Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994 - CorrespondenceGIQ City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 o FAX (407) 589-5570 January 19, 1994 Mr. Milan Vesley PO/CP26182 King Value Centre Post Office Kitchen Ontario, Canada N2G 4V8 RE: Sewer Service for 885 Schumann Drive, Sebastian, Florida Dear Mr. Vesley: Recently our City Utilities service personnel were called upon to investigate a sewage blockage at 885 Schumann Drive in Sebastian, Florida. This residence is currently owned by you. The Utilities workers discovered that the residence was never connected to the sewer and is currently on a septic tank. I have already written a letter to Mr. Charles Fancher, President of GDU, informing him that all prior customers of GDU are entitled to refunds on the sewer portions of their utility bills. Your current tenant, Mr. Billy Dale Lambert, is entitled to a refund. Inasmuch as the drainfield failed, it constitutes a health hazard. Being that municipal sewer service is available, I am notifying you as the owner of 885 Schumann Drive, that you must connect to the City sewer within 60 days. A copy of the current charges and application is enclosed with this letter. Failure to connect to the City sewer will result in possible legal action by the City against you as owner. Sincerely, Richard B. Votapka, P.E. Utilities Director RBV/n/sv CC: /Kay O'Halloran, Interim City Manager O Marilyn Swichkow, Finance Director Charles Nash, City Attorney Mike Galanis, Director, Indian River County Health Department City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 o FAX (407) 589-5570 January 19, 1994 Mr. Charles Fancher, President General Development Utilities 2601 South Bayshore Drive Miami, FL 33133-5461 RE: GDU Account No. 02-19229-08 for Billy D. Lambert, 885 Schumann Drive, Sebastian, Florida Dear Mr. Fancher: On December 27, 1993, our Utilities Department received a complaint from Billy Dale Lambert, tenant at 885 Schumann Drive and former customer of GDU, in regard to a sewage blockage. Upon investigation by our utilities service personnel, it was discovered that the residence at 885 Schumann Drive was not connected to the sewer. On January 5, 1994, I personally witnessed wastewater being discharged directly into the septic tank located in the front yard when Economy Septic Tank Service pumped out the tank. Mr. Lambert claims that he has lived in the residence at 885 Schumann Drive for approximately 19 months and has been charged for sewer service on his bill since then. Being that he was a customer of GDU prior to December 17, 1993, he is entitled to a complete refund of his deposit, sewer charges, and portion of the franchise fee from GDU. Also, all of the other GDU customers who have lived in the house prior to Mr. Lambert are also entitled to refunds from GDU. The City of Sebastian Utilities Department is adjusting Mr. Lambert's account to delete sewer service from it. Please copy me on all correspondence on the action you take in regard to this account. Thank you. Sincerely, I �/C,2 y Richard B. Votapka, P.E. Utilities Director RBV/nsv CC: Kay O'Halloran, Interim City Manager MV Marilyn Swichkow, Finance Director Charles Nash, City Attorney Billy D. Lambert City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET a SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 o FAX (407) 589-5570 January 21, 1994 Mrs. Margaret Mahr 3622 West Derry Drive Sebastian, FL 32958 RE: Impact Fees for Park Place/Palm Lake Club as of December 17, 1993 Dear Mrs. Mahr: This letter is written in response to our telephone conversation this morning in regard to the impact fees for Park Place and Palm Lake Club following the City's acquisition of the General Development Utilities Sebastian Highlands water and sewer system on December 17, 1993. As a result of a rate study that was done by the City's consultants, the water impact fees for all new City utility customers were determined to be $1,100.00. Since the City operates the Park Place water treatment plant, the water service capacity charge (water impact fee) is also applicable to all Park Place and Palm Lake Club residents. Unfortunately, this is not the case with the wastewater impact fee. Since Indian River County still provides the wastewater treatment at its North County Wastewater Treatment Plant in Hobart Park, the wastewater service capacity charge (sewer impact fee) is the amount of the County's impact fee of $2,551.00. The City's Rate Ordinance 0-93-19 addresses this on Page 20 (copy attached). The second to the last sentence reads "notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein, those City retail customers whose wastewater service capacity is provided via the Indian River County Wastewater System shall pay a wastewater capital charge of TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED FIFTY-ONE DOLLARS ($2,551.00) per ERU. Except for a different value for the wastewater capital charge, all other provisions of this Section 9 shall apply to said retail customers". Therefore, all customers who have to pay an impact fee where wastewater treatment is provided by Indian River County must pay the County's impact fee to the City. This not only includes Park Place and Palm Lake Club, but any other customer who connects to the County force main along US 1, Indian River Drive, and County Road 512. Page 2 of 2 January 21, 1994 Letter to Margaret Mahr Until such time as the City can build diversion structures to divert sewage flows to the City's wastewater treatment facilities, the City must remit all sewer charges and impact fees it collects to Indian River County. The City is obligated to do this through the April 21, 1992 Interlocal Utilities Agreement between Indian River County and the City of Sebastian. If the City only charged Park Place customers the City impact fee of $1,650.00, the City would have to pay an additional $901.00 to the County for each impact fee! The July 11, 1989 County Take -Over Agreement with Nelson Hyatt, owner of Park Place Utility System, provides for collection of the impact fees in Park Place in Section 6 entitled "Impact Fees". I am attaching a copy of this section to this letter for your information. Also, I am including a summary of charges for Park Place and Palm Lake Club residents for connection to the water and sewer system. I apologize for any misinformation which may have inadvertently been given to you in regard to the impact fees. However, you can see where confusion arises between the City and the County provided wastewater treatment within the City. Should you need additional information or have further questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Richard B. Votapka, P.E. Utilities Director RBV/nsv CC: 'Kay O'Halloran, Interim City Manager Marilyn Swichkow, Finance Director PARK PLACE/PALM LAKE CLUB WATER AND WASTEWATER CONNECTION CHARGES December 17, 1993 PALM LAKE CLUB Developer's Charges: Water Impact Fee $1,100.00 Meter Installation (5/8" x 3/4" meter) $ 130.00 Water Inspection Fee S 25.00 Sewer Inspection Fee S 25.00 TOTAL $1,280.00 Note: Palm Lake Club Developers have prepaid for 40 Wastewater ERU's. Until such time as these ERU's have been depleted, there will be no wastewater impact fee charged to Palm Lake Club. Residents or New Owners Water Deposit Sewer Deposit Administration Fee TOTAL PARK PLACE Developer's Charges: Water Deposit Sewer Deposit Meter Installation (5/8" x 3/4" meter) Water Inspection Fee Sewer Inspection Fee TOTAL New Owners (resales) Water Deposit Sewer Deposit Administration Fee TOTAL S 50.00 S 60.00 =^S 130.00 S 25.00 S 25.00 5 290.00 Note: As determined by the July 11, 1989 County Takeover Agreement with Nelson Hyatt, upon resale of an existing mobile home in Park Place, impact fees must be paid in the following amounts: Water Impact Fee Sewer Impact Fee TOTAL $1,100.00 S2. 551.00 S3,651.00 When service is d- — ontinued or ordered disc( inued because of nonpayment of amounts due, the reconnection fee shall be based on the actual costs incurred by the City, but shall not be less than $18.00 during normal working hours and $25.00 after normal working hours. SECTION 9. WATER AND WASTEWATER CAPITAL CHARGES; ADOPTION: CALCULATING APPLICATION: AND TIME OF PAYMENT. (1) Adoption. The City hereby adopts and establishes pursuant to general law, a water capital charge and a wastewater capital charge, the purpose of which will be to finance capital expenditures and the payment of City indebtedness associated with the expansion of the City's water supply, treatment and transmission system and the wastewater transmission, treatment, and effluent disposal system. The water capital charge imposed by the City shall be ONE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1,100.00) per ERU, and the wastewater capital charge shall be ONE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS ($1,650.00) per ERU. (2) Applicability. Except for (1) those customers who have previously paid plant capacity charges to the previous owner of the utility and having previously been connected to the System and (2) those City retail customers who connect into the Indian River County Wastewater System, the impact fees set forth herein shall be paid by those new customers who (a) connect to said System, (b) request service from the City, or (c) request an increase in water and/or wastewater service capacity on or after the date the City acquires the System from GOU. The City may exempt any customer from the payment of all or a portion of the 19 ter and wastewater ^iita1 charges to the exte' that the City accepts a permanent contribution -in -aid -of -construction related to the water supply, treatment or transmission facilities or the wastewater transmission, treatment, or effluent disposal facilities having a value of not less than the portion of the water or wastewater capital charges being exempted. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein, those City retail customers whose wastewater service capacity is provided via the Indian River County Wastewater System shalL.pay a wastewater capital charge of TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED FIFTY-ONE DOLLARS ($2,551.00) per ERU. Except for a different value for the wastewater capital charge, all other provisions of this Section 9 shall apply to said retail customers. (3) Time Of Payment. Beginning on the date the City acquires the System. from GDU, all water and wastewater capital charges shall be paid prior to connection of a structure or structures to be served by the City, or such other time as may be specifically provided by City resolution, ordinance, agreement, or permit; provided, however, that the City may permit installment payments of any water or wastewater capital charges upon such tests and conditions as the City deems appropriate. (4) Determination of Equivalent Residential Unit Factors for Water and Wastewater Services. (a) For purposes of calculating and imposing the wastewater capital charge provided for in this Section 4, the ERU factor for any particular connections shall be calculated and imposed in the manner provided as follows: 20 City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET c SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 0 FAX (407) 589-5570 MEMORANDUM DATE: January 31, 1994 TO: Kathryn M. O'Halloran City Clerk/Acting City Manager FROM: Sally Maio Deputy City Clerk RE: Appendix A - Code of Ordinances - Franchises - Article I. (GDU Water); Article VI. (GDU Wastewater); and Article VIII (Sebastian Lakes Utility). ----------------------------------------------------------------- While reviewing the proposed resolution for Sebastian Lakes Utility agreement for placement on the February 9, 1994 agenda, the question of franchises occurred to me. When the interlocal agreement with Indian River County was adopted, we took back the rights to all franchises within the City limits. When we purchased General Development water and wastewater utilities, were the GDU franchises that were originally adopted by Ordinance Nos. 0-81-8 and 0-81-9 automatically transferred to the city by virtue of the purchase documents and by what form of notification or documentation should Municipal Code Corporation be notified so that they can delete those franchises from the code book? I guess my question holds true for Sebastian Lakes utility franchise which was adopted by 0-85-16 and is current until 2005. If we take over that utility, the same question relative to the franchise comes to mind. F4alffi cc: cUpt�il(ittiies Director 1 _- I City Attorney, C.I. Nash comments re: Park Place Regular Meeting - February 23, 1994 Letter from Tom Cloud received by C.I. Nash on Monday, February 21, 1994 that indicated that he (Cloud) had reviewed the agreements and applicable law and he was of opinion that the city really could not take any action relative to Park Place other than to continue on with the agreement. That the agreement was lawful, entered into - at least on face - between Indian River County and Mr. Hyatt (owner of Park Place) and that we agreed to step into the shoes of Indian River County and so that we are in a position that we have to continue to act as a conduit for the collection and payment of that $10.00 surcharge. Also they looked at the issue of some of the things going on between Indian River County and the City of Sebastian and they looked at the agreement and were of the opinion that as to two things: 1. That the City of Sebastian was on required to pay over certain assessments that were made by the county and we didn't have the obligations to pay that over and that the county needs to pay that money back to us. 2. Another issue that was looked at, the request of City staff including the Finance Director, had to do with the removal of that water plant at the Park Place development The agreement appears clear that that property was to pass to the City of Sebastian. So intend to make demand on the County to pay that money back to us. Oberbeck: Charley, I believe there was a dollar value put on that one point in time. Somewhere in the vicinity of one hundred sixty thousand dollars, just for your information. Nash: Ya, and I think that I am going to talk to the City Manager about this and get some input from the Finance Director and Utility Director. But maybe it would be easier for Indian River County to "belly -up" cash instead of moving the plant back from - I guess - the county landfill. So we'll explore those alternatives with the County as well and bring it back for Council to make a decision what is in the best interest of the city. City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 0 FAX (407) 589-5570 March 1, 1994 Rev. Paul Hauenstein Christ the King Lutheran Church 1329 U.S. Highway No. 1 Sebastian, FL 32958 RE. City Water Service to Christ the King Lutheran Church Located at 1301 Fellsmere Road (County Road 512), Sebastian, Florida Dear Rev. Hauenstein: As per our previous discussions, the City intends fully to provide water service to your new church being constructed at 1301 Fellsmere Road in Sebastian. The City's plan is to tap the existing 8" water main between Buildings 6 and 7 in the Sebastian Lakes Condominium development, run a water main through the development, and along the south side of Country Road 512 to the east corner of the church property where a meter will be set. On February 9, 1994, the Sebastian Lakes Utility Company entered into an agreement with the City to convey its existing water and sewer systems within Sebastian Lakes to the City. Unfortunately, the easement which the City needs to construct the water main must be granted by the Sebastian Lakes Condominium Association. As you know, I met with the general membership and Board of Directors at their meeting on February 22, 1994. To date, I have not received any favorable news about the Association granting the easement. The City may have to resort to possible legal action to procure the easement. Needless to say, I cannot predict how long this will take but the City shall persevere since the City has committed to providing potable water to your Church. RBV/nsv Sind Richard B. Votapka, P.E. Utilities Director CC: Joel Koford, City Manager .e■e\eaaKay O'Halloran, Former Acting City Manager 16V CITY OF SEBASTIAN UTILITIES DEPARTMENT DATE: March 2, 1994 TIME: 9:00 am - 9:42 am [x ] CONFERENCE WITH Mrs. Alice Allard, 581 Balboa Street, Sebastian, Florida [ ] TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH SUBJECT: Billing for Water Service Which is Not Connected RESUME OF CONVERSATION: Mrs. Allard brought in a copy of her January, 1994, bill from the City for the base facility and billing charges in the amount of $14.85. She had not received a bill from GDU since 1986. In 1986 or 1987, Mrs. Allard said that GDU had installed water mains, service lines, and meters. She paid $978.00 for the service line, meter, and impact fee. She has the receipts at her home to prove the amounts paid. City records confirm that Mrs. Allard made payment of $978.60 on December 16, 1985. Mrs. Allard said that she paid for the meter and service at that time because she believed it would be cheaper to do so. If it became mandatory in the future to connect, she felt that connection fees would cost considerably more. Mrs. Allard didn't want to connect to the system because she didn't like the smell and taste of chlorine, and the idea that she had to soften City water. Mrs. Allard said that the neighbors next door at 571 Balboa Street never paid anything to GDU, but a service line was installed. However, they never received a bill either. She is willing to pay the minimum rate (base facility charge), if necessary. Evidently, there are approximately 10 customers who are in a similar situation as Mrs. Allard. I would recommend our attorney to review this situation to see if these people should be grandfathered in as non -accounts or place them on notice that they must connect within 60 or 90 days. We should also have GDU in Miami furnish us with complete records on these 10 accounts should that information not be included in our files. *On March 3, 1994 the City's Utilities Personnel investigated 571 Balboa Street and found that no meter was installed. Therefore, GDU would not have sent a bill to this address. ORIGINATED BY: COPY TO: �� vice-�rr- n City of Sebastian POST OFFICE BOX 780127 ❑ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32978 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 ❑ FAX (407) 589-5570 MEMORANDUM DATE: March 3, 1994 TO: Marilyn Swichkow, Finance Director FROM: Richard Votapka, Utilities Director x 6i/ SUBJECT: Explanation of the Background and Status of Sewer Impact Fees, Sewer Reserve Accounts, and Bulk Wastewater Rates Imposed on the City of Sebastian By Indian River County On May 1, 1993, Indian River County transferred all of its water and sewer customer accounts within the boundaries of the City of Sebastian to the City of Sebastian Utilities Department. These accounts included the water and sewer system at Park Place and Palm Lake Club, twenty one (21) lift station accounts and 98 sewer reserve accounts. The City took over the complete operation of the water treatment plant at Park Place and, therefore, became the provider of water for both the Palm Lake Club and Park Place Manufactured Home Parks. However, Indian River County continued to provide the wastewater treatment for the Park Place and Palm Lake Club, and lift station accounts. The sewer reserve accounts are not associated with any sewage flow or usage since the customers' establishments are not physically connected to the County's system. When Indian River County initially established the North County Voluntary Wastewater Assessment Program, customers could elect to reserve capacity in a proposed County wastewater treatment plant by paying for impact fees over a period of ten (10) years. However, once the treatment plant and wastewater transmission system were completed, Indian River County invoiced monthly all subscribers (sewer reserve accounts) the base facility charge of $13.50 per ERU (equivalent residential unit) and a $2.00 billing fee. Once the County transferred these accounts to the City, the City was responsible for collecting the charges due on a monthly basis, and remitting all collections except the billing fee to Indian River County. .-. /kk Page 2 of 3 March 3, 1994 Memo to Marilyn Swichkow Nineteen (19) sewer reserve accounts constituting 384 ERU's were delinquent when Indian River County transferred them to the City. However, the County demanded payment for the monthly base facility charges to be paid to it despite the fact that the City was unable to collect payment. The City has requested that the County file liens on all delinquent accounts, confiscate their ERU's, and stop requiring the City to pay monthly base facility charges. The County finally deleted six sewer reserve accounts on October 12, 1993 which removed 213 ERU's from the City's billing register. An additional 14 ERU's were deleted on November 1, 1993, after a meeting between City and County Utilities Personnel on October 27, 1994. To date, the County is still charging the City for ten (10) delinquent sewer reserve accounts, totally 155 ERU's. This amounts to payment of $1,855.35 ($11.97/ERU x 155 ERU's) by the City to the County each month for which the City cannot collect revenue. Being that these accounts are not physically connected to a water and/or sewer system, the City cannot "shut off" a customer for non-payment. In a letter dated November 9, 1993, Harry Asher, Assistant Director of Utility Services, clearly states that wastewater capacity "units cannot be terminated until the capacity is resold." Requests will be added to the current list of requests for return of ERU's and will be processed on a first come, first serve basis. The County has never provided such a list to the City. Until the customer pays all delinquent charges or the City wins a legal challenge to stop payment of these charges, the County will continue to demand payment. The City's legal counsel has been advised of the County's position and is currently reviewing it to determine the course of action the City should take against the County. The City of Sebastian sent out its first utility bills in June 1993. After transmitting the City's "Billing Register" to the Indian River County Utilities, the City received a bill from Indian River County and immediately recognized that the County was basing its sewer charges to the City on 95% of the water consumption. However, the County charges sewer service for all of its retail customers based on 85% of the water consumption. City officials had interpreted the bulk wastewater agreement for sewer charges with the County as 95% of the 85% of the .water consumption. The City naturally surmised that the wholesale rates must be lower than retail rates. However, the County Utilities Department does not agree. Therefore, the City has paid the bills sent to 1t by the County as "to be disputed", since the County is charging the City 10% more for wholesale rates than it charges its retail customers. `a Page 3 of 3 March 3, 1994 Memo to Marilyn Swichkow Legal counsel for the City has been requested to review this matter and make recommendations to the City Staff to determine the course of legal action the City can take against the County. Until such time as the customers at Park Place, Palm Lake Club, and lift station customers are physically connected to the City of Sebastian's sewer system, Indian River County will continue to hold the City hostage to its wastewater rates, impact fees, and wastewater policies. The City tried to open the door for renegotiations on October 14, 1993, but was told by the County that the City had already accepted the bulk wastewater agreement from Indian River County on April 21, 1992. Unfortunately, the City's consultants of Hartman and Associates and Gray, Harris, and Robinson advised the City that the County had given the City an ultimatum. The ultimatum was the condition that had the City not accepted the bulk wastewater rates mandated by the County, the County would not finalize its agreement with the City to takeover the water and wastewater accounts within the City limits. Robert Ori, Financial Manager of Hartman & Associates, whose Department was responsible for the rate study of the Sebastian System, designed the rates to offset the losses incurred by the City in being billed the bulk wastewater rates by Indian River County. The new rates went into effect on December 17, 1993, when the City acquired the Sebastian Highlands water and wastewater system from General Development Utilities, Inc. Finally, Indian River County sent the City of Sebastian estimated bills for the months of August and September because the City had not provided a copy of the City's Billing Register to the County by the County's self imposed due date of the 10th of each month. Even though actual Billing Registers were submitted to the County Utilities Department a short time later, the County Utilities Department never refunded the difference due the City or applied a credit towards subsequent bills. Therefore, the County still owes the City $255.43 for the August 1993 billing and $1,920.38 for the September 1993 billing (refer to the attached December 13, 1993 memo from N. Veidt to R. Votapka). Attachments: November 10, 1993 Memo to K. O'Halloran from R. Votapka RE: Termination of ERU's November 9, 1993 Letter to R. Votapka from H. Asher RE: Termination of ERU's October 27, 1993 Memo to R. Votapka from N. Veidt RE: Meeting with Lori Kowalski December 13, 1993 Memo to R. Votapka from N. Veidt RE: Estimated Billings from Indian River Cty MEMORAADUM DATE: October 27, 1993 TO: Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director FROM: Nancy Veidt, Clerical Assistant SUBJECT: Meeting with Lori Kowalski Marge Poole and I met with Lori Kowalski, Accounting/ Clerical Supervisor of Indian River County Utilities, this afternoon. The meeting was set up to discuss the wastewater reserve (ERU) accounts and to determine if the City's records are accurate in regard to these accounts. Lori did not have the information available to