Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003 Qualification Evaluation FormsSECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM Section QE QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF AIRPORT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer: Evaluated by: t ar✓ �ili �G✓S �, r 1. PROPOSER'S LETTER OF DaTMEST rev 3/132003 A INTRODUCTION of FIRM (5 points) points E. SPECIFIC PROJECT EXPERIENCE (max 12 points) is points Recently completed projects (completed no more than five years ago) that demonstrate the Proposing Firm or ContractorBuilder or Design Professional specific experience relevant to the proposed project. (Up to 4 points each —12 points max) Pmject Name Location Budget Year Completed a.( I 6 % M.'/1 ?00,.� b. Q 1;WL,.1'Y, t - et o, a.b.3 1�11 aoou c. �A e- mC o✓/1�P71 I C. PROPOSED TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT EXPERIENCE (max 12 points) la points 1 DESIGN TEAM MANAGER RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE 4 oints Protect Name Location Budget Year Com leted a C iA<< rnr m b. &..6•1:t C. �J vn; Fines 2 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER/SUP. RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE 4 oints Project Name I Location b Budget I Year Completed a.zlmpet AdiviL, QQ0J b. I= �000 C. �J vn; Fines Municipal Airpon-Administration Building QE -1 SECTION QE -QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM 3) PROJECT MANAGER RELATED my 3/132003 Pn�ectName Location Budget Completed a. l' rl n,N M r c T1 b. tit' c. 20S %/n -TK -4-4C �)a-o 11. D. LETTERS OF EVALUATTON/RECOMIvIENDATION (max 6 poims)__L points Client references relevant to the Proposer's specific experience. ( 2 Points each- 6 points max) Project Name Client Name S. Eval/ Recom Contact 1 e r f./-7 1 d /� C. 'D� 5'/71'h W1 l o ,� UOA/ E. PROPOSING FMM(S) ABILITY & CAP -AC= (5 points) points F. PROPOSING FIRM(S) PROOF OF BONDING CAPACIT 17: YES k NO TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATTON SCORE (45 points max) L pts Municipal Airport-Admmisvatim Building QE -2 LOCAL, PREFERENCE: J 2. pOiVtS >200 200-150W 150-100 ml 99-50 m! <50mi 1 2 3 4 5 3. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE FORM: YES NO 4. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES FORM: YES `)C. NO _ 5. DEBARWZNT CERTIFICATION: YES NO 6. LICENSES & REGISTRATIONS a. General Contractor's License attached? YES NO _ b. State of Fl. Certification/Registration attached YES X NO , C. Architect/Engineer Registration attached YES 1C NO _ d. State of Fl. Professional License YES - NO_ 7. PROOF OF INSURANCE: YES NO_ S. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT: YES NO TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATTON SCORE (45 points max) L pts Municipal Airport-Admmisvatim Building QE -2 SECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM m 3/13/2003 CRITERIA FOR SCORING PROPOSING FIRM'S EXPERIENCE ON PROJECTS OF $TmD„AR OR GREATER SCOPE AND SIZE TO THE ONE UNDER CONSIDERATION Proiect Experience Score Design/Build Administration Buildings 4.0 points each Design/Build other Projects 3.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY Administration Buildings 2.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY other Projects 1.0 point each Where a submittal provides project information for two firms (_Architect/Engineer and Builder/Contractor), the two -firm team experience will be evaluated together as a single unit. General Remarks and Observations concerning this Qualifications Submittal: b1%(( O-'n4A, led t"„rnrit fr 1G%�or� L<<Y- ri �� inSJ�!✓L�. s /isli /hc 4Ar41N4c ea&K Date: L�17 Municipal Airport- *++m=ation Building QF_3 SECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM Section QE QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF AIRPORT ADN O NISTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMYOUND Proposer: ,-- Ho IWA� fv.`/ao�, L of S. F4 .It , .L,, , . Evaluated by: / �o^� 6 ' r • %Ws/ -1, 1. PROPOSE, R'S LETTER OF INTEREST my 3/13/2003 A INTRODUCTION of FIRM (5 points) S points B. SPECIFIC PROJECT EXPERIENCE (max 12 points) O points Recently completed projects (completed no more than five years ago) that demonstrate the Proposing Firm.or Contractor/Builder or Design Professional specific experience relevant to the proposed project. (Up to 4 points each —12 points max) Pm'ee Name Location Budge I Year Completed a. t L N ri G 3,6 1y4 evinple ¢e e L ° m �;eo C. A W 4A k,�l ' fi, 1,Atr C. PROPOSED TEAM MEMBMS PROJECT EXPERIENCE (max 12 points) 1) DESIGN TEAM MANAGER RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE � points (4 points) — D Projea Name Location Budget IYear Com leted a. ,!r Wa b. I;K 5 fk� a 7Savx C'. Ar be 71• 5ry tf I 2) CONSTRUCTION MANAGER/SUP. RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE (4 noints) Project Name Location BudM Year Completed a. IQ `C b. t- c. ` Municipal Airport-Admnush'ation Building QE -1 O y l 1 O MR SECTION QE -QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM kl77Zi P u : ► , : � r�� �►�� . ��. a rev 3/13/2003 (A ..,,4, d) _ Z Pr 'ect Name LocationS Budget YewCompleted 2. LOCAL PREFERENCE: 3 points b. WNor eC /v. Fz- C. C 1 r pL •` it f • �' G / Al L oiDJ D. LETTERS OF EVALUATION/RECOMMENDATION (max 6 points) Opoints — IVDAI, rf6 enl Client references relevant to the Proposer's specific experience. (2 Points each - 6 points max) Project Name Client Name Eval/ Recom Contact a. b. C. E. PROPOSING FIRM(S) ABILITY & CAPACITY (5 points) S✓ points E. PROPOSING FIRM(S) PROOF OF BONDING CAPACITY: YES �- NO 6. LICENSES & REGISTRATIONS a. General Contractor's License attached? YES NO _ b. State of Fl. Certification/Registration attached YES NO _ C. Architect/Engineer Registration attached YES _ NO _ d. State of Fl. Professional License YES NO 7. PROOF OF INSURANCE: YES NO_ 8. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT: YES /y, NO _ TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION SCORE (45 paints max) I pts MumcipalAupod-Adm;nishati nBuilding QE -2 2. LOCAL PREFERENCE: 3 points >200 200.150 m1 150-100 mi 99-50 mt <50m1 I 2 3 4 5 3. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE FORM: YES ?C' NO 4. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES FORM: YES NO 5. DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION: YES NO _ 6. LICENSES & REGISTRATIONS a. General Contractor's License attached? YES NO _ b. State of Fl. Certification/Registration attached YES NO _ C. Architect/Engineer Registration attached YES _ NO _ d. State of Fl. Professional License YES NO 7. PROOF OF INSURANCE: YES NO_ 8. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT: YES /y, NO _ TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION SCORE (45 paints max) I pts MumcipalAupod-Adm;nishati nBuilding QE -2 SECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM m 3/13/2003 CRITERIA FOR SCORING PROPOSING FIRM'S EXPERIENCE ON PROJECTS OF SIIyTTf,AR OR GREATER SCOPE AND SIZE TO THE ONE UNDER CONSIDERATION Proiect Experience Score Design/Build Administration Buildings 4.0 points each Design/Build other Projects 3.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY Administration Buildings 2.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY other Projects 1.0 point each Where a submittal provides project information for two firms (Architect/Engineer and Builder/Contractor), the two -firm team experience will be evaluated together as a single unit. General Remarks and Observations concerning this Qualifications Submittal: A L: IJ PU/i�./,q�./ �.+✓�^% •�vsn/(l�._ �'�°as�c� �,/,o{Nm1� F/ll�i� �I� ��lif/�;� Sianature: Manicipal AirportAdmmist ation Building QE -3 Date: sE=N QE- QUALMcAnaNS EVALUATION FORM Proposer: Section QE QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF AIRPORT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMFOUND Paul Jacquin & Sons, Inc. P.O. Box 4343, Fort Pierce, FL 34948 Evaluated by. //-, 1. PROPOSER'S LETTER OF WrEREST A INTRODUCTION of FIRM (5 points) B. SPECIFIC PROJECT EXPERIENCE (max 12 points) =3/13/2003 S points points Recently completed projects (completed no more than five years ago) that demonstrate the Proposing Firm or Contractor/Builder or Design Professional specific experience relevant to the proposed project (Up to 4 points each —12 points max) Project Name Location Budget I Budget Year Completed a, Paris Air Center Indian River County 983,479.00 September 2001 b. Kepley Wemmer Indian River County 880,000.00 March 2002 C, US Trust Indian River County 3,100,000.00 September 2000 C. PROPOSED TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT 1) DESIGN TEAM MANAGER RELATED PROJECT (max 12 points) > (4 points) PijeftNme i.ocadon Budget I Year Completed a, Syngenta Indian River County 5,000,000.00 June 2003 b.Kepley Wemmer Indian River County 880 000.00 March 2002 C. Seald Sweet Indian River CountV 1,200 000.00 August 1991 2) CONSTRUCTION MANAGERSUP. RELATED PROJECT (4 points) Project Name Location Budget Year Co eted a.Vero Glass & Mirror Indian River County 408 693.00 Aril 2002 b.Paris Air Center Indian River County 983,479.00 September 2001 C.Huber Dental Office St. Lucie Countv 227 297.00 December 2000 Mudapa1Aiupart- dminict mB0dhg QE -1 SECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION PORM my 3113=03 Project Name Location I -fu­dget Year Completed a. White CitV Medical St. Lucie Count I n a I n a b. Huber Dental Office St. Lucie County 227,297.00 December 2000 C. IRCC R & L St. Lucie Countv 13,654,916.00 Aril 2002 D. LETTERS OF EVALUATION/RECONINIENDATION (max 6 points) --L points Client references relevant to the Proposer's specific experience. (2 Points each - 6 points max) Prcgect Name Client Name Eval/ Reeom Contact a. Nero - Glass & Mi dor ?u/) b, Beachland Elem. SDIRC c. Moorings Reno Moorings Club 1 2 3 4 E. PROPOSING FIRMS) ABIL= & CAPACITY (5 points) _�— poirrts F. PROPOSING FIRMS) PROOF OF BONDING CAPACITY: YES 4 NO 2. LOCAL PREFERENCE: >200 200.150W 150-100 ml 99.50 mt <5omr Paul Jacquin & Sons, Inc.. —�— iI I is located less than 50 1 2 3 4 5 miles from the City of Sebastian. 3. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE FORM YES x NO 4. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES FORM: YES x NO 5. DERARA ENT CERTIFICATION: YES x NO 6. LICENSES & REGISTRATIONS a General Contractor's License attached? YES x NO _ b. State of Fl. Certification/Registration attached YES x NO _ C. ArchitectfinNneerRegistration attached YES x NO._ d. State of Fl. Professional License YES --2L NO _ 7. PROOF OF INSURANCE: YES x NO 8. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT: YES X- NO 2 f TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION SCORE (45 points mar) pts Zy mdpalAssport-Admmistmt Bm1dng QE -2 sEcnON QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM CRITERIA FOR SCORING PROPOSING FIRM'S EM SIMILAR OR GREATER SCOPE AND SIZE CONSIDERATION Project Experience Design/Build Administration Buildings Design/Build other Projects Design ONLY or Build ONLY Administration Buildings Design ONLY or Build ONLY other Projects x 3/132003 ON PROJECTS OF ���M.1 ►11�►11_ sl: Score 4.0 points each 3.0 points each 2.0 points each 1.0 point each Where a submittal provides project information for two firms (ArchitectlEngineer and Builder/Contractor), the two -firm team experience will be evaluated together as a single unit. L/�a g7+-iv,"rime/- I L. Date: L' ?-0 S' Municipal Aupoit-Admmifir onBwldmg QE -3 J SECTION QS- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM Section QE QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND COI\TSTRUCTION OF AIRPORT ADAMUSTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer: Evaluated by: �A� o� rn,` ��`✓S /L I. PROPOSEWS LETTER OF RzT TEREST my 3/132903 A INTRODUCTION ofFJRM (5 points) S- points E. SPECIFIC PROJECT EXPER1EbTCE (max 12 points) 10 points Recently completed projects (completed no more than five years ago) that demonstrate the Proposing Firm or ContractorMnilder or Design Professional specific experience relevant to the proposed project (Trip to 4 points each -12 points max) Project Name Location Budget 1 Year Completed a. fT l f r e I A 10 CC yv (00 0 b. Sim" A LI ro"A' f o. /� q y C. !vr Corr , the . A o d C. PROPOSED TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT EXPERIENCE (max 12 points) lj�7x.`i[e7jllYeG ���i�/Ti�7_Ce:�: : � rax : � r�r e►:�• �r ��, e 10 points r n .. ... Pro ecr Name Location 8 el T Year Completed a.VA; J IAq o a,-7 I4 b.5< ,n01( Lamno�e Ilr ✓ iC am d c. rAc< G� lug<�1 tro C3t1c oo 21 r..0NSTRTTC7Tr1N MANAGER/STTP RF.T.ATP.n PRnTRrT T S 13T.MTl7Mr= r e « Project Name Location Budget IYear C d a. fT l f r e I A 10 CC yv (00 0 b. (enhie4151 C. M "9 S. D v- Mmicapd Airport-Adm=sftzLonBmlding Q&1 SECTION QE-QUALIBICAMONS EVALUATION FORM 41 PROJECT MANAGER RELATED my 3/13IM03 ( 4 nnirrta) Pr "ect Name I Location Bud Year Completed a. b. c. D. LETTERS OF EVALUATION/RECOMWIENDATION (max 6 points) --.6- points Client references relevant to the Proposer's specific experience. (2 Points each- 6 points max) Project Name Cheat Name EvaU Recom Contact aAt i9<k AAqt AL N 1 1!n 'e L b. &kMit Bf X;.N. JL4, 1� II 1 6, g, u e -Al ( , �;IJA & E. PROPOSING FIRMS) ABILITY &CAPACITY (5 points) points F. PROPOSING FUZ*S) PROOF OF BONDING CAPACITY: YES X NO - 2. O_ 7. PROOF OF INSURANCE: YES -r- NO_ S. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT: YES , - NO _ TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION SCORE (45 paints m=) I pis MumieipdAirport-Adminisftz rmBmUing QE -2 MNCE: Spoinrs 2. LOCAL PREF >200 200.150 m1 150-100 mi 99.50 mi <50m1 1 2 3 4 5 3. DRIIGF'REE'WORKPLACE FORM: YES NO 4. PUBLIC ENTITY C'RIlVIES FORM: YES V NO _ 5. DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION: YES NO _ 6. LICENSES & REGISTRATIONS a. General Con ractor's License attached? YES NO _ b. State of Fl. Certification/Registration attached YES NO _ c. Architect/Engineer Registration attached YES NO d State of Fl. Professional License YES NO 7. PROOF OF INSURANCE: YES -r- NO_ S. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT: YES , - NO _ TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION SCORE (45 paints m=) I pis MumieipdAirport-Adminisftz rmBmUing QE -2 sECnON QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM =v3/13/2003 CRITERIA FOR SCORING PROPOSING FIRM'S EXPERIENCE ON PROJECTS OF SMM AR OR GREATER SCOPE AND SIZE TO THE ONE UNDER CONSIDERATION Project Experience Score Design/Build Administration Buildings 4.0 points each DesiguBuild other Projects 3.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY Administration Buildings 2.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY other Projects 1.0 point each Where a submittal provides project information for two fins (Architect/Engineer and Builder/Contractor), the two -firm team experience will be evaluated together as a single unit .11 w � .111 . �. •111 � / �1 .11 •11 \II � 11 11 � 1 � 1 1 .1111 1 11 IY. VAC( l A F 00'.4"%1 C I A.11, -Set 1 Date: L—O M..ipd Aupm t-Adm=saahm Bwldmg QE -3 SECTION TE- TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7114/2003 Section TE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer: 1+0t14 AZ gr,// Evaluated by: o,/ n6 I �r✓S �L r A. TECHNICAL CIMTMA - 330 Points Total Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative, concept drawings and other documentation 1. Proposed Site Plan (40 points) Conceptual Site Plan/Narrative (8 points): Yes: %` No: Issues Identified and Addressed: (32 points max) epoints Grading/Dramage; Access Roads/Parking; Landscaping/Inigation; Fencing (8 points max per issue) e I ---------- --I --------- -- �- - -- — —� 3 � points 0 Supporting comments: fair 4 good 6 excellent 8 2. Proposed Structural Plan (40 points) Conceptual Structural Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: -/\ Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) no Supporting comments: Administration Building No: fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 _J" pts• 3C) pts TE -1 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM ro, 711412003 3. Proposed Exterior Wall/Finishes Plan (50 points) Exterior Wall Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: \ No: I pts. Exterior Appearanee/Aesthetics (10 points): —L—Opts. Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I -----------------I-------------- I – - -- --I S^c� pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 4. Proposed HVAC Plan (40 points) Conceptual HVAC Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: x No: D pts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) -- -- - – I -------------i– -- — –I a Epts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 5. Proposed Electrical System Plan (40 points) Conceptual Electrical System Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: No: J pts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I----- --I— -- – –I----------- I p 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supportin= comments: Administration Building TE -2 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECM41CAL EVALUATION FORM 6. Proposed Plumbing System Plan (40 points) Conceptual Plumbing System Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: x No: Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I--------- —-------- I ------------ —----- I -------------------I 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: rev 7/14/2003 10 pts Dr pts 7. Proposed Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points) Communications & Other Equipment Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: X No: Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) M Supporting continents: fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 8. Police Evidence Building Plan (40 points) Police Evidence Building Plan/Narrative (10 points): Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) n Supporting comments: fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 j S pts Yes: ',< No: 30 pts Administration Building TE -3 Sebastian Municipal Airport to )0 SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 TOTAL TECHNICAL CRITERIA L 1. Site Plan (40 points max) ( D pts TOTAL TECDMCAL SCORE (330 points max) 310 pts Administration Building TE -4 Sebastian Municipal Airport LI n 2. Structural Plan (40 points max) pts S. Exterior Wall Plan (50 points max) 50 pts 4. HVAC Plan (40 points max) S 5 -pts 5. Electrical Plan (40 points max) 3 S' pts 6. Plumbing Plan (40 points max) 3 pts 7. Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points max) pts S. Police Evidence Building ( 40 points max) 0 pts TOTAL TECDMCAL SCORE (330 points max) 310 pts Administration Building TE -4 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM reg, 711412003 B. MANAGEMENT CRITERIA -110 Points Total Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative and other documentation 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (18 points max) Proximity of Design Consultant to site (7 points max): >150 mi150-100 mi 99- 50 mi <50 mi -------------------- I -------------------- I ------------------- I VVV� points 0 2 4 6 Proximity of Builder to site (7 points max) >150mi 150-100 mi99-50 mi <so mi �_______--___---______ I_______ _ ------------------- points 0 2 4 6 Proximity of Design Consultant to Builder (6 points max) >I30 mi 150-100 mi 99- 50 mi < 50 mi ___ ---------------- -------------------- I------------------- points 0 2 4 6 Supporting comments: 2. Proposer's Organization and Key Personnel (40 points max) Proposing Firm organization chart (5 points max) 3 points Proposed Project Management personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max) points Proposed Project Design personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max) i D points Proposed Project Construction personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max) G points Time commitment of key personnel to this project (5 points max) points Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Management Programs (40 points max) Project Cost Control (5 points max) points Value Engineering Plan and Experience (5 points max) points Administration Building TE -5 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM Scheduling experience and history on similar projects (5 points max) SDBE Participation Plan (5 points max) Local Business Participation Plan (10 points max) Veteran's Participation Plan (5 points max) Project safety plan (5 points max) Supporting comments: 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) rev 711412003 3 points 3 points 8 points points points Quality Control/Quality Assurance plan for design activities (6 points max) points Quality Control/Quality Assurance plan for construction activities (6 points max) points Supporting comments: TOTAL MANAGEMENT CRITERIA 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (18 points max) ! N points 2. Proposer's Organization and Key Personnel (40 points max) A points 3 Proposer's Management Programs (40 points max) points 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) points TOTAL MANAGEMENT SCORE (110 points max) 9q points Administration Building TE -6 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE- TECINICALEVALUATTONFOFM C. PROJECT SCHEDULE -100 Points Total 1. Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points max) Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower) (10 points max) Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) Time commitment of key personnel (10 points max) Supporting comments: 2. Builder's Construction Schedule (50 points) rev 711412003 Lb/ points points 6 points Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower, equipment) (5 points max) points Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) 3 points Demonstrated subcontractors schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) points Time commitment of key personnel (5 points max) 3 points Coordination of design and construction activities (5 points max) 2 points Identification of long lead time items (5 points max) points Scheduled allowance for permitting activities (5 points max) points Scheduled allowance for submittals and review activities (5 points max) 3 points Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points) Note: Schedule shall reflect all investigations, surveys, design, permitting, preparation of construction documents, reviews, construction, inspections, testing, preparation of record Administration Building TE -7 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE- TECMUCAL EVALUADON FORM rev 7/1412003 drawings and other documents, and all other required activities from Notice To Proceed to Certificate of Occupancy. 2 points will be awarded for each 7 calendar day period less than the allowable project design and construction schedule of three hundred and sixty-five (365) calendar days (20 points max) points Supporting comments: TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE CRITERIA a. Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points max) b. Builder's Construction Schedule (50 points max) c. Proposers Total Schedule (20 points max) TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE SCORE (100 Points max) THIS SECTION LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY II b points points points 3 U points Administration Building TE -8 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM EVALUATION SUNIMARY 1. Technical Criteria Score (330 points max) 2. Management Criteria Score (110 points max) 3. Project Schedule Score (100 points max) TOTAL TECBNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION SCORE (540 points max) General Remarks and Observations concerning this Proposal: rev 711412003 3)0 points U911 paints 3$ points 1-13) points St, II �t qy! S., b In i .0cc"? 