HomeMy WebLinkAbout07212009BAC~,,
~T1/~
HOME OE PELICAN ISLAND
1225 Main Street, Sebastian, FL 32958
(772)589-5330
CITY OF SEBASTIAN
CITIZENS BUDGET REVIEW ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MINUTES
July 21st, 2008 @ 6:00 p.m.
1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN
1. The Citizens Budget Advisory Review Committee Meeting convened at 6:00 p.m.
2. AI Minner led the Pledge of Allegiance.
3. Roll Call:
Adrina Davis
Todd Klitenic
Charles Cardinale
Thomas Burke
Brad White
Dwight Trout
Ed Herlihy
Staff Members present:
AI Minner, City Manager
Ken Killgore, Finance Director
Nancy Veidt, Jr. Accountant
Mary Rosenthal, Acct. Clerk I/ Recording Secretary
4. Announcements:
a. Election of Chairman
Mr. Davis and Mr. Trout made a motion for Thomas Burke to be named
the Chairman. Mr. Burke nominated Mr. Herlihy a vote was taken Mr.
Burke was voted in as chairman by 4 votes.
b. Election of Vice Chairman
A motion was made for Adrina Davis to be named the Vice Chairman, Mr.
Trout seconded the motion all members where in favor.
5. ~proval of Minutes of July 16, 2007 Meeting:
Mr. Oakes our former chairman moved away, Mr. Burke made a motion to
accept the July 16, 2007 minutes in Mr. Oakes stead, Adrina Davis seconded
the motion all members were in favor.
6. New Business:
Mr. Minner thanked the finance department and all of the department head and
management staff for their cooperation in getting the budget assembled and
completed.
Mr. Minner gave a power point presentation on the FY 2008/2009 proposed
budget overview. (attached)
In this overview Mr. Minner discussed a range of topics including property taxes,
tax reform, rollback, reserve levels, general fund revenue projections, special
revenue debt services and the enterprise fund.
After Mr. Minner's presentation he turn the meeting over to Mr. Burke.
Mr. Herlihy handed out a proposal to provide funds for additional police officers;
the proposal also included statistical data and a request for 10 new police
officers. (Proposal is attached)
Mr. Klitenic stated that we asked for 4 new police officers last year and got none
and we are behind in police officers from other municipalities.
Mr. Herlihy stated that just looking at the statistics we need 10 new officers.
Mr. Kltenic stated that he agrees, and that we should also add a community
center that would help all citizens and double as a hurricane shelter.
Mr. Minner explained that police officers have to be funded by the general fund
revenue. This impact of hiring officers is approximately $62,000 per officer. If
we add the police officers we will have to increase the millage rate or use cash.
Mr. Trout asked about the ratio of help from the Indian River County Sheriffs
department, he feels any discussion should also include this ratio of help.
Mr. Minner stated that even if we were at 3.1 officers per thousand ratio the
crime rate would still be the same, because it is hard economic times. The
response time would improve but the crime rate would stay the same.
Mr. Davis asked about the health program and did we look into getting the best
program.
Mr. Minner stated that they looked at all avenues and our present program is the
most affordable.
Mr. Burke doesn't want to dip into the cash reserves at this time because of the
economy, and feels that we need to reserve this money for catastrophic times.
Mr. Klitenic asked what we are doing to bring in new revenues so that we don't
have to increase taxes.
Mr. Minner stated that we have reduced taxes and with Sebastian being mainly
residential there are only one or two areas that will bring in revenue: the ad
valorem taxes, state shared revenues and the franchise fees.
Mr. Klitenic asked about the community center and when could we look at it
being built.
Mr. Minner stated that council has no problem with building a new community
center but the staffing and cost of maintaining the center is not feasible at this
time we don't have the money for this.
Mr. Burke asked about upping the millage rate to add extra police officers.
Mr. Minner stated that if you go one bit over 3.3436 you need a super majority
vote. Or you go over and lose your state funding. State funding is important it's
another 30% of you revenue.
Mr. Herlihy said that he spoke to 2 council members who reacted favorably to his
proposal, but stated that funding would cause a majority vote.
Mr. Minner said that he spoke with Chief Davis and our officers are aware of the
difficult time we are in and are out there giving it there all.
Mr. White stated that he was an advocate of adding more police officers. He
noticed that the ratio of police officers in Vero is larger that in Sebastian but the
crime rate is the same, showing that our officers are doing a good job. He feels
the numbers don't justify the need for 10 additional new officers.
Mr. Minner agreed saying that 10 new officers would not necessarily bring the
crime rate down, response time would be better, some crime may be deterred
and services to the public would improve but it would not change the crime rate
significantly, because of the climate we are in.
Mr. Cardinale asked how the council responded to the request last year for 4 new
police officers.
Mr. Minner said that the council was in favor but wanted to wait to see what
happen with amendment #1 and knew in January we wouldn't be able to add
any officers.
Mr. Cardinale wanted to know what we are doing with the police vehicles as far
as them being flex-fuel cars.
Mr. Minner said that the police department has been clear in their request for
combustion engines because of the need for patrol and issues during a chase.
Mr. Davis the magic number is 3.36 if we go over we need a majority vote.
Mr. Minner that is correct.
Mr. White said couldn't we plan to add 1 police officer per quarter and ease into
additional officers.
Mr. Minner said we would still have to raise the millage rate or a cut somewhere
else to plan for the additional costs.
Mr. Burke asked if it would be advisable to submit to council a request for
additional officers by raising the millage rate to a maximum of 3.7.
Mr. Minner said that this would be a reasonable request.
Mr. Cardinale asked the average of housing building permits.
Mr. Minner said that at this time the average is about 2 permits per month. We
need 20 permits per month to break even.
Mr. Gilliams of 1623 US 1, is concerned with changing the millage rate. He feels
that the committee should look at the budget and try to find extra monies. He
stated that there are ways to increase revenue, cameras at traffic lights to
generate revenue from speeding tickets. Use volunteers to cover more areas to
deter crime.
We need to reduce our spending 10% across the board. We need to look at all
ways to reduce spending.
A motion was made that council adopt the proposed FY09 budget with due
consideration to increase police officer staffing at a level of 2 officers per year for
the next 5 years and encouraging a super majority vote to take such action.
The motion was passed unanimously.
Mr. Herlihy made a motion to give the council a modified version of the proposal
for additional police officers.
Motion was seconded and passed.
Mr. Klitenic made a motion for Mr. Herlihy to represent the committee at the
council meeting.
The motion was seconded and passed.
Mr. Herlihy will represent the budget committee at the council meeting and
summarized the proposal for the council.
Mr. Minner stated that the budget committee representative would be on the
agenda to present the proposal to the council.
7.) Adjourn
Mr. Burke made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:40 P.M. All were in favor.
~a xpri~ny ,, Chairman
Citizens Budget Review Committee
Approved at the Citizens Budget Review Committee Meeting
May 20, 2009
Proposal
For the
City of
--
e~as~ian
Florida
To provide funds in the 2008-2009 budget for
an additional ten police officers.
SUBMITTED BY:
Edward H. Herlihy
Member of Sebastian Budget Review Committee
474 Sea Grass Avenue
Sebastian, FL 32958
772-388-0665
July 21, 2008
INTRODUCTION
During the Sebastian Budget Review Committee meeting in July 2007, there was sentiment to
add up to ten police officers to the Sebastian Police Department.
That proposal was put on hold and ultimately not acted upon during the fiscal year.
Another yeaz has passed. The City is facing an even more severe budget "crunch". However, our
police department continues staffing at a very low level compared to the rest of the cities in
Florida and cities with the same population level,
The purpose of this proposal is to add ten police officers to the Sebastian Police Department this
fiscal year. Supporting data and budget effect are included in this proposal.
STATISTICAL DATA
All data in this proposal was obtained from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE)
website; www.fdle.state.fl.us. Copies of the data are attached for reference.
1. FDLE TOTAL INDEX CRIME:
Sebastian Police Department:
2006 2.598/100,000
2007 3.237/100,000
Increase 24.59
2, SEBASTIAN PD RATIO OF FULL TIME OFFICERS PER 1,000 POPULATION:
At the present time, the Sebastian has 40 Hill time officers. With a population of 22,400
in Sebastian, the ratio per 1,000 is 1.78.
3. FDLE RATIO OF FULL TIlVIE OFFICERS STATEWIDE:
The ratio of all police departments in Florida is 2.68 officers per 1,000 populations
4. FULL TIME OFFICER RATIO IN CITIES WITH POPULATION 20,000 TO 25,000:
Sebastian has an estimated 2007 population of 22,400. There are 14 cities, including
Sebastian, listed with populations of 20,000 to 25,000. The average officer ratio is 2.28.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the 2007 FDLE statistics, the Sebastian Police Department is understaffed by twenty
(20) full time officers. If the Department were to add twenty officers, the ratio of officers to
1,000 population would be 2.67, the State average.
The FDLE crime statistics show a sharp increase in overall crime in Sebastian between 2006 and
2007. The rate increased 24.59% in one year.
It should be noted that the cause of the crime increase was in three areas; aggravated assault,
37.5°I°; burglary, 40.4% and larceny, 29%.
