HomeMy WebLinkAbout11082006 Attachment
Q'lYOf
HOME OF PWCAN ISI.AND
eit of Sebastian, Florida
Agenda No. [:0. { fe5
Subject: Resolution R-06-24 approving
Preliminary Plat for Bristol Lakes
Subdivision (a townhouse development)
Department Origin: Growth Management
Purchasing/Contracting:
Finance DIrector: ~
City Attorney:
City Clerk: .
Approved for Submittal by: City Manager
AI Minner
Date Submitted: November 2, 2006
For Agenda of: November 8, 2006
Exhibits: R-06-24; Staff Report; Application; P & Z Minutes; Public Notice & Surrounding Property Owners; HRS
Comments; IRC Fire Rescue Comments; IRC Utility Comments; Wetland Mitigation Correspondence; SJRWMD
Permit; Fish & Wildlife Comments; Traffic Analysis Comments; Misc. Correspondence; Preliminary Plat &
Construction Drawings with Aerial and Survey; Architectural drawings; Pool Bathrooms Floor Plan & Elevation
Sheet; colored rendering of buildings; Bio-Tech GT map.
EXPENDITURE
REQUIRED:
None
AMOUNT BUDGETED:
None
APPROPRIATION
REQUIRED: None
SUMMARY
Mr. Joseph Schulke, on behalf of Sebastian Landings, LLC, has filed for preliminary plat
approval for an 84-unit townhouse development located on northwest of Barber Street and
Park Place Mobile Home Park, east of Bristol Street and south of Palm Lake Club Mobile
Home Park. The project consists of 84 units in 15 residential buildings and a swimming pool
with restroom facilities, together with associated parking, water and sewer service, drainage,
and landscaping. Access to each unit will be accomplished via an internal road network with
the primary access on Barber Street and a secondary emergency and utility access further
east on Barber Street. Proposed water service will be accomplished via connection to an
existing Indian River County Utilities water main, and wastewater service will be provided by
connection to the existing Indian River County Utilities sewer system. Stormwater runoff for
the proposed development will be routed to multiple on-site retention areas. The site
consists of 10.9 acres, of which 4.78 acres will be impervious (43.8%) and 6.12 acres will be
open space (56.2%). The proposed preliminary plat reflects compliance with current RM-8
zoning townhouse requirements, including minimum lot size, setback standards, open space
requirements and all other dimensional criteria.
Per the Land Development Code and established City procedures, the site plan for this
project has been reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission at a quasi-
judicial public hearing on October 5, 2006. The Planning and Zoning Commission also held
a public hearing at that meeting to consider the preliminary plat and made a recommendation
to City Council for its approval.
co
The Preliminary Plat for Bristol Lakes Subdivision has been provided in the agenda packet.
The site plan, as presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission, as well as other
supporting documents, are available for review in the Growth Management Department.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Conduct quasi-judicial public hearing.
"Move to approve Resolution R-06-24, Preliminary Plat for Bristol Lakes Subdivision."
(j)
RESOLUTION NO. R-06-24
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, JJLORIDA,
APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR A TOWNHOUSE
DEVELOPMENT SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS BRISTOL LAKES;
PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Sebastian Landings, LLC, has filed an application for approval of a
preliminary plat for a townhouse development subdivision known as Bristol Lakes; and
WHEREAS, said subdivision and plat comply with applicable State and City codes and
regulations;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SEBASTIAN, as follows:
Section 1.
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL. The City Council of the City of
Sebastian does hereby approve the preliminary plat and subdivision plan for Bristol Lakes
prepared by Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard L.L.C., with an engineer's stamp and signature dated
October 31,2006, as maintained on file with the City Growth Management Department.
Section 2.
CONFLICT. All resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith
are hereby repealed.
Section 3.
EFFECTIVE DATE.
This resolution shall take effect immediately
upon its adoption.
The foregoing Resolution was moved for adoption by Councilmember
The motion was seconded by Councilmember and, upon being put into a
vote, the vote was as follows:
Mayor Brian Burkeen
Councilmember Nathan McCollum
Councilmember AI Paternoster
Councilmember Andrea Coy
Councilmember Sal Neglia
CD
@
~....
The Mayor thereupon declared this Resolution duly passed and adopted this 8th day
of November, 2006.
CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA
By:
ATTEST:
Mayor Brian Burkeen
Sally A. Maio, MMC
City Clerk
Approved as to form and legality for
reliance by the City of Sebastian only:
Rich Stringer, City Attorney
HOME Of PELICAN ISlAND
Growth Management Department
Preliminary Plat - Staff Report
1.
Project Name:
Bristol Lakes Subdivision
2. Requested Action: Preliminary Plat approval for an 84-lot (unit) townhouse
subdivision
3. Project Location
a.
Address:
b.
Legal:
Northeast corner of Barber and Bristol Street
See sheet No.5, "Preliminary Plat" for full legal
description
c. Indian River County Parcel Number: 31-39-20-00000-7000-00007.3
4.
Project Owner:
5.
Project Agent:
6.
Project Engineer:
7.
Project Surveyor:
8. Project Description
Sebastian Landings, L.L.C.
Emilio Suaya
272 E. Flagler Street
Miami, FL 33131
(305) 528-6144
Joseph Schulke, P.E.
Joseph Schulke, P.E.
Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard
1717 Indian River Blvd, Suite 301
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
(772) 770-9622 fax: (772) 770-9496
David M. Jones
3899 39th Square
Vero Beach, FL 32960
(772) 567-9875
a. Narrative of proposed action: Mr. Joseph Schulke, on behalf of Sebastian
Landings L.L.C., has filed for preliminary plat approval for an 84-unit
townhouse development located northwest of Barber Street and Park Place
Mobile Home Park, east of Bristol Street and south of Palm Lake Club Mobile
Home Park. The project consists of 15 residential buildings, together with
associated parking, water and sewer service, drainage, and landscaping.
1
@
Access to each unit will be accomplished via an internal road network with
the primary access on Barber Street and a secondary emergency and utility
access further east on Barber Street. Proposed water service will be
accomplished via connection to an Indian River County Utilities water main,
and wastewater service will be provided by connection to the Indian River
County Utilities sewer system. Stormwater runoff for the proposed
development will be routed to multiple on-site retention areas. The site
consists of 10.9 acres, of which, 4.78 acres will be impervious (43.80.10) and
6.12 acres will be open space (56.20.10). A swimming pool with restroom
facility will also be provided.
b. Current Zoning: RM-8
c. Adjacent Properties
Zonina Current land Use Future land Use
North: R-MH mobile home park R-MH
(Palm Lake Club)
East: PUO-MH mobile home park R-MH
(Park Place)
South: PUO-MH mobile home park R-MH
(Park Place)
West: RS-10 residential homes LOR
(Sebastian
Highlands)
d. Site Characteristics
(1) Total Acreage: 10.9 acres
(2) Current land Use(s): Vacant
(3) Soil: Myakka, archbold, and
quartzipsamments
(4) Vegetation: Pines, oaks, wetland vegetation.
Tree survey has been provided.
(5) Flood Hazard: Zone X and A
(6) Water Service: Indian River County Utilities
(7) Sanitary Sewer Service: Indian River County Utilities
(8) Parks: Filbert Street < 1 mile
(9) Police/Fire: Barber St. Fire Station 2 miles
Sebastian PO < 4 miles
~)
,------/
2
9. Comprehensive Plan Consistency
a. Future Land Use: consistent
b. Traffic Circulation: consistent
c. Housing: consistent
d. Public Facilities: consistent
e. Coastal Management: consistent
f. Conservation: consistent
g. Recreation and Open Space: consistent
10. Contents of Preliminary Plat:
a.
name of subdivision:
Bristol Lakes
b.
vicinity sketch:
provided
c. legal description including section, township and range: provided
d. north arrow graphic scale: provided
e. date of preparation provided - 3/29/06
f. name, address, and telephone of applicant: provided as listed above
g. name, address, and telephone of owner of record: provided as listed
above
h. name, address, and telephone of mortgage holder:
i. statement that they will join in the dedication:
j. name, address, and registration number of engineer: provided as
listed above
k. name, address, and registration number of surveyor: provided as
listed above
I. name of adjacent subdivisions, if any, including plat book and page
number reference: provided
m. names of owners of record of adjacent acreage: provided
3
(2)
CD
n. contour map including a perimeter strip up to 150 feet in width.
provided
o. all existing watercourses, drainage ditches and bodies of water,
marshes, and other significant, natural or man-made features:
provided
p. name, aliment and width of all existing and proposed streets, alleys,
rights-of-way or easements including name, right-of-way width,
street or pavement width and established center line elevations:
street names will be coordinated with city staff and will be presented on
final plat.
q. all existing and proposed property lines, easements and right-of-
ways, their purpose, their effect on the property to be subdivided,
and the proposed layout of lots and blocks: provided
r. access points to collector and arterial streets showing compliance
to the access requirements: provided
s. all existing drainage district facilities and the ultimate right-of-way
requirements: provided
t utilities such as telephone, power, water, sewer, gas, etc., on or
adjacent to the tract: provided
u. a statement that all utilities are available and have been coordinated
with all required utilities: provided
v. sites proposed for parks, recreational areas and schools: provided
w. location of all temporary structures or permanent structures having
a temporary use: n/a
x. if borders public water, delineate the mean high water line: n/a
y. plan for stabilizing shoreline with natural vegetative cover or other
environmentally sensitive manner acceptable to DEP and the city:
provided
z. permanent reference monuments shall be shown at all block
corners, at all points of reverse or compound curvature, and at all
points of tangency occurring with block limiting lines: provided
aa. block perimeter returns at block corners or other block line
intersection: provided
11.
ReqUired Supplemental Information
4
a. existing land use policy and proposed policy changes: provided
b. on-site wastewater disposal data: provided
c. surface water management plan: provided
d. traffic impact analysis: provided
e. required park land and/or facility improvements: provided
f. required potable water improvements: provided
g. required wastewater improvements: provided
h. erosion and sedimentation control improvements: provided
i. reference to required improvements
i. access: provided
ii. alleys: n/a
iii. blocks: provided
iv. bridges: n/a
v. comprehensive stormwater management system: provided
vi. easements: provided
vii. lots: provided
viii. seawalls, bulkheads, piers and docks: n/a
ix. soils: provided
x. streets: provided
xi. bicycle/pedestrian paths: provided
xii. off-street parking areas: provided
xiii. utilities: provided
xiv. utility installation: provided
xv. central water system: provided
xvi. central wastewater system: provided
xvii. individual sewage systems: n/a
xviii. water and sewage treatment and processing plants: n/a
xix. median strips and entranceways: provided
xx. traffic control devices: provided
xxi. monuments: provided
xxii. commercial and industrial subdivisions: n/a
xxiii. mobile home subdivisions: n/a
j. schedule of multiple phases: n/a
12. Fee paid: provided
5
0J
13. Other Preliminary Plat Matters: The preliminary plat meets the dimensional
requirements of the townhouse development regulations in the RM-8 zoning
district as follows:
a. Minimum lot size (prior to platting): 1 acre
site is 10.9 acres
b. Minimum interior lot size within the site:
1,875 SF
minimum provided 1,875 SF
c. Minimum interior lot width:
25 feet
minimum provided 25 feet
d. Minimum interior lot depth:
75 feet
minimum provided 75 feet
e. Special regulations: Special regulations regarding access, unified
control, development standards, and common open space have been
provided.
14. City Engineer's review: The site plan was reviewed and all issues identified by
the City Engineer have been resolved. The site plan was subsequently reviewed
and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commision on October 5, 2006. The
site plan, as approved, will be used as the "approved Construction Plan" for the
subdivision.
15. Other Matters: Procedurally, townhouse development requires both a site plan
approval and a subdivision approval. T.he site plan establishes the design of the
project and includes building locations, setbacks, stormwater drainage, building
elevations and colors, parking, sidewalks, recreational sites, landscaping, and
requisite buffering from adjacent properties. The site plan was approved by the
Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting of October 5,2006, with these
conditions stated in the staff report dated 9/29/06:
1. When palm trees are used as canopy trees, they shall be clustered at
the ratio of 3 palms to equal one canopy tree.
2. Trees shall have an overall height of 12 feet, with a 2 %" DBH at
planting.
3. At least 50% of trees shall be draught tolerant.
4. Tree requirement along north property line is 1 tree/25 LF. Correct tree
count to 39 trees.
5. Site provides 183 parking spaces. Correct off-street parking calculation
to 183 parking spaces x 1 tree/5 spaces = 37 trees.
6. Total tree requirement to be corrected to 210 trees.
7. Growth Management Director must approval final selection of specific
trees and shrubs to be utilized (per Land Development Code).
(ij
6
8. Additional landscaping to be required at the rear of the pool area to
provide better separation between this recreational facility and the
private residence;
As well as the following conditions:
9. Lights in parking areas shall be shielded to minimize light overflow onto
neighboring properties.
10. Establish a line-of-sight easement on the southwest property at the
intersection of Barber and Bristol Streets, similar to that provided on
the eastern portion of the property along Barber Street.
Based upon the Planning and Zoning Commission action, this multi-family
development has been approved for construction. In order to convey ownership
of the individual townhouse units, a subdivision must also be approved for the
creation of the individual lots (units). At their meeting of October 5, 2006,
following a review of the preliminary plat, the Planning and Zoning Commission
made a recommendation to City Council to approve the preliminary plat for
Bristol lakes.
16. Conclusion: As proposed, Bristol lakes is consistent with all applicable state
and local laws with respect to subdivision development, including provisions
contained within the Comprehensive Plan and land Development Code.
17. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat for
Bristol lakes.
~RED~~
/1-j-OcP
DATE
7
..-----'"
(. \ '\
\~
~.
@
Permit Application No.
City of Sebastian
Develo ment Order A lication
A\lm-hLrOl. n '3"3 ~ &0
FAX Number: ( )
E-Mail:
Title of permit or action requested:
'Yre\\minax\. Plo.,f A
(o"ClI
PLEASE COMPLETE ONLY THOSE SECTIONS WHICH ARE NECESSARY FOR THE PERMIT OR ACTION THAT YOU ARE REQUESTING.
COPIES OF ALL MAPS, SURVEYS, DRAWINGS, ETC. SHALL BE ATTACHED AND 8-1/2" BY 11" COPIES OF ANY ATTACHMENTS
SHALL BE INCLUDED. ATTACH THE APPROPRIATE SUPPLEMETAL INFORMATiON FORM.
A. Project Name (if applicable): Se~' . a.,n \}\\\l- :",
~
Lot:
Indian River County Parcel #: ?J 1. 301. 2-0' (](XX) 1, tOCOV. otXXJ1. 8>
Zoning Classification: .f\ f\I\'.)?' . Future Land Use:
Existing Use: Proposed Use:
Ub c.,1 . nt mu.1 i.
c.
DATE RECEIVED: ~Z.3 j(XJ,
FEE PAID: $ IS{)(). 00
f~\~1M-~
v\'\UI\(. II' 10 'Z.-t
RECEIVED BY: .DB
@
L@
Permit Application No.
Address
. C{L~
0J(Yt~ (A,~
Phone Number: (
FAX Number: (
E-Mail:
Attorne
Name:
Address
Phone Number: (
FAX Number: (
E-Mail:
En ineer:
Name:
SOvVY\!, o...~
Address
.~
Phone Number: (
FAX Number: (
E-Mail:
FAX Number: (112. )S1.o'1- 1'72.
E-Mail:
,I"" W'll'
"b~~Y'~~~ 1 lam Stoddard
f:'~":*~ Coffi!IJission #DD401889
~~~..'J:,,~:: ExpIres: Apr 12, 2009
"""/~~~~~" !3onde(l Thni
I AtlantIc Bonding Co., Inc.
Mar 29 05 04:59p
mo.l_ LJ. LVV.J J.J"TI JTI
!.JLc.. "!i?~. .'
5 Z~ DD ~
~ o..J..'
~~m'Dll'rep""", lIy ad llmn> tOI
Sl\.Il'DJ:lj )\.. BLOCl!t, I! .J..
'iJ3339 cardinal Drive. SUit:. 200
/ {vero lIaac:h. :n. 32,63
CE Block
772 587 7121
nu. JLL"l ,. L t.to:"
p.3
..
l'31cdmNIIlIlbr. 31_39_20_0QOI)0'-'7000-00007. 3
lBOllhl
'JHJs llOClIMENr
lNnlE PUBUc ~~:'J' ~COfIDEo
INmANRllIERCOItNTYFL F .
BK: 18:14 PQ'2119 P
01l2ll1201IhlQs:i1 AM. . age1 Of Z
D DtlCTA,X PD IB40lI 00
JEPAiEY I\: IW{ .
COURT ToN. ClJiFlK OF
Warranty Deed
This Indenture, MadB this ~ dtoyof JanulJ,:r:y . :01 005 A.D.. :Between
ADVAUCED 'l'E(;:BOOLOGY PDTNERS, LLC, a J'1orida limited liabilit.y ao:mpQDy
of lb. County of pa1Jn Beach . Slale l)f Florida , gT2n!or~ ami
Si:BAS~IA:N LANDIHGS, Ia.L.C., a Fl:orida L1mited Liabilit.y COmPanY
wba" ,dd=s is, 2875 W.E. 191st St:.reet, 'l'urDberry P1az.., SUite 801
Jlventura, rIa 33180
of th. Coullly of Hiem:1-Paile SIlIlB of P'1orida.
, grantee..
Witnesseth thallhoGRAN'rORS. ear.1IlI iDc<msid....liolIofIhoI1JlllDf ,..
__---___________________~ DOLLARS ($10)----------------------- DO~R~
lIIUI clbor IPI'I :uId YJluabta ccmaf,lI!nIion 10 llRANIOIlS ill hlIIIII paid by G1L\NIPJ;, a.e ftCelpt wham! ia hot<by' oo:IaIO'wlodmed. bm:
gm>Itd, borpbu:d ml soIil lD Iho pJd GJtANIEE aDd ~ b<Us. - lIIlId uslIDi tbnva, the 6lU<>...m, ck$:ribed Jaod. &IIlIa~
~a.,.nlllDlklM~qty.Df' :D:Idian R~:iTer Sl:ltol of rJ.orida 10 wit:
SEE. EXHIBJ:T wA" AH1I.CBED JJ]!:RE'rO
Sul:>~ect to r8atr:l.ctions, rs~ervat;:i.ons ~ easements of record. if ~.
and. ~~B SUb~~t t;o ne.:ember 3.1., 2004. .
.ad 1M g.:>ll1Olll do 1Iam;y iUlIy .......... a.. lil\o ", Did laud, - wm dcf..m duo ssn>e .s>Ins. LnrlW <Jams ot all pdSO'" ..,~.r.
In' Witness Wliel'eof, dlo-.~ IiBV<l hamofo ..I 1h<it hmds ud ~ lis. do.y JlI)lI >- liDI '000;,. wril1....
Signtd, sealed and delivered In ourp~esente: ADVANCED ".r1!lCBHOLOGY l'AR'J.'Nl!:RS, LLC,
'-1\. _ . n i."" ~' >Or: l!'1ari.. ......- ""iHty c--:.",
:r~~~<;
witness
~..,~
I' ~ed .N8JlS8: v~ r.;. \...161 /:.hd
'Or t'DellS
STATE OF Floric!a .
COUNTY OJ.4':+:i\.:hq./) I\''-'<.-r
The f<>regoing tns!nm>olll w.u lolalow\Dil~ baw.a 1J1lI tIll.s \ ~ day of
~J.ao1i-"Jbxli::lf'f~ "Maiili~'1D:g '~r'--of'~
a F:J..or:ida: J:bn:Lt:ed 1,1ab~1;i.ty', Com.P~
wbo Is potOD1llIIIyIa1oWIIll>mo orwbo bNJ1ro~ his F1or:ida c1r1_r' II
Jan~ ,2005
-n:cm101.ooY'PARTNERS, r.r.c.
by
~lI,WElCHa
MYCOMNISSIOH,1lIl3f*
ElCPIImApl!l 18, 20:8
---....,.~
/-~
~
Mar 29 05 04:59p CE Block
03/29/2005 10:11 F~~ 7727709496
772 567 7121
SCHULKE B I'ITLE STODDARD
p.2
~002
[
lETTER OF AUTHORllA liON
RE: Sebastian Landings
Barber Street. Sebastian, Fl
Parcel JD No. 31-39-20-00000-7000-??oo7.3
To Whom It May Concem:
This is written authorization for Joseph W. Schulke, JOdah B. Bittle, or William P. Stoddard of
Schulke. Bittle & Stoddard. LLC. to act on behalf of SEBASTIAN LANDINGS. LLC. as the agent
in the processing of all planning and permitting for the above referenced project.
.~
8nmo~-
County of
State of FLORIDA
Swom and subscribed before me this:J.9fE day of 11{a/t~c.Z- 0200"')' before me personally
appeared / who is to me well known or who produced
as identification.
r <J j l.
'\ I...<-..:>Q-:-., ~ _ . n i..:o ~~lmf"tf,,1.
Pji'~ted Name: - #~\)~!;~~~qcJ!/~
~ry Public - State of FJ~ :,-~~\SSION ~-t;.. \.
~ .. v~ ~~\ 12, <a ~ -. ~
':': :5i~<::$ 1& ~~ S
~*: ...... :*=
:: . . ""'C:
~-z:," ~DD1087g :f2:'::
~o. f?:g:;-
~ ~'.4<. ~d'(\l(\\ #. C5~
~ r?'t.':::"u'Yo,br Unb~", .' "<"~
~.I': r A .....u~:=...... ox ~
."//,,//18UC Sijl.\\~~~"
"'"I/,illl\l\\\'\ .
My Commission Expires:
j :
c;,.< i ":vi 0 /~_
,c,f: .' .....c::-
(0
Permit Application No.
Permit Application No. .
arY<:f
Supplemental Information
Preliminary Plat Approval
HOME OF PEUCAN ISLAND
~. The following infonnation is required on all preliminary plats:
-La. A vicinity sketch showing the location of the boundary lines and distance of
the land proposed for the subdivision in reference to other areas of the city.
~. A north arrow, graphic scale, and date of preparation.
h. The name of adjacent subdivisions, if any, and the plat book and page
reference, together with the names of the owners of records having interest
in adjacent acreage.
~. The names, alignment, and width of all existing and proposed streets,
alleys, rights-of-way or easements adjacent to or within three hundred (300)
feet of the proposed subdMsion including name, right-of-way width, street
or pavement width, and established center line elevation. Existing streets
shall be dimensioned to tract boundary.
~. All existing and proposed property lines, easements and rights-of-way, their .
purpose, their effect on the property to be subdivided, and the proposed
layout of lots and blocks.
~ Access points to collector and arterial streets showing their compliance to
access requirements.
~. All existing drainage facilities.
_ h. Existing and proposed utilities such as telephone, electricity, water, sewer,
gas, etc. on or adjacent to the tract. The preliminary plat shall contain a
statement that all utilities are available and have been coordinated with the
reqUired utility departments.
~ Site for proposed parks, recreational areas and schools.
h The location of any temporary structures or pennanent structures having a
temporary use.
/ k. If the proposed plat borders upon any pUblic water bodies, delineate the
/" mean high water line.
_I. Permanent reference markers shall be shown.
.."------...
CV
Permit Application No.
The following Is required for all comprehensive plan amendments, zoning amendments
(including rezoning), site plans, conditional use permits, special use permits, variances,
exceptions, and appeals. -,
I~_ THE OWNER(S) / ~LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER(~) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED WHICH IS
THE-SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION, HEREBY AUTHORIZE EACH AND EVERY MEMBER OF THE
BOARD/COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN TO PHYSICALLY ENTER UPON THE PROPERTY AND VIEW THE PROPERTY IN
CONNECTION WITH MY/OUR PENDING APPLICATION.
I/WE HEREBY WAIVE ANY OBJECTION OR DEFENSE I/WE MAY HAVE, DUE TO THE QUASI-JUDICIAL NATURE OF THE
PROCEEDINGS, RESULTING FROM ANY BOARD/COMMISSION MEMBER ENTERING OR VIEWING THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING ANY
CLAIM OR ASSERTION THAT MY/OUR PROCEDURAL OR SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS RIGHTS UNDER THE FLORIDA.
CONSTITUTION OR THE U ED STATES CONSTITUTION WERE VIOLATED BY SUCH ENTERING OR VIEWING.
ENT IS BEING SIGNED BY ME/US VOLUNTARILY AND NOT AS A RESULT OF ANY COERCION APPLIED, OR
Y EMPLOYEE, AGENT, CONTRACTOR OR OFFICIAl OF THE C10F SE.BASTIAN.
'I.., 1/ f~ ~t;
DATE
,/
SIG ATUf
I _
S\yorn 0 an subscribed before me by V'\ ~OY)
who i e n or produced -
::: :ffiSf:::::iS~daY~~~ g
Pnnted Name of Notary , .~
Commission No./Expiration
Seal:
,\1111'", William Stoddard
~~~Y,1:~-=:. Commission #DD401889
;~.~'::E Expires: Apr 12, 2009
-:.,,,,~. . . 'o~,:: Bondoo 11uu
"',8~,~\\' Atlantic Bonding Co., Inc.
(JJ
PLANNING AND ZON'~ j COMMISSION
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING OF OCTOBER 5,2006
NONE
NEW BUSINESS:
1. QUASI-JUDICIAL PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE - NEW
MODEL HOME PERMIT - 1089 BARBER STREET - MERCEDES
HOMES, INC.
Chmn. Allocco swore in staff, applicant and anyone wishing to speak. John Ludwig of
Mercedes Homes, Palm Bay presented the application. Mr. Ludwig stated that they are
planning to have the parking on the Rosebush Terrace side of the property to minimize
the impact of cars backing out onto Barber Street. Ms. Bosworth reviewed the staff
report. She also addressed the concerns of a neighbor on Rosebush regarding the
decision on parking location at this model home, noting comments from the City
Engineer and Chief of Police who are in agreement with parking on Rosebush.
MOTION by Paul/Simmons to approve the conditional use permit for a new model home
at 1089 Barber Street by Mercedes Homes. Inc.
ROLL CALL: Chmn. Allocco
Mr. Morrison
Mr. Simmons
yes
yes
yes
Mr. Mahoney
Mr. Paul
yes
yes
The vote was 5-0. Motion passed unanimously.
2. QUASI--:'UDICIAL PUBLIC HEARING - SITE PLAN - BRISTOL LAKES
TOWNHOUSES - BARBER STREET & BRISTOL STREET - RM-8
ZONING DISTRICT
Chmn. Allocco swore in staff, applicant and anyone intending to speak. Joseph Schulke
of Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, Vero Beach represented Sebqstian Landings, LLC and
Emilio Suaya. Also present was Attorney Bruce Barkett.'.Mr. Schulke handed out
11 "X17" copies of the plan. He detailed the location of the site. The proposal consists of
84 town home units with the main access directly lined up with the access to Park Place
on Barber Street. The secondary access point to the east was selected because there is
an existing Indian River County Utility lift station driveway location. The county is
requiring the developer to bring the lift station up to code. Tract B is an existing wetland
area, which will be increased by the applicant. The oak hammock to the west of Tract B
will not be disturbed. The proposal is for platting the lots, which means the homeowner
owns the land fee simple as well as their unit. Parking consists of one-car garage and
driveway, additional spaces around the units with ari added thirteen spaces throughout
the site.
Ms. King reviewed the staff report. She reinforced that the secondary access point is for
emergency and utility use. The applicant is providing 14 more parking spaces than is
required by our minimum code requirements. She explained the landscape plan and
tree requirement. Staff recommends approval of the site plan with the conditions listed
on page 8 of the staff report. Further, staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning
Commission make a recommendation to city council to approve the preliminary plat.
2
(0)
PLANNING AND ZONL ..z.; COMMISSION
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING OF OCTOBER 5, 2006
Mr. Paul discussed traffic and the future of Barber Street. Mr. Simmons asked about
total coverage and Ms. King said the site would be allowed up to 60% but will be 43.8%.
Mr. Morrison inquired if the school board had reviewed this application for concurrency
and Mr. Schulke said they did not and to his knowledge the school board had not
adopted a standard as yet. Mr. Barkett said Mr. Schulke is correct. There is a system
being considered to allow school board reviews but right now the county does them. Mr.
Schulke added that within the impact fees paid, there is an allocation for schools. Mr.
Mahoney inquired about sidewalks and Mr. Schulke said there are sidewalks throughout
the development and there will be sidewalks constructed on Barber Street.
The following people spoke on this application:
Ken Burgess, 2401 Kelley Drive, traffic concerns.
Shannon Smith, American Land Lease (owner of Park Place),1001 West Lakeview
Drive, concerns with traffic, storm water flows and drainage.
Mason LeVan (?), 135 Bristol Street, traffic and wildlife concerns.
Harold Farrington, 143 Bristol Street, storm water runoff and traffic concerns.
Diana Frederick, 145 Bristol Street, concerned about lights from parking area and road.
Joe Piatti, Keystone Drive, traffic concerns.
Cheryl LeVan (?), 135 Bristol Street, lighting and traffic concerns.
There was discussion between the commission and Mr. Schulke regarding the concerns
expressed by the public. Ms. King added that Ms. Grohall hired a traffic consultant to
review the submitted traffic survey.
Staff recommends approval of the Bristol Lakes Townhouses with the eight (8)
conditions listed in the staff report, which are all landscape related, and staff would
further recommend that the Planning and Zoning Commission make a recommendation
to city council on the preliminary plat to approve the preliminary plat. Chmn. Allocco
added the light overflow that Joe Schulke agreed to on the west border and to ensure a
sight distance at Bristol and Barber Street intersection.
MOTION by Allocco/Morrison to approve the site plan for Bristol Lakes Townhouses at
Barber and Bristol Streets with the conditions noted in the staff report as well as sight
distance and light overflow.
ROLL CALL: Mr. Mahoney
Mr. Paul
Chmn. Allocco
yes
yes
yes
Mr. Morrison (a)
Mr. Simmons
yes
yes
The vote was 5-0. Motion passed unanimously.
MOTION by Morrison/Simmons to recommend city council approve the preliminary plat
for Bristol Lakes Subdivision.
ROLL CALL: Mr. Paul
Mr. Mahoney
Chmn. Allocco
yes
yes
yes
Mr. Simmons
Mr. Morrison (a)
yes
yes
The vote was 5-0. Motion passed unanimously.
CHAIRMAN MATTERS:
@
3
HOME Of PELICAN. ISLAND
1225 MAIN STREET. SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958
TELEPHONE (772) 589-5518 . FAX (772) 388-8248
PUBLIC NOTICE
CITY OF SEBASTIAN
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
FLORIDA
PURSUANT TO SECTION 54-4-19.5(b)(4)d OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, THE CITY COUNCIL HAS SCHEDULED A QUASI-
JUDICIAL PUBLIC HEARING IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 1225 MAIN STREET,
SEBASTIAN, AT A REGULAR MEETING ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2006, AT 7:00
P.M., TO CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION R-06-24 APPROVING A PRELIMINARY
PLAT FOR BRISTOL LAKES SUBDIVISION (TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT)
CONSISTING OF 10.9 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, LOCATED NORTHWEST OF BARBER
STREET AND PARK PLACE MOBILE HOME PARK, EAST OF BRISTOL STREET AND
SOUTH OF PALM LAKE CLUB MOBILE HOME PARK. THE I.R.C. TAX PARCEL NO. IS
31-39-20-00000-7000-00007.3. CURRENT ZONING IS RM-8 (RESIDENTIAL MULTI-
FAMILY, MAXIMUM 8 UNITS PER ACRE) AND LAND USE IS MDR (MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL). PROPOSED DENSITY IS 7.71 UNITS PER ACRE (84 TOWNHOMES).
ALL INTERESTED PARTIES MAY APPEAR AT THE HEARING AND PRESENT
TESTIMONY WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT.
ALL RECORDS, PLANS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY ARE
AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT CITY
HALL, 1225 MAIN STREET, MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY, 8 A.M. TO 4:30 P.M.
ANYONE WHO MAY WISH TO APPEAL ANY DECISION TIIAT MAY BE MADE AT TIllS
HEARING WILL NEED TO ENSURE TIIAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS
MADE, WIDCH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WIDCH THE
APPEAL IS BASED.
IN COMPLIANCE WITH TIlE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), ANYONE
WHO NEEDS SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS FOR TIllS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT TIlE
CITY'S ADA COORDINATOR AT (772)-589-5330 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO TIlE MEETING.
PUBLISHED: OCTOBER 24,2006
@
Village of Lake Dolores, Inc.
2512 Kelly Drive
Sebastian, Florida 32958
Harold & Patricia Farrington
143 Bristol Street
Sebastian, Florida 32958
Daniel Roberts
116 Keystone Drive
Sebastian, Florida 32958
Virginia Seferian
6572 Marissa Circle
Lake Worth, Florida 33467-7943
Michael & Victoria Dipasquo
126 Keystone Drive
Sebastian, Florida 32958-6934
Mercedes Homes, Inc.
3585 SW Corporate Pkwy
Palm City, Florida 34990
John Hugerth
124 Keystone Drive
. Sebastian, Florida 32958-6926
Joseph & Tammy Piatti
134 Keystone Drive
Sebastian, Florida 32958-6926
Nick Cerro
141 Bristal Street
Sebastian, Florida 32958-6974
Dorothy Holzknecht
132 Keystone Drive
Sebastian, Florida 32958-6934
Indian River County
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Rommel & Marie Agustin
139 Bristol Street
Sebastian, Florida 32958
Anthony & Connie Sapienza
122 Keystone Drive
. Sebastian, Florida 32958-6934
Teresa Reynolds
127 Bristol Street
Sebastian, Florida 32958
Richard Kessell
200 Damons Point Road
Marshfield, MA. 02050
Sebastian Landings LLC
2875 NE 19th Street
Turnberry Plaza
Aventura, Florida 33180
Joseph Pagliarulo
4320 SW 74th Terrace
Davie, Florida 33314
Park Place Qommunity LLC
C/O American Land Lease
29399 US HWY 19 N STE 320
Clearwater, Florida 33761
Linda Brand
107 Wild Oak Drive C",
Brandon, Florida 335110
Marie Thibodeau
2311 Kelly Drive
Sebastian, Florida 32958-8598
. \ ~ oc.P
('I' (#' ~ '!7"'
\O~
Francois Phillippe
1998 Barber Street
Sebastian, Florida 32958
Bishop Geralu Barbarito
Diocese of Palm Beach
A TTN: Real Estate Department
P.O. Box 109650
Palm Beach Gardens, FL. 33418-9650
Vincent & Nancy Dipasquo
126 Keystone Drive
Sebastian, Florida 32958
John & Cheryle Johnson
R.R. 1 BOS 96 H
Athens, PA. 18810
Clifford Sanders
114 Keystone Drive
Sebastian, Florida 32958
Gloria Treibits
2304 Kelly Drive
Sebastian, Florida 32958-8597
Richard & Diana Frederick
416 E. Main Street
Dayton, PA. 16222
10
V
Palm Lake of Sebastian Inc.
39 Treasure Circle
Sebastian, FL 32958
@
-
Jeb Bush
Governor
I~
M. Rony Fran~ois, M.D., M.S.P.H., PhD
Secreta~
December 20,2005
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEAL TH DEPARTMENT
,..r--..-"'.,.."
/ ~O'2.12.2Z3.a "'-,,\
/ " ",C'!> ~<?6' \
/ ~~ ~. ~~ ~~~ \
~ ~ ~~c~~.. s ~)
t- C, ?r:::Fj N
~ \)~ ~~\~\. & I
\ ~~ ~\~~~ /~ /
'\. ~LB 't" /
~8l9SVS /./
""'-----....-'
Ms. Dorri Bosworth
Community Development
City of Sebastian
1225 Main Street
Sebastian, FL 32958
RE: Site Plan/Preliminary Plat - Bristol Lake Townhouses
Dear Ms. Bosworth:
The following comments are relative to our review:
1. Acknowledged that project will be connected by public water and
wastewater services.
2. The proposed swimming pool shall be reviewed and approved by.the
Regional Public Health Engineering Office (Orlando).
If you have questions or need additional information, please contact me.
GI R. Schuessler
Environmental Supervisor
Environmental Health
1900 - 27th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960
Telephone: (772)794-7a1'l \
Suncorn: 259-7 V
Fax: (772)794-744
@
Dee .12 05 03:36p
IRe Fire Prevr "')n Burea
'781848
p.4
Indian River County Fire Rescue
Vero Beach, FL 32960
Fire Prevention Violation Notice
Mon Dec 12, 2005
C of Seb
File (Occupancy)ID#
,.,-
00360);' .<;Po,,:;;.; ">'
/ ~ \~ I.... H.' .'.' ...
...' t.~. '1.-
l/ .;;.':'- ~ ~ '\.
/ o,~.. .~f'(J ';:-
i ~,l ~~~ nf0f00 ~.
Mon Dee 12, 20qS to ~~ ~~\.J ~'\. ~ tJ
\ ~'''. ....~ ~~ ~ ;
. ~ -. ~ ^'
you must, (l~ect ~~ A~)
eonpl ian6e Xt:~ n:ttPC!l
'.., ,-O€6Zo ./
"'~""""'~~_.,~_...."......_.r .//
Bristol Lakes Townhomes
0000 Barber ST
Sebastian, ~L 32958
An inspection (or plan revielt') of your facility on
revealed the violations listed below.
ORDER TO COMPLY: Since these: conditions are contrary to law,
them upon receipt of this neltice. An inspection to determine
this Notice will be conducte:d on at / /
If you fail to comply with this notice before the reinspec::~on date listed, you
may be liable for the penalties provided for by law for such violations.
Violation Code
Commercial bldgs. - 6inch Address
Commercial/Multi-family buildings
Article
rRCO
Division
Page
951.07.3.b
shall post a minimum 6 inch numerical address.
Multiple suites/units 4 inch address
951.. 07 . 3 . c
Turning radius 35ft. inside & 55ft.outside
T-iJ.rning radius shall be 35 ft. inside
width.
* Special note to intel:ior. radius
952 5 b
and 55ft. outside utilizing full paveme~t
Key access box (KNOX) is required. Fire NFPA 1 3-6
Applications are available in the Fire Division.
_.'. .._______0 ___ ________.. _ ____.. ____A. _._. ___ ___.. . __ __.___. ___ . ___ _.._.____. ._____.. ".____. ~ __. _.._____. ____ __ __ow .._____. ".________ .._. __ _. ._____. ___ . _ .____ .__ "___ _ _. ___________.
These plans are pending paYTner.t
Eydrant Access
* Relocate dead end hyd_ that is near Bristol St.
x
Buckner, Ellis
Inspector
(Blectronic Signature)
Occupant/OWner
.
I/~"\I
0:/
12/12/2005 15: 19
Page
1
@.
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
DATE:
JANUARY 6, 2006
THRU:
MICHAEL C. HOTCHKISS, P.E.
CAPITAL PROJECTS MANAGER
{II#-
C7f5
TO:
JAN KING
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR
CITY OF SEBASTIAN
FROM:
GORDON E. SPARKS, P .E.
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT ORDER
SITE PLAN/PRELIM PLAT REVIEW
BRISTOL LAKES TOWNHOMES
We have reviewed the above-referenced project. The following comments must be addressed
and/or incorporated prior to site plan approval:
· Water and sewer available, must connect.
· Contact Kevin OsthuslUtilities (567-8000 x1824) for survey and as-built requirements.
· Contractor must call for utility locations 48 hours prior to construction. Water and sewer
facilities can be located through Sunshine State One at 1-800-432-4770
· Must indicate utility easements and dedication to fudian River County, for construction
and maintenance of water and sewer utilities.
· A full set of construction plans must be submitted for a Utility Construction Permit and
capacity charges must be paid to guarantee capacity.. Proposed size of water meter(s)
must be indicated on plans. Water and sewer services must be installed outside of paved
areas (in grassed areas) and outside of courtyards or fenced areas. An 8" water main
must be constructed in commercial areas.
· Capacity charges and account deposits will be required for connection to County water
F:\Utilities\UTILITY - ENGINEERING\Projects - Sebastian Reviews\SITE PLAN REVIEW Bristol Lakes
Townhomes JAN. 6, 2006.doc
~)
Page 2
and sewer.
· All checklist items associated with the Utility Construction Permit must be complete or a
performance bond for 125% of the portion not complete under finished grading, paving,
drainage and/or restoration must be in place.
· Glued-joint PVC construction is not allowed for water, or sewer mains. Specification of
construction material must be PR-200 for pipe sizes less than 4" diameter, and C-900 for
pipe sizes greater than or equal to 4" diameter.
· Contractor must call for utility locations 48 hours prior to construction. Water and sewer
facilities can be located through Sunshine State One at 1-800-432-4770.
· Line extension fees and/or account charges must be paid for connection to water and
sewer.
· If applicant proposes to develop project in phases, then each phase will require a separate
utility construction permit.
· For your information regarding the Solid Waste Disposal District, an assessment for solid
waste shall be paid at the time construction of the parcel has been completed,
immediately prior to obtaining a certificate of occupancy. For further details, contact
Donna Stark at 567-8000, ext.1294.
· Downstream wastewater collection system must be evaluated and/or modified for impact
of development, prior to issuance of Utility Construction Permit.
· Existing Lift station shall be evaluated for additional flows and upgraded if necessary.
· Isolation valves shall be installed on all lateral feeds.
· Isolation valves shall be installed on water main between loop feeds. All valves shall be
clustered together.
· Water main must be looped whenever possible. A fire hydrant or an equivalent blow-off
valve shall be installed at all water main dead ends.
· Fire hydrants shall be installed at 1000' intervals in single-family residential areas and
600' intervals in multi-family home residential/commercial areas. All valves and fire
hydrants shall be located on lot corners to avoid future conflicts with driveways. Indicate
location of all existing valves and fire hydrants on plans.
· All on-site flow wells not in use must be abandoned and plugged. St. Johns River Water
~
Page 3
Management District must be contacted regarding modification of associated
consumptive use permit. Funding may be available from St. Johns for plugging wells.
Contact Roland DeBlois with the Environmental Planning Department for details of well
plugging program.
If you have any questions, please call me at 567-8000 x1823.
GES/ ges
cc: Robert Keating, Community Development Director
Stan Boling, Planning Director
Lori Hoffman, Environmental HealthDepartment
(j)
@
.~~.I
v.~~~
. . !o
.~ ~.
'-~~
"4l~~
April 20, 2005
Irene sadowski
U.S. Army Corps of Engineer&
400 'High Point Drive Suite 600
Cocoa, FL 32926
RE: SEBASTIAN LANDINGS AT BARBER STREET
WETLAND DELINEATION
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ECG PROJECT NO: 385001
Dear Ms. Sadowski:
Development is planned for a parcel located at the northeast intersection or Barber Street and Bristol Street
(SectIon 20, Township 31 South, Range 39 East, Indian Rivet County). The latllude and longitude near the
center of the property 8I'e 270 45' 55.26" and 80" 27' 9.26-.
At site inspection was conducted on March 9, 2005 for the PUrpo8e of performing 8 wotfand delineation in
accordance with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1981 Wetland Delineation Manual and Chapter 62-340.
Florida Administrative Code. A subsequent site inspeetion was conducted on March 24. 2005 with Marc YOn
Canal (SJRWMD) to field-verify flagged wetland boundaries.
The property, approximately 11 acre6 in size, was recenlly cleared of 9and pine trees that had fallen during the
2004 hurricanes. The subject property, surrounded by development, consists of two types of upland areas and
four wetland are8S (see attached map). The upland areas Include 1) a cleared and mowed aree (primarHy
vegetated by BahIa grass and ruderal species fronting Barber Street, and 2) a higher elevation xeric scrub
community. The scrub community has been affected by patti81 clearing to remove fallen sand pines. The
predominant vegetation Is saw palmetto (Serenoa repen~), rusty Iyonia (Lyonia ferruginea). scattered scrub
oaks (Quercus geminsts, Q. chapmflnll, Q. myrlifolia), slash pine (Pfnus fJ/lioftII) and sand pine (P. clausa).
The 8Cleages for wetlands 1,2,3, and 4 are 0.6,0.16,0.05 and 0.22, respectively. Please see the attached
USACE data sheets and the attached DOQQ map for property boundaries and wetland limits. WeIland
boundaries were located using a Trimble GeoXT GPS device (sub-meter accuracy). All wetlands are Isolated
and do not connect 10 other wetlands or surface walers.
It is our opinion that the property contains wetlands that are isolated and not regulated by the USACE in
accordance with U.S. Supreme Court in Solid Waste Agency of N. Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers No. 99-1178.
150 OXFORO ROAD SUITE 130
FERN PMK. FL 32130
(-407) 331-6599 (""07) 331-36l1O 13X
POST OFFICE BOX 181518
CASSJ;lBERRY. FL 32718.1518
reese @lIC{Jltlc.org
@
~\
~
Irene Sadowski. USACE
Sebastian Landings at Barber Street
ECG Project No: 385001
April 20. 2005
Page 2
We would appreciate written verification of your conclusions. Correspondence should be sent to:
Reese Kessler
Erwlronmental COnsulting Group, Inc.
P.O. Box 181518
Casselberry, FL 32718-1518
Please call me if you have questions.
Thank you for your assistance.
~ff~
Reese H. Kessler, Jr., PWS. President
Ecologist
c: Charles Block
Joseph Schulke. P.E.
Enclosures
,; ..
:z: ~
;: "
8 11
~ ~
~~
~..-
~ ~~
~ :. ~Ul~
UQf;i
:i~'"
"'lII:it
ffig~
;:EaI:,.:
zfZ..
O.....G.
lll:o~
~=~
,,~ 4~
g
Q
:Ii
~
II.
o
m
Q
i
:ill:
~
i
~
8i
It.
o
f
w
5
z
~
2
~
...
.,.-
~!
"'IIJ~
MlIJ~
eig"
IOg:Q
!f~~
lD"t
:iCWZ
OX::)
4/)lt.O
C!)OU
Z5;lE
~::)~
::J~"
~~~
~-g
3!iE
~i
g
~
~
W
~
~
IIitu0'
:iClt:!!
