Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03062014PZ AgendaCROF HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND 1225 MAIN STREET ■ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (772) 589 -5518 ■ FAX (772) 388 -8248 AGENDA PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THURSDAY, MARCH 6, 2014 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. ANNOUNCEMENTS 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Regular meeting of February 6, 2014 6. OLD BUSINESS 7. NEW BUSINESS: A. Public Hearing - Recommendation to City Council regarding a Special Exception to LDC Section 54- 2- 5.6(c) to allow a Pawn Shop in IN (Industrial) zoning district - a leased space located at 137 Sebastian Boulevard S. CHAIRMAN MATTERS 9. MEMBERS MATTERS 10. DIRECTOR MATTERS 11. ATTORNEY MATTERS 12. ADJOURNMENT ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE ON THE ABOVE MATTERS, WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH APPEAL IS TO BE HEARD. SAID APPEAL MUST BE FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE WITHIN TEN DAYS OF THE DATE OF ACTION. (286.0105 F.S.) IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), ANYONE WHO NEEDS SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THE MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE CITY'S ADA COORDINATOR AT (772)- 589 -5330 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING. TWO OR MORE ELECTED OFFICIALS MAY BE IN ATTENDANCE. CITY OF SEBASTIAN 06 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION (3) C MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING C.0 FEBRUARY 6, 2014 C Q Chairman Dodd called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. cu E F- a E The pledge of allegiance was said by all. Q. E +1° ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Mr. McManus (a) Mr. Dodd Cc c Mr. Qizilbash Ms. Kautenburg (a) i + f!) ? Mr. Durr Mr. Carter Ci -p m 0 Mr. Paul Mr. Reyes cc ._ > > Ms. Dale Simchick, IRC School Board Liaison M C ct) Q o o o. a c CO N a a cn EXCUSED: Mr. Roth ALSO PRESENT: Jan King, Senior Planner Robert Ginsburg, City Attorney Dorri Bosworth, Planner /Secretary ANNOUNCEMENTS: Chmn. Dodd noted the LDC requires that election of Chairman and Vice - Chairman should occur at the first meeting held each year. He requested this be added as "Item C" to the agenda. Per a voice acknowledgement, the Commissioners agreed to the addition. Chmn. Dodd announced that Mr. Roth was excused from the meeting and that Mr. McManus would vote in his place. He then introduced Ms. Dale Simchick, newest member of the IRC School Board, and noted she will be serving as the liaison between the School Board and Commission. Mr. Ginsburg gave a summary of the role the School Board liaison has and stated the liaison was not a member of the Commission, and could not vote nor make or second a motion. It was up to the Commission if she could participate in the discussions during a Public Hearing, or in the deliberations after the hearing was closed. He considered the liaison a "pipeline" between the City and School Board, which works both ways as she could be the spokesperson for the City to the Board. Mr. Dodd stated he thought it was appropriate for Ms. Simchick to sit at the dais, and to have input during the hearings when it related to the schools. Ms. Simchick stated she was happy to participate as the District's representative. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MOTION by McManus /Carter to accept the minutes of the November 21, 2013 meeting as written. Motion was approved unanimously by voice vote. OLD BUSINESS: None NEW BUSINESS: A. QUASI - JUDICIAL PUBLIC HEARING — SITE PLAN MODIFICATION — SEBASTIAN CHRISTIAN CHURCH — 8,154 SF ADDITION TO FELLOWSHIP HALL, 1,216 SF NEW PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 6, 2014 STORAGE BUILDING, AND COLUMBARIUM — 190 DAY DRIVE — PS (PUBLIC SERVICE) ZONING DISTRICT B. PUBLIC HEARING — RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL — SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A 910 SF COLUMBARIUM — SEBASTIAN CHRISTIAN CHURCH — 190 DAY DRIVE — PS (PUBLIC SERVICE) ZONING DISTRICT Chairman Dodd asked the Commissioners if they had any ex -parte communication to disclose. There was none. Mr. Paul noted that the project's engineer was his neighbor. The applicants and staff were sworn in by the City Attorney. Mr. Ginsburg also informed the Commission that they could hold one hearing to discuss the applications together, but make separate motions for each. Mr. Todd Howder, MBV Engineering, represented the applicant, and gave a brief overview of the project. He stated that Phase I will be a small storage building along with a small driveway and dumpster to be built presently, a Memorial Chapel with a columbarium and minor site improvements in Phase II to be built in 1 to 3 years, and a new Fellowship Hall with additional parking along with utilities in Phase III in approx 5 years. The stormwater was a master design to handle all phases. He then