HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008 Applicationcm or
.:°`~.
FIOME OF PEUGN tStAND
AGENDA TRANSMITTAL
Subject: Agenda No.
FLORIDA BOATING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Department Orrin: Cit i Manager
'
'
GRANT [
Finance• ~~.•..
City Attorney:
Ap ve ubmittal by: City Clerk:
Date Submitted: Jun 08
i Mana er
E hibits:
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: AMOUNT BUDGETED: APPROPRIATION
N/A N/A REQUIRED:
N/A
SUMMARY
The attached resolution provides Council support for the Florida Boating Improvement Grant
Program sponsored by Florida Fish & Wildlife Commission. Recently, City staff has applied for
$425,291 in funding which is applicable to the Indian River Drive/Main Street Project. If received,
these funds can significantly reduce the total cost of the project, thereby having the potential to
fund the construction with $912,823 in grant funding, equaling 50% of the construction costs.
Concerning the construction portion of the project, the City currently has $1,822,494 available.
These funds come from the following categories:
FUNDING SOURCE ~ AMOUNT
CRA Fund $834,962
Recreation Impact Fee Fund $500,000
FIND Grant $487,532
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUNDS $1,822,494
From these funds, the City has a cash allocation of $1,334,962. Obviously if the FWS grant is
received, these funds can be reduced by $425,291 and shift monies back to either the CRA or
Recreational Impact Fee Fund.
One other item concerning project costs. The allocation of $1.82 million does not include money
we have spent to date on the project such as engineering and property purchase. These costs
equal an additional expense of $598,690.24. All costs in and if the estimates for construction are
reached, the total project will be $2.4 Million. Below is a spreadsheet, which outlines total costs
to date for the entire project. Please keep in mind that construction costs are estimates, they
could increase or decrease based on actually bids.
45
__ _ _ __ _
INDIAN RIVER DRIVEIMAIN STREET
PROJECT C0741
_ _ ~ _ __
Direct Charges to CRA Fund:
:Land Purchase 397 849 24
Appraisals on 806 Indian River Drive 10,000.00
Not~ceslPostage _ _ _ _ _ __
719.75
Schulke for Design 190 061.25 598 690.24
:Transfer to Project from CRA Fund:
_.
_
FY2007 _...
'.215,401.00
FY2008 619,561.00 834,962.00
:Transfer to Project from Recreation_Impact Fees 500,000.00
_.
Erected Proceeds from FIND Grant _, ,_y _.._.._ 487,532.00
__ _.
_ __
Total from All Funding Sources 2 421,184.
...~___ ___. _ _.. _ _.. _. ~.... _ ... 24
Less Direct Charges to CRA Fund. (Shown Above) _.
_ (598,690.24]'
Current Budget for Project in Construction Fund 1,822,494.00
.~.. ___ ~__. _.e.._--_ ... __ .__..._._ _.~..__._ _
Charges to Budget for Project __.. _. __..._._~ __.
.:Trash/Landcleanng __ „_ X1,799.24)
Public Notices X271.67)
~.... ___.._.~,. _yTree ConsultationlSpra~mq ,._ _ _ . ..._..... ~i365.00~ _
Schulke for Construction Admin. :46,052.50 (48,988.41}
Currently Available Balance for Project C0741 1 773,505.59
Total_ Pro_Ject Cost Estimate is $1 936 972.46
Less $238,013 75 included for Design and Contract Admirnstration
_. _..._.. ~__ .~_._.w_ _ _ .~. ~__._
Estimated Balance of Project Costs 1,698,958.71 '.
Available for Contingencies __ __ __ .
74,546.88
The purpose of the Florida Boating Improvement Grant is to assist in supporting marine activities
throughout the state. The purpose of this resolution is to support the grant and is a part of the
application process. This resolution will enable the City to apply for funding and to administer the
grant, fund expenses, and associated improvements, for safer recreational boating at the Main
Street Boat Ramp. .
Also attached for your review is the grant application, which has been submitted to FWS. The
application does not become complete until this Resolution is approved. Further, Council will be
required to accept assurance in the grant agreement, if awarded the funds.
RECOMMENDATION
Move approval of grant Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO R-08-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER AND OR HIS DESIGNEE TO
APPLY FOR FUNDING FROM THE FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE
CONSERVATION COMMISSION, FLORIDA BOATING IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM, PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE
DATE
WHEREAS the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Division of
Boating, has been authorized to provide funding opportunities to local governments to finance
recreational boating improvement projects along the coastal waters of the State of Florida;
WHEREAS the City has been advised by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission of the availability of funds under this program;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SEBASTIAN FLORIDA as follows:
Section 1. AUTHORIZATION. The City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized
to apply for funding from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Florida
Boating Improvement Program to fund expenses and associated improvements for
recreational boating at the Main Street Boat Ramp adjacent to the Indian River Lagoon.
Section 2. CONFLICTS. All resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are
hereby appealed.
Section 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its
adoption.
~F~
This resolution was moved for adoption by Councilmember
was seconded by Councilmember
was as follows:
Mayor Andea B. Coy
Vice Mayor Sal Neglia
Councilmember AI Paternoster
Councilmember Dale I. Simchick
Councilmember Eugene Wolff
The motion
and, upon being put to a vote, the vote
The Mayor thereupon declared this Resolution duly passed and adopted this day of
2008.
By:
Mayor Andrea Coy
ATTEST:
Sally A. Maio, MMC
City Clerk
CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA
Approved as to form and content for reliance by the
City of Sebastian only:
Rich Stringer, City Attorney
4~
Q11'OF
~~
HOME OF PELICAN ISLAND
1225 MAIN STREET ^ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958
TELEPHONE (772) 589-5518 ^ FAX (772) 388-8248
May l3, 2008
Ms. Susanna Stephens, Program Administrator
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
Florida Boating Improvement Program
Division of Law Enforcement
620 South Meridian Street Room 235
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1600
(850)488-5600
RE: 2008-2009 Florida Boating Improvement Program
Dear Ms. Stephens,
It is my pleasure to submit to you the City of Sebastian's application for assistance through the 2008-2009
program. The City is truly excited with the potential this project has to really bring the waterfront to more
citizens through safer and improved access to the boat ramp, restroom amenities, and increase in boat
trailer parking, etc.
I want to assure you of the City's commitment to this project and its support by the City Council. I will
ensure that a signed resolution of the same is submitted to you in a timely manner. In the meantime, please
feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns you might have. I may be reached at (772) 589-5330
or aminner citYofsebastian.org. You may also contact Margie Reynolds with questions at (772) 388-8212
Cc~ Rich Stringer, City Attorney
Sally Maio, City Clerk
Margie Reynolds, City Environmental Specialist/Planner
44
Florida Fish and Wildlife Florida Boating Improvement Program
Conservation Commission
MyFwC.com Grant Application for Boating Access Facilities
FOR OFFICE USE;ONLY
Gram A lication Nlumber : ~ ~ ` .Date Received:
Fill in all.cectinnc that annly- l.oavo all nthvr.coctinn.c h)nnl-
I -APPLICANT INFORMATION
a. Applicant: City of Sebastian
b. Federal Employer Id. No.: 59-6000427 .
c. Project Manager Name: Alfred Minner Project Manager Title: City Manager
d. Mailing Address: 1225 Main Street City: Sebastian Zip Code: 32958
e. Shipping Address: 1225 Main Street City: Sebastian Zip Code: 32958
f. Telephone: 772 589-5330 Fax: 772 388-8248 Email: aminner@cityofsebastian.org
g. District Numbers: State House: 80 State Senate: 26 County Commission: 1
II -PROJECT SUMMARY
a. Project Title: Sebastian's Main Street Public Launching Facility
b. Type of Application: ®New (never considered before) ^ Reconsideration ^ Phased Continuation-Phase No.:
TIER-I TIER II
e. Project Category:
^ A -Public Launching Facilities
^ A -Boat Ramps, Piers, and Docks
®B -Public Launching Facilities
d. Project Cost: Total Cost: $ $1,697,857.00 Amount Requested: $ X425.291.00
e. Project Summary:
The City of Sebastian , a State of Florida Municipality has planned to construct additional boat trailer parking, provide amenities
such as a public restroom facility and realign the access road to eliminate launching safety hazards.
Fwc~s~-s loirosl
Page 1 of 9
III - FACILTTY INFORMATION
a. Facility Name: Main Street Boat Ramp
b. Type of Facility:
® Existing Boat Ramp /Public Launching Facility
^ Proposed Boat Ramp !Public Launching Facility
Other:
^ Existing Marina /Tie-up /Overnight Moorage Facility
^ Proposed Marina /Tie-up /Overnight Moorage Facility
c. Facility location:
County: Indian River Water body: Indian River Lagoon
Latitude: N 27 dee 49 min. 6.276 sec. Longitude: W 80 deQ. 28 nun. 8.29 sec.
Facility Street Address or Location: 1302 Indian River Drive Sebastian- F132958 _
d. Upland Ownership:
® Public -Fee Simple ^ Public -Lease Number of Years Remaining in Lease:
Name of Owner: Ci of Sebastian
e. Is this facility open to the general public? ®Yes ^ No
r ,-_.t~ _:_ n.r..e..~ /°%\ TTen of T mmrhino Facility' 9U% Motorboats/SailboatS 10%Non-Motorboats
g. Day Use, Parking or Launch Fee Amount: $0.00 Tie-up/Ovemight Moorage: $0.00
h. Number of Launch Lanes: 2 Condition: ^ New ®Good ^ Average ^Poor
i. Length of Boarding Docks: 80 Ft. Condition: ^ New ®Good ^ Average ^Poor
Type of docks: ®Fixed Wooden ®Fixed concrete ^ Floating concrete ^ Other
j. Number of Boat Trailer Parking Spaces: 1 S Condition: ^ New ^ Good ^ Average ®Poor
k Length of Tie-up Dock or Moorage: 80Ft or OSlip Condition: ^ New ®Good ^ Average ^Poor
Type of docks: ®Fixed Wooden ®Fixed concrete ^ Floating concrete ^ Other
1.Other Facility Attributes:
Restroom: ^ Yes ^ No ®Proposed Other. Proposed amenity
Pump out or Dump Station: ^ Yes ®No Other: Proposed amenity
m. Names of adjacent boating facilities, public and private (ramps, tie-up facilities/marinas) within a 10-mile radius.
