Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-04-2011 PZ AgendaSEBASTIAN CI Zit HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND 1225 MAIN STREET • SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (772) 589 -5518 • FAX (772) 388 -8248 AGENDA PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THURSDAY, AUGUST 4, 2011 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. ANNOUNCEMENTS 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: June 16, 2011 Regular Minutes 6. OLD BUSINESS A. Quasi - Judicial Public Hearing - Site Plan - Clams R' Us - 1624 Indian River Drive - Mixed Use: Aquaculture Facility and Single -Family Residence - CWR (Commercial Waterfront Residential) Zoning District 7. NEW BUSINESS: B. Recommendation to City Council - Review of Capital Improvement Program and Capital Outlay Items Greater than $50,000 - 6 Year Schedule FY 2011 /2012 thru 2016/2017 8. CHAIRMAN MATTERS 9. MEMBERS MATTERS 10. DIRECTOR MATTERS 11. ATTORNEY MATTERS 12. ADJOURNMENT ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE ON THE ABOVE MATTERS, WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH APPEAL IS TO BE HEARD. SAID APPEAL MUST BE FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE WITHIN TEN DAYS OF THE DATE OF ACTION. (286.0105 F.S.) IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), ANYONE WHO NEEDS SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THE MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE CITY'S ADA COORDINATOR AT (772) -589 -5330 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING. TWO OR MORE ELECTED OFFICIALS MAY BE IN ATTENDANCE. CITY OF SEBASTIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING JUNE 16, 2011 Chairman Dodd called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. The pledge of allegiance was said by all. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: ALSO PRESENT: Mr. Roth Mr. Dodd Ms. Hennessey (a) Mr. Carter Mr. Reyes Mr. Kayser (a) Mr. Qizilbash Mr. Durr Mr. Hepler Jan King, Interim Growth Management Director Dorri Bosworth, Zoning Technician Robert Ginsburg, City Attorney Joe Griffin, Airport Director ANNOUNCEMENTS: Mr. Dodd welcomed Ms. Hennessey as a new alternate to the Commission. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: ca c C O w E a W 8 — O ¢ EE v co V !A ? Fa. O as c N A C Cc/L3 N � p n ''nm MOTION by Durr /Hepler to approve the minutes of the May 19, 2011 Regular Meeting as submitted. Motion was approved unanimously by voice vote. MOTION by Kayser /Reyes to approve the minutes of the May 19, 2011 LPA Meeting as submitted. Motion was approved unanimously by voice vote. OLD BUSINESS: None NEW BUSINESS: A. QUASI- JUDICIAL PUBLIC HEARING — SITE PLAN ADDITION — WIND TURBINE FACILITY AT SEBASTIAN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT HANGAR B — 212 AIRPORT DRIVE EAST Mr. Dodd opened the hearing and the Commissioners were asked if they had any exparte communication to disclose. There was none. Mr. Ginsburg swore in anyone that was going to offer testimony. Jan King reviewed the history of the project stating the site plan for the building was reviewed by the Commission in March, and because of lack of information at the time, the wind turbines shown on the plan were excluded. Additional information was now available and was now being presented to the Commission for their review, with Mr. Joe Griffin, Airport Director, present for any questions. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 16, 2011 Mr. Carter asked why the amount of turbines was reduced from 5 to 2, and noted the site plan showed a concrete pad by the turbines. Since the turbines were only 20 feet high he was concerned parking of trucks on the pad would restrict air flow. Mr. Griffin stated the proposed concrete pad was going to be eliminated. Based on the public bid process, staff decided to go with only two turbines. The city would still get the same six - kilowatt hour rating. The two 3- kilowatt hour devices would be the same height as the proposed five, being a bit wider in diameter, but more efficient. The energy produced by the turbines will feed back into the grid thru a net metering system, and the airport will get a credit from FPL. Mr. Durr questioned how many security street lighting [poles] this would benefit. Mr. Griffin stated approximately 6 to 7 poles connected to the meter. Mr. Durr asked what the dollar payback would be. Mr. Griffin responded it would be variable based on the wind speed. The 6kw system generated power at approx. 6 mph winds. The higher the winds, the higher the payback. Based on NASA surveys, the average annual wind speed for Sebastian is 9.44 mph. Assuming that speed at 50% of the time, enough money [credit] would be earned to pay off the system in about ten years. Mr. Kayser wanted to know if there was a maximum wind velocity the turbines could take and did they shut down. Mr. Griffin stated the maximum velocity was 55 mph, and they shut down at 110 mph. If a hurricane came through, the wind blades could be disassembled by city crews with the bucket truck. Mr. Hepler asked what the costs for each turbine were. Mr. Griffin relayed that the installed costs for the system, including the inverters, was $44,300. One variable cost that may have to be incurred is $1500 for an FAA study check [because of the vertical construction], but because a check was done on Hangar B, which is taller than the turbines, one may not be needed. He explained the cost for the Hangar B project, which the turbines were a part of, was $1.45 million, with $1.16 million coming from FDOT and 20 %, or $290,000, from the City. Ms. Hennessey asked if the turbines were safe from the storms that pop up quickly. Mr. Griffin stated he was confident they were safe. It was a new industry, but they had a clutch mechanism to slow at excess speeds. Mr. Reyes questioned where the wind would come from with regards to the height of the surrounding structures, including the 32 ft high golf net, and was the turbines ever considered to be placed on top of the buildings as shown in the agenda packet examples. Mr. Griffin responded that the prevailing wind for Sebastian is out of the East to Northeast, and roof -top mounting was considered, but because of structural and aesthetic reasons they decided to place them vertical from the ground. Mr. Reyes asked if any other type of product was looked at. Mr. Griffin said solar is less efficient, and the credit from FPL is less for propane or CNG. Mr. Qizilbash asked what happened if there was no wind for a week and if another location was considered. Mr. Griffin stated there would still be FPL service to power the lighting. There were numerous locations at the airport to construct the turbines, but it was decided to keep them near the buildings and close to the metering system. Mr. Roth commended Mr. Griffin for the project and being on the forefront using the new technology. He verified that the proposed turbines were the ones with the vertical 2 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 16, 2011 panels. Mr. Griffin stated, yes, and that each panel was an air foil shaped like a wing. Millings instead of concrete in the drive aisle area was also discussed. Mr. Dodd asked what was the percentage of the power needs for the security lighting. Mr. Griffin stated he did not have the percentage figures but that the security lights cost an average $200 a month. The credit back from FPL is half the cost of retail. Net return, per month, could be $140 to $170 a month. Ms. Hennessey asked if there was any risk [to surrounding properties] if an abundance of energy (surges) went back into the system. Mr. Griffin stated there were safe -guard installations that both the city and contractor had to put into agreements with FPL. Public Input was opened. Mr. Ben Hocker, 124 Larchmont Terrace, asked about the sharing of the credits at different meters, specifically Hangar B. Ms. King summarized staff recommended approval. Mr. Dodd opined that this project probably was not guaranteed to get a payback, but the city is beginning its process to find alternative energy sources, and he liked the project. Mr. Carter noted he also was glad for the city and its forward thinking. MOTION by Durr /Roth to approve the 212 Airport Drive East modified site plan. ROLL CALL: Mr. Durr yes Mr. Qizilbash yes Mr. Hepler yes Mr. Reyes yes Mr. Roth yes Mr. Carter yes Mr. Dodd yes The vote was 7 -0. Motion passed. CHAIRMAN MATTERS: Mr. Dodd asked if the review of the zoning districts would be going anywhere. Ms. King stated there were a couple more districts to still come before the Commission. MEMBERS MATTERS: Mr. Hepler discussed his frustration with getting site plans to review that have already been accepted or "put in play" such as Mulligan's [and the parking —in -lieu program], the change to Fisherman's Landing of the observatory to a child's play area, and the BSSC football fields. He felt the Commission was asked to rubber stamp projects. As a commissioner, he did not want to be liable if something went wrong. Mr. Roth stated he felt the same, especially regarding city projects where they were expressed to be "all working towards the same goal ", and rubber stamping wasn't really looking out for the best interests of the city and its residents. 