Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12172003 SPECIAL Special City Council Meeting December 17, 2003 Page Two 03.063 1-22 OVERVIEW BY CITY MANAGER The City Manager gave a brief overview on the benefits of annexation, the Tischler annexation report; and advised that, whether or not these properties are annexed, they will most likely be developed and annexation would give the City the opportunity to control the development. OVERVIEW BY CITY ATTORNEY The City Attorney gave a brief advisory on procedures to be followed relative to these land use amendments and one quasi-judicial rezoning and conceptual plan. He cautioned that, with the exception of item B, Council should determine only whether the proposed land use categories are appropriate for the City and not discuss planned development. He said item B is a zoning matter with quasi-judicial rules and that a decision must be based on facts presented, not conjecture. He said all land use applications will be forwarded to the State for review and come back with comments for a scheduled second hearing. He stated that annexation hearings will also take place after the land use comments come back from the State, but it would be proper, if Council did not believe it would move forward with annexation, to make that determination at this time. He also said the reason there are two hearings on the Ashbury rezoning and conceptual is because Planning and Zoning approved it with conditions, that require two hearings of Council to override if it wishes; and that there is no requirement for a super majority vote. PUBLIC HEARINGS Ao First Reading and Public Hearing for Transmittal to DCA - Ordinance No. O-03-20 Land Use Amendment - 56+/- Acre Tract of Land Situated Along Powerline Road North of Sebastian Elementary School and South of Main Street, Adjacent to Sebastian Highlands Unit 1 (GMD Transmittal 12/4/03, 0-03-20) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHICH AMENDS THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP TO DESIGNATE AN INITIAL LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR) FOR ANNEXED LAND WITH A PRIOR COUNTY LAND USE DESIGNATION AS LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, 6 UNITS PER ACRE (L-2) FOR LAND CONSISTING OF 56 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, KNOWN AS ASHBURY SUBDIVISION; AUTHORIZING FINDINGS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE. (The 12_/17/03 agenda packet including the transmittal, appfication, staff report, and supporting documents are permanent records of the City on file in the Office of the City Clerk) The City Attorney read Ordinance No. 0-03-20 by title and Mayor Barnes opened the hearing. 2 Special City Council Meeting December 17, 2003 Page Three Joseph Schulke, Schulke, Biddle & Stoddard, LLC, representing the applicant, presented the application for proposed land use of Iow density residential; and responded to questions from Council. The Growth Management Director presented staff recommendation for approval as amended since being heard by Planning and Zoning; and responded to questions from Council. The following individuals addressed City Council (see CLUP sign-up sheet attached): Ruth Sullivan, 1215 Indian River Drive, Sebastian, urged Council to keep Sebastian small town. Andrea Coy, 333 Pineapple, Orange Heights, Sebastian, objected to the proposal based on environmental and conservation issues and requested a comprehensive wildlife study be conducted. Sal Neglia, Sebastian, urged Council to keep to 3 units per acre. Carole Little, 325 Tangelo, Orange Heights, Sebastian, read a Press Journal Letter to the Editor written by a Sebastian teen concerned with growth. Robert Fowland, Orange Heights, Sebastian and New Hampshire, expressed concern for growth. Eugene Wolf, 757 Wimbrow Drive, said these developments are revenue positive only for developers. Maryanne Krueger, Sebastian, expressed concern for environmental and groundwater issues. Collette Low, agreed with concern that Sebastian is not a small town anymore. Edeltraud Ostendorf, 333 Pineapple, Orange Heights, Sebastian, suggested government buy the property for a park. Damian Gilliams, 1623 US Hwy 1, Sebastian, suggested taking 2.4 million supplemental bond for the new City Hall building and use it to handle the new development coming in and plan to expand City Hall now instead of 15 years from now. Mayor Barnes asked him to stay to the subject, however, Mr. Gilliams continued. Mayor Barnes asked that Mr. Gilliams leave the podium and, when he refused, the Mayor asked that he be escorted from the podium. TAPE I - SIDE II (7:00 p.m.) The Growth Management Director responded to environmental concerns noting that these issues are generally addressed during preliminary development, that all new development will be connected to Indian River County water and sewer, drainage will be self-contained, and that turtles are not allowed to be destroyed. He said there are seven governmental agencies which receive and review all land use proposals. Special City Council Meeting December 17, 2003 Page Four 03.063 23-58 The City Attorney explained that school impact issues are being addressed through state required interlocal agreements between school boards and local governments. He described the urban service area surrounding the City as set up by Indian River County which is bordered by CR510 to the west and south, which is why staff states that these properties will be developed whether or not they are annexed into the City. City Council discussion continued relative to impacts to the City whether or not this property is annexed due to the fact that it is an enclave. Council further recommended to citizens to lobby state legislators to change state laws relative to development, that surrounding land use is less than 5 units per acre, the fact that growth is inevitable, and the City has an opportunity to control it and keep densities lower than they might be otherwise. Debra Poll, 273 Columbus Street, asked how close this project will be to her home and the City Attorney advised that must be discussed during the next item. Being no further input, Mayor Barnes closed the hearing. MOTION by McCollum/Hill "Mayor I would move to pass Ordinance No. O-03-21 on first reading and schedule a second reading and final public hearing at a later date, oh I'm sorry 0-20 I'm on the wrong one. Move to pass 0-03-20 on first reading for transmittal to Department of Community Affairs." Mayor Barnes - aye Mr. Coniglio - aye Mr. Barczyk - aye Mr. Hill - aye Mr. McCollum - aye Motion carried 5-0 Mayor Barnes called recess at 7:35 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 7:50 p.m. All members were present. First Reading and Public Hearing - Ordinance No. O-03-21 Conceptual Development Plan and Rezoning Request from Agricultural (A-l) to PUD-R - 56+/-Acre Tract of Land Situated Along Powerline Road