of size, appliques or vinyl letters are prohibited for use on plastic sign faces. (12) Changeable copy signs for office, industrial, commercial and residential uses, unless such sign is incorporated within the allowable monument sign area. (d) Signs that are encouraged: Shaped and fashioned "wood look" multi-level'signs (i.e.: sand blasted or carved), and signs having durable sign cabinet material such as high-density polyurethane arid PVC. (2) (3) Internally illumir~ated aluminum cabinet with textured finish, and cutout inset or push through acrylic letters~ Backlit reverse pan channel letters (opaque.faced) moUnted on sign that is harmonious with the project's architecture. (4) Signage that relates to the building's style of architecture and materials. (5) Thematic signage. (e) Colors. (1) The following colors are encouraged for. signage: Use of earth-tone colors and pastels. Darker backgrounds with light color sign copy. Use of colors that match or are compatible with the project's architecture. Polished or weathered true bronze, brass, or copper metal finishes are acceptable and encouraged. LDC21:32 PERFORMANCE OVERLAY DISTRICTS § 54-4-21.B.6 (2) The following colors are prohibited for signage: a. The use of bright metallic or mil! finish colors (i.e., gold, silver, bronze, chrome, aluminum, stainless steel, or other extraordinarily bright colors). Colors such as medium or dark bronze are acceptable and encouraged. Precious metal colors are allowed on sand blasted or carved "wood look" style signs. b. The use of garish colors, such as flUorescent colors, is prohibited. ' (f) Multi-tenant spaces: Applicants of proposed mUlti-tenant .projects, such as shopping centers,' out parcels, industrial complexes and parks, and office complexes and parks, shall submit a sign program for review and approval. This sign program shall communicate the coordination and consistency of design, colors, materials, illumination, and locations of signage. In a multi-tenant project Where no established pattern exists as described above, the owner of the mnlti-tenant project shall be required to submit a sign program for approval prior to issuance of any new sign permits for a tenant space. (g) Design criteria and additional restrictions. (1) Freestanding changeable copy signs. Where allowed, a freestanding changeable copy sign shall not comprise more than 80% of the total area of the actual sign. (2) Wall/facade signage. a. The maximum vertical dimension of a facade or wall sign shall not exceed 25% of the building height. b. Awnings with lettering shall be considered wall signs. Where lettering is used on an awning, the area of lettering shall be included in the percentage limitation of a project's sign .area. c. Lettering, logos, and trim colors on canopy fascia shall be considered a wall sign and shall be limited to 33% of the fascia area of any one elevation. Internally illuminated signs shall not be placed on. a canopy structure, and no sign. shall be placed above the fascia on a canopy structure. (3) Changeable copy wall signs for theaters. Theaters may utilize up to 80% of actual sign area for display of names of films, plays or other performances currently showing. (4) Illumination. All external floodsign illumination shall be mounted at grade, directly in front of the sign area. Light source shall be completely shielded from oncoming motorist's view. (h) Nonconforming signs: It is the intent of this section to allow nonconforming signs permitted before the adoption of this code to continue until they are no longer used, or become hazardous, but not to encourage their survival: Such signs are hereby declared to be incompatible with the overall intent of this section. (1) Removal of nonconforming signs: Ail nonconforming signs, except as provided for herein, shall be removed. LDC21:33 § 54-4-21.B.6 SEBASTIAN LAND.DEVELOPMENT CODE (2) Continuance of nonconforming signs: A nonconforming sign may be continued, subject to' the following provisions: a. A. nonconforming sign shall not be' enlarged or increased in any way from its lawful size. at the time of the adoption of this code. b. Nonconforming signs or nonconforming sign structures that are defined as abandoned signs shall not be permitted for reuse, c. Except as otherwise provided herein, there may be a change of tenancy or ownership of a nonconforming sign, withoUt the loss of nonconformiug status, if the property is not abandoned. (3) Repairs, maintenance, and improvements: Normal repairs, maintenance; and improve- ments may be made. (4) Reconstruction: If any nonconforming sign. is destroYed by fire,' flood, explosion, collapse, wind, or other catastrophe, it shall not be used or reconstructed exceptin full conformity With the provisions of these special regulations. (5) CasUal, temporary, or illegal ~use: the casUal, temporary, or illegal use of any sign shall not be Sufficient to establish the existence of a nonCOnforming use or to create any rights in the continuance of such use. Sec; 54-4-2LB.7. Nonconformities. Within the CR .512 District area, legally established existing development and uses that do not comply with these special regulations are grandfathered in. Ail nonconforming uses and structures'are governed by article VIII. In addition, within the CR 512 DiStrict area the following nonconformity regulations shall apply: (a) Nonconforming property: It is the intent of this chapter to allow nonconfOrming properties to continue, but also encourage their conformity to what extent is possible considering the existing site conditions and characteristics. A "cOmpatible property" shall be considered in compliance with the intent of the CR 512 District special regulations. (b) Continuance of nonconforming property: A nonconforming property may be continued, subject to the following provisions: (1) Use of nonconforming structures abandoned for a periOd of six or more consecu- tire months located on a nonconforming property shall not be permitted until'the property is brought into compliance with the requirements of a compatible property. (2) Except