Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12062012PZ Agenda� � � , ..��� ; _� �� ,P-�,���r:'K Y .:§[ � ... .a'1., � ' ' , � , 1225 MAIN STREET ■ SEBASTfAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (772) 589-5518 ■ FAX (772) 388-8248 AGENDA PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THURSDAY, DECEMBER 6, 2012 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. ANNOUNCEMENTS 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Meeting of August 2, 2012 6. OLD BUSINESS 7. NEW BUSINESS: A. Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing - Site Plan - Dollar General - 9200 Sebastian Boulevard, Sebastian Crossing Commercial Subdivision - 9100 SF Retail Building and Site Improvements - CG (Commercial General) Zoning District 8. CHAIRMAN MATTERS 9. MEMBERS MATTERS 10. DIRECTOR MATTERS 11. ATTORNEY MATTERS 12. ADJOURNMENT Site Plan is available for review in the Community Development Department, Sebastian City Hall, 1225 Main Street, from 8:00 a.m. to 12 Noon & 1:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday - Friday ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE ON THE ABOVE MATTERS, WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH APPEAL IS TO BE HEARD. SAID APPEAL MUST BE FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE WITHIN TEN DAYS OF THE DATE OF ACTION. (286.0105 F.S.) IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), ANYONE WHO NEEDS SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THE MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE CITY'S ADA COORDINATOR AT (772)-589-5330 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING. TWO OR MORE ELECTED OFFICIAI.S MAY BE IN ATTENDANCE. CITY OF SEBASTIAN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 2, 2012 Vice Chairman Roth called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. The pledge of allegiance was said by all. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Mr. Roth Mr. Qizilbash Mr. Durr Mr. Carter Mr. Paul Mr. Reyes EXCUSED: Chmn. Dodd Ms. Kautenburg (a} Mr. Dyer (a) ALSO PRESENT: AI Minner, City Manager Joe Griffin, Community Development Director Jan King, Senior Planner Robert Ginsburg, City Attorney Dorri Bosworth, Planner/Secretary ANNOUNCEMENTS: Vice Chmn. Roth stated Mr. Dodd, Ms. Kautenburg, and Mr. Dyer all had excused absences. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MOTION by Reyes/Durr to approve the minutes of the June 21, 2012 Local Planning Agency meeting as submitted. Motion was approved unanimously by voice vote. OLD BUSINESS: None NEW BUSINESS: As Planning 8 Zoning Commission: A. RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL — REVIEW OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND CAPITAL OUTLAY ITEMS GREATER THAN $50,000 — 6 YEAR SCHEDULE FY 2012/2013 THROUGH 2O17/2018 Mr. AI Minner, City Manager, gave a brief history of why the CIP came before the Commission, and then presented a power point overview (see attached) of the proposed capital improvement program which gave information on the projects and the special revenues used to fund the projects. Mr. Durr had questions regarding the functionality of the Stormwater Park and equipment needed for maintenance. Mr. Carter asked Mr. Minner if precautions were being put in place to prevent Sebastian from going into bankruptcy. Mr. Minner responded that for the Generai Fund monies, City Council has identified what the City's service block is - bare necessities needed to operate and still provide a level of service for the community, and to verify that the City's costs for those services were comparable to other communities. Studies showed that Sebastian is providing PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 16, 2012 services for less within our region. The City also has approx. 