North of Sebastian Elementary School and South of Main Street Adjacent to Sebastian Highlands Unit 1 (GMD Transmittal 12/4/03, O-03-21 ) THIS HEARING IS QUASI-JUDICIAL 4 Special City Council Meeting December 17, 2003 Page Five AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, DESIGNATING AN INITIAL ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL (PUD-R) IN ACCORDANCE WITH A CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR ANNEXED LAND WITH A PRIOR COUNTY ZONING DESIGNATION AS AGRICULTURE (A-l) FOR LAND CONSISTING OF 56 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, KNOWN AS ASHBURY SUBDIVISION; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILiTY; PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE. (The 12/17/03 agenda packet including the transmittal, application, staff report, and supporting documents are permanent records of the City on file in the Office of the City Clerk)(A sign up sheet is also included with these minutes) The City Attorney read Ordinance No. O-03-21 by title, explained quasi-judicial procedures, and Mayor Barnes opened the hearing at 7:53 p.m. No member of City Council had ex-parte communication to disclose. Joseph Schulke, representing the applicant, and the Growth Management Director, were sworn in by the City Clerk. Mr. Schulke submitted Exhibits A-H into the record (see attached to these minutes), and presented the application for a zoning classification of PUD-R and conceptual development plan for the 56 acre site. He described the 195 lots, 3.47 units per acre, 20 foot rear, 20 foot front, and 7 ¼ side setbacks, minimum total 40 foot setback on the perimeter, 60% open space, access to CR 512 by extension to Wimbrow and Main Street from Powerline Road. He addressed environmental and traffic impacts concerns expressed by residents. Mayor Barnes noted, at this time and for the record, that each City Council member had met on an individual basis with Mr. Schulke in the past on this proposed development. Other City Council members concurred. City Council discussion followed on completing the improvement to Powerline Road to the south to CR 512 at this time. There was a general feeling of Council that an escrow account could be established for future improvement and Mr. Shulke agreed. Mayor Barnes called for those in favor to speak: Lisanne Monier, Planning and Zoning Commission, was sworn in and noted some of the conditions imposed by Planning and Zoning have been met in this submittal. Sal Neglia, Sebastian, asked if a traffic light would be installed at Wimbrow, whether the public would be allowed in the development, if there were sidewalks to the school, and recommended improving Powerline now. He was told a light was not warranted, this would be a gated community, and there were sidewalks. Joyce Anderson, 225 Columbus Street, asked about planned buffer to Columbus and Mr. Hill told her there is approximately 75 feet for buffer and he would be in strong favor of buffering for Columbus residents. 5 Special City Council Meeting December 17, 2003 Page Six Mayor Barnes asked for those opposed to speak. Eugene Wolf, 757 Wimbrow Drive, recommended three units per acre. Maryanne Krueger, 121 Miller Avenue, Sebastian, asked if the City and other agencies go to the properties to scrutinize them, and was told the City does and other agencies typically do. Andrea Coy, 333 Pineapple, Orange Heights, Sebastian, was sworn in and presented a petition with 266 citizen signatures opposing the development and read a prepared statement. (The petition and prepared statement are attached to these minutes) Debra Poli said Powerline will endanger children. Collette Lowe said it will look like row houses. Mr. Schulke was given an opportunity to respond to citizen concerns at this time. TAPE II - SIDE I (9:18 p.m.) City Council discussion followed on procedure whereby a second hearing on this ordinance will be conducted upon receipt of comments from the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) in approximately three months if Council acts upon it favorably tonight, the developer putting money in escrow for Powerline Road, that most of Planning and Zoning concerns have been met, and a request by Mr. McCollum on the status of Roy Road by the next hearing. Being no further input, Mayor Barnes closed the hearing. MOTION by Hill/Coniglio "1 move to pass Ordinance No. O-03-21 on first reading and schedule a second reading and final public hearing at a later date." Mr. Coniglio - aye Mr. Barczyk - aye Mr. Hill - aye Mr. McCollum - aye Mayor Barnes - aye Motion carried 5-0 Mayor Barnes called recess at 9:38 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 9:48 p.m. All members were present. 03.239 C. First Reading and Public Hearing for Transmittal to DCA - Ordinance No. O-03-16 59-76 Land Use Amendment for a Proposed 115-Acre Private Subdivision Situated Along Powerline Road South of Barber Street and North of CR510 Adjacent to Sebastian Highlands Unit 11, and Known as Cross Creek Subdivision (GMD Transmittal 12/4/03, O-03-16) 6 Special City Council Meeting December 17, 2003 Page Seven AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHICH AMENDS THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP TO DESIGNATE AN INITIAL LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR) FOR ANNEXED LAND WITH A PRIOR COUNTY LAND USE DESIGNATION AS RESIDENTIAL, 1 UNIT PER ACRE (R) FOR LAND CONSISTING OF 115 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, KNOWN AS CROSS CREEK SUBDIVISION; AUTHORIZING FINDINGS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE. (The 12_/17/03 agenda packet including the transmittal, application, staff report, and supporting documents are permanent records of the City on file in the Office of the City Clerk) The City Attorney read Ordinance No. O-03-16 by title and announced that Vice Mayor Coniglio had a voting conflict to declare (see attached to these minutes); and Mayor Barnes opened the hearing at 9:50 p.m. The Growth Management Director gave a brief presentation and recommended transmittal to DCA. Warren Dill, representing the applicant, presented the application for Iow-density residential land use and requested a correction to the legal description to strike the reference "LESS the east 35 feet thereof for right-of-way". Staff concurred with the request. Mayor Barnes called for public input (see CLUP sign-up sheet attached): Clive Beckwith, 465 Lighthouse, expressed concern for use of Shakespeare but in light of this being a land use plan ordinance only, said he would not continue. Being no further input (see CLUP sign-up sheet attached), the hearing was closed. MOTION by BarczyldHill "1 move to pass Ordinance No. O-03-16 with change on first reading for transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs." Mr. Barczyk - aye Mr. Hill - aye Mr. McCollum - aye Mayor Barnes - aye Mr. Coniglio - abstained