as otherwise provided herein, there may be a change of tenancy or ownership Of a nonconforming property, without the loss of nonconforming status, /fuse of the nonconforming structures is not abandoned for a periodof six or more consecutive months. LDC21:34 PERFORMANCE OVERLAY DISTRICTS § 54-4-21.B.7 (3) Colors of a structure located on a nonconforming property shall not be changed from those existing at the time of the adoption of these special regulations, unless the new, to-be~painted colors comply with the CR 512 special color regulations. (4) Projects on nonconforming properties requiring a building permit (excluding permits for roofs or minor repairs) shall be required to .bring' the property into compliance as a "compatible property." (5) A structure located on a nonconforming property shall not be enlarged or increased in any way from its lawful size at the time of the adoption of these special regUlations. Where such changes are made, a building permit and compliance with the requirementS of a "compatible property" are required for the enlargement, or addition. LDC21:35 CRA Master Plan Appendix Appendix E Economic Analysis Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 48 of 49 September 23, 2003 Mr. Henry Iler Iler Planning Group Palm Beach Gardens, Florida Dear Mr. Iler: Miami Economic Associates, Inc. (MEAl) has performed analysis to determine the market forces that will provide the basis for redevelopment activity within the portions of the City of Sebastian that have been designated for redevelopment under the provisions of F.S Chapter 163, Part II1. The defined redevelopment areas include the portion of the City considered to be its Downtown, which is located between the Indian River and the Florida East Coast Railway right-of-way. They also include the land immediately west of the railroad tracks within the fork of County Road (C.R.) 512 and south of southern tine of fork. The purpose of this letter, which is organized in the manner outlined immediately below, is to provide you with the results of our analysis. Section Page Analytical Procedures 1 Summary of Key Findings 2 Market Demographics 4 Employment 5 Historic Development Activity 7 Redevelopment Potentials 8 Housing 8 Hospitality Use 9 Retail Use 10 Office Use 10 Industrial Use 10 Conclusion 11 Analytical Procedures In order to assess the market forces that will impact redevelopment within the City of Sebastian, MEAl performed the following analytical procedures: Mr. Henry Iler Iler Planning Group September 23, 2003 Page 2 Surveyed the defined redevelopment areas described above to evaluate the nature and quality of their existing development as well as their physical characteristics; Met with you and the other members of the consulting team you have assembled to prepare a Redevelopment Plan for the areas described above to discuss the attributes of those areas that could potentially benefit or inhabit the redevelopment process; Reviewed relevant secondary source socio-economic data for the City of Sebastian proper and the broader Sebastian Market Area as well as Indian River County; · Reviewed data relating development activity that has occurred in the City of Sebastian and the Sebastian in recent years; · Spoke to officials of the City of Sebastian including the City Manager and members of the City's Growth Management Department; · Interviewed realtors and other knowledgeable about the City's economy and real estate market; and · Reviewed the minutes of the "stakeholder" interviews conducted by Iler Planning Group. Key Market Findings The bulleted paragraphs that follow summarize the key findings of MEAl's analysis. For the purpose of our analysis, the "Sebastian Market Area" was defined to include the City of Sebastian and the unincorporated areas surrounding it within Zip Code 32958. It also includes other nearby unincorporated areas such as Vero Lakes Estates as well as the portion of the barrier island lying north of Wabasso Road. While in-flow into the market can be expected from areas outside that just defined, MEAl believes that the redevelopment will be primarily defined by the market forces at work within the defined Sebastian Market Area. Review of the tax rolls for Downtown Sebastian reveals that the between Fiscal Years 2001 and 2004 the taxable value of property contained therein increased from $45.83 million to $66.17 million. While a portion of the increase was due to the record levels of appreciation experienced by real property generally in recent years, it also indicates that the area is positively perceived by the market and that some amounts of new development have been occurring even in the absence of a formal redevelopment plan. · The Sebastian Market area is characterized by strong growth in terms of population and income. Between now and 2010, population within the area is Miami Economic Associates, Inc. 6861 S.W. 89th Terrace Miami, Florida 33156 Tel: (305) 669-0229 Fax: (305) 669-8534 Email: meaink@bellsouth.net Mr. Henry Iler Iler Planning Group September 23, 2003 Page 3 expected to increase by approximately 4 percent a year with the result that the area should have about 45,000 residents by the latter date compared to the slightly more than 32,600 it had at the time of the 2000 Census. Median household income is expected to increase from approximately $52,500 in 2000 to in excess of $75,000 in 2010. It should be noted that income varies greatly throughout the Market Area with the households on the north end of the barrier island as a group being considerably more affluent than those on,the mainland. From a retail perspective, this makes it essential that island households be made to a feel a part of the Sebastian community. During the 1990's, private sector employment in Indian River County increased by approximately 1,000 workers on an average annual basis. Specific data for the Sebastian Market Area is not available. Private sector employment within the County --- also apparently within the Market Area --- is dominated by the Retail Trade, Health Care Services