HomeMy WebLinkAbout05202009Budget - AgendaUfY QF
~~~~~
_ ~ _ r_,t,
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
1225 MAIN STREET • SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958
TELEPHONE: (772) 589-5336 • FAX (772) 589-5574
CITY OF SEBASTIAN
CITIZENS BUDGET REVIE'~V ADVISORY COMMITTEE
AGENDA
WEDNESDAY, MAY 20, 2009
6:00 PM
CITY HALL 1225 MAIN STREET
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. Call Meeting to Order {City Manger as Ex-Officio Member)
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Roll Call
4. Selection of Chairperson
5. Selection of Vice-Chair
6. Approval of Minutes of July 21, 2Q08 Meeting
7. Fiscal Year 2010 Budget Introduction -City Manager
S. Member Discussion
9. Adjoununent
Q1Yff
~~
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
1225 Main Street, Sebastian, FL 32958
(772)584-5330
CITY OE SEBASTIAN
CITIZENS BUDGET REVIEW ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MINUTES
July 21st, 2008 @ 6:00 p.m.
1225 MAIN STREET, SEBASTIAN
1. The Citizens Budget Advisory Review Committee Meeting convened at 6:00 p.m.
2. Al Minner.led the Pledge of Allegiance.
3. Roll Call:
Adrina Davis
Todd Klitenic
Charles Cardinale
Thomas Burke
Brad White
Dwight Trout
Ed Herlihy.
Staff Members resent:
AI Minner, City Manager
Ken Killgore, Finance Director
Nancy Veidt, Jr. Accountant
-Mary Rosenthal, Acct. Clerk I/ Recording Secretary
4, Announcements:
a. Election of Chairman
Mr: Davis and Mr. Trout made a motion for Thomas Burke to be named
the Chairman. Mr. Burke nominated Mr. Herlihy a vote was taken Mr.
Burke was voted in as chairman by 4 votes.
b. Election of Vice Chairman
A motion was made for Adrina Davis to be named the Vice Chairman, Mr.
Trout seconded the motion all members where in favor.
5, AQOroval of Minutes of July ib, 2007 Meeting:
Mr. Oakes our former chairman moved away, Mr. Burke made a motion to
accept the July 16, 2007 minutes in Mr. Oakes stead, Adrina Davis seconded
the motion all members were in favor.
b. New Business:
Mr. Minner thanked the finance department and ail of the department head and
management staff for their cooperation in getting the budget assembled and
completed,
Mr, Minner gave a power point presentation on the FY 2008/2009 proposed
budget overview. (attached)
In this overview Mr. Minner discussed a range of topics including property taxes,
tax reform, rollback, reserve levels, general fund revenue projections, special
revenue debt services and the enterprise fund.
After Mr. Minner's presentation he turn the meeting over to Mr. Burke.
Mr. Herlihy handed out a proposal to provide funds for additional police officers;
the proposal also included statistical data and a request for 10 new police
officers. (Proposal is attached}-
Mr. Klitenic stated that we asked. for 4 new police officers fast year and got none
and we are behind in police officers from other municipalities.
Mr. Herlihy stated that just looking at the statistics we need 1.0 new officers.
Mr. Kltenic stated that he agrees, and that we should also add a community
center that would help all citizens and double as a hurricane shelter.
Mr. Minner explained that police officers have to be funded by the general fund
revenue. This impact of hiring officers is approximately $62,000 per officer. If
we add the police officers we will have to increase the millage rate or use cash.
Mr. Trout asked about the ratio of help from the Indian River County Sheriffs
department, he feels any discussion should also include this ratio of help.
Mr. Minner stated that even if we were at 3.1 officers per thousand ratio the
crime rate would still be the same, because it is hard economic times. The
response time would improve but the crime rate would stay the same.
Mr. Davis asked about the health program and did we look into getting the best
program.
Mr. Minner stated that they looked at all avenues and our present program is the
most affordable.