Motion carried 4-0 7 Special City Council Meeting December 17, 2003 Page Eight 03.24O D. 77-94 First Reading and Public Hearing for Transmittal to DCA - Ordinance No. O-03-18 Land Use Amendment for a Proposed 38.27 Acre Private Subdivision Situated Along CR510 Immediately South of Sebastian River Landings Phase II and Immediately East of Sebastian River High School (GMD Transmittal 12/4/03, O-03-18) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHICH AMENDS THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP TO DESIGNATE AN INITIAL LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR) FOR ANNEXED LAND WITH A PRIOR COUNTY LAND USE DESIGNATION AS RESIDENTIAL, 1 UNIT PER ACRE (R) FOR LAND CONSISTING OF 38 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, BEING A PART OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 31, RANGE 38; AUTHORIZING FINDINGS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE. (The 12/17/03 agenda packet including the transmittal, application, staff report, and supporting documents are permanent records of the City on file in the Office of the City Clerk) The City Attorney read Ordinance No. O-03-18 by title, and Mayor Barnes opened the hearing. The Growth Management Director gave a brief presentation and recommended transmittal to DCA. Bruce Moia, Mosby and Associates, representing the applicant, presented the application for Iow density residential land use. Mr. Hill expressed concern for controlling growth by not expanding the City's borders any further out and stretching the police force too thin. Mr. McCollum agreed and Mr. Coniglio said he would like to hear from the Police Chief on this. The City Manager said he had met with the Chief and this is not an overt concern. There being no public input (see CLUP sign-up sheet attached), the hearing was closed. MOTION by Coniglio/Barczyk "Move for staff recommendation for first reading and transmittal to Department of Community Affairs." Mr. Hill - nay Mr. McCollum ~ nay Mayor Barnes - aye Mr. Coniglio - aye Mr. Barczyk - aye Motion carried 3-2 Special City Council Meeting December 17, 2003 Page Nine 03.241 E. 95-114 First Reading and Public Hearing for Transmittal to DCA - Ordinance No. O-03-22 Land Use Amendment for a Proposed 134.381 Acre Tract of Land Situated Immediately North of the Sebastian Municipal Airport Along CR505 (Roseland Road) (GMD Transmittal 12/4/03, 0-03-22) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHICH AMENDS THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP FROM INDUSTRIAL (IN) TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR) FOR LAND CONSISTING OF 134 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, ALSO KNOWN ROSELAND SATELLITE FIELD TRACT NO. 3; AUTHORIZING FINDINGS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE. (The 12/17/03 agenda packet including the transmittal, application, staff report, and supporting documents are permanent records of the City on file in the Office of the City Clerk) The City Attorney read Ordinance No. 0-03-22 by title, and Mayor Barnes opened the hearing. The Growth Management Director gave a brief presentation and recommended transmittal to DCA. Chuck Mechling presented the application for a change from industrial to Iow-density residential land use. Mayor Barnes called for public input (see CLUP sign-up sheet attached). William Sullivan, Fulton Way, expressed concern for impacts to the airport. City Council discussion followed relative to impacts to Roseland Road, and concern about giving up needed industrial land. Mr. Coniglio noted that Growth Management had been advised this use would be better for Roseland residents. The Growth Management said this environmentally sensitive land is a problem for industrial development. MOTION by Hill/Coniglio "Move to extend." VOICE VOTE on the motion carried 5-0. Special City Council Meeting December 17, 2003 Page Ten 03.242 115-134 Mr. Mechling said he wanted the application to go to Department of Community Affairs before he spent the money to conduct the environmental assessment. In response to Mayor Barnes, the City Attorney advised that once converted to residential it would be difficult to change it back to industrial if necessary. MOTION by Coniglio/Barczyk "1 move for staff recommendation first reading transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs." Mr. McCollum - nay Mayor Barnes - nay Mr. Coniglio - aye Mr. Barczyk - aye Mr. Hill - nay Motion failed 2-3 First Reading and Public Hearing for Transmittal to DCA - Ordinance No. 0-03-24 Land Use Amendment for a 60+/- Acre Tract of Land Lying Northwest of the Intersection of CR510 and CR512, and Hereafter Referred to as Sebastian Crossings Subdivision (GMD Transmittal 12/4/03, O-03-24) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHICH AMENDS THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP TO DESIGNATE INITIAL LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS OF LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR) AND GENERAL COMMERCIAL (CG) FOR ANNEXED LAND WITH A PRIOR COUNTY LAND USE DESIGNATION AS LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, 3 UNITS PER ACRE (L-l) FOR LAND CONSISTING OF 60 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, KNOWN AS SEBASTIAN CROSSINGS; AUTHORIZING FINDINGS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE. (The 12/17/03 agenda packet including the transmittal, application, staff report, and supporting documents are permanent records of the City on file in the Office of the City Clerk) The City Attorney read Ordinance No. 0-03-24 by title, and Mayor Barnes opened the hearing. Mike Evans, applicant, presented the application for Iow-density residential land use. The Growth Management Director gave a brief presentation and recommended transmittal to DCA. 10 Special City Council Meeting December 17, 2003 Page Eleven It was noted that nothing to the north or west of this property could ever develop due to location of the middle school and conservation area. Mr. Hill said he could not support crossing the line of CR 510. Being no public input (see CLUP sign-up sheet attached), the hearing was closed. MOTION by Coniglio/Barnes "1 move staff recommendation for transmittal to Department of Community Affairs." Mayor Barnes - aye Mr. Coniglio - aye Mr. Barczyk - aye Mr. Hill - nay Mr. McCollum - aye Motion carried 4-1 03.243 135-154 First Reading and Public Hearing of Ordinance No. O-03-26 Land Use Amendment for a 152.21 Acre Tract of Land Along CR510 Approximately % Miles East of 82nd Avenue, and Hereinafter Referred to as River Oaks Preserve (GMD Transmittal 12/4/03, 0-03-26) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHICH AMENDS THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP TO DESIGNATE AN INITIAL LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR) FOR ANNEXED LAND WITH A PRIOR COUNTY LAND USE DESIGNATION AS RESIDENTIAL, 1 UNIT PER ACRE (R) FOR LAND CONSISTING OF 152 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, KNOWN AS RIVER OAKS PRESERVE; AUTHORIZING FINDINGS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE. (The 12/17/03 agenda packet including the transmittal, application, staff report, and supporting documents are permanent records of the City on file in the Office of the City Clerk) The City Attorney read Ordinance No. O-03-24 by title, and Mayor Barnes opened the hearing. Rick Melchiori, WCG, representing the applicant, presented the application for Iow-density residential land use. The Growth Management Director gave a brief presentation and recommended transmittal to DCA and noted that access would be from CR510. 