If Sebastian were to add ten full time officers during this fiscal year, the officer ratio would be
2.23, about the same as other cities with the same population.
At the verbleast, with crime up about 25% in one year, the Sebastian Police Department should
acid ten~1Q~11 time cfficers thT__s v~ __ _______
THE PROPOSAL
The cost to add 10 police officers this fiscal year is estimated at $57,500 each making a total
budget request of $575,000.
Automobiles and associated equipment would come from sales tax revenue.
If the Budget Review Committee agrees that we want to make this proposal to the City Council,
the information provided in this proposal should be given to Council along with an explanation
from this Committee regarding the matter.
Further, we should have a document showing the effect on the Sebastian tax rate for Council
review.
A copy of the City Manager's 2009 Budget update to City Council is attached for reference.
Please note the last paragraph, which references millage rates and police additions.
When the City Council meets to consider the budget, the Budget Review Committee should
schedule time on the agenda to make this presentation.
tmr of
'•~; ti~F5
r oa ~rrc~w rsrarin
AGENDA TRANSMfTTAL
Subject:
FY 09 BUDGET UPDATE
Submittal by:
Agenda No.
Departmen Origjn: Finance
City Attorney:
City Clerk:
Date Submitted: 2 Jul 08
SUMMARY
Per Council request, this item has been placed on the agenda to seek preliminary direction
conceming the FY 09 Budget. Two important upcoming dates before Council are (1) Monday,
July 21'~ -Budget Committee Workshop; and, (2) Wednesday, July 23nd -Setting of the
Going forward from this point, I believe the Council has three issues that summarize the FY 09
Budget. Those issues are (1) continuing to provide tax relief by exceeding the State's
requirements; (2) meeting the budget restrictions imposed by the passage of Amendment #1;
and, (3) increase services which will require a super majority vote.
At the present time, the General Fund has estimated expenses for FY 09 at $11.9 million and
revenues at $11.4; leaving a deficit of approximately $500,000. Much will transpire in the next
few weeks to continue analyzing revenues and expenditures. The budget assumption that
remains at this time is the usage of the current millage rate of $2.9917. If this rate is used again,
additional tax relief can be provided, but some level of deficit spending will be required. As
outlined in a memo submitted to Council on July 1, 2008, I am working to bring the deficit
spending to about $250,000 which should not be a significant effect on reserve funds.
The next alternative is to balance the budget with the "permitted" roll back rate of $3.3646. Like
last year this is a tuff forward. This will generate an additional $470,000 balancing the budget
without deficit spending. This rate also provides the additional homestead exemption tax relief
provided by Amendment #1. Note also, this option does not increase services or the current
estimated expenditures of $11.9 million.
Perhaps the most important factor for this agenda item is direction from Council and
consideration of additional service prior to the Budget Committee Workshop. At this time, the true
"roll back" rate is projected to be a roll forward at $3.7060 mills. If this rate where used, an
additional $900,878 could be generated which could help increase police officer levels or other
staffing requests. For the past two fiscal years, discussion concerning public safety has surround
the budget process. Again, 1 anticipate these discussions to take place; but, what makes this
year's budget process different is that and increase above the $3.3646 millage level wilt require a
super majority (4 votes) to approve the budget.
RECOMMENDATION
No action is required on this information topic.
I~
FDLE STATISTICS
SUPPORTING MATERIAL
\°
~ fL6 ~ O M 0 0 0 N CK) M f~ O) tt O O O
N M 0 0~ GO 4 0 0 0 Cq r M O
O O
O V ~ GOO 0 0 0 N r N N 0 0 0
N M M M N 'd' ~- Z 'ct ~ 0 0 0
N M Q N ~
~ ~' M
D
0 0
V r r ~
~ Cp
CU .~ O
p CO
D 1~r
O ~ ~-NMOh NO Otfy O MM
O
O G
V Cp
0 tM
N O O r~ M
M N M I~ M O V' ~ I~ O
M
Z Cn a0 ~
~
Cd
0
U F O ~ 0 N r 1` N M M ~
N .. Q 'ct r r 0
O
~.. .- c-•- cM MrM~.-- NcD NN N NN
O '~ ~
N
~ M 0 0 0
N
~~ N N O O O O
~ ~~ ~' O O O O
(D
M M O O O
R O
~ ~ Q1 0 0 0 N ~ 'NV ~~ N CO O O M N Z V N `- 0 0 ~ ~ n O O O
J N ~- ~
~1 ~ ~~ 0 0 0 p ~ ~ pOj Q~ N O 0 0 N ONO Z ~~ 0 0 0 OOD COD N O O O
m ~
'O
w
f6 3
O1 Q ~I' VM' N 0 0 0 CN N 1` ~~ O O. O r G40 ~ Q r e- O O O N ~ N O O N
~" r
CA
Q
O M M O O a O ~ st S I N 0 0 0 0
r
^, n
O ~
O ~
N
1 ~
d ~
N ~
X N
~ O C
~ U
O
V ~
a 'R
N 7
~~ fl.
3
'~ a°
c
o
V
ea
c
0
LL
o
4-
d
.~
V
d
C
~° ~
H U
GO I~r 000 M NO ~f'~CDOOOO
N NO OOO N NOO~00000
O CD r O)
N N N 0 0 0 ~ a~0 Oro N~ V (D O r
tl' cV
V' r M ~ O ~ (~
V tOD O ti ~ O ~
Cn (~ N M O ~; C\
r r., CA h
cD ~
O CO
ao ~.'j
r
~~ Q O O O O O O CO M 0 0 0
~ M
Z 0 0 0 0 0
Q GO O N O O O
x
CD O Z 0 0 0 0 0
Q r ~-- O O O O
~ ~ CD VM' r 0 0
~ p N O O N
0
0 C
v O~
~ M ~ N ~ ~ ~
to t[') Q)
M CD O CV r ~ ~ N
°~
~ w ~ ~
~ o ~ wo ~ o ~ .~~
c lii o c~~ 'C ~~ p~ o~ c tL o O aci W o
°' 3U m~~ ~ w ~ E~~ m 3U rn~ 3U
N~ w~ '~' ~, N N Q N .~ U N Q- ~ N~ w~ L N O G5
m °~ > Uo o ~ c QO D c~ ~ d ~ a~ ~ O O~ Q a°i >_ Uo ~ ~ ~ Q > ~ °
O O O p U-L W 0,> ~ U O T ~U
~ ~ ~D,o ~ U U. ov~Qu.x ~ c.~~o ~ ~Qv ~ rs c .. ~Qp c
m o c ~- d c o
> > ._ 4. •~ d L a o ~' ~ ~ ~ c o B o a o •_ a •c c o ~ 'o
O o o W s ~ j N a ~- ~ a~ a~ m m U O CL N 0. o W ° ~ c U U~ 0 uo. a~i
U U 4 Q I.~ p > m c o>>>~ U o m p„ ~ LL ° c o~~ tt
~ ~ >. rn o x ~ ~ N m d~~~ ~ p c c~ •~ ° c c~ ~ o c o o~
m R w ~ c c E~ m c c c ~ m ° c c 'a ° o ~ ~' ~~ N~
~ E c E ~ p. '_° ca ~ ~ o m m m a v ~ ~ ~ ~ aoi ~ - s a ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ n.
0 0 0 0 o x ~ c~ o° c c c= o ca ro o .. c R m z ~ d y o 0 0=
x xmxzu. u.cn>_ u. ~ -~~UC9cn-~•~~ o -~ -,~~~u.
N
N
w
O
O
N
rn
R
a
a
a~
c X 0 0 0 W O~ CD O O O O O O to r tr d N~ ~ O
N 0 0 0 N ~ N M~ 0 0 0 d• ~ H tci I~ O p O O O ap ici tM 0 0 0 0 ~ O~ N O V' O
(~ N N N N N N r 0 0 0~ ~, M O O O O N N VM• N O S
~~ O r ~ O tf~ M 00 tt ~t 0 0
~ O ~ ~ ~ uj ~ ~ N ~ (O N N N V. O to r
'C p r (O r d• ~ M O M r ~ v O ~ N~ ap ri
U ~ ~ M N to r CD ui ~' c0 (D ~ ~ N m N ~ ~ ~ ~ V
`•' r' M M r N M °~
~ N
O U ~ 00 Op r.
