Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01232008cm' of ~r~uE~'~T~'!'~V HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND SEBASTIAN CITY COUNCIL AMENDED* AGENDA REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 23, 2008 - 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA ALL AGENDA ITEMS MAY BE INSPECTED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA Individuals will address the City Council with respect to agenda items immediately before deliberation of the item by the City Council -time limit five minutes where public input allowed 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE LED BY COUNCIL MEMBER SIMCHICK 3. MOMENT OF SILENCE 4. READING OF CIVILITY PLEDGE BY COUNCIL MEMBER SIMCHICK We will be respectful of one another even when we disagree. We will direct all comments to the issues. We will avoid personal attacks. 5. ROLL CALL 6. AGENDA MODIFICATIONS Modifications and additions require unanimous vote of City Council members 7. PROCLAMATIONS. AWARDS, BRIEF ANNOUNCEMENTS Presentations of proclamations, certificates and awards, and brief timely announcements by Council and Staff. No public input or action under this heading. A. Recognition of the Passing of Cora Sembler Sadler 1911-2008 8. CONSENT AGENDA All items on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of consent agenda items unless a member of City Council so requests; in which event, the item will be removed and acted upon separately. If a member of the public wishes to provide input on a consent agenda item, he/she should request a Council Member to remove the item for discussion prior to start of the meeting or by raising his/her hand to be recognized. 3-14 A. Approval of Minutes - 1/9/08 Regular Meeting 08.008 B. William and Mary Ingui - 626 Layport Drive -Deed to City- Reimbursement of 15-19 $792.39 and Adopt Resolution No. R-08-202 Repealing Vacation of Easement R-98-20 (City Attorne Transmittal, Deed, R-08-02) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION R-98-20; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE. 08.009 C. Authorize the Purchase of Five Crown Victoria Vehicles from Duvall Ford in the 21-33 Amount of $127,740 and Five Chevrolet Trailblazers from Alan Jay Automotive Network in the Amount of $143,792 -Both Purchases to be Made Under Florida Sheriff's Association State Contract #07-15-0827 (PD Transmittal, Bid Info) D. Riverview Park Use Request -Rotary Home Show -Additional Day -Sunday, March 30, 2008 (City Manager Transmittal 1/18) 9. COMMITTEE REPORTS & APPOINTMENTS City committee reports and Council Member regional committee reports. No public input or action except for City committee member nominations and appointments under this heading. 10. PUBLIC HEARINGS -None 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 08.010 A. Collier Creek Canal Project Update (City Manager Transmittal, Previous 35-39 Updates) 08.011 B. Staff Report on Possible South Prong and River Pollution Within City Due to 41-52 Proposed Wild Turkey Rock Mining -Requested at 12/12/07 Meeting (City Manager Transmittal, GMD Report, IRC SDD Letter) 12. PUBLIC INPUT Public Input for each individual is five minutes, however, it can be extended or terminated by a majority vote of Council members present. 13. NEW BUSINESS 08.013 A. Sebastian River High School Student Presentation -Crime and Drug Use Prevention (backup previously given) 08.014 B. Set Bi-Annual Goals and Objectives for City Manager, City Attorney and City Clerk 53 As Required by Resolution R-07-31 (City Clerk Transmittal) 2 14. CITY ATTORNEY MATTERS 15. CITY MANAGER MATTERS 16. CITY CLERK MATTERS 17. CITY COUNCIL MATTERS A. Mr. Paternoster B. Ms. Simchick C. Mr. Wolff D. Mayor Coy E. Mr. Neglia 18. ADJOURN (All meetings shall adjourn at 10:30 pm unless extended for up to one half hour by a majority vote of City Council) HEARING ASSISTANCE HEADPHONES ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS FOR ALL GOVERNMENT MEETINGS. Regular City Council Meetings are Scheduled for Live Broadcast on Comcast Channel 25 ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL /S TO BE HEARD. (286.0105 F.S.) IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR THIS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE CITY'S ADA COORDINATOR AT 589-5330 AT LEAST 48 HOURS /N ADVANCE OF THIS MEETING. Upcoming meetings: February 13, 2008 - 7:00 pm -Regular City Council Meeting February 27, 2008 - 7:00 pm -Regular City Council Meeting March 12, 2008 - 7:00 pm -Regular City Council Meeting March 26, 2008 - 7:00 pm -Regular City Council Meeting Apri19, 2008 - 7:00 pm -Regular City Council Meeting April 23, 2008 - 7:00 pm -Regular City Council Meeting a~v~~ J HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND CORA SEMBLER SADLER 1911 - 2008 Cora Sembler Sadler was the daughter of Charles William Sembler and Margaret Elether Knight. Her father supported the incorporation of Sebastian and served on Sebastian City Council from its beginnings in 1924 and for approximately twenty years thereafter. Her great uncle by marriage, Thomas B. Hicks, was the first Mayor of Sebastian and her great nephew, grandson of Cora's brother Don, Charles Sembler II served in the Florida House of Representatives from 1993 to 2000. The Sembler and Hicks families arrived in Sebastian just after 1900 to operate a fish business. They ran a sawmill in Wabasso where they cut timber for the developing town of Fellsmere and for Flagler's railroad, and supplied shell for road building. Cora's was born in 1911 and her family first lived in Roseland in 1912, moved to Grant and came back to Sebastian in 1920. Cora graduated from Florida State College for Women (now FSU) and taught in the Sebastian School which is the former City Hall and now the Historic 1927 Schoolhouse, from 1934-1936. This building now houses the Sebastian River Area Historical Society and Indian River Community College. Cora married Glendy Sadler and they had four children, Margaret, Orin, Marion and Palmyre. Cora Sadler, during her tenure as President of the Sebastian River Area Historical Society, was instrumental with several others in piecing together Sebastian's written history, which became in 1990, "Tales of Sebastian" and "More Tales of Sebastian". We honor Cora for her contributions and her family's contributions to the City of Sebastian and its history. O cm ~~ ~~~ .~ HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND SEBASTIAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 9, 2008 - 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA The Mayor called the regular meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Council Member Paternoster led the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. A moment of silence was held. 4. Council Member Paternoster read the Civility Pledge. We will be respectful of one another even when we disagree. We will direct all comments to the issues. We will avoid personal attacks. 5. ROLL CALL City Council Present: Vice-Mayor Sal Neglia Council Member AI Paternoster Council Member Dale Simchick Council Member Eugene Wolff City Council Absent: Mayor Andrea Coy (excused) Staff Present: City Manager, AI Minner City Attorney, Rich Stringer City Clerk, Sally Maio Deputy City Clerk, Jeanette Williams MIS Systems Analyst, Barbara Brooke/Rob Messersmith Airport Director, Joe Grim Growth Management Director, Rebecca Grohall Growth Management Manager, Jan King Human Resources Director, Debra Krueger Parks Supervisor, Chris McCarthy Regular City Council Meeting January 9, 2008 Page Two 6. AGENDA MODIFICATIONS Modifications and additions require unanimous vote of City Council members None. 7. PROCLAMATIONS. AWARDS, BRIEF ANNOUNCEMENTS Presentations of proclamations, certificates and awards, and brief timely announcements by Council and Staff. No public input or action under this heading. 08.001 A. Certificate of Appreciation to Gary Barth -Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee Service Vice Mayor Neglia presented a certificate to Gary Barth, commended him for volunteering his time to the City and noted a certificate has been prepared for Kelly Palfi, also a former member of Parks and Recreation who was not in attendance. 8. CONSENT AGENDA All items on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of consent agenda items unless a member of City Council so requests; in which event, the item will be removed and acted upon separately. If a member of the public wishes to provide input on a consent agenda item, he/she should request a Council Member to remove the item for discussion prior to start of the meeting or by raising his/her hand to be recognized. 1-11 A. Approval of Minutes -12/12/07 Regular Meeting 08.002 B. Approve Soccer Association 2"d Annual 5K Run Fundraiser February 16, 2008 13-19 from 7:30 am to 9:30 am on Indian River Drive and Use of Large Pavilion in Riverview Park -Close Indian River Drive from Harrison to Jackson Street from 7 am to 9:30 am (Parks Transmittal, Information) MOTION by Mr. Paternoster and SECOND by Ms. Simchick to approve the December 12, 2007 minutes carried on a voice vote of 4-0. MOTION by Ms. Simchick and SECOND by Mr. Paternoster to approve item B of the Consent Agenda carried on a voice vote of 4-0. 9. COMMITTEE REPORTS & APPOINTMENTS City committee reports and Council Member regional committee reports. No public input or action except for City committee member nominations and appointments under this heading. Ms. Simchick reported on Keep Indian River Beautiful street adoption programs and invited interested citizens to contact Joan Dean at 388-5474 for more information. Mr. Paternoster reported on Indian River County Commission approval of a six month mining moratorium. Regular City Council Meeting January 9, 2008 Page Three Vice Mayor Neglia returned to Brief Announcements at this time and announced that the Community Redevelopment Agency meeting scheduled for tonight has been rescheduled to 1/23/08; Early Voting will take place from January 14 through January 26 excluding Sundays from 8 am to 4 pm in the old Schoolhouse City Hall building, the Frog Leg Festival will be held January 17-20, and the Sebastian River Art and Music Festival will be held January 26 and 27. 08.003 A. Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee 21-26 (City Clerk Transmittal, Application, Ad) i. Interview, Unless Waived and Submit Nominations for One Regular Member Position with Term to Expire May 31, 2008 The City Clerk noted that since there is only one applicant, a nomination can be made and appointment would be automatic and no motion is needed. Mr. Wolff nominated Ms. Solomon and she was appointed to the position. 08.004 B. Police Pension Board of Trustees 27-34 (City Clerk Transmittal, Memo, Application, F.S) i. Appoint Debra Krueger as Fifth Member to Police Pension Board in Accordance with F.S. with Term to Expire January 2010 On MOTION by Mr. Paternoster and SECOND by Ms. Simchick, Ms. Krueger was ratified as the fifth member of the Police Pension Board. Mr. Wolff asked about the City's residency requirement for boards and noted the applicant is not a resident. The City Attorney stated this is a statutory board and not one of our City boards and the residency requirement does not apply. The City Clerk noted that there is a state law residency requirement for two members of this board appointed by Council but the fifth member is not required to be a resident. Roll Call on the motion result was as follows: Neglia, Paternoster, Simchick, Wolff Ayes: All Nays: None Passed 4-0 10. PUBLIC HEARINGS (QUASI-JUDICIAL) 08.005 A. Quasi Judicial Hearing on Resolution No. R-08-01 -Request for 18 Month Extension 35-52 for Bristol Lakes Subdivision Preliminary Plat (GMD Transmittal, R-08-01, Application, Letter of Request dated 9/26/07, R-06-24, Preliminary Plat, Public Notice, City Council minutes dated 1/10/07, Plat Under Separate Cover) Regular City Council Meeting January 9, 2008 Page Four A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, APPROVING AN EXTENSION OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR A TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS BRISTOL LAKES SUBDIVISION; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE. The Clerk swore in individuals who intended to offer testimony. Vice Mayor Neglia opened the hearing at 7:11 p.m., and there was no Council Member ex-parte communication to disclose. The City Attorney noted for the record that this issue has come before Planning and Zoning previously. Joseph Schulke, Schulke, Bittle, and Stoddard, LLC introduced himself, Chris Sopotnick, environmental consultant and Richard and Joseph Jones, project owners. He stated the eighteen month extension on the preliminary plat is needed because a pair of scrub jays has nested on the property and a habitat conservation plan must be completed. The Growth Management Manager added the Planning and Zoning Commission approved this request last Thursday with the following conditions: reinstall the silt fence, complete an updated environmental study, relocate any found gopher tortoises, complete an updated traffic study, and complete and implement the habitat conservation plan. Mr. Wolff asked whether there was anything in writing from U. S. Fish and Wildlife (USFWS) citing that the scrub jay issue can be resolved in twelve months. Chris Sopotnick, Ecological Consulting of Florida, said the 12 to 18 month time frame was based on a verbal meeting with USFWS. Mr. Paternoster asked him to clarify the process for the scrub jay nesting issue and Mr. Sopotnick responded that a survey is done to determine how large of an area the pair is occupying, a program is