~..lD
"'~~
~~I
... .....
II) '" ...
...~
~~3
~:ii~
o~g
fgg
8
...
o
;;~ !
0J
(ij;)
~
Iii
~
~
: ~
~ ~ 9
~ :a~
II. o(/)z
a (/)oj
.:I ~zo
t: z~C)
!2 ct-D!:
i ~~~
~ ! ~
i ~ is
i a ~
A. fn
i
0.
~
Z
tit
~
~ li)
Ii :!i
~ j
.~ ~
~llJf~
..~~~
I!! Ii -I
~?!
.. :z .....,
~D!Q
j;~io(
aMii::t5
::Jail)
<<~o~
A.QQ::J
J
..s
"I
...
(j 2
!; ill
e: "
:) ~
~ i
00
:!it')
..,,-
;.II!!
il-
zi
8Q'~
~ct
~i~
W~:ll
12E
~)(f
-c~
~~III
_ u-
f'.'.'
~I
...:'.~
5
co
I..~.I
v:~.~~
,. '. .,.
. . . .
April 2f>. 2005
Charles Block
C. E. Block Architect, Inc.
P. O. Box 1206
Vero Beach. Fl32961-1206
RE: SEBASTIAN LANDINGS ON BARBER STREET
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
ECG PROJECi NO: 385001
Dear Mr. Block:
EnVironmental Consulting Group, Inc. has completed Part 1 contracted services as authorized on
February 21, 2005. The services induded:
1. Conduct a site Investigation to determine wetland areas and vegetative communities,
2. Flag wetland boundarie8in accordance with Chapter 62-340, F.A.C., and the U,S. Army Corps of
Engineers 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual. .
3. Conduct a cursory teview of the property to qualitatively assess habitat conditions and to determine
the potential of tho site serving as habitat for species listed by the Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservallon Commission andfor the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
4. Conduct research of iIVBiIable data, 9.g. GIS data, to determine If lhere have been any recordings of
listed species Inhabiting the site or vicinity.
5. Meet onsile with St. Johns River Water Management District and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to
field verify Bagged weUand boundaries.
6. Prepare a summary letter and related items concem~g findings and recommendations InclUding a
vegotatlV$ cover map Identifying approximate habitat areas.
Attached is a letter submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers requesting confirmation that the onsite
wetlands are isolated end are not regulated In aecordalce with SWANCC. Marc von Canal of the
SJRWMD performed a site Inspection end verified Ihe flagged Wetland boundarIes on March 24, 2005.
Information regarding the wetland boundary flagging has been submitted to Joseph Schulke so that the
land surveyor can locate the wetland extent and calculate the wetland acreage. Written verification of the
wetland delineation may be obtained from the SJRWMD oither by submitting a copy of the surveyor by
submitting an ERP application for the proposed development.
150 OXFORD ROAD SUITE 130
FERN PARK, FL 32130
(407)331.6699 (C07) 331-3860 fax
POST OFFICE BOX 181518
CASSELBERRY. FL 32718-1518
reeSll@eoginc.org
@
Charies Block
Re: Sebastian Landings on Barber Street
Environmental Servtces; ECG Pro~ No: 385001
April 20. 2005
Page 2
A site inspeclion was conducted on March 9, 2005. The subject property, surrounded by development.
consists of two types of upland areas and four wettand areas (see aUached map). The upland areas
include 1) a cleared and mowed area (primarily vegetated by Bahia grass and tudersl species fronting
Barber Street. and 2) 8 higher elevation xeric scrub community. The scrub community has been effected
by partial cIearlng to remove faIten sand pines (2004 hurricanes). The predominant vegetation is saw
palmetto (S&f'ftnoa reprms). rusty lyonia (Lyon/a fflrrug;nea), scettered scrub oaks (Quercus geminata. Q.
chapman;;. O. myftifoll8), slash pine (PinU$ eI1iottH) and sand pine (P. claus8).
Wet"nds
The weOands (4) were flagged and located using a hend held Trimble GeoXT GPS unit (submeter
accuracy). The acreage provided below Is based on this dale and not from Information from the land
surveyor.
Weiland 1 is approximately 0.6 acres In size. It appears to be mowed along with the adjacent upland
fronting Barber Street. The wetland edge has a canopy of scattered slash pine. The weUand ground
Cover consists of sedges and rushes (Rhyncllospora sp., Juocus spp., Xyrfs sp.). bluestem (Andropogon
glomeratlJ$), and wax myrtte (Myrica CMifera). The soil was saturated to the surface at most locations
and inundated in some areas. Hydric soil indicators included oxidized rhizopheres and a strlpped matrix.
Wetland 2 Is approximately 0.16 acres in size. The soN In this area was affected (partially graded) by the
fallen tree removal. The remaining vegetation is swamp fem (Blechnum serrulatum), chain fern
(WOOdwan1hl virglnlca), peragrass (Urochlott mutica), and along the edge gallberry (/lex Qlabrs) end slash
pine. The soil was saturated and contains a high organic surface (hydric soil indicator).
Wetland 3, approximately 0.05 acres in size, fe$embfes e drainage &wale along a subdlvlsloo road. The
predominant vegetation is swamp fern, chaIn fem, and dahoon holy.
Weiland 4, approximately 0.22 acres in size, is a shallow depression (may have been excavated) With
standing water. The weiland ground COVer consists of lledgee and rushes (Rhynchospora sp., JunCU$
spp., Xyris Bp.), bluestem (Andropogon glomefBfU$), and witchgrass (DichtJnthelium sp.). The soil was
inundated at most locations. Hydrtc SON indicators Included a !huck surface.
Conclusions from the meeting with Mare von Canal of the SJRWMO are 1) that WetlandS 2, 3 and 4 ere
isolated wetlands less than 0.5 acre In size and Will not require wetland mltlgallon for wetland impacts,
and 2) that Wetland 1 is Isolated. but exceeds 0.5 acre in size; therefore wetland miligalion will. be
required. Weiland mitigation requirements are determined in accordance with calculation Procedures
d8$Cribod In Chapter 62-345, FAC. (UMAM). Tho calculations are performed based on a specific
mitigation proposal, but based on Mr. von Canal's experience 10 date using UMAM for other similar
disturbed wetlands, he anticipates e resultant wetland mitigation ratio is 1:1 (or proposed impects to
Weiland 1. He suggested that satisfactory wettand mitigation could be achieved by creating 8 wetland
along a stormwater pond; however, mitigation monitoring would be required, adding to the cost. A
wetland mitigation bank with a service area covering this project Is not available. An option that may be
available is coordination with Indian River County Parks and Recreation 10 provide wetland improvements
on county land In Ihls vicinity. ECG's proposal for these setVlces haa been provided to you.
@
Char1es Block
Re: SebastIan Landings on Barber Street
Environmental Servic"s; ECG Project No: 385001
April 20, 2005
Page 3
En~anger.d and Threatened Species
A review of the Florida Fish and WHdlife Conservation Commission database (wildlife observations and
eagle nest locator) did not reveal recordings of listed speclos within one mHe of the project ares. A
cursory Inspection ot the xeric scrub located two (2) gopher tortoise burrows (one active and one
abandoned). The gopher tortoise (Gopherus pofyphemus) is currently listed by the FWC as 8 species of
SPecial concern. A gopher tortoise survey that covers 100 percent of the xeric scrub Is recommended to
determine the tortoIse population and density. The FWC gopher tortoise protection options Bre:
1. Avoid developing in the area occupied by tortoises.
2. Develop so as to avoid gopher tortoise burrowt by avoiding concentrations of burrows
altogether and/or stay at leest 25 feet rrom enlrances of individual burrows.
3. Mitigate for acllvltles that will probably entomb or kill tortoises by providing a degree of
habitat protection similar to that provided by DRI developers. A permit is requlrod.
4. Relocate those tortoises that would olherwise be -taken." Biologically, relocation is the
least effective alternative. A permit Is required.
5. In cases where five or fewer tortoises are affected and some habitat or open space will
exist on the site following construction. tortoises may be captured bV tho landowner or his
agents and released back onto the site In an area where they can move freely. A permit
Is required.
Options 1, 2 and 4 may not be feasible for the proposed project. Option 5 may be appropriate jf the
proposed project includes open space area tor relocation. Typically, authorization for Option 5 (five or
fewer gopher tortoise relocation permit) can be issued online in less than one week. The duration of the
permit is 90 days. Because of the project size and Clevelopment footpmt, Option 3 may be the most
feasible. The amount or mitigation required is dependent on the gopher tortoise density and Ihe amount
of tortoise habItat. All of the xeric scrub (5.77t acres) Is considered habitat. The formula used to
dEltermlne the amount of mitigation required Is 15 percent of suitable habitat when tortoise density Is 0.4/
acre (prorated); 15 percent when density Is loss than O.81acre; 25 percent When the density is equal to or
greater than O.81acre. Therefore. in a worst-case situation, the acreage required is 25 percent of 5.77
acres Or 1.44 acres. Using the current (effective July 8. 2004) cost for the Treasure Coast Region (June
14,2004 teller from the FWC) of $7,657.00 pet' acre, the resulting COst is $11,026.80.
Florida scrub-jay
The Florida scrub-jay is Dated all Threatened by the Florida F"l6h and Wildlife ConBetVation Commission
and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. A review of the FWC database for I'8CiOrdod nesting locations
identified two sites. the nearest being approximately 2 miles northwest of the project site. None were
observed during the site Inspections.
Florida scrub-jays have very specifIC habitat requirements, includIng various fonns of scrub communities
that bUrn frequently anOUgh to maintain a tree helghl of 3-10 feet tall. They actlveJy avoid other forest
types, wetlands, and large, open areas such as agricultural lands. However. Jays are known to occupy
aro!is that are not typically identified 8S preferred habitat, such as Scrub sites Ihat have been converted 10
other uses (residential developments or grove).
cv
@
Ch:trtes Block
Re: Sebastian landings on Barbor Street
EO'Iironmental Services; ECG Project No: 385001
April 20. 2005
Page ..
The project site contained sand pines. but has been cleared recently. Sand pme communities are
generally avoided by scrub jays. The recent removal of the trees and creatiOn of open spaces may have
imprOVed site conditions to a degree that a portion of the sIte (essentially the gopher tortoise habitat)
could be considered potential Aorida scrub-jay habitat: however, the potentiaf habitat on Ihe property i$
Small (scrub-jaya usuallv require 10 or mOAt acres). The site may become oCCUpied during the dispersal
periods (post nesting season). For these reasons. it Is recommended that coordInation with the USFWS
be conducted. A Florida scrub-jay survey may or may not be required. The preferred timos for 8 8urvey
are spring (especiBlly March), July. and September - October. In general. the survey protocol established
by the USFWS requires thallhe survey be conducted in a certain manner for a minimum of f) consecutive
days, under specific weather conditions, and during mornings.
:~e If you have QUeStions or need clarification.
?~
Re"'~J~
Ecologist
Enclosures
c; Joseph SChulke
March- .1'6, .zOOl~.
Joseph:Schulke, P"J:; ..
Schulke, Blttle-&.Stoddard, LtC .
1717 Indian River Boul~vard Suite 30.1
VeroBeach,FL 32eeO .
. RE:
. SEBASTrAN VltLAGg-(BRISl'Ol,.lAKES)..
.Wi;tLANRMITIGATI0NPtANo.:REVlSED
. SEBASTIAN;:IND1ANRiVER:COUNTY,FLORIDA .
ECGPRO,h::cr' NoTaH50iJ"f. .... .... . - .
. . . -. -'. .
. . . . .
Dear Mr;:~chU!ke: .
. . -
This.pr.op.osed.mitlgationplanis:$ubmitteCl pursqahUo.th~ revised: site prall received.on February 17,2006. The
reVlsed:slte:Pt~n:lncl~ges-:a'J;edu,dtion:.Jn'imp.acrto Wafland 3. .Asif~.d~scriptioll was proyl_ded and-~~ues:related .
toend~lIigetetfand.-thieaten~d'~pecieswere addressed In_ our september 2005 Correspondence.... The revised
mitlQalion',plan aSd:eb:liled:~beloWis.also_a response to the SJRWMD De.cember 28, -2005 request for Information
(po~fon~:ofql:l~stloms 4;- to,.1.l;:l2-, .arid .13). . .
Qtcestion:4 ,- .
". '
. .Th."lIe\'iliil';:~tlililll~"""th.iilvi$ed","il~1lfIes1hl> .~pramfb"ffet'.rcmgWOtJand 3; Tha tipland
,,: bUff'et:IO~I:Ud$s:.~xi~tl~~f-(fratiitrauy.::v~g~.tated:LJPI$l1d.areasas..waU aSdisiurbe'd;areas:that'are. presen~ at:the .south
.edge-'()r-W&~and;3> VV~tlamd'_3';antLitS.:$_out~ .side:have been. -subject.ad tofreqlient mowing and tflerefore.do .not
. have :8'natl:;lral. uPlanCl. buffer,.' TillS. adj~centuplcmd: cQnslstsof a mowe!i. gr~S$. area: . The. .proPQsed buffer
alo~g t.he_ :s'ou~h-edg~ ofVVeUand :3. Consists-:offl".~lopes, ~l,It 'is. to' be ..v~g~t~ted - withdeSirable-. upia:nd. species
($ee . table below).. - . The buffer o.n.. thew.est ..slde. of - the: -wetland: consists _ of. upland native vegetation, will be
plaGe(l.in- :th~:c6!l~~fVation'~~~ement,. .~D~. wI/I: not -be- impactec;l (e.g,_ fil.!. slopes). PI~ase Dote. tl)at the wetland
. impacHo provide -fill. slopes;.bas-been:iri.cludedhithe tatal wetland ,ImpaCt .acreage (0:28 acres). . .ihe proposed,
bUffer'Wilr;be:~oetattYeiY'b-EJttedhan-the:exlsting_ upland along the. south. side: of Wetland 3. . _
Qoe.stkm:10
The :site;plan.h~sbeEmreVisedtaTedl,lce:jri1pacts to.Wetlanq 3; The Impact:has.been.reduced from 0;56. acres
to.. 0;28 ::acr88,. a:.redu~tion,byt!Op-ercent,.. 'Fhe. non..lrripacted wetland:area _will. be .protectedbya. conservation
eaSement and-enhanced::byremovlng.Brazilian p~pper along the Wetland-edgs:and byplantfng Wetland species
as detai/ed beIOW~.:Ii1'additioii~.Wetlan<fcreatiOriispr,?posed:adjacentOto Wetland-3. :. _
15Cit>XFORO:ROAD.SUlTE 130 ...
FERt'fPARK;.F.l32730
(407)'331'-6599_ .(407). 331;.3860'fax. .
- .P~~T Q.F~IQ.~ra9.XJ81_518. .. . -
. CAS~E4BeRRY;.-f.L 32718-151&
. r.eel!e@ecglnc,org
@
JosephSchUlke,P.E; .
Re: . Sebastian Village
WeUand Mitigation: Plan~Revi.sed
March 16, 2.00'6
Page 2
Wetland Mitigation Plan .
. . .
. The wet1and mitigation plan Is proposed to .offsetimpacts to. ap:proXimately.O;28 acres 'of Wetland 3(0;62 .ac:res'
total}. .
the. revised Wetland :mitlg~tlon.inclu.cfes.the following:
1.Presef\iilig.aildenhancing Wetland:3; .
.2. . Creatlng.w~Uand EidJacentto'WeQand'3,. . '. .. .: . :..... .'. ..' . ". .: .
.3.. Provlding.apliffer s~ctIOIi'COn~lsilng':of~xlstlng'hatJve vegetation af~ng.the.west side of.th~. created and:
enhaiiced.\wetland,thaO$ fafg~"'thardhefecommer\ded1s.25'foQt width,' . .
4. . Provlding.an>up.land,;buffer.atong the'north alid'south sides of the. wetland' mitlgc.1tionarea .U1at is an
. improveiiJehUronrtheexistin.Qcohdltions, . ... .... .; ... ... .. . . .
,5.Ptacing'the'..enht:mce.~:ai:1d . created.. wetlandsarJd ..uplahd . buffers...(existing and.,lmproveq) ina.
. . .eon's8ivatlon:.easemehttlitIlWill,pievenUhe:current o.ngoing:disturbanceactivities, ,and. . ..
6~. .. .f,10Stihg.' .edueational, .sign$lnfoimin~J;,r:esident~of the .Y~l1qe o.f .the. wetl.ands ..and ''tbe, need to. protect. ..
wetlands,. . .
. The;acreagefor. eaChateaisJistedbelbW..
AREA
Acreage:
: Wetliiuld:.ERt)af,iterrrent .
. WetJand:CreatJon
'.WeUl;ih;~FBt(ffjai':' . .
... W~tiartd~et;fter;:N6rttfofW~1J~nd".;' :'......
qfh'er;Ui\ni:ih~iP.re$~.ve . JadlE!~iiUd:W'en~n<f) .
..,.'O'tAL. . .;. .... . ..... .
,0.34
0.33.
0.14
O.Q~L
.':0.32.
l.~2
. . Att$~f.1edere.the<:t~VI$eCj:SJRWMttpe,n;lt'appncatlOn.:tabl~s tegardl/:lg. ,wetJan'd, :Impacts an~' mitigation. .. The.
.. wettanQeJlhai)cel11e)}t:WiU:'bera:ecompnSbedbYrl:im9Ving'(h~rbIClde;.tre.atmerit) .exotlc, specl8$ 'suco. as. BrazlJlaan
.. p'e'Prierand:by'l~~Ui1lfr.itt:p'lanl&i~S,ee<~~~I~,~:Qelo'\V)... 'ttie',srf:)a .fo.r lhe pr()po~~d:.cr~ated wetlandswl11. be graded
. . as,fF1dlcat~~ ~J1.fhe:dt~W.ih,gS"an~'$UbSeCi(Lieri~Y pl~f)tedWith.wetlaQq, sp.ecles'.~p':eclfied in the :~Ies' be.low.
. . ..
. .... ..... '. '.-... '. . . .
The"preserv$d :.upiajjds:.Wi'lJ)e.protecte((by:a.cq:o~ervatiofl easement AnyeXo~ic species.. such: as . Brazilian
p~pp~... ,V{.U1. be:rEJitr~ved'ibY'I1;~r;J,jicfqe. ,ap.plitattpn,... ,Thepre~erv~d ujifa!lqs.a.re:adja~ntto. and: 'Contiguo,us.with
. Wetlar:id ~:and:lhtfYP.'llandpl,iff&.(s(~s ..reqult~d:by ttlf;j.SJRW/vJ[);. The protect~d.:uplc.1rJd.are~s will prpvlde f:1abitat..
ad~oef)H9jhe;wetfa'l)dsand ::provideprotection;to )he' created' ande.nhariced,:wetla'1ds.... . '.
. '. . . ". .
. tb~~Wetlari!:f~a(~fr~v~ts/w~:rW$~~d~i1~ttr~;grOUrid:;~'evatl()nfl:alon,u;,the; perirq~ter :of We~and 3 being 19.6 teet. .
BasSd. On: th(f.ge:~!ecfirl1tif!lr.(eport':prep'8redbr . KsM -:EngioeeTIIl~t an(fTesting,.the high: water' elevation. is
. esti~~:ed.t~be.20;2 .f~et.atWe.tl~nd :3.. 'It: Is anticrpa~e(fttlatthe wetl.and wlUeither .be ./liundatedor saturated
duringJhe;wersea$J)ll'petiOd.: .... ,.. .
ThefOIrOWin~HaDles.pro"tdeinformatlori:..regarding..Wetland .miti9ation~
.~
@J
Jos.eph'SchUlke..P.E.. .
Re: Sebastian Yllla.Qe .
Wetland. Mitlgation.Plan~Revised
elevation
.1.8
..
.' ',.
.
..:.
.. .
.
l'QTAl:. ..
AQre,
..0;34.
1.9
~O:
21 ."
::A~rQ" .;.
.0.14:
totAL
A!:r:e$-
<M:i9
TOTAL; .
TOrAL ..
wetLAND. ENHANCEMENT
March 16. 2.006'
Page 3 .
. W.ETLAND CREATION
Acres.
0;06.
SPElcles.
Pqntedetis'c;qrdata
Saaittatia./tmi)ifolia
.Elei1M~rl$.inter$fi.n.cta,
.
.
,. .. .'
0:05
.Ji;mcU$:e,ffusus
.PQnttr(.jeJi~..cori:Jata
,S~fiittarJ~"anc.iiolli'
h Cladli.Jmj~mfli~lilis9
:O.l9:
. .,. J,l)ncl)$~ffl;!sC!s
, .. : h.$p~rtlf1~.biik~f.t
.. ..C .ClilcJju;"jai11ai~n~(}..
. . :itiP$~b~rn::iJticWJo.ldiJs
~ , hf:;~iif1aii@c~ti:ia:;.
.:.. .
...
.
. ...
. Jt'Q3.
.(),3,~. h
.wcrLANDBUFF~
.Si~e
.1., gal
1:gal
SR.
Plant Spacing.
.3
.
3
3
BR
laal.;'
fgal
4".
.3
3
,3
. 3
3
2.
.,3
S
.3
.
..2
:5
:5,
;. ....
. . :':$.partlh!J:4~k~fI . 3g81
. . 'Ttip$8cr{Ij1J'a~(;JyiQicle$:. 3. gEl/' ; .
; : .ifex c~$..sih8. .3:gal
BR
4"
4':'.:
.}gal...
.$R..;~
.to
2'
...;5.
'. : 10
.6..
..' '915.
:M6 .
9.
. ..
'.WETLANDBUFFERNORTHOF CR.EATED WETlAND
7
735.
'.63..' .
.6
Co.ST
$'1-036;00
$2;270.00.
. '$751:50.
$4 063:50
QtY
96
...'96...
'96
.48
.48
.48
4a
.92
1241
92.
33
,...1.84
245'
.13
1'6
cost.
.$46;80 .
... $3202:50,
$1- 423:50
$720;00'
. $5'392.80.
. COST'
$54.60'
$2;572.5()
. .$a14;25
$450;00
. $3,691.~5' .
COST
$336..00
$168.;00
$120.00
.$60.00
$168.:00.
$.91-.20
$120.00
.$115;00
$3.102,50
..$230..00
$1lS.;SO
; $230;00
$1.923.25
$102.05.
$292:.00
$7~17:3.!$O
(0:\
o
Joseph..Sehulke, P.E.
Re: Sebastian Vlllag~ .
WetlarJd Mitigation. Plan.~Revised
. .
March 16, 2006
. Page 4:
. Wetland Monitoring.
Monitoring. will be conductedsemiannuaily .andannually the..first year and annually. the second and .third.years..
Semlsnrlualinonitoring will be . conducted in March/ApriL MnuaJ.monitoriilg witf be conducted .in
August/September. The monftoringandreports will be. conducted as fOllows:.
Semiannual monitoring wiilbe conducted. qualitatively.and consist of:
1..Photos..at peimanent statl.ons.documentlng condiUons .
2. M assessment of v~getatlv.e cOfolditlons
3. Observations Of wildlife. use .
4. Wrltt.en report descrlblng. obs~rvatlons, restoration. schedule,
.recommendatlons: .
corrective. . measures . taken, and
Mhtial.mortlt(jring will be conductedquantifatively aridcom~lstof: .
1.. A, s",mmsly.,OflnfomnitiOri .hlcludedln the .Semiannual MonJtoringan~ previous Annual Monitoring (if
appliCable). . .. ..... .
2..'Phoios.,at'P&rman.ent.stationS.documenting conditions. ... '. . . . ... . . .
. . 3.. quadrat: sar\ipfing. .to determine percent.. of cover by. herbaceous species' . (IncllJding. npn-foluisailce and .
.riUlsanee.spfi!cies} ... . .. . . . .. .. .. .' ... : . '.. .... .
4. O.ata.ar1d:summary'tables.
.5. .Canclusion's andrecommen(jations.
the' reports $re.to/be. submiltedwithin .30'days f~om .t118 date. Of. the sUrVey:belng:cOnduCted.
Sl;Jccess:CrrtE;lria. .
The creatiorilenha.ncerrient area wlU be de.eined successful ba~ed. on. 80 percent (lOVer by 62-340, F.AC.
species and cover nqt.exceedlngtOpf;trCen.lby nu.isan~ and exotic species.
Question 11
Exotfc ~p~cr$SatWeUan(r.3c;:onsist.ofsparS~.alllQl,Jllts Qfl:~ra~lIan..pepper..a1on9 .the edge .of.Wetland.'3; The
percenta,~i()h)i)V~t"I~:'~stlm~te~A9.be'Ie.$~; than j7~.:pergent .ofthe tota1.'W~tJ~d.:area ;Wlth. .some of :the Brazilian
PeP.~et::bliil~:?'A..::ttle;~ajfiGei1t:.'iiPland.::bJlffet:.J3ra~nan :pepp'er' removaL wlll.:';be.conducted by. a. basal. bark
.~pj~Wf.ji(Jt:!Gi;lrl(milh;f;6.tn'&r;tiiefbibiqe'(-ROOEO}s'u.itable:forweflarid.iuse.(based:on conditi~ns ~t'the time of .
..'l>tP~~joii}..'.'....". :..... .... '.. ... .. ... . '. .. . ...
.".-,",..: ."",
. , .
. .. .'Qtie~tt~ti~tti:' :'.: ~:.:. ...?, .'
. .
. ..' . P.
. . .
. the',r~U~ln~.t/s'"a.de.faiiof.the.estirnated .eostsf()rthe Proposed .wetland . mitigatIon for.s 3-year. period.
PLAN.TINO' '. '. .
: WETLAND '3 ENHANCEMENT
.WETlANDJ~RE;ArI0N
. . WJ:TLANO'BUF,FER .. .
. . .,WETLANDBUFl=ER NORTH OF CREATED WETLAND.
TOTJ\i.
/-~
( \
~J
. . WErLAN'llMONIfORING'
Year 1 (Semfarmual &.Mnual)
Year2.(Annualf .
Year 3 (Anmisl)
TOTAL .
$4;063.50
7;173;50
5;392.80 .
. .:t691.35
.. $20;321.15.
$ 4,000.00
2,500.00
.2.5QO;OO
. .$ 9,000.00
~
Joseph SChulke,P:E
Re: Sebastlcin Viila.ge _ . ..
Wetland Mitiga.tiorl- Plan.,Revised
March 16, 2006
Page 5
.Gtand TotaHor Ws.tlartd -Mlt,gatlon
$29,321.15 -
Financial accbuntai>i1ity doclimentation 'is: being provided by Mi'. Emilio. Suaya in separate correspondence.
Question 13
A draft conservation easement for the wetland -enhancement. and. creation and the. adjacent upland buffer is
being provided by Mr. Emilio Suaya in separate correspondence.
Please .call me if yoU have questions or need clarification.
f1~~....
ReeseH. -KesSI~n; .Jr;, PW$j President
Ecologist
Enc108UJes. .
cc:- .Einlilo Suaya
a~
.\8
@
JOSEPH W. SCHUlKE, P.E.
JODAH B. BITI1.E, P.E.
WILLIAM P. STODDDARD, Ph.D., P.E.
SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C.
CIVIL & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING. LAND PLANNING. ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING
March 31, 2006
Mark Crosby, Engineer
Karen Garrett-Kraus, Senior Regulatory Scientist
Department of Water Resources
St. John's.River Water Management District
525 Community College Parkway S.E.
Paltn Bay, FL 32909
IiI FllECOPY
Re: . Bristol Lakes'FKA Sebastian Village
Application No. 40~061-18640-7
Dear 1v{r. Crospy and Ms. Garrett-Kraus,
Attach~d, please find three (3). sets of revised drainage . calculations, construction
plans~ .and ofuefStlpportlng docUmentation inrespo1).Se;to your December 28, 2005
TechWcal ~eview. .
. . PI~asenQtethat we have proposed aSigrtificantc!l@geto thestonnwater
management concept. The. initial'applicationand. dOCuU1e1).tati~nprOPQSed.fl . ..
t;nodifi~atibn/co1npliance. dete~ation to the pernrlttedPark plaee develQP,lJlent wet
detention $ystem:. 'The: site..wasotigipallyincl1.ided and part of that development, and the
wet detention system' was designed to accommodate this site.' s water quality and. quantity
requirements. Within the last 5 years, this site was rezoned from lllobile home use to
multi~famtly Use, and was offered for sale and purchased, and is no longer a part of the
Park-Place project. Our initial application proposed to direct connectto Park Place and
. rely On itS 'water qUality and q~tity capacity for.thisslte;-Uowever, the present Park ,..
Place owneJ; isnot.pennittlng this connection With olitsigmficantand seemmgly ,
disproportionate and.unfair monetary payment: Therefore, the applicant has decided to
redesign the development to incorporate a wet detention stormwatermanagement system
and meet the S.J. R.W.M.D. water quality and quantity criteria on-site and independently
fronnheParkPlace development. The attached calculatjons and plans present data that
provides aSsurance that the Bristol Lakes development meets water .quality criteri~ and
that its. post developriient disdiarg~does not exceed ii.S(pre~developnierit disclutrge prior
to leaving the site arid' out-falling mto clrainage. facilities Within. Baibel Street, a public.
road right~()f-way.
. . . ". I. .
17171NDIANR1VER BLVO., SUITJ201, V~RO BEACH.FLORIDA32960.i. :'..
Ta 772 I 770-96Z2 FAX 772 I 770-9496 - EMA/1. infotalsbsennl;,AA............ . .' " .
ct)
""' "
I have. reviewed your comments regarding the above referenced project addressed in your
letter dated December 28, 2005, and offer the following reSponses:
@
..1. . :Draft Articles of Incorporation and .j)ec.larationofCo'venants and Restrictions
. will be submitted under separate covet. .. .
2. Acknowledged. lfthe'project is-determined"to be located in the vicinity of
archaeological orhistoricm resources we will provide assurances to ..
demonstrate that the archaeolOgica!orhistoricsite Win be avoided-and the
project will not result in adverse affects to archaeological resources or-
. historical prpperties. .
3. The cross~sections for au proposed coiis:tnictiQri in and.adJacenHo wetlands
and proposed upland buffer are provided on Sheet 11. .
a. A detailed cross-section has been provided between. the proposed
upland buffer adjacent to wetland.3 and. the fill slope.
b.The wetland 1. in the northwest COrner of the site is' to be filled.
c. A detailed cross-section has:bec.n.provided b~twe~.tbe oQnstructiOll
and wetland 3. How~vet,Wetland2jn.the Sb:uthwest cOl'fietofthe site
is to benlled. .
4. The proposed upland buffers'havebeeticlearly identifiegon theplaps by
batching(sees.heets 5,6, 7, 8). . .. . . .
5.. The:upland buffer (oak:bammock) will not be a disturbed~a.. The pipe haS
beenr~ovedfromthisaiea. .. . . .
6. A split rail fenCe will be ihstalled around the cOIiservationtractperimeters to
protect the. preserved wetland and.llplandbUffer.(See sheet 8, and note 5 on
sheets '5, 6, 7). .
7. An outline of measures taken to protect wetlands and uplandbutfersis noted
onsheets5,6,i-seenotesI_S~ . .
8. The. elevations for the wet seasopal water: levels within the' on-site wetlands
have been provided in the drainagerepoit. it is estimated that the water level
is at elevation 20.1 ft..:t. This is based in parton-on-site observation of3"fo
6" ofponding, and substantiated by the 'existence offWo.(2) inlets on-site with
. topelevationsof20.14 and 19.86 ft. These inlets provide positive drainage of
the e}{i.sting site and effectively control the peak elevatioIi attained.
9. Treatmenf has been provided for the stormwater prior to discharging into the
wetland in order to prevent adverse impacts to the water environment
functions of the wetland system.
10. See attached response from Environmental Consulting Group, Inc.
11. See attached response from Environmental Consulting Group, 'Inc.
12. See. attached response' from Etiviro:Q11:iental Consulting Group, Inc.
13. a. A draft conservation easem.ent is attached.
b. Proof of the title will be provided under separate cover.
c. See attached conservation. easement.
d. A survey of the conservation area is attached.
e. See plat - sheet 4 under separate cov~r.
2
f. See note on plat -sheet 4.
g. Mortgagees Consent will be provided under separate cover.
h. There are no easements or other encumbrances.
i. Acknowledged.
j. Acknowledged.
14. A Type 'c' inlet with an orificeof3 inches at an elevation of20.l is provided
in the wetland which connects to the pond. The control elevation is at 19 ft
and the treatment volume is at 20.16 ft. Consequently, the wetland will not be
subject to backflow ofuntrea,ted water.
15. Since we are proposing a stormwater drainage system all run-off will be
directed to the inlets and into the lakes through a piping system. Additional
grading details have been provided as requested to ensure all run-off is
directed into the syst~m.
16. The lake side..slopes have been changed to a4:1'slope doWn to 2 ft below the
control elevation.
17. The gaftle is noted top~ sealed (sheet 10).
18. The platis:have been revis~dWith a newpiplllg system and all inverts are
proyided.The layout has Changed fuld.weno longer have ail entrance to
Bristol Street.
19. Details for connection to the drainage iIifi:astructure in Batber Street is
provided (sheet 5). .
20. As indicated in the introauction of this r~sponseletter, we have modifi,ed this
system to meet . all 8m. water quality and quantityreq1.1h'eme~ts on,;site;.a.nd do
not depend onthe .ParkPlace system. We do notbellevef!,ny documentation
from Park Place is requited. .
21. As indicated in theintroduetion of this response letter, we have tnodifiedtbis
system to meet all SJR water qualitY and quantity requirements on-site, and do
not depend on the Park Place system. We. do not believe the drainage
easement agreement is necessary.
22. Acknowledged.
If you have any further questions or need additionalinfOmiation, please do not
hesitate to contact my office.
3
@J
@
@.h.
. '. \ .
&ii.iR
.~. St.]O ns Riy~r
. '" '. Water Management DIstrIct
Kirby B. Green III, Executive Director . David W. Fisk, Assistant Executive Director . Mike Slayton, Deplrty Executive Director
John Juilianna, Palm Bay Service Center Director, Regulatory
May 3, 2006
C~rtifiedMail: 7005 2570 0001 9891 2491
525 Community College Parkway S.E. · Palm Bay, FL 32909 . (321) 984-4940
On the Internet at www.sjrwmd.com.
Joseph Schulke, P.E.
Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, LLC
1717 Indian River Blvd., Suite 301
Vero Beach, FL 32960
Re:
Sebastian Village
Ap'plica~!R~.p~..4Q;9,~1;"t~.~9-'l (forme.rly 4-061-18670-7)
(pteasereference the above number on all submittals.)
Dear Mr. Schulke:
Please be advised that this applic n given the status of an Standard ERP
application, pursuant to Chapte C-40.30 (4 (b), F.A.C., since there is a valid
individual permit for a master drai e la d it does not exceed any of the
thresholds listed in 40C-40.302(2), F.A.C. This change is administrative and requires
no application resubmittal by the applicant.
tfo
. .
The staff has reviewed your response to the District's Request for Additional Information
(HAl) letter. Unfortunately the folloWing technical information is lacking to sufficiently
review the possible impacts t.he project may have on the surrounding area. This
information is again being requested pursuant to the authority vested in the St. Johns
RiverWatef Management District under subsection 373.413(2), Florida Statutes (F.S.),
and sections 40C-4.1 01 and 40C-4.301 , Florida Administrative Code (F.A. C.).
In order to expedite the review of your application, please use the application number
'referencedabove on all correspondence, and submit three (3) copies of all
requested information unless otherwise indicated by a specific information request.
1. The draft Articles of Incorporation and Declarations of Covenants have been
forward to District legal counsel. The documents will be reviewed and you will be
notified whether they are acceptable for recording or if revisions are required.
These documents must be approved prior to permit issuance. [40C-42.027,
F.A.C.] 1
l II'?!? ,il)~b~4~~ F{lrt
fl'\41"'~6i/;VIWVN~ y*~
teef /Jilt t4-1tBi I' t,
David G. Graham, CHAIRMAN
JACKSONVilLE
R. Clay Albright
OCALA
GOVERNING BOARD
John G. Sowinski, VICE CHAIRMAN Ann T. Moore, SECRETARY
ORlANDO BUNNELL
(t;
Susan N. Hughes
PONTE VEDRA
William W. Kerr
MElBOURNE BEACH
Duane L. Ottenstroer, TREASURER
JACKSONVILLE
Ometrias D. Long
APOPKA
W. Leonard Wood
FERNANDINA BEACH
~
eEl
2. Please revise cross-section F to account for the fill impact as shown on the plan
view; or revise as applicable in any re-design to meet elimination and reduction
of wetland impacts. [40C-40.301 (1), 40C-4.302(1), F.AC.]
3. Please be advised that elimination and reduction of wetland impacts has
not been demonstrated: District staff suggests that impacts to Wetland 3
can be further reduced by eliminating the proposed construction of unit 17
and reducing the amount of fill slopes within the wetland. District staff
suggests that the fill slopes around the south half of Wetland 3 be reduced
to 3:1 slopes to reduce impacts and still allow for the proposed plantings
to minimize secondary impacts. Please explore alternate design
modifications that would reduce or eliminate the proposed impacts and
revise plans and cross-sections as necessary. In addition, please provide
revised total wetland acreages, impact acreages and mitigation acreages
as necessary. District staff suggests that the proposed upland plantings on
the reduced fill slopes remain as part of the application in order to reduce
--- seconda:ry'imp-acts: r5ecff&n-12.2.1.1; A:H., 12.3. f2 and 12A.2, A.H.]
4. Please be advised that the upland buffers that are really fill slopes do not meet
the provisions of Section 12.2.7(a) of the Applicant's Handbook. Since the
proposed upland buffers do not meet the provisions of 12.2.7, AH., secondary
impacts have been assessed using the Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method
(UMAM) to determine required mitigation to offset impacts to wetland functions.
Please be advised that Distr!ct staff take into account the proposed plantings and
signage for the reduction acres of secondary impac~s assessed. Please provide
the acreage of existing uplands to remain as undisturbed upland buffers for
determination of mitigation credit. [12.2.7, AH.; Chapter 62-345.400-.600, F.AC.]
5. Please be advised that it appears that the proposed stormwater pond will result in a
drawdown of the proposed creation area such that appropriate wetland hydrology
will be compromised. Please prOVide additional information and/or design
information that-demonstrates that the proposed wetland creation hydrology will
function as proposed. Please call District staff to discuss. [12.3.3.1, AH.]
6: Plea-se<-elarifyiMhecreation'area--iS-:3 . acres as shown on the plans or .33 acres as
stated in the environmental Ii . [40C-40. 1), 40C-4.302(1 )a, F.AC.]
7. Please rem ve xcupr ssocyp-ariS leylandii from _ e Wetland Buffer North planting
list on the plan it is not included in the n . e upland buffer planting list. [40C-
40.301(1),40C-4.30 \j./ \(_
\.-\ 'tJ 1} t\t
8. Please revise the Wetland Monitoring report to include monitoring of the percent
survival of the upland buffer plantings. The upland buffer plantings must meet
success criteria of 80%. In addition, please note that since the presence of
Brazilian pepper is already less than 5% and only present on the wetland edges,
that enhancement credit is not appropriate for Success criteria of less than 10%
exotics. District staff suggests for enhancement credit that all the Brazilian
pepper within the wetland and native upland buffer be eradicated and maintained
as such during the monitoring period. [12.3.3.1, A.H.]
9. Please submit a revised estimate of the costs that includes the following:
a. revisions associated with any revision in the mitigation area based on any
project re-designs for elimination and reduction of wetland impacts;
b. please revise the wetland enhancement costs to include the cost .of
Brazilian pepper removal and maintenance for three years; and
c. please provide the costs of excavating the wetland creation area'L ~ f/JO
[12.3.7.7, AH.] ~ t
1 O.Since the estimated cost is greater that $25,000, please provide the information
outlined in Section 12~3.7-Financial Responsibility for Mitigation-of the
Applicant's Handbook. Please a draft copy gf a financial [~spon~ibility
-.,--.------rnechanrsrrrmeetlMg~tl1eGnterlaofsearons t2.3.7.2 -12.3.7.5, AH. along with a
letter from your financial institution indicating their willingness to issue. Please
note that the amount of the financial responsibility mechanism is dependent on
District approval of the final mitigation cost estimate and should be in the amount
of 110% of the cost estimate. A list of financial responsibility mechanisms can be
found in Section 12.3.7.6 of the Applicant's Handbook. [12.3.3.2(p), AH.,
12.3.7.2- 12.3.7.6, AH.]
11. Your project proposes to mitigate for impacts to wetlands by preserving uplands
and wetlands. Please provide the following information:
a. The. District received the draft conservation easement and the
conservation easement that is included as part of the proposed
Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions.They will be reviewed by
District legal counsel and you will be notified if revisions are required.
b. Proof of sufficient record title of the conservation easement area by the
grantor must be provided. Examples of such evidence include, but are not
Iimiteu tOj'an attorneY'slifle opihion, title certificate or warranty deed.
c.. Please submit (1) a metes and bounds legal description of the area to be
placed under the conservation easement, ( the description provided is for
Tract C which should not be included in the proposed conservation
easement as it for County requirements and not the District requirements)
(2) a surveyor's sketch with the easement area clearly delineated and
labeled, with the acreage of the easement area noted on the sketch, and
(3) the appropriate USGS topographic map with a surveyor's sketch of the
conservation area plotted on the map. Please have the pages clearly
labeled as Exhibit "A" to the conservation easement (Le., Exhibit "A", page
- of _). After your submittal of Exhibit "A", District staff will review the
@
/
(
exhibit to confirm that the conservation easement area described is the
area approved in the mitigation plan. If you can provide the legal
description in ele'ctronic format it would be appreciated and may help
speed up our review.
d. Is the,property that will be encumbered by a conservation easement
subjeCt to a mortgage? If there is a mortgage on the property, a draft
Consent and Joinder of Mortgagee will be required. The draft Consent
and Joinder must contain the name of the mortgagee, the title of the
mortgage document, and the official records book and page number(s} of
the public records of the county where the mortgage is recorded. If there
is no mortgage on the property, please provide a letter from the applicant
or other documentation such as a title insurance policy or title opinion
demonstrating that no mortgage exists over the property.
--- -.--~.....,:..-.-..-
e. Please remove the proposed .1.0' d!aLnag~, e?s~r.neJll from th.e
-COl'lSefVatr6n~e~fsementa'rea"and-provide a revised acreage.
. f. If the Grantor is a corporation, please note that Section 692.01, F.S.,
requires1hat the president, vice president, or chief executive officer of a
corporation execute instruments conveying an interest in real property,
- 'v ~ G and that the instrument contain the corporate seal.. ~ J
-~ . g ,Please provide.a limited liability compa~y affidavit demonSt'rating that t~e
{)" . member Who will execute the conservation easement has been authorized
~ .;; to do so by the limited liability company. A draft copy of an affidavit is
...~t.t#~~ attached for your informat!on.
t .j \~~/I [40C-4.301 (1 )(d,f), F.AC., 40C-4.302(1 )(a)2, 7, F.AC., 12.3.8, AH.]
12. Please provide a weir in the control structure DS-15, below the elevation 22-ft
NGVD, so that peak stages may discharge into the pond without overtopping the
bank. [40C-4.301 (1) (b), (i), F.AC.] ~+ ~ ~,.~ P1 \It"}'\
~J \t rt ttJ rnl!A1 'p A 1 ",,0
13. Please revise the post-development wetland node to begin with the initial stage
af20:t-ft rathettnan19.9-ft to better represent the wet season condition. [40C-
4.301 (1) (i); 40C-4.302, F.AC.]
14. Cross-$ection H/11 appears to allow for direct diSCharge 0 ted runoff fro
the buildings into the adjacent wetlands. Please revis r provide a nota ion
indicating the roof runoff will be directed by downspou s into the wet detention
pond or stormwater management system collection an onveyance system.
[40C-4.301 (1) (e), F.AC.] tJO\Q ~ {,
~ W-rr.: \
Note: In addition to the above requested information, which is needed to make your
application complete, this project, as proposed, fails to meet the review criteria.
@
Please be advised that the proposed mitigation does not offset the
proposed loss of wetland functions as determined using the Uniform
Mitigation Assessment Method. As such the project does not meet the
wetland criteria outlined in Section 12.2.2(a)(b), A.H. and 12.2.3(b), A.H. and
mitigation requirements as set forth in Chapter 62-345.300, F.A.C. In order
to meet the criteria referenced above, District staff suggests that the
wetland impact acreage can be reduced andlor additional mitigation can be
proposed. [Section 12.2.2(a)(b), A.H. and 12.2.3(b), A.H. Chapter 62-345.300,
F.A.C.]
Please be aware, that .suggestions or other direction provided by District staff are offered
to assist applicants in complying with District rules. However, applicants bear the burden
of demonstrating that their application meets the applicable rule requirements. Although
District staff may provide suggestions to applicants that would allow staff to recommend
approval of an application to the District Governing Board or senior staff, the final
decision regarding the issuance or denial of a per~it isyp _t~_Jbe Di$trict
-Gri~ffi1'ig'BtfaicrorsefiicjrsfifflAppTicants -are hereby advised that the Governing
Board and senior staff are not bound by previous statements or recommendations of
District staff regarding an application.
If the applicant desires to dispute the necessity for any information requested on an
application form or in a letter requesting additional information, pursuant to section
373.4141, F.S., he or she may request an administrative hearing in accordance with
section 120.57, F.S. Any petition for administrative hearing must comply with Chapter
28-106 and section 40C-1.1007, F.A.C.
Please be advised,pursuantto section 40C-1.1008, F.A.C., any application that has not
been technically completed within 120 days from the date of receipt of a request for
additional information by the District, will be prepared for an Intent to Deny at the next
timely Governing Board meeting. If you require more than the allotted 120 days, please
indicate this to the staff.
In addition, no construction shall begin on the proposed project until a permit is issued
by the St.Johns River Water Management District. This is pursuant to subsection
40C-4.041(1); F.A C., Wflicff:states~iri relevant part, II. . . unless expressly exempt an
individual or standard environmental resource permit must be obtained from the District
under chapters 40C-4, 40C-40, 40C-42, 40C-44 or 40C-400, F.A.C. prior to the
construction, alteration, operation, maintenance, removal or abandonment of any dam,
impoundment, reservoir, appurtenant work or works. . .".