Name Distance Name Distance
1. City of Sebastian Yacht Club 1 mi 2. John Jor ensen Boat Ramp 10 mi
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
9 10.
~--`
FWC/FBIP-B (01/08) Page 2 of 9 ~ Gj
N -PROJECT DESCRIPTION
a List Primary Need for Project: ®Safety
^ Age-end of Useful Life ®High Demand by Users
® Environmental Needs of the Area ~ Recommended by FWC Staff
® Other: Public Amcaity Needs ~ Lack of In-house Capability
b. Need Statement:
I .Currently access to the existing boat ramp to lauch a vessel causes entire blockage of Indian River Drive and a public
safety hazard. There has been an overall increase of boaters utilizing the boat ramp and trailer parking area. Many will
park their trailers along US 1 and other non-designated areas.
2. Reconstruction of the existing boat trailer parking area to allow more boat trailers parking along with a staging azea, and
remove the current envimmnenial impacts associated with stormwater run-off directly into the Indian River Lagoon.
3. There are no public restroom facilities at the boat ramp. Boaters currently leave the boat ramp area.
c. Project Tasks:
Task 1 Realign Indian River Drive to the West to direct non boating traffic away from the ramp to increase public safety.
Task 2 Install stormwater treatment facilities.
Task 3 Reconsh~uct the existing boat trailer parking, to provide 28 designated spaces, with a staging area.
Task 4 Construct public restrooms that connect to Sanitary Sewer lift station and County water to keep ail wastewater off
site.
Task S Install Educational Kiosks, and landscaping
d. Project Benefits:
By providing more spaces for parking, provide public amenities, and ensure boating safety, we will provide recreational,
natural and physical access opportunities, and enhance the historic fishing village character of Sebastian.
5Z
FWC/FBIP-s (01/08) Page 3 of 9
V -PROJECT ELEMENTS: BOAT RAMPS & PUBLIC LAUNCHING FACILITIES
a. Type of project: ^ Engineering /Planning only ^ Renovation /Repair ®Expansion ®New Construction
b. Boat Ramp
Number of existing launch lanes to be repaired:
Type of ramp: ^ Asphalt ^ Concrete ^ Other
Number of new/added launch lanes: 0
Type of new ramp: ^ Asphalt ^ Concrete ^ Other
c. Boarding Dock
Length of existing boarding docks to be repaired /replaced: ft.
Type of docks: ^ Fixed wooden ^ Fixed concrete ^ Floating Concrete ^ Other
Length of new/added boarding docks: ft.
Type of new docks: ^ Fixed wooden ^ Fixed concrete ^ Floating Concrete ^ Other
d. Parking
Number of existing boat trailer parking spaces to be refurbished 15
Type of parking: ^ Asphalt ^ Concrete ®Other Sand/Grave 1
Number of new/added boat trailer parking spaces 13
Type of new/added parking: ®Asphalt ^ Concrete ®Other Porous Turf Block
e. Lifts, Hoists, Marine Railways
Number of lifts or hoists to be repaired /replaced:
Number of new lifts or hoists to be installed /added:
Length of marine railway to be repaired /replaced:
Length of new marine railway to be added:
Maximum length of vessel that can be lifted:
Maximum length of vessel that can be lifted:
ft.
ft.
f. Amenities /Other elements
® Restrooms: Describe 300 square foot Men & Ladies public restroom
® Access Road: Length of access road: 228 yds. Type of road: ^ Gravel ®Asphalt ®Other Porous Turf Block
® Educationalkiosk / signage: Describe Plan to install kiosk with educational placards for Recreational Boating Safety, Manatee
Protection Zone Map, and Boaters Guide to the Indian River Lagoon ,along with Grant Funding Source Acknowledgements
. ~.. ,
FWC/FBIP-B (01/08) Page 4 of 9 ~ /~~
VI -PROJECT ELEMENTS: MARINAS & OTHER MOORING FACILITIES (Piers /Docks)
a. Type of project: ^ Engineering 1 Planning ^ Renovate /Repair ^ Expansion
^ New Construction
b. Docks / In-water slips
Length of existing docks to be repaired /replaced: ft. Number oftie-ups /slips:
Type of dock: ^ Fixed Wooden ^ Fixed Concrete ^ Floating Concrete ^ Other
Length of new docks to be added /installed: ft. Number of tie-ups /slips:
Type of dock: ^ Fixed Wooden ^ Fixed Concrete ^ Floating Concrete ^ Other
c. Mooring Buoys
Area of mooring field: sq. ft.
Number of mooring buoys to be repaired /replaced:
Number of new mooring buoys to be installed:
d. Dry Storage
Number of existing dry storage slips to be repaired /replaced:
Number of new dry storage slips to be constructed:
e. Amenities /Other elements
^ Restrooms: Descnbe
^ Access Road: Length of access road: yds. Type of road: ^ Gravel ^ Asphalt ^ Other
^ Educational kiosk / signage: Describe
^ Pump-out or Dump station
VII -PROJECT ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION
a. Who is or will be completing project design/engineering? b. Level of engineering completed at time of application:
® Applicant's Own Staff ^ None
® Consulting Engineers ^ Conceptual (Master Plan Phase)
^ N/A (Materials or Equipment Purchase) ^ Preliminary
^ Other: ®Final (Ready to Bid)
5~
Fwc~s~-B roiros~
Page 5 of 9
VIII -BUDGET
a. Has a detailed cost estimate been developed for this project? If yes, attach a copy to application.
® Yes, Preliminary ^ Yes, Final ^ No
b. PROJECT COST: NON-CASH FUNDS
Cost Item
Applicant Other source
(List below in
Section VIIn Do Not Use ` .
~ .Column
TOTAL
Administration $ 25,000 $ 0 $ 25,000
Project Management $ 40,000 $ 0 $ 40,000
In-Kind Engineering $ 40,000 $ 0 $ 40,000
In-Kind Labor $ ~ 30,000 $ 0 $ 30,000
In-Kind Materials $ 30,000 $ 0 -- $ 30,000
In-Kind Equipment $ 15,000 $ 0 . ;' $ 15,000
Total Non-Cash Funds $ 180,000 $ 0 - $ 180,000
c. PROJECT COST: CASH FUNDS
Cost Item
Applicant Other source
(List below in
Section VIII) ~~ Grant
Request
TOTAL
Administration /project Management $ 32,500 $ 0 $ 32,500 $ 65,000
Design /Engineering $ 122,125 $ 0 $ 122,125 $ 244,250
Permitting $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Construction /Repair: Boat Ramps $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Construction /Repair. Lifts, Hoists, Marine Railways $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Construction /Repair. Piers or Docks $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Construction /Repair: Pazking $ 40,472 $ 80,944 $ 40,472 $ 161,888
Construction /Repair: Rsstrooms $ 125,077 $ 24,750 $ 125,078 $ 274,905
Other: Site Work/ Roadway Access $ 105,116 $ 160,232 $ 105,116 $ 370,464
Other: Contingency 10% $ 86,500 ~ u ~ u a ao,~w
Other: Acquisition $ 223,700 $ 177,650 $ 0 $ 401,350
Other. $ $ $ $
Other. $ $ $ $
Total Cash Funds $ 735,490 $ 443,576 $ 425,291 $ 1,604,357
FwC/FBtP-s (ot/os) Page 6 of 9 (~
IX -OTHER SOURCE OF FUNDS (Partnerships)
a. Funding source /Agency: Florida Inland Navieation District
b. Type of funding: ^ Federal grant ®State/Local grant ^ Loan
c. Grant Name: 2007-08 Waterways Assistance Proeram Amount $ 487.532.00
d. Approval Status: ®Approved ^ Pending ^ Intend to Apply, Date:
a. Funding source /Agency:
b. Type of funding: ^ Federal grant ^ State/L,ocal grant ^ Loan
c. Grant Name: Amount $
d. Approval Status: ^ Approved ^ Pending ^ Intend to Apply, Date:
a. Funding source /Agency:
b. Type of funding: ^ Federal grant ^ State/L.ocal grant ^ Loan
c. Grant Name: Amount $
d. Approval Status: ^ Approved ^ Pending ^ Intend to Apply, Date:
a. Funding source /Agency:
b. Type of funding: ^ Federal grant ^ State/I.ocal grant ^ Loan
c. Grant Name: Amount $
d. Approval Status: ^ Approved ^ Pending ^ Intend to A 1 Date:
PP Y.
X -PERMITS
Submitted Approved N/A
a. Florida Department of Environmental Protection ^ ® ^
b. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's ^ ^
c. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ^ ® ^
d. Local and Others (If needed) ^ ® ^
T ror mooring ouoy prolecrs, a r~onaa unuorm waterway MarKer ~-ppucatron must be submitted to FWC prior to submittal of the
grant application.
"' :. .
FWC/FBIP-B (01/08) Page 7 of 9
XII -BOATER SAFETY
a. Explain how the project may affect boater safety whether positively or negatively.