Mr. Burke doesn't want to dip into the cash reserves at this time because of the
economy, and feels that we need to reserve this money far catastrophic times.
Mr. Klitenic asked what we are doing to bring in new revenues so that we don't
have to increase taxes.
Mr. Minner stated that we have reduced taxes and with Sebastian being mainly
residential there are only one or two areas that will bring in revenue: the ad
valorem taxes, state shared revenues and the Franchise fees.
Mr. Klitenic asked about the community center and when could we look at it
being built.
Mr. Minner stated that council has no problem with building a new community
center but the staff[ng and cost of maintaining the center is not feasible at this
time we don't have the money for this.
Mr. Burke asked about upping the millage rate to add extra police officers.
Mr, Minner stated that if you go one bit over 3.343b you need a super majority
vote. Or you go over and lose your state funding. State funding is important it's
another 30% of you revenue.
Mr. Herlihy said that he spoke to 2 council members who reacted favorably to his
proposal, but stated that funding would cause a majority vote.
Mr. Minner said that he spoke with Chief Davis and our officers are aware of the
difficult time we are in and are out there giving it there all.
Mr, White stated that he was an advocate of adding more police officers. He
noticed that the ratio of police officers in Vero is larger that in Sebastian but the
crime rate is the same, showing that our officers are doing a good job. He feels
the numbers don't justify the need for 10 additional new officers.
Mr. Minner agreed saying that 10 new officers would not necessarily bring the
crime rate down, response time would be better, some crime may be deterred
and services to the public would improve but it would not change the crime rate
significantly, because of the climate we are in.
Mr. Cardinale asked how the council responded to the request last year for 4 new
police officers,
Mr. Minner said that the council was in favor but wanted to wait to see what
happen with amendment #1 and knew in January we wouldn't be able to add
any officers.
Mr. Cardinale~wanted to know what we are doing with the police vehicles as far
as them being flex-fuel cars.
Mr. Minner said that the police department has been clear in their request for
combustion engines because of the need for patrol and issues during a chase.
Mr. Davis the magic number is 3.36 if we.go over we need a majority vote.
Mr. Minner that is correct.
Mr. White said couldn't we plan to add 1 police officer per quarter and ease into
additional officers.
Mr. Minner said we would still have to raise the millage rate or a cut somewhere
else to plan for the additional casts.
Mr. Burke asked if it would be advisable to submit fio council a request for
additional officers by raising the millage rate to a maximum of 3.7.
Mr. Minner said that this would be a reasonable request.
Mr. Cardinale asked the average of housing building permits.
Mr. Minner said that at this time the average is about 2 permits per month. We
need 20 permits per month to break even.
Mr. Gllliams of 1623 US 1, is concerned with changing the millage rate. He feels
that the committee should look at the budget and try to find extra monies. He
stated that there are ways to increase revenue, cameras. at traffic fights to
generate revenue from speeding tickets. Use volunteers to cover more areas to
deter crime.
We need fio reduce our spending 10% across the board. We need to look at all
ways to reduce spending,
A motion was made that council adopt the proposed i=YtJ9 budget with due
consideration to increase police ofFcer staffing at a level of 2 officers per year for
the next 5 years and encouraging a super majority vote to take such action.
The motion was passed unanimously.
Mr. Herlihy made a motion to give the council a modified version of the proposal
for additional police officers.
Motion was seconded and passed.
Mr. Klitenic made a motion for Mr. Herlihy to represent the committee at the
council meeting.
The motion was seconded and passed.
Mr. Herlihy will represent the budget committee at the council meeting and
summarized the proposal far the council
Mr. Minner stated that the budget committee representative would be on the
agenda to present the proposal to the council.
7.) Adjourn
Mr. Berke made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:40 P.M. All were in favor.
i~~~.