addressed the civil site plan issues of the project including the proposed stormwater system and SJRWMD permits, existing and proposed utilities, and landscaping. He explained that the stormwater improvements for all phases will be constructed in Phase I, new utilities are not needed for Phase I or II but a new lift station was required for Phase III, and that the landscaping was being updated to the current code requirements. Mr. Dodd had questions on where the closest discharge pipe was from the swale system on Schumann Drive under and into the Collier Creek canal system, and mitigation regarding the two existing on -site septic systems. Mr. Howder verified the two systems were functioning properly per an Environmental Health Department inspection and approval. Mr. Howder then addressed the applicant's concerns with the latest comments from the City's consulting engineer with regards to his request for additional [drainage] modeling for the whole area and that the request was out -of- scope. He asked that the Commission remove that recommended condition of approval from their consideration. Ms. King clarified that the Memorial Chapel in Phase II would be built regardless of the decision of the Special Use request to use the structure as a columbarium also. She explained that the latest comments from the consulting engineer had come in too late to address before the meeting and that was why they were added as conditions of approval. Mr. Durr asked for some clarification regarding wording in the consulting engineer's letter about drainage pipe details and the modeling request. Mr. Qizilbash had questions on stormwater. Mr. Paul verified that Phase III was also being reviewed at this meeting and would not come back to the Commission in the future. Mr. McManus had questions on the co -use of both septic and sewer systems. Mr. Reyes discussed a possible setback encroachment on a rear corner of the new church building. The project's architect, Ms. Amy Banov, addressed his questions with showing the plan on the overhead projector. He also had a question for Mr. Howder regarding the stormwater calculations. Ms. Kautenburg felt the code requirements for church parking should be looked at since they may be outdated and not reflect today's actual passenger load in cars. She also had questions on the 2 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 6, 2014 size of the new kitchen /cafe area, expressing it may lead to large events and additional traffic in the neighborhood. Ms. Banov answered her concerns. Ms. Kautenburg asked if use of the columbarium would be limited to church members or available to the general public. Ms. Banov stated it would not necessarily be the case. It was not a "public space" per se, but you would not have to be a member of the church to purchase a space. Ms. Banov then gave a presentation on how a columbarium differed from a mausoleum, reviewing the Special Use Permit request for the columbarium use of the Memorial Chapel. She noted that the Florida Statutes exempts columbaria from the statutes that regulate cemeteries when they are less than Y2 acre and are attached to a religious institution. Mr. McManus verified that visually the building would look like a chapel and the niches would not be noticeable from the outside. Ms. Banov stated that was correct and showed examples on the overhead projector of other columbaria that already existed in Indian River County. Ms. Simchick thanked the Commission for having her as the School Board liaison and verified her questions that she will always ask will only be from the perspective of how it affects the school, school traffic, etc. Regarding Phase I, she noted that commencement of the storage building and rear driveway on Pelican Island Place would begin in March, when school was still in session. A teacher's driveway, also on Pelican Island Place, was used during drop -off and pick -up times, and she was concerned construction would conflict with school traffic, asking for the distance between the two drives. She also asked about the staging of the construction, and any proposed lane closures. Mr. Howder stated the distance was at least 75 feet, and that Ms. Simchick concerns were duly noted and they would coordinate construction efforts with the school. Mr. Dodd discussed his concerns with the drainage plan noting the consulting engineer's concerns, and stated his opinion that the two septic systems should be removed when the force main for Phase III was installed. Mr. Howder reviewed his conversations and discussions with the Indian River County Utilities Department regarding their requirements, and they were not requiring removal until the systems were not functioning properly. Mr. Dodd felt the cost would be greater to have to retrofit when the systems failed in the future, than to plan for total capacity when Phase III is constructed. Mr. Paul had further questions regarding the columbarium building and design which included shape of the building, railings, hours, roofing, a