This project will increase recreational boater safety. The boaters will have improved launching accessibility, more area to
park trailers, stage vessels, and provide safer pedestrian access to the Main Street Boat Ramp or restroom facilities. Non-
boating vehicles will be routed westward of the boat trailer parking and amenities to ensure public safety.
FWGFBIP-B (olro8) Page 8 of 9
XIII -APPLICATION ATTACHMENTS CHECKLIST
Submit one (1) electronic copy on CD or floppy disk and seven ('n photocopies of the application with attachments.
Inc. - - -Required Attachments - - -
® a. Cover Letter: application transmittal cover letter (Identify priority rank with multiple applications).
® b. Application: One (1) application with original signature from authorized individual.
® c. Resolution: An adopted resolution, by the Governing Body, authorizing that the Project Manager has the authority to
apply for and administer the grant on behalf of the applicant. If the Applicant is applying on behalf of another public
entity, then a Memorandum of Understanding between the Applicant and the public entity must also be submitted.
® d. Boundary Map: indicate boundary of the project area.
® e. Site Control Documentation: (e.g. a deed, lease, results of title search, etc. for the project site.)
® f. Ezisting Condition Photographs (sufficient to depict the physical characteristics of the project area)
® g. Aerial Photographs (marked with the approximate boundaries of the project site)
® h. Navigational Chart: An 8.5" x 11" photocopy of a current NOAA North American Datum 83 nautical chart (provide
the NOAA chart name and member) indicating the precise location of the project site.
- - -Optional Attachments - - -
® i. Detailed Cost Estimate: Cost estimate in the form of a formal bid, written quote from proposed vendor or an
engineer's cost estimate.
® j. Plans: preliminary design/engineering plans (if completed).
® k. Permits: Photocopies of necessary project permit(s) or permit application(s). If exempt, provide notification of
exemption from permitting agency.
® 1. Support/Opposition: Attach letters of known public support or known public opposition.
APPLICANT SIGNATURE
Application is hereby made for the activities described herein. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained
in the application, and, to the best of my. lmowledge and belief, this information is true, complete, and accurate. I further
certify that I possess the authority including the necessary requisite property interests to undertake the proposed activities.
I also certify that the Applicant's governing body is awaze of and has authorized the Project Manager as the pfficial
representative of the Applicant to act in connection with this application and subsequent project as well as to provide
additional information as may be required. By signature below, the Applicant agrees to comply with all applicable
federal, state, and local laws in conjunction with this proposal and resulting project so approved.
M~ ~ Crt~t ~~c~
t/T ame Title
~3 Mk-t ~
ignature Date
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF ( SN~tAxl 2~yE~L )
Personally appeazed before me this 13~ day of , 200
subscribed and swore to the above instrument in my presence.
Notary Public N
My commission
~"2°'~
#DD 30678
NOTE: Instruction and further information regarding this application and the Florida Boating Improvement
the Florida Boating Improvement Program Procedure Guide or you may contact the Program Administrator
Wildlife Conservation Commission, Florida Boating Improvement Program, 620 South Meridian Street, Ta]
or call (850) 488-5600; or email fbipSa,~yIvFWC.com.
~o~ros~
Page 9 of 9
NOVEMBER 25, 1958
COMMENCING AT THE NW CORNER OF GOVT. LOT 5, SECTION 6 TWP 31 S,
RANGE 39 E; THENCE RUN SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID
GOVT. LOT 5 A DISTANCE OF 382.06 FEET TO THE SOUTH RNV LINE OF MAIN
STREET; WHICH HAS AN 80' R/V1/; THENCE NORTH 83^ 25' 31" E ALONG SAID
STREET LINE A DISTANCE OF 179.00 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE AT THE SE
CORNER OF NEW U.S. HWY#1 & MAIN STREET FOR POB, THENCE ALONG THE
EAST RNV OF NEW U.S. HWY #1 SOUTH 17^29'29" E A DISTANCE OF 203.4 FEET
TO AN IRON PIPE; THENCE NORTH 76024'31" EAST A DISTANCE OF 229.95 FEET
TO AN IRON PIPE ON THE WEST RNV LINE OF OLD U.S. HWY #1; THENCE ALONG
SAID R/W LINE NORTH 25^29' 29" WEST A DISTANCE OF 181.49' TO AN IRON
PIPE AT THE SW CORNER OF OLD U.S HWY #1 & MAIN STREET; THENCE ALONG
THE SOUTH LINE OF MAIN STREET 83^25'31" WEST A DISTANCE OF 207.77 FEET
TO P.O.B.
This may be part of the "City Park" property - corner of Main St., Indian River Dr.,
and US 1 where the Chamber of Commerce Building is or was located
RUTH 8 THOMAS WATERS / CITY OF SEBASTIAN
MAY 5, 1965
A TRACT OF SUBMERGED LAND IN THE INDIAN RIVER IN SECTION 6, TWP 31
SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWED:
FROM THE NW CORNER OF GOVT. LOT 5, SECTION 6, RUN SOUTH ALONG WEST
BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 386.06' TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY OF MAIN
STREET BEING 80' IN WIDTH, THEN RUN NORTH 83^ 25' 31" EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 386.77' TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY OF OLD DIXIE HWY; THEN RUN SOUTH
25^ 29' 29" EAST ALONG RIGHT OF WAY, A DISTANCE OF 118.76' TO THE WEST
BANK OF THE INDIAN RIVER 8~ THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THEN MEANDERING
NORTH 25^ 33' 51" WEST, A DISTANCE 295.12' ALONG THE SHORE OF LINE OF
THE INDIAN RIVER THRU BLOCK 2, CARROLL ROBERTS SUBDIVISION TO THE
NORTH RIGHT OF WAY OF OLD MAIN STREET, HAVING RIGHT OF WAY OF 60';
THEN NORTH 63^ 56' 9" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 170.62' TO BULKHEAD LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 295.28' THENCE RUN SOUTH 63^ 56' 9" WEST A DISTANCE OF
170.62' TO POINT OF BEGINNING
INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT FUND OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA /CITY OF
SEBASTIAN
JUNE 2,1980
THE SOUTH 1' OF LOT 24, BLOCK 1, HARDEE SUBDIVISION, NO. AB@, AS SHOWN
IN PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE 74, ST LUCIE COUNTY RECORDS; TOGETHER WITH AN
EASEMENT OVER AND UNDER THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED
THE EAST 5' OF THE SOUTH 6' OF THE WEST 835' OF LOT 24, BLOCK 1, HARDEE
~5
SUBDIVISION NO. AB@, PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE 74, ST. LUCIE COUNTY RECORDS.
SAID LAND NOW LYING AND BEING IN THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA
HELEN B. BOONE 8~ SANDRA FAYE COBB !CITY OF SEBASTIAN
WARRANTY DEED (Statutory Form -Section 689.02, F.S.)
Between Bettina Boudrot and the City of Sebastian
The South 5.00 feet of the North 72.00 feet of Lot 2, Block 3, HARDEE SUBDIVISION,
NO. B, as recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 74 of the Public Records of St. Lucie County,
Florida; said lands now lying andbeing in Indian River County, Florida.
N.B. THIS IS A CORRECTIVE DEED TO CORRECT SCRIVENER'S ERROR IN THE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK
1946, PAGE 769 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
/ _
1 ,
1 ,
THIS PARCEL SOLD TO CITY OF SEBASTIAN -SEE WARRANTY DEED ON
JANUARY 8th 2007
u ev ~n a eon
1
, 1
AS-F
RF(-`~ ^~P.
rIJA11Alr` AT T
LJC IAI
TC~CC/'`TIl1A
1 nC
TLJC
CA~+r
nlr+l 1'T i-.
r urw~
/l
C
.v ccr, resr
1 ~ v 1 ~
y 1 1
1
1 1 q
/
. .,
1
1 . . .,
. . ., 1 1 ,
1 1
• 1 /
•' 1
.
BETTINA BOUDROT /CITY OF SEBASTIAN
THtS PARCEL SOLD TO CITY OF SEBASTIAN -SEE WARRANTY DEED ON JANUARY 8th
2007
CDC
•
,
THIS PARCEL SOLD TO CITY OF SEBASTIAN -SEE WARRANTY DEED ON
JANUARY 8th 2007
~+ 8hw- 4~ 7~„~Awo
~aFFaAtj~-~@@~
,
~
~ ~
~~
THIS PARCEL SOLD TO CITY OF SEBASTIAN -SEE WARRANTY DEED ON
JANUARY 8th 2007
Release of Deed Restriction
BETTINA BOUDROT /CITY OF SEBASTIAN
April 12, 2006
THE NORTH 35' OF LOT 4, BLOCK 3, HARDEE=S SUBDIVISION B, ACCORDING TO
THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE 74, PUBLIC
RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY (NOW LR.C.), FLORIDA.
In and for consideration of the mutual benefits to the parties, the sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged, the City of Sebastian, a Florida municipal corporation, does
hereby release that certain restriction contained in that warranty deed made by the City
of Sebastian as grantor to Bettina Boudrot as grantee dated March 1988 as recorded in
OR Book 797 Page 2954 of the Public Records of Indian River county thereby
converting the title being conveyed by said deed from fee simple conditional subject to
said restrictions to fee simple title.
~~
January 8th, 2007
WARRANTY DEED (Statutory Form -Section 689.02, F.S.)
Between Bettina Boudrot and the City of Sebastian
The North 5.00 feet of the South 13.00 feet of Lot 4, Block 3, HARDEE SUBDIVISION,
NO. B, as recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 74 of the Public Records of St. Lucie County,
Florida; said lands now lying and being in Indian River County, Florida.
