HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-09-41RESOLUTION NO R -09 -41
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, REQUESTING A BOUNDARY MODIFICATION
AND INCREASING FUNDING ALLOCATION FOR THE APPROVED
STAN MAYFIELD WORKING WATERFRONT GRANT; PROVIDING
FOR CONFLICTS AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS the Florida Communities Trust, has been authorized to provide
funding opportunities to local governments or non profit entities to preserve and promote
Sebastian's heritage commercial fishing industry through the Stan Mayfield Working
Waterfronts grant program.
WHEREAS the City has acknowledged that the purpose of the Stan Mayfield
Working Waterfronts program is to further the protection and continuation of working
waterfronts in the State of Florida.
"Working Waterfront" is defined in the Florida Statute as:
(a) A parcel or parcels of land directly used for the purposes of the commercial
harvest of marine organisms or saltwater products by state licensed commercial
fishermen, aquaculturists, or business entities, including piers, wharves, docks, or
other facilities operated to provide waterfront access to licensed commercial
fishermen, aquaculturists, or business entities; or
(b) A parcel or parcels of land used for exhibitions, demonstrations, educational
venues, civic events, and other purposes that promote and educate the public
about economic, cultural, and historic heritage of Florida's traditional working
waterfronts, including the marketing of the seafood and aquaculture industries.
WHEREAS the City was awarded up to $3,163,500.00 from Florida
Communities Trust on April 13, 2009, to be utilized to acquire the two parcels of land
outlined in the original application fulfilling the goals of the program as outlined in part
(b) above.
WHEREAS the State conducted two appraisals and sent a written offer for the
Sebastian Entertainment parcel, which was rejected by the property owner and no longer
being considered for acquisition.
WHEREAS the City now requests a boundary modification to start the
acquisition process for the parcel commonly known as Dabrowski/ Offshore Marina
containing a commercial dock and historic fish house. This parcel would be considered
for purchase instead of the Sebastian Entertainment parcel.
WHEREAS the City will commit funding to the amended project.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN FLORIDA as follows:
Section 1. APPROVAL. The City Council hereby expresses its support and request
approval of boundary modification.
Section 2. AUTHORIZATION. Authorizes the City Manager to transmit a letter with
this resolution to the Florida Communities Trust program.
Section 3. CONFLICTS. All resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are
hereby repealed.
Section 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its
adoption.
The motion was seconded by Council Member H i l l and, upon being put to a
vote, the vote was as follows:
The Mayor thereupon declared this Resolution duly passed and adopted this 14
day of October, 2009.
ATTEST:
This resolution was moved for adoption by Council Member C o y
Sally A. Mais, MMC
City Cler
Mayor Richard H. Gillmor
Vice Mayor Jim Hill
Councilmember Andrea Coy
Councilmember Dale I. Simchick
Councilmember Eugene Wolff
aye
aye
aye
aye
aye
CITY OF_SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA
Mayor Richard H. Gillmor
Approved as to Form and Legality for Reliance
by the City of Sebastian only:
Robert A.Ginsburg
City Attorney
November 25, 2008
Fisherman's Landing Sebastian, Inc.
PO Box 780126
Sebastian, FL 32978
Mr. Ken Reecy
Community Program Manager
Florida Communities Trust
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Sadowski Building, Suite 310
Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -2100
Dear Mr. Reecy:
On behalf of Fishermen's Landing Sebastian, Inc., I am pleased to submit the enclosed
grant application (one original and two copies) to Florida Communities Trust's Working
Waterfronts Program. This application is for acquisition of Fishermen's Landing
Sebastian, Inc, 1532 Indian River Drive, Sebastian, FL 32958. Parcel number
31390600001001000002.0.
If the project site is selected for funding, Fishermen's Landing Sebastian, Inc., is
committed to fulfilling all commitments made in the grant application.
We have received an opinion from the local government planning staff determining that
the proposed use of the project site is consistent with the local comprehensive plan.
I also certify that condemnation or the threat of condemnation has not been used and
will not be used to acquire any portion of the project site.
hereby authorize Charlie Sembier, director, to act as the Key Contact for the project. I
understand that all correspondence concerning the grant application will be directed to
this person. You may reach him at 772 473 -1578 or Bsembler @aol.com or by mail at
6945 49 Street, Vero Beach, FL 32967.
Sincerely,
Ed Mangano, President
1
Florida Communities Trust Application Form SMWW -1
Stan Mayfield Working Waterfronts Grant Application Form
In Accordance With Rule 9K- 9.003(1), F.A.C.
1. PROJECT NAME Fisherman's Landing Sebastian
2. APPLICANT NAME Fisherman's Landing Sebastian, Inc.
(Name of Local Government or Nonprofit Working Waterfront Organization)
Nonprofit Working Waterfront Organization, must provide the required information requested in Exhibits J, K and L.
3. PARTNERSHIP APPLICATION
Is this a Partnership Application between a Local Government and Nonprofit Working Waterfront Organization?
YES NO X
If yes, provide the name of the Nonprofit Working Waterfront Organization. Also, provide an application transmittal letter
from the partnering agency.
4. KEY CONTACT PERSON
Note: The key contact is required to be an employee of the Local Government or Nonprofit Working Waterfront
Organization. Identify only one key contact person.
Key Contact Name Charles W. Sembler
Title Director
Department
Mailing Address 6945 49 Street
City Vero Beach
Phone Number 772 473 -1578 Fax Number
E -mail Address bsembleraol.com
Chief Administrator for the Local Government
Name Phone Number
Note: If the Applicant's principal office address is a post office box, a delivery address is also required.
Delivery Address
City FL Zip Code
5. PROJECT SITE LOCATION
Form SMWW -1 (Fffaotiva 1
(Descriptive project name)
First Middle Initial Last
FL Zip Code 32967
County Indian River Section 06 Township 31S Range 39E
Note:. Include all directional designations (Township either North or South Range either East or West).
6. TOTAL PROJECT ACREAGE
.38 acres (upland), .76 acres (submerged lease assigned to land owner), total 1.14 Acres
Pons. 1
Indicate the approximate acreage of the Project Site.