and Leisure and Hospitality sectors. Manufacturing and Wholesale Trade, which are the prototypical users of industrial space, are significantly smaller employment sectors and not growing at significant rates. As a result the small amounts of industrial space added since 1998 have primarily been occupied by service establishments such a repair shops. There has also been only minor amounts of office development because with the exception of Health Care Services, the sectors of the economy that typically use such space like Finance, Insurance and Real Estate and Professional Services have also not being growing quickly. MEAl estimates that there will be demand for between 600 and 700 new residential units in the Market Area annually though 2010. Historically, residential demand for new residential units within Sebastian has been overwhelmingly oriented toward single-family homes, which would be inappropriate in the Downtown area. The area is essentially zoned to accommodate Iow density multi-family units such as townhouses. MEAl believes that approximately 50 such higher value --- $200,000 and above .... units could be absorbed annually along the riverfront if the land were available. We recommend that such development be particularly encouraged to occur along the portion of the riverfront south of Main Street where it would benefit from proximity to Riverfront Park while, in turn, serving to energize the park. The preceding estimate of absorption is based on a number of factors including: o The successful development of multi-family units on the barrier island's riverfront; and A segmentation analysis of the market that should that a significant portion of prospective demand will be comprised of households headed by persons over the age of 55 with incomes in excess of $75,000. MEAl also believes that higher value residential development of the townhouse type should be encouraged in the portion of the area targeted for redevelopment that is located within the C.R. 512 fork. Residential units developed on this Miami Economic Associates, Inc. 6861 S.W. 89th Terrace Miami, Florida 33156 Tel: (305) 669-0229 Fax: (305) 669-8534 Email: meaink@bellsouth.net Mr. Henry Iler Iler Planning Group September 23, 2003 Page 4 property could also potentially benefit from excellent water views. MEAl is aware that this area is in relatively close proximity to the FEC right-of-way; however, development of the type proposed has been successfully undertaken in locations equally close the FEC line in the Cities of Boynton Beach and Delray Beach in Palm Beach County. In fact, the opportunity to buffer the proposed development from the impacts of rail traffic is greater in this instance than in those other locations. It is recognized that property within the C.R. 512 fork is currently zoned for industrial uses but MEAl believes that sufficient land for all foreseeable industrial development within the redevelopment target area exists south of C.R. 512. It is also our opinion, based on data relating to recent sales of industrial land in the area, re-designation of the land within the fork, inclusive of the parcel that the City will soon be disposing of, would produce higher land values than its current designation. As a result of the population and income growth already discussed, MEAl estimates that the Sebastian Market Area could support the development of approximately 100,000 square feet of new retail space annually through 2010. It is recommended that up to 150,000 square feet of this space be encouraged to occur in the vicinity of Riverfront Park and be designed for specialty shops and restaurants. Such development should serve as a catalyst for the higher value townhouse development in the area south of Main Street previously discussed. It could also serve to attract residents of the barrier island to Downtown Sebastian. Based on our understanding of the economy of Sebastian, MEAl does not believe that office development will play a significant role in redevelopment. We also believe that the demand for new hospitality uses will be modest. Market Demographics The bulleted paragraphs that follow describe the demographic composition of the Sebastian Market Area. During the 1990's, the population of the State of Florida increased at an average annual rate approximating 2.4 percent per year, which was substantially higher than the national rate of growth of 1.3 percent. The population of Indian River County, in which the Sebastian Market Area is located, increased at any even faster rate, 2.5 percent, than that of the State on an average annual basis. Of the 112,947 residents of Indian River County at the time of 2000 Census, 32,614 of them --- 29 percent --- lived in the Sebastian Market Area. As shown in Table 1 in the Appendix to this letter, the rate of population growth in the Sebastian Market Area during the 1990's was nearly 4 percent, or 1.6 times the County's strong rate of growth. Based on the fact that this rate of growth is Miami Economic Associates, Inc. 6861 S.W. 89th Terrace Miami, Florida 33156 Tel: (305} 669-0229 Fax: (305) 669-8534 Email: meaink@bellsouth.net Mr. Henry Iler Iler Planning Group September 23, 2003 Page 5 already expected to be maintained through 2007, MEAl believes that by 2010, the population of the Sebastian Market Area should approximate 45,000 people. The population of the Sebastian Market Area at the time of the 2000 Census was distributed in 14,505 households. The average household contained 2.25 persons. The relatively small household size reflected the fact that the over 40 percent of Market Area households were headed by individuals 65 years of age or older, as shown in Table 2 of the Appendix.. Based on projections for the year 2007, MEAl expects that the age profile of household heads will be somewhat, but not significantly, younger by 2010. The highest concentration of households headed by people of retirement age households is located on the northern end of the barrier island where the median age of the residents is currently estimated to be 59.2 years. In contrast, the