40% of its General Fund amount in a reserve account, and compared with other cities, Sebastian is not overly debt-ridden. Mr. Roth asked for Mr. Minner's forecast regarding tax income for the next few years. Mr. Paul had questions regarding the comparison chart in Mr. Minner's presentation regarding stormwater fees, and the addition of non-comparable cities with higher fees that may have skewed the figures. He stated he was concerned with the proposed increase of the City's stormwater fee at this time considering the stagnant economy. Mr. Minner felt the figures were fair in that ali the communities he used for comparison were GDC communities, built in the same era, and were ali facing similar problems with aging stormwater systems. Mr. Paul inquired about the costs noted for the construction of the Fish House. Mr. Minner updated the Commission on the progression of the Working Waterfront project. Mr. Paul also asked questions regarding the proposed improvements to the Barber Street — Schumann Drive intersection and how costs were being split with the county. Mr. Minner explained that the project was being put on hold, and might be eliminated because of the new lower growth projections for the level of service at that light, and because Powerline Road took some of the traffic flow from that area. Mr. Reyes had questions about the expenditure for the volley ball court lighting at a time the CAV Corp property improvements were being designed and stormwater run-off was planned for the same area, along with further questions regarding the pump problems at the Stormwater Park. Mr. Reyes also asked how much lineal footage of %4-round could be installed for the budgeted $500,000 per year. Mr. Minner replied the cost for only the '/-round was $1.25 per foot, but overall costs included equipment, sod and driveway replacements, contractor fees, etc. Mr. Qizilbash inquired if we received a proportionate share of the county's Traffic Impact Fee. Mr. Minner responded that the City does not get any amount of impact fees from IRC. However, fee money is spent by the county in districts where it is collected - on north county projects such as the widening of CR 512, Roseland Road improvements, etc. Mr. Roth had questions on specific projects which included replacement of the guard rails, maintenance on City Hall, and lighting at the Barber Street Sports Complex. Mr. Paul asked questions regarding the proposed CAV Corp property designs. There were no comments or questions from the public. MOTION by Reyes/Qizilbash to approve the six-year Capital Improvement Program. [Favorable recommendation to City Council] ROLL CALL: Mr. Durr Mr. Paul Mr. Roth The vote was 5-1. Motion passed. As Local Planning Agency: yes Mr. Qizilbash yes no Mr. Reyes yes yes Mr. Carter yes B. PUBLIC HEARING — REVIEW AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ORDINANCE 0-12-07 WHICH PROPOSES AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, ARTICLE X, SECTIONS 54-3-10.6(a)(3) AND 54-3- 10.7(c)(1) REGARDING PARKING AREAS AND BACKING INTO A PUBLIC STREET The City Attorney read the Ordinance title into the record. E PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 16, 2012 The public hearing was opened at 8:43 p.m. Mr. Griffin explained the location of a proposed, new public parking area on the west side of Indian River Drive across from Capt. Hiram's. Mr. Minner gave a brief presentation on an update to the CRA Master Plan that was done a few years ago and its intent to find parking areas that wouid serve businesses and park use in the district. A parking survey was done by consultants to determine parking needs. Although the study found the riverfront parking to be adequate, it found areas along streetscapes that could aliow parking improvements. Complete street improvements are being planned for Washington, Martin, and Cleveland that include drainage, new bases, paving, striping, and widening, which will accommodate the addition of angled and parallel parking spaces. Existing LDC's do not allow for backing out onto a pubiic street. Mr. Minner felt that the city should be exempt from that requirement if doing so allowed public parking areas to be created that wou►d benefit the area businesses and residents. The code amendment only exempts the city at this time. Mr. Durr questioned the addition of "unless otherwise specifically approved by the city" in Section 54-3-10.7 and asked if this could be used for a private business with a parking design issue. Mr. Minner stated yes. Mr. Durr asked what situation would warrant the exemption and he was uncomfortable with allowing the discretion to be with the city. Mr. Griffin stated commercial projects will still be presented to the Commission. Mr. Minner felt the amendment helped address parking issues that may arise for businesses