7. ACQUISITION TYPE
The Applicant must fill out one of the following acquisition types, as appropriate.
1.14 Acres
X Fee Simple
The Project Site will be a joint acquisition with both FCT and the Applicant participating in the Acquisition process.
Less than fee Working Waterfront Covenants
FCT and the Applicant will acquire a Tess than fee interest in the site acquiring the development rights off the property
while still allowing the owner to continue operation of the site as a Working Waterfront.
1 Number of separate ownerships to be acquired within the Project Site.
Note: No Project Site can contain more than 3 ownerships.
8. ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS
Enter an amount on each line and round to the nearest hundred dollars.
a. Land purchase price (estimated) 2,000,000.00
b. Acquisition costs (estimated)
Cost of certified survey(s), appraisal(s), appraisal review(s), title report(s), 45,000.00
title insurance premiums) and environmental audit(s).
c. Total Project Costs [Add a. and b.] 2
9. AWARD AMOUNT AND MATCH
Dollar Amount Percentage of Award
a. FCT grant award amount (1) 2,045,000.00 100 (2 decimal places)
b. Match amount (2) 0.00 0 (2 decimal places)
c. Total Project Costs [Add a. and b.] 2,045,000.00 0
(Should equal 8.c above)
(1) The total amount of any Award or combination of Awards applied for by any Local Government(s) or Nonprofit Working
Waterfront Organization(s) under any Application(s) or Partnership Application(s) for any project(s) shall not exceed funds
available during any one cycle.
(2) No match is required. Points are awarded in the criteria (4)(a) 1 and 2 for various levels of match.
10.SOURCE OF MATCH Not Applicable No Match Proposed
Check the appropriate response(s) below to indicate eligible source(s) of Match:
Existing or future cash from the Applicant.
Cash or grant from federal, state, regional, county, municipal, or other agency.
Cash from a private Donation.
Value of real property donated by the landowner in a documented bargain sale or Donation agreement.
Note: If the source of the Match is from a third party, provide documentation indicating source and amount.
Form SMWW-1 (Effective
Pans. 9
OWNERSHIP AND ACQUISITION PLAN
List all property owners and parcel tax identification numbers for all parcels.
Requirement: Provide a willing owner letter for all parcels listed below (Exhibit H).
Owner's Name Parcel Tax ID Number(s)
Owner's Mailing Address
Owner's Name Parcel Tax ID Number(s)
Form SMWW -1 (Effective
Parcel Tax ID Number(s)
Owner's Name
Anna Dabrowski Authorized Agent: David A. Dabrowski (son) 31390600001001000002.0
Owner's Mailing Address
Anna Dabrowski, 20100 Renfrew, Detroit, MI 48221
David Dabrowski (authorized agent), 9225 87 Street, Vero Beach, FL 32967 (772) 589 -3957
Phone
Owner's Mailing Address Phone
Phone
Page 3
The purpose of the Stan Mayfield Working Waterfronts Program is to further the
protection and continuation of Working Waterfronts in the State of Florida.
"Working Waterfront" is defined in the Florida Statute as:
(a) A parcel or parcels of land directly used for the purposes of the commercial harvest of
marine organisms or saltwater products by state licensed commercial fishermen,
aquaculturists, or business entities, including piers, wharves, docks, or other facilities operated
to provide waterfront access to licensed commercial fishermen, aquaculturists, or business
entities; or
(b) A parcel or parcels of land used for exhibitions, demonstrations, educational venues, civic
events, and other purposes that promote and educate the public about economic, cultural, and
historic heritage of Florida's traditional working waterfronts, including the marketing of the
seafood and aquaculture industries.
The project proposed for funding in the grant application trust clearly further the
purposes of a Working Waterfront as outlined above.
Form SMWW -1 (Effective
Panes 4
Project Summary or Business Summary
Business Summary
The disappearance of commercial fishing and working waterfronts in Florida has been astonishing;
their losses leaving scars on our shores, economy and cultural heritage.
Today, only a fraction of Florida's 1,197 miles of coastline are devoted to commercial fishing. Portions of our state's working
waterfronts are being sold weekly and converted to other uses, often times as second homes and condominiums. As a result,
Florida's historic fishing industry and the rich cultures once prevalent in its waterfront villages are in peril.
The Stan Mayfield Working Waterfront Act recognizes the need to preserve our State's esteemed fishing traditions and
provides for crucial commercial waterfront access:
'The Legislature finds that the quality of life, environmental quality, as well as the viability and vitality of the urban areas of this state
are directly linked to urban open space and greenways. The creation of greenways; expansion of green spaces; enhancement of
recreation areas; preservation of working waterfronts; and protection and restoration of urban lakes, rivers, and watersheds in the
urban areas of this state are necessary to link populated areas with natural areas, preserve unique cultural and heritage sites, provide
land for recreational opportunities to enhance the health and well -being of the urban residents of this state, improve water quality,
reduce the level of urban crime and violence, and build confidence and self esteem among the urban youth of this state. fs 380.502
Fisherman's Landing Sebastian, Inc. is dedicated to "Preservation by Maintaining"
Our organization's approach acknowledges that some things cannot be "fixed" quickly, and that the framework of an object's original
state must inevitably change. Preservation by Maintaining calls for a dynamic approach to that which is being preserved; it is a gradual
shift from focusing on individual buildings, to a broader focus on the more organic segments of the constructed and living maritime
community.
Preservation by Maintaining must be dynamic, or "holistic in order to create self- sustaining models; the true goal of preservation.
Even a goal like the preservation of an individual threatened species is dependent upon the larger objective of maintaining a balance
in habitat. In other words, preserving the overall environment is critical to sustaining the various species within it; they are
interdependent. If the Florida commercial fisherman is to survive, it is vital that we preserve the environment in which tie exists;
Florida's working waterfronts and the communities which surround and interact with them.