~; ~ O O O ~ O O M N 0 0 0 ~ M N M~ p~ ~M, 0 0 0 N ~ N O O O O O t1 O N N ~
N ~-
T
C O ~A d tt ~ .-
O O O ~ O N ~ m 0 0 0 r•' 'V;, M N p~j O~ M .- O O [1' O M ~ 0 0 0 ~ V O O g M
~ r ~ N r ~ to r M ~ m q O? M~ V N
~ ~ N ~
~ ~j O e- ~ p r r
0 0 0 ~ ~< N O 0 0 0 t0 ~~ ,Od. ~ O r ~ 0 0 0 0 O O O O N M r .-- _
m c- ~ ~ N ~; N e- r ~. M O O O Ca00 ~ N e[f- ~ `'"
a
m =
~ c~u r coMOCfl cOp ~o ° O r ~"~ rn oco
~~ O O O ~O ~ O N O O O O M ~p r~ n 0 CD f0 O O O N d, M N O O e- .- ~- ap O
~f Q O cri `- cV M N d• a'
Q
Z'
4f
0 0 0 ti ~ O ~~ 0 0 0 N p N N M 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 ~- r p 0 0 0 ~ O V O ~'`~
OD N O
0
0
N
`~f
y
C
0
C
R
C
O
V
'••~
C
0
U
7+
.a
.O
LL
o`
w-
V
d
C
w
H
`n
L
X
C N
:° U
F•-
O
N
O O O `•"
~y .M-MOtoOOO ~ NmF rOONOOOO O 00000 M NOMrO O~
d
0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ M N N N O O r 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O r t0 r O O O
~ O
O O O C~ O~~~ O O O N ~~ d p 0 l!~'1 O .- O O r Cp r 0 0 0 r N N A M 0p O
CO M N N r• N O N N N tf) ~ O r f~ ti M
~ M
Cr0 ~ ~ ~ N d- ~ ~ aO0 O O ~ M N pdp N ~ ~ N
n °~ `_° ~ ~ M
M N
ms ~ f0 N ~ ~ N ~ M
f
e
- ^
° ~ U O ~ C L
G~ ~ .+ C C~ O ~ ~~ W V- Q
3 U O °' ~ c w O ~ aCi .,.•, fl- •aC H~ ~ U v o~ ~ c c~
~~-C 3U ~ ° m ~ c
-~°1 cmaE~d ~•Caci~ ~O~~E U~WO ~~E•c
o~ s~ Q~ o m ~' ~ n..~ ~ U Q m> c C9 ~~ J~ ~ c~a m~ ~
m a~ '~ ~ ~ ~~ C7 a c ~ ~ ~ Q m B o a o~ t a a m c '' 0 ~~ a`~i
~ ~ •~ c ~ •~ •o Q a c m U ° °~ 4 ~ ° u. w .? o ~ ~ p •> C~ V a' a ~ o`
Oti-'~ U Uad ~p~0. ar s o ~ 4~w~Ou. ° ~ ~ ~~~ ° U ° ~.~•o~
od° ~' ~ ~°~J,~ ~ rna•~a~iEmarnrnrn°` a ~°o. •ca~ ~ V•ooav~
aam = a m maaa m ~ o~'4.F.~ cfn o 0 o m U UdOU. o ~ > ~c
m ~ ~ =° m ~- a c ccu m J a o` U m ° ~ m o o` o o ~ ai ~ >, y ~ Z ~ ~ a~ •~ m ~
a`ci a~i S rn rn o ~ .a ~ ~ n, y ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ,> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "~ E ~ ~ ~ m vii ~ m c
~ ~u.cn> ~
2007 CJAP: Full Time Officer Ratios
2007 Criminal Justice Agency Profile Report
Ratios of Full Time Officers Statewide
2007 * 2006
Full-Time Officers per 1,000 population
Page 1 of 2
Population ratios are provided for full-time sworn law enforcement officers per 1,000 population. The
population data is provided by the University of Florida, Bureau of Economic and Business Research: Florida
Estimates of Population 2007. The full-time sworn officer counts are provided by the FDLE Automated
Training Management System (ATMs).
Ratios are listed by agency for_sheriffs' offices and ci police departments. A genP~ral overview_ofnfficers
per 1,000 population can be found in the tables below to include totals for police departments, sheriffs
offices, state agencies and school & port agencies. All ratio calculations are based on full time officers with
law enforcement certification.
Concurrent officers are not included in the officer per 1,000 population ratios. Concurrent information is
provided for the statewide ratios comparisons..
Correctional officers are also not included in the officers per 1,000 population ratios. For correctional officer
populations to inmates, please contact the Florida Department of Corrections or local sheriffs' offices.
Many variables impact officer staffing ratios. These variables should be considered when comparing
agencies and populations. Some variables that could impact these ratios include population density, crime
rate, service calls per officer, size ofjurisdiction, seasonal residents, and tourists.
2007 Police Ratio by Agency
2007 Sheriffs' Offices Ratio by Agency
Note -Ratios are based on jurisdiction population. Within the county population, there may be several
agencies. Each police department serves its city population. The sheriffs offices serve any city population
not served by a police department plus the unincorporated population within the county.
2007
Sheriffs Offices 1.70 officer per 1,000 population (Law Enforcement Only)
Sheriffs Offices 2.14 officer per 1,000 population (Law Enforcement & Concurrent)
_ Police Departments 268 officers per 1,000 population (does not include schools and ports)
Police Departments 2.54 officers per 1,000 population (including schools and ports)
Law Enforcement 2.21 officers per 1,000 population (includes Sheriffs, Police Departments, State LE
and Schools and Ports)
http://www.fdle.state.fl.us/cjst/cjap/2007/ratios/ratio totals.html 7/18/2008
' lUt1"/ t;JAY: r'uil 'l'ime Officer Ratios
Page 2 of 2
Law Enforcement 2.47 officers per 1,000 population (includes Concurrent, SO's, PD's, State LE and
Schools and Ports)
• Estimated population under local police jurisdiction: 7,396,310
• Police Departments full-time officer count: 17,612 (does not include schools and ports)
• Schools & ports: 1,141
• Estimated population under local Sheriffs' Offices jurisdiction: 11,237,444
• Sheriffs' Offices full-time (law enforcemen#) officer count: 19,052
• Sheriffs' Offices full-time (concurrent) officer count: 4,987
• State Agencies (excluding Universities & Colleges) :4,266
2006
Sheriffs Offices 1.65:1,000 (Law Enforcement Only) 1.65 officer per 1,000 population
Sheriffs Offices 2.09:1,000 (Law Enforcement & Concurrent) 2.p9 officer per 1,000 population
Police Departments 2.40:1,000 / 2.40 officers er 1000 o ul i
ports
Police Departments 2.55:1,000 / 2.55 officers ps1 000 DOgulati_on(includinva sohools_and ports) --
Law Enforcement 2.23:1,000 (does not include Concurrent) 2.23 officers per 1,000 population
Law Enforcement .2.50:1,000 (includes Goncurrent) 2.50. officers per 1,000 population
• Estimated population under local police jurisdiction: 7,099,17$
• Police Departments full-time officer count: 17,013 (does not include schools and ports)
• Schools & ports: 1,068
• Estimated population under local Sheriffs' Offices jurisdiction; 11,134,599
• Sheriffs' Offices full-time (law enforcement) officer count: 18,380
•
• Sheriffs' Offices full-time (concurrent) officer count:, 4,883
• State Agencies (excluding Universities & Colleges): 4,195
http://www.fdle.state.fl.uslcjst/cjap/2007/ratios/ratio totals.html 7/18/2008