~
"
... ... .,.. .,
@
I~~
0!v
If you have any questions, please call Mark or me (321) 984-4940.
Sincerely,
~
Mark Crosby, Engineer III
Department of Water Resources
~~ fVI~ f,d1
Karen Garrett-Kraus, Senior Regulatory Scientist
Department of Water Resources
cc:
PDS/RAIL
John Juiliann~
Strsall'MoorJ7v\ .
Fariborz Zanganeh ~
Thomas Mayton
Emilio Suaya -
Sebastian Landings, LLC
2875 NE 19tH Street
Aventura, FL 33180
Environmental Consulting Group, Inc. - 150 Oxford Park, Suite 130
Fern Park, FL 32730
June 6, 2006
Joseph Schulke, P.E.
Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, LLC
1717 Indian River Boulevard Suite 301
Vera Beach, FL 32960
EMAILED
RE: SEBASTIAN VILLAGE (BRISTOL LAKES)
WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN- REVISED
SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ECG PROJECT NO: 385001
DearMr. Schulke:
Thisprapb.s~d mitigation plan is submitted pursuant to the revised site plan in accordance with
the SJR\JVMD~equ~s.tforadditi(>nal information and a meeting with SJRWMD on May 31, 2006.
Thislett~nespondstoRAI questions 3, 4, 7, 8, and 9. All drawings as requested in the RAI are
being provided by SBS. .
In addition to the on site wetland mitigation that is detailed below, 0.5 credits are to be purchased
from the Mary A Ranch Mitigation Bank. It is my understanding that the client is in the process of
obtaining a letter of reservation for credits from the Mary A Ranch Mitigation Bank.
Wetland Mitigation Plan
The wetland mitigation plan as revised is proposed to offset impacts to approximately 0.25 acres
of Wetland 3 (0.62 acres total).
The revised wetland mitigation includes the following:
Preserving and enhancing Wetland 3,
Creating wetlahd adjacent to Wetland 3,
Providing a buffer section consisting of existing native vegetation,
Providing a planted upland buffer along the north and south sides of the wetland mitigation are'l,
Placing the enhanced and created wetlands and upland buffers (existing and improved) in a
conservation easement that will preventthe current ongoing disturbance activities, and
Posting educational signs informing residents of the value of the wetlands and the need to protect
Wetlands (added to drawing).
150 OXFORD ROAD SUITE 130
FERN PARK, FL 32730
(407) 331-6599 (407) 331-3860 fax
POST OFFICE BOX 181518
CASSELBERRY, FL 32718-1518
reese@ecginc.org
/0
Joseph Schulke, P.E.
Re: Sebastian Village
Wetland Mitigation Plan-Revised
June 6, 2006
Page 2
The acreage for each area is listed below.
Area
Acreage
Wetland Enhancement
Wetland Creation
Wetland Buffer
Wetland Buffer North of Wetland
Other Upland Preserve (adjacent to wetland)
TOTAL
0.37
0.34
0.10
0.09
0.30
1.20
Attached are the revised SJRWMD permit application tables regarding wetland impacts and
mitigation. The Wetland enhancement will be accomplished by removing (herbicide treatment)
exotic species such as Brazilian pepper and by installing plants (see tables below). The area for
the proposed created wetlands will be graded as indicated in the drawings and subsequently
planted with wetland species specified in the tables below.
The preserved uplands will be . protected by a conservation easement. Any exotic species such
as Brazilian pepper will be removed by herbicide application. The preserved uplands are
adjacent to and contiguous with Wetland 3. The protected upland areas will provide habitat
adjacent to the wetlaridsand provide protection to the created and enhanced wetlands.
Theplannedwetlatid water levels weteestimated from thegi"ound elevations along the perimeter
. of Wetland 3 being) 9:6 feet. Based on thegeo-technical report prepared by KSM Engineering
ahdTestfng,the>high'Water elevation is estimated to be 20.2 feet at Wetland 3. It is anticipated
.thafth~wetlahd,^,iIIeitherbeinUhdatedorsaturated during the wet season period. A clay core in
theb~I"n1'Q~tWe~ntheWetlandandthe storm water pond has been added to address the District's
,hydrologj(::aLcorrcerns calisedby the storm water pond.
The following tables provide information regarding wetland and upland planting using native
species only.
WETLAND ENHANCEMENT
Acres
0.37
Species
Tripsaeum daely/aides
Spartina bakeri
C/adium jamaieense
Common Name
Fakahatchee grass
sand cord grass
saw grass
Plant Spacing Plant #
5 348
3 908
3 303
Size
1 gal
4"
4"
COST
$1,219.68
$2,270.00
$757.50
$4,247.18
TOTAL
@-~>..I
tJ J
"'-~
Joseph Schulke, P.E.
Re: Sebastian Village
Wetland Mitigation Plan-Revised
June 6, 2006
Page 3
WETLAND CREATION
Plant SIZE COST
Elevation Acres Species Common Name Spacing Plant #
18 0.06 Pontederia cordata pickerel weed 3 96 1 gal $336.00
Sagittaria lancifolia arrowhead 3 96 1 gal $168.00
E/eocharis interstincta jointed spike rush 3 96 BR $120.00
$0.00
19 0.05 Juncus effusus soft rush 3 48 BR $60.00
Pontederia cordata pickerel weed 3 48 1 gal $168.00
Sagittaria /ancifolia arrowhead 3 48 1 gal $91.20
C/adium jamaicense saw grass 3 48 4" $120.00
$0.00
20 0.19 Juncus effusus soft rush 3 92 BR $115.00
Spartina bakeri cordgrass 2 1241 4" $3,102.50
C/adium jamaicense saw grass 3 92 4" $230.00
Tripsacum daety/oides Fakahatchee grass 5 33 1 gal $115.50
Canna f1aeeida yellow canna 3 184 BR $230.00
$0.00
21 0.04 Spartina bakeri cordgrass 2 327 3 gal $2,564.60
Tripsacum dacty/oides Fakahatchee grass 5 17 3 gal $136.78
/lex cassine dahoon holly 5 21 3 gal $381.59
TOTAL 0.34 $7,939.16
WETLAND BUFFER
Acres $ pecies Common Name Plant Spacing Plant # SIZE COST
0:10 Pinus elliottii slash pine 10 4 3 gal $33.98
Muhmnbergmcapmaris muh/y grass 2 653 1 gal $2,286.90
Serenoa repens saw palmetto 5 105 1 gal $1,019.30
Quercus virginiana live oak 10 7 8' $522.72
TOTAL $3,862.90
WETLAND BUFFER NORTH OF CREATED WETLAND
Acres Species Common Name Plant Spacing Plant # SIZE COST
0.09 Pinus elliottii slash pine 10 4 3 gal $54.60
Muh/enbergia capmaris muhly grass 2 735 1 gal$2,572.50
Serenoa repens saw palmetto 5 63 1 gal $614.25
Quercus virginiana live oak 10 6 8' $600.00
TOTAL $3,841.35
@
Joseph Schulke, P.E.
Re: Sebastian Village
Wetland Mitigation Plan-Revised
June 6, 2006
Page 4
WETLAND AND UPLAND MONITORING
Monitoring will be conducted semiannually and annually the first year and annually the second
and third years. Semiannual monitoring will be conducted in March/April. Annual monitoring will
be conducted in August/September. The monitoring and reports will be conducted as follows:
Semiannual monitoring will be conducted qualitatively and consist of:
Photos at permanent stations documenting conditions
An assessment of vegetative conditions
Observations of wildlife use
Written report describing Observations, restoration schedule, corrective measures taken, and
recommendations.
Annual monitoring will be conducted quantitatively and consist of:
A summary of information included in the Semiannual Monitoring and previous Annual Monitoring
(if applicable) .. ..
Photos at permanent stations documenting conditions
Quadrat sampling to determine percent of cover by herbaceous species (including non-nuisance
andnuisance.speCies)
'Data and summary tables
Conclusions and recommendations
The reports are to be submitted within 30 days from the date of the survey being conducted.
SUCCESS CRITERIA
The creation/enhancement area will be deemed successful based on 80 percent cover by 62-340,
FAC. species and cover not exceeding 10 percent by nuisance and exotic species.
Exotic species at Wetland 3 consist of sparse amounts of Brazilian pepper along the edge of
Wetland 3. The percentage of cover is estimated to be less than 1-5 percent of the total wetland
area with ~ome of the Braziliary pepper being i~ th~ adjacent upland buffer. B.r~zilian pepper
removal will be conducted bY./; basal bark application of Garlon4 or other herbICIde (RODEO)
suitable for wetland use (basefon conditions at the time of application).
COST ESTIMATES
Excavation Cost
$5,000.00
The following is a cost estimate for the proposed wetland mitigation for a 3-year period.
Planting
WETLAND 3 ENHANCEMENT
WETLAND CREATION
WETLAND BUFFER
WETLAND BUFFER NORTH OF CREATED WETLAND
TOTAL
$4,247.18
7,939.16
3,862.90
3,841.35
$19,890.59
/:;;\
~:
Joseph Schulke, P.E.
Re: Sebastian Village
Wetland Mitigation Plan-Revised
June 6, 2006
Page 5
Wetland Monitoring
Year 1 (Semiannual & Annual)
Year 2 (Annual)
Year 3 (Annual)
TOTAL
$ 4,000.00
2,500.00
2,500.00
$ 9,000.00
Herbicide Application
Year 1 (Semiannually)
Year 2 (Semiannually)
Year 3 (Semiannually)
TOTAL
$7,000.00
7,000.00
7.000.00
$21,000.00
$54,890.59
Grand Total for Wetland Mitigation
Please call me if you have questions or need clarification.
Reese H. Kessler, Jr., PWS, President
Ecologist
Enclosures
cc: Emilio Suaya (emailed)
@
@
JOSEPH W. SCHULKE. P.E.
JODAH B. BITTLE. P.E.
WILLIAM P. STODDDARD. Ph.D., P.E.
i
SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C.
June 7, 2006
CIVIL & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERINq~LAND PLANNING. ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING
__'if,z c::. I~ c:=, ~~14~
~'P'1 - l~7 SJJZ. w--n1/
~~
Mark Crosby, Engineer
Department of Water Resources
St. Johns River Water Management District
525 Community College Pkwy, S.E.
Palm Bay, FL 32909
Re: Bristol Lakes FKA Sebastian Village
Application No. 40-061-18840-7 (formerly 4-061-18670-7)
Dear Mr. Crosby,
Attached, please find three (3) sets of revised plans, drainage calculations, and wetland
mitigation plan narrative. I have reviewed the comments addressed in your letter dated
May 3, 2006, and offer the following responses:
1. Acknowledged.
2. Cross section F has been revised, and a steeper slope is proposed. There is no
longer a fill impact in this area.
3. See attached response from Environmental Consulting Group, Inc..
4. Upland slopes have been steepened as much as practical (3:1, except 4:1 adjacent
to sidewalk) and wetland impacts have been reduced to 0.25 acres. Also signs and
split rail fence have been added around the perimeter of the conservation area, and
an upland buffer planting plan is proposed adjacent to the wetlands. See attached
response from Environmental Consulting Group, Inc.
5. In accordance with my conversation with District Staff (Mark Crosby - May 11,
2006), we have provided an impervious clay layer between wetland and the lake
to prohibit any measurable drawdown of the wetland. (See sheet 5 and section I,
sheet 13). The water elevation difference is only 1 ft., and the impermeable layer
will negate.any drawdoWll.
6. The wetland creation has been increased to 0.34 acres.
7. Xcupressocyparis Leylandi has been removed from the Wetland Buffer North
planting list on the revised plans, and replaced with Live Oaks.
8. The Wetlands Monitoring report has been revised to include monitoring of the
percent survival of the upland buffer plantings. The upland buffer plantings will
meet success criteria of 80% as required. See attached response from
Environmental Consulting Group, Inc.
9.. A revised estimate of the costs is provided for your review (see attached-
prepared by Environmental Consulting Group, Inc.) and includes the following:
@
1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD.. SUITE 201, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
TEL 772 I 770-9622 FAX 772 I 770-9496 EMAIL info@sbsengineers.rom .
a. revisions associated with any revisions in the mitigation area based on any
project re-designs for elimination and reduction of wetland impacts;
b. the wetlands enhancement costs, including the cost of Brazilian Pepper
removal and maintenance for three years;
c. costs of excavating the wetland creation area
10. A draft Financial Responsibility for Mitigation will be provided under separate
cover.
11. The following is provided for your review:
a. Acknowledged. Attached is a revised conservation easement.
b. A warranty deed is provided.
c. Legal descriptions, surveyor's sketch with the easement clearly delineated
and labeled with the acreage of the easement noted. on the sketch, and a
USGS topographic map are provided for your review.
d. There is no mortgage on the property.
e. The proposed 10' drainage easement has been removed from the
conservation easement and a revised acreage is provided.
f. Acknowledged.
g. A limited liability affidavit demonstrating that the member who will
. execute the conservation easement has been authorized to do so by the
limited liability company will be provided under separate cover.
12. In accordance with my conversation with Staff (Mark Crosby - May II, 2006) we
have provided a 12" weir at El. 21.3 ft. (peak stage of annual storm event). The
computer model results have been redone, and all results are still acceptable.
13. The post-development wetlands node has been revised to begin with the initial
stage at 20.1-ft, rather that 19.9-ft, to better represent the wet season condition, as
illustrated in the plans.
14. A notation has been provided for Cross-SectionH/13 indicating that the roof run-
offwill be.directed by downspouts into the wet detention pond or stormwater
management system collection and conveyance system, and notes and drain pipes
for this purpose are provided in the plans (sheet 6).
If you have any questio or need additional information, please do not hesitate to
contact my office.
'\
Gi)
~002
(~<ii
~("
08/29/2006 08: 53 TEL 77277094W'
SCHULKE BITTLE &STODDARD
4049 Reid Street · P.O. Box 1429 · Palatka, FL 32178.1429 · (386) 329-4500
. On the Internet at www.sjrwmd.com;
August 25, 2006
Sebastian Landings, LLC
272 East Flagler Street
Miami, FL 33131
SUBJECT: Permit Number 40-061-18640-7
Bristol La~:es
SCANNED
AUG 2 5 2006
Palm Bay Service Center
Dear Sir/Madam:
Enclosed is your general permit as authorized by the staff of the St. Johns River Water
Management District on August 25, 2006. .
This permit is a legal document and should be kept with your other important documents. The
attached MSSW/Stormwater As-Built Certification Form should be filled in and returned to the
Palatka office within thirty days after the work is completed. By so doing, you will enable us to
schedule a prompt inspel::tion of the permitted activity.
In addition to the MSSW/Stormwater As-Built Certification Form, your permit also contains
conditions which require submittal of additional information. All informatlon.submltted as
compliance to permit coriditlons must be submitted to the Palatka office address.
Permit issuance does. not relieve you from the responsibility of obtaining permits from any
federal, state andJor local agencies asserting concurrent jurisdiction for this work.
Please be advised that the District has not published a notice in the newspaper advising the
public that it is issuing a permit for this proposed project. Publication, using the District form,
notifies members of the public (third parties) of their rights to challenge the issuance of the
general permit. If proper notice is given by publication. third parties have a 21,,(jay time limit on
the time they have to file a petition opposing the issuance of the permit If you do not publish, a
party's right to challenge the Issuance of the general permit extends for an indefinite period of
time. If you wish to have certainty that the period for filing such a challenge is closed, then you
may publish, at your own expense, such a notice in a newspaper of general circulation. A copy
of the form of the notice i:lnd a list of newspapers of general circulation is attached for your use.
In the event you sell you,. property, the permit will be transferred to the new owner, if we are
notified by you within thirty days of the sale and if you provide the information required by 40C-
1.612, FAC. Please assist us in this matter so as to maintain a valid permit for the new
property owner.
GOVERNING BOARD
David G. Graham, VICE CHAIRMAN R. Clay A1brtght, SECRETARY
JACKSONvIlLE OCALA
Duane Ottenstroer, TREASURER
JAa(SONY)LlE
Ometrlas D.long, C,jAIRUAN
APOPKA
W. Leonard Wood
FERNANDINA aEACfl
John G. Sowinski
IlRLANOO
SusanN. Hughes
PONTE veOAA
William Kerr
MELBOURNE BEACH
Ann T. Moore
BUNNELL
,~-.....,
Q0
08/29/2006 08: 53 TEL 77277094!J<~
~
@;
SCHULKE BITTLE &STODDARD
14I 003
Thank you for your cooperation, and if this office can be of any further assistance to you, please
do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
~o- ~,.:)
Jo Ann Fuqua
Service Center Data Management Supervisor
Division of Permit Data Sl3rvices
Enclosures: Permit with As-built Certification Form
Notice of Flights
List of Newspapers for Publication
cc: District Permit File
Agent:
Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, LLC
1717 Indian River Blvd, Suite 301
Vera Beach, FL 32960
08/29/2006 08:53 TEL 77277094!1~
SCHULKE BITTLE &STODDARD
ST. Jt:>HNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
Post Office Box 1429
Palatka, Florida 32178-1429
PERMIT NO. 40-061-18640-7
PROJECT NAME: Bristol Lakes
A PERMIT AUTHORIZING:
DATE ISSUED: Auaust 25. 2006
Construction of a Surface Water Management System with stormwater treatment by wet
detention for Bristol Lake:), a 10. 75-acre project to be constructed as per plans received by the
District on July 27,2006.
LOCATION:
Section( s):
20
Township(s ):
Range( s): 39E
31S
Indian River County
Sebastian Landings, LLC
272 East Ragler Street
Miami, FL 33131
Permittee agrees to hold and save the St. Johns River Water Management District and Its
successors harmless from any and all damages, claims, or liabilities, which may arise from,
permit issuance. Said application, including all plans and specifications attached thereto, is by
reference made a part horeof.
This permit does not convey to permittee any property rights or any rights of privileges other
than those specified hemin, nor relieve the permittee from complying with any law, regUlation or
requirement affecting thE! rights of other bodies or agencies. All structures and works installed
by permittee hereunder nhall remain the property of the permittee.
This permit may be revol{ed, modified or transferred at any time pursuant to the appropriate
provisions of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes:
PERMIT IS CONDITIONED UPON:
See conditions on attached "Exhibit A", dated August 25, 2006
AUTHORIZED BY: St. Johns River Water Management District
Dopartment of Resource Management
~004
/1'
U0
08/29/2006 08: 54 TEL 77277094!'~
I
\@
SCHULKE BITTLE &STODDARD
I4J 005
"EXHIBIT A"
CONDITlON~> FOR ISSUANCE OF P.ERMIT NUMBER 40-061-18640-7
SEBASTIAN LANDINGS, LLC
DATED AUGUST 25, 2006
1. All activities shall be implemented as set forth in the plans, specifications and performance
criteria as approved by this permit. Any deviation from the permitted activity and the
conditions for undernlking that activity shall constitute a violation of this permit.
2. This permit or a copy thereof, complete with all conditions, attachments, exhibits, and
modifications, shall b3 kept at the work site of the permitted activity. The complete permit
shall be available for review at the work site upon request by District staff. The permittee
shall require the contractor to review the complete permit prior to commencement of the
activity authorized by this permit.
3. Activities approved by this permit shall be conducted in a manner, which do not cause
violations of state water quality standards.
4. Prior to and during construction, the permittee shall implement and maintain all erosion and
sediment control meusures (best management practices) required to retain sediment on-site
and to prevent violations of state water quality standards. All practices must be in
accordance with the guidelines and specifications in chapter 6 of the Florida Land
Development Manual: A Guide to Sound Land and Water Management (Rorida Department
of Environmental Re!~ulation 1988), which are incorporated by reference, unless a project
specific erosion and sediment control plan Is approved as part of the permit, in which case
the practices must bit in accordance with the plan. If site specific conditions require
additional measures during any phase of construction or operation to prevent erosion or
control sediment, beyond those specified in the erosion and sediment control plan, the
permittee shall implement additional best management practices as necessary, in
accordance with the specifications in chapter 6 of the Florida Land Development Manual: A
Guide to Sound Land and Water Management (Florida Department of Environmental
Regulation 1988). The permittee shall correct any erosion or Shoaling that causes adverse
impacts to the water resources.
5. Stabilization measures shall be initiated for erosion and sediment control on disturbed areas
as soon as practicable. in portions of the site where construction activities. have temporarily
or permanently ceased, but in no case more than 7 days after the construction activity in
that portion of the site has temporarily or permanently ceased.
6. At least 48 hours prilJr to commencement of activity authorized by this permit, the permittee
shall submit to the District a Construction Commencement Notice Form No. 40C-4.900(3)
indicating the actual start date and the expected completion date.
7. When the duration of construction will exceed one year, the permittee shall submit
construction status reports to the District on an annual basis utilizing an Annual Status
Report Form No. 40G-4.900(4). These forms shall be submitted during June of each year.
8. For those systems which will be operated or maintained by an entity which will require an
easement or deed rostriction in order to provide that entity with the authority necessary -to
operate or maintain the system, such easement or deed - restriction, together with any other
final operation or m2lintenance documents as are required by subsections 7.1.1 through
7.1.4 of the Applicant's Handbook: Management and Storage of Surface Waters, must be
submitted to the District for approval. Documents meeting the requirements set forth in
these subsections of the Applicant's Handbook will be approved. Deed restrictions,
easements and othElr operation and maintenance documents which require recordation
either with the Secmtary of State or the Clerk of the Circuit Court must be so recorded prior
08/29/2006 08: 54 TEL 77277094!1"
SCHULKE BITTLE &STODDARD
I4J 006
to lot or unit sales within the project served by the system, or upon completion of
construction of the syutem, whichever occurs first. For those systems which are proposed to
be maintained by COU!1ty or municipal entities, final operation and maintenance documents
must be received by tihe District when maintenance and operation of the system is accepted
by the local govemmElntal entity. Failure to submit the appropriate final documents
referenced in this pamgraph will result in the permittee remaining liable for carrying out
maintenance and operation of the permitted system.
9. Each phase or indepElndent portion of the permitted system must be completed in
accordance with the permitted plans and permit conditions prior to the initil;stion of the
permitted use of site infrastructure located within the area served by the portion or phase of
the system. Each phi3se or independent portion of the system must be completed In
accordance with the permitted plans and permit conditions prior to transfer of responsibility
for operation and maintenance of that phase or portion of the system to local government or
other responsible entity.
10. Within 30 days after c:ompletlon of construction of the permitted system, or independent
portion of the system, the permittee shall submit a written statement of completion and
certification by a regh;tered professional engineer or other appropriate individual as
authorized by law, utilizing As Built Certification Form 40C-1.181(13) or 4OC-1.181(14)
supplied with this permit. When the completed system differs substantially from the -
permitted plans, any substantial deviations shall be noted and explained and two copies of
as-built drawings submitted to the District. Submittal of the completed from shall serve to
notify the District that the system is ready for inspection. The statement of completion and
certification shall be based on on-site observation of construction (conducted by the
registered professional engineer, or other appropriate individual as authorized by law, or
under his or her direc:1 supervision) or review of as-built drawings for the purpose of
determining If the work was completed in compliance with approved plans and
specifications. As-built drawings shall be the permitted drawings revised to reflect any
changes made durin!~ construction. Both the original and any revised specifications must be
clearly shown. The plans must be clearly labeled as "as-built" or "record" drawing. All
surveyed dimensiom; and elevations shall be certified by a registered surveyor. The
following Information, at a minimum, shall be verified on the as-built drawings:
1. Dimensions and elevations of all discharge structures including all weirs, slots, gates,
pumps, pipes, and oil and grease skimmers;
2. Locations, dimensions, and elevations of all filter, exflltration, or underdrain systems
including cleanouts, pipes, connections to control structures, and points of discharge to the
receiving waters;
3. Dimensions, eleVc:ltions, contours, or cross-sections of all treatment storage areas
sufficient to determir,e state-storage relationships of the storage area and the permanent
pool depth and volume below the control elevation for normally wet systems, when
appropriate;
4. Dimensions, elevEltions, contours, final grades, or cross-sections of the system to
determine flow direotions and conveyance of runoff to the treatment system;
5. Dimensions, elevEltlons, contours, final grades, or cross-sections of all conveyance
systems utilized to c,:mvey off-site runoff around the system;
6. Existing water elevation(s) and the date determined; and Elevation and location of
benchmark(s) for thEI survey.
@
08/29/2006 08: 55 TEL 77277094W~
SCHULKE BITTLE &STODDARD
~007
11. The operation phase of this permit shall not become effective until the permittee has
complied with the requirements of general condition 9 above, the District determines the
system to be in compliance with the permitted plans, and the entity approved by the District
in accordance with subsections 7.1.1 through 7.1.4 of the Applicant's Handbook:
Management and Stclrage of Surface Waters, accepts responsibility for operation and
maintenance of the system. The penn It may not be transferred to such an approved
operation and maintenance entity until the operation phase of the permit becomes effective.
Following inspection and approval of the permitted system by the District, the permittee shall
request transfer of th 9 permit to the responsible approved operation and maintenance entity,
if different from the p';trmittee. Until the permit Is transferred pursuant to section 7.1 of the
Applicant's Handbool(: Management and Storage of Surface Waters, the permittee shall be
liable for compliance with the terms of the permit.
12. Should any other regulatory agency require changes to the permitted system, the permittee
shall provide written10tification to the District of the changes prior implementation so that a
determination can bEl made whether a permit modification is required.
13. This permit does not eliminate the necessity to obtain any required federal, state, local and
special district autholrizations prior to the start of any activity approved by this permit. This
permit does not convey to the permittee or create in the permittee any property right, or any
interest in real property, nor does it authorize any entrance upon or activities on property.
which is not owned elr controlled by the permittee, or convey any rights or privileges other
than those specified in the permit and chapter 4OC-4 or chapter 4OC-40, F.A.C.
14. The permittee shall hold and save the District harmless from any and all damages, claims,
or liabilities which ml!y arise by reason of the activities authorized by the permit or any use
of the permitted system.
15. Any delineation of the extent of a wetland or other surface water submitted as part of the
permit application, irlcluding plans or other supporting documentation, shall not be
considered specifically approved unless a specific condition of this permit or a formal
determinatlor.l under rule 40C-1.1006, F.A.C., provides otherwise.
16. The permittee shall notify the District in writing within 30 days of any sale, conveyance, or
other transfer of ownership or control of the permitted system or the real property at which
the permitted system is located. All transfers of ownership or transfers of a permit are
subject to the requil'l!ments of rule 4OC~1.612, F.A.C. The permittee transferring the permit
shall remain liable felr any corrective actions that may be required as a result of any permit
violations prior to such sale, conveyance or other transfer.
17. Upon reasonable no-tice to the permittee, District authorized staff with proper identification
shall have permisslc1n to enter, inspect, sample and test the system to insure conformity with
the plans and specifications approved by the permit.
18. The permittee shall .immediately notify the District in writing of any previously submitted
information that is later discovered to be inaccurate. .
19. This permit for construction will expire five years from the date of issuance.
!~,
I~/
20. At a minimum, all retention and detention storage areas must be excavated to rough grade
prior to building construction or placement of impervious surface within the area to be
served by those faci Iities. To prevent reduction in storage volume and percolation rates, all
accumulated sediml~nt must be removed from the storage area prior to final grading and
stabilization.
08/29/2006 08: 56 TEL 772770941JJl
SCHULKE BITTLE &STODDARD
141 008
21. All wetland areas or water bodies that are outside the specific limits of construction
authorized by this per-nit must be protected from erosion, siltation, scouring or excess
turbidity, and dewatering.
22. Prior to construction, the permittee must clearly designate the limits of construction on.site.
The permittee must advise the contractor that any work outside the limits of construction,
including clearing, may be a violation of this permit.
23. The wetland mitigation areas must be planted prior to any of the following events (whichever
occurs first): iSSUanCE! of the first certificate of occupancy; use of the infrastructure for its
intended use; or tramifer of responsibility for operation and maintenance of the system toa
local government or either responsible entity.
24. The Permittee must furnish the District with two copies of an annual monitoring report in the
month of August on District form EN-55, for the time period stated in this permlfs success
criteria condition.
25. If successful establishment has not occurred as stated above, the permittee must apply to
the District for a permit modification no later than 30 days following the termination of the
monitoring period. The application must include a narrative describing the type and causes
of failure and contain a complete set of plans for the redesign and/or replacement planting of
the wetland mitigation area so that the success criteria will be achieved. Within 30 days of
District approval and issuance of the permit modification, the permittee must implement the
redesign and/or replslcement planting. Following completion of such work, success criteria
as stated above or modified by subsequent permit must again be achieved. In addition, the
monitoring required tiY these conditions must be conducted.
26. In the event that 50% or greater mortality of planted wetland species in any stratum within
the mitigation area oocurs. the Permittee must undertake a remediation progl:8m approved
by District staff.
27. The project must be I~nstructed and operated in accordance with the plans and information
received by the Distrd on July 27, 2006.
28. The stormwater management system must be inspected by the operation and maintenance
entity once within two years after the completion of construction and every two years
thereafter to insure that the system is functioning as designed and permitted. If a required
inspection reveals that the system is not functioning as deSigned and permitted. then within
14 days of that inspection the entity shall submit an Exceptions Report on form number 40C.
42.900(6), Exceptions Report for Stormwater Management System Out of Compliance. The
operation and maintElnance entity must maintain a record of each required inspection,
including the date of inspection, the name, address, and telephone number of the inspector,
and whether. the system was functioning as designed and permitted, and make such record
available for inspection upon request by the District during normal business hours.
29. Prior to beginning construction, the permittee must survey the conservation
easement boundary and monument the conservation easement boundary with 6-foot high
PVC poles with f1uor'9scent flagging tied to the tops. A silt fence or orange construction
fence must also be placed along the conservation easement boundary. Following initial
clearing adjacent to ,:he conservation easement boundary, a slit fence must be properly
installed along the c<mservation easement boundary and maintained throughout
construction.
30. Mitigation activities must commence concurrent with wetland impacts.
(:0
08/29/2006 08: 56 TEL 77277094W~
I
I
I
I r:;-~ -. '\
I~:
SCHULKE BITTLE &STODDARD
14I 009
31. Prior to any lot filling, ia silt fence must be installed along the surveyed conservation
easement line and mllst be maintained throughout construction.
32. Prior to the sale of any lot to a builder or individual, a conservation easement fence must be
constructed along the entire surveyed conservation easement boundary in accordance with
Sheet 14 of the plans received by the District on July 2.7, 2006.
33. The created upland bJffers as shown on sheet 10 of the plans received by the District on
July 27, 2006 must bEl planted as described in the submittal from Environmental Consulting
Group, Inc. re~ived by the District on June 15, 2006.
34. The conservation easement areas must be clearly shown in a visual display In clear view of
the public in the subdivision's sales center. It must be stated In this display that no
construction or clearing of any kind is authorized within the conservation easement areas.
This display must be posted prior to the sale of lots.
35. After completion of mugh grading of the wetland creation/restoration areas and prior to
removal of grading equipment from the site, the permittee must contact the entity
responsible .for the viability of the planting area to inspect the site to ensure that wetland
hydrology will be appropriate. The responsible entity may make minor adjustments to the
excavation depth or ~ilope, in conjunction with the P.E. who designed the system, to ensure
that the entirety of thl3 wetland creation Irestoration areas have sufficient inundation to
support the wetland <:ommunities required by this permit.
36. The permittee must Iwbmit two copies of an as-built survey of the wetland creation areas.
The as~uilt $urvey must be certified by a registered surveyor and show dimensions, grades,
ground elevations, and surface water elevations. The as-built must be submitted within thirty
days of completion and prior to the sale of any lot. .
37. Within the wetland and upland mitigation areas, non-native vegetation and nuisance
vegetation such as, cattails (Typha spp.), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifloius) and
primrose willow (Ludwiga peruvianna), must be cOntrolled by hand clearing or other
methods approved by the District so that they constitute no more than 5% of the area cover
in each stratum.
38. Successful establishment of the wetland creation mitigation and created upland buffers will
have occurred when:
39. At least 80 percent d the planted individuals in each stratum have survived throughout the
monitoring period arid are showing signs of normal growth, based upon standard growth
parameters such as height and base diameter, or canopy circumference; and,
40. At least 80 percent cover by appropriate wetland herbaceous species in the creation area
and native upland species in the created upland buffers has been obtained; and,
41. Hydrologic conditions generally conform to those specified in the mitigation plan; and,
42. The above criteria t1ave been achieved by the end of a 3-year period following initial
planting.
43. Successful enhancement of the wetland enhancement mitigation will have occurred when:
43.1 ~ non-native and nuisance vegetation, such as cattails (Typha spp.), primrose
willow (Ludwiga peruvianna), Brazilian pepper (Schirius terebinthifolius) and Climbing
fern (Lygodium sp.) constitute no more than 5% of the areal cover In each stratum:
43.2. At least 80 percent of the planted individuals In each stratum have survived
throughout thEI monitoring period and are showing signs of normal growth, based
08/29/2006 08: 57 TEL 77277094!111
SCHULKE BITTLE &STODDARD
I4J 010
upon standard ~Irowth parameters such as height and base diameter, or canopy
circumference; imd,
43.3. At least 80 percent cover by appropriate wetland species has been obtained;
43.4. The above criteria have been achieved by the end of a 3-year period.
44. The wetland creation areas must be constructed according to the wetland creation plan on
Sheet 11 and cross-section A on sheet 14 of the plans received by the District on July 27,
2006 and as described in the submittal by Environmental Consulting Group, Inc. received by
the District on December 2, 2005 and as revised in the submittals by Environmental
Consulting Group, 1m:. received by the District on April 7, 2006 and June 15, 2006.
45. Baseline monitoring i,"/formation will be collected and submitted to the District within one
month of construction of the wetland creation mitigation areas and within 30 days of planting
the created upland buffers. The baseline data monitoring must be foJlowed by annual
vegetative data colle<:tions for created upland buffers, wetland creation and enhancement
mitigation areas in August. The monitoring reports must include water levels within the
creation area. The mlseline monitoring and annual data collection must be conducted in
accordance with the .~ubmittaJs by Environmental Consulting Group, Inc. received by the
District on December 2, 2005 and as revised in the submittals by Environmental Consulting
Group, Inc. received by the District on April 7, 2006 and June 15, 2006.
46. Prior to wetland imps cts, the District must receive a letter of verification from the Mary A
Mitigation Bank stating that a transaction regarding the transfer of 0.5 mitigation credits has
been completed.
47. In the event that the permittee does not successfully complete the transaction to obtain 0.5
mitigation credits fonn the Mary A. Mitigation Bank, the permittee must obtain a permit
modification to provide altemative mitigation for wetland Impacts.
48. The clay liner to be constructed between Tracts Band E must be made of a synthetic or
natural material that is impermeable to water movement. Prior to installation, the permittee
must submit the impE~rmeable liner specifications for District staff review and approval, and
also the permittee mlJst notify the District just prior to backfilling the area excavated for the
liner installation so that a District engineer may conduct an on~site inspection of the liner .
material. The liner must be installed prior to use of the Infrastructure. The project as-built
certification and/or dl'8wing must indicate whether the liner was built in accordance with the
final approved plans.
49. If historical or archaE1ological artifacts are discovered at any time on the project site, the
Permittee shall ceasl~ all activities in the immediate vicinity of such discoveries and shall
immediately notify the District and the Florida Department of State, Division of Historical
Resources, Review nnd Compliance Section at (850) 245-6333 or (800) 847-7278.
50. Prior to commencement of construction, the permittee shall submit to the District an
executed irrevocable: Performance Bond for mitigation in the amount of $65,379.65. The
Performance Bond shall be approved in form and content by the District's Office of General
Counsel. The permittee shall submit a renewed Performance Bond to the District at least
thirty days prior to the expiration of the currently effective Performance Bond. An effective
Performance Bond must be maintained until the District determines that the mitigation is
successful.
51. The Permittee must notify the District by certified mail of the commencement of a voluntary
or involuntary procending under Title XI (Bankruptcy), U.S. Code, naming the permittee as
/ - '\
(i\1; \)
o
08/29/2006 08: 57 TEL 77277094!18
SCHULKE BITTLE &STODDARD
141 011
I
1
I
\
I
;
I
I
\
I
I
I
I@
debtor within 10 business days after the commencement of the proceeding.
52. The permittee shall be deemed to be without the required financial assurance in the event of
bankruptcy, insolven<~y, suspension or revocation of the license or charter of the issuing
institution. The permittee must reestablish a financial responsibility mechanism within 60
days after such an event, with the form and .content of the financial responsibility mechanism
approved by the Dlsttict's Office of General Counsel.
53. When transferring a permit in accordance with Section 40C-4.351, F.A.C., the new owner or
person with legal cor.trol shall submit documentation to satisfy the financial responsibility
requirements of subsections 12.3.7 through 12.3.7.9 of the ERP Applicanfs Handbook. The
prior owner or person with legal control of the project shall continue the financial
responsibility mechanism until the District has approved the permit transfer and substitute
responsibility mechanism.
54. This permit requires .the recording of a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions that
includes restrictions I)n certain real property.
Description of Restril;ted Area
The permittee shall provide to the District for review and written approval a copy of: (a) the
preliminary plat showing the area to be encumbered by the restrictions, or (b) a surveyor's
sketch and legal description of the area to be restricted, per the approved mitigation plan, at
least 45 days Drior tel: (1) d~dging, filling, or clearing any wetland or surface water for which
mitigation Is required, (2) clearing any upland within a Riparian Habitat Protection Zone for
which mitigation is rElQuired, (3) the sale of any lot or parcel, (4) the recording of the
subdivision plat, or (!5) use of the infrastructure for its intended use, whichever occurs first.
If the Impacts to an upland within a Riparian Habitat Protection Zone or to a weUand or
surface water for which mitigation is required will occur in discrete phases, the areas to be
preserved to offset such impacts may be restricted in phases such that impacts are offset
during each phase. Such phasing of preservation shall only occur if It has been proposed in
the mitigation plan and approved by the permit, or if It is approved in writing by the District.
A surveyor's sketch and legal description of the area to be restricted during each phase
must be submitted in accordance with the previous paragraph.
Recording of Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions
Prior to (1) the sale l:>f any lot or parcel; or (2) the recording of the subdivision plat, or (3) use
of the Infrastructure for its intended use, whichever occurs first, the permittee shall record a
Declaration of COVe!1ants and Restrictions which shall include restrictions on the real
property pursuant to section 704.06, Florida Statutes, and be consistent with section 12.3.8,
Applicant's Handbook, Management and Storage of Surface Waters (February 1, 2005).
The Declaration shall be In the form approved in writing by the District and, if no plat has
been submitted, the Declaration shall include the approved legal description and surveyor's
sketch. If the Distric:t does not provide written comments on the preliminary plat or
surveyor's sketch and legal description within 45 days of receipt, then the permittee may
record the Declaration with the legal description and surveyor's sketch or plat reference
previously submitted. If the District provides written disapproval of the preliminary plat or
surveyor's sketch and legal description, the permittee shall, within ten (10) days of receipt of
the disapproval, correct all errors with the Declaration, including the preliminary plat or legal
description and surveyor's sketch, and record the Declaration.
Pursuant to section 704.06, Florida Statutes, the Declaration shall prohibit all construction,
including clearing, dredging, or filling, except that which is specifically authorized by this
permit. within the mitigation areas delineated on the final plans and/or mitigation proposal
~8/29/2006 08: 58 TEL 77277094!)"
SCHULKE BITTLE &STODDARD
approved by the District The Declaration must contain the provisions set forth in
paragraphs 1 (a}-(h) of section 704.06, Florida Statutes, as well as provisions indicating that
the restrictions may be enforced by the District, and may not be amended without written
District approval.
Additional Document:, Required
The permittee shall ensure that the Declaration identifies, and is executed by, the correct
grantor, who must hold sufficient record title to the land encumbered by the restrictions. If
the Declaration's gral,tor is a partnership, the partnership shall provide to the District a
partnership affidavit !.tating that the person executing the Declaration has the legal authority
to restrict partnership land or convey an interest in the partnership land. If there exist any
mortgages on the land, the permittee shall also have each mortgagee execute a consent
and joinder of mortg~lgee subordinating the mortgage. to the Declaration. The consent and
joinder of mortgagee shall be recorded simultaneously with the Declaration in the public
. records of the county where the land is located.
Within 30 days of rec:ording, the permittee shall provide the District with: (a) a certlfied.copy
of the Declaration (including exhibits) showing the date it was recorded and the official
records book and page number, (b) a copy of the recorded plat (if applicable), (c) a
surveyor's sketch of the restricted area plotted on the appropriate USGS topographic map,
and (d) the original rt:tcorded consent and joinder of mortgagee documents (if applicable).
Demarcation of Restricted Area
Prior to lot or parcel sales, all changes in direction of the restricted area boundaries must be
permanently monumented above ground on the project site.
~012
@
08/29/2006 08:58 TEL 77277094!JH
SCHULKE BITTLE &STODDARD
I4J 013
Notice Of Rights
1. A person whose substantial interests are or may be affected has the right to request an
administrative heflring by filing a written petition with the St. Johns River Water
Management District (District). Pursuant to Chapter 28-106 and Rule 4OC-1.1 007,
Florida Administrfltive Code, the petition must be filed (received) either by delivery at the
office ofthe Distri.::t Clerk at District Headquarters, P. O. Box 1429, Palatka Florida
32178-1429 (404!~ Reid St., Palatka, FL 32177) or bye-mail with the District Clerk at
Clerkctbsirwmd.com.. within twenty-six (26) days of the District depositing notice of
District decision in the mail (for those persons to whom the District mails actual notice),
within twenty-one (21) days of the District emailing notice of District decision (for those
persons to whom the District emails actual notice), or within twenty-one (21) days of
newspaper publication of the notice of District decision (for those persons to whom the
District does not mail or em ail actual notice). A petition must comply with Sections
120.54(5)(b)4. and 120.569(2)(c), Florida Statutes, and Chapter 2&-106, Florida
Administrative Cede. The District will not accept a petition sent by facsimile (fax), as
explained in para;graph no. 5 below. Mediation pursuant to Section 120.573, Florida
Statutes, is not al/ailable. .
....A.
2. If the Governing Board takes action that substantially differs from the notice of District
decision, a person whose substantial interests are or may be affected has the right to
request an admir1 istrative hearing by filing a written petition with the District, but this
request for admirllstrative hearing shall only address the substantial deviation. Pursuant
to Chapter 2&-106 and Rule 4OC-1.1007, Florida Administrative Code, the petition must
be filed (received) at the office of the District Clerk at the mail/street address or email
address described in paragraph no. 1 above, within twenty-six (26) days of the District
depositing notice of final District decision in the mail (for those persons -to whom the
District mails actual notice), within twenty-one (21 ) days of the District emalling the
notice of final District decision (for those persons to whom the District emails actual
notice), or within twenty-one (21) days of newspaper publication of the notice of final
District decision (for those persons to whom the District does not mail or email actual
notice). A petition must comply with Sections 120.54(5)(b}4. and 120.569(2Xc), Florida
Statutes, and Chapter 28-106, Florida Administrative Code. Mediation pursuant to
Section 120.573, Florida Statutes, is not available.
3. A person whose substantial interests are or may be affected has the right to a formal
administrative he,arlng pursuant to Sections 120.569 and 120.57(1}, Florida Statutes,
where there is a dispute between the District and the party regarding an issue of material
fact. A petition for formal hearing must also comply with the requirements set forth in
Rule 2&-106.201, Florida Administrative Code.
4. A person whose substantial interests are or may be affected has the right to an informal
administrative hElaring pursuant to Sections 120.569 and 120.57(2}, Florida Statutes,
where no material facts are in dispute. A petition for an informal hearing must also
comply with the requirements set forth in Rule 28-106.301, Florida Administrative Code.
j@
_08/29/2006 08: 59 TEL 77277094W'
SCHULKE BITTLE &STODDARD
141014
Notice Of Rights
5. A petition for an administrative hearing is deemed filed upon receipt of the complete
petition by the District Cieri< at the District Headquarters in Palatka, Florida. Petitions
received by the District Clerk after 5:00 p.m., or on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday,
shall be deemed filed as of 8:00 a.m. on the next regular District business day. The
District's acceptance of petitions filed bye-mail is subject to certain conditions set forth
in the District's St:atement of Agency Organization and Operation (issued pursuant to
Rule 28-101.001, Florida Administrative Code), which is available for viewing at
www.sirwmd.com. These conditions include, but are not limited to, the petition being in
the form of a PDF file and being capable of being stored and printed by the District.
Further, pursuant to the District's Statement of Agency Organization and Operation,
attempting to file ia petition by facsimile is prohibited and shall not constitute filing.
6. Failure to file a PEltition for an administrative hearing within the requisite time frame shall
constitute a waivElr of the right to an administrative hearing. (Rule 28-106.111, Florida
Administrative Cc>de).
7. The right to an aclministrative hearing and the relevant procedures to be followed are
governed by Chapter 120, Florida Statutes, Chapter 28-106, Florida Administrative
Code. and Rule 40C-1.1 007, Florida Administrative Code. Because the administrative
hearing process Is designed to formulate final agency action, the filing of a petition
means the District's final action may be different from the position taken by it in this
notice. A person whose substantial interests are or may be affected by the District's final.
action has the right to become a party to the proceeding, in accordance with the
requirements set forth above.
8. A person with a II:lgal or equitable interest in real property who believes that a District
permitting action Is unreasonable or will unfairly burden the use of their property, has the
right to, within 30 days of receipt of the notice of District decision regarding a permit
application, apply for a special magistrate proceeding. under Section 70.51, Florida
Statutes, by filing a written request for relief at the Office of the District Clerk located at
District Headquarters, P. O. Box 1429, Palatka, FL 32178~1429 (4049 Reid St., Palatka,
FL 32177). A request for relief must contain the information listed in Subsection
70.51(6), Florida statutes. Requests for relief received by the District Cieri< after 5:00
p.m., or on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, shall be deemed filed as of 8:00 a.m.
on the next regular District business day.