put together to continue to develop while keeping a habitat for the birds and it can take up to two years. Mr. Paternoster asked if the habitat area could be segregated and Mr. Sopotnick said probably not, because the birds prefer natural scrub. Mr. Neglia asked if more time will be needed if more scrub jays arrive. The Growth Management Director stated mitigation is part of the process and Mr. Sopotnick said habitat will be made available for the birds. Mr. Neglia said that now that School Concurrency is in effect, he asked Mr. Schulke if he knew what effect the development will have on schools. Mr. Schulke said there would be 84 units and associated impact fees would be paid. The Growth Management Manager corrected the date for the extension to be July 2009. ~ ° Regular City Council Meeting January 9, 2008 Page Five Mr. Wolff said his objection to the extension is by the time people move in it will be 2010, with the closing of Fleming Street, other site approvals on the way, existing problems on Barber Street, and the entry and exit being located opposite Park Place, he said eighteen months is the longest Council can extend with a 2006 traffic study and was concerned with the impact to the community and how the quality of life and how will we address the growth when this project is completed. In response to Mr. Paternoster, Mr. Schulke said sidewalks will be installed on Barber along their frontage. Mr. Paternoster asked about the turn lane, and Mr. Schulke said the traffic impact study indicated the project will be significantly less than the City's code threshold requiring a turn lane. The Growth Management Director said if a new traffic study shows off-site improvements are needed, a modified site plan will go to the Planning and Zoning Commission for approval. Mr. Paternoster asked if another pair of scrub jays show up at the 17th month, 29th day, would the applicant request another extension. The City Attorney said the applicant would then re-apply, but this could not happen because the next extension would be to complete construction once they have begun, but they cannot construct unless permits are in hand. In Favor of the Request Richard Gilmore, 744 Kroegel Avenue, Sebastian, said we need this affordable housing in the community. In Opposition of the Request None. MOTION by Ms. Simchick and a SECOND by Mr. Paternoster to approve Resolution No. R-08-01, requesting an 18 month extension for Bristol Lake Subdivision preliminary plat. Roll call result was as follows: Ayes: Paternoster, Simchick, Neglia Nays: Wolff Passed 3-1. A recess was taken at 7:58 p.m. and upon return at 8:08 p.m., all members were present. 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS -None 5 O Regular City Council Meeting January 9, 2008 Page Six 12. PUBLIC INPUT Public Input for each individual is five minutes; however, it can be extended or terminated by a majority vote of Council members present. Don Wright, Fischer Circle, Sebastian, presented an update from Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Taskforce, listing the members, and read into the record a letter dated January 7, 2008 (see attached). Frank Garland, Ponoka Street, Sebastian, said there are a lot of people in the City out of work, some with equipment, and suggested using these people for the Collier Creek project; and said that for every hundred dogs that enter Hardee Park there are 33-35% let loose to run and one third of the dogs are leaving stuff behind. He said last Saturday he watched two carloads of kids playing touch football in the field where dogs had been running loose and said it is a health hazard. He asked Council to take this into consideration, open a dog park and give the parks back to the people. Cindy Falco, Louisiana Avenue, said the historical district will be having a grand opening and is trying to establish a historical walkway. She also said she has spoken to many business people in the business district who are not able to post signs, and not supported by the community. She said the City is not business friendly and without the businesses we have to go to Wal-Mart and Vero Beach or Melbourne to shop. Mr. Neglia suggested she get with Mr. Wright and she said she tried but was not received. Lisa Flores, new business owner, Strands of Silver, agreed the City is hard on businesses with signs, and that most of their customers are not from Sebastian. Mr. Wolff said he has pledged to spend his money in shops where people know him, and commended them for coming forward, and agreed with possibly allowing some dispensation for signs and thinking out of the box. The Growth Management Director said staff has given the property owner options and Ms. Flores said the property owner wants the businesses to pay for it. Ms. Simchick asked who Council could talk to about slowing speed on US 1. The City Manager said it is regulated by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and the City could petition the Department and adopt a resolution requesting a reduction in speed. Mr. Paternoster asked what jurisdiction business owners would have on a state road within the City limits and suggested the street parking in that area of US 1 near these shops could be a turning lane. Mr. Paternoster said the ambience the City is trying to portray is not really showing on US 1. ~~ 6 Regular City Council Meeting January 9, 2008 Page Seven The City Attorney said the City has no jurisdiction on US 1 and advised the best way to deal with FDOT is to work with them, but take a political front as well. The City Attorney explained that FDOT originally planned to six-lane US 1, and people complained, so the City asked for bumpouts to make it harder for FDOT to eventually six- lane the road. Ms. Simchick suggested that she and Mr. Paternoster as members of Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) can work through that committee to promote the idea. It was the consensus of Council that the City Manager and City Attorney proceed to pursue the recommendation. Discussion took place on the effect of this area being an historical district and a redevelopment district. Ms. Simchick said a sign at the northbound light before the park for the water park and the scenic route could divert some traffic off of US 1. The Growth Management Director said they had suggested the Villages owner allow the businesses to put their signs on his monument sign. Louise Kautenberg, Sebastian, said she spends her money in Sebastian, but we as a City need to give our support to the businesses, said FDOT is coming back because they want six lanes and will ask what we are doing. She said Ms. Simchick's directional sign idea is excellent, that crossing US 1 and Main Street is very difficult, suggesting better timing so crossing is not dangerous. Grace Wieber, 632 Stevenson Avenue, said she and her husband have their own business and thanked Council for supporting businesses, asked who it is that decided that there is a double entryway to the Village Shops and suggested maybe ingress could be north and egress could be south. She said she believes in this area and thought maybe we could be like Melbourne's historic district, and knows better days are ahead. The City Attorney said it is two-way on the site plan and the property owner could come in for a minor modification and it would have to be signed off by the County. Rex Nelson, 710 Fischer Circle, Sebastian, spoke on the Ocean Concrete appeal of the County denial of their request for site plan extension; the July 24th County decision to not allow this type of use in light industrial zoning; and announced that people will attend the County P & Z hearing tomorrow night. He directed people to review websites irccdd.com and sebastianconcernedcitizens.com and encouraged participation. Ms. Simchick said she had asked the City Clerk to send the letter and resolutions previously approved by Council to the County Planning Commission. Regular City Council Meeting January 9, 2008 Page Eight Mr. Neglia asked how they would feel to keep getting those copies from us and to be careful on that. Ms. Simchick said there are new members. Chuck Lever, Mulberry Street, Sebastian, said the County designated Old Dixie Highway as historical and asked if the City Attorney had followed up on doing this in Sebastian. He also suggested the Main Street Project be put on hold and re-allocate the money to attract businesses to the business district. Mr. Paternoster asked what happened with the historic roadway designation, and the City Attorney said the majority of the road is through the County, and the thinking was let them take the lead, it will be complicated and there would be "taking" issues involved if it was declared historic and said it could not be modified. Mr. Paternoster asked Council to keep the on-going petition opposing the Main Street project in mind. Damien Gilliams said he is glad to see the businesses come out, thanked Mr. Wolff and Mr. Paternoster for coming out to his business when he had a problem, suggested moving the Chamber near City Hall, asked about the citizens academy, suggested using the Main Street Project money to buy parking downtown, asked where the legislative wish list is. He distributed the Oxbow Eco-Center newsletter and pointed out the same programs could be done with the conservation area behind City Hall which included holding classes, teaching kids about Florida, have a gift shop to generate revenue. He continued to suggest that the Chamber be taken off Main Street and use that area for parking for downtown, and said a change of leadership is needed. He asked where the $2 million the City withdrew from the State Board of Administration is, suggested changing the Charter officers, have Finance Director be a Charter officer, and the City Attorney report to the City Manager. Anita Solomon, newly appointed to Parks and Recreation, said it will be her quest to work with the dog issue, and generate tourism to assist the businesses such as holding a green market, arts on the avenue, and theater under the stars. Ms. Simchick asked if the bandshell could be used as a movie screen, and the City Manager said he would look into this. Mr. Neglia said he discussed this last year with the City Manager and he was going to look at this at the Barber Street Sports Complex along with a handball court. A recess was taken at 9:14 p.m. to 9:24 p.m. and upon return all members were present. 13. NEW BUSINESS 08.006 A. Update -Growth Management Site Plan Review (City Manager Transmittal 53-63 w/Attachments) 1~ 8 Regular City Council Meeting January 9, 2008 Page Nine The City Manager explained the need for outside consulting services to assist in expediting site plan review under his spending authority limit of $15,000. His full report is included in the agenda packet. He said it was his intention to first clean out the bottleneck and then research other avenues such as fee increases, staffing or a program to charge an additional fee to fast track a plan. He said step number two is dual permit review by the Growth Management Director for land development, general code, setbacks, parking, construction standards, structure, mechanical issues to expedite the process, and step number three would be to revamp the land development regulations to be more business friendly. Council expressed that staff would be the best gatekeeper of the City's codes, but they have received many complaints and they were willing to try the City Manager's recommendations. The City Attorney advised that once the City updates the comp plan, by law the land development regulations have to be updated and since we are in the procurement process with the comp plan update we can plan on updating the land development regulations after the comp plan update. Mr. Paternoster suggested utilizing Main Street project money to entice businesses to the district and hire more staff. Damien Gilliams, 1623 US 1, suggested using a citizens' academy such as Boulder CO, and Greenberg NY uses to keep taxes down. Mr. Paternoster pointed out no one has initiated an academy yet. The City Manager asked Mr. Gilliams if he would volunteer to review site plans. MOTION by Ms. Simchick and SECOND by Mr. Paternoster was made to extend the meeting to 11:00 p.m. carried with a voice vote of 4-0. The City Manager said there have been volunteers in some departments, but volunteers aren't the right people to do site plan review and the City does have currently have volunteers working at the front desk. Ms. Simchick said volunteers are used for non-essential jobs and asked what would be the City's liability if volunteers made errors while approving site plans. She offered Mr. Minner's phone number to the public in case they would like to volunteer. 9J Regular Ciry Council Meeting January 9, 2008 Page Ten 08.007 B. Request to Municipalities from Florida League of Cities for Resolution Urging 65-85 Legislative Support for FLC Legislative Priorities Relating to Affordable Housing,. Environmental Permits, Growth Management Local Business Taxes Local Government Pension Plans, Mobile Home Park Closures Municipal Indebtedness Property Tax Reform, Transportation and Water -Direct Staff Accordingly (FLC Memo, List of Officials, Draft Resolution) Council members asked for clarification on the following issues: tax-increment financing, electronic traffic devices vs. witnessing traffic infractions, reclassifying businesses for local business taxes and setting up gas tax monies as an enterprise fund. Because of the discussed concerns, it was the consensus of Council not to move forward with a resolution. 