median age of Vero Lakes Estates residents approximates 35. Median household income also varies significantly within the Sebastian Market Area depending on location. Illustratively, the median income of households living in the mainland portion of the Market Area is currently estimated to approximate $41,760 while that of the households' on the barrier island is estimated to be in excess of $84,250. As shown in Table 3 of the appendix, on an overall basis the median income of households in the Sebastian Market Area currently exceeds $55,500, which is considerably greater than that countywide. Countywide the median income approximates $40,000. Based on the income estimates provided in Table 3 for 2007, MEAl anticipates that the projected 20,300 households in the Sebastian Market Area in 2010 will have a median income on an overall basis exceeding $75,000. The median income of the mainland households will approximate $56,000 while that of the households living on the barrier island will exceed $116, 500. The income figures discussed in the preceding two paragraphs indicate that from an economic prospective it is important to have the residents of the northern portion of the barrier island identify with Sebastian. In fact, in terms of potential buying power, they will represent at least 44 percent of the market in 2010. To the extent that current year income does not reflect the full buying power of a group that is comprised substantially of retirees, their importance could even be greater. Employment The bulleted paragraphs that follow discuss the characteristics of employment in Indian River County and to the extent possible, based on the data available, within the Sebastian Market Area. · The employment data issued by the Florida Agency for Workforce Innovation is complied at only the County level. That data indicates that approximately 42,670 Miami Economic Associates, Inc. 6861 S.W. 89th Terrace Miami, Florida 33156 Tel: (305} 669-0229 Fax: (305) 669-8534 Email: meaink@bellsouth.net Mr. Henry Iler Iler Planning Group September 23, 2003 Page 6 people were employed within Indian River County on an average monthly basis during 2002. The private sector accounted for slightly over 37,000 of the total jobs with various agencies of government at the Federal, State and local providing the remainder of the jobs. In terms of private sector employment, Retail Trade and Health Care Services accounted for 33.3 percent of total jobs, employing 7,581 and 6,601 workers, respectively. Leisure and Hospitality Services accounted for an additional 5,653 jobs, or 13.2 percent of total employment. As shown in Table 4, other sectors of economic activity employing more than 2,000 workers included, in order of importance, Professional and Business Services, Construction, Manufacturing, Agriculture and Mining and F.I.R.E. The category of Professional and Business Services includes a wide range of activities ranging from legal and engineering services to copying services. Table 5 provides a list of the 17 largest private sector employers within Indian River County in 2002. It shows that 4 of them are in the health care sector, 3 in the leisure and hospitality sector and 3 in retailing. Most of the remainder is comprised of agricultural enterprises. Only 1 manufacturer is represented. In 2002 the Florida Agency for Workforce Innovation changed its historic method of counting employment by industry sector making comparisons with prior years somewhat difficult. However, it appears that during 10-year period inclusive of 1993 through 2002 approximately 1,000 jobs were created on an average annual basis. Growth occurred in all sectors of the economy with the exception of Agriculture and Mining. Particularly strong levels of growth occurred in Retail Trade, Construction and Health Care Services, reflecting the rapid growth in population during the period. The levels of growth in the F.I.R.E., Manufacturing and Wholesale Trade were moderate, with those three sectors adding fewer than 1,200 jobs in total over the ten-year period. As indicated previously, there is no reliable source of employment data for either the Sebastian Market Area or the City of Sebastian itself. In 2002, Tischler & Associates prepared a fiscal analysis for the City which indicated that a total of 3,685 were employed within the City. The source of that estimate was Claritas, Inc. MEAl is well-acquainted with the methodology used by Claritas to estimate employment. Given its reliance on the voluntary contribution of data by employers, we believe that it tends to produce numbers that are substantially understated, particularly in areas such as Sebastian in which most reporting entities are small businesses. Notwithstanding the fact that the Claritas data probably understates the number of employed in Sebastian, it does, in our opinion, reasonable reflect the composition of the workforce in terms of economic activity. According to the Claritas data, nearly 50 percent of the people employed by the private sector in the City are engaged in Retail Trade, Personal Services (i.e. dry cleaning, hair Miami Economic Associates, Inc. 6861 S.W. 89th Terrace Miami, Florida 33156 Tel: (305) 669-0229 Fax: (305) 669-8534 Email: meaink@bellsouth.net Mr. Henry Iler Iler Planning Group September 23, 2003 Page 7 care, etc.) and Leisure and Hospitality services. It further indicates that in excess of 25 percent are employed in F.I.R.E, Professional and Business, Health Care and Educational Services. Manufacturing and Wholesale Trade account for approximately 5 percent of the workforce within the City. Historic Development Activity The bulleted paragraphs that follow profile the developmental activity that has occurred within the Sebastian Market area since 1998. As shown in Table 6, the number of residential building permits issued by the City of Sebastian has been steadily rising since 1998, with 352 being issued in 2002. On an average annual basis, approximately 1,262 residential building permits have been issued in the unincorporated portions of Indian