N.B. THIS IS A CORRECTIVE DEED TO CORRECT SCRIVENER'S ERROR IN THE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK
1946, PAGE 766 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
January 8th, 2007
WARRANTY DEED Between Bettina Boudrot and the City of Sebastian
Exhibit "A"
PARCEL 1:
Lots 3 and 4, less the North 42 feet of Lot 4, Block 3, HARDEES SUBDIVISION B,
according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 4, page 74, Public Records of St.
Lucie county, Florida; now lying and being in Indian River County, Florida, and less and
except those portions conveyed to the City of Sebastian in O.R. Book 936, page 2133
and O.R. Book 1946, page 766, Public records of Indian River County, Florida
PARCEL 2:
The South 5 feet of the North 72 feet of Lot 2, Block 3, HARDEES SUBDIVISION B,
according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 4, page 74, Public Records of St.
Lucie County, Florida, said land now lying and being in Indian River County, Florida:
AND
The South 30 feet of the North 65 feet of Lot 2, Block 3, HARDEES SUBDIVISION B,
according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 4, page 74, Public Records of St.
Lucie County, Florida; said land now lying and being in Indian River County, Florida.
AND
The North 35 feet of Lot 2, Block 3, HARDEES SUBDIVISION B, according to the Plat
thereof as recorded in Plat Book 4, page 74, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida;
said land now lying and being in Indian River County, Florida.
AND
A parcel of land being the North 2.00 feet of the South 23.5 feet of Lot 2, Block 3,
~s
HARDEES SUBDIVISION B, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 4,
page 74, Public Records of St. Lucie county, Florida; said land now lying and being in
Indian River County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at
the intersection of the East right of way line of Indian River Drive (60 foot right of way)
and the North line of the South 23.5 feet of Lot 2, proceed South 87D36'23" East along
said North line a distance of 47.69 feet to a point on the safe upland line (S.U.L.) on the
West bank of the Indian River (S.U.L. elevation 0.9 ~N.C.V.D., located on 7/12/88};
thence South •11~D52'05" Ease along the S.U.L. a distance of 2.06 feet to a point being
2.00 feet South of the North line of the South 23.5 feet of Lot 2 when measured
perpendicular; thence North 87D36'23" West along a line 2.00 feet South of and parallel
to said North line of the South 23.5 feet of Lot 2 a distance of 68.10 feet to a point on the
East right of way line of Indian River Drive; thence North OOD26'42" West along said
East right of way line a distance of 2.00 feet to the Point of Beginning.
January 9th, 2007
WARRANTY DEED (Statutory Form -Section 689.02, F.S.)
Between Bettina Boudrot and the City of Sebastian
The South 5.00 feet of the North 72.00 feet of Lot 2, Block 3, HARDEE SUBDIVISION,
NO. B, as recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 74 of the Public Records of St. Lucie County,
Florida; said lands now lying and being in Indian River County, Florida.
N.B. THIS 1S'A CORRECTIVE DEED TO CORRECT SCRIVENER'S ERROR IN THE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK
1946, PAGE 769 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
~q
ho
Indian River County, Florida Property Appraiser -Printer Friendly Map
Owner CITY OF SEBASTIAN
Address 1302 INDIAN RIVER DR
Mailing Address 1225 MAIN ST SEBASTIAN
Notes
Page 1 of 1
7~
http:l/www.rcpaorgJPrintMap.aspx 5/14!2008
Parcel 31390600003003000002.0
Nautical Chart Viewer
Page 1 of 1
~ _ c ~ 1 - c•v+ to west
x.. ~~ ~•rm
` ,f„ ~~ ~ ., ~ ~ ttr M7 ?li
tii~ _ r. ~ fr i ~ MMM~#klt
1W.4 ~
~ J ~ l~~
-~.
~
{ ~ ~ ~
~
~ TY, +
fly: t ,~
N
,O! TA ? i1 ~
+x \
' w ~ ~ ~
t ~7 t#7
_ t ~
+o~ ssh ~ ~s ~ ~ '
~~
sR +o, x t' ~~
~~ ~ u ~~
~
~ ~ 4t.
/
,~ i
/1 F
~ 1 ~ ~
k, t? 't ~ i $~ ~ r11Mf-Ali ~ '7~P-'~~
~ ~ ~ I ~
~~ tM ~ S
' ~ 11 I
k A JpI '`
p1
~
Y}
1 _-
tahl~ "n ~` u ~
74
~ ,r i ar ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :.
• , 1 ~
'~ ~
~ '
a••X, 9 ,al
~` ~~ ~
IS y q~ ~
~ r
~,,,, Q ;:
~ ,r,{ .rw
~~ ~
~
~ ~,
~~ fah ,,~ ""
~~'
y
~rt3i y ~ ~~
~ ~` j 8~ "~~~
"~ ~' rWCb~fp
,
r-~ ~~ a rt ~'+ t+
s~'
~
~ f
y
Yllnr ~,: ~ ~
~r M1~ ~
~'~ J
~
ss ` j. t
i# ~~
+1~
ilat~ 1 a ~ ~+ n
+1~ t
'~`1M ~''f,
~ tW Y'i
st '~, at
+w ~~
~ w~
stp
illle a ~ '' ! tap
1 ~
.~ r
~ ~ ~ MawcMf~l1
rs
..
r~
~ «~ ~ ~ "(r ~ tt! ~ t
;.~ 1e a
3 r~r rr J ,x,
73
http://www.oceaugrafi~c.cum(o.glCharts/chartViewer.html?viewRegian=Atlantic&viewChart~Cape-Canave... 5/12/2408
7~
City of Sebastian's
Main Street Public Launching Facility
Project Elements Quantity Estimated Cost Applicants Cost FIND Cost FFWCC
ENGINEERING/ACQUISTION'
Purchase w/ closing costs" LS 1 $395,000.00 $395,000.00 $197,500.00 $0.00
Appraisals' LS 1 $6,350.00 $6,350.00 $0.00 $0.00
Preliminary Engineering LS 1 $7,250.00 $7,250.00 $0.00 $3,625.00
Engineering Contract LS 1 $237,000.00 $237,000.00 $0.00 $118,500.00
Administration/Project Management LS 1 $65,000.00 $65,000.00 $0.00 $32,500.00
SUBTOTAL
SITE WORK/ROADWAY ACCESS
$710,600.00 $378,325.00 $177,650.00 $154,625.00
Mobilization LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $12,500.00 $6,250.00
Maintenance of Traffic LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,500.00
Silt FencelErosion Control LF 1,850 $1.35 $2,498.00 $2,498.00 $1,249.00 $624.50
Clearing, Grubbing and Grinding AC 2.25 $5 ,000.00 $11,250.00 $11,250.00 $5,625.00 $2,812.50
Remove Existing Concrete SY 815 $2.00 $1,630.00 $1,630.00 $815.00 $407.50
Remove Existing Pavement SY 3,500 $3 .85 $13,476.00 $13,476.00 $6,738.00 $3,369.00
Remove Existing Curbing LF 578 $13.00 $7,514.00 $7,514.00 $3,757.00 $1,878.50
Excavation CY 1000 $3.50 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $1,750.00 $875.00
Grading SY 17,020 $1.50 $25,530.00 $25,530.00 $12,765.00 $6,382.50
Import Fill (Assume 1.5' east of I.R. Drive) CY 3,222 $10.00 $32,220.00 $32,220.00 $16,110.00 $8,055.00
8" Stabilized Subgrade SY 3,161 $ 2 .15 $6,796.00 $6,796.00 $3,398.00 $1,699.00
6" Rock Base SY 3161 $11.50 $36,352.00 $36,352.00 $18,176.00 $9,088.00
Asphalt 1 1/2" S-1 mod. SY 3,161 $11.50 $85,146.00 $85,146.00 $42,573.00 $21,286.50
F' CurbNaltey Curb LF 1,021 $ 15.00 $15,316.00 $15,316.00 $7,658.00 $3,829.00
D Curb LF 261 $10.50 $2,742.00 $2,742.00 $1,371.00 $685.50
Misc. Concrete {Sidewalks) SF 9090 $3.75 $34,088.00 $34,088.00 $17,044.00 $8,522.00
6" Solid White Paint LF 442 $1 .00 $442.00 $442.00 $221.00 $110.50
6" Solid White Thermo LF 626 $2 .00 $1,252.00 $1,252.00 $626.00 $313.00
~5
City of Sebastian's
Main Street Public Launching Facility
Project Elements Quantity Estimated Cost Applicants Cost FIND C
ost rrwvv
6" 10'-30' Skip Thermo LF 82 $2 .00 $164.00 $164.00 $82.00 $41.00
6" Solid Yelbw Thermo LF 786 $2 .00 $1,572.00 $1,572.00 $786.00 $393.00
12" Solid White Thermo
24" Solid White Thermo LF 133 $3.00
LF 63 $4 .00 $400.00
$252.00 $400.00
$252.00 $200.00
$126.00 $100.00
$63.00
Tum arrow
Straight 8 Tum Arrow
Handicapped Man Symbol EA 3 $450.00
EA 1 $550.00
EA 1 $100.00 $1,350.00
$550.00
$100.00 $1,350.00
$550.00
$100.00 $675.00
$275.00
$50.00 $337.50
$137.50
$25.00
Handicapped Sign EA 1 $ 125.00 $124.00 $124.00 $62.00 $31.00
Stop Sign w/ Street Sign EA 3 $200.00 $6pp,Op $600.00 ~.~ $150.00
Do Not Enter Sign EA 2 $ 150.00 $300.00 $300.00 $150.00 $75.00
Keep Right Sign EA 2 $150.00 $3pp,00
$300.00
$150.00
$75.00
Signalized Intersection Modifications (U.S.1) LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $0,00 $25,000.00
SUBTOTAL
PARKING
$370,464,00 $105,116.00 $160,232.00 $105,116.00
Turf Block SF 11,159 $2.15 $23,992.00 $23,992.00 $11,998.00 $5,998.00
8" Stabilized Subgrade SY 4,243 $2.15 $9,122.00 $9,122.00 $4,581.00 $2,280.50
B" Rock Base SY 4,243 $11.50 $48,784.00 $48,784,00 $24,397.00 $12,198.50
Asphalt 1 1/2" S-1 mod. SY 4,243 $11.50 $48,794.00 $48,794.00 $24,397.00 $12,198.50
F' Curb/Valley Curb LF 204 $15.00 $3,060.00 $3,060.00 $1,530.00 $765.00
D ~~ LF 785 $10.50 $8,242.00 $8,242.00 $4,121.00 $2,060.50
Misc. Concrete (Sidewalks) SF 2,639 $3 .75 $9,896.00 $9,896.00 $4,948.00 $2,474.00
6" Solid White Paint LF 1,971 $1.00 $1,970.00 $1,970.00 $985.00 $492.50
6" Solid White Thermo LF 160 $2 .00 $320.00 $320.00 $160.00 $80.00
12" Solid White Thermo LF 207 $3.00 $622.00 $822.00 $311.00 $155.50
18" Solid White Thermo LF 375 $3.50 $1,312.00 $1,312.00 $658.00 $328.00
24" Solid White Thermo LF 72 $4.00 $288.00 $288.00 $144.00 $72.00
~~ 2
• City of Sebastian's
Main Street Public Launching Facility
Project Elements Quantity Estimated Cost A Iicants Cost
PP FIND Cost
FFWC
C
Straight & Tum Arrow EA 4 $ 550.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00
$1
100
00
$550
00
,
. .