14. CITY ATTORNEY MATTERS -None. 15. CITY MANAGER MATTERS The City Manager said bids have been opened on the Collier Creek project (see memo attached), however it has been brought to their attention that walls could be done with the funds available. He said he did not have anything further tonight but to look into it the feasibility and he will report back to Council after research is done. He updated Council on the how the state has handled the State Board of Administration (SBA) funds. He explained the City has $19.2 million in cash with 5.9 million in cash in Wachovia (earning 4%), 7.8 million still in SBA, 5.5 million in agency notes (earning 3%). The City withdrew money from SBA and it went into the 5.9 million that is in cash. He said the City is not depositing into SBA at this time. The City Attorney advised that under the City's policy, the Finance Committee administers the City's investments on a regular basis and has done so since 2001. Mr. Wolff asked if the City lost money and was the City's money in jeopardy. The City Manager said in his opinion the City's SBA money is not in jeopardy because the state has done the right thing holding the bad securities in abeyance, eventually pay the good securities with accrued interest and perhaps a year from now also, pay the bad securities with interest so the only loss would be interest. 16. CITY CLERK MATTERS -None ~Z 10 Regular City Council Meeting January 9, 2008 Page Eleven 17. CITY COUNCIL MATTERS A. Mr. Neglia Mr. Neglia referenced the FLC e-mail regarding the property tax reform, stated Council can't tell citizens how to vote but he would like consensus to have the City Manager write up something and put it on website and TV screen to educate the citizens. Council gave their consensus. Mr. Wolff asked if anyone is doing neutral public education on this matter. The City Attorney stated there is no neutral party that he is aware of. B. Mr. Paternoster Mr. Paternoster reminded the public of his January 22"d public forum to be held in the chambers. He stated the garbage pickup was late again on Vocelle, Floraland, and Mulberry. He also said three weeks went by with no yard debris pickup. He said it is his understanding that after Walgreens went up, a sidewalk would be put in. The City Attorney said the City had the money to do the sidewalk but the former City Engineer gave the money back to the developer. The City Manager said the first phase of the sidewalk project is finishing up under budget and after the gap is closed on Main Street to Easy Street, the Walgreens area will be looked at. Mr. Paternoster said he has received comments that the Public Works flatbed and boat are not being utilized but because of the hour he will send an a-mail for the City Manager to follow up on. C. Ms. Simchick Ms. Simchick said the new monument signs look great around town, especially Mel Fisher's Treasure Museum. The Sebastian Historical is having an open house and membership drive on February 2"d from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. She asked that signs on US 1 to gear people to scenic route not be put by the wayside. I3 Regular Ciry Council Meeting January 9, 2008 Page Twelve D. Mr. Wolff Mr. Wolff said there are no bicycle racks at old schoolhouse and it might be a good way to "go green." E. Mayor Coy Absent. 18. Being no further business, the regular meeting adjourned at 10:58 p.m. i~ 12 City of Sebastian, Florida Agenda No . ~ ~ , D y Subject: William and Mary Ingui; pool enclosure Date Submitted: 1/17/08 For Agenda of 1/23/08 SUMMARY: As discussed at the Board of Adjustment hearing on January 9, 2008, the City has undertaken to clean-up the situation that arose from a conveyance. of right-of--way land in lieu of a variance to Bill and Mary Ingui in 1998. To clear this matter up once and for all, the following course of action has been recommended: 1. Mr. and Mrs. Ingui obtain a variance for the pool and screen enclosure encroachment. 2. The Inguis execute the attached Quit-Claim Deed, so as to cancel the unlawful transaction, and the City shall record the same. 3 . The -City adopt Resolution R-08-02 to rescind the abandonment. of easement approved under resolution R-98-20. 4 . The City Manager give formal written consent to Mr. and Mrs. Ingui for the utilization of the five feet of easement for the pool enclosure, with provision for compensation should use of the easement be needed that; requires removal of improvements. 5. The City issue a check to Mr. and Mrs. Ingui in the amount •of their payment for the returned drainage right-of--way and half of the application fees for the variance set forth above, for the total amount of $792.39. The variance was granted on 1/9/08, subject to the completion of this recommended course of action. RECOM[~NDED ACTION: Move to adopt Resolution R-08-02 and authorize staff to undertake the remaining recommended actions to resolve the Ingui pool matter. REVIEWED BY CITY CLERK: AUTHORIZED PLACEMENT ON AGENDA BY CITY MANAGER: ~s r~ Return to: Richard Stringer, City Attorney 1225 Main Street Sebastian, FL 32958 QUIT-CLAIM DEED THIS QUiT-C1,A1M DEED, executed this ~` day of January, 2008, by William Ingui and Mary Ingui, whose address is 626 Layport Avenue, Sebastian, FL 32958, first party, to the City of Sebastian, a Florida municipal corporation, whose address is 1225 Main Street, Sebastian, FL 32958, second party: WITNESSETH, that the said first party, does hereby remise, release and quit-claim unto the said second party forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which the said first party has in and to the following described lot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the county of Indian River, State of Florida, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest; lien, equity and claim whatsoever of the said first party, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said second party forever. IT IS THE INTENT OF THE PARTIES TO RESCM THAT CERTAIN QUIT-CLAIM DEED BETWEEN THE PARTIES RECORDED AT BOOK 1212 PAGE 1087 OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said first party has signed and sealed these presents the day and year set forth above. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: Witness William Ingui Witness Mary Ingui STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of January, 2008 by William Ingui and Mary Ingui who are personally known to me. Signature of Notary Public State of Florida i~ A parcel of property being three (3) feet in width being more particularly describe:~~~'f'ollo~vs: :.:::.. For a point of beginning, commence at the northeast corner of Lot S, Block 104, a replat of portions of Sebastian Highlands, Unit 2, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 6, pages 87 though 87B of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida; thence northerly along the projected line of the east property line of said Lot 5 a distance of three (3) feet to a point, thence westerly and parallel to. the north property line of said Lot 5 to a point located three (3) feet northerly of the ntrit~«~vest property corner as projected and extended northerly by the west propert*~~ line of said Lot S, thence southerly along said projected west lot line of said Lot 5 to t~:~ northwest comer of said Lot 5, thence easterly along the rear property line of said L+tit~S to northeast corner of said Lot S, thence easterly along the rear property line of ~a'id~ot 5 to northeast corner of said Lot S being the point of beginning, containing 27i.;$,.~et more or less, reserving a drainage and utility easement on the entire three (3) foo~'~y~+e pa:cel for the purpose of installing and maintaining drainage and utilities. Aii I~ririg'~~~ith in Section t2, Township 3 i South, Range 38 East, Indian River County, ~+ort~da. 0 N N -o O CD /8 RESOLUTION NO. R-08-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION R-98-20; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Resolution R-98-20 abandoned a portion of a utility easement as part of a conveyance of right-of--way to an adjoining private resident; and WHEREAS, said conveyance has been rescinded and accordingly, the easement should not be vacated. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council hereby rescinds Resolution R-98-20 concerning the abandonment of an easement over the following described real property: The south three feet of the north teen foot public utility and drainage easement of Lot 5, Block 104 Replat of Sebastian Highlands Unit 2. dignity. Section 2. This resolution shall prevail over any conflicting provision of equal or lesser Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. A motion to adopt the foregoing Resolution was made by Council Member The motion was seconded by Council Member and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Mayor Andrea Coy Vice-mayor Sal Neglia Councilmember AI Paternoster Councilmember Dale Simchick Councilmember Eugene Wolff By: The Mayor thereupon declared this Resolution duly passed and adopted this 23`d day of January, 2008. CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA ATTEST: Sally A. Maio, MMC City Clerk Andrea Coy, Mayor Approved as to form and legality for reliance by the City of Sebastian only: Rich Stringer, City Attorney l4 2a ~~ nm l-~~ .. HoIN{E OF PEi.iGN ISLAND CITY OF SEBASTIAN AGENDA TRANSMITTAL Subject: Agenda No. C7 ~f _ (~~~ Approved for Submittal by: City Manager Department Origin: Police Dept. ~~~~ Finance Direct City Attorney. City Clerk: A Minner Date Submitted: 1/15/2008 For Agenda of: 1/23/2008 Ezhibits: FSA Bid Awards 07-15-0827 Rollover, pages 14-16, 25, 73 and 475. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: AMOUNT BUDGETED: APPROPRIATION $271,532.00 $385,000.00 REQUIRED: None SUMMARY The police. department has an approved budget to replace ten high mileage, high maintenance vehicles. We have selected Ford Crown Victoria's for general patrol vehicles and Chevrolet Trailblazers for four patrol supervisors and one replacement K-9 vehicle.- The Crown Victoria's are consistent with our current patrol fleet. The Trailblazers are consistent with other special purpose vehicles within the fleet and will give the police department the ability to respond to emergencies in the event of flooding and provide some access to our recreational areas. The ten replaced vehicles will be sold at public auction. There will be other associated costs for add on equipment to make the vehicles patrol ready. Those items will be purchased separately from this order. RECOMMENDED ACTION Move to authorize the purchase of five Crown Victoria Patrol Vehicles from Duvall Ford in the amount of $127,740 and five Chevrolet Trailblazers from Alan Jay Automotive Network in the amount of $143,792. Both purchases to be made under the Florida Sherifl's Association State Contract # 07-15-0827. Z/ 22 01!1012008 08:46 8634024221 ALAN-JAY-FLEET PAGE 02!02 .... ~L,/+~Cyll7i'7~`llf~l J~I~'~'~3/'C~-J'"/C--..~.~». Cat! its ~, for all of year Fteet Automotive, & L' Ight Trrtck needs. PHONE (8l?D) .d7,ANdAY (252-GSZ9) WWVY.AL4NJAY.GOM ~l^I~i ; :.. „ 2003 U.S. 27 Sooth 1.41kfi~fl~il P.O. BOX 920D ?I;tn,, .y « s. !,~I, . ~ ~.',i _ Sebring, FL 33870 ~1~++i' ~ i ~ Sobrln9, FL 33671-9204 Direct 863~t02-4234 Mobile $63.381-x411 Fax 863-A02-4221 Q-U~~I~ QLTIDTE SHEET FOR VEHICLES FROM STATE CONTRACT & FLORIbA SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION 13II7 DATF 10-Jan-08 PAGE 1 of 2 REQUESTING AGENCY: CITY O1F 5EBASTiAN p,D. CONTACT PERSON: LT GREG W1TT PHONE NUMBER: 772-589-2512 FAX NUMBER: 772-3$8-1872 ewitt(a~citvofsebastian.orir State Bld t! 10-070-001-P-REBID http://www,myflorldamarketplace.carn 2406 MODEL. YEAR FSA BID # 47-75-0027 http;liwww.fl~herlffs,prg MODEL: CT155oG SPECIFICATION # aoo8 CIiEYY 7RattBtAZER 4YIR7 ^;411 vehicles will be orclen~ whJte w/ Barkest interior ~~ Unl®ss t:tearty stated otherwise an purChaS@ order. OPTION # DESCI21PTIpN LH~ 5,3L V8 GAS ENGINE W/ ACTNE P8300 SETINA PUSH BUMPER 300 SERI 51.E SETINA SERIES 10 LEXAN CAGE 12-V-~ ~~ wPL6-LEb 1 W-890 WvL~~ .~., W-GL UY7/DB ©$-~~.. US2-GMSC ~_ JD-425358 C-VS-1300 TBZ 44007-1-2 40188 COST 51,250A0 $515.00 $?26.OD $59ti.OD B 00 $436.00 windows) $343.00 $343.00 $89.00 INCL $459 0~ ~..__.. ~~ $395.00 $395.00 X179.00 $10g 00 $9,433.00 50.00 $28,079.00 QTY 4 ~ 5112,316.OD 1 appreciate the opportunity to submit this quotation. Please review it carefuAy. If there are any errors or changes please feel irpp it ront~ct ma at sny timo, !will be happy !o d33ist you. Comments: Alan Jay Chevrolet Catlrllac, Inc. FEID p65.0211444 !Alan Jay Pontiac Buiek OMC, Inc. ~i4 # 593533026 Alan Jay Ferri t incoin Moreury, InC. F61D t! 20.6eBC360 / Alen Jey Chrysler Jeep, trr{r. 64-0650530 Alan Jay Import Center, Inc. dlb/a Alan Jay Toyota FEID # 59~533D26 !Alan Jay Nissan, Inc. FEID #76-0833978 Satum of,Senring, Inc. 59.3533024 VEHICLE QUOTED BY: Chris Wilson, h'leet Manager 863-40z-x234 "1 Want to be Your Fleet Provlder^ Direct Connect 158^41460"14 Ghrts.wilson(n~7,alaniay.com 4UOTE SHEET SEBASTIAN PD SUV's 19 BASE DISTRICT PRICE: $19,645^00 O TOTAL OP bPTIONS: EXTENDED WARRANTY: TOTAL COST; 01110!2008 08:46 8634024221 ALAN-JAY-FLEET PAGE 01102 Call Us ~, for all ofyour Flee#Aulomotive, & Light Truck needs. PHONE (S00) ALANJAY (252-6529) WWW.ALANJAY.COM i~N' , ,(„S'+'3;13, ii;• ~.~~: ~; 9. 