because the City didn't have a traditional downtown, and it brought a bit of flexibility to the design criteria. The approval by the city could be by variance, waiver, or PZC approval. Mr. Paul verified that the underlined verbiage in the ordinance was what was being added to the text. No one from the public spoke in favor of the amendment. Mr. Ben Hocker, Sebastian, listed other private parking areas with back-out spaces into the ROW and asked if the ordinance was legalizing existing oversights, or preparing for upcoming street re- designs and proposed CAV Corp improvements. He stated when he parks his small car in a back-out space, he has to be more than three-quarters of the way into the roadway before he can see both directions. The public hearing was closed at 9:03 pm. Staff summarized the amendment and recommended approval of the Ordinance. Mr. Durr stated he was not comfortable with the language of the amendments, and requested a possible workshop to explore different ideas. He felt the amount of safety was being reduced with the changes and that the current code has shown that the city felt back-out parking was an unsafe action. Mr. Minner felt safety issues could be addressed during the design stage. MOTION by Paul/Reyes to recommend approval of the proposed Land Development Code amendment, Article X, Appearance, Design and Compatibility, specifically Section 54-3-10.6(a)(3) and 54-3-10.7(c)(1) to City Councif. ROLL CALL: Mr. Reyes Mr. Durr Mr. Carter The vote was 5-1. Motion passed. yes Mr. Roth yes no Mr. Paul yes yes Mr. Qizilbash yes 3 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMiSSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 16, 2012 CHAIRMAN MATTERS: Mr. Roth thanked the Commissioners for their patience with his chairing of the meeting. MEMBERS MATTERS: Mr. Reyes questioned what the minor construction at Easy Street Park was. Ms. King responded it was for a memorial bench. Mr. Carter asked if the airport turbine issues were resolved. Mr. Griffin stated yes. DIRECTOR MATTERS: Mr. Griffin informed the Commission that the hearing dates at City Council for the back-out parking ordinance are scheduled for August 22"d, and September 26'n ATTORNEY MATTERS: None Vice Chairman Roth adjourned the meeting at 9:15 p.m. (db) 4 1. � 3. 4. . • y r . ,� . � � ��� _ -���, � ��� ��.v. �°',"�-�' �� .�`" I • • ' / Community Development Department Site Plan Review Staff Report Project Name: Dollar General Requested Action: Site plan approval for a 9,100 SF retail building along with required parking, stormwater, and landscaping Project Location a. Address: 9200 Sebastian Boulevard b. Legal: Lot 4, Sebastian Crossings Commercial Subdivision c. Indian River County Parcel Number: 31-38-22-00003-0000-00004.0 Project Owner: 5. Project Agent: 6. Project Engineer 7. Project Architect: R.K.M. Development Corporation Mr. Don Wallace 147 Second Avenue S, Suite 400 St. Petersburg, Florida 33701-4399 (727) 895-2150 Fax (727) 821-5461 Herb Green, PE Cadjazz Engineering P.O. Box 450006 Kissimmee, Florida 34745 (407) 738-1979 hgreen@cadjazz.com Brenda Rooney FWH Architects, Inc. 3336 Grand Boulevard, Suite 102 Holiday, Florida 34690 (727) 815-3336 Fax: (727) 815-3337 1 8. Project Description a. Narrative of proposed action: R.K.M. Development Corporation, on behalf of Dollar General, has filed a site plan application for a 9,100 SF retail building to be located on Sebastian Boulevard in the Sebastian Crossing Commercial Subdivision near the CR 512/510 intersection, west of the Sunoco Gas Station, and east of the Sebastian River Middle School and Advance Auto. The project consists of a one-story structure together with associated parking, water and sewer service, drainage, and landscaping. Access to the site will be via a subdivision entrance driveway on CR 512 and an entrance from Sebastian Crossings Boulevard. Water and wastewater service to the site is accomplished via connection to Indian River County Utilities. The site consists of 1.4 acres, of which 1.08 acres will be impervious (77.1 %) and .32 acres will be open space (22.9%). b. Current Zoning and Land Use: Land Use: CG (General Commercial) Zoning: CG (Commercial General) c. Adjacent Properties North: East: South: West: Zonina PUD-R CG A-1 CG d. Site Characteristics (1) �2) (3) (4) (5) (6) �7) c8i