Straight arrow EA 3 $450.00 $1,350.00 $1,350.00 $675
00
$337
50
. .
Handicapped Man Symbol EA 2 $100.00 $200.00 $200.00
$100
00
$50
00
. ,
Handicapped Sign EA 2 $125.00 $250.00 $250.00
$125
00
$62
50
. .
ved for small boat trailer <17' boat sign EA 3 $125.00 $376.Op $376.00
$188
00
$94
00
. ,
3p Right Sign EA 2 $150.00 $ 300.00 EA 2 $150.00 $300,00 $300 ~
$150
00
$75
00
. .
Stop Sign w/ Street Sign EA EA 4 $200.00 $800.00 $800.00
$400.00
$200.00
SUBTOTAL $161,888.00
$40,472.00
$80,944.00
$40,472.00
WATER/SEWER/RESTROOMS
Force-main tapping sleeve EA 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500,00
$0.00
$1,250.00
Force-main Fittings LS 1 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00
$0
00
$1
750
00
. ,
.
Lift-Station (Private)' LS 1 $85,000.00 $65,000.00 .$85,000.00
$0
00
$32
500
0
. ,
.
0
4" DR 18 PVC Force-Main LF 37 $15.00 $555.00 $555.00
$0
00
$278
. .00
6" DR 18 PVC Sewer LF 290 $25.00 $7,250.00 $7,250.00
$0.00
$3,625.00
Sanitary Sewer Manhole EA 1 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 $2,100.00
$0
00
$1
050
00
. ,
.
Sanitary Sewer Cleanout EA EA 2 $250,00 $500.00 $500.00
$0.00
$250.00
Exist. F.M. /Conflicts LS 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
$0.00
$7,500.00
Water Service FJ- EA 1 $500.0 $500.00 $500,00
$0.00
$250.00
RPZ Backflow Preventor EA 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,800,00
$0.00
$750,00
Exist. W.M. /Conflicts LS 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
$0.00
$7,500.00
Fire Hydrant EA 1 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500,00
$1.750.00
$875.00
Turtle Lighting LS 1 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00
$3,750.00
$1,875.00
Navigation Signage EA 2 $500,00 $1,000.00 $1,000,00
$500
00
$25
. 0.00
Restroom Facilities LS 1 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00
$0
00
$50
000
. ,
.00
Educational Kiosk LS 2 $6000 $12,000.00 $12,000.00
$0.00
$6,000.00
Electric (Budget) LS 1 $20.000.00 47n nnn nn ~ ........... .... _ . _
3 ~~
City of Sebastian's
• ~ Main Street Public Launching Facility
Protect Elements Quantiri Estimated Cost Applicants Cost FIND Cost FFWCC
Construction Survey Layouts 8 As-Builts LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,500.00
Construction Testing LS 1 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $3,750.00 $1,875.00
SUBTOTAL $274,905.00 ;125,077.00 $24,750.00 $125,078.00
Contingency 10% $86,500.00 $86,500.00 $0.00 $0.00
SUBTOTAL $86,500.00 $86,500.00 $0.00 10.00
In-Kind Non-Cash LS 1 $180,000.00 $180,000.00 $0.00 $0.00
SUBTOTAL 1180,000.00 $180,000.00 $0.00 $0.00
TOTALS 51,784,357.00 $915,490.00 $443,576.00 $425,291.00
i ~g 4
FISH A,y,~
~~e~
~~~`~-~m
4 ~3~.`~ g4: ~ 2n ,t
C "7,~ ~ ,,,~' p
~ ~
SQL . ,~~~. N1
~TION GOCl`
Florida Fish
and Wildlife
Conservation
Commission
Division of Law
Enforcement
Boating and
Waterways Section
Florida Boating
Improvement
Program
620 South Meridian
Street
Tallahassee, FL
32399-1600
Tel: (850) 488-5600
Fax: (850) 488-9284
E-mail:
FBIP~MvFWC.com
Florida Boating
Improvement
Program
Guidelines
January 2008
Permission is granted for duplication, use and reuse of any and all information
contained in this document.
~a
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION I - IlVTRODUCTION.......»........»»»..........».........»..» .................»..................».».......»...»........»»...»..............»» 1
1.1 PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................................................1
1.2 FLORIDA BOATING IMPROVEMENTPROGRAM (FBiP) - TIER I ............................................................................1
13 FLORIDA BOATING IMPROVEMENTPROGRAM (FBIP) - TIER II ..........................................................................1
SECTION II -DEFINITIONS..».»».....»».....»».....»»»..»........».»»»»».»».......»....»......»»...»».».....» ...............».»...........»..2
SECTION III - ELIGIBILTI'Y .» ...............»........».»....»........»...»....».....».......»....».....».............»..........»......»........».»...»..3
3.1 ELIGIBLE PARTICIIANTS FORTIER I ...................................................................................................................... 3
3.2 ELIGIBLE PARTICIPANTS FOR TIER II .................................................................................................................... 3
SECTION IV -FUNDING »»....»»»».».....»»....... .».»».».........»......» ....................».»......»..........»».»»..»».»»»»»».»..3
4.1 SOURCE OF FUNDS ................................................................................................................................................... 3
4.2 ELIGIBLE USES OF TIER I FUNDS ............................................................................................................................4
4.3 ELIGIBLE USES OF TIER II FUNDS ........................................................................................................................... 5
4.4 INELIGIBLE USES OF PROGRAM FUNDS .................................................................................................................. b
4.5 MATCHING FUND REQUIItEMENTS: CASH I' l~ ................................................................................................. 6
4.6 MATCHING FUND REQUIREMENTS: NON-CASH FUNDS (IN-KIND SERVICE) ........................................................ 7
4.7 ADVANCED FUNDS ................................................................................................................................................... 7
4.8 PRttr-AwARDCosTS .................................................................................................................................................7
4.9 PHASED PROJECTS ................................................................................................................................................... 8
4.10 APPROPRUTION .......................................................................................................................................................8
4.11 DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDS ......................................................................................................................................... 8
SECTION V -APPLICATION PROCESS.._........»»».......»,.»...,.,,,_,»,»..» ...................».»».»....».»..»».»....»..........»......» 9
5.1 SUBMISSION PERIOD ................................................................................................................................................9
S.2 SUBMISSION ADDRESS ............................................................................................................................................. 9
53 APPLICATION FORM AND INSTRUCTIONS ............................................................................................................... 9
5.4 COVER LETrER ......................................................................................................................................................10
5.5 RESOLUTION ..........................................................................................................................................................10
S.6 CHECIn.IST (ATTACHl-4ENTS) ...............................................• ..................10
..............................................................
5.7 APPLICATION NUMBER ..........................................................................................................................................10
S.8 INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS .................................................................................................................................10
5.9 RESUHMLSSIONS .....................................................................................................................................................14
5.10 EVALUATION CRITERIA .........................................................................................................................................11
5.11 EVALUATION COMMrrrEE .................................................................................................................................... 11
5.12 MIIHIMUM$CORE ...................................................................................................................................................11
5.13 GRANT AVYARDS ....................................................................................................................................................11
SECTION VI -AGREEMENT.»..»..»»..»..»»......».»...........»»...........»»»»»..»»......»..»......»...».»..».».».....».»»..........»....11
6.1 GRANT AGREEMENT ..............................................................................................................................................1 1
6.2 TERM OF AGREEMENT ..........................................................................................................................................12
63 EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT .................................................................................................................................12
6.4 AGREEMENT FUNDING ..........................................................................................................................................12
SECTION VII -COMPLIANCE REQUIREMEIVTS.»...»»..».»»...».........».».»........».......»»»..»»...........»»...».»».......»..12
1.1 Purpose
The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (Commission) pursuant to
Sections 206.606 and 327.47, F.S., is charged with providing funding through
competitive grants for projects designed to serve the needs of boaters and boating-related
activities on coastal and/or inland waters within the State. General provisions,
requirements, and information stated herein, together with attachments, and applicable
laws and rules, incorporated herein by reference, constitute the program guidelines of the
Florida Boating Improvement Program (FBIP).