confirm any information concerning these accounts. She stated that she would hopefully have the information compiled by sometime next week. In our discussions I did discover that the Sebastian Paradise Ltd. accounts was forwarded to the City as having 6 ERU's. There was obviously an operator error in entering the information into the computer that resulted in the 20 ERU's which we are charging. I have attached the previous correspondence on this account to this memo. In discussing the delinquent wastewater reserve (ERU's) accounts, Lori stated that the County interprets the Interlocal Agreement as stating that the City is not obligated to reimburse the County for any delinquent amounts owed to the County at the time of the agreement. She states that the County still expects payment from the City whether or not we are collecting on the accounts. I questioned her on when the County would recall these accounts, since they all had large balances with the County when they were turned over to the City. She stated that the City needs to take action on the accounts. I explained to Lori that the County had contracted with these customers, not the City, and the County needed to recall the accounts. She stated that the County could not take back these accounts unless the City had another buyer for them and it would have to be discussed with Harry Asher. As far as the Volume Charges the County is billing to the City for sewer usage, Lori states that she has discussed this issue with Harry Asher and the County will continue billing the City 100% of the water volume with no maximum usage. She stated that maximum charges would be figured by taking the total metered accounts and dividing by the total volume. If this figure was over 13,000 gallons, then they would bill that portion at a discounted rate. City of Sebastian POST OFFICE BOX 780127 o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32978 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 0 FAX (407) 589-5570 PS -E s1 .J -I 'A V D ,J PS DATE: December 13, 1993 TO: Richard Votapka, Utilities Director FROM: Nancy.Veidt, Clerical Assistant SUBJECT: Estimated Billings from Indian River County The following bills were estimated by Indian River County for reasons stated below. The actual data has since been provided to Indian River County. However, no revised billings for volume charges have been received. An estimated bill for the August 1, 1993 through September 1, 1993 billing was sent to the City on September 12, 1993. As of that date, no billing register had been provided to the County from the City. The City hand delivered the billing register on October 20, 1993. Estimated volume billed 1946 gallons @ $3.19 $6,206.68 Actual water volume 1875 gallons @ $3.19 $5,981.25 Difference $ 255.43 As estimated bill for the September 1, 1993 through October 1, 1993 billing was received by the City. The City did not provide the County with a billing register for this period until October 20, 1993. Estimated volume billed Actual water volume 1946 gallons @ $3.19 $6,207.74 1344 gallons @ $3.19 $4,287.36 Difference $1,920.38 BOD OF COUNTY COMMISSI i.RS 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Telephone: (A07)567-8000 November 9, 1993 Richard B. Votapka City of Sebastian P.O. Box 780127 Sebastian, Florida 32978 f N GV 1 993; � 1, L=sI _U --------------------------- SUBJECT: TERMINATION OF ERUS PURCHASED BY THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN UNDER THE NORTH COUNTY WASTEWATER ASSESSMENT Dear Richard: This is to respond to your correspondence dated November 1, 1993 concerning the above -referenced request to return 15 ERUs of wastewater capacity reserved for the City at various locations. This request will be added to the current list of requests for return of ERUs and will be processed in a first-come first -serve basis. The units cannot be terminated until the capacity is resold. We will advise you as soon as these units are resold. Sincerely, ar .Asher Ass' tant Duector of Utility Services _• ej cc: James E. Chandler, County Administrator Charles Vitunac, County Attorney (RVOTAPKA.HEA)sb City of Sebastian POST OFFICE BOX 780127 ❑ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32978 TELEPHONE (4��t 0��7) 5899-5330 0 FAX (4-07) 5r89r-5570 DATE: November 10, 1993 TO- Kay O'Halloran, Interim City Manager/City1/Clerk FROM: Richard Votapka, Utilities Director �" SUBJECT: Termination of ERU's Purchased By The City of Sebastian Under The North County Wastewater Assessment Program Today I received the attached letter from Harry Asher, Assistant County Utilities Director, in response to my letter of November 1, 1993. As you can see by Harry's letter, the City must continue paying the monthly minimum bill (billing and base facility charges) on all wastewater reserve capacity (ERU) accounts indefinitely. Neither Indian River County nor the City can predict when all of the ERU's previously returned to the County by others will be resold before the City's returned ERU's will also be resold. TQC( 0� City of Sebastian POST OFFICE BOX 780127 a SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32978 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 a FAX (407) 589-5570 M E VJR���Jif_'J-Pr DATE: March 4, 1994 TO: Marilyn Swichkow, Finance Director FROM: Richard Votapka, Utilities Director )E ✓ SUBJECT: Park Place MHP $10.00 Surcharge for Utility Customers The City of Sebastian currently charges $10.00 per month per ERU (equivalent residential unit) for only those water and sewer customers located within the Park Place Manufactured Home Park. The City assumed collection of this $10.00 surcharge on May 1, 1993, the date Indian River County transferred the operation and maintenance of the Park Place water system to the City of Sebastian. The $10.00 surcharge was initially established by Indian River. County in its "Take -Over Agreement" dated July 11, 1989 between Nelson Hyatt (Seller), owner of Park Place, and Indian River County (County). The surcharge was to be collected by the County for ten (10) years until July 11, 1999, or until $777,000 had been paid to the Seller, whichever came first. The $777,000 represented the initial capital investment used to construct the Park Place water and sewer system. The County agreed to fund the return of the Seller's investment by charging all of the customers within Park Place $10.00 per month. Once Indian River County turned over the Park Place water and sewer systems to the City of Sebastian through a mutual County -City Interlocal Agreement dated April 21, 1992, the City became the collector of the $10.00 surcharge in lieu of the County. Attached are pages 1 and 4 of the July 11, 1989 "County Take -Over Of Utility System" agreement between Indian River County and Nelson Hyatt on which the portion applicable to the surcharge are underlined. Wherever the word "County" appears the "City of Sebastian" shall substitute. BI.1 INDIAN It vEaEAc MrY, FLORIDA, NELSON IIYATT RE: COUNTY TAKE-OVER of UTILITY SYSTEM TIIIS AcrtEEMENt, made this 11th_ _ day of July 11N 1969, between INDIAN RIVER COtY, a political subdivision of the State or Florlds, 1010 15th Slreel, Vera Beach, hl 37960 (tx)UNtY) anir"N'"6111MVISELLERt, whose address is w 1 T N E S S E T N WIIEREAS, SELLER Is the owner of a water and wastewater utility system servicing a portion of the City or Sebastlan: and WHEREAS, COUNTY has embarked on a program of Providing quality water and wastewater service to as much of Indian River County as Is financially tadslble; and WHEREAS, as part of thls program, the COUNTY has approached SELLER concerning purchasing 1119 utility system; and w11EREAS. SELLER has agreed to this purchase by MUNTY, provided that he will have five years In which Io finish his development, without paying Impact tees, and for 111080 units sold before the end or the five-year period. Impact fees will have to be paid only as those units are resold: and 111115MAS, SELLER would like to receive a return of Ills initial capital Investment of some 1771,660 used to construct Ilia utility: and WHEREAS, the CM" agrees to tills, provided that only the customers (n the service area of SYSTEM at t,,a date or this agreement shall be charged for this expense, NOW, "tit PORE, for and In consideration or file nalluel covenants contained herein as well as other good still valuable considerailon, the COUNTY and SELLER agree as rollows: F. ��_I 11_J I 11 R 11 S. WARRANTY __OF TITLE: _ IfOL_b_ _HARMLESS! SELLER shall warrant title to all the real and personal property in SYSTEM and shall hold the COUNTY harmless from any and all claims for damages from third parties, and In particular for any claims from LAkE DELORES UTILITIES AND CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEMS, INC. 6. IMPACT _FEES: After five years from the dale of this agreement SELLER shall be obligated to pay Impact fees to the COUNTY, at the rate then current, for each unit which thereafter requires a Certificate of Occupancy. Units which have had a Certificate of Occupancy Issued to them before five years from the date of this agreement mist have an Impact fee paid when that unit Is resold, without regard to the five-year SELLER's grace period. At closings on such sales, SELLER or successor In title shall collect the Impact fee and remit It to COUNTY. 7. SUNCIIARGE__ON RATES: CLxjNfY shall establish a surcharge on water and wastewater rales for customers In the service area as shown on Exhibit "D." The surcharge steal: tee collected by the COUNTY for ten years. only or until $777,000.00 has been paid, whichever comes first, and funds so collected shall be remitted quarterly to SELLER. SELLER agrees that the funds so remitted shall be full satisfaction for SELLER's right to be reimbursed for Its equity In the SYSTEM. The COUNTY surcharge shell be $10 per EAU lequlvalent residential unit). 8. CLOSING DATE: The closing shall.take place on or before August 1, 1989. IN WITNESS WIIEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals on the dale first set forth above. Attest ilarKyt,WthVeo r BOARb or COUNTY cowlssloNERs INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA B _ ar C� ee e�-- Ch rman (SEAL) M.rai.., [.--iw._;_-d --$lain - c-.. S..3o.a�. City of Sebastian POST OFFICE BOX 780127 ❑ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32978 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 ❑ FAX (407) 589-5570 MEMORAVDUM DATE: March 10, 1994 TO: Joel Koford, City Manager / FROM: Richard Votapka, Utilities Director T6✓ SUBJECT: Utility Easement for Water Main Installation at the Southwest Corner of Sebastian Lakes Condominium Development As of Monday, March 7, 1994, Mrs. Virginia Zahn, President of the Sebastian Lakes Condominium Association, informed me that she would have a letter written to the City granting a utility easement to the City as requested, but subject to the review and approval of the Association's attorney. Following your directive at this morning's staff meeting to write a memo on this subject, I called Mrs. Zahn at 11:15 a.m. to learn when I could expect the letter. Mrs. Zahn informed me that new elections for Association Board Members were held yesterday and that all new members were elected. She told me that to protect the Board from liability, she now requests, again, a letter from the City informing the Association Board that the City will evoke its right of eminent domain powers to acquire the easement. I told Mrs. Zahn that I had already discussed this approach with you and neither one of us want to threaten Sebastian Lakes with legal action to obtain an easement. We would prefer to acquire the easement through more amicable means. Mrs. Zahn told me that the only other alternative was to have the Board issue ballots as to whether or not the Association could grant an easement. This process may take three or four weeks to complete, since the people do have the right in their Association rules and regulations to vote on granting an easement. Page 2 of 2 March 10, 1994 Memo to Joel Koford I told Mrs. Zahn that I had written a letter to the pastor of Christ the King Lutheran Church committing the City to provide water to the Church in the future. I explained that the City was in the process of trying to obtain a utility easement from Sebastian Lakes and could not guarantee when this would materialize. I told Mrs. Zahn that my letter would enable the Church to receive approval from the Indian River County Environmental Health Department to use its irrigation well as a temporary water supply until such time as the City installs the water main. Therefore, since the Church could be temporarily served water by its own system, I preferred that the Association take a vote of their members as soon as possible rather than the City issuing a threatening ultimatum involving eminent domain action. March 24, 1994 Richard B. Votapka, P.E. Utilities Director City of Sebastian 1225 Main Street Sebastian, FL 32958 Re: Interlocal Utilities Agreement Between Indian River County, Florida and City of Sebastian, Florida Regarding Class II Customers Our File No. 93-2523 Dear Rich: This letter is to follow up on our meeting of March 22, 1994. I will be waiting for you to provide to me financial information with regard to the bulk wastewater rates, sewer reserve charges, and the assets that were acquired from Indian River County. My office is currently researching potential defenses to the surcharge which is currently being imposed upon the users of the water and wastewater system. As soon as you have the financial information together, please forward it to my office. At that time, we will schedule another meeting to discuss your findings. I look forward to hearing from you regarding this .i.ssue. Sincerely, FRESE, ASHD& TO/RPE, P. A. L� Richard E. Torpy RET/lb cc: Joel Koford, City Manager FRESE, NASH & TORPY, P.A. 11 MAR 2 8 1994 1! I ATTORNEYS AT LAW -i ♦aJ GARY B. FREE. t 930 S HARBOR BLV_D. CHARLES IAN NAEH• _CITY _ y SIlPl'E 505 VINCENT G. TORPY, JR. t RICHARD E. ToRPY MELBOURNE, PWRIDA32901 GREGORY S. HANSEN t 44071 9843300 J. PATRICK ANOEREON FAX 44071 9513741 LADRA L. ANDERSON GRAIN, A. SCHILLINOER STEPHEN P. HEUSTON TBOARD CERTIFIED IN TAXATION BOARD CERTIFIED IN WIL S. WILLIAM A. GRIHM TRUSTS & ESTATES OF COUNSEL *BOARD CERTIFIED IN CI TRIAL LAW CRIS BATES FOSTER OF COUNSKI, March 24, 1994 Richard B. Votapka, P.E. Utilities Director City of Sebastian 1225 Main Street Sebastian, FL 32958 Re: Interlocal Utilities Agreement Between Indian River County, Florida and City of Sebastian, Florida Regarding Class II Customers Our File No. 93-2523 Dear Rich: This letter is to follow up on our meeting of March 22, 1994. I will be waiting for you to provide to me financial information with regard to the bulk wastewater rates, sewer reserve charges, and the assets that were acquired from Indian River County. My office is currently researching potential defenses to the surcharge which is currently being imposed upon the users of the water and wastewater system. As soon as you have the financial information together, please forward it to my office. At that time, we will schedule another meeting to discuss your findings. I look forward to hearing from you regarding this .i.ssue. Sincerely, FRESE, ASHD& TO/RPE, P. A. L� Richard E. Torpy RET/lb cc: Joel Koford, City Manager LAW OFFICES MCKINN❑N, STEWART, NALL & MCKINN❑N " IS034 CHARTERED POST OFFICE BOX 3345`'�� j•%� `'' VERO BEACH. FLORIDA 32964-334S _ CHARLES R. MCKINNON WILLIAM J. STEWART ROBERT C. NALL CHARLES W. MCKINNON 'BOARD CERTIFIED REAL ESTATE LAWYER March 29, 1994 Mr. Richard V. Votapka Utilities Director City of Sebastian 1225 Main Street Sebastian, FL 32958 Re: Proposed Amendment for Installation of Water Main - Sebastian Lakes Condominium Development Dear Mr. Votapka: 3355 OCEAN DRIVE VERO BEACH. FLORIDA 32963 TELEPHONE 14071 231-3500 TELEFAX 14071231-9876 We received your letter of March 17th regarding the above -captioned matter on March 23rd. I have now had an opportunity to review your letter with our client. The Association would prefer not to grant an additional easement over its common elements if it could be avoided. While we can appreciate your concern about installing a water main near electrical lines, the Association requests that the existing utility easements be used as much as possible for the water main. If we can be of any further assistance in regard to this matter, please do not hesitate to let me know. Sincerely yours, Charles W. McKinnon CWM:gae c.c. Sebastian Lakes Condominium Association, Inc. City of Sebastian POST OFFICE BOX 780127 ❑ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32978 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 ❑ FAX (407) 589-5570 DATE: March 31, 1994 T0: Marilyn Swichkow, Finance Director FROM: Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director Z•5 SUBJECT: Maintenance of the Utility System Customer Database At 12:00 noon today both Nancy and I were informed by Howard Kettler of your Department that you had restricted Nancy's access to the Utility System software to a level 3. This allows Nancy only to "browse and look" at information in the system. This act on your part has violated the understanding we developed on February 2, 1994 between the Finance Department and the Utilities Department. At that meeting it was decided that Utilities Department would maintain the customer database. This included adding all new customers to the database, changing the status on customers terminating service and preparing these accounts for an off -cycle billing, changing customer addresses, and processing work orders for the field personnel. Nancy is now prohibited from performing these tasks. This action has upset both Nancy and myself because our Department can no longer perform the functions it willingly had been doing. Therefore, if this is the action you have decided to take, your Department will now have to perform all of the above functions. I am transmitting all of the information to you that Nancy was currently processing. The Utilities Department has always tried to maintain a good working relationship with your Department. I feel that your action today has jeopardized this relationship for the detriment of the City. In my opinion, the fact that Nancy was assisting your staff with matters that your staff did not have the time or immediate knowledge to deal with, was nothing but beneficial. From now on, I insist that any communications relayed to our Department by your be reduced in writing to me before hand instead of having one of your staff relay the messages after the fact. CC; Kay O'Halloran, Acting City Manager Joel Koford, City Manager r City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET 0 SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 o FAX (407) 589-5570 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: April 1, 1994 TO: Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director FROM: Marilyn Swichkow, CPA ) Finance Director RE: Maintenance of Utility System Customer Data Base In response to your memo of March 31, 1994, let me say first, I apologize for any comments made by any of my staff to you and Nancy. It is not my intent to cause ill -will or hurt feelings. I have called and/or left messages for you to call or see me over the last few days so I could go over Finance procedures before the March bills go out. I understand you had some line breaks that have kept you busy. We are trying to balance the Utilities files, resolve continuing data base errors, change meter readings, transaction codes, balances due, as well as assign responsibility for specific functions in my office with the aid of flowcharts and written procedures. We cannot balance, reconcile or resolve where a task has fallen through the cracks until I "freeze" the files. To do that, I have shut down all activity except payment processing for the next few days (into the computer) not operations. I sincerely appreciate all of the help Nancy has provided to my office. However, I do have a responsibility to balance the books. As most already know, I have been quite busy with W -21s, GDU database load of the 1500 customers, computer upgrades, state reports, financial statements and audit. This is my first opportunity to get into the details of Utility accounting. Again I regret any ill -will caused by miscommunications. I have instructed my staff to honor your request for written communications. AON Richard B. Votapka April 1, 1994 Page #2 My plan of action has been and is to get the Utilities database correctly loaded before Itron uploading for the March billing cycle due out next week. This means flowcharts, written procedures, timing of input/output data, separation of Indian River County transactions into a separate cycle, delinquency billing and cut-off notice. cc: Joel L. Koford, City Manager Kay O'Halloran, Acting City Manager /sg City of Sebastian POST OFFICE BOX 780127 o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32978 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 o FAX (407) 589-5570 DATE: April 4, 1994 TO: Marilyn Swichkow, Finance Director FROM: Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director ;eS v SUBJECT: Sewer Usage and Base Facility Charge Collections From May Through December 1993 Attorney Rick Torpy has requested the total dollar amount the City has collected on sewer usage (volume) charges from May through December 1993 for Park Place/Palm Lake Club and the lift station accounts. Also, he has requested the total dollar amount the City has collected on the base facility charges for Park Place/Palm Lake Club sewer, lift station, and sewer reserve accounts from May through December. Please furnish this information to me as soon as possible so I can relay it to Rick Torpy. Z wsQ o au t� 5-', a-UT6 IC�A cWVa�/4, d-6 POST OFFICE SO: 0,j TELEPHONE U"/A ' S (moo vzv -� DATE: April 4, 1994 J TO: Joel Koford, City Manager FROM: Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director &I/ SUBJECT: Vicker's Grove S/D Today I received the attached letter from Randy Mosby of Mosby and Associates, the engineer for the Vicker's Grove Subdivision. I met with Randy on March 31st to discuss the water and sewer redesign for the subdivision. I had initially contacted him on March 16th following the staff meeting in City Hall. I informed him that the redesign would have to be resubmitted by April 6 if the preliminary plat was to be brought before City Council on April 13th for approval. As a result of our meeting, Randy Mosby is requesting an extension of time, but has not indicated how much time he will need in order to complete the plans for resubmittal. During the course of our discussion, I learned that the south end of the subdivision had been connected to the Indian River County water and sewer system '.What I find most interesting is that the City of Sebastian and Indian River County have no agreement (that I am aware of) in regard to the County providing wa_� to any customer within City limits. The April 22, 1992 Interlocal Agreement Between Indian River County and the City of Sebastian specifically does not address the sale of water by the County to the City. If the City will now provide water to the Vicker's Grove Subdivision, do we allow Indian River County to continue to serve the south end of Vicker's Grove Subdivision, or do we construct a master meter pit at the south City limit of the subdivision to interconnect with the County's water system? (us MOSBY AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS April 1, 1994 Mr. Richard Votapka Director of Utilities City of Sebastian 1225 Main Street Vero Beach, Florida 32958 Subject: Vicker's Grove Subdivision Sebastian, Florida Engineer's Project No. 93-131 Dear Mr. Votapka: ..'2ass-ran-r �tvErive--- P.O. BOX 6368 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32961 407.569-0035 Thank you for taking the time yesterday to discuss the details for providing water and sewer services to the proposed subdivi- sion.. We have authorized our surveyor to proceed with obtaining the "as -built" information of the existing GDU water and sewer system along the subject perimeter property lines. Due to the time required in obtaining the necessary field data and the redesign of the water and sewer systems, we are request- ing an extension to the April 13, 1994 City Council meeting in which we were to receive preliminary plat approval of the subject subdivison. Your 9,4istance in 'r is request would be appreciated. Should you requyurthe/Ainrmation, please call. P. E. RLM: cc: Mr. Henry Fischer Mr. Warren Dill STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 2: 40 CE NTE R V I EN' D R I V E T A L I A H A S S E E, F LOR I DA 32399-21 00 LAWTON CHILES Gwem , The Honorable Lonnie R. Powell Mayor, City of Sebastian 1225 Main Street Sebastian, Florida 32958 Dear Mayor Powell: LINDA LOOMIS SHELLEY Secretary April 12, 1994. x CI pFFt^EK� The Department has completed its review of the Development Agreement between the City of Sebastian and Sebastian Lakes Associates that was submitted on March 3, 1994. The review was conducted to fulfill the Department's responsibilities pursuant to Section 163.3243, Florida Statutes (F.S.). As a result of the review, the Department has identified areas in which the agreement does not meet the requirements of the Local Government Development Agreement Act, Sections 163.3220 - 163.3243, F.S., or is inconsistent with the City of Sebastian's comprehensive plan. These problems are discussed in the attached memorandum and checklist. While the Department believes that the provisions identified do not conform with the provisions of Sections 163.3220 - 163.3243, F.S., it will not pursue legal action under Section 163.3243, F.S., to correct or challenge the compliance of the agreement with the Act. The Department's decision not to pursue action at this time does not preclude the Department from exercising its responsibility under Section 163.3243, F.S. should local circumstances, the situation, or conditions of the agreement change. The Department encourages the City of Sebastian to correct the identified provisions and ensure that future agreements reflect the requirements of the Act. The failure of the agreement to meet the requirements of law may affect the financing or title covenants for the property. You should discuss these concerns with your local attorney and the developer's attorney. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT • HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT The Honorable Lonnie R. Powell April 12, 1994 Page Two If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. Roger Wilburn at (904) 488-9210. Sincerely, Charles G. Pattison, Director Division of Resource Planning and Management CGP/rwc Enclosure cc: Bruce Cooper Director of Community Development Barbara Hall, City Clerk STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 2 7 4 0 C E N T E R V I E W D R I V E T A L L A H A S S E E LAWTON CHILES Governor M E M O R A D U M F L O R I D A 3 2 3 9 9. 2 1 0 0 LINDA LOOMIS SHELLEY Secrewy To: Development Agreement File Through -Bob Dennis, Program Administrator From: Roger Wilburn, Planning Manager Subject: Development Agreement between the City of Sebastian and Sebastian Lakes Associates Date: April 6, 1994 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT The Agreement concerns the development of the Sebastian Lakes PUD, which consists of 35.5 acres of residential development and 17.57 acres of commercial development. Development approval for the PUD's 284 dwelling units and 267,872 square feet of commercial was granted respectively, on June 11, 1984 and December 7, 1988. As of the date of this Agreement 64 multi -family units and a County Library facility have been constructed. The PUD approvals require the developer to make certain transportation improvements and to dedicate right of way for certain improvements. The City wishes to have certain roadway improvements constructed at this time and to have dedications of right of way also made at this time. The Developer is agreeable to funding the construction of certain of those improvements and the dedication of right of way at this time, provided the property retains certain development rights. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT . HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT City of Sebastian/Sebastian Lakes PUD April 6, 1994 Page Two The Developer agrees to: the construction of Laconia Street from Grandeur Avenue to Fellsmere Road as a two lane facility. This includes design plans, water management district stormwater permits, and dedication of right of way and drainage easements; the dedication of an additional 20 feet of right of way for Roseland Road and the construction of Roseland Road from Fellsmere Highway to Laconia Street; construct turn lanes or deceleration lanes to serve the property from Roseland Road or from Fellsmere Highway and to provide such traffic signalization as is necessary at the intersection of Fellsmere Highway and Roseland Road. The City agrees to not alter the Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation and zoning for the property, except at the request of the then owner of the portion of the property for which the change is requested. IDENTIFIED PROBLEMS The Department's review of the development agreement identified the following deficiencies in meeting the requirements of Section 163.3220 - 163.3243, Florida Statutes. 1) 163.3227(1)c. F.S., Building height is not addressed. CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Agreement was reviewed for consistency with the City of Sebastian's Comprehensive Plan. Based on the information provided, the development as proposed in the Development Agreement is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Attached is a detailed consistency checklist for the Florida Local Government Development Agreement Act, Section 163.3220 - 163.3243, Florida Statutes. RW/ Attachment FLORIDA LOCAL GOVERNMENT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CHECKLIST DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: City of Sebastian and Sebastian Lakes Associates EXECUTED ON: February 9, 1994 163.3225 Public Hearings (1) Two public hearings YES 163.3227 Requirements of a Development Agree- ment (1) A development agreement shall include the following: a. - legal description of the land YES - names of its legal and equitable owners; YES b. - duration of the agreement YES - not exceed 10 years (163.3229) YES c. - development uses permitted on the land YES - population densities YES - building intensities YES - height; NO d. - describe public facilities that will service the development YES - who shall provide such facilities YES - date new facilities will be constructed YES - a schedule to assure public faci- lities are available concurrent with the impdcts of development; YES e. - describe any reservation or dedi- cation of land for public purposes YES f. - describe all local development permits approved or needed to be approved for the development of the land; YES g. - a finding that the development permitted or proposed is consis- tent with the local government's: - comprehensive plan, and YES - land development regulations; YES h. - describe any conditions, terms, restrictions, or other require- ments determined to be necessary by the local government for the public health, safety, or welfare of its citizens; YES A statement indicating that the failure of the agreement to ad- dress a particular permit, condi- tion, term, restriction shall not relieve the developer of the ne- cessity of complying with the law governing said permitting require- ments, conditions, term or restriction. YES (2) A development agreement may provide that the entire development or any phase thereof be commenced or completed within a specific time period. N/A 163.3231 Consistency with the comprehensive plan and land development regulations (1) A development agreement and authorized development shall be consistent with the local government's comprehensive plan and land development regulations. YES Officially Recorded February 18, 1994, OR 1008 PG 1928 CITY OF SEBASTIAN UTILITIES DEPARTMENT DATE: April 20, 1994 TIME: 4:00 PM [ ] CONFERENCE WITH (x ] TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH Virginia Zahn, President, Sebastian Lakes Condominium Association SUBJECT: Easement Required for Water Main at Sebastian Lakes RESUME OF CONVERSATION: Virginia Zahn returned my call of April 18th. She and her husband had been out of town. I told her I had contacted Chuck McKinnon, Attorney for the Association. I told her that his only concern was that the easement requested did not encumber any of the property for future expansion of the buildings. I told Virginia that I assured him that the location of the proposed easement would not interfere with any construction. There was no foreseeable expansion in the developed portion between Building 6 and 7, since this area in question was already developed. Virginia suggested that I get information on the location and width of the utility easement for the electrical poles. Neither the Attorney or she had this information. She said she had no problem in granting an easement with the City. I talked with Virginia about the inquiry from Col. A.J. Scotti. She said he is on a committee looking into the costs for billing Sebastian Lakes. She said he should go through the director on the Committee. Co. Scotti is not to proceed on his own volition acting as the authorized spokesperson. He had "no authority". ORIGINATED BY: COPY TO: Seba: MOA -C-, p.-Iti z k o,,j sM e4_ J �u7� ` 1" � 1 "I'S 4-1W 1 l-.4_ d C 4j p� Wu.,, i, 1.0" .,5 +, C.J ow,.. *, —TL, -F,,4- Q;�s (li1 �1-s-WA 6-.\,..1y'd � �, "'C' -W a l -I,.,,,,g�, k- — i�4 1 0.3 SUVA W1L. 1V\^`^ ("VYS.A 1, 1""" �-\/ S14kU" "PdL/ 1A-, -05 G r 1V� T/'wct - -A . -76- kave, x6e a al f3ab C�12A,-Ik of d\._ 111A«,�;si -�k;,, l.oiti , [,j %4, taa✓ City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET a SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 a FAX (407) 589-5570 UTILITIES SYSTEM CUSTOMER INQUIRY FORM Date: /-/,cA� '� Time: Z Ate, Inquiry Taken by: HW Customer Name: Coo • Z1. J- fc o 7- 7 1 Address: '/) rX-L,g /1'14af Phone m: .! e` 5 - ,, 7 `/ / Account m: sf4 ,, ,r -i - Question: /1/iy1Tt-;L 4rjr-c / ax i-4 H!'^i 1- fee 4 T / J /2 l- X /! /J/074 dyer 9i i3�«/. c f 04dc-() Cm. r�-r.eiim� Resolution: Ms - i�,i!K Responded via: phone Date & Time: Response by: n other (list) City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET 11 SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 u FAX (407) 589-5570 MIEMORAADUM DATE: April 24, 1994 TO: Kay O'Halloran, City Clerk FROM: Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director F,6�/ SUBJECT: Certified Boundary Surveys Dated 12/17/93 for the Filbert Street and Manley Avenue Water Treatment Plants and the Bailey Drive Wastewater Treatment Plant I have requested and received additional prints from Allen Engineering, Inc. for the subject surveys. I request that you store a print of each in the vault for safekeeping. My Department, as well as the Community Development Department, also have certified prints. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1840 259h Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Telephone: (407) 567-8000 April 29, 1994 Richard B. Votapka City of Sebastian P.O. Box 780127 Sebastian, Florida 32978 RECEIVED MAY 3 1994 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SUBJECT: BILLING REGISTERS AND COUNTY ESTIMATED BILLING Dear Richard: This is to respond to your letter of April 6, 1994 to Lori Kowalski, Accounting Clerical Supervisor, concerning the billing registers and County estimated billings. This is to restate the County billing policy. The service provided the City is for the period from the 1st through the 31st of each month. The County does not believe it unreasonable to request the billing information by the 10th of each month for the previous month. The County requirements are for receipt of the billing information by the 10th of each month so that an accurate billing can be submitted. If'the County does not receive the billing information by the 10th, the County will submit an estimated billing based upon the previous month's billing. Upon receipt of the billing information a corrected bill will be calculated and any credits or additional charges will be added to the next month's billing. By County ordinance, if any billings are not paid within 20 days from the date of the billing, penalty and interest charges will apply. A detailed review of the billing registers will be performed by Ms. Kowalski to confirm the accuracy of the credits taken for the estimated billings. �/S �2 •' �b a f�' �'i1 A Richard B. Votapka April 29, 1994 Page 2 Please advise if I can be of further assistance in this matter. Sincerely, Harry ElAsher Assistant Director of Utility Services HEA:sb cc: Terrance G. Pinto, Director of Utility Services James E. Chandler, County Administrator Joel Koford, City Manager Mayor Arthur Firtion (VOTAPKAS.HEA)sb City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET n SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 n FAX (407) 589-5570 April 6, 1994 Mrs. Lori Kowalski Accounting/Clerical Indian River County PO Box 1750 Vero Beach, FL 32960 Supervisor Utilities Department RE: Billing Registers for February and March 1994, and County Estimated Billing to the City Dear Lori: I am in receipt of your March 21, 1994 letter you wrote to City Finance Director Marilyn Swichkow in reference to the above. As I understand from my assistant, Nancy, you did receive the February and March billing registers, but both arrived late. Scheduling in both the Utilities Department and Finance Department precludes the City's Billing Register from being sent to the Indian River County Utilities Department by the County's self imposed deadline of the 10th of each month. Therefore, the City will elect to furnish you with the Billing Register by the 20th of each month. The Finance Department will no longer obligate itself to pay estimated'bills, because the estimated bills never agree with the actual bills, and the County has never credited the City with the overcharges it has paid. The City also refuses to pay penalty and interest charges. Since the County still owes the City of total of $4,716.95 in .__ _--_.-charges between the actual and estimated bills, the City is deducting this amount from the March bill. Nancy has prepared the attached table showing Indian River County Estimated Billing vs. City of Sebastian Actual Billing. The billing registers which you have received from the City will confirm the actual charges. Sincerely, Richard B. Votapka, P.E. Utilities Director RBV/nsv cc: Joel Koford, City Manager Marilyn Swichkow, Finance Director BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Telephone: (407) 567-8000 April 29, 1994 Richard B. Votapka City of Sebastian P.O. Box 780127 Sebastian, Florida 32978 SUBJECT: UTILITY BILLING - ACCOUNT NO. 19139-03 - RIVER RUN Dear Richard: The County has received the utility billing for the above -referenced account for water service to River Run development. The following questions need to be addressed and answered in writing before payment can be made: 1. What is the previous meter reading? 2. How does the base facility charge of $352.25 and the usage charge of $662.00 equal $2,014.25? 3. What is AD01 in the amount of $1,576.09? 4. The previous reading of -0- does not correspond to the ending reading on the previous billing. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. 7Si cgrely, Harry')�Asher Assistant Director of Utility Services HEA:sb cc: Terrance G. Pinto, Director of Utility Services James E. Chandler, County Administrator Joel Koford, City Manager Mayor Arthur Firtion (VOTAPKALHEA)sb City of Sebastian p UTILITIES DEPARTMENT Amount Paid $ 1225 Main Street, Sebastian, FL 32958 3 , Service Address: 1 ACCOUNT NUMBER SERVICE TO NEW CHARGES TOTAL DUE PAST DUE AFTER 000001.9139--03 NIAR 30 MAY 20 191311 $3, 7c?; -77 1 Ua t CAR -RT SORT *'N 01 1. INDIAN RIVER 00 UTILITIES ACCOUNTING DEPT 1840 25TH ST VERO BEACH Fl_ 3E960-3265 ACCOUNTNUMBER SERVICEADDRESS CIoow19139-03 1 US 1 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS BILL PLEASE CALL - 589-5330' XRVICE AFTER READINGS M I,OW's USAGE TYPE PREVDUS CURRENT (1000'S) WATER 424 424 SEWER SERVICEIUTE si Vv u u TYPE C1155 FIgM TO WATER WA52 03/01 SEWER KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS , PAYMENTS RECEIVED DATE RECEIVED SINCE LAST BILL $(I .00> BRUNGANDBASE USAGE CHARGE FACIUTY CHARGE GAL 352 . 25 $662 . CIO t GAL NUMBER ip OFDAYS City of 3c Sebastian DETACH AND RETURN THIS STUB WITH YOUR PAYMENT BILLING DATE 04/13/94 BALANCE FORWARD a.it,il(I CUIREMBILLING 2, 014.E'_5 A D 0 1 11.576.09 _--_ THIS SPACE FOR MESSAGES _ _-. _. ____ _ __ _ . - ------- - - - _iTILITY "TAX I 201.x!3 FRANCHISE FEE 0.00 PLEASE PAY 3 , 791. .7 ; THIS AMOUNT PAYTHISAMOUNT AFTER DUE DATE $3,823.98 City of Sebastian r3 UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1225 Main Street, Sebastian, FL 32958 Amount Paid $ $2, 685.76 ACCOUNT NUMBER SERVICE TO NEW CHARGES TOTAL DUE 19139-02 3/1/94 PAST DUE AFTER - ' 589-5330 CLASS 3/21/94 $4,540.43 Service Address: 1 US I River Run Condominium Indian River Co. Utilities Accounting Dept. 1840 25th Street Vero Beach, FI 32960-3365 DETACH AND RETURN THIS STUB WITH YOUR PAYMENT ACCOUNT NUMBER SERVICE ADDRESS KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS BILLING DATE 19138-02 1 US 1 River Run Condominium 3/1/94 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS BILL PAYMENTS RECEIVED DATE RECEIVED BALANCE FORWARD PLEASE CALL SINCE LAST BILL FA0M - ' 589-5330 CLASS OF DAYS Sebastian $2,685.76 3/94 7.91 — XRVICE AETER READING USAGE WA52 BWNGANDBASE USAGE CHARGE CURRENT BONG 1YPE PREVIM CURRENT (1000's) FACILITY CHARGE QOp 2833 3119 286 $1,352.25 $ 431.86 1784.11 WATER GAL SEWER GAL SERVICE ATE.USED SERVICE NUBBER Qd °Q City OF FA0M TO TYPE CLASS OF DAYS Sebastian WATER SEWER WA52 2/4 3/1 25 F3 QOp THIS SPACE FOR MESSAGES Utility Tax — 178.41 pl-t _ . FOR AFTER HOUR EMERGENCY SERVICE CALL 589-5733 PLEASE PAY $0+ THIS AMOUNT PAY THIS AMOUNT AFTER DUE DATE BILLING CODES WA - Water PN - Penalty IR - Irrigation HY - Hydrant FF - Franchise Fee SW - Sewer UT - U61ity Tax CR - Credit AD - Adjustment SC • Surcharge BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Telephone: (407) 567-8000 April 29, 1994 Richard B. Votapka City of Sebastian P.O. Box 780127 Sebastian, Florida 32978 SUBJECT: UTILITY BILLING - ACCOUNT NO. 90001-01 - REFLECTIONS Dear Richard: The County has received the utility billing for the above -referenced account for water service to Reflections development. The County would request your explanation of the following items concerning the billing: 1. What is the $288.44 credit balance forward? 2. How does the base facility charge of $252.25 and the usage charge of $1,313.00 equal $3,565.25? 3. What is AD01 in the amount of $288.44? 4. The previous reading of 1349 on the April 13, 1994 bill is not consistent with the ending reading on the previous month's bill. Please respond at your earliest convenience. C7�Si ce ely, �i C .-C: Harry,V.Asher Assistant Director of Utility Services P ff.wt cc: Terrance G. Pinto, Director of Utility Services James E. Chandler, County Administrator Joel Koford, City Manager Mayor Arthur Firtion (VOTAPKAI.HEA)sb City of Sebastian UTILITIES DEPARTMENT Amount Paid $ e 6 4 1225 Main Street, Sebastian, FL 32958 Service Address: ACCOUNT NUMBER SERVICE TO NEW CHARGES TOTAL DUE n� PAST DUE AFTER ii0 1 itig0i u i11 1l1:3 t OniiQOC? ;)I)7.- iiI .'11.1 DIf14' TY) !. ;)V:I. cr:; ';;j CAR -RI- :_ORI' � 01 It`IDIAN RIVER CO 1111L_I IIEC 1-'O DOX 17.'50 VERO BEACH F:._ DETACH AND RETURN THIS STUB WITH YOUR PAYMENT ACCOUNT NUMBER SERVICE ADDRESS KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS BILLING DATE n� ii0 1 itig0i u i11 1l1:3 t TIL QC GUr J 04/1'3/?4 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS BILL PAYMENTS RECEIVED DATE RECEIVED BALANCE FORWARD PLEASE CALL SINCE LAST BILL 589-5330 S��',9CSf.. lil:1 ilt)/C".':; /'r4 $i'.OE'., tLtL-• ;ERVICE MTERRFACINGSNtMi USAGE BIUNG AND BASE USAGE CHARGE CURRENT BILLING TYPE PREVIOUS CURRENT 11000'$) FACIUTYCHARGE WATER 1;349 L3169 i3c'11 GAL ".:)e'.i:�fi 'K 1.,31.3,1)11 3.565.25 SEWER GAL TYPE GAS$ 1 FROM I To OF DAYS WATER W001 )r.L /' )1 94 V SEWER THIS SPACE FOR MESSAGES PAY THIS AMOUNT AFTER DUE DATE $3.972.93 4d o City of Sebastian P AL,�;a atg,tL4 117II.Il"/ TAX I 3':;6.3)3 F'RAPII' III ;": FE!:::: i1,0(� PLEASE PAY 119,921.7 THIS AMOUNT BILLING CODES WA -Water PN - Penalty IR - Irrigation HY- Hydrant SR- Sewer Reserve (ERUt SW - Sewer SU - Surcharge CR - Credit AD - Adiustment I F -lilt Sla. Charoe City of Sebastian �3 UTILITIES DEPARTMENT Y 4 1225 Main Street, Sebastian, FL 32958 4,798.86 Amount Paid $ ACCOUNT NUMBER SERVICE TO NEW CHARGES TOTAL DUE PAYMENTS RECEIVED DATE RECEIVED PAST DUE AFTER ;ERVICE 90001-01 3/1/94 3/21/94 $7,956.60 Service Address: U.S. 1 Indian River Co. Utilities Accounting Dept. 1840 25th Street Vero Beach, FI 32960-3365 DETACH AND RETURN TRIS STUB WITH YOUR PAYMENT ACCOUNT NUMBER SERVICE ADDRESS 90001-01 U.S.1 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS BILL PLEASE CALL Reflections on the 589-5330 PAYMENTS RECEIVED DATE RECEIVED SINCE LAST BILL ;ERVICE 1EIERRENIINGS USAGE TYPE PREVIOUS CURRENT (1000'5) WATER 2810 2884 597 SEWER 6527 7050 SERVICE RATE SERVICEUSED TYPE CASS' FROM i0 WATER WA 50 2/4 3/1 SEWER THIS SPACE FOR MESSAGES KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS Reflections on the River PAYMENTS RECEIVED DATE RECEIVED SINCE LAST BILL $4,798.86 3/94 BAUNGANDBASE USAGE CHARGE FACAITYCRARGE GAL $2,252,25 901.47 GAL OEM FOR AFTER HOUR EMERGENCY SERVICE CALL 5845733 PAY TMS AMCIJNT AFTER DUE DATE BILLING CODES WA - Water PN - Penalty IR - hiiga6Dn SW - Sewer LIT - Ublily Tax CR - Credit Utitlity Tax PLEASE PAY THIS AMOUNT HY - Hydrant AD - Adjushnent BILLING DATE_ 3/1/94 BALANCE FORWARD $4,487.51 CIAIRENT BILLING 3,153.72 315,37 FF - Franchise Fee SC - Surcharge 4 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Telephone: (407)567-8000 May 17, 1994 Richard B. Votapka, P.E. City of Sebastian Utilities Department P.O. Box 780127 Sebastian, Florida 32978 MAY :9 19,9944 co C11 ' 'U RK' ;�� GFFIi�E �3 7 SUBJECT: CITY OF SEBASTIAN UTILITY BILLING FOR RIVER RUN AND REFLECTIONS ON THE RIVER Dear Richard: This is to acknowledge receipt of the corrected billings included with your correspondence dated May 10, 1994. The corrected billings have been approved and are being processed for payment. Attached is a copy of the April, 1994 billing, dated May 7, 1994, for Reflections on the River, with the billing and base facility charge reflecting the amount due of $252.25. Based upon the explanation in your May 10, 1994 letter, we will assume that the amount should read as $2,252.25 and will process the invoice for payment. Please advise if the above assumption is not correct. Sincere Harry E. sher Assistan Director of Utilitv Services HEA:sb cc: Terrance G. Pinto, Director of Utility Services James E. Chandler, County Administrator Joel Koford, City Manager Mayor Arthur Firtion (VOTAPKA-.HEA)sb C/t,/ G�ea.✓e .� Service Address: City of Sebastian +3 UTILITIES DEPARTMENT Amount Paid $ 1225 Main Street, Sebastian, FL 32958 ACCOUNT NUMBER SERVICE TO CHARGES TOTAL DUDUEAFTER $0.00 04/05/94 $3,921.78 ERVICE FNIW USAGE 0000090001-01 MAY 0702,1994 USAGE CHARGE 57,967,69 DETACH CAR—RT SORT ** 01 1 AND RETURN INDIAN RIVER CO UTILITIES THIS STUB WITH PO BOX 1750 YOUR PAYMENT VERO BEACH FL 32961-1650 ACCOUNT NUMBER SERVICE ADDRESS KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS BILLING DATE 0000090001-01 U.S. #1 �0 05/13/94 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS BILL PAYMENTS RECEIVED DATE RECEIVED BALANCE FORWARD PLEASE CALL - 589-5330 SINCE LAST BILL $0.00 04/05/94 $3,921.78 ERVICE METER RFACINGSBT IWs USAGE AD - Adjustment BIUNG AND BASE USAGE CHARGE CURRENT BIWNG TYPE PREVIOUS CURRENT (10005) FACRIIY CHARGE WATER GAL SEWER 2169 3050 881 252 . 25 $1,425.85 3,678.10 caL d SERVICE RATE SERVICE USED NUMBER TYPE CUSS OF DMSO City of }3 Sebastian FROM TO WATER SEWER WA51 04/01 11 Ub /US 35 4' THIS SPACE FOR MESSAGES WA50 WA01 0 . C)C) UTILITY TAX I .',�.7.C�] FRANCHISE FEE 7.v0 FOR AFTER HOUR EMERGENCY SERVICE CALL 589.5233 PLEASE PAY PAYTHISAMOUNT THIS AMOUNT AFTER DUE DATE 083.69 WA - Water PN - Penalty BILLING OD IR - Irrigation S HY - Hydrant SR - Sewer Reserve (ERU) SW - Sewer SU - Surcharge CR - Credit AD - Adjustment LF - Uh Sta. Charge City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 o FAX (407) 589-5570 MEMORANDUM DATE June and July, 1994 (See Below) TO Gray, Harris and Robinson File FROM Richard Votapka, Utilities Director /-6 ✓ SUBJECT : May 13, 1994 Bill - Re: Water & Sewer Matters The May 13, 1994 bill for legal representation through April 30, 1994 by Gray, Harris and Robinson, P.A. was mailed from their office on May 20, 1994. It was received by the City Clerk's office on May 23, 1994. From there it was forwarded to the Finance Department, who in turn submitted it to Utilities on June 3, 1994 for approval. After reviewing the bill, I called Linda Dittman on June 5, 1994 to request the backup for the current cost advances in the amount of $10.79. Linda said she could take care of it and send the backup to me. On July 8, 1994, after not having received any backup, I called Linda again. Linda was out, so I left a message with Mary that no backup had been provided so I was still holding the bill. On July 12, 1994, Ann Rousseau of the City Clerk's Office received a call from Linda Pittman. Linda said they could not locate the backup. She told Ann that the City could just forget it and they will write it off. The bill was adjusted accordingly by me and the $10.79 was deleted. RBV/avr cc: Sarah SolomonV City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET 13 SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 o FAX (407) 589-5570 MEMORANDUM DATE: May 25, 1994 TO: Mayor Firtion & Sebastian City Council Members FROM: Joel L. Koford, City Manager RE: Proposed Ordinance for Stonnwater (Drainage) Utility Fees The current Federal Clean Water Act will place a rather heavy task on our shoulders. This law basically states that run-off water from roof tops, roads, farmland, etc, and eventually ends up in a free flowing body of water (ie. a lake, stream, river or ocean), must meet certain standards. Also, we have drainage problems that have not been corrected because of insufficient funds from one year to the next. This proposal provides the capability of establishing a rate structure by resolution and utilize the monies to assist the City in responding to citizens drainage problems as well as complying with the federal standards. The rate setting resolution would be provided to Council prior to budget hearings, but the rate is usually about 50 cents per month per ERU and we would want to place a cap of $3.00 per ERU per month. The cap would prevent automatically increasing the rate every year. Without this special source of funding, we are faced with using property tax and other revenues already earmarked for other activities and costs. /jmt Attachment: Draft Copy Only of Proposed Ordinance for Stormwater (Drainage) Utility Fees DRAFT COPY ONLY ORDINANCE NO. TITLE WHEREAS, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, THAT: Section Authority. The City is authorized by the Florida Constitution and the provisions of Florida Statutes Chapter 166 and Section 403.0893 to construct, reconstruct, improve and extend stormwater utility systems and to issue revenue bonds and other debts if needed to finance in whole or part the cost of such system and to establish just and equitable rates, fees and charges for the services and facilities provided by the system. Section Definitions. For the purpose of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply; words used in the singular shall include the plural, and the plural, the singular; words used in the present tense shall include the future tense. The word "shall" is mandatory. The word "may" is permissive. Words not defined herein shall be construed to have the meanings given by common and ordinary use as defined in the latest edition of Webster's Dictionary. Board means the administrative hearing board, established pursuant to Ordinance No. I Director means the City Engineer or his designee, as authorized by the City Manager. Dwelling unit means any residential space identified for habitation by members of the same family or as classified by the City building code. Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) means the statistical average horizontal impervious areas of "residential units" (single-family, mobile homes, multifamily, condominiums, etc. with the City). The horizontal impervious area includes, but is not limited to, all areas covered by structures, roof extensions, patios, porches, driveways and sidewalks. Impervious area or impervious surface means a horizontal surface which has been compacted or covered with a layer of material so that it is highly resistant to infiltration by water. It incudes, but is not limited to, semi -impervious surfaces such as compacted clay, as well as streets, roofs, sidewalks, parking lots and other similar surfaces. Nonresidential property means any developed lot or parcel not exclusively residential as defined herein, including transient rentals such as hotels and motels. Residential property means any lot or parcel developed exclusively for residential purposes including, but not limited to, single family homes, manufactured homes, multifamily, apartment buildings and condominiums. Undeveloped property means that which has not been altered from its natural state by the addition of any improvements such as a building, structure, impervious surface, change of grade, or landscaping. For new construction, a property shall be considered developed pursuant to this chapter. (1) Upon issuance of a certificate of occupancy, or upon completion of construction or final inspection if no such certificate is issued; or (2) Where construction is at least fifty (50) percent complete and construction is halted for a period of three (3) months. Section Stormwater Management utility fee. 2 A stormwater fee is hereby imposed upon each lot and parcel within the City for services and facilities provided by the stormwater management utility. For purposes of imposing the stormwater fee, all lots and parcels within the City are classified into the following three (3) customer classes: (1) Residential, which includes single-family; mobile homes; multifamily and condominiums. (2) Nonresidential, which includes governmental; institutional (tax exempt); commercial; industrial and other. (3) Undeveloped. Section Schedule of rates. (a) The Director is directed to prepare a list of lots and parcels within the City and assign a classification of residential, nonresidential or undeveloped to each lot or parcel. (b) The City Council, upon recommendation of the Director, shall by resolution establish the average square footage of impervious area of the ERU and shall by resolution establish reasonable rates for stormwater management systems for each ERU. (c) The fee imposed for residential properties shall be the rate for one (1) ERU multiplied by the number of individual dwelling units existing on the property (ERU rate x number of dwelling units). (d) The fee imposed for nonresidential properties as defined herein shall be the rate for one (1) ERU multiplied by the numerical factor obtained by dividing the total impervious areas of a nonresidential property by the ERU. (ERU Rate x Impervious Area ERU Impervious Area) (e) Th6 fee imposed for undeveloped properties as defined herein shall be the rate for one (1) ERU multiplied by a factor established by resolution and then divided by the square footage for one (1) ERU established by resolution. 3 (f) The Director shall be responsible for determining the impervious area based on data supplied by the county property appraiser, or by the property owner, tenant or developer if such information is unavailable. The Director may require additional information as necessary to make the determination. The billing amount shall be updated by the Director based on any additions or deletions to the impervious area as approved through the building permit process. (g) The minimum fee for any nonresidential parcel shall be equal to the rate of one (1) ERU. (h) All unoccupied developed lots and parcels shall be subject to the stormwater management utility fee. Section Billing and payment; penalties. (a) Bills or statements for the stormwater utility fee shall be rendered monthly, in accordance with the regular utility billing cycle, by the utility billing division of the City for all properties subject to the fee. Bills shall be payable at the same time and in the same manner and subject to the same penalties as other City utilities. Any partial payment of a combined utility bill shall be applied first to the stormwater utility fee. (b) For properties normally receiving monthly utility bills for other services, the stormwater utility fee shall be included in the monthly utility bill rendered to the established customer. At the discretion of the City Finance Director, fee waivers for short-term inactive utility accounts accruing fees of ten dollars ($10.00) or less in a six- month period may be made for purposes of administrative convenience. (c) For properties not receiving monthly utility bills for other services, the bill or statement for the stormwater utility fee shall be sent to the owner of the property as determined from the tax rolls. The utility billing division may render annual or semi- annual billing at the beginning of the defined period on such properties if determined to be in the best interests of the City. (d) The owner of a property is ultimately responsible for all fees imposed under this chapter. Section Adjustment of fees. 0 (a) Requests for adjustment of the stormwater management utility fee shall be submitted through the Director, who shall be given authority to administer the procedures and standards and review criteria for the adjustment of fees as established herein. All requests shall be judged on the basis of the amount of impervious area on the site, or additional/enhanced stormwater facilities. No credit shall be given for the installation of facilities required by City or county development codes or state stormwater rules. The following procedures shall apply to all adjustment requests of the stormwater utility fee. (1) Any owner who has paid his stormwater management utility fees and who believes the contribution rate component of his stormwater management utility fee to be incorrect may, subject to the limitations set forth in this chapter, submit an adjustment request to the Director. (2) Requests for adjustment of stormwater fees paid by an owner making the request shall be in writing and set forth, in detail, the grounds upon which relief is sought. (3) Adjustment requests made during the first calendar year that the stormwater management utility fee is imposed will be reviewed by the Director within a four-month period from the date of filing of the adjustment request. Adjustments resulting from such request shall be retroactive to the beginning of billings but shall not exceed one (1) year. (4) The owner requesting the adjustment may be required, at his own cost, to provide supplemental information to the Director including, but not limited to, survey data and engineering reports, performed by either a registered professional land surveyor currently registered in the State of Florida or a professional engineer currently registered in the State of Florida. Failure to provide such information may result in the denial of the adjustment request. (5) Adjustments to the stormwater management utility fee will be made upon the granting of the adjustment request, in writing, by the Director. Denials of adjustment requests shall be made in writing by the Director. (b) Upon receipt of the written denial of the adjustment request, the owner who initially requested the adjustment may, within thirty (30) days of receipt of such denial, 5 appeal to the board for review of the denial. (1) The board shall complete its review with sixty (60) days of receipt of said request for appeal. The board's determination on the appeal shall be in writing and set forth in detail the reason for its decision. (2) In evaluating the appeal, the board shall be bound by the standards and review criteria contained herein. (3) All determinations of the board arising out of this section may be appealed to the County Court of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit in Indian River County. Section Capital contributions. Procedures and standards developed by the Director shall define appropriate means by which to optimize development capital contributions in the implementation of basic specific stormwater systems. These basis specific capital contributions shall take the form of "fee -in -lieu -of' or "availability charges". Each situation will be analyzed by the Director, and a specific written decision will be developed. The application of each is defined as follows: (1) Fee -in -lieu -of is applied to a site-specific negotiated procedure, wherein a development's stormwater contribution (quantity and quality) is assessed its share of the capital needs of the facilities required to serve the development in question. This capital contribution would be used to implement City -owned stormwater facilities. The process does not apply wherein the stormwater facilities are privately held. Each application is evaluated against the City's stormwater master plan for the watershed involved or, while the master plan is incomplete, the cumulative impacts from the development. (2) Availability charge is administered on a site-specific basis identical to the fee -in - lieu -of procedure noted above; the only difference is that the capital investment advanced by the City in implementing a stormwater facility is now recovered through an availability charge. The capital charge is determined on a prorata share of the capacity used by the new applicant or by the cumulative impact from the development upon all impacted facilities. 0 (3) All capital projects will be included in the annual Capital Improvement Budget of the City. Section Program responsibility. It shall be the duty of the Director to administer the stormwater utility program under the direction of the City Manager. The Director shall keep an accurate record of all persons using the services and facilities of said stormwater management utility of the City and propose changes in accordance with the rates and charges established in this chapter or by resolution. Section Stormwater utility enterprise fund. There shall be established a stormwater utility enterprise fund for the deposit of all fees and charges collected by the stormwater utility. These funds shall be for the exclusive use of the City's stormwater management utility including, but not limited to, the following: (1) Stormwater management services, such as studies, design, permit review, plan preparation and development review. (2) Operation, maintenance, repair and replacement of the stormwater collection, storage, treatment and conveyance infrastructure. (3) Project costs related to constructing major or minor structural improvements to the stormwater-related infrastructure as provided in the City-wide stormwater management plan. (4) Administrative and personnel costs associated with the management of the stormwater utility fee. (5) Debt service financing of stormwater-related capital improvements defined in the City-wide stormwater management plan. (6) Funding of studies including water quantity and quality monitoring, aerial photography, and geotechnical work associated with the planning of the stormwater- related infrastructure. 7 Section Limitations. The administrative and personnel costs of the enterprise fund shall not exceed twenty (20) percent of the total annual budget of the enterprise fund in any given fiscal year. This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its passage and adoption. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, ON FIRST READING, THIS DAY OF , PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA, ON SECOND AND FINAL READING, THIS DAY OF 11994. CITY OF SEBASTIAN ATTEST: City Clerk I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have approved the form of this Ordinance. 3 City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET 11 SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 11 FAX (407) 589-5570 M MJRABD UM DATE: May 25, 1994 TO: "Sebastian Lakes" File per,/ FROM: Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director lens SUBJECT: Inquiry as to Sebastian Lakes Assessments By Utilities Georgette of Lawyer's Title called me to ask about Sebastian Lakes - whether the City had any assessments on the property for water and sewer. I told her that there were no utility assessments on the property at this time. I explained to her that Sebastian Lakes was supposed to donate their entire water and sewer system to the City, in addition to $198,000 for payment of connection charges. The agreement between the City and Sebastian Lakes was signed on February 9, 1994. The closing was scheduled on or before 90 days from that date. However, I told Georgette that the money had not been received by our City Attorney by the close of business on the 90th day or May 10th. Therefore, the agreement was technically in default. Georgette wanted to know if there were any liens or tentative liens pending. I told her "no, to the best of my knowledge" on both accounts. I told her that the City was obligated to serve Sebastian Lakes with water. The City was suppose to provide Sebastian Lakes with sewer service in a 2 year period. If not, the County could service them should Sebastian Lakes connect into a live force main on CR 512. Sebastian Lakes, however, still can operate its permitted wastewater treatment plant which has plenty of capacity. Lastly, I asked Georgette if this was in reference to the commercial property (13.5 acres) at the north confluence of CR 512 and Laconia. She said it was and thanked me for clarifying the entire situation. BO �'D OF COUNTY COMMISSR ^ TRS 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Telephone: (407) 567-8000 June 1, 1994 Joel L. Koford, City Manager City of Sebastian 1225 Main Street Sebastian, FL 32958 Dear Joel: Suncom Telephone: 224-1011 This is to acknowledge your May 31, 1994 letter regarding a cooperative City and County effort concerning future utility service within the City. Terry Pinto and I understand and appreciate the situation you related to us at our May 26 meeting. In that regard, the County will certainly work with the City to explore various alternatives and be of assistance where feasible. As we discussed at the meeting, contact Terry to arrange the necessary staff meetings. As you and I have discussed, anytime we can be of help, let me know. Sincerely, /James E. Chandler County Administrator JEC/mg cc: Board of County Commissioners Terry Pinto City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 o FAX (407) 589-5570 Mr. Thomas H. Collins Captain Hiram's River 9301 N A -1-A, Suite 4 Vero Beach, F1 32963 Dear Tom: June 1, 1994 Raw Bar & Seafood Cafe Thank you for your letter of May 13, 1994 concerning the Teen Center building. The issue of utility turn -over to the County is still on the burner, but we need to upgrade the interior of the Teen Center in order to conform to the new federal mandate. Upon completion and no movement from the County, I will place our utility accounting in the Teen Center to alleviate the overcrowding in City Hall. We plan to build a new structure next year adjacent to City Hall to accommodate the City Council. When this new structure is completed, utility accounting will return to the area formally the Council Chambers, if the County and City have not come to terms. In either event, we will be providing the Indian River Drive area with potable water during the forthcoming fiscal year. Sincerely, ioetlj�_L. Koford City Manager cc: Mayor & City Council JLK/sg 4073683202 PARK PLACE SALES 673 P01 JUN 15 '94 13:04 South U.S. • e astian, FL 32958 (407) 388-3342 • FAX (407) 589-5032 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION DATE: —6k9� 589- T0: FROM: NUMBER OF PAGES (Including Cover Set): MESSAGE: 6A4A,4we/ was I iu l/ O.J 7,4,.,. lI / WA / uo mJ � /d 4073883202 PARK PLACE SALES 673 P02 JUN 15 '94 13:05 The homeowners of Park Place (most times represented by Steve Pitiak and others) frequented the City Council meetings at the City of Sebastian. Much turmoil was caused, but some good was coming about. Most often discussed and debated were: 1. Impact Fees 2. Surcharge ($10) Tentative promises were made that the City would do something to help the homeowners of Park Place. Before election time, City Council hopefuls and some existing Council members met at Park Place with quite a few homeowners. Again, homeowners were led to believe something positive would be done about: 1. Impact Fees 2. Surcharge ($10) 3. Water and Sewer rates A Chamber Event took place at Park Place (breakfast) with City representatives in attendance. In particular Robb McClary and Richard Votapka were optimistic that something positive would be done for the homeowners of Park Place in regard to: 1. Impact Fees 2. Surcharge ($10) 3. Water and Sewer rates Robb McClary had called for a meeting with Nelson Hyatt previously. Robb, Nelson, Richard Votapka, and Michael Cairns met on three (3) different occasions. Negotiations were begun on: 1. Impact Fees 2. Surcharge ($10) 3.. Water and Sewer rates Nelson and Michael were taken into confidence about the strong possibility of G.D.U. being taken over. They were even told Park Place's water and sewer wouldn't have been taken over from the County if the G.D.U. possibility wast*lmost certain. Negotiations centered around: 1. Park Place giving up promised money for Stratton/Barber St. �•J46L 2. Nelson Hyatt giving up the $10 Surcharge �'F 3. Good chance that water and sq r rates would be 1 wer than I.R. County rates ( �f a. ,1�c�c[ ory vwee �� * Much work on both sides went into, ming up Mxith projections on the dollar value of �-p-a'c^t_I s d hoyvm,�ch money was involy d ,for $10 Surcharge. t d /�-e &� For the above, Park Ple might receive: V 1. a) Impact fees "grandfathered" in for all existing residents of Park Place b) Possibility of Impact fees being put off at Park Place for another 1 to 5 years 4073883202 PARK PLACE SALES 673 P03 JUN 15 '94 13:05 2. Water and Sewer rates going down 3. Little to no charge for Water and Sewer when home- owner was away for 1 month + from Park Place Negotiations were favorable until G.O.U. possibility didn't look good anymore. Park Place was told we are a low priority now. Robb McClary gets let go. Richard Votapka says he can do little until G.D.U. and City Manager situations get resolved. Homeowners at Park Place are very restless, but Nelson and Michael convince them to hold off any actions and let them handle the situations. They were confident that their negotiations wouldn't be lost in the "shuffle". Steve Pitiak dies. Different homeowners take up the gauntlet, but Nelson and Michael say they can handle the situation and work out the best deal for all at Park Place. Lonnie Powell visits Nelson and Michael. Lonnie says to give the City a little more time. He was aware of the negotiations and felt favorable. Richard Votapka tells a few homeowners that something positive is being done on Water and Sewer if homeowner isn't at Park Place for a month to several months. May only be something like a small base charge. Richard Votapka tells a resale owner that there will be no impact Fees if home was C.0'd before July of '89. (This was actually written). Both the above have since been reneged upon. Lonnie Powell loses election. Homeowners very upset, but again, Nelson and Michael hold them at bay. Let's let new City Manager do something. Let's let new Mayor do something. "Do Something" has gone long enough! We need some answers now! One thing has been done - G.D.U. was acquired. New Impact Fees were established. Now Park Place has higher rates for Sewer Impact Fees than the rest of Sebastian. Joseph Morozowski Park Place V.P. of P.P.H.k.( 6 fit''`adll 07/01/94 15:05 V407 839 5790 EARrAAN ASSOC [21001/001 O =201 HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. -Z91 engineers, hydrogeologists, surveyors k management consultants 201 EAST PINE STREET — SUITE 1000 — ORLANDO. FL 32801 TELEPHONE (407) 839-3955 — Fax (407) 839-3790 FACSIMILE TRA1Y'MITTAL DATE: ° 7 RE: W AreL'y-- rr ' N WE ARE SENDING YOU 3 PACES, INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET. THESE PACES ARE BEINC TRANSMITTED AS INDICATED BELOW: YAS REQUESTED 'FOR YOUR USE FOR YOUR COMMENTS FOR YOUR APPROVAL HARD COPY: ❑ WILL BE SENT VIA REGULAR MAIL ❑ WILL BE SENT VIA OVERNIGHT MAIL ❑ WILL BE SENT BY FACSIMILE ONLY MESSAGE: ''t 3 'E o S 3'3 C- C. 3 E rL G ry 1rUr'PF ARF. OUESTIONS OR PROBLEMS WITH THIS TRANSMITTAL. 12 IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS OR PROBLEMS WITH THIS TRANSMITTAL. PLEASE CALL (407) 839-3955 Ill. Statement by Utility The undersigned states that the Sebastian Highlands water treatment plant has sufficient capacity to provide wasiewateddrinldng water treatment to serve this system when completed, that the treat- ment plant wolf operate in compliance with Chapters 17.6117555, F.A.C., and any other applicable regulations, and that the facility is not under a moratorium of any kind. Existing plant rapacity (MGD) 0.671 Existing plant flow/demand (MGD) (from operation reports) 0.35 Existing number of Equivalent Residential Connections served 1450 Existing number of Equivalent Residential Connections presently approved 3.190 Signature R lrhard B Vocapka P.E. Name and Title (Please Type) 1225 Main SS, Sebastian, FL 32978 Address (Please Type) Telephone No.(407) 589-5330 Oate N. Statement by Engineer This is to certify that the engineering features of this system have been designed by me in acordance with Chapters 17-6M7-55,% FAG, and any applicable lorairequirements. Itis also stated that the undersigned has furnished the appli- caM with written instructions for the operation and maintenance of the system. A statement certifying completion of the system and appropriate clearances wily be submitted to the Depertnwwtt in order to obtain approval to place the system in service Signature (Affix Seal) Gary J. ReV.oir U, P -E. 46684 Name (Please Type) Ronda Registration Number Hartman & Associates, Inc. Company Name (Please Type) 201 E. Pine St_, Suite 1000, Orlando, FL 32801 Company Address (Please Type) Telephone Na(407) 839-3955 Date ear � .r- s Om o z e e gr.q, 'v HARMAN & ASSOCIATES, iNC. PRINCIPALS: ASSOCIATES: James E. Chrutophcr, P.E. engineers, hydrogeologists, surveyors & management consultants William D. Musser, P.E. Charles W. Doke, P.G. Scolr C. Quinlan, P.E. Gerald C. Hartman, P.E. Timothy A. Hochuli, P.E. Mark L Luke. ELS. Macro H. Rocca. C.M.0 Mark A.Rynnluldt. r, P.E. July 7, 1994 HAI# 92-023.07 Harold E. Scnmitl.jE. Ha. JUL 1994 PeRinaid L. TH ugi. P.E. John w. vogr p. E. Mr. Joe Koford oivQd City Manager PaeManage` s City of Sebastian cityOfilce 1225 Main Street Sebastian, Florida 32958 i Subject: Mr. Richard Votapka's Letter Dated June 27, 1994 Dear Mr. Koford: This letter is in response to Mr. Richard Votapka's letter of June 27, 1994, to my attention, which I received on July 5, 1994. Since Richard requested an explanation of the events which he only knows a portion of, we will try to provide to you an update of the events which are well documented in the City files, as well as our own. Initially, the City of Sebastian retained Hartman & Associates, Inc. (HAI) to conceptually evaluate if it would be feasible to obtain the water and sewer franchise back from Indian River County. This overview and conceptual study was provided to the City as a report. In summary, the report recommended that it was feasible retake to water and sewer franchise back from the County only if the City purchased the General Development Utilities, Inc. (GDU) Sebastian Highlands water and sewer facilities for an amount of $2,000,000 with a contingency provision of about $600,000 subject to negotiations, detailed inspections and other due diligence requirements. When the City approached GDU relative to this matter they initially refused to discuss the sale of the Sebastian Highlands facilities, and maintained that City inspections, testing, and so forth would interrupt their operations. In addition, GDU stressed that their franchise was with the County not the City. Later, during settlement negotiations for the Cities of North Port, Palm Bay and Sebastian facilities, in which :.1-. Rob McClary participated, a value of $2,250,000 was recommended as a maximum for the Sebastian Highlands water and sewer facilities subject to proper investigations. This offer was subsequently rejected by GDU. Then the City of North Port arbitration hearing was held and GDU obtained an award of $16.5 million for that system. After that award and prior to the next arbitration for the Port Malabar facilities, an offer to settle both the Cities of Palm Bay and Sebastian facilities was given to the City of Palm Bay by GDU in which they allocated a value for the Sebastian Highlands facilities. The value for the Sebastian Highlands facilities was not distinguished, yet believed to be between $2.5 and $3.0 million. This offer from GDU was rejected by the City of Palm Bay since the price to settle the Palm Bay portion was considered too high. As was the case with the City of North Port system, the City of Palm Bay went through the arbitration process and the Court award for the Palm Bay system was $31.9 million. 