11 Special City Council Meeting December 17, 2003 Page Twelve City Council discussion took place on MPO recommendation to four-lane CR510. Concerns were expressed regarding expanding the City limits. Mayor Barnes called for public input. Eugene Wolf, 757 Wimbrow Drive, Sebastian, said this was a good opportunity to draw the City line. Richard Smith said police do not operate from the station but are mobile on the road. Being no further public input (see CLUP sign-up sheet attached), the hearing was closed. MOTION by Coniglio/Barnes "Move to pass Ordinance No. 0-03-26 on the first reading for transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs." Mr. Coniglio - aye _~/¢ Mr. Barczyk - ~ ¢.~L (q,,.a,L Mr. Hill - nay '~¢'~(1~/~ Mr. McCollum - aye r~ ~ Mayor Barnes - aye Roll Call carried 3-2 8. CITY ATTORNEY MATTERS A. Request for Authorization to File Litiqation The City Attorney requested authorization to file for an injunction against a local professional office that has failed to comply with landscaping requirements and is operating without an occupation license. The professional has also used an unlicensed electrician for his business sign. City Council concurred. 9. Being no further business, the Mayor adjourned the meeting at 11:00 p.m. Approved at the January 14'h Regular City Council Meeting. ~ ¢¢.~~-~ Wal(er W. Barnes, Mayor Sally A. Maio, ~C, City Clerk 12 Comprehensive Plan Citizen Courtesy Information List Local Government: .Sebastian e./bf Coune i I Hearing Date: Type Hearing: 12--17-03 Transmittal (Proposed) AdOption 0-o$-lb DCA Amendment Number: (DCA Official Use) Please Print Clearly By providing your name and address you will receive information concerning the date of publication of the Notice of Intent by the Department of Community Affairs. Citizen Name Address, City, State, Zip Code Check Appropriate Response(s) Comment Comment II Identify Amendment which is of Interest Comprehensive Plan Citizen Courtesy Information List Local Government: Hearing Date: 12-1'"/- 03 Type Hearing: Transmittal (Proposed) Adoption ©-03-13> DCA Amendment Number: (DCA Official Use) Please Print Clearly By providing your name and address you will receive information concerning the date of publication of the Notice of Intent by the Department of Community Affairs. Citizen Name Address, City, State, Zip Code · Check Appropriate Response(s) Written IISpoken Comment Comment II II Identify Amendment which is of Interest Comprehensive Plan Citizen Courtesy Information List Local Government: ~8/O0ts~-ian ~i3t4 CDtkvI Ci I Hearing Date: 1~-17- o3 Type Hearing: Transmittal (Proposed) Adoption 0-03-20 DCA Amendment Number: (DCA Official Use) Please Print Clearly By providing your name and address you will receive information concerning the date of publication of the Notice of Intent by the Department of Commtmity Affairs. CitizenAddress, City, State, Name Zip Code I~'~, ~,,~ ~ ~ll t II II · Check Appropriate Response(s) Written Comment Spoken Comment II II / Identify Amendment which is of Interest $~veuax~ -r~-t- ~ Comprehensive Plan Citizen Courtesy Information List Local Government: Hearing Date: I2- !"/-03 Type Hearing: Transmittal (Proposed) Adoption 0-03-22 DCA Amendment Number: (DCA Official Use) Please Print Clearly By providing your name and address you will receive information concerning the date of publication of the Notice of Intent by the Department of Community Affairs. Citizen Name Address, City, State, Zip Code · Check Appropriate Response(s) Written Comment IlSpoken Comment Identify Amendment which is of Interest · Comprehensive Plan Citizen Courtesy Information List LoCal Government: 5e/oastia n Ci~ ~un¢i! Hearing Date: 12--l-1-03 Type Hearing: Transmittal (Proposed) Adoption 0-03 DCA Amendment Number: (DCA Official Use) Please Print Clearly By providing your name and address you will receive information concerning the date of publication of the Notice of Intent by the Department of Community Affairs. Citizen Name Address, City, State, Zip Code II Check Appropriate Response(s) Written Comment Spoken Comment II [I II II Identify Amendment which is of Interest Comprehensive Plan Citizen Courtesy Information List Local Government: o5/-/an Hearing Date: Type Hearing: Transmittal (Proposed) Adoption O- 03 -2 ~ DCA Amendment Number: (DCA Official Use) Please Print Clearly By providing your name and address you will receive information concerning the date of publication of the Notice of Intent by the Department of Community Affairs. Citizen Name Address, City, State, Zip Code · Check Appropriate Response(s) Comrnent Spoken Connnent I[ Identify Amendment which is of Interest FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF-VOTING CONFLICT FOR COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS LAST NAME--FIRST NAME--MIDDLE NAME MAILING ADDRESS CITY COUNTY DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED NAME OF BOARD, COLINCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION: MY POSITION IS: ~ ~"LECTIVE~ APPOINTIVE WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B This form is for use by an3' person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non-/~dvisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. The requirements of this law are mandatory; although the use of this particular form is not required by law, you are encouraged to use it in making the disclosure required by law. Your responsibilities under the lag' when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES ELECTED OFFICERS: A person holding elective county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained. In either case, you should disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should 'incorporate the form in the minutes. APPOINTED OFFICERS: A person holding appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained. A person holding an appointive local office otherwise may participate in a matter in which he has a conflict of interest, but must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision by oral or written communication, whether made by the officer or at his direction. IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: · You should complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. * A copy of the form should be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. · The form should be read publicly at the meeting prior to consideration of the matter in which you have a conflict of interest. I I'¢11~\1 ~B lO-g6 PAGE IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO.INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION OR VOTE AT THE MEETING: · You should disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. · You should complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, Who should inCbrP°rate the form in the minutes. DISCLOSURE OF STATE OFFICER'S INTEREST I, ,,/~',~(O/J~ 6~/0 , hereby disclose that on ~ (a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one) inured to my special private gain; or ~'/inured to the special gain of , by whom I am retained. (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: Date Filed NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317 (1985), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5,000. PAGE CE FORM 8B - 10-86 ASHBURY SUBDIVISION A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT EXHIBITS Fnr CITY nF SEBASTIAN CITY ICOU N P. IL PRESENTATION DeCEMBer ] ?, 20D3 P I~EPARE D BY ,IriSEPH SP. HULKE, P.E. SE:hUlK:e, BitT1e ~:~ STDDDARD LIST OF EXHIBITS PLANNED DEVELDPMENT ASHBURY SUBDIVlSIDN-P. FiNBEPTIJAL PLAN PUBLIC BENEFITS LAND Use MAP P.I-iMPARATIVE DENSITIES WITH AD~IAE:ENT PRE}PERTIES F P.E}MPARATIVE LAND USE AND DENSITY WITH SEBASTIAN HIGHLAN DS TYPIE:AL lI3T DEVELI-iPMENT H - RFiADWAY DESIGN P-DMPARISIDN EXHIBIT 'A' PLANNED DEVELDPMENTS ALLBWS THE {NUMBER PRO.IECT TO ACHIEVE a REASONABLE DENSITY, DF LDTS) AND ALSD PRDVlDES DPPDRTUNITIES FDR BETTER USE OF LAND, FOR: RES ERVATInN REP. REATIn N DPEN SPACE THIS IS ACHIEVED BY WAIVING CERTAIN STANDARD ZnNINB CFINVENTIE}N S SETBACKS LOT SIZE AND IN DGING Sa, GAINING: NATURAL RESOURCES AMENITIES riPEN-USABLE SPACE EXHIBIT 'B' CONCEPTUAL PLAN ~ .il ~ UPL~,ND PRESERVE AREA 6.76 ACRES 5.6.3 ACRES TRACT 'X' (NOT INCLUDED IN PUD-R) SCHULKE, B ITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C. CIVIL & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERfNG' LAND PLANNING' ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING 1140 7th COURT, SUITE F VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 TEL 772 / 770-9622 FAX 772 / 770-9496 EMAIL sbseng@gate.net PUBLIC EXHIBIT 'C' BENEFITS STATEMENT AND COMPARISON SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS S/D -NO PERIMETER BUFFER -NO UPLAND PRESERVATION -NO WETLAND PRESERVATION -NO RECREATION AREA -OPEN SPACE AT 50% -NO SIDEWALKS -NO CURBED DRAINAGE - SWALE AND DITCH SYSTEM IS A LARGE BURDEN ON CiTY RESOURCES -PUBLIC ROADS - A LARGE DRAIN ON CITY RESOURCES ASHBURY P.D. -PERIMETER BUFFER - NATIVE PRESERVATION AND NEW VEGETATION -UPLAND PRESERVATION - 6.76 ACRES -100% WETLAND PRESERVATION - 3.33 ACRES -RECREATION AREA - 3.05 ACRES, WITH CABANA/POOL, PLAYGROUND AND PASSIVE RECREATION AREAS -INCREASED OPEN SPACE-61% -INTERNAL SIDEWALKS - BOTH SIDES OF THE ROAD -CURBED DRAINAGE - CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUESTS OF MANY CITIZENS FOR THE CITY STREETS -PRIVATELY MAINTAINED ROADS AND DRAINAGE SYSTEMS - NO DRAIN ON CITY RESOURCES -R/W CONSTRUCTION (S. WIMBROW EXTENSION FROM CR512) AT NO COST TO THE CITY INCLUDING: * WATER AND SEWER MAIN EXTENSIONS * ACCOMMODATE ROAD DRAINAGE AT NO COST TO THE CITY- HELPS WITH NPDES REG'S * PROVIDES OPPORTUNITY FOR NEW COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT- NEW TAX BASE -R/W CONSTRUCTION POWERLINE RD. FROM TRIAD (APARTMENTS) TO SITE AT NO COST TO THE CITY, INCLUDING: * EXTEND WATER THROUGH SITE * AQUIRE DRAINAGE PERMITS FROM STATE FOR POWERLINE ROAD CONSTRUCTION -ADDITIONAL TAX BASE AND IMPACT FEES COLLECTED (195 LOTS) *BUT WITH LESS IMPACTS TO CITY RESOURCES * EXAMPLES: RECREATION IMPACT FEE PAID, YET PROVIDING 3.05 ACRES OF RECREATION DRAINAGE IMPACT FEE PAID, YET PROVIDING CENTRAL DRAINAGE PROPERTY TAXES PAID, YET PROVIDING PRIVATELY MAINTAINED ROADS SCHULKE, B ITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C. 1140 7th COURT, SUITE F VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 TEL 772 ! 7'70-9622 FAX 772 / 770-9496 EMAIL sbseng@gate.net EXHIBIT 'H' ROADWAY DESIGN COMPARISON 40' R/W MIAMI 20' ROADWAY __---__ MIAMI CURB SIDEWALK ~'"T'--~' ' PROPOSED ASHBURY PD ROADWAY SECTION --""' 50' R/W DRAINAGE 20' ROADWAY DRAINAGE SWALE ..... -- SWALE TYPICAL SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS ROADWAY SECTION ISCHULKE, B ITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C. · CI1/IL ~ ST,%~TU/~. E~V~/IV~£1~,'~ ·/.4/~ PL~VN//~. EIWIRONI~ENTAL P~ti'I, GITIN~ 114o ?th COURT1 SUITE F VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 TEL 772 ! 770-9622 FAX 772 / 770-9496 EMAIL sbseng~gale.net CITY COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 17TM, 2003 Mayor Barnes, Members of the City Council, Ladies and Gentlemen...My name is Andrea Coy and I live in Orange Heights at 333 Pineapple Street. ! come before you tonight with a petition signed by 266 local residents. We are united in being strongly opposed to the Ashbury Subdivision. Our objections are based on two major areas of concern: 1) Environmental and conservation issues, and 2) The Ashbury proposal itself. Environmental Concerns Environmentally, the Ashbury Subdivision will wipe out 56 acres of pristine wilderness. This natural forest area contains a wide variety of flora and fauna. As a homeowner in the City of Sebastian, I have to get a permit to remove one single tree, even if it's dead. The city's effort to conserve valuable natural resources is commendable, but makes absolutely no sense when it is willing to allow a contractor to destroy literally hundreds, of protected and specimen trees in one fell swoop. Why do we have to level the existing wildlife in order to develop an area? Next let's take a look at the animals who live in this 56-acre forest. The environmental site assessment dated May 2003 found there are at least 15 active gopher tortoise burrows on the property. Somehow this figure seems to be incredibly Iow because we have more than that wandering around in Orange Heights alone. As a private citizen, I can be fined for disturbing or harassing the tortoises that parade through my yard. Yet, we are going to allow the contractor to destroy these animals by paying a small fee. Something is very wrong with this picture. In addition to the gopher tortoise, there are many other animals in the woods. For some rsason, the people conducting the study could not seem to find any scrub jays. This amazes me because my neighbors see them in the wood line and backyards all the time. Residents on Foster Road have had several sightings of a Florida panther and on one occasion with a cub. As I speak, there is a group of Sand Hill Cranes in residence on the property