relocation of the church, height of the chapel, and landscaping. Mr. Carter asked how many niches were proposed. Ms. Banov stated it could be as minimal as 72 or several hundred depending on the size of the niches. Chmn. Dodd opened the hearing for Public Input at 8:10 pm. No one spoke in favor, or in opposition, of the application. Mr. Dodd asked staff to respond to the consulting engineer's memo and the issue of whose responsibility it was to model the drainage basin for that area. Ms. King stated that city staff should probably have a meeting with the consulting engineer, and that possibly the city already had the information he was looking for. A third set of eyes may be necessary to get a resolution, and it was worded in the condition "to the satisfaction of the city ", which ultimately would be the city manager. Mr. Dodd suggested removing the phrase "by the applicant" from the condition. Ms. King agreed. Mr. Dodd stated he understood the consulting engineers concern for finding where the water flowed in that area. Jan King summarized staffs recommended four conditions of approval: 1) relocate the monument sign which inadvertently was installed in the street ROW, 2) address the drainage comments by the consulting engineer, and revise the wording of the condition as proposed in the staff report as discussed above, 3) regarding the columbarium, and requested the wording also be changed in the proposed condition to reflect that the structure (Memorial Chapel) was approved as part of the 3 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 6, 2014 site plan for Phase II, but the columbarium use was conditional on approval from City Council for a Special Use Permit, and 4) that the site must hook up to the IRC Utility sewer system during Phase III. Mr. Dodd stated he would like Condition #4 to indicate that the applicant would be required to replace the existing septic systems during Phase III, also. Mr. Durr questioned why it wouldn't be OK to remain since it was verified to be functioning properly by the Health Dept. Mr. Dodd felt that when there was a major modification to a site that was the time to address the septic issue. Mr. Durr felt there was no violation. Ms. Kautenburg agreed with Mr. Dodd and stated that just because the system was not failing now it wouldn't down the road, and why wait till it fails and then have to dig up the property when it could be done during the construction of the new sanctuary. Mr. Durr stated he didn't agree with forcing someone to hook up. Mr. Dodd clarified he would not request the hook -up if they weren't already being required to put the lift station in by IRC Utilities for Phase III. Mr. Paul had questions regarding the costs to hook into the sewer system. MOTION by Paul /Carter to "approve the site plan with the revisions asked for by both the Chairman and others, for the approval of a phased site plan modification for [Sebastian Christian Church] for the Fellowship Hall as well as for the Memorial Chapel, and all that was requested ". Mr. Ginsburg asked for a clarification with regards to the septic and Mr. Dodd's intent to either "replace" or "remove" the system. Mr. Dodd stated his intent was to have the system removed and eliminated, and agreed the word "remove" should be used in Condition 4. Ms. Bosworth clarified for the Commission that the vote was for approving the site plan with four conditions: o #1 Existing church sign must be relocated onto church property o #2 Drainage comments by Frank Watanabe of Neel- Schaffer (engineer reviewing the project for the City) dated January 29, 2014, shall be addressed to the satisfaction of the City o #3 The columbarium use of the Memorial Chapel must be approved by City Council prior to the construction of Phase 2 o The site must hook up to the Indian River County Utility sewer system during Phase 3, removing the existing septic system Mr. Paul asked Mr. Howder if he felt it was an undue burden, relating to costs, for the applicant to remove the septic system in Phase 3. Mr. Howder stated there would be significant costs added to the project for a larger pump size, impact fees, and connection fees (ERU's). ROLL CALL: Mr. Durr yes Mr. McManus yes Mr. Qizilbash yes Mr. Paul no Mr. Reyes yes Mr. Carter yes Mr. Dodd yes The vote was 6 -1. Motion carried. MOTION by Dodd /burr to "recommend to the City Council that they approve a Special Use Permit for a columbarium at Sebastian Christian Church ". ROLL CALL: Mr. Reyes yes Mr. Dodd yes Mr. Durr yes Mr. Paul no Mr. Carter yes Mr. McManus yes Mr. Qizilbash yes The vote was 6 -1. Motion carried. 