River County during the 1998 - 2000 period, with the highest number, 1,809, being issued in 2002. MEAl believes that the number issued on an average annual basis in the Sebastian Market Area, inclusive of the City and its unincorporated areas has ranged between 500 and 600, inclusive of seasonal/recreational units. The building permit activity within the City of Sebastian is overwhelmingly oriented toward single-family units. Within the unincorporated portions of the County including on the barrier island, there are significant numbers of multi- family units permitted each year. On an average annual basis, approximately 63,500 square feet of new non- residential space has been permitted within the City of Sebastian between 1998 and 2002. The amounts permitted have, however, varied greatly during the period. In two of the years including 2002, the amount permitted has approximated 36,000 square feet. In 2001, nearly 120,000 square feet was permitted. Review of the quarterly Community Development Reports issued by Indian River County indicates that the preponderance of the space permitted was for retail uses with some serving the health care sector. To the extent that new industrial space has been constructed, it is primarily occupied by service types uses (repair shops, etc,) rather than manUfacturing and wholesale trade enterprises. The amount of new non-residential space permitted in the unincorporated portions of Indian River County from 1998 to 2002 has also varied significantly. In 2001 and 2002 combined, a total of 624,814 square feet were permitted; however, in each of those two years the amount of development lagged behind the amount permitted on average in the years 1998 and 2000. The taxable value of property in the Downtown area of the City of Sebastian in 1994 was $34.96 million. As shown in Table 7, by Fiscal Year 2001 this figure had risen to $45.83 million. For the current fiscal year, 2004, it is $66.17 million. While a portion of the increase from FY 2001 to 2004 reflects a real estate Miami Economic Associates, Inc. 6861 S.W. 89th Terrace Miami, Florida 33156 Tel: (305) 669-0229 Fax: (305) 669-8534 Email: meaink@bellsouth.net Mr. Henry Iler Iler Planning Group September 23, 2003 Page 8 environment in which appreciation has been occurring at historically high rates, these numbers also indicate that some of the development activity discussed in the preceding paragraphs has occurred within the targeted for redevelopment. Many, if most, redevelopment areas do not experience the types of increases in taxable valuable that has characterized Downtown Sebastian before the adoption and implementation of a coherent Redevelopment Plan. This is a positive sign, indicating that redevelopment initiatives in Downtown Sebastian will have a strong prospect for success. Redevelopment Potentials The bulleted paragraphs that follow assess the potential for new development of various uses with the areas targeted for redevelopment within the City of Sebastian. Housing As discussed previously, approximately 500 to 600 new residential units were permitted on average annual basis from 1998 to 2002 in the Sebastian Market Area. This figure is inclusive of seasonal/recreational units. Based on the amount of population growth expected to occur annually through 2010, it anticipated that the market will support the development of 600 to 700 units annually. The overwhelming preponderance of new residential units in the Mainland portion of the Sebastian Market Area have been single-family homes. Such development would generally be infeasible within the areas designated for redevelopment where zoning favors development of up to 8 units per acre and mandates a three-story height limit. This zoning is basically consistent with single-family attached or townhouse product that could easily be developed with imagery evocative of many traditional seacoast communities. Accordingly, to the extent that new residential development is to be undertaken as part of the redevelopment initiative, it will require the emergence of a multi-family market not previously seen to any significant degree in Sebastian. Significant amounts of multi-family development have been occurring in unincorporated Indian River County as well as Vero Beach, most significantly in the portions of those areas located on the barrier island. Multi-family units are also being developed in the barrier island community of Indian River Shores. While some of this development has involved units with beach or golf course frontage, the attraction of other units has been frontage on the Intracoastal, which can be replicated within Downtown Sebastian. Given the topography of the City of Sebastian as it moves inland from the Intracoastal, residential units developed on the land within the fork of C.R. 512 could also enjoy excellent water views. It should also be noted that the supply of vacant land on the barrier island is substantially depleted in many areas. · Throughout Florida there is increasing demand by segments of the market, including portions of that comprised of affluent households, to live in Miami Economic Associates, Inc. 6861 S.W. 89th Terrace Miami, Florida 33156 Tel: (305) 669-0229 Fax: (305) 669-8534 Email: meaink@bellsouth.net Mr. Henry Iler Iler Planning Group September 23, 2003 Page 9 environments that are both beautiful and "alive". Evidence of this trend exists in places such as Downtown Delray Beach and Downtown Boynton Beach, among others. MEAl believes that such an environment can be created in Downtown Sebastian, particularly if increased specialty retailing and food and beverage uses that take advantage of the riverfront are developed. It should be noted that much of the development referred to above in Boynton Beach and Delray Beach, most of which is of high value, has been in close proximity to the FEC railroad line. It is further noted that there would be greater ability to buffer development in the C.R. 512 fork from the railroad noise than has been the case in Boynton Beach and Delray Beach. Review of the data in Table 