'i/A, ato(7oSAI ; i-l.rhS rTYb G y✓eeork Ov(rg6 / r /'t 5 v1AfiynegfL, )A>J An MACPWe�Se- 01-C !t A� P '/�� �M i lyVorrc / er r n C ,_ ��v 7'flf GreC �a ✓1� elf 6--rh the Safe alna Stf/C�h✓Pa wP,re- aAle/-ir/71-. /c w4S ti 0r(.1 -l- /} Ll -la Y4r✓ % Oe 44; l ,n "171 r / L((/htC rn ✓PPA /l b7,`c. /2.. ' _ -L,`, ._ A r'CA✓/C II �t qy! S., b In i .0cc"? z;,",/ fih r Ny �/iy sc S /Sl, mo 5 � ; i-l.rhS rTYb G y✓eeork Ov(rg6 / r /'t 5 v1AfiynegfL, Fl� 7"Ae (9 C/e /✓�i9 �T / 9 m�y ' -Yq Ize ��✓r+y )A>J An MACPWe�Se- yt �1�P'J V fJXAIVIL/a/ 91-01"9'-I , Signature: Date: ^ / Administration Building TE -9 Sebastian Municipal Airport W SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM Section TE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer: ojq 4 Evaluated by: f visor/ M, l f"Vl A. TECHNICAL CRITERIA- 330 Points Total rev 711412003 Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative, concept drawings and other documentation 1. Proposed Site Plan (40 points) Conceptual Site Plan/Narrative (8 points): Yes: Y No: Issues Identified and Addressed: (32 points max) Grading/Draifiage; Access oads/Parldng; LandscapiFencing (8 points max per issue) I----------- -- I __ —I ---------------I 0 fair 4 good 6 excellent 8 Supporting comments: /y> 4APId In� ;,-:k �oyc 2. Proposed Structural Plan (40 points) � 0 points Conceptual Structural Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: __X No: / O pts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I------------------I----------------1------------------i v pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: Administration Building TE -1 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TEC MCAL EVALUATION FORM m, 7119/2003 3. Proposed Exterior Wall/Finishes Plan (50 points) Exterior Wall Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: K No: !Yj pts. Exterior Appearance/Aesthetics (10 points): U pts. Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I-----------------I-------------I 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 4. Proposed HVAC Plan (40 points) Conceptual HVAC Plau/Narrative (10 points): Yes: iC No: pts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I-- -- --- I - --- --I--- - -- —I a ° pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 5. Proposed Electrical System Plan (40 points) Conceptual Electrical System Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: No: pts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I --- -- I— - — — -I ----- I �O pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: Administration Building TE -2 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM 6. Proposed Plumbing System Plan (40 points) Conceptual Plumbing System Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: _X No: Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I----------- ------- I ------------------- I --- -------------- I 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting continents: rev 7/14/2003 / pis -)S pts 7. Proposed Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points) Communication & Other Equipment Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: No: Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 8. Police Evidence Building Plan (40 points) Police Evidence Building Plan/Narrative (10 points): Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I--------------------I---------------I------------------I 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: o pts Yes: Y No: 8 ) S pts Administration Buildin.- TE -3 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7114/2003 TOTAL TECHNICAL CRITERIA 1. Site Plan (40 points max) u pts 2. Structural Plan (40 points max) pts 3. Exterior Wall Plan (50 points max) Y ptsV/ 4. HVAC Plan (40 points max) 4. 3o pts 5. Electrical Plan (40 points max) qv pts 6. Plumbing Plan (40 points max) 35- pts 7. Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points max) -30 pts 8. Police Evidence Building ( 40 points max) 23 pts TOTAL TECHNICAL SCORE (330 points max) -11-i-7pts Administration Building TE -4 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM m, 711412003 B. MANAGEMENT CRITERIA -110 Points Total Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative and other documentation 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team ( 18 points max) Proximity of Design Consultant to site (7 points max): >150 mi 150-100 mi 99- 50 mi < 50 mi points 0 2 4 6 Proximity of Builder to site (7 points max) >150 mi 150 -100 mi 99-50 mi < 50 mi I— ------------------ I -------------------- I ------------------- I points 0 2 4 6 Proximity of Design Consultant to Builder (6 points max) >150 mi -100 mi 99- 50 mi I = SECTION TE- TECI3NICALEVALUATIONFORM Scheduling experience and history on similar projects (5 points max) SDBE Participation Plan (5 points max) Local Business Participation Plan (10 points max) Veteran's Participation Plan (5 points max) Project safety plan (5 points max) Supporting comments: 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) Quality Control/Quality Assurance plan for design activities (6 points max) Quality Control/Quality Assurance plan for construction activities (6 points max) Supporting comments: 101RAWFUR1R 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (18 points max) 2. Proposer's Organization and Key Personnel (40 points max) 3 Proposer's Management Programs (40 points max) 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) TOTAL MANAGEMENT SCORE (110 points max) rev 711412003 3 points 3 points points 2 points points (O points Gpoints 1 points C points 3Q— points �'L points Ili q1 points Administration Building TE -6 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM C. PROJECT SCHEDULE -100 Points Total 1. Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points max) Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower) (10 points max) Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) Time commitment of key personnel (10 points max) Supporting comments: 2. Builder's Construction Schedule (50 points) reg, 711412003 10 points ipoints 1 0 points Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower, equipment) (5 points max) L' points Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) points Demonstrated subcontractors schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) points Time commitment of key personnel (5 points max) points Coordination of design and construction activities (5 points max) points Identification of long lead time items (5 points max) points Scheduled allowance for permitting activities (5 points max) points Scheduled allowance for submittals and review activities (5 points max) points Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points) Note: Schedule shall reflect all investigations, surveys, design, permitting, preparation of construction documents, reviews, construction, inspections, testing, preparation of record Administration Building TE -7 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE- TECEMCAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 drawings and other documents, and all other required activities from Notice To Proceed to Certificate of Occupancy. 2 points will be awarded for each 7 calendar day period less than the allowable project design and construction schedule of three hundred and sixty-five (365) calendar days (20 points max) U points Supporting comments: TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE CRITERIA a. Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points max) 1 points b. Builder's Construction Schedule (50 points max) 3 points c. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points max) U points TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE SCORE (100 Points max) 0 points THIS SECTION LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY Administration Building TE -8 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM ren 711411003 EVALUATION SUMMARY 1. Technical Criteria Score (330 points max) Ll 7 points 2. Management Criteria Score (110 points max) y 7 points 3. Project Schedule Score (100 points max) C 6 7 points TOTAL TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION SCORE (540 points max) l points General Remarks and Observations concerning this Proposal: Il PeA IINffa VK(e /e"' /-� O n, 451` 1'n 41, ef; fo5c -'4e:r Wos;Av✓&, )k cAS C�v; pit -'A, 5,)6 mtlP�� flof0sa 1 NQS Ver�j !new, Signature: Date: W-./'-/- a,-? Administration Building TE -9 Sebastian Municipal Airport I SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM Section TE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer: �J t� j C /14 Evaluated by: J AZW A. TECHNICAL CRITERIA - 330 Points Total rev 711412003 Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative, concept drawings and other documentation 1. Proposed Site Plan (40 points) Conceptual Site Plan/Narrative (8 points): Yes: X No: points Issues Identified and Addressed: (32 points max) 111� GradingMrainage; Access Roads Parldng; Landscaping�gation; Fencing (8 points max per issue) I------------------1------------------I---------------I a Y points 0 fair 4 good 6 excellent 8 Supporting comments: 2. Proposed Structural Plan (40 points) Conceptual Structural Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: % - No: /0 pts. Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I ------------------I— --- ---------- -I-- ------ ----- ---I aS pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: Administration Building TE -1 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE- TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 3. Proposed Exterior Waffinishes Plan (50 points) Exterior Wall Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: _ C No: _L pts. Exterior Appearance/Aesthetics (10 points): pts. Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I--------- ---------- I— ---------------- I ------------------- I /.-pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 4. Proposed HVAC Plan (40 points) Conceptual HVAC Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: x No: I o pts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I----------------- I – – -- --I-----------------I /S pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 5. Proposed Electrical System Plan (40 points) Conceptual Electrical System Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: _ No: 10 pts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I----------------I-------------------I------------------I aD pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: Administration Building TE -2 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM m 711412003 6. Proposed Plumbing System Plan (40 points) Conceptual Plumbing System Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: _� No: 19 pts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I-------------------- I ------------------- I ------------------- I a fpts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 7. Proposed Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points) Communications & Other Equipment Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: No: Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I--------------------I------------------I------------------I Sets 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 8. Police Evidence Building Plan (40 points) Police Evidence Building Plan/Narrative (10 points): Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) Yes: L No: pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: Administration Building TE -3 Sebastian Municipal Airport 10 SECTION TE - TECIINICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7119/2003 TOTAL TECHNICAL CRITERIA 1. Site Plan (40 points max) 3) pts 2. Structural Plan (40 points max) 3S pts 3. Exterior Wall Plan (50 points max) 33 pts 4. HVAC Plan (40 points max) Dspts 5. Electrical Plan (40 points max) 30 pts 6. Plmnbing Plan (40 points max) pts 7. Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points max) 315- pts 8. Police Evidence Building (40 points max) 3 �- pts TOTAL TECWgCAL SCORE (330 points max) Z L o pts Administration Building TE -4 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECMUCAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7/1412003 B. MANAGEMENT CRITERIA -110 Points Total Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative and other documentation 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (18 points max) Proximity of Design Consultant to site (7 points max): >150mi 150-100 m! 99-50 mi < 50 mi I--------------------I--------------------I-------------------I points 0 2 4 6 Proximity of Builder to site (7 points max) >150mi 150-100 mt 99-50 mi < 50 m1 I--- ---------------- I -------------------- I ------------------- I points 0 2 4 6 Proximity of Design Consultant to Builder (6 points max) >150 ml 150-100 mi 99- 50 mi < 50 mi I---- —--- —--------- I -------------------- I ------------------- I points 0 2 4 6 Supporting comments: 2. Proposer's Organization and Key Personnel (40 points max) Proposing Firm organization chart (5 points max) �;- points Proposed Project Management personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max)P0 O points Proposed Project Design personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max) I () points Proposed Project Construction personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max) I points Time commitment of key personnel to this project (5 points max) N points Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Management Programs (40 points max) Project Cost Control (5 points max) Value Engineering Plan and Experience (5 points max) Administration Building TE -5 -�- points y points Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECMCAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 Scheduling experience and history on similar projects (5 points max) 3 points SDBE Participation Plan (5 points max) 3 points Local Business Participation Plan (10 points max) 10 points Veteran's Participation Plan (5 points max) points 11 Project safety plan (5 points max) points Supporting comments: 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) Quality Control/Quality Assurance plan for design activities (6 points max) points Quality Control/Quality Assurance plan for construction activities (6 points max) points Supporting comments: TOTAL MANAGEMENT CRITERIA 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (18 points max) I � points 2. Proposer's Organization and Key Personnel (40 points max) 3 `1 points 3 Proposer's Management Programs (40 points max) points 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) points TOTAL MANAGEMENT SCORE (110 points max) Cl points Administration Building TE -6 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECFMCAL EVALUATION FORM C. PROJECT SCHEDULE -100 Points Total 1. Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points max) Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower) (10 points max) Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) Time commitment of key personnel (10 points max) Supporting continents: 2. Builder's Construction Schedule (50 points) rev 711412003 1 o points 8 points points Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower, equipment) (5 points max) —points Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) S points Demonstrated subcontractors schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) ® points Time commitment of key personnel (5 points max) y points Coordination of design and construction activities (5 points max) points Identification of long lead time items (5 points max) points Scheduled allowance for permitting activities (5 points max) points Scheduled allowance for submittals and review activities (5 points max) points Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points) Note: Schedule shall reflect all investigations, surveys, design, permitting, preparation of construction documents, reviews, construction, inspections, testing, preparation of record Administration Building TE -7 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 drawings and other documents, and all other required activities from Notice To Proceed to Certificate of Occupancy. 2 points will be awarded for each 7 calendar day period less than the allowable project design and construction schedule of three hundred and sixty-five (365) calendar days (20 points max) V points Supporting comments: TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE CRITERIA a. Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points max) b. Builder's Construction Schedule (50 points max) c. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points max) TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE SCORE (100 Points max) THIS SECTION LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY D— points 3`,t points 0 points S ? points Administration Building TE -8 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM re» 7/14/2003 EVALUATION SUMMARY / 1. Technical Criteria Score (330 points max)�b�C) points CG 2. Management Criteria Score (110 points max) / I points 3. Project Schedule Score (100 points max) S7 points TOTAL TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION SCORE (540 paints max) LI I (O points General Remarks and Observations concerning this Proposal: 9 � p Pet fge-1✓Ici 61 F. '/irt A,-1 w�It ✓PrY Gm orZ 1rS Sfrtn./cS were 4 S ��a Pa CPr� f CC �i� WC`L SIS IveIAI .r� 0n61 P✓ -l- to* -P tltI/ let A/Ift/9I-A i S Ir rA t(-V1,4,z C .✓.a., /'h iA4 <-. _- i'1✓i.,n t _, ri . ✓Leilcr �r�l Got'i �n� �nan t�rrnen� cr:'i'� fns/ S.'Pe c/c'S i, ✓V., Signature: Date: F— / 70 Administration Building TE -9 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM Proposer: Evaluated by: Section QE QUALIFICATTONS EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF AIRPORT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOIIND O C- I. PROPOSERS LETTER OF EITM 'ST m3113/2003 A INTRODUCTION ofFIRM (5 points) points E. SPECIFIC PROJECT E32ERMNCE (max 12 points)_ `� points Recently completed projects (completed no more than five years ago) that demonstrate the Proposing Firm or Contractor/Builder or Design Professional specific experience relevant to the proposed project (Up to 4 points each —12 points max) Project Name Lo 'on C. Budget Year Completed aC�ccc� Ron 33 ' a®o3 30% bo e y 3 Y "VA, c• f ia�� Fc El -( '300-4— 02 C. PROPOSED TEAM MaMERS PROJECT EXPERIENCE (max 12 points) tg points � � 4__: u u : • : a; ; a ray • : � � e►.• e,: ��. ......_ Project Name Location Bud et Year Com 1=d a 8 4teD 0 V c• JR 9S -L I boa ? 9IaZ�1�7.���il M � • u : ► : �; 1' :rax : • r o►y• ar �-r. �_ PramectName Location Bu4get a. b. s —77 C. Mumcipa1AupMt- dmmmhmt;onBm7dmg QE -1 `.. rav 3/33/2003 _ ....a...A"M1t5Z17vALVAM0NF0RM D. LETTERS OF EVALUATION/RECOI& ENDAnON (max 6 p omts) U poems Client references relevant to the Proposer's specific experience. ( 2 Points each - 6 points max) 5 E. PROPOSING FIIZM(S) AB�ITY' &CAPACITY (5 points) points/ F. PROPOSING FnUWS) PROOF OF BONDING CAPACITY: YES ✓ NO _ 2. LOCAL PREFERENCE: p01nS5 >200 200.750 no 150-100 mi 99-50 mi <501n; 1 9 4 DRUG-F"E WORKPLACE FORM: YES V NO _ 3. NO ENTITY CRE IES FORM: YES d _ 4. PUBLIC S. DEBARMENT CERTMCATION: YES NO _ 6. LICENSES & REGISTRATIONS General Contractor's License attached? YES ✓ NO _ a. b. State of Fl. Certification/Registration attached YES NO , C. Architectangineer Registration attached YES ✓ NO _ d. State of Fl. Professional License YES,2 NO _ / 7. PROOF OF INSURANCE: YES NO— S. EQUAL OPPORTClNIff STATEMENT: YES i/ NO _ TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION SCORE (93points m2ti)` P PS2 SE oNQE-QUALOCATIONSEVALUATIONFORM rev 3113/2003 CRITERIA FOR SCORING PROPOSING FIRM'S EXPERIENCE ON PROJECTS OF SBuI AR OR GREATER SCOPE AND SIZE TO THE ONE UNDER CONSIDERATION Proiect Exiperience Score Desien/Build Administration Buildings 4.0 points each Design/Build other Projects 3.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY Administration Buildings 2.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY other Projects 1.0 point each Where a submittal provides project information for two firms (Architect/Engineer and Builder/Contractor), the two -firm team experience will be evaluated together as a single unit General. Remarks and Observations coaceining this Qualifications Submitral: Date: t= - 11� - 0 3 MunicipalAirpmt monBuflding Q&3 rev 3/13/2003 SECTION QE' QL7P3gICATI0N5 EVALUATION FORM Section QE QUALWICATIONS EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF AIRPORT A.DMRgSTRA'TION BUILDING UIDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer:1� �`t l c of c TiZ�, c i 1� C' Evaluated by: 1. PROPOSEW S LETTER OF INTEREST A INTRODUCTION OfFmM (5 points) PROJECT EHI'ERIENCE (max 12 points) r, 6 points I_ points B. SPECIETC Recently completed projects (completed no more than five years ago) that demonstrate the Proposing Firm or Contractor/Builder or Design Professional specific experience relevant nroiect. 6DP to 4 points each —12 points max) C. PROPOSED TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT EXPERIENCE (max 12 points) I a points l.nn na ATCT DDnTP T FXPF.RTFNC..E ( 4 Dolnts) 1) DESIGN 'I H A M N1HlN-IH-n Bud et Year Completed Piojec[Name Locauon a. b. A`r`1� t 70 C. Mrmicips1 Airport AdDijBjsftzbon BaLjdino X-1 SECnoN QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM 31 PROJECT MANAGER RELATED EXPERTS P.P.. my 3/13/2003 Proiect Name Location ---Budg—etT Year Com leted a. b. / c. D. LETTERS OF EV-ALUATION/RECOMMENDATION (max 6 points) points Client references relevant to the Proposer's specific experience. ( 2 Points each — 6 points max) Project Name Client Name Evall Recom I Contact o R r t mc[ A, �E iz- 20 ,A(2015 C t;l nI7) u ui C.LLNiP _ _S 4A LA f1t A&I 6 .R- -jam E. PROPOSING FIRM(S) ABILITY & CAPACITY (5 points) points F. PROPOSING FIRM(S) PROOF OF BONDING CAPACITY: YES r/ NO 2. LOCAL PREFERENCE: >200 200-150 mi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi 1 2 3 4 3. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE FORM: 4. PUBLIC ENTITY CRU IES FORM- S. DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION: 6. LICENSES & REGISTRATIONS L General Contractor's License attached? b. State of Fl. Certification/Registration attached C. ArchitectlEngineer Registration attached d. State of 171. Professional License 7. PROOF OF INSURANCE: 8. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT: 5 points <50mi YES !/ NO YES ✓ NO 17 ES v11 NO YES °� NO _ YES NO YES _✓ _� NO J YES ✓ NO YES / NO YES ✓ NO TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION SCORE (45 points max) Y 5 pts Mtm apal Airpoft-AdmmutaUan BUMM9 QE -2 SECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM my 3/13/2003 CRITERIA FOR SCORING PROPOSING FIRM'S EXPERIENCE ON PROTECTS OF SEyTTi au OR GREATER SCOPE AND SIZE TO THE ONE UNDER CONSIDERATION Project Experience Score Design/Build Administration Buildings 4.0 points each Design/Build other Projects 3.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY Administration Buildings 2.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY other Projects 1.0 point each 'Where a submittal provides project information for two firms (Architect/Engineer and Builder/Contractor), the two -firm team experience will be evaluated together as a single unit. General Remarks and Observations concerning this Qualifications Submittal: 6 Municipal Airport -Administration Building QE -3 Date: --I:n> s=ON QE- QUALIRcAllomEVALUAnoN FORM Section QE QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF AIRPORT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer: Paul Jacquin & Sons, Inc. P.O. Box 4343, Fort Pierce, FL 34948 Evaluated by. 1. PROPOSERS LETTER OF DMWST A INTRODUCTION of FIRM (5 points) B. SPECIFIC PROJECT EXPERIENCE (max 12 points) mv3113/2oo3 S-- points "a points Recently completed projects (completed no more than five years ago) that demonstrate the Proposing Firm or Contractor)Builder or Design Professional specific experience relevant to the proposed project (Up to 4 points each —12 points max) Project Name Location Budget I Budget Year Completed EL Paris Air Center Indian River County 983,479.00 September 2001 b. Kepley Wemmer Indian River County 880,000.0 March 2002 C. US Trust Indian River County 3,100,000.001 September 2000 C. PROPOSED TEAM MEM ERS PROJECT EXPERIENCE (max 12 points) _LO_points 1) DESIGN TEAM MANAGER RELATED PROJECT ( 4 points) Project Name Location Budget I Year Completed a. Syngenta Indian River County 5,000,000.00 June 2003 b.Keplev Wemmer Indian River County 880 000.00 March 2002 C. Seald Sweet Indian River Count7 1,200 000.00 August 1991 2) CONSTRUCTION MANAGER/SUP. RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE (4 points) Pm'ect Namc Location Budget Year Completed a. Vero Glass & Mirror Indian River Countv 408 693.00 Aril 2002 b.Paris Air Center Indian River Countv 983,479.00 September 2001 C.Huber Dental Office St. Lucie Countv 227 297.00 December 2000 bb idpalAftpatt-AdministationBmldmg QE -1 SEMON QB- QUALTnCA.MDM EVALUAMON FORM my 3113=03 A .... •....., ProiectName Location Budget IYear Com erect a. White City Medical St. Lucie Count n a I n a b. Huber Dental Office St. Lucie County 227,297.001 December 2000 C. IRCC R & L St. Lucie County 13.654,916.001Aril 2002 D. LETTERS OF EVALUATIONMECOIv MENDATION (max 6 points) points Client references relevant to the Proposer's specific experience. ( 2 Points each- 6 points max) Project Name Client Name EvaU Recon Contact a. Vero -Glass & Mirror Ken Sandor S,],,dc R- b. Beachland Elem. SDIRC v ( a z R C. Moorings Reno Moorings Club Lac e l GU ,J�J E. PROPOSINGFIRM(S) ABILITY & CAPACITY ( 5 points) � points F. PROPOSING FMM(S) PROOF OF BONDING CAPACITY: YES ✓ NO 2. LOCAL PREFERENCE: 7. PROOF OF INSURANCE: YES x NO_ 8. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT: YES _ NO x TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION SCORE (43points max)_ pts Mnmcipd Aupart-Admm� Balding QE -2 >200 200-150 rd 150-100 ml 99-50 mt <50mi Paul Jacquin & Sons, Inc.. I— I is located less than 50 1 2 3 4 5 miles from the City of Sebastian. 3. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE FORM: YES x NO 4. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIlVIES FORM: YES x NO 5. DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION: YES x NO 6. LICENSES & REGISTRATIONS a General Contractor's License attached? YES x NO b. State of FL Certification/Registration attached YES x _ NO C. Architect/Engineer Registration attached YES x _ NO. d State ofF1 Professional License YES X NO _ 7. PROOF OF INSURANCE: YES x NO_ 8. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT: YES _ NO x TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION SCORE (43points max)_ pts Mnmcipd Aupart-Admm� Balding QE -2 SECTION QE- QUALIFICAnONS EVALUATION FORM x 3/1312OD3 CRITERIA FOR SCORING PROPOSING FIRM'S EXPERIENCE ON PROJECTS OF SIMIIAR OR GREATER SCOPE AND SIZE TO THE ONE UNDER CONSIDERATION Proiect Experience Score Design/Build Administration Buildings 4.0 points each Design/Build other Projects 3.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY Administration Buildings 2.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY other Projects 1.0 point each Where a submittal provides project information for two firms (ArchitectfEngineer and Builder/Contractor), the two -firm team experience will be evaluated together as a single unit ..u. ar. : au . .w .n . • . aA Y.i. .0 .0 - w . . �i . ...... ... nv. mmcipd Airpmt-Adminishstion Bwlding QE -3 SECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM Section QE QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF AIRPORT A.DAE NISTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer: r— G; Evaluated by: I. PROPOSERS LETTER OF INTEREST my 3/13/2003 A INTRODUCTION of FIRM (5 points) � points B. SPECIFIC PROJECT EXPERIENCE (max 12 points) 18' points Recently completed projects (completed no more than five years ago) that demonstrate the Proposing Firm or Contractor/Builder or Design Professional specific experience relevant to the proposed project (Up to 4 points each —12 points mag) Pmiect Name I Location I Bud Year Co leted a.r4AZT — b u t i oa Moo r 6 00 ovJ ea a oo ( C. PROPOSED TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT EXPERIENCE (max 12 points) d points 1) DESIGN TEAM MANAGER RELATED PR oTprT RTror.'Rtmdrr A Pro ect Name i ocatinm - - -- — Badget Yew Com leted &tow OaIA�I C / 600 oa S b� oe0-F, a4A%E, 00`1tp -( owodig ec-A o c. cc 0co F-(. Jt6oD ®o -a- 2) CONSTRUCTION MANAGER/SUP. RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE (4points) Project Name Location -Budmi Year COMIlletod a. Plaza ;r,3bs P b• 21 LL s ark soy oeo LSM v-pir _ l Sao 000 Municipal Airport-Adminisa-ation Building QE -1 SEMON QT- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM rev 3/132003 I A ,...:..a...\ Project Name Location Budget Year Completed a. b. C. D. LETTERS OF EVALUATION/RECON ENDATION (max 6 points) points Client references relevant to the Proposer's specific experience. ( 2 Points each - 6 points max) P7DJect Name Client Name Eval/ Recom Contact LOCAL PREFERENCE: a. GP 0,"6 S -Aock A i4NSo d ro C.JI N Q�'/d-r� K.Q. < JA A3 -�r� A4c I E. PROPOSINGFIRM(S) ABILITY & CAPACITY (5 points) 6 points F. PROPOSING FIRMS) PROOF OF BONDING CAPACITY: YES ✓ NO 2. LOCAL PREFERENCE: 15' points >200 200.250 m1 150-100 M1 99-50 M1 <50ell 1 2 3 4 5 / 3. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE FORM: YES i/ NO 4. PUBLIC ENTTTY CREMES FORM: YES NO 5. DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION: YES V1 NO 6. LICENSES & REGISTRATIONS a. General Contractor's License attached? YES'/ NO _ b. State of Fl. Certification/Registration attached YES ✓ NO _ c. Architect/Engineer Registration attached YES �� NO d. State of R Professional License YES NO _ 7. PROOF OF INSURANCE: YES ✓/ NO_ 8. EQUAL OPPORTUNTTY STATEMENT: YES ✓ NO TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION SCORE (45 points ntaz) -3 c pts Mmncipal Airport-Adim� Bald n QE SECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM m 3/13/2003 CRITERIA FOR SCORING PROPOSING FIRM'S EXPERIENCE ON PROTECTS OF SiMTTAR OR GREATER SCOPE AND SIZE TO THE ONE UNDER CONSIDERATION Proiect Experience Score Design/Build Administration Buildings 4.0 points each Design/Build other Projects 3.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY Administration Buildings 2.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY other Projects 1.0 point each Where a submittal provides project information for two firms (Architect/Engineer and Builder/Contractor), the two -firm team experience will be evaluated together as a single unit. General Remarks and Observations concerning this Qualifications Submittal.: m=mpal AnportAdmm -sbon Buldmg QE -3 SECTION TE - TECERMAL EVALUATION FORM Section TE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer: r � /4 n11-) BU L Evaluated by. ��c2f1Y TJ /�LCr A. TECHNICAL CRTTERiA - 330 Points Total rev 7/14/2003 Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative, concept drawings and other documentation 1. Proposed Site Plan (40 points) Conceptual Site Plan/Narrative (8 points): Yes: )L No: V points Issues Identified and Addressed: (32 points max) Grading/Drainage; Access Roads/Parldng; Landscaping/Irrigation; Fencing (8 points max per issue) 3 -points 0 fair 4 good 6 excellent 8 Supporting comments: 2. Proposed Structural Plan (40 points) Conceptual Structural Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: 7�., No: pts. Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) �) I---------- I -- — — —I — —4-1 i� 6 pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: Administration Building TE -1 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE- MCMUCALEVALUATIONFOm 3. Proposed Exterior Wall/Finishes Plan (50 points) Exterior Wall Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: No: Exterior Appearance/Aesthetics (10 points): Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 4. Proposed HVAC Plan (40 points) Conceptual HVAC Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: �_ No: Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) 0 fair 10 good 20 llent 30 5. Proposed Electrical System Plan (40 points) rev 7/14/2003 /D pts. /pts• r., 0 pis RLpts Conceptual Electrical System Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: 7�,— No: 0 pts Issues Identified and Addressed (30 points max) I----_ --- I-- — --I — �— Ie its 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: Administration Building TE -2 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 6. Proposed Plumbing System Plan (40 points) Conceptual Plumbing System Plan/Naaative (10 points): Yes: �7 _ No: pts Issues Identified and Addressed (30 points max) I- - --- i -----------I- -- -I_ps 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 7. Proposed Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points) Communications & Other Equipment Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: No: —L�gts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) C Supporting comments: fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 S. Police Evidence Building Plan (40 points) Police Evidence Building Plan/Narrative (10 points): Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) no Supporting comments: fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 :3 D pts Yes: �_ No: 10 prs Administration Building TE -3 Sebastian Idlunicipal Airport 30 pts SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATIONFORM rev 711412003 TOTAL TECIDgCAL CRITERIA 1. Site Plan (40 points max) q0 pts 2. Structural Plan (40 points max) —3.1 pts 3. Exterior Wall Plan (50 points max) SO pts 4. HVAC Plan (40 points max) 3 pts 5. Electrical Plan (40 points max) 3 pts 6. Plmnbmg Plan (40 points max) 31 pts 7. Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points max) q0 pts S. Police Evidence Building ( 40 points max) 1/77 ptS TOTAL TECHNICAL SCORE (330 points max) -:3 L ptS Administration Building TE -4 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECEDIICAL EVALUATION FORM re , 7119/2003 B. MANAGEMENT CRITERIA .110 Points Total Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative and other documentation 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (19 points max) Proximity of Design Consultant to sim (7 points max:): >150mf 150-100 rat 99-50 mi < 50mi 6 I- - -- 0 — —-I------------------I-----------------I 2 4 6 points Proximity of Builder to site (7 points max) >150 mi 150-100 m1 99-50 mi < SO m1 I------------i-------------I-_.—.-------I 0 2 4 points 6 Proximity of Design Consultant to Builder (6 points max) >150mi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi < 50mi I ---------I -- – — – I -------------------I points 0 2 4 6 Supporting comments: 2. Proposer% Organization and Key Personnel (40 points max) Proposing Firm organization chart (5 points max) 3_ points Proposed Project Management personnel relevant experience/resumes (1 o points max)_ points Proposed Project Design personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max) / Q points Proposed Project Construction personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max) 10 points Time commitment of key personnel to this project (5 points max) S points Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Management Programs (40 points max) Project Cost Control (5 points max) Value Engmeering Plan and Experience (5 points max) Administration Building TE -5 3 points points Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TEC UCALEVALUATTONFORM rev 711412003 Scheduling experience and history on similar projects (5 points may) 3 points SDBE Participation Plan (5 points max) 3 points Local Business Participation Plan (10 points max) 7 points Veteran's Participation Plan (5 points max) 2 points Project safety plan (5 points max) points Supporting comments: 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) Quality Control/Quality Assurance plan for design activities (6 points max) points Quality Control/Quality Assurance plan for construction activities (6 points max) points Supportmg comments: TOTAL MANAGEMENT CRITERIA 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (18 points max) J points 2. Proposer's Organization and Key Personnel (40 points max) 3 5 points 3 Proposer's Management Programs (40 points max) a points 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) 0 point TOTAL MANAGEMENT SCORE (110 points max) points Administration Building TE -6 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7/1412003 C. PROdECI SCEEDULE -100 Points Total I. Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points max) Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower) (10 points max) �6' points Demonsnated schedule adherence on similar projects (1 o points max) 6 points Time commitment of key personnel (10 points max) points Supporting comments: 2. Builder's Construction Schedule (50 points) Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower, equipment) (5 points max) 3 points Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) points Demonstrated subcontractors schedule adherence on similar projects (1 o points max) points Time commitment of key personnel (5 points max) 5 points Coordination of design and construction activities (5 points max) 3 points Identification of long lead time items (5 points max) 3 points Scheduled allowance for permitting activities (5 points max) 3 points Scheduled allowance for submittals and review activities (5 points max) _-pow Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points) Note: Schedule shall reflect all investigations, surveys, design, permitting, preparation of construction documents, reviews, construction, inspections, testing, preparation of record Administration Building TE -7 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECEMCAL EVALUATION FORM m 711412003 drawings and other documents, and all other required activities from Notice To Proceed to Certificate of Occupancy. 2 points will be awarded for each 7 calendar day period less than the allowable project design and construction schedule of three hundred and sixty-five (365) calendar days (20 points Max) TOTALPROIECT SCHEDULE CRITERIA L Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points max) /5 points b. Builder's Cons ruc on Schedule (50 points max) 3 O points c. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points max)y points TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE SCORE (100 Points max) 4`J1 points THIS SECTION LEFT BLANK INI'E_NTIONALLY Administration Building TE -8 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE- TEM41CALEVALUATIONFORM EVALUATION SUMMARY rev 7/14/2003 1. Technical Criteria Score (330 points max) 3 (5 points 2. Management Criteria Score (110 points max) points 3. Project Schedule Score (100 points max) 4-166' points TOTAL TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION SCORE (540 points max-) -Y/ i�points General Remarks and Observations concerning this Proposal: WfJS The p1r9e-Cx) U.) WElzE /c'a(ClrJ6 }012 Date: B - ( 7 � Administration Buildingg TE -9 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECIiNICAL EVALUATION FORM Section TE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND COATSTRUCTION OF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer R r f Evaluated by. A. TECHNICAL CRITERIA - 330 Points Total rev 7114/2003 Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative, concept drawings and other documentation 1. Proposed Site Plan (40 points) Conceptual Site Plan/Narrative (8 points): Yes: '- No: g points Issues Identified and Addressed: (32 points max) Grading/Drainage; Access Roads/Parking; Landscaping/Irrigation; Fencing (8 points max per issue) 1---l-44--i 4----I as points 0 fair 4 good 6 excellent 8 Supporting comments: 2. Proposed Structural Plan (40 points) Conceptual Structival Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: '�, No: Issues Identified and Addressed (30 points max) 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: opts• Administration Building TE -1 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE- TECMUCAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 3. Proposed Exterior Wall/Finishes Plan (50 points) Exterior Wall Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: )4— No: 7_pts. Exterior Appearance/Aesthetics (10 points): pts. Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) i--- ---- I----E---1----I ! s Pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 4. Proposed HVAC Plan (40 points) Conceptual HVAC Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: _� No: 0 pts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I ---- I-- --- — I --- I opts 0 fair 10 good 20 exec nt 30 Supporting comments: 5. Proposed Electrical System Plan (40 points) Conceptual Electrical System Plau/Narrative (10 points): Yes: % No: / 0 pts Issues Identified and Addressed (30 points max) I—� — --I--- -- ---I— — — — -------- 3 0 pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: dramistration Building TE -2 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION IF - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 6. Proposed Plumbing System Plan (40 points) Conceptual Plumbing System Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: -A No: 0 pis Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) _opts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 7. Proposed Communications 8 Other Equipment Plan (40 points) Communications & Other Equipment Plan/Narrative (10 points): Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 8. Police Evidence Building Plan (40 points) Police Evidence Building Plan/Narrative (10 points): Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: Yes: ),-, No: 1O P 15 a P— pts Yes: 9, No: l�pts Administration Building TE -3 Sebastian Municipal Airport 9 per SECTION TE - TEMUCAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 TOTAL BCIDZCAL CRITERIA 1. Site Plan (40 points max) 0 pts 2. Structural Plan (40 points max) 3 D pts 3. Exterior Wall Plan (50 points max) 30 pts 4. HVAC Plan (40 points max) 3 j pts 5. Electrical Plan (40 points max) q0 pts 6. Plumbing Plan (40 points max) G/ 0 pts 7. Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points max) 3 .1�1 pts 8. Police Evidence Building (40 points max) a q pts TOTAL TEC)iNIICAL SCORE (330 points max) 23 �pts Administration Building TE -4 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECMUCAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7/14/2003 B. MANAGEMENT CRITERIA -110 Points Total Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative and ocher documentation 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (18 points max) Proximity of Design Consultant to sit-, (7 points max): >150mi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi < SOMI 0 2 4 6 points Proximity of Builder to site (7 points max) >150mi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi < 50mi I -- -------------I------------- -I--- - — -I points 0 2 4 6 Proximity of Design Consultant to Builder (6 points max) >150 mi 150-100 mi 99 -So mi < 50mi 0 2 4 / I-------I---------_—I______-----I � points 6 Supporting comments: 2. Proposer's Organization and Key Personnel (40 points max) Proposing Firm organization chart (5 points max) � points Proposed Project Management personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max)__f points Proposed Project Design personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max) / (7 points Proposed Project Construction personnel relevant experience/resurnes (10 points max) / poems Time commitment of key personnel to this project (5 points max) points Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Management Programs (40 points max) Project Cost Control (5 points max) Value Engineering Plan and Experience (5 points mar.) Administration Building Tlr5 points i c_points Sebastian Municipal Airport SEMONTE- MITCALEVALUATIONFORM rn- 7/14/2003 Scheduling experience and history on similar projects (5 points max) 3 points SDBE Participation Plan (5 points max) 3 points Local Business Participation Plan (10 points max) S pow Veteran's Participation Plan (5 points max) � points Project safety plan (5 points max) 3 points Supporting comments: 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) Quality ConlroUQuality Assurance plan for design activities (6 points max) Quality Control/Quality Assurance plan for construction activities (6 points max) Supporting comments: TOTAL MANAGEMENT CRITERIA 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (18 points max) 2. Proposer's Organization and Key Personnel (40 points max) 3 Proposer's Management Programs (40 points max) 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) TOTAL MANAGEMENT SCORE (110 points max) points points % U points 40 points 2 G points points cl 6 points Administration Building TE -6 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTIONTE- TECEMCAL EVALUATION FORM re 711412003 C. PROJECT SCHDDLE -100 Points Total 1. Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points max) Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower) (10 points max) �0 points Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) -1 points Time commitment of key personnel (10 points max) 16 points Supporting comments: 2. Builder's Construction Schedule (50 points) Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower, equipment) (5 points max) 3 points Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) points Demonstrated subcontractors schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max),S points Time commitment of key personnel (5 points max) "i points Coordination of design and construction activities (5 points max) j points Identification of long lead time items (5 points max) points Scheduled allowance for permitting activities (5 points max) 5 points Scheduled allowance for submittals and review activities (5 points max) point Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points) Note: Schedule shall reflect all investigations, surveys, design, permitting, preparation of construction documents, reviews, construction, inspections, testing, preparation of record Administration Building TE -7 Sebastian Munici al p Airport SECTION TE - TEMUCALEVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 drawings and other documents, and all other required activities from Notice To Proceed to Certificate of Occupancy. 2 points will be awarded for each 7 calendar day period less than the allowable project design and construction schedule of three hundred and sixty-five (365) calendar days (20 points max) Supporting comments: TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE CRITERIA a Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points max) b. Builder's Construction Schedule (50 points mac) c. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points max) TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE SCORE (100 Points max) THIS SECTION LEFT BLANK INTENdTIONALLY l 0 points points U points Administration Building TE -8 Sebastian Municipal Airport points SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUAnON FORM rm, 711412003 EVALUATION SUMMARY 1. Technical Criteria Score (330 points max) ?3 q points 2. Management Criteria Score (110 points Max) C1 ( points 3. Project Schedale Score (100 points max) kpoints TOTAL TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION SCORE (540 points mxc) 3o! points General Remarks and (Observations concerning this Proposal: / Yf�GY God P aoyo sot c tBc t am 4- � r -t4 t IV Coca/KA-7 i0" p e ( o� (Rtsr,u 7,d l � o.) Date: t `" /y — LI) 3 Administration Building TE -9 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM Section TE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF ADAUNISTRATION ]BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer. �u ao ( k Cx dsrtzkr- ibc,o Evaluated by. 14le CC A. TECHNICAL CRITERIA - 330 Points Total rev 711412003 Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative, concept drawings and other documentation 1. Proposed Site Plan (40 points) Conceptual Site Plan/Narrative (8 points): Yes: 1Z No: points Issues Identified and Addressed: (32 points max) Grading/Drainage; Access Roads/Parlang; Landscaping/Irrigation; Fencing (8 points max per issue) 0 Supporting comments: fair 4 good 6 excellent 8 2. Proposed Structural Plan (40 points) Conceptual Structural Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: _� No: I pts. Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) ---� -1 2 e pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: Administration Building TE -1 Sebastian Municipal Airport SEMON TE - TECMUCAL EVALUATION FORM 3. Proposed Exterior Wall/Finishes Plan (50 points) Exterior Wall Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: __�,_ No: Exterior Appearance/Aesthetics (10 points): Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 4. Proposed HVAC Plan (40 points) Conceptual HVAC Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: )( No: Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I------ I-- -�--- I ------------------I 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 5. Proposed Electrical System Plan (40 points) Conceptual Electrical System Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: No Issues Identified and Addressed (30 points max) 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: rev 7/1412003 _(D pts. % pts. / b' pts —AL pts Administration Building TE -2 Sebastian Municipal Airport / S pts pts Ii , SECTION TE - TEMNICAL EVALUATION FORM 6. Proposed Plumbing System Plan (40 points) Conceptual Plumbing System Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: _� No: Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I------------------I----------------I---------------I 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 7. Proposed Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points) Communications & Other Equipment Plan/Narrative (10 points): Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: S. Police Evidence Building Plan (40 points) Police Evidence Building Plan/Narrative (10 points): Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) 0 fair 10 good 20 ent 30 Supporting comments: rev 7/14/1003 1pts 3 o pT.S Yes: No: /0 PrS a a- pts Yes: X No: _Lprs Administration Building TE-_ Sebastian Municipal Airport pts SECTION TE- TECMCAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7/14/2005 TOTAL TECI'DgCAL CRITERIA 1. Site Plan (40 points max) -3 �/ pts 2. Structural Plan (40 points max) :3 R pts 3. Exterior Wall Plan (50 points max) 3 5 pts 4. HVAC Plan (40 points max) Qpts 5. Electrical Plan (40 points max) Pts 6. Plumbing Plan (40 points max) 410 pts 7. Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points max) S I pts 8. Police Evidence Building ( 40 points max) 3 r pts TOTAL TJ CHMCAL SCORE (330 points max) 9 7 % pts Administration Building TE -4 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECMUCAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7/1412003 B. MANAGEMENT CRITERIA -110 Points Total Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative and other documentation 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (18 points max) Proximitv of Design Consultant to site (7 points maa:): >150mi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi < so mi I-----------------I-------------------I-----------------I 0 2 4 6 points Proximity of Builder to site (7 points max) >150 mi ---150-100 mi 99-50 mi !— ---- I- -- --- I ----------------I 0 2 4 < 50mi 6 J� points Proximity of Design Consultan to Builder (6 points max) >150 mi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi I -------I------ ---------- I -- 0 2 4 < so mi - — —I 6 S points Supporting comments: 2. Proposer's Organization and Key Personnel (40 points max) Proposing Firm organization chart (5 points max) 5— points Proposed Project Management personnel relevant experience/resumes (lo points max)_Lo pomts Proposed Project Design personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max) _ L_ points Proposed Project Construction personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max) --LO pow Time commitment of key personnel to this project (5 points max) _ points Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Management Programs (40 points max) Project Cost Control (5 points max) points Value Engineering Plan and Experience (5 points max) d pow Administration Building TE -5 Sebastian Municipal Airports SEMONTE- TECMUCALEVALUAT[ONFORM rev 7/19/2003 Scheduling experience and history on similar projects (5 points max) 3 points SDBE Participation Plan (5 points max) tJ pow Local Business Participation Plan (10 points max) points Veteran's Participation Plan (5 points max) 3 points Project safety plan (5 points max) _points Supporting comments: 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) Quality Control/Quality Assurance plan for design activities (6 points max) points Quality Contro /Quality Assurance plan for construction activities (6 points max) point Supporting comments: TOTAL MANAGEMENT CRITERIA 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (18 points max)Points 2. Proposer's Organization and Key Personnel (40 points max) qQ ` points S Proposer's Management Programs (40 points max) 3 `( / points 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) points TOTAL MANAGEMENT SCORE (110 points max) Ica points Administration Building TE -6 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECMUCAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 C. PROJECT SCHEDULE -100 Points Total 1. Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points maz) Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower) (10 points max) 10 points Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) _e points Time commitment of key personnel (10 points max) 8 points Supporting comments: 2. Builder's Construction Schedule (50 points) Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower, equipment) (5 points max) 5 points Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) points Demonstrated subcontractors schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) ``6 V points Time commitneut of key personnel (5 points max) _points Coordination of design and construction activities (5 points max) 5 points Identification of long lead time items (5 points max) S points Scheduled allowance for permitting activities (5 points max) _points Scheduled allowance for submittals and review activities (5 points max) 5 pots Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points) Note: Schedule shall reflect all investigations, surveys, design, permitting, preparation of construction documents, reviews, construction, inspections, testing, preparation of record Administration Building TE -7 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECFINICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 drawings and other documents, and all other required activities from Notice To Proceed to Certificate of Occupancy. 2 points will be awarded for each 7 calendar day period less than the allowable project design and construction schedule of three hundred and sixty-five (365) calendar days (20 points max) I= Supporting comments: TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE CRITERIA a Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points max) -2 L points b. Builder's Construction Schedule (50 points max) 3 points c. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points max) Q points TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE SCORE (100 Points max) (I a points THIS SECTION LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY Administration Building TE -8 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE- TECEINICALEVALUATIONFORM m711412003 EVALUATION SUMMARY 1. Technical Criteria Score (330 points max) 27 % pow 2. Management Criteria Score (110 points mass) pow 3. Project Schedule Score (100 points max) points TOTAL TECEMCAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION SCORE (540 points max) ! points General Remarks and Observations concerning this Proposal: f nOdrL 7R-0 PO's AL Aj �ReS�w�ILliUni 1iuf �l� -�C-r 13A c- E Odiia t&i N G �0 7ts Signature: Date: 9 — /y - O 3 Administration Building TE -9 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM Section QE QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF AIRPORT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer: Evaluated by,--`, x 1. PROPOSER'S LETTER OF INTEREST rav 3/13/2003 A INTRODUCTION of FIRM (5 points) points B. SPECIFIC PROJECT EXPERIENCE (max 12 points) % 1110— points Recently completed projects (completed no more than five years ago) that demonstrate the Proposing Firm or Contractor/Builder or Design Professional specific experience relevant to the proposed project. (Up to 4 points each —12 points max) Project Name Location Budget Year Completed a. L —ac�i b. C. PROPOSED TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT =ERIENCE (max 12 points) ! points 11 DESIGN TEAM MANAGER RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE (4 points) Project Name Location Budget Year Com leted a. b. � c. 2) CONSTRUCTION MANAGERISUP. RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE (4 pomts) Project Name Location Budget Year Completed a. b. C. Municipal AirportAdu imah-ation Building QE -1 SECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM 3) PROJECT MANAGER RELATED rev 3/13/2003 ( 4 points) Project Name Location Budget Year Completed a. b. c. D. LETTERS OF EVALUATION/RECONRvMNDATION (max 6 points) (, points Client references relevant to the Proposer's specific experience. ( 2 Points each – 6 points max) Pro ect Name Client Name Eval/ Recom Contact a. b. C. ., S .SOS Jn_ �-.�. Com• E. PROPOSING FIRMS) ABILITY & CAPACITY (5 points) points F. PROPOSING FIRM(S) PROOF OF BONDING CAPACITY: YES fN0 2. JOC_AL PREFERENCE: points 8. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT: YES NO TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION SCORE (45 points max) pts Municipal Airport-Adminislmhon Building QE -2 >200 200-150 mi 150-100 mi 99- 50 mi —4 � < 50 mi I+ —2 3 1 5 3. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE FORM: YES NO 4. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES FORM: YES l NO 5. DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION: YES NO _ 6. LICENSES & REGISTRATIONS a. General Contractor's License attached? YES NO _ NO b. State of Fl. certification/Registration attached YES _ C. Architect/Engineer Registration attached YES NO _ d. State of 171. Professional License YES NO _ 7. PROOF OF INSURANCE: YES NO_ 8. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT: YES NO TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION SCORE (45 points max) pts Municipal Airport-Adminislmhon Building QE -2 SECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM m 3/13/2003 CRITERIA FOR SCORING PROPOSING FIRM'S EXPERIENCE ON PROJECTS OF SIlVIILAR OR GREATER SCOPE AND SIZE TO THE ONE UNDER CONSIDERATION Proiect Experience Score I)esignBuild Administration Buildings 4.0 points each Design/Build other Projects 3.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY Administration Buildings 2.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY other Projects 1.0 point each Where a submittal provides project information for two firms (Architect/Engineer and Builder/Contractor), the two -firm team experience will he evaluated together as a single unit. General Remarks and Observations concerning this Qualifications Submittal: Date: Mu=pal Ailport-AdmunstrabonBuildng QE -3 SECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM Section QE QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUMON OF AIRPORT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer: S Evaluated by: 1. PROPOSER'S LETTER OF INTEREST A INTRODUCTION of FIRM (5 points) B. SPECIFIC PROJECT (max 12 points) rev 3/13/2003 J points 1-i_ points Recently completed projects (completed no more than five years ago) that demonstrate the Proposing Firm or Contractor/Builder or Design Professional specific experience relevant to the proposed project. (Up to 4 points each —12 points max) Project Name Location Budget Year Completed a. ` ��? 7 b. �-- C. C. PROPOSED TEAM ME HERS PROJECT E3-2ERIENCE (max 12 points) ,� r�acrnrT Trerrt TReTTe(:FR RRT.ATP.T) PROTF.('T RXPRRTF.N('.R 'I points ( 4 nnints) Project Name i ocation Bud ct Year Completed FC �-- n\ rrnr.TCTRTTTTh)KT MATTArRR/CTTP RFT.ATF.n PRC)TF.(.T F.XPFRTF.NC.F. (4 nnitrtg) Project Name Location Budget Year Completed b. y lz� 5aocoo C. Cil S2oa o Municipal Airport -Administration Building QE -1 SECTION QE- QUAIMCAMNS EVALUATION FORM ;1 PROTP..('T MANAGER RELATED 2 WIN97YADkf (4 points) Project Name Location Bud et Year Completed a. b. U c. D. LETTERS OF EVALUATION/RECOMNIENDATION (max 6 points)( points Client references relevant to the Proposer's specific experience. ( 2 Points each — 6 points max) Pro ect Name Client Name EvaU Recom Contact points >200 200-150 mi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi b. C. E. PROPOSING FIRM(S) ABILITY & CAPAC= (5 points) points F. PROPOSING FIRM(S) PROOF OF BONDING CAPACITY: YES/tsNO 2. LOCAL PREFERENCE: points >200 200-150 mi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi <50mi 1 2 3 4 5 3. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE FORM: YES Xx NO _ 4. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES FORM: YES ✓ NO S. DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION: YES NO _ 6. LICENSES & REGISTRATIONS a. General Contractor's License attached? b. State of Fl. Cerdfication/Registration attached C. Architect/Engineer Registration attached d. State of Fl. Professional License YES YES YES YES NO _ NO _ NO NO 7. PROOF OF INSURANCE: 8. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT: YES / NO_ YES / NO TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION SCORE (45 points max) -'?> I pts Municipal Airport-Ad=mst<etion Building QE -2 SECTION QT— QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM x 3/13/1003 CR11MPJA FOR SCORING PROPOSING FIRM'S EXPERIENCE ON PROJECTS OF ST1yMTf AR OR GREATER SCOPE AND SIZE TO THE ONE UNDER CONSIDERATION Proiect Experience Score Design/Build Administration Buildings 4.0 points each Design/Build other Projects 3.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY Administration Buildings 2.0 points each Design ONLI' or Build ONLY other Projects 1.0 point each Where a submittal provides project information for two fu -ms (Architect/Engineer and Builder/Contractor), the two -firm team experience will be evaluated together as a single unit. General Remarks and Observations concerning this Qualifications Submittal: Signature: Municipal Aixport-Admmistetion Bm7ding QE -3 sEcnoN QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM Section QE QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF AIRPORT ADN RUSTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE CONTOUND Proposer: ` GIT \ v�1G, �1 Jtr� --zfz Evaluated by:� L, 1. PROPOSE R'S LETTER OF INTEREST rry 3/1312003 A INTRODUCTION of FIRM (5 points) points B. SPECIFIC PROJECT EXPERIENCE (max 12 points) points Recently completed projects (completed no more than five years ago) that demonstrate the Proposing Firm or Contractor/Builder or Design Professional specific experience relevant to the proposed project (Up to 4 points each — 12 points max) Project Name Location Budget I Year Com leted a. we , 9fS �t b. G 2— C. c. C. PROPOSED TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT EXPERIENCE (max 12 points) ':: l points 1) DESIGN TEAM MANAGER RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE (4 noints) Proiect Name I Location Budget I Year Completed a. b. C. 2) CONSTRUCTION MANAGER/SUP. RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE t 4 nnintel Project Name Location Budget Year Completed a. b. C. Mem mpal Airport Administration Building QE -3 SECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM ' .1 1 11 : ► : C � M � A' : 1�1� my 3/13/2003 ! d nnimcl Project Name Location Budget Year Completed a. —a -- b. c. D. LETTERS OF EVALUATION/RECOMIMENDATION (max 6 points) --L points Client references relevant to the Proposer's specific experience. (2 Points each — 6 points mag) Prdect Name Client Name Eval/ Recom Contact a. b. G oaa� ka few a �. Cans r ' 1 M� E. PROPOSING FIRM(S) ABILITY & CAPACITY (5 points) points F. PROPOSING FIRM(S) PROOF OF BONDING CAPACITY: YES NO 2. LOCAL PREFERENCE: 5 points 8. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT: YES NO TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION SCORE (45 points max) -3-11 pts MunicipalAirpon-Admicl cm Building QE -2 >200 200150 mi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi <50mi I 2 3 4 5 3. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE FORM: YES _Z' NO 4. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES FORM: YES 1 NO _ S. DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION: YES NO 6. LICENSES & REGISTRATIONS a. General Contractor's License attached? YES NO b. State of Fl. Certification/Registration attached YES NO C. Architect/Engineer Registration attached YES _ NO d. State of Fl. Professional License YES _� _ NO _ 7. PROOF OF INSURANCE: YES NO 8. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT: YES NO TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION SCORE (45 points max) -3-11 pts MunicipalAirpon-Admicl cm Building QE -2 SECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM m 3/13/2003 CRITERIA FOR SCORING PROPOSING FIRM'S EXPERIENCE ON PROJECTS OF SBMAR OR GREATER SCOPE AND SIZE TO THE ONE UNDER CONSIDERATION Proiect Experience Score Design/Build Administration Buildings 4.0 points each Design/Build other Projects 3.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY Administration Buildings 2.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY other Projects 1.0 point each Where a submittal provides project information for two firms (Architect/Engineer and Builder/Contractor), the two -firm team experience will be evaluated together as a single unit. General Remarks and Observations concerning this Qualifications Submittal: Date: M=cipalA#mt-A mnlr t;onBuildmg QE -3 SECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM Section QE QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF AIRPORT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer: 4 C Evahlated by:,S 1. PROPOSER'S LETTER OF INTEREST A INTRODUCTION of FIRM (5 points) B. SPECIFIC PROJECT EXPERIENCE (max 12 points) rev 3/1311-003 3 points 5 points Recently completed projects (completed no more than five years ago) that demonstrate the Proposing Firm or Contractor/Builder or Design Professional specific experience relevant to the proposed project. (Up to 4 points each —12 points max) Pm'ect Name Location Bud et Year Com I a. �tvcn Q c� D s wa b. C. PROPOSED TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT EXPERIENCE (max 12 points) -7 points 1) DESIGN TEAM MANAGER RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE ( 4 points) Project Name Location Budget Year Cbmpleted b. 7,56 oc-D C.a. ?i500 M CONSTRUCTION MANAGER(SUP. RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE (4 nomts) Project Name Location Budget Year Completed a. b. C. Mimicipal Aiupon-Administration Building QE -1 SECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM my 3/13/2003 ( 4 nninfc) D. LETTERS OF EVALUATION/RECOMMMMATION (max 6 points) O points Client references relevant to the Proposer's specific experience. (2 Points each -6 points max) Project Name Client Name Eval/ Recom Conrad a. b. Jrt--- $J C. E. PROPOSING FIRM(S) ABILSTY & CAPACITY (5 points) 4. points F. PROPOSING FIRMCIT S) PROOF OF BONDING CAPACITY: YES _ NO 2. LOCAL PREFERENCE: >200 100-150 mi 150-200 M1 99- 50 rid < 50 ml 1 2 3 4 5 3. DRUG-FREE WORTCPLACE FORM: YES Z NO _ 4. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIlVIES FORM: YES NO _ S. DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION: YES Z NO 6. LICENSES & REGISTRATIONS a. General Contractor's License attached? b. State of FL Certification/Registration attached C. ArchitecVEngineer Registration attached d. State of FL Professional License 7. PROOF OF INSURANCE: 8. EQUAL OPPORTUNI'T'Y STATEMENT: YES NO _ YES NO _ YES NO YES NO YES/ NO YES _/ NO / c�Ctw+� fid•-i%:�. J[��c�?r�+�* TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION SCORE (45 poinrs max) 2 Z pts Municipal Airport-Ad»mm=trm- =Bmld=g QE SECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM = 3/13/2003 MIERTA FOR SCORING PROPOSING FIRM'S EXPERIENCE ON PROJECTS OF SMU AR OR GREATER SCOPE AND SIZE TO THE ONE UNDER CONSIDERATION Proiect Eznerience Score Design/Build Administration Buildings 4.0 points each Design/Build other Projects 3.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY Administration Buildings 2.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY other Projects 1.0 point each Where a submittal provides project information for two firms (Architect/Engineer and Builder/Contractor), the two -firm team experience will be evaluated together as a single unit. Simatarc: Mmmpal Airport-Adm=sm±Lm BuRding QE -3 Date: SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM Section TE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer: Evaluated by: A. TECHNICAL CRITERIA - 330 Points Total rev 7/14/2003 Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative, concept drawings and other documentation 1. Proposed Site Plan (40 points) Conceptual Site Plan/Narrative (8 points): Yes: /o: points Issues Identified and Addressed: (32 points max) Grading/Drainage; Access Roads/Parking; Landscapingdrrigation; Fencing (8 points max per issue) I-------------------- I ------------------- I ------------------- I 3a points 0 fair 4 good 6 excellent 8 Supporting comments: 2. Proposed Structural Plan (40 points) Conceptual Structural Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: —ZNo: 1 o pts. Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I--------------------I-------------------I-------------------pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: Administration Building TE -1 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TEMSTICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7114/2003 3. Proposed Exterior Wall/Finishes Plan (50 points) Exterior Wall Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: No: (-0 pts. Exterior Appearance/Aesthetics (10 points): pts. Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I-------------------- I ------------------- I ------------------- I —,(D pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 4. Proposed HVAC Plan (40 points) Conceptual HVAC Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: �No: pts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I-------------------- I ------------------- I ------------------- I opts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 5. Proposed Electrical System Plan (40 points) Conceptual Electrical System Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: No: (o pts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I-------------------- I ------------------- I ------------------- I 3z> Pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: Administration Building TE -2 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 6. Proposed Plumbing System Plan (40 points) Conceptual Plumbing System Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: / No: -D pts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I-------------------- I ------------------- I ------------------- I 3a pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 7. Proposed Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points) t0 Communications & Other Equipment Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: / No: Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) 0 Supporting comments: fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 8. Police Evidence Building Plan (40 points) Police Evidence Building Plan/Narrative (10 points): Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) 0 Supporting comments: fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 o� pts Yes: / No: 2,n pts Administration Building TE -3 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE- TECIINICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 1 • Y .hl ;_ .1wM_ . ; 1. Site Plan (40 points max) 3rz pts 2. Structural Plan (40 points max) j O pts 3. Exterior Wall Plan (50 points max) 151--� pts 4. HVAC Plan (40 points max) L-1 D pts 5. Electrical Plan (40 points max) 'f O pts 6. Plumbing Plan (40 points max) L -(O pts 7. Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points max) 35 pts 8. Police Evidence Building ( 40 points max) 'I O pts TOTAL TECHNICAL SCORE (330 points max) 32-3 pts Administration Building TE -4 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECENICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 B. MANAGEMENT CRITERIA -110 Points Total Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative and other documentation 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (18 points max) Proximity of Design Consultant to site (7 points max): >150 mi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi < Sow ---- -------- --1--- ---- --------- -I ---- ------------- I points 0 2 4 6 Proximity of Builder to site (7 points max) >150 mi 150-100 ml 99-50 mi < 50 mi L` I--------------------I--------------------I-------------------I points 0 2 4 6 Proximity of Design Consultant to Builder (6 points max) >150mi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi I---- —-------------- I -------------------- I ------------------- < 50mi I Co points 0 2 4 6 Supporting comments: 2. Proposer's Organization and Key Personnel (40 points max) Proposing Firm organization chart (5 points max) 3 points Proposed Project Management personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max) `L points Proposed Project Design personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max) points Proposed Project Construction personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max) ` points Time commitment of key personnel to this project (5 points max) �5 points Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Management Programs (40 points max) Project Cost Control (5 points max) Value Engineering Plan and Experience (5 points max) Administration Building TE -5 3 points S points Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECFINICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 Scheduling experience and history on similar projects (5 points max) points SDBE Participation Plan (5 points max) points Local Business Participation Plan (10 points max) points Veteran's Participation Plan (5 points max) points Project safety plan (5 points max) -5 points Supporting comments: 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) Quality Control/Quality Assurance plan for design activities (6 points max) ( points Quality Control/Quality Assurance plan for construction activities (6 points max) ( points Supporting comments: TOTAL MANAGEMENT CRITERIA 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (18 points max) points Y 2. Proposer's Organization and Key Personnel (40 points max) points 3q 3 Proposer's Management Programs (40 points max) ).O points 23 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) 5 points 8Y TOTAL MANAGEMENT SCORE (110 points max) S points Administration Building TE -6 Sebastian Municipal Airport 9i SECTION TE - TECMZCAL EVALUATION FORM C. PROJECT SCBEDULE -100 Points Total 1. Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points max) Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower) (10 points max) Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) Time commitment of key personnel (10 points max) Supporting comments: 2. Builder's Construction Schedule (50 points) Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower, equipment) (5 points max) Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) Demonstrated subcontractors schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) Time commitment of key personnel (5 points max) Coordination of design and construction activities (5 points max) Identification of long lead time items (5 points max) Scheduled allowance for permitting activities (5 points max) Scheduled allowance for submittals and review activities (5 points max) Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points) rev 711412003 W points -!i'L points %points `I points 5 points points 7 points tl -points `I points -I points `V points Note: Schedule shall reflect all investigations, surveys, design, permitting, preparation of construction documents, reviews, construction, inspections, testing, preparation of record Administration Building TE -7 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECIINICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 drawings and other documents, and all other required activities from Notice To Proceed to Certificate of Occupancy. 2 points will be awarded for each 7 calendar day period less than the allowable project design and construction schedule of three hundred and sixty-five (365) calendar days (20 points max) points Supporting comments: TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE CRITERIA a Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points max) )-`( points 2,(1 b. Builder's Constriction Schedule (50 points max) L1 D points 3 Z c. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points max) points Sg TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE SCORE (100 Points max) �- `l points THIS SECTION LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY Administration Building TE -8 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHI41CAL EVALUATION FORM EVALUATION SUMMARY 1. Technical Criteria Score (330 points max) 2. Management Criteria Score (110 points max) 3. Project Schedule Score (100 points max) TOTAL TECIINICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION SCORE (540 points max) General Remarks and Observations concerning this Proposal: Signature: Date: rev 7114/2003 3 �, points 615 points toy points points Administration Building TE -9 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECIMCAL EVALUATION FORM Section TE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer: Evaluated by: �7 CC�c y_or=,cS A. TECHNICAL CRITERIA - 330 Points Total rev 711412003 Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative, concept drawings and other documentation 1. Proposed Site Plan (40 points) Conceptual Site Plan/Narrative (8 points): Yes: No: b points Issues Identified and Addressed: (32 points max) Grading/Drainage; Access Roads/Parldng; Landscapingdrrigation; Fencing (8 points max per issue) I--------------------I-------------------I-------------------1 01 `j points 0 fair 4 good 6 excellent 8 Supporting comments: 2. Proposed Structural Plan (40 points) Conceptual Structural Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: No: pts. Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I---------------- ---I— -------- ------ I ------------------- I d o pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: Administration Building TE -1 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7114/2003 3. Proposed Exterior Waffinishes Plan (50 points) Exterior Wall Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: pts. Exterior Appearance/Aesthetics (10 points): \O pts. Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I------------------I---------------I-----------------I 3o pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 4. Proposed HVAC Plan (40 points) Conceptual HVAC Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: /No: pts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I-------------- ----- I ------------------- I -------------- ---- pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 5. Proposed Electrical System Plan (40 points) Conceptual Electrical System Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: / No: t O pts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I-------------------- I ------------------- I ------------------- I 3-D pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: Administration Building TT --2 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM 6. Proposed Plumbing System Plan (40 points) Conceptual Plumbing System Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: No: Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: rev 7/1412003 A-'-') pts pts 7. Proposed Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points) I A Communications & Other Equipment Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: "�- No: Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 8. Police Evidence Building Plan (40 points) Police Evidence Building Plan/Narrative (10 points): Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I-------------------I-------------------I-------------------I 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 01 > pts Yes: No: 7o pts Administration Building TE -3 Sebastian Municipal Airport I SECTION TE - TECIINICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7/14/1003 TOTAL TECHNICAL CRITERIA 1. Site Plan (40 points max) pts 2. Structural Plan (40 points max) pts 3. Exterior Wall Plan (50 points max)_ pts 4. HVAC Plan (40 points max) 3 3 pts 5. Electrical Plan (40 points max) L-1 1C> pts 6. Plumbing Plan (40 points max) O pts 7. Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points max) 3 5 pts S. Police Evidence Building ( 40 points max) a pts TOTAL TECHNICAL SCORE (330 points max) ` 4 pts Administration Building TE -4 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE- TECHNiCALEVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 B. MANAGEMENT CRITERIA -110 Points Total Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative and other documentation 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (18 points max) Proximity of Design Consultant to site (points max): >150mi 150.100 mi 99-50 mi < 50mi I— ------------------ I --------------- —--- I---- ------------- I % points 0 2 4 6 Proximity of Builder to site (points max) >150mi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi < 50mi ------- ------- ___I_____------------- I b points 0 2 4 6 Proximity of Design Consultant to Builder (6 points max) >150 mi150 -100 mi99- 50 mi < 50 mi ___---_ I------- -------- I------ ------- I---- -----I � points 0 2 4 6 Supporting comments: 2. Proposer's Organization and Key Personnel (40 points max) Proposing Firm organization chart (5 points max) -- points Proposed Project Management personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max) 1 O points Proposed Project Design personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max) 10 points Proposed Project Construction personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max) I O points Time commitment of key personnel to this project (5 points max) 5 points Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Management Programs (40 points max) Project Cost Control (5 points max) Value Engineering Plan and Experience (5 points max) Administration Building TE -5 5 points points Sebastian Municipal Airport I SECTION TE - TECFMCAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 Scheduling experience and history on similar projects (5 points max) — points SDBE Participation Plan (5 points max) �_ points Local Business Participation Plan (10 points max) s points Veteran's Participation Plan (5 points max) points Project safety plan (5 points max) S points Supporting comments: 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) Quality Control/Quality Assurance plan for design activities (6 points max) 4 points Quality Control/Quality Assurance plan for construction activities (6 points max) L points Supporting comments: TOTAL MANAGEMENT CRITERIA 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (18 points max) (6/- points 2. Proposer's Organization and Key Personnel (40 points max) y points 3 Proposer's Management Programs (40 points max) 2`( points 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) 12 points TOTAL MANAGEMENT SCORE (110 points max) CI 4 points Administration Building TE -6 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECFINICAL EVALUATION FORM C. PROJECT SCHEDULE -100 Points Total 1. Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points max) Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower) (10 points max) Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) Time commitment of key personnel (10 points max) Supporting comments: 2. Builder's Construction Schedule (50 points) rev 711412003 points points o points Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower, equipment) (5 points max) points Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) -7> points Demonstrated subcontractors schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) points Time commitment of key personnel (5 points max) 5 points Coordination of design and construction activities (5 points max) S points Identification of long lead time items (5 points max) s points Scheduled allowance for permitting activities (5 points max) points Scheduled allowance for submittals and review activities (5 points max) points Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points) Note: Schedule shall reflect all investigations, surveys, design, permitting, preparation of construction documents, reviews, construction, inspections, testing, preparation of record Administration Building TE -7 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 9/74/2003 drawings and other documents, and all other required activities from Notice To Proceed to Certificate of Occupancy. 2 points will be awarded for each 7 calendar day period less than the allowable project design and construction schedule of three hundred and sixty-five (365) calendar days (20 points max) Supporting comments: �, points TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE CRITERIA a. Design Consultant's Desiga Schedule (30 points max) b. Builder's Construction Schedule (50 points max) c. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points max) TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE SCORE (100 Points max) THIS SECTION LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY Administration Building TE -8 Sebastian Municipal Airport points points points points SECTION TE - TEMWAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 EVALUATION SUMMARY 1. Technical Criteria Score (330 points max) points 2. Management Criteria Score (110 points max) points 3. Project Schedule Score (100 points max) e' points TOTAL TECIINICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION SCORE (5=10 points max) points General Remarks and Observations concerning this Proposal: Signature: — xZA/// Date:—r f3 6 3 Administration Building TE -9 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECM41CAL EVALUATION FORM Section TE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer: Evaluated by:«c y 1 s 5 A. TECHNICAL CRITERIA - 330 Points Total rev 7/14/2003 Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative, concept drawings and other documentation 1. Proposed Site Plan (40 points) Conceptual Site Plan/Narrative (8 points): Yes: ✓ No: 7 points Issues Identified and Addressed: (32 points max) Grading/Drainage; Access Roads/Parldng; Landscaping/Irrigation; Fencing (8 points max per issue) I------------------I-------------------I-------------------I ali� points 0 fair 4 good 6 excellent 8 Supporting comments: 2. Proposed Structural Plan (40 points) Conceptual Structural Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: / No: Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) 0 Supporting comments: fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 l0 pts. 3 o pts Administration Building TE -1 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rep 711412003 3. Proposed Exterior Wall/Finishes Plan (50 points) Exterior Wall Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: No: o pts. Exterior Appearance/Aesthetics (10 points): t pts. Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I-------------------I------------------I-----------------I opts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 4. Proposed HVAC Plan (40 points) Conceptual HVAC Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: / No: Z> pts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I-----------------I------------------I-----------------I a7o pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supportmg comments: 5. Proposed Electrical System Plan (40 points) Conceptual Electrical System Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: No: 5 pts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I--- —-------------- I -------- -------- I------- ----- -- --- I pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: Administration Building TE -2 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM 6. Proposed Plumbing System Plan (40 points) Conceptual Plumbing System Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: / No: Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I-------------------I-------------------I-------------------I 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: reg+ 7114/1003 opts 3e-,3 pts 7. Proposed Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points) Communications & Other Equipment Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: / No: Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I-------------------- I ------------------- ------------------- I 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 8. Police Evidence Building Plan (40 points) Police Evidence Building Plan/Narrative (10 points): Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) 13 Supporting comments: fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Yes: ---� No: Administration Building TE -3 Sebastian Municipal Airport pts pts SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7119/2003 TOTAL TECIINICAL CRITERIA 1. Site Plan (40 points max) 3 5 pts 2. Structural Plan (40 points max) ' 10 pts 3. Exterior Wall Plan (50 points max) O pts 4. HVAC Plan (40 points max) a> pts 5. Electrical Plan (40 points max) pts 6. Plumbing Plan (40 points max) '10 pts 7. Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points max) 35 pts 8. Police Evidence Building ( 40 points max) `{10 pts TOTAL TECHNICAL SCORE (330 points max) 4VO pts Administration Building TE -4 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECO -TICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7114/2003 B. MANAGEMENT CRITERIA -110 Points Total Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative and other documentation 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (18 points mag) (, Proximity of Design Consultant to site (.Tpoints max): >150mi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi < 50mi (o I------------------I--------------------I------------------1 points 0 2 4 6 (P Proximity of Builder to site (.7points max) >150 mi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi < 50 mi !-7 I---------------I-------------------I-------------------1 points 0 2 4 6 Proximity of Design Consultant to Builder (6 points max) >l50 mi 150 100 mi 99.50 mi < 50 mi 5 I------ --------------- I------ ------- I---- -----I points 0 2 4 6 Supporting comments: 2. Proposer's Organization and Key Personnel (40 points mag) Proposing Firm organization chart (5 points max) 5 points Proposed Project Management personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max) i o points Proposed Project Design personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max) 10 points Proposed Project Construction personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max)_J 0 points Time commitment of key personnel to this project (5 points max) '-) points Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Management Programs (40 points mag) Project Cost Control (5 points max) Value Engineering Plan and Experience (5 points max) Administration Building TE -5 points points Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECEIMCAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 Scheduling experience and history on similar projects (5 points max) — points SDBE Participation Plan (5 points max) �1_ points Local Business Participation Plan (10 points max) t O points Veteran's Participation Plan (5 points max) — points Project safety plan (5 points max) S points Supporting comments: 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) Quality Control/Quality Assurance plan for design activities (6 points max) G points Quality Control/Quality Assurance plan for construction activities (6 points max) points Supporting comments: TOTAL MANAGEMENT CRITERIA 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (18 points max) I (o points 2. Proposer's Organization and Key Personnel (40 points max) `l points 3 Proposer's Management Programs (40 points max) points 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) Z points TOTAL MANAGEMENT SCORE (110 points max) 9(. points Administration Building TE -6 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHIBICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 C. PROJECT SCHEDULE -100 Points Total 1. Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points max) Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower) (10 points max) Ci points Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) 1�k points Time commitment of key personnel (10 points max) 1 o points Supporting comments: 2. Builder's Construction Schedule (50 points) Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower, equipment) (5 points max) �> points Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) points Demonstrated subcontractors schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) points Time commitment of key personnel (5 points max) points Coordination of design and construction activities (5 points max) points Identification of long lead time items (5 points max) 5 points Scheduled allowance for permitting activities (5 points max) points Scheduled allowance for submittals and review activities (5 points max) points Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points) Note: Schedule shall reflect all investigations, surveys, design, permitting, preparation of construction documents, reviews, construction, inspections, testing, preparation of record Administration Building TE -7 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 drawings and other documents, and all other required activities from Notice To Proceed to Certificate of Occupancy. 2 points will be awarded for each 7 calendar day period less than the allowable project design and construction schedule of three hundred and sixty-five (365) calendar days (20 points max) points Supporting comments: TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE CRITERIA a. Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points max) 2c,� points b. Builder's Construction Schedule (50 points max) LI -0 points c. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points max) I points TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE SCORE (100 Points max) points THIS SECTION LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY Administration Building TE -8 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7/14/2003 EVALUATION SUMMARY 1. Technical Criteria Score (330 points max) PLCro points 2. Management Criteria Score (110 points max) I (o points 3. Project Schedule Score (100 points max) to'/ points TOTAL TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION SCORE (540 points max) 'ELL points General Remarks and Observations concerning this Proposal: Signature: Date: Administration Building TE -9 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM Proposer: Section QE QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF AIRPORT ADYM41STRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND my 3/13/2003 Evaluated by: 1. PROPOSER'S LETTER OF INTEREST A INTRODUCTION of FIRM (5 points) —5L points B. SPECIFIC PROJECT EXPERIENCE (max 12 points) -Zf-,points Recently completed projects (completed no more than five years ago) that demonstrate the Proposing Firm or Contractor/Builder or Design Professional specific experience relevant to the proposed project. (Up to 4 points each —12 points max) Project Name Location Budget I Year Completed -2cwd O b. // �� '� O06 as o0 c. C. PROPOSED TEAM MEMBERS PROTECT EXPERIENCE (max 12 points) _/2�_ points ,N "vert'_*r arc Al,t A)r&V Ar:RR RPT .ATRT7 PR0TRr.T F.WT-MTRNCE ( 4 voinds) ['�.°,�41II�)IJ-�1hJ" ICS; ' � ., - • - . t ��" . 7 ... nr% TWTDTU'T MT n,TAT.TAf:RR/RUP RF.T.ATF.n Piznmr.T EXPERIENCE (4 noints) Municipal Aupori-Adminis¢ation Building Q&1 SECTION QS- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM n.,,o� NAArTAnuu uRT Amen FYVFUTPMrF :ev 3/1312003 ( 4 nnirrta) J 'ect Name Location BiulM ear Co leted a.- < 4" vet " ovV /X b. -Pi r/ �� e / 7 OD a D. LETTERS OF EVALUATION/RECOMMENDATION (max 6 points) points Client references relevant to the Proposer's specific experience. ( 2 Points each - 6 points max) E. PROPOSING FIRM(S) ABILITY & CAPACITY (5 points) points F. PROPOSING FIRM(S) PROOF OF BONDING CAPACITY: YES _ 2. LOCAL PREFERENCE: Y—points >200 200-150 m1 150-100 ml 99-50 ml c50m1 1 2 3. DRUG-FREE WORE PLACE FORM: YES NO - 4. O_4. PUBLIC ENTITY C IMMS FORM: YES NO _ 5. DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION: YES X NO _ 6. LICENSES & REGISTRATIONS L General Contractor's License attached? YES X NO b. State of FL Cenification/Registration attached YESJ NO G. Architect/Engineer Registration attached YES NO _ d. State of Fl. Professional License YES NO _ 7. PROOF OF INSURANCE: YES NO_ 8. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT: YES _ NO L TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION SCORE (45 points max) Pts yy 1,41nicipalAiiport-Ad ;n;clrari.mBllllding QE, -- SECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM rev 311312003 CRITERIA FOR SCORING PROPOSING FIRM'S EXPERIENCE ON PROJECTS OF SID'IIIAR OR GREATER SCOPE AND SIZE TO THE ONE UNDER CONSIDERATION ProieCt Eguerience Score Design/Build Administration Buildings 4.0 points each DesignBuild other Projects 3.