With its abundant natural resources (fish and shellfish populations), available shoreline, deep water access, existing infrastructure and
no other competitive venues, the Sebastian area currently provides an excellent opportunity to embark upon a successful working
waterfront model. In fact, Sebastian historically and currently possesses all the attributes needed to be hailed as "the model' working
waterfront conservation program.
A Brief History
First known as Newhaven, the coastal area located at the south end of the Indian River Lagoon was renamed Sebastian in 1884.
Fishing in the area for subsistence and recreation had flourished since the time of the Ais Indians, and was the mainstay of the
small community.
By the end of the 1800's, two things helped establish Sebastian as a small, but lively and important fishing village. Henry Flagler's
Florida's East Coast Railroad provided fishermen and citrus growers with the fastest shipping possible to the country's northeast
markets. Combined with John Gorrie's ice machine, it became possible to transport highly perishable products over long distances;
and the town of Sebastian prospered.
Four firms were engaged in the fish business during the winter of 1895 -96, shipping goods mostly to New York, Richmond, and New
Orleans. Opportunity seemed limitless, and it didn't take long for a full fledged industry to be set in motion. In its heyday, some
nineteen fishhouses were located along the Indian River. Sebastian's Archie Smith Wholesale Fish Company, no longer in business,
is now an official historic site on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places.
Commercial fishing, citrus, tourism, and a host of smaller industries continued to fuel the area's economy and growth until World War
I1. Today, however, only the remnants of a once mighty fishing industry remain.
Countless hurricanes, government regulations, net bans, foreign competition, skewed property taxes, pollution, and residential
development are just a few things that contributed to Sebastian's historic and cultural collapse.
Form SMWW -1 (Effective
Paoe 5
The Indian River Lagoon no longer provides a nucleus and much needed infrastructure for commercial fishing operations. As a result,
the number of profitable ventures has declined. While some finfish is still harvested and there is a modest and viable farm raised clam
industry, there is also a gaping "hundred- mile hole" between Cape Canaveral and Ft. Pierce where fishermen can no longer efficiently
make a living. It's not uncommon to see commercial fishing boats tied to sea walls along the hundred -mile stretch, impatiently waiting
to find makeshift docking facilities with enough deep water and infrastructure to handle their catches. Often times, they are forced to
waste fuel and valuable time traveling to the north and south of Sebastian to unload.
In spite of these obstacles, the determination of this die -hard fishing breed, combined with battered, but renewable, fishing
infrastructure presents a rare and timely opportunity. The City of Sebastian has clearly demonstrated its desire to resurrect and
preserve its historic working waterfront. Cultural preservation, like the conservation of our natural resources, depends upon leadership,
management, the resources of civil society and the popular will. Sebastian possesses nearly all of these traits. Land acquisition is
critical.
Provided the necessary funding for land acquisition, Fisherman's Landing Sebastian, Inc. and the local community are prepared to
nurture, rebuild and maintain an environment to facilitate a maritime renaissance for perpetuity; a living cultural heritage comprised of
both the old and the new. This rebirth of the area's commercial fishing industry will assist in fulfilling current consumer demand for local
seafood products and provide a myriad of employment opportunities during and after the development stages.
Within eyesight of Sebastian is Pelican Island. The Park is renowned as the United State's first National Wildlife Preserve.
The Sebastian area is poised for yet another first:
To be Florida's first and nation's most successful working waterfront program.
While similar initiatives can be found in the Northeastern United States, our plan is unique in that it embraces a multitude of
commercial waterfront and educational activities at a single location.
Florida Communities Trust can be instrumental in making this vision a reality by partnering with Fisherman's Landing Sebastian, Inc.
Once the necessary land is acquired, we are prepared to execute the following:
Overview of Strategies
Land Acquisition
o Application to Florida Communities Trust working waterfront grant program for initial funding. The current site is
ideally suited for the business proposal and can be acquired from a single private owner on a Fee Simple offering.
It should be noted that the current owner is motivated by the Stan Mayfield Working Waterfront Act. While the
current owner is not engaged in commercial fishing; she is committed to the spirit and intent of the new legislation;
to preserve Florida's working waterfronts;
Development of Non Profit Fisherman's Cooperative
o Recruit and formally contract with commercial fishermen, aquaculturists, brokers, wholesalers, distributors and
retailers for utilization of facilities and /or products provided by the Cooperative;
Budgeting
o Develop a comprehensive business plan and a formalized extensive budget for capital improvements,
recruitment, operations, marketing and maintenance;
Restoration of Fishhouse
o Reconstruct existing facilities and develop a new two -story structure for commercial utilization (minor and major
restorations) as outlined in the FCT application. The fishouse redesign will incorporate venues for public educational
viewing and participation (photos and exhibits);
Restoration of Docking Facilities
o Reconstruct and expand existing, damaged and decaying docking facilities to facilitate commercial utilization
(minor and major restorations) as outlined throughout the FCT application. Commercial and recreational boat
facilities will be identified (photos and exhibits);
Enhancement of Aquaculture Facilities
o Improve existing facilities (clam processing) for commercial utilization, value -added processing and public viewing
opportunities (photos and exhibits);
Restoration of On Dock Rail Transport System
o Reconstruct a vintage rail transfer system to facilitate efficient movement of products and supplies to and from
fishhouse and distribution channels. Public viewing venues will be incorporated (photos and exhibits);
Multi -Media Educational Venues
o Develop interactive educational and promotional kiosks, displays and signage within fishhouse, along all
linear docks and public walkways as outlined throughout the FCT application. Emphasis will be placed on
cultural heritage in context with modern -day business practices;
rm SMWW -1 (Effective
Pane R
Eco- Tourism Venues
o Develop an integrated system of public participation eco- tourism venues and provide a schedule of
"Info tainment" events and programs as outlined in the FCT application;
Marketing Partnership
o An on -going marketing, advertising and promotional program will be developed and implemented with the Florida
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Marketing and Development, Bureau of Seafood and
Aquaculture. This program will maximize commercial use and public participation while raising awareness of
Florida's seafood industry and rich heritage. The Sebastian Chamber of Commerce, Visit Florida and the Florida
Department of Transportation can also contribute toward these marketing efforts;
Destination and Product "Branding"
o Fisherman's landing will provide unique educational and entertainment experiences for all visitors. Products and
services from the area will also be unique and meet the current consumer demand for "locally produced" items.