1.2 Florida Boating Improvement Program (FBIP) -Tier I
FBIP - Tier I is established in accordance with ss. 206.606(1)(b)3., F.S., to fund local
projects for recreational channel marking and other uniform waterway markers, public
boat ramps, lifts, and hoists, marine railways, and other public launching facilities,
derelict vessel removal, and other local boating-related activities through a competitive
grants program. This section further provides that priority consideration be given as
follows:
^ Unmet needs in counties with populations of 100,000 or less.
^ Unmet needs in coastal counties with a high level ofboating-related activities
from individuals residing in other counties.
FBIP - Tier I is divided into four project type categories: Recreational Waterway
Markers, Recreational Boating Access, Derelict Vessel Removal, and Other Boating-
related Projects.
13 Florida Boating Improvement Program (FBIP) -Tier II
FBIP -Tier II is established in accordance with section 327.47, F.S., to fund projects
through a competitive grant program for the construction and maintenance of publicly
owned boat ramps, piers and docks, boater education and economic development
initiatives that promote boating in the state. In addition, FBIP -Tier II includes a
competitive grants program for public launching facilities established in accordance with
section 328.72(15), F.S.
FBIP -Tier II is divided into four project type categories: Boat Ramps, Piers, and Docks;
Public Launching Facilities; Boater Education; and Economic Development Initiatives.
Page 1 of 13
8~
The following definitions are provided for further explanation of terms stated herein and shall
have the.meanings indicated which are applicable to both the singular and plural thereof:
AGREEMENT: Written document under which the Recipient and Commission mutually agree
to cant' out respective responsibilities for a fixed period, unless amended by mutual consent.
AGREEMENT PERIOD: Number of days or the dates stated in the Agreement to complete
the Project.
APPLICANT: Eligible participant that submits an Application for Program Funds to the
Commission during an announced Application Submission Period.
APPLICATION: A formal request for Program funds by an Applicant on the form approved by
the Commission and with required documentation.
APPLICATION SUBMISSION PERIOD: The formally announced period of time provided by
the Commission for the submission of Applications by eligible participants for Program Funds.
BOARDING DOCKS: A fixed, floating, or ad}ustable structure extending parallel to the
launch ramp and designed to permit mooring of a watercraft in such a way as to facilitate
boarding or exiting the craft.
BOAT RAMP (PUBLIC LAUNCHII~TG FACILITY: A graded and surfaced slope consisting
of one or more launching lanes constructed of concrete, timber, or asphalt, which is extending
from the shoreline into the body of water and partially above and below the water surface. It is
designed to accommodate launching or retrieving a boat from or to a trailer. Includes, at the very
minimum, a ramp, parking, boarding dock, access road and sanitation.
CONIlVIISSION: Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.
DOCKS (PIERS): A fixed or floating structure, including access walkways, terminal platforms,
catwalks, mooring pilings, lifts, davits, and other associated water-dependent structures used for
mooring and accessing vessels.
MARINA: Licensed commercial facility which provides secured public moorings or dry storage
for vessels on a leased basis.
PROGRAM ADMIlVISTRATOR: The Commission's staff member designated by the .
Director, Division of Law Enforcement, to manage the Florida Boating Improvement Program.
PROGRAM FUNDS: Funds appropriated for the Florida Boating Improvement Program as
specified in Sections 206.606 and 370.0603, Florida Statutes.
Page 2 of 13
~~
PROJECT: Components} designed to provide additional or enhanced boating access that meet
criteria.
PROJECT COMPLETION CERTIFICATION: Fonn completed by the Recipient certifying
that the Project is completed in accordance with the Agreement.
RECIPIENT: The Applicant that has been awarded Program funds and party responsible for
completing the project and the operation and maintenance of the site.
RECREATIONAL CHANNEL MARI~NG: Labor and materials to provide and install any
device external to a vessel intended to assist a mariner to determine position or safe course, warn
of dangers or obstructions to navigation, .or to alert the mariner of various regulatory matters.
RURAL AREA OF CRITICAL ECONOMIC CONCERN: A region composed of rural
communities adversely affected by extraordinary economic events, meet the criteria stipulated in
Section 288.0656, Florida Statutes, and designated as established by Executive Order.
SECTION III -ELIGIBILITY
3.1 Eligible Participants for Tier I
Eligible participants for Tier I shall include county governments .and municipalities of the
State of Florida. Municipalities in the counties.that meet criteria stipulated for priority
consideration in Tier I shalt also be given priority consideration.
Counties must submit an annual detailed accounting report of vessel registration revenues
to the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission as required in Section 328.72(15),
Florida Statues, to be eligible for priority consideration in Tier I.
3.2 Eligible Participants for Tier II
Eligible participants for Tier II shall include county governments, municipalities, and
other governmental entities of the State of Florida.
SECTIOV IV-FL'\DI?~G
4.1 Source of Funds
FBIP - Tier I projects are funded pursuant to ss. 206.606(1)(b) I ., F.S., from a portion of
the funds collected from fuel sales tax that is transferred to the State Game Trust Fund.
FBIP -Tier II projects are funded pursuant to section 206.606(1)(d}, F.S., from a portion
of the moneys attributable to the sale of motor and diesel fuel at marinas transfer ed to
the Marine Resources Conservation Trust Fund in the Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission.
Page 3 of 13
83
FBIP -Tier II public launching facility grants are funded from a portion of vessel
registration fees transferred to the Marine Resources Conservation Trust Fund in the Fish
and Wildlife Conservation Commission pursuant to section 328.72(15), F.S.
4.2 Eligible Uses of Tier I Funds
Only those funds necessary for the planning, design, engineering, permitting,
development, new construction, expansion or rehabilitation of projects statewide on
coastal and/or inland waters that enhance recreational boating for motorized vessels
through projects that include:
Recreational channel marking and other uniform waterway markers:
^ Costs associated with the installation, repair, or replacement of signs or buoys
marking an FWC permitted boating restricted zone.
^ Costs associated with the installation, repair, or replacement of permitted signs or
buoys marking achannel to/from a recreational boating access facility.
^ Costs associated with the installation, repair, or replacement of permitted signs or
buoys which provide information to recreational boaters (other than aids to
navigation).
Public boat ramps, lifts, hoists, marine railways, and other public launching facilities:
^ Costs associated with the design, engineering, permitting, and construction to
build, repair, or enhance a publicly owned boat ramp, lift, hoist, or marine railway
for recreational boaters.
^ Costs associated with the design, engineering, permitting, and construction to
build, repair, or enhance amenities at a public launching facility. Eligible
amenities include boarding docks, staging areas, restrooms, trailer parking, access
roads, and educational kiosks.
Derelict vessel removal:
^ Costs for the removal and disposal of derelict vessels as defined in section 823.1 1,
Florida Statutes. A sworn law enforcement officer must determine a vessel meets
the definition in statute to be eligible for removal.
^ Only vessels that are located on the public waters of the state may be removed
with grant funds.
Other local boating-related activities:
^ Costs associated with projects that increase or enhance boating access for
recreational boaters.
^ Costs associated with projects that improve boater safety, boater education, or
boater understanding of waterway regulations.
Page 4 of 13
8'~
^ Costs associated with research, studies, or planning to determine the need for
additional boating access or improvements.
43 Eligible Uses of Tier II Funds
Only those funds necessary for the planning, design, engineering, permitting,
development, new construction, expansion or rehabilitation of projects statewide on
coastal and/or inland waters that enhance boating access for motorized vessels through
projects that include:
Publicly owned boat ramps, piers and docks:
^ Costs associated with the design, engineering, permitting, and construction to
build, repatr, or enhance a publicly owned boat ramp.
^ Costs associated with the design, engineering, permitting, and construction to
build, repair, or enhance apublicly-owned marina, mooring field, or dry storage
facility.
^ Costs associated with the design, engineering, permitting, and construction to
build, repair, or enhance amenities at a publicly owned boat ramp. Eligible
amenities include boarding docks, staging areas, restrooms, trailer parking, access
roads, and educational kiosks.
^ Costs associated with the design, engineering, permitting, and construction to
build, repair, or enhance amenities at a publicly-owned marina. Eligible
amenities include utilities hook-ups, restrooms, access roads, and educational
kiosks.
Public launching facilities:
^ Costs associated with the design, engineering, permitting, and construction to
build, repair, or enhance apublicly-owned boat ramp, lift, hoist, or mazine
railway.
^ Costs associated with the design, engineering, permitting, and construction to
build, repair, or enhance amenities at a public launching facility. Eligible
amenities include boarding docks, staging areas, restrooms, trailer parking, access
roads, and educational kiosks.
Boater education:
^ Costs associated with projects that will increase public knowledge of boating
issues by generating materials for distribution, educational programs, or displays.
Economic development initiatives that promote boating in the state:
^ Costs associated with the design, engineering, permitting, and construction to
build, repair, or enhance publicly-owned boating access facilities used exclusively
or primarily for commercial activities.
Page 5 of 13
~~
^ Costs associated with the design, engineering, permitting, and construction to
build, repair, or enhance publicly-owned mooring facilities that provide public
access to retail and commercial establishments.
^ Costs associated with research, studies, or planning to determine the need for
additional boating access or improvements.
4.4 Ineligible Uses of Program Funds
Program Funds for both Tier-I and Tier-II will not be awarded for projects that do not
directly relate to the enhancement of boating or boating access within the state. Costs
listed below are not eligible for reimbursement under this Program:
^ Costs for the construction or repair of any facilities not directly related to boating
access (such as picnic areas, trails, fishing piers, general parking areas for picnic
areas, restrooms for picnic areas, etc.)
^ Application preparation costs. This includes overhead, payroll, salaries or
accounting costs.