201 EAST PINE STREET • SUITE 1000 • ORLANDO, FL 32801 TELEPHONE (407) 839-3955 • FAX (407) 839-3790 ORLANDO FORT MYERS JACKSONVILLE TALLAHASSEE Mr. Joe Koford July 7, 1994 Page 2 Our firm then recommended to the City that a detailed investigation of the GDU Sebastian Highlands water and sewer system be conducted, and subsequently provided a cost quotation for the work to the City. At that time, the City Administration felt that any probable purchase of the GDU system would be within the $2.5 to $3.0 million range and that GDU would not reduce the price below that no matter what. Therefore, the combination of the above and GDU's refusal for detailed inspections resulted in a temporary compromise between both parties, where GDU provided limited operational records and a one -day inspection of the Sebastian Highlands water and sewer facilities. The City designated Mr. Gerald C. Hartman to negotiate with Mr. Charles Fancher, President of GDU. He did, and obtained Mr. Fancher's initials on a purchase price for the Sebastian Highlands facilities of $2.75 million. Both were limited in authority, Mr. Fancher had to present the results of the negotiations to the Board of Directors, and Mr. Hartman had to present the same to the City Council and City Manager and the City had to conduct a Chapter 180.301 hearing. It should be noted that the above was subject to detailed inspections and corrections of encumbrances found by surveys, title work or environmental audits. Mr. Hartman, W. McClary and I met with each council member to discuss the negotiations thoroughly and subsequently conducted a public meeting regarding the same. GDU then filed a rate case, in which they proposed approximately a 100 percent rate increase. The purpose of this rate increase filing was to possibly increase the purchase price of the facilities, based on the results of the rate case. The City hired Rachlin & Cohen to handle the rate case and system inspections associated therewith. Rachlin & Cohen reported no significant deficiencies and recommended a 95 percent rate increase. It is my understanding that once the GDU Board of Directors learned of the Rachlin & Cohen report, they rejected the $2.75 million dollar figure. As a result of the apparent stalled negotiations, the City Council appointed an acquisition task force which included the Mayor, Acting City Manager, Finance Director, Utilities Director and City Attorney. The purpose of this acquisition task force was to negotiate directly with GDU. During this period, Hartman & Associates, Inc. were limited to on-call services as -needed and did not participate in the discussions or contract preparation, which lead to the $3,625,000 value that the City's acquisition task force negotiated with GDU. HAI was subsequently retained for the Chapter 180.301 briefing document and engineers report for the bonds. During the preparation of these documents, HAI recommended to the City numerous capital improvements, system documentation studies and renewal and replacement (R&R) programs as documented in the files. The City representatives rejected the programs to be bonded due to the rate impact. In addition, HAI recommended that a water system expansion program with assessments be conducted to expand the customer base to spread -out the costs to maintain lower rates. This also was delayed, yet indicated that such a program would be forthcoming soon as a second phase. Furthermore, to limit costs, the City engineering and administrative conducted reviews, training, transitional Mr. Joe Koford July 7, 1994 Page 3 activities, and budget preparation activities, including R & R capital outlay and operation and maintenance (O & M) costs. With regards to the maintenance and repair items that have been revealed, and the televising of the GDU gravity sewer system, you should keep in mind that GDU only permitted HAI one (1) site visit. This site visit was limited in nature and HAI was not permitted to physically test or operate any of the equipment associated with the water and wastewater facilities. In addition, without GDU's permission televising of the gravity sewer system could not be conducted. Furthermore, during the conceptual phases of the acquisition HAI stressed to the City administration of the importance of detailed site inspections based on our knowledge of GDU's operations. Other than the initial inspection, I am not aware of whether or not the City was permitted to inspect the Sebastian Highlands facilities during their negotiations with GDU, since HAI was not involved with the negotiations. The purchase price was agreed upon based the system analysis conducted by the City's acquisition task force, and not HAI. As noted above, during the financing phase of this acquisition HAI recommended to the City that programs be funded for unknown deficiencies. The City staff rejected these programs due to the rate impact on the system customers. I believe the record will show that the capital improvements and programs delineated by HAI address W. Votapka's letter's point. The City's combined wishes to hold rates, not expand the water system, and increase the purchase price from $2.75 million to $3.625 million have led to the present situation. I believe the above addresses Mr. Votapka's June 27, 1994 letter. If, however, you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, Hartman & Associates, Inc. Harold E. Sc lvm t, Jr., P.E. Vice President HES/er/C-1/Koford.hes cc: Richard B. Votapka, P.E., City of Sebastian Gary J. ReVoir, P.E., HAI hh 1 When a person is arrested by the police, the person is read his rights, if not, when in court *0 case is dismissed by the Judge! X440 here I go back on June 2, 1989, Mr. James E. Chandler (County Administrator) M e pages from book 77 pages 287 thru 292 titled "PUBLIC BEARRgG - PURC'rIASE DELORES UT1IdTIES". C�= The hour of 9:05 o'clock A.M. having passed, the Deputy Clerk read the following notice with proof of publication attached, to wit: I charge that the publication which was published June 9 & 16 1989 was illegal because the description was not correct as to the legality of the public notice. On page 288 it reads as follows: "SUBJECT: ACQUISITION OF NELSON HYATT WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES SERVING PARK PLACE MOBILE HOME PARK (FORMERLY LAKE DELORES UTILITY SYSTEM)" If on June 9 & 16 1989 the public notice described the wrong name in the newspaper and no objection was voice�jt was because of the manipulation of describing the wrong place! It should be nulled and voided, thrown out. Someone knew what they were doing to eliminate the opposition! Chairman Wheeler opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There was no one probably because Park Place residents did not recognize the name "LAKE DOLORES UTH= SYSTEM" which was used in the published June 9 & 16 notice; and, referenced as the former name of the "NELSON HYATT WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM" in the June 2, 1989 memo to Mr. Chandler (Reference Book 77 Pages 287 & 288)! Who defends the defenseless? When this more or less two or three named public notice was in the record books of #77 and pages 287 thm 292, there were 80 residents who were not told that they were victimized. Now there are 200 residents or victims of an iL'egal public notice each paying a $10 monthly surcharge. Some have been paying this surcharge for almost five years (nearly $600). I have been paying it, so far, for twenty-eight months. I am tired of it and so are a lot of others! Who ever heard of a franchise fee, a utility tax of 10% for the amount of water not to exceed $2.50. Water seems to be a luxury instead of a necessity for lifel CC �C,4 �4, IIL LLL((lti�C L K,( YtrL�Lc � L_ ✓ c� (L�LY�u1Lc'r�� CL4t .�[CL;zGt aaL 711 City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET a SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 11 FAX (407) 589-5570 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 8, 1994 TO: City Manager Joel Koford and Department Heads FROM: Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director Rhe SUBJECT: Acting Utilities Director This memo is to authorize Nancy Veidt, Utilities Department Administrative Assistant, to act in my behalf during my vacation from July 11 to July 15, 1994. Ron Briskie, Plant Supervisor, will continue to be in charge of field operations. GARY B. FRESE , CHARLES IAN NASR ' VINCENT G. TURFY. JR. , RICHARD E. ToR GREGORY S. HAWSER , J. PATRICK ANDERSON LAURA L. ANDRRSON C.+.R, v= A. SCRILLINOER STEPHEN P. HEURTON WILLIAM A. GRD9t OF COUNSEL Cws BATES FOSTER OF COUNSEL FPESE, NASH & T012PY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 930 S. HARBOR CITY BLVD. SUITE 505 MELBOURNE, FLORIDA 32901 140719845300 PAX 14071 9515741 T BOARD CERTIFIED IN TAXATION BOARD CERTIFIED IN WILLS, TRUSTS & ESTAx S S BOARD CERTIFIED IN CxV TR,.*- I.AW Mr. Terence Pinto Director of Utility Dept. Indian River County 1840 25th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Re: Sebastian Lakes Associates / Utility Service Agreement Our ril.'.. No. 882489.2358 Dear Mr. Pinto: Enclosed is a copy of correspondence received from Barbara Hall, regarding their intention to close their transaction with the City of Sebastian. The purpose of this letter is to seek confirmation that Indian River County 'will supply utilities, as per our agreement, after receipt by the County of the $198,000.00 fee for providing said services. Please contact me so we can discuss the time table that you expect for being able to provide the utilities to the Sebastian Lakes Associates as previously agreed upon by the County. Sincerely, FRESE, NASH & TORPY, P.A. Richard E. Torpy RET/lb Enclosure cc: _ logo City Manager, City of Sebastian HOUR HUM Barbara A, Hall 30576"236 June 6, 1994 Richard Torpy, Fsq, Frese, Nash & Torpy 930 South Harbor City Boulevard Suite 505 Melbourne, Florida 32901 Re: Sebastt,� Dear Mr. Torpy: I now have in my possession a check in the amount of $198,000.00 payable to the City of Sebastian, which is the payment provided for under Section 3.2 of the Water and Wastewater Contribution Agreement. Sebastian Lakes Associates and Sebastian Lakes Utility are prepared to proceed to close under that Agreement as soon as all necessary documents have been completed and approved by the parties. BAH:amc cc: Ms. Elizabeth Simonson Best regards, A Barbara A. Hall 6REygDEHC, T.ADRIC, HOFFMAN. LIFUFP, R"EN& QUE N,I,C1 f A 51$GnSI'LAS n1.AS iDI)LEVAHU FORTLApDERDAi.{t, FIDAIDA 3.,130] 305-765.0500 FAX 3(15.765-1447 MIAMI FORt'LA UULRD.U.0 NEST TAI.RFJFACD JA(�I:FONVILLP. TALLA HASaEE FP+9 1-1,I T1 -r rTt-c i F4�T , r -,r nuv1 nv'nant».— - __ ..- 02 506200 WW COIiTAI$UT 02/09/94 WATER & WASTBI4AT$A ' 190,000,00 ASSOCIATES Payee: CITY OF SE3ASTIAN NMI Edo, � 3ai3i3,1.'3s,8 d SEBASTMN LAKES ASSOCIATESThe Chase Manhattan Hank, N.A. Go The Chase Manhattan H 1 Chase Manhattan Plaza 1 2 Bank, N.A. 2'-2 10 101 Park Avenue, 15th Floor New York, N.Y. 10081 Now York, N.Y. 10178 Date Check No. Check Amount 06/02/94 31 $198,000.00 NE Any to the Order of.HUNDRED NINETY EIGHT THOUSAND and 00/100 DOLLARS • VOID IF NOT CASTI&D R77'k71N ti0 DAYS PROM DATE OF ISSUG CITY OR SEBASTIAN (�_ ATTN: RICHARD VOTAPKA 1225 MAIN STREET SEBASTIAN, FL 32958 ��' TJ: WO SIGNATURESQUIRHD ]FOYER 55 1('00003 in' ':02&0000211: 910 2 69304 211' July 8, 1994 Barbara A. Hall Greenberg Traurig 515 East Las Olas Boulevard Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Re: Sebastian Lakes Our File No. 882489.2358 Dear Ms. Hall: Enclosed is a copy of the letter that has been forwarded to Indian River County pursuant to the Sebastian Lakes Utility Agreement. As soon as I have received word back from the County, I will contact you by telephone. Sincerely, FRESE, NASH & TORPY, P.A. Richard E. Torpy RET/lb Enclosure FREsEI , NASA & TORPY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 930 S. HARBOR CITY BLVD. GARY B. FRESE I .SUITE 505 CHARLES IAN NASH ' MELBOURNE. FLORIDA 32901 VINCENT G. ToRPY. JR. I RICHARD E. ToRPY 14071 984.3800 GREOORY S. RANSEN I FAX 14071 9513741 J. PATRICH ANDERSON - LAURA L. ANDERSON }BOARD CERTIFIED IN TAXATION CRARLEs A SORQ.LINoER BOARD CERTIFIED IN WIL[.R, STEPHEN P. REUSTON TRUSTS do ESTATES WILLIAM A. GRIHH ; BOARD CERTIFIED IN QI TRIAL LAW OF COUNSEL CRIS BATES FOSTER OF COUNSEL July 8, 1994 Barbara A. Hall Greenberg Traurig 515 East Las Olas Boulevard Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Re: Sebastian Lakes Our File No. 882489.2358 Dear Ms. Hall: Enclosed is a copy of the letter that has been forwarded to Indian River County pursuant to the Sebastian Lakes Utility Agreement. As soon as I have received word back from the County, I will contact you by telephone. Sincerely, FRESE, NASH & TORPY, P.A. Richard E. Torpy RET/lb Enclosure e.:_1-1 1 _. _ ' _ 1 Mr. Joel Koford City Manager City of Sebastian RE: New Format of Utility Bill Dear Mr. Koford: 106 Thunderbird Drive Sebastian, Florida 32958 July 11, 1994 ' JUL CITY CLERK r OFFICE c The new format of the City of Sebastian Utility Bill does not provide full disclosure of charges levied. Specifically, itemization of "Billing and Base Facility Charge" and "Usage Charge" has been eliminated. These two charges are now lumped together by category: WA for water; SW for sewer. Also, information on the number of days in the billing cycle has been eliminated. For what intent were these items eliminated from the redesigned bill? Was it to camouflage inefficiency in the Utility Department? Was it to increase revenues by changing the monthly "Billing and Base Facility Charge" to a shorter period? Was it to make future rate increases appear to be of a significantly smaller percentage? In these days of full public disclosure requirements promulgated by State. and Federal governments on such industries as telephone, electric, cable, banking, insurance, real estate, and others engaged in charging money for services rendered, the lack of such disclosure by a Municipality is unconscionable. Martha S. Wininger C -City Council CITY OF SEBASTIAN . 1"a mm Wm S.6nvlan. FL 329588697 PRESORrm � (407) 589.5330 FlRsr CLAW WA. VEAO BEACH. a RetTan [his Portion with Payment LATE THE UNPAID OAMCE BUT NOT MOUNnNGTO Iffy THAN OAp ONTM� US POSTAGE PATO PSRwrNG re ftgc Y fab Aeon Rr6gOp oA RweRraYq Aw.T.Rryq Oo�npm Aei.ey Ae. AuuW A 4483' A Wile =", —4483: y --- 4483 LET07 LF mxmux RIu 236 X —t,4 '� $-q AWSa17e6T A 235894062" A 7? 173 6000 23 0 91. %RcHhM W 3325 W ssw samoom 3385. TZ TAX rd MUM NA - TAT®ONCE I i i � i • 59.19: 64:9OG 59'!'. "°• 000007768601.000007768601 06 THUNDERBIRD DRIVE .:j WININGER i MARTHA S WININGER 940701 106 THUNDERBIRD DRIVE SEBASTIAN _ 32959 IIIIIIIi19�i16Nllllllill � I ACCOUNT NUMBER SERVICE ADDRESS KEEP THIS PORTICN FOR YOUR RECORDS OOUOV776B6-01 106 THUNDERBIRD DRIVE IFYOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS BILL PAYMENTS RECEIVED DATE RECEIVED PLEASE CALL SINCE LAST BILL 589-5330 $63.97 05/20/94 SERVICE MEiQiiFAgNGSW t,000's USAGE BIUNG AND BASE USM#CFIARGE TYPE PREVOS CURRENT 11000'51 FAGUTY CHARGE WATER GAL, 170 173 3 $13.50 $4.53 SEWER GAL $16.7/5 $8.25 SERVICE RATE SFAWCE USED NUMBERglon TYPE CLASS FROM TO OF DAYS /� I City OlWATER Sebastian SEWER WAO 1 05 /i 15 O5/20 16SWO1 05/06 05/24 19 THIS SPACE FOR MESSAGES BEGINNING WITH THIS BILLING CYCLE. METERS WILL BE READ ABOUT THE 20TH OF EACH MONTH WITH BILLS MAILED AROUND THE 1ST OF EACH MONTH 58}5233 PAYTHISAMOUNr AFTER DUE DATE $50.21 UTILITY TAX FRANCHISE FEE PLEASE PAY THIS AMOUNT BILLING DATE 05/31/94 BALANCE FORWARD $0.00 CURRENTBIUNG 18.03 25.00 1.SO 0.00 BILLING CODFS WA - Water PN - Penalty IR - Irrigation HY - Hydrant SR - Sewer Reserve (ERU) SW - Sewer SU - Surcharge CR - Credit AD - Adjustment LF - Lift Sta. Charge HAND DELIVERED 106 Thunderbird Drive Sebastian, Florida 32958 July 11, 1994 Mr. Joel Koford City Manager City of Sebastian Re: Utility Tax Cap Dear Mr. Koford: r In violation of City Ordinance No. 716, Code Section 94-31, I have been charged more than the Utility Tax Cap of $2.50 on five occasions, as follows: Billing Date Tax Charged Overcharge 5-13-94 $2.54 $ .06 9-7-93 4.72 2.22 8-4-93 5.80 3.30 7-6-93 2.70 .20 6-1-93 2.55 .05 Total $5.83 Please consider this letter a request for refund of monies due me. Since ely, Martha S. Wininger�'� C—City Council Telephone: (407) 567-8000 July 18, 1994 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 FAX: 407-778-9391 4 :_JUL 1994. Rn"; 1nrJ Joel Koford, City Manager City of Sebastian -,1;,>- a P.O. Box 780127 F0 'R Youa Sebastian, F1 32978-0127 Subject: Indian River Drive Within the City of Sebastian Dear Mr. Koford: A recent search of county records indicates that the State of Florida transferred Indian River Drize within the city limits to the City in 1958. Enclosed is a copy of our records. Please contact my office at (407)567-8000 ext. 245, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jam W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Director JWD:rt IRDRV.JUL Attachment: Copy of County Records cc: Charles A. Cramer, PLS, County Surveyor Roger D. Cain, P.E., County Engineer Robert M. Keating, AICP, Community Development Director Terry Cook, Road & Bridge Superintendent J. William Strange, P.E., Traffic Engineer Terry Pinto, Utility Services Director Doug Wright, Emergency Management Director J G (.T &0161` .s; /y,(7 Pic ' W Ax, Ile w S.P. , Sc ZW-/'Z )`a Sc u /� /a7�E rsrc e 7`1fl,c 7V -Ie Ile uJ Z,P S O/Q� U S. / Ksle 3) uJ a s cz b a n �!o n d y�ro Alai - me Al� y71 Al les • %LD Se e%o s li a -ee a zie cl7 J �/ Iw I le s aj a s / � 1 G��4rt�G�'�t: ice:-?.r4'�u.c ,C"id�r C"Cusv7�y i 7Ze u of 6c& �',/ o ba n doii c a �is !1 [f urlu/Yi/iiocts ka/cr OIL /1/t{de Se een(lre d o! -i /71 ee l/.r� �. /1/dCvelm ie e /.7, /9S� /cul `fit Y U F P City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 o FAX(407)589-5570 July 22, 1994 Mr. Michael Cairns Park Place 2210 E. Lakeview Drive Sebastian, FL 32958 Dear Michael: It appears from your latest FAX that you have not received the information relayed to your office or you are ignoring the content of this information for whatever the reason. The Stratton/Barber Street is owned by Nelson Hyatt. I have no document indicating conveyance or acceptance by the City. I do have a new engineering/survey document that indicates a realignment of the right-of-way as requested by our City Engineer. I have requested an inspection of the roadway to determine if it meets FDOT specifications. If it does, we can then proceed to the next step, which is to draft the document of conveyance. 2. I have a file regarding the proposed or requested cut -through on U.S #1, and copies of a petition sent to Representative Sembler. I would suggest you contact him and determine the status of your request. He is up for re-election, 3. The surcharge is an issue that can only be changed by Mr. Hyatt. The contract provides that we charge, collect and remit the funds to Mr. Hyatt. 4. I am still positive, not negative as you claim. The City will not provide additional funds to the County in order to reduce the impact of the relationship to impact fees and the (5) five year build out. The City is still willing to agree to the (10) ten year build -out figure, as long as the County agrees. They were the entity that accepted the original five (5) year term from Mr. Hyatt and programmed their costs accordingly. If they are not willing to extend these terms for another five (5) years, it is a moot issue, for the present. 6. The temporary hold on the date for enforcement of the July 11, 1994 date to collect impact fees was related to City Council action. It was evident at our meeting that the administrative process to change the five (5) years to (10) years would go beyond the July 11, 1994 date. Hence, we would not hold up your action accordingly. However, when I faxed to you the memo from our City Attorney and the information from the County, it was evident from these two documents that the City cannot change the terms without County approval. Therefore, until the County changes their mind, the terms of the document stand. Your FAX to me on 7-12-94 has been answered. Why do you continue to ignore the information? I have copied Mr. Joseph Morozowski and will continue to do so in the future. I believe Mr. Morozowksi should know that the City is doing everything within it's legal power to help the situation. However, it was Mr. Hyatt that entered into the original agreements with the County, and not the City. Sincerely, 0 1 L. Koford City Manager JLK/jmt cc: Mr. Joseph Morozowki 3426 Heatherway Lane Park Place Sebastian, FL 32958 4073223202 PARK PLACE SALES 715 P01 JUL 21 194 15:01 July 20, 1994 T0: Joel Koford FROM: Michael Cairns RE: Response to your request for support material to be on the City Council Agenda You are familiar with much that has gone on with Park Place and the City of Sebastian over the past year plus. After repeated meetings with many City personnel, we started meeting with you. When it seemed like Park Place wasn't a high enough priority to the City, we requested on June 14, 1994, to be put on the City Council Agenda. With our request, we submitted a two (2) page abbreviated history on what has transpired over the years with Park Place residents, the Park Place Board, Robb McClary, etc., etc. (attached 1). This history was actually from Joe Morozowski, Park Place, V.P. of the Homeowners Association. This request seemed to spur some positive activity on behalf of Park Place. Two meetings produced a first step to assist in answering the problems/questions. At your request, our Attorney, Sam Block, put together an Amendment to the Agreement Re: Take -Over of the Utility System.* Everything seemed great as "Assigned" was used in the original agreement which you felt, and our attorney confirmed, meant that the City can change the agreement. Changing five (5) years to ten (10) years seemed to be no problem. You even said previously that you would extend everything for six (6) months until we came up with a resolution to our predicament. Now, neither seems feasible according to your/our City Attorney (attached 3). * (attached 2) We at Park Place believe the City started something with us that they never finished. We believe the existing Council should hear first hand what Robb McClary and Richard Votapka said during our meetings. Lonnie Powell told us he was aware of the negotiations. Other things have happened in the meantime that could have important considerations in our predicament: * Stratton/Barber Street (City owns?/Nelson Hyatt owed money?) * Cut through on U.S. 1 so the public doesn't use the Park Place Sales Office parking lot as a thoroughfare. * Surcharge elimination possibilities * Your own positive ideas, responses, and actions regarding our predicament only to result negative results or giving up. etc., etc. 4073883202 PARK PLACE SALES 715 P02 JUL 21 '94 15:02 The above and more results in our requesting to be on the Council Agenda! In addition to the above, we have talked to Harry Asher and Terry Pinto of Indian River Utilities. They both agree that the Agreement wasn't signed until sometime in August 189. Also, Terry Pinto says that you; or better, the City isn't offering the County anything in return if they agreed to go along with the 5 year to 10 year amendment. He would be open to discussion with something in return (call us first before calling Terry for more pertinent details). lastly, what has happened with: * Credit you said City could give the county to at least put Park Place residents on a par with the rest of the residents in Sebastian? * Your confidence that "Assigned" gives the City to do whatever they want to the Agreement. * Your confidence to at least put a temporary hold on any date until we come up with more equitable terms? * My FAX to you 7/12/94 (attached 4). 4073683202 PRRK PLRCE SRLES 715 P03 JUL 21 '94 15:02 The homeowners of Park Place (most times represented by Steve Pitiak and others) frequented the City Council meetings at the City of Sebastian. Much turmoil was caused, but some good was coming about. Most often discussed and debated were: 1. Impact Fees 2. Surcharge ($10) Tentative promises were made that the City would do something to help the homeowners of Park Place. Before election time, City Council hopefuls and some existing Council members met at Park Place with quite a few homeowners. Again, homeowners were led to believe something positive would be done about: 1. Impact Fees 2. Surcharge ($10) 3. Water and Sewer rates A Chamber Event took place at Park Place (breakfast) with City representatives in attendance. In particular Robb McClary and Richard Votapka were optimistic that something positive would be done for the homeowners of Park Place in regard to: 1. Impact Fees 2. Surcharge ($10) 3. Water and Sewer rates Robb McClary had called for a meeting with Nelson Hyatt previously. Robb, Nelson, Richard Votapka, and Michael Cairns met on three (3) different occasions. Negotiations were begun on: 1. Impact Fees 2. Surcharge ($10) 3. Water and Sewer rates Nelson and Michael were taken into confidence about the strong possibility of G.D.U. being taken over. They were even told Park Place's water and sewer wouldn't have been taken over from the County if the G.D.U. possibility wasefdlmost certain. Negotiations centered around: 1. 