Current Land Use Residential Subdivision Vacant Agriculture (IRC Jurisdiction) Vacant Project Area: Current Land Use(s): Soil: Vegetation: Flood Hazard: Water Service: 1.395 acres Vacant Riviera None Zone X Sanitary Sewer Service: Parks: 2 Future Land Use LDR CG L-1 CG Indian River County Utilities Indian River County Utilities North County Rec. Park -.25 miles Dale Wimbrow Park — 3 miles (9) Police/Fire: 9. Comprehensive Plan Consistency a. Future Land Use: b. Traffic Circulation: c. Housing: d. Public Facilities: e. Coastal Management: f. Conservation: Indian River Fire — 2 miles Sebastian Police — 4.5 miles consistent consistent n/a n/a n/a consistent g. Recreation and Open Space: consistent 10. Contents of Site Plan: a. lot configuration: provided b. finished ground floor elevation: 20.0' c. contours and designated number of dwelling units: 0 d. square footage of project area: provided — 60,810.99 SF e. building coverage: 9,100 SF = 14.96% (30% maximum) f. square footage of impervious areas and open area: impervious 46,854.44 SF = 77.1% (80% maximum) open 13,956.55 SF = 22.9% (20% minimum) g. setbacks: provided — in compliance with zoning regulations Required Proposed Primary Front: 0` 90.5' Secondary Front: 6' 101.4' Side: 5' 40.5' Rear: 10' 63.2' h. scaled drawings of the sides, front and rear of the building or structure: Provided �3 0 i. generalized floor plan indicating uses and square footage of each proposed use within each building or structure: provided j. Building exterior construction materials and color: provided k. building height: provided: 32.3' (maximum 35'). I. location and character of all outside facilities for waste disposal, storage areas, or display: Provided - rear dumpster, screened by PVC shadow box fencing. m. location and dimensions of all curb cuts and driveways: provided n. number of spaces with their location and dimensions: provided Parking Required: Retail: greater than 5000 SF but less than 10000 SF 1 space for each 200 square feet: 9,100 sf = 200 = 45.5 (46) Parking Provided: 46 spaces (44 regular, 2 H/C) o. details of off-street parking and loading areas (including requirements of Article XV): provided — Based on aggregate gross ftoor area of the building, one loading space meeting required size dimensions, has been provided. p. all off-street vehicular surfaces available for maneuvering: provided q. surface materials: provided r. number of employees: undetermined s. type of vehicles owned by the establishment: none t. If there is a combined off-street parking facility, required agreements: n/a u. Location of all pedestrian walks, malls, yards and open spaces: provided v. location, size, character, and height or orientation of all signs: Location provided for monument sign, and dimensions & details for signage copy areas provided — all signs will require building permits and additional zoning reviews. w. location and character of landscaped areas and recreation areas: provided � x. location, design and character of all public, semi-public, or private utilities: provided y. location, height and general character of perimeter or ornamental walls, fences, landscaping: provided z. surface water drainage facilities plan certified by an engineer or architect registered in the State of Florida: provided — The master stormwater system for the commercial subdivision has previously been permitted by SJRWMD in 2005/06. A recent letter dated 9/24/12 from SJRWMD verified that additional permitting was not required. aa. location of existing easements and right-of-way: provided bb. Land survey with complete legal description prepared and certified by a registered surveyor: provided cc. Verified statement showing each and every individual person having a legal and/or equitable ownership interest in the subject property: provided 11. Site location and character of use: provided 12. Appearance site and structures: a. harmonious overall design: yes b. location and screening of inechanical equipment, utility hardware and waste storage areas: provided for all. The A/C units located on the west side of the building will be screened and all vents and ductwork will be painted to match the buildings. c. commercial and industrial activities conducted in enclosed buildings: yes d. exterior lighting: provided 13. Access, internal