^ Costs related to the acquisition of real property.
^ Costs for any legal fees.
^ Costs associated with ordinary operation, maintenance or routine minor repairs of
the proposed project. This includes costs to provide power, water or sewer or any
other utilities or services to the facility for the stipulated length of the 20-year
Agreement.
^ Costs expended for any type or form of security activities, watchmen, fee
collection, maintenance or other personnel costs.
^ Costs associated with the acquisition or use of any type of equipment such as park
equipment, vehicles, lawn care, dredge, or other capital equipment purchases used
for operation and maintenance of the existing or completed project area.
^ Costs associated or directly related to a component of a project that would create
or increase a boating safety hazard.
^ Costs for any type of general business, marketing or promotional plans.
4S Matching Fund Requirements: Cash Funds
Applicants do not have to provide cash matching funds to the project. However, the
Commission encourages Applicants to provide the highest amount of cash matching
funds to reduce the total amount of grant funds requested.
Cash matching funds may be in the form of the following:
^ Services paid for by the Applicant for master plan or other engineering and/or
consultant services.
Page 6 of 13
8~
^ Construction expenditures paid for by the Applicant.
^ Other expenditures paid by the Applicant directly related to boating access and
not listed as ineligible costs.
Applicants are encouraged to seek other sources of cash matching funds from other state
or local grants to help leverage the maximum amount of grant funds available. However,
Applicants cannot use funds from their Boating Improvement Program (funds collected
from boat registration fees) as cash matching funds for projects funded by Tier II.
Applications for projects that are within Rural Areas of Critical Economic Concern, as
established by Executive Order, will be given additional consideration by automatically
being assigned the maximum points for Matching Funds in the Evaluation Criteria
(Attachment I).
4.6 Matching Fund Requirements: Non-Cash Funds (In-kind Service)
Applicants must identify and agree to furnish some form of in-kind matching funds to the
project.
Non-cash matching funds include the cost of administrative/contract management,
engineering/construction management, labor, materials, and equipment provided through
in-house resources of the Applicant.
Applicants may not provide more than 5% of the total project cost for project
administration and 10% of the total project cost for project engineering/construction
management.
4.7 Advanced Funds
The Commission will not a rove a re uest for an advance in Pro ram Funds. The
Recipient must have the financial capability to process invoices and make timely
payments to contractors, vendors, etc. pending receipt of Program funds for
reimbursement of project expenses.
4.$ Pre-Award Costs
Project costs will not be approved for any portion of a project initiated or completed prior
to the award of the Agreement, unless specifically requested by the Applicant and pre-
approved by the Commission and a provision included in the Agreement. Preliminary
costs may include any of the following activities completed before signing the
Agreement: Appraisals, environmental reviews and permitting, feasibility studies, site
surveys and site planning, cost estimates, and working drawings, construction plans and
specifications.
Page 7 of 13
~~
4.9 Phased Projects
Applications for large projects may be submitted in phases, over several years, to
maximize funding; however, funding for an initial phase does not guarantee funding for
subsequent phases.
4.10 Appropriation
The Commission's performance and obligation to award program grants is contingent
upon an annual appropriation by the Florida Legislature.
4.11 Distribution of Funds
Pursuant to Legislative appropriation, each fiscal year, funds from each source will be
distributed equally between project type categories as shown in the table below:
State Game Trust Marine Resource Marine Resource
Fund -Fuel Tax Conservation Trust Conservation Trust
Funds Fund -Marina Fuel Fund -Vessel
Tax Funds Re istration Fee
Recreational
Waterwa Markin 25% of appropriation
Recreational Boating
Access 25% of appropriation
Derelict Vessel
Removal 25% of appropriation
Other Boating-related
Pro'ects 25% of appropriation
Boat Ramps, Piers
and Docks 50% of a ro nation
pP p
Public Launching 100% of
Facilities a ro riation
Boater Education 25% of a ro riation
Economic
Development 25% of appropriation
Initiatives
After ranking and awarding projects in each project type category, any remaining funds
in each project type category will be reallocated equally among other project types within
the same funding source.
The Commission will make every effort to maximize funding through possible
redistribution within project type categories of unexpended funds, use of additional
Page 8 of 13
8~
funding sources, and advising Applicants on methods to submit large projects in phases
to maximize possible funding.
5.1 Submission Period
The Commission will announce the application submission period in the "Florida
Administrative Weekly" before February 1 of each year. Applications must be submitted
within 60 days after the announcement date or by the deadline in the announcement,
whichever is later. The application submission period will also be announced on the Web
at httn://MvFWC.com/boating/grants/fbip htm. The Commission will also notify eligible
participants who have contacted the Commission. The Commission may announce
additional application submission periods if funds become available after the initial
submission period. Applications submitted after the submission period deadline will be
returned to the applicant.
5.2 Submission Address
Applicants must deliver applications on or before the last day of the announced
submission period(s), no later than the close of business to the following address:
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
Division of Law Enforcement
Boating and Waterways Section
620 South Meridian Street, Room 235
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1600.
5.3 Application Form and Instructions
Applicants must submit applications on the FBIP Application Forms (FWC/FBIP-A
through FWC/FBIP-E) incorporated herein by reference. The FBIP Application Forms
and Instructions may be obtained from the Commission's Web site,
httn://MyFWC.com/boating/~rants/fi~ip htm.
Instructions will include how to complete the application and the convect format for
submission in order for the application to be considered complete. The Applicant shall
submit a hard (paper) copy, as well as an electronic version The correct number of
copies, as indicated on the Application Form and Instructions, must be submitted or the
Application may be rejected.
All sections of the Application and required attachments and/or documentation must be
completed. Information not included in the application ~ result in the application
being rejected.
Page 9 of 13
g9
5.4 Cover Letter
A cover letter must accompany the original application(s), addressed to the Program
Administrator, requesting consideration of the project(s), identifying the priority of
multiple projects, and any other pertinent information.
5.5 Resolution
Applications must include an adopted Resolution by the Governing Body, authorizing
that the Project Manager has the authority to apply for and administer the grant on behalf
of the applicant. Approved motions, consent agenda items, or any other form of
authorization will not be accepted.
5.6 Checklist (Attachments)
An Application Submission Checklist is included as part of the Application and
Instructions (Attachment 1I) to assist the Applicant with submission of all required
documentation and attachments.
5.7 Application Number
Upon closing of the application submission period, Commission staff will assign a Grant
Application Number and outline the review process in an acceptance letter back to each
Applicant. Grantees will use this Grant Number for all future correspondence regarding
that Application and/or Project.
5.8 Incomplete Applications
Applications will be reviewed for completeness and compliance to the program
guidelines and all applicable statutes and rules. The applicant will be notified by email of
any portion that is considered by the Commission to be in noncompliance and given an
opportunity within a specified time period to provide the necessary information or
documentation. Failure to provide the requested information or documentation within
this time period will result in the application not being considered for funding.
5.9 Resubmissions
If a project is not selected for funding in a given fiscal year, a new application must be
submitted.
Projects previously approved, but funds were not expended during the Agreement period,
cannot be resubmitted until a new submission period is announced.
Page 10 of 13
qb
5.10 Evaluation Criteria
An eligible Application will be evaluated according to the Evaluation Criteria,
incorporated herein as Attachment I, for each project type category. The maximum score
for each factor and element is indicated in parenthesis Q. An Evaluation Committee will
assign a total point score for each Application.
5.11 Evaluation Committee
The Evaluation Committee shall be comprised of the FBIP Program Administrator and no
more than six (6) evaluators, appointed by the Director of the Division of Law
Enforcement.
Each evaluator will review and assign a score to each application based on the Evaluation
Criteria found in Attachment I. The final score for each application will be the average
of the individual evaluator's scores. The FBIP Program Administrator will serve as chair
of the Committee, but will not assign a score to the applications.
5.12 Minimum Score
An application must receive a minimum of 60 percent of the total score possible to be
eligible for funding. The minimum score for each tier is listed below:
Tier I = 96 points minimum
Tier II = 60 points minimum
5.13 Grant Awards
Complete Applications that meet the minimum required score for each Tier will be
ranked on a list by project type category in descending order according to total assigned
points. Grants will be awarded to the higher ranking Applications in each project type
category until all funds have been awarded.
6.1 Grant Agreement
Upon approval of a project for funding, the Recipient and the Commission shall enter
into a Grant Agreement. This Grant Agreement will describe the responsibilities of both
parties, terms and conditions particular to each project, and incorporate applicable
statutes, rules, and policies. Unless otherwise specified herein or in the Agreement, a
project may not commence until the Grant Agreement is fully executed by all parties.
Page 11 of 13
~~
6.2 Term of Agreement
The Agreement, unless modified by mutual consent of both parties, shall bind the parties
for a period of 20 years or as stipulated in the Agreement.
63 Execution of Agreement
Upon receipt of the Agreement from the Commission, the Recipient must sign the
Agreement and return it to the Commission within 90 days. Failure to execute the
Agreement within the 90-day period will render the grant null and void.
6.4 Agreement Funding
The Agreement will specify if the project will be funded by State of Florida program
funds or federal funds administered by the Commission, and all applicable requirements.
SECTIOti VII - COMPLL~NCE RI:QL IRE~tE\T
7.1 The project must comply with all local, state, and federal regulations, including the
Manatee Protection Plan, if applicable.
7.2 Failure to complete the project and make final payment request to the Commission within
the stipulated period will result in project termination and possible Loss of Program funds.
7.3 The Recipient shall inform the Commission staff of any changes or time delays incurred
with the project, and provide at least 60 days notice if delays may require an amendment
to the Agreement.