3 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 16, 2011 Mr. Reyes stated it appeared that a lot of the city projects are coming before the Commission with incomplete plans, that the city should be held to the higher standard, and he hoped this was changed in the future. DIRECTOR MATTERS: Ms. King gave an update on the two sign ordinances that had been reviewed by the LPA. ATTORNEY MATTERS: Mr. Ginsburg stated he was going to organize an information session for all of the city's board and committee members to discuss the Sunshine Law, procedures, case studies, and basic standards etc. Chairman Dodd adjourned the meeting at 7:54 p.m. (6/20/11 db) 4 TO: RE: Ott OF SEBASTIAN HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1225 MAIN STREET • SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (772) 589 -5518 • FAX (772) 388 -8248 www.cityofsebastlan.org MEMORANDUM Planning and Zoning Commission Clams "R" Us 1624 Indian River Drive DATE: July 26, 2011 On March 17, 2011, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing to review a site plan application and landscape waiver request for Clams R Us, a proposed project consisting of an aquaculture facility and single- family residence. After their discussion, and in lieu of approving or denying the project, the Commission requested the applicant to consider revising the building elevations, re -work the landscape plan and reschedule the public hearing for further review. Please find enclosed a new set of plans that include revised building elevations, an updated landscape plan [no waiver n, requested] a memo from the civil engineer detailing additional minor changes, minutes from the March 17' meeting, and an updated staff report packet. If you have any questions or need additional information, do not hesitate to contact staff at 589- 5518. Dom Bosworth, Planner Community Development Department rage 1 of 2 Dorri Bosworth From: Chris Weier [chrisw @knightmcguire.com] Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 3:12 PM To: Dorri Bosworth Cc: davidk @knightmcguire.com Subject: Clams 'R' Us - List of Changes July 7, 2011 Dorri Bosworth, Planning Technician City of Sebastian Growth Management 1225 Main Street Sebastian, FL 32958 RE: Clams R Us Per your request the following is a summary of changes to the Clams R Us plans that were made per the latest Planning and Zoning comments. Cover Sheet • Sheet 3d (Dock Access Plan) has been removed from the set. • Sheet 8 (Building Elevation Plan) has been removed. An architectural floor plan and elevations sheet by Banov Architects has been added as an attached plan. • A revision note with the date 06/28/2011 has been added. Sheet 2a — Site Plan • Revised building characteristics. • Show adjusted square footage of building coverage. • A revision note with the date 06/28/2011 has been added. Sheet 2b — Phasing Plan • Adjusted the configuration of gravel construction access to match driveway. • Adjusted construction schedule dates. • A revision note with the date 06/28/2011 has been added. Sheet 3a — Paving, Grading & Drainage Plan • Changed finished floor elevation from 10.1 to 9.6. • Adjusted grades immediately adjacent to building. • A revision note with the date 06/28/2011 has been added. Sheet 3b — Utility Plan • Changed finished floor elevation from 10.1 to 9.6. • A revision note with the date 06/28/2011 has been added. Sheet 3c — Dock and Seagrass Plan • Changed finished floor elevation from 10.1 to 9.6. • A revision note with the date 06/28/2011 has been added. Sheet 3d — Dock Access Plan - This sheet was removed from the set. Sheet 4 — Existing Conditions Plan - No changes were made to this plan. Sheet 5 - Paving, Grading, Drainage & Miscellaneous Details • Revised finished floor from 10.1 to 9.6 on sections B & D. • A revision note with the date 06/28/2011 has been added. Sheet 5b - Water and Sewer Details - No changes were made to this plan. Sheet 6 - Stormwater Pollution Protection Plan • Adjusted the configuration of gravel construction access to match driveway. 7/11/2011 rage 2 of 2 • Changed finished floor elevatio rm 10.1 to 9.6. • A revision note with the date 06/28/2011 has been added. . Sheet 7 — Landscape Plan • The landscape plan has been revised to meet all code requirements including plantings associated with wetland areas. Sheet 8 - Building Elevation Plan • Sheet 8 (Building Elevation Plan) has been removed. An architectural floor plan and elevations sheet by Banov Architects has been added as an attached plan. 7/11/2011 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 17, 2011 The vote was 6 -0. Motion passed. B. QUASI- JUDICIAL PUBLIC HEARING - SITE PLAN AND RIVERFRONT OVERLAY DISTRICT WAIVER — CLAMS R US — 1624 INDIAN RIVER DRIVE — MIXED USE: AQUACULTURE FACILITY AND SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENCE — WAIVER REQUEST FOR LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS — CWR (COMMERCIAL WATERFRONT RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT Mr. Paul opened the hearing and asked the Commissioners if they had any exparte communication. There was none. Mr. Ginsburg swore in anyone that was going to offer testimony during the hearing. Mr. David Knight of Knight, McGuire & Associates, Inc., who represented the owner, Mr. Joesph Weismann, displayed a colored version of the proposed site plan on the overhead monitor and screen, and reviewed the boundaries of the overall property and then the developable area of the site (upland area). He described components of the proposed residential and aquaculture uses & structures, the dock layout, phasing schedule and construction, state and environmental permits, and the difficulty in getting the riverfront landscaping onto the developable area. He reviewed the projects request for a waiver from the east side perimeter and east side foundation landscaping requirements. Ms. Bosworth reviewed additional items from the staff report including building height [measured from the BEE], parking requirements for the dock, site lighting, traffic statement information, LDC environmental requirements, and waiver history and considerations [root systems affecting the retaining wall, house on top of stormwater area]. Mr. Carter asked how many employees there would be. Mr. Knight stated it would be the owner and possibly one other helper. Mr. Dodd had questions regarding the construction of the structure over the stormwater pond and water overflow into the river, boat traffic, and his disappointment of the architectural elevations. He stated this was his main reason he could not support the project. Mr. Knight addressed the stormwater overflow concerns, and suggested a condition of approval to redesign the elevations. Mr. Reyes had questions regarding the date of the Environmental Site Summary, seagrass survey information and project impacts, fuel refilling, and the owners current commercial activities [at another location]. Mr. Durr questioned, because of the mixed use, which of the landscaping requirements had to be met, residential or commercial. Staff detailed the difference, and stated since the less, commercial setbacks were used, commercial landscaping was required. He had concerns that an incorrect open space square- footage was used for tree calculations and zoning compliance. He also felt the building was too large for the site, and should have been revised instead of asking for a landscaping waiver, and that the size of the building did not create an "inordinate burden" for the Commission to grant approval. He clarified that the public or customers would not be coming to the site, had questions regarding the driveway drainage structure, existing easements, and proposed plant species. 3 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 17, 2011 Mr. Paul also expressed his dislike of the building elevations, and did not want to end up with an unattractive residence if in the future the commercial use was abandoned. Staff, too, suggested to request a redesign of the elevations as a condition of approval since the structure would not be built until Phase ID in 18 to 24 months. Mr. Knight stated the owner wanted to begin construction of the aquaculture facilities because he had some deadlines with the jurisdictional permits and would hate to see the initial phases held up because of the structure, which they would work on revising the elevations. Public Input was opened. There were no proponents who spoke. Opponents who spoke: Mr. Norm Adams, President of the Sebastian Village Condominium Resort Association, stated his objection for the site plan based on the Association's concerns with the size of the project on a small area of land, lack of architectural detail on the building, request for the landscape waiver, non - compliance with established standards seen on surrounding properties, phasing details, traffic information, garage door location, current code enforcement violations on the vacant lot, the aquaculture structures, and the T -111 siding. Mr. Adams clarified for Mr. Paul that there were 12 condo owners. Mr. Greg Parker, condo owner, had concerns with smells that may come from the aquaculture facility, additional hovering birds, and also the garage -type elevations of the building. Staff addressed some of the opponent's questions and concerns. Mr. Dodd questioned the city attorney regarding the Commission's option to only approve a portion of the phases, specifically approving the commercial use but denying the residential. The Commission discussed this option, again relaying their displeasure mostly with the building elevations. Mr. Ginsburg clarified that some action must be taken on all three phases. There was further discussion regarding open space and the inclusion of wetland area, and an explanation by staff of the required SCADL (School Concurrency Availability Determination Letter) for the proposed residential use The Commission discussed the option of deferring a decision to a later meeting so that the owner and Mr. Knight could work on revising the elevations and possibly the lay -out of the building, and also re -work the landscaping regarding the waiver request. MOTION by Dodd /Paul to "defer the site plan for Clams R Us for further review requesting that the applicant modify the design of the residential structure and to view the possibility of making it smaller and fit the overall theme." ROLL CALL: Mr. Reyes yes Mr. Hepler yes Mr. Paul yes Mr. Dodd yes Mr. Durr yes Mr. Carter yes The vote was 6 -0. Motion passed. 