2. QQnyi Park Place giving up promised money for Stratton/Barber St.0 Xa'✓/9 ez Nelson Hyatt giving up the $10 Surcharge `� 3. Good chance that water than I.R. County and se r rates would be 19wer ` h rates (pcG / c,..vc4yAeGc� dIIAZ i yv y' U2CdrsCx�/ Muc work on both sides went .1 GO com ng up ith projections on the dollar value of pact frre�s a d, how ,M� ch• money was involved ,for th 1 $10 Surcharge. � /eFisez( � aNarK� wad For the above, Park P1 ce might receive: 1. a) Impact fees "grandfathered" in for all existing residents of Park Place b) Possibility of Impact fees being put off at Park Place for another 1 to 5 years 4073883202 PARK PLACE SALES 715 PO4 JUL 21 '94 15:03 2. Water and Sewer rates going down 3. Little to no charge for Water and Sewer when home- owner was away for 1 month + from Park Place Negotiations were favorable until G.D.U. possibility didn't look good anymore. Park Place was told we are a low priority now. Robb McClary gets let go. Richard Votapka says he can do little until G.D.U. and City Manager situations get resolved. Homeowners at Park Place are very restless, but Nelson and Michael convince them to hold off any actions and let them handle the situations. They were confident that their negotiations wouldn't be lost in the "shuffle". Steve Pitiak dies. Different homeowners take up the gauntlet, but Nelson and Michael say they can handle the situation and work out the best deal for all at Park Place. Lonnie Powell visits Nelson and Michael. Lonnie says to give the City.a little more time. He was aware of the negotiations and felt favorable. Richard Votapka tells a few homeowners that something positive is being done on Water and Sewer if homeowner isn't at Park Place for a month to several months. May only be something like a small base charge. Richard Votapka tells a resale owner that there will be no impact Fees if home was C.0'd before July of 189. (This was actually written). Both the above have since been reneged upon. Lonnie Powell loses election. Homeowners very upset, but again, Nelson and Michael hold them at bay. Let's let new City Manager do something. Let's let new Mayor do something. "Do Something" has gone long enough! We need some answers now! One thing has been done - G.D.U. was acquired. New Impact Fees were established. Now Park Place has higher rates for Sewer Impact Fees than the rest of Sebastian. Joseph Morozowski Park Place V.P. of P.P. .Pj 4073883202 PARK PLACE SALES 715 P05 JUL 21 194 15:03 AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT RE. TAKE-OVER OF UTILITY SYSTEM THIS AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT OF JDLY 11, 1989, is hereby made this day of , 1994, between the CITY OF SEBASTIAN, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida, 1225 Main Street, Sebastian, FL 32958 (CITY), the successor of Indian River County by virtue of Assignment of Agreement, and NELSON HYATT (SELLER), whose address is 12505 North A -1-A, Vero Beach, FL 32963. W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, CITY and SELLER are desirous of extending the terms of the Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, ,for and in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein as well as other good and valuable consideration, the CITY and SELLER agree that the following Amendments be made to the Agreement: The terms "ten -years" and ^ten-year periodic, shall be substituted for the terms "five -years" and "five-year period" in the fifth paragraph of Page 1, and The term "ten years" shall be substituted for the term ',five years" in three instances in Paragrah 6. IMPACT FEES, on Page 4, and The word "City" shall be substituted for the word "County" wherever it appears through the Agreement. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals on the date first set forth above. CITY OF SEBASTIAN, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida Attest: by: by: Witness: NELSON HYATT Hyatt.Amd DW3/bl / 4073883202 PARK PLACE SALES 715 P06 City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET C SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 o FAX (407) 589.5570 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 7, 1994 TO: Michael Cairns FROM: Joel L, Koford, City Manager SUBJECT: Park Place Water & Sewer Agreements JUL 21 194 15:04 Via Fax: 407-589-5032 The City Attorney has indicated that the City would require County approval for the language change because the five year term is related to the County expenditure for sewer treatment plant expansion to accommodate Park Place. 1 will talk to the County today and advise you accordingly, Keep your fingers crossed. /jmt 4073883202 July 8, 1994 PARK PLACE SALES 715 P07 JUL 21 '94 15:04 1'. - -, W� City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN. FLORIDA 3 5 TELEPHONE (407) 589.5330 a FAX (407) 589-5570 Mr. Nelson Hyatt 2210 E. Lakeview Drive Park Place n4'V-) , Sebastian, FL 32958 fl2 REQ Payment of Water and Sewer m�. the City of Sebastian Dear Mr. Hyatt, R F'XrA� jam - (I 1/1LLPJ � ��(fLWCw Fees inKF Park Place to G�1 C As you know, the July 11, 1989 "Agreement" between you and Indian River County in regard to the County takeover of the Park Place utility system provided a five year "grace period with respect to payment of impact fees. The "grace period" terminates on July 11, 1994. Thereafter, both water and sewer impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of a Certificate of occupancy for each unit. Current impact fees are $1,100 for water and $2,551 for sewer. Units which already had a Certificate of Occupancy issued to them prior to July 11, 1994, must pay the impact fees when the unit is resold. At closing on such sales, you or the successor in title must collect the impact fees and remit them to the City. Sincerely, Richard S. Votapka, P.E. Utilities Director RBVlnsv cce City Manager. Joel Koford Community Development Director, Bruce Cooper Assistant Finance Director, Chris Moore City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET 0 SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 0 FAX (407) 589-5570 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 14, 1994 TO: Michael Carins FROM: Joel L. Koford, City Manager V SUBJECT: Nelson Hyatt - IRC Agreement I invite your attention to 93 of the attached letter dated July 13, 1994 from Attorney Richard E. Torpy. jjmt Attachment A:\M0714CAKWPD FxESE, N ASH & Toxpy, P.A. ATTORN=Y9 AT LJw Ganz a P� , C^•^ • La NARn Vmca G. To=r. Ja . Rica+ E Toner G=o B. v� J. PaTR ARDRR9ON I...ORA L ANDz9soN (`o.e...e � aro........_.. sTirniN P. B.VD N wD •,.,. A. GR or COON = CR BAT FOeaa[ or Cocness. July 13, 1994 Mr. Joel L. Koford City Manager City of Sebastian 1225 Main Street Sebastian, FL 32958 930 S. HARBOR CITY BLVD. 9UITa 505 MB:LBOVRNB. PLORIDA 32901 4071 9943900 PAX 14071 9513741 1BOA= C=Wa IN TAZATION 'BOARD CaRTlJIZD n. w.... Mstu T B 88TaT i BOA= CICRTw= a CN TlraAL Law Re: Amendment to the Nelson Hyatt -IRC Agreement 7/11/89 Our File No. 882489.3201 Dear Mr. Koford: I have reviewed your memo dated June 29, 1994 regarding the amendment to the Nelson Hyatt - Indian River County Agreement, dated July 11, 1989. With regard to your proposed amendment, I have the following comments. 1. Rather than doing an addendum, it is my suggestion that we simply write a new agreement with Mr. Hyatt, and reference within that new agreement that the new agreement supersedes the agreement dated July 11, 1989. The only reason I make this suggestion is because it makes it easier for future individuals trying to interpret agreements to be able to review one document and not have to look at a document then read subsequent amendments to it. Further, there is always the possibility that the amendment could get lost or not attached to the original document properly and create confusion as to what the actual agreement is. 2. If you prefer to go with your format, there will need to be a section on there for approval about the city attorney as to form and content. You may want to take the standard form contract that we have prepared for the City and use the signature page for your formatting purposes. 3. Finally, due to the fact that you are extending the terms of this agreement, and Indian River County has taken the position that they are holding us responsible for certain financial issues relating to utilities, this addendum should be approved only if .Indian River County also agrees to the addendum. Mr. Joel L. Koford City Manager July 13, 1994 Page -2- If you have any other questions, please let me know. Sincerely, FRESEE,,,NNASH &&TTORPY, P. /✓ Richard E. Torpy RET/lb City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET a SEBASTIAN. FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) SM5330 a FAX (407) 589-5570 MEMORANDUM DATE: June 29, 1994 TO: Rick Torpy, Esquire FROM: Joel L. Koford, City Manager 5)f --- RE: Amendment to the Nelson Hyatt - 11 July 1989. IRC Agreement, dated As a reference, the 'Interlocal Utilities Agreement" between the City of Sebastian and Indian River County, dated 21 April, 1992, paragraph 5 on page 7 of the referenced agreement provides a definition regarding "other agreements,,The specific reference is Park PIace and ..."The COUNTY assigns and the CITY assumes all COUNTY'S rights, duties, and obligations under this agreement effective upon the cancellation date" (referring to the City -County Franchise cancellation). Mr. Hyatt and myself have met on several assist in his development occasions regarding developing a method to We are of the opinion that a five year build -out for his mobile home park was rather ambitious, and it should have read "ten years". Will the attached amendment suffice for a change so that it would reflect a terminal date of July 11, 1999 instead of I994? If so, is the form ok, or should it be revised? /jmt City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET 13 SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 0 FAX (407) 589-5570 MEMORANDUM DATE: August 3, 1994 TO: Unit 17 - Maintenance Problems - Sewer FROM: Richard Votapka, Utilities Director RE: Accident on Capri Avenue - Truck Damaged from a Manhole Cover at 144 Capri Ave (Claim No. G940391) I called Anita Wynsong of the Florida League of Cities Insurance Dept. to explain to her that Don Parker of Don's Aluminum had called me on July 20th. He informed me that Anita told him that his claim was being denied and that he would probably sue the City. Anita told me that she sent Don a letter of denial on July 20th. Of course, he hadn't received the letter as of our phone call. I told her that I never received a copy of her letter. Anita told me that he had sent a copy of her letter to Marge Poole in Finance. Anita felt that our Dept. was responsive to the report phoned in at 10:05 a.m. on June 6, 1994 by Mr. Black. Nancy Veidt had immediately called our personnel at the water treatment plant who immediately went to check the operation of Lift Station No. 2. Anita felt that given the time constraints, there was no liability on the City's part after she concluded her investigation. From the tune the call was received at 10:05 a.m. to the time Bob Korda checked out the operation of Lift Station No. 2, only 25 minutes elasped. Anita said that she felt that there was no neglect on the part of our Utilities personnel. Our Department did not let the problem go unattended for hours or days. Anita said that the problem was created by a flood or Act of God beyond the City's control. I told Anita that I thought she had misunderstood. I explained to her that the sewer system was flooded but not because of stormwater on rainfall runoff. It was caused by vandals who dumped logs and wood into a manhole. The debris, unfortunately, caused a blockage at a manhole and caused the sewers to back up. The hydraulic force of the sewage pushed the manhole cover up. Don's Aluminum truck hit the manhole cover and incurred damage. I informed Anita that Bob Korda had gone to the Lift Station No. 2 via Caprona St. not by way of Capri Ave. Therefore, he could not have known that there was sewage flowing out of the manhole on Capri. Anita said that Don's Aluminum can go through his own insurance company and let them subrograte the City. I asked her exactly what this meant. She said that Don's Aluminum insurance company would pay him for full damages less his deductible. Don's insurance company would then seek damages from the City's insurance. I told her I was concerned that Don would sue the City and this incident would go to court. She said that if it comes to that, Don would have to prove that the City was at fault for the manhole cover hitting his truck. /sg City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 13 FAX (407) 589-5570 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 28, 1994 TO: Maintenance & Repair - Sewer -Unit 17 FROM: Robert Korda, Utilities Service Worker I RE: Accident on Capri Ave. Involving Don's Aluminum Truck & Sanitary Sewer Manhole Cover - June 6, 1994 This is information on the accident of a truck damaged from a manhole cover on Capri Ave. At about 10:05 a.m., I (Bob Korda) got a call from Nancy Veidt, Administrative Assistant, about a sewer backup on Capri Ave. I then went to the lift station No. 2 on Caprona to see if it was operating OK; it was. I went back to the water plant and Skip Cruce was there. I told him about the backup and we went to Capri Ave. When we got there, the manhole cover was about 25 feet from the manhole and the truck was damaged. The manhole was over flowing. I told Skip we should get some traffic cones and call Roto Rooter. We went to the sign shop and got some cones and put them at the manhole. Skip called and got Roto Rooter to pump out the sewer. Skip and I went back to check 2 other manholes for blockage. Checked lift station where Roto Rooter was working. They found a tree limb blocking the flow of the sewer. P.S. There were marks on the street where the manhole cover was dragged by the truck. Skip took pictures. City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 o FAX (407) 589-5570 MEMORANDUM DATE July 20, 1994 TO Maintenance & Repair File FROM Richard Votapka, Utilities Director A SUBJECT Accident on Capri Avenue - Truck Damaged from a Manhole Cover in front of 144 Capri Ave (Claim No. G940391) I received a call from Don Parker of Don's Aluminum at 11:30 A.M. He wanted to know if Anita Wysong of the Florida League of Cities had spoken to me about the accident his truck was involved in on Capri Avenue in June. I told Don that I spoke to Anita yesterday. She wanted more information concerning the accident as she was investigating it. Don said that he spoke with Anita who told him that the League was denying the claim since the City wasn't negligent in this incident. I told Don that I didn't feel that the City was negligent but Anita did not tell me that she was denying the claim. I did tell him that our employees had substantiated the fact that the manhole cover had been moved quite a distance from the manhole and they had seen the dent in the truck. Don said he feels the City ought to pay for the damage and will go to court if necessary. He'd like to avoid going to court and spend $3,000 to $4,000 for a $500.00 issue. I suggested that I speak to Anita Wysong of Florida League of Cities and that Don wait until he has received a document or letter from Anita denying the claim. I told him that if he wished he could speak to the City Manager about the incident. RBV/avr City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 13 FAX (407) 589-5570 DATE July 20, 1994 TO Maintenance & Repair, Sewer - Unit 17 FROM Richard Votapka, Utilities Director (yS ✓ SUBJECT Accident on Capri Avenue - Truck Damaged from a manhole cover at 144 Capri Ave. (Claim No. G940391) Anita Wysong of the Insurance Office of the Florida League of Cities, (Telephone 1-800-445-6248) called me at 9:40 A.M. on July 19, 1994, regarding the truck that was hit by a manhole cover on Capri Avenue on June 6, 1994. She was investigating the accident and wanted some more information. I researched the files and talked with Bob Korda to provide answers to her questions. Specifically, she wanted to know the following: 1) Did the call come in at 10:05 A.M.? Yes, according to the Utilities System Customer Inquiry Form filled out by Nancy Veidt. 2) Who was doing what when the call was received? Nancy called Bob Korda at the Water Treatment Plant. Ron was on vacation; Tom was at the plant after completing work orders; and Skip was checking lift stations. Bob went out initially and checked the lift station. He said he initially drove to the lift station on Caprona via Schumann Drive and Easy Street. He did not go down Capri Avenue. Bob spent about 15-20 minutes to check the wet well, pumps and control panel. He found Maintenance & Repair, Sewer - Unit 17 July 20, 1994 Page Two the lift station to be all right. At 10:30 A.M. he called Nancy Veidt from the water treatment plant back and told her that the lift station was okay. At 10:40 A.M. Skip Cruce and Bob went out to look. This time they drove down Capri Avenue and found the manhole cover to be about 20' away from the manhole. Bob told me that traffic cones were placed by him and Skip Cruce after they found the manhole cover on the road. 3) Was 25 minutes a reasonable amount of time to respond? I told Anita that 25 minutes was reasonable including travel time and time to check the lift station. 4) In talking with Skip Cruce on July 20, 1994, Skip told me that he went out with Bob around 10:40 A.M. on June 6th. They drove down Capri Avenue and noticed the manhole cover had been moved away from the manhole. Shortly thereafter, the driver of Don's Aluminum truck met with them to inform Skip and Bob of the recent accident between our manhole cover and his truck. Therefore, the accident must have taken place shortly after 10:30 A.M. According to the driver, however, he placed the accident happening around 11:00 AM on the police report that he filed. RBV/avr City of Sebastian POST OFFICE BOX 780127 ❑ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32978 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 ❑ FAX (407) 589-5570 MEMORANDUM DATE: March 20, 1994 l7 TO: Maintenance/Repairs - Sewer - Unit ).6' FROM: Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director /Ed SUBJECT: Sewer Blockage on Capri Avenue, Blocks 613, 614, 615, and 616 Ron Briskie called me around 11:00 am and reported that there was a sewer blockage on Capri Avenue. Mr. Tom Black at 146 Capri Avenue noticed that his toilet wasn't flushing normally and checked his outside cleanout. His cleanout was full of sewage. He called the Police Department, who in turn notified the Sebastian Water Plant were Ron was working. Ron found that a majority of the manholes on Capri were filled with sewage all the way up to the lid. After calling me, I advised him to call Roto -Rooter Sewer and Drain Cleaning Service in Ft. Pierce. They responded immediately and were able to dislodge the blockage by using a high pressure nozzle in the sewer main. Evidently, the blockage was caused by neighborhood kids which had opened a sewer manhole in a vacant lot on the north side of Capri, approximately four lots east of 146 Capri Avenue. Ron reported to me that he found wood, a Florida Home Finder's sign and post, and other debris. I told Ron to call Skip and Bob, if necessary, to help him. He called Skip. I met both at lift station No. 3. We had to pull both pumps. Pump No. 2 had to be taken apart since it had a stuffed rabbit and a rope in the impeller. Every time the pump was turned on it blew the overload protector, because the amperage was too high. Page 2 of 2 Memo of March 20, 1994 Regarding Sewer Blockage The amperage exceeded 30 amps. Skip and I used a net that Ron brought from the wastewater plant to fish out a 2 foot log approximately 4" in diameter. After pumping the station down, resetting the floats, and removing the debris, we checked the alternating relay to make sure Pump No. 1 would alternate with Pump No. 2. We left at 3:50 p.m. when both pumps were running about 7 to 8 amps each. I stopped by the station at 6:50 pm and found the alarm light on. I checked the pumps and the alternating relay. The pumps worked find, but the alternating relay didn't seem to behave normally. This could be a problem in the future. I talked with Mr. Black and thanked him for being so observant. He had worked for the New York City Sewer Department for 20 years and had much experience. He told me that the neighborhood kids will remove the manhole lid in the vacant lot and will throw things into it. I asked him to call the Police Department if he saw the kids doing it. Meanwhile, I will try to order a locking cover for the manhole so the kids can't remove it. Page 2 of 2 EMPLOYEE INCIDENT/ACCIDENT REPORT FORM WRITE YOUR ACCOUNT OF EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED IN DETAIL, INCLUDING TIMES, DATES, AND NAMES OF ALL PERSONS INVOLVED. USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY During the morning hours of Monday June 6 1994 the sanitary sewers in the vicinity of Blocks 613 and 614 in Unit 17 north and south of Capri Avenue became filled with sewage as a result of a blockage in the 8" diameter sewer main The blockage occurred iust west of Manhole 12 in the center of the street in front of 143 and 144 Capri Avenue, as shown on the attached plan Since the top of this manhole is set at the lowest elevation of the system by at least 6", the sewage forced the manhole cover upward and out of the manhole frame. It is my understanding that Vincent Grewell an employee of Don's Aluminum, 8960 US 1. Micco Florida was driving the company truck west on Capri Avenue around 11:00 AM when he drove over the manhole lid The south edge of the lid popped up and hit the door sill leaving a circular dent on the inside of it The truck dragged the lid approximately 20 feet west of the manhole before the lid came to rest on the pavement. The dent in the truck door sill on the driver's side prevented the door from closing properly. Mr. Grewell informed two utilities personnel Skip Cruce and Bob Korda of the incident after they had arrived at the site Both Skip and Bob confirmed the damage and photographed the marks in the asphalt caused by the manhole lid / A�""'•��✓• I�"".�"' TT}ili}i ue T..__ nn .nn. Signature of 6iiployee Departzent Date PROPERTY DAMAGES INVESTIGATION TO BE COMPLETED IMMEDIATELY AFTER DAMAGES DATE OF DAMAGE June 6, 1994 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY A company service rack LOCATION OF PROPERTY At the time the vehicle was damaged, it was on Capri Avenuute Sebastian Florida in the vicinity of unit 17. OWNEROFPR6Pl DIY 4 Don's Aluminum 8960 US 1 Mir'co Florida -- CAUSE OF DAMAGES The left door (driver's side) was dented by a manhole cover which after being driven over by the truck, lifted upward There was a sewage blockage which hydraulically forced_ the cover up from the manhole frame to relieve the 1�rPGGura in the manhole. The truck tire flipped the cover up into the underside of the truck. moo SIGNATURE Richar''01 Vota ka P E TYPE OR PRINT AME OF �P TOR ASSESSMENT BY DEPT. HEAD SIGNATURE Page 2 of 2 INCID IACCIDENT REPORT FORM WRITE YOUR ACCOUNT OF EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED, IN DETAIL, INCLUDING TIMES, DATES, AND NAMES OF ALL PERSONS INVOLVED. USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY. 32 Page 2 of 2 INCIDE REPORT FORM DENT WRITE YOUR ACCOUNT OF EXACTLY WH TI HAPPENED, IN DETAIL, INCLUDING TIMES, DATES, AND NAMES OF ALL PERSONS INVOLVED. USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY. (zooc n Fr7--' r-��I tbv5 i 14(s Cry -( RUE LVJ0l o o-)LTkk- 6U-T'E(L--►.V—LAuj. c)pIUcS —v-NGtI' Crym L t)OLOO—A Ci�\Pk.l T Ql Sc=(0etU M`Rt, 3 bio u:- C�CY�TE n P qq.o &-r o V� I- SRP (�-I R -y E �i 5Ev--� C 2 L 1 0 ez SME FPOS 6E( t.-1 a C-gKc,E f� t—t- 1(3 E�-!4 �� L C� uc� f� G ►'� t (�i 'C t-HE�T- �Sc� C--2 D N FI --cob -1-0 i P fl N t -E L i �D was tAc--vy k(A y c W 32 8960 U.S. 1 • MICCO 664-2256 1/ Cu WOODY'S PAPER & PRINTING` - 388 -3238 !` '� A0N30V1NM3380dN3 MVI A0 03131dW031HOd3H'AOA AB MIME N0113V H3HLHM ONO S(96/1 'A3H) 9000e AWSH Mod SIHl d0 NOV8 3H1 NO SNOLL3nH1SNI 3H1 H11M kldVJOO'ONtl OV38 1SOW 310A m H3H10 O 1, OS O Z 040O dHd 01.-�__:.-._-:__.__: _._.___-_-_,.1N RMd30-.. _-ONmavel'0'1- _N30Hd09NI1VSLLY311NV9NION11MI 4030IHWA0IS ONV INIVV SH30N3SSVd tlegl ,Nita - z 1 n1s 9h/ -S3S53N1u1 d(Z/ormt,510 su95pro RWMW-993"y watI 39MYO 101NI1017tl'153 SIINNu 04 AM.9VWVI Al93JDHd 063 a 31VIS ONV AM " 49M PUT AgUHIN) S53HOOV � 3WVN SMMKgSgVd m da._3LOAS CIV AM - �' -" ' ��'!"�' 1 (3e04S 00c ra0w1W) S53HOV .� — '-''AT 3WVNSH3911355tld ?-- 3NOHd am P1V 3NOHd �' rr,MI � ��,�Y?d�.xyn�rc-•.c' ) SS31,15no 1 _-i1tlIH1S3O3d/H3AItl0 ""' • NtlIILL5303d/H3AIH0 39VWtl0 d0 LInOWtl'1S3 its igitl ' - HlHls d0 91tl0 3dA1 nn 31tliS ... H3HWnN MUM Skl3AWO W- ----'31Y1S sw AM _' - ,(lwllSP0ef0gwnN)SS3HOOV-}MH1S303d!10su9orl s/anup u9 se Alper3)H3hR10 c> 31tl15 INdtl ALKI - .--IWaAS Pue ,aw,nNl SS3HOOY .'-'1O!anu0se ��rt$!!NO04o)3WtlN Tlni S.H3NaM�0.� ..� E n "ION AOnOd (did HOAlnlStln)ANvd1Y0o3oNVHnSNI R'Jn mdn rI ann W!vH min amen I" OPO AWA INIiT/digH� Am 0v -.cu ,3'.e H3SWnN NOLLtl3WLLN3013131H3A HV3A 31tl15 "ON Ovi 3wN nM16A ('Ola''enAa!q'3Pn,i',e0)3dll --3MVW 'HY3A- ::::aa;7JIN=i'i--tq "bifii rpS- awls ONtl Allo• .. - 0"As Put ngwnN) ss3H00tl ._. 3WtlN S.H39N355Ud m dQ' 3IN' Wa!8W00n �31tl15 ONtl All? ' '" 49043 PUT 19gwnN) SS3HOO' 3WVN SAMN3SSVd r uYea+u bG+voi.. 9P03 i9,tl 3NOHd opoo e0,tl 3NOHd' NtlIH15303d/tl360HANn - - - ( NtlIH1S3) ss3mmisno _ i�N pl y`b191 ... ,eaA Aep.0W �BVIIV030 LIIIOWtl'1S3 "s weH H1HI83031tl0. 3dA1'on m,31V15. '. H3HWON 3SN37n S.H3AIfi0 r. iivis 0NV Alla "` 1190,IS Pue iagwnN) SS3HOOV NVIH15303d!(Mu90!I 8�DA!10 u9 Se A1i^-ex3) H3AIH0, ...n - 131V1S 30002Q '.. i ONtl A1L7 0004S Pue >'gwnN) SSWOOV ( n 12nu0 se aures ll'tlO9W13NYNHMdSJHNtlD ;� U � - v UN A7I10d ". (did HD A11118tln) ANtldWD037NtlHnSNI itl/1 ,Ad/H nd V5l1 IPSn 10 tM' 1+OHl1 Tud/V IDN 'PRO - PI I IABWON NOI1tl71dL N3013131HR HV3A 31V1$ 'ON 413SN3011 31 IH3A ('oie'910A0!g )oM',eP13dA1 -' 3NVW MA . o 3000 dQ UM ONtl AM (199/15 Du¢ 19gwnN) S53HOOtl 3W S.tl39N3SSVd _ ---3007dlZ _—_-...31VISS -U90AS Pae u9wnN) SS3HOOtl 3WtlN S.N35N3SStld ONVAI�jA�J—�� - .. —pq3 �(—� L`/h ) ,�i �W o" v/ ( 9� O{"1 1 SS3NIS0 e - 3WOH _._...NVIH1 303d/H3AIH0 ----- -NVI S303d/ 0 Mje - 39tlWtl0 d01Nn tl'1 will H1HIB 3031tl0 3dA1'on _._ _._'_-.—. .___.._--H3BWON 35N3on S1AANIQ -e- (�--31tl1S. --w J13 .__30O7dQ __ _,._._._-_--... tl ONV.All3-.»_.::.� _._.._.. .. 99,ISPue,9gwnN)ss3HOOV.-...-_.Nvlu/s303d/laauaansAAMmOtildUix3l.HdAO10 �> 9L O m 3007 dQ 31V1s ONV Allo (IMAS Pue ,9gwnN) SS3HOOV 1 O JDAPO se awe$ I! N09go 13NVN T1M$lANMO �-Z ��/ 0 o zl�o � Ion" a ON AMU U All118 NVdW0330NtlHnSNi ,Wn ,etln nll n 0F5/tl u0N/1 •N3/Y 700N PO Y � H38WnN NNOOOLLtl713LLN3I013171H9A HV3A 31 ON Otl13SN3on 31oieA ('oi9 113b'Q -Xm4 -M) 3dA1 ''�- 3NVW ,,/L� '. � 91YW4VRjgjgrI S Ovou 1- dO NOLL7BSH31NI HV3N H01V _ AVIAR91H HO OVOH :133tl1S NOON 30ON 1X3N S311W/1331 HO n D NiO❑O❑ M nw!'. 