The area's aquaculture production is considered "eco- friendly" and has excellent value -added qualities. Venue
merchandising opportunities are limitless. All these attributes will lead toward a "Sebastian Brand" identification
program to enhance marketing efforts and profitability;
Maintenance Program
o Marine facility maintenance is complicated. A comprehensive program will be developed by a team of maritime
experts and rigidly followed to keep all facilities in optimal condition;
Develop Ongoing Growth and Expansion of the Waterfront Model
o Fisherman's Landing Sebastian, Inc. will work with the City of Sebastian and Indian River County to acquire adjacent
lands (from private landowners), incorporate the City's Riverfront Development Project, expand the size and scope of
the working waterfront and contribute to the current goals stated in their Community Redevelopment and
Comprehensive Growth Plans.
Closing Statements:
Given the magnitude of the Fisherman's Landing working waterfront initiative, it is not possible to thoroughly detail all of the specific
business elements within the parameters of this application. The strategies listed above should be considered in context with the brief
explanations throughout the application, photos, and exhibits; and with an understanding that a comprehensive business plan will be
developed. The master plan will communicate immediate objectives, long -term goals, and specific criteria to measure success.
Particular attention will be focused on cooperative participation, industry profitability and visitor attendance. The purpose of this outline
is to communicate the vision of Fisherman's Landing Sebastian, Inc. and petition for assistance from the Florida Communities Trust.
The vision and master plan of Fisherman's Landing Sebastian, Inc. creates a new model for the local community that
involves cooperative commercial fishing and aquaculture, processing and distribution; public education and recreation;
retail merchandise outlets, entertainment, public dining, and eco- tourism all laced with traditional and cultural flavor.
Ideally located adjacent to major transportation corridors, interstate highways and Florida's hub of tourism, we believe
Sebastian will become an attraction for out -of -state tourists and a destination for citizens looking for "Stay- cations"
during tough financial times. The long -term goals include attracting other related businesses further bolstering the local
and State economies.
While cultural heritage preservation is not yet as engrained as conservation of nature, the movement is rapidly growing in Florida.
More than ever before, people and organizations now understand that cultural resources are critical to the State's memory, survival
of local economies and Floridians' very sense of themselves.
Florida Communities Trust holds a financial lifeline for Florida's seafood industry and the steeped traditions of Sebastian.
Fisherman's Landing Sebastian, Inc. holds a vision, drive and expertise to develop and sustain a traditional working waterfront.
In fact, our team maritime experts has centuries of experience in the development and operation of commercial fishing enterprises
(bios attached).
With the enactment of the Stan Mayfield Working Waterfront Act and a recent Constitutional Amendment providing tax incentives
for such properties, it is clear that our State's citizens and leaders value commercial fishing and view our shared cultural heritage as
a public good. We are prepared to start the process in Sebastian and welcome the opportunity for onsite communication and master
plan development.
Form SMWW -1 (Effective
Paae 7
PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA
Answer the following questions, as applicable to the proposed project. Where requested, provide support documentation
or attached Exhibits.
Note: Provide a response to each of the following criteria, either yes or no. If the answer to a criterion is checked no,
move to the next question. If the answer to a criterion is checked yes, provide a response as appropriate and limit your
response to no more than 1/2 page. Any criterion that is not addressed or is left blank will not be evaluated and no
points will be awarded.
(1) Location
(a) The Project Site is located within the boundary of a locally designated Community Redevelopment Area as
defined in s. 163.340, F.S. and furthers the adopted community redevelopment plan (10 points).
YES X NO
If yes provde documentation from the local government that the Project Sites located v,fithin a Community
Redevelopment Area, provide a neap showing the boundaries of the CRA. and provide a copy of the adopted corn iu
redevelopment plan.
Were all three documents provided in the grant application?
YES X Documented in Exhibit M
NO If documentation is not provided, no points will be awarded.
(b) The Project Site is adjacent to state -owned submerged lands designated as an aquatic preserve identified in s.
258.39, F.S. (10 points).
YES X NO
If yes, provide documentation from the Department of Environmental Protection's Office of Coastal and Managed Areas,
including a map and letter, that the Project Site is adjacent to state -owned submerged lands designated as an aquatic
preserve.
Were both documents provided in the grant application?
YES X Documented in Exhibit N
NO If documentation from the Department of Environmental Protection's Office of Coastal and Managed
Areas is not provided, no points will be awarded.
(c) The Project Site is located within a municipality with a population Tess than 30,000 (10 points).
YES X NO
If yes, provide documentation from the FCT web site showing that the Project Site is in a municipality with a population
less than 30,000.
Was documentation provided in the grant application?
YES X Documented in Exhibit 0
NO If documentation is not provided, no points will be awarded
(d) The Project Site is within an area designated as an active "Waterfronts Florida Partnership Community" (9
points).
YES NO X
If ve,s, provide documentation from the Depart en, o1 Community Waterfronts c F P
:I.il'!!'lit'r f :ltr.�i: i1 at -fii' nt.� s Partners ,p, `f'i Riding
acid letter, that the Project Site s located wit, acts "Waterfronts i. map
j i 71t� I 'dt tF `,i; i!ft :3 d" w}i Florida i= Partners .'ip Community",
Form SMWW -1 (Effective
Page 8
Were both documents provided in the grant application?
YES Documented in Exhibit
NO X If documentation from the Department of Community Affairs' Waterfronts Florida Partnership is not
provided, no points will be awarded.
(e) The Project Site provides services and is located within 15 miles of a state designated aquaculture "High
Density Lease Area" (5 points).
YES X NO
If yes, provide documentation from the Department of Agriculture a o Consumer Service including a rnaap and letter
the Project Site is located with n 15 miles of a stale -'a% Eilated aquae u :urt High .)e'ns Lease Area'.
Were both documents provided in the grant application?