4 area HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND Growth Management Department Site Plan Review Revised Staff Report (For 8/4/2011 PZC Meeting) 1. Project Name: Clams "R" Us 2. Requested Action: Approval of a phased site plan for a mixed -use project which consists of an aquaculture facility and a single - family residence 3. Project Location a. Address: 1624 Indian River Drive b. Legal: Metes and Bounds (See survey) c. Indian River County Parcel Number: 30- 38 -30- 00002 - 0020 - 00003.0 4. Project Owner: Clams R Us, Inc. c/o Joseph Weissmann 11 Hidden Valley Road Annandale, NJ 08801 (772)- 538 -1051 5. Project Agent: Chris Weier /David Knight, PE 6. Project Engineer: Knight, McGuire and Associates, Inc. 80 Royal Palm Pointe, Suite 401 Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772) 569-5505 7. Project Surveyor: David M. Jones, PSM 3899 39(h Square Vero Beach, Florida 32960 (772) 567-9875 8. Project Description a. Narrative of proposed action: Phase 1 of the project includes upland improvements, mainly installation of a retaining wall, placement of fill, and construction of the stormwater management. Phase II will consist of constructing the dock and implementing the aquaculture facilities, along with a temporary parking area and some minimal landscaping. Phase III will begin the site construction of the residence, and complete the parking areas, stormwater, landscaping, and utilities. b. Current Zoning: CWR c. Adjacent Properties Zoning Current Land Future Land Use Use North: CWR vacant RMU East: C Indian River C South: CWR timeshare RMU recreation West: CWR Condominiums RMU d. Site Characteristics (1) Total Acreage: Gross project area - .44 total acres Area of development - .21 acres (2) Current Land Use(s): vacant (3) Soil: Immokalee fine sand (4) Vegetation: Pepper Trees, Cabbage palms, Wetland vegetation (5) Flood Hazard: Zones AE 7, AE 8, and VE 8 (6) Water Service: Indian River County Utilities (7) Sanitary Sewer Service: Indian River County Utilities (8) Parks: Jordan Park — % mile Riverview Park — 1'/. mile (9) Police /Fire: Indian River Fire — 1.5 miles Sebastian Police — 1 mile 9. Comprehensive Plan Consistency a. Future Land Use: consistent b. Traffic Circulation: consistent c. Housing: consistent 2 d. Public Facilities: consistent e. Coastal Management: consistent f. Conservation: consistent g. Recreation and Open Space: consistent 10. Contents of Site Plan: a. lot configuration: provided b. finished ground floor elevation: 9.6' NGVD c. contours and designating number of dwelling units: provided - 1 d. square footage of site: Area of development: 9,169 SF = .21 ac Wetland Area: 10,150 SF = .23 ac Total site: 19,319 SF = .44 ac e. building coverage: 2,167 SF = 11.2% (Max. 30 %) f. square footage of impervious areas and open area: g. Impervious: 6,242 SF = 32.3% (80% max.) Open Space: 13,077 SF = 67.7% (50% res & 25% commercial min.) setbacks: provided: h. scaled drawings of the sides, front and rear of the building or structure: provided generalized floor plan indicating uses and square footage of each proposed use within each building or structure: provided j. Building exterior construction materials and color: provided k. building height: 25' (25' max) location and character of all outside facilities for waste disposal, storage areas, or display: provided 3 Required Proposed Front (West) 10' 27.7' Side (North) 5' 33' Side (South) 5' 90' Rear (East) 10' 29' min h. scaled drawings of the sides, front and rear of the building or structure: provided generalized floor plan indicating uses and square footage of each proposed use within each building or structure: provided j. Building exterior construction materials and color: provided k. building height: 25' (25' max) location and character of all outside facilities for waste disposal, storage areas, or display: provided 3 m. location and dimensions of all curb cuts and driveways: provided n. number of spaces with their location and dimensions: Single- family residential: 1 @ 2 spaces per unit = 2 spaces Warehouse area: 264 SF @ 1/1000 SF = 1 space Dock: 4 wet slips @ 1 per 2 slips = 2 spaces Total spaces needed: 5 Total spaces provided: 5 (1 I-1/C) o. details of off - street parking and loading areas (including requirements of Article XV): provided A loading zone, which meets the required dimensional criteria, has been placed in front of the garage area for use by the aquaculture facility. p. all off - street vehicular surfaces available for maneuvering: provided q. surface materials: provided r. number of employees: s. type of vehicles owned by the establishment: t. If there is a combined off - street parking facility, required agreements: n/a u. Location of all pedestrian walks, malls, yards and open spaces: provided v. location, size, character, and height or orientation of all signs: none are proposed at this time w. location and character of landscaped areas and recreation areas: provided x. location, design and character of all public, semi - public, or private utilities: provided y. location, height and general character of perimeter or ornamental walls, fences, landscaping: provided z. surface water drainage facilities plan certified by an engineer or architect registered in the State of Florida: provided aa. location of existing easements and right -of -way: provided — see note under Additional Considerations (item #23C) bb. Land survey with complete legal description prepared and certified by a registered surveyor: provided 4 cc. Verified statement showing each and every individual person having a legal and/or equitable ownership interest in the subject property: provided 11. Site location and character of use provided 12. Appearance site and structures: a. harmonious overall design: yes b. location and screening of mechanical equipment, utility hardware and waste storage areas: provided c. commercial and industrial activities conducted in enclosed buildings: yes d. exterior lighting: Per applicant, "No unusual lighting will be provided for the clamming portion of the project as the project will be a daytime operation. The residential portion of the project will have standard lighting." 13. Access, internal circulation, off- street parking and other traffic impacts: a. internal circulation system design and access /egress considerations: provided b. separation of vehicular and pedestrian areas: provided 14. Traffic impacts: provided — Based on approved ITE standards, average daily trips are under 100 (11.11 ADT), therefore, a traffic impact study is not required. 15. Open space and landscape (including the requirements of Article XIV): a. Name, address and phone number of the owner and designer: provided b. North arrow, scale and date, minimum scale of one inch equals fifty (50) feet: provided c. Property lines, easements, and right -of -way with internal and property line dimensions: provided d. Location of existing or proposed utility service: provided e. Location and size of any existing or proposed structures: provided 5 f. Location and size of any existing or proposed site features, such as earthen mounds, swales, walls and water areas: provided g. Location and size of any existing or proposed vehicular use area: provided h. Location and size of any existing or proposed sidewalks, curbs, and wheel stops: provided j. Location of sprinkler heads, hose bibs, or quick cupplers and other information on irrigation: Irrigation system will be provided. Location of sprinkler heads will be field designed. Calculations of required type, dimensions and square footage of landscape materials and of required landscape areas, including: total site area, parking area, other vehicular use area, percentage of non - vehicular open space, perimeter and interior landscape strips, and required number of trees: provided k. Location of required landscape areas and dimensions: provided Location, name, height and size of all existing plant material to be retained: provided m. Location, size, height and description of all landscape material including name, quantity, quality, spacing, and specified size and specification of all plant materials: provided n. Height, width, type, material and location of all barriers of nonliving material: provided o. Location, dimensions and area of landscaping for freestanding signs: n/a P. Show all landscaping, buildings, or other improvements on adjacent property within five (5) feet of the common property line: q. Riverfront Overlay District special landscape requirements: provided 16. Required screening of abutting residential and nonresidential uses: n/a 17. Flood prone land and wetland preservation: provided 18: Surface water management: provided 19: Available potable water: Indian River County Utilities 20: Wastewater service: Indian River County Utilities 6 21: Soil erosion, sedimentation control and estuary protection: provided — See Sheet 6: Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan (SWPPP), Sheet 3c: Dock & Seagrass Plan, and comments below (item #23A) regarding required Coastal Resource Impact Analysis. 