'ON 300ON NOW 'ON 30ON 1tl - noo W jui`il�" Ago ul 114314ISuYJO'i 0i ro A 0 iN, 3=V 30 NoRd � 99❑ �❑ pp T8wOM91tlOd3GH�J130 A� tlAY15H H3SWnN1NOd3HA7N39v isA11 ALHOSH 3031V0 1N30071 d03WLL> llAOg7V d031tl0 .............................................................. . .. mom Iu n T Aum AVAMN 30'1d30 all 1WN 1N30133V 3113Yd1 AO 1NOM MAIMI Z 1HOM WHOA IHOHS IM33HOIN3 AM O,-t ................»:..................................................... . ;rt j1.V ..:.i' . n. �• �sla,�"yr '���;.. ESTIMATE OF REPAIRS ESTIMATE OF 0 PHONE: REPAIR COST Revels Paint & Body Shop 569-7433 130 GIBSON STREET • P.O. BOX 61 • ROSELAND, FLORIDA 32957 NAME ADDRESS 1 DATE 2 7 _ PHONE DATE WANTED Repair Repkpe LABOR PARTS AND MATERIALS SUBLET WORK OTALS TOTALS- THISADDITIONAL PARTS OR LABOR WHICH MAY BE�PEOUIRED AFTEESTIMATE 13 RS THE NARK HASON CUR NS BEEN STARTED. AFTER THE N AND DOES NOT WORK HAS STARTED, WORN OR DAMAGED PARTS "CH ARE NOT EWDENT ON FIRST INSPECTKXI MAY BE DISCOVERED. NATURALLY THIS ESTIMATE CANNOT COVER SUCH CONTINGENCIES. PARTS PRICES SUBJECT TO CHANGE VATHOUT NOTICE THIS ESTIMATE IS FOR IMMEDIATE ACCEPTANCE THIS WORK AUTHORIZED BY Q LABOR Dtf PARTS & MATERIALS SUBLET WORK G ! _ ^ GA+ TAX GRAND TOTAL de 35 ESTIMATE SHEET AND REPAIR ORDER �Rd � Collision.Work ` Complete Paint Job ED:�S-�1l1Ta130DY VISIBLE DAMAGE QUOTATION' 1104 Louisiana Avennzz~ P.O. Box 780744 Sebastian, Florida 32978 NAME �� �'7 IS �/ ✓"'1 i n jJ T— ADDRESS Spot Repair insurance Claims PHONE: 407 - 589-2226 DATE l^ PHONE n ZZ S DATE WANTED YEAFWODELLOLOR A/#KE OF CAR BODY TYPE LICENSE N% SERIAL Na MGC, PAINT Na ` MILEAGE P.*, R.P1. SUBLET WORK PARTS AND MATERIALS LABOR REFINISHING .1.U/C 3 o r ti 3 C) y O , I I I SUBTOTALS 7v L` sNOT COVER AOomoNu.PARTS oR BEEN STARTED. AFTER THE WORK NOT EVIDENT ON FIRST INSPECTION NOT COVER SUCH CONTINGENCIES THIS ESTIMATE IS FOR IMMEDIATE T TOTAL SALES TAX31 GRAND TOTAL >Fr. - // F6— c� —...,"vrtTc AWHORIZED BY ESTIMATE SHEET AND REPAIR ORDER "i ESTIMATE OF. R9PAIRS .� AS LWM FOR LABOR AND MATERIALS VERBALAGREEMENTS NOIJVMJG ESTIMATES FREE 8085 RICKS,AUfO BODI., 512 Trade Cente. • C.R'51Y Sebastian. FLS 32958 , k '< .. `� (40M 589-5357 OWNER � ' DIE. INSURANCE CO. - ORDERNO- V AR MAKE L `IL GE G 105/ MOTOR NO. - . SERIALNO. QUAK ',' E PTION OF LABOR OR MATERIAL - PART NO. 7ERIAL',,, ;IAIOR.`f;.' , i �1 .. I F PARTS PRICES BASED ON STANDARD CATALOG PROCUREMENT. PRICE LISTS SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. PROCUREMENTAND DELIVERY CHARGES MAY BEADDED FOR SPECIALSERVICE ON ITEMS NOTAVAILABLE LOCALLY. TOTAL MATERIAL OLD PARTS REMOVED FROM CARS WILL BE JUNKED UNLESS OTHERWISE INSTRUCTED IN WRITING. ISAN ESTIMATE BASED ON OUR INSPECTION AND DOES NOT COVERADDITIONAL PARTS OR LABOR WHICH REQUIRED AFTER THE WORK HAS BEEN OPENED UP. OCCASIONALLY AFTER WORK HAS STARTED WORN PARTS ARE COVERED WHICH ARE NOT EVIDENT ON FIRST INSPECTION. BECAUSE OfTHIS THE ABOVE PRICES ARE NOT GUARANTEED. ESTIMATE -' � APPROVED BY TOTAL LABORBE TOTAL MATERIAL TAX PAID OUT -TOW & STORAGE J�THABOVE ORIZE<?ANDACCERTED - - - ` DATE SUBLET R PAIRS TOTAL n N 00 032 oz L/ PIP/ „, LO %P*- Cli', Aon N N�.�sanaNnW.s tId Q L 3 W W aA: N M Ia��o o W f— °Q 4 NN0 N a N �Z Lirl/ �/ 9/ Q ;w N Z sG060 ,GEv Z N N N r' cv E hZ v W N akaa K � 2 N !� N N 3 ��, �Z 64+� t/ S ,t/ 1 H+I N ZG•B/ � '7O0HJS �6G io 6'o c� b uol, , vw f 60*£ os+1 .-'NNvvy,nHOS 0Dto N' N N _.. N 01 ca 7 In r N 2 L nr o !amu �44 ... obi 83H1)8e' OD j4` 01 y. •7 ; ; UAB '�q OD' / P 3.144 r w• . � City of Sebastian n 1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 0 FAX (407) 589-5570 MEMORANDUM DATE: August 4, 1994 TO: Joel L. Koford, City Manager FROM: Richard Votapka, Utilities Director 'Zl✓ RE: Emergency Plans and Procedures in the Event of a Hurricane I have prepared a draft of emergency plans and procedures in the even of a hurricane in accordance with your request made in the July 21, 1994 staff meeting. A copy is attached for your review. I have given a copy to John King of the Indian River County Emergency Services Dept. for his review. I plan to have a meeting with all of the Utilities personnel next week to discuss the plan after they have an opportunity to review it. I would like to discuss the plan with you, especially the "Emergency Status for Employees During a Hurricane" section. Also, I plan to develop procedures in regard to chemical spills, and lightning and tornado damage as well. I would also like an opportunity to discuss a memo I wrote to John VanAntwerp, Airport Manager, regarding an emergency coummmications center at the airport before the next Sebastian Emergency Management Committee meeting on August 12, 1994. AOMN -DP—KF—k GOP`f CITY OF SEBASTIAN UTILITIES DEPARTMENT AUGUST 1, 1994 EMERGENCY PLANS AND PROCEDURES IN THE EVENT OF A HURRICANE PRE -SEASON PREPARATION Hurricane season traditionally begins on June 1st every year. During the month of May, the Treatment Plant Supervisor and Staff should do the following: 1) Check inventory of the following chemicals: A) Chlorine at both the Water and wastewater Plants B) Polymer at the Water Treatment Plant C) Lime at the Water Treatment Plant 2) Check diesel fuel levels in the underground storage tanks at the Water and Wastewater Treatment Plants. Fuel supply should be sufficient to run the generators for a minimum of three (3) days. The water plant has a 6000 gallon tank; the wastewater treatment plant has a 2000 gallon tank. 3) Perform an inventory of spare parts available for lift station control panel electrical components. Order spares if necessary. 4) Check supplies in first aid kits to see if there is a satisfactory supply. Those items which have aged and exceeded their shelf life shall be replaced. 5) Inspect the condition of boots, rain coats, rain pants, and any other foul weather gear to make sure that they are in good condition. 6) Make sure all flashlights, battery operated clocks, and radios are working properly and that there is an ample supply of spare batteries. All personnel should be equipped with a water proof flashlight. 0Or 7) Have fire extinguishers checked to ensure that gauge pressure is in the operable range. 8) Make sure all emergency phone numbers are up to date and emergency plans and procedures are readily accessible to all employees. 9) Check inventory of leak repair supplies for house services and water mains. 10) Have vegetation removed from all fences to eliminate the potential for wind damage. 11) Check for trees and tall shrubs growing near or around the power lines providing service to the three (3) treatment plants and lift stations. Call 1- 800-342-5375 (FPL) to arrange for a qualified, professional line cleaning crew to trim trees and shrubs growing into or near the power lines. Trees that are not near power lines should be trimmed before the possibility of storm warnings. 12) Check windows, door frames, and roofs for potential leakage from intense rainfall; caulk or repair if necessary. 13) Keep an emergency supply of non-perishable food items on hand. It is suggested that a minimum of three (3) days supply for two people be kept at the water treatment plant. Canned and dried foods can be stored in a designated food locker. A propane camping stove and lantern could be purchased. Both 5 gallon insulated coolers should be filled to capacity. Also, additional 4 gallon water carriers can be purchased for additional emergency water storage. 14) The Plant supervisor should hold a meeting with all employees to review and discuss Pre -Season Preparation, and Hurricane Procedures - before, during, and after the storm. A checklist of items should be given to each employee so that it can be reviewed and revised if necessary, and employees can be assigned specific emergency preparation duties. HURRICANES Hurricanes originate in the lower Atlantic Ocean and Caribbean Sea during the months of June through November. Hurricanes are seasonal storms. The highest frequency of occurrence is during the month of September, and their occurrence drops essentially to zero during December through May. When notification of an impending storm is received, the Plant Supervisor should begin to take appropriate measures for protection of the plant, plant grounds, and personnel. Preparations will relate specifically to a "Hurricane Watch" and "Hurricane Warning" which are two very important terms that all employees should know. The terms "Hurricane Watch" and "Hurricane Warning" as defined as follows: 1) "HURRICANE WATCH" indicates that hurricane's conditions are possible in the specified area of the "water", usually within 36 hours. The Plant Supervisor must listen to weather advisories and initiate precautionary action in anticipation that hurricane warnings may be issued. 2) "HURRICANE WARNING" indicates winds of 74 mph (64 knots) or higher with high seas are expected in the specified area with 24 hours. Strict attention should be paid at all times to weather reports issued by the National Hurricane Center. All storm preparations should be completed as soon as possible. HURRICANE DISASTER POTENTIAL SCALE The Hurricane Disaster Potential Scale is divided into six sections, Zero through Five, according to wind speed and storm surges above normal tides. It is intended as a guideline to indicate the severity of the hurricane at any given time if it were located in the immediate area: 1. Scale Zero --73 mph. No damage. Determined as Tropical Storm. Tide level, less than 4 feet above normal. 2. Scale One --74-95 mph. Primary damage to shrubbery, signs, and unanchored mobile homes. Tide level, 4 to 5 feet above normal. Avftk rm*, Scale Two --96-110 mph. Major damage to poorly structured signs and exposed mobile homes; some damage to roofs, windows, and doors. Tide level, 6 to 8 feet above normal 2 to 4 hours before hurricane arrival. Some evacuation of shoreline homes. 4. Scale Three -411-130 mph. Large trees downed; serious roof, window, and door damage. Tide flooding along the coast. Evacuation of low-lying residences within several blocks of the shoreline may be required. Scale Four -431 -155 -mph. Extensive roof damage on small homes, destruction of mobile homes, some wall damage. Tide level, 13 to 18 feet above normal. Terrain lower than 10 feet may be flooded inland as far as 6 miles. 6. Scale Five --Over 155 mph. Considerable roof and structure damage. Some complete building failures. Tide level, greater than 18 feet above normal. Major damage to all structures less than 15 feet above sea level within 500 yards of shore. Massive evacuation of residential areas within 5 to 10 miles of the shore may be required. EMERGENCY STATUS FOR EMPLOYEES F11 "M 101VA: I A meeting was held among the Utilities Director and four (4) operating personnel on July 25, 1994. It was agreed that everyone would help secure the water and Wastewater treatment plants during a "Hurricane Watch". Tom Stirtzinger and Aughtman (Skip) Cruce would be the first to be released to return home after the majority of the emergency preparation were accomplished. Tom lives in Palm Bay and Skip lives in Vero Beach. Ron Briskie, who resides in Sebastian and is nearest to the water and sewer plants, would be the next employee to leave. Bob Korda, who resides in Sebastian, has volunteered to stay at the water treatment plant during the hurricane. Bob elected to stay since he does not have any children at home and his wife is willing and able to find refuge elsewhere during the threat of an impending hurricane. As Director of Utilities, Rich Votapka will be directed by the City Manager to remain at City Hall or other communications center established by the City for Hurricane emergency operations. Employees who will be leaving their homes to go out of town or to a public shelter shall telephone Bob at the water treatment plant or Rich Votapka at City Hall or other designated shelter to inform him of the location of where they are staying and the telephone number where they can be reached. rW►, PREPARATIONS DURING A HURRICANE WATCH As soon as the plant supervisor learns of a hurricane watch for the local area, he should have the following items done: 1) Call the City's diesel fuel supplier to completely fill the underground storage tanks at the water and wastewater treatment plants for the emergency generators. 2) Board up three (3) windows with plywood sheets at the wastewater treatment plant laboratory building and five (5) windows at the Filbert St. water treatment plant. 3) Check the residual amount of chlorine at the three (3) treatment plants. Order cylinders to be delivered as soon as possible if in danger of running low on the supply of chlorine. 4) Chain the fiberglass shed to the Park Place Plant. 5) Secure all loose objects such as pipes, garbage pails, dumpster, transportable equipment by placing them in the storage garages at the Filbert St. and Bailey Drive Treatment Plants. This includes all loose items on the vehicles. 6) Fill up the 500,000 gallon ground water storage tank to capacity. 7) Fill up all emergency water containers available for the employee who will remain at the plant during the hurricane. 8) Secure a cot and bedding in the water treatment plant lab. 9) Check food provisions in emergency food locker. Place propane stove, and lantern in the lab. 10) Make sure foul weather gear, waterproof flashlight, and extra batteries are placed in the lab at the water treatment plant. 11) Secure a walkie-talkie from the central garage for the employee to remain at the plant to provide for backup communication should the phone lines go dead. 12) Fill up gasoline tanks on all vehicles. Gasoline may not be available after a hurrican strikes the local area. 13) All vehicles which can not be parked in the garages should be parked in areas away from buildings, tanks, and plant equipment to minimize the risk of potential damage to the plant. 14) Call Treasure Coast Refuse Corp. at 562-6620 or (407) 465-5919 to have them haul away and trash, debris, yard clippings, trimmed branches, refuse, etc. from the treatment plant sites. ACTION TO TAKE DURING A HURRICANE WARNING As soon as a "Hurricane Watch" is transformed into a"HURRICANE WARNING", the plant supervisor should implement the following actions: Complete any preparations which remain unfinished during the "Hurricane Watch". 2. Dismiss employees who are no longer essential for the completion of preparations and who live the furthest distance from the water and sewer plants. 3. Shut the valves OFF on the chlorine cylinders at the wastewater plant and Park Place water treatment plant at the last possible moments before wind and/or rain conditions make traveling dangerous. Install the protective steel heads over the valves on the cylinders. 4. Secure the chlorine shed to the Park Place water treatment plant with two chains (top and bottom). 5. Perform radio checks with walkie-talkies with the Public Works Dept. Inform them who will be manning the water treatment plant. 6. Shut down the plant electrically at the last possible time before wind and/or rains make conditions to venture outside unsafe. Shut off all electrical breakers except for the high service pumps and interioi lights in the laboratory and pump house at the Filbert St. Water Treatment Plant. The Park Place Water Treatment Plant and Bailey Drive Wastewater Treatment Plant should be left in full operation. EQUIPMENT FAILURES Item importance Action Well Pumps 1 100 percent firm capacity is pro- vided; however, repair immediately. Use second well while first is down. It may be necessary to open throttling valve on second well in order to match production with demand. Aerator 3 By-pass. aerator. Repair as soon as possible. Precipitator 1 There is no way to by-pass the pre - (draining req'd) cipitator. All maintenance and repairs which require draining of the Precipitator must be accom- plished within the time permitted by the demand versus the amount of stored water on hand at the time of shut down. Precipitator 2 If water can pass through the (draining not req'd) Precipitator it can be filtered and chlorinated prior to distribution. This will provide an adequate degree of treatment for short periods of time until repairs can be made. Filters 2 Normal levels of treatment can be pro- vided with one filter out of service. Direct flow from Precipitator to the two remaining filters. Repair as soon as possible. Transfer Pumps 1 100 percent firm capacity is provided; however, repair immediately. It may be necessary to temporarily bypass the automatic lead -lag alternator and operate the remaining Pump in the manual mode in order to maintain the desired level in ground storage reservoir. Backwash Pump 1 Repair immediately. High Service 1 100 percent firm capacity is Pumps provided; however, repair immediately. Sludge Pumps 2 100 percent firm capacity is pro- vided; however, repair as soon as possible. Item Recovery Pumps Flowmeters Lime Feed System Alum Feed System Polymer Feed System Chlorinator System al = critical 2 = less critical 3 = non-critical Importance Action 3 100 percent firm capacity is pro— vided; repair as soon as possible. 3 Repair as soon as possible. A spool piece or temporary pipe section may be substituted for the meters while repairs are made. 2 No back up is provided; however, loss of softening capability would not be critical for short periods so long as proper disinfection could be maintained. Repair as soon as possible. 3 Repair as soon as possible. 3 Repair as soon as possible. 1 Start corrective action immediately. If finished water chlorinator fails reroute chlorine solution flow for remaining chlorinator to finished water service. POST - HURRICANE ACTION After the passing of the hurricane through the local area, the following items should be done: The Director of Utilities should contact the employee remaining in the Filbert St. Water Treatment plant and ask him to assess the damage done. The plant should be placed back in operation as soon as possible. The next page entitled "EQUIPMENT FAILURES", shows the plant equipment, its importance to the treatment process, and the action to take should the equipment be damaged. Equipment that is damaged is and is non-essential to the treatment process should be bypassed if at all possible. 2. The plant operator should check the chlorine room to make sure that there are no leaks from the chlorine cylinders. If a minor leak is detected, the plant operator shall call the Sebastian Fire Department for assistance. If there is a moderate size or major leak, the plant operator shall call 911 for emergency assistance. The Utilities Director and Plant Supervisor shall meet with the plant operator to obtain a verbal report on the condition of the Filbert Street Water Treatment Plant. The Utilities Director and plant supervisor should visit the Park Place Water Treatment Plant and Bailey Drive Wastewater Treatment Plant to survey and assess damage. They shall take photographs and write a report on damage assessment. If the plants are operable, the chlorine cylinders should be reconnected as soon as possible because they should have been shut off and capped just prior to the hurricane hitting the local area. IF THERE IS NO ELECTRICAL POWER TO THE PARK PLACE WATER TREATMENT PLANT, contact Florida Power and Light immediately for information on when power will be expected to. be restored. If power is expected to be out for more than 24 hours, contact Scott Telford or any other It representative at Aggreko, Inc. at (407)423-8834. Request that Aggreko, Inc. haul down a 100 KW Hushpower generator with a minimum of 20 feet of electrical cables. 4. Once the plants have been inspected and assessed for damage, the Utilities Director and Plant Supervisor should survey all of the water distribution and sewage collection systems. All lift stations should be checked first. A written report shall be maintained. Any downed power lines and areas of power outages should be noted and reported to Florida Power and Light. 5. Notify the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) about the status of the Utility System. If the water distribution system was damaged to the extent that it lost pressure and there was a possibility that ground water may have entered the system, notify the EOC that 'Boil Water Notices" will be issued. The Plant Supervisor and Utilities Director shall notify the local radio and TV stations and local newpapers as follows: WGUL 93-7 FM Vero Beach 567-8366 WJNO-1330 AM Ft. Pierce 930-3333 WQCS 88.9 FM Ft. Pierce 930-8936 WQOL 103.7 fin Vero Beach 567-7700 WTTB Vero Beach 567-8366 WPEC TV 12 CBS 1-800-273-WPEC Falcon Cable Sebastian 589-3846 Sebastian Sun Sebastian 5894566 Vero Press Journal Sebastian 589-6616 Florida Today 1-800-242-3604 Include an estimation of time to be back in service when reporting the outage to the news media. 6. The Utilities Director and/or Plant Supervisor shall call the remainder of utilities employees to advise them of the situation and give the_ m their new assignments. 7. Begin general cleanup of the plant sites. i City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 13 FAX (407) 589-5570 MEMORANDUM DATE: August 4, 1994 TO: Joel L. Koford, City Manager FROM: Richard Votapka, Utilities Director 713✓ RE: Pending Legal Issues Not Completed By the Former City Attorney There were several legal issues discussed with Rich Torpy involving Park Place and Indian River County for which opinions were never received as follows: 1) The validity of the $10 surcharge imposed on the water and sewer customers in Park Place and specifically the method it was imposed by. The surcharge may not have been properly noticed under the appropriate Statute. 2) The extent of the City's maintenance responsibility for water and sewer lines within Park Place in reference to the perpetual 10 foot wide easement found in Exhibit "C" of the County Takeover Agreement of Park Place Utilities. 3) Action the City should take in reference to paying Indian River County for base facility charges on delinquent sewer reserve accounts (ERU capacity reservation accounts). The City is billing customers who do not pay. In turn, Indian River County is billing the City and demanding payments. 4) The City's lien rights and action to take against potential customers who are not connected to the water and sewer system although the service is available to them. No opinion was issued in regard to the enforcement powers the City has. Specific case involved Mr. Milan Vesley at 885 Schumann Drive. 5) The Bulk Wastewater Rates charged to the City by Indian River County. Indian River County bases its sewer charges on 85% of the water consumption. However, its wholesale (bulk) wastewater rates to the City are based on 95% of the water consumption. The City's water and sewer consultants maintain that there is discrimination based on rates and the City had no choice but to accept the County's bulk rates in order for the City to takeover the wastewater system from the County inside City limits. 6) Actual itemized assets and costs of those assets for the water and sewer systems in Park Place and Palm Lake Club. Charles Nash was to have written a demand letter to Indian River County concerning the assets. 7) Resolution of the Citrus Utilities vs. GDU and City of Sebastian lawsuit. 8) Resolution of the wastewater connection issue and utilities agreement in default between the City and Sebastian Lakes Associates/Sebastian Lakes Utilities. /sg HM i► #Oftk MASTELLER & MOLER, INC. - CONSULTING ENGINEERS - August 5, 1994 Mr. Joel Koford City Manager City of Sebastian Post Office Box 127 Sebastian, FL 32958 RE: Proposed Water System to Serve the Area East of U.S. #1 from the South to the North City Line Dear Joel: /23456 AUG ]V Receive a�o�wd LZ City of Sebastian City Line In accordance with our recent meeting, I am pleased to attach ten (10) copies each of a system layout plan which is conceptual and my engineer's estimate of the project cost breakdown. This information is for your use and possible distribution to the Mayor and Council. I am also transmitting a copy of this letter and attachments to Terry Pinto for his use and information. It is my professional judgement that the system which is shown on the exhibit and proposed will serve practically all of the commercial and residential users east of U.S. #1 from the north to the south city line. There may be some isolated properties which are not feasible to be served from a cost/benefit point of view, such as the Professional Title office located along U.S. #1. However, the water system conceptual layout plan has been designed in order to provide service to the maximum number of potential users at the minimum construction cost. We have sized the main pipeline in Indian River Drive at 12" diameter as a function of fire flow. We have contacted Captain Jeff Diggs of the Indian River County Fire Department and he has indicated that the worst case fire flow would be something like Captain Hiram's or the oyster Pointe Complex. He directed us to utilize a fire flow of 2500 to 3000 GPM for design of the water main. Based on the design criteria of 3000 GPM and maintaining a velocity in the water main of less than 10' per second, the smallest pipe size which can be used is 12" diameter as shown on our lavout plan. N) W A M 1623 N. U.S. Highway 1, Suite B2 ❑ 7380 Murrell Road, Suite 106 Sebastian, FL 32958 Melbourne, Florida 32940 (407)589-4800 (407)255-1175 (407) 589-2742 Fax (407) 253-4439 Fax AI. 10,%k Mr. Joel Koford 05 -Aug -94 Page 2 The construction of this water project, in addition to the existing sanitary sewer facilities, will complete the utilities infrastructure for this area of the City which is primarily zoned and land use planned for commerical development. Well planned, quality commerical development of this area will provide the City with a substantial increase in tax rateables and result in the reduction in the tax burden on the City residential homeowners. It is my understanding that the City wishes to take advantage of a County contract recently awarded to Speegle Construction, Inc. for construction of a 16" water main along the east side of U.S. #1 from Wabasso to the south City limits. Our firm provided the engineering design and preparation of construction plans for the Speegle project and the City and County are interested in having this City water system project added to the Speegle project as a Change Order. Based on this approach, our firm will be authorized by the County Utilities Department to proceed with engineering services in connection with the design of the City water project as a Change Order to the Speegle U.S. #1 water project. The City should agree to reimburse the County for engineering and construction expenses in connection with the City's project. If this reprsents the desire of the City and County, please be advised that time is of the essence in order for us to proceed with our services and have the construction plans and permitting in place before Speegle completes the U.S. #1 water project on behalf of the County. In our opinion, Speegle Construction should receive the Notice to Proceed on the project on August 12, 1994 and they have 180 days to complete the project, which would result in completion by the middle part of February 1995. I estimate it will take our office approximately three months to engineer the project and have construction plans and specifications ready for permitting and an additional two months to secure the project permitting. Based on these estimates, it would appear that we should be underway with engineering and design by the end of August in order to accomplish the objective of having this project constructed as a Change Order to the County's U.S. #1 water main project. If you wish to proceed based on this letter and attachments, I would suggest that the Mayor and Council authorize you and the City Attorney to prepare and execute the necessary documentation with the County which will allow the County to authorize our office to proceed with the engineering services to design the water mains and allow the Speegle organization to construct the water mains as a Change Order to the existing U.S. #1 water main project. M OOR*A 140ok Mr. Joel Koford 05 -Aug -94 Page 3 If I can provide any additional information to assist you and the County, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, MASTELLER & MOLER, INC. Earl H. Masteller, P.E. President EHM/vk Enclosures cc: Terrance G. Pinto w/attachemnts File #9459 (jk080594) M -10 s o -IId13 T� 91 0� 5 9 n L 8 6 01 I I ZI j in £+I �! ��� 51 �© y &a, I# v oar �'y' I'D N IVIS L I o I ID N �` ` gZZ kill do?Id/I 1 I Z2 � o6-oa45 Z 19 I 1Ddb� „ As -lIdl3 f�j I I FEJ71} �I o ZI II N 01 6 0 8 L 9 i g {, I I =614, 'O y /8 £/ Z� °� Q�. 