YES X Documented in Exhibit P
NO If documentation from the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services is not provided, no
points will be awarded.
(f) The Project Site is within an area designated as a "Rural Area of Critical Economic Concern" (4 points).
YES NO X
if yes, provide documentation from t ie FCT web site showing that the Project Site is in 'Rural Area of Critical Economic
Concern",
Was the documentation provided in the grant application?
YES Documented in Exhibit
NO X If documentation is not provided, no points will be awarded.
(2) Economic Consideration
(a) The proposed project provides an economic benefit to the community (10 points);
YES X NO
If yes, discuss now the acquisition development and management of the Project Site will provide an economic benefit to
the community.
The State of Florida's "Enterprise Florida" agency recently reported that the state's economy is experiencing a contraction in both
output and employment, and has been propped up by continued performance in several critical sectors including exports, government,
tourism and agriculture. While Sebastian is experiencing downward economic pressure, the area also holds agriculture, seafood, and
tourism assets all recognized as viable; but not fully and creatively developed.
Almost all successful entrepreneurs and reputable business schools confirm that organizations entering an economic downturn
with a pre established and creative strategic plan with emphasis on development and marketing strategies are best positioned to
approach recessions as economic opportunities to strengthen their competitive advantages and derive value from its assets.
Investing in Sebastian's existing waterfront assets will immediately yield employment opportunities and facilitate local economic
growth. Restorations, news construction and business development will prompt local spending, circulate funds and ultimately yield
additional tax revenues for City, County and State governments. This project is, literally, `Main street economic stimulus"
(b) The Project Site is located in a municipality or in the unincorporated county with a growth rate that exceeds
the average growth rate for the state, as shown by population increase since the last census (10 points);
YES X NO
if yes. prove documentation from the FCT web site rh v r� Sh s in t the yes, web :,z: �;.s aE .'�...Is the z r;; "t.,L Site i. an arca that a
growth rate for the state, as shown by population increase since the fast census
Form SMWW -1 (Effective
Was the documentation provided in the grant application?
YES X Documented in Exhibit Q
NO If documentation is not provided, no points will be awarded
Penn Q
Provide photographs of the tac
(c) The Project Site has sustained hurricane damage in the past 5 years such that operating capacity was reduced
or normal operations were interrupted for a period of not Tess than two weeks (5 points).
YES X NO
It yes, provide documentation showing that the Project Site has sustained significant hurricane damage in the past 5 years,
including identifying the hurricane and provide a state or federal doc .rne t verifying that the project site sustained
significant hurricane damage such as a copy i t` :e e of t at or
r., C.:., :lf;', i. partrr ^nt C3: Environmental f'i'otc ;ticn'S Emergency �`iiz :h :eri7<s<
t ie repair of the docking facility,
Was the documentation provided in the grant application?
YES X Documented in Exhibit R
NO If documentation is not provided, no points will be awarded
(3) Site Suitability /Readiness
(a) The Project Site contains existing structures that can be used or require only minor improvements, for use as
commercial saltwater fisheries or aquaculture operations (points may be awarded based on the following
criteria):
(1) Docking facility for commercial fishing vessels (12 points);
YES X NO
If yes, describe the existing facility, car (Ilion of the existing structure and proposed uses for the dockiric facility.
Provide photographs of the docking facility.
Minor repairs include replacing broken, cracked or decaying boards that could pose a potential hazard to workers or visitors
on the site. Some functional pilings will be replaced to prevent damage to watercraft mooring at the facility. While some of the
existing pilings currently provide adequate support for a simple single -use dock structure, our development plans call for
replacement with taller pilings to avoid hazards with larger commercial and recreational vessels. These replacements are not
considered "major" due to the nature of the work, and the commercial use of the facility will not be disrupted during repairs.
Were photographs of the existing docking facility provided?
YES X Documented in Exhibit S
NO If photographs are not provided, no points will be awarded
(2) A Seafood House or other buildings to be used for Working Waterfronts Business (10 points);
YES X NO
If yes, describe the existing facility, i'ond tion of the existing structure, and proposed use for the facility.
The clam "raceways" (flowing cultivation chambers) presently located between the North and South docks will be renovated
both aesthetically and structurally for more efficiency and to allow better visibility (as an educational venue) for visitors.
The truck loading and logistics center is a site structure that will also receive minor repairs (replaced decking).
Were photographs of the existing facility provided?
YES X Documented in Exhibit T
NO If photographs are not provided, no points will be awarded
(3) Boat ramp for commercial fishing vessels (8 points);
YES NO X
if yes, describe the xistii t 'fit 1 ?f. r? ;i is i'. o uct
51-4 r L,.i3 t r�. Et
Pro pncto rr i o i boat rt
rr r',
uses for the boat ramp.
Form SMWW -1 (Effective Page 10
Were photographs of the existing boat ramp provided?
YES Documented in Exhibit
NO X If photographs are not provided, no points will be awarded
(4) Storage area for traps, nets, and other gear needed for commercial fishing or aquaculture operations (4
points);
YES X NO
if yes, describe the existiria area and proposed uses for the storage area.
Provde photograps of the storage area.
A portion of the site has been set aside for the storage of algae push nets and other aquaculture cultivation equipment used
by Cooperative members in the cultivation and processing of commercial shellfish.
Were photographs of the storage area provided?
YES X Documented in Exhibit U
NO If photographs are not provided, no points wiH be awarded
(b) The Project Site has a submerged land lease from the Board of Trustees, Environmental Resource Permit, or
Wetland Resource Permit for the existing or proposed docking facility (7 points);
If yes provide a copy of the subrnerged land lease from the Board of Trustees, Environmental ReoourcoPannit
Wetand Resource Perni. for the existing or proposed dockiny facity.
Was the documentation provided in the grant application?
YES X, Docurnented in Exhibit V
NO |fdocumentation is not provided, no points will be awarded
(c) The Project Site has obtained all necessary permits from the local government for existing or proposed uses
on the uplands (7 points);
If yes, discuss the existing or proposed uses of the upland and what local permits are required,
Provide a letter from the local gove[mnentb|Rnningur building department that the Project Site has obtained aU necessary
perrnits for tho e>dsting or proposed uses on the upands
Was the documentation provided in the grant application?