2003 [T.S. Z7 Saath Sebring, FL 33870 ~ ~ ~tl #1 ;I;~ ~"' P.O. BOx szoD Sebring, tL 33877-8200 Direc# 863-40a-4234 Mobile $63.381-3411 Fax 863-d0~-42$1 QITICI~ QU+aTE SHEET FOR VEF3ICLE5 FROM STATE CONTRACT & FT.ORTT7A SHF.RTT'F'ri ASSnC.TATTt7N RTI~ DATE 10•Jan-08 REQUESTING AGENCY; CONTACT PERSON; PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER; PAGE 2 of 2 CITY dr SEDASTiAN )?.p. LT GREG WTTT __ _ _ 77z-589-ZS1Z 772-0$$-1872 8a'itt@cityofsebastian.org , St9to Bid tr 1p-070.007-P-REBID http:llwww.myfloridamartcctplace.aom 2008 MODEL YEAR FSA BID # 07.75-DSZ7 http:l/www.flsheriffs.or~g MODEL: CT15S08 SPECIFICATION # 19 2 C EVY TRAILBLAZER 4V1+D All veh/cles wf!! be a+xlered white w/daricest Inter/or BASE DISTRICT PRICE: $19,646.00 ~~ Unle59 Ctearl stated ofherwlse an putnhase ar3ier, OPTION # DESCRIPTION LH B 5.3L VB GAS ENGINE W! ACTIVE FUEL MGMT ~ PB300 SF_T1NA PUSH BUMPER 300 SERIES W-690 WHELEN 90 WATT 4 CORNER STRQBE PKG .,.~..~ UY71D6 CLA55 ill RELIEVER, WIRING, DRAW BAR 2" BALL Gt30 LOCKING REAR DIFFERi;NTU1L US2-GMSC AIR BAG CUTOFF SWITCH FOR SIDE IMPACT JD-425-5358 C-VS-1300 TBZ 44007-1-2 40188 HAVIS K9 WAVIS DR HAVIS HA WPUMP LED W-SLED W-GL sir ttAV15 CONSOLE FUK I KAILt3LALtK WEATHER TECH FLOOR LINERS ! an/+rc.+r+2fe fhe opportunity to submit this quotation. PloACC review it carefully. If them, are any errors or changes please feel free to contact the at any time, 1 w!!l be happy to assist yau. comments: COST $1,250.00 $61b.Op $436.00 $$9.00 INCL $395.00 $179.04 $109.00 $2,529.00 5996.00 $899.00 $2,893.00 $343.00 5343,00 $11,830.00 _ 80.00 $31~4T6.DD ~~. Alan Jay Chevrolet Cadillac, loc. FEID X65-0Z11404 t Alan Jay Pe~rtiaG Buick CtiMG, Inc. FE1D 4 S$-3533D28 Alan Jay Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc. FEID # 20-5998366 !Alan Jay Chrysler Jeep, Ina. fili-0668p0 Alan .lay ImpoR Gooier, Inc. dtbta Alan Jay Toyota FEID Yi 59.3633028 !Alan ,lay hli94en. Inc. FEID tE76.OB3347$ Saturn of Sabring, loc. 59 3533024 VEHICLE QUOTED BY: Chris V47ilson, Fleet Manager 863-402234 "! WBrtt to be ou! eet Provitler" DirectCdnnoct 158'41480.14 chris.wilsonnalanjay_coTn ~~ J 4UQTE SHEET SEBASTIAN PD SUV's TOTAL OF OPTIONS: EXTENDEd WARRANTY; TOTAL COST: Page 1 of 2 Michelle Morris From: Smith, Laura [Laura.Smith@duvalford.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 2:07 PM To: Michelle Morris Subject: SebastianPD Cv-marked.xls Attachments: image001.jpg Revised copy Duval Ford Laura Smith 904-381-6555 Fax: 9043876816 Lsmith@d uvalford.com Contact Dennis Hovasse Contract # 06-14-0821 Org City of Sebastian Phone 772-589-5233 Fax Email dhovasse ci ofsebastian.or We appreciate your interest in the 2007 Florida Sher~'s Associationl Florida Association of Counties Purchaseing Contract. Listed below are the items we discussed. Item Price # I Cr-vic/Marked 3ase Price ound dome light invited slip differential ear door locks & handles inop. ioor blank & rear window barriers ~ainshields- flange ;evlar trunk pac ;ourtesy light disabled ~echargable mag light 'ear deck led warning lights red & blue) eft hand pillar mounted spotlight iberty led package (red & blue) grille strobes i0W 4 corner strobes 'roguard 6000 1/15/2008 19 ~,,,. 125. $89.00 $190.00 $20.00 $135.00 ~~ $190.00 $2,245.00 $289.00 $390.00 $556.00 z5 Page 2 of Z roguard P2600 lexan cage dotal ~ ~`~ ~( ~ $25,548.00 Attention: This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply a-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation." Z to 1/15/2008 BID AWt1RD ANNOUNCEMENT 07-15-0827 PURSUIT, ADMINISTRATIVE NON-PURSUIT, UTILITY VEHICLES, TRUCKS 8t VANS, & OTHER FLEET EQUIPMENT Participating Sheriff's Offices 8L Local .Governmental Agencies of the State of Florida Coordinated By The Florida Sheriffs Association, Florida Association of Counties & Florida Fire Chiefs' Association F FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES At! About Florida Z7 ~o FLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION P. O. Box 12519 • Tallahassee, FL 32317-2519 PHONE (850) 877-2165 FAX (850) 878-8665 WEB SITE: http://www.flshertffs.org DATE: October 1, 2007 TO: ALL PROSPECTIVE PARTICIPANTS FROM: Gary E. Perkins Lynn Meek Peggy Goff Executive Director Vehicle Bid Coordinator Vehicle Contract Manager RE: SHERIFFS' OFFICES & LOCAL GOVERNMENTALAGENCIES OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA COOPERATIVE BID FOR PURSUIT, ADMINISTRATIVE NON-PURSUIT, UTILITY VEHICLES, TRUCK & VANS, & OTHER FLEET EQUIPMENT Bid No. 07-15-0827 We are pleased to announce that the Florida Sheriffs Association, FloridaAssociation of Counties and Florida Fire Chiefs' Association has successfully conducted its fifteenth statewide competitive bid for vehicles which includes police pursuit, administrative non-pursuit, utility vehicles, trucks & vans, backhoes, motorgraders, agriculture type tractors, skid steer loaders and regenerative air street sweepers. This contract is effective beginning October 1, 2007 through September 30, 2008, as long as vehicles are available through fleet. Bids will be extended and guaranteed to any and all units of local governments and political subdivisions includ- ing, but not limited to, county, local county board of public instruction, municipalities and/or police agencies, other local public or public safety agencies or authorities within the State of Florida. Also, in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 287, F.S., and 60A, FloridaAdministrative Code, any state agency including the Division of Universities, Department of Children and Family Services, Department of Health, Department of Juvenile Justice and Department of Corrections which elects and is authorized to purchase from a source other than the State of Florida contract is eligible to purchase from this bid. In addition to the eligible users referenced above and with the consent of the successful bidder(s), purchases may be made under the terms and conditions of this contract by governmental entities located outside the State of Florida. Appropriate governmental entities' purchasing laws, rules and regulations shall apply to purchases made under this contract. This program is designed to provide participating agencies with the most economically priced patrol, administra- tive non-pursuit, utility vehicles, trucks & vans, and other fleet equipment tailored to their specific needs, in a prompt and timely manner. One of the unique characteristics of this program that distinguishes it from others is that this bid contract is awarded to the lowest responsible bidder by manufacturer by specification by zone for all vehicles, trucks, vans and other fleet equipment. The Florida Sheriffs Association, Florida Association of Counties and Florida Fire Chiefs' Association realize that Sheriffs' Offices, Police Agencies and other units of local governments must provide economically based maintenance and stocked parts for their fleets. They must consider overall operational cost of their vehicles instead of just considering "low bid" on the purchase of the vehicle. This program's bid award system not only provides the purchaser with the means to make sound decisions on dedicated fleet needs, but also offers the convenience of shopping and purchasing from a single contract. cBid Award Announcement (07-I 5--0827) 14 ~0 All interested parties who wish to purchase from this contract may do so by following these simple procedures: ORDERING INSTRUCTIONS 1. Contact the awarded dealership (see pages 55-59) listed in the zone from which you wish to purchase and advise them of your interest to purchase'from the Sheriffs' Offices & Local Governmental Agencies of the State of Florida Bid No. 07-15-0827. They will assist you with the placement of your order and answer any questions you may have regarding the vehicles purchased through this program. All agencies ordering any FORD, GENERAL MOTORS, or CHRYSLER product, please be advised that you must use the appropriate FIN CODE/FAN CODE for the Florida Sheriffs Association in order to obtain the manufacturer's concessions. Also, you must use your FIN CODE/FAN CODE as a secondary number. For futher assistance call the Fleet Customer Information Center for your appropriate manufacturer. Manufacturer Type Code FSA Code Fleet Center Contact Numbers FORD FIN CODE QE065 1-800-34-FLEET (1-800-343-5338) GENERAL MOTORS FAN CODE 917872 1-800-FLEET OP (1-800-353-3867) CHRYSLER FAN CODE 49313 1-800-999-FLEET (1-800-999-3533) 2. YOU MUST send a conv of the ORIGINAL PURCHASE ORDER (including_FSA's Contract No. 07- 15-0827Zyou submitted to the participating dealer to: Florida Sheriffs Association P. O. Box 12519 Tallahassee, Florida 32317-2519 ATTN: Lynn Meek, Cooperative Bid Coordinator Basic information required on all purchase orders is listed on Page 61 of this Bid Award Announcement. Purchase orders lacking the required basic information listed may result in the delay of placement and/or confirmation of orders. NOTE: Purchasers are reminded that the issuance of a Purchase Order does not in itself guarantee the placement of an order. The agency is responsible for filling in the requested information on the "Confirmation of Order" and submitting it along with your purchase order to the respective dealership. Dealers are required to fill in the bottom section of the "Confirmation of Order" and send it to the purchaser within seven (7) calendar days after receipt of purchase order. Purchasers are encouraged to contact the dealer if a "Confirmation of Order" has not been received within a reasonable time frame and request its issuance. 4. Agencies which elect to purchase off this contract will incur the following Administrative Fees: • Pursuit, Administrative Non-Pursuit, Utility Vehicles, Trucks & Vans (Any vehicle up to 52,000 lb. GVWR) -Dealers have included the administrative fee of $75.00 per unit in their bid prices and made it a part of the base unit's purchase price. • Trucks starting at 52,000 lb. GVWR and all Heavy Equipment -Dealers have included the one-half percent (.005) administrative fee in the base price and all add options that are listed. The one-half percent (.005) will also be included in any additional equipment (add options) which the dealers quote to the governmental agencies. 5. In order to ensure quality service for our user agencies, we are requesting each of you to notify the Florida Sheriffs Association regarding any problems encountered in working with the awarded dealers. Any issues, including but not limited to, receipt of confirmation of order, delivery problems and communication problems, Bid Award Announcement (07-15-082 Z9 should be reported to us by e-mail at lmeekna,flsheriffs.org. This information will be considered in future bid awards in order to ensure that agencies are receiving the level of service required of dealers who wish to participate in this program. 6. Add/delete options might include a superscript listed by the Order Code. The purpose of the superscript is to identify which options correlate to a specific dealer. Superscripts will be a number between 1 and 4, and will correspond as follows: 1 =Western zone dealer 2 =Northern zone dealer 3 =Central zone dealer 4 =Southern zone dealer If a dealer has been awarded more than one zone, they will only have one superscript number assigned, and it will be the lowest numerical number that applies to their awarded zones. For example, if a dealer is awarded the northern and southern zones, their add/delete options for both zones will be represented by a " 2" super- script. IlVIPORTANT NOTE: The manufacturer's have announced that they will be producing limited quantities of pursuit vehicles this year and that orders would be processed on a first come first serve basis while quantities last. To be on the safe side, we are advising all agencies to place their orders for pursuit vehicles as soon as possible to ensure delivery of product. On a final note, prospective purchasers aze reminded that pursuant to Florida State Statute all fees (title, applica- tionplate transfer, etc.) aze included in the base price for each vehicle. Purchasing agencies which elect to do their own title work, may wish to consider seeking reimbursement from the dealership for those transfer fees already included in the base price of each vehicle. Below is a complete overview of all the 2008 vehicles that will be provided. However, the ones indicated with an (*) before the vehicle name are the vehiches which need to be purchased from the Bid Awazd Announcement 06-14-0821 and 06-14-0821A Rollover. The Florida Sheriffs Association's, Florida Association of Counties' and Florida Fire Chiefs' Association's bid award for full size (pursuit and administrative), mid size (pursuit and administrative), utility vehicles, trucks and vans, and other fleet equipment are as follows (zones indicated with a * =specification low bid for Bid 07-15- 0827 - © =specification low bid for Bid 06-14-0821 and 06-14-0821A): OVERVIEW OF AWARDED SPECIFICATIONS Name of Dealership Type of Vehicle Zone Base Price FULL SIZE PURSUIT VEHICLES - RWD (POLICE PA KAGEZ (5~ecification #011 Orville Beckford Ford-Mercury Duval Ford Duval Ford Duval Ford Beck Auto Sales, Inc. Beck Auto Sales, Inc. Beck Auto Sales, Inc. Beck Auto Sales, Inc. Bid Award Announcement (07-15--0827) Ford Crown Vctoria (P71/720A) Western $19,918.00 Ford Crown Victoria (P71/720A) Northern $19,846.00 Ford Crown Victoria (P71/720A) Central $19,846.00 Ford Crown Victoria (P71/720A) Southern $19,846.00 Dodge Charger (LXDH48/27A) ~ Western $19,248.00 Dodge Charger (LXDH48/27A) ~k Northern $19,198.00 Dodge Charger (LXDH48/27A) ~k Central $19,223.00 Dodge Charger (LXDH48/27A) ~r Southern $19,248.00 16 30 Name of Dealership Type of Vehicle MID SIZE 4-DOOR UTILITY VEHICLES - 4X2 (Specification #17) (continued) Alan Jay Pontiac Buick GMC, Inc. General GMC Truck Sales .. . General GMC Truck Sales .. . Beck Auto Sales, Inc. Beck Auto Sales, Inc. Beck Auto Sales, Inc. Beck Auto Sales, Inc. GMC Envoy (TS15506) GMC Envoy (TS 15506) GMC Envoy (TS 15506) Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo (WKTH74) Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo (WKTH74) Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo (WKTH74) Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo (WKTH74) Zone Northern Central Southern Western Northern Central Southern Base Price $18,874.00 $18,795.00 $18,745.00 $18,715.00 $18,665.00 $18,690.00 $18,715.00 Alan Jay Import Center, Inc. *Nissan Pathfinder (09217) Western $21,538.00 Alan Jay Import Center, Inc. *Nissan Pathfinder (09217) Northern $21,487.00 Alan Jay Import Center, Inc. *Nissan Pathfinder (09217) Central $21,124.00 Alan Jay Import Center, Inc. *Nissan Pathfinder (09217) Southern $21,174.00 Saturn of Sebring Saturn Outlook (ZR14526) Western $25,913.00 Saturn of Sebring Saturn Outlook (ZR14526) Northern $25,763.00 Saturn of Sebring Saturn Outlook (ZR14526) Central $25,713.00 Saturn of Sebring Saturn Outlook (ZR14526) Southern $25,763.00 Alan Jay Import Center, Inc. *Toyota 4 Runner (8642) Western $25,083.00 Alan Jay Import Center, Inc. *Toyota 4 Runner (8642) Northern $24,933.00 Alan Jay Import Center, Inc. *Toyota 4 Runner (8642) Central $24,883.00 Alan Jay Import Center, Inc. *Toyota 4 Runner (8642) Southern $24,958.00 MID SIZE 4-DOOR UTILITY VEHICLES - 4X4 (Specification #18) *(Rollover Vehicles -formerly Specification #17 on Bid Award Annou ncement 06-14-0821) Orville BeckfordFnrd-Mercury *Ford Explorer (U73) Western $20,776.00 Duval Ford *Ford Explorer (U73) Northern $20,747.00 Duval Ford *Ford Explorer (LJ73) Central $20,821.00 Duval Ford *Ford Explorer (L773) Southern $20,893.00 Orville Beckford Ford-Mercury *Ford Explorer Sport Trac (U51) 4 Western $20,514.00 Duval Ford *Ford Explorer Sport Trac (U51) ©Northern $20,539.00 Tropical Ford *Ford Explorer Sport Trac (U51) ©Central $20,547.00 Duval Ford *Ford Explorer Sport Trac (U51) ©Southern $20,637.00 Champion Chevrolet, Inc. Chevrolet Trailblazer (CT15506) ~k Western $19,883.00 Cindy Chevrolet, Inc. Chevrolet Trailblazer (CT15506) ~r Northern $19,774.00 Alan Jay Chevrolet Cadillac, Inc. Chevrolet Trailblazer (CT15506) * Central $19,646.00 Cindy Chevrolet, Inc. Chevrolet Trailblazer (CT15506) ~k Southern $19,794.00 Proctor & Proctor, Inc. GMC Acadia (TV 14526) Western $24,915.00 Proctor & Proctor, Inn, GMC Acadia (TV 14526) Northern $24,915.00 General GMC Truck Sales ... GMC Acadia (TV 14526) Central $24,785.00 Bid Award Announcement (07-15--0827) 25 ~l FLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION, FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES & FLORIDA FIRE CHIEFS' ASSOCIATION FULL SIZE PURSUIT VEHICLES - RWD (POLICE PACKAGE) SPECIFICATION #1 2008 Ford Crown Victoria (P71/720A) The Ford Crown Victoria (P71/720A) purchased through this contract comes with all the standard equipment as specified by the manufacturer for this model and FSA's base vehicle specification(s) requirements which are included and made a part of this contract's vehicle base price as awarded by specification by zone. ZONE: Western Northern Central Southern BASE PRICE: $19,918.00 $19,846.00 $19,846.00 $19,846.00 While the Florida Sheriffs Association, Florida Association of Counties and Florida Fire Chiefs' Association have attempted to identify and include those equipment items most often requested by participating agencies for full size vehicles, we realize equipment needs and preferences aze going to vary from agency to agency. In an effort to incorporate flexibility into our program, we have created specific add/delete options which allow the purchaser to tailor the vehicle to their particular wants or needs. The following equipment delete and add options and their related cost aze provided here to assist you in approximating the total cost of the type vehicle(s) you wish to order through this program. Simply deduct the cost of any of the following equipment items you wish deleted from the base unit cost and/or add the cost of any equipment items you wish added to the base unit cost to determine the approximate cost of the type vehicle(s) you wish to order. NOTE: An official listing of all add/delete options and their prices should be obtained from the appropriate dealer in your zone when preparing your order. Additional add/delete options other than those listed here maybe available through the dealers, however, those listed here must be honored by the dealers in your zone at the stated prices. Please refer to the "Overview of Awarded Specifications" for vehicles which were low bid. All vehicles indicated with the ~t are low bid for Bid 07-15-0827 -those indicated with ©are low bid for Bid 06-14-0821 and 06-14-0821A. Bid Award Announcement (07--15-0827) 73 32 ~A FLORIDA - COUNTIES A!! About Florida FLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION, FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES & FLORIDA FIRE CHIEFS' ASSOCIATION MID SIZE 4-DOOR UTILITY VEHICLES - 4X4 SPECIFICATION #18 2008 Chevrolet Trailblazer (CT15506) :~~«;E, , ~~ ``,~ M1 ~`.$~~ 45S 4Kq! i ' pC4A'C'~`.• The Chevrolet Trailblazer (CT15506) purchased through this contract comes with all the standard equipment as specified by the manufacturer for this model and FSA's base vehicle specification(s) requirements which aze included and made a part of this contract's vehicle base price as awazded by specification by zone. ZONE: Western Northern Central Southern BASE PRICE: $19,883.00 $19,774.00 $19,646.00 $19,794.00 While the Florida Sheriffs Association, Florida Association of Counties and Florida Fire Chiefs' Association have attempted to identify and include those equipment items most often requested by participating agencies for full size vehicles, we realize equipment needs and preferences aze going to vary from agency to agency. In an effort to incorporate flexibility into our program, we have created specific add/delete options which allow the purchaser to tailor the vehicle to their particulaz wants or needs. The following equipment delete and add options and their related cost aze provided here to assist you in approximating the total cost of the type vehicle(s) you wish to order through this program. Simply deduct the cost of any of the following equipment items you wish deleted from the base unit cost and/or add the cost of any equipment items you wish added to the base unit cost to determine the approximate cost of the type vehicle(s) you wish to order. NOTE: An official listing of all add/delete options and their prices should be obtained from the appropriate dealer in your zone when preparing your order. Additional add/delete options other than those listed here may be available through the dealers, however, those listed here must be honored by the dealers in your zone at the stated prices. Please refer to the "Overview of Awarded Specifications" for vehicles which were low bid. All vehicles indicated with the ~ are low bid for Bid 07-15-0827 -those indicated with C+~ are low bid for Bid 06-14-0821 and 06-14-0821A. Bid Award Announcement (07-I 5--0827) 475 ~~ 3y QtY GF r. .. .~ HtiME 01F P~uCAN ISUtiNn AGENDA TRANSMITTAL Subject: Agenda No. Department Ori ' COLLIER CREEK UPDATE City Attorney: City Clerk: " ' Date Submitted: 17 J 08 Ap rov Submittal by: er Cit Mana er Exhibits: Previous Council Updates EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: AMOUNT BUDGETED: .APPROPRIATION N/A N/A REQUIRED: None at This Time SUMMARY Over the last two weeks, this Office has communicated with Council concerning a potential major shift in treatment of the side banks of the Collier Creek Canal. After opening bids for the rip-rap option, City staff was presented with information that indicated wall treatments on the Canal may be affordable because market conditions have dramatically changed. To that extent, I submitted a memo on January 9th which enumerated several engineering considerations that need to be reviewed in making a determination on whether wall construction is feasible. After extensive review, it is the opinion of the City Engineer and CDM that walls can be constructed at a cost more in line with our rip-rap bids. It is also believed that wall construction could still provide enough retention area to keep water treatment components great enough not to jeopardize the major aspect of this capital project - stormwater treatment. What is not known at this stage is the actual cost of construction. To fully examine this alternative, this Office will be seeking Council direction. The options are to (1) immediately move forward with the rip-rap option; or (2) further investigate wall construction. Should Council direct staff to investigate the wall option; below is an outline on how staff will move forward: Bidding: Currently, the rip-rap bids are valid until April 16, 2008. The City Attorney has opined that a contract for walls cannot be awarded based upon responses to a rip-rap bid. Hence, a Request for Proposals will be immediately submitted into the market place to provide a closer financial comparison of walls to rip-rap. This information must be received before April 2008. ~~ Engineering_ In moving forward with an RFP, staff will solicit and compare "Design/Build" proposals. In this format, potential contractors will not only bid on project construction, they will also provide construction specifications signed and sealed by a professional engineer. Those plans will then be reviewed by CDM. A cost proposal has not been received by CDM on this function, but additional consulting will be required by law to pertorm oversight of the builder's engineer. I anticipate that estimate to be present Wednesday night. Permitting: Any permit modification, such as rip/rap to walls, sludge disposal site, and/or cross section modification will be required as part of the Design/Bid proposal request. Any potential mitigation would also be reviewed at this time. Finally, if the cross section changes to such an extend that the grant would be withdrawn, staff would recommend to not move forward with a wall option. RECOMMENDATION Staff requests direction from Council concerning the Collier Creek Project. 3~ TO: Members of the Sebastian City Council FROM: AI Minner, City Manager RE: COLLIER CREEK BID UPDATE DATE: Wednesday, January 9, 2008 As advised via a-mail on Friday, January 4, 2008, Dave Fisher and I conducted a meeting on Tuesday, January 8th regarding a construction alternative for the Collier Creek Canal Project. Upon review of the bids, .additional information was brought to our attention, which indicates that wall construction may, indeed, be a potential. Unfortunately, the true additional cost is not yet available. However, it seems that this option may be within affordability. For the last several years this option, in my opinion, was always the preferred alternative. Nonetheless, every bit of data we collected indicated that wall construction was unaffordable, which lead to the rip-rap design. It has not been until the Collier Creek Project bid opening, that (1) significant changes in the market place have been fully realized; and, (2) information from contractors was received that indicates that wall construction may be significantly less expensive than estimated. Noted in my a-mail of January 4th, I believe this office has a fiduciary responsibility to investigate the market place. To that end, this memo is provided to update Council on the January 8th meeting. With regard to engineering the proposed alternative, the meeting identified that the alternative proposal to construct walls from CR 512 to the Barber/Lake Street Bridge for $3.6 million was incomplete. It was incomplete for several engineering questions that concern the following: SAFETY FACTOR: In engineering terms, design criteria include a safety factor for any given project. To prevent wall failure, CDM calls for a safety factor of 1.5. The contractor proposal safety factor was 1.0. CANAL WATER LEVEL: In a schematic of wall structural integrity, the contractor proposal has an incorrect water level. GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS: It was proposed that the walls be "jetted° into the soils in front of existing walls. This is a process were water cuts a small trench in which the new wall is set. The analysis of geotechnical data is critical to the design of an installation back-up plan. This was not dealt with thoroughly enough in the alternate proposal presentation. SCOUR DEPTH: No allowance for scour was included in the proposal. After discussion, it was agreed that a minimum of 6" scour depth needed to be included in the analysis. WEEP HOLES: An unclear/incomplete analysis was provided on wall weep construction. This is important for ground water escape, as water retention (on the outside of the canal) could lead to wall failure. SURCHARGE: A full analysis was not done on surcharge. In other words, additional data and information needed to be considered to account for the pressures caused by dirt, slops, storage and other improvements on the outside of the canal. CROSS SECTION: The provided cross section. was typical but did not include a 12-foot total sheet length as the cost estimate indicated. A different cross section of the canal, which includes wall depth, surcharge and other engineering issues need to be computed to identify more accurate wall deflection data. CONCRETE CAP: It was determined that without cross bracing, a concrete cap was the best method of completing the wall. The concrete cap was not computed in the $3.6 million estimate. 