22. Performance Overlay District Requirements: provided 23. Additional considerations: A. As this proposed new development abuts the Indian River Lagoon, regulations required from Article XI Environmental Protection were reviewed, such as Section 54 -3 -11.1 Preservation of wetlands and transitional wetlands, Section 54 -3 -11.2 Soil erosion and sedimentation control, and Section 54 -3 -11.4 Coastal resource impact analysis, along with all other state jurisdictional requirements. The applicant is required to "submit as part of the permitting process, plans that demonstrate how the development shall incorporate features designed to protect against potential adverse impacts to shoreline vegetation and stabilization, water quality, native habitat including seagrass beds and wetland habitats, living marine resources and shoreline access. The following analysis was submitted by the applicant, as indicated on the site plan: (1) "Shoreline vegetation will be enhanced by exotic removal per FDEP requirements and stabilization is achieved by the Environmental Protection Wall. (2) Water quality will be achieved by construction and operation of the stormwater management facilities that were approved by the FDEP to demonstrate that there will be no net increase in discharge of pollutants from the site due to development. In addition, the dock facility must be constructed and operated in accordance with the division of aquaculture BMP's which prohibit activities that would degrade water quality. (3) Native habitat will be preserved and enhanced in the wetland portion of the project. In addition no submerged seagrasses are expected to be impacted by development. (4) Living marine resources such as seagrass and manatees are not anticipated to be impacted by development. In and around the proposed dock location, there is no seaqrass as alga is dominant. In addition no increase in boat traffic is anticipated that would result in increased manatee -boat collisions as this area has been used for clam aquaculture by the owner without dock access. (5) Shoreline access will remain as in its current state through the development of the project. The proposed dock access will link the upland portion of the project with the dock facilities. The Environmental shorequard between the upland and wetland portions of the project and will not disturb or impact the shoreline." The applicant also submitted the attached "Environmental Site Summary". B. All permits required from the Department of Agriculture, Department of Environmental Protection, and Army Corps of Engineers for the project are 7 current and up -to -date, including the state's submerged land lease for the property. All environmental information, studies, surveys, and site plans were also reviewed by these state agencies. Copies of the jurisdictional permits are available in the Growth Management Department. C. As noted on the site plan, there is a small existing utility easement adjacent to Indian River Drive, dedicated from the 1956 platting of Indian River Hills Subdivision. Because there is no proposed structure being placed in the easement, it does not have to be formally abandoned. However, utility sign -offs will be required for the proposed placement of asphalt in that portion of the easement before the building permit can be issued. D. Because of the proposed residential use, as required, a School Concurrency Availability Determination Letter (SCADL) was received from the IRC School Board indicating school capacity was available for this project. 24. City Engineer's review: The applicant has addressed all of the consulting engineer's comments. 25. Conclusion: The site plan is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Land Development Code, and Riverfront Overlay District. 26. Recommendation: Hold public hearing regarding site plan approval. Staff recommends approval of the Clams R Us phased site plan. PREPARED BY 8 a D E Knight, McGuire & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers and Planners 80 Royal Palm Pointe, Suite 401 Vero Beach, Florida 32960 David S. Knight, P.E. Phone: (772) 569-5505 Scott B. McGuire, P.E. Fax: (772) 569 -1455 Environmental Site Summary For Clams R Us Project located at 1624 Indian River Drive Sebastian, FL 32958 The existing site lies along the Indian River Lagoon Drive and is part of the Malabar to Vero Beach Aquatic Preserve. In the past, the Clams R Us site had a working boat ramp and a commercial boat dock with 40 boat slips. The boat ramp has for the most part, become filed in and overgrown. In the hurricanes of 2004 the entire dock was lost except for the pilings which still remain. In addition, a great deal of litter and debris has become deposited over the years including multiple abandoned boats, tires and parts of the previous dock facility. This onsite debris has recently been removed (within the past two months) as part of the mitigation requirements associated with the owners Environmental Resource Permit acquired for the project approval from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. As far as vegetation, the site is primarily dominated by invasive exotic and nuisance vegetation. There currently exists Brazilian pepper, Australian pine, and creeping ox -eye as well as various vine species throughout the site. There are a few saw palmettos and also one cabbage palm located on the site. Near the shoreline plants such as needlerush, bulrushes, water pennywort, false nettle, white mangrove, black mangrove and sea purslane can be found. A few land crab holes can be found around the shoreline/ wetland area of the site. As part of the mitigation required by the FDEP for the proposed project, the owner is required to remove all exotic vegetation in the wetlands. As far as submerged aquatic vegetation, the site investigation performed by Dr. David Cox Consulting found four types of seagrass species: shoal grass, manatee grass, paddle grass and star grass, with shoal grass being the most abundant. In addition alga (Caulerpa Prolifera) was encountered on the site in and around where the existing pilings were located. The existing submerged bottom at the project site consists of sand and fine sediments and muck is present in patches with varying depth of about 4 -12 ". An oyster bed is located at the seaward end of the headwall and extends to the north at lease 100 feet. No bird colonies were reported to be onsite by Dr.David Cox Consulting. Bird species observed at the site include the Brown Pelican, Double- crested cormorant, Great Blue Heron, Opsrey, Green Heron, Great Egret, American Oystercatcher, and Common Tern. As part of the Clam aquaculture facilities associated with the site development a 326 ft x 6 ft commercial aquaculture dock with a 30 ft x 8 ft terminal platform is proposed. The docking facility is subject to Aquaculture BMP's and conditions associated with the Department of Agriculture Lease No.31 -AQ -1044. The dock facility proposes clam upwellers and raceways in addition to 4 boat slips for aquaculture vessel use only In and around the proposed development the existing submerged aquatic vegetation is dominated by alga and excludes seagrass coverage. The dock is to be constructed basically in place of the existing pilings although; thenetentiaill JAN 2 7 2011 City of Sebastiair arnwth Management Cc& be removed and replaced with new ones. In addition to the acquculture farming lease, Clams R Us has acquired state and federal permits required for the dock facility and siteplan. The existing site is identified to be within zone 3 of the Indian River County Manatee Protection and Boating Safety Comprehensive Management Plan. Zone 3 is further identified as an area most conducive for locating the proposed project due to: (1) marina channels are several feet deeper than the avenge adjacent water depth; (2) existing marinas within Zone 3 are proximate to the intercostal waterway and Sebastian Inlet; and (3) although 11 commercial, recreational and residential marinas are located in Zone 3 and generate the highest level of on -water vessel traffic in the county, only four watercraft- related manatee mortalities have been reported in Zone 3. References 1. Jurisdictional Wetland Delineation Report for Clams `R' Us Sebastian, Indian River County, FL By: Coastal Tech — Coastal Technology Corporation — January 2007 2. Natural Resource Survey Submitted to Florida DEP for Clams `R' Us — By: David Cox Consulting, LLC — June 306 2010 3. Memorandum — to Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services from Stephani Culp, Director of Office of Cabinet Affairs — Including FDEP staff recommondatins —March 17, 2005. Page 2 Permit Application NA UU 1 ^ S P' 1 SEBTAN City of Sebastian How or Development Order Application Applicant (If not owner, written authorization (notarized) from owner is required) Name: —� J. 'oh l6 _ u in -0,i.o B. Site Information Address: � - A R_..I '► g ! 2 2, pa • . kLL AI Address: / a 3 l ue, . c / SuA5 L n i F �{ 1 \fC�t n ch P 11� Number ( ) - Phone Number: Mk )53s' - is i E -Mail: LUPIF)Srfl � pFAR JIGn(.t- 14),net Owner (If different from applicant) Name: Lmc, as n moII (Ian f Address: I Phone Number: ( ) - FAX Number: ( ) E -Mail: Title of permit or action requested:C • 1 Jl cti I.ec> eG: t .t PLEASE COMPLETE ONLY THOSE SECTIONS WHICH ARE NECESSARY FOR THE PERMIT DR ACTION THAT YOU ARE REQUESTING. COPIES OF ALL MAPS, SURVEYS, DRAWINGS, ETC. SHALL BE ATTACHED AND 8 -1/2" BY 11° COPIES OF ANY ATTACHMENTS SHALL BE INCLUDED. ATTACH THE APPROPRIATE SUPPLEMETAL INFORMATION FORM. A. Project Name (if applicable): /' aI )„ s _ ChM Ado' aCIi I -lam B. Site Information Address: � - A R_..I '► g ! 2 2, pa • . kLL AI C '97, Lot Block: n Unit: Subdivision:InALi i �(Uer Pi I IS 3 i Y) Indian River County Parcel It n ���I n ) J Zoning Classlficatlon: Future Land Use: n , C, uJ t2 �2 V - -Mn4 m l xenl (J se, Existing Use: \ /Q� ( Proposed Use: -61_-f°) e_rui a- gur-Sec ey ,f In -(_ C. Detailed description of proposed activity extra sheets if'necessar and building as well purpose of the requested permit or action (attach - consisting of 3,770 SF residential and 264 SF of as a clam aquaculture dock. The requested permit is and dock. CotlStrucflon of a mixed use two story commercial clam packaging facility for a new siteplan for the building, parking DATE RECEIVED: 71/q/0 FEE PAID: $ ) I RECEIVED BY:5 Permit Application No. D. Project Personnel: Agent: CMLci4 STET, t1x+M1s - M1cKt5"h, Name: J tai a S 41 11 (]h1 0E0 Address g0 Y(i')) n) iz? Stu -I-e, 4) �e� rh) Phone Number: ((InTN K/l / - 500 FAX Number: (71))36?