9. A timely filed req uest for relief under Section 70.51, Florida Statutes, tolls the time to
request an administrative hearing under paragraph nos. 1 or 2 above. (Paragraph
70.51(10)(b), Florida Statutes). However, the filing of a request for an administrative
hearing under ps:ragraph nos. 1 or 2 above waives the right to a special magistrate
proceeding. (Subsection 70.51(10)(b), Florida Statutes).
10. Failure to file a roquest for relief within the requisite time frame shall constitute a waiver
of the right to a. special magistrate proceeding. (Subsection 70.51(3), Florida Statutes).
0J
08/29/2006 09: 00 TEL 77277094W'
SCHULKE BITTLE &STODDARD
~015
I
I
I
I@
Notice Of Rights
11. Any person whose substantial interests are or may be affected who claims that final
action of the District constitutes an unconstitutional taking of property without just
compensation mflY seek review of the action in circuit court pursuant to Section 373.617,
Florida Statutes, ;3nd the Florida Rules of Civil Procedures, by filing an action in circuit
court within 90 dflYs of rendering of the final District action, (Section 373.617, Florida
Statutes).
12. Pursuant to Section 120.68, Florida Statutes, a party to the proceeding before the
District who is ad versely affected by final District action may seek review of the action in
the District Court of Appeal by filing a notice of appeal pursuant to Rules 9.110 and
9.190, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, within 30 days of the rendering of the final
District action.
13. A party to the pmceeding before the District who claims that a District order is
inconsistent with the provisions and purposes of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, may
seek review of the order pursuant to Section 373.114, Florida Statutes, by the Florida
Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission, by filing a request for review with the
Commission and serving a copy on the Florida Department of Environmental Protection
and any person named in the order within 20 days of the rendering of the District order.
14. A District action is considered rendered, as referred to in paragraph nos. 11, 12, and 13
above, after it is ::;igned on behalf of the District, and Is flied by the District Clerk.
15. Failure to observe the relevant time frames for filing a petition for judicial review as
described in parngraph nos. 11 and 12 above, or for Commission review as described in
paragraph no. 1 a above, will result in waiver of that right to review.
08/29/2006 09: 00 TEL 772770941'"
SCHULKE BITTLE &STODDARD
141 016
'"'
Notice Of Rights
Certificate of Service
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing Notice of Rights has been sent by U.S.
Mall to:
Sebastian Landings, LLC
272 East Flagler Street
Miami, FL 33131
At 4:00 p.m. this 25th day of August 2006.
~~rI~
Division of Permit Data Services
Gloria Lewis Director
St. Johns River Water Management District
Post Office Box 1429
Palatka, FL 32178-1429
(386) 329-4152
Permit Number: 40-061..18640-7
@
@
United States Departm.eRt of the Interior
FfSH AND WILDLjFE SERVICE
South F!of:idaEco;(J~t:afSeI'Viees Office
. . 1339 ~()Street .
Vel'O 13ea<::h.Flotidu 32960
October 3, 2005
ReeseR Kessler,Jt.
El1virci,nrn~ntalConsulting Group, Incorporated
] 50 Oxford Road, Suite .130
Fern Park, Florida 32730
:. ,". '-." -"'.
~ar~i.~s1~r::
~'y.",~~M'l1'9,~5,~sf\o th~ fiSh and WIl4life. Service (Ser\lil;e) fl>'
t~hl,1ic~nssist~ce cO'nc~ll~~eU9ovel'eferepbedproject. ..We undeTStandarnu1tiple~fa~ilY
~~tjatd~y.~lQWJ1et>.li~.,prop~8edt~be bmltonmll1.;a~'1ot looa~din.Sebastian,FkH'ida. .
..............).i:.~~.~;:2=la=~~d
. ," , ," : :'....,. , . '. .... -,
. Service Lng No.: 4:-1-()5-TR-I1991
Date Received: Ivlay12, 2005
Prqiect: Sebastian Landings on BarberStreet
App1icant~ Emilio Suaya
County: Indian Riv~r
'1'heService has reviewed our Geographic Information System (GIS) database for recorded
locanopsof federally listed threatened and endangered species and critical habitats on l)f
aqjacent to the project site. The GIS database is a cOlllpilation ofduta received from several
sources.. A vaiJableinforttHition indicates tbe federally threatellcd Florid~~crub-jay (Aphelocolna
cQera!~,5'l!.'e11S)h~~eell ideXl;tifi~d~thin 2, 19SteetoftheptOjectsite~hO\vever, no. Sctllb":"jays
. wereob.se.rv~d op~site. . .. .. . ..
I3aSedupollour review. andtheapplicams'. July 7} 2005, agreement that clearing of vegeta'tioIl
wjU~e.conducted outsideofs~rub~Jay nesting season (M.arch 1.to June 30), the Service d()cs not
object to issuance of a permit for the proposed project.
Pleasellot~ Serviccreview. ofthis.prqjectinno way impJiescompHance.with other Federal,
St~te,powrty~ .or municipal r~@;Ul'llti{}l'J$... Itis the.applicallt~s responsibility to ensure the project
m~t!{Wl~ppH~ableregulations; IfmodHications are made to the project, if additional
informatiolliuyoJvitlgpotentiaJerfecls . to. listed species becomes available, if a new species is
Jiste<i!, otifdesignated Gtiticalhabitat inay be adversely affected by the project, ::J,dditional
coord.ination with this office may be necessary.
TAK,EPRIDE
JNAMERI
~
If you have
; .~"...
Florida gopher tortoise speci.,ocation permit
PERMIT
Issued Under Authority of the Wildlife Code of the State of Florida (Title 68A, FL Administrative Code)
.'NORTHEAST REGION
STATE OF FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERV AnON COMMISSION
1239 SW 10th Street, Ocala, FL 34474-2797, 352-732-1225
e
G
fi.~'~ _
. .
i . - I
~"4~ c.~
Issuance Date: 12/5/2005 Expires: 31512006
Rule Authority: 68A-9.002, 68A-25.002 & 68A-27.005
Permit No: GTRS-2005-2444
Type: Gopher Tortoise Relocation
Special .
Permittee: Reese Kessler Owner:
Affiliation: Environmental Consulting Group Company:
Inc.
Address: 150 Oxford Road Suite 130
Fern Park, FL 32730
Phone: 407-331-6599
Tltle:Sebastian Village
Parcel#:31392000000700000007.3
Provisions/Conditions:
1. Up to five gopher tortoises may be live-captured by non-harmful methods (such as by excavation, bucket-trapping,
or by hand), relocated and released on-site within the legal boundaries of this property to preclude their harm due
to imminent construction or land clearing activities. If excavation is used, burrows are to be excavated in
incremental stages to minimize the potential of harming the tortoises involved. If bucket-trapping is used, traps
must be checked at least once per day and remain in place for at least 28 consecutive days or until a tortoise is
captured, whichever occurs fll"St. Release of tortoises must be accomplished in such a way as to preclude~oitoises
returning to their burrows. Temporary, fencing may be used to exclude relocated tortoises from construction sites,
but if such fencing necessitates confuffngtortoises, shade must be available therein, the confinement is tocqmply
with the applicable guidelines (see # 7 below), and confmement is not to exceed 10 days. Any mortality ~sociated
with the pennitted work must be reported to this office within five days. '
2. Any gopher tortoise burrow commensals (other animal species which share the burrows) encountered in the
capture operation may likewise by live-captured, relocated, and released. However, no more than 10 each of
Florida mice (Podomys floridanus) and gopher frogs (Rana capito) may be relocated. Should additional. specimens
of those species ot other species listed as endangered, threatened or of special concern, be encountered, the capture
operation is to be suspended inunediately and the appropriate regional office contacted. Florida Fish and Wildlife
regional offices may be contacted for information concerning the identification of burrow commensals.
3. Tortoises may be captured and relocated only on the fll"St day of a three-day period during which the low
temperature during the entire three-day 'period is forecasted by the U.S. National Weather Service to be above 500
F. The Pennittee shall cover all traps on days forecasted to be below 500 F. This three-day window of milder
temperatures is necessary to allow the relocated tortoises to settle into the receiving area on the site.
4. This permit, with the original signature of the Pennittee, must be clearly posted on-site at all times from before
permitted activities begin until such activities are completed. This permit shall be effective only after issuance of
all legally required local, state and federal permits for construction and land clearing. Originals or copies of all
such legally required permits shall be available for inspection on the property during permitted activities.
5. This permit does not authorize access to any public or private properties. Any required access permission must be
secured from the appropriate landowners prior to undertaking any work on such properties.
6. This permit is subject to revocation at any time pursuant to Chapter 120, Florida Statutes. It is nontransferable.
Other qualified personnel may assist in permitted work in the absence of the Pennittee's direct supervision only
with physical possession of a letter from Pennittee authorizing such assistance.
7. All activities under this Permit must comply with all applicable provisions of the Gopher Tortoise Guidelines,
which may be found at: http://myfwc.com/permitsltortoise/policy/tortoise ~relocation ~idelines.pdf. Copies of
the Guidelines may also be obtained from the regional biologist.
Kenneth D. Haddad, Executive Director, By FWC Regional Biologist
Certification: I hereby swear or affirm by my signature below that I have received, read, understand, and agree
to abide by all regulations, guidelines, and provisions regarding the issuance and use of this permit; and, that the
information submitted in this application is complete, true and accurate. I understand that any false statement
herein may subject me to criminal penalties. I further state that I will abide by all applicable State, Federal, and
local laws.
Emilio Suaya
Seabstian Landings LLC
Address:
2875 NE 19th Street Turnberry Plaza
Aventura, FL 33180
305-528-6144
T/RlS: T 31 S R 39 E S 20
Phone:
County: Indian River
Permittee Signature:
Date:
Not valid until signed
httn'//www mvfw~ ~nm/nArmit!::/tnrtni!::A/tnrtni!::p.PArmit ::4!::n?lrl=?44t1
Page 1 0
~
()
I
~
-
,
0-.
~
~
:t
()
uJ
l-
I
o
-
~
~
u.)
ifJ
I
I-
-
~
~
W
~
~
j
~
1
I
0-
uJ
~
(\..0
)(
w
@
O/fi/?r
o
.......
Q)
OJ)
~
~
-=
Q)
~
&1
~
.~
o
~
=
o
'.-1
~
o
S
Q)
I-f
-
~
'.-4
o
Q)
~
{IJ
Q)
{IJ
'.-4
o
1::
o
.....
b
..c::
~
o
OJ)
~
"0
.~
o
-
~
@)
[K]
z
o
1-4 V)
000
oo~
~~
o~
UM'
~ Z \0
,g 0 e
~t E=:o\'
Zo :<0'\
E.s>~
~CI.)~~,..!.
u_~_
::.g~~
~ ~80M
Z -g.~ U ~
u~~r--
F"-.-' ~ i;l u.. ~
~ ......... ~ .q-
~~j~~
~ <s] ~ ~
l-I .€~ ~ .s"
~~i< ~
::s1,O t:I:: 0
<,goo "
100 .<;:: 1-4 l)
r.l.g c~ Q)
~:5 ~~
] ~o:S
<11 00
.!:!l -
~~
~oo
00'\
~E
~
00
[K]
I
~
CO
N
o
o
0>
I
<C
ex>
CO
~
..
'i:
OLO
.cO
"0
::I .
<(~
CD.
-<C
::lex>
~CO
U~
.-
!:;N
UO
CDO
0.'
(I)~
CO
o
o
N
r:::
N
C\i
CD
U
c:
as
::I
rn
rn
-
..
c:
CD
E
"C
c:
CD
E
<(
't-
o
CD
..
as
C
r:::
o
~
B
o
~
eo (l)
.....en
..... ,-
~.@
· 0
LOI-
o
Om
N .-
I 0
(J)(l)
c::c.
I-(J)
C) ..
.. CD
.Q.
o >t
Z~
:t:=:t::
E E
"- "-
CD CD
0.0.
CO
o
Oeo
No
"0
~N
.. "5 ex)
rnl,;"N
CDeo>.
1U:E eo
0_::2:
LO
Co co
000
;:NO
lU ..N
r... LO ..
's. 0 ""
>(s...N
I!! ~ ~
CDEeo
u (l) ~
cois
lU(l)Q)
;ClU.
.!l
..
.- as
E..... 3
i; ~
D.NN
c.;)
r:::
c.
~
e
00
O)M
r:::T""
~Q)
--
:J .-
en:JO
r:::(J)M
0'0""
OeoN
s... 0 ('I')
Q)m ..J
--O::u.
.. en r:::
(DenQ)"E ..
~~gs~
.- Q) 0 x 0-
f ~ ,: 0 r:::
(D(l)>0s...
Q.c::tIi~~
..0
I::)
I::)
~
"'
QO
~
~
CIS
~
o
-
"0
II)
co
~ Q)
"5 =
.~ ~
II)
~
. "'0 ..
II) ~ rI.l
- 0 =
CIS..::: <=
"0 t':S ...
s::.......
o .- ...
._ c::l.'C
~ :< =
M~ <=
's. 00 u
M~~
..... =
.. = <=
-. ~ ...
..!;, e .~
="0 ~
e = <=
~~..
~.9 ~
rr..J~ =
"0 ~ =
~ e <=
"0 ~.-
=.;:::
~='C
e~'C
<z<
s
-
u
~
.-
Cl
II)
>
'p ~
B's>
II) 0
:<-
~.9
od'CQ
~ca
"0 ~
~.~
ci~
..=U
o~
s~
II) ~
~CQ
"0 rIl"O ~
=.... = = =
=.;a = a =
-=~.B =... 'i
= ~. s..
CIS ~- e ~
~ S ~~'i
~-= e.....~
-==u= "'
== = rIl ~.a
~.... J;;:I =
-d'~ =.Boo
- e=
~=.........~
i:=~rIl:C
~U~CIS
...,:'........ rIl U
... ---
~ ~ ~Q..
.s.;a CIS ~ =..
U = CIS
e ~:a CIS=
:a.......... =
~. =~
~==.c"Q
....~_.....
.c~ -=~
~ .1 =:S
.....rIl.....CIS"Q
===-==
.;a.S a ~=
rIl"Q -....
~'> ="0 ~
aerll~~
+;i · = ....
CIS ~e)oooC CIS
=-..... .=
CI)........~....
....==~~
rIlClSa=....
~ "'. ~ CIS
"Q~tS"Q't;
a = ="0 s..
=.... = ~
ce~ ~ =~
=.....= ~ Joe
e =..... 20ItS
u~"O
"' CIS ~~
"OrIl,=-
~g""'~~
.... ~~....
~.....~ .....
..... CIS.... -;
~~~ ~~
~.s..~-
i=~eas
L -.c..... =
Q3 -... rIl....
.c ~.. ~ e .
"Q cS "Q.c
~ ~u
~)oooC ...
00-= '= e
=--= .....
e"Q = e
.... CIS ..... ~ .
..... CIS ~rIl
ClSe ~l:l~
~.......:~..... =
:= ~.= s..~-
1: ~ = =.;;;;
~ · · u"Q c;J
U CI)~ c;J =' e
=_elSrI.l_
00
~
.....
=
~
~
s..
=
.....
=
=
CI)
....
rr..J
~
~
ts
's
-
~
=-
u
.g
"":-.:t
~~
Ee"
]~
\U-
E;::
~~
E rI.
r.;; .~
~~
BiD-Tech Consulting Inc.
Environmental and Permitting Services
inlo@bio-techeonsulting.eom
www.bio-teeheonsulting.com
September 18, 2006
Rebecca Grohall, Growth Management Director
City of Sebastian
1225 Main Street
Sebastian, FL 32958
Proj: Bristol Lakes - Indian River County, Florida
Section 20, Township 31 S, Range 39 E
BTC File # 299-02.03
Re: Gopher Tortoise Relocation
Dear Ms. Grohal1:
Our client, Mr. Emilio Suaya, has requested that we provide the City of Sebastian
notification that we have been retained to secure a Relocation Permit to capture,
remove and relocate the Gopher Tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus) found within the
Bristol Lakes project limits. The permitting process and surveying will begin
approximately 90 days before the start of construction to ensure that an accurate
population survey is obtained.
If you have any questions, concerns, or require any additional information, please
contact our office at (772) 563-0344. Thank you.
Regards,
~~
Stephanie Salvilla
Project Manager
cc: Emilio Suaya
Joseph Schulke, P.E., Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard Engineering
o 315 North Ferncreek Avenue Orlando FL 32803 ph 407.894.5969 Ix 407.894.5970
o 1717 Indian River Boulevard, Suite 301 Vero Beach FL 32960 ph 772.563.0344 Ix 772.563.0345
@
(ii(P.\'
<6 /
-----
Page 1 of 1
Jan King
From: Rebecca Grohall
Sent: Wednesday, September 20,20069:29 AM
To: Jan King
Subject: FW: Bristol Lakes
for the file
Rebecca Grohall, AICP
Growth Management Director
City of Sebastian
rgrohall@cityofsebastian.org
(772) 388-8228
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephanie [mailto:Stephanie@bio-techconsulting.com]
Sent: Monday, September 18,.2006 2:32 PM
To: 'Rebecca Grohall'; 'Joseph W. Schulke, P.E.'; Emilio Suaya
Subject: Bristol Lakes
Rebecca,
Pursuant to our emails, please find attached a letter stating the Bio-Tech Consulting has been retained to secure a Relocation
Permit for the Bristol Lakes site.
9/20/2006
~i'i
~V
@
tt~ ~ l'.-~
10 \ C \~ '\ . S.e 'Ill rt'l'\o... \ /l- .l- 0 "-
~... '. G a6?~ -a.,. 1)V"h'1'J
f","', ~~~~ ~ ~~-'. ,..., A'.l\"" O...~ i.,~.~rt."f/7)-
.1\,.. Ns;d....~l ..t Q~(... l...~.. ~at\c (~~~'""51-1) ~t
,,\.~ <.v'~ .... IS"'& 'I" ~ 10... "t...'t. t.... i "'\ fY- -rt... ..-. C~6
k ,.<jl. ~"'P' .....,;t: S ~ ~ I. 'H .... SJ fv.... h.-k Pia _.(.ft. a
-\....\ ~......jU't.\.~ i S C{6;"1..J. ~"'f'" ~ 1'.-
w~ ..",,--'~. - l-"'.A. doe~... ("0 M....:t' ~ t~W"t s ~
U..;lJL .",q...,',-*.. ~ t..I'(~'" \ t ~1I.. t.)o~11J
~ tn Ii. . -ft.... ",,.,.9 -ct.. " , .." U. 5 · f -tW ·
1\a..l<S/' . ~\+ ~.. r
\b~ ~k. t~~ ~.\ ~e.p{~.Q)' i). {~I..; ~7)...
OCT-02-06 0-': 18 AM
~ ,:,:, :.> .
'" \
.'- (;-1-~-j
"HJ9 Be.> (e.-\ () CA- ""e tk.J . S'" "-' a. tt c:< ~ e ~ .
CJ;:-3~
,t.',.
fts't W TV (Y\. lL{2. u. (,6-t:/t.
P.01
@
@
~'t7
MOTORIST DESIGN
Traffic/Transportation Consultants
Traffic Impact Analysis
Sebastian Village ttkA'- Ba\sTbA.... ~1\-KE5
S b t. FI 'd Tow..> r\ C'M....es.
e as lan, on a
September 2005
Prepared for:
Joe Schulke
Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard ~~='-.,
1717 Indian River Boulevard, Suite 301 / to,\f>.'1.o.~.__.-..laif)-2o "\
Vero Beach, Florida 32960 a c.'Y~." . -'^ ~.. \
!' "'u.~ ~ .
\";:-' '" ~/l "fY ,.;) \
c .^& ~4' .
;; t;J <Y ~
(0 ~ /J "?') ?y
\ ~... 4'~ '-"~' f\J,
~- ~"L(') (jl I
tP '.A_ () ^.J'-
,~~ ~ (loll
a. ""l'..;t 1J.
\ \:') ~ a.,v.l
Prepared by: " e-l_ ,..~:,:t~ .
'..... - Le OL u ,....
....... J'"
MOTORIST DESIGN OF MERRITT ISLAND, INC. '----
2755 N. Banana River Drive
Suite B
Merritt Island, FL 32952
(321 ) 459~2905
~
Project Number 050624
@
Motorist Design of Merritt Island, Inc., 2755 N. Banana River Dr. Suite B, Merritt Island, FL 32952
EB/BA #8720 - a-mail: motoristdesign@aol.com - voice; 321-459-2905 - fax: 321-459-2012
&
MOTORIST DESIGN
Traffic/Transportation Consultants
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Paoe
Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 _ 2
Existing Conditions ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 _ 3
Trip Generation ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4
Distribution and Assignment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 _ 8
Area of Influence .................................................... 9
Conclusions and Recommendations ........... ......................... 10
Appendix. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ................................... 11
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1
Location Map ............................................ 2
Figure 2
Distribution by Percent .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
Figure 3
New Trip Assignment ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1
Peak Season Peak Hour Predevelopment Conditions .............. 3
Table 2
Peak Season Peak Hour PostdeveJopment Conditions. . . . . . . . . . . . .. 7
@
Motorist Design of Merritt Island, Inc., 2755 N. Banana River Dr. Suite B, Merritt Island, FL 32952
EBIBA #8720 - e-mail: motoristdesign@aol.com - voice: 321-459-2905 - fax: 321-459-2012
ftJ
MOTORIST DESIGN
Traffic/Transportation Consultants
INTRODUCTION
The following document is an evaluation and analysis of the impact, with respect to
. traffic, of the proposed 85 unit townhouse project, on the northeast corner of Bristol and
Barber Street, in Sebastian, Florida. .
The site proposes full access on both Bristol and Barber.
The site buildout is proposed to be in 2007.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Table 1 outlines the 2007 predevelopment roadway conditions within the study area.
The IRC capacities listed in the table represent the base capacities. The links that
appear to have potential capacity issues have been analyzed with more data intensive
methods (see appendix) and were all found to have more than sufficient capacity.
1
@
Motorist Design of Merritt Island, Inc., 2755 N. Banana River Dr. Suite B Merritt Island FL 32952
EB/BA #8720 - e-mail: motoristdesign@ao~com - voice: 321-459-2905 - fax: 321'-459-2012
@
I\;
MOTORIST DESIGN
Traffic/Transportation Consultants
~
~
ra.
'\
...
-45TH Sf
~
N
I
CR 512 I 95TH Sf I FEI.l.SHERE: RD
~
77TH ST
73RD ST
69TH ST
~
'"
III
....
LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 1
2
Motorist Design of Merritt Island, Inc., 2755 N. Banana River Dr. Suite B, Merritt Island, FL 32952
EB/BA #8720 - e-mail: motoristdesign@aol.com - voice: 321-459-2905 - f(J,3;: 321-459-2012
20r PREDEVELOPMENT PEAK SEAS J
IRe
BASE
LINK ON FROM TO CAP 2007 VST TOTAL AVAIL
1375N US 1 49TH ST 65TH ST 1860 1582 132 1714 146
1375S US 1 1860 2054 101 2155 -295
1380N US 1 65TH ST 69TH ST 1860 1970 112 2082 -222
1380S US 1 1860 1271 105 1376 484
1385N US 1 69TH ST OLD DIXIE 1860 2003 148 2151 -291
1385S US 1 1860 1305 1.37 1442 418
1390N US 1 OLD DIXIE SCHUMANN 1860 2062 141 2203 -343
1390S US 1 1860 1288 140 1428 432
1395N US 1 SCHUMANN CR 512 1860 1700 74 1774 86
1395S US 1 1860 1296 78 1374 486
1510N SCHUMANN CR 510 @ 66TH CITY LIMIT 860 896 8 904 -44
1510S SCHUMANN 860 429 11 440 420
1810E CR 510 CR 512 66TH AVE 932 480 286 766 166
1810W CR 510 932 726 246 972 -40
3150N 66TH AVE 45TH ST 65TH ST 870 570 53 623 247
3150S 66TH AVE 870 386 47 433 437
3160N 66TH AVE 65TH ST 69TH ST 870 581 25 606 264
31608 66TH AVE 870 374 28 402 468
3170N 66TH AVE 69TH ST CR 510 870 604 20 624 246
31708 66TH AVE 870 377 19 396 474
BASED UPON BASE CAPACITIES ONLY
SEE APPENDIX FOR MORE DATA INTENSIVE CAPACITY ANALYSES.
~.111
",Y
TABLE 1
--~
fill
MOTORIST DESIGN
Traffic/Transportation Consultants
TRIP GENERATION
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
85 Townhouses
ta = (0.52)(x)
= 45 peak hour trips (67% in /33% out)
(30 entering /15 exiting)
C <0 l';:)(~ ';
\X) ~ ' ~ .. LJ.
~~~ . \~-
XO~
85 Townhouses
T = (5.86)(x)
= 504 daily trips
~
B~t\ ~
AFTERNOON PEAK HOUR
4
@
Motorist Design of Merritt Island, Inc., 2755 N. Banana River Dr. Suite B, Merritt Island, FL 32952
EB/BA #8720 - e-mail: motoristdesign@aol.com - voice: 321-459-2905 - fax: 321-459-2012
~~
MOTORIST DESIGN
Traffic/Transportation Consultants
TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT
Trip distribution and assignment parameters were based upon the results of the
FSUTMS model and the site's proximity to complimentary land uses and existing traffic
patterns observed in the vicinity of the site. An unadjusted printout of the FSUTMS
Percent Distribution may be referenced in the appendix of this report.
Trip distribution by percent can be referenced in Figure 2. Traffic impacts on individual
roadway links are identified in Table 2 and Figure 3. The IRC capacities listed in Table
3 represent the base capacities. The links that appear to have potential capacity issues
have been analyzed with more data intensive methods (see appendix) and were all
found to have more than sufficient capacity.
5
@)
Motorist Design of Merritt Island, Inc., 2755 N. Banana River !Jr. Suite B, Merritt Island, FL 32952
EB/BA #8720 - e-mail: motoristdesign@aol.com - voice: 321-459-2905 - fax: 321-459-201~
&
MOTORIST DESIGN
Traffic/Transportation Consultants
~
;
~
~
~
..
~
N
I
CR 512 I 95TH ST I YEI.LSHERe: RD
3%
@
JCR 51D I II5TH Sf I "'ABA D RD.
: BIST Sf 3%
I
,
I
,
I
69TH Sf I HDRTH VINTER BEAcH RllAll
I 9%
J 6:lTH Sf
J 7%
J 61ST Sf
I
I 57Tli ST
I
I 53RD Sf
,
J
I 4%
I
I
I
77TH Sf
69TH ST
~
<
~
...
45TH Sf
DISTRIBUTION BY PERCENT
FIGURE 2
6
Motorist Design oj Merritt Island. Inc., 2755 N. Banana River Dr. Suite B, Merritt Island, FL 82952
EB/BA #8720 - e-mail: motoristdesign@aol.com - voice: 821-459-2905 - fax: 321-459-2012
20r~ oOSTDEVELOPMENT PEAK 8EA N
IRC
BASE
. LINK 8ite ON FROM TO CAP 2007 VST TOTAL AVAIL
1375N 2 US 1 49TH ST 65TH 8T 1860 1582 132 1716 144
. 1375S 1 US 1 1860 2054 101 2156 -296
1380N 3 US 1 65TH ST 69TH ST 1860 1970 112 2085 -225
1380S 1 US 1 1860 1271 105 1377 483
1385N 4 US 1 69TH ST OLD DIXIE 1860 2003 148 2155 -295
13858 2 US 1 1860 1305 137 1444 416
1390N 6 US 1 OLD DIXIE SCHUMANN 1860 2062 141 2209 -349
1390S 6 US 1 1860 1288 140 1434 426
1395N 2 US 1 SCHUMANN CR 512 1860 1700 74 1776 84
1395S 4 US 1 1860 1296 78 1378 482
i510N 11 SCHUMANN CR 510 @ 66TH CITY LIMIT 860 896 8 915 -55
15108 6 SCHUMANN 860 429 11 446 414
1810E 3 CR 510 CR 512 66TH AVE 932 480 286 769 163
1810W 1 CR 510 932 726 246 973 -41
3i50N 2 66TH AVE 45TH ST 65TH ST 870 570 53 625 245
3150S 1 66TH AVE 870 386 47 434 436
3160N 3 66TH AVE 65TH ST 69TH 8T 870 581 25 609 261
3160S 1 66TH AVE 870 374 28 403 467
3170N 4 66TH AVE 69TH 8T CR 510 870 604 20 628 242
3170S 2 66TH AVE 870 377 19 398 472
BASED UPON BASE CAPACITIES ONLY
SEE APPENDIX FOR MORE DATA INTENSIVE CAPACITY ANALYSES.
([:0")
~~/
TABLE 2
&
MOTORIST DESIGN
Traffic/Transportation Consultants
~
s1
os
.fil
t\..
LEGEND:
00100 = NB/SB OR EBIWB
~ --2J~~~ ~A-I2'J?~ "S-r.
"\ ,q, --1 lP
~ "
1/ ~l J G'tN~ l1 }
~
V{JlVfl1r '7
~ N
I
CR 51t:! I 95TIl ST I FElLSHERE RD
4/Z
77TH ST
69TH ST
6l5TH ST
2/1
51ST ST
:s7TH ST
53IlD ST
53RD ST
~
'"
t:l
'"
'"
...
. 49T1f ~
\
45TH Sf
g
NEW TRIP ASSIGNMENT
FIGURE 3
8
Motorist Design oj Merritt Island, Inc., 2755 N. Banana River Dr. Suite B, Merritt Island, FL 32952
EB/BA #8720 - e-mail: motoristdesign@aol.com - voice: 321-459-2905 - JG.$: 321-459-2012
~
MOTORIST DESIGN
Traffic/Transportation Consultants
AREA OF INFLUENCE
The study area included in this analysis extends out to a point where the site's impact is
5% of the site. Based upon the Indian River County concurrency network, the study
area includes the following roadway sections and intersections:
ROADWAYS:
US 1 (link analyses in appendix)
Schumann (link analysis in appendix)
CR 510 (link analysis in appendix)
66th Avenue (link analyses in appendix)
INTERSECTIONS:
No intersections were impacted by 2% or more of LOS C at any approach.
Turning movement counts utilized in the intersection analyses were adjusted to peak
season conditions based upon the FOOT seasonal adjustment factors. Traffic counts
were provided by Indian River County and supplemented by traffic counts performed by
Motorist Design where no current counts were available.
All traffic counts were converted to 2007 volumes by use of a 4.4% annual growth rate.
Based upon the review of each of the above-referenced roadway, the roadway network
in the vicinity of the site can generally accommodate the proposed traffic without
significant degradation of level of service.
Although some roadways initially appear to be approaching. capacity, detailed link
analyses demonstrate that there is more than sufficient capacity to accommodate the
proposed trips.
Barber Street is not listed on the concurrency determination network, but was reviewed
anyway as it is directly accessed by the site. In the vicinity of the site, Barber has peak
season peak hour volumes of 166 eastbound and 364 westbound and will continue to
operate at level of service "C" with or without the proposed site traffic.
9
Motorist Design oJ Merritt Island, Inc., 2755 N. Banana River Dr. Suite B, Merritt Island, FL 32952
EB/BA #8720 - e-mail: motoristdesign@aol.com - voice: 321-459-2905 - Ja:c: 321-459-2012
C0jJ
do
MOTORIST DESIGN
Traffic/Transportation Consultants
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENOATIONS
Based upon the preceding traffic impact analysis, the existing roadway network Is not
significantly adversely impacted by the new trips generated by the proposed project.
@
10
ME~';jJl f,~m7~On !!.J ~e~tl~ Island, .Inc., .2755 N. Banana .River Dr. Suite B, Merritt Island, FL 32952
/, 7fi e ma~. motonstdemgn@aol.com venae: 321 459 2905 fG.$: 321 459 2012
&;
MOTORIST DESIGN
Traffic/Transportation Consultants
APPENDIX
FS UTMS Print Out
Link Analyses
11
Motorist Design oJ Merritt Island, Inc., 2755 N. Banana River Dr. Suite B, Merritt Island, FL 32952
EB/BA #8720 - e-mail: motoristdesign@aol.com - voice: 321-459-2905 - JG.$: 821-459-2012
,--~
GY
Page 1 of1
HIGH PLAN 2002 Conceptual Planning Analysis
IFllename i
IProgram i
jAnalyst !
lRoad Nam:e
!AnalYSis Type
IUser Note~
!
;
IIHP _prevlew.xmJ
IIHIGHPLAN
JIMotorlst DesIgn
ILus 1
IISegment
112007 bulldout
Description I File Information
IIDate Prepared 119/12/2005 I
IIverslon 111.1.1 I
IlAgency II IIDistrict
lIFrom/To 1l49th Street to 65th ]
ILPeak DirectIon IfSouthbound IIstudv Period
! ! Roadway Variables
IArea Type! r- dever~~~~ 1# Thru Lanes II
lClass 11 N/AllTerraln II
Posted sp~edl 45]IMedlan II
Free Flow fpeed I sollLeft Turn Lanes JI
:::I~nei I N/AII% NPZ II
[
I
L
l
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
L
l~
r
I:
I
@J!
i
i
I v/cRatioll 0.59
La)1es
i1
~
a
~
Lares
~
~
~
~
lapes
~
~
~
~
Lapes
~
i
.3
*
I
!
II
II
II
l'
I
II
II
II
/I
If
II
It
II
II
II .
I'
t
II
II
1/
A
890
1330
1770
1610
2420
3220
14800
22200
29600
0.28
0.28
0.28
I::
Ir
II
II
Il
II
Il
';
II
I[
I[
':
I[
Ir
II
I[
Facil ity Data
I!
4/IAADT
LevelllK
vesllD
NolIPHF
N/AJ
II
IIK5-6pm
Traffic Variables
II I % Heavy I
34248 Vehicles
II .1091~ase Capacity JI
If .55/ ~:~~~:dj. I
II 91 Adjusted I
. . . Capacity .
0.45
0.45
0.45
2720
4090
5450
4950
7430
9910
45400
68200
90900
0.B5.
0.B5
0.B6
file://C:\Dqcuments and Settings\Administrator\Local Settinf!s\Temn\HP t'\Tp.vip.\Xl vrnl
LOS Results
II Density II 23.50 I[ PTSF II N/A If ATS JL 50.00 If % FFS JI N/A
Service Volume Tables
B II c II
Hourlv V~lume In Peak Direction
. )1 II
1430 11 2050 II
2140 II 3090 II
2850 II 4120 JI
Hourly vo:ume In Both DIrections
II IL
2590 Il 3740 lr
3890 " 5620 ;L
5180 II 7490 ir
Annual IAVerage Dally Traffic
If 11
23800 il 34300 Il
35700il 51500 lL
47600 IIi 68700 jr
MiI~mum vIe Ratio ,
II J
Il 0.65 Jf
II 0.65 jl
II 0.65 iL
I
21
20001
11
15841
II LOS IITJ
I
J
I
1
I
I
I
ill I
I 57601
Jr 8640 I
il 11520 I
I
I
J
l
I
1
I
I
I
D
JI
If
II
II
JI
II'
[ 52800
i
./ 79300
Jf 105700
r
f
JI
II
1.00
1.00
1.00
n/1 "> ',,>nnr
E
3170
4750
6340
IFllename i
IProgram ;
IAnalyst ~
IRoad Name
IAnalysls ~ype
IUser Note~
! ~
IArea TYP~
IClass !
lposted sp~ed II
Free Flowjspeed I
Pass Lanei I
Spacing :
I vie Ratlolll 0.52
Page 1 ofl
HIGHPLAN 2002 Conceptual Planning Analysis
Description/File Information
Facility Data
I!
41lAADT
LevellfK
vesllD
NolIPHF
N/AI
LOS Results
" Density II 20.70 II PTSF II N/A II ATS II 50.00 l[ % FFS I[ N/A 1/ LOS Ie[]
Service Volume Tables
IlHP _prevlew.xml
lIHIGHPLAN
IlMotorlst Design
lIus 1
Ilsegment
112007 bulldout
IIDate Prepared
IIverslon
IIAgency
lIFrom/To
lIPeak Direction
119/12/2005
111.1.1
Il
1l65th Street to 69th
IlNorthbound
)
I
IIDlstrict
I
I!StUdy Period
"
I!K5-6pm
II
II
Traffic Variables
II. 30125/ % Heavv I
. . Vehicles .
II .10911Base Capacity 1/
II . .551 ~::~:dj. I
II .91 ~:~~~~:; I
I
2J
2000j
~
15841
,
I II A II B II C " D If E j
I L~nes II Hourly V~lume In Peak DIrectIon
I 11 II II Jl II JI J
I 12 II 890 II 1430 n 2060 II 2720 Jl 3170 ,
I 13 II 1330 II 2140 II 3090 II 4090 II 4750
I 14 II 1770 II 2850 II 4120 JI 5450 I[ 6340
I La~nes II Hourly vo;ume In Both Dlrect:ons
I /2 II If JI II
I ~ II 1510 II 2590 " 3740 II 4950 II 5760
I :s II 2420 II 3890 II 5620 II 7430 JI 8640
I ~ II 3220 I[ 5180 II 7490 II 9910 II 11520
I La~es 'I Annual :Average Dally Traff:C
I il II II II II 11 I
I ~ II 14800 II 23800 [I 34300 )I 45400 II 52800 I
I ~ II 22200 II 35700 JI 51500 1/ 68200 II 79300 I
I ~ II 29600 1/ 47600 II 68700 Il 90900 I[ 105700 I
I La/les II MaxImum vIe Ratio I
I ~ II II II JL JI I
I ~ II 0.28 II 0.45 I[ 0.65 1/ 0.B6 ~I 1.00 ,
I ~ II 0.2B Il 0.45 " 0.65 1/ 0.B6 I 1.00 I
I ~ II 0.28 II 0.45 II 0.65 II 0.86 II 1.00 I
(~(~
~>
file://C:\D<<pcuments and Settings\Administrator\LocaI Settines\Temn\H1> mp."i~u, VTnl
n""'l"'n^~
Page 1 of 1
HIGH PLAN 2002 Conceptual Planning Analysis
IFllename i I!HP -prevlew,xml llDate Prepared JI9/12/2005 ~
IProgram ! IfHIGHPLAN irVerSlon 111.1.1
IAnalvst i IIMotorlst DesIgn J~gency II . llDlstrlct II J
I
IRoad Namla lIus 1 '~rom/To Jl69th St to Old Dixie i
!AnalVSls T~pe IIsegment l[!teak Direction IlNorthbound J~tudV Period JII<S-6pm I
[Ysel' Note$ JI2006 Bulldout J
Description/File Information
i
r i Roadway Variables 1! Traffic Variables I
IArea Typel r devel~~~~II# Thru Lanes JI 411AADT II 3051SJ % Heavy I 2J
Vehicles
lClass J II N/AIITerraln II LevelllK Ir .109Jfsase Capacity IL- 2000]
rposted SPfed If 4~IMedlan II ves/ID l[ .5~ Local Adj. f 1J
Factor
Free Flow fpeed r 501lLeft Turn Lanes I[ vesl/PHF JL .9] Adjusted I 198~]
Capacity
Pass Lane i I N/AII% NPZ II N/~
Spacing
Facility Data
I
I
l vlc Ratio ~I 0.52
I
I
LOS Results
II Density II 20.90 II PTSF II N/A I[ ATS 11 50.00 IL % FFS II N/A II LOS ICO
Service Volume Tables
I I II A I~ B I[ c J~ D If E I
!
t Lahes JE Hourly v~'h,me In Peak Direction J
.
!1 C il 11 II II 11 I
F ~ IL 1110 II 17BO II 2570 Il 3410 JL 3960 J
~ If . 1660 II 2670 II 3860 lL 5110 5940 I
[ It il 2220 J: 3560 II 5150 JI 6810 ir 7920 - J
I
r La~~s iE Hourly vo:ume In Both Directions
~ If II II . " 11 I
I ~ JI 2020 II 3240 II 46BO II 6190 il 7200 J
I ~ 3020 It 4B60 Il . 7020 ir 9290 il 10BOO ]
L ~ II 4030 6480 /I 9360 IL 123 eo il~oo]
I Lapes I~ Annual ;Average Dally Traffic:
I:
~ I[ Il IL I
I ~ I' 18500 I[ 29700 I[ 42900 l[ 56BOO 11 66100 J
I <; 27700 JL 44600 I[ 64400 Je 65200 99100 J
I $ / 37000 I: 59400 '! 85900 i~ 113600 )[ 132100 4
I
-I Lar)es 'I
MaxImum vie Ratio
l i II " 11 If _it J
~ Ir 0.28 Jl 0.45 JI 0.65 iL 0.B6 1.00 I
L ~ -1[ 0.26 0.45 JL 0.65 II 0.86 i[ 1.00 ]
l 4 0.26 II 0.45 JI 0.65 J( 0.86 1.00 l
r I
/~\
~~)
file:/IC:\Dqcuments and Settings\Administrator\Local Settinll!':\Tflmn\m:> nr..,,;,:..u ...._1
1'\11,..',-.___
I
URBAN ~TREET WORKS HE" 'tl
URBAN STREET WORKSHEET #1
Site Information
Urban Street U S (
Direction of Travel NDrth~bound
Jurlsdictfon
Analysis Year Predevelopment
Genera( Information
Analyst. I Motorist Design
Ag~ncy/Cp.
Date Performed 9/12/2005
Time Peripd 2007 Peak Season
Project D~scriptlon:
Input P~rameters
I
jAnalysls gerIOd(h) T = 0.25
Cycle length, C (5)
Eff. green Ito cYcle ratlo, Q/C
vIe ratio fdr lane group, X
Cap of lane group, c (veh/h)
Pet Veh on Grn., PVG
~rrivaJ tyPf;l, AT
Unit Extension. UE (see)
Length of aegment, L (m!) .
Initial Queue, Qb (veh)
Urban str~et class, SC
Free-flow $peed, FSS (mi/h)
Running TIme, TR(s)
Other delay, (s)
Delav Computation
Uniform d$lay, d1 (5) 23.5
Incremental delay adj, k 0.29
Upstream mterlng adj factor, I 0.713
Increment~1 delay, d2 (5) 1.0
Inltfa) que~e delay, d3 (s) 0
Progresslqn adj factor, PF 1.000
C-ontml delay, d (s) 24.5
Segmenk LOS Determination
Travel tim~, ST (s) 159.5
Travel spel:ld, SA (mVh) 33.9
Segment I..IOS B
Urban street LOS Determination
"'otal travel time (5) 492.0
trotallengtp (mi) 4.60
Irotal travel speed, SA (ml/h) 33.7
Irotal urba~ street LOS B
I
1
123.0
0.510
0.730
2008
3
3.0
1.50
o
2
40
135.0
0.0
:
Copyright @ 2005 UniversIty or FIQrlda, NI RIghts Reserved
I .
I
I
2
105.5
0.470
0.850
1769
3
3.0
1.50
o
2
40
135.0
0.0
24.7
0.38
0.608
2.6
o
1.000
27.3
162.3
33.3
B
Segments
3 4 5 6
160.0
0.490
0.740
1899
4
3.0
1.60
o
2
40
144.0
0.0
32.6 5.4
0.30 0.50
0.411
0.7 2.6
o
0.782 0.256
26.2
5.4 5.4
0.50 0.50
0.256 0.256
170.2
33.8
B
HCS+™ Version 5.1
5.4
0.50
0.258
Page 1 of 1
7
8
5.4
0.50
0.256
Generated: 9/13/2005 7:42 AM
i
.file:/lC;\D~ownents and Settings\Administrator\Local Settine:s\Temn\$l?kA.RIl fTnn
@\)
n/1,., l1'\n^~
URBAN STREET WORKSHEP'1:'#l
'j !
i
Page 1 of1
1
i URBAN STREET WORKSHEET #1
i
General: Information Site Information
~nalyst 1 Motorist Design Urban Street lJ ~ r
IAgency/Co. Direction of Travel North-bound
Date Perfbrmed 9/12/2005 IJUrisdlction
I11me Peri9d 2007 Peak Season !Analysis Year PostdeveJopment
Project Description:
Input P~rameters
I Segments
Analysis ~erIOd(h) T = 0.25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Cycle length, C (5) 123.0 105.5 160.0
Eff. green Ita cycle ratio, glC 0.510 0.470 0.490
vIe ratio fd,r lane group, X 0.730 0.850 0.740
Cap of lan~ group, c (veh/h) 2008 1769 1899
Pet Veh oQ Gm., PVG
Arrival typ~, AT 3 3 4
Unit Exten~lont UE (see) 3.0 3.0 3.0
Length of $egment, L (mi) 1.50 1.50 1.60
Initial Que~e, Qb (veh) 0 0 0
Urban str$t class, SC 2 2 2
Free-flow $peed, FSS (mVh) 40 40 40
Running Time; TR (5) 135.0 135.0 144.0
Other delay, (5) 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delav Computation
Uniform delay, d1 (5) 23.5 24.7 32.6 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
Increment*' delay adj, k 0.29 0.38 0.30 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Upstream filtering adj factor, I 0.701 0.608 0.411
Increment~1 delay, d2 (5) 1.0 2.6 0.7 2.6
Initial Que4edelay, d3 (5) 0 0 0
Progression adJ factor, PF 1.000 1.000 0.782 0.256 0.256 0.256 0.256 0.256
Control delay, d (s) 24.5 27.3 26.2
Seamen.t LOS Determination
Travel time, ST (s) 159.5 162.3 170.2
Travel spe~d, SA (mf/h) 33.9 33.3 33.8
Segment L,'QS B B B
Urban Street LOS Determination
Total travel time (5) 491.9
Total lengt~ (ml) 4.60
I
trotal travel speed, SA (mllh) 33.7
I
tIatal urba~ street LOS B
Copyright ~ 2005 UnIversIty or Florida, All Rights Reserved
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
HCS+™ Version 5.1
Generated: 9/13/2005 7:42 AM
/:::i:i
~
file://C:\D9cuments and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Temp\a2k48A.tmn
Q/1 ~/'){){)~
URBAN STREET WORKSHEY--lll
!