4 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 6, 2014 Mr. Dodd noted that Indian River County was currently considering another extension to the impact fee exemptions, and that this was a good time to have them discuss a reduction in [impact] fees for hooking into the sewer system. C. ELECTION OF CHAIRPERSON AND VICE - CHAIRPERSON Mr. Dodd opened the floor for nominations: Mr. Durr nominated Mr. Dodd for Chairperson. Mr. McManus seconded the nomination. There were no other nominations. All were in favor. Mr. Reyes nominated Mr. Paul for Vice Chairperson. Mr. Durr seconded the nomination. There were no other nominations. All were in favor. CHAIRMAN MATTERS: None MEMBERS MATTERS: Mr. Carter stated he had attended the recent Indian River Lagoon Workshop, it was very informative, and that the Commissioners should take into consideration the decisions the Commission makes with regards to the effects on the river. Mr. Paul forwarded to staff complaints received from neighbors regarding potholes on Skyline Drive. Mr. Reyes welcomed Ms. Simchick to the meetings and thanked her for her input. DIRECTOR MATTERS: None ATTORNEY MATTERS: None Chairman Dodd adjourned the meeting at 8:33 p.m. (db) 5 ary Of SEBAS-TU-% HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND Community Development Department Special Exception - Staff Report 1. Project Name: Austin Fox Pawn Shop 2. Requested Action: Special Exception to Section 54- 2- 5.6(c) of the Sebastian Land Development Code to allow a pawn shop as a conditional use within the Industrial (IN) Zoning District. 3. Project Location 4. a. Address: 137 Sebastian Boulevard b. Legal: Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 10, less the north 14 feet thereof, Hardee's Addition to Sebastian. Applicant: Austin Fox 451 NW 112th Avenue Coral Springs, FL (954) 547 -7376 Property Owner: 6. Project Description: Donald Stadnik DS Investments LLC 13815 N Indian River Drive Sebastian, FL 32958 (954) 547 -7376 a. Narrative of proposed action: Austin Fox is requesting a special exception permit for property located at 137 Sebastian Boulevard to allow a pawn shop as a conditional use in the Industrial Zoning District. The existing 6,500 square foot building contains multiple rental units with businesses including an auto detailing service and a tattoo business. Mr. Fox intends to lease Unit B, a 1000 square foot area, for his pawn shop. b. Current Zoning: IN (Industrial) Current Use: Auto detailing, and a tattoo business C. d. Adjacent Properties: Site Characteristics (1) Total Acreage: .41 acres (2) Current Land Use(s): industrial building (3) Water Service: public water (4) Sanitary Sewer Service: public sewer 7. Staff Comments: As detailed in Section 54 -2 -3.1 of the Land Development Code, a special exception is a use which is provided in the zoning regulations for a particular zoning district or classification and, if controlled, would not affect the public safety, health, or general welfare by allowing the use in an additional zoning district or classification. The Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council may permit such uses in such zoning districts or classifications as special exceptions only if the applicant meets specific provisions and conditions deemed appropriate. Procedurally, staff reviews the special exception application and makes a recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Commission shall hold a public hearing and shall indicate whether, in their opinion, the proposed special exception meets the required findings of facts and review criteria established in Section 54- 2- 6.2(d), including specific criteria of Article VI. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall then make a recommendation to City Council to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application for the special use. ON Zoning Current Land Use Future Land Use North IN vacant IN East IN warehouse IN South IN warehouse and outside storage IN West IN air conditioning service and a fitness club IN Site Characteristics (1) Total Acreage: .41 acres (2) Current Land Use(s): industrial building (3) Water Service: public water (4) Sanitary Sewer Service: public sewer 7. Staff Comments: As detailed in Section 54 -2 -3.1 of the Land Development Code, a special exception is a use which is provided in the zoning regulations for a particular zoning district or classification and, if controlled, would not affect the public safety, health, or general welfare by allowing the use in an additional zoning district or classification. The Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council may permit such uses in such zoning districts or classifications as special exceptions only if the applicant meets specific provisions and conditions deemed appropriate. Procedurally, staff reviews the special exception application and makes a recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Commission shall hold a public hearing and shall indicate whether, in their opinion, the proposed special exception meets the required findings of facts and review criteria established in Section 54- 2- 6.2(d), including specific criteria of Article VI. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall then make a recommendation to City Council to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application for the special use. ON A pawn shop is allowed as a conditional use in the Commercial General (CG) zoning district. To approve a special exception permit to allow a pawn shop in the IN zoning district, the conditional use criteria must be met, as well as the following code required findings of fact. 8. Required findings of fact (Section 54- 2- 3.1(a)(3): a. The approval of the application for a special exception will not be detrimental to the public safety, health or welfare, or be injurious to other properties or improvements within the immediate vicinity in which the property is located based on criteria established in Article VI. The Sebastian Land Development Code defines a pawn shop as an establishment in which goods or property are bartered in exchange for loans or cash. Additionally, said goods or property may be sold at retail from such establishments. As such, this use would not be detrimental to the public safety, health or welfare, or injurious to other properties in the area. b. The use requested is consistent with the purpose and intent of the respective district, and can be demonstrated to be similar in nature and compatible with the uses allowed in such district. The industrial district broadly includes uses such as manufacturing, assembling and distribution, warehousing, and general commercial activities. A pawn shop can be considered a general commercial activity. C. The requested use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Code of Ordinances. The Comprehensive Plan lists general commercial activities as part of the industrial land use category. As such, the use would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Code of Ordinances. 9. Conditions of approval (Section 54- 2- 3.1(a)(4): In approving an application for a special exception under this section, the City Council may require such conditions as will, in its judgment, substantially secure the objectives and intent of the zoning regulations. Staff recommends the following condition of approval: 3 Applicant shall comply with all regulations and reporting requirements established by the State of Florida for the operation of a pawn shop. 10. Planning and Zoning Commission findings (Section 54- 2- 6.2(d): Any approval with or without conditions shall be rendered only after a finding by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council that the proposed use satisfies the following criteria: (1). Is so designed, located and proposed to be operated so that the public health, safety and welfare will be protected. The site is fully developed in conformance with its approved site plan. (2). Does not present an unduly adverse effect upon other properties in the impacted area in which it is located. As a general commercial activity, the pawn shop will be less intense than many other allowed uses in the IN district, such as manufacturing or distribution. (3). Based on the scale, intensity and operation of the use, shall not generate unreasonable noise, traffic, congestion, or other potential nuisances or hazards to contiguous residential properties. There are no contiguous residential properties. (4). Conforms to all applicable provisions of the district in which the use is to be located. The property is in compliance with its approved site plan. (5). Satisfies specific criteria stipulated for the respective conditional use described in this article in Section 54- 2- 6.4(34)b, which states: 1. All sales activity and storage shall be in an enclosed structure. No outside display area or storage proposed. 2. No structure shall be located within 50 feet to any lot line abutting a residential district. M Site does not abut a residential district. 3. No off - street parking or loading area shall be located closer than 15 feet to any property line abutting a residential district. Site does not abut a residential district. (6). Is consistent with the Code of Ordinances and Comprehensive Plan. The request is consistent with the Code of Ordinances and Comprehensive Plan. 12. Additional Comments: It is the opinion of staff that pawn shops should be included as a conditional use within the IN zoning district, as it already is in the CG zoning district. The IN district includes the broadest and most intense uses allowed in our City, and should include all uses allowed in the CG district. Staff also believes this to be an oversight in the Land Development Code. During the Planning and Zoning review of the zoning district uses at the March 15, 2012 meeting, there was a decision to add pawn shops as a conditional use in the C -512 district. However, upon further consideration, it was realized that the conditions requiring separation from a residential district could not be met in most, if not all, of the C -512 district, and therefore was not included. Consideration of pawn shops in a less - intense district such as C -512 should provide a good argument to include them in the more intense IN district. 13. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of a special exception permit for Austin Fox to allow a pawn shop as a conditional use within the IN zoning district, specifically for the property located at 137 Sebastian Boulevard, with the additional condition that applicant shall comply with all regulations and reporting requirements established by the State of Florida for the operation of a pawn shop. 61 14. Planning and Zoning Action: Planning and Zoning to hold public hearing, and make a recommendation to City Council. 1 re red by JakKjaj Date Proposed times and dates for the workshop were discussed. Mr. Dodd thought there should be a lot more public input and suggested having a series of workshops with the Chamber, Working Waterfront Committee, etc. The proposed conditional use criteria for Single- family dwellings in CR and CWR districts was discussed with the size allowed percentage different for each district, less in the CR district (20% of total developed SF) than CWR (50 %). Recently reviewed mixed - use site plans, Clams R Us and Muscle Car Memorabilia Shop, were compared with the new suggestions, and did [the new criteria] force larger buildings along Indian River Drive to accommodate those still wanting a residential use. Mr. Dodd noted the suggestions did not address attached or detached residential structures. Landscaping requirements and parking was discussed with staff. Mr. Dodd reviewed that Trade and skilled services was proposed to be changed from permitted to conditional in CR, and removed from CWR. One of the proposed conditions, that it be an accessory use to permitted commercial uses, was discussed using the existing custom cabinetry business and carpet & the shop on US #1. After further review and discussion, the Commission agreed to keep the use permitted in the CR district. - Mr. Paul stated that Pawn shops had been added as a conditional use in C -512, but not changed in Article VI. Mr. Dodd stated since there were existing conditions, the zoning district could be added. Staff noted that as written, pawn shops wishing to locate on Sebastian Boulevard could not meet the condition of the structure being 50 feet from any residential lot since the Sebastian Highlands are adjacent to the rear of any property zoned C -512. The Commission agreed to take out pawn shops in the C -512 district as it was to begin with. The Commission and staff discussed how they stood with regards to the changes and what may come out of the workshop, and how they thought City Council would stand on some of the issues. Mr. Ginsburg stated he was surprised there was not more public input at these meetings than there has been. Mr. Griffin noted the public may be watching at home on Channel 25 than actually attending the meetings. CHAIRMAN MATTERS: None MEMBERS MATTERS: None copy DIRECTOR MATTERS: None ATTORNEY MATTERS: None Chairman Dodd adjourned the meeting at 9:15 p.m. (db) 4 Permit Application No. .-1, SEA _ City of Sebastian HOSE OF PELICAN KI AIM) Develonment Order Annlinnfinn Applicant If not owner, written authorization notarized from owner is required) Name: Address: Address: ,r �.� � �}� t2 ��, • ° � Subdivision: r j-tG �- QA -max -�,n � L Phone Number: () �� - FAX Number. E -Mail: Owner If different from applicant) Name: Address: Phone Number: ( -712-) ` - FAX Number: E -Mail: Title of permit or action requested: - : Fjcce0rK&% 'P PLEASE COMPLETE ONLY THOSE SECTIONS WHICH ARE NECESSARY FOR THE PERMIT OR ACTION THAT YOU ARE REQUESTING. COPIES OF ALL MAPS, SURVEYS, DRAWINGS, ETC. SHALL BE ATTACHED AND 8 -1/2" BY 11° COPIES OF ANY ATTACHMENTS SHALL BE INCLUDED. ATTACH THE APPROPRIATE SUPPLEMETAL INFORMATION FORM. A. Project Name (if applicable): B. Site Information Address: Lot: Block: Unit: Subdivision: r j-tG �- QA Indi n River County Parcel #: Zoning Classification: Future Land Use: Existing Use: F I Proposed Use: C. Detailed description of proposed activity and purpose of the requested permit or action (attach extra sheets if necessary): DATE RECEIVED: Z 1.,5_1 /'t FEE PAID: $ ,,50D ° no P,q %o z - 5-I`f Giz4b , RECEIVED BY: City of Sebastian Development Order Application C. Detailed description of proposed activity and purpose of the requested permit or action (attach extra sheets if necessary): Provide Pawnbroking services, including but not limited to, offering secured loans to people with items of personal property used as collateral, purchasing used and second hand items, operating a new and used retail store front, trading, selling and buying of firearms. The aforementioned activities to increase revenue for the City of Sebastian. Permit Application No. D. Project Personnel: Agent: Name: Address Phone Number: ( ) - FAX Number: E -Mail: Attorney: Name: Address Phone Number: { ) - FAX Number: E -Mail: Engineer: Name: Address Phone Number: ( ) - FAX Number: E -Mail: Surveyor: Name: Address Phone Number: ( ) - FAX Number: E -Mail: I, r- �6'_.a'Y, , BEING FIRST DULY SWORN, DEPOSE AND SAY THAT: _ I AM THE OWNER _ AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED WHICH IS THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS APPLICATION, AND THAT ALL THE INFORMATION, MAPS, DATA AND /OR SKETCHES PROVIDED IN