-0#66 l gtic� E -Mail: �1%ft/ nigh +mc utr e. COm WI ICICtiS� J Attorney: KiName: k) Address Phone Number: ( ) - FAX Number: ( ) - E -Mail: Engineer: Name: I 11)4y1 Address • r, 7 I (F Phone Number. (772 7- otob • Number: ( 772561- 45 5 E- 11/411ai:(akii6t-R Uu T tklre.ec -y) Surveyor: Name: Y a - ,l -T" e--1 cr.;cr./� r..rtci.o l ems' Address II / _cf \ ap eyp _.,•11) O�i1 • L. •I r-��? 1 r L !—I[0 i� O/ FAX Number: (7- g)r79�/ -0),,, I rY Phone Number. (r'rrr�)5�_� f .- ! Ul�� 1 7 lLJ"[' 1 E -Mail: 1, _ I.' * ■ ♦ (_. S 1�Q 1 BEING FIRST DULY SWORN, DEPOSE AND SAY THAT: VI—AM THE OWNER _ AM THE LE • L REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED WHICH IS THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS APPLICA AND THAT ALL THE INFOR ATION, MAPS, DATA AND /OR SKETCHES PROVIDED IN THIS APPLICATION ARE ACCU D TRUE! THE BEST OF M NOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. / DATE / lJJiu$S MY1 RN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME BY J \ � \ I\ WHO IS PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME OR P: PDUCED AS IDENTIFICATION, THIS S T DAY OF _It' 1 11 NOTARY'S SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME OF NOTARY COMMISSION ND. /EXPIRATION SEAL: 20 1 1, 1031Y S. GILLEN MY COMMISSION r 0O 592413 EXPIRES:O :bet 13, 2010 Bonded Thna*miy PIM woman Permit Application No. The following Is required for all comprehensive plan amendments, zoning amendments (Including rezoning), site plans, conditional use permits, special use permits, variances, exceptions, and appeals. JME LtTHE OWNER(S) / _ THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER(S) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION, HEREBY AUTHORIZE EACH AND EVERY MEMBER OF THE BOARD /COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN TO PHYSICALLY ENTER UPON THE PROPERTY AND VIEW THE PROPERTY IN CONNECTION WITH MY /OUR PENDING APPLICATION. 1/WE HEREBY WAIVE ANY OBJECTION OR DEFENSE I /WE MAY HAVE, DUE TO THE QUASI- JUDICIAL NATURE OF THE PROCEEDINGS, RESULTING FROM ANY BOARD /COMMISSION MEMBER ENTERING OR HEWING THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING ANY CLAIM OR ASSERTION THAT MY /OUR PROCEDURAL OR SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS RIGHTS UNDER THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION OR THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION WERE VIOLATED BY SUCH ENTERING OR VIEWING. This W AND CONSENT IS BEING SIGN D BY ME/US VOLUNTARILY AND NOT AS A RESULT OF ANY COERCION APPLIED, OR PROMI •E, BY ANY EMPLOYEE, AGE CONTRACTOR OR OFFICIAL OF THE CITY 0 SEBASTIAN. g DATE S • n to and subscribed before me by c who is personally known as identification this 5 Notary's Signature Printed Name of Notary Commission No. /Expiration Seal: to me or p educed W- day of ear MEN MY COMMISSION A DD 592413 EXPIRES Otlols 13, 2010 Thu Peary Make LM•mbn BANOV ARCHITECTURE & CONSTRUCTION z 0 r: U ,24 z 0 U czs H U w x ,:4 -t 0 ANOV Architecture and Construction, Inc. Exterior Color Scheme for Clams "R" Us As of June 22, 2011 Roofmg: Mill finish metal roof Body of Building: SW6127 "Ivoire" Building trim, soffit, fascia board, shutters, railings, garage doors: SW7004 "Snowbound" 2975 Twentieth Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 772- 299 -6565 www.banov.net CGC1518416 1 �+' x'11 a 4 VIl k d ?i� l t5 a -0 x p., tio o Litil cif kir HI 5 �:,H� k, in 66 ill gi d; a' RECEIVED i DRAWING INDEX DESCRIPTION COVER SHEET OUS DETAILS 5 s o a w 3 o g a 0 § PO ° CI o = p n a = ° °a ° U K N 0 )- < _ 0 b N 2 w R 2 W $ U N ) w a u 0 O0 w a 3 STORM WATER POLLUTION PROTECTION PLAN (SWPPP) ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND ELEVATIONS (S LOCATION MAP SPOIL AUGUST PARK vas o oo9H IS ..AND '214)<>“4, - LS*l � 3 0 �,� ��j N0. 3 \ �� �i R 1 Ear �� PROJEC ■ �a �, =�� SITE ,s, .�.ya `5=.4,, .1 O a Li k, as 1� dd,1a': titx �1 0ra;q 0 a w i areiAl ,,,ggo Nadi o D 1 ,kte ?zing z 0 6i �A ii±Pa kkP 1 t 1 $��l #iai$ 1j LOCATION MAP SPOIL AUGUST PARK vas o oo9H IS ..AND '214)<>“4, - LS*l � 3 0 �,� ��j N0. 3 \ �� �i R 1 Ear �� PROJEC ■ �a �, =�� SITE ,s, .�.ya `5=.4,, .1 O a Li k, as 1� dd,1a': titx �1 0ra;q 0 a w i areiAl ,,,ggo Nadi o D 1 ,kte ?zing z 0 Q rI 1 Baal p ! {I�Ili 1 olPyt 5 ! + a 1 111111! 1 111111 1 ! 21 ; ! li II I�Il Hill II o® ;1111 ;II I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII lllll PP 1111•111 II j�A �Al�fAY� =IIIYIWIIWINIA- IIWIIIIIIIAIIMIIIA a -� IA111NWIWHIIIAIA= INDI AN RIVER DRIVE e 4 VNIN / / ( 1 |� IIIIIIIIIIYIIIIIIIIIIII as VNI :5 p W E1s1 gEigi tt 91 xo:gg 020 1 t 11 f f! 1'K ilj lfit I? 116 Viii Il If I + ;I 116 1 ll� 11 oil tt!!i }I .1 1 1 1 1. d�11' 11t11110`iI11{1tl eI' {I {' I1e a3 • i11w Oii f1311,; it1iIt1 tt ;11110111k1!l1'ill 11 �ti�tl��ai�l;l issd't11 • b 11�,EIil3iit�1± tjt #iil;ul tiih1 iifli;ttl1t, a 63 1M MI NM num • 11 MEMO mu LIII II j ■ \ 0 0 31.417 Aid3dOdd /1 m :! vioqi C6 1 z; Cann /% O \;s § 0 w 0 :11 BI {111111 { {11111 {11{12 11! i, m..l aax.a l• II H 1 clan Nowasil uorl "1/4 ¢mip 1 111 —•— —;I -- 0 En a 11 1 {j i1 i!f 1 ;�1�11 4f 1 S1 •1 11E{ 11 II 1 1! 11 it 111: I1ill 1111111; 11'11 11111 111 `1 111 1111; 1111' y! !11111 1 1 1111,11 11: 21. 11' 1111 �111i11111' 1111 s :11 ,i 11 10:11111 6'1 1 1111111101111 1111 1 1 11 1 111111$11111 1111111111 1 :1 11 11;1111,,. 11;11i111'i1'i1i 1i11i1'1111, 1..�.�:11.aLie,1,.,1,11 my, mP; 61 c 0 0 °....v....8.,,. o in o r4 • o ..v ...o • -1 • 0 o '8 a a 1. v i!El III; EI °I E, { III? 1,,111 IIIE !I l !! 41! mill! I �;i 1;' 1 l li4I j .` 9 ::ii' t.I1E yillfi1i.EPi I �i .iEl99i11i i : 1. 1 1 I° P °aY 0 v ! 11 E p \'.. a I a .' =� i9 LS 1 6 . % y� ® N ii l . ' I 4 1e• a gse lei ee ill 1E! 1. v e 1. 1 1 I° 99 p iE eevp� ,, iii ,t <<,,� 1 7 I e i 11! 19 EIW' i M 1111 11 31 I a .' =� i9 iel ILO y� ® �l alg1E'villE p �Ei!'1;ilI®e qp4i! 61e ' iii 1e• illlii EII EE ij EII II. i ^ft o Y15i1E!II1911v°i1 19= _, ... ..... 111 a gse lei ee ill 1E! Hilill.ele avl 0 1?P . 11f ti 1 ! i pI ll�g �Illi!III9� I 4 i3 A li[ ell • 91a 1il E a 1. v IIEI E�+ • 'EiE !IliIII!PiEEE ?P51!$ L VALVE AND BOX 4111 i 5. o • ,t <<,,� Iil �!IBE iel ILO y� —, �l alg1E'villE p �Ei!'1;ilI®e qp4i! 61e ' iii 1e• illlii EII EE ij EII II. i ^ft o Y15i1E!II1911v°i1 19= _, ... ..... 111 a gse lei 1. v 1 Lry_ 14 e e f ;i ; H13 : ;pi 191 P'!1! i r111 lP ti. pip]g .... ?P51!$ L VALVE AND BOX 4111 di i5 ➢d • Iil �!IBE iel ILO e S 19 PII Ai 1e• i—r a gse lei ee ill 1E! �Ci 1 Lry_ 14 e e f ;i ; H13 : ;pi 191 P'!1! i r111 lP ti. pip]g .... L VALVE AND BOX 4111 ___ Iil �!IBE iel ILO e S 19 i! I i—r -Irk NodY �Ci a Y ti 1 I a € ial r 1 1 I • 1! ',) !( | y; 5 | �•,; |�,! | |.� ,,, ,amid! . ! ���6,. ;l.� ; ; ;�� 1111 s 1 / ƒ $ _J v' ;p4 Hie "-ee\ day,. . At' '_— IS B r-wx% •a; :--Attu m:u ac. i• ns • 4 gogoiltgi 1 .vwsrw _—_ V ®__ i i §R i¢R 3RR§ yy00 y - Key Oty SclendWarnrnan Hanle Ht Remarfa - Ri 11 1 i!iP Sao• € flIU E1yFFFF +, E € €f gpr:M: 1111 I ;nk ;" ... 0 o a 5 3 a d a d :° 5 _J v' ;p4 Hie "-ee\ day,. . At' '_— IS B r-wx% •a; :--Attu m:u ac. i• ns • 4 gogoiltgi 1 .vwsrw _—_ V ®__ i 6061000 —VV 'V 'd 5999 -66d (ZLL) 096Zf Valaol3 'HOV3S ON3A L33U1S Hi 311N3A11 GL 6? � •._. -2 r, ':ff V018013 'NVLLSVa3S ZAI10 2I3ARI NVIQNI 17391 SR ,2I, SNIWID j r/ kili 'S,LOa,LIHO2W AONVH 0 �, CG 0 kili PAO 0 CM r . '< its vie 1 o o � ��I ■u;❑ E 1 *IP ti u 1 al WTI 0 Oi iRIO CG 0 8 kili 1 -y J � ti Oi L- 1 SIM -- 8 HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission RE: 6 -Year Capital Improvement Program DATE: July 27, 2011 Attached is the Recommended Capital Improvement Program for the period from FY 2011/12 through FY 2016/17. According to the City's Land Development Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall approve the Capital Improvement Program before the City Council's final adoption. This is scheduled to be included on the agenda for the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on Thursday, August 4th. Following review and approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Capital Improvement Program is scheduled to be discussed by the City Council at their regular meeting on Wednesday, August 10th. Input on capital outlays utilizing Recreation Impact Fees was received from the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board at their meeting held June 27th. The scheduled capital improvements for the initial year will be taken into account during the process of formulating the City's Annual Operating budget for FY 2011/12. A special meeting/workshop is scheduled to be held by the City Council on Monday, August 22nd to consider and discuss the Annual Operating Budget for FY 2011/12. If you have any questions concerning the enclosed package, please do not hesitate to give me a call. I can be reached at (772) 388 -8200. A in er C y Manager CEIY OF HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2011/12 THROUGH FY 2016/17 CITY MANAGER - AL MINNER Planning and Zoning Commission Review August 4,2011 CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2012 -17 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City of Sebastian's adopted financial policies requires the City to coordinate the development of the Capital Improvement Program with the development of the strategic plan and operating budget, as well as ensuring compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvement Element. Operating expenditures and revenues associated with new capital improvements will be projected and included in the Capital Improvement Program Five -Year Forecast. The Capital Improvement Program is updated and approved by the City Council annually and encompasses a period of six years. What are Capital Improvements? Capital improvements include streets, buildings, building improvements, new parks, park expansions /improvements, airport runways, infrastructure improvements, and major, one -time acquisitions of equipment. Projects in the Capital Improvement Program generally cost more than $50 000 and last at least five years. Policies Used in Developing the Capital Improvement Program All capital projects submitted for approval must be justified in terms of how the project supports the achievement of the City's Strategic Priorities. Projects are prioritized and approved based on the relevancy of the project to the City's Strategic Plan and the impact on the end stakeholder(s). 