Page 1 of 1
I URBAN STREET WORKSHEET #1
I
i
Generaf: Information Site Information
!Ai1alyst 1 Motorist Design Urban Street u$ ,
IAgency/Cb. Direction of Travel South-bound
Date Perfbrmed 9/12/2005 Wurisdlctlon
Time Perl6d 2007 Peak Season ~alysis Year Predeve/opment
Praiect D~scriDtfon:
Input P~rameters
. Segments
Analysis ~eriOd(h) T = 0.25
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B
Cycle length, e (s) 105.5 123.0 180.0
Eff. orean Ita evcle raUo, Q/C 0.470 0.510 0.390
vIe ratio fQr lane oroup, X 0.600 0.500 0.400
CaD of lan~ecirauP, e (veh/h) 1769 2008 1689
Pet Veh om Gm., PVG
Arrival typ~. AT 3 3 3
Unit Exten~lon, UE (sec) 3.0 3.0 3.0
Length of $eoment, L (mir 1.60 1.50 1.50
Initial Que~e. Qb (veh) 0 0 0
Urban stre,et class, se 2 2 2
Free-flow sDeed, FSS (milh) 40 40 40
Runnlno Ti me, TR(sf 144.0 135.0 135.0
Other del a, v,ls) 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delav C(>moutation
Uniform d~lay, d1 (5) 20.6 19.8 39.7 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
Incremental delay adj, k 0.19 0.11 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Upstream filtering ad1 factor, I 0.957 0.769 0.858
Inerement~l delay, d2 (8) 0.5 0.2 0.1 4.1
Initial quelte delay, d3 (s) 0 0 0
Progresslqn adj factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.256 0.256 0.256 0.256 0.256
lControl de BY, d (5) 21.2 20.0 39.8
Segment LOS Determination
Travel tlm~, ST (5) 165.2 155.0 174.8
Irravel soe!:ld. SA lmllh) 34.9 34.8 30.9
Seoment LjQS B B B
Urban Street LOS Determination
Total travel time (s) 495.0
TOlallength (m!) 4.60
I
Total travel speed, SA (mi/h) 33.5
Total urban street LOS B
I
COPyright @ 20'05 Unlversfly of Florfda, All Rights Reserved
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
!
i
!
HCS+™ Version 5.1
Generated: 9/13/2005 7:42 AM
fiIe://C:\D?cuments and Settings\Administrator\Local. Settings\Temo\a2k48E.1mn
@
011'1 J"lf\f\l:
URBAN! STREET WORKSHF "#1
i
,
!
Page 1 of1
I
I URBAN STREET WORKSHEET #1
f
Gener~llnformation Site Information
Analyst I Motorist Design Urban Street V S l
Agency/qo. Direction of Travel South-bound
Date Performed 9/12/2005 lJurisdlction
Time Period 2007 Peak Season !AnalysIs Year PostdeveJopment
Prolect D~scriptlon:
Input P~rameters
I Segments
Analysis period(h) T = 0.25
! 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Cycle lenbth, C (8) 105.5 123.0 180.0
Eff. green to cycle ratio. Q/C 0.470 0.510 0.390
vIe ratio f9r lane group, X 0.600 0.500 0.400
Cap ofla~e_group, c (vehlh) 1769 2008 1689
Pet Veh dn Gm.. PVG
Arrival type. AT 3 3 3
Unit Exte~slon, UE (sec) 3.0 3.0 3.0
enQth oflsegment, L (ml) 1.60 1.50 1.50
Initial Qu~ue. Qb (veh) 0 0 0
Urban str$et class. 8C 2 2 2
Free-fJowlspeed, FSS (ml/h) 40 40. 40
Running Time, TR (s) 144.0 135.0 135.0
Other del~y, (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay C!omputation
Uniform d~lay, d1 (8) 20.6 19.8 39.7 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
Incremen(al delay ad}, k 0.19 0.11 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
UpstreamlfllterlnQ adj factor, I 0.957 0.769 0.858
Incremen(ar delay. d2 (8) 0.5 0.2 0.1 4.1
Initial que~e delay, d3 (s) 0 0 0
Progressl9n adj factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.256 0.256 0.256 0.256 0.256
!Control d~lay, d (s) 21.2 20.0 39.8
Segment LOS Determination
~ravel tfm~. 8T (s) 165.2 155.0 174.8
rrravel sPEted, SA (mVh) 34.9 34.8 30.9
Segment I!-OS B B B
Urban S,treet LOS Determination
Total trav~1 time (5) 495.0
Total ren9lh (mf) 4.60
~otal trav~1 speed. SA (mi/h) 33.5
Irotal urbab street LOS B
I
Copyright @ iD5 UnIversity of Florida. All Rights Reserved
i
f
i
I
,
I
I
i
i
I
i
HCS+™ Version 5.1
Generated: 9/1312005 7:43 AM
/--\
~
.file:IIC:\D~cuments and Settings\Administrator\Local Settinl!s\Tflmn\~?lr.1Q,) f-n.....
"I...... J__....._
URBAN STREET WORKSHEE'
Page 10f1
URBAN STREET WORKSHEET #1
General Information Site Information
!Analyst Motorist Design Urban Street Schumann (66th Ave)
!Agency/Co. Direction of Travel North-bound
Date Performed 9/13/2005 Jurisdiction
trlme Period 2007 Peak Season ~nalY8ls Year Predave/opment
Project Descrlotlon: CR 510 to Barber, existina aeometrv
Input Parameters
!Analysis Period(h) T = 0.25 Segments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a
Cycle length, C (s) 120.7 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0
Eff. areen to cycle ratlo. glC 0.330 0.700 0.700 0.700 0.700 .0.700 0.700 0.700
!vIe ratio for lane group, X 0.410 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600
Cap of lane group. c (veh/h) 603 600 600 600 600 600 600 600
Pel Veh on Grn., PVG
IArrival tvoe, AT 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Unit Extension, UE (see) 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Length of segment, L (011) 0.80
Initial Queue, Qb (veh) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Urban street class, se 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Free-flow speed, FSS (ml/h) 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Running Time, TR (s) 73.0
Other delav, (8) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delav ComDutation
Uniform delay, d1 (5) 31.3 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
Incremental delay adj, k 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Upstream filterlno ad] factor. I 0.448 0.917
Incremental delay, d2 (5) 0.2 4.0
Initial queue delay, d3 (8) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Progression adj factor, PF 1.000 0.256 0.256 0.256 0.256 0.256 0.256 0.256
Control delav, d (5) 31.5 5.4
Se~ment LOS Determination
rrravel time, ST (8) 104.5
~ravelspeed.SA(mVh) 27.6
Segment LOS C
Urban Street LOS Determination
trotal travel time (s) 104.5
Total length (ml) 0.80
Total travel speed, SA (Oll/h) 27.6
Total urban street LOS C
Copyright @ 2005 UnIversIty of Florlde, All Rights Reserved
HCS+™ VersIon 5.1
Generated: 9/13/2005 11:19 AM
e e.--.",
(V
file:I/C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\TemD\a2k46E. tmD
9/1 :vmOl\
URBAN STREET WORKSHEE
Page 1 of 1
URBAN STREET WORKSHEET #1
General Information Site Information
IAnalyst Motorist Des/gn Urban Street Schumann (66th Ave)
iAgency/Co. Direction of Travel North-bound
Date Performed 9/13/2005 ~urlsdlctlon
mme Period 2007 Peak Season lAnalysls Year PostdeveJopment
Proiect Description: CR 510 to Barber, existing geometry
Input Parameters
6.nalysls Perlod(h} T = 0.25 Segments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B
Cycle length, C (5) 120.7
Eft. green to cycle ratio. gle 0.330
J/c ratio for lane group, X 0.430
Cap of lane group, c (vehlh) 599
Pct Veh on Grn.. PVG
Arrival tyoe, AT 3
Unit Extension, UE (see) 3.0
Length of segment, L (m)) 0.80
Initial Queue, Qb (veh) 0
Urban street class, se 2
Free-flow speed, FSS (mVh) 40
Running Time, TR (5) 73.0
Other delay, (s) 0.0
Oelav Computation
Uniform delay, d1 (5) 31.6 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
Incremental delay adj, k 0.11 0~50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Upstream f1lterina adl factor, I 0.448
Incremental delay, d2 (s) 0.2 4.0
Initial queue delay, d3 (5) 0
Progression ad] factor, PF 1.000 0.256 0.256 0.256 0.256 0.256 0.256 0.256
Control delay. d (5) 31.8
Segment LOS Determination
trravel time, ST (5) 104.8
rrravelsoeed,SA(mVh) 27.5
SeQment LOS C
Urban Street LOS Determination
rrotal travel time (5) 104.8
lTotallength (ml) 0.80
trotal travel speed, SA (milh) 27.5
trotal urban street LOS C
Copyright @ 2005 Unlverslly or FlorIda, All Rlghts Reserved
HCS+™ Verslon5.1
Generated: 9/13/2005 11:21 AM
GSJ
file:/IC:\Documents and Settine:s\Administrator\Local Rp.tt1nl1_~\1'pmn\!:t?1r.ll.~n tn-o...
n /1 ., /""''''1:
Page 1 of 5
;
I
i
I
ARTPLAN 2002 Conceptual Planning Analysis
!
;
Description/File Information
IFllename II~P _CRS10-EB-512 to I!Date Prepared 119/12/2005 I
66th-B.xml
IProgram . IIARTPLAN I\verslon 115.1.1 I
IAnalyst I IIMotorlst Design I!Agency IIlRC UNK IBI0E IlDlstrlct I
!
IArterlal NTme IICRSI0 II Begin IntersectIon .11CR512 11~~:ersectlon 1166th Ave I
IStudy perJ,od IIKS-6pm IIpeak DIrection IIEastbound I
User 112007 I
Notes
Facility Data
I ROa~Way Variables 11 Traffic Variables I Control Variables MVU~:::b~::1
...... Tvpei T......Ilk>llng/U"'an rADT IG Arrival TVpe D =_0"81" G
IClass i II 111K IG Signals/Mile I .soll~~:~de Lane IITYPlcal1
Iposted sp~ed II soliD 1[~lleYCle Length II 1321 ~:~:;i~~t ITyPlcal1
1# Thru La~es II 211PHF II O.7S!lThroUgh O/e II o.Sllsidewaik l~
IMedlan Ty~e II Nonel ;:::eu:ns Excl. Dleontrol Type II Actuatedl :edpe=~~nROadWay ITYPlcal1
Left Turn Janes I vesllJ/lJ Heavy ~ Sidewalk/Roadway r--;;J
I. . Vehicles ~ Protective Barrier ~
! Base Sat Flow ~ Obstacle to Bus ~
i Rate ~ Stop ~
! Local Adj. r---:l I 10
; Factor l.---..:J Bus Freq 1
I Adjusted Sat ~ Bus Span Of ~
I Flow Rate ~ Service ~
@
file://C:\Dpcuments and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Temo\oreview.xml
all") /.,nnc:
Page 2 of5
I I Segment #
11 (to 82ndlAve)
\2 (to 66th f\ve)
t
Median Type I
Nonel
Nonel
, JI
I I II Thru Mvmt -'GJI Control II Int. Approach Speed If Segment I
Segment # Flow Rate Delay LOS (mph) LOS
11 (to 82nd ~ve) II B871~1 73.6BII eJI 31.411 q
12 {to 66th Ave} II 8771~1 164.2311 Fil 25.SJl 0/
i Arterial Length r 4.2 I AutD Speed I 28.2 . I Auto LOS l c ,
Automobile Service Volume Tables
: I A II B 1/ C II D II E I
i
I L~nes 'I Hourly ~Olume In Peak DJ~ctlon I
I 11 II 520 II 670 II 760 II 770 JI *** I
I 12 II lOBO /I 1340 " 1510 n 1540 II **'" I
I 13 II 1660 II 2020 II 2270 " 2310 II *** I
I 14 I 2230 II 2700 II 3030 If 3090 II *** I
I I'" 520 II 670 II 760 IL 770 I[ *** J
I ~nes Hourly ~olume In Both Dlt~ctlons
I 12 910 II 1170 If 1330 Jr 1350 II *** i
I !4 1900 II 2360 II 2660 II 2710 JI *** I
I 16 2900 II 3540 JI 3990 II 4060 1/ "'** J
Is II 3910 II 4730 II 5320 II 5410 II *** ,
I: 1* II 910 II 1170 II 1330 II 1350 If *** 1
I La1Jes I: Annu:al Average Dally T~afflr: J
I !2 10900 II 14100 II 16000 JI 16300 JI *** I
I 1J II 22900 " 28400 II 32000 IL 32600 *** I
I ~ II 35000 II 42700 II 4BOOO ]I 48900 ' il *** j
I B II 47100 II 57000 I~ 64000 II 65200 II ***
I i- II 10900 II 14100 16000 /I 16300 If *** i
G0
file://C:\DQcuments and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Temp\oreview .xm I
i
0/1 'l/'lnnt:
Page 1 of5
I
i
I
i
j
,
A~TPLAN 2002 Conceptual Planning Analysis
i
I
I
I
I
Filename i
I
I
!Program !
IAnalyst I
I
Arterial Name
!
IStudy Period
12007
I
I
!
I Roa~way Variables II Traffic Variables I Control Variables ~~I~~~::I
..... Ty..1 r'"'''t1o.,.g/U'''.+.DT IG ."Iv., Type D E::tde'/Blke G
IClass I II l11K IGlslgnals/Mlle 10 ~~:~de Lane ~YPICall
Posted sp~ed I soliD IDlcVcle Length IG ~:~:;I~~t ~YPlcall
1# Thru La~es II 21lPHF II 0.93!1Through g/C II O.5l1Sldewalk I~
IMedlan Tv~e II Nonel {:~e~ms Excl. Dlcontrol Tvpe I Actuated} ~~~~~:::rnRoadWay /TYPICall
I I I Dfg Heavy r--::-:l Sldewalk/RDadway r--:J
Left Turn ~anes Yes VehIcles ~ PrDtectlve Barrier ~
! Base Sat Flow ~ Obstacle to Bus r-;J
i ~ . ~ ~ ~
I ~~~~:dj. D IBUS Freq ID
I :J':!~S~~~eSat I 15961 :~~f:ean Of G
Description I File Information
C:\IRC2005\2007
Bulldout\AP _CR510-
512 to 65th-B.xml
lIARTPLAN
[IMotorlst Design
ICR510
UK5-6pm
19/12/2005
115.1.1
IIIRe UNK IBI0W
/66th Ave
lIWestbound
I
ICR512
Date Prepared
I
I
IIDlstrlct
lend
Intersection
I
[IVerslon
IlAgency
I Begin IntersectIon
IlPeak Direction
Facility Data
@
file:IJC:\D?cuments and Settings\Administrator\LocaI Settings\Temu\ureview:xml
0/1 '1/'l"n~
Page 2 of5
I ! Segment #
11 (to B2nd ~ve)
12 (to CR51~)
I
Automobile Segment Data
I Cycle QI Arr'lr%l # Dir'ILength IlAADT) Hourly I FFS 11
Length E..::J Type ~ Lanes Vol.
II 131[~C]c::JQ]CJ]1 2.211 922BI~rnl
II 1471l0.42ICJJ~CJ]1 211 922B'~~!
Automobile LOS
Median Type I
Nonel
Nonel
:
I I If Thru Mvmt IbJl Control 11 Int. Approach II Speed II Segment I
j
Segp,ent # Flow Rate Delay LOS (mph) LOS
11 (to B2nd ~ve) II 931\1 0.9711 31.6311 ell 38.711 el
12 (to CR51.?) JI 362JI 0.5411 32.1211 cil 43.211 AI
I Arterial Length I 4.2 I Auto Speed I 40.7 I Auto LOS I B I
Automobile Service Volume Tables
I I A II B II c IL D It E
i
I L~nes II Hourly ~olume In Peak DI~ectlon
I il II B60 II 1060 11 *** I[ *** II ***
I !2 II 1750 II 2130 If *** If *** II ***
I 13 II 2660 II 3190 II *** II *** II ***
I 14 JI 3570 II 4260 II ...** JI *** 11 ***
I 1* II BGO . " 1060 II. *** II *** [I **. I
I Lanes II Hourly ~Olume In Both Directions I
.
I 12 II 1720 II 2130 II *** lL *** jl *** I
I 14 II 3500 II 4260 II *** Ir *** r *** J
I 16 II 5330 II 6380 II *** II *** II *** I
I fa II 7140 II 8510 II *** II *** II *** I
I 1* II 1720 II 2130 JI *** II *** IL *** I
I La:nes Il Annu:al Average Dally Traffic I
I ~ 15100 II 18700 II *** IL *** JI *** J
I i4 II 30700 II 37300 II *"'* II *** If *** I
l :6 II 46700 II 56000 Il *** *** II *** I
I . :s II 62600 Ir 74700 I[ *** /I *** /I *** I
'* II 15100 II 18700 Ir *** II *** It *** I
I
@
file://C:\D9cuments and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Temp\preview.xml
QIl ?1'>f'tf\t::
Page 1 of!
HIGiH,PLAN 2002 Conceptual Planning Analysis
IFllename i IIHP prevlew.xml IIDate Prepared J!9/12/2005 I
IProgram i IIHIGHPLAN IIverslon 111.1.1 I
IAnalvst j II IIAgency II IIDlstrh:t II I
I
IRoad Nanie n66th Avenue IIFrom/To 1145th St to 55th St I
IAnalysls TlVpe lISegment IIPeak Direction /INorthbound !IStudy Period IIK5-6pm I
juser Note~ 112007 Bulldout I'
Description IFile Information
,
! . i Roadway Variables I! Traffic Variables I
IArea TYP~ I Transltlonlng/Urbanl/# Thru Lanes II 2/IAADT II I % Heavy I 61
9713 Vehicles
lei ass I II 31lTerraln II LevelllK II .1191fBase CapacIty II 17001
I I 5sllMedlan 1010 IG Local Adj. I 11
Posted Speed
I . Factor
Free Flow I I 50lftLeft Turn IDlpHF IG Adjusted G
Speed I
I Lanes . Capacity
Pass Lane1 I N/AII% NPZ 10
Spacing !
Facility Data
i
I
I vIe RatJollI 0.44 "Density 1\ N/A
LOS Results
/I PTSF II 84.50 II ATS II 49.03 /I % FFS II 81.7 II LOS leu
Service Volume Tables
I i II A II B Ir C II D II. E I
I L~nes I! Hourly V~lume In Peak Direction I
I il II 210 II 570 1/ 940 II 1270 II 1450 I
I 12 I
I 13 I
~ I
Lanes II Hourly Volume In Both Directions I
.
~ II 350 II 950 II 1570 II 2130 II 2430 I
;4 I
:s I
~ I
La~es I! Annual Average Dally Traffic I
~ 3200 II 8600 II 14200 II 19300 /I 22000 I
~
~
~
I Lahes II Maximum vlc Ratio I
I ~ 0.15 II 0.39 II 0.54 II 0.88 II 1.00 I
I , I
~
I ~ I
I t I
@
file:/IC:\DQcuments and Settings\Administrator\Local Settings\Temn\HP nrr:viAm vml
011 'll'lnn~
Page 1 of1
HIGHPLAN 2002 Conceptual Planning Analysis
It:llename : IIHP _prevlew.xml UDate Prepared 119/12/2005 I
Iprogram i /IHIGHPLAN lIVerslon 1J1.1.1 I
IAnalyst ! II lI~gency II IJDlstrlct II ,
tRoad Namle 1l66th Avenue IIFrom/To IIS9th St to CR 510 I
IAnalysis ~pe IlSegment Upeak Direction IlNorthbound l[study Period IIKS-6pm I
IUser Note~ 112007 Bulldout I
Description/File Information
~ I Roadway Variables I~ Traffic Variables J
IArea Typel rTranSltlOnlng/Urba~l# Thru Lanes' IDIAADT II 94491 % Heavy D
Vehicles
IClass I II 311Terraln II level!lK II .1261[8a5e Capacity /I 17001
I I 4sllMedian IDID IG Local Adj. D
Posted Speed
I Factor
Free Flowl I 5011~:~e~um 1C3IPHF 1G Adjusted G
Speed . Capacity
Pass Lanei I N/AII% NPZ 10
Spacing I
Facility Data
LOS Results
0.48 II Density II N/A II PTSF II 85.18 II ATS II 38.9B IL % FFS IL 78.0 II LOS lLO
Service Volume Tables
I j II A II B IL C II D n E 1
I L~nes II Hourly V~lume In Peak Direc~on I
I 11 II 200 II 470 II 790 II 1080 II 1420 I
r 12 I
l 13 I
[ !4 I
~ La:nes 'I Hourly Volume In Both Directions I
!2 II 330 II 760 IL 1270 II 1740 II 2290 I
~ !4 I
:6 I
r ~ ,
I La~es II Annual Average Dallv Traffic I
I ~ 1/ 2900 r 6600 II 11000 II 15100 l[ 19800 I
L ~
~ ~
~
r La~es Maximum vIe Ratio I
~ 0.15 If 0.34 JI 0.56 II 0.76 II 1.00 J
[ ~ I
l ~ I
!J I
I
@
file://C:\D9cuments and Settings\Administrator\LocaI Settiml"~\Tp.mn\J.ip Tn...";..,,, ..._1
T'\J1 '" I",,..,,,..
)raft SebastIan VIllage TIA KeVlew
rage 1 or -'
/.
,
Rebecca Grohall
From: Karl Passetti [kpassetti@kittelson.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 8:14 AM
To: Rebecca Grohall
Cc: Jan King; Justin Bansen
Subject: RE: Draft Sebastian Village TIA Review
Jo problem. Here is the revised list of comments (I put the trip gen issue as comment #2). Please let me know if you have any other
luestions.
Carl Passetti, P .E.
<ittelson & Associates, Inc.
.15 E. Robinson St., Suite 465
>rlando, FL 32801
'IWW.kitteJson.com
passetti@kitlelson.com
407) 540-0555 (telephone)
407) 540-0550 (fax)
'ransportalion Engineering I Planning
laltimore I Boise I Fort Lauderdale I Orlando I Phoenix I Portland I Tucson
=rom: Rebecca Grohall [mailto:RGrohall@CityOfSebastian.org]
tent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 8: 14 AM
ro: Karl Passetti; Rebecca Grohall
:c: Jan King; Justin Bansen
iubject: RE: Draft Sebastian Village TIA Review
rhanks Karl-
did respond to your first email earlier, if its in the Code explicitly, I would prefer to utilize that number. But, I agree with your
ltatement below.
~ebecca
~ebecca Grohall, AICP
3rowth Management Director
::;ity of Sebastian
'grohall@cityofsebastian.org
772) 388-8228
-----Original Message-----
From: Karl Passetti [mailto:kpassetti@kittelson.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 5:28 PM
To: Rebecca Grohall
Cc: Jan King; Justin Bansen
fj0
V
5/25/2006
City of Sebastian
Growth Management Department
PROJECT NAME:
Page 1 of 1
STUDY PREPARED By:
DATE:
SEBASTIAN VILLAGE
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
MOTORIST DESIGN OF MERRITT ISLAND, INC.
MAY 24, 2006
I Comment Specific Review Comment(s)
Number
1 Original Comment: The traffic study only examined p.m. peak hour conditions. Due to existing
land uses in the vicinity of the site (such as the Pelican Island Elementary school), a.m. peak
hour conditions should be analyzed.
2 Original Comment: Section 54-3-9.8 of the City Land Development Code (LDC) states that
the trip generation rate that shall be used for multiple-family residential developments is 10
trips per day. Please revise the analysis to be consistent with the City LDC.
3 Original Comment: No intersection analyses were included in the study. The City of
Sebastian is concerned that either overcapacity or nearly overcapacity intersections are bein~
impacted by the project. At a minimum, the signalized intersections of US 1/Barber Street, 66
AvelBarber Street, -66th Ave/CR 510, and the site access pOint on Barber Street need to be
studied. Existing intersection conditions should be analyzed using existing signal timings. Any
changes to the signal should incorporate reasonable signal timings that can be implemented in
the field.
4 Original Comment: Please include the analysis of Barber Street in the Predevelopment and
Postdevelopment tables. While it is recognized that Barber Street is discussed on the bottom
of page 9, the analysis should clearly show the addition of project trips and the project impact
on Barber Street.
5 Original Comment: Please summarize the capacity values that are being recommended as
part of the "more data intensive capacity analyses" that are included in the appendix in tabular
form in the report. The table should clearly show that available capacity exists on all the study
roadways for the project and that the level of service (LOS) requirements listed in Section 54-3-
9.7 of the City LDC have been met.
6 Original Comment: For the HIGH PLAN analyses, please show how the MDT values were
developed (existing MDT plus background growth plus in-process development plus project
trips) and please list the source of the K, 0, heavy vehicle, and PHF values used. Also, please
provide justification as to why the local adjustment factor was adjusted to 1 from the program
default values.
7 Oripinal Comment: The ARTPLAN analysis for CR 510 shows approach vlc ratios at 1.09 (to
82" Ave) and 1.28 (to 66th Ave). VIC ratios >1.0 indicate that the intersection approaches are
over capacity and need to be analyzed. (see comment #2)
8 Original Comment: Please confirm that available sight distance (stopping sight distance and
intersection sight distance) is available at the emergency access point located near the
roadway curve.
9 Original Comment: The conclusions and recommendations may need to be modified based
on the previous comments.
@J
~ 54-3-9.7
SEBASTIAN LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
Roads:
MINIMUM LOS
STANDARD PEAK
ROADWAY FACILITY HOUR*
State Arterials
U.S. Highway 1 C
County Arterials
CR 512 (Fellsmere Highway) D
CR 505 (Roseland Road) D
County Collectors
Indian River Drive ]j
Schumman Drive D
City Collectors
Barber Street (Wrmbrow Drive to Schumann Drive) D
Fleming Street (Main Street to CR 512) D ... ~
Easy Street (Main Street to Schumann Drive) D
Vocelle Avenue (CR 505 to Fleming) D
Main Street (US 1 to Wrmbrow Drive) D
Laconia Street (CR 512 to South City Limit) D
Significant Local Streets Shown on the Major Thoroughfare Plan
Barber Street Extension (Schumann Dr to US l}-Citjr D
Englar Avenue (Barber St to Schumann Dr}-City . D
Wrmbrow Drive (Main Street to East CR 512}-City D
Louisiana Avenue (Main Street to CR 512)-City ,. D
Local
All roads not classified as arterials, collectors, or significant D
local streets shown on the Major Thoroughfare Plan.
*The peak hours shall be the 30th highest hour established by FDOT.
Prior to issuing a development order the city shall review all proposed development to
ensure consistency with adopted LOS standards. No development shall be approved that is
projected to decrease the existing LOS below the adopted standard, unless those are mitigated
by the developer.
Sec. 54-3-9.8. Methodology for determining demands on concurrency facilities.
(a) Roads. In determining demand for available capacity for roads, the follOwing criteria
shall be used:
. (1) Residential development. For proposed residential development (except within planned
developments), the following trip generation rates shall be used to calculate the impact
of the proposed development:
LDC9:12
@
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT
~ 54-3-9.8
Land Use TYpe
Single-family
Multiple-family
Trips Per Day Per Unit
8
10
......~-
(2) Nonresidential development and mixM-use ~lanned re~evelopment and development
(PR))). For all other development categories allowed within the futm:e land use
element, the impacts of development shall be measured by utilizing the average peak
trip generation rate associated with the land use designation in which the prQposed
development shall occUr, using the most recent published edition of the Institute of
Traffic Engineers;~ Trip ~nerati<?nManual. Internal capture rates may be consid~r~d
in determining- traffic volumes for mixed use developments; however, the applicant
shall bear the burden of demonstrating any internal capture rates of the total
nonresidexitial trips.
(3). .OthermethQds. __and. procedures. -J( the. prelintinary leYal. of service iIrfon;ll!ition
indicates a deficiency in capacity based on adopted level of service standards (reference
section 54-3-9.1 fQr adopted lev-el of service standards for roads), the developer may at
his option, prepare ani:ore detailed alternative ~ghway Capacity Analysis as
described in ~he' Highw~y Capacity Manual (Special Report 209, Transportation
Research Board, National Research Council, 1985); or conduct a travel time and delay
~ \ '," ....\
study followmg .:Profeseional standards and procedures contained in the Florida
Department ofirransportation, Traffic Engineering Office in its Manual for Uniform
Traffic Studies. .
If the alternative methodology, after review and acceptance by the planning and
growth management director, indicates no deficiency in the capacity based on the
adopted level of service standard, notwithstanding that the comprehensiye plan
indicates a deficiency in capacity based on the adopted level of service standard, the
results of the alternative methodology will be used. However, the city shall, at its
discretion, reserve the option to have the methodology reviewed, by a professional
transportation engineer or transportation planner prior to accepting the methodology.
The cost for such review shall ~e borne by the applicant.
a. Required traffic analysis. For all new developments which are required to follow
the site plan review process, the applicant/developer shall be required to submit
a traffic analysis which identifies the development's impact on the city's trans-
portation system. The planning and growth management director may also
require the submission of a traffic analysis for developments if the site location,
anticipated total trip generation, circulation patterns or other such factors
warrant a more extensive review of traffic impacts.
b. Traffic analysis methodology. The impact area for the traffic analysis shall
include adjacent and connected roadway segments as determined by the planning
and growth management director. The applicant may apply alternative trip
@
LDC9:13
" '.
MOTORIST DESIGN OF ML'RmTT ISLAND. INf'.
TT(tJ(1.c/l'ranspcrti1 l1C!n C'm31iltu/t I,'!
June 30, 2006
Rebecca Grohal!
Growth Manag~ment Director
City of Sebastian.
rg rohal1@cityofsebastian:org
(772) 388,.8228
Re: Bristol Lakes fka SepastianViBage - Response to CityComrn~rits
Dear Ms. Grohall:
Please find t~eattach:ed re$ponse tocommentsJadditional information (~gatdingthe
September2005 Traffic'lmpactAnalysis for Sebastian Village., As We diSCUssed in OUt
telephoneqonv~rsatipn a. f~wwe~ksa~o,at thetime that the,~tt!cf:y~~,p~rf.orml3g1~~t.
su.. mmeritwasbase.d upQn YPl,1ntyfequiremenlsper thedire~tiQ:ti:ofGitY$taff attbe.:tiiff$~
Thereforesoh,€ioHhe-'teSponsesare loa somewhat abbreviateif,;f:orm.Wehavejil1owe~et
tried to pr.(:)VideaIlQfthe~~ddttiQni:l1 analysis that seemed to';b~';~t'P.f,lr-tl$utarrnte,restdtlrinS'Qut;
phoneconvarsatiQI). ... ..
1. AM peak holrr
PerotJrconv~rs~tiQn.. wt;::lhave.lnclqdeda. mornIng peak hOtlra.na..IY'$i$tQ~lQwifh:th~t
aft(arno()n.peak;h~qr a.nf!IY~j~foJ" Ba.rber Street arid for 'e.a~J1qftf;)~Je~{j13pted intf}f~ectigo~;
Pleaseseethefollowihgsummary of Barber Street trafficoonditions in tesponse4~a.rid the
attached morning pe.ak. hour trip generation rates, and aUael]edilitersectionanal;y'sesJoJ
eachinterse~ti()n;lQh~rseQ.tjon V91tlme worksheets a.re alSQ attac.he.qat theenq f9FYQYf
reference.
2. AveragePaJlyTril'Genetatiol1
PerthecorrrmentWl3 ba.xle....cha... ngedthe a.vera.. ge daily trip ge.....l1erati.oh to'll'lEtt.oh th~highgr
rate in the Gitygo.de.lrsnould he noted that this change does notimpacttheanaWslsQf
any intersection 01" roadw~y segment in the original study, 8$ it was based uPOnpe~khour
traffic.
3.lntersectioriAnaJyses .
Please findatta.the~Jhe requested intersection anal~sesfor both am and pm pe~k hours
for US 1 [Barb",r,Q6~ Ave (Schumann) [Barber, 66 AvelQR 510, a"q tl)e~'s Bar""'@
MOTORJSTDESIGN OFIVlERRiTT/.SLAND, INc.) 2755 N. Banana River DriVtt,Sulte8, Merritt JsJand,F/Q{idft32952
J;BIBA#87'lO -e-maU: motoristdesign@aol.com - voice: 321 459-2905 . fax: 321459-2012
~t7
MOTORIST DESIGN OF MERRiTT JStAND. INC.
Tralfic/T'i'ftnsporIUlifj'f/. C'o1t:?'/Iltdrt Is
Street access. The driveway analyses assume that roughly half of the project trafficrwill
utilize the Barber Street access. All of the sc.enariosanaly;zed passed concurrency based
upon existing roadway geometry and existing or optimized signal timing except the
intersection of 66th Avenue @ CR51 0 in the morning peakhour condition. When aD(;ily:zed
with just the. addition of a second through lane in each direcUoneastboLlnd andwestbound,
the intersection then passes, As thiswould.bethe bare... mihimum co. nstrutted ih
.. .
association with the proposedwidenirIg of GR 510; theintersecti6n.Willmeet conCurrency
based upon proposedirnprovements. 011 CR51 O.
4. BarberStreetAnalysis .. . .... .. ... . ..... . .. ..... .. .. .
Per your request, weh'gv~lookedifl.rnore detail at the morning and afternoon pellik l1plJr
traffic.ol'} Harber StreetfrQmSchumannto:US'l. . BaSec1 uPPntheJJ'lt~T~ection volume
worksheets used .fotBarherI661h(Sctttlmaon) and fof13arperlLJ$ ;181 the DaCI< bf:ti1~:l .
.attachement,we added togetherZQQI: preq;evEjJQPrnerif voJumes for each setoftfue'thrf3e
movements that~qrnRd$~ eith~rtl1(i);~ast5ound;of we.stbound.tram~ ~l'\t~rQrlfJl;i.vitlg,"~pQtl,
intefs~tiqna$appropriate, and lhenaver:C\tt~-tbe;itwo ~~un.$~~r,E}~qtr~~:n~tl~:;tQ u
determine the peak hour link volume. ineaob :Q~~(?tjQn,TRg~1,4mf3,&;~:lnClude: a:,_~\t.~\1o per
yeatannualgrQwth ra~ ',andtbe,adgilip.tjpf ~~d.itiprial-vested tiitpsftortt m~jor~~J~Jj,t$~
.. "" .
AM8H ~:{(47+2:10+4e)+t86+15t272)}lZ=~a~m~m;jng~$$;tpq9@d_~-t~~H:~Ve)~pntent tdp,$
AM.WB.={(24+88+e(})T(51+6+93->}1?:;:1'4~Jiiom)ngwe$tbol1nd prede.velof1ment tfip:s.
PM.E8="{(38+95+49)+~126+4+.~.29~IJ2F221'. aftemoon'e,a$.tbQunq}flred~v~lowro~D~.trtp~..
PMWB= m59+280+58)+(45+8+32~)}/2~388:.~fl.~rpo9n. W$stpq40~g.pr~QeveI6pment:trif)s.
.BaseduPQO the. F[)QTGeger~li~~dTablesJ.a~o.lane Uf)djVid'ednon"pt~te rQ~d~)'h~$'9,
level oJ&~rvice..C.thre~hoJdof4'80... ThereforejheJQadwaYJ~p~pj.ec~~QtpQp.~f~t~aJ'LOS.
Gineactl direction dUring.tnemQrning,ancf afternQonpe:}~~ hotif8Jn 20.07 wnl100tifbei
proposed projecttrips,
Based.'upoh the'tripdlstributionintne,otlginal $ttldy~ ano th.~gttgqhl3d.:ttipgeneratio'hlthe
siteisprbjectedtoadd .
12 AM BB trips, 19 AM \/VB trips1t8 pM',EE trips,and1iZ PMV\l13.tfips
fa the roadway at itsgreatestpoirltof1tnpacHoreach time, period., Ad_djngthe~e,$i.t~. trlP$
totheabQve-referenced 2007 prelievelopmentfraffic respltsin the fQUqwingZOQ7 ..
PostdevelopmentV6lUhies:
@
MorORISTPESI($NOFMERRlTT ISLAND,INC.i2755 N~ Banana RiverDriVe,$ui~BtMerrittJ~ta.r;J(:ffFlfJrida 32952
. EBIBA#8Z20- e-mail: motoristdeslgn@aotcom - voice: 321 4S~-2905- fax:, 3g1'~~f)"2012
----"
~J
MOTORIST DESICN OF MERHITT ISLAND. INC.
1'raffi.G/! 7'ra,n.iporl.rtJ'i.i1n (:rilt,.:;uJtants
AM Ef3::; 3&1 t,.j~
AMWB=165 Lose
PM EB=239 LOS G
PM WB=AOO LOS C
. .
5. Capile:itj Values from Data Intensive Link Ana.lys,es
Based upon the HIGHPLAN analyses ihthe appendix of the QriginaLreport"thefollowing'
peak hoOt directionaHhresholds have beeni(jentifi,ed fQfCOnsicleration: .
V$1-4~thto65th- LOSC2QRO, LgSDZ74Q,.J20S' (:2:$170
U$1....... qqthto69th ~ LOS G206D, Los D27201LOSE S1'70
U$1..6Sth to Old Dbde LOS 02570, LQ$D.341((I4,t>$ e. ~:$pQ
6eth Ave-45thtQ65th ... . LOSC9401 LO$D1270; 'L(;)~E:'1491l
66th 'Av:e'~ 69th taPIR 6'10 Lose 790j LOS D tOBO,~LOSE 14.~O'
,Sjt-lce'tl;tewlde,ningofCR~j.1QlsnCi)W ~n .th~fir~la''ye,ar$, gfi~~~~JMjpl;;lnjttl~i4Qm'lly
~q~pt~ittw~$hQlqJ)~~~e,en lti9fE;a~~ to ~~p'Q1al1d {b~ A'~-- ......' "liahilly~~ tnQltjd~ cui-the
!!::~~~;:=E=!St5=~~=~~~9~1'
l~okimg~l~p~Cifjc,$jgm.ll~i(l1ingJ la~egeometl'YJ turnIng mQXteme.fitS'i,~f)jrJtoaeh\t>e~k bout
fa010r$letc.UnfdrtunafeIYt fotsig,haJitedcoftidors the arral~$t$;,JdQes;,l1bt!J)toduceJan~aQtu~t
. cap8citYthresbQld. value. perse. ,'It cfln;{)nly,ana,lyze"tf1e',$,;pe~lf:t~:N~t~et>,JiJn~h~r'9!1,e~pqt,
condition iSind jdef1tjfyd~I,~y and JeYelofser;ytcetJndertO,QS~)i~p~~fj~ $QOqltip.r1S', ThatJs'
WhYeaohproj~ctmust recreat€L8 similar ahaJY$is.specifi~.i6tbe.~()nd.ttiol)s proposed.
instegdor beIng able tojU$tJncrea$.etheadopteQQapar;jtY:~hJt~n'Qld. .vvhal~tQroe~rfta$
nave qQ()pted(lRCJ()rf9.X~rnplehasd9ne, tDt$j[l,its9P~~d~,~t.~ ,,~.t~<ttipe.} Jp(l\, ~gJ.iqY"of
increa.singt})eadopled capacity to the volumesanalyzedan.tlITI'ed,as. me:etiqg
acceplablelevelsofsetvice. .
G.. HIGHPLAW'Analyses
Th.~.AA.DTValue.sweie. based upon the County sUPP. 'liedi.MDT' VdlUtrtes arthetime and
. . 0" '_ ......,..:.".. .-- _,. -..' - _ . c' .
g'rown flIp to,2007 volumes based upon the Coonty's 4Agt(J,a@~f1U~jx~gt(jwtb r~J~whip.fu w~s
the tequirementat the time.'Recentgrowtb r9tejl1forrp9tipQ~~~tiJjJJ .otber$t4~.H~s. iij ~J1(:}
l3r~a re~nXIYf)eem1op~, genera.Uy id~Qt!fyiP9t\slight.lY: lQMt~t gr9Wfht;a.t~ jn:tne':~r~~,ofthis
sitetnanthe.CouoiyWideAAPIo..rate. used in this analysis~'Tfuis4sipt()bably,due'totbeJact
lhaHM CitYl\as helm relatively weUdeveloped tor many ~a~,#llll!l\e; COl!~elJlll~~
~,~/)
M()TORISTDES/GN.OFM~RRJTT ISLAND, JNC'.12755 N.BananaRiVeriJfl~f#'L~l!l:(~.13l.MerrjttJs/;ind.. FJQrjd~..32952
.. . ealBA#8720- ~rnaiJ: motoristdesign@aoU:om - vojce:3~l,4:q~~29(J5.. fax:32145~2()12
--,
c..-:-'-,.~~"\ J.
....... .
v
U(J T.OT,lj""l' I)' V'\J'iJ"i\i (Ii~' Af~_\lr\'R'lrlrq, ..f.;_~L';lNr.). '/;:V.'C..
~'l J .. r.. ...,,' .J.,I 1_ \.. _ . r _" , F. _ 1 ...1_ L "
'1'r{~f.f1~;./Tr!f.li:ipGT{ntwn C07lSuLtahls
includes numerous areas that were undeveloped and thereforehav~ ~~perienced' higher
pereenfageincreases. .... .. . . .... ... '.. . . . ..
TheassoTted factor values (k,d, etc) were also based upon cOOtl'ty.sUPPUed values.
Theloc~l adjustment factor was adjusted to 1,0 from thedefCll..lltvfdqehecaUse the corridor
is operating at more than 50%. of capacity I is showing typiqaJcbrnmqter pa.tter,ns w.ith. ..
regard to other factors (k, d, ete) and general observations ihtheatealndfcate that during
peak hours, the traffic has the "appearancelJ of being a mote uro:a:rdype'of;ttaffio that
happens to be traveling through a rural area to get from oneurh~ni~~dClrea lp another.
7.QR510ARTPL4N . . . ... ... ...... .
As wedJaclIssed ontne phone, the roadwayi$noWprogtamrnedfqrWiqenjng~. and the
Jrit~rsectionswo.ulo then nOlongerbe functioning at th.e I1tgfJ~ryl~ r~ti9f,An~JY~~,~:fgrthe.
in.te.J~. ~...cti.Q.o.a.t.C.R...........51..0.....1..:.'.6....6t.h'.Ave. flue h.. a.. ..".. e...... b...e.....~n.:. incl.IJ..... d... e. d. ..a.........~.....r.e. q:u...e.$~..."q..'ifi.(!;.o....m.m.'...'en.J.3i bu.l
-fh$ofnerswou Id: noioliger be cOflsideredappropriate ri()W1n~j'tbe:t.ElJs;;a planned:
irnptoYetrientin,place.
B'~ ;SightQ'$.tam:~
Tne"$jg~t4istance comm.ent-wlU.be (Of 'has been)addte.sse.d'ftl:)fMflm thafBre4note
invtilVed,with thesit~desi!:Jn, a~ it lsout$ide, Qfour$cop$;of~jnv*~rmimf orftn'$;sg:lI$j~ct.
'9.. 'QQn~lo$.i()ns'~nd Rec()rnlnenda~iQP$
After-c6mpfeting'tl1e.above discussed items, we have: reviewed fthept/grnal' cort.bIb.slobs'
and recommendations' and find themtp s.till p'e approprj~~e,; , .
IfV9.(.I. ha"~ar"'lyquesti<>ns,coml11entsi of reqlliteadditional) infofmatloh~please:adv1se, We
100ok:forWard to, continuIng working withYOlJ,
$incerelYI
.... ()1 \,~
eJvlJ\!t1.-rtJr-'fi, ~ --
RliondaPlep.er."Schmitz
.att.
c;c: Emili0Su~ya
Joe Schulke
@)
MotO~/ST DESIGN OF NfERRITT ISLAND, INC.) 2755. N_ Banana River jjr;W~j.$fJite $)<M.e.rrittl~/fJf1d,F/orida 32952
'.EBIBA#8720-e-.ma#:motoristdesign@aol.corri - voice; .321 459-2:905- .fax:321459<-2012
~-,
1\\0
MOTORIST DESIGN
Traffic/Transportation Consultants
TRIP GENERATION
Peak 'hour generation rates andentering/ex1ting dIstribtJtionswerehased upontHeJates
identified. in Trip. Generation,. Seventh Edition,. p.ublished by th~ Institute. of
Transportation Engineers. Trip generation rates fortheAverage Daily Traffic Were
ba$ed upon the higher rates identified i'n the City code per the request pf City Stam
The foHowingisa sUmmary of the trip generation tor the site:
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
85 Townhouses
T ::: (10~)
::: 8$OdaUy trips
MOR.NING PEAK HOl..JR
.
'85-rownhCllJ~eSi.
tt'n:.~ (P.44){x)
=3-" pe'Eik.hQJ.tJ';tj1J?$ ... n7Wcrjn.1J~3%i Q~t)
(6 'enterios.1; a'1e.~tlng) ..
AFTERNoON PEAK HOUR
85 TownhoHseS..
tEL;:: (9.5:2);t~):
::. 45'peakhourttip*, ,((37'% in 13~o/(i: oUt}
(30entedrig I t5exiting) ,
4-
Revised Jime:2QOe
@
Motorist 1)1?sf.g1).ofMerri,tt Island, lnc.j2755 N.,Banana River[)r.$u#ft.!J,.. Merritt IsUl:n,ti.FL. 349.52
~BIBA#Q'l~()- e~j,k moto~tfi,esig1'J,@a.gl.cQ1T}:.=,'Il.<4ce: 321~45;97.29()5 - fax; 32-.1-+Q9~?,OJZ
/
(@
Short Report
General Information
Analyst
Agency or Co.
Date Performed
Time Period
Volum~andTiminQ InoUL .....
.
SHORT REPORT
Site Information .
Motorist peslgn
Isolated Likely Existing
Times
2006
Number of Lanes
LT
:...
1
.. ..
..
RT
o
Intersection
Area Type
Ju.risdiction
Analysis Year
LT
,0
WB
TH
1
LT
6
2
0<44
A
3:0
Barber IUS 1
All other areas
AM - 2007 Predeveloprnent
RT
1
IT
1
L
93
NB
TH
:2
T
q~$
2'
0,84
A
.2,5
RT
1
R
T
.2
0.B4
A
2.5
SB
'TH
2
T
.. 1:26
.2
OJ8S'
A
2.p
IT
1
L
1
2
0.89
A
2.5
Page I 61'2
RT
'1
R
5.1.