near Foster Road. Other animals include: bald eagles, osprey, bobcats, fox, pileated woodpeckers, cardinals, blue jays, and lots of snakes. At the P&Z board meeting on September 18th, many people voiced their concerns over the destruction of this area. I found it disconcerting that the City Attorney dismissed the possibility of this being considered for a wildlife conservation area. Since when has he become an authority on environmental issues? The general public in attendance was not allowed to address and fully discuss this issue. Our sightings of protected species were summarily dismissed by the City Attorney. Seems like somewhere along the line the decisions had already been made. Other improprieties were evident at this meeting. If you review the minutes, you will find that no motion was ever made to annex the land from the county. Once again you get the 2 feeling that the decisions had already been made prior to the public hearing. Why bother to invite the public? The 266 people who signed this petition formally request that no action be taken on the proposed Ashbury Subdivision until the conservation issues have been fully addressed and discussed. In addition, we request that a new, comprehensive environmental study be conducted. There are too many sightings of protected wildlife by local residents to ignore. We would also ask that core samples be taken to verify the wetland area. We believe that the wetlands may extend much farther than the marked boundaries in the current study. That exhausts the environmental concerns so let's move on to the proposed development itself. Development Concerns Mr. Schulke touts the wide-open space design of this community for "everyone" to enjoy. He mentions "everyone" so often that you are led to believe that the entire City of Sebastian is going to be invited to swim in their pool and play tennis. This is very amusing because Ashbury is planned as a gated community and clOsed to the general public. You'll notice that none, repeat none of these open spaces are adjacent to the current residential areas of Orange Heights or the Highlands for us to at least visually enjoy. 3 Let me point out that 103 of the 266 signatures on the petition are from Orange Heights, Foster Road, and Calamondin taxpayers who are the immediate neighbors of this development. Mr. Shulke goes to great lengths to compare his proposal with the adjacent neighborhoods of Orange Heights and the Highlands. On paper, his statistics look lovely ... only 3.47 units per acre of land in Ashbury compared to 4.2 in Orange Heights and 3.4 in the Highlands. As we all know, statistics are amazing in that they can be manipulated to show favor or disfavor according to one's needs. What Mr. Shulke's statistics don't tell you is that the Orange Heights and Highlands figures are actual homes per acre. We have no conservation or recreation areas polluting our numbers. According to the revised blueprints for Ashbury, the area immediately adjacent to Orange Heights is listed as "Block 4." Block 4 has 48 lots and consists of 8.57 acres. Now let's do the real math here. This comes out to be 5.6 cookie-cutter houses per acre. Let me add that as perimeter houses, these are the laraest lots in Ashbury. The statistics get worse with Block 1 at 5.98 homes per acre, Block 2 at 6.3 homes per acre, and Block 3 as the overwhelming winner with a whopping 6.49 homes per acre. There are some other frightening numbers we need to look at. The ordnance governing our mobile home property in Orange Heights requires 10-foot side yard setbacks. My neighbor's house recently caught on fire and burned to the ground. Fortunately Bob Fullerton was able to crawl out on his hands 4 and knees in his birthday suit. Thank God we had sufficient space between our homes or more than one household would have burned to the ground that evening. Why do our mobile home lots have 10-foot setbacks and the Ashbury houses have only 7.5? In Orange Heights we are also required to have a minimum lot width of 70 feet and minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. The largest perimeter lot in Ashbury will be only 7,150 square feet with a meager 55 foot width. How is it possible that our mobile home lots are going to be bigger than the Ashbury home lots? Why are we willing to lower our standards? Who will ultimately benefit by lowering our standards? The developer is the only beneficiary in this deal. There is no value added to the current residents of the city of Sebastian. A twenty-five foot buffer area between our communities is not enough to hide the fact that these cookie-cutter houses are being piled up right on top of us. (Show taped area of 25 feet). This is 25 feet. The screen porch on my mobile home is greater than 25 feet. The view from Orange Heights and the Highlands will change from natural woods and wildlife to roof, roof, roof, roof, roof. It's the same oppressive view we get to see on 1-95 or the Expressways in Orlando - the view where hundreds of cookie- cutter houses are crammed together with no yards. It's the view that most of us drive by and say "uugghh, who'd want to live there?" It's certainly not a view consistent with the fishing village image of Sebastian. It's not the view that the 266 people who signed this petition want to have in their backyard. Put Ashbury on 1-95 with all the other cookie-cutter homes. In Orange Heights we also anticipate an increase in pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Since the shortest distance between two points has always been a straight line, we expect the children will be taking the shortcut through the buffer and Orange Heights residential area to reach the riverfront and downtown. No child is going to voluntarily take the extra-long route out the 512 or Powerline Road exits to get to where the action is. As a final issue, let me mention the lack of infrastructure resources in the City to support our rapid growth. I'm sure many residents were surprised to find out in last Sunday's paper that Sebastian already exceeds Vero Beach in population. Developers are gobbling up land in our city at an unprecedented rate. Our resources are already spread thin. Will we be able to handle the increased traffic created by an influx of new residents? Is our police force and fire department able to cope with the growing demands placed upon them? We already know that our schools can't handle the increase. The City is already aware of existing drainage problems on Main Street and in Orange Heights due to overflow from this property during the rainy season. How will Ashbury affect the current drainage problems? The recent 2.1 million dollar City Hall faux-pas probably could have been avoided with the expenditure of a little more 6 time, effort, and research. Let's not make another irrevocable boo-boo by rushing to judgment this evening. In September, Mayor Barnes stated publicly that the people of Sebastian needed to make their wishes known. Tonight, 266 people are asking you to vote NO on the Ashbury Development. We are not necessarily opposed to annexation of the county land, however, we ask that additional research be done on the conservation issues before any development is considered. Mayor Barnes, the people are speaking to you loud and clear. Thank you. 7 PETITION The following Sebastian residents are opposed to: PETITION 1) The annexation of the current county land tract North of Sebastian Elementary School for any purpose other than conservation of wetlands and natural forest and wildlife preservation. 