Thomas Burke, Chairman
Citizens Budget Review Committee
Approved at the Citizens Budget Review Committee Meeting
TO: Members of the Sebastia City Council
FROM: AI Minner, City Manag
RE: FY 2010 PRELIMIN Y UAL BUDGET REPORT
DATE: Tuesday, March 3, 2 09
CC: Members of the Budget Advisory Committee
White officio{ calculations and estimates from the Indian River County Property Appraiser's Office
are still four months off, this report provides a foundation for planning the FY 2010 Budget and
responds to Council's request far early preparations. As of this writing, I remain optimistic that
the FY 2010 Budget can be adopted without increasing ad valorem taxes. However,
accomplishing that goal will not come without difficult choices.
This report includes revenue estimates that continue to decline, while expenses continue to .
increase. Further, this report provides 10 Budget Relief Measures. To balance the budget in
responsible fashion, it will require that a11, some, amended or blended portions of these measures
be considered. While some of these budget measures may seem severe, they provide avenues
to avoid the harsher consequence of (1) increasing taxes; (2) reductions in force; or (3} significant
reserve spending.
REVENUES, EXPENSES AND PROJECTED SHORTFALLS
FY 09 experienced an 18% decrease in the City's ad valorem tax base (13% due to a fal[ in
property values and 5% due to the additional homestead exemption). The City Manager's Office
has been in contact with Indian River County officials, Indian River County Property Appraiser
and the Sebastian Finance Department. Our best estimate is that property values will continue to
decline in FY 2010 at a rate of 15%. Between personnel expenses that are scheduled to
increase and the stated revenue shortfall there is a projected budget gap of $1,025,739.
FUND REVENUE ! FY 2449 ~ FY ?494 FY 2449
se Fees _____ _._. .............i...,.....-...__ 1,305,000_.':_._._._.._..1,331,100 !,_-•-• 1,357,722
Taxes ____..__-_•--,`------2,377,OOD-I-__--- 2,424,540 ..~-_ 2,473031
s and Permit ~ 55,200 56,304 i 57.430
al Grants 41
Shared Revenue 2.b11
`Charges for Services 327,301. 333,847_ ; 340,524 347 334
-Fine and ForfeRs 58,600
i
60,792
A 62,008 53,248
Interest Earnings _ .._... _
r..
307,200 ._
..
,_... -.---
307 200 -_- _---.
r..
--
307 200 I _____..
307 200
Rents and Royaftles ; _ 95,500 ; 97 410 99 358 ~ 101,345
Sale of Fixed Assets •12 500_ 12,750 13,005 ;
--_ 13,265
____. _..~_-.-
Cantnbutions~Uonetions
__.____-_._,_..._._-_ -_-.-__... _.
37,900
.. _....
36 658.
. _- -_.__..L.. _.___ r
39,481
_.._..... _.__- . :
40 220
...- . .._,....L._. ..
Other Mlseellaneous _ _ 37 659 . __.....___.__38,412 ---._ - -- -- 39,180 -- - _-- _ 39,964
interfund Transfers 849,000: 849,000 849,000 849,000 !
:other Sources .. 61,400_ _ _ . -.. - _ 61,400. -_ -- ----• 81,400. , _ _ .. _ 81,400
-TOTAL tZEVENUES 99 830 747. 99,999,_37 90,878,fi3II I
EXPS -All General Fund
...._..-.... .. ..__..._-- ... ...... ........ . 7165 430
_....... -.1 _.-...,1,. -. ,._.,. 7 305393
..... ..._I. _.. _.i~ .. 71524,555
._.. _. 7 750 291
..._..._.1___.L__... ~,
EXPS -Police Department „ ,4,685,317: _ 4,919,583 - _ 5~D67,170 _,__.5,279,165_;
TOTAL EXPENSES ! 99,850,747 , 72,2?a,97G i?,591,725 ! 92,969,477 `:
REVENUE EXPENSES $0 (~1 02x,739 ~ _ ($1,713.027) . ($2,162,9o7j
This trend continues and deepens, with a projected decrease in revenues by 10% for FY 2011
and 5% for FY 2012.