2007 CJAP: Police Department Full Time Officer Ratios
Police Department Fuli Time Officer Ratios
Page 1 of 6
County
Agency 2007 FT Officer
count
Total Population
Ratio Per 1000
Alachua Alachua Police Department ~ 22 ~ 7,854 ~ 2.8
Seminole Altamonte Springs Police Department ~ 100 ~ 43,529 ~ 2.29
Calhoun ~Altha Police Department ~ 0 ~ 568 ~ 0
Franklin 'Apalachicola P olice Department ~ 7 ~ 2,489 ~ _ 2.8
Orange Apopka Police Department ~ 75 ~ 39,508 ~ 1.89
(Desoto Arcadia Police Department ~ 19 ~ 6,617 ~ 2,87
Lake ~Astatula Police Department ~ 5 ~ 1,649 ~ 3.03
(Duval , Atlantic Beach Police Department ~ 26 ~ 13,961 ~ 1.86
Palm Beach Atlantis Police Department ~ 14 ( 2,154 ~ 6,49
Polk Auburndale Police Department ~ 32 ~ 13,883 ~ 2.3
Dade Aventure Police Department ~ 76 30,383 2.5
Highlands J Avon Park Police Department ~ 24 ~ 8,964 ~ 2.67
(Dade J BaI Harbour Vllage Police Department ~ 28 ~ 3,058 ~ 9.15
Polk ~ Bartow Police Department ~ 44 ~ 16,515 ' 2.66
Dade ~ Bay Harbor Island Police Department ~ 23 ~ 5,148 ~ 4.46
~Pinelias 1Be11eairPoliceDepartment ~ 11 ~ 4,158 ~ 2.64
Marion ~ Belleview Police Department ~ 15 ~_ 3,988 ~ 3.7&
Dade Biscayne Park Police Department ~ 11 ~ 3,328 ~ 3.3
Calhoun J Blountstown Police Department ~ 10 ~ 2,473 ~ 4.04
Palm Beach Boca Raton Police Services Department ( 187 ~ 85,296 ~ 2.19
Holmes ~ Bonifay Pplice Department ~ 6 ~ 2,783 ~ 2.15
~Mardee ~ Bowling Green Police Department ~ 8 ~ 3,078 ~ .2.59
Palm Beach Boynton Beach Police Department ~ 157 ~ 66,872 ~ 2.34
Manatee Bradenton Beach Police Department ~ 11 ~ 1,536 I 7.16
Manatee Bradenton Police Department ~ 1i7 ~ _ 54,409 ~ 2.15
Hernando J Brooksviife Police Department ~ 22 ~ 7,309 ~ 3
~Flagler ( Bunnell Police Department ~ 15 ~ 2,394 ~ _ 6.26
Sumter ~ Bushnell Police Department ~ 10 ~ 2,338 ~ 4.27
Lee ~ Cape Coral Police Department # 213 ~ 164, 523 ~ 1.29
~Frankiin ~ Carrabelle Police Department ~ 7 ~ 1,324 ~ 5,28
Seminole ~ Casselberry Police Department ~ 57 ~ 25,013 2.27
(Bay I Cedar Grove Police Department ~ 6 ~ 5,723 1.04
Levy ~ Cedar Key Police Department ~ 5 ~ 927 ~ 5.39
Sumter Center Hill Police Department 4 4. ~ 912 ~ 4.38
Gadsden Chattahoochee Police Department ~ 10 ~ 3,720 ~ 2.68
Levy ~ Chiefland Police Department ~ 12 ~ 2,338 ~ 5.13
Washington ~ Chipley Police Department ~ 12 ~ 3,679 ~ 3.26
Pinellas ~ Ciearwater Police Department ~ 288 ( 110,469 ~ 2.6
Llake Clermont Police Department ~ 48 ~ 22,882 ~ 2.09
Hendry + Clewiston Police Department ~ 18 ~ 6,619 ~ 2.71
lBrevard Cocoa Beach Police Department ~ 38 ~ 12,805 ~ 2.96
~Brevard Cocoa Police Department ~ 65 ~ 17,164 ~ 3.78
~Broward Coconut Creek Police Department ~ 87 ~ 48,207 ~ 1.8
http://www.fdle.state.fl.us/cjst/cjap/2007/ratios/ratio pd.html 7/18/2008
2007 Criminal Justice Agency Prole Report
lUU"/ C;JAY: Police Department Full Time Officer Ratios
Page 2 of 6
~SUmter
+Dade Coleman Police Department
Coral Gabfes Police Department ~ 1
~ 185 ~ 647
~ 44,604 ~ 1.54
~ 4.14
~Broward
Jackson JCoral Springs Police Department
~Cottondale Police Department ~ 198
~ 3 ~ 129,766
~ 918 ~ 1.52
~ 3.26
'Putnam
~Okaloosa Crescent City Police Department
Crestview Police De
artment ~ 7
~ ~ 1,775
3.93
Dixie p
Cross City Police Department 48
~ 5 ( 21,149
~ 1,756 - ~ 2.26
~--"- 2,84
,^-
~Citrus Crystal River Police Department ~ 17 ~ 3,737 ~ 4.54
Pasco ~ Dade City Police Department i 24 ~ 6,906 ~ 3.47
Polk Davenport Police Department ~ 8 ~ 2,439
~ 3.28
~Broward Davie Police Department 166 ~ 93,428 I 1.77
~Volusia ~ Daytona Beach Police Department ~ 225 ~ 64,370 ~ 3.49
~Volusia ~ Daytona Beach Shores Public Safety Department ~ 30 ~ 5,335 ~ 5.62
Walton J Defun(ak Springs Police Department ~ 18 ~ 5,288 ~ 3.4
~Volusla Deland Police Department , 59 ~ 26,905 ~ 2.19
(Palm Beach Delray Beach Police Department ~ 149 ~ 64,360
~ 2.31
~POIk Dundee Police Department 8 ~ 3,324 ~ 2.4
Marion ~Dunnellon Police Department , 10 ' 2,031 , 4.92
(Orange ~ Eatonville Potice Department ~ 15 ( 2,539 ~ 5.9
~Volusia J Edgewater Police Department ~ 34 ~ 21,770 1.56
Orange ~ Edgewood Police Department ~ 14 ~~ 2,236 6.26
Dade i El Portal Police Department i 11 ~ 2,523 ~ 4.35
Lake
Indian River ~ Eustis Police Department
~ Fellsmere Police De
artment ~ 46
~ 18,401
I
~ 2.49
(Nassau p
~ Fernandina Beach Police D
a
t
t 7 ~ 4,687 ~ 1.49
ep
r
men ~ 39 ~ 11,911 ( 3.27
(Dade
J ag er eac o ice epa mrt-enf- -- ~
Florida City Police Department 15
30
~ ~ 5,401
~ 9,318 2.77
~ 3.21
~Broward J
Polk ~ Fort Lauderdale Police Department ~
Fort Meade Police De
artment ~ 468 ~ 179,971 ~ 2.6
(Lee p
Fort Myers Potice Department 15
192 ~ 5,987 ~ 2.5
~ 67,851 ~ 2.82
~St. Lurtie J Fort Pierce Police Department ~ 111 I 41,972 ~ 2.64
IOkaloosa ~ Fort Walton Beach Police Department ~ 53 ~ 21,008 ~ 2.52
Lake ~ Fruitland Park Police Department ~ 12 ~ 3,829 3.13
~'
Alachua Gainesville Police Department ~ 267 ~ 122,671 2.17
(Dade Golden Beach Police Department ~ 17 ~ 951 ( 17.87
Jackson ~
Clay Gracevitle Police Department ~
Green Cove Sprin
s Police De
artm
nt ~ 6 ~
7 2,523 ~ 2.37
Palm Beach ~ g
p
e
Greenacres Department of Publi
S
f
t
~ 1
~ 6,488 ~ 2.62
c
a
y
e 50 ~ 32,105
~
1.57
Gadsden Greensboro Police Department 1 ~ 634 ~ 1.57
Gadsden Gretna Police Department ~ 3 ~ 1,714 ~ 1 75
Lake ~ Groveland Police Department ~ 25 ~ 6,983 ~ 3.58
Santa Rosa Gulf Breeze Police Department ~ 19 ~ 5,805 ~ 3.27
~Paim Beach Gulf Stream Police Department ~ 10 ~ 693 ~ 14.3
Pinellas Gulfport Police Department ~ 28 ~ 12,814
~
2 18
Polk ~ Haines City Police D apartment 57 ~ 18,748 ~ 3.04
~Broward Hallandale Beach Police Department ~ 86 ~ 38,193
~
2 25
Bradford Hampton Police Department 3 ~ 456 ~ 6.57
Gadsden ~ Havana Police Department ~ 9 ~ 1,778 ~ 5.06
Alachua Hawthorne Police Department ~ 1 ~ 1,401 ~ 0.71
Dade ~ Hialeah Gardens Police Department ~ 33 ~ 20
491 1.61
Dade ~ Hialeah Police D apartment ~ 376 ~ ~
~
^
228, 528 ~ 1.64
Alachua High Springs Police Department ~ 14 ~ 4,739 ~ 2.95
Palm Beach ( Highland Beach Police Department ~ 13 ~ 4,155 ~ 3.12