circulation, off-street parking and other traffic impacts: a. internal circulation system design and access/egress considerations: provided b. separation of vehicular and pedestrian areas: provided 14. Traffic impacts: A Traffic Statement was provided by the applicant. Indian River County Traffic Engineering Department is currently deciding if a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) will be necessary, taking into consideration the 2006 CR 512 Widening improvements that were constructed, and the ROW acquisition agreement between IRC and the developer, executed also in 2006. If required to be submitted, approval and acceptance of the study by IRC will need to be 5 completed, and any required road improvements constructed, before the Certificate of Occupancy is issued. Because of the turning lane and median cut already provided for the commercial subdivision with the 2006 road construction, staff does not foresee additional improvements being required, but will implement, if necessary. 15. Open space and landscape (including the requirements of Article XIV): a. Name, address and phone number of the owner and designer: provided b. North arrow, scale and date, minimum scale of one inch equals fifty (50) feet: provided c. Property lines, easements, and right-of-way with internal and property line dimensions: provided d. Location of existing or proposed utility service: provided e. Location and size of any existing or proposed structures: provided f. Location and size of any existing or proposed site features, such as earthen mounds, swales, walls and water areas: provided g. Location and size of any existing or proposed vehicular use area: provided h. Location and size of any existing or proposed sidewalks, curbs, and wheel stops: provided i. Location of sprinkler heads, hose bibs, or quick cupplers and other information on irrigation: A private well, details shown on the utility plan (Sheet 6), will be used for the irrigation system. j. Calculations of required type, dimensions and square footage of landscape materials and of required landscape areas, including: total site area, parking area, other vehicular use area, percentage of non- vehicular open space, perimeter and interior landscape strips, and required number of trees: provided — Landscape Plan, Sheet L-1 k. Location of required landscape areas and dimensions: provided Location, name, height and size of all existing plant material to be retained: provided m. Location, size, height and description of all landscape material including name, quantity, quality, spacing, and specified size and specification of all plant materials: provided L-'� n. Height, width, type, material and location of all barriers of nonliving material: provided o. Location, dimensions and area of landscaping for freestanding signs: Provided p. Show all landscaping, buildings, or other improvements on adjacent property within five (5) feet of the common property line: provided 16. Required screening of abutting residential and nonresidentiat uses: none required 17. Flood prone land and wetland preservation: n/a 18: Surface water management: provided 19: Available potable water: Indian River County Utilities 20: Wastewater service: Indian River County Utilities 21: Soil erosion, sedimentation control and estuary protection: provided 22. Performance Overlay District Requirements: Provided — The proposed site plan meets the intent and requirements of the CR 512 corridor vision. The architectural/building standards, colors and building graphics, and landscaping codes have been met. The special sign regulations will be reviewed and verified under a separate building permit process. 