TAXES, R[F AND RESERVE SPENDING
85% of the Genera! Fund budget continues to rely on three primary sources of revenue - (1} ad
valorem taxes; (2} State shared taxes; and, (3} utility taxes. Of these three sources, two (ad
valorem and State shared taxes} are in steady decline.
In preparing the FY 2010 Budget, three measures that can fill the entire projected deficit are not
recommended. These issues are brought to your attention to offer perspective on the challenges
ahead.
1. Ad Valorem Tax increase -Going into the budget process, a revenue estimate is made
which decreases ad valorem revenue $637,944. This deficit is increased because without
mitigation, expenses are expected to increase by $387,795. Therefore, to fill this entire
$1,025,739 shortfall, the current millage rate of $3.3456 would need to be increased to $4.3284,
costing the average borne owner approximately $97 in additional City ad valorem taxes (when
compared to holding the rate at the same level for two years). The estimated FY 2010 Rollback
rate is $3.9672 and the estimated FY 2010 Majority Vote millage rate is $4.0862. The
Department of Revenue will announce the growth rate, which is used to calculate the majority
vote millage rate, sometime in mid-April. For this report the growth rate was estimated at 3%, last
year's rate was 4.15%.
FY 70 M[LLAGE HEEDED i
k_.._._.___. __.. ~..___..___.~.~~__~R Si{oRTFALL FY 14 tv1AJORITY VOTE I FY 10 ROLLBACK _ j FY 10 CURREIIT I
-~
!FY 09 Assessed ---__ _,mm ~ _-..1,327,5751169 ______~_ 1,327,575,161 ;-- 1,327,575,169 _( __. 1,327,575161 I
FY 19 EST Assessed ~i 1.128.438.887 i 128 ase 8A7 ! i 17A d'~i fiR7 !^ ~ 1'7G A9G CG'l i
4.640.116
4,611
387
'Ave Resfdei7iial Tax Increase { $97 i (~15] 1 (526t I lRAA1 l
2. Reduction In Force (RIFT - To reduce personnel costs in the past three years, several
actions have occurred such as position freezes, position eliminations and early retirement by-
outs. Over this period, total full-time employment with the City of Sebastian has decreased from
154 to 936 employees {12% reduction}. These actions have helped stabilize the budget, but a
point is being reached ~vhere further RIFs :vill negatively affect service delivery. If the projected
shortfall is filled by RIFs alone, 10 positions would require elimination from the General Fund.
3. General Fund Reserve Spending -The estimated balance for the General Fund Reserve
Account (as of September 30, 2008} is $5,534,858. This amount is healthy. However, it has
been subsidized by an approximate amount of $200,000 from the capital replacement reserve. In
other words, while this is an increase from last year's $5,424,199, it is artificially high and will
experience increased financial stress going forward as no other funds are available to "prop" it up.
If this fund is used as a major balancing mechanism, reserve funds will be depleted quickly.
The better plan for reserve spending is to use unrestricted cash to smooth out contingency
shortfalls. This mitigates the larger unforeseeable problems associated with reserve spending
and keeps the City more financially sound.
10 BUDGET RELIEF MEASURES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010
The following are 10 recommendations for balancing the FY 2010 budget:
1. Temporarily Suspend the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRAI - In FY 01 the City
created a CRA along the riverfront. That district generates a budget of approximately $500,000
by the City and Indian River County making an earmarked payment equal to the incremental
assessed value of the CRA district. These funds can only be used to promote or develop the
CRA district. If the City were to suspend this payment, those revenues used for CRA projects
could be used to lessen the General Fund shortfall. While this option provides 25% of the
projected relief needed to balance the General Fund, it does have some negative aspects. First,
it returns to the County their $25D,000 contribution. Second, it potentially stops district capital
improvement. There are ways to mitigate these shortfalls. For example, we could suggest to the
County that their funds be used to bolster other county economic development funding programs.