YES X Documented in Exhibit W
NO If documentation is not provided, no points will be awarded
(d) The proposed project will be acquired using a Iess-than-fee Working Waterfront Covenant for all of the land to
be acquired (5 points).
YES NO X
yes, describe the existina or proposed activi hat MI be conducted to further continuation of Working Waterfront
activities in that area
Provide an affidavit from the owner that they are willing to sell the dev:-)1opment rights off the prooerty and continue 0
operate the site to further the continuation of Working Waterfront activities on the site.
Was the affidavit provided?
YES Documented in Exhibit
NO X If the affidavit is not provided, no points will be awarded
Form SMWW-1 (Effective
1
Facie 11
(e)The Project Site will participate in Florida's Clean Marina Program (4 points).
YES X NO
The applicant will work with the r
Dep tm t of En .nt P n c Marina t t`
r� t;n` :r'ie'?r°"ir,.� c:l litri:=4 n `C implement a c.ri �arl'13 '!'S;. "arT' z:4c the
Project Site. w
(4) Financial Contribution
156
Form SMWW-1 (Effective
(a) Providing a share of the eligible Match. The Applicant is committed to: Not Applicable
Provide photographs of the existing facility or the area for the proposed structure.
(1) Provide a Match between 25 percent to 34 percent of the Project Costs, or, for Small Local Governments as
defined in 9K- 9.002(21) and Nonprofit Working Waterfront Organizations, a Match between 10 percent and 19
percent of the Project Costs (5 points); or
YES NO X
(2) Provide a Match of 35 percent or more of the Project Costs, or, for Small Local Governments as defined in
9K- 9.002(21) and Nonprofit Working Waterfront Organizations, a Match of 20 percent or more of the Project
Costs (10 points).
YES NO X
(b) The applicant has committed to major restoration of an existing docking facility for commercial fishing
vessels or to construct a new docking facility for commercial fishing vessels (8 points);
YES X NO
For the major restoration of an existing docking facility, describe the existing docking facility, condition of the existing
docking facility, what repairs the applicant will do to bring the structure into working condition, and proposed uses of the
structure.
For the construction of a new docking facility describe the size of the proposed docking facility and the proposed use of
the structure.
The proposed docking area needs to be boated in a rm n mi rn of 3 feet of water at Mean Low Water and not located over
any sea grass beds.
Provide documentation from a surveyor, engineer or environmental consultant, showing that the dooming ari=a located in
at least 3 feet of water at itfean Low Water and that there no grass beds in the decking area.
Decking for the South Dock was totally destroyed by hurricanes in 2004. Presently, fishermen use the make -shift facilities to tie up
their boats, but shore access is only available via a narrow and precarious arrangement of unattached boards. New supports and
marine decking will return the dock to a complete commercial facility. A fully functional "retro" push -car rail system will also be installed
along the South Dock. This system will permit efficient loading of ice, bait, equipment and other supplies for fishing vessels. The two
way transportation system will also help fishermen move daily catches from vessels to the fishouse and truck loading center in an
efficient manner. These facilities are deemed critical to users. Fishermen are currently using wheelbarrows to manually load product.
Was the documentation of the docking area and photographs of the existing facility or area of the proposed structure
provided?
YES X Documented in Exhibit X and AB
NO If the documentation and photographs are not provided, no points will be awarded
Page 12
(c) The applicant has committed to major restoration of an existing Seafood House or other building(s) used for
Working Waterfront Business or to construct a new Seafood House or other buildings of at least 1,000 square feet
to be used for Working Waterfront Business (6 points);
YES X NO
i r the major restoration of an waist utr cure describe th st r, t:_ c r f existing e ��xi.: ;i: i Sa: i..t "z :Jitit�n of the xi5tiil� 3tru cu'e, what
repairs the ziriplir a 'MI: do to bring the s ructure into :-working condition, and prop e uses of the structure.
For the construp, n Cif a new building, de s�;ril:
and the proposed ..se of the structure.
Provide phctograp is of the existing i ifiy or the area for tt r r000seci st.rrictt
Pro
roc% tiff
$st 3
(5) Community Planning
Form SMWW -1 (Effective
neeos to be located in a emir
proposed size of Inc new _.tructurc (min ;miii i of 1,000 square feet)
The existing Fishhouse was damaged beyond repair by hurricanes Frances and Jeanne in 2004. The structure will be rebuilt using the
current "footprint", however, the new building will be significantly larger and of two -story design.
The bottom level will be modeled after a classic "open floor" fishhouse using a "track- transport system and provide entry points on
three sides (North, East and South). These portals will allow multiple boats to be off loaded in two different zones simultaneously
(North and East). Product will be moved into the fishhouse, sorted and weighed with hanging scales; iced, packed; and transported to
the truck loading center using the vintage retro rail system (photo).
The second story of the fishhouse will incorporate a wide open center -floor viewing area. The "see- through" flooring will allow
real -time observation of the work occurring on the first level and on all functional decks. High -tech electronic media will also be used in
the ceiling to educate and entertain visitors, who gain access to the upper level via a sweeping, ADA- approved ramp connected to a
boardwalk along the shoreline.
Were photographs of the existing facility or area of the proposed structure provided?
YES X Documented in Exhibit Y
NO If the photographs are not provided, no points will be awarded
(d) The applicant has committed to major restoration of an existing boat ramp for commercial fishing vessels or
to construct a new boat ramp for commercial fishing vessels (4 points).
YES NO X
For Inc major rest era :ion of an exi sti. g boat ramp, describe the cony; it <can of the existing moat r- i.
applicant will do to bring the structure into working condition, and proposed uses of the structure.