23. Additional considerations: As shown on the survey, there is an existing asphalt roadway within the 50-foot wide cross-access easement that connects all four lots of the subdivision, with a connection to Sebastian Crossing Boulevard on the east side of the applicant's property. Across the boulevard exists another cross-access roadway through Crossroad Plaza of Sebastian, LLC's vacant property, which is used by Burger King and Sunoco patrons. The two access roads did not line up across the street from each other. Because of the closer proximity to the intersection of Sebastian Boulevard (CR512), the City's consulting engineer, Mr. Frank Watanabe, PE, requested the access road driveway on Dollar General's property be relocated, a shift to the north, to align with the Crossroad Plaza access road driveway. The applicant has complied. However, the shift to the north has now moved the access road out of the 50-foot wide cross access easement. The applicant is in the process of compiling a document which will expand or add to the existing easement as needed for the new driveway, and the document will be recorded. A copy of the recorded document will be needed before the Certificate of Occupancy is issued. (See Note #20 on Sheet 4, Site Geometry Plan) 7 The applicant is providing an off-site improvement constructing a public sidewalk along Sebastian Crossing Boulevard which will connect to the existing sidewalk along CR 512. However, in order to meet FDOT's design standards, the sidewalk will need to cross a small area of their property in the southeastern corner. The applicant is also in the process of compiling a sidewalk easement document, and a copy of the recorded document will be needed before the Certificate of Occupancy is issued. (See Note #20 on Sheet 4, Site Geometry Plan) Section 54-3-14.11(a) of the LDC states "If an existing landscape strip is provided on the adjacent lot, the required landscape strip may be reduced to five feet in width upon the recommendation of the planning and growth management director and approval of the planning and zoning commission." In order to accommodate delivery truck and emergency vehicle turning radii, the applicant has requested that the west side perimeter landscape strip be reduced to 5 feet, taking into consideration that future development on the adjacent lot will provide the additional 5 foot landscape buffer. The amount of required trees and hedge material is not being reduced. IRC Fire Department, IRC Utilities Department, and Environmental Health Department comments have been addressed. 24. Consulting Engineer's review: Applicant has addressed all comments. 25. Conclusion: The proposed 9,100 SF retail building site plan is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Land Development Code, and CR512 Corridor Overlay District Requirements. 26. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the applicant's request to reduce the west side perimeter landscape strip to 5 feet. Staff recommends approval of the proposed site plan with the following conditions: 1) Approval of a Traffic Impact Analysis and any required roadway improvements, if requested, is received from IRC Traffic Engineering Department before a Certificate of Occupancy/Completion can be issued. 2) Copies of the recorded Cross Access Easement expansion and Sidewalk Easement are received before a Certificate of Occupancy/Completion can be issued. �.r�. .,, •�� , � E:3 ►i ag �. DATE _� . �t. � ns �.��r J, �.,� Water Management District - Hans G. Tanzler ill, Executive Director • John Juilianna, Palm Bay Service Center Director 525 Gommunity College Parkway S.E. • Palm Bay, FL 32909 •(321) 984-4940 On the Internet at floridaswater.com. September 24, 2012 Herb Green, P.E. Cadjazz P.O. Box 450006 Kissimmee, FL 34745 RE: Sebastian Crossings Commercial Lot 4 Application No.: 40-061-98440-3; Item number 1207268 (Please reference the above application number on all correspondence) Dear Mr. Green: The St. Johns River Water Management District is in receipt of your Environmental Resource Permit application for the above referenced project. The original permit number 40-061-98440-1 issued for this project contained a permit condition that states: "The permittee must submit plans to the District and receive staff approval prior to the development of Lots 2, 3, and 4. The plans must demonstrate proper stormwater conveyance and compliance with the allowable impervious area for each lot." The proposed 1.395-acre project will include a total of less than 80% impervious area, and the plans received on September 11, 2012, and revised sheet 5 received on September 24, are in conformance with the master surFace water management system design, and the above permit condition. Therefore, a permit is not required from the St. Johns River Water Management District. Please note that the permit application number 40-061-98A40-3 file has been closed, and an application fee refund will be provided under a separate cover. Please be aware that this determination applies only to the requirements of the St. Johns River Water Management District and does not relieve you of ineeting the permitting or compliance requirements of other regulatory agencies or local government. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (321) 676-6631 or by email at mcrosbvCc�sirwmd.com. Sincerely, ��J� ��¢��� Mark Crosby, Engineer 111 Division of Regulatory Services cc: John Juilianna, Janice Unger, Fariborz Zanganeh, Susan Moor, Eric Muldowney Donald Wallace, Jr. - RKM Development Corp. 147 2"d Avenue South, Suite 400 St. Petersburg, FL 33701 CRF-Panther II, LLC - 500 South Florida Avenue, Suite 700 Laketand, FL 33801 White Family Enterprises, LLC - 9360 90`h Avenue, #150 Sebastian, FL 32958 Lad Daniels, CHAIRMAN JACKSONVILLE Chuck Drake ORLANDO GOV�RNING 80ARD John A. Miklos, VICE CHAIRMAN Douglas C. Bournique, SECRETARY Maryam H. 6hyabi, TREASURER ORLANDO VERO BEACH ORMOND BEACH Richard G. Hamann George W. Robbins Fred N. Roberts, Jr. W. Leonard Wood GAINESVILLE JAGKSONVILLE OCALA FERNANOINA BEACH I i' � • ;� � !° ° � , �t I `.�� �4� � ; �$ b I ( �:� t�_'—_ ( � ;� ' � 'i � .� � ';¢:- �. ( m :I � I y �:i �:� � � n 'i 4 Z , �� F Q I O q.. �, C ; � - � I � , ,�;, � ;��;� �� � �`fi� a O � �I � r !� O A ; �a �i� I� ! �� ` `F .I � �E; :I I ' '' `i � z I `I I � ; !E I 4� O � ��_ � � �= ►;:� ,- � , ,,� I -�. , �� ,' `� � � '�' ` -- ,, ���:w �� I � �� m ���o � �T��p ���]"�9 � ➢S�NOfi{ y ^ ^' L� n @ `� � 4 �v n ��� . ��,�- E �� � M m+rse- e zun a) ��{ ^a � � s -__ _; � ----�rir3c- �a � te � � � , � q ;�, ` TRUCK ACCESS PLAN ;e..; ` �3.� :��u ; � \ � � ✓ �� m�/� �I€ �4�; z .��.., -`/= _� noLinR ��Rni, p sEansnnr� cp /� �� � �i��g}�� � je�e; � . Eng g Consuitants • SEBASTIAN FLORIDA .. �� � F� S� 5i`g roaa..smos•r�Aria3+s�s RRM.DEVEIAPIUFNTCORP. �.P N0.?'ri8�lSA . tut�V11Jt0.:14 . a� C 8� Y� --�--- � � � � �' � r �f ,:��-,�i��:;�z��r��# � �I�� ° m Z v i��! � D ��6�`i����•.■}z 4 � � m ��������������� �� � � � � �����Fa� , o � �aH � � � Q � � � � � Q _ � � S Sebastian Crossings Commercial Lot 4 Drainage Statement The stormwater management system for the Sebastian Crossings Commercial has been permitted by St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) under permit #40-061-98440-1. The master pond, pipe netwark, and outfall control structure has been constructed awaiting connections from each Lot. Within the approved District permit, Lot 4 has been accommodated to 80% impervious area. We have submitted to SJRWMD the permit request to modify the above referenced permit number to accommodate the impervious area of 1.023 acres. The total Lot 4 area is 1.395 acres; therefore, the percentage of impervious area requested was 73.3% that is less than the previously permitted 80% impervious area. SJRWIVID has acknowledged that a letter approval will be processed based on the current submittal for Lot 4. Within the submittal, we are planning some minor modification to an existing inlet within Lot 4 to accommodate for the building pad and ADA accessibility grades, and complete the stormwater piping and inlet system far Lot 4. The proposed finished floor of 20 feet NGVD and lowest inlet P1PVatinn nf 1 R'7 fPat N(',VTI caticfiac tha riirrPnt CTRUVI�iTTI r�PrmittPrl ennr�itinnc /g-g-� � � �t0� � � d�s e���at��;���;y : �``�0 ��RT C ;v��✓'�883H �� �`� �e���o��• e�s• �AP ; '�'c� a ° `�tS � i Q � :` � �' � �. $887 = Z � � � • . � , ,� �� : � � � � •af ,�Oc • �' v mu ' � 7- • m ' R° RIDP�,..°�<c,��� " °•.o....�° c ������, �Al. �����`°�o� �st�1118�d��CE1VED SEP 2 5 2�12 City of Sebastian Community pevelopmt�nt Ga�k, I � Permit Application No. �,,:. 5��� City of Sebastian ��::G �� H�,�,���h�,� Development Order Application A licant if not Qwner, written authorization notarized from owner is re uired Name: � �� �� --�e �-�� � � Address: rt 1�� S-e�� c� I-`�n�� S U,� �c�c� Phone Number:-f�f 2—� �G- Z � SO FAX Num er: (-�i�� �2� �-�t �� ` � .� � I E-Ma . � � �lif � � h. � .9 J l...