37 While all the above engineering data seems ominous, the major general consensus from the January 8th meeting was that if all the above changes are made, a wall project might still be affordable. Moving forward is tricky. The biggest concern is that a very good proposal for rip-rap construction has been received and may be lost in search of a wall option. In other words, we have a "bird in hand" with the rip-rap project, but there may be "birds in the bush" if we continue down the wall path. At this stage Dave Fisher and I believe there are at least three options going forward: 1. Negotiate a project modification with value engineering (to support and sign-off on wall construction with a professional engineer) with all four rip-rap bidders only. All value engineering would be reviewed by a City Engineer/Consultant (i.e., CDM). 2. Retain City Engineer/Consultant (i.e., CDM) to prepare avalue-engineered Collier Creek Wall RFP. 3. Retain a City Engineer/Consultant (i.e., CDM) to redesign a wall project and start a completely new procurement. Note, that this option is not favored at this time, pending a review of additional information requested. Obviously one major concern is to preserve the integrity of the bid process, as well as its costs. To date this has been accomplished and the bids are good until April 16, 2008. Currently, the City Attorney is researching legal ramifications concerning the above-mentioned options. Other concerns at this time: FINANCIAL -Should additional money be required, I would propose use of DST money. This may cancel already scheduled projects and use the bulk of unallocated DST funds. In any case, provided the walls do not exceed affordability, I believe there may be a way to shift financial blocks and pay for the potential increases. TRANSPORTATION/STREET MAINTENANCE -There is some argument that as rip-rap construction occurs, significant truck traffic will impact streets, bringing additional cost that could be avoided by not using rip-rap. Please note, based on a sludge disposal site, truck traffic still could be an issue with wall construction, but far less than if we are also hauling in rip-rap. For the last four years, the City has moved methodically to ensure a successful capital project amid much debate and emotional public input. As a result, the City has gone the extra mile to please all, while sometimes pleasing no one and having a "compromised project'. A final reward of walls seems to indicate moving forward rapidly to capitalize on market conditions is now a very reasonable approach. In summation, we are waiting on additional information and legal updates. As these are presented, I will come before Council with a formal recommendation. 3g Page 1 of 1 Alfred Minner From: Alfred Minner Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 5:21 PM To: council Cc: Rich Stringer; Sally Maio; David Fisher Subject: Collier Creek Bid Update Tracking: Recipient Read council Rich Stringer Read: 1/7/2008 10:01 AM Sally Maio Read: 1/7/2008 10:23 AM David Fisher Read: 1/7/2008 9:08 AM Eugene Wolff Deleted: 1/7/2008 10:53 AM Dale I. Simchick Deleted: 1/7/2008 10:53 AM As of today, I have informed each of you on the developments in the Collier Creek Canal bid process. In short, we have received information that may indicate that constructing walls is more affordable than originally anticipated. With the additional information coming in, too many moving parts exist to appropriately recommend a course of action. However, as I stated to each of you, I believe it is my fiduciary responsibility to investigate this avenue before bringing a construction contract to your attention. On Tuesday, January 8, Dave and I will be conducting a meeting with CDM and the construction company that initiated this situation. I will report back to Council with updates and recommendations as quickly as possible. While I am sure it is legal to have at least one Council member present at this meetings, after considerable thought, I am asking that Council, at this time, allow Dave and I to handle this matter administratively. I believe that is the best way to move forward right now. Please be advised that if there is a way to move towards a wall construction (within affordability, constructability and environmental reasonability), Iwill recommend so. However, all indications still point that moving in that direction will be more costly and involve a smaller cross section (or dredge) which reduces the amount of treatment area. This is something CDM has, always stipulated. Again, there are many moving parts to this project and it is just too early to fairly provide equal information to Council at this time. Hence, I am taking this administrative liberty. But you needed information on the bid process and a full disclosure on where the project stands at this very moment. I appreciate your understanding on this matter and sincerely look forward to reporting to you on this interesting turn of events. AI Minner City Manager City of Sebastian 1/17/2008 39 ~o OF "'~l EIO1NfE OF FE1 6SLAN1) AGENDA TRANSMITTAL Subject: Agenda No. ® . ~/ LD TURKEY REPORT Department Ori •GMD City Attorney: Ap ove r bmittal by: City Clerk: Date Submitted: 1 N 08 r, i Mana er Exhibits: GMD Report, IRC CDD Letter At the December 12, 2007 Regular Meeting, Council requested that my office provide a report on the current status of the Wild Turkey Mining site plan submitted to Indian River County. Because this petition is not within our jurisdictional review authority, I offered to Council the City's professional review on how the County's planning staff was applying County land regulations on this matter (see December 12, 2007 minutes, page 10). Toward that endeavor, Rebecca Grohall reviewed the site plan and met with County staff, as well as the petitioning Engineer and has provided the enclosed report. (Please note, Rebecca is unavailable for the January 23 meeting because of a previously arranged vacation and Margie Reynolds will be present for any technical questions.) In short, it was determined that the County has been following the applicable regulations satisfactorily. Note however, that on specific environmental and other "sensitive issues" some information is not available, nor has that information been fully submitted to the County. County staff has memorialized this fact and has submitted a letter to the petitioners dated December 5, 2007 requesting same. Withstanding that information, it is City staffs determination that Indian River County officials are processing this application professionally and correctly. Please keep in mind that this petition is not within our jurisdiction. This is important because City staff can only opine on process application. Further, this situation does not provide any local ability to enforce or reprimand the petitioner for any deviation from process during the application or operation of said mine later. In effect, while this proposed development may have local ramifications, because it is a County petition, the City as a governmental organization can only act as a single voice after a majority action of Council. In this manner, the City of Sebastian should- only be offered the same rights to voice opinion(s) on this matter as enumerated by County land development regulations. This is the right to provide public input on site planning as afforded to any one citizen. Council acted in this fashion with respect to the Ocean Concrete proposal. As you know, the County has now moved into a moratorium on mining applications, which is scheduled to end July 7, 2008. As a courtesy, we have requested that County Staff inform the City when additional information on the petition is received and when the petition review process formally recommences. No recommendation at this time. `7" I ~Z .City of Sebastian Growth Management Department 1225 MAIN STREET ^ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (772) 589-5518 ^ FAX (772) 388-8248 MEMORANDUM DATE: January 16, 2008 TO: Al Minner, City Manager FROM: Rebecca Grohall, Direct C~ SUBJECT: Review of Wild Turkey ine application As requested by the City Council, I have reviewed the site plan for the mine and the County's review of said site plan, and am providing this document outlining my review. In my review gathered information from the site plan, County staff reports, conversations with key County staff and the engineer of record. Overview of Application The County received an application for major site plan and administrative permit use approval on behalf of Wild Turkey Estates of Vero Beach- LLC to .create and operate a sand/rock mine on a 835.52 acre site located between 37th Street on the south and 53rd Street on the north, and between 82nd Avenue on the east and 90th Avenue on the west. The actual mining operation will occupy a 708.6 acre portion of the total 835.52 acres. As proposed, the excavation/lake area and the volume of material to be excavated would result in Wild Turkey being the largest mining operation in Indian River County to date. Zoning Classification: Land Use Designation: Project Site Area: Limits of Development: Area to Be Excavated: A-1, Agricultural (up to 1 unit per 5 acres) AG-1, Agricultural (up to 1 unit per 5 acres) 835.52 acres 708.6 acres 238 acres The project is shown in 14 phases, and one 20 acre "cell" will be active at a time and worked "in the dry". They plan to dewater the cell they are working in and circulate that water to the ~{3 Page 2 inactive cell. County's Site Plan Review Process Although this application was submitted prior to the adoption of the County's most recent mining LDR amendments relating to buffers, hours of operation, and mining bonds, staff has applied these new regulations to this application. A use which requires administrative permit approval, such as the proposed sand/rock mine, is one which normally would not have an adverse impact on its surroundings when carefully regulated in scale, duration, or nature. Administrative permit approval requires submittal of an approvable site plan meeting all site plan criteria, zoning district criteria, special land use criteria (e.g. Chapter 934 Excavation and Mining Regulations), and the criteria set forth in the regulations for the specific use (e.g. mining criteria of Section 971.22). It is the responsibility of the Planning and Zoning Commission to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the administrative permit request and act on the submitted major site plan application. The Planning and Zoning Commission may attach to its approval any reasonable conditions that it feels are necessary to mitigate possible. negative impacts. If approved, the applicant will also. need to obtain a mining permit from the county prior to mining. A mining permit can be obtained after all conditions attached to the approval are satisfied, all bonds are in place, and copies of all jurisdictional permits are provided to the County. County staff has received various components, such as the traffic study, environmental study, and hydrological report, of the Wild Turkey mining application. Although the preference of Staff is to have all items submitted at one package, staff reviewed the submittals and generated several review comment emails and letters in response to on-going submittals. On December 5, 2007, County staff issued a 24 item comment discrepancy letter that included "significant comments" and this report is attached. As a result of the number of "significant comments" County staff determined that .the application was insufficient to schedule .for consideration at a Planning and Zoning meeting. As provided for in LDR section 914.06(5)(e)1, the applicant requested in writing that the application be placed on the agenda for the December 13, 2007 PZC meeting even though staff had determined that the application was insufficient and Staff would recommend denial. Consequently, this item was placed on the agenda even though -there are currently unresolved aspects of the administrative permit application. The applicant then asked that consideration by the PZC be postponed, until they could revise the plan to address staff concerns. To date, there have been no other revisions. Furthermore, the County has enacted a moratorium on new mining operations to review and revise land development regulations relative to mining. The moratorium is in effect until July 7, 2008, and County Staff have indicated that they will not process any submittals during the moratorium. The moratorium affects Wild Turkey, as well as two other proposed sand mines. I have asked the County to notify the City any time new information regarding this proposed site plan is received by County Staff, this should ensure that the City receives timely information. The applicant has offered to attach special conditions to the proposed project that are not specified in the county's regulations. These include limiting the amount of trucks daily, ~~ Page 3 restricting. their travel route to the south, and having a "traffic cop" to ensure that trucks take the appropriate route south of the site. The County has concerns as to how these conditions can be effectively implemented and verified. Additionally, the applicant has agreed to not use explosive devices which County staff agrees is an appropriate restriction. And, while not required by the LDR's the applicant has offered to pave a portion of 82"d Ave., although the extent of paving has not yet been agreed upon. Synopsis of Outstanding Issues Other Jurisdictional Permits required for the site: St. John's River Water Management Permits for stormwater and consumptive use, have not yet been applied for. Other permits that need to be acquired include a Sebastian River Water Control District drainage permit. There is evidence of wetlands on the site and there has been no determination from Army Corp of Engineers at to whether or not they will need a jurisdictional permit. It should be noted that the County's procedure is that site plan approval is conditional. Site plans are not released for construction until those jurisdictional permits are received. In essence, outside jurisdictional permits are required prior to construction, not prior to site plan approval Dewatering/Ground Water Impacts: County staff has concerns regarding the phasing plan as it "hop scotches" across the site. The bonding (calculation and enforcement) will most likely be extremely complicated for County staff. Also, the County LDRs allow for a mine to be operation for 10 years, yet the phasing plan seems to extend past the 10 year window. Its unclear if a lake that is on the site will be dewatered as part of the "cell" dewatering. Its also not clear that the dewatering ditches will not adversely affect adjacent freshwater marshes on the Sexton property. County staff have noted that there are conflicts between the site plan information on the face of the site plan and the hydrologist report. As such, the County has been unable to fully assess the ground water impacts and determine if any mitigation is required. Traffic: The Applicant has submitted a traffic impact study; however, .the County's Traffic Engineering reviewer has requested further information. Its current status remains unapproved. An approved haul right has not been established. In addition to the County's approval, Sebastian River Water Control District also has to approve routes that traverse their. right of way. Additional right of way needs to be acquired and dedicated, as well as paving improvements. The applicant has verbally proposed paving the roadway south from the site's 82nd Avenue entry to the currently paved portion of 82nd Avenue. Based on the potential volume of truck traffic from the. project, engineering and planning staff agree that a condition to pave 82nd Avenue from the site's entry south to the paved portion of 82nd is appropriate. It is staffs opinion, however, that the segment of 82nd Avenue from the site entrance north to 69th Street needs to be paved. 