8 that segments future housing demand by age of household head and income indicates that in excess of 70 percent of the future demand for housing is likely to involve households headed by persons 55 years of age or older. Within this segment of the market, there is frequently strong interest in multi-family units. It is further anticipated that in excess of 50 percent of this potential demand segment could afford housing priced in excess of $200,000, in most cases significantly higher. Based on the segmentation of housing demand discussed in the preceding paragraph, MEAl believes that demand for higher-value multi-family, townhouse- type units in the Downtown area and C.R. 512 fork in range of 50 units per year though 2010 could exist. Such development in the Downtown area should be most encouraged along the riverfront south of Miami Street. Its development will benefit from proximity to Riverfront Park and would, in turn, serve to energize the park as a major community facility. Hospitality Use Downtown Sebastian already contains some small to moderately-sized hospitality facilities. Modest demand for additional such development may emerge as redevelopment initiatives enhance the ambiance of the area and to the extent that new specialty retailing and eating and drinking venues are created. Development of a major new, chain-affiliated property is not, however, anticipated due to absence of a major amenity like beach or a marina. The height limitation imposed of Downtown development would also preclude the efficient operation of such a facility. Retail Use As discussed previously, the Sebastian Market Area is expected to experience significant growth in terms of both population and income. MEAl estimates that as this occurs, the opportunity will exist for the development of approximately 100,000 square feet of new retail space though the Market Area on an average annual basis though 2010. It is recognized that significant portions of the new supportable space are likely to be developed along the C.R. 512 corridor as new residential communities emerge and on in-fill sites along U.S. 1. However, a Miami Economic Associates, Inc. 6861 S.W. 89th Terrace Miami, Florida 33156 Tel: (305) 669-0229 Fax: (305) 669-8534 Email: meaink@bellsouth.net Mr. Henry Iler Iler Planning Group September 23, 2003 Page 10 portion of the new spending should be available to support the development of up to 150,000 square feet of specialty shops and eating and drinking establishments along the Riverfront. MEAl believes that retail and restaurant uses of the type just indicated should be encouraged to create the type of "lively" environment that has prompted higher value multi-family development to occur in the places previously referred to such as Downtown Boynton Beach and Downtown Delray Beach. We further recommend that such development occur in the vicinity of Riverfront Park, thereby drawing new residential development to the area south of Main Street. Office Use The development of new office uses is generally predicated on growth in the F.I.R.E. and professional and health care sectors of the economy. Based on our understanding of employment trends in Indian River County, inclusive of the Sebastian Market Area, MEAl does not envision significant demand for new office space, with the possible excePtion of medically-oriented facilities. We also do not believe that office use will play a significant role in the redevelopment of Downtown. Industrial Use To the extent that industrial development will be part of a redevelopment initiative, it would only be appropriate in the portion of the defined redevelopment area that is located west of the railroad tracks in the vicinity of C.R. 512. Survey of the industrial buildings that already exists in that area shows that are primarily occupied by a variety of service businesses such as repair shops and lawn services rather than manufacturers and wholesale trade firms. This is consistent with the employment data for Indian River County and is likely to remain the case. Review of building permit data for the period from 1998 to 2002 further indicates that new industrial development will only occur on a highly sporadic basis. That is further reflected by the fact that five of six recent sales identified, have been at values between $0.63 and $2.25 per square foot. The redevelopment area in the vicinity of C.R. 512 is actually comprised of two parts. The first part is located within the fork in the road. Included in this part of the area is a City-owned property that it will be disposing of and which will require re-designation in terms of permitted use. The second part of the area is located south of C.R. 512. MEAl believes that the redevelopment plan should direct all future industrial development into this latter area. We further recommend that the land within the fork be re-designated for mixed-use development inclusive of residential uses. Given the slow pace at which industrial development is occurring within Sebastian and the Iow land value reflected in the recent sale discussed above, MEAl believes that the recommended action would actually enhance the value of the property that would be subject to the land use amendment. Miami Economic Associates, Inc. 6861 S.W. 89th Terrace Miami, Florida 33156 Tel: (305) 669-0229 Fax: (305) 669-8534 Email.' meaink@bellsouth.net Mr. Henry Iler Iler Planning Group September 23, 2003 Page 11 Conclusion MEAl believes that significant market support for redevelopment in the City of Sebastian. We also believe that the market's general positive image of the area is likely to make redevelopment a successful undertaking. Sincerely, Miami Economic Associates, Inc. Andrew Dolkart President Miami Economic Associates, Inc. 6861 S.W. 89th Terrace Miami, Florida 33156 Tel: (305) 669-0229 Fax: (305) 669-8534 Email: meaink@bellsouth.net Mr. Henry Iler Iler Planning Group September 23, 2003 Page 12 APPENDIX Miami Economic Associates, Inc. 686t S.W. 89th Terrace Miemi, Florida 33156 Tel: (305) 669-0229 Fax: (305) 669-8534 Email: meaink@bellsouth.net Table 1 Population and Households Sebastian Market Area 1990 - 2007 1990-2000 Average Annual Change 2000-2002 2002-2007 Area 1990 2000 2002 2007 Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Population Mainland * 15,433 22,631 24,580 29,049 720 4.7 975 4.3 894 3.6 Barrier Island ** 7,918 9,983 10,642 12,142 207 2.6 330 3.