~Broward Hillsboro Beach Police Department ~ 14 ~ 2,223 ~ 6.29
~Volusia
J Holly Hill Police Department
~ 30
~
12,494 ~
2.4
~Broward ~ Hollywood Police Department ~ 321 ~ 142,843
~
2.za
Manatee Holmes Beach Police Department ~ 12 ~ 5,059 ~ 2.37
Dade Homestead Police Department ~ 109 ~ 57,605 ~ 1.89
http://www.fdle.state.fl.us/cjst/cjap/2007/ratios/ratio pd.html 7/18/2008
2007 CJAP: Police Department Full Time Officer Ratios
Page 3 of 6
Lake J
Brevard Howey-In-The-Hills Police Department
~Indialantic Police Department ~ 6
~ 12 ~ 1,223
~
I 4'9
I
Dade
Brevard
Indian Creek Village Police Department
~ Indian Harbour Beach Police Department
~ 11
~ 21 3 OOQ
~ 59
( 8 715 3 °8
~ 2,27
~ 2 4 ~
Indian River
IPmeltas ~ Indian River Shores Department of Public Safety
~ Indian Shores Police Department ~ 18
~ 13 ~ 3,674
~ 1,804 ~ 4.89
~ 7,2
Levy
Putnam Inglis Police Department ~
~Interlachen Police Department 5 ~
4 ~ 1,731
1,442
~_ 2 88
~ 2.77
iDuvai ~
Hamilton Jacksonvllle Beach Police Department ~
Jas
er P
li
D 60 ~ 22,253 2.69
p
o
ce
epartment ~ 8
Hamilton Jennings Police Department ~ 2 ~ 1,687
~ 820 4.74
~ 2.43
Palm Beach Juno Beach Police Department
14
LPalm Beach Jupiter Inlet Colony Police Department ~ 5 ~ 3,644
~ 368 ~ 3.84
~ 13.58
Martin Jupiter Island Public Safety Department ~ 15
Palm Beach Jupiter Police De
artm
t
~ 672
~ 2 23
p
en
Pinellas ~ Kenneth City Police Department ~ 109
I 19 ~ 49,724
~ 4,567 ~ 2.19
~ 4.16
Dade ~ Key Biscayne Police Department
Monroe Key Cbiony Beach Police Department f 26
I 6 ( 11,433
~ 857 ~ 2,73
~ 7
Monroe Key West Police Department
91
Osceola Ki
i
P
li ~ 24,629
' + 3.69
f
~~
ss
mmee
o
ce Department ~ 133 ~ 61,036 2.17
I
Lake
Polk Lady Lake Police Department
Lake Alfred Police D
a
t
t ~ 30 J 12,842 ~ 2.33
Columbia r
ep
men
Lake City Police Department ~ 10
I 42
~ 4,517
~ 11,340
~ 2.21
~ 3.7
Palm Beach
(Polk ~ Lake Clarke Shores Police Department
Lake Hamilton Police De
rt
t { 11 ~ 3,680 ~ 2.99
pa
men 7 ~ 1,405 ~ 4.98 ~
~V3usia
~Semmole
a e een olice Department
Lake Mary Rolice Department
8
~ 40
~ 2,905
~ 14,288
~ 2.75
~ 2,78 _
Highlands
Polk Lake Placid Police Department
Lake Wales Police D apartment ~ 8
~ 42 ~ 1,760
~ 13,039 ~ 4.54
~ 3,22 '
Palm Beach
Polk Lake Worth Police Department
Lakeland Police Department I 88
~ 256 ~_ 37,044 ~
~ 93,428 ~ 2.37
2,74
Palm Beach
~Pinelias Lantana Police Department
Largo Police Department ~ 32
~ 171 ~ 9,961 ~
~ 75 924 ~ 3.21
2 25
~Broward
Bradford Lauderhill Police Department
~ Lawtey Police Department ~ 118
~ 1 ~
64,281 ~
675 ~
1.83
1.48
Lake
~Broward ~ Leesburg Police Department ~
Lighthouse Point Police Department ~ 73 ~
33
i 19,934 ~
10,964 ~ 3.66
3
Suwannee ~
Manatee Live Oak Police Department ~
Longboat Key Police Department ' 18
20 ~
6,855 ~
2,613 ~
2.33
7.65 f
Seminole ~
Bay ~ Longwood Police Department ~
Lynn Haven Police Department ~ 39 ~
29 ~ 14,062 (
16,217 ~ 2.77
1.78
Madison
Orange Madison Police Department
artment ~
Maitland Police De
14 ~
3,084 ~
4.53
~PalmBeach ~ p
Manalapan Police Department I
I 97 ~
I 16,100
354 ~ 2.91
25.42
Collier ~
IBroward ( Marco Island Police Department
nt (
Margate Police De
artm 32 ~ 15,825 ( 2.02
Jackson p
e
Marianna Police Department ~ 117 ~
16 ~ 55,661 ~
6,531 ~ 2.1
2.44
Lake ~
Dade ~ MascottePoliceDepartment ~
Medley Police De
artment 15
~
4'478 ~
3.34
Brevard ~ p
Melboume Beach Police Department ~ 31 ~
8 ~ 1,132 ~
3,369 ( 27.35
2.37
Brevard ~
Brevard ~ Melbourne Police Department ~
Melbourne Villa
e Police pe
art
t 167
~
78,386 ~
2.13
LBay J g
p
men
Mexice Beach Police Department ~ 5 ~
5 ~ 724 I
1,320 ~ 6,9
3.78
Dade
Dade Miami Beach Police Department ~
Miami Gardens Police De
a
t
t 372 ~ 93,721 ~ 3.96
(Dade p
r
men
~
Miami Police Department ( 15 ~
1046 ~ 109,200 ~
39b,434 ~ 1.37
2.71
Dade
(Dade Miami Shores Police Department ~
Miami Springs Police De
artment 28
~
10,323 ~
2.71
p 41 ~ 13,643 I 3
http://www.fdle.state.fl.us/cist/ciap/2007/ratios/ratio pd.html 7/18/2008
zuu~/ (:JAY: Police llepartment Full Time Officer Ratios
Page 4 of 6
Santa Rosa Milton Police Department ( 20 ( 7,717
~ 2.59 (
(Broward (Miramar Police Department ( 175 ( 111,705 ~ 1.56
Jefferson (Monticello Police Department ( 8 ( 2,554
( 3.13 (
Lake (Mount Dora Police Department ( 34 ( 11,945 ~ 2.84
Polk Mulberry Police Department ( 21 ( 3,495 ( 6.07 (
Collier Naples Department of Police and Emergency
Services
76
23,101
3.28
Duval (Neptune Beach Police Department ( 18 ( 7,332 2.45
Pasco ~ New Port Richey Police Department ( 38 ( 16,747
2.26 (
~Volusia ~ New Smyma Beach Police Department ~ 52 23,286 ~ 2.23
(Okaloosa ~ Niceville Police Department ~ 20 13,272 1.5
Dade (North Bay ~Ilage Police Department ( 26 ( 5,736 ~ 4.53 (
(Dade ~ North Miami Beach Police Department ~ 112 ( 40,942 ( 2.7
Dade North Miami Police Department ~ 122 ~ 60,275 ~ 2.02
Palm Beach (North Palm Beach Public Safety Department ~ 33 ~ 12,476
( 2.64 (
Sarasota (North Port Police Department ( 87 ( 53,732 ( 1.61 (
~Volusia (Oak HiII Police Department ( 6 ~ 2,031 ( 2.95 (
(Orange (Oakland Police Department ( 8 ( 1,958
( 4.08
Marion Ocala Police Department ( 151 ( .54,238 ( 2.78
Palm Beach (Ocean Ridge Police Department ( 14 ( 1,628 ( 8.59
Orange (Ocoee Police Department ( 67 ~ 33,533 ~ 1.99 (
Okeechobee Okeechobee Police Department ( 20 ( 5,814 ( 3.43
Dade (Opa Locke Police Department ( 27 ( 15,359
~ 1 75 (
~Volusia (Orange City Police Department 23 I 9,817 ( 2.39
ICfay (Orange Park Police Department ~ 23 ( 9,109 ( 2.52 (
-(4ndien~iver }Arehid Paliee-Departure - ( -303-
~Orange (priando Police Department ~ 803 ( 228,765 ( 3.51
(Volusia T (Ormond Beach Police Department ( 67 ~ 40,941 ~ 1.63 (
Seminole (Oviedo Police Department ~ 61 ~ 32,855
1.85 (
Putnam (Palatka Police Department ( 35 ( 11,470 ( 3.05
(Brevard ( Palm Bay Police Department ( 170 I 101,793 ( 1.67
Palm Beach J Palm Beach Gardens Police Department ~ 114 ( 49,387 ( 2.3 (
(Palm Beach ( Palm Beach Police Department ( 76 ( 9,744 ( 7.79
(Palm Beach ( Palm Beach Shores Police Department ( 11 ( 49,387 ~ 2.22