Also, other special revenues such as Qiscretionary Sales Tax or Recreation impact Fees could
be used for riverfront capital improvement projects. Finally, as property assessments regain
strength, the City can choose to re-start the district. This is one of the tougher budgeting choices,
but it provides significant financial relief. EST SAVINGS - $275,000
2. Reduce FY 09 Daeration Expenses by 3% -Operation expense far the FY 09 General Fund
are $2,692,653. While these were budgeted extremely conservatively without contingency,
management staff will be asked to trim final expenses by 3%. Reductions can come from limiting
travel, training, and other miscellaneous operations. Another area that may provide relief is fuel
budgets were calculated at $4.OD per gallon. White same operational costs will be fixed, it is not
unreasonable to assume some savings. Those savings can be carried into FY 2010. EST
SAVINGS - $80,$00
3. Cost of Living Adiustment (COLA) Freeze for Department Heads and Police
ChieflDenuty ChieflCaptains -Our policy is that management staff receives the same collective
benefits as the CWA. The agreement calls fora 2% COLA, effective April 1, 2009. To save
money this COLA will be eliminated. These employees currently earn aver $70,000 annually and
there are 14 employees affected. Some supervisors fall into this Management employment
category, but if they earn below $70,000 annually, their COLAs will not be frozen at this time.
In addition, because the City Manager and City Clerk salaries have been frozen since April 2008,
both employees met and voluntarily offered suspension of the City's family medical insurance
coverage payment (effective April 1). The family medical coverage is a beneft afforded to these
employees because it was negotiated in the Clerk/ManagerlCity employment agreements. EST
SAVINGS-$18,800
4. Freeze Wages far Department Heads and Management in FY 2010 -While department
heads will be asked to forgo the April 2% COLA, a salary freeze will also be required for FY 2010
which includes department heads and other management staff. EST SAVINGS - $88,243
5. Citv Attornev Savings -When City Council formally hired apart-time City Attorney in
January 2009 they established personnel savings. In FY 09 the transition into the part-time
position is estimated to be revenue neutral. However, in FY 2010, savings should be realized.
EST SAVINGS - $75,000
8. Freeze Wages for CWA Union Members in FY 2010 - At the close of FY 09, the previous
collective bargaining agreement with the CWA expires -encompassing all public works,
maintenance and some administrative City positions. Of course, this option will need to be
collectively agreed going into this summer. The alternatives are job loss and/or significant benefit
reductions. EST SAVINGS - $107,428
7. Request Wage Freeze for PBA Union Members in FY 2010 -With the exception of the
Chief of Police, Deputy Chief and two Captains, a!I Sebastian Police Officers are members of the
Police Benevolent Association (PBA} and have collectively bargained their benefits and wages.
The PBA agreement is scheduled to expire at the end of the FY 2010 (September 30, 2010).
However, in light of the other City benefit reductions and pay freezes, City management may
seek to request an opener to the existing PBA agreement. If the PBA agrees to these terms, it
may make it beneficial for the new agreement which will be negotiated toward the end of FY
2010. This action may work #o mitigate future job loss and/or significant benefit reductions. While
City Council direction has been to retain 39.5 officers, this policy direction may need to be re-
visited in light of the current budget circumstances. EST SAVINGS - $143,951
8. Furlough Days In FY 2010 - In lieu of position reductions, the City should consider
suspending work days or furlough days. This proposal will rotate days in which personnel are not
required to come to work, but the employee will not be paid for the day they are not required. If
every fu[[-time employee in the City has one day furloughed, the savings is $25,000. At this time,
the recommendation is two furlough days. EST SAVINGS - $50,000
9. Reduce Retirement Contributions -The PBA manages a pension plan in which retirement
contributions are dictated by (1) the actuarial report; and, (2} PBA agreement which is not
expired. The City may have same management rights to reduce these payments now. However,
for FY 2010 all other employees of the City receive a 9% retirement payment and that amount
can be reduced to 8%. EST SAVINGS - $47,000
'!0. Wealth Insurance Benefit Modifications -While the City has worked to mitigate increasing
costs of health insurance for our employees, this policy must be reviewed. Health insurance can
still be provided to meet the collective bargaining agreement, but benefits under the plan could be
modified. For example, the deductible could be increased which could Power premiums. Should
this year's claims experience continue on the current positive trend, this action could lower overall
health insurance costs. EST SAVINGS - $20,000
SUMMARY
With these modifications, the FY 2010 budget shortfall is reduced to $84,910. Addressing this
estimated shortfall is a more manageable task when additional circumstance and information
present themselves. In addition, these steps bring out-year trends closer to balance. In
summation, please feel free to provide input on these items and this office will continue to keep
Council informed throughout the budget process.