1. The City shall adopt an annual Capital Budget based on the Capital Improvement Program. Future capital improvement expenditures necessitated by changes in population, real estate development, or in economic base will be calculated and included in the capital improvement budget projections. 2. The originating department of the capital improvement project will identify the estimated costs and funding sources for each capital project proposal before it is submitted to the City Council for approval. 3. The City shall make all capital improvements in accordance with an adopted Capital Improvement Program budget. 4. The City will determine and use the most prudent financial methods for acquisition of capital improvement projects based upon market conditions at the time of acquisition. Following is a six -year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Schedule for each requesting department/division. In addition to the Golf Course and Airport Fund (AP), the CIP also includes projects funded by the Local Option Gas Tax (LOGT), Discretionary Sales Tax (DST), Recreation Impact Fee (RIF), developer contribution, debt financing, as well as State and Federal Grants. Also included is the Riverfront CRA. The CIP is intended to be a complete listing of projects needed for replacement or improvement of the City's major equipment, facilities, roadways, and structures. Although potential funding has been identified, changes may be made in conjunction with alternative sources as they become available or adjustments become necessary due to reductions in projected revenues. The timing of projects identified may also be altered from year to year to meet changing circumstances. CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2012 -17 List of Projects FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015-16 FY 2016 -17 Total General Government Fleet Maintenance Equipment $ 23,000 $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ 23,000 Building Painting 75,000 - 75,000 Police Department Police Vehicle Replacement 185,000 250,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,635,000 Roads and Special Projects Barber Street Bridge Repairs - - 500,000 - 500,000 Schumann & Barber Intersection - - - - 1,500,000 1,500,000 Street Repaving - 100,000 150,000 250,000 U.S. #I Improvements 300,000 - - - - - 300,000 Gateway Enhancements 25,000 - - - - - 25,000 512 Median Landscaping - - 500,000 - - - 500000 Parking Improvements 75,000 750,000 - - - - 825,000 Presidential Streets 310,000 - - - - - 310,000 Parks & Recreation Barber Street Field Lighting - - 300,000 - - 300,000 Morring Fields 50,000 - - - - 50,000 Blueway /Greenway Signage 25,000 - - - - 25,000 Baseball Fields Drainage 50,000 - - - - - 50,000 Bleacher Shields 50,000 - - - - - 50,000 Azine Terrace Park - 50,000 - - - - 50,000 Creative Playground 30,000 - - - - - 30,000 Handicap Pier - Mainstrect 15,000 - - - - 15,000 Stormwater Road Crossings/Sideyard Pipes - - - - 250,000 250,000 500,000 Pipe Sliplining - 80,000 - - - - 80,000 Stormwater Pond Installation - - - 500,000 - 500,000 1/4 Round Swale Rehab 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 3,000,000 Cemetery Redo South Paved Roadway - - 50,000 - - 50,000 Retaining Wall - - - - 75,000 75,000 Golf Course New Clubhouse/Tee Box Improvements - - - 2,500,000 2,500,000 Airport Runway 8/26 Survey & Rehabilitation 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 Maintenance Equipment 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 Build Taxiways/Install Lighting - 3,158,000 - - - - 3,158,000 Main Street Access Road - - 1,200,000 - - - 1,200,000 Construct Hangars - - - 1,500,000 - - 1,500,000 Rehab Apron F - - - 500,000 - - 500,000 Construct Access Road West - - - - 800,000 - 800,000 Construct Aviation Facility - - - - - 1,500,000 1,500,000 Total 2 CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2012 -17 SUMMARY FY 2011 -12 FY 2012 -13 FY 2013 -14 FY 2014 -15 FY 2015 -16 FY 2016 -17 Total Grouped by Department General Government $ 98,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 98,000 Police Department 185,000 250,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,635,000 Public Works Department Roads and Special Projects $ 710,000 $ 750,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 S 100,000 $ 1,650,000 4,210,000 Parks & Recreation 220,000 50,000 - 300,000 - - 570,000 Stormwater 500,000 580,000 500,000 500,000 1,250,000 750,000 4,080,000 Cemetery - 50,000 - 75,000 125,000 Golf Course - - - - 2,500,000 2,500,000 Airport 200,000 3,158,000 1,200,000 2,000,000 800,000 1,500,000 8,858,000 Total by Departments S 1,913,000 54.788,000 $ 1550,000 53,600.000 S2,450,000 56.775,000 522,076,000 Grouped by Function General Government $ 98,000 $ - $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ 223,000 Public Safety 185,000 250,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,635,000 Transportation 910,000 3,908,000 1,700,000 2,500,000 900,000 3,150,000 13,068,000 Parks & Recreation 220,000 50,000 - 300,000 - 2,500,000 3,070,000 Physical Environment 500,000 580,000 500,000 500,000 1,250,000 750,000 4,080,000 Total by Functions S 1.913.000 S 4,788,000 S 2,550.000 5 3.600.000 S 2,450,000 S 6,775.000 522.076.000 Grouped by Funding Source DST $ 1,493,000 $ 1,080,000 $ 1,300,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 1,550,000 $ 2,550,000 $ 9,573,000 LOOT - - - 100,000 150,000 250,000 Recreation Impact Fees 220,000 50,000 - - - - 270,000 Golf Course - - - - 2,500,000 2,500,000 Airport Operating Revenues 22,500 - - - - - 22,500 Grants/Bank Notes 177,500 3,408,000 1,200,000 2,000,000 800,000 1,500,000 9,085,500 Cemetery - - 50,000 - - 75,000 125,000 Riverfront CRA - 250,000 - - - - 250,000 Slormwater Fund - - - - Total Funding Sources S 1,913.000 54.788.000 $ 2,550,000 53.600.000 52,450.000 $ 6.775.000 522.076,000 3 CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2012-17 Local Recreation Option Impact Grants/ Riverfront Cemetery Gas Tax DST Fig Golf Airport Bank Note CRA Trust Fund Total FISCAL YEAR 2011/2012 General Government Fleet Maintenance Equipment Building Painting Police Department Police Vehicle Replacement $ Roads and Special Projects US. MI Improvements Gateway Enhancements Parking Improvements Presidential Streets P arks & Recreation Mooring Fields Blueway /C eenway Signage Baseball Field laminage Bleacher Shields Creative Playground Handicap Pier - Mmnsbeei S tormwahs 1/4 Round Swale Rehab Airport Runway 8/26 Survey & Rehabilitation Maintenance Equipment Total FY 1811/2012 195,000 300500 2,500 $ 20,000 $ • 4 CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2012 -17 Local Recreation Option Impact Grants/ RIverfront Cemetery Gas Tax 0.ST Fees Golf Airport Bank Note CRA Trust Fond Total FISCAL YEAR 2912/2013 Police Department Police Vehicle Replacement s 250,000 S 250,000 Roads and Special Projects Parking Improvements S 250,000 s 250.000 $ 150,000 s 750,003 Parks & Recreation Azine Terrace Ptak $ 50,000 5 50,000 Stormwater Pipe Sliplining 1 s 80,000 1/4 Round Swale Rehab 1 5 500,000 Airport Build Taxiways/Install Lighting $ 1158,000 $ Total FY 2012/2013 5 CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2012 -17 Lucid Rccrcarion Option Impact Grants/ Riverfront Cemetery Gas Tax DST Fees Golf Ainai Bank Note CRA Trust Fund Total FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014 Police Department Police Vehicle Replacement Roads and Special Projects 512 Median Landscaping Stormwater 1/4 Round Swale Rehab Cemetery Redo South Paved Roadway Airport Main Street Access Road Total FY 2013rz014 S 100,000 S 500,000 S 500,000 6 I 1.100.000 S 100,000 S 500,000 S 500,000 s 50,000 S 50,000 $ CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2012 -17 Local Recreation Option Impact Grants/ Riwrfront Cemetery Gas Tax 0 ='f Fees Golf Airrcr Bank Note CBA Trust Fund 'ford FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015 Police Department Police Vehicle Replacement Roads and Special Projects Barber Street Bridge Repairs Parks & Rmrenrion Barber Street Field Lighting Starmwater 1/4 Round Swale Rehab Airport Construct Hangars Rehab Apron F Total FY 2014/2015 E 300,000 500,000 E 300,000 500,000 7 5003000 S 300,000 500,000 300,000 5 500,000 E 1500,000 $ 500,000 CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2012 -17 Iocal Recreation Option Impact Grants/ Riwrfront Cemetery Gas Tan DST Fees Golf Airport Rank Not CRA Trust Fund Total FISCAI, YEAR 2015/2016 Police Department Police Vehicle Replacement s s 000}000 Roads and Special Projects Street Repaving s mom s mom Stormwater Road Crossings/Sideyard Pipes s 250000 S 250,000 Stomlwater Pond Installation s 500,000 s 500,000 1/4 Round Swale Rehab s 500.000 s 500,000 Airport Construct Access Road West $ 800,000 $ Booboo Total FY 20152016 8 CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2012 -17 Local Recreation Option Impact Grants/ Itiwrfront Cemetery C Tax DST Fees Gulf AUOOrt Bank Nate CRA Trust Fund Total FISCAL YFAR 20/620/7 Polite Department Police Vehicle Replacement $ 500.000 Roads and Special Projects Schumann & Barber Intersection $ Street Repaving s lso0x Stormwmer Road Crossings/Sideyard Pipes $ 250,000 1/4 Round Swale Rehab $ 500,000 Cemetery Retaining Wall Golf Course New ClubhousetTee Box Improvements Airport Construct Aviation Facility Total FY 2016/20/7 Grand Tom 9 S 2,507,000 5 300,000 S 1,500000 S 150,000 S 250,00 S 500,000 S 75,000 S 75,000 S S CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2012 -17 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST AND JUSTIFICATION FORM GENERAL GOVERNMENT Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: Fleet Maintenance Equipment Project Description: Discretionary Sales Tax Upgrade fuel pumps and purchase vehicle lift. The mechanical gas pumps are no able to pump the now blended ethanol fuels. This causes a reduction in the volume of gas that tan be delivered add increases the costs per gallon, Project FY 11 -12 FY 12 -13 FY 13 -14 FY 14-15 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 Total $23,000 Operating Impact: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $23,000 - $3,000 - 53,000 - $3,000 - $3,000 43,000 - $15,000 Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: Building Painting Project Description: Discretionary Sales Tax Repaint City Hall. Police Department and Old City Hall. This project is needed to improve the appearance of these buildings. Project FY 11 -12 FY 12 -13 FY 13 -14 FY 14 -15 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 Total $75,000 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $75,000 Operating Impact: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 POLICE DEPARTMENT Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: Police Vehicles Project Description: Discretionary Sales Tax 11/12 - 3 patrol vehicles, I code enforcement vehicle and 1 crime scene van. Replace 5 older vehicles that have higher mileage and maintenance cost. Project FY 11 -12 FY 12 -13 FY 13 -14 FY 14 -15 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 Total $185,000 $250,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,635,000 Operating Impact: 50 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 10 CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2012 -17 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST AND JUSTIFICATION FORM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEN'r Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Barber Street Bridge Repairs Project Description: Discretionary Sales Tax Repair deteriorating Bridge and add new vuardrails This project is necessary to maintain the bridge to DOT standards based on yearly bridge inspections. Project Costs: FY 11 -12 FY 12 -13 $0 $0 Operating Impact: $0 $o FY 13 -14 FY 14 -15 FY 15 -16 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 Project FY 16 -17 Total $0 $0 $500,000 $0 so $0 Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: Schumann & Barber Intersection Project Description: Discretionary Sales Tax Improvements to Intersection. This project will be designed to improve traffic flow and reduce congestion on the south side of the City. These funds were budgeted in Fiscal 08 -09 in conjunction with Indian River County but are now being reallocated to FY16 -17 FY 11 -12 FY 12 -13 FY 13 -14 FY 14 -15 $0 $0 $0 $0 Operating Impact: $0 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 Project Total $0 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 so $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: Street Repaving Project Description: Local Option Gas Tax Rehabilitation and repaving of failing road base and roads. This project iz necessary ;to keep the streets in good condition and •so. to the residents, Repaving Is expected to'.reduce complaints, as well as insurance claims for damages and liability. FY 11 -12 FY 12 -13 FY 13 -14 $0 $0 $0 Operating Impact: $o so $0 1=Y 14 -15 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 Project Total $0 $100,000 $150,000 $250,000 so $0 so so Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: U.S. Highway 41 Improvements I Project Description: Discretionary Sales Fax Work to make improvements to U.S. Highway #1. This project was authorized by the City Council during FY 10-11 to improve traffic flow, parking and aesthetics along U.S. Highway #1. FY-II-12 FY- 12 -13 FY -13 -14 FY -14 -15 FY -15 -16 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 Operating Impact: $0 $0 to $0 $0 $0 $0 Project FY -16 -17 Total $0 $0 $300,000 11 CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2012 -17 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST AND JUSTIFICATION FORM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: FY 11 -12 FY 12 -13 $25,000 $0 Operating Impact: $0 Gateway Enhancements Project Description: Riverfront Community Redevelopment Improvements to the entrances to the CRA area. These improvements are intended to further define be4;RA area,-.. $0 FY 13 -14 FY 14 -15 FY 15 -16 $0 $0 SO $0 Project FY 16 -17 Total $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: 512 Median Landscaping Project Description: Discretionary Sales Tax Work to improve the appearance of this major entryway to the City. Irrigation and landscaping will be added. This project is desirable to enhance the view of those entering the City. FY -I1 -12 FY -12 -13 $0 Operating Impact: $o FY -I3 -14 FY -14 -15 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $o $0 FY -15 -16 $0 $0 FY -16 -17 Project Total $0 $500,000 $0 $o Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: Barber Street Field Lighting Project Description: Discretionary Sales Tax Remove and replace old lights. These are the oldest IIghtsin the ei y and need to be replaced with new energy elfigient lighting. FY 11 -12 FY 12 -13 $0 $0 Operating Impact: $0 $0 FY 13 -14 FY 14 -15 FY 15 -16 $0 $300,000 $o so Project FY 16 -17 Total $0 $0 $300,000 $1,500 $1,500 $3,000 Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: FY-II-12 $50,000 Mooring Fields Project Description: Recreation Impact Fees Design and engineering for placing mooring fields for boaters. A mooring field is needed near the Main Street Pier to provide boaters a safe place to tie -up and access the amenities near downtown. Project FY- 12 -13 FY -I3 -14 FY -14 -15 FY -15 -16 FY -16 -17 Total $o $o $o $o $o $5o,000 Operating Impact: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 12 CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2012 -17 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST AND JUSTIFICATION FORM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: Blueway /Greenway Signage Project Description: Recreation Impact Fees Improvements to blueway /greenway signage. The blueway/grecnway !POuidors connect to numerous destinations and em owage non- vehicular transportation Improvements to s Page will make these corridors more attractive to the user. FY 11 -12 S25,000 Operating Impact: $0 FY 12 -13 SO $0 FY 13 -14 FY 14 -15 FY 15 -16 $0 $0 $0 $0 Project FY 16 -17 Total $0 $0 - $25,000 SO $0 $0 Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: Baseball Fields Drainage Project Description: Recreation Impact Fees Improvements to drainage. This project will Ol eimprovements to dr tge the 0 r Street Baseball FjeWS:.' FY 11 -12 $50,000 Operating Impact: $0 FY 12 -13 $0 $0 FY 13 -14 FY 14 -15 FY 15 -16 $0 $0 $0 $0 Project FY 16 -17 Total $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: Bleacher Shields Project Description: Recreation Impact Fees Acquire bleacher shields. This will fund the purchase of cover for attendees at events at the Barber Street Sports Complex. FY -11 -12 FY- 12 -13 $50,000 $0 Operating Impact: $0 $0 FY -13 -14 $0 $0 FY -14 -15 FY -15 -16 $0 $0 $0 $0 Project FY -16 -17 Total $0 $50,000 $0 $0 Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: Azine Terrace Park Project Description: Recreation Impact Fees A park will be created. This projec iII increase park fac lilies available to residents m that area. FY 11 -12 FY 12 -13 FY 13 -14 FY 14 -15 FY 15 -16 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 Operating Impact: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Project FY 16 -17 Total $0 $0 $50,000 13 . CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2012 -17 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST AND .JUSTIFICATION FORM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: Creative Playground Project Description: Recreation Impact Fees Playground equipment at Barber Street Sports Complex. This project will allow us to purchase playground equipment at the Barber Street Sports Complex.; This is necessary because the current equipment has sharp edges and is a danger to the kids FY 11 -12 $30,000 Operating Impact: $0 FY 12 -13 $0 $0 FY 13 -14 FY 14 -15 FY 15 -16 $0 $0 $0 $0 Project FY 16 -17 Total $0 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: Handicap Pier - Mainstreet Project Description: Recreation Impact Fees install handicapped floating dock at the Mainstreet Pier. This protect will improve accessibility by the handicapped. FY 11 -12 $15,000 Operating Impact: $0 FY 12 -13 $0 $0 FY 13 -14 FY 14 -15 FY 15 -16 $0 $0 $0 $0 Project FY 16 -17 Total $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: 1/4 Swale Improvements Project Description: Discretionary Sales Tax Installation of 1/4 round in swales. To continue the program of updating the drainage throughout the City. FY -11 -12 $500,000 Operating Impact: $0 FY- 12 -13 FY -13 -14 FY -14 -15 $500,000 $500,000 $0 $0 FY -15 -16 FY -I6 -17 $500,000 $50Q000 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 Project Total $3,000,000 $0 Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: FY 11 -12 Road Crossings/Sideyard Pipes Project Description: Discretionary Sales Tax Installing new pipes in side yard ditches as quarter round is installed and replacing necessary road crossing pipes. This project will help eliminate major flooding throughout the City- by replacing :failing pipes under roads and reducing maintenance of side yard ditches Project FY 12 -13 FY 13 -14 FY 14 -15 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $250,000 $500,000 Operating Impact: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 14 CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2012 -17 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST AND .JUSTIFICATION FORM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: Pipe Sliplining Project Description: Discretionary Sales Tax Slipline pipe on Martin Lane. This project will rehabilitate the pipe under Martin Lane which is slowlydeteriorating. _ FY 11 -12 FY 12 -13 FY 13 -14 FY 14 -15 $0 $80,000 $0 $0 Operating Impact: $0 $0 $0 $0 Project FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 Total $0 $0 $80,000 $0 $0 $0 Project Name: Funding Source: Stormwater Pond Installation Project Description: Discretionary Sales Tax Creation of a new stormwater pond at either Barber /Atom location or Azine Terrace. Justification: Project Costs: This project will allow creation of a stormwater pond similar to the one installed on Periwinkle at one of the two locations metioned based on recommendations from the engineer, Neel - Schaffer. FY -11 -12 $o Operating Impact: $0 FY- 12 -13 $0 $0 Project FY -13 -]4 FY -14 -15 FY -15 -16 FY -16 -17 Total $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: Redo South paved Roadway Project Description: Cemetery Trust Fund 100 feet of road way to be removed, redirected and installed. The road was put in the 70's and it went over some grave space of the Carpenter family and they want the issue resolved. This project will stop the sand from washing down onto the cemetery from the north side of the property. It would also be put on he north boundry line to show where the City's property is, serve as a privacy fence and could be a supporting wall in the future for more niches. We would j&eto resolve thislissu before the family presents this as a problem to the City FY 11 -12 $0 Operating Impact: $0 Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: FY 12 -13 FY 13 -14 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 Project FY 14 -15 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 Total $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Retaining Wall Project Description: Cemetery Trust Fund Install a retaining wall along north side of the Cemetery. Wall to be 325 feet long, 6 feet high and tapered to U.S. Highway #1. This project will stop the sand from washing down onto the cemetery from the north side of the property. It would also be put on he north boundry line to show where the City's property is, serve as a privacy fence and could be a supporting wall in the future for more niches. FY-I 1-12 FY- 12 -13 FY -13 -14 FY -14 -15 $0 $0 $0 Operating Impact: $0 Project FY -15 -16 FY -16 -17 Total $0 $75,000 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 15 CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2012 -17 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST AND JUSTIFICATION FORM RIVERFRONT COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT FUND Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: Parking Improvements Project Description: Discretionary Sales Tax $500,000, plus Riverfront Community Redevelopment Cash of $250,000. This would encompass improvements to the CavCorp property or other improvements identified in the Parking Study. Parking is a:primary issue identified in the =CRA Master:Plan. The City Council has requested tbutdila be given attention Engmeenng would be done in FY 12-13, with construction in FY 12-13 FY 11 -12 FY 12 -13 $75,000 $750,000 Operating Impact: SO $0 FY 13 -14 FY 14 -15 FY 15 -16 $0 $0 SO $0 Project FY 16 -17 Total $0 $0 $825,000 $0 SO $0 Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: Presidential Streets Project Description: Discretionary Sales Tax This project wold resurface the streets within this area. This would improve wherapossibie he streets in the downtown area as well as provide additional on -street parking, FY 11 -12 $310,000 Operating Impact: $0 FY 12 -13 FY 13 -14 FY 14 -15 FY 15 -16 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 So Project FY 16 -17 Total $0 $0 5310,000 50 $0 $0 GOLF COURSE FUND Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: Clubhouse and Improvements Project Description: Financed with a 12 Year Note at an anticipated rate of4.5 %. First payment scheduled to begin from Golf Course Fund in FYI7 -18 for $270,000. New Clubhouse, tee box improvements and irrigation upgrades (downstream of irrigation station). Project is scheduled in FY16.17 n order to accumulateadd*lona] savings during ygxts:fbll owing _ the final bond payment that was made m fiscal FY10 11 and in order to better track the state of the ecomonmy in general Irrigation mprovements are included, as all irrigation hardware, downstream of the irrigation station are (mostly) original parts from the beginning of Of comae construction in 1981'. These irrigation parts include all PVC pipes, hydraulic tubing, irrigation heads and control boxes. FY 11 -12 FY 12 -13 $0 $0 Project FY 13 -14 FY 14 -15 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 Total $0 50 $0 $2,500,000 52,500,000 Operating Impact: $0 so $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 16 CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2012 -17 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST AND JUSTIFICATION FORM AIRPORT FUND Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: Runway 8/26 Survey & Rehab. Project Description: FDOT: $2,500; Airport : $2,500; FAA $95K. Runway 8/26 Improvements. Runway 8/26 identifying '. marking are marginally out of tolerance due to magnetic -: :variation. Runway needs marking improvements- '1 h s is a 95% FAA, 2.5% FDOT and Airport match. Project FY 11 -12 FY 12 -13 FY 13 -14 FY 14 -15 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 Total $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 Operating Impact: $2,500 so $o $0 so $0 $2,500 Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: Maintenance Equipment Project Description: FDOT $80K; Airport $20K. Purchase maintenance equipment through 80/20 FDOT Grant. Airport continues to have to share city maintenance equipment as needed. That practice disrupts City and Airport projects. Project FY 11 -12 FY 12 -13 FY 13 -14 FY 14 -15 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 Total $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 Operating Impact: $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: Build Taxiways /Install Lighting Project Description: FAA $3,040K;FDOT $80K; Airport $80K. Will finance Airport's share by an advance from DST Funds. Construct T/W C, D, & E and install taxiway and REII. (Runway end identification lighting). Airport is non - towered. In the interest of safety, parallel taxiways are needed to avoid runway incursions. Project includes taxiway lighting and end of runway identification lighting that will also enhance safety. FY 11 -12 FY 12 -13 FY 13 -14 FY 14 -15 FY 15 -16 $0 $3,200,000 $0 $0 Operating Impact: $0 $0 $2,400 $2,400 $2,400 $2,400 $9,600 Project FY 16 -17 Total $0 $0 $3,200,000 17 CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2012 -17 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST AND JUSTIFICATION FORM AIRPORT FUND Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: Main Street Access Road Project Description: FAA and USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) Grants Construct new Airport Drive East; Improve Main Street intersection at Airport Drive East. Rehabilitate Apron. Airport Drive East and its Main Street intersection will be at capacity. Main Street intersection requires realignment and turn lanes to handle increased car trips to /from Airport East industrial area. FY 11 -12 FY I2 -13 Project FY 13 -14 FY 14 -15 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 Total $0 $0 $0 $1,200,000 $0 $0 $1,200,000 Operating Impact: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: FY 11 -12 Construct Hangar(s) Project Description: FAA and USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) Grants Build new hangar(s). Rehabilitate Apron. Economic development and inf astructure improvements require additional aviation hangars for anticipated demand. FY 12 -13 FY 13 -14 $0 $0 Operating Impact: $0 Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: $0 FY 14 -15 FY 15 -16 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Project FY 1617 Total $0 $1,500,000 SO $0 Rehab Apron F Project Description: FAA and USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) Grants Rehabilitate Apron. Apron F is former Runway 13/31 which was constructed in 1943. poor. Surface is lifting and drainage is very Project FY 11 -12 FY 12 -13 FY 13 -14 FY 14 -15 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 Total $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000 Operating Impact: $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $o . 18 CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2012 -17 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT REQUEST AND JUSTIFICATION FORM AIRPORT FUND Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: Construct Access Road West Project Description: FDOT $640K; Airport $160K. Will finance Airport's share by an advance from DST Funds. Design Build Access Road West. FDOT $1,200K; Airport $300K. Will finance Airport's share by an advance from DST Funds. Airport West development require infrastructure. Project FY 11 -12 FY 12 -13 FY 13 -14 FY 14 -15 FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $800,000 $0 $800,000 Operating Impact: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,800 $4,800 Project Name: Funding Source: Justification: Project Costs: Construct Aviation Facility Project Description: Build new aviation storage /manufacturing facility. FDOT $1,200K; Airport $300K. Will finance Airport's share by an advance from DST Funds. Anticipated demand requires additional aircraft storage /manufacturing facilities. FY 11 -12 FY 12 -13 FY 13 -14 FY 14 -15 $0 $0 $0 Project FY 15 -16 FY 16 -17 Total $0 $0 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 Operating Impact: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 .19