--3 300 2.8 Total 23,351 32,614 35,222 41,191 926 4.0 1,304 4.0 1,194 3.4 Households Mainland * 6,390 9,710 10,590 12,656 332 5.2 440 4.5 413 3.9 Barrier Island ** 3,716 4,795 5,137 5,929 108 2.9 171 3.6 158 3.1 Total 10,106 14,505 15,727 18,585 440 4.4 611 4.2 572 3.6 Average Household Size Mainland * 2.38 2.32 2.32 2.29 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Barrier Island ** 2.13 2.08 2.07 2.04 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 2.29 2.24 2.24 2.21 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A * Incudes City of Sebastian, the remainder of Zip Code Area 32958 and other nearby unincorporated areas such as Vero Lakes Estates ** Includes area lying north of Wabasso Road Source: Claritas, Inc.; Miami Economic Associates, Inc. Age Range Table 2 Distribution of Households By Age of Household Head Sebastian Market Area 1990 - 2007 Average Annual Change 1990 2002 2007 1990-2002 2002-2007 Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Mainland * 15- 24 119 1.9 163 1.5 196 1.5 4 3.1 7 4.0 25- 34 984 15.4 851 8.0 957 7.6 (11) (1.1) 21 2.5 35-54 1,610 25.2 3,585 33.9 4,117 32.5 165 10.2 106 3.0 55-64 1,127 17.6 1,741 16.4 2,412 19.1 51 4.5 134 7.7 65 and over 2,550 39.9 4,250 40.1 4,974 39.3 142 5.6 145 3.4 Total 6,390 100.0 10,590 100.0 12,656 100.0 350 5.5 413 3.9 Median Age 47.5 47.9 49.5 Barrier Island ** 15 - 24 40 1.1 63 1.2 69 1.2 2 4.8 1 1.9 25 - 34 183 4.9 144 2.8 149 2.5 (3) (1.8) 1 0.7 35 - 54 956 25.7 1,301 25.3 1,442 24.3 29 3.0 28 2.2 55 - 64 701 18.9 995 19.4 1,324 22.3 25 3.5 66 6.6 65 and over 1,836 49.4 2,634 51.3 2,945 49.7 67' 3.6 6._~2 2.4 Total 3,716 .100.0 5,137 100.0 5,929 100.0 118 3.2 158 3.1 Median Age .59.3 59.2 .59.6 Total 15 - 24 159 1.6 226 1.4 265 1.4 6 - 3.5 8 3.5 25 - 34 1,167 11.5 995 6.3 1,106 6.0 (14) (1.2) 22 2.2 35 - 54 2,566 25.4 4,886 31.1 5,559 29.9 193 7.5 135 2.8 55 - 64 1,828 18.1 2,736 17.4 3,736 20.1 76 4.1 200 7.3 65 and over 4,386 43.4 6,884 43.8 7,919 42.6 208 4.7 207 3.0 Total 10,106 100.0 15,727 100.0 18,585 100.0 468 4.6 572 3.6 Median Age 51.8 51.6 52.7 * Incudes City of Sebastian, the remainder of Zip Code Area 32958 and other nearby unincorporated areas such as Vero Lakes Estates ** Includes area lying north of Wabasso Road Source: Claritas, Inc.; Miami Economic Associates, Inc. Table 3 Distribution of Households By Income Sebastian Market Area J990 - 2007 Average Annual Change 1990 2002 2007 1990 - 2002 2002 - 2007 Age Range Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Mainland * Under $25,000 3,122 48.9 2,475 23.4 2145 16.9 (54) (1.7) (66) (2.7) $25,000 - 34,999 1,288 20.2 1,619 15.3 1,522 12.0 28 2.1 (19) (1.2) $35,000 ~49,999 1,123 17.6 2,248 21.2 2,496 19.7 94 8.3 50 2.2 $50,000 - 74,999 577 9.0 2,474 23.4 3,154 24.9 158 27.4 136 5.5 $75, 000 - 99,999 149 2.3 1,044 9.9 1,645 13.0 75 50.1 120 11.5 $100,000 and over 131 2.1 730 6.--9 1,694 13.4 5--0 38.1 193 26.4 Total 6,390 100.0 10,590 100.0 12,656 .100.0 350 5.5 413 3.9 Median $25,341 $41,759 $51,059 Barrier Island ** Under $25,000 979 26.3 685 13.3 528 8.9 (25) (2.5) (31) (4.6) $25,000 - 34,999 393 10.6 410 8.0 465 7.8 1 0.4 11 2.7 $35,000 - 49,999 446 12.0 498 9.7 547 9.2 4 1.0 10 2.0 $50,000 - 74,999 743 20.0 727 14.2 654 11.0 (1) (0.2) (15) (2.0) $75, 000 - 99,999 323 8.7 638 12.4 663 11.2 26 8.1 5 0.8 $100,000 and over 832 22.4 2,179 42.4 3,072 51.8 112 13.5 179 8.2 Total 3,716 100.0 5,137 100.0 5,929 100.0 118 3.2 158 3.1 Median $50,633 $84,251 $104,583 Total Under $25,000 4,101 40.6 3,160 20.1 2,673 14.4 (78) (1.9) (97) (3.1) $25,000 - 34,999 1,681 16.6 2,029 12.9 1,987 10.7 29 1.7 (8) (0.4) $35,000 - 49,999 1,569 15.5 2,746 17.5 3,043 16.4 98 6.3 59 2.2 $50,000 - 74,999 1,320 13.1 3,201 20.4 3,808 20.5 157 11.9 121 3.8 $75, 000 - 99,999 472 4.7 1,682 10.7 2,308 12.4 101 21.4 125 7.4 $100,000 and over 963 9.5 2,909 18.5 4,766 25.6 162 16.8 371 12.8 Total 10,106 100.0 15,727 100.0 18,585 100.0 468 4.6 572 3.6 Median $34,641 $55,638 $68,134 * Incudes City of Sebastian, the remainder of Zip Code Area 32958 and other nearby unincorporated areas such as Vero Lakes Estates ** Includes area lying north of Wabasso Road Source: Claritas, Inc.; Miami Economic Associates, Inc. Table 4 Employment by Industry Indian River County 2002 Industry_ Emoloyment Percent Agriculture & Mining 2,350 5.5% Co nstructio n 3,252 7.6% Manufacturing 2,556 6.0% T.C.P.U. * 1,096 2.6% Wholesale Trade 740 1.7% Retail Trade 7,581 17.8% F.I.R.E. ** 2,001 4.7% Professional & Business Services 3,478 8.2% Educational Services 598 1.4% Health Care Services 6,601 15.5% Leisure & Hospitality 5,635 13.2% Other Services 1,761 4.1% Government 5,020 11.8% Total 42,669 100.0% * Transportation, Communications and Public Utilities ** Finance, Insurance and Real Estate Source: Florida Agency for Workforce Innovation; Miami Economic Associates, Inc. Table 5 Largest Private Employers Indian River County 2002 Em_Dloyer Em_Dloyees Indian River Memorial Hospital 1,451 The New Piper Aircraft 1,000 Public Supermarkets 715 Wal-Mart 672 Sun Ag, Inc. 550 Hale Indian River Groves 500 John's Island 475 Gracewood Fruit Packing 465 Dodgertown Complex 450 Winn-Dixie 440 Legend Properties, Inc. 426 Indian River Estates 413 Sebastian River Medical Center 370 Indian River County Exchange Packers 350 Visiting Nurse Association 332 Flight Safety Institute 300 Disney Veto Beach Resort 275 Industry_ Health Services Manaufacturing Retail Trade Retail Trade Agriculture Agriculture Hospitality Agriculture Leisure Retail Trade Real Estate Health Services Health Services Agriculture Health Services Transportation Hospitality Source: IRC Chamber of Commerce; Miami Economic Associates, Inc. Table 6 Building Permit Activity Indian River County 1998 - 2002 Single- Multi- Family