45 Page 4 Environment: The biologist report for protected species has been reviewed but not yet approved; in fact, further studies are requested to determine if there are impacts to threatened or endangered species and the appropriate mitigation. There are additional staff concerns that have not yet been addressed regarding upland buffer and wetlands. As this letter was being drafted, Councilperson Dale Simchick requested the following questions be addressed: 1. How will they control lateral movement of surface water runoff (that will contain pollutants from stock piling soil) which may contain arsenic and copper/heavy metals? Do they have an Erosion safety plan? How will they safeguard in general a direct discharge into the canal? It is my understanding that there will be no off site surface. water run-off. This means no water will be discharged off the site; it will all be contained on site. Water will be re-circulated on site through the cells and through a ditch. The site also has a berm that encompasses the facility that is 8 feet above grade. There is not yet an erosion plan submitted, typically this would be submitted to the County and must be approved prior to construction. The County has also made this a condition of approval for the site plan. 2. Will they have sprinkler systems that will mist down the limestone mounds as mined? Pollutants carry through the air, water and gravity. How will they safeguard pollutants traveling in this process? Yes, there will be a system to mist the limestone. Furthermore, while I am not an expert in mining techniques it is my understanding that the limestone will be crushed while wet. The County has also requested further information that will address the second part of this question; how to safeguard the air and water quality. I am unable to answer that question as further information has not been received from the applicant. 3. Is the bridge certified to carry a typical load from a truck crossing over the lateral C canal? Thus preventing and minimizing an OSHA industrial accident and pollution that will directly dump into lateral C. The bridge is privately owned and maintained. The County has requested the applicant complete a structural evaluation of the bridge, and if needed, they will require the applicant to make improvements. There are currently two other mines as well as citrus trucks that use this bridge, so currently there is opportunity for an industrial accident and pollution to occur. 4, tMll the County be taking backgrounds (baseline) water samples north and south of this locafion in Lateral C canal? (This should be answered by County staff report). If not a topic of conversation for Council and in general background samples testing "OUR" South Prong ~F~ Page 5 should be taken by the City and within the City to ensure original integrity of our waters and later prove a breach of pollution protection from this project or any other. I don't know if County has made a decision on this yet, however, they do have the ability, equipment and personnel to conduct testing and could .conduct the tests at multiple locations. 5. Was the pollution prevention plan submitted- as required by the clean water act (and mentioned formerly by the developer as a requirement) prior to approval? Does it protect the City of Sebastian's concerns? There is not yet a pollution prevention plan submitted, typically this would be submitted to the County and must be approved prior to construction. 6. Is there monitoring wells used to measure ground water and who will be monitoring them as the regulator? Yes there will be monitoring wells; BCI (the applicant's hydrologist) will be providing reports. The County may want to require those reports. as a condition of the permit. Conclusion It is my opinion that the County has followed their site plan procedures and have fairly applied the code to the project. There are several unanswered questions/concems that need to be addressed before staff can recommend approval. County staff have made a preliminary listing of conditions for site plan approval, those are listed below. It is expect that during the moratorium, additional rules and regulation may come about, the County has recommended the following as conditions for any site plan approval. Please note the following list of conditions does not include any new regulations that may be formulated during the moratorium. Additionally, since County Staff was unable to receive answers on key concems, this list may be expanded to include other items (like approved haul routes, environmental mitigation, wetland mitigation, etc). 1. Prior to the exportation of fill from the proposed sand/rock mine, the applicant shall pave 82nd Avenue from 69th Street south to the existing paved portion of 82nd Avenue. 2. Prior to site plan release, the applicant shall: a) dedicate without compensation the local road right-of-way. b) obtain approval for a detailed buffering plan c) obtain approval for a detailed reclamation, littoral zone and landscape plan. d) establish the compliance, restoration and road maintenance bonds. e) enter into an agreement with the county for the sale of the thoroughfare plan right- of-way. f) obtain staff approval of a dust control plan. g) obtain a letter from .the U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service indicating. that the project will have no adverse impact on listed species. h) obtain approval of an upland set aside conservation easement. i) enter into an agreement with the Indian River County Sheriffs Office to pay for traffic enforcement on 82nd Avenue. 47 Page 6 3. During sand/rock mine operation, a) the height of excavated material shall be limited to 25'. b) the hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00, am and 6:00 pm Monday -Friday (weekdays) c) no off-site discharge of water shall occur. d) each cell shall be graded and grassed at the completion of the cell. e) each lake shall be reclaimed at the completion of the last cell within the lake. f) no explosives or drag lines shall be used in the operation. Lastly, this report was meant to give the City Council an overview of the project and its status. I probably could have written a book but tried to limit it to the largest issues. µ8 December 5, 2007 INDL~N RIVER COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach FL 32960 772-226-1237 / 772-978-1806 fax www. ircgov. corn Geoffrey Barkett Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, LLC 1717 Indian River Blvd Suite 201 Vero Beach FL 32960 RE: Wild Turkey Sand Mine SP-MA-07-10-34 (2004120019-59695) Dear Mr. Barkett: Planning staff has the following comments based on the plans resubmitted December 3, 2007 Planning (John McCoY226-1235) 1. Note number 1 under additional mine construction notes needs to remove all reference to the county acquiring any right-of--way. 2. Does the applicant have any methods to limit the number of trucks to 200 per day that are independent, objective and verifiable? Please verify that this is 200 absolute trips per day and not averaged. 3. The proposed limits of paving for 82nd Avenue need to be added to the notes, and the commitment clear. 4. Be advised the TIS needs to be approved before the conditional concurrency certificate can be approved. 5. The hydrologist report is under review. Staff will forward any comments we have on the report. 6. On page 4, note that at the completion of each cell the slopes will be finish graded and grassed (stabilized). C:\Documents and Settings\rgrohall\Local Settings\Temporery Internet Files\OLKI6A\Wildturkeycommentltr(3) (2).rtf 1 ~f9 7. Where is the information on the phasing and stabilization of the berm? Which plan sheet is it on? The berm needs to be built before any material is exported. 8. The road bonding for the haul route needs to include up to 69th Street. 9. Please confirm that there will be no off-site discharge of water under any conditions. This does not appear to be addressed in the Ground Water Impact Analysis. 10. Clarify the maximum acreage of excavation being de-watered at any given time. Please relate to phases. Will the mining of the last cell within a lake, require the entire lake area to be de- watered? Environmental Planning (Ken Oristaglio or Roland DeBlois 226-12491 1. County environmental planning staff has received and reviewed the Listed Species & General Wildlife Survey dated December 3, 2007 by Bio-Tech Consulting, Inc. (BTC). The survey indicates that no nests were found on the Wild Turkey site for the federally listed Audubon's Crested Caracara (Polyborus plancus audubonii). However, BTC recommends that a spring survey (January-April) be conducted in order to accurately determine if there is caracara present on-site. Please be advised that, within the past year, county staff observed a pair of caracara on the adjacent Sexton Ranch property (on the portion of the ranch east of 82na Avenue, north of 37'~ Street). Given this information, the applicant is advised to coordinate with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and provide verification that the proposed project will have no adverse impacts to federally protected caracara. 2. The submitted site plan notes that there are "no natural vegetation communities" on site, yet the land use map and site description in the BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc. report "Ground Water Impact Analyses for the Wild Turkey Sand Mine, Indian River County, Florida" (December 2007) indicates that there is native shrub / brushland and upland hardwood forest on the site. Aerials of the property also indicate that native upland plant communities potentially exist in the southwest quadrant of the overall Wild Turkey property, some of which may overlap into the "Lake 1" proposed mining phase. County Code Section 929.05 requires 15% set-aside of native upland plant communities. Please coordinate with county environmental planning staff to determine the extent of native upland plant communities on-site and revise the plan to address the native upland set-aside requirement. 3. The BCI Ground Water Impact Analyses report indicates that there will be groundwater draw- downs exceeding 0.5 feet extending 900 feet or more past the proposed dewatering ditches. The report further indicates that "there are several freshwater marshes within 900 feet of the property that might warrant additional monitoring during the period of mining."There are wet prairie areas ("freshwater marshes") on the adjacent Sexton Ranch that are protected under conservation easement(s) recently acquired by the County that appear to be within 900 feet of the proposed dewatering ditches. Please advise what measure will be taken to ensure that the conserved wetlands on the Sexton Ranch property will not be adversely affected by the mining project, in light of indications in the BCI report. If monitoring is proposed, please provide information on indicators and thresholds of indicators that will be used to prevent adverse impacts. O C:\Documents and Settings\rgrohall\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OI,K16A\Wildturkeycommentitr(3) (2).rtf 2 4. The site plan shows a proposed 52 foot wide, 8 .foot high berm around the entire property "to be constructed during each phase of mining." There are no mining phases proposed on the northernmost and southernmost portions of the overall property where the proposed berm is shown. As such, under what phases of mining are these "non-phase" berm areas proposed to be constructed? Also, if the intent of the berm is to shield adjacent properties from the mining operation, at what point in each phase will the berm be completed relative to the timing of the mining excavation? In other words, will the berm be constructed before, during or after mining excavation? If the berm is proposed to be constructed during or after mining excavation, how does it effectively shield the operation? 