,2
0,89'
A.
2,,$
2,,(1
Lane GroWP
Volurne (vph)
% Heavy Vehicles
PHF .... ......... ....
Pr(;!timl:Cl/Aqtuated (PiA).
Startup Lost Time
ExtensionofEffeclive
Green
Atrivat:rype ..''{f .. '3. "33::'3,'3" 3 3 $' 'S( ..
l.:!nlt E2~ensiqn .. 3.0 ~ SdJ3.0:tO 3JJ .' .li~. 3,0 $.0 ,'$.0 3,a
Pf;;!!lIl:3j~tRJIiQR: V:~b.Jm~.. rp,"::si;)~;o ...00 ... p. .(), , '0"; .q;O...~l:: ;.II..
!k~M"~.~.. 'fg.tf'tf;rl'" '" '1."4:0 ..'1:2.0' ;12~(j: ,1,'40 1'2;Q, 't?tQL ]~~(f, ]~~'f1f;
.fJ?rRJhSfGradetPaTldng'iiJ:..:,"Jjr-=C m.M tv O}xi M ,~c-()' N - -ji:{'.Q "-.Ifl,.,~"
1:)~rKiijgIBQl.l['. ""':~.:,~ ............ n ...----: ....... ... ......._':.--_.~__H'
Bus Sloj)slHour . ()} . .~ . ..,0 ~ (}, l1 tJ(r (f .....0
'fM.tpl.P1.qrr(P~-~~:~~lIii~6' ~: ~-~..";,~'...:,,:.: ':~t:~ : ":-"-<":':"::"""':<:":',-.'"- $':2[ ~ .;:-:,..:.. .~~.~-; '-,:,':";'~'- :$lf2:: '"
:~;~.a:$i:ii_ij~ ':"~" "':'sv,r_p~~~)ttr'-;: :'~2:~"'::::::!' -. [f, :nq -.. :04. EXcJ.)Left~.-~: ~:N:Sj:.pijttTf'n7 -,.-"' ....-~Qar.'._. !
;
6;::22;tt(s~-,QjO'~G;;;O,0 '(3~. 0:06 =: RO,S ;:;63J1;S\;;O;(j' ::0,:; 'fJ-Xl
:Y':::,' Jr. .......... 'y;;;-'~, . '.,Y:::f,(J _ ..,t;';',(J Y:':'6 Y::$ :y:::,' ,u,. Y~)ll---'-:
'Duration 6fAll<:J.1V$jsXfir$:='O;~.fj,C:vcle ,Cetidlli-:C'f'tt:l',rrm.. -
,l..arieGtP;l.JDSC~pa>clt.V~ppijt~&'rJ:>:~lijv,.antt.LP$JOetefrrliri~iiQ"'. ..... .. ....,_,.,.".,
.. -...-.,-.. .. -.. __.m_,._ n]g~:' ............ WB-~_.NfJ .. ..~~~
Adjusted.Flow'Rate" 1.01$.34., ..... ...28 ff' '11165$81 :142-
Lane GtoupDapacUy2a1 302 196299 86:3 >199]8!M '508'19..9.7
Timin.g
v/cRatio
Green Ratio
JJ.njformOel$y Q1
Delay Pa-Clork'
!.P9fementf;lJ'Dela-Y 0,2
;!?F Fa,G~Or '.. ... .....
ChnlrolDelay
L$he'Gt6tip'LP$
/,\pp(6ae,hpel(iy
/..
8~
2
Q;$5'
A
g,tJ
2~O
0.39:
0.19
39;4
0.:11
1,0
.1'.000
'40i3,'
. D
. .
~B
TH
.. .
1
TR:
15
2'
0,,80
A
.'3,0
272
2
0.86.
A
6
2
0.44
A
:
.
R
5
2
0.46
II
13,0
2;0
0:14
0.1.9
1:37;5
0,.11
0,3
1.000
37,8
D ..
37..5
0,84-
A
2.5
2.0
0;04
0.19
36."
0,11
o,t
1.000, ..
36.8
D
2
2,()
2,0
2.0
ao
z.o.
'OA'3' e..S3 0,01. O!OO
0;59 0.56 O,~P; OJ69
J5] .13;01l!),6,-.Q;O'
'0:4>1 0.11- OA4'Q;:f1,
IT();!1, 0.1' ...P:G 'off)
1.000 Cj'kObo tIlfOO'1 ,ot)o
5.,8 '13S.. 1P;( .,.~J)'..
.A; B1;1 ~ ..
12:0'
fi.le~jlC.~Vf)ficiitnkni".. })ridSetti119:R\RihriI1rla\1;ci'c;;lj'.;S~ttirilis\tremri\s2k 1..C'ft:tii1ti..'
2,0
111
0.19,;
45:0
OJ30
'83,'3
;Jj)OO
.128:3
F
,1()7,9
... ..". ... . .
..'.
.
0;.(1;1;
(l56
1f!~a
Q.:1ffi
!1~Q.
-jCooej:
1;~h!
"B
_1M,/rJ: /~-~'
........i.~
...,,~
6n>>~M6:
Short Report
A roach LOS
Intersection Delay
F.
41.3
o B
Intersection LOS
Copyright.@2005 University of Florida, All Rignts Reserved
HCS+™ Version5.2
@
file:/lC:IDocumeritS.andSkttim!s\Rhonda\Local Settings\Temo\s2klCE.tmp
Page 2 of2
B
D
Generated: 6/29/2006 3:17 PM
612912n06
Short Report
Page 1 of2
S H 0 RT REPORT
General Information Site Information
Analyst Motorist Design Intersection Bf.![ber/ /.IS 1 ..
Isolated Likely Existing Area Type 81lottr~r areas I
'Agency or Co. Times AM-20(j7Po$tdeveloPQn7$f]t
Date P~rformed 2006 Ju risdiction
Time Period Analysis Year
VolumeahdTiming Input ... .. .. .-.. .
E8 WB N6 sa
LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH HT TJ TH RT
Number oRanes 1 1 0 .0 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1
L.an~ (Sroup L TR LT R L r R: L f R
Voipll1eN'ph) 92 15 278 6 6 5 94- .55.S. ,7 1 J2'6 5~
% HealO' Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Z: .2 2 2 ,2 .
PAP O. 85 .0. 85 .0.86 .0.44 0.44 OA6 (),B4' OJ}#' t:Q,ft4 (j:l~Q 0,.$.9 Q.?9
.... .-_.
p.r~tirne(j/ActUated (PJA) A A A A A A A ,. A A '.
A , A A
$lartup Lostlime 3..0 3. 0 . 3.. a 3.0 2:5 2.0 .2,:5 2;$ ,~V$ 2.5
Extension of Effective .'~~'- .'C'.. ..,
$teeh 2..0 2..0 2..0 2;.0 2Jl ; 2,,0" 2:0 2Jl 2;0 2.0
:Arrlv'atType. . 3 3 3 3: <';3; , \3: ..'~ '. .3 3; 3'
.. -.',: , ..
~UPltExteMiQO 3. 0 :3;0 $.0 :ro. '3,.~ , : slt?: ~,.~....: XU) ~;;~: .$;0
:.". ,.....N"-. '- . . '-. ':'.' '- ,
..f?ii~tiIK~iBT@:fi{'\J9Igme. 0 () .. ,(;j; ...". ~ : ~-~,. ~'''.'' ..
0 0 () ;0 . :Fiji 1) fJ (J a
r~ng~qm"... .. '. .... 1~)0 12;0 t4.;O' 1'2.CJ, i~;,~:_, ~?;;~! 'l~0; d.~~~ i!(~,Q 1Z0;
"e~.tKin91~f?q~lPgff<h'lg.. N 0 N tV ._-. .f); 'JV .. 'I\L ,,;:.(1'... N'.) .-" tI~:: ti ..Jlr
;'patktnglHQgf: . .'. .....__.'~.. .. - >". - .- I'
... "" ~-,....,....._...~. ,. ......,,, ,-....~ .,."-_..,."^,.,,. ..-
;:t3.u'~~~p~Qgr' 0 O' tf ,-, -:'QI'.-: \~ ....... -..
() '0.\ :.1], t);: : XQ..
-
;MlrUmuOiPe~MfrlarrTime 3:2 3::2 ........,:;:',.. ,,,:, ",: '~~. - - .', '.." ,,$t2!
" ,~_.,' .
.... ..... .. .~,.... ~., ,---- ...
............'. ,,' " . ". ,-,..
'.Pl1aslhn I2VV'Pe'ftu.... 02 '03 ........ .........- "'Q4C~ Exdh k~fr~ 'N.$!\~ ....:....:07' ...... J1l8'
... ... .,. ..
;..... ......, .......... .. S,!:: 22.'0 G (J.O G O. 0 G 0:'0 ,. G;,jf":S:"(J'.- '(;j'";:!:, {63.:Qi 1 :,;~':.:: Q. -a, , ~',-~ 'G)::'rxo:
.,-' - -
1hnirig. y 'lif. >{:;;; .0 Y- o y ...... 0 y 0: "i 'S 0 ;:y>:::: 0: ....... Y- o
........ . . -
-- __n .. ..
:P.utatibfiofAhal'l"$ls (brs ;:;.0-25 . ....... " .. ...,..... ;~~CI~4~~DAftLQ;e .../tt1c;QL...,
.. . ._,...,. , ..
".L;an:Ei~;roup. CaoacifV,Contro) O~laV,i:\ijd'l..OS DeigrmJ))~~i~Jl....
.;'.' ".,-..:.' - -''--'-.' .:,."..'. ....--.- ---,'
...EB . ....,.... . -we' .. .... 4'~'-_ ",- ....-".- 'NB .. ..913;
.,.
AdJusted Flow'Rate 1.08 341 2.8 1:1i e '~$.!t. ~' ........ t '14'g
.... .. . ..,;' ~~~rt .... .: ,1fJ.~7
LaneGroupCapaclty 26.1 302 189' 4QS fj91 S08
. ...
(J,1:q~ ....
vJbRiatio a. 41 1.13 .. ~~~4t.,; ~,~~ ".'. m Q;'Q'Q .. fNQ7
0,'0.1
:Green. Ratio 0.:1 9 o.~19 .0.19 Q..1~; qU~9 . 0;;$:9 ~~~~. (j~~~ 1;JY56
LtlrHftlrrct l)el~Y,dl 37:$ ~~~r:.. :~3i ... ~1.:f) .
, 39. 6 4f:>.O Q;.t~.
.'
;O~la,y Factork . a; 11 OA5a 0;11 d,ff OJ;1 (Ji11 ,..
...
:,I(f~Fgm$tltal Delay O2 91.3 fJA hil ~f'ii.p; .cM ... ,9.0 eN) ':1'.0.0'
1 .1 ..
."T...._,.:..~.. ..---
~f?f;f.pC~Of 1. 000 1.0'00 1..0.0.0 1. 0.0.0; !lOQQ... ~;;Qo'(J' tOof}:, 1~l)()() t;ppo
,
13(f3 37.c~ '3..~,:s.. ;~;1J' _"H 1@.;7 ., 11,1
Oqotrorpelay....... 40. 7 1$:1 . [0;(1
;'L.~tl~ F D D ;)\-; g' .. B .. 'A 8',
t3roupLQS D
.... 1 13.3 . . '. . . . 12{lJ
,~RRr9~ch l)elC;iY' 3T6 1to
, ...... . ...... .. ....
filedIC:\Dhcl1rnentSmidSettin.Qs\Rhonda.\Local..Settln!!s\Iemn\.s2w1,~B,tmo;...:
@
6129120'0.6
Short Report
Page 2 of2
Approach LOS F D I 8 8
Intersection Delay 43.6 Intersection LOS D
Copyright @ 2005 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved
HCS+™ Version5:2
Generated: 6/2912008 3:20 PM
@
. file:/IC:\Documentsand Settings\Rhon4a.\LqcalSettings\Temp\s2klCE.:tIUl;)
(i129/200'6
Short Report
General Information
SHORT REPORT
Site Information
Analyst
Agency or Co.
Date Performed
Time Period
Motorist pesign
Isolated Max Times
2006
Intersection
Area Type
Jurisdiction
Analysis Year
Barber IUS 1
All other amas
PM- 2007 Predeve/opment
Volume and Timlnq Inout
,.
LT
Number of Lanes 1
Lane Group L
Volume (vph) 12$
. ..
T!irtlil1fr
;A~jj.lst~dFlow.Rate
.. .. ......,
Lane <prbupC~m:lqiw
vie Ratio'
.
~[eeQ f{~tio ,.. ....,
i{1I1rf2rmO~I€lY 91
ClelZl'1ra.c.tc>r K ,
HncrementaeDeiay:.d~
iPF F:aCtpJ- _'.'.H.n.._ _m ,_ .......
dpQtrpl:.Q~i~y ...., '. ....
-..
Han~;@rgl.lpLQS';".; ,..., ....,
ApptoaChDelay.. -
1-4.0
2$$
os@:
, .- - ",~.".
'Ot1j!. ,
47A
(),#/J
.'1?$
l.fJ,ao.
$1,,*1.
Page 1 of2
EB
TH RT
1 .'. ()
fIR
4 129
.....'
..
WB NS S8.
TH RT LT TH RT LT TH HI
1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1
LT R L '7 R L T R:
. .. ..
8 9 324 :13.12 7 7 914 4.~r
LT
o
21
l.ff7
'40
% Heavy Vehicles 2 2: 22 2 2 2 2 '2 '.;?'. 2 . ~
'Pl-lP O:9l1 '0.90' 0..9.0 0.72 0.72 0.72 0,85 0.'a5 OJ!5 Q,s4 Q:9A(-J~~4
Pretirhe,dIAct4?teP.(PlA) A.A. A . ......... A A. A A A A A,A . '.' A
S~rtupLost Tjnie3(O~:Q 3,0, tlQ 2;$ ~.5 . 2.,~ .2..52..5....,2...$
~~~~19norEffeqtive2d}' 2,07.0 2.0 2;.0 i.o ~;lJ 2.0 ~.O ::~,O--.
~J'tlv~VtYP(;1 $. '3, 13333' ,3 a: 3.;~.
Unit EXtension '., ...S;(l ..... 3dJ' 1.......3;0 S;{) 3;,0 a.,o' S,D ,$;{) jiti. 8JJ
-,
(?~9iI3jke!RTQ~,}'f~I\1m~ Q.'Q',D.":P Q () '.0 ... o'f)qi_ }fJ:_ ,p: ;q,
.,t.?fi~~dtn .."': .~: -,12;1) !f'li:(]: . .... ,'1'2;0, (12;O r12.0Q: :t~;'QXi" 1j~lt1 ,,?;rO ~~f,t. 1t2ia!!'
.Parkin9l(5ra~e!lPafkbjg;", 'N; .i) -M ,N 0 N Nti iN 'Ili ['If !f'.l.;
'~a:f:ktngJHour"""A' ,
'~p.......I.,..~a.....Js:,'.'.n~...a~.m.'.p. ~;.,:"...:..~,...';~.......... '....._....~....a.).l:rw.,..,'T:,.....:.i:..~~.. ..'O~.'....~. ". I: '.'0 ..4.,3. ~'O ~ a~ l!, (j' "'~'" " , !i
):11"'1 P.;lfY r....lJH 4 ... .. :()3EXcl.Left' . :N$:]=?eft)1,.o:r ,08:
,G -P22;()"Gi;~' .(J~Q;' ..,<3.: OdlG - O.f1G =20.0 ' :<3 ;:t;",B3~;{)., ;f!?i>;itu'O;O."G~'o..(r.';
y# ',6 ,'Y - () ,v';., '0. y,= 0 Y.... 6' -Yd.e .. IX':' 'Xl cY'~Q;. I
DOt'ati.OD bfAoalv$I$Hllt'S}=:Qi~p l;CYcleL~ijQfr{C)=, if23~O 1
~:Lilf1eGiolJP,'Ga'pa:eitV.]5Qrit~Ql:D.~lav,. ia.ridLOS.Determjnatirio'- qW___
~B.WB NJ3:
12384'1,'$4,4 .f3. - t
2:72
231
27.0
€US4
Q;Jr
~Kfr
P~14
2,2;
1J10P
48Ai
;,
0.J7 0;.04
9.17 0.1.7
f43.6 4?!i
0.11 0.11
(.L4 0:1
t.ooo 1.0'00
43.9 . 42.7
..... 0 .p
43.7 ..
..
tD...I.rLq .... ....
'; ...50.1
4,82
f). 79
. Q:l?_
15.1
(f~4
'ft7
1...00,0
23]
.€.
. .
1'$.O~
8Q4
342
0,$6: l);'Ot P;'Q2
g!;~1' 9io:1 0;'''4
.. g~,;4.,15.;0 't5ltt
lh8~ (>;11 (Jitt
A~3 frO g.Q
t,(!)fflQ ..... 1).Qc.Q 1;f),OO
..
~tJ.;7 1(5.0 15: 1
.'C. '.13.,Ei '
:L&~,~ "
~~;.
~72
1~Q.2:
ft;M; ..
&J:t
~.Q;$;
~.1~
0;3;
1-. bflt)'
~Q.?
1ti"g
Short Report
Page2.pf2
Approach LOS D 0 I c C
Intersection Delay 28.6 Intersection LOS C
Copyright @ 2005 UnjverSilyofFloiida, All Rights Reserved
HC$+TM VersionS:2
Generated: 6/29/20013 3:1~~.PM
@
f'i lp. ,./}r. \DOCI I rnp..iJt<nmd'Setii rlP.<<\R h()nda\T.()ca] Seti.i nQ s\Temn\...2klCE. tmri
6129J.2no6
Short Report
GenerallnfonnaUon
Analyst
Agency ot Co..
Date Performed'
Time PetlQd
Vl',)lumeandTlmin!i Input
Motorist Design
Isolated - Max Times
2006
Page, 1 of2
SHORT REPORT
Site Information
Intersection
Area Type
Jurisdiction
Analysis Year
8arber I US1
AI/qther C!re~s
PM - 2007PostdeVt3IopttJt3nt
NUlt1b~rqfla!1l~$,
lane Group'
EB we
LT TH RT LT TH RT LT
1 1 0 0 h
1 1 1
.' ..
L TF? LT R L
R'f
-1
R
Vo.lume. (vphX
.. '. .,.:..: ." h.
..
%Heavy VehiCles 2 2 2 2 2 2 22' '2 :2 22
PHF 0.90 0;90 0.90 6.72 OJ20J2 0.85G~,S$ Q.$5 :q;:Q~ Q,;~'10;f)4
f?r~tim~dIApt!J~tedJ?I)\) A A A A A A A' A ,~ ~; __ .~....A ,
,starfup:LosfTIme3JJ 3.0 3.0 ROgiS ;2;5 ;,2;5 h2~5' J2~5;2;S
Extenslonof<E~6tjVe. 2,0 . 2. ~O. ..' ,2.;0.' ..1'))',.)'\.... :.2..:'Q..'.c
Green.__2.(J, 2.0 2.0 :2{o'x:.;v~~'...
ArrivalType .. 3 3 :) 3 3, 3: .. .... L~. 3,; 3: :3
;JJnitg~n~fph;, .., ... .3503:0 3d) 3':0 3:i{1~ --, ati c~:O- :~;jt 3~.r~_ ~:3)o.
;h>.~~/~I~~:~,: 'PJ~fufL 0 000, Q () ...... q(r"'~7f,'_.--':{j' ..1iio
:4?tti~~",:~:"'--""1i2.,O 42,0 _,. ....., 1'2:0. f2,0 IJ'2;'l1 :;1i~.ilrt~;p,,:i d~ll^,l ~1,.2.;(t" I1:~~Q'
t~~f~r;lgr~~a'~,t~ii9 --IV'. ,JiJ, N 1'iO N #@u!#: tfl: ..rlL" .N',
J?~i:lSl~9IFi~f": . ,,' ..' '" ..," ..,,,_':,,,~:~ '
'gU$:$l~$1ij'9tJC (l,O, 0 0 ,0 ~'P; ,a.. a '()
~Minlmijm<Re(f~~tr;lartnme '. . $,;2, 3/2 ".E. x..c.'I... ..L....e'.~.'.', '~.:...-...C!..:. .,....,.....D.......~. .............', ~,.~.,.:......":,_",,..',..,'..:,,;:.._.'_..--,.'..,..".'",.......~.~.,~_;....,.,..i~ d
p-!;rssing;" , 'ra~JrR$tiTi 02Q3 04 n k~9T"'"w. .~:.;o.8'="
...~ .."..,S,S: 22.$ G .,;OdJG 0.0 G == 0.0 .G-2p;O'~w;;:(!$:3~o'.) Fa c f).'Q;"~$:J!l:O'
TIrntng 'V,,- .i:! V' .0.. y.'..-,.;;. o. Y ',- 0 .y, 6 ",,", ~ '6.' .:y.,\.l' n v :1'\.....
., :iL~.~, ''f,;,1: ... '-", ,'", i_~. · -.- , . -- '.r - :.. {' .,~..!:~, _..__ ,._. ..::J.~ \:.I
~$i$.t?r$}= 0.25 ....,. ,.., .........." .... .. .... . ..... .,. ...., . .. .' . .."O'l~I~lk~nati1_b;;,~~'.l23;OE:":::: "
lan(}:GtOUl5;:(l.apa,ciw, GOhtrol.DelaY"and I...OS Oeterminati,ot)..;"" "" ...
EB WB NB' h'se
1'2: !aaa:.. lS44-. . 8 '''J. 972
....., '"
18.02 1802
228 270. '4el2; ''a04$42'. " . .:. .
129
. .., .
)\djus,fediFloW Rate
143
LafleG.rollp.Gapadity
23$
,.
..-. -
vIe Rallo'
'Green Ra'ti(;" ....
)pl:lif9rmm~lav ~1 .
:jO~I~YF~etpr;k-' . ....
.1hcr~rOtmti;ij'f5~iay tk
,Pt=' Factor:' ..
iGf;lp@~f1.~I}a,M
i~~:i1~ ~,@pp'4QS.
':j\;pproacfiQelay
0.6J
0.17
47.2
0,20
4.7
1.QOQ
52;0
D
4
tilB
TH:
2'
T
13:t2 >7
'7
...,...
$B
;-ni
2;
r
9J4'
RT., ...(1
1 '1
.R t
".."
51
132
21
8
9
330
,.".,.. .'.
1:fj1
40
272
..
0;56
0.17
46.7
0.15
2.5
rooo
49.2
o
50;6
0.18....... QJ)4 .... 'N~Q 0.$5 QJJ1....(J,02 0..54
0.17 0;1;'7.--, p~.:Bi~,." Q;;R.1 '0:;72 0.51
43.6 42i6 .... )1(5.7", ~~J~ "l~;P;__j;p;Q' 20.-5
0.11 0.1'1 ~J~~""~;'~~H ~l1' .. ,9/11 Q,,:14
/~;o l~Q]I~.,6o.~ ~~~d, t~~6'; ;1~~d~d 1~bbo
44,0 42)1 ;g~i~'--~~P/l ~1:Ji~f;t '1,,:1' 2()j8
o 0 . :dQ" .13; '.]Ef C
43.7 ,L,Y;P .... '., ...' 20;$
@
:61e:lICt\1)ot:.uh1entS and SeUiIHzs\Rhol1da\Local Settin2.s\Temn\s2klAH;tmn,.
A/?Ql? AOt.
Short Report
Page 26f2
Approach LOS D 0 I c C;
-. .......... .-
lfltersection Delay 28.8 Intersec:tion LOS C
COPYright:@ 2005Unjverslty of Florida. All Righ~ReseNed
HCS+™ Version 5.2
Geni:}rated: 6/2912000 3:09PM
~0
~i
-fileiIlC:\DocurnentS and .Setti:n.gs\R.honda\Local. Settimts\Te.tnp\s2klAD~:tm.tr...
6t2.9/1.0Q6
Short Report
General Information
Analyst
Agency or Co.
Date Performed
Time Period
SHORT REPORT
Site Information
Motorist Design
isolated - optimized
2006
SchUmann I Barber
Alfother areas
AM 2007 Predevelopment
EB .WB. NB SB
LT TH HT L1 TR :..RT LT TH RI IT TH RT
Number of Lahes 1 1 0 1 10 1 1 01 16.
Lane Group L TR .L TR L TEl L TR
Volume (vph) 97 210 47730 88 24186 }90. 46 47 184 45
%HeavyVehi~i~s 2 2 22 22 2.22 22; ...2:
Pl:-IF 0.83 0.83 0,83 0..88 0;88' 0,88 OIg3 0.93 OI93/{7J! &1Q' 0'79
Pretimed/Actuated (PIA) A A A A A.A A . A.. A A A ..... A
pt<lrtUP LostTime 3,0 3:0 3.0 3.0.3;0 3.0 '" 3.p __ $;(1
:~:~SiOhOfEffective 2,0 2.0 , 2,0 2.0.2:(I-2;{) ?;Q ..?p
--
Arrival TYPe 3 3 . ;3 33 '2 .....;3 a
UnitExtension 3.0 3;0 .. 9;0 3;QSJJ :8;(>, 3,0.3;0
'Ped!8ikeIRTOR)/oltime ,0 0 ~(J;o. '(J '() ... o Ct. 0 ..Q, o. .'PL..
4aneWidth 1~,,0 1~.() . ...J~.'O' ,t?JP,w..'f2;g ,.t2.P~" ]?:if' 1~}J.
Parking/GradeflParl<ih9 N ,0> tv IV" .{):N'- N r:t .NN' (J
-- .-
:B'arlQng1Hoqr .....,. ........ ....: ......... ...." .... ....
BlJS;:$top$'H9~r Q 0.' .... m?Of)' .. .;~- r(j; o.'~:
,Minimum ge~~$tfi~nTil'Jje" 3.4 ...... ~g;.$<~;',q.'?"
PhaSingE%QI,J..eftEW:Perm03...Jlfk.'t;xe,;tl.Jt3ft 'NSp:~itl"'; 01'. .... i, ;08
;..-:,>~, ""d.,_ 'el==:::-j-~.4 ;;G'~':;;:. '-02;'7"" ~:G~'=" tEr:t:~. .;t3:::~: ::5~,_3"i G~;i;;'>2~~3:'.": ;'G';':~. .". ..c_:."" :l3':<,:;.~ ".~ ~.,
TlmlTlg y;;:: 0.4 .. Y - :0.2' Y ...'1 ",Y..5..4Y'iI5i'$" y,:" ... ;Y':; ''-
Duration;ofAnalvsis Jbrs=fe,15 .... ...... ,. ..... ...u.. ..CYQ[e'tejj~'jtl1;C';: 12QXr
LaneGr()Upeat)acitVl.CpntroID~J~v~. an(l,l.:.OS'''Determi"rlali9n ...-- .... ......, ... ... ....
a - '~ .~
117~2$,~~::1~7 200210
874$58 . "fOff927 '2.17 ~24
..
0.17 0.97 0.31 0,14 (J.92' fJ.:~.9
OJ57 0.$'1 0;'57. 0.51' O{~t ().'2,4
14,2 28.1 &9.0 ... :t'ti2 44:9 1?~,7
0,11- 0.47' 0;11; 0.11 Oi4:4 0;1{.
0.1 22.5 tr :0.1 122.'.5 : VA ..
1.000tooo 1.eoo 1.000 1.0,0Q 1,POO
;14.3 00:640.7 1i5.3 ....i37A ;4(),1
I:B D.... '0 'S S I'D
.
Volume and Timing Input
Adjusted Flow Rate
tarie.Group.Gapacity
vIe Ratio
Green Ratio
tJniforml)~lay d1
gelaY'F~ct()rK.
.!ncremePt31 D~laYP2 .
PF Factor
Control Qelay
Lane Group LO$
Appro<.lchPelay
ApproachLO$
Intersection
AreaType
Juri$diction
An~'Y$is Year
46.1
b
20:7
C
53:4
D
.
rile:IIC :\DocJitrlents and Settirl.g~\Rhonda\LQyal~~tt!p.g~Vr~1l1p\s2,k2P7/1Jnp
Page 10f2
"tV
i..'.'"i..,....
:.:,.......$13,:
~o929if
28.3 ... .,42J}
0.;21 OJ~8
.
o.>~~_ .. Q;?4
,
~fJ;Q' 11]
Q; n .. Q:~q
,~OA.. .'1.1:,
1;00.01,0.00,
........ .'. ?9;.3.1$A
... G...... .J?u
I 43,3
'k O'
\)~1
. )
~/
6129/2.006
Short Report
Page 2 of2
Intersection Delay 45.0
Copyright@ 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
Intersection LOS D
HCS+™ Verslon52GenE.1r~te!i:6129j2006 5:10PM
@
file-:Il(}:\I)ocum~nts gnd$ettings\Rhonda\LocaI Settings,\J'en1p\s2k2l;!%./.IDp,
'61291:2(}Q6
EB WB NB .$13:
L T TH RT LT TH RT LT TH HT tTJ'fC" In
NLln1berpf~f,lDes 1 1 0 1 1 01 'i'01 1 . ()
~~:Q(;; GrQ\.lp L TR L TR L Tf3, L TR!
Volumetvpl1) 97 211 477 30 94 24 18p:t$Q 4FJ 471(14<... .,15
f&l11~aVYVehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 '2 :2'. 2 20
J?I'+F: ... .. :.. 0.B30,83 a83 ,o.B8 0.88 0.88 0:93' Q:Q$' Q.~$:(),"9; 0;,79 Q:79
?1'~tl'trledIAchj~ted(PJA) A A A A A A AA ... ~;" .A... ...S: A
$tattpp LQ~tTitoe ...... ...... ...... 3.6 3.0 3,0 3.0 3:0..3.0" ., :3d). 3':0 ...
2*t~J.1SiQtiqfEfrePtive ZO 2:0 2.0 2.0 2.Q 2.ft:.2dJ 2~\.o~
";r~~n H... , .. ," .....
A-rrlx~I'T~p~ $ 3 .3 33'S': ;3':$
U'f:lUExtensron3:0 3;OS,Q ao 3iO <M~ , ,ato.:ttQ ...
';P~\'JlBi~~~Tg~ Volume' 0 0 0 -C-o oO;QT~ ;()jh':(1 it)': " :f) '0.
Latie:Wlcltb'i....< .. lZdi1Z.0 '12:(f12JO ...'t~Ql)' rt~~L '--"'-' "1f:1l;} fTf~iQ;;J_..,
;~~t\<fn91~r:;aqel~~tMng, l'fi () AI N b. N 'M :if tj 'fJ)' '1 i";1}/'} "fJ,"'"
:~~ngttJQ)J'r,~.'~-,-.':'~.:~.',:'.-:-:',:~.': ~... ,. __ ,.:., .,_:",:~:,_~_~:~,::'\.:"~; ~<':;~~,: --. _.u
,1iQ~ ~~P~itit,\:'l,4~O() tl .'0 Q ~ C.f)" ",3(, ..~. . ..'
'a~i~~oTime, ,~;2~"2 ~ ir3~l,'
JPnasind', ;jereLueft>EW. Perm '03 04 ExCl.l:eft j"ftiS.~a~lm.~:uUI('::;io~r
r.'~....l.."'..,.....;.'ih.'.~, ~,....G.:...'.':.=;,.....:.Z...;~..,...~.'.'.. ... .yG. '..:..._-..,.. ,~.~-7 G="(3 = ...G - 5.:J .... 'G',F:;~~;~',G;;~"--.:G:;:'
''"CW''. '::J : 1- <;J"t v~; Y - y>. y - f5A YC5~~ IV':"'""'..Y'B
ib.:fJratton. QfArH:i1Y$i$;(lJr$='0;25~vcte'Lengt~Ct:#L?I~(j2li ..~", ,ce
']~~anet;t<>UD1'Canaci1:V~Control Delav-,and Los' Determin~ti()n:" ",:'..
EU3 WE NJl H,~J}:,
82934 n, f34 20tH ~.' :-${i: ;~9:o
85810692921fl ~423: ":28(J',426
0.97 0.32 0:140..92 ~.So: d,2:j O:6S
0.51 0.57 p.51 Q.:3~ f.J~4'4i' ,..... fK82 0)24
28.1 8~A..",t?3, 44.fl ~Jt~i: ~,BJ} 41]
.. -.....-...-..."
0,47 0.11 0,11 . ~;;1'!:" ..&;1;1 -q\~~
22,8 1.8.0.1 ~,;$ :f1t?f"'0,,4'4,,4
1.0001.000 toaa h,.. ff:.QOQ 'f'v.GlJP .... 'LOao . "{;.000
5Ct9 4Q.9 tp)4 r$f,~,4''1<iig: I: l4;~t$' 4.~.J
D D B ',~ {!J ., ~_Cb
..-......
20.5 5'3.4, 43.3
C . .(j; ... . . ... ...C:- eX""
Short Report
.,
General Information
Analyst
Agency qrCo.
Date Performed
Time P~ribd
'Volume and l1minalnput
Motorist Design
isolated - optimized
2006
Adj.u~$teaJibw;R'ate..1.1.7
Cane'Grbu,pC~F)'acity'..667
\jl~R-atiQ' '.' . 0.J8
:l~~r~!tR~ti() ...... ... ......... 0.57
'Vrtji8mvbel~y' 0, .... 14,3
':~~11;1yI~#8~g u.u., 0_11
'I!tq~ementarbelay.a~u . 0.1
'lff.Facti>r' .1.000
G,grgrBlP~lay 14.4
;~€:l,tie<?rpl,lpFl..b,$ 8
. ....--..--....-.... --.....
iAppl"oachb.eJay.'.
Approach LOS
Page 101'2
SHORT REPORT
Site Information
.
Intersection
Area Type
Jurisdiction
Analysis Year
Sdhumann/Barber
A1F6therare<:!s
AM 2007PQstdf?vf),lopmfint
46.4
D .
/--_.~
:-:-~~( 1--0
~/
p1291g006.
fU~~tjC;XDoCl.lmefits'a.I1d Sertings\Rho)lda\ltoMl Settings\Tcrnp\s4l<:4G~itfAp
Short Repor:t
.Intersection Delay
45.0
I ntersection. LOS
HC$+TM Versioil5.2
Cbpyright@2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
@
fiIe;IIC: \Doeuments.3Jl(tSettings\Rlwi1(.lt:l\Lo'cal..Settings\T~lIlP\S4k2G$jtlJlp
Pllge 2 01'2
D
Generated: 6/29/2006 5:10 PM
6/2912009
Lane Gr9IJp
VolUme (vph)
0/0 Heavy Vehicles
PH.F
Pretimed/AcbJated.:.(P/A)
Startup Lost Time
Extension of Effective
Green
~_... ._-.
'Artivall:ype33 3 3 .a' 3 ...",':'9, :(f
.WnitE:xten$loli..3~ Q: :lO ,3;0: 3;0 31Q .3,'0 $/J t3.dj. ..
[pedlBike1RTORV'oh,lme :0.0 1ft _Q 1,:9: ... octl!>. ;-(J' J). ' .,l)
tl,;aD$;fWJ~U'i. .... u .. .'1:gX{,:tgirt" u', i~;.o .t'gJ) 'i"zo; 12;-Q. 19~()' ~:~fQ;
'Par.kiiigJG@~.~1?j;lTI<lD9N'.o:;, N: J.,FO IN'<N''' P:IV . ... ,t1"l;'ifJ:.,.
PliljMjl')glBou.r, . ,_.. - m ..,.," .., '
!f3U*i$,tgpSll-l?u{',"',j:i" 0 .t)' 'o:~,~:I,r;. ...,.."'~~~~]j".'
Mfn!mum'FJedestrian.rtirie ~,~ \3;;?, , 0 ";?~.g, .ja~u. ..
iPhaslh9L ..."E)(ckL~frEWP&rti'l<;Q~r' 'O:4'excl:le'ft:NBi0!5iv '.;r~rS'J;)~rm;;;' ...mr'
.:.....'G -9.D <5=:.35;0 -(3 ,.,.',' ......(3;:: tL.,.. 'StO. __ (~"t::.-2(');.€r;' ;'67 ita,it;' 'G,;::r OM.
1'1f'!1m9, ... Y;::$.4 Y=.5:2 IY;;: IY~ Y::5A' Y',....' :5)f Yf:fifi};.:3', .... y.._
nuration.ofAnalysfs.(ht$1~,.0,2p, ,.., ,.... - .....Gv;c;leleogth 0,#''1J.:1,:7.,
LaheGr()lJP..CapaCitv~.'CnhtrolDelaVli>at)(f.EOS, .Deteiiriinati~n
EB.' .....ws . .
~9a.Q336s
481.. 259524
..
. .. 0,24 0;70
0..41 0..29
')3/1 St3
. . .......
fl11 0,27
0.5 4,2
1.000 1.WO
24:2 44.5
C D
39J)
Short Report
General Information
SHORT REPORT
Site Information
Analyst
Ag~ntyorCo.
Date Performed
Time Period
VolurneandTiminQ Input
Motorist Design
isolated
2006
Intersection
Area Type
Jurisdiction
IAnalysis Year
Number of Lanes
LT
1
L
21
2
0.82-
A
3,0
EB
TH
1
TR
95
2
0.82
A
3.0
59
2
0,Q2
A
WB
TH
1
TR
280
2
0.92
A
3:0.
HI
()
tT
1
L
58
2
0,92
A
3.0
231
'2.
(t82
A
2.0
2.0
;2,0'
2,0
1\djY~ledFI()W RC'lte
Lema (3fOl!P Cf,3pacity.
vie Ratio
26
2.ff2
OJJg
0,41
22}i
0.11
0.1
fOQD
22..f},
C
0:83
...". ..
O.-~9
...I$~~.t
0.3.:7
'14.4
t{'j~Q'.. .....
..-.
50;'5.
D
48)f3
f)
D
Green Ratio
...
tJhiformDelay. dj
'DelaY Factorik
Il1cr~ll1entalDelay d2
PF i;=act9r
Contro1Delay
LC;lDe Group LOS
Approa!;/1 palay " .... ......
Approach ~qs.
.'
.........
;[J.~' . ..9;4:
l'OOo 1;()'Q~
~7;:~. 62(8l
:f;) D
..'
AJ},8'
.
Schumannl Barber
All other areaS
PM2007 Predevelopmenf
RT
o
LT'
Kia
TH
1
TR
173
2
Q.?7
A
3;'.0
.......... ....
Be
TH
1
TR
1.ot
22
Q;Q2
A
3...0
RT
o
LT
1
L
38
1.....
L
523
,."2;
.0;'87
A
3:0,
49
2
tJ;'8?.
,
A
~~2
A
3..0
2..0
2;0
2...0
2J}
NS
601:25~; ,
.'$3!'j" 6:#9
0;94 0.39..
. . q.4:8 0.36
24;,7 2!~~T ,.
0.:.1.6 O.f1
1?.O..Q.2..
... ......... '1:~bQtJ1:JXQQ:
r$~it , ,gltg
.....
A'1
-282:
0;15
10;21
137.4
P;'11
.
-......
. ..() .
, 'h.
:0...<.
34,2
,.
Page Lof2
RT
()
4q
2
0.92
A
o.
. ....SEf
1f:iQ;
267
.0,64
O,f4
4.7.5:
.0.2:2
. .., .',72." @
6/29120JJ6.
c
file:I/CNbocuments;Au.d,Setth~g$\IU19j,J,~f!\k9~~l,Syttirtg$\'J:'yJJlP\~f~~9.tt;.l11) .
Short Report
Page ;2 6f2
lntersectionDE;tc;lY 40.2
Copyright @2005 UiliitersilyofFlorida, All Rights Reserved
Intersection LOS D
HCS+ 1M Version 5.2 Generated: 8/29/20.0.6 4:55 PM
@
I ... #\."p"\'.~I!11Jt$.~t~\R11~'Wg<;l!i$~g~lll'~\$;'~il!lW
~Z29/2006
Shott Report
Generalflnformation
Malysj
f\gei1cyor Co.
Pi;1tt3 P$rformed
Hme. Periqd
Voh1meafl'd Timinn Input
Motorist Design
isolate.d
2006
,.N.'utntler.of Lanes
. ....'......-... ..". .-' ,. .
2.
0.82
A
LT
1
L
21
EB
TH
,1
SHORT REPORT
Site Information
Intersection
Area Type
Jurisdiction
Analysis Year
RT
o
.. WB
LT TH RT
'1 1 0
L TR
58 283 59
2 2 2
OiJ2 0.92 0.92
A A A
3.0 3:0
2.0 2.0
Page I of2
$cbu(1u~t)nI8~rber
Alfothet~ri'tas.
PM 2.007Postd~veIQPment
NB
LT 11-:1
1 1
ETR
52$1.73..
W 2
o. tat o.;8Z ...
A .A
3~jj~ - 3/6
2~o.
f'iledt'C:\QOCllments'aIid'.SettingsXRhtolloa\Local Settillf!s\IenlD\s2k2.-9.Qc.1lrtri},
TR
100
2
0,82
A
231
2
0.82
A
,Lahei<3roup
VO:loroe'(vph)
o/tt,tr~tlyyYehiqles
tDHF
fpreUmedJActllaled (PIA)
'$t~qVp ~()stTJm~,3jO ... 3.0
t:~Mn~~~.n ofqffectiVe
Green
A!Ti\@tty,~~, 3, 3 3 3p;.:$;, ......
ti.h11t'Exten~iQn.' ..3;1) S;Q. $.0, 3;0 $;(1' ,X~,tll:... ..
:ee~t$i~~IR*qR\(*!9I)1e 0 0000: "ji :0 ,... . :(1 ... it:
lLaoEiWOth 'f2.,otao 12,:0 19~a 't~!':Qi t~1:ft
::Rg.t%lri~defP?r~l!)g"N 0 N ..... N 0 -NJ\i..,.'.J:O; ,In
'~~fklQgtm,~Yr, ',,"
~~~~tQP:~gyt",:;,>(( 'p DCr i J~ Ii:l,,~.,tii,'." ~,.c, ~..J},,:f .riJ
[MJtli'm~P,~~~~d~iiTIm~ 3.2 .. ..3.'2 I, eN'T>; \:i 2
:Rnasi'm:t, LEXcl\ Eeft .. ,'12weernr 'OS '04'E5CCI.ht3ltii' :~JJfrO'm\L~ :J'i4$~t;ibifi?:/~2,; ',,{)8'
.'0 - 9iYG;"350 G = '(3 =G~ 9.0', :~,Ef,j21J1~ ;Si~ '1;8-:'0: is;':::
ltlroJ'tlg Y:5;4 y': 5..2:. y= Y-. Y,..,,5AY:9; 5,4;. 'Y\:;ii '~$,; Y:='~,'
,O~rat[Po3~fl&naIY$i$(hf$':::.;Qi2Ii .., .. . ..' .;,~~Cl&m;r~i1t~fij~~~i;:J '11.7.7
:h~:n~G,t()1JP'Ca-P(;\Clty, a.,ntroID~hr'l,~pd LO,S D~t~rmlriatl6ijm" h__' ..........,~= ..._m
,h .............. .... EB'= ~ ....WB .. t:". ,$j:f.
.~~Jq~t~q'~lqwR'~te..'. ..... 26.404 .63$7:2 ~. .42 165
=:rPibapaci~ . ::::.: .. == :;~ft~r ~.;:
'GreejiRatiO 0;4~ 0:29 0.41 0>29 .'.a'i'l~ ,r ." Q;2JQa~'.
,iYn1rQ@;pt:11?y Ot . ... .... 22.S 39.:3' 23.8 1,3/:.4 .. ~i,4~:tf4 '
l10efaY Fr.aCtor.R o. n . 0.37 0.11' kt27". ~.~~-,": m .. ett1 .. ~i.??7'
,!11Rremeht81.[)elay ~2()A 12.4 O.54i5 t~.(f'. '; 1?~. "......., ;Qc~" <tirq.;
'J.?f Fi3.9tQf 1,000 too01.QOO LOOP '..l~~,@~"~rQ~tJ:)a:Q 1"QQr.{
'G,Qnfrof;O~lay22~9 51.6 24.341J9 "." '~f~; .30'(6' ,$,2~f!'
ttaOe'GrQupLOS ." C DOt) ff)...... 'If ....'0 tJ: '..
~pptQ~QbP~lay .. ........ ... ., 4$...9 . ,p9;S ,. :'&4:2, .'.4J~;8
:A}b~chtos ......... Dr( '.. A"..........".'''. ..~:,.
."PP...,...,...... ..',. .... ..... ..... LI',.", LJi
2~0
2.0
.......
tn....
.,
'.0"
~&'
:~;
Q~,~7
tl
2"()
..,.
......
LT
1.
J-
.s9
'2'
'(k~2'..
t\.,
,,gAl
-, sa
TH
..{
TR
107
. ... .
2.
or~2
A
$,0'
"RT
6
.15
2.
0.92
A
2.0 ,2,a
3:;3.
,~~ ':~~~: ~
fi~;:(JE' ;~~]p('"
,At' if) !'At'
(~
IV
.. ....,.. \.;
;6129/;1;fYfJ6.
Short Report
Intersection Delay
40.5
Intersection LOS
HCS+™ Verslon:5.2
Copyright@ 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
@)
file:llQ:\:t>oqU1;iJ.etltsand SetthlgS.\Rllonda\LoRatSetJingS\JJetilt}\s2la9Jl;:tmp
Page 2 of2
D
Generatecl; 6/29/2006 4:57 PM
6129/2006'
Short Report
Generallnformatio.l1
Analyst
Agency or Co.
Date Performed
Time Period
Volume and Timina Input
SHORT REPORT
Site Information
Motorist Design
Isolated - Optimized
Existing Geometry
LT
1
L
315
2
0.80
A
S.p
ES.......
TH
1
TR
458
2
0.80
A
31
2
0..80
A
RT
o
LT
1
L
31
2
o,;,g?
A
3;0
Intersection
Area Type
Jurisdiction
Analysis Year
.... ~V'iIfJ
TH' RT
1 0,
TR
209
Z
Q:~5
A
3;0
, ~()
'2
(J.9S
A
. ... :..... ~
2;0 2;(J
..