Family Total (Units) (Units) (Units) Sebastian Year 1998 236 4 240 1999 262 10 272 2000 278 18 296 2001 294 13 307 2002 328 24 352 Industrial/ Commercial (S.F.) 50,930 35,874 74,355 119,579 36,684 Unincorporated County 1998 713 561 1,274 1999 697 115 812 2000 793 599 1,392 2001 927 98 1,025 2002 1,035 774 1,809 461,421 556,341 417,217 229,245 395,569 Total County 1998 1,075 593 1,668 1999 1,104 283 1,387 2000 1,200 668 1,868 2001 1,350 145 1,495 2002 1,484 991 2,475 658,841 640,897 581,221 523,008 554,354 Source: Indian River County; Miami Economic Associates, Inc. Table 7 Taxable Value of prOperty Downtown Sebastian Fiscal Years 2001 - 2004 Fiscal Year Taxable Value (O00's) 2001 $45,834.9 2002 $58,263.7 2003 $58,844.2 2004 $66,174.3 Source: City of Sebastian; Miami Economic Associates, Inc. CRA Master Plan Appendix Appendix F Site Development Regulations and Permitted Use 'Summary Sebastian, Florida 12-3-03 Page 49 of 49 Sebastian CRA Zoning Districts Permitted Uses PERMITTED USES Med. Density Multiple Commercial Commercial Family Residential Commercial-512 General Riverfront (RM-8) (C-5t 2) (CG) (CR) Commercial Waterfront Residential Industrial (CWR) (IN) Public Service (PS) Single-Family Dwelling Duplex Dwellings Multifamily Dwellings (up to 8 du/ac) Foster Care/Group Homes (Not Exceeding 6 Residents) Home OccuPations Townhouse Development Timeshare Cultural/Civic Faci!ities ChurChes ~,dministrative Se~ces (Public and Private) Clubs and Lodges (Public and Private) Business and Professional Of~c~s (No Driye-Through) 'Business and Professional Offices (Drive-Through Permitted) Medical Services Commercial Retail (Not Exceeding 5,000 sq. ff.) Commercial Retail (Not Exceeding 10 000 sq. ft.) Commercial Retail (Not Exceeding 20,000 sq. ff.) Plant Nurseries Commercial Amusements, Enclosed ;~esta~rants (Driye-Thr~ugh Permitted) Restaurants (Exclude Drive-Through) Trade and Skilled Services Residential Uses Accessory to Permitted Uses Accessory uses to Residential Uses Accessory Uses to Permitted Uses Hotels and Motels Parking Garage Gasoline Sales Gasoline Sales (Retail) Vel~icular Services a:~d Maintenance Vehicular Sales and Related Services Wet or Dry Boat Storage Madne Power Sales and Service Bait and Tackle Shops E'd~cationai institutions, Uadne Related Marine Fuel ~ales Boat Sales and Rental ~ ~h Markets and Packing Facilities Yacht Clubs I~ddng Lots without Building(s) on Lot Utilities, Public and Pdvate ;torage Facilities Wholesale Trades and Services Ve~e!!nary Services Indusbial Activities ~,ccessQry Watchman Facilities Parks and Recreation Areas (Public) X X Note: Conditional uses not shown. Source: City of Sebastian Land Development Code, 2003. zoning code summary.xls Sebastian CRA Zoning Districts Site Development Regulations Med, Density Multiple Commercial Commercial Commercial Family Residential Commercial-512 General Riverfront Waterfront Residential (RM-8) (C-5~2) (CG) (CR) (CWR) Industrial (~N) Public Service (PS) Mull Family Townhomes Residential Nonresidential )imensional Regulations Maximum Density Maximum Height Lot Coverage and Open Space: Maximum Building Coverage Maximum Impmvious Surface Minimum Open Space Lot Dimensions: Minimum Lot Size Minimum Interior Lot Size Within a Site Minimum Lot Width Minimum Intedor Lot Width Minimum Lot Depth Minimum Interior Lot Depth Minimum Setbacks: Front Yard (Residential: 1 stoc.j) Front Yard (Residential:2 slodes) Rear Yard (Residential: I story) Rear Yard (Residential: 2 slodes) Side Yard (Residential: Intedor- 1 story for residential) Side Yard (Residential: Interior- 2 stodes) Between Residential Structures on Same Lot - 1 story Between Residential Structures on Same Lot - 2 stodes Maximum Setbacks: Front Yard M~dimum Living Ama: Single-Family Dwellings Duplex Dwellings Multiple-Family Dwellings - Efficiencies Multiple-Family Dwellings - One Bedroom Units Multiple-Family Dwellings - Two Bedroom Units Multiple Family Dwellings - Three Bedroom Units Multiple Family Dwellings - Each Add'L Bedroom After T Max. 8 du/ac. 35 feet (Note 1) 40% 60% 40% 10,000 sq. ft. 80 feet 80 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 10 feet 15 feet (Note 2) 20 feet 20 feet 900 sq. fi. 750 sq. fl. per unit 600 sq. fi. 700 sq. fi. 850 sq. ft. 1,000 sq. ft. 100 sq. ff. per additional room Max. 8 du/ac. 35 feet (Note 1) 40% 60% 40% acre (pdor to platting 1,875 sq. ft. 25 feet 75 feet 25 feet 25 feet 20 feet 20 feet 10 feet 10 feet 15 feet 15 feet 900 sq. E Max. FAR: 50% 35 feet 35% 80% 20% 20,000 sq. ft. 125 feet 160 feet 74 ft. or 10 ft. (Note 3) 10 feet None or 10 ft. (Nole 4) 84 feet Max. FAR: 60% 35 feet 30% 80% 20% 10,000 sq. 75 feet 125 feet None or 6 feet (Note 5) 5 fi. or 30 ft. (Note 6) 10 ft. or 30 ft. (Note 6) Max. FAR: 60% 35 feet (Note 1) 30% 80% 20% 10,000 sq. ft. 75 feet 125 feet None or 6 feet (Note 5 5 ft or 10 ti. (Note 6 10 ft. or 30 ft. (Note I 8 du/ac. 35 feet (Note 1) 30% 80% 50% 10,000 sq. ft. 80 feet 125 feet 25 feet 25 feet 20 feet 20 feet 15 ft. (Note 2) 15 ft. (Note 2) 20 feet 20 feel 1,200 sq. ft 750 sq. ft. per unit 600 sq. ft. 700 sq. ft. 850 sq. ft~ 1,000 sq. lt. 100 sq. ft. per additional room Max. FAR: 50% 35 feet (Note 1) 3O% 8O% 25% 10,000 sq. ft. 80 feet 125 feet None or 10 feet (Note 5) 10fl: or 30 ft. (Note 6) 5 ft. or 10 fl. (Note 6) Max. FAR: 50% 35 feet 50% 80% 20% 15,000 sq. ft. 100 feet 125 feet 20 feet 10 feet None Max. FAR: 60% 35 feet (Note 1 ) 40% 60% 45% 30 feet 25 feet 10 feet Source: City of Sebastian Land Development Code, 2003. For lots located in the Riverfront or CR 512 Performance Oveday Districts, the additional requirements of the overlay district shall be complied with. 25 feet east of Indian River Ddve. 2 Plus 1 foot for each additional 2 feet in height above 25 feet. 3 tf abutting CR-512, 74 feet; otherwise, 10 feet. 4 None if the building is built to the side property lines; otherwise, 10 feet. 5 None if front yard has sidewalks, curb and gutters; otherwise as shown. 6 As shown, except larger setback as shown when abutting a residential district. zoning code summary, xls