For the constrl ctior' of a new boat ramp, describe the r dosed size.
pr
s ru .ture.
si,ir gi;rleer of environmental rt. r 1 t9F Shi)Wir
t i' at Mean L ow Water and that here 110 OraSS bed r 1
boat Tramp and the n pc sect use of the
rid not
repairs tree
(a) The project is located in a Future Land Use category, zoning district, or overlay district that has been
identified for the protection and preservation of Working Waterfronts (5 points);
YES X NO
the Inc of the boat ramp is
Was the documentation of the boat ramp area and photographs of the existing facility or area of the proposed structure
provided?
YES Documented in Exhibit
NO X If the documentation and photographs are not provided, no points will be awarded
Page 13
•t
1 _r Li cJ:
a:if #n
'se catr,igw
rft'or. .:s.
turtiler
"Chapter 1: Future Land Use Element" of the City of Sebastian's Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies (Exhibit Z), in
Objective 1 -1.2 states: "Commercial development shall be comprised of a wide range of business uses. The City shall promote the
image and function of the central business district the area generally located as the City's center for commerce as well as civic and
cultural enrichment. In this pursuit the City shall enhance the identity, design, and vitality of the waterfront corridor which provides a
unique waterfront activity center within the central core area of the City."
Exhibit Z also contains a letter, dated November 2, 2008, from the City of Sebastian's Growth Management Director that acknowledges
that "Yes. The zoning, future land use category and comprehensive plan objectives all further the goal of a working waterfront." Policy
1 -1.2.4 (Page 1 -3) defines the city's Riverfront Corridor and Map 1 -1 on Page 9 shows the location of Fisherman's Landing within a
Commercial Marine Waterfront area.
The third document in Exhibit Z is a copy of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council's Riverfront District Master Plan for the City
of Sebastian's Riverfront District, which includes the Fisherman's Landing location (identified on Page 2).
Was a copy of the map and description of the category or district provided?
YES X Documented in Exhibit Z
NO If a copy of the map and description are not provided, no points will be awarded
(b) The project furthers local government comprehensive plan objectives and policies that ensure the protection
and preservation of Working for use by commercial fishermen, aquaculturists, or business entities
that support these industries (5 points);
YES X NO
if policies are ves or po
o
c
Les, identify which b ec fili furthered red: ov.de a summary objective, nd c
f .t �:r; o` the policy ;t;" e a v�..s,,.€ i?e how
the local government's comprehensive plan's objectives and policies further the. protection and preservation of Working
Waterfronts for Use by commercial fishermen, aquaculturists, or business entities that support these industries,
Vide a Copy o t?'.^ loc,21 government's comprehensive pan's objectives and policies that ensure the
servation of V orkino Waterfronts for use by commercial fishermen. aquaculturists, e ousin ss €mti
s industries.
Again, Objective 1 -1.2 of the City of Sebastian's Comprehensive Plan Goal, Objectives and Policies (Exhibit Z) states: "Commercial
development shall be comprised of a wide range of business uses. The City shall promote the image and function of the central
business district, the area generally located as the City's center for commerce as well as civic and cultural enrichment. In this pursuit
the City shall enhance the identity, design, and vitality of the waterfront corridor which provides a unique waterfront activity center
within the central core area of the City."
Exhibit Z also contains a letter, dated November 2, 2008, from the City of Sebastian's Growth Management Director that acknowledges
that "Yes. The zoning, future land use category and comprehensive plan objectives all further the goal of a working waterfront." Policy
1 -1.2.4 (Page 1 -3) defines the city's Riverfront Corridor, Map 1 -1 on Page 9 shows the location of Fisherman's Landing within a
Commercial Marine Waterfront area.
The City's Community Redevelopment Master Plan (Exhibit M, Pages 34 and 35), FLUE (Future Land Use Element) Policies 1- 1.2.4,
1- 1.5.1, 1 -3.3.4 and 1-3.3.6, along with Objectives 1 -1.5 and 1 -3.3 define the City's vision and plans for revitalization and preservation
of its Riverfront Corridor.
The third document in Exhibit Z is a copy of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council's Riverfront District Master Plan for the City
of Sebastian's Riverfront District, which includes the Fisherman's Landing location (identified on Page 2).
Were copies of the policies or objectives provided?
YES X Documented in Exhibit I
NO If a copy of the policies or objectives are not provided, no points will be awarded
Form SMWW -1 (Effective
coon and
s port
Page 14
c e projec urthers local government comprehensive plan objectives and policies to provide facilities that
promote and educate the public about the economic, cultural and historical heritage of Florida's traditional
Working Waterfronts (3 points).
YES X NO
(6) Public Education
Form SMWW -1 (Effective
of the idea
pt. i about
Km g
Y to
€;:rfL C Y€ Jf, F�if.f t €..w 9 a(.. ot
As stated in 5(b) above: Objective 1 -1.2 of the City of Sebastian's Comprehensive Plan Goal, Objectives and Policies (Exhibit Z)
states: "Commercial development shall be comprised of a wide range of business uses. The City shall promote the image and function
of the central business district, the area generally located as the City's center for commerce as well as civic and cultural enrichment. In
this pursuit the City shall enhance the identity, design, and vitality of the waterfront corridor which provides a unique waterfront activity
center within the central core area of the City."
Exhibit Z also contains a letter, dated November 2, 2008, from the City of Sebastian's Growth Management Director that acknowledges
that "Yes. The zoning, future land use category and comprehensive plan objectives all further the goal of a working waterfront." Policy
1 -1.2.4 (Page 1 -3) defines the city's Riverfront Corridor, Map 1 -1 on Page 9 shows the location of Fisherman's Landing within a
Commercial Marine Waterfront area.
The City's Community Redevelopment Master Plan (Exhibit M, Pages 34 and 35), FLUE (Future Land Use Element) Policies 1- 1.2.4,
1- 1.5.1, 1 -3.3.4 and 1- 3.3:6, along with Objectives 1 -1.5 and 1 -3.3 define the City's vision and plans for revitalization and preservation
of its Riverfront Corridor.
The third document in Exhibit Z is a copy of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council's Riverfront District Master Plan for the City
of Sebastian's Riverfront District, which includes the Fisherman's Landing location (identified on Page 2).