ADJUSTED i i
itEVEIIUE FY ?009 FY 2009 FY 2040 ': FY 2011 FY 2042
?Frenchtse Fees
~_.._..__.._._...~.;-- 1,3D5,000 _
- __ 1 305,000
.. _ 1,331,10_0 1,357,722 i
_ 1,384
~UtiltttesTaxes
~ 2,377,000 ! 2,377,000. 2,424,540_ ~
_2,473,031 ! 2,522
'UcensesandPerrrul
'
~_--------------- ----•-~- 55,200,`.
----- __,_55 ~
200 __ _~
56,304 I--
-- 57,430 '--
----58
,Federal Grards ~ 41 1529 ; 41,529.1
----
- 42,36D '.
._
, 4307 i 44
SteteSharedRevenue_
2,011 000 -
~
2~011,OD0 - ~
..__
r_
1,910,450 . _ ____.__-~_
i,t362.__S6B9 ;_ ___.~
_ 1862
i
;Charges for Services -._ _ __. _
,-- 327 301 i__
_ 327 3, 0? ~
_._ 33J847 , 3-_
_.___ 340y524
347
;Fete and Forfeits i
.._.__._...---.._- ...............-..._.._...-,.- 59,E00 ~_.•
---_.___.___._t ___ 59,S00
-__~. 60,792
...._._...--....~ _ 62,pp8 3
._... _...- r 63
IrAerest Earnings _.. ..........1.. _..._....307,200 i.._ ..-_.._307,200_i_ ._...__3D7,200.'_- __--303 7~Q0 I_ _..._307
Renls end Royalties ! 95,500 __ _____9x',500 ___ _____ _97,410 __ ___- _ 99 56 101
IS°leofFxedAssets '... -.-__.~~,5~..._. _._..._??,5~ t_ __-----12,750;-- ---__.-13 DS 13
Cortrlbu[ians~Donattwts _ 37 9DD 37,900 38,808 ' 39,431 ~ 40
i0ther tvliscellaneous 37 659 .37,659 38 412 , 39160 39
°Interfund Transfers 849 000 ; 849,OOb ' _ 849,OOD , 849,000 { B49
Other Sources
_ _ 61,400 _
81,400 i
81 400
01,400 '
81
;TOTAL REVEtIOES 11,83Q,747 17,830,747 11,199,237 I 10.878.698 10.506
DH APR COLA Freeze 0 ~ f18 8Dt]) 0
97~ Operattons SAVGS 0_~ t80,8DD) _ 0
- - ----
CRA Suspension
.. ;
(270 000)!
;
Gty Attorney _ -
0 470 0001±
CWAIMGT Retirement - _(#x,000);- _ -
'Suspend Workday (2j ! (a0 000)
Health fnsurence ~ j~0 DDDj s
TOTALEXPEIiSES 11,859,7x7 -11,731,147 11>Ba,l•i7 ; 11?84,747 71,284147
REVENUE-EXPlT15ES 50: $99,60D _(584,910);, ('~405,4~{9) (1~477,6271j