(Palm Beach ( Palm Springs Public Safety Department ~ 41 ~ 15,419 ( 2.65
Manatee J Palmetto Police Department ( 36 ~ 14,310 ( 2.51 (
(Bay ( Panama City Beach Police Department ( 45 ( 11,651 ~ 3.86
Bay ( Panama City police Department ( 93 ( 37,640 ( 2.47
(Bay ~ Parker Police Department ( 9 ~ 4,683 ~ 1.92
(Broward Pembroke Pines Police Department ( 240 ( 152,888 ( 1.56 (
(ESCambia ( Pensacola Police Department ~ 17D ~ 55,024 ( 3.08
(Taylor ( Perry Police Department ( 21 ( 6,786 ( 3.09 (
(Dade ~ Pinecrest Police Department ( 47 ~ 19,382 ( 2.42 (
(Pinellas ( Pinellas Park Police Department ( 117 ~ 48,320 ( 2.37
Hillsborough ( Plant City Pollee Department ( 67 ( 33,277 ( 2.01
Broward ( Plantation Police Department ~ 191 ( 85,349 ~ 2.23
VLotusia ( Ponce Inlet Police Department ~ 13 ~ 3,279 ~ 3.96
(Volusia ~ Port Orange Police Department ~ 82 ( 56,850 ( 1.44
Pasco ( Port Richey Pplice Department ( 12 ( 3,165 ~ _ 3.79 (
Gulf ~ Port 5t. Joe Police Department ( 11 ( 3,813 ( 2,88
ISt. Lucie ( Port St. Lucie Police Department ( 242 ( 155,315 ( 1.55
Charlotte ( Punta Gorda Police Department ~ 36 ( 17,444 ~ 2.06
(Gadsden Quincy Police Department ( 27 ( 7,436 ( 3.63 (
(Palm Beach ( Riviera Beach Police Department ~ 98 ~ 34,470 ( 2.84 (
(Brevard ( Rockledg a Police Department ( 44 ( 25,911 1.69
(Seminole ~ Sanford Police Department I 126 ( ~ 5 0 9 2,97
(Lee ( Sanibel Police Department ( 24 ( 6,297 ~ 3.81
Sarasota ~
~ Sarasota Police Department ( 194 ~ 55,644 ~ 3.48
i I I 1 ~
http://www.fdle.state.fl.us/cjst/cjap/2007/ratios/ratio pd.html 7/18/2008
LUU"/ t;JAY: Police Department Full Time Officer Ratios
Page 5 of 6
(Brevard ~
~BfoWard --, jSateflite Beach Police Department
Sea Ranch Lakes Police Department ~ 23
1 7 ~ 10,769
I 732 { 2.13
I g.56
Indian River Sebastian Police Department 40 22,426 1.78
Highlands Sebring Police Department. 34 10 381 3.28
Martin
(Okaloosa
Jackson
Volusia
(Dade {Sewalls Point Police Department
{Shalimar Police Department
{Sneads Police Department
South Daytona Police Department
South Miami Police Department ~ 8
{ 3
{ 6
{ 32
~ 48 ~ 1,996
{ 728
~ 1,972
~ 13,547
~ 10,561 ~ 4
{ 4.12
~ 3.04
{ 2.36
{ 4.54
(Palm Beach (South Palm Beach Public Safety Department ~ 10 { 1,528 { 8.54 {
Bay
~St. Johns
~St. Johns Springfield Police Department
{St. Augustine Beach Police Department
f St. Augustine Police Department { 13
( 15
~ 44 ~ 8,956
{ 6,03'1
{ 13,912 ~ 1.45
~ 2.48
{ 3.16 {
Osceola { St. Cloud Police Department ~ 61 ~ 30,834 { 1.99
Pinellas {St. Pete Beach Police Department ~ 32 ~ 10,086 ~ 3.17
Pinellas {St. Petersburg Police Department ~ 573 ~ 253,369 ~ 2.26
Bradford
Martin J
Dade
~Broward J {Starke Police Department
Stuart Police Department
{Sunny Isles Beach Police Department
Sunrise Police Department ~ 21
~ 45
~ 47
{ 168 ~ 6,087
~ 16,564
{ 18,747
{ 89,633 { 3.44
{ 2.71
{ 2.5
{ 1.87
{
{
Dade (Surfside Police Department ~ 27 ~ 5,775 ~ 4.67
Dade {Sweetwater Police Department ~ 23 { 14,326 ~ 1.6
Leon
Hillsborough {Tallahassee Police Department
{Tampa Police Department { 356
{ 983 ~ 176,429
{ 336,264 ~ 2.01
{ 2.92
Pinellas ~ Tarpon Springs Police Department { 48 J 24,628 1.94
Lake {Tavares Police Department
{ 31 ~~~.
~_ 13,013
2.38
Hillsborough
Palm Beach Temple Terrace Police Department ~
{Tequesta Police Department ~ 55
18 ~ ~ 24,026
_ 5,855 2.28
.3.07
(Brevard {
Pinellas Titusville Police Department {
Treasure (stand Police Department { 81
20 ~ { 44,526 {
7,597 ~ 1.81
2.83 {
Gilchrist {
Lake ~
~Okaloosa {
Sarasota ~ Trenton Police Department ~
Umatilla Police Department ~
Valparaiso Police Department ~
Venlce Police Department ~ 2 ~
9 ~
11 ~
47 { 1,690 ~
2,601 ~
6,562 ~
22,149 1.18 {
3.46
1.67
2.12
Ilndian River , Vero Beach Police Department { 59 { _ 18_06~ ~_ 3.28
Dade { Virginia Gardens Pol'~ce Department { 6 { 2,354 { 2.54 {
(Alachua ~ Waldo Police Department ~ 7 { 831 ~ 8.42
(Hardee ~ Wauchula Police Department { 14 I 4,447 ~ 3.14
Sumter { Webster Police Department { 3 ~ 777 ~ 3.86 {
Putnam { Welaka Police Department ~ 1 ~ 646 { 1.54
{Brevard { West Melbourne Police Department { 35 { 15,777 ~ 2.21 {
Dade ( West Miami Police Department ~ 16 { 5,724 ~ 2.79
(Palm Beach ~
Hamilton ~ West Palm Beach Police Department {
White Springs Police Department ~ 307 {
2 ~ 105,068 (
782 { 2.92
2.62 {
(Sumter ~ Wildwood Police Department { 17 ~ 4,895 ( 3.47
Levy ~ Williston Police Department ~ 13 ~ 2,557 { 5.08 {
~Broward Wilton Manors Police Department { 30 { 12,848 { 2.33
Orange ~ Windermere Police Department { 11 ( 2,638 { 4.16
(Orange ~ Winter Garden Police Department ( 59 { 30,065 { 1.96 {
Polk (
Orange J Winter Haven Police Department {
Winter Park Police Department ~ 85 {
88 ~ 33,569 {
28,486 ~ 2.53
3.08 {
Seminole ~
(Pasco ~ Winter Springs Police Department {
Zephyrhills Police Department { 71 {
31 { 34,433 ~
12,730 { 2.06
2.43
~H,ardee { Zplfo Springs Police Department { 3 ~ 1,612 { 1.86
( Totals( 17,612 ( 7,396,310 ( 2.38 (
Note: Population estimates are provided by the Universfty of Florida, Bureau of Economic and Business Research: Florida Estimates of
Population 2007
http://www.fdle.state.fl.us/cj st/cjap/2007/ratios/ratio_pd.html 7/18/2008
BUDGET ADVISORY COMMITTEE
FY 08-09 BUDGET WORKSHOP
MONDAY, JULY 21, 2008
a1voF
PREPARED BY AL MINNER -CITY
MANAGER
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
GTY OF
FY 08-09 BUDGET s~ ,.~{~ ~~
~_..~._
xs~:
-- -__
__
PRESENTATION HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
EW
•Property Taxes -Tax Reform Effects -Three
Avenues
•General Fund Reserve Levels and Getting
Balanced
•General Fund Revenue Projections
•General Fund Major Expenditure Highlights
•Special Revenues
•Enterprise Funds
•Closing Comments
•~l~ ~o~finn~ ' nrl O n~~~ior~
PROPERTY TAXES -TAX REFORM
EFFECTS -THREE AVENUES
CIiY OF
FY 08-09 BUDGET PRESENTATION
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
FY - B D ET Gn~ ~
08 09 U G ~~ ~,:~
k:.: ~N
Amendment #1 Passes -=
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
•On January 29, 2008, Amendment #1 Passes by
64.4%. Indian River County Voters Pass it by
69.8%.