5. One of the intents of the required 150 foot setback of mining excavation pits. from property lines is to provide enough space for post-mining development (e.g., residential lots) and road access around the periphery of the excavations. The proposed site plan has certain areas where the excavation is shown to be at the 150 foot setback line, with 50 feet of the 150 foot setback devoted to a 50-foot wide berm. Staff suggests that the applicant consider a wider setback of excavation from the property line at those locations in consideration of potential future use of the property. 6. The "Additional Mining Notes" on the revised site plan indicate "road options include paving part of 82nd Avenue." This note is unclear as to whether the applicant is proposing to pave part of 82nd Avenue, or not. Please clarify and provide details if paving is proposed. 7. Please provide details on the proposed hiring of a "traffic cop" to enforce speed limits. Is this individual someone who would work under the oversight of the developer, the Board of County Commissioners, or the Sheriff's Department? Is a sheriff's deputy proposed as the individual and is one available, or is the applicant proposing to hire someone else, and if so, with what qualifications? Is this individual to be policing at all times during. mining operation at random locations, or proposed to be at a certain location? Please explain. 8. Please provide a detailed plan as to how erosion control and control of airborne particulates will be addressed during the course of mining operations. Traffic: (Jeanne Bresett 226-1326) Traffic Engineering staff reviewed the traffic impact study revisions, dated November 30, 2007 and offers the following comments: 1. On Table 1-Trip Generation, revise the last calculation in the daily trip generation from 2 to 1.15 and label as "safety factor". 2. The traffic study does not follow Indian River County's Typical Traffic Study. Several items are missing from the report as follows: a) Introduction b) Location Map c) Trip Distribution and Assignment, Area of Influence, and Study Area Descriptions d) Table 2 -Determination of Study Intersections e) Existing Traffic Conditions f) Existing Peak Season Peak Hour Intersection Volumes on a map C:\Documents and Settings\rgrohall\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKI6A\Wildturkeycommentltr(3) (2).rtf 3 g) Future Traffic Conditions /Background Conditions Description (include growth rate and build-out year) h) Background Conditions Peak Season Peak Hour Intersection Volumes on a map i) Full Development Conditions Peak Season Peak Hour Intersection Volumes on a map j) Roadway Link Capacity Analysis Description k) Table 4 -Roadway Link Level of Service Analysis 1) Site Access Description m) Total Driveway Volumes , PM Peak Hour, Full Development n) Conclusions Section o) Appendix A -Distribution By Percent 3. What are the distribution percentages for traffic assignment on 66`~ Avenue north and south of 69`~ Street, 69~' Street east of 66`~ Avenue, and SR60 between 58'~ Avenue and 66~` Avenue? Show the percentages on Appendix A, Distribution By Percent and assign project trips as applicable, per Indian River County Land Development Code to the aforementioned links. 4. Round 16.5 west bound trips to 17 shown in the Traffic Impact Executive Summary, Item 15. The SR60 Interest Share Contribution is $130,509.00. In addition, revise the project trips shown on the link sheets to 17. Revise the 2008 AM peak hour turning movement volumes shown on the Intersection Worksheet. Nine out of twelve fuming movement volumes are incorrect. Include the turning movement count that was utilized in the report. 6. The volumes used in the future condition analyses should be prof ected for the term. of the mine. However, the future AM and PM peak hour volumes were only grown to 2008. Please address all of these comments with revised plans and a written response. Based on the substance of these comments, it is staffs position that this application is not ready to be scheduled for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Per section 914.06(5)(e)1, the applicant may request in writing that the item be scheduled for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission, regardless of staff s position. If you require any additional information please contact this office at 226- 1235 or jmmcoy@ircgov.com. John W. McCoy, AICP Senior Planner, Current Development Sincerely, 1 1, W •r r ~. cc: Robert M. Keating Stan Boling, AICP Ken Oristaglio Dave Cox Jeanne Bresett Jesse Roland Ellis Buckner Glenn Schuessler Scott Sanders Bob Ulevich D. Victor Knight Mary McGuire Smith Suzon Franzke Gene Oathout Joseph Paladin C:\Documents and Settings\rgrohall\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK16A\Wildturkeycommentltr(3) (2).rtf ,4 mru SEA ~~,~~.3 - City of Sebastian 1225 Main Street Sebastian, Florida 32958 Agenda No: (~ ~, b (~{ Set Goals. and Objectives for Each Charter Officer Department Origin: C Clerk City Mana er City Attorney: ° Date Submitted: 1/16/08 For Agenda of: 1/23/08 Exhibits: None SUMMARY STATEMENT City Council adopted Resolution No. R-07-31 on August 22, 2007 to establish procedures for Charter Officer evaluations. Language from the resolution is set out below. Language specifically states that goals and objectives for each of the Charter officers shall be bi-annually set in January and June. SECTION 1. CHARTER OFFICER GOAL SETTING. City Council shall bi-annually set and review goats and objectives for the City Manager, City Afforney and City Clerk at public .City Council meetings in January and in July. SEC, T/ON 2. CHARTER OFFICER EVALUATION PROCEDURES. City Council shall receive evaluation forms for the City Manager, City Attorney and City Clerk as well as the cun'ent cost of living adjustment percentage being provided to the Communications Workers of America (CWA) from Human Resources staff by May 7~ of each year. Subsequent to receipt of information provided as set out above, each .City Council member shall prepare an evaluation for the City Manager, City Attorney and City Clerk by using the forms provided or by writing a nan-ative or in whatever form each deems appropriate. Each City Council member shall also conduct an oral interview with each of the Charter Offrcers on an individual basis prior to meeting in public for a final evaluation. City Council shall conduct a Special Meeting in June of each year to publicly evaluate and act upon any merit increases for the City Manager, City Attorney and City Clerk. RECOM!MENDED ACTION Set goals and objectives for each Charter Officer. ~3 Page 1 of 1 Alfred Minner From: Alfred Minner Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 11:03 AM To: council Cc: Chris McCarthy; Linda Kinchen; Sally Maio; Rich Stringer Subject: Jan 23 Agenda Amendment At the very last moment, at 8:30 AM this morning, I received a call from Chris Pinson of the Rotary Club. If you recall at the December 12, 2007 meeting, Council approved a park use request for the Home Show scheduled for Saturday, March 29. As it turns out, the Rotary Club decided they wanted an extra day for the Home Show. They had a two day show last year, but after requests from sponsors and the like, they decided to inquire into moving back to a two day show. As a result, I have checked park availability for Sunday, March 30. It is available. Because this request came in after agenda packets were prepared, the Clerk's office will be sending out to you an amended agenda for the additional day request. Please see this change in the consent portion of the agenda. In your mail boxes in the Clerk's Office is the agenda back-up from the last meeting. All information is still the same -expect, the Dates for March 29 and 30. AI Minner City Manager City of Sebastian 1 /18/2008 w'~'[ ~ >,~ ,::<_ .~~ CITY OF SEBASTIAN AGENDA TRANSMITTAL Subject: Approval of Sebastian Rotary Club Agenda No. O ~~ 2"d Annual Home and Garden Show. Department Origin: CS,t,~,~,o-W~cC~}-(,~ Approved for Submittal by: City Manager Finance Director: ° City Attorney: City Clerk• A~ Alfred Minner Date Submitted: December 6, 2007 For Agenda of: December 12, 2007 Exhibits: Memo from Rotary Club, Diagram map and Park Use Application Permit. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: AMOUNT BUDGETED: N/A APPROPRIATION None ~ REQUIRED: None SUMMARY Z°)~ The Sebastian Rotary Club is seeking Council approval r their Second Annual Home and Gazden Show at Riverview Park on Saturday March 2008 from 9AM to SPM. The attached letter and map outlines the logistics and requests for the event. The Ciub is requesting approval for beer and wine sales at the event. They are requesting to use the City stage this year. The only road closure necessary for the .event is Sebastian Blvd, from just past the Hess Station to Indian River Drive from 7AM until 6PM on 3/28/2008. Last year's event went well with no problems at all. „q~~ RECOMMENDED ACTION Move to approve ebastian Rotary Club Second Annual Home and Garden Show at Riverview Park on Mazch 2008 from 9AI~~~SIPM. Move to approve beer and ~ sales at the Sebastian Rotary Club Home & Gazden Show at Riverview Park on March , 2008 from 9AM to SPM. Move to approve closing Sebastian Blvd. from just past the Hess Station to Indian River Drive from 7AM until 6PM on March 2008. , !~ ~~ !~ ~ ~ ~,~~~ -P~ , ~~; Memo Toe Sebastian Cily Council F~orrre Sebastian Rotary Club-Chris Pinson C~ [Click here and type name Dabee August 8, 2007 itx Request use of Riverview Park for 2nd Annual Home & Garden Show The Sebastian Rotary Club requesting fA use Riverview Panic th hold our 2"d Annual Home Garden Show On March 29 2008. As you probably know the i'~ show went without a hitch and we were able th raise quite a bit of money and return it b our community. We plan th do this again and we hope th step it up a notch by partnering with the city this year. We would lli ce b offer set up in the park on the evening March 28, 2008 at 5:00 and icidc off the show ~ 9:OOam and ending at 5:OOpm Saturday March 29, 2008. We also request .approval th seq beer and wine ih the park during the event We also request that Sebastian Boulevard, just east of the Hess Station driveway, to Indian River Drive be dosed for that day. Rotary wr~l be responsUle fior obtaining I"~cense for beer and wine sale and aq site cleanup. Expected activities should include; 90 to 100 10' x 10' booths with vendors all pertaining to home and garden adivities ony. There will vendors that seH there products at the show. We will have a feuv outside food vendors included to be located at the east end of the park. Rotary wiN also have a food booth. Beer and wine booth to be operated only by Rotary Club We will be scheduling local enl~ertainment and would also like tp use the clties band stand 1 am sure there are a number of questions and we look forward to answering them. My name is Chris Pinson Sebastian Rotary member and I am available at 772-473-1337 any time. We at Rotary feel the show went great last Year and know with the cities help will be even better this years Thank youl J~ cnr of ~~~~~ ~~ wox~ o~ ' tn<ucwty Rsurs~ 1225 Main Street, Sebastian. Ft 32958 Telephone (772)5895338 - Fax (772)589-5579 crrr of sEaASrrAN PARK UsE PERMrT APPL ICA 7"ION Put~c Tveut - 50 to 304 Attendees SSii.00 ApplicatioitlPernout k'ee Pleatse check the appropriate $ox: or Serial Lrr+ent- 301 or Myra A,tte~ndees 5100.00 Application Fee Date• d ~ ~1 ~ ~~~ Narne of pe~mittee: PeraiXs Hay anti lte tssue+ Address: Mai t ing Address: !Y(.U y,~,~91T ,~~/ /d T,_ Tetephone•, _ 2~D~ `~7~'/33 Name ofi Organization or Group: Reason for Use: ~(~ ~' Requested Date(s) ~~ -sr~ ~ ~ ~~ Rai n Date •,. uO~Vi.~ ~j~N~~ Tide of Use: From: 9 A~ To: •~ ~~n - /~'`i ~1L ~'~~-~'Q W111 there be any Sale of goods Yes•,•~, No~ Ifi yes. please describe type of goods on back. Food ov other types of vetidors7 Yesx.._ No if yes. please fist name, address and type of vendors and schematic of any structures to De rected or otherwise assembled on baek.:~ •. Y, the undersigned, acknowledge that I am the applicant or the authorized agent of the applicant. I further acknowledge that I am aware of the provisions of the City oi= Sebastian Codes in respect to this application and the use of the City facilities for which I have applied far a permit to allow a Pane Event or a Special Event have made myself familiar with khe general rules and r a runs prey ibe by the City and agree to the terms of the permit. l cant Age t ignature Office Use Only: • Permit Fce Paid pate Initials . ~ ~3 , xatS Park Application Continued - if Required List anv vendor information and/ar schematics an this_pa~e, ~R - ADflRESS TYPE i /s _... ~ O ~" _ '~ a~ P ~' ~c_ ~~~ ~~~ 3p 29 2~• 27 2_ 6 25 ` 22 2 ~ ,~o A 3 1 ~ry ~ gS, LS 8S 6S 09 I9 Z9 E9 b . ~ per'' p ~ ~S 9 ~s '~ ~Q r' -. _L 00 c~ ,~y `~~p ~, M 1 i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' •P. ~ O w ,~. r, ~ ~ t~'~1 O ~ N, •^ i M ~ r N w.a (~. 4 fi ~ .~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ n oo • ~ ~ xontnvr ^ '' •~ 'ti ~ ~ • sNan o~ ~• ~, ' cn ~ ,~ ~ - '- . r h d' ~ w ~ ~ to 1 F1~l3:18 ~i ~ _ _ . ...,-. .... ~..~. ~ r~ ~ .. . _. .. -._._. .. ._ cc~~ $ $,~ 85 84 83 8 a C3 g6 ~., --3 ~ ~ IN .. ~~: "d sA ~`I_ . ~~ , . ~ .. .. ..- `J !_1... . tai ~4~ ., ,, .. ~~~.a ~~ -y~ nil ~v~r~dr,= ` ~ • ~~ ~ ----~ w'r~'~k~ i jr. ht,. ~• o, -~ ~ ~ C ~~. ~ ~4Q,. -x H ..~._ •' O 5~•• • ~