2) The proposed Ashbury Subdision or any subdivision proposal that deviates from standard lot widths no smaller than 70 feet, densities of no more than three units per acre, and side yard setbacks of at least 10 feet. PRINT SIGN STREET TELEPHONE NAME NAME ADDRESS CITY/STATE (OPTIONAL) /~,'uo~:,4 ~.o? 333 ~0;.,~_,~.~._ ,..~ SEBASTIAN, FL 38B-o~i SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL PETITION The follo~ihg Sebastian residents are opposed to: PETITION 1) The annexation of the current county land tract North of Sebastian Elementary School for any purpose other than conservation of wetlands and natural forest and wildlife preservation. 2) The proposed Ashbury Subdision or any subdivision proposal that deviates from standard lot widths no smaller than 70 feet, densities of no more than three units per acre, and side yard setbacks of at least 10 feet. PRINT NAME SIGN NAME STREET TELEPHON~ ADDRESS i ~3(~ q"13eo{)~)]C,._~, SEBASTIAN, FL. I SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL I SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL ! -.-------.SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL I i SEBASTIAN, FL { SEBASTIAN, FL i SEBASTIAN, FL PETITION The following Sebastian residents are opposed to: PETITION l) The annexation of the currant county land tract North of Sebastian Elementary School for any purpose other than conservation of wetlands and natural forest and wildlife preservation. 2) The proposed Ashbury Subdision or any subdivision proposal that deviates from standard lot widths no smaller than 70 feet, densities of no more than three units per acre, and side yard setbacks of at least 10 feet. PRINT SIGN STREET TELEPHONL NAME NAME ADDRESS CITY/STATE (OPTIONAL) ~'O~ ~.J ' SEBASTIAN, FL H~ ~ SEBASTIAN, FL l-~7~ ~. ' SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL ~,~~~ ~~ ~ ~o'7 ~~~F SEBASTIAN, FL :~:: ~ ~ "a ~: :~~ SEBASTIAN, FL d~O S: ~; ~ ~ :~ C/~ ~ SEBASTIAN, FL 5 [~e l~ ~ SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL ~Lt~E ~' ~~' ~ ~[~ ?~ ~', SEBASTIAN, FL :, ~/>~~. ~ ~~ ~' SEBASTIAN, FL PETITION The following Sebastian residents are opposed to: PETITION l) The annexation of the current county land tract North of Sebastian Elementary School for any purpose other than conservation of wetlands and natural forest and wildlife preservation. 2) The proposed Ashbury Subdision or any subdivision proposal that deviates from standard lot widths no smaller than 70 feet, densities of no more than three units per acre, and side yard setbacks of at least 10 feet. PRINT SIGN STREET TELEPHONE= NAME NAME ADDRESS CITY/STATE (OPTIONAL) 0'~/C,,'~/~/.- 0 ./-), ~~..-~...~.Z~ SEBASTIAN, FL ~~ ~ ~ ~ SEBASTIAN, FL . ~ ~~~ SEBASTIAN, FL r , ~ ~q SEBASTIAN, FL - v ~ I -- ~ ~ SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL ~W~?~ ~ ~~~ SEBAST,AN, F~ PETITION The following Sebastian residents are opposed to: PETITION 1) The annexation of the current county land tract North of Sebastian Elementary School for any purpose other than conservation of wetlands and natural forest and wildlife preservation. 2) The proposed Ashbury Subdision or any subdivision proposal that deviates from standard lot widths no smaller than 70 feet, densities of no mom than three units per acre, and side yard setbacks of at least 10 feet. PRINT SIGN STREET TELEPHONE ~IAME NAME ADDRESS CITWSTATE (OPTIONAL) SEBASTIAN, FL ~'~6~I SEBASTIAN, FL ~~ SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL ~~0 ~/~1 ~/~ X~ 2 ~/~ ~r SEBASTIAN, FL ~~ ~J7 ~ ' ~ ~,~ ~/~ SEBASTIAN, FL FATbaCk %[L6 q l, 32~ ~~~ SEBASTIAN, FL .... .' / ; ~,//~0 r~,,-,¢~ ~~~ S~O ~ ~'~ SEBASTIAN, FL ~ Z~/~ ~ ~/~~ ~ SEBASTIAN, FL ~ ~/~ ~/~~ ~ SEBASTIAN, FL ~',~ ~~ ~J~'~ ~[~ ~66~r{~ S~ SEBASTIAN, FL PETITION The following Sebastian residents are opposed to: PETITION 1) The annexation of the currant county land tract North of Sebastian Elementary School for any purpose other than conservation of wetlands and natural forest and wildlife preservation. 2) The proposed Ashbury Subdision or any subdivision proposal that deviates from standard lot widths no smaller than 70 feet, densities of no mom than three units per acre, and side yard setbacks of at least 10 feet. PRINT SIGN STREET TELEPHONE NAME NAME ADDRESS CITY/STATE (OPTIONAL) SEBASTIAN, FL ?,-- // b --~~ a r.Q~,... ~~ / ~ ~~r ~. SEBASTIAN, FL ,; '~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ /~ ~~ ~ ~ SEBASTIAN, FL fl ~ ~ ~ ' -- ~ -- . I ' -- gZ: ~,~/~ ~ SEBASTIAN, FL ~/~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~/~_~ ' ~ SEBASTIAN, ~,~1~ ~}[0{~~Z ~:~~~ ~: ~EBASTIAN, FL ~ ~ . ,/,.- /, PETITION The following Sebastian residents are opposed to: PETITION 1) The annexation of the current county land tract North of Sebastian Elementary School for any puroose other than conservation of wetlands and natural forest and wildlife preservation_ 2) The proposed Ashbury Subdivision or any subdivision proposal that deviates from standard lot widths no smaller than 70 feet, densities of no more than three units per acre, and side yard setbacks of at least 10 feet. PRINT SIGN STREET TELEPHONE NAME NAME ADDRESS CITY/STATE (OPTIONAL) / - / ' ,, SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAn, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL PETITION The following Sebastian residents are opposed to: PETITION 1) The annexation of the current county land tract North of Sebastian Elementary School for any purpose other than conservation of wetlands and natural forest and wildlife preservation. 2) The proposed Ashbury Subdision or any subdivision proposal that deviates from standard lot widths no smaller than 70 feet, densities of no mom than throe units per acre, and side yard setbacks of at least 10 feet. PRINT SIGN STREET TELEPHONE NAME NAME ADDRESS CITY/STATE (OPTIONAL) S EBAST lAN, FL ~ /~ ~ ~~/~ SEBASTIAN, FL ~ ~/~ / [ PETITION The following Sebastian residents are opposed to: PETITION 1) The annexation of the current county land tract North of Sebastian Elementary School for any purpose other than conservation of wetlands and natural forest and wildlife preservation. 