•In Short, Amendment #1 Provides:
-Additional $25,000 Homestead Exemption
to Residential Properties
-Caps Annual Increase for Commercial
Assessment
- Established New Regulations for
Comautina "Roll Back"
FY 08-09 BUDGET
Amendment #1 -Calculating
Rollback
•Rollback is the Millage Rate which Provides the
Same Revenue as the Previous Fiscal Year
•For FY 09 the Millage Rate has to Include the
Additional $25,000 of Tax Relief Afforded by
Amendment #1
•For FY 09 Any Millage Rate Not Providing Full
Value of the Additional Homestead Exemption
Requires Super Majority Vote to Approve Budget
•In Future Years, Amendment #1 Will Adjust
Rollback for Inflation and Cannot be Exceeded
Without Super Majority Vote of the Elected Body
GTY OF
TAX REFORM FORMULA
ifi~n~ Sufi
F FI1L ElE1T I, I ,~~~, 7 I
F T~~LE LLIE I , ~, ~, I I
F ILL ~ ITE . ~
~1~~1 Tl 11 ~1L IE~LI Tl 11 ~ ~11E11 ~lEi T ~# I ~ ~ or 4 I ~ Ali
TTL F ll II T TE" ill LLE ITE 4
E~ITI ILLE RATE I ~
PEIE1T H1E I1 ElE1T LLIE I ~. I ~~
NET EFFECTS FROM
ECONOMY AND
AMENDMENT #1
I TEI
Sufi
~EIEfT HIIE
Rai ~~ ~I ~~
11 or~~tr~~~ti are
rr~ ~r~ ~ rr~ ~r~~t I
I ~ ~ ~ ~
~~,~~
I ~~~
I ~~~
-~ ~ ~~
GTY OF
THREE MILEAGE RATES
CHANGE BETWEEN
FRAM FY OS MI LLAGE
ITElVti IVtiILLAGE REVNUE ACTUAL RATFS
FY 09 Rollbake Rate $3.700 $4,fi73,994 $37,459 $430,57
FY 09 "Majority Dote" Millage Rate $3.364 $4,~43,4~ I $668,03
FY 08 Milla e Rate $x.991 7 $3,773, 12 I $ I , 138,33 $470,300
Hni iSEHOLD TAX
:STIMATE
PRQPQSED RATE CLIRREMT RATE
ITEM $3.3G4G $x.9917
FY OS Taxable Value $200,000 $200,000
Homestead Exemption $25,000 $25,000
FY OS 1~let Taxable Value $1 75,000 $1 75,000
FY OS City of Sebastian Taxes $2.991 7 $2.991 7
City of Sebastian Taxes $524 $524
FY 09 Taxable Value $ 174,000 $ 174,000
Homestead Exemption Amend ~# 1 ~ $50,000 $50,000
FY 09 let Taxable Value $ 124,000 $ 124,000
FY 09 City of Sebastian Taxes $~.~64~ $2.991 7
Cit of Sebastian Taxes $ 41 7 $ 3 71
Tax Savin s ~ 106 ~ 153
Difference Betvueen Pro used and Current Tax Rates $4G
8.0000
7.0000
6.0000
5.0000
4.0000
3.0000
2.0000
1.0000
0.0000
TAX LEVY
1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
GENERAL FUND RESERVE
LEVELS AND GETTING
BALANCED
cnvoF
FY 08-09 BUDGET PRESENTATION
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
GETTING
BALANCED AT
^
S
•Proposed Budget is Balanced w/ Millage Rate of
$3.3646
•No Reserve Funds Used to Balance Budget
•Services Levels Remain Consistent
•No Personnel Cuts Made to Balance
•Hiring Freeze Still in Effect
•No New Police Officers (39'/2 Officers at 1.80 Per
1,000)
•No New Public Works Positions
GETTING BALANCED
.. I AT $2.9917
~~~
•Currently a Difference of $470,300
•Additional Service Level Cuts To Consider:
-3rd DItCh Mowing ($100,000)
-Police Department Crime Lab ($65,000)
Engineering Department Intern Program ($20,000)
-Skate Park Attendants ($20,000)
-Part-Time A/V Position ($5,000)
•TOTAL CUTS - $210,000
•DEFICIT SPENDING REQUIRED ($260,300)
WORKING CAPITAL
RESERVE
$6,000,000
$5,000,000
$4,000,000
$3,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
$0
CITY OF
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
CITY OF
WHY SOME DEFICIT SEe~sT-„!AN
SPENDING WORKS~oFPE~~~AN~S~
$7, 000, 000
$6, 000, 000
$5, 000, 000
$4, 000, 000
$3, 000, 000
$2, 000, 000
$1, 000, 000
$0
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
WHY SOME DEFICIT
SPENDING WORKS
of Sebas#ian -General Fund
Ao[ual Estimate
2447 2448
Fund Balances 6,479,124 6,390,787
ooerS4 Taxes ~ 4 Fn9 Fnrl 4 911 4F:i
Transfer From Sales Tax 219,738 0
Transfer Fram S[armwa[er 466,576 500,000
Transfer from Cemetery ~ 41,546 38,028
Total Sources 11,991,460 12,179,650
Personnel Accounts 8,521,598 8,620,177
Operating Accounts 2,970,935 3,012,178
Total Operating Costs 5 11,482,533 11,632,355
Capital Outlay 587,264 212,811
Total Expenditures 12,079,797 11,845,166
Can[ingencylReduc[ians 225,000
Total Uses 12,078,787 12,070,166
Equipment Replacement 235,088 91,001
Employee EVen[s 6,251 6,251
Law Enforcement 12,804 12,804
Unappropriated 5,486,644 5,740,215
3,000,828
c#ions i#h ,411oca#io for Capi#al Expenses 1€.ISiugore 7!29!2444
Budge[ Budge[ Budge[ Budge[ Budge[ Budge[ Budge[ Budge[ Budge[ Budge[
2449 2470 2477 2472 2473 2474 2475 2476 2477 2478
6,500,271 6,290,271 5,837,801 5,333,022 4,840,130 4,368,709 3,921,673 3,502,038 3,113,018 2,758,038
4,243,421 4,328,290 4,414,856 4,569,376 4.729,304 4,894,829 5,066,148 5,243,464 5,426,985 5,616,929
2,377,000 2,448,310 2,521,759 2,597,412 2.675,334 2,755,594 2,838,262 2,923,410 3,011,112 3,101,446
1.305.000 1.357.200 1.411.488 1.467.848 1.526.665 1.587.732 1.651.241 1.717.281 1.785.883 1.857.422
55,200 55,200 55,200 55,200 55,200 55,200 55,200 55,200 55,200 55,200
2,052,529 2,052,529 2,052,529 2,052,529 2.052,529 2,052,529 2,052,529 2,052,529 2,052,529 2,052,529
327.301 335.820 344.560 353.528 362.730 372.171 381.858 381.787 401.884 412.457
59,600 59,600 59,600 59,600 59,600 59,600 59,600 59,600 59,600 59,600
307,200 305,691 296,245 286,489 277,938 270,152 263,124 256,934 251,669 247,419
217.058 217.058 217.058 217.058 217.058 217.058 217.058 217.058 217.058 217.058
10, 944, 310 11,159, 698 11, 373, 297 11, 659,141 11, 956, 360 12, 264, 867 12, 585, 022 12, 917, 284 13, 262,131 13, 620, 062
81,400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 256,507 263,183 270,033 277,062 284,273 291,672
60,000 61.800 63.408 65.058 66.752 68.480 70.272 72.101 73.878 75.803
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
500,000 512,500 525,313 538,445 551,906 565,704 579,847 594,343 609,201 624,431
38.000 40.015 41.057 42.125 43.222 44.347 45.501 46.685 47.800 48.147
11, 874, 710 12, 024, 013 12, 253, 074 12, 554, 770 12, 874, 747 13, 206, 590 13, 550, 675 13, 907, 474 14, 277, 483 14, 661, 215
9,105,793 9,378,967 9,660,336 9,950,146 10,248,650 10,556,110 10,872,793 11,198,977 11,534,946 11,880,995
2,897,517 2,897,517 2,897,517 2,897,517 2,897,517 2,897,517 2,897,517 2,897,517 2,897,517 2,897,517
12.003.310 12.276.484 12.557.853 12.847.663 13.146.167 13.453.627 13.770.310 14.086.484 14.432.463 14.778.512
81.400 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000 200.000
12,084,710 12,476,484 12,757,853 13,047,663 13,346,167 13,653,627 13,970,310 14,296,494 14,632,463 14, 978,512
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12.084.710 12.476.484 12.757.853 13.047.663 13.346.167 13.653.627 13.870.310 14.286.484 14.632.463 14.878.512
200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000
100, 000 100, 000 100, 000 100, 000 100, 000 100, 000 100, 000 100, 000 100, 000 100, 000
350.000 350.000 350.000 350.000 350.000 350.000 350.000 350.000 350.000 350.000
9, 6 01 9, 6 01 9, 6 01 9, 6 01 9, 6 01 9, 6 01 9, 6 01 9, 6 01 9, 6 01 9, 6 01
6, 2 51 6, 2 51 6, 2 51 6, 2 51 6, 2 51 6, 2 51 6, 2 51 6, 2 51 6, 2 51 6, 2 51
12, 804 12, 804 12, 804 12, 804 12, 804 12, 804 12, 804 12, 804 12, 804 12, 804
5.611.615 5.158.145 4.654.366 4.161.474 3.680.053
6,290,271 5,837,801 5,333,022 4,840,130 4,368,709 3,921,673 3,502,038 3,113,018 2,758,038 2,440,742
45.71'f. 41.08'f. 36.23'f. 31.66'f. 27.43'f. 23.55'f. 20.03% 16.87'f. 14.07'f. 11.64'f.