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY Administration Buildings 2.0 points each Design ONLI' or Build ONLY other Projects 1.0 point each Where a submittal provides project information for two firms (Architect/Engineer and Builder/Contractor), the two -firm team experience will be evaluated together as a single unit. General Remarks and Observations concerning this Qualifications Submittal: Signature: Municipal Airport-AdmmisWgm Building QE -3 SECTION QE. QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM Section QE QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF AIRPORT ADNIINISTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer: Evaluated by: 2. PROPOSERS LETTER OF INTEREST rev 3/13/2003 A INTRODUCTION of FIRM (5 points) s points B. SPECIFIC PROJECT EXPERIENCE (max 12 points) --1-4 points Recently completed projects (completed no more than five years ago) that demonstrate the Proposing Firm or Contractor/3nilder or Design Professional specific experience relevant to the proposed project. (Up to 4 points each —12 points max) C. PROPOSED TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT 1) DESIGN TEAM MANAGER RELATED PROJECT (max 12 points) _4L—points _F4 ( 4 points) 2) CONSTRUCTION MANAGERJSUP. RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE 4points) PigectName Location Budget Year Completed a. b. fl c. Mmmpal Airport Admnawmhon Buldmg QE -1 SEMON Q&• QUALIFICATIONS EVALUAnON FORM 3) PROJECT MANAGER RELATED my 3113=03 l 51 LEM0 KiS�i��� (A D. LETTERS OF EVALUATION/RECONRv E ATION (max 6 points) points Client references relevant to the Proposer's specific experience ( 2 Points each — 6 points max) E. PROPOSING FIRM(S) ABILITY & CAPACITY (S points) __,— paints F. PROPOSING FIRMS) PROOF OF BONDING CAPACITY: YES /� NO 2.. LOCAL, PREFERENCE: : >200 200.250 ml 150-100 mi 99- 50 ml 1 2 3 3. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE FORM: 4. PUBLIC ENTITY C LIMES FORM: 5. DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION: 6. LICENSES & REGISTRATIONS L L General Contractor's License attached? b. State of FL Cm tification/Registration attached G. ArchitectTngineer Registration attached d. State of FL Professional License 7. PROOF OF INSURANCE: 8. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT: 2—pomts <50mi YES v� NO YES !// NO YES // NO YES YES YES YES YES I YES NO NO NO NO T 900 NO TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION SCORE (45points max) pts Mi=mpalAirportAdmmisft ti Bmildmg QE -2 sECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUAMONFORM Section QE QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF AIRPORT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer: ^ -W- my 3/13/2003 1. PROPOSER'S LETTER OF INTEREST A INTRODUCTION of FIRM (5 points) B. SPECIFIC PROJECT EXPERIENCE (max 12 points) points ,Z�2_ points Recently completed projects (completed no more than five years ago) that demonstrate the Proposing Firm or Contractor/Builder or Design Professional specific experience relevant to the proposed project (Up to 4 points each —12 points max) C. PROPOSED TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT EXPERIENCE (max 12 points) _,Z2 --points 1) DESIGN TEAM MANAGER RELATED PROJECT (4 Doints) i' TTI .... _ 2) CONSTRUCTION MANAGJEt/SUP. RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE (4 points) Municipal AuPmt-Admmistaftan Bu7dmg QE -1 SECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM 31 PROJECT MANAGER RELATED EXPERMWC'F. rev 3/13/2003 • > . u- • .MM •n D. LETTERS OF EVALUATTON/RECOhOvME MATION (max 6 poi>rts)—�— points (lent references relevant to the Proposer's specific experience. ( 2 Points each - 6 points max) =.. c. E. PROPOSING FIRMS) ABI= & CAPACITY (5 points) b points F. PROPOSING FIRMS) PROOF OF BONDING CAPACTTY: YES �O _ 2. LOCAL PREFERENCE: points >200 200-150 ml 150-200 m1 99- 50 mf < 50 mt 1 2 3 4 5 3. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE FORM: YES NO _ 4. PUBLIC ENTITY CTMdES FORM: YES ` NO 5. DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION: YES NO 6. LICENSES & REGISTRATIONS a. General Contractor's License attached? YES NO b. State of Certification/Registration attached YES Z, _ NO _ C. Architect/Engineer Registration attached YS E �/ NO _ d. State of Fl. Professional License YES NO _ 7. PROOF OF INSURANCE: YES ` NO 8. EQUAL OPPORTONTIT STATEMENT: YES f NO— TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION SCORE (45 points max) 11-1J pts M=mpalAirportAdmaisj� Bmldmg QE SECTION QE-QUALMCAn0NS EVALUAT70N FORM s 311MOD3 CRITERIA FOR SCORING PROPOSING FIRM'S EXPERIENCE ON PROJECTS OF Sl1yEM.4R OR GREATER SCOPE AND SIZE TO THE ONE UNDER CONSIDERATION Proiect Experience Score Design/Build Administration Buildings 4.0 points each Design/Build other Projects 3.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY Administration Buildings 2.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY other Projects 1.0 point each Where a submittal provides project information for two funis (Architect/Engineer and Builder/Contractor), the two -firm team experience will be evaluated together as a single unit 1 S4aalnre: Municipal Aixport-Admiaishm ion BuMing QE -3 SEMON QE- QUALMCAnONS EVALUAnONFORM Section QE QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF AIRPORT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer: Evaluated by: 0flAa,/, YROPOSER'S LETTER OF INTEREST A INTRODUCTION of FIRM (5 points) B. SPECIFIC PROJECT E2ERIErTCE (max 12 points) my 3/1312003 points points Recently completed projects (completed no more than five years ago) that demonstrate the Proposing Firm or Contractor/Builder or Design Professional specific experience relevant to the proposed project. (Up to 4 points each —12 points max) C. PROPOSED TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT EXPERIENCE (max 12 points) �� points � r ea. r :�� ��:.: :a r�r •;rl ( 4 noinis) 2) CONSTRUCTION MANAGER/SUP. RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE (4 noints) Mimicipal Aiiport-AdmmistmhonBuildmg QE -1 SECTION QE- QUALIRCA27ONS EVALUAMN FORM 3) PROTECT MANAGER RELATED EXPERIENCE my 3/132003 (4 noin[c) D. LETTERS OF EVALUATION/RECON ENDATION (max 6 points)_ Q_ points Client references relevant to the Proposer's specific experience. ( 2 Points each — 6 points max) Project Name Client Name Eva]/Recon Contact a. h. e� C. E. PROPOSING FIRMS) ABILITY & CAPACITY (5 points)points F. PROPOSING FIRMS) PROOF OF BONDING CAPACITY: YES NO 2. LOCAL PREFERENCE: >200 200.250 mi 130-100 mi 1 2 3 3. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE FORM: 4. PUBLIC ENTITY MMES FORM: S. DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION: 6. LICENSES & REGISTRATIONS points 99-50 mt <50 "d —1--i 4 5 / YES _ NO !� YESZ NO /_ YES U ' NO a. General Contractor's License attached? b. State of Fl. Certification/Registration attached C. Architectf.Engineer Registration attached d. State of Fl. Professional License i. PROOF OF INSURANCE: 8. EQUAL OPPORTUNTIY STATEMENT: YES NO YES NO _ YES NO ,-- YES NO YES d NO YES NO TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION SCORE (45 points max)—&— pts Municipal Airport -Adm n s&,dim Building QE -2 SECTION TE - TECIRMAL EVALUATION FORM Section TE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer:131 Pfes" / �D2( /�� ,t/N i -es Evaluated by: �-P m cr"-f �� n ,t/ 4 CG / rev 711412003 A. TECHNICAL CRITERIA - 330 Points Total Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative, concept drawings and other documentation 1. Proposed Site Plan (40 points) / Conceptual Site Plan/Narrative (8 points): Yes: .4�0: points Issues Identified and Addressed: (32 points max) Grading/Drainage; Access Roads/Parldng; Landscaping/Irrigation; Fencing (8 points max per issue) points 0 fair 4 good 6 excellent 8 Supporting comments: 2. Proposed Structural Plan (40 points) Conceptual Structural Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: A� No: pts. Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I- -------------- ---I ---------------- -1 ------ ---------- I -0-1�pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: Administration Building TE -I Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TFUMCAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7/1417003 3. Proposed Exterior Wall/Finishes Plan (50 points) Exterior Wall Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: No: _[� pts. Exterior Appearance/Aesthetics (10 points): pts. Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) -- — — — ------ —------ —--- I ------------------- I 34 pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 4. Proposed HVAC Plan (40 points) Conceptual HVAC Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: ✓ No: er pts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I-- ------ ------- I— ---- ---------- I ------ -- — -I $2-L pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 5. Proposed Electrical System Plan (40 points) Conceptual Electrical System Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes:A--'No: / d pts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I-------------------- I ------------------- I ------------------- I Pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: Administration Building TE -2 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECM TICAL EVALUATION FORM 6. Proposed Plumbing System Plan (40 points) Conceptual Plumbing System Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: /,*"- No: Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I--------------------I-------------------I------------------I 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 7. Proposed Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points) Communications & Other Equipment Plan/Narrative (10 points): Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I-------------------- I ------------------- I ------------------- I 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 8. Police Evidence Building Plan (40 points) Police Evidence Building Plan/Narrative (10 points): Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I------------------I-----------------I------------------I 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: rev 711412003 Yes: ,--' No: D pts �0pts �z () pts Yes: _Af�fNo: d pts Administration Building TE -3 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7114/1003 TOTAL TECHNICAL CRITERIA 1. Site Plan (40 points max) _r pts 3 2. Structural Plan (40 points max) S pts g 3. Exterior Wall Plan (50 points max)4pts S� 4. HVAC Plan (40 points max) a b/pts 5. Electrical Plan (40 points max) _�S pts 3%1- 6. Plumbing Plan (40 points max) 0 pts 3 V 7. Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points max) —6 pts 3 O 8. Police Evidence Building ( 40 points max) 1.3 pts 30 TOTAL TECBMCAL SCORE (330 points max) -?, S -Y pts 2 % (P Administration Building TE -4 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 B. MANAGEMENT CRITERIA -110 Points Total Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative and other documentation 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (18 points max) Proximity of Design Consultant to site (7 points max): >150mi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi < 50mi I---------------I-----------------I-------------""'1 --'5 points 0 2 4 6 Proximity of Builder to site (7 points max) >150 m! 150-100 mi 99-50 mi < 50 mi _____-- I------ 1------ -------------------- I----'_____-- ___--1 / Points 0 2 4 6 Proximity of Design Consultant to Builder (6 points max) >I50mi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi < 50 mi 1� — — — — I -----------------I-----------------1 �5 points 0 2 4 6 Supporting comments: 2. Proposer's Organization and Key Personnel (40 points max) Proposing Firm organization chart (5 points max) �� points Proposed Project Management personnel relevant experiencetresumes (10 points max)_ZjL:points Proposed Project Design personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max) / d points Proposed Project Construction personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max)__L�rpoints Time commitment of key personnel to this project (5 points max) points Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Management Programs (40 points max) Project Cost Control (5 points max) Value Engineering Plan and Experience (5 points max) i points 5 Points Administration Building TE -5 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 Scheduling experience and lustory on similar projects (5 points max) _- points i SDBE Participation Plan (5 points max) � points Local Business Participation Plan (10 points max) _ points Veteran's Participation Plan (5 points max) points Project safety plan (5 points max) points Supporting comments: 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) Quality Control/Quality Assurance plan for design activities (6 points max) S points Quality Control/Quality Assurance plan for construction activities (6 points max) �� points Supporting comments: TOTAL MANAGEMENT CRITERIA 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (18 points max) points 2. Proposer's Organization and Key Personnel (40 points max) points 3 3 Proposer's Management Programs (40 points max) _,J_��points 33. 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) //I points O TOTAL MANAGEMENT SCORE (110 points max)4 to points Vr Administration Building TE -6 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECEDUCAL EVALUATION FORM C. PROJECT SCHEDULE -100 Points Total 1. Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points max) Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower) (10 points max) Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) Time commitment of key personnel (10 points max) Supporting comments: 2. Builder's Construction Schedule (50 points) rev 7/1412003 points points points Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower, equipment) (5 points max) S points Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) /(? points Demonstrated subcontractors schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) 5 points 'time commitment of key personnel (5 points max) 7 points Coordination of design and construction activities (5 points max) J points Identification of long lead time items (5 points max) ,5�points Scheduled allowance for permitting activities (5 points max) points Scheduled allowance for submittals and review activities (5 points max) points Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points) Note: Schedule shall reflect all investigations, surveys, design, permitting, preparation of construction documents, reviews, construction, inspections, testing, preparation of record Administration Building TE -7 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 drawings and other documents, and all other required activities from Notice To Proceed to Certificate of Occupancy. 2 points will be awarded for each 7 calendar day period less than the allowable project design and construction schedule of three hundred and sixty-five (365) calendar days (20 points max) Supporting comments: TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE CRITERIA a. Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points max) b. Builder's Construction Schedule (50 points max) c. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points max) TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE SCORE (100 Points max) THIS SECTION LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY points �/�oints /.o points y points r— �points Administration Building TE -8 Sebastian Municipal Airport 0 SECTION TE • TECIMCAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7/1412003 EVALUATION SUMMARY 1. Technical Criteria Score (330 points max) -2 oints 2. Management Criteria Score (110 points max) (0/poiats 3. Project Schedule Score (100 points max) Xpomts TOTAL TECBNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION SCORE (540 points max) points General Remarks and Observations concerning this Proposal: Signature: le Date: Administration Building TE -9 Sebastian Municipal Airport R SECTION TE- TECIMCAL EVALUATION FORM Section TE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer: Evaluated by: (;e6,? AD��1 j A. TECHNICAL CRITERIA - 330 Points Total rev 711412003 Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative, concept drawings and other documentation 1. Proposed Site Plan (40 points) Conceptual Site Plan/Narrative (8 points): Yes: J— Io: points Issues Identified and Addressed: (32 points max) Grading/Drainage; Access Roads/Parldng; Landscaping/Irrigation; Fencing (8 points max per issue) I ------I - - - --I -----Ioints 0 fair 4 good 6 excellent 8 Supporting comments: 2. Proposed Structural Plan (40 points) / Conceptual Structural Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: ✓ No: —5f—,9 pts. Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I---------- -------- I ------------------- I- ------ ---------- I --30 pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: Administration Building TE -1 Sebastian Municipal Airport M SECTION TE - TECMgICAL EVALUATION FORM 3. Proposed Exterior Wall/Finishes Plan (50 points) Exterior Wall Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: l-� No: Exterior Appearance/Aesthetics (10 points): Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I----- ---- -----I 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: rev 7114/2003 / 0 pts. /0 pts. ,34 pts 4. Proposed HVAC Plan (40 points) Conceptual HVAC Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: ✓ No: Q pts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) ------ -- I— — — --------------I .25,pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 5. Proposed Electrical System Plan (40 points) Conceptual Electrical System Plau/Narrative (10 points): Yes: ANo: pts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I-------------- I — — -- I ------ — I pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: Administration Building TE -2 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECIINICAL EVALUATION FORM 6. Proposed Plumbing System Plan (40 points) Conceptual Plumbing System Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: /-`�- No: Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I-------------------- I ------- —---------- I ------------------- I 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 7. Proposed Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points) Communications & Other Equipment Plan/Narrative (10 points): Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I--------------- ---I-- ---- —---- -----1— --------------- I 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 8. Police Evidence Building Plan (40 points) Police Evidence Building Plan/Narrative (10 points): Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I— — -- —I------- —---------- I ------------------- I 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: rev 711412003 / Opts -i0 pts Yes: ,--" No: /d ,73�pts Yes: _ �No: /Q ---?Dpts Administration Building TE -3 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7/1412003 TOTAL TECHNICAL CRITERIA 1. Site Plan (40 points max) V&d pts 2. Structural Plan (40 points max) �%!� pts 3. Exterior Wall Plan (50 points max) pts 4. HVAC Plan (40 points max) .3 pts 5. Electrical Plan (40 points max) J -T pts 6. Plumbing Plan (40 points max) yU Pts 7. Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points max) yd pts ' 8. Police Evidence Building (40 points max) pts TOTAL TECBMCAL SCORE (330 points max) -.2110 pts Administration Building TE -4 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECIMCAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 B. MANAGEMENT CRITERIA -110 Points Total Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative and other documentation 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (18 points max) Proximity of Design Consultant to site (7 points max): >150 mi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi < 50mi --- -- --I-------- ----- ---I-- --- ---- ----- I_�' points 0 2 4 6 Proximity of Builder to site (7 points max) >150mi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi < 50 mi I__ ------- —-------- I -------------------- I --------- —-------- I —Y— points 0 2 4 6 Proximity of Design Consultant to Builder (6 points max) >150mi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi <50mi I____—__—_____ 1 ----_________ I______-____- - -1 5 points 0 2 4 6 Supporting comments: 2. Proposer's Organization and Key Personnel (40 points max) Proposing Firm organization chart (5 points max)CJpoints Proposed Project Management personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max)_I/'points Proposed Project Design personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max) points Proposed Project Construction personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max) points Time commitment of key personnel to this project (5 points max)points Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Management Programs (40 points max) Project Cost Control (5 points max) points Value Engineering Plan and Experience (5 points max) points Administration Building TE -5 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECIRMAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 i Scheduling experience and history on similar projects (5 points max) points SDBE Participation Plan (5 points max) points Local Business Participation Plan (10 points max) points Veteran's Participation Plan (5 points max) points /Project safety plan (5 points max) "5points Supporting comments: 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) Quality Control/Quality Assurance plan for design activities (6 points max) points Quality Control/Quality Assurance plan for construction activities (6 points max) �_ points Supporting comments: TOTAL MANAGEMENT CRITERIA 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (18 points max) points 2. Proposer's Organization and Key Personnel (40 points max) Q points 3 Proposer's Management Programs (40 points max) -,Ls points 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) points TOTAL MANAGEMENT SCORE (110 points max) —5E> points Administration Building TE -6 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE . TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM C. PROJECT SCHEDULE -100 Points Total 1. Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points max) Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower) (10 points max) Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) Time commitment of key personnel (10 points max) Supporting comments: 2. Builder's Construction Schedule (50 points) rev 7119/2003 01/0 points / 6 points _46 - points i Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower, equipment) (5 points max) L points Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) / v points Demonstrated subcontractors schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) / 0 points Time commitment of key personnel (5 points max) points Coordination of design and construction activities (5 points max) points Identification of long lead time items (5 points max) 5 -points Scheduled allowance for permitting activities (5 points max) points Scheduled allowance for submittals and review activities (5 points max) < points Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points) Note: Schedule shall reflect all investigations, surveys, design, permitting, preparation of construction documents, reviews, construction, inspections, testing, preparation of record Administration Building TE -7 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECIDUCAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 drawings and other documents, and all other required activities from Notice To Proceed to Certificate of Occupancy. 2 points will be awarded for each 7 calendar day period less than the allowable project design and construction schedule of three hundred and sixty-five (365) calendar days (20 points max) Supportin.g comments: TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE CRITERIA a. Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points max) points 3 b. Builder's Construction Schedule (50 points max) //^� points S� c. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points max) ® points �— �v TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE SCORE (100 Points max) points THIS SECTION LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY Administration Building TE -8 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTTON TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7114/2003 EVALUATION SUMMARY 1. Technical Criteria Score (330 points max) –Unpoints 2. Management Criteria Score (110 points max) _, points 3. Project Schedule Score (100 points max) — o points TOTAL TECIINICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION SCORE (540 points max) 1� 0.qnts General Remarks and Observations concerning this Proposal: Signature: Date: ,a G/ 2 0O-3 Administration Building TE -9 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECMCCAL EVALUATION FORM Section TE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer: /-7/0 //N C11 Evaluated by: A. TECEMCAL CRITERIA - 330 Points Total rev 711412003 Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative, concept drawings and other documentation 1. Proposed Site Plan (40 points) Conceptual Site Plan/Narrative (8 points): Yes: )-----No: points Issues Identified and Addressed: (32 points max) C.rrading/Drainage; Access Roads/Parldng; Landscaping/Irrigation; Fencing (8 points max per issue) I --- —I — —I ---------------I AkPoints 0 fair 4 good 6 excellent 8 Supporting comments: 2. Proposed Structural Plan (40 points) Conceptual Structural Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: ✓ No: /0 pts. Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I— ------------------ I------ --------- I --- —---- -------- I 6 pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: Administration Building TE -1 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE . TECM4ICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7/14/2003 3. Proposed Exterior Wall/Finishes Plan (50 points) Exterior Wall Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: 1✓ No: / 4 pts. Exterior Appearance/Aesthetics (10 points): / o pts. Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I---------------1--------------I-----------------I 30 pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 4. Proposed HVAC Plan (40 points) Conceptual HVAC Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: ✓ No: pts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I----------------- I — —---I-------------I --,? L pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 5. Proposed Electrical System Plan (40 points) Conceptual Electrical System Plau/Narrative (10 points): Yes: A—'No: pts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I------------- — I-- — -- —I--- ---- —---- — --- I 36 pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: Administration Building TE -2 Sebastian Municipal Airport N SECTION TE - TECFIIQICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7/1412003 6. Proposed Plumbing System Plan (40 points) Conceptual Plumbing System Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: !O", No: _L pts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I-------------------- I ------------------- I ------------------- I ,Z pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 7. Proposed Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points) Communications & Other Equipment Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: /_ No: -26 Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) 0 Supporting comments: fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 8. Police Evidence Building Plan (40 points) Police Evidence Building Plan/Narrative (10 points): Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) 0 Supporting comments: fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 2,f pts Yes: No: Administration Building TE -3 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7/14/2003 TOTAL TECHNICAL CRITERIA 1. Site Plan (40 points max) . /Opts 2. Structural Plan (40 points max) _-X-0 pts 3. Exterior Wall Plan (50 points max) 3 d pts 4. HVAC Plan (40 points max) pts 5. Electrical Plan (40 points max) Y6 pts 6. Plumbing Plan (40 points max) .3 r pts 7. Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points max) .3J�-P is 8. Police Evidence Building ( 40 points max) _o pts TOTAL TECBMCAL SCORE (330 points max) ;; yJ pts Administration Building TE -4 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECiINICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7114/2003 B. MANAGEMENT CRITERIA -110 Points Total Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative and other documentation 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (18 points max) Proximity of Design Consultant to site (7 points max): >150mi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi < 50mi I--------- —---- --I ---- ----- --------- I-- — --------1 -5 points 0 2 4 6 Proximity of Builder to site (7 points max) >150 mi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi < 50 mi I------------------I--------------------I-----------------1 —41 points 0 2 4 6 Proximity of Design Consultant to Builder (6 points max) > 150 mi 150-100 mi 99- 50 mi < 50 mi `� I----------------I--------------------I-----------------1 J points 0 2 4 6 Supporting comments: 2. Proposer's Organization and Key Personnel (40 points max) Proposing Firm organization chart (5 points max) 5,points Proposed Project Management personnel relevant expenence/resumes (10 points max)_,'points Proposed Project Design personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max) ��points Proposed Project Construction personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max) ) points Time commitment of key personnel to this project (5 points max) points Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Management Programs (40 points max) Project Cost Control (5 points max) -S points Value Engineering Plan and Experience (5 points max) J points Administration Building TE -5 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TEMUCAL EVALUATION FORM Scheduling experience and history on similar projects (5 points max) SDBE Participation Plan (5 points max) Local Business Participation Plan (10 points max) Veteran's Participation Plan (5 points max) Project safety plan (5 points max) Supporting comments: 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) rev 7114/2003 ___,r'points Y points points points _ points Quality Control/Quality Assurance plan for design activities (6 points max) _� points Quality Control/Quality Assurance plan for construction activities (6 points max)_ points Supporting comments: TOTAL MANAGEMENT CRITERIA 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (18 points max) —_Z -[-points / 2. Proposer's Organization and Key Personnel (40 points max) f6 points z 3 Proposer's Management Programs (40 points max) Ji points 3 [� 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) Z points I Z TOTAL MANAGEMENT SCORE (110 points max)_points Administration Building TE -6 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM C. PROJECT SCHEDULE -100 Points Total 1. Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points max) Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower) (10 points max) Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) Time commitment of key personnel (10 points max) Supporting comments: 2. Builder's Construction Schedule (50 points) rev 711412003 _/ points points Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower, equipment) (5 points max) S / points Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) /p points Demonstrated subcontractors schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) points i 'Time commitment of key personnel (5 points max) 5 points Coordination of design and construction activities (5 points max) .S points Identification of long lead time items (5 points max) ) points Scheduled allowance for permitting activities (5 points max) S points Scheduled allowance for submittals and review activities (5 points max) J� points Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points) Note: Schedule shall reflect all investigations, surveys, design, permitting, preparation of construction documents, reviews, construction, inspections, testing, preparation of record Administration Building TE -7 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7114/2003 drawings and other documents, and all other required activities from Notice To Proceed to Certificate of Occupancy. 2 points will be awarded for each 7 calendar day period less than the allowable project design and construction schedule of three hundred and sixty-five (3 65) calendar days (20 points max) Supporting comments: TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE CRITERIA a. Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points max) b. Builder's Construction Schedule (50 points max) c. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points max) TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE SCORE (100 Points max) THIS SECTION LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY �3 () Points Z YO points S (� Points -- _ L — points Administration Building TE -8 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECM IICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7114/2003 EVALUATION SUMMARY 1. Technical Criteria Score (330 points max) o� -5 points 2. Management Criteria Score (110 points max) /- points 3. Project Schedule Score (100 points max) —Y& points TOTAL TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION SCORE (540points max) Xz�Opoints General Remarks and Observations concerning this Proposal: F Date: C)63 Administration Building TE -9 Sebastian Municipal Airport -. 16Y�C��IM1�1�7J.�41��L•���l��l�lrlMCi}��+�iJ:iul Section TE TECFMCAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer: SUFPO _K - Evaluated by: V l 1 ' i 2o A. TECBNICAL CRITERIA - 330 Points Total rev 7/19/2003 Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative, concept drawings and other documentation 1. Proposed Site Plan (40 points) Conceptual Site Plan/Narrative (8 points): Yes: ✓ No: 7 points Issues Identified and Addressed: (32 points max) 7 G G Grading/Dramage; Access Roads/Parldng; Landscapmg/Irrigation; Fencing (8 points max per issue) I-------------------- I ------- --------- I ------------------- I 0 fair 4 good 6 excellent 8 points Supporting comments: nIJ Yoymiint of it sgjiri, Lw;ter 1 ia,v,. of Zti Wj( UjvNaf r Gi 2. Proposed Structural Plan (40 points) Conceptual Structural Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: ✓ No: 10 pts. Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I -------------------I---------------1-------------------1 9 0 pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: Administration Building TE -1 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECEMCAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 3. Proposed Exterior Waffinishes Plan (50 points) Exterior Wall Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: ✓ No: O pts. Exterior Appearance/Aesthetics (10 points): 1 O pts. Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) 3 ©pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 4. Proposed HVACP1 (40 points) Conceptual HVAC Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: No: /0 pts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I-------------------I-------------------I-------------------1 3 o pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: I I S [ I f� . 5. Proposed Electrical System Plan (40 points) pow"i. S Conceptual Electrical System Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: No: pts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I-----------------I-------------------I---------------I 2 % pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: ME2G.fitowW I So kvj Administration Building TE -2 Sebastian Municipal Airport • SECTION TE - TECFINICAL EVALUATION FORM 6. Proposed Plumbing System Plan (40 points) Conceptual Plumbing System Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: No: Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: rev 711412003 / © pts 28' pts 7. Proposed Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points) _ /0 � ig Communications & Other Equipment Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: No: Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I----- —------------- I ------------------- I ----- ------------ I 30 pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: rive alayy, 8. Police Evidence Building Plan (40 points) Police Evidence Building Plan/Narrative (10 points): Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: Yes: No: 3 opts Administration Building TE -3 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE- TECI]NICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 TOTAL TECHNICAL CRITERIA 1. Site Plan (40 points max) —aapts 2. Structural Plan (40 points max) lI D pts 3. Exterior Wall Plan (50 points max) --"Opts 4. HVAC Plan (40 points max) L10 pts 5. Electrical Plan (40 points max) 3 4 pts 6. Plumbing Plan (40 points max) 38 pts 7. Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points max) q0 pts 8. Police Evidence Building ( 40 points max) 4 Opts TOTAL TECHNICAL SCORE (330 points max) 32-0- pts Administration Building TE -4 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECM41CAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 B. MANAGEMENT CRITERIA -110 Points Total Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative and other documentation 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (18 points max) Proximity of Design Consultant to site (7 points max): >150 mi 150-100 mi 9A 50 mi < -50 mi _--_--- I----- I--------- ---- I---- ----_-- -I & points 0 2 4 6 Proximity of Builder to site (7 points max) >150mi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi < SOW I---- _---------- ___I ---- _--______----- I ------------------- I .5'pomts 0 2 4 6 Proximity of Design Consultant to Builder (6 points max) >ISOmi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi <-50mi -� I__________________I___--_____-_-'I___________ 1 6 points 0 2 4 6 Supporting comments: 2. Proposer's Organization and Key Personnel (40 points max) Proposing Firm organization chart (5 points max) points Proposed Project Management personnel relevant expenence/resumes (10 points max) %O points Proposed Project Design personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max) points Proposed Project Construction personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max)__ZCI points Time commitment of key personnel to this project (5 points max) Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Management Programs (40 points max) Project Cost Control (5 points max) Value Engineering Plan and Experience (5 points max) Ll points 5' points Administration Building TE -5 Sebastian Municipal Airport points SECTION TE - TEMUCAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7/14/2003 Scheduling experience and history on similar projects (5 points max) points SDBE Participation Plan (5 points max) 5 points Local Business Participation Plan (10 points max) points Veteran's Participation Plan (5 points max) points Project safety plan (5 points max) S points Supporting comments: 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) Quality Control/Quality Assurance plan for design activities (6 points max) points Quality Control/Quality Assurance plan for construction activities (6 points max) points Supporting comments: TOTAL MANAGEMENT CRITERIA 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (18 points max) / &points 2. Proposer's Organization and Key Personnel (40 points max) _qq points 3 Proposer's Management Programs (40 points max) ZS points 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) / Zpoints TOTAL MANAGEMENT SCORE (110 points max) / 2 points Administration Building TE -6 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECEMCAL EVALUATION FORM C. PROJECT SCHEDULE -100 Points Total 1. Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points max) Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower) (10 points max) Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) Time commitment of key personnel (10 points max) Supporting comments: 2. Builder's Construction Schedule (50 points) rev 711412003 points points -5-,points Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower, equipment) (5 points max) A points Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) points Demonstrated subcontractors schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) S points Time commitment of key personnel (5 points max) Coordination of design and construction activities (5 points max) Identification of long lead time items (5 points max) Scheduled allowance for permitting activities (5 points max) Scheduled allowance for submittals and review activities (5 points max) Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points) r points Jam'points 5 points S points points Note: Schedule shall reflect all investigations, surveys, design, permitting, preparation of construction documents, reviews, construction, inspections, testing, preparation of record Administration Building TE -7 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 drawings and other documents, and all other required activities from Notice To Proceed to Certificate of Occupancy. 2 points will be awarded for each 7 calendar day period less than the allowable project design and construction schedule of three hundred and sixty-five (365) calendar days (20 points max) Supporting comments: TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE CRITERIA a. Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points max) b. Builder's Construction Schedule (50 points max) c. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points max) TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE SCORE (100 Points max) THIS SECTION LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY points l5 points 3 �? points points —513 points Administration Building TE -8 Sebastian Municipal Airport A EVALUATION SUMMARY 1. Technical Criteria Score (330 points max) 2. Management Criteria Score (110 points max) 3. Project Schedule Score (100 points max) TOTAL TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION SCORE (540 points max) General Remarks and Observations concerning this Proposal: rev 711412003 32 O points 9L points points (O`er points S%%�C Pte . S' a Date: Administration Building fv= Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECIMCAL EVALUATION FORM Section TE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer: BRP H Evaluated by: Tes u s M. V l c I R o A. TECHNICAL CRITERIA - 330 Points Total rev 7/74/2003 Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative, concept drawings and other documentation 1. Proposed Site Plan (40 points) Conceptual Site Plan/Narrative (8 points): Yes: V/ No: Issues Identified and Addressed: (32 points max) ^6 Co 9 Grading/Drainage; Access Roads/Parldng; Landscaping/Irrigation; Fencing (8 points max per issue) I--------------------I-----------------I-------------------I _30- points 0 fair 4 ((good 6 excellent 8 Supporting comments: �eAyefect Z Ph for so, Set6,ck 2. Proposed Structural Plan (40 points) ✓ ✓ Conceptual Structural Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: ✓ No: g pts. Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) opts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: Guumi-rrm-, L -PA No ' , i Administration Building TE -1 Sebastian Municipal Airport Y SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7114/2003 3. Proposed Exterior Wall/Finishes Plan (50 points) Exterior Wall Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: No: /O pts. Exterior Appearance/Aesthetics (10 points): !iJ pts. Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I-------------------I----------------I----------------1 2 6 pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 1Vo McNTio,3 n1F :bD02S 4. Proposed HVAC Plan (40 points) Conceptual HVAC Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: No: L a pts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I— - I I— I pts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 10 5. Proposed Electrical System Plan (40 points) Z+ r✓7 Conceptual Electrical System Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: No: 10 pts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I-----------------I---------------1-----------------I S opts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supportingcomments: Vee �j -be—, 1 - Ex c. wl-P,-r aru ctzL- - �VEIeGU2�c i.1T" i?f2om7c.leyicze. LI�H7�nirs�RDi�e7TPnJ-CMr.eCsr'UGy Lic,"m EMER&c,JW &tcr--RAjmp. t�osc;st 30001 'P0•1kJM Administration Building TE -2 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE- TECENICAL EVALUATION FORM 6. Proposed Plumbing System Plan (40 points) Conceptual Plumbing System Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: ✓ No: Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 110 -Pw M a!.re- ?� A vJ rev 711412003 -- -L pts Opts 7. Proposed Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points) O pi -S / P Communications & Other Equipment Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: ✓ No: Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I-------------------- I ------------------- I ------------------- I 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 3 Opts Supporting comments: InicL-vbr—s SEcvfzint 4 3-CISE'h (!iP-WjtT 1 %J E Lecrglep� -PLA-0 tNcLuet-c llyts EQ i�P 8. Police Evidence Building Plan (40 points) Police Evidence Building Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: ✓ No: _4 O Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) 7 Supporting comments: fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 3 C pts Administration Building TE -3 Sebastian Municipal Airport ! SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 TOTAL TECHNICAL CRITERIA 1. Site Plan (40 points max) 38 pts 2. Structural Pian (40 points max) g pts 3. Exterior Wall Plan (50 points max) pts 4. HVAC Plan (40 points max) ' pts 5. Electrical Plan (40 points max) pts 6. Plumbing Plan (40 points max) 31 pts 7. Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points max) Liv pts 8. Police Evidence Building ( 40 points max) — IQ pts TOTAL TECBMCAL SCORE (330 points max) 3ZD pts Administration Building TE -4 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7/1412003 B. MANAGEMENT CRITERIA -110 Points Total Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative and other documentation 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (18 points max) Proximity of Design Consultant to site (7 points max): >150mi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi < 50 mi I-------------------- I -------------------- I ---- ------- - ----- I —& points 0 2 4 6 Proximity of Builder to site (7 points max) >150mi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi < 50mi I------------- ----- I -------------------- I ------------------- I —k- points 0 2 4 6 Proximity of Design Consultant to Builder (6 points max) > 150 mi 150 -100 mi 99- 50 mi < SOW I--------------------I--------------------I-------------------I 0 2 4 6 —4- points Supporting comments: AL -L, w i rtti o sw,n ,= F % aM i Q R c", of i n= 2. Proposer's Organization and Key Personnel (40 points max) Proposing Firm organization chart (5 points max) s points ;1rst A 8 0 b / /3rvw., Crowe Proposed Project Management personneirelevant experience/resumes (10 points max)___LO points ev,/il4 1 Crvu,c / 6i,FCy„ � e R, IleT/ d an , Hcw2,"+, , Y0VV re even Proposed Project Design personnel t expenence/resumes (10 points ax) 10 points ipodw;N l Crotwell /eavice Proposed Project Construction personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max) points Time commitment of key personnel to this project (5 points max) _ -IS- points Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Management Programs (40 points max) Project Cost Control (5 points max) S points Value Engineering Plan and Experience (5 points max) S points Administration Building TE -5 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHIQICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 Scheduling experience and history on similar projects (5 points max) — points SDBE Participation Plan (5 points max) $ points Local Business Participation Plan (10 points max) points Veteran's Participation Plan (5 points max) ? — points Project safety plan (5 points max) points. Supporting comments: 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) Quality Control/Quality Assurance plan for design activities (6 points max) (a points Quality Control/Quality Assurance plan for construction activities (6 points max) points Supporting comments: TOTAL MANAGEMENT CRITERIA 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (18 points max) _L points 2. Proposer's Organization and Key Personnel (40 points max) _ ) points 3 Proposer's Management Programs (40 points max) z opoints 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) 17 points TOTAL MANAGEMENT SCORE (110 points max) 0 points Administration Building TE -6 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM C. PROJECT SCHEDULE -100 Points Total 1. Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points max) Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower) (10 points max) Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) Time commitment of key personnel (10 points max) Supporting comments: 2. Builder's Construction Schedule (50 points) rev 711412003 5 points points V points Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower, equipment) (5 points max) 3 points Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) 'J-� points Demonstrated subcontractors schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) Z points Time commitment of key personnel (5 points max) Coordination of design and construction activities (5 points max) Identification of long lead time items (5 points max) Scheduled allowance for permitting activities (5 points max) Scheduled allowance for submittals and review activities (5 points max) Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points) S points points ;Z points s points 5 points Note: Schedule shall reflect all investigations, surveys, design, permitting, preparation of construction documents, reviews, construction, inspections, testing, preparation of record Administration Building TE -7 Sebastian Municipal Airport % SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7114/2003 drawings and other documents, and all other required activities from Notice To Proceed to Certificate of Occupancy. 2 points will be awarded for each 7 calendar day period less than the allowable project design and construction schedule of three hundred and sixty-five (365) calendar days (20 points max) points Supporting comments: TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE CRITERIA a. Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points max) 2 O points b. Builder's Construction Schedule (50 points max) points c. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points max) points TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE SCORE (100 Points max) 5-$? points THIS SECTION LEFT' BLANK INTENTIONALLY Administration Building TE -8 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECIDUCAL EVALUATION FORM EVALUATION SUMMARY 1. Technical Criteria Score (330 points marc) 2. Management Criteria Score (110 points max) 3. Project Schedule Score (100 points max) TOTAL TECIINICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION SCORE (540 points max) General Remarks and Observations concerning this Proposal: rev 7114/2003 3 ZO points '0 points 5-�? points 4� points Date: / D 3 Administration Building TE -9 Sebastian Municipal Airport J SECTION TE - TEMOCAL EVALUATION FORM Section TE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Evaluated by: T. M - V 1 C_. l l20 A. TECHNICAL CRITERIA - 330 Points Total rev 7114/2003 Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative, concept drawings and other documentation 1. Proposed Site Plan (40 points) Conceptual Site Plan/Narrative (8 points): Yes: ✓ No: g points Issues Identified and Addressed: (32 points max) GradinglErainage; Access RoadsTarldng; Landscaping/Irrigation; Fencing (8 points max per issue) I-------------I-----------I------------------I 3 2 points 0 fair 4 good 6 excellent 8 Supporting comments: 2. Proposed Structural Plan (40 points) Conceptual Structural Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: ✓ No: g pts. Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I-------------------I----------------I------------------I 3 opts 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: Administration Building TE -1 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7114/2003 3. Proposed Exterior WalYFinishes Plan (50 points) Exterior Wall Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: ✓ No: / O pts. Exterior Appearance/Aesthetics (10 points): /0 pts. Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: 4. Proposed HVAC Plan (40 points) Conceptual HVAC Plan/Narrative (10 points): Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) —0 pts Yes: / No: S pts . �� 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 n Supporting comments: d� iyo + �a u e $c jj- c i eJ dP�0.L K 4 ' k noeo Q/Y 5. Proposed Electrical System Plan (40 points) Conceptual Electrical System Plan/NwTative (10 points): Yes: No: g pts Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I--------------------I-------------------I-------------------1 2 8 pts 0 fair 10 good20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: S&vtike OA cLfbs tNOA-'t LA% cnA f��1""wtiglyg, ��tn w. hteoPn�tcU CM At�A.ta U]Q.r2 C Administration Building TE -2 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECIRWAL EVALUATION FORM 6. Proposed Plumbing System Plan (40 points) Conceptual Plumbing System Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: ✓ No: Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I— ------------------ I ----- ------------ I ------------------- I 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: SepC // ar `_.. w. ✓ 7. Proposed Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points) Communications & Other Equipment Plan/Narrative (10 points): Yes: Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) 7 Supporting comments: fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 8. Police Evidence Building Plap (40 points) /79 Police Evidence Building Plan/Narrative (10 points): Issues Identified and Addressed: (30 points max) I-------------------- I ------------------- I ------------------- I 0 fair 10 good 20 excellent 30 Supporting comments: rev 711412003 /0 pts 130 pts No: -30 pts S— ^,t ---j Yes: No: rtJ '30 pts Administration Building TE -3 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7/1412003 TOTAL TECHNICAL CRITERIA 1. Site Plan (40 points max) 0 pts 2. Structural Plan (40 points max) - g Pts 3. Exterior Wall Plan (50 points max) so pts 4. HVAC Plan (40 points max) -3 (0 pts 5. Electrical Plan (40 points max) 3 opts 6. Plumbing Plan (40 points max) 1i 0 pts 7. Communications & Other Equipment Plan (40 points max) pts 8. Police Evidence Building ( 40 points max) 3 5 pts TOTAL TECHNICAL SCORE (330 points max) 3 /," pts Administration Building TE -4 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECEMCAL EVALUATION FORM rev 7/1412003 B. MANAGEMENT CRITERIA -110 Points Total Evaluation items as addressed in proposal narrative and other documentation 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (18 points max) Proximity of Design Consultant to site (7 points max): >150mi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi <60mi 1------------------I-------------------I-------------- -I 1 w points 0 2 4 Y Proximity of Builder to site (7 points max) >150mi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi < 50mi I__— ------------ —__I -------------------- I ---- ------------ —Ipoints 0 2 4 6 Proximity of Design Consultant to Builder (6 points max) >150mi 150-100 mi -_______ 99-50 mi ______ <-So mi I---- __- ------ ---I_______ I —__c I points 0 2 4 6 Supporting comments: 2. Proposer's Organization and Key Personnel (40 points max) Proposing Firm organization chart (5 points max) amn points Proposed Project Management personnel relevant experiencetresumes (10 points max) +.f points Proposed Project Design personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max) --- wpoints Proposed Project Construction personnel relevant experience/resumes (10 points max) I Q _ points Time commitment of key personnel to this project (5 points max) --e—points Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Management Programs (40 points max) Project Cost Control (5 points max) Value Engineering Plan and Experience (5 points max) Administration Building TE -5 2 points 2points Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 Scheduling experience and history on similar projects (5 points max) —points SDBE Participation Plan (5 points max) 2 points Local Business Participation Plan (10 points max) Z points Veteran's Participation Plan (5 points max) --- points Project safety plan (5 points max) 5- points Supporting comments: 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) Quality Control/Quality Assurance plan for design activities (6 points max) 3 points Quality Control/Quality Assurance plan for construction activities (6 points max) 3 points Supporting comments: TOTAL MANAGEMENT CRITERIA 1. Location of Proposer/Proposal Team (18 points max) points 2. Proposer's Organization and Key Personnel (40 points max) ZSpoints 3 Proposer's Management Programs (40 points max) 3 points 4. Proposer's Quality Assurance Program (12 points max) 6points TOTAL MANAGEMENT SCORE (110 points max) 5 9 points Administration Building TE -6 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM C. PROJECT SCHEDULE -100 Points Total 1. Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points max) Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower) (10 points max) Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) Time commitment of key personnel (10 points max) Supporting comments: 2. Builder's Construction Schedule (50 points) rev 711412003 points points 5 points Ability to meet schedule (resources, manpower, equipment) (5 points max) Z points Demonstrated schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) -- points Demonstrated subcontractors schedule adherence on similar projects (10 points max) "— points Time commitment of key personnel (5 points max) 3 points Coordination of design and construction activities (5 points max) -- points Identification of long lead time items (5 points max) — points Scheduled allowance for permitting activities (5 points max) — points Scheduled allowance for submittals and review activities (5 points max) — points Supporting comments: 3. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points) Note: Schedule shall reflect all investigations, surveys, design, permitting, preparation of construction documents, reviews, construction, inspections, testing, preparation of record Administration Building TE -7 Sebastian Municipal Airport 0 SECTION TE- TECIINICALEVALUATION FORM rev 711412003 drawings and other documents, and all other required activities from Notice To Proceed to Certificate of Occupancy. 2 points will be awarded for each 7 calendar day period less than the allowable project design and construction schedule of three hundred and sixty-five (365) calendar days (20 points max) Supporting comments: TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE CRITERIA a. Design Consultant's Design Schedule (30 points max) b. Builder's Construction Schedule (50 points max) c. Proposer's Total Schedule (20 points max) TOTAL PROJECT SCHEDULE SCORE (100 Points max) Administration Building THIS SECTION LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY points S points points points /0 points TE -8 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION TE - TECHNICAL EVALUATION FORM EVALUATION SUMMARY 1. Technical Criteria Score (330 points max) 2. Management Criteria Score (110 points max) 3. Project Schedule Score (100 points max) TOTAL TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION SCORE (540 points max) General Remarks and Observations concerning this Proposal: rev 7114/2003 3 /,`Points S$ points J points 3 $ � points Administration Building TE -9 Sebastian Municipal Airport SECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM Section QE QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF AIRPORT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer: ' Evaluated b<;•; j, 11. 1 1 e l " I. PROPOSE' R'S LETTER OF INTEREST m 3/13/2003 C 04AT>" A INTRODUCTION of FIRM (5 points) S points B. SPECIFIC PROJECT EXPERIENCE (max 12 points) 9 points Recently completed projects (completed no more than five years ago) that demonstrate the Proposing Firm or Contractor/Builder or Design Professional specific experience relevant to the proposed project (Up to 4 points each —12 points max) Project Name Location IBud et Year Completed a. a _ b. O•, C. . C. PROPOSED TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT EXPERIENCE (max 12 points) i v -points 1) DESIGN TEAM MANAGER RELATF.T) PR OTRrT T2XPywPwrT i n Project Name Location Bud et Year Com Ieted a. Ll. Vi b.�' '•w � 11 � 30•. � 2) CONSTRUCTION MANAGER/STTP RFT.ATRn PUOTPrT FTtPAATG'Nrr i n 3 3 3 c.� Municipal AuportA umstartionBuildmg QF l SECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM 31 PROJECT MANAGER RELATED EX F..RTFNCT.. m 3/13/2003 A nni rtcl .�.� . ,.l'I • Y D. LETTERS OF EVALUATION/RECOMMENDATION (max 6 points) points Client references relevant to the Proposer's specific experience. ( 2 Points each - 6 points max) �1 E. E. PROPOSING FIRMS) ABILITY & CAPACITY (5 points) 5 points F. PROPOSING FIRM(S) PROOF OF BONDING CAPACITY: YES ' NO 2. LOCAL PREFERENCE: t�> points >200 200-150 mi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi <50 mi 1 2 3 4 5 3. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE FORM: YES ✓ NO 4. PUBLIC ENTITY CRMIE(S FORM: YES NO _ S. DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION: YES ✓ NO 6. LICENSES & REGISTRATIONS a. General Contractor's License attached? YES / NO _ b. State of Fl. Certification/Registration attached YES 7 NO _ C. ArchitecVEngineer Registration attached YES NO d. State of Fl. Professional License YES / NO 7. PROOF OF INSURANCE: YES ✓ NO 8. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT: YES L/ NO TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION SCORE (45 points max) 1 U pts Municipal Airport Ad•, mztra +m, Building QE -2 11M '3 3 SECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM my 3/13/2003 CRITERIA FOR SCORING PROPOSING FIRM'S EXPERIENCE ON PROJECTS OF SROnAR OR GREATER SCOPE AND SIZE TO THE ONE UNDER CONSIDERATION Project Experience Score Design/Build Administration Buildings 4.0 points each Design/Build other Projects 3.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY Administration Buildings 2.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY other Projects 1.0 point each Where a submittal provides project information for two firms (Architect/Engineer and Builder/Contractor), the two -firm team experience will be evaluated together as a single unit. General Remarks and Observations concerning this Qualifications Submittal: Municipal Airport Adminisuation Building QE -3 SECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM Section QE QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF AIRPORT ADAMISTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer: Evaluated by: V 1 1= l �� 1. PROPOSE, R'S LETTER OF MM REST alock� A INTRODUCTION of FIRM (5 points) B. SPECIFIC PROJECT EXPERIENCE (max 12 points) r" 3/13/2003 r S points --1z-points Recently completed projects (completed no more than five years ago) that demonstrate the Proposing Firm or Contractor/Builder or Design Professional specific experience relevant to the proposed project. (Up to 4 points each —12 points max) i-' hk" 4 0---V 'T, AP . LiA._0R f d h IT -rI,. (- 1 - . 42 O t. v__ _ u • "Ili �Y�������• � .. C. PROPOSED TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT EXPERIENCE (max 12 points) 8 points 1) DESIGN TEAM MANAGER. RELATF.T) PRnTRrT r-VPVPTRWrT7 / e o) f C)NSTRTT(171rW MANA(14PRIUM RFT ATRn D1?f1TT1r r LZTOLnrc r c f n Municipal Airport-Admmistaton Building QE -1 earompleted L/ L/ SECTION QE -QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM 3) PROJECT MANAGER RELATED my 3/13/2003 ( 4 noints) D. LETTERS OF EVALUATION/RECOMiv1EISMATION (max 6 points) = points Client references relevant to the Proposer's specific experience. ( 2 Points each - 6 points max) Pro'ect Name Client Name Eval/ Recom Contact 8. b. c. E. PROPOSING FIRM(S) ABILITY & CAPACITY (5 points) 3 points F. PROPOSING FIRM(S) PROOF OF BONDING CAPACITY: YES I NO 2. LOCAL PREFERENCE: YES NO points NO YES XNO >2M 200-150m1 150-100 m/ 99-50 w <50mt NO YES NO I-1 1 2 3 4 i 5 3. DRUG-FREE WOPU PLACE FORM: YES NO 4. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIME, S FORM: YES ✓ NO 5. DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION: YES ✓ NO 6. LICENSES & REGISTRATIONS a. General Contractor's License attached? b. State of Fl. Certification/Registration attached C. Architect/Engineer Registration attached d. State of FL Professional License 7. PROOF OF INSURANCE: S. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT: YES >/ NO TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION SCORE (45 points max) 33 pts M=mpal AupmtArim=sfratirm Bd&w QE -2 YES NO YES NO YES XNO _ YES _ NO YES NO YES >/ NO TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION SCORE (45 points max) 33 pts M=mpal AupmtArim=sfratirm Bd&w QE -2 SECTION Qf_ QUALIIEATIONS EVALUATION FORM x 3/13/2003 CRITERIA. FOR EXP PROJE TS OF gilV1II,AIt OR SGREATERCORING R 3C0 EG AND FIRM'S SIZE ETON THE ONE CUNDER CONSIDERATION Score Project E%Perlence DesignBuild Administration Buildings 4.0 points each 3.0 points each DesignBuild other Projects 2,0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY Administration Buildings 1,0 point each Design ONLY or Build ONLY other Projects P where a submittal provides project information for two firms (Architect/Engineer and Builder/Contractor), the two -firm team experience will be evaluated together as a single unit. General Remarks and Observations concerning this Qualifications Submittal: J�Sog= C62�–� P1A C f \- — QE -3 Municipal AiTport-Admmstalion Building SECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM Section QE QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF AIRPORT ADAEMSTRATION BUILDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer: Evaluated by: ����g> ►L t Ji E 1 20 1. PROPOSER'S LETTER OF ifhTIEREST A INTRODUCTION of FIRM (5 points) B. SPECIFIC PROJECT E)2ERIENCE (max 12 points) rev 3/13/2003 t t�� -5 points _,points Recently completed projects (completed no more than five years ago) that demonstrate the Proposing Firm or Contractor/Builder or Design Professional specific experience relevant to the proposed project. (Up to 4 points each —12 points max) Project Name Location Budget Year Completed a. 1 • N w a- c. 7b% C • llah-e o 17, ur .AnA 20 :. C. PROPOSED TEAM MEMEERS PROJECT EXPERIENCE (max 12 points) 1) DESIGN TEAM MANAGER RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE (4 oints) Project Name Location Budget Year Completed a. b. C. 2) CONSTRUCTION MANAGER/SUP. RELATED PROJECT EXPERIEKCF. / 4 nnintcl Project Name Location Budget Year Completed a. cPAA A.P r,a b. C. Municipal Airpon-Admimshafion Building QE -1 . SECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM 3) PROJECT MANAGER RELATED EXPERffiQCE my 3/1312003 ( A nninta) D. LETTERS OF EVALUATION/RECONEvE NDATION (max 6 points)__a?points Client references relevant to the Proposer's specific experience. ( 2 Points each - 6 points max) E. PROPOSING FIRMS) ABILITY & CAPACITY ( 5 points) S points F. PROPOSING FIRM(S) PROOF OF BONDING CAPACITY: YES ✓ NO 2. LOCAL PREFERENCE: `� points >200 200.150 m1 150-100 ml 99-50 ml <50m1 L /vV TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION SCORE (45 points max) pts T Municipal Airport-Adminis¢ation Building QE -2 1 2 3 4 5 3. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE FORM: YES i✓ NO _ 4. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES FORM: YES NO S. DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION: YES NO 6. LICENSES & REGISTRATIONS a. General Contractor's License attached? YES _✓ NO _ b. State of Fl. Certification/Registration attached YES ✓ NO C. Architect/Engineer Registration attached YES _ NO _ d. State of Fl. Professional License YES _✓ NO _ 7. PROOF OF INSURANCE: YES ✓ NO— S. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT: YES __�/ NO _ L /vV TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION SCORE (45 points max) pts T Municipal Airport-Adminis¢ation Building QE -2 SECTION QE -QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM m 3/13/2003 CRITERIA FOR SCORING PROPOSING FIRM'S EXPERIENCE ON PROJECTS OF SBMAR OR GREATER SCOPE AND SIZE TO THE ONE UNDER CONSIDERATION Proiect Experience Score DesignBuild Administration Buildings 4.0 points each Design/Build other Projects 3.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY Administration Buildings 2.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY other Projects 1.0 point each Where a submittal provides project information for two firms (Architect/Engineer and Builder/Contractor), the two -firm team experience will be evaluated together as a single unit. General Remarks and Observations concerning this Qualifications Submittal: Municipal Airpon-Admms¢ation Buildmg QE -3 SECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM Section QE QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF AIRPORT ADAEMSTRATION BUnDING AND POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND Proposer: t RUL (-kC—(:y J 4 Evaluated by: J (U 1. PROPOSER'S LETTER OF INTEREST rev 3/13/2003 A INTRODUCTION of FIRM (5 points) S points B. SPECIFIC PROJECT EXTERIENCE (max 12 points) points Recently completed projects (completed no more than five years ago) that demonstrate the Proposing Firm or Contractor/Builder or Design Professional specific experience relevant to the proposed project. (Up to 4 points each — 12 points max) C. PROPOSED TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT =ERIENCE (max 12 points) i 0 points 1) DESIGN TEAM MANAGER RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE (4points) 3 Project Name Location Budget Year Com le 3 b. J W &xk 3 C. � rf 2) CONSTRUCTION MANAGERISUP. RELATED PROJECT =ERMNCE (4points) - Project Name Location Bud et Year Com leted Ea. `S \Y' Y b. Vero c. 3 Muvimpal.Airport-Administration Building QE -1 Project Name Location Budget I Year Com leted a. b. P LtJ �2 t C. _ eL 2 t v 3 C. PROPOSED TEAM MEMBERS PROJECT =ERIENCE (max 12 points) i 0 points 1) DESIGN TEAM MANAGER RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE (4points) 3 Project Name Location Budget Year Com le 3 b. J W &xk 3 C. � rf 2) CONSTRUCTION MANAGERISUP. RELATED PROJECT =ERMNCE (4points) - Project Name Location Bud et Year Com leted Ea. `S \Y' Y b. Vero c. 3 Muvimpal.Airport-Administration Building QE -1 SECTION QE- QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION FORM rev 3/1312003 3) PROJECT MANAGER RELATED =ERIENCE (4Points) 3 •'S Project Name Location Budget I Year Com let b. c. D. LETTERS OF EVALUATION/RECOMMENDATION (max 6 points) !o points Client references relevant to the Proposer's specific experience. ( 2 Points each — 6 points max) Project Name Client Name EvaU Recom Contact a. b. c. E. PROPOSINGF]RM(S) ABILITY & CAPACITY ( 5 points) 4 points F. PROPOSING FIRM(S) PROOF OF BONDING CAPACITY: YES ✓ NO _ 2. LOCAL PREFERENCE: 5 points >200 200-150 mi 150-100 mi 99-50 mi <50mi 1 2 3 4 5 / 3. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE FORM: YES ✓ NO _ 4. PUBLIC ENTITY CRINIES FORM: YES_✓/ NO _ 5. DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION: YES ✓/ NO 6. LICENSES & REGISTRATIONS S. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT: YES __,/ NO _ TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION SCORE (45 points max) pts Municipal Airport Admmisimdo Building QE -2 / a. General Contractor's License attached? YES NO _ b. State of Fl. Certification/Registration attached YES � NO _ C, Architect/Engmeer Registration attached YES ✓ NO _ d. State of Fl. Professional License YES _ NO 7. PROOF OF INSURANCE: YES _/ NO— S. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT: YES __,/ NO _ TOTAL QUALIFICATIONS EVALUATION SCORE (45 points max) pts Municipal Airport Admmisimdo Building QE -2 SECUON QE -QUALIFICATIONS EVALUAUON FORM =3/1311003 CRITERIA FOR SCORING PROPOSING FIRM'S EXPERIENCE ON PROJECTS OF SIlVI]I AR OR GREATER SCOPE AND SIZE TO THE ONE UNDER CONSIDERATION Proiect Experience Score Design/Build Administration Buildings 4.0 points each Design/Build other Projects 3.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY Administraiion Buildings 2.0 points each Design ONLY or Build ONLY other Projects 1.0 point each Where a submittal provides project information for two firms (Architect/Engineer and Builder/Contractor), the two -firm team experience will be evaluated together as a single unit General Remarks and Observations emreming this Qualifications Submittal: MUMMpal Anport-AdmmisftahonBuilding QE -3