2) The proposed Ashbury Subdision or any subdivision proposal that deviates from standard lot widths no smaller than 70 feet, densities of no mom than three units per acm, and side yard setbacks of at least 10 feet. PRINT SIGN STREET TELEPHONE NAME NAME ADDRESS CITY/STATE (OPTIONAL) J~t SEBASTIAN, FL ~ , ~'~ ~ J ~'~ SEBASTIAN, FL FL ~~. d ~ A~ / ~f~ SEBASTIAN, FL PETITION The following Sebastian residents are opposed to: PETITION l) The annexation of the current county land tract North of Sebastian Elementary School for any purpose other than conservation of wetlands and natural forest and wildlife preservation. 2) The proposed Ashbury Subdision or any subdivision proposal that deviates from standard lot widths no smaller than 70 feet, densities of no mom than three units per acre, and side yard setbacks of at least 10 feet. PRINT SIGN STREET TELEPHONE NAME NAME ADDRESS CITY/STATE (OPTIONAL) ~4~/~2 )~ ?(~/ ~-'~)~ Y ~~ J ~' SEBASTIAN, FL ,~~ ~j~ ~. ,~U~ 5¢~ ~¢ ~~ SEBASTIAN, FL .~~ /0.~ ~¢5 ~'~¢~)~ SEBASTIAN, FL O~ ~C D ' r' SEBASTIAN, FL &~~ ~/~ ~~ ¢~, SEBASTIAN, FL // SEBASTIAN, FL PETITION The following Sebastian residents are opposed to: PETITION 1) The annexation of the current county land tract North of Sebastian Elementary School for any purpose other than conservation of wetlands and natural forest and wildlife preservation. 2) The proposed Ashbury Subdision or any subdivision proposal that deviates from standard lot widths no smaller than 70 feet, densities of no more than three units per acre, and side yard setbacks of at least 10 feet. PRINT SIGN STREET TELEPHONE NAME NAME ADDRESS CITY/STATE (OPTIONAL) ~"'~-' r/~0 ~ ~'~, ~ .' ,' , SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL .'~ h W, ~--~ ~6~ ~~~ SEBASTIAN, FL ~Jqg SEBASTIAN, FL Z /Z~&/~ 5 ... /~7~ ~ ~' SEBASTIAN, FL 3C8 --7~/Z PETITION The following Sebastian residents are opposed to: PETITION 1) The annexation of the current county land tract North of Sebastian Elementary School for any purpose other than conservation of wetlands and natural forest and wildlife preservation. 2) The proposed Ashbury Subdision or any subdivision proposal that deviates from standard lot widths no smaller than 70 feet, densities of no mom than three units per acre, and side yard setbacks of at least 10 feet. NAME NAME ADDRESS CITY/STATE (OPTIONAL) SEBASTIAN, FL ~/¢~ ~O"?T/~ SEBASTIAN, FL , SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL / I , SEBASTIAN, FL i/ ~:;/ ~ .... x SEBASTIAN, FL ~ ICL~ K 'nj ~ . .. , } - ~,; SEBASTIAN, FL ¢/ ['7: ~ ¢ '~0 " , ~ SEBASTIAN, FL PETITION The following Sebastian residents are opposed to: PETITION 1) The annexation of the current county land tract North of Sebastian Elementary School for any purpose other than conservation of wetlands and natural forest and wildlife preservation. 2) The proposed Ashbury Subdision or any subdivision proposal that deviates from standard lot widths no smaller than 70 feet, densities of no more than three units per acm, and side yard setbacks of at least 10 feet. PRINT SIGN STREET TELEPHONE NAME NAME ADDRESS CITY/STATE (OPTIONAL) , ~.. SEBASTIAN, FL 'l'-'q ~'/I---  SEBASTIAN, FL ~0~ ~'~~~ ~j ~-~~ SEBASTIAN, FL ~'rep~ *7.,~~k l~ ~[0~ ¢" SEBASTIAN, FL ~ J"V~ r''~, ~, ~ ~, SEBASTIAN, FL PETITION The following Sebastian residents are opposed to: PETITION 1) The annexation of the current county land tract North of Sebastian Elementary School for any purpose other than conservation of wetlands and natural forest and wildlife preservation. 2) The proposed Ashbury Subdision or any subdivision proposal that deviates from standard lot widths no smaller than 70 feet, densities of no mom than three units per acre, and side yard setbacks of at least 10 feet. PRINT SIGN STREET TELEPHONE NAME NAME ADDRESS CITY/STATE (OPTIONAL) .~, SEBASTIAN, FL '~-.q,,,~ ,rJ _~, .,~'~I Jz?/)l F:' j,f:[? ¢ ~ "' SEBASTIAN, FL , , SEBASTIAN, FL .~ SEBASTIAN, FL , ,_, , ~ :~ ~ ~ ~ SEBASTIAN, FL . SEBASTIAN, FL PETITION The following Sebastian residents are opposed to: PETITION 1) The annexation of the current county land tract North of Sebastian Elementary School for any purpose other than conservation of wetlands and natural forest and wildlife preservation. 2) The proposed Ashbury Subdision or any subdivision proposal that deviates from standard lot widths no smaller than 70 feet, densities of no more than three units per acm, and side yard setbacks of at least 10 feet. PRINT SIGN STREET TELEPHONE NAME NAME ADDRESS CITY/STATE (OPTIONAL) SEBASTIAN, FL .,-- ,~ ~/~ SEBASTIAN, FL " '/" ' - -~3 / O~)SEBASTIAN, FL ........ ~ ' SEBASTIAN, FL - ~,.~:¢- ~ ~~ SEBASTIAN, FL  SEBASTIAN, FL / /I SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL PETITION The following Sebastian residents are opposed to: PETITION 1) The annexation of the current county land tract North of Sebastian Elementary School for any purpose other than conservation of wetlands and natural forest and wildlife preservation. 2) The proposed Ashbury Subdision or any subdivision proposal that deviates from standard lot widths no smaller than 70 feet, densities of no mom than throe units per acre, and side yard setbacks of at least 10 feet. PRINT SIGN STREET TELEPHONE NAME NAME ADDRESS CITY/STATE (OPTIONAL) · SEBASTIAN, ~..,.}~._ ~ ~.// / FL :.::SE BAST IAN, FL ~ / n t ( / / SEBASTIAN, FL ' ~ PETITION The following Sebastian residents are opposed to: PETITION 1) The annexation of the current county land tract North of Sebastian Elementaw School for any purpose other than conservation of wetlands and natural forest and wildlife preservation. 2) The proposed Ashbury Subdision or any subdivision proposal that deviates from standard lot widths no smaller than 70 feet, densities of no mom than three units per acre, and side yard setbacks of at least 10 feet. PRINT ''SIGN STREET " TELEPHONE NAME NAME ADDRESS CITY/STATE (OPTIONAL) SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL PETITION The following Sebastian residents are opposed to: PETITION 1) The annexation of the current county land tract North of Sebastian Elementary School for any purpose other than conservation of wetlands and natural forest and wildlife preservation. 2) The proposed Ashbury Subdision or any subdivision proposal that deviates from standard lot widths no smaller than 70 feet, densities of no mom than three units per acre, and side yard setbacks of at least 10 feet. PRINT SIGN STREET TELEPHONE NAME NAME ADDRESS CITY/STATE (OPTIONAL) SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL PETITION The following Sebastian residents are opposed to: PETITION 1) The annexation of the current county land tract North of Sebastian Elementary School for any purpose other than conservation of wetlands and natural forest and wildlife preservation. 2) The proposed Ashbury Subdision or any subdivision proposal that deviates from standard lot widths no smaller than 70 feet, densities of no mom than three units per acre, and side yard setbacks of at least 10 feet. PRINT SIGN STREET TELEPHONE SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL SEBASTIAN, FL