Page lof2
51()&fiqthA va
AJfoflJer areas
AM200TPredeveloPment
cr
1.
L
217
.2
'O:B4
A
SHY
NB
J-H RT
1 . a
tF? ,....
rO-S: : 5$
2: 2'
.0;:$4, . ()}fJ1'
..t';........ .A
s;t{
.>>
2;0' J2~Q
fHetlIC:.\Documents'.'al1d.SettlIfllsNRhonua\Le,<ilal'Settinl2is\Temn\S2k@1(4~ttnt>..
Nl.lrnber.of Lanes
I,;ane Groqp
VolUme (vph)
% Heavy VehiCles
.PHF
PretimedJActuated.(P/A).
st.~tt\.lPhostTfme
EXten~ionofEffecljVe
~reeh
At:rivaITY'pe 33. 3 . .~.~ ~......:}3.. 3. ... 3 .,.' ....
.i[jiiW~xt~nsiCn ,.... ..... ..... 3.0 3~() ......... $i;(:)$.,.6;..i'3Jf! !'~:W .. .3J;):..~~;o , ...
pedJ.B'ikelRTORV.i:>]ume ...0 o (lQ, a ....(.1..... 0 .. CtY'"'iff .... ~... ..Q.. '. i(f,
tarle;~dth 12;,(J ~2;.O; . .. rg.:p',. ' ~~iQ; 4~),~ tt~~~'J' ......j2;0 . :~l:~rr.c
.P~rntn9t~@~~lP~r~ml:.N 0 ... ~1N,N;..' i.(},.I!1I:N,y-;j::"lJ.: Lli:"x;N' .. '(!1 . N.h. !
.~t:irWn9mpijt.,.. ,IC. ....~~.... . .h.. .... ,
li4$,i:St01:)$IH9Uri h oCC" (J .... (.t' hOT. ''0;, di ""'""'-li r~;~"
Mfnlmv&J?e,Mstfj~I'i'1'.iti'le ...3,,2fh ....... .... C~,,~::'TJi" "";">'I,s'f,,2,:'j.'"
f>basimf . .:l2Xelll;eft, EW Perm 93 '€lAC. .1:S.~R;L.eftr': t.l%$:,~~mlj, ~'.h'O'l... . . .....'08 ......
_.....'..~.,. '-,' j~'G~"=i 4~.5-":';-:-"':: a:.i:....~J(2; '" "5;:-;. G.:-'~~ -~ Tsr:F--14i::,---'":: S;:' '''~l~::4~ .~ !G.f=" :::Gl~:t:"
TIr:mnQ ;Y# 4.9 Y.'=.5: 1 .y~y .... '?!f=,=ij.)8 ;~(;'?'.:5 ...' 'Y;;;.' '.. ::Y'=F; ......
:.oi.ftijfi6i:i6r&rlal~Sj$Jbr$s.a;~5':' :... ..... ..... .............................. . .~. '." .:O~:pt~..~~n'Qttt~'# -;1;2()i'C.:~.'. ...:....
Uin~Gr9utLCa~~~itv. COhtrQf [)~lav.ana;l~S;Dit~rminati.()n(.......:.....,.... .... ........ h
.... ...... ,.... .... .EB .. -V'iif3' ... . .. ..... "';,&]F."" ....... .....-.sa
J\9'jU~Je(jFlowRate394 611 ..~~.ag1t ...~.'29~;.:..i!188 ...1: .... ...........3*(/ 671'
~~n~::~"f~upQap.acjfY'3:5-t '.. 6$41'1}l~~8 ..... . C" '~~$c:cj ~~~.~."'...:' iR:1:~.c..: p~:t
\dR::.ga~:Q 1,1~ 0.'9.2 .. ()~g$" (;),;#;7 .... .. ~rq1:uQ~?5 ... q~,~["L03
.(pr~errRatio ... 0.4'4 0..36 9.4~ Q;ig$ . ~,.~~ Q~?:~. Q~#8. 'O.:qQ:. ...
.\.iiijtQr~:.f),~ltlYdl... ... 40] h'J({i ... 2$.1' 2:9,6 .. j??5{ ..... ..: g~,;~,;.! ~t~8.
!Oel~Y.FaCtork ... 0..50. OA4 0.1'1:1631.. ......" O.5&C'.~~..f( ......T el~.~. gj~()~'
\1ri~~m~ntc:l'I P!3layo2 'B5A1:8~'2 tXx ..... .Xt4- . ... ... 59~1iL' r :'(j~;#;.. . ....... ...... 'd!,4.4,~;:a.
}?:F';~9~Qf 1.3;>00 1;00.0 ttQf)() , 1,'o()O .' .... '~{ll@t) 1;(qQtf' .....,.".." 1,.Q~(r: toOr;
:O()l)trQ1ED~lay . 126.254:9 27iOi ;3Q:O g:2df'~3/d' 29,~ .'88(1,
lane Group LOS F tJ . ..... c C -cc 'PC: ........... C" F'
Ap#t9a~n DelaY' '82.9 ..29.,7 .... ........ ...~7(4 CC"$&:3
.Api?r6acfiLo.SF .. .... ...... ....... '0 ......'......;13...." ;c":ft<
3.0. ..
2.0.
2.0
..
L
309
2
'0/91
A
jiiY
.....
......
. .. ......
Lt
1
'Sa
TH
1
TR
456
2
Q.,94'
A
.:310
0.:91 .
.... . .
A
RT
o
64
2
2.0.. ::MJ
"\
\L\S 1
612~t2,O:Q6
Short Report
Page 20f2
Intersection Delay 68.1
Copyright (02005 University of Rortda. All RIghts Reserved
Intersection LOS C
HCS+™ Version 5.2 Generated: 6129/2006 4:22 PM
@
:file~!lC:IDocWnents and Settllli!s\Rhorida\Local.SettinQ's\Temn\s2 k27'4"tmn.
611gnOOfl
Short Report
Bagelof2
Analyst
Agency or Co.
Date Performed
Time Period
Volume .andTlmlnaJi'lIlut
Motorist Design
Isolated - Optimized
Existing Geometry
SHORT REPORT
Site Information
lriter!';ection
Area Type
Jurisdiction
Analysis Year
.
General..lnformation
510 & 66th Ave
. .... d..
All other areas
AM 2007 PQstdevefbprilaht
. .'.
EB .. WE N8$.H
LT TH RT L T TH RT LT TH RTLT .. L~,IH; RY"
Numberof~an~s 1 1 01 1 0 1 1 0 '1 1:..Q
Lane Group .. L TR .L TR L fRt; rg
VOlume'('\i'ph) .. 316 458 31 31209 80 227f0455,'..310 460'
% He<lyy\iel1!9ie~s, 2 22 2 2 2 ~. ?2, .~.'.... ? .. ...
PHF ..... .... 0:800.80. Q.?O.....O.95 0.95. 0.95. 0.84 (J,SifO.B4 !dJH 'O!91
Pr$tirnedJ.Actuatea {PIA) A AAA A A A A. ..}\: A. .. A
$tart9p l<;)~tTifi1e<.. . .3.0 };.Q.3.0 S.O 3.6 . '3;(2 . ...~!.iQ: 3.~i~
&~:~sion 9rEff~$ti'/,~'2,02i02.o. '2.P 2.0 'Z.O 2,{); ~..?.l) ,
Arrivafrype:,'> 3 3.'. ..3 33:...3.' .... ; 2$.3~' ..--
'lJhifE~hsi6n'3.:0 '3AJ'3./J, 3;0 . ... .. ill) . $;0. .... __ .... . j~~:~",;' ti.,~tj <,'''''.
'e~~i$i~~/~J~R,}\{919.m~,O o' OOo.; (f tj: '6:0. .Jj..'f!i....:CJ'J..........,;.h.:...~....,.-.i.O,:....~.;.j4t. D.'.:....,..~~.;.~........:. :_.'..~..,~'~....~...,..'.. ':
ikilni:;:'WJ~ij)~' .dg.i:J' ,1'2)5 1'g;g 1~:lJ 12iQ' J'2iQL ''_' f!~ 101 _V&i.~ .
'paf:1<i~9JStadeiP~tkii1~f..>::iv .. '~(') N' :N 0 N. N':~:;(1l)O"N r~L.:.J C~[_ ;,~l'i~:
':~~;1I':kin9!H9!Jr' ". ....... :" --q ,.-' . ". ~~ "~; '...
:tJi)~ $,tgp~M9.lJ];;,.>,:-.--.- ;Q\",~ r;~Q; '..' r-' -- '''0; .... "0. '0." __~(fi ... '''--'.. Ji . f1
~:= ~:~~J>~!'~~ ..~:ii'i ~(~,;;i;:~J~ ~;$j
T1ming:~":~:::,., ;~.;::;~' '~: ..... .~..~. ~: ;.~1,,( ~: -:7:4. ~.=.:'''= g. ". ,_
DUrat\Qrj9f.A5.~Jil$fsfJ:"f,$:=:O;:2q .'. ., ,cl,eXeridttU~z.=. ']'Z@,Q'.- -
LaO~'~t&:uj):;Gaiail1V~collfJ;91f;)e.J~\l,andLOS:.Oettlr:minatt~Ji; .. .... .........,," . ,..":':~::.-:' .. .
,............ --'u' ........ '~13 .. ~... ..........,.. "NEt.. !".""~~~
Ad' . .AF1'.' n'...: .. 3'9S;611B.'3....:....... 3.....,.a,.....4...;2:Z0. ....1:......0..9.....,... .. '........'... JI.....'.".....'. l;i."....:z..'Q..... .'.
,:justel;.t. ow;,6ia~"" iJ , \! ~,!,:r "'N"
... _ r ._.._ '.
:'L~t1e~tQti.p.C.i~~~Qj1:Y351. .664 1 tT:043 . ..... ~9~; .. pS,6.... 5't4c
;V1C~.li<1 .. 1clSb;'9Z M{i 0.47 . ..... i,lJ6..-I1~ ;;::: ii:". t;.~.
.~te~I)Rpt)# 'U. ...... ." .......... ~44 tH~6 OA4 0;36 0.4.'6: ., ~_$O .." ttf-i~ :.'u g~.~' ..
.P~iformlj.~lif~;L.,:.,_ 4'rK7 ~$;l ..26.1 '9,6 2l~9 [3.eY& i .... ...~..... g~~.',=: ~i~~f-
.o~'-ay f~t9HBXu'... _ 0;[>9_ (PH Q,11 (X11 0.50 031, ff:2~ir .."
lrich;~meil'tell~ej~~;gk..-~~:.f> HJ~;~ 1.0 (PI: Fl-2Jl ;(h4i: 1:7 g.~;'c ~5j;)f5:
'PFHlCtOP' ... ..,c"'''.' 1:;000. t:otfO'f:.fYOO 1.00.0 jifxf10 1MiQO 1,Qlt.fl _. ~:iQ'G,Q
;CohtrQl:1:}~t~y..._\~-~,.::::.: "1~~'ii2:$4i9>' ,2'7/Q, :.$D:OfOD<5$S"O-..?9.:~'-""' !Y~~(
Lane G[oa,p;1.P$;,:.,....., .... F.-cfJ"m .. Cd .. F.e :0 P::
Ah....p...roaCh lDeiau;.m "83.'3 .. ..-R9.7" ... 7:2;"8, .....i u~~;2;
If l __.. .., . ... ....... ..._<:..' ...... ,.'. .._..
...- .-~-.
Appr6iich tOS ....... ...FG ...~_ Jr'
67
u:? u
Q;;~1.
.A
. .
,
n.
-
'.. ...
. .... ..
@
c.....'~n"l:.(!'1.I"I(ur
\R:~;?'I}.4JJ.J:JU.
f~;l!C{~<!g~~A~1~4;$~t~mg:;;~g~~){f,,9:~_at:~~~tiUg$\1~mp~~2kL;pl...tti;1p;...
Short Report
Page2of2
Intersection Delay 70.1
Copyrigh!@ .2005 University of Florida. An Rights Reserved
Intersection Los E
HCS+1M VerslOn5;2 Generated: 6/2912006 4:21PM
@
file:/lC:\Docnments.ahd Settiul?:s\Rhonda\Local.Settirii!s\Tentd\s2.k2&Ltrri-o
6/29/2006
Short Report
Page I of2
SH ORT REPORT .'
General Information Site Info rmation .
..
Analyst. Motorist Design Intersection 510. & 66th Ave
Ag~ncy 'Or Co. isolated ~ Optimized Area Type . Alfptherareas
Date P~rformed 4-1ane CR 510. Jurisdiction AM2007 Postf;Jevelbpnfent
Time Period Analysis Year
VQlume<anCl Tirnin~lnptit -c- -c-
.... . ..
EB .... \N8 NB sa
-.
LT TH RT LT I8 RT LT TH RT LT. IH RT
Number of Lanes 1 2 0. 1 2 0. 1 1 0 1 1 0
Lane Group L TR L TR .L, Tg .. L TR
"
VQ1urrte<(vph) 316 458 31 3.1 2-V9 80 227 104 95 31Q 400. 67
0/0' He<;iVY Vehicle.s 2- 2 2 2 2 2 .. _moo :2 2 g
2 2 2
.... O.eo 0.80. 0:80. 0.95 o;~5 0..9.5 oHt4 '0.:84 'o.i'9'1 " o.,g,f (t~1
PHF QJJ'4
Pretito~dlf.9illated ( PIA) A A A A .A A A A A- A .A A
.. .. ... -. .,-..... ..
~tEltWP l.ostTime a.o 3;0 .._"... .. 'S. 0 3.(j) 3.(J 300 $.() $l(}
... ...
Extension of Effective . .
.4iJ 2..0 2 0 2.0. Z(j): '2.(); '>2,-0: ;,?;O
Gr~erl . ... ......, n- 7.
An1val'Type ?i- a .'., .. ( ,..,. . . 'j.
3: 'S 3 .. '3 '3
Qlilt~~n$i0n :to ,----, .. 3,0 aO ~.(;! .,. ., ,3:0 ~;Q_. :$;:()f.
... f~.g-
~,~~I~!K~B;fQg 0 ,., -," C)': --- "'-.- ,., ()
VoIUm.e ;(:); P () J)! () () tQ; I) .. /(t
..i ..'.. -, ;.,..
k~n~V~{ifu":.., ,.--..... ]2d,<fL 1~;() y,.g;q;; 'k2~f!: :, :~2;~!t, d{~:(j ..-... .. /l~JlJ ::~1~~q. ....
,
..... :" ~ ...- -
.. ....-...
.l'a!Ri". '. fGladetParkin. .-.'.-' 'AI .. 0 N .; ; 'rl )(); tV., AI" (l, N: N <:'~'" .w
...."...,. 11.9.,..,.., ,. .'".. , . 9
F.~tj9'fHf:)ur ..,. ..... -~:::.-'. ., " ..... ~
,
-. .....,.-..:,. ..
atis~~!gp-~IH()uJ. ... ..... '~ 0' ~ .tlf Q (Oi, '(j
. , ... ...
,.. ...~
MlmJm,llro:'pe9'fi~rl91n..Tjm~ $;.2'~ '. ~..z~ .. .' :i~:~i .. .'
., ..n. .. .......
?haW,bif 'EXc[[eft E;WPenn .: 03.... 04: L.ExctJieft.: .,N.$Bem)':: JJl... :..':Q~r ,.
. . - . ,', ", :,"..,~'';':,,.,
,(5;='. 11- 1- .(3' QS"t). G'7" .' ,6,,,,,; \3=. 1 2.2 C,l.:... ',~:J'" ':Sf:: .. ... '.<3";:;:, .....
"t" .:. .n__.
Jlm'lng ...
'i';:.i-',t9-'. y;:;; 5;1 Y .# f[?J,,- ;y. 4:'8 .". y- o: '''( .- ., -., .. Y;;~
- c,....-_ ...
-,
Odfauoij'Qf -Analy$isi\:1rs; :::Qi:1~ Cv~I~.l.;tiJO}!:1tn;0-7 :7.:f)oi(a
.Laiie,:G.toitp:Cana(;i.tv;,:CQritrQI.O~lav.andFl~S"D~t~rrrfinat1p'h.. '.. " .. -- "
... --~..
,.,-,.:.:'...., .,i. ,.. >'" ......., .....c..... J;Ef 'WB'~...' ..... ;NS , .,.. " "'-- :~'pl,'.
".,.......,.. .. .... . .... ,. - .- .-
AdJuste~ FIQwRate 395 611 ?j 304' .,..."c ~:7(j t1.&~_.,' . .. '~4't ..." ''57,fjc-
.. .
i.,<;ltl~"G.rQup' C~pa'Oity 790. ....... ,. ;270 ,. 765 2-72- ,~t~ ;~lJ.c~:, :9~.?
3.99 ..", ., ..,.,,",
YlGif:{~tlO (fQ9 0.77 im12' OAO '.".-FiC (K9~;, q!:~3' Qdfr (Mt?
... . .... .,. '.' ...
@.~een.RCitJp QJJ9 O~$9.. 0.22 CUI9 ...--. .GI32'. '0,49 fh32
0..22 ...
,~bi~_~'Del~}'Al,. $4..4 ~6.,4 . ~{)f7 $3. G .... ,- 2JIiO ?&':6:.... .... 1~..1,,_ 8~;4-
., Q~I~Y,f~Clt~ tJ..4~ Q.(J2 q/11 QA1 GA9: p:1 1 ',...,........ P:20 0:48 "
. . . ."
fncremeRtalDelay'dz 4f;$ 4.,8 .q.~ 0.3 52;4 ();3 - .. ,2.(0 .81.3
,_..,_...... . -. .
PFJ;t:\~1' - 1 ~:OOO 1.000. .. 1;oOl!), l.fJ06 1Hi(j(j ~dj~() 1(~O()Q . (POC)
G'~~QlP~I!;lt cc.':. ........ ,7l;i7 41.?_ .. ... :~()f9 :3.3.2 ,. !80.4... ;25.:9 .... 21.1'-" JJ4..8
... ...
7' _...n ". ___..._n_._ .-. .. ~.
La.tl:~(Sr{;lUp J.;~$ D c ,0 .' F (c E.
t~p'pt'oachDelay"..'.. 55. 9~.O .. ~80...'. 48.6
1 .... ......'. 1>,..-' . .. .-... ','_""C..
.~~ptp?~h{tOS.... .f3 .. ... C . 'ft.' -. , 'U..'
.' . . ..' ... .. .
..... ~ ..., -".- .-. .... . ..
'~ll~it1~;\[)o:qpm~l1t~ ahd $'~tUpg~\Eh.o~~\.L~9'~.$ettiJlJtsyremp\s2.k2:61~!,nip..
/\
@)
. fi129f2006
Short Report
Page 2 of2
Intersection Delay
50.5
IntersectionlOS
HCS+™ Version~t2
D
Copyright @2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
Generated, 612.9/2006 4:36 PM
@
file:lt(J;\Docul11ents:AP4$~ttmg~~P4g{:).\L()~m:$~ttll1gs'\TJ:n1p\s2.k:Z(tLitI.nP,
6/2911006
Short Report
General Information
Analyst
Agency or Co.
Date Performed
Time Period
Motorist Design
Isolated MfJx Times
20.0.6
VolUme and TimihQ 1l1Dot
.,
LT
1
L
41
2
0.90
A
3.0
EB
TH
1
TR
20.6
2
0.90
A
3La
2:0.
Z(J
SHORT REPORT
.. Site Information
Intersection
Area Type
Jurisdiction
Analysis Year
Page 10f2
510. ,&66th Ave
Aft othet ateas
PM 2007 Predevelopment
we
RT LT TH RT LT
0 '1 1 a 1
L TR L
129 58 397 240 237
2 2 2 2 2
0.90' 0.98 0.98 0.;98 0.95
A A A A A
3.0 3,0 3}) ..
~.O 2.0 2,0
....
.
. ,
Number of Lanes
Lane Group
Volume (vph)
:% Heavy Vehicles
PHF
Pretim~d/Actuated (e/A) .
Star'tupLostTirne ..
.Extension of ~ffe.Gtiv.e
Green
ArriyalType .... ...... 33 .... 3. 3 3 3'- 3~ . .s'"
UrHfEXtkmsion "3:0. Ul[) ,3.03,0 3,,0 ax) '?;(:),$..lj .,....~~
:'fJ~I~*~RTb.R!VOIQme 0 '0.0 0 '000' o~,in: .. eli' iO':
J,:-aJ'l~:W1dltt . 1~Jj 1,r;2JJ '12,0 1:2;;0 '12;Q. ]'g;.i):"" ;'1g;~; ;i'(~JQj1
'f:>af@~giGiadetParking;1V .... .'0 N ,.'N D, tV. N" '0.: N JV; 1). ,Hf
"Pi;lt~i09lHQur .... .. c.,,~~.: ... ..
~:(;~:~~_P .'~; ._..... ..q:f~ 0 ..' ~..a..
:Rhasmgt, , ..EXd.i,tefk ,:EW Perm ... ...ns .. ..' '04 ;il;XcLU~ft i"NS::l?~tm~J: -;07
'l1mJri9. .G.v. -....__=.~~..~....;.~.:~.......'.c .:.c.'.........._=..~.fj.'.....5.....1......() ... :~......._'=. ..,~.....:._:-=..... G - fAD "G.:: 40JO::a:~
I 't i'i!V iJ 'II Yo,,,,, 4,8 Y::;'$' ..._.IY';;:
:.o,Ufg\lpnJ>.fAnalvsl'S.;(hrs "=F0~2.s;' .... ....,..,....... .._.... ..u,:CV9Wfl,;cehg{IiG':"';
.L,~Jle Gt'QUPC(lriilQltv. eQnfrpf [)el~i~",al1~L..OS'beterlll.inati()rf.":..'..__ ..,.
, ...' ...~a WB - Niji , .. $13,
{Adjln;teaf'lowR~t~: . .,' .. ...... 46 .$h2 ,. ... ..!?~ Q5Q .. '247 '429 .'.128; '26:1)'
:Lane.Group Capacity--" 1'?fJ 719 3f!T 72Q '.c :$q3'f!1fYZ21;536
'VlGB.atlo .. .... tL2:2f 0.$,2 0;19 o.~o O.lO .i:i,'lgi' 0/&8 '0:.1(9;:
'GteehRatio: . 0:51 . 0.4:1 O.lit. OA10.4P f1;:$tJ ...... Q;Y1;'(iO;~();
'1.Jn.if9rm DelaY'Pl .... ~4i~ 2'9; if ...18.2 ~o;4 S;!::?, __1~\7 .'_u_ ~:~,g.. ~~~~;
(Delay Factork. 0: n '0:12 .. ..... 0,1.1 .... f).~2 . ... .. q;.?7- ,. :t!.~~. .. 0:-t7 .. ~,iiq.
11l1~retnel1tal Delay.d2 .(),-70,T 0:.2... '1-.4.7 '. .a..tl..lk1. It,8,.Qf'{
~pFFactor 1.0(/0. tOOfl' t'Qoo j,OO()1,.QlilO. .,~'Qtlri 1,000. '1ioOlJi
'GbhtroibEHay . .24.'9' . >:29.<8 1804 'p:1.24$;J$;50;?; ?$.~;$.~i~;
:tah~Gf()l;lP LOS C C SD D p.G: '" Ii):
'1)J:l,prQ.~C}hP~lay ....;.. ,29.3 48A .... 4811 .. -"&~.fL
ApPt'L~~hl,~~ ,C ...0 · ........ ......jfJ.. .... ......'.,0".
NB
TH RI
1 .0
TR
3~8 5.4 ....
.......'.-.
2 2
a.~2.... Q~Q6
A A
:HJ
2,D
"
nletIlC;IDoCUlllentS!and$el'tmlls\lU1enda\LocaJ.,Settin\!1sXTemn\s2k2E.C;tm-n ..
sa
LT TH RT'
1 J a'
t TR.'
114 190, 43
2 'g; 2'
,0.89 ; (k8~(HlS
At A~_,.. A.,
.... .-
3.0$,0;
2.,0.
g,i!
a :
~ig,
... ~j~R
G'!:: ,c;".:..
Y':;;:
1<ftJJ
@
6n~b,Qh(i
Short Report
Page2of2
Intersection Delay 42.6
Copyright @ 2005Universlly of Florida. All Rights Reserved
IntersectiOn LOS D
HCS+™ Verslon5~2: Generated: 6/29/~006 5:13 PM
@
.til~:lIe:ID.QCUrilints..fuid Se:ftili.gs~on:dai\LocalSettilu~s\Te:mD\s2k2EG.1:mn
.6~Yt2tt06;
Short Report
Generat..lnformation
AOCllyst
AgencY9rCo.
Date Performed
Time Period
Volume,ano Timin~lnput
Motorist Design
Isolated
2006
Number of Lanes
LT
1
L
44
2
0~90
A
3.0
2.0
......
EB
TH
1
TR
206
2
0.90
A
3,0
SHORT REPORT
Site Information
129
2
0;90
A
2,'0
RT.
o
\..T
1
L
58
2
0;98
A
320
Intersection
An~El Type
Jurisdiction
Analysis Year
WB
TH. HT
1 0
TR
397
2
0.98
A
3:0
.241
2
D.9S
A
2,'0
2.0
'.
510 & fJ6.th Ave
AII'bth~wareas
PM.'2007.Postdevelopment
..NEf ..... .. ..
LT TH RT
11 ,.0
LT.R
2373lJ2
2: Z
.(f9f3 (fgS
A 11.
~,~ ....3)0.
54
,g
0;1)$
A
Zj')
:f~~Q: .
I..Clrle(?rQUP
Vqlt!01te{VcPh)
0/0 Heavy V.ehicles
pHf
gr~mmedlActUC1ted (piA)
Startuplost Tirne
~Extension o.f Effective
Gteert .
Arrivat1iY'pe 3,3 '" . 3 3 :8 ,j ',e ,$C'$;'
JJhJtiE>5t~I]*:I9f1 3;0 3:0 3,0 3;0 tHJSU): $!lit$:;Q
':p,e,~!Blk~mt<:>B:VOI\Jlil$..O p '0 00 (), Jof '0 I ,0 .0 c." ; II
"aherW6clth'=':.. J'2.Q1Z;0..... f?!;lJ 12.0 '1~lfi! figItJ I; '\?,j:ij y~?;~;
pjtl~rrj'gr~~~WP,arKfng.u ,N 0 N.N.. fJAr ..'N:..' "'c(j ,fjJ<1'fl~'."'i'g~.::> 7i::
',e~lirigtHp.ur ..:: ,......._' U,'u"u
'J~Y'S:StoPslBQ4.F ..;' .. ... ;'() e . ... lj;(j) '~.1 :()J 'f:F:'" ',Jr:~. ..
.,P?qe:~ttiAA:Ti~ 3.2 :$;2 'rf.~r"" , --, ...!r1;:~. - .U.
J~tia~ina:lacttetf:EW Per-rll 03'04: .. )Excl. LeffN,$1l?i9:iJri :"";()Jl,;.,,,~a
<388 G 55 0 GG;:;(3,::c9{(); )~5:;L2tQi:Q:~;G ~ :G';:::
'_~~~~:(;~~'~$;'. y~ ...... . y-.. ...Y~#'~::~~nriDJ;~'1..HJ.;~r:. ........
i(.an~J'SrQUP'Capacltv.C(.mtrQI Dillav ,andL05: Oet~rmin;;ltJ,()n
>-""":'\':--"--'-'--~'-<- - 'El~: :\NB NB.
:'."'..,.".. ..... .... . ..". u '.'.". .... 'u,... ....... ..... ....
A<ljusted Flow Rate 49 372 .'59651 i2#'!['Jt.$@'u
Lan'e Gro4pCapacity187 719397720 1I&*g'9~I
'Vie Ratio.. 0.26 0.52 '0.'1'5 0.90 (;Dli1; 0;'130
'(Steeb R~tio 0.51 0.41 0.51 0.41 ............ 6J40' ~.3tf
!il;9jf9rl')'l!!t:l~IE!yd1. . 24;3 29.11:8..2 36.5 ~Z;:7:' f12;f1. .............
,Pi~jt3YFfl$tor~ ~,1r 0.12 ..... ... ... 0.11 GAS Oi.'27' l');'$4
i~!1P~em~fltaJDelay. d2 b.B 0:7 0.214.ff" r-g{;~ i '8~14
:PF FaCltor . . ... 1.000 LOOO 10.000 1.0()0'l,~;Q~Q 1,Jj(jQ'
C01'ltrolD~lay 25.1 29,81:8.451A' ... .........;,#(2.' \5,1.2
j~f1~Gr(}lipLq$ ....... Oc:$ 0" 'YjJ n 'f)
_t:Pl?PP<.3Bl1Qe,l~y ...' 29.2 .48.9'.. ....,-.4~.7 . .......
,~PRr2pgh LoS c tJ .. ...... '.- ..'. "". fJ)'
..
flle://C :\Ddcumelltsartd. SettihIls\Rhonda\LdcalSeuinQsVl?emn\S2k2ET:H:mn"..
L.T
(
'(.;.
114.
.2
:Qi~9:
A.
~~Q
'., m~'. ...,
'58
TH
t
T.R
1-92
2
O;8~'
A
$:.9
2,0
io
Page 10f2
RT
o
44
',2
OJ1.9'
A
Xl;
.... SB.'
~;j;2tJ '~65, '
A.,.., J;$.~
,,:lq~~J!' Qi,~~
Q~?P
......~~~3
_n.
0:,1'1-
fA?
fOGO
K39io'
fJ
.37,,2
"'.",1)"'-
.
..
cNo
29,3
'0018
...4;~
to(JD
" 33~4-.
........ C
,
.
@
61'NJZf/j}(1{{
Short Report
l-'age 1 01' 1.
I Intersection Delay 42.9
Copyright.<<:> 2005 UniVersity of Florida, All Rights Reserved
Intersection LOS 1 D
HCS+™ VeIDion 5.2 Generated: 6/2912006 5:14 PM
@
..t':.l~ .1Ip. \n,:.;;"il"W;.i....... .bi-itt,QpfffnO'!:i\'R;hArtib:i\T,d)MLSettinlis\Temo\s2k2.FR.tfu.o
'Q/2:9ta.nObi;
Two..Way Stop Control
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Site Information
Intersection
Jurisdiction
General h"ifonnation
Analvst
AQencv/Go.
Date Performed
Analvsis Time'Herlbd
Motorist Deslcm
2D06
P.roiect Description
EastJVl,fest Street "Barber
Inte(~ectlon Orientation::. Ea$t<-West
\f~hicle V6UJm.esand.Adiustmehts
MaiorStfeet . .. .. . Eastbound
Movemenf 1 2
L T
2~3$
QJlO D,M
2 375
2> -
..
1\l61tirne (vehfnf ..
P~~~~HourFaCtotif>HE
HoudyFlowiRate;Hfll
;yen/h)
Per~efJ.tH~.avY' V'.gb)<;ies,.
rv"eqI~n"fvpe
ftTChanh~Jl~et:f
l1~tles,. ...., ..../0:.. ............
C9n:figuraUoo.;' .... L.t
UDJm . ....si~nil"
;', Jt..~m..)t!L.'... ...
MJrt6jiStr~tC::~::'.m" ..... ... .....
.IMQv~i'rl~nt.. ""; ']."
n .. ..1::
ito.lllthe t'1iehlhl.:;,'"""
'~~i.iJ(4~.r~~aa0t6ti;:J~~.flF~', : ..:,' fl~~f(t-'''C'.'' ....-.
~~~i\ti'PlPWtRat~,Jtl:rgr:: ; >":0
1~&tQetirHe$vv\lgblCle~: :() ..
l1ief~prGra!je.r{Pfif .... ... .. ..... ...........
f.%1?fe.~AP.PfQ'~CBj.. ;.....
.''StQ'f~g~':.' m ....
trnCt(filnn?1il'ecf .'.>'
\(?:il'ie.s '. ,.. . ..()
CopudiJij;ili66- .
tJeJaVi.;Queue Lengtb fcmCl.>~ev~loffS.ervlce
~ijRt:<ia,gh. ..."-!;~$l&pYnd'WeS,tbcOllnd
~~v:~m~uL .... .... T4
~~ne'Go/'lngutatlC?rt ...... 1/[
~{y'~h~ 2
G 1m) I~t)lDY .. ........t4tJ?~.
Vie'. ... .....,QJ.Q()r.
~~\%igJj~\1~xl~ngfl;l.:,,;: ~;:ftii() =
~Q#t(p!iP~lli~{~tQ.etil.. 4fj
L(i:1$; . '-'. ... ,A ..
..
.
1
tJ
ijotttJb.ound
8
... .................1I
.... "..
.
odiO
o
o
Q
N
n_ _"_
()
v
..
IAnalysis Year
.
Page lof2
BarberDrivewav
.... .
4.M2Q07.
PQstdeveJooment
-""
North/South StreeLSlte.Piivewiiv
Study Period (hts);....O.25
m
3
R
4'
L
0.90
o
... 0:'90
Q
...
o
Undlvlq~tt:; .n
o
o
J)
.... .
Westb.ound
"';:5
T
~.4$.: h
-.... ;O~;:~Q~
1'$2
.....+ ......
6
R
h '1
f),90
1
.,.
-::- --c
1:
.:;(J
h ':0:
'.' ,., tlJ::t
... ....
hm:.:.. ..':."i,(l ;
>". - .~.::-(~t.1nit1ll)wi:t>.
.:10.
~,<";,"s.",,..';,">'.
._"e-",~",.,.::""",,,
:9
0.'.
.f"\"
L
......6
~~(J
.~
....
.
029.0
o
o
2
o
o
,.'~'..
......
0. :
....
.
."
Northboung:
7 8~r
. ..'
...
..:.
h. ....
..
.
., .
,
. .... .m..
n.;.le!I1C~\D;ocuments'an.....d;8~fting$XRhonda\LocatSettln.gs\TemD\u2kI7J\;;tmti.
. . " ,,'. - . .. ,.,. . .'. -' - . . - ,., ~.- '-. '.
"'1<.:..,::'..:..:':'\"'".
i ;~
,.....fJiS,(j) HH.' ..
_."...~......
Q:
".'l~ .....
~,.
d~D.';
'n.Ol'iV
"2 . ... .
'0-'.
1'f
.'ii
'."
.".,
n,."
4:
;t.t:Ff. ... ...
q9:i;1.~D~QYDft.:.";,.:;:,;;.: ..rr
't01ijf!'f2"
'i -,.llflf{:",,_
.)t~f._ ~'_ ....
L]~~~'-I
'~;:f~::
i.fJi.@,f!! P
1:0;3' ;
B< ::
\ ;;;;
//
61291~o.(m
Two-Way Stop Control
~ _. pproa. C.h D, .,elay
slveh)
pproach LOS
Copyrighl@2005Un\V?lJllyofFlprida. All Rights Reserved
@
J
Page 2of2
1Q.3
fJ ,.
j
HCS+TM Version52
f"lle':/lC:\9Qcu:meiitsand SettingS\Rl1onda\Local Settings\Temp\u2k11J\.>.t:tn:n
... ,
Generated: 6129/20.06 6':03 AM
6t1iiJl2006
TWO-WAYSTOP CONTROL SOI\llMARY
Site Information
Intersection
urisdlction
Two- Way Stop Control
General Information
.,
~nalyst
IAgency/Co.
Date Performed
lAnalvsis TimepenOd
Motorist Design
2006
.
Project Description
EastIWest s.treet:13arber
IOterseCtion Orientation:. East,.West
Vehicl~ Volumes and Adlustments
MaiorStr~et Eastbound
M6ve.ment12
Ln. T
9 22'1'
0.90 0.90
I. .
10 245..
VQIUI11e:(Vehlhl
Peak-HourFactOf. PHF
Hourly Flow Rate; HFR
vehlh1
~etcen{ R~avyVE~hiplep
Median Type
RT Channeliied ..... .
j..'$h~ ........ .'.
tr':;;:...: ..... ................. ....
lyvnfiglJ~tloh
l)p,,$tteam $Jgri.~K.
M'nor'$t~f:~:.... ... .. ..
mo*em~t ., ......
2
..
o
LT'
:1:
(j , .....
NofttiliijO'hd
j:
7
L
,
., "
.'. ..'
\,tdlume(venIJ11 . :...
: Pijak'iH9lJt;E~aptiPHF
~~~glf"lt)w'Rafe;,HFR'
RercenfHeaVy'VehlCles.
l?,efcenf$rade'(r~}.' ...
Elpred f?p'prQ~pf:j
:$tb'fage
~T Ch;;in~lIt~R:f'>
[~hes;" . ". D..... 0
~Qnfi.g,qr~rp;9;'f ....'.:. ~: -......-,
DeJay .:Q'ue'iie l.eijgthiand~Levelof,Servlce
I:\pprO'?~l)I ... Eastbol.lilCl .'. .We~1~9tiDo
MoY~m-ehf' .... > . '1",# .........
J1~neqon~g4i';3gQb .. LT . .~.. ..,....
y(vehih)'.1j) ..
C (m) (vetl/tl)" 1123
ylcO.01
95%qUe.u~l~n~th OllS....
Control,Pel~Y {$lyeh}8,'.1!
LOS .... y ....A ...... ... ..... .'. ......
0,90
Ol9Qi
..'
()
.. ...
lJ
o
..0..
O.
:N
tJ
..." "
.
.. .
fA.naJy~is 'year
Pagel of2
..
8arberDriVeway
PM20()7
PostdeveJopmenf
NorthlSouth Stre:eti".,$iteDriveway.
StudvPeriodi(hr$J:.. .o.2S
.. _'.'"T,-" .....
I' ':,(1;
.'""'"~;c_",,,~ .~c';$"~tnhfjCiimd' ..... .. :'.' "':.,. ~:'::;'.':. ..
. .
3
R
.4.
:L
0.90
o
......
0/90. ......
o
0,
... .. VhCfJVk$ffc( "..
()
.(J
t)
.
.."'. ........
JL
. ,{" ,.
....~;(J: ...:"
];.
....,,,.;;~
11.90, ;.i>,>,~' " ."~tiJ~a;
.". ...,...,.
() ;g.
...........0
".
~,
...
.
d
(f,
. D
'.
7:
NorthbOUnd
@ .....
9'.
'.
':
. .
... '.".. .'"
.
...
.
... . ., .,
. ,.. ... . ...
'..
Jile':!lC~\D6~ume.nts:'.and.Setti.~I$~~Pl1~~~RRfljrS~~~1$~>:t'.nmp\~Jgi,~,~)~W.R', .
.. .
:
.V\lestbound
5
T
.. .$fJ1if'..
0;9.0
431
-'.':... -"--.......~:
..... ..
-. '{:
T:
.. :~Q:
'tJyglf)
ifl
""2'.
0.
'TV.
:'9:
l'
iUtfJ ..
i1J)
.
.. ...
';:..,C.
.
...
... .
6
R
6.....-
0.90
6.
~-
'0
:0
..:r.:R.:
.,...,. ....
.~
1'1
..:::..:,}l~
.-... ~R
5
,:Q:~Q:.
..
5
- :2
-.-.,:
....
....
.".
,..
...
.... ."
u.. .
. '.. c..,.. .,.
$OtlJbPQqn~;
1,1 : 1'2
(t7JjJ:.....;.:' .,
c.,..... "'
.ff ...........
f.. ~,l,~L:,.
'Qff1'4.f
(P~PJ;.. . ...
..1?.J
.8,.,
.
.. ........;.:.//1\
(V
6~9ti,OO.6.
Two- Way Stop Control
~.. ppro. a Ch.. Delay
slveh)
pproach LOS
Copyright@2005 Uniirersilyof Florida. Au Rlghl$ ReseNed
Page 20f 2
12,1
B
I
HCS+™ Version 5'.2
@
,flle:/lC:\DocUtrieIitsaild Setting~\RhO,na~\tocal Settir\~\Te~p\u2kl~.8.):rrip
. .... . '-'--,, ......'.' ." , '.
. Generated: 6/29/20Q66:02 AM
61:2912~Q&
o
'<t
.0
o
C')
.c:: :m.
":';'.0
~ ,~:
@". ",<>J:.
I~I
:S.ID Ii) .0 '<t 0
..0) Too o. C') '<t 0 '<t
.- ."-' 'N~ N
q:::' ~....... . .......
"0:
3:.L: ,
o g>."".:o. 0;. I'-
B 0 (O~: IX) b 00>
V) 1::C').,.... C') :.-: <')
Q) }-
~;
.....
'<t
N
r-
0)
C')
'<t
~ C') 1.0 .(O'<t co
.Q) 1.0 Rl,()oO 1.0
...J .,... .:r:
co
1.0
Ero 1.0 ..-.t ::~ 0>
.Q).....~: No 0 N
0::. :'r'". 't""!': .'1;.;-:; ~
ID
N
'''(''-
-0 .
c.':;::'.' ..
is g>;t.o 1.01'- '.~
.~ .@:'~ ,~..~ :3
.tN;J-,
(0
.00
N
(0
o
eN
''<;j-
4=.. fo.,. tricj) ";t 0 ,.... "",.
.,21'.:."(').. e....C')~ ."<if C')v
. :r-
.c
to
'.1::,' . Lbv
0) 0) .0 ..'r .t!;o ~. or'- ~.
-ii!C')' \Fv:r:
'P
11~~~~O~N~
:~ e' ~:~: ~p~.q ~
... ~
~:~ ~'~'~ :pt;t, ,~
1;.1.. r
1;,g~ibM ~
.I:;)':eNO~ ..0
:1;~.0 ;i'_, ~
. .'., .. !<t
q::: ,(0 ,lJ),.1'- i'<t r- r-..
Q) ',.':"'"'9 NbC>!?. 'm
.;:.J:Nr eN:;...; . ,,. {';j
CON
l().-q- <<>
<') <')
(1)
E
.::) -0 0
o c Q) .It=
> ow ~,
t i8 .'~. r-..
Q) ,~. '- ..0 .1:5
E .,u '- .0.0) ,~
Q) . ~ .o'(U'O' ,..!;2 .. '0,
>. 'ro '-""'" ..'\-",lE"':"
.0.(1) '0..:;:; 0- . roll:..
.~. . 0:. '~:m b.i= ;S,
g.R :g'l.r:..~ .~' '15 ,~
.,,...,.lJ.. ,+- '3....... I'- Q) -r;....
E:Q5; :~()S ;:6 '0'.6.
;:;:l" .... X """Po ''-0
bo.. w ,c;>. .c;( N o..N
<((Ouo
LULL.(,o
~f,?~h:g..ogdO
0::: .-..,.. IX)
:'0
C..c::
::) 0) , . .. '<t . .
0::) =- '.lC> ....",. '<t' .,.,. 0>' 0)
.0 0',0) ~ ,000.0: 0
-m ..~. r..... .,()j. ~.N' N
S
'4:::..' .,1.0' . . :"t'
Q) ro .0,0> '<to..'",",
-' N' ,N R ,. C')
.~ . ~
..,.,
~.
.:E: -i.O"t .
,g>g;:q ,;.,ga.: g q .'~..
Ii:: .:..... .,...:. .
r.-
~
1:1
c.'J::r
l.i'~ :~~ ~o,~
~+"'"
'~~ ~2.:g'~' .,0 ..~...~': ~
~.
I'()
"t,
,if& .~,'~ ~ o'?$:tn: ~
'0"
iI;~~~~I~~
~iiJ Id "'tif7 ~
F:,o;~ en :~.-..\ "..
0)'Jii) ,.0, (.ria o~m:
~;\' .,.,:.z:...... .,...:'''''';;
-0'
g; ~', . ,JO. ~ .--,tn,,__. ~
':1: ~ :lt~; ~'J ;\\1>>:~; ,~ ;~
.,~.,.N,_..:.:...'..:~.; N-.::'... ..;1;,.,........,.'.. N.';.'. .1'\-
~ J$l!'t .CiJ ;~c"'" ~.@!,
~
~:
_:Jim; {S.
:> ..~ {j). ..',:..'"'-....Q~"....:.....-.t
'E'ro~: F"
e; .c% ($ 'iJ .i
;n).. .:ii: '- r-.,--. ,C::t '5'
'> ro '* ~, 9 1ft: '-:
'?; Q) m ~ p;: -~ ~
'i~fil~l;
>~:mOb'
{U,u...:<:p
~
(ju~0)
~
o
(,[)
o
l.O
(>')
1;
1::.
(0'
E'
::1'
€ ~
00 ,0
.;s:.~. ~
~..,.a.,N
..~ -
='-.
i
"5>...-. ~. '<3" ~ 0 (1) (1)
.-. I.D . ' l.O 0 I,{) l.O
0::::' ...- '.-r:
"'0
't::.r:
::!O>.... ~
o ON(,[) 1'-- ..'<t. 0 M
.00."<:1'.0 1.0 0 0 O:>MCO
,.'iii. .~ N,...: C\I." C\I C\I
", ..... '...-
....~
~
4;;<.0 "<:t
(l)OC)(")goco
..J \.0 -r: 1.0 .~ \.0
0:>
l{)
~...O'. <.0 ,N. ,; ...-. .
0>'0..0 'r:- t:i o. M.
i:EN. -r: N .~. . C\I
..-
(")
C\I
"'0 .
. C :J::
:J'.O>
0.:1 ..
-B8'~
'l!) ;J:::.
(0. '-
UJ~
.'V
,g t"- .~o \.O.li) g
,;,-:0:> .....,; . (1) ..,-
i<p.~ (j) ..~ 0 ~ ..-
'.;.J T"'.,..:..- ..~ . C\I N
i~ '.~ ~. ..~o Iff
'1:1'
illli'!g(~" ~ ~
~ .~.~~ ~ ~c;:i~, ;"<7' !~
\0
.;q-
I~r'~:~. .~6~:.~ .~
lf~~~~"~' g
~.i:~~..~.6.~.. ..~.
(I)
E
.'~c. "$@
>0 .1)). ~
~... .m ~ ,-,t
~. ~ .00 .'~
ui ~.. 5'CU':*,Q:Q'
..~..'. ..~: ..~ ..~. b: ~ .0:
~ .. 0... '" - ..... .''-j::
f~'t .Ii i~
r'Q.: dj..(!) ..q::'Na. N
<tm'd b
Wll..{O
c
c:
..ro
E
:::l
.t:1t)
00.