9LV lel i� �`� �� ►d1 al I I d d V 0 m I r (0 } v 11 ti is 0) Al I� 0 n I �I ZI I I N 01 6 .8� L< 9 1 1 g N� £ o Z Ir o ,� Z I R,10 09£ 6/-1/ /AfiO c9,et O.go � •%o�n p oZ+` 6S 9r 5 /7 %/ o� Or"O �I gl 91 L 81 61` OZ ✓IZ ZZ✓~�ZV w,_ �Z 9Z / 6"647E.,e,4L DRIVE w w� i co -j O Cn W -`moi r o N �. STREET I �' •� 1 /207 \ O � � b�•0� ° o � lfivwo foZ _ '� � I �� o � l D N •Na�_ N w U1 Dap, 'D � A w �] � � •A I 1N N A {a Ln � c)t [7t' � /F9G I• 1 G L•dTE.e.4[. �� N '`� I4! . /15J-4 1 t1G /BOG fSBRaaa 00 4r Ot 0 lJ � r' o (D w \0 D 7� 7,0 � 5 2 / oI 2t/4o 5)7 U °o �1w N w — N N � � — CJI / 6"647E.,e,4L DRIVE w w� CITY OF SEBASTIAN UTILITIES DEPARTMENT DATE: October 3, 1994 TIME: 9:15 a.m. [ ] CONFERENCE WITH [X ] TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH Fred Saenger, 168 Caprona, Telephone Number 589-3946 SUBJECT: Sewer Blockage on Osceola Ave. in Unit 17 RESUME OF CONVERSATION: Mr. Saenger called in at 9:15 a.m. to report that sewage was coming up out of the sewer and flowing into the storm drain. He said it was on Osceola - east of Caprona Street. I immediately called the Water Treatment plant and reported the information to Tom. He said he'd take care of it. 4lckie Watters e: Maintenance & Repair - Sewer MEMORANDUM DATE: June 9, 1994 TO: Maintenance & Repair - Sewer System - Unit 17 FROM: Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director 7A ✓ SUBJECT: Replacement Manhole Rings and Covers for Block 614, Unit 17 Sewer blockages have occurred twice in the sewer system north of Capri Avenue where the sewers were installed along the rear lot lines of Block 614, Unit 17. The blockages occurred as a result of vandals removing the manhole lids and dumping debris into the manhole. To prevent this situation from reoccurring in the future. I propose to replace the existing manhole covers on three manholes located in Block 614 with bolted manhole covers to prevent removal by vandals. I solicited price quotes from three (3) vendors for a US Foundry No. 580 manhole ring with 90# cover having two (2) hold down bolts and two (2) 5/8" holes drilled in the flange, 1800 apart. The prices were as follows, as quoted on June 6, 1994: 1. Davis Meter and Supply Co. $140.40/each as per Ion 2. Ferguson U.G. Supply Co. $270.00/each as per Gene 3. Semsco $190.25/each as per Eddie Kinsel Based on the above, I prepared the purchase order for obtaining the manhole rings and covers from Davis Meter and Supply Co. Our Utilities personnel can install the materials. -DP,\tks k—.im k- S u ppt,,, Co. 1-800- �15s-?�s VS p'out.1 o" W" S 80 w l`i-L 90-111; cwv.d- t.,, .J"..o }i. 4" L�" ,seer vc.- k 2 1.. W &vw bulij w w,.*- + w s/ b " 4.0 W dm l L,,l , w -Ho- -('14..� Nud d�I�. p ,Ls., F&-v4� rpt . w; l l 4-k1 , lam' �d if /'231 "I 40 �S SvPQt t Co ( ItI14- a 7a,, A of h+'.s /• {tr9vaa•. U. G. /., /- $ao -¢77-0$76 Zr3 ,..�ukf a*4 J t !O 1 )O -4 v d1 Qr;3�01�` U.S. FOUNDRY & MANUFACTURING CORPORATION USF 576 RING AND COVER STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS: 1. Machined horizontal bearing surfaces. 1-251A 2. Non -penetrating pickholes. TO ORDER: 1. Specify USF ring number and covertype. 2. Specify lettering, if required. 7 I I COVER LOAD COVER TOTAL TYPE RATING WEIGHT WEIGHT BH HEAVY DUTY 140 355 USF 578 RING AND COVER STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS: 1. Machined horizontal bearing surfaces. 2. Non -penetrating pickholes. CITY OF ATHENS, GEORGIA STANDARD 22 TO ORDER: 1. Specify USF ring number and e'h cover type. 2. Specify lettering, if required. iff 3. Specify vented or solid cover. 34 USF 580 RING ANO COVER SERIES STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS: 1. Machined horizontal bearing surfaces on all heavy duty rated castings. 2. Non -penetrating pickhole. TO ORDER: 1. Specify USF ring number and cover type. 2. Specify lettering, if required. COVER TYPE COVER LOAD COVER TOTAL HEAVY DUTY TYPE RATING WEIGHT WEIGHT 145 AU HEAVY DUTY 170 370 USF 580 RING ANO COVER SERIES STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS: 1. Machined horizontal bearing surfaces on all heavy duty rated castings. 2. Non -penetrating pickhole. TO ORDER: 1. Specify USF ring number and cover type. 2. Specify lettering, if required. COVER TYPE LOAD RATING COVER WEIGHT TOTAL WEIGHT E HEAVY DUTY 130 220 F HEAVY DUTY 145 235 H HEAVY DUTY 150 240 J HEAVY DUTY 150 240 K LIGHT DUTY 70 160 W HEAVY DUTY 165 255 X HEAVY DUTY 212' 302 BJ HEAVY DUTY 217 307 WIEDEMAN AND SINGLETON ENGINEERS STANDARD THIS RING ALSO AVAILABLE WITH: _ WATER DOUBLE GRATE TIGHT "0" RING COVER SF N0.j JAUCOVERI AUCOVER PG N0. 11 47 1 50 USF 580-E SHOWN SHALLOW MANHOLE RING AND COVER THIS RING ALSO AVAILABLE WITH: GRATE WATER TIGHT "0" RING DOUBLE COVER USF NO. 3215 ALL EXCEPT — K COVER PG NO. 66 — 50 — —ALWAYS SPECIFY USF NUMBER— PAGE 25 CITY OF SEBASTIAN REQUEST-" - FISCAL YEARS 1994-1995 DEPARTMENT DIVISION PROJECT NUMBER FUND UTILITIES SEWER RENEWAL/REPLACEMENT Item/Project Name Bolted Watertight Manhole Rings & Covers Item/Project Manager Richard Votapka Estimated Acquisition Time 60 days Units Requested Description of Item/Project Priority Rating: 3 U.S. Foundry Cast Iron Bolted (Locking) Number of Similar Watertight Manhole Rings and Cover with Units on Hand two hold down bolts. none Explain need for this expenditure: Scheduled Replacement Expand Service Replace Worn Out Equipment New Operation Present Equipment Obsolete Increased Safety Cut Personnel Time X Replacement Additional If replacement, describe item to be replaced Disposition of item replaced: Sale Trade In Scrap X Other Dept. Use Justify need for this item, including use: To prevent vandals from removing the covers in remote areas and dumping debris into the manhole to block the sewer main Will requested expenditure require additional personnel? If yes, explain: Yes X No Estimated Useful Life 50 years Estimated Cost $600.00 Less Trade In None Net Cost $600.00 Comparable Price Quotes: (1) SE Municipal Supply Amount $ 600.00 (2) U.S. Foundry $ 700.00 * If the cost is less than $500 and the expected life is more than one year, then you must use your operational fund accounts. U.S. FOUNDRY & MANUFACTURING CORPORATION USF BOLTED WATERTIGHT MANHOLE RING AND COVER SERIES ROUND BUILT UP TYPE _] STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS: 1. Machined horizontal bearing surfaces. lef" 2. Non -penetrating pickholes. 3. Flat gasket. 4. Stainless steel hex head bolts. TO ORDER: 1. Specify USF ring number and covertype. 2. Specify lettering, if required. 6. 1tS tJ .S 1= �e� L[f�riT qC) US,� 60� Flt 6u_7 23T. r nir�..o�ocnl r. Innl I IMN "C"1 HFIhHT ICOLIIMN "F"1 AND TOTAL WEIGHT. FST 11 1954 (4s QJ®6St `�-3 Z3L40 2D-y1[IIL USF 4zo=c snvwrl'"` S t1 I 4 Ca- Ifflu 4. L16AT DUT4 U11 C✓ Iry Vf1✓c-r. - NUMBER A . B --_.... _. - C _ _ ICATALOG .. E F COVER WEIGHT TOTAL WEIGHT LOAD RATING NO.OF BOLTS 125-M-BWT 22/4 11h 20% 24 32 6 105 250 EAVY DUTY 4 105 M -B 22'/. 1'h 20'12 221/2 261h 4 105 195 HEAVY DUTY 4 240-B-BWT 223/, 2 20'12 24 323/4 6 130 325 HEAVY DUTY 4 525-C-BWT 223/4 2 20'12 24 36 9 160 495 HEAVY DUTY 4 150-S-BWT 223/4 2 203/e 241/2 36 7 125 320 HEAVY DUTY 4 420-C-BWT 223/4 2 20312 24'12 36 7 160 400 HEAVY DUTY 4 440-B-BWT 223/4 2 203/4 203/4 30 3 130 240 HEAVY DUTY 4 465-B-BWT 223/4 2 203/4 203/4 323/4 4 130 320 HEAVY DUTY 4 485-S-BWT 223/4 2 203/4 25 36 9 125 365 HEAVY DUTY 4 578-AU-BWT 233/4 13/6 22 25312 34 6'12 170 370 HEAVY DUTY 4 604-AU-BWT 233/4 13he 22 243/4 34 8 170 425 HEAVY DUTY 4 170-E-BWT 233/. 1'/4 22'/� 24'12 30'/4 6 130 285 HEAVY DUTY 4 195-E-BWT 233/4 1% 22% 24% 36 6 130 325 HEAVY DUTY 4 227-AS-BWT 253/4 2 24 27 351/2 7 170 390 HEAVY DUTY 4 230-AA-BWT 32'12 1'/2 301/4 34 411h 7 285 595 HEAVY DUTY 6 655-U-BWT 34% 1'/2 1 32 32 401/2 4 260 490 HEAVY DUTY 6 120-T-BWT 34'/e 11h 321/4 343/a 40112 4 260 430 HEAVY DUTY 6 679.AZ-BWT 38 11/2 36 40 49 10 475 875 HEAVY DUTY 6 B DIMENSION EQUALS DEPTH OF RING SEAT WITHOUT GASKET —ALWAYS SPECIFY USF NUMBER— PAGE 47 G U.S. FOUNDRY & MANUFACTURING CORPORATION C. - BOLTED WATERTIGHT MANHOLES MOST U.S. FOUNDRY SOLID MANHOLE COVERS (ROUND OR RECTANGULAR) CAN BE MADE WATERTIGHT. THIS APPLICATION IS IDEAL FOR PREVENTING SURFACE WATER INFILTRATION UNDER LOW PRESSURE APPLICATIONS. --- - acify Number of Bolts Required) T GASKET OUR DESIGN OFFERS TWO SIGNIFICANT BENEFITS INTERCHANGEABILITY AND FULL CLEAR OPENINGS Precise drilling and tapping assures interchangability between like covers and easy allignment at installation. Clear openings of castings are not reduced with bolting pads or any other features to facilitate bolting. THE FOLLOWING TWO PAGES LISTS MANHOLE RINGS AND COVERS WHICH ARE MOST FREQUENTLY MADE WATERTIGHT µg —ALWAYS SPECIFY USF NUMBER— NAME a DATE- 1v^ TBI E IN TIME OUT WORK COMPLETED Tk 61 f` S^I -P a Ila REMARKS: / % g6 / NAME S K; P C r G c e - DATE (-G-qv na IN TEVE OUT WORK COMPLETED X71,) 7SU LJ6 �p J7S3Y6l -t Id r ''Cr 1 �Gc.!� 1% 0 11¢C'@m0.?^?�•; �;�-i� Sic-i�y7=. IOIU ICU' w• (!I� I 131J L�•�'f n I LIS) 153J �iU•%? IMMARM : f 6� o City of Sebastian 125 MAIN STr'�E=1 G SESASi TAN, FLOORIDA'2SSa i � HONE (407) 589-553_20c FAX (40) ^a?-ai0 ( M Date: Time: Inquiry Taken bv: f1,,--1/ Customer Name: 'n2) NJ Address: Phone r: (D Co v Wave Responded via: phoney other (list) Date & Time: Response by: t1S1J City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN S i RE -i c S23AS71AN, FLORIDA .32953 i �F=HCNE (407) 53 .'30 Q FAX (40-17 53�� r 0 U-TIII=S SYSTEM CUSTOMER IT QU RY FOR!ti1 Date: — Time: 10'-0S Inquiry Taken by: nSV Customer Name: m t�' Address: Phone T: account T: Responded via: phone Date & Time: Response by: other (list) VIDEO CASSETTE TAPE OF THE SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS PHASE I UNIT 17 GRAVITY SEWER MAIN ALONG CAPRONA AVENUE December 1981 Phase I Unit 17 Manhole 14 to Manhole 15 Camera is 8' into the line pulling from north to south Joint at 14' Joint at 26' 39' Service lateral on top right Joint at 51' Joint at 64' Joint at 76' Joint at 88' Joint at 100' Joint at 113' Joint at 125' Joint at 138' Joint at 150' Joint at 162' Joint at 174' 187' Service lateral on top right Joint at 199' 207' Service lateral on top right Joint at 212' Joint at 224' Joint at 247' End of Run from Manhole 14 to Manhole 15 City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 11 FAX (407) 589-5570 MEMORABDUM DATE: April 28, 1994 TO: City Manager, Joel Koford FROM: Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director SUBJECT: Videotapes of Sewer Main on Thunderbird Drive After our discussion yesterday in regard to the existence of a videotape of the sewer main on Thunderbird Drive west of Schumann Drive, I rechecked all of the tapes we had received from General Development Utilities. Unfortunately, I did not find a tape of the sewer main from Manhole 23 at the intersection of Schumann Drive and Thunderbird Drive west to Manhole 22 on Thunderbird Drive. Manhole 22 is located just east of Mr. Wininger's residence. According to Mr. Wininger, when he moved into his house the GDU staff in Miami denied the fact that a sewer main had been installed on Thunderbird Drive. 61I L*L/ •gj Q _ 08383 ddd N N � Go -- - M tr9 a w? 1r rn U 0 N Cn CO Q) x R ro 3 f S Its �� N ZL'4/ � iOO HJS OS+I 'w a A rn ".NNVvq;nHOS y °D� o N N N N N 7 CA v 2 In r 2?i L a°I °M N V) 6jyi o2 11) c) rD 83 HO8V - ou N � qi 9 I—.1.�CIItI(V115 PJ N rn m M ca �m a w D a' \• , 61I L*L/ •gj Q _ 08383 ddd N N � Go -- - M tr9 a w? 1r rn U 0 N Cn CO Q) x R ro 3 f S Its �� N ZL'4/ � iOO HJS OS+I 'w a A rn ".NNVvq;nHOS y °D� o N N N N N 7 CA v 2 In r 2?i L a°I °M N V) 6jyi o2 11) c) rD 83 HO8V - ou N � qi L �m a w N Q \• W 61I L*L/ •gj Q _ 08383 ddd N N � Go -- - M tr9 a w? 1r rn U 0 N Cn CO Q) x R ro 3 f S Its �� N ZL'4/ � iOO HJS OS+I 'w a A rn ".NNVvq;nHOS y °D� o N N N N N 7 CA v 2 In r 2?i L a°I °M N V) 6jyi o2 11) c) rD 83 HO8V - ou N � qi City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET ❑ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 ❑ FAX (407) 589-5570 MEMORANDUM DATE: April 26, 1994 TO: City Manager, Joel Koford �2,/ FROM: Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director I"6" SUBJECT: Gravity Sewer Main Along Schumann Drive From Thunderbird Drive North to Lift Station No. 4 Yesterday, I received the VHS videotapes of the Sebastian Highlands sanitary sewer system that the Video Doc had copied from GDU's old Beta videotapes. Consequently. I viewed the video tape for the subject sewer main last night. I noted all of the audio comments made during the original December 3, 1981 televising on the attached sheet. The video tape starts from Manhole No. 23 at the intersection of Thunderbird and Schumann Drives and continues northward along Schumann Drive to Lift Station No. 4. A copy of a portion of GDU's Unit 17 (Phases 3, 4, and 5) sewage collection system is attached showing Manholes 23 and 24. Manhole 23 is the receiving manhole from the sewage discharged from the 8" force main emanating from the Pelican Island Elementary School on Schumann Drive. From my visual observation of the video tapes and audio comments made by the televising technician, the entire gravity sewer main appears to be constructed to grade. There were no major undulations of the pipe and only a slight dip near the very end of the run near the lift station. The technician even stated that the main had a good slope. I did not see where the original construction of the sewer main would have caused blockage of the flow in future years. The Utilities Department personnel, who the City hired upon acquisition of the system, do not have any recollection of any blockage in this main during the course of their employment. If the odor that is being reported by residents on Thunderbird Drive was caused by a blockage in the main from Manhole 23 to the Lift Station No. 4, I am sure that our personnel would have had to flush the main out within the last two to three years. This, of course, has not been the case according to Ron Briskie, Plant Supervisor. Page 2 of 2 April 26, 1994 Memo to Joel Koford Therefore, I am under the opinion that the odor at Thunderbird and Schumann Drives is caused by sewage in the 8" force main that has turned septic from sitting in the pipe for a 48 hour or longer period over the weekend. VIDEO CASSETTE TAPE OF THE SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS PHASE III UNIT 17 GRAVITY SEWER MAIN ALONG SCHUMANN DRIVE FROM THUNDERBIRD DRIVE NORTH TO LIFT STATION #4 Page 1 of 4 Correlate this tape with GDU drawings entitled "Portion of Unit 17 (Phases 3, 4, and 5) Sewage Collection System" The following is the audio commentary on the tape from the video technician: December 3, 1981 Manhole 23 to Manhole 24 Phase III Unit 17 Camera is 8' into the line Joint" at 15' Joint at 27' Short section of pipe at 39 Joint at 52' Joint at 58' Joint at 65' Joint at 70' Joint at 75' Joint at 87' Joint at 100' Joint at 112' Joint at 124' Joint at 137' - 40', not leaking 150' Service lateral on the left Joint at 163' Joint at 175' 188' Service lateral on the left Joint at 200' Joint at 213' Joint at 225' Joint at 237' Joint at 250' Joint at 262' Joint at 275' Joint at 287' Joint at 300' 309' Service lateral on the left Joint at 313' Joint at 326' Joint at 338' 346' Service lateral on the right Joint at 350' Joint at 363' Joint at 376' (The technician did not report the total footage from Manhole 23 to Manhole 24) Comments: "Line was clean, did not see any leaks." VIDEO CASSETTE TAPE OF THE SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS PHASE III UNIT 17 GRAVITY SEWER MAIN ALONG SCHUMANN DRIVE FROM THUNDERBIRD DRIVE NORTH TO LIFT STATION #4 Page 2 of 4 Manhole 24 to Manhole 25 Joint at 11' Joint at 23' Joint at 36' Joint at 48' Joint at 60' 73' Service lateral on the left Joint at 84' Joint at 96' 109' Service lateral on the right Joint at 121' Joint at 124' Joint at 146' Joint at 159' Joint at 171' Joint at 183' Joint at 196' Joint at 208' Joint at 221' 223' Service lateral on the left, very small amount of water Joint at 247' Joint at 258' 271' Service lateral on the right Joint at 284' Joint at 296' Joint at 308' Joint at 321' Joint at 333' Joint at 346' Joint at 358' 371' Service lateral on the left (The technician did not report the total footage from Manhole 24 to Manhole 25) Comments: "Line was clean. Some services had water but believe it was water from the cleaner. Very small dip at the end of the line." VIDEO CASSETTE TAPE OF THE SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS PHASE III UNIT 17 GRAVITY SEWER MAIN ALONG SCHUMANN DRIVE FROM THUNDERBIRD DRIVE NORTH TO LIFT STATION #4 Page 3 of 4 Manhole 25 to Manhole 26 15' Service lateral to the left Joint at 27' 40' Service lateral to the right (about 2 o'clock) Joint at 52 Joint at 64' Joint at 77' Joint at 89' Joint at 101' Joint at 114' Joint at 126' Joint at 139' Joint at 151' 164' Service lateral Joint at 176' Joint at 188' Joint at 201' 203' Service lateral Joint at 213' Joint at 226' Joint at 238' Joint at 251' Joint at 263' Joint at 276' Joint at 288' Joint at 300' Joint at 313' Joint at 326' Joint at 338' Joint at 351' Joint at 363' 3 to the right to the right 66 Joint at 376' Service lateral to the left (The technician did not report the total footage from Manhole 25 to Manhole 26) Comments: "Reached the end of the line. The line was clean. Did not see any leaks. It has a good slope." VIDEO CASSETTE TAPE OF THE SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS PHASE III UNIT 17 GRAVITY SEWER MAIN ALONG SCHUMANN DRIVE FROM THUNDERBIRD DRIVE NORTH TO LIFT STATION #4 Page 4 of 4 Manhole 26 to Manhole 60 Joint at 19' Joint at 31' Joint at 44' Joint at 56' Joint at 69' Joint at 81' Joint at 94' Joint at 106' Joint at 119' Joint at 131' Joint at 143' Joint at 156' Joint at 168' Joint at 181' Joint at 193' Joint at 206' Joint at 218' Joint at 231' Joint at 243' Joint at 256' (The technician did not report the total footage from Manhole 26 to Manhole 60) Comments: "Little bit of sand at the end. The line looked good. Didn't see any leaks." Manhole 60 to the Lift Station Joint at 14' Joint at 27' Little piece of PVC sticking out. but is no problem Joint at 39' Joint at 51' Joint at 63' (The technician did not report the total footage from Manhole 60 to the Lift Station) Comments: "End of line. Line is complete and looks OK." i - City of Sebastian r1 1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 C1 FAX (407) 589-5570 MEMORANDUM DATE: August 8, 1994 TO: Joel L. Koford, City Manager FROM: Rich Votapka, Utilities Director &l SUBJECT: Information Requested on the City's Wastewater System 1. SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY FLOW (AADF) 66,000 GPD Based on 1993 Monthly Operating Reports, the Bailey Drive wastewater treatment plant annual average daily flow (AADF) for the Sebastian Highlands system was 0.066 MGD (66,000 gals/day) See page 10-2 of Master Plan. 2. SEBASTIAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT CAPACITY 142,000 GPD The rated treatment capacity of the City's Bailey Drive wastewater treatment plant is 0.300 MGD (300,000 gallons per day). However, the permitted maximum effluent disposal is 0.142 MGD (142,000 gals/day). Therefore, the capacity of the plant is limited to its effluent disposal or 142,000 gals/day. See pages 10-7 and 10-12 of the Master Plan. 3. PARK PLACE/PALM LAKE CLUB ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY FLOW (AADF) (32,000 GPD) Based on 1993 Monthly Operating Reports, the Park Place/Palm Lake Club AADF was 0.032 MGD (32,000 GPD) See page 10-1 of the Master Plan. AOMN Av%� 4. TOTAL AVERAGE DAILY WASTEWATER FLOW FOR SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS AND PARK PLACE/PALM LAKE CLUB WHEN COMBINED = 98,000 GALS/DAY If in six (6) months, the Sebastian Highlands sewer system is interconnected with the Park Place/Palm Lake Club system, the AADF would be (32,000 GPD + 66,000 GPD) = 98,000 gals/day. This combined flow would have 44,000 gallons of plant capacity remaining. 5. AVERAGE NO. OF UNITS CONNECTED TO SEWER IN PARK PLACE/PALM LAKE CLUB IN 1993 = 202 units (avg.) When the City assumed operations on May 1, 1993 from Indian River County, Park Place had 164 units and Palm Lake Club had 23 units connected to the sewer system. At the end of 1993, Park Place had 186 units and Palm Lake Club had 31 units connected to sewer. The AVERAGE number of units in 1993 connected to sewer in Park Place was 175 and Palm Lake Club was 27. Adding the average number of units in Park Place (175) and Palm Lake Club (27) for 1993, the yearly average number of units for both developments equalled (175 + 27) 202 units. 6. MAXIMUM NO. OF UNITS IN PARK PLACE AND PALM LAKE CLUB AT BUILDOUT = 784 units (max.) The maximum number of units to be developed in Park Place is 648 at full build out; the maximum number of units to be developed in Palm Lake Club is 136 units. The total amount of combined units = 648 + 136 = 784 units. (See attached maps) 7. ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY FLOW (AADF) FOR PARK PLACE/PALM LAKE_ CLUB =160 gals/unit/day Using the 1993 AADF of 32,000 gallons, divide by the average number of units connected to sewer in 1993 which is 202. (32,000 gals/202 units = 158.4 gals/unit). Round to 160 gallons/unit per day based on AADF. 8. AVERAGE DAILY FLOW (ADF) FOR PARK PLACE/PALM LAKE CLUB AT TOTAL BUILDOUT =125,000 gal/day Multiply the maximum number of units (784) by the average daily flow (ADF) 160 gals/day/unit = 125,440 gallons per day at full buildout of both developments. Round to 125,500 GPD. 9) COMBINED FLOW OF SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS SEWER SYSTEM WITH FLOW FROM MAXIMUM BUILDOUT OF PARK PLACE/PALM LAKE CLUB SEWER SYSTEM =191,500 gals/day Taking just the present day annual average daily flow (AADF) of the Sebastian Highlands system which is 66,000 gpd and adding it to the AADF maximum buildout of Park Place and Palm Lakes Club (which may occur in 5 to 10 years from now) of 125,500 gals/day, the total flow would be 191,500 gals/day. This flow is approximately 50,000 gals/day more than the rated capacity of the existing percolation ponds. The AADF will, of course, be higher in the Sebastian Highlands system due to customer hookups during the period of time in which buildout would occur in Park Place/Palm Lake Club. 10) EXPANSION OF THE CITY'S WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES Since the wastewater treatment plant has the treatment capability of 300,000 gals/day, the effluent disposal capability of the percolation ponds should be increased by 158,000 gpd. Reuse water on citrus groves surrounding the wastewater plant, on the golf course, or scrub jay habitat lands set aside by the City should be used in lieu of percolation ponds. The poor characteristics of the soil on the wastewater sites most probably will not allow expansion of the percolation ponds. The Master Plan addresses improvements to the wastewater plant to provide for reuse and for expansion of the wastewater plant itself from 0.3 MGD to 0.5 MGD. See pages 10-22 to 10-24, 10-29, and 10-30 of the Master Plan. Attachments: Master Plan Pages and Maps Specified Within Memo /sg Summarized in Table 10-1 are the projected average daily flows for the City's WWTP for the 10 -year planning period of this report. Upon analysis of this data, it can be seen that even with the Park Place/Palm Lake Club and other sewage contributions incorporated with the existing Sebastian Highlands flows, the Sebastian Highlands WWTP treatment capacity will not be exceeded anytime during the 10 -year planning period. However, based on these projections, the capacity of the present effluent disposal system will be exceeded sometime during the 1995 to 1996 timeframe. It is noted that the projected average daily wastewater flow in 1994 was estimated to be approximately 0.128 MGD and increase to approximately 0.226 MGD in 2003. The 1994 flow estimates for the Sebastian Highlands WWTP (0.128 MGD) are noted to be much higher than the 1993 recorded annual average (0.066 MGD). The projected flow estimates are based on the sewage flow trends for several years past. The 1993 AADF value of 0.066 