Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992 Candy Cane Park SurveyKimbaH*L/oyd, Inc. 1835 20TH STREET VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 PHONE: (407) 562 -4112 FAX: (407) 778 -8836 October 29, 1992 Daniel E. Eckis City Engineer, City of Sebastian 1225 Main Street Sebastian, FL 32958 RE: Ashford T. Gordon Park (Candy Cane Park) Survey Kimball-Lloyd Project No. 92 -9197 Dear Mr. Eckis: N�,iwrtR�. Nod alga in t ci �; � d P(_afJNC -Rti ',U f�VEYt;fi o As per the instructions in your letter dated October 21, 1992, we verified our survey as per the legal description furnished and found it to be correct based on the existing field monumentation that was in place at the time of our survey. The measurements, by field survey, checked the legal description measurement calls within 0.15 hundreds of a foot (t 13 /4- inches). We further verified the Sullivan Deed call of 181.25 feet, which is the frontage of the Sullivan Property along the west right -of -way line of Indian River Drive. We field measured this line to be 181.32 -feet to the north line of the Potter Property which was surveyed by Mr. Lloyd many years ago. I have enclosed a copy of a portion of the Tax Atlas for Section 6, Township 31 S, Range 39 E with the hatched out area denoting our survey. There is a line drawn south of the hatched out area, but it scales 20 -feet to 40 -feet south of our boundary line. The distances shown on the Tax Atlas, which are the same as the deed dimensions, scale to the arrowed points as a further check. It should also be noted that the Tax Atlas sheets are for information purposes only and are not for survey purposes. It is my opinion that at some point in time there may have been a problem with this line, (as it is shown to extend to the east side of Indian River Drive). The deeds of record for both properties appear to have been prepared by the same person due to similarities in the wording of both deeds. An abstract of title for both properties should reveal when this correction was made. I believe this explains the two (2) lines that are shown on the Tax Atlas. In any event, the boundary line that we found monumented by field survey is in fact the same line as the most northerly line shown on the Tax Atlas. The encroachment lies north of this line. A SUBSIDIARY OF L ROBERT KIMBALL & ASSOCIATES. INC. Daniel E. Eckis October 30, 1992 Page 2 As stated above, our survey is correct and there is an encroachment across the south boundary line. Mr. Sullivan's Property to the south has its required amount of land and is in the correct location by deed description which is verified by existing field monumentation. I suggest that if this does not satisfy Mr. Sullivan, that he retain another surveyor (at his expense), to perform a boundary survey of his real property by deed description, at which time we will be more than happy to meet with all parties involved. If I can be of further assistance or answer any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, /1C .-7u9� Phillip Bryant Office Survey Director PB /dm s ,t s � yr ,L 3 cj 180" 111 GOV T. LOT 5 , i,ls N Si r �, 050 121 Ocs4C), 1 �.A \ s \ n((��jj s � .' �ln1U��© 0010 \ ,c T Y W pARK AD 'k4 7A 17 o Z �,-'b ley ..h - V .d. • 0 -1 Colo o 50 4 ° po 09� \i? �r 0$ w� 10 coo o y 3 0� �' S7 5 • a 1 OV 54 � 12 m s 01 1 6.0, 0 ' ....... DO Oo h n U 14 y �a� 1 • , J .. (,,�- ° ; .:� j• 157.5° . NOp• � � (/[. ,-,`v p �r ,,,� '185, , y I /