.~'.'. ..~.
.J::::'~'.~
('0 '<N.
<.0 ~.
@) .:?:
.....
II)
..0
....
.ro
.cp
1:: <.O~
.Ql ~ 0. gj 0
a:. ..- .....,..:
"'0
C,e.
5 0>. to ..;t..
..o5COo..-"<:t
't) .... 1'-- ;,-:0:> '..~.
(I) '.=. ...-
~
~~'~'~,i
i~ ~ .~c!
"'0
li~~~!~
'~. ~, ~ '0..'f,i-;
Q.l.(x)' . "(Q~,
..J ' ~ ....... :.;....
_J~~.~!~
;g ..
'~-g,.,> ,'. ;}~ .
iO, '" C)., ~. .dS ,~.
I~~;'~~
It: ., ~ ." .~
~~;i.~~
~"'O!~~N ~
,!;?l'''"t' '!R!, .:j<t ,'5:,
.~ ... .""'.'~..~i
;0:,
.~. ~!_, ."m:'
.g. :::l:O'~'~ .'*t..
J::' 'e~( ,..JJ ~~ ~;
1::.;.c::. . "..,.."..
~:I-H'
~'~~',~i
'Q),:
E~
",.,
..~...... ;~
,...... (Q'
.-.. '.'...~...
.p '\1)
~' f;f)
~! ,.:i .a)
,0' :m.o,
;in
~ '<t.
C\I C\I
~(Q~
o C).
(>')(")
.J>o.,.
~
..~.:
o . ......
.~'f""<N,
~.~'
,Iii '1;0'
'to :~.
m .,.~.,.:.:.,.
~. ",.
~ ~9 f~~
~ ,t)! ~~
~ ~f
~ i,;.~...'._:....;
~:..".-.
'QI
~~
It I
.~.~:~
~;t;;~
l"'-m,.,t"\i,
~~i~
~;!dli Q lO, f1J. ~ ;~'!
0 :c CO ~ +J_ '<;t:
CO .s::::. w '<;t
0 .Q>CO ~ Cf) ~ 0 Cf) (J) 0> '<;t ~ '<;t 0 l.{) l.{)
l.{) n:: .- .~ T-
'" T- .......
"0 "0
C ..c:: c .s::::.
::J 0) '<;t ::J 0> ..~
0 ::J CO g E :l oo.
.0 e r-.. ~ CO d 00 to 0 l.Q q l.{) 8 <0 (O
..... ;- ..... ..... r
en .s::::. (f) ..c:: .-T-
0> I- 0> I-
~ ~
;l:::: co '<;t ;l:::: ,!Xl: '<;t
C'\I '<;t '<;t
0> ,... ~ .<:; co ~, ~ .3 1.09. 1.0 <:; <0 <0
....J ,... ..- N N
..... ....... ~
.......
l.{)
~. g
N
@)~:{')
.....a~
~. .?:-
.... ::s
~.-,
:5.;\:<<) ~?ti:j .~ .f.-.. .~
~. ;r--
ll~ ~;~ ~
;a: '
.~. ~ :!';~~.
:CMCO..-; (J) C'\I
0>,0 ~ ....... 0 OO.N'" M
((.- ...........,: ....... .....
~:~~* :~
p'
C.s::::.
8 ::~"".~ 'V. .:~
~; ~ T-'......~. .~. ..~.
:m'~
.L1J'I""
'i'ro ;.;rg Q) ..;t
4.1';.::r'!"':~
"0
c..c::
::JO>
0':;] .
~.e (")
(f)J::
&]1-
.0:=.. r-.. ..oCO <O~ <0. 0)
tI> 0 ...- 0 0 N C<), N
~.~:~ ~ ~ -~ -~
co '<;t
o,M~d~
.,-. -~
~
'......:
~.~. ..~ ...~ :~.o ifi.'. to :~.
'.0;: .'t- ..-.:
'-0
c..
::J,& ... .. .d 'V .. ....
o ::J'. N .j:Qco 'V-o:i ..'!;f. ~
.t:l..o. 0 P. !Po ,....~. .~. '
J::. ,,.. 1';.... .....1"- ... . co .0): _,
+:.::.-Je .. - ~
5P.
U)
I.t).
o
Z::>'. <>
....... N
@):~M
.J.:.'i;
I;::::
~, ..
~';9~:'R~~
())
3 (i:i.! (r>' ~6N
?r
I'S
.... ~
;WCb'~ '.4;.. ~'.QN'
f..
-c
c .x:
:;] en. : .."" g.....'
.0::; '~. ..co. "-.'... ..... ."'...... :
'-.0 0.. (") '0.....: : . ,l.Q Jr.
. ..0.' ~ .0)(")
€ 1:'. T-...... ;-. ~ ..;-
bI-
Z
N
~:
~:
i.O ro ..,.,....,q- ..,*... .0.
O:=l"-Om'*ON(O(>')
....JIJ) N..:" ...:: N 0, .... '" . .'. "'....
- - ~ -''' T-- ' . ..
Q)
E 0
::J ."O.~'.=':.
.-0 c~. 'tij.
> g :~0
'Ero > t
CD (/)...(1) :"--0 .~:
E .....0 Q) .."...,
CD ~O '(W'O' ;20
~ ~ '0 ~0:::1ij at
.~Q.;ro_ ........;c
g>.d, g;~'m ..~ ..~ ~.
.- Yo: :;:; '3. ;e .r,.; )1} ,..",...
.E (J) .!1q '6oO'p
.j3. a~(5 .~. .g>,o:>W
;:IJ).
:,E
o.
is C:
>g;
~. <U,
:IJ) 'IJ):..
iECfi
(I). ::fit.....
~ ro: .8
o Q)~
~ ,aLL.
ilil
<( (() 00
wu:.ti>
~,l:o (:>CO :tjj,~,t!)
C'\I co
1"-(0.""
NN
l.(').
T-
lb.
.......
w(o'''''
iX).. .. . .Q)
'4;"- ~
(0; ,<0
: :.t'\l'.CSI
~ .~
0: ,P.
~:
M
,."".
1'0'
~'.-..~,
.cj
IE
'(1)'
.;.L,.;.;:
h
.:1:).: .'. -.'.u.
":<1) - .'4>
III
@
@
JOSEPH W. SCHULKE. P.E.
JODAH B. BITTLE, P.E.
WILLIAM P. STODDDARD, Ph.D., P.E.
SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C.
CIVIL & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING. LAND PLANNING. ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING
Ms. Jan King
City of Sebastian
1225 Main Street
Sebastian, FL 32958
i
February 20, 2006
Re: Project Name:
BIDSTOLLAKESTOWNHOMES
SITE PLAN AND PRELIMINARY PLAT
Dear Ms. King,
Enclosed, please find twelve (12) sets of revised site plans for the above
referenced project, and the following responses to TRC comments addressed in your
letter dated December 6, 2005:
1. All plans have been changed to reflect new name "Bristol Lakes" Townhouses
& Subdivision.
2. The access on Bristol has been removed (this was initially indicated to me by
staff as a preferred alternative).
3. Acknowledged. All dead end streets have been removed. To eliminate the
easternmost dead end, we have added a new emergency access on the east side
of the Barber Street frontage. We met with John Duran ofthe Indian River
County Fire Department on January 31 to review the new configuration and
access, and he agreed that it is acceptable.
4. A turn lane on Barber Street is not required by code. Please see attached copy
of city code and our traffic report. The code indicates the need for a turn lane
if the project exceeds the following thresholds:
Left in: 30
Right in: 75
Our traffic report indicates only 18 left in/12 right in.
5. Sidewalks are not required internally, and therefore may be less than 5 ft. The
external sidewalk on Barber Street has been revised to 5 ft. width.
6. Internal roads only need to be 22 feet wide. Attached, please see the copy of
city codes (section 54-3-10.7, and others) citing the width requirement.
1
1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201, VERa BEACH, FLORIDA32960
TEL 772 I 770-9622 FAX 772 I 770-9496 EMAlL infoliil.sbsenaineers.com
@
7. Attached, please see the copy of city codes. Parking spaces that are adjacent to
sidewalks need to be only 18 feet with 2' grass overhang.
8. The project layout has been revised.
9. Parking calculations for clubhouse have been provided.
10. Acknowledged. What additional landscaping? Please advise.
11. A separate erosion control plan and dewatering details/permit will be provided
prior to building permit issuance and subdivision construction permit
approval.
12. Acknowledged. We will have the surveyor update the survey. It will be
submitted under separate cover.
13. Acknowledged. The surveyor shall update the survey. It will be submitted
under separate cover.
14. According to the survey and title work, this sliver is owned by this
development. Attached is documentation from the developer's attorney, Sam
Block.
15. Tract A has been described more clearly and the location has been noted on
the plans. (Tract A area has been hatched.)
16. Cover sheet has been revised.
a. Parcel ill No. has been corrected.
b. Square footage numbers have been added.
c. The flood zone designation has been added.
d. The N.E. Parcel is part of this property.
e. The Type of permit has been changed to "B".
17. Preliminary plat has been adjusted to show corrected density calculations and
building numbers.
18. A complete warranty deed is attached.
19. A new check has already been submitted for the preliminary plat fee of
$1500.00. (Emilio Suaya dropped off a check directly to Planning
Department. )
Response to fire Department comments:
Note: SBS met with John Duran on January 31, 2006 and discussed the revised site
plan. Mr. Duran agreed that the changes depicted were acceptable, and agreed that the
new emergency access driveway on the east side of the site is acceptable.
Specific responses to his comment letter are:
@
Numerical address size will meet minimum Fire Department requirements, and
will be addressed on the building permit plans.
Radii at intersections have been increased to 30' or 35' as necessary. Where they
are 30 ft, a turning radii (35'/55') is depicted on the plan to show that the
equipment can travel the roadway without impediment.
An application for a Knox switch for the gate will be submitted prior to Building
Department issuance.
The fire hydrant has been shown on a "looped" 8" water main that is fed from a
16" water main on Barber Street.
2
If you have any further questions or need additional information, please do not
hesitate contact my office.
3
@
0-0
Chapter IV: Administration of i ---.1 Review and Subdivisions
Article XIX: Subdivision
(2) Intersections. Streets shall be laid out to intersect as nearly as possible at right angles.
No street right-of-way shall intersect another at an angle ofless than :tl50 of900 degrees
unless special provision is made in the design of the intersection. Multiple intersections
involving the junction of more than two streets shall be prohibited unless special
provision is made in the design of the intersection. All intersections shall be designed to
provide adequate stopping and sight distance in accordance with the current edition of
AASHTO Standards. The intersection of any two (2) local roads or streets with a major
collector or arterial shall be separated by a minimum distance of six hundred sixty (660)
ft. from center line to center line.
a3) A~The following location and design criteria sball apply to
intersections. Acceleration, deceleration, and/or tumina lanes shall be rovided b e
applicant at intersectIOns 0 . _ I tor routes if traffic enterin the
SIte equa s or exceeds . (30) vehicles I the peak hour turning left, or seven -five
(75 ve ldes m tee 0 move or projects with significant
c lC over five (5) percent of anticipated projected traffic volume), passenger car
equivalents (PCE) at the rate of one (1) truck equals three (3) PCE shall be used in
determining the application of the above acceleration andlor deceleration lane
requirements. For purposes of this section, any vehicle with three (3) or more axles shall
be considered a truck.
(4) Radii. The point of curvature of any local street shall not be closer than one hundred
(100) feet to the point of intersection. When the centerline of a local street deflects by
more than ten (10) degrees, it shall be curved with a radius adequate to assure safe sight
distance and driver comfort, but never less than a minimum centerline radius of one
hundred (100) feet. Property lines at street intersections shall have twenty-five (25) feet
or greaterradius and street pavement radii shall be a minimum of thirty (30) feet.
q. Street Side Swales. Typical sections for street right of way shall comply with "Manual of
Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance for Streets and
Highways", and shall:
(1) Have a side slope no steeper than 3: I within the applicable clear zone.
(2) Be designed to accumulate and carry water pu
plan in a manner in accordance with Article XIJ
GV ~1tJ L4N~
\2~ \ rzmf91Jc7
(3) Be sodded in right-of-way along full frontage of
(4) Provide proper drainage structures
r. Standards for Roadway Section Construction.
approved road base and wearing surface shall be pre
(1) The construction methods and all materials use
Article shall comply with applicable specificat
materials prescribed by: 1) the current Florida Ci>
Specifications for Road and Bridge Constr \'~~
Association for Water Improvements Com .
Federation for Wastewater Facilities Constrl
Environmental Protection (DEP); Indian River County utilities; and the S1. Johns River
Water Management District.
Lmd Deve10pmenc Code
6/9/2000 9:03 ~vl
Page XIX-35
City of Sebastian
Chapter IV: Administration ofP. J.eview and Subdivisions
@)
Article XIX: Subdivision
ROW width shall be increased by at least 10 feet on each side of any arterial or major
collector road for a minimum distance of 200 feet from its intersection with another arterial
or major collector road or street pursuant to proper intersection design. All arterial and
collector roads shall have a minimum of 12ft travel lane width. Local streets may have a
minimum of 10 feet travel lane.
STREET CLASSIFICATION
MINIMUM RIGHTS-OF-'\-VAY
Arterial Roadways: These roadways move
traffic to, from and through the County.
140 feet
Collector Streets:
Major Collector Streets: These streets serve
to collect heavy volumes of traffic from local
streets and developed areas and distribute the
traffic to arterial roadways.
80 feet
Minor Collector Streets: These streets
collect traffic from local streets and distribute
traffic to major collectors and arterials.
60 feet
Local Streets: These streets provide access
to residential development and distribute
traffic to collector and arterial streets where
commercial development and major
community activity centers are located.
60 feet (if served by swales)
50 feet (if served by curb and gutter)
h. Dead End Streets (cul-de-sacs). Dead-end streets shall be prohibited except when designed
as a cul-de-sac. Such streets shall not exceed the length of six hundred (600) feet in length
except. where natural geographic barriers exist necessitating a greater length approved by the
city engineer. When constructed with a curb and gutter, cUl-de-sacs shall have fifty (50) feet
of right-of-way approach to a 9..Q-foot diameter turnaround circle. When constructed with
swale drainage, cul-de-sacs shall have sixty (60) feet of right-of-way approach to a one
hundred-foot diameter turnaround circle or fifty (50) feet of right-of-way with a dedicated
easement ten (10) feet wide on each side. ,-- y:- 'lP F7
Width of surface course of pavement s I be twenty (20) feet on the a roach and sixty (60)
feet di around. Approac an rn oun shall be constructe m
accordance with this ordinance. If a dead-end street is of a temporary nature, an adequate
turnaround within the proposed right-of-way shall be required. When one (1) or more
temporary turnarounds are shown, the following note shall be included on the plat.
"The area on this plat designated as "temporary turnaround" will be constructed and used as
other streets on the subdivision until [name(s) of street(s)] is/are extended to [name(s) of
street(s)] at which time the land in the temporary turnaround area will be abandoned for
street purposes and will revert to adjoining lot owners in accordance with specific provisions
in their respective deeds."
Land Development Code
6/9/2000 9:03 A..vl
Page XL,,( -33
City of Sebastian
Chapter IV: Administration ofPL _{eview and Subdivisions
Article XIX: Subdivision
intersecting right-of-way lines, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Access
spacing of lesser lengths may be granted if requested by the applicant and recommended for
approval by the Planning and Growth Management Director, the City Engineer, and the
Planning and Zoning Commission and approved by the City Council. Lots shall access local
street network. Driveways on collector or arterial streets will be discouraged.
c. Non-Residential Driveways and Internal Circulation.
(I) Vehicular circulation must be completely contained within the property and vehicles
located within one portion of the development must have access to all other portions
without using the adjacent street system.
(2) Acceptable plans must illustrate that proper consideration has been given to the
surrounding street plan, traffic volumes, proposed street improvements, vehicular street
capacities, pedestrian movements, and safety.
(3) No driveway shall be constructed in the radius return of an intersection.
d. Service Drives. Where a subdivision borders on or contains a limited access highway right-
of-way, or arterial street, the City Council may require a service drive or suitable provisions
for future service drives approximately parallel to and on each side of such right~of-way, at a
distance suitable for the appropriate use of the intervening land~ as for park purposes in
residential districts, or for commercial or industrial purposes in appropriate districts.
Distances involving right-of-way shall also be determined with due regard for the
requirements of approach grades and future grade separations.
3. Alleys. Alleys may be required a10ng rear lot lines of commercial and industrial subdivisions.
When provided alleys shall be paved eighteen (18) feet wide in a minimum 20-foot wide right-
of-way for commercial and industriat use, all having appropriate radii for the use intended.
Alley intersections and sharp changes in alignment shall be avoided and dead end alleys. are
prohibited. Fire lanes shall have a minimum paved width of twenty (20') feet. V '""'1
_~ 170,...
4. Streets. All streets and related facilities required to serve the proposed subdivision shall be
constructed and paved by the applicant pursuant to specifications herein stipulated. The con-
struction shall consist of, but not be limited to, street grading, sub grading stabilization, base
preparation and surface course along with drainage as required under this Article. All roadway
improvements shall comply with concurrency management provisions of Article IX,
"Concurrency Management."
a. Street Layout. The proposed subdivision street layout shall be coordinated with
Transportation Element in the Comprehensive Plan as adopted or as may hereinafter be
amended, and with the street system of the surrounding area. Consideration shall be given
to existing and planned streets, relation to topographical conditions, to public convenience,
safety and their appropriate relation to the proposed use of the land to be served by such
streets. All roads and streets shall intersect :I: 5 0 angle of ninety 900 unless circumstances
acc~ptable to the City indicate a need for a lesser angle of intersection. All local or minor
collectors providing access to residential developments with mean lot frontage of 125' or
less or non residential development with mean lot frontage of 225' or less shall provide
sidewalks.
@)
Land Development Code
6/9/20009:03 fLV!
Page XLX-31
City of Sebastian
Chapter Ill: Performance Criteria
Article X: Appearance, Design and Compatibility
2. On-site. The required queuing shall be located on site and shall not include any public right-of-
way or accessways to the property. No vehicle may block other parking stalls, access aisles,
driveway, or off-street parking
3. Length of spaces. Each space shall be a minimum of twenty (20) feet in length.
4. Width of spaces. Each Queuing lane shall be a minimum of ten feet in width. On curves with
a radius of twenty-five (25) feet or less, a minimum pavement width of twelve (12) feet shall be
provided. On curves with a radius of more than twenty-five (25) feet, a minimum pavement
width often (10) feet shall be provided.
5. Vertical clearance. Minimum vertical clearance of fourteen (14) feet.
6. Surface. Surface requirements shall be the same as those specified for parking areas in Section
54-3-10.10.
7. Parking. Queuing spaces may not be used to satisfy any off-street parking requirements or
~ loading requirements of this code.
~ec. 54-3-10.a ENTRlEJi, EXlTS~ VEmCLE MANEUVERING AREASWQR MULTI---"
~ FAl"~ (EXCLUDING DUPLEX LOTS), COi\'IiVIERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND
\.......--^-'" INSTITUTIONAL LOTS.
Entries and exits. . /'"" -* 1l/'. f'1 ,
1. All uses which are required to Provi(off-street parking spaces shall have entry and exit ways
and drives at least twen -two (22 feet in width to accommodate two-way traffic, unless a one-
way traffic system is utllZe , in' w c. case entry and exit ways and drives shall be at least
twelve (12) feet in width. In the event that a one-way traffic system is utilized, appropriate
traffic direction markers shall be installed.
A.
2.
One driveway shall be permitted for ingress and egress purposes to any project.
3.
The Planning and Zoning Commission may either increase or reduce the following separation
distances based upon a recommendation by the City Engineer after an analysis of street
frontage, trip generation, or other factors, as deemed appropriate has been performed.
4.
A joint access driveway shall be considered as adequate access for any two (2) adjacent parcels
and shall be encouraged. For a project where more than one driveway is requested, the
applicant Shal. 1 submit a traffic report justifvina th.. ""~~..l(.J;'~_ 2; r' . ~.t-L m and
par~g system and id:ntifying the impact D ~, u E:- 1,1:.JLV ~ 1. ~ccess
faCIlIties on the operation of the street systt - ~r:Vr:rt~ '5et.-1/~~
Minimum spacing between two-'way drh of COf7E - A1 L-
conform to the table below. Distance betv . ___
centerline. These standards shall not apply "?lJfrotG'1 A 11 l..-r
lJV "7TH oF 'lrZ- FT.
OJt: ~f?7
shall
ine to
I
5.
-u~
Land Development Code
6/8/2000 4: 10 PM
Page X- to
CMprerllI: P~onrumceCrireria
Article X: Appearance, Design and Compa.l1bility
4. Separation from doorways or pedestrian entrances. No door or pedestrian entrance at
ground level shall open directly upon any parking space, driveway or access aisle unless the
doorway or pedestrian entrance is at least four (4) feet from said parking space, driveway or .
access aisle.
5. Drainage. All off-street parking facilities shall be suitably sloped and drained so as not to
cause any discharge of runoff to adjacent or public property.
B. Stalls, aisles and driveways. The following criteria is applicable to all parking spaces except single-
family and duplex homes:
Parking Stall Width Stall Length Aisle Width Curb Width Overall
Angle (A) (B) (C) (0) (E) Width (F)
0 9 ft. 22 ft. 12 ft. 23 ft. 30 ft. tftI J tJ1/f .
30 10 ft. 18.2 ft. 12 ft. t 20 ft. 48.4 ft:
45 10 ft. 20.5 ft. 12 ft. . :z.,ft' 14.1 ft. 53 ft. ~~~ ~~O "
60 10 ft. 21.5 ft. ~ "It 11.5 ft. 61 ft.
...2.0- .QQlD 20 ft. . \ 22 ft. 10ft. 62 ft. tfI JJt. b '10
90 9 ft. 20 ft. . 9 ft. 63 ft H~V(IV r:(Nld
90 9.5 ft 20 ft. 23.5 ft. 9 ft. 62 ft. p~
All parking spaces, aisles and driveways shall substantially conform to the indicated design.
C. Striping. All paved parking spaces shall have lines between spaces, at least four (4) inches in width, of
a contrasting color to the pavement or, unpaved surface and each stall may be required to be equipped
with wheelstops if deemed appropriate by the City Engineer and the Planning and Zoning Commission.
D. Lighting. Parking areas shall be lighted and entrances at public streets shall provide private area lighting.
E. Wheelstops. Wheelstops shall comply with the following standards:
1. Standard precast concrete wheelstops or other types as approved by the City for stalls adjacent
to landscaped strips shall be located two and one-half 2Yl et the front end of the stall to
,.prevent encroachment into required landscaped areas. The front two (2) feet of the sta may e
kept as a maintained grass strip although no credit will be extended toward the open space
requirements of this code.
2. Standard precast concrete wheelstops or other types as approved by the City for Stalls not
adjacent to landscaped strips shall be located two and one-half (2Yl) feet from the front end of
the stall. The front three (3) feet of the stall maybe kept as a maintained grass strip although no
credit will be extended toward the open space requirements of this code.
3. All wheelstops shall be permanently anchored.
F.
Compact spaces. Parking lots with. twenty (20) or more spaces may be comprised of a maximum of
fifteen (15) percent compact car parking stalls but only if approved by the Planning and Zoning
Commission. Such compact car stalls shall be seven and one-half (7Yl) feet wide by fifteen (15) feet
long and marked for use by small vehicles. All markings shall be on the pavement surface where
possible.
@
Land Development Code
6/8/2000 4: 10 'pM
Page X-8
City of Sebastian
Chapter ill: Penormance Criteria.
Article X: Appearance, Design and Companbility
4. Separation from doorways or pedestrian entrances. No door or pedestrian entrance at
ground level shall open directly upon any parking space, driveway or access aisle unless the
doorway or pedestrian entn:mce is at least four (4) feet from said parking space, driveway or .
access aisle. .
5. Drainage. All off-street parking facilities shall be suitably sloped and. drained so as not to
cause ~y discharge o~ runoff to adjacent or public property.
B. Stalls, aisles and driveways. The following criteria is applicable to all parking spaces except single-
family and duplex homes:
Parking Stall Wi 'sle Width Curb Width Overall
Angle (A) (B) (D) (E) . Width (F)
~
0 9 ft. 22 ft. 12 ft. 23 ft. 30 ft. vV' r;111
30 10 ft. .18.2 ft. 12 ft. 20 ft. 48.4 ft:
45 10 ft. 20.5 ft. 12 ft. 14.1 ft. 53 ft. {Jr1~~ ~;o "
60 10 ft. ~ ~ 11.5 ft. 61 ft.
..2D- l!QJ0 Oft. 10 ft. 62 ft. IfI 11(. b 10
90 9 ft. o . 9 ft. 63 ft H AV (IV~( N \.1
90 9.5 ft 20 ft. 23.5 ft. 9 ft. 62 ft. p#
All parking spaces, aisles and driveways shall substantially confonn to the indicated design.
C. Striping. All paved parking spaces shall have lines between spaces, at least four (4) inches in width, of
a contrasting color to the pavement or, unpaved surface and each stall may be required to be equipped
with wheelstops if deemed appropriate by the City Engineer and the Planning and Zoning Commission.
D. Lighting. Parking areas shall be lighted and entrances at public streets shall provide private area lighting.
E. Wheelstops. Wheelstops shall comply with the following s.tandards:
1.
Standard precast concrete wheelstops or other types as approved by the City for stalls adjacent
to landscaped strips shall be located two and one-half 2 Y2 e end of the stall to
;revent encroachment into reqJlired landscaped areas. The fro t two 2 feet the sta ma e
as a maintained grass strip although no credit will be exte . oward the open space
requirements oftbis co e. .~ Z. F1' OVt::lf?\-I4Nb'
~ I? rJt::tZIYJIHl:."Y
Standard precast concrete wheelsto s or other types. as approved by th.e City for stalls not
adjacent to landscap. strips sha e located two and one-half (2Y2) feet from the front end of
the stall. e front three 3) feet 0 the stall ma 'be kept asa r
credit will be extended towar t open space requIrements 0
2.
3.
All wheelstops shall be permanently anchored.
'0 f}f);t N/d 5-r trtL
I l-tfVb1H
-
F. Compact spaces. Parking lots with twenty (20) or more spaces ma~
fifteen (15) percent compact car parking stalls but only if approv
Commission. Such compact ,dr stalls shall be seven and one-half.(~
long and marked for use by small vehicles. All markings shall be
possible.
'2Jj F'1 - Z F-r 0, H.
-;: \0 F=7
~
(j12)
~
Land Development Code
6/8/2000 4: I 0 PM
Page X-8
Chapter IV: Administration of ~ .L Review and Subdivisions
Article XIX: Subdivision
(2) During construction, the applicant's engineer shall make such measurements, field tests
and laboratory tests or cause them to be made to certify that the work and materials
conform with the approved development plans and the provisions of this ordinance. The
City Engineer or other representative designated by the City Council may require tests
and measurements which are deemed necessary and which shall be perfonned at the
expense of the applicant or his engineer.
(3) The road for arterial streets and commercial or industrial streets shall be a minimum of
seven (7) inches compacted limerock, or cemented coquma shale as per FDOT
Standards for road construction. All other street bases shall be six (6) inches. All base
construction shall be compacted to 98% density and extend six (6) inches beyond edge
of pavement.
(4) All surfaces shall be one and onelhalf (1 Y2) inches type S3 Asphalt for local roads.
Commercial streets, major collectors and arterials shall be one and one-half (1 Y2) inches
S-l and one (1) inch S-3, or Two and one- half (2Y2) inches S-3, two (2) lifts.
(5) Pavement crown shall be one-fourth (Yi) inch/foot (.02%) cross slope or greater with no
inverted crowns permitted.
(6) . Subgrades for arterial streets and commercial or industrial streets shall be twelve (12)
inches compacted thickness extended twelve (12) inches beyond base and 75' FBV or 40
LBRcompacted to 98% T-180. All other streets shall be nine (9) inches compacted
thickness, extended twelve (12) inches beyond edge of pavement with 60 FBV or 40
LBR compacted to 98% T-180. /
- 1 I ,jJ\ty)'it
" ~ 1ft
(7) If not specified, the FDOT manual shall prevail. .
--- --
(8) The City Engineer shall review and approve of the design and construction of streets.
'* 't '" f1
After sub grading streets, there shall be given one (I) course penetration treatment of
emulsified asphalt width of the street and an additional
course to mid enty-two (22) feet of said street, to the specifications and
requirementS neer.
s. Sidewalks and Bicycle Paths. The project developer shall be responsible for provision of a
~ike path along the project she frontag on all right-of-way or easements-designated.
Sidewalks shall be constructed on one or both SI es 0 all collector and arten streets.
'--BIcycle path shall be constructed on bOth sides of all arterial. streets. They may De
constructed concurrent with road construction or deferred and. guaranteed by the posting of
surety. A required sidewalk may be waived as determined by the City Engineer when
bicycle paths provide adequate pedestrian circulation.
Where provided, sidewalks shall be a minimum of five (5) feet wide. Sidewalk sub-base
shall be 95% compacted density. They shall be constructed of concrete having a
compressive strength of two thousand five hundred (2,500) pounds per square inch at
twenty-eight (28) days. The fiber mesh concrete thickness shall be six (6) inches across
driveways. In commercial areas, thickness shall be six (6) inches. In other areas, thickness
shall be four (4) inches. The cross slope shall be one-quarter inch per foot. Bicycle paths
shall be eight (8) feet wide and shall be constructed in accordance with the current FDOT@
Bicyc.le Facilities Planning and Design Manual. If not specified, the FDOT manual shall ,\) .
prevaIl. \
Land Development Code
6/9/2000 9:03 A:.\t{
Page XIX-36
City of Sebastian
&
MOTORIST DESIGN
Traffic/Transportation Consultants
~
,1
~
~
LEGEND:
00100 = NB/SB OR ESIWB
.-J~L
~ ~ l$- I~ ~M~tP- -St,
\. I~ --1 v
.. ;,-- .--- ....--
~ --
1?~t J GVV4~.1 ~
~
VOlVmr ~
--=.. N
-- I
CR :512 I 9:sTH ST I rELLSMtRE RD
~
B1ST ST
4/2
73RD ST
3/1
6:5TH Sf
211
61ST ST
:57TH ST
:53RD ST
77TH ST
69TH ST
~
...
t:l
1lI.
....
45TH ST
/fi0
lei
NEW TRIP ASSIGNMENT
FIGURE 3
8
.~(
Motorist Design of Merritt Island, Inc., 2755 N. Banana River Dr. Suite B. Merritt /sla.rul T/'T. _~9Q~?
1i?R IRA ./I.R'1,)() _ ",___':1. __.L_~_L' . ~ .
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
1225 MAIN STREET. SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958
TELEPHONE (772) 589-5518 . FAX (772) 388-8248
Following are comments from the 5-24-06 Growth Management staff meeting:
1. Please provide clarification on the parking, per the LOC in residential areas
credit cannot be taken for parking in the garage. However, one space will be
credited for the driveway. Identify the second required parking space per unit,
showing it to be within 150 feet of the front door per LDC requirements.
From the site plan, it appears that no guest parking or overflow parking has been
provided. Staff is concerned that the parking provided will be insufficient for the
development.
2. Please provide elevations and floor plan for the residential buildings. Include
square footage of each unit, and number of bedrooms.
3. Please provide elevations and floor plan for the pool building. Please define
what amenities are in the labeled "health club" or is it better defined as
clubhouse?
4. Staff has concerns regarding emergency access in close proximity to the
curve.
5. Please provide some turning provision for the eastern most unit (Unit # 1)
6. Please provide copy of the environmental study.
7. Please provide copy of the wetland permit.
8. Please provide an explanation of the variation in the northern property line
setback, it varies from 25 feet to 15 feet.
9. Landscape plan does not meet buffer requirements of multifamily next to
residential. Provide additional landscaping (except in the wetland area) providing
opaque coverage, or alternatively provide wall or fence detail.
10. Please provide location of overhead utility lines on the landscaping plan.
11. Please provide St. John's permit.
12. See attached comments regarding the review of the traffic study.
@
@
JOSEPH W. SCHULKE, P.E.
JODAH B. BITTLE, P.E.
WILLIAM P. STODDDARD, Ph.D., P.E.
SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L~C.
CIVIL & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING. LAND PLANNING. ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING
June 8, 2006
i) ~ v3~~Vt; ~'\5'!:1 ~~
i) (Ue-CQ ~ i Co"-~w ~~
OV"-- ~<g~ LO(~~
Rebecca Grohall, Director
Growth Management
City of Sebastian
1225 Main Street
Sebastian, FL 32958
Re: Bristol Lakes FKA Sebastian Village
5-24-06 Growth Management Staff Meeting Comment's Responses
4-28-06 City Engineer's Comments
Dear Ms. Grohall,
Enclosed, please find twelve (12) sets of revised plans, and the following responses to the
Growth Management comments addressed in your letter received via email Friday, May
28,2006 and response to the City Engineer's comments in an outline dated April 28,
2006:
1. Acknowledged. Only one (1) space is crediting per. driveway. Additional spaces
are provided throughout the site. A sketch is enclosed depicting the second
required space per unit, within 150 ft. of the front door.
2. Elevations and floor plans for the residential buildings, including square footage
of each unit, and number of bedrooms, was previously submitted (12 signed and
sealed sets prepared by architect C.B. Block) with the original site plan
application, on July 15, 2005. Please check your file.
~. CD Elevations and floor plans for the pool ~uilding were previously submitted (12
signed and sealed sets) on February 20 ,2006.
.' 4. Attached is a sketch/exhibit for your reference, depicting the emergency driveway
and Barber Street, and minimum stopping site distance, minimwn departure site
distance and other applicable information. The driveway exceeds F.D.O.T.
requirements and could function as a primary access. Also, there presently exists
an access easement and unimproved driveway in the sanle vicinity for IRC Utility
Dept. for access to the existing public sewer lift station. Our thought was to
combine this driveway with our driveway - declare it for secondary .
use/emergency use/utility use only, all uses which will not frequently use the
driveway. This would serve to provide a code required 2nd means of access in case
of emergency and would also provide access for IRC l.Jtility Dept. Therefore, this
proposal will reduce the no. of driveways from three (2 required for this site and I
existing for the lift station) to two (2) driveways serving both this site and the lift
station.
5. Attached is a sketch/exhibit depicting the turning movement for a passenger car,
car with trailer, and a garbage collection truck. As you can see, turning ability is
provided.
~
1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
TEL 772 I 770-9622 FAX 772 I 770-9496 EMAlL info@sbsenaineers.com
@
6. A copy of the environmental study and correspondence/approvals from U.S.F.W.
and F.F.W.C.C. are provided for your review.
7. A copy of the most recent correspondence with SJRWMD is attached. The ERP
permit should be issued within 45 days, which includes approval of the wetlands
plan.
8. The site has street frontages on all sides. Bristol to the west, Barber to the south
and east, and Treasure Circle on portions of our north boundary. Our
interpretation is that the only property line without frontage (west and east sides
of the north property line) is considered a side yard. Therefore, the north property
line has a front yard setback where it abuts Treasure Circle and a side yard
setback along the remaining area. p
9. A fe?ce is provided along the north property line to meet the 6' opaque feature ~
requrrement. ~~vV"T ""L9
1 O. Location of overhead utility lines is depicted on the landscaping plan. ~ l ;:;;;. jJ~
11. A copy of the St. John's River Water Management District permit will be ~ t.)'~
provided for your review upon issuance, which we expect within 45 days. 'V':l ~ '"
12. Traffic related responses will be submitted by Motorist Design Group under ,...,1 '" CI(O\.t~'
separate cover. :1\ VI "
~r -
The following are responses to the City Engineer's comments, dated April 28, 2006:
EnJ!ineerim! Comments, Storm water:
· Please be advised that you are incorrect. DS-14 is the control structure.
· Please be advised that you are incorrect. The water from DS-14 flows through
DS-2 to off-site drainage systems. The pipe flows in the correct manner.
· The MES in Tract 'D' has been removed and the invert of the pipe has been
lowered, as shown in the revised plans.
· Those arrows are representative of drainage flow at ground level and not flow
direction in the pipes.
· The MES in Tract'!' has been removed and the invert of the pipe has been
lowered, as shown in the revised plans.
· All possible stations have been labeled on the revised plans.
EnJ!ineerinJ! Comments, Site Plan and Preliminarv Plat:
1. The plans have been revised to reflect the correct project name "Bristol Lakes
Town Houses & Subdivision", as depicted on the cover sheet of the plans.
2.-19. It appears that the City acknowledges that all previous comments no.2-19 have
been addressed on the plans adequately.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to
contact my office.
@
00
~
o
trj=
~1-3
=s
;00
~1-3
1-3~
(1
trj
nL ~ ~
OJ ~ I
~::: ~ C
_2 c;: r
-..j ~ C')
C3~ ~ ^
~;o 0 ~ m
"'< '" ~
"'m~52OJ
;o~!O)
"Tlro S?~ _
s<<g~-i
-..jQza! -i
j:j'o, ~~ r
-C>. m
::::l=iSr;;:
Om I;: ~
~~~t:l )C'"
~~~~(j)
m~ Z!l: -i
5:0 5~ 0
~~~~~. 0
a.oo 0
@;c ~ ~ )>
g};n",~;o
~~ ~ 0
~.~ ~ ~
mw
~t!l ~!
8~ !Ii: r
3 ~ 0
~.
1U)u)<~~
::-I g II 1I:!i i:
)>:;;0 c::
tD~ ~ ~S23:
F:;;.. q3:~O
c..,., .." -0 )> rr1
I g :I:~~
to...... rr12
a 1:;;0
:;;0 r- rr1
rr1 rr1
!Z! ~
OJ 0
8 ~
='\
Iu)u)<~~
::-Ig II II 3:
Eti~~~z~
F:;; r:t q 3: ~ :;;0
c..,.,C1 -c~E
1 a :I:~c::
""""f :!i:;;o
rr1
00
~
("")
rr1
- ----
..
~
:;;0
rr1
!Z!
0'"
rr1 '"
~r-
:;;0 .."
-l)>
C::O
:::00
1'Tl=i
U)o
-lz:
1'Tl)>
r-
o
U)
~
z:
("")
rr1
OJ
8
='\
T fllC;TAJlr.F,
i I. C;I(;H
/., WI"
N
N
--
--
~-
!:I
."
'"
!I::
--
@
,\(J~-n/:;
Ils".~q
>
~)o-l.
.....
~
Q
- ...hnc.tinrl "jilin,],::. FK,:... S.=.hn:::.tinn
eo
~
~
r.n
~
o
~
~
>
~
r.n ~
~ r.n
eo ~
> 0
~ ~
> ==
",Z 0
~ ~
~ ~
r.n
Ro
r.n
~
eo
~
~
~
~
r.n
~
o
z
--l ~ en
lTI~ ..... ()
~~ p,. I
~~ ~
~z :ij C
:::J!2 t;;: r
g~ ~ ^
~~n,e: m
rv< '" ~
m~!>'I
;0 ~ ~ I'T'I
~tD~~ VJ
x< 5!:!l -I
~o z;ij
tj'u, 0 ~ -I
~s:. r
~--l~l;:: m
<?ma~
~~:!!l;:) Qo
gJ~~~ en
m~ ~ ~ -I
s::oz~
~tD ~ c:') 0
i~ ~~ 00
@:t:(l)~
","-n8l::t) )>
C"r [DO
g:o i::O
~.~ I:!J 0
ffi;!> ~ ~
roW
?l~ :tt r
~~ i r-
~0
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
!aba'~ -0
3oo~ ~
:I. "'" ","::r
~o () ~
0
~b ~
100
(i""'" i-l
::l 0
3
CD
~O)I>)I>) 3
0). . . !!.
.000 CD
~ooo ~
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
@
,irtC!s
- Rnrh.=.( C;f\n~-(I'::I:;\r1"~'l\(-:i'iil\I~()nstr\'
- G ~
;a
ir:;;');!-o
l.::.o~
~ .!..()
J ~
[ ,:
I ~
UI
c"
o
<eill
\
\
\
n\::1rl7R
l'"
!!:
FHFRi,FI Jr. ( ;,r. c: F<::;c; flFT.dw'J. I "j
t. :
.,: '."
.. ',. .
. ;.,
..
..~: '
.. .
.. .
. . .
:~'>'./::~. >~
. ..
'lX' :
.. .
.. .
.:
.6' """ .'
. .: ."::
,:'~ : ,". ~ ~&,:,.,-
" &.'.' '';' "." :"
~ ......
. >.
&. ~
. .
. .
, :\D'i-D?R
I)SP~'q
>
~~
...
~
o
r.n
tr.j
~
>
r.n
1-3
~
>
Z
-..
~
~
.
rri~ 2 ~
~:j PI- I
~~ ~ C
'"'10 ~ r
~~ ~ ^
Rl~ n ~ m
N< I"'l ...
!B~S!
~lD~~ OJ
x< is ~ -i
'"'Ioz;ij
~~ ~ ~ -i
'"'IS>. r
Cjrri~~ m
.bN 0 ~ n,.,.
~o~..... )(""
~~~~ (J)
m~ ~ ~ -i
~oz~
~lDf?1:5 0
i~ ~ 6 g
@_I 8l el~ )>
c/)..." en
C"rOJ~
~~ i!:;o
lQ.o t5 0
16:l> ~ ~
CllW
!i1~ :tJ r
n '" ~.
~o ~ r
~0
hflstiflrt '1illfl')P FKA C;phfls.tiflni rlirt')s
- dil flrhprQ/:;t \D'i-ofI?R\rlw') \r.ivil\r. nrto.t r
b b b
000
0I.,;:l! I ;:l! I;:l! I
b
o
;:l!-
In\'iO?R FldFR(;Ftlr.y Ar.r.FC;C; nFT.rlw'). [n'J
~
~
~
r.n
1-3
o
~
~
>
~
tr.j
r.n
1-3
o
~
z
==
o
~
tr.j
r.n
Ro
r.n
o
~
Cl
~
-<
~
r.n
~
o
z
'r:;;'UlG'>
I~~
g ~
J G'>
I :
I ~
^
~
'"
!al):;t~ G) b
(lOCa. )> 0
3. "'~st :;0
"'.... 0)
<00 ~
~I) to '. .'
<00 fT1 b VI
CD" 0 0
::l -I b . .
3 :;0 0 .....
(ll C
VI 01 to to ~
O' . . ....
.000
0000
0
@)
, :\rti3-n?R hnstinn 'filln')p FKA C;phnstinr- ,rlin')s - Rnrhpr C;t\n'i-n?R\rl,,{')\r.i'fil\r.nnst,
I JS<:r'tl
>
~r..H
I-'
W
Q
r.F1
~
0=
>
r.F1
~
I-ol
>
Z
...
~
t""I
.
~
~
~
00
~
o
~
~
>
~
tlj
00
~
o
~
z
==
o
~
tlj
00
~
00
~
~
~
~
<
~
00
~
o
z
-l ~(f)
~:::: '" ()
--l~ PI- I
--l--l ~
~z :a C
::::J2 s: r
~~ ~ ^
R.l~ ojl: m
",<", v
m=lttl
;o~~OJ
~lDO=;:
x' ~.... -
::::J? ~ ~ :j
~CfJ ~~ r
::::J~ ~. m
omJ:~
~ ~ ~ 1:5 !'(o
~~~~(f)
~~ ~ ~ -f
~lD P ~ 0
~~ g' 0
0-(") o~ 0
@J:o;s
(I):" ~~ :t=-
0', CD!f .,.,
~~ I: AI
lQ.5 [!:I 0
al> ~v
<lie.>
ii1~ :tJ r
00> m.
~o I: r
~ ()'
~.
.pel
@
nn\'in?R FHFRr,FI\Ir.y Ar.r. FC;C: I1FT,rlw'). I.,y
0
Co
~CfJb:;l(")a'(") "U 0
cri () g.~ _.~ OJ VI
,..- - i!)
~s.r+~::;I~ ~
d;tO 0 -l g ~ Q.
.5 ~bg ,..~g: 0.
~tO 0,.. :r
iD'" 0
to ::l
iD 3
(1)
-l>-
0,
0
.........0.. .. 3 ?l
-.JVlO)I\)~1\)1\) (1) 0
Q....a.. . . . . .... .. ..
. . O-l>-CXl-l>-~ (1) '. .
O-.Jooooo ~ .. .b
o~ "
. .
..... ,'.
'," "b
-.J
l:o
-.J
Ul
b
co
I\)
Co
Ul
~~
E to
J ~
[ g
J
"
~
o
""1
C/)tJj
t:I:l ;u
tJj H
:x:o C/)
C/) 1-3
1-3 0
H t""
~ t""
, :x:o
:;.:
"%j trl
t"" C/)
o
;u
H
t::I
:x:o
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J ..... --"""
r-~........... ~-
Hi !;l .,
jl: < _.
q~ -.=
l fi. 9 .!...
It ~ El CD"
.i~ ~ _
. ::!. :: ,. If
a~~=,
B;n
~;:::l _
:-:: C. -..
~! ~=
-J. !; en
1-.. _ =
,ai S._
l~::::...
. ,"" -.-,
l' E~ is =
~ ~i CIl<=
1'1'1 r; _
~ ~~ ~ =
f t ~ _.
0;: ~~ ~ C"
I,. "'.
~
l1
o
()
~
p.
o
~
~
~
"C
~
~
~
~
~
~tJ:j
..q ::1.
(t) CIl
I-t rt
n2...
o l1
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
7j
..........
o
I-t
.......
0..-
~
l-d
t11-t
tJ:j ~ 0
rt 0..-
C/)~r: ~
Q n\O~
rD=tt:"--o..-
.. N tJ:j
........ N........~
(.).)\0"--"
"'0 \0 ON l1
I r"'.
OOOlJ
ONo\C/)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
en ~D r-
~ ~ - CD
D)
- (Q
s:: CD
0 }> Ul "0 OJ ~
Z
r- }> () Q, ::!. Q,
0 -l D) 1Il
() <: - Q.
-l (I)
<: m r-
CD Q)
m , ^
0 CD
0') 1Il
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I