Were copies of the policies or objectives provided?
YES X Documented in Exhibit Z
NO If a copy of the policies or objectives are not provided, no points will be awarded
(a) The Project Site provides a permanent structure containing displays of artifacts and other items open to the
public that provide information about the economic, cultural or historic heritage of Florida's traditional Working
Waterfronts (4 points);
YES X NO
!f yes, describe tile' pe'r? saner structure of artifacts ilif tic y its :i'id Dille te
r ims t l be
Y proposed struct
r
provide lb
out 71 t'{ aout the economic, cultural 't's. i o a' t r
t i 3 z,r��;� €fie r S t`ae t
public. DD.DAesv„ t io a proximate location of t T c c Furl
l tll� ad L, C�" l�: �l �'i. e'li w C >rJ to the .Y s. °.I., W€ +:�:,i N ov`rl�:4.
The nucleus of the Fisherman's Landing Sebastian project is a two -story fishhouse, designed as a functioning workplace for fishermen
on the lower level, and an observation education venue for the public on the upper level. A portion of the upper -level flooring will be
constructed of "see-through" building materials which will allow real -time observation of the work occurring on the first level and on all
functional decks. High -tech electronic media will also be used in the ceiling to educate and entertain visitors.
Sebastian's historic fishing heritage and current marine practices will also be prominently displayed in high -tech and traditional exhibits
throughout the waterfront visitor areas.
The upper level will also feature open -air walls which will provide visitors with a panoramic view of the Indian River Lagoon, including
Pelican Island, known as the nation's first designated national wildlife refuge. This bonus attraction will provide visitors with
photographic locations and memorable views of the entire Indian River Lagoon.
A boardwalk will be constructed along the site's north boundary to allow visitors safe access to the dock area where they can get "up
close and personal" with fishermen as they prepare to go fishing and unload upon return. Kiosks and signage along the boardwalk, in
conjunction with photographic displays and historic maritime artifacts, will provide additional educational experiences.
Page 15
(b) The Project Site contains a structure(s) that is listed on the National Register of Historic Places administered
by the National Park Service (3 points);
YES NO X
Form SMWW -1 (Effective
Were both documents provided in the grant application?
YES Documented in Exhibit
NO If documentation from the Division of Historical Resources is not provided, no points will be awarded.
(c) Interpretive kiosk or signs will be provided that educate the public about the economic, cultural, or historic
heritage of Florida's traditional Working Waterfronts (2 points).
YES X NO
if yes, describe the proposed k
F J
traditional d T t o ai i E: f _£S r E s ✓E 41
L or spcin w it! bi. provided.
3
ec. i
of
Interpretive kiosks and displays will be located along the boardwalk as described in Part 6 (a); and in the upper -level visitor's area.
The kiosks will feature both historic and modern -day marketing, educational and promotional materials developed by the Fisherman's
Landing Sebastian, Inc., the fisherman's Cooperative, the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services' Bureau of Seafood and
Aquaculture and other interested local and State businesses and agencies.
Page 16
(BITS
Each of the following exhibits is required to be submitted with the grant Application. Provide a label and tab for each
exhibit and please ensure that all exhibits are legible and of an appropriate scale. If two or more exhibits are consolidated,
make sure this is reflected on the exhibit label. If a specific exhibit is not applicable, include an exhibit page with a
statement that it is "Not Applicable." Locate the exhibits behind the project evaluation criteria section of the Application.
Exhibits
A United States Geological Survey 7 1/2 minute quadrangle map with the boundary of the Project Site clearly delineated.
B County Tax Appraiser's map clearly delineating the Project Site boundary, names of the property owners, and parcel
tax identification numbers, and ownership boundaries using an appropriate scale.
C Aerial photograph (1 inch 2,000 feet or greater detail) with the Project Site boundary clearly delineated.
D Physical improvements map of an appropriate scale that clearly delineates all existing physical improvements,
alterations, or disturbances occurring on the Project Site, and including all cleared areas, buildings, roads, fences, docks,
power lines, billboards, boat ramps, parking areas and known easements and rights -of -ways, and the approximate
acreage of the foregoing.
E Conceptual site plan that clearly delineates the Project Site boundary and shows the approximate location of all
proposed site improvements.
F One set of labeled photographs of the Project Site which depict all on -site features on the Project Site and including,
waterbodies, shorelines, historical features and existing improvements. Each photograph submitted shall include a legend
that identifies the photograph location and key features that the photograph is intended to depict.
G If applicable, evidence of status as a Nonprofit Working Waterfront Organization as defined in subsection 9K- 9.002(16),
F.A.C.
H A signed statement from the owner(s) of each parcel indicating their willingness to consider an offer to purchase their
parcel(s). If it is a less than fee acquisition, provide an affidavit from the owner that they are willing to sell the development
rights off the property and to continue to operate the site as a Working Waterfront.
I A copy of each Local Comprehensive Plan objective and policy cited in the grant Application that applies to the Project
Site. Please highlight or underline the applicable plan directive being referenced.
J If the Applicant is a Nonprofit Working Waterfront Organization, evidence of status of the organization, including
documentation from the Internal Revenue Service that the organization is recognized as a 501(c)(3) organization, a copy
of the Bylaws, and a copy of the Articles of Incorporation.
K If the Applicant is a Nonprofit Working Waterfront Organization, they shall provide documentation that they have funds
on hand, or letters of commitment to provide the funds prior to closing on the Project Site: (1) Fee simple acquisition, an
amount equal to ten percent of the Project Cost shall be set aside as a management endowment fund for the Project Site,
or (2) Less than fee Working Waterfront Covenant, an amount equal to five percent of the Project Cost shall be set aside
as a management endowment fund for the Project Site.
L If the Applicant is a Nonprofit Working Waterfront Organization, they shall provide a guaranty or pledge by a Local
Government, the Water Management District, or the Board of Trustees to act as a backup manager to take over the
responsibility for management of the Project Site in the event the Nonprofit Working Waterfront Organization is unable to.
Form SMWW -1 (Effective
Page 17