7.4 The Recipient must agree to provide, for the period of the Agreement, any and all costs
for ordinary and routine operations and maintenance of the facilities that were funded in
whole or in part through this Program, including equipment or service, and supplies costs.
7.5 The Recipient must agree to comply with all local and state laws related to procurement
for any labor, equipment, materials, facilities, construction and other services related to
the project funded.
7.6 The Commission reserves the right to review and approve any and all fees proposed for
grant project sites, funded in whole or in part by this Program, for the term of the
Agreement to ensure that excess collection does not occur and that funds collected are not
reallocated or diverted to any non-boating access related purpose.
7.7 The Recipient shall ensure, to the maximum extent possible, that facilities or programs
funded, in whole or in part by Program funds, are made available to the general public
without regard to race, creed, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability.
Page 12 of 13
9~.
7.8 Public information produced with assistance from this Program shall not be copyrighted
and shall be provided free of cost, except for the cost of reproduction, to the public.
7.9 Work shall begin or project initiated within 90 days of execution of the Agreement,
unless delay is of no fault of the Recipient, or the Ageement shall be cancelled.
7.10 The Recipient shalt make every effort to avoid cost overruns on a project. If the total cost
of the project exceeds the grant amount and match, the Recipient shall assume liability
for any additional cost.
7.11 The Recipient, at its expense, shall purchase, erect and maintain a permanent sign, not
less than four (4) feet by six (6) feet in size, displaying the Commission's official logo for
launching projects, or shall attach a permanent plaque for marine projects, or use some
other manner of acknowledgement for non-construction projects, approved by the
Commission, identifying the Florida Boating Improvement Program as a funding source
for the Project.
7.12 Land owned by the Recipient that is developed with funds from this Program shall be
dedicated for a minimum of twenty (20}years as a site for the use and benefit of the
public. The dedication shall be recorded in public property records by the Recipient.
Land under control other than by ownership by the Recipient (i.e. lease, management
agreement, cooperative agreement, inter-local agreement or other similar instrument) and
developed with funds from this Program shall be managed by the Recipient for a
minimum period of twenty (20) years from the completion date of the Project.
7.13 The Recipient shall forward one copy of any bid package to the Commission's Program
Administrator for review prior to soliciting for quotations or commencing any work.
7.14 A Grant Agreement may be terminated and Program Funds returned to the Commission
for non-compliance with any of the terms of the Agreement or the rule and con'esponding
guidelines.
Page 13 of 13
~3
Florida Boating Improvement Program Guidelines Attachment I-A
Evaluation Criteria for Tier-I
Category I -Project Evaluation
Recreational Channel Markings (80) Points
1. Does the project correct or prevent a navigation problem? (30)
2. Does the project promote boating safety or boater understanding of waterway regulations? (30)
3. Does the project mark a new or previously unmarked boating restricted zone? (20)
4. Does the project replace markers destroyed by hurricane, or replace markers that were posted over
five years prior to application? (15)
Public Launching Facilities (80) Points
1. Does the project increase or enhance boating access for recreational boaters? (30)
2. Does the project provide a new recreational boating access facility in an area where a documented
need has been identified? (30)
3. Does the project increase recreational boating access at an existing facility (includes additional boat
ramp lanes, more trailer parking, etc.)? (20)
4. Dces the project provide adequate parking and additional amenities such as restrooms? (20)
Derelict Vessel Removal (80) Points
1. Does the project improve recreational boating access by removing derelict vessels that pose a threat
to navigation? (30)
2. Does the project remove derelict vessels that pose a threat to the environment? (20)
3. Has a reasonable attempt been made to identify vessel owners and to have the owners remove their
vessels? (20)
4. Does the project provide for derelict vessels to be used in the construction of permitted artificial reef
sites or recycled as scrap metal? (10)
Other Local Boating Related Activities (80) Points
I . Does the project increase boating access or enhance boating for recreational boaters? (30)
2. Does the project improve boater safety, boater education or boater understanding of waterway
regulations? (20)
3. Does the project use innovative or creative techniques to increase boating access or enhance
recreational boating? (20)
4. Does the project have clearly defined tasks, goals, and deliverables that will enhance recreational
boating? (l 0)
Page 1 of 4
~~
Florida Boating Improvement Program Guidelines Attachment I-A
Category II: General Evaluation Criteria
1. Grant provides for unmet needs in counties with populations of 100,000 or less. (15)
2. Grant provides for unmet needs in coastal counties with a high level ofboating-related activities
from individuals residing in other counties. (15)
3. Priority rank for multiple applications for Tier-I funding submitted by the same applicant. (5}
a. Only one Tier I application submitted. (5)
b. First priority rank of multiple applications. (3)
c. Second priority rank of multiple applications. (2)
d. Third priority rank and lower of multiple applications. (0)
4. A detailed cost estimate is submitted in the form of a formal bid's schedule of values, a bona fide
vendor's quote or an engineer's cost estimate. (10)
5. Total project cost (grant request plus matching funds) is ... (l 0)
a. $200,000 or less. (10)
b. Greater than $200,000 and less than or equal to $400,000. (5)
c. Greater than $400,000. (0)
6. Matching Funds (10)
a. Requested grant is 25% or less of total project cost. (10)
b. Requested grant is greater than 25% and less than or equal to 75% of total project cost. (5)
c. Requested grant is greater than 75% of total project. cost. (0)
7. Project Permitting Status (15) Points
a. All permits for the project have been obtained. (15)
b. Project is for permitting and engineering cost only; a permit waiver letter is submitted; or project
type does not require permits. (10)
c. Permits are required for project and permits have been applied for but not approved. (5)
d. Permits are required for project and permit applications have not been submitted. (0)
Tie-Breaker System
If two or more Applications receive the same score as a result of the above scoring process, the
following tie-breaker system will be used in the order listed to decide the priority ranking:
1. The Application submitted is for a project located in a county having a population of 100,000 or less,
or a coastal county with a high level of boating related activities from individuals residing in other
counties.
2. The Applicant having received the lowest amount of program funds during the previous three fiscal
years receives the highest priority.
3. Applications submitted by counties, or municipalities within counties, with the highest number of
registered vessels for the year prior to the grant period.
Page 2 of 4
q5
Florida Boating Improvement Program Guidelines Attachment I-B
Evaluation Criteria for Tier-II
Category I -Project Evaluation
Boat Ramps, Piers, Docks and Other Mooring Facilities (50)
1. Does the project increase or enhance boating access? (20)
2. Does the project provide a new boating access facility in an area where a documented need has been
identified? (20)
3. Dces the project increase boating access at an existing facility (includes additional boat ramp lanes,
in-water slips, dry storage, mooring buoys, more trailer parking, etc.)? (l 0)
4. Does the project provide adequate parking and additional amenities such as restrooms, pump-outs,
fueling stations, etc.? (10)
Public Launching Facilities (65)
1. Does the project increase or enhance boating access? (20)
2. Does the project provide a new boating access facility in an area where a documented need has been
identified? (20)
3. Does the project increase boating access at an existing facility (includes additional boat ramp lanes,
more trailer parking, etc.)? (10)
4. Does the project provide adequate parking and additional amenities such as restrooms? (10)
5. Is the project located in a county with 35,000 or more registered vessels? (15)
Boater Education (50)
1. Will the project increase public knowledge of boating issues or boater understanding of waterway
regulations? (20)
2. Is the project aimed at an appropriate target audience using an appropriate delivery method? (10)
3. Does the project use innovative or creative techniques or create a pilot project which may be used
statewide? (10)
4. Does the project incorporate boater safety education with resource protection? (5)
5. Does the project have clearly defined goals, tasks, and deliverables that will improve boater
education? (5)
Economic Development Initiatives (50)
I . Dces the project provide economic benefits and promote boating? (20)
2. Does the project improve or enhance a designated Working Waterfront? (15)
3. Is the project located in a designated Rural Area of Critical Economic Concern? (5)
4. Does the project have clearly defined goals, tasks, and deliverables that will enhance boating? (10)
Page 3 of 4
9~
Florida Boating Improvement Program Guidelines
Category II: General Evaluation Criteria
Attachment I-B
1. Priority rank for multiple applications for Tier-II funding submitted by the same applicant. (5)
a. Only one Tier II application submitted. (5)
b. First priority rank of multiple applications. (3)
c. Second priority rank of multiple applications. (2)
d. Third priority rank and lower of multiple applications. (0)
2. A detailed cost estimate is submitted in the foam of a formal bid's schedule of values, a bona fide
vendor's quote or an engineer's cost estimate. (10)
3. Total project cost (grant request plus matching funds) is ... (10)
a. $200,000 or less. (10)
b. Greater than $200,000 and less than or equal to $400,000. (5)
c. Greater than $400,000. (0)
4. Matching Funds (10)
a. Requested grant is 25% or less of total project cost. (10)
b. Requested grant is greater than 25% and less than or equal to 75% of total project cost. (5)
c. Requested grant is greater than 75% of total project cost. (0)
5. Project Permitting Status (15) Points
a. All permits for the project have been obtained. (IS)
b. Project is for permitting and engineering cost only; a permitwaiver letter is submitted; or project
type does not require permits. (10)
c. Permits are required for project and permits have been applied for but not approved. (5)
d. Permits are required for project and permit applications have not been submitted. (0)
Tie-Breaker System
If two or more Applications receive the same score as a result of the above scoring process, the
followingtie-breaker system will be used in the order listed to decide the priority ranking:
1. The Applicant having received the lowest amount of program funds during the previous three
fiscal years receives the highest priority.
2. The application submitted is for a project located within a Rural Area of Critical Economic Concern as
defined in the Policies and Guidelines.
3. Applications submitted by counties, or municipalities within counties, with the highest number
of registered vessels for the year prior to the grant period.
Page 4 of 4
q~