� : � ���� � e vS yhr�' Title of permit or action requested: � S ,-�-�.1�y�,1 o�m�er�-�-- PLEASE COMPLETE ONLY THOSE SECTIONS WNICH ARE fVECE$SARY FOR THE PERMIT OR ACTION THAT YOU ARE REQUESTING. GOPIES OF ALL MAPS, SURVEYS, DRAWtNGS, ETC. SHALL BE ATTACHED AND 8-112" BY 11" COPIES OF ANY ATTAGHMENTS SNALL BE INCLUDED. ATTACH THE APPROPRIATE SUPPLEMETAL lNFORMATION FORM. A. Project Name (if applicable): � re � . � ����'iG�� �, ,�� ��S 9n �e C � ��Y1l�'i�YCia� B. Site lnformation Address: N v�/ Cc�rr� e r oF ` Lot: Block: Unit: Indian River County Parce4 #: � I ►— Zoning Classifj�ation: _� � Existing Use: � � �r! ���0 @'��-�'!�� �; ��-io� �1v� o.nd ��bms-�-iar Subdivision: �-�22- OQOo?� AQ�Ooc F�u,eture and Use: ��'n� �C�L� 6� � Proposed Use: � �.��'�� �ri .��c�,� � � i � DATE RECE)VED: "i f=� /� FEE PAID: $ 6L-u" '�" RECEIVED B`1t: � �2ECEIVED ��T Q 9 Zfl12 c��ty �� �����t��►� Cortimunity I�ev�i��?��F+t �e�i. D. Project PersonneL• Name: Address�� ��X �C��l�� � al Phone Number. (r���) �--�3�- `�� � l Permit Application No. �� ��� !�'�SStr�-�r��e� �1-c� ����' FAX Number. (t I�� )2�a� ��� `f J� E-Mail: ,.��j��:�G' er � �� �� ��. �1 � e Attorney: Name: Address Phone IVumber: ( ) - FAX Number: ( E-Mail: Engineer: t�ame: ���� p��l� � Address �� ��� ! �5���� "� Phone Number: ( t,��� �i� �- � �� O� � -r E-Mail: � � Surveyor: IVame: � , ,,, , Phone Numlaer: (y�} ��Z � � C1 � v ) - � �� C', �-� �.1SS 6�rt v�.�P, � ��i� �� FAX Number: (t.�U �)���--1 �..� 8 � � �1� � �o�. �} • FAX Number: ( E-Mail:���YQ � �J/ �i'V � � LD2 • �J 1 v` �? ? ) i, �°I !J ��Pi��I , BEING FIRST DULY SWORN, DEPOSE AND SAY THAT: _ i AM 7HE OWNER '_ 1 AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE dF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED WHICH 15 THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS APPLICATION, AT l. THE INFORMATION, MAPS, DATA AND/OR SKETCHEB PROVIDED IN THIS APPLICATION ARE ACC T TR TO TH BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. � Z_. SIGNAT DATE SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME BY �-Q�'V�/i �T `� Y' .2Q�{'� Wi-10 iS PERSONALIY KNOWN TO ME OR PRQDUCED � L t7�-- AS IDENTIFICATION, 7HIS �_ DAY dF ��'� �•r , 20�. NOTARY'S SiGtJATURE ��V �� PRI{VTEQ NAME OF IVOTARY -�-{(f� p N �Fjp�_ COMMISSIONI�IO.IEXPIRATION �k; �ln���t� 7` ��h_�,�ti� S EaL: HEATHER OSBORNE �{ � Notary Public, State of Florfda Commissionll EE 168810 My comm. expires F9b. 28� 2016 $35 Permit Appiication No. The foliowing is required for alt comprehensive plan amendments, zoning amendments (including reaoningj, site p[ans, conditianal use permits, special use permits, variances, �xceptions, and appeals. i/WE, � THE OWNER(S} /�' THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF 7HE OWNER(S} OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPIICATfON, HEREBY AUTHORlZE EACN AND EVERY MEMBER OF THE p�AidNIN(r-'' �NlNG-- BQARD/COMMISSION OF THE CITY QF SEBASTIAN TO PHYSICALLY ENTER UPON THE PROPERTY AND VIEW THE PROPERTY IN CONNECTION WITH MY/OUR PENDING APPLICAi10N. IlWE HEREBY WAIVE ANY OBJECTION OR DEFENSE 1/WE NfAY HAVE, DtJE TO Tl-iE QUASI-JUDICIAL NATURE OF THE PROCEEDINGS, RESULTING FROM ANY BOARDICOMMISSIQN MEMBER ENTERING OR VIEWit�G THE PROPERTY, INCLUDfNG ANY C[AtM OR ASSERTION THAT MY/OUR PROCEDURAI OR SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROGESS RIGHTS UNDER THE FLORIdA CQNSTiTUT10N OR THE UNkTED STATES CONSTITUTION WERE VI�iATED BY SUCH ENTERtNG OR VIEW)NG. THIS WANER AN � SE BEING SIGNED BY ME/US VOLUNTARiLY ANQ NOT AS A RESULT OF ANY COERCiON APPLIED, OR P ISE � Y NY EMP YEE, AGENT, CONTRACTOR OR OFFICtAL OF TNE CITY OF SEBASTtAN. � � } �� G�?�Z- Si AT DATE Sv�om to and subscribed before me by '��" .i? C�'�C�L'--�'Z who is personapy known to me or produeed �-5� , �,�:�•� ;�-L ��,', �c . as identification, this c day af �;.��'s , 201 '� . Notary's Signature Printed Name of Notary Commission NoJExpiration Seal: �.�i1�LC."+�t `�`�� Cc,.�-� \ �,�\i 20�PR.•PiB�i�, CriRV1.B� MY COMMISSi4N t DD 908981 " ' * EXPIRES:August4,2013 `�,� �F F`��OP 8onded Thru Budget Notary Services APPLtCATfON FEES ARE ESTABUSHED BY RESOLUTION OF CITY COUNCIL. ADDITIONAL FEES FOR THE CITY'S CONSULTING ENGINEER REVIEW (WHEN R QUIRED) WILL BE THE t�ESPONSIB LITY OF THE APPLICANT. P�Se �r�✓� �a_ G�va� � ii10�� C,e, O.�- .�.�� ad,dit, 9✓ttiI F�S � fr r � �p � /� � U {� Pi ��Ca.�. yy� � 5'�- ��re — G►�OP�o ✓(�. '�''�P D� �"�ic-� C�+�+s ✓�fi r� t�O�' , � �a `7�G�w� A O L GMENT DA E /C%T c ES o� � vrs�v� C�v�►5 � � Tr a � FE�s s�-F-�o�c.0 �� s.� 7- �,� ,� �� �����r�►T ��e-P, �Trr� : 1..7o n� v��u, �. C,� �Q YV� �.� M 1� Ev. c