THIS APPLICATION ARE ACCURATE AND TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. SIGNATURE DATE SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME BYVSSi{ °374 WHO IS PERSONALLY KNOWN TOME OR PRODUCED AS IDENTIFICATION, THIS _� DAY OF'_�t� �. `� ^� 20. NOTARY'S SIGNATURE���� PRINTED NAME OF NOTARY COMMISSION NO. /EXPIRATION L)e -PLr(" , ` 3p SEAL: a °S;R ••.,evo WENDI MALONE * * MY COMMISSION # FF 079997 EXPIRES: December 29, 2017 ��ATS OF �cdR- "Ow, EXPIRES: Thru Budget Notary Services Permit Application No. The following is required for all comprehensive plan amendments, zoning amendments (including rezoning), site plans, conditional use permits, special use permits, variances, exceptions, and appeals. IA/VE, 5 THE OWNER(S) / _ THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER(S) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION, HEREBY AUTHORIZE EACH AND EVERY MEMBER OF THE BOARD /COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN TO PHYSICALLY ENTER UPON THE PROPERTY AND VIEW THE PROPERTY IN CONNECTION WITH MYIOUR PENDING APPLICATION. I/WE HEREBY WAIVE ANY OBJECTION OR DEFENSE I /WE MAY HAVE, DUE TO THE QUASI— JUDICIAL NATURE OF THE PROCEEDINGS, RESULTING FROM ANY BOARD /COMMISSION MEMBER ENTERING OR VIEWING THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING ANY CLAIM OR ASSERTION THAT MY /OUR PROCEDURAL OR SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS RIGHTS UNDER THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION OR THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION WERE VIOLATED BY SUCH ENTERING OR VIEWING. THIS WAIVER AND CONSENT IS BEING SIGNED BY MENUS VOLUNTARILY AND NOT AS A RESULT OF ANY COERCION APPLIED, OR PROMISES MADE, BY ANY EMPLOYEE, AGENT, CONTRACTOR OR OFFICIAL OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN. SIGNATURE DATE y o' -. a t Sworn to and subscribed before me b who is personally known �tome or produced Pr\ye.ys, #..Af:,mV as identification, this to day of .20 Q' Notary's Signature Printed Name of Notary yJ e YA, ii,c' f Commission No. /Expiration Cx c r-1-4--ley ,1A It -) Seal: !ok WENDIMALONE MY COMMISSION # FF 079997 * * EXPIRES: December 29, 2017 J''9rf. i�(iQ\OF Bonded Thru Budget Notary Services Permit Application No. °i `F Supplemental Information Special Use Permit > = _ (ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES IF NECESSARY.) HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND 1. Describe the use for which this special use permit is being requested: _ 2. Describe how the granting of the special use permit will not be detrimental to the public safety, health or welfare or be injurious to other properties or improvements within the immediate vicinity in which the property is located. (Attach additional pages, if necessary) 3. Describe how the use requested is consistent with the purpose and intent of the respective zoning district, and that the use is similar in nature and compatible with the uses allowed in such district. (Attach additional pages, if necessary): _ 4. Attach a list of the names and addresses of all owners of parcels of real property within three hundred (300) feet of the parcel to be considered. f Supplemental Information Special Use Permit 1. Establish and operate a Pawnbroking business. 2. Pawnbroking offers an exciting opportunity for all types of members of the community to buy, sell and secure loans. Pawnbroking businesses have long carried the stigma of "nuisance business ". While this may have been true of some Pawnbrokers in the long history of the Pawn industry, the Pawn industry is now one of the most highly regulated industries in the State of Florida. When purchasing or pawning there is a mandatory form for all goods acquired. This form includes extensive detail of the seller including a fingerprint and State I.D. number (see attachment: Florida Pawnbroker Transaction Form). All of this information must be shared with the local and state Police Department for inspection (see Florida Statute 539.001 section 8). People often think of Pawnshops as a place to sell stolen property. Data shows that less than one -tenth of one percent of all pawned property turns out to be stolen (see attachment: "Florida Pawnbroking: An Industry in Transition "). In fact, non -Pawn second hand retail stores have no obligation to record any information about the seller. Thereby, making them much more attractive to criminals than any Pawnbroker. Pawn allows people to secure short term loans. Traditional lending institutions do not allow for small short term loans of this kind. When customers need food for a large family, to pay an unexpected bill or to fix their family automobile they often turn to Pawnbrokers for a loan. Pawn offers the community a needed service. Pawnbrokers must maintain a clean image and lawful practices to continue operating. 3. Pawnbroking within the industrial area is consistent with the intent of the zoning district. It is offering an additional service to the area and surrounding community.