3,069,121 3,139,463 3,211,916 3,286,542 3,363,407 3,442,578 3,524,123 3,608,116 3,694,628 3,783,735
PROJECTED REVENUES
CITY OF
FY 08-09 BUDGET PRESENTATION
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
REVENUES
FY 2008-09
M1~91AN®US INT9~RJND
m /all 1~+ ~rf w w ~ erTr~c+
RNeSAND FORFBT
1%
CHARGES PDR
~1/ICE
3%
INT9~C~OVN'T RED
19%
rovvi i i ~
0%
AD VA11JR9V1 TAXeS
36%
AND
31%
$6, 000, 000
$5, 000, 000
$4, 000, 000
$3, 000, 000
$2, 000, 000
$1, 000, 000
$0
REVENUES
BIG THREE 84%
GTY OF
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
EXPENDITURES
MAJOR HIGHLIGHTS
cnv of
FY 08-09 BUDGET PRESENTATION
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
S
2008-09 GENERAL FUND
City Council
0%
City Manager
2%
City Clerk
3%
City Attorney
2% Fnance
3%
NonDepartmental
5%
growth Managemer
3%
Pr.iblic Works
33%
4%
MIS
2%
Human F~sourcevs
1%
E~forcerr~errt
1%
Police Department
41%
EXPENDITURE
$6,000,000
$5,000,000
~-
$4,000,000 ,,-° ~~
$3,000,000
$2,000,000
-Administration
-Public Safety
Engineering
Public Works
2005 2006
NonDepartmental
2008-09 DEPAR~ENTAL GROWTH
2007
2008
2009
POLICE
EXPENDITURES
2007-08 POLICE PROGRAMS
Dispatch
10%
Detective Di
12%
ProFessonal ~andards
3%
Code Eif
0'
Special Operations
9%
CITY OF
at ion
School Resaxce
4%
4% 45%
POLICE
EXPENDITURE
RIES
11%
Support Services
7%
Detective Division
15%
Achinistration
14%
Divisions
itrol Division Operation and
53% Maintenance
9%
Category
Capital
1%
90%
^
u ~c ors Gn~,
~~ ~v
__ ~~,
X ~ n I u re s HOME OF P~EL~ICAN ISLAND
Building Maintenance
7%
Cerr~tery
4%
x~rruvater
34%
Divisions
Parkland Recreatia
29%
5%
Finads
21%
Operation and
Maintenance
35%
Categor
Capital
0%
65%
Non-Departmental
Expenditures
~~~
~ n~rr~~l om~nt
~~I ~ ICI ~ ~1~if~ter, fewer, Electirc, Telephone
I"1Ll~'~I`l~~
~~'IC1~IC1~IC1~1
~~~1 ~~ .~L.1~
Ii~r~fr~ar~~t ~~I~~m~r~~t ~~
~`l~f ~p~~ial Ev~rrts, ~p~ratin~, rlll~win~, LJn~mplrm~r-~t, uppli~s, Tuition Plan, Janitorial, Et~.~
OrI~I I`1~~r1
~~
~_
~ ,
~,
,~
~,
~,
MAJOR
EXPENDITURE
HEIGHTS
•General Fund Expenditures are 76% Personnel
•Operating Expenses -Decreased $326,000 or
10.8%
•Capital Expenses - $81,400
•No New Vehicles
•All Capital Purchases from Replacement and Do
Not Effect General Fund
GTY OF
.~
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
•MIS -Server Replacement ($10,000)
•MIS -Battery Back Up ($5,000)
•MIS/Police - 911 Mapping ($20,000)
•Police -Tactical Vests (13 - $19,500)
•Police -Laptops (2 - $5,000)
•Police - Tasers ($1,100)
•Engineering -Sign Plotter ($4,500)
•Engineering -Laser ($2,000)
•Garage -Engine Analyzer ($3,500)
•Cemetery -Scissor Jack Trailer ($8,300)
•Cemetery -Fencing ($2,500)
GENERAL FUND
EXPENDITURE
Operation and
Maintenance
23%
Capital
1%
76%
Operation and
Maintenance
23%
GENERAL FUND
EXPENDITURE
FY 2008-09
76%
Capital
1%
Operation and
Maintenance
25%
FY 2007-08
73%
Capital
2%
PERSONNEL COSTS
rnv of
FY 08-09 BUDGET PRESENTATION
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
HEALTH CARE COSTS
..I BENEFITS
~~~
•Goal -Continue Same Benefits
•100% Healthcare Coverage for Employees
•50% Dependant Care Coverage
•Employee/Spouse
•Employee/Child
•Employee/Family
•100% Employee Coverage for Dental/Eye Insurance
•50% Dependant Care Coverage for Dental/Eye Insuran •Life Insurance/Long Term Disability
PERSONNEL
EXPENDITURES
SUMMARY (ALL FUNDS)
Workers
~.. ~.,"~...., ~., ~...,~ ~ :... r.,
F~etirerr~
8%
Uniform
0%
RC
6%
Salaries
70%
2%
FY 08-09 BUDGET
PERSONNEL QUICK
•76°/a of General Fund is Personnel Costs (FY 08 -
73°/a)
•Total Personnel Costs (All Funds) - $10,115,147
•FY 08 - $9,726,695 - Up 4%
•Total Overtime - $242,600
•Health Care Costs - $1,227,780 - Up 3°/a
•Dependant Care Coverage - $251,280 - 20% HC
Costs
•Retirement Contributions $844,807
HEALTH CARE COSTS
Current Plan -
BCBS
Employee $511.54
Employee/Child $961.67
Employee/Spouse $1,058.87
Employee/Family $1,624.13
Estimated 18% Rate
Increase
$526.89
$900.52
$1, 090.64
$1, 672.85
TOTAL ANNUAL COST ~ $1,191,214 ~ $1,227,780
SPECIAL REVENUE, DEBT
SERVICE AND CIP FUNDS
CnvoF
FY 08-09 BUDGET PRESENTATION
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
GTY OF
cPECIAL
VENUES
Discretionary Sales Tax - $2,400,000
Local Option Fuel Tax - $650,000
Recreation Impact Fee - $135,000
Stormwater Utility Fee ($4/Month) -
$850,000
GTY OF
~~ y , ~ -'~
,, ,
<<
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
~~
$3,000,000
$2,500,000
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
$-
FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008
GTY OF
4 ~ xs~ ~_.-~.-
~'S~~ --_
-- ,
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
EXPENSES
Discretionary Sales Tax
•City Hall Debt Service - $1,033,207
•Police Vehicle Replacement (10) - $385,000
•Schumann/Barber Intersection Improvements -
$1,500,000
~~~4 Round Swale Project - $350,000
•Potomac Crossing - $125,000
GTY OF
~~~1~
7.1~"~-°
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
$800,000 -
$700, 000
$600, 000
$500, 000
$400, 000
$300, 000
$200, 000
$100, 000
$-
FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 Fy 2007 Fy 2008
SPECIAL
REVENUES
EXPENDITURES
Local Option Fuel Tax
•Annual Operating Expenses (Public Lighting) -
$203,699
•Paving Debt Payment - $300,000
•Transfer to General Fund - $250,0000
SPECIAL REVENUES
RECREATION IMPACT
FEE HISTORY
$600,000
$500,000
$400,000
$300,000
$200,000
$100,000
$-
GTY OF
FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008
SPECIAL
REVENUES
EXPENDITURES
Recreation Impact Fee
•Schumann Tennis Courts - $175,000
SPECIAL REVENUES
STORMWATER UTILITY
FEE HISTORY
$1,000,000
$900,000
$800,000
$700,000
$600,000
$500,000
$400,000
$300,000
$200,000
$100,000
$-
FY 2002FY 2003FY 2004FY 2005FY 2006FY 2007FY 2008
SPECIAL
REVENUE
EXPENDITURES
Stormwater Utility Fee ($940,373
•Series 2003 Debt Payment - $437,748
•General Fund Transfer - $500,000 (Ditch/Swale
Mowing)
•GF Lines -Sod, Cement and Culvert
•Collier Creek Project Cash Match $750,00
DEBT SERVICE
DATE
ISSUED
AMOUNT
PROJECT
RETIRE
DATE
PAYMENT
2003
2003
2001
1998
$11, 625, 000
$5, 630, 000
$2, 435, 000
$3, 260, 000
City Hall
Stormwater
Golf Course
Road Projects
2018
2022
2010
2013
$8.445.000
$4, 570, 000
$870, 000
$1, 333, 400
$1, 033, 206
$437, 277
$306, 590
$300, 000
ENTERPRISE FUND HIGHLIGHTS
CnvoF
FY 08-09 BUDGET PRESENTATION
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
ENTERPRISE
Golf Course
•Continuation of Golf
Programming
•Overseeding Program -
Successful
•Range Improvements ($7,000)
•MISC Equipment ($11,750)
•Top Dresser
•Welder
Airport
•Shifting Gears to Economic
Development
•Searching Avenues to Diversify
Revenue
•Hanger Project - $1,450,000
BUILDING
DEPARTMENT LOSS
Month by Month Performance - Starting February
2005
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
~i ~~ ~i ~~ ~i ~~ ~i
ENTERPRISE
Building Department
•Building Slow Down Continues
•20 Permits Per Month
•Total Elimination of 6 Positions - 50% Reduction in
Workforce
•Estimated FY 07 Loss of $250,000
•Mitigate Losses For FY 08
•Lateral Transfer of 2 Positions
•Business Tax Revenue and Employee Shifted
•Deficit Spending - $21,407
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
$0
($500,000)
($1,000,000)
($1,500,000)
($2,000,000)
($2,500,000)
BUILDING
DEPARTMENT LOSS
GTY OF
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 --.2013 2014 2015 2016 2 2018
FY 08 ESTIMATED FORECAST (JUL 07) °-1~
FY 08 ACTUAL
PROJECTION w/ RIF 1
`~
PROJECTION w/ RIF 2
PROJECTION w/ RIF 3
PROJECTION w/ BUSINESS TAX
CLOSING COMMENTS
an of
FY 08-09 BUDGET PRESENTATION
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
FY 08-09 TOTAL
PROPOSED
$25,173,832
Golf Course Fund
7%
CI P Fund
16%
Debt Service
Fund
6%
Airport Fund
2%
~ecial F~venue
Fund
Building
Depart Trent Fund
2%
General Fund
47%
20%
CITY MANAGER -
OVERALBUDGET
•Planned Well For Tax Reform
•Doing More with Less
•Strong Reserve Levels in all Funds
•Solid Capital Funding Position
•Weakening Operational Position (General Fund)
•Some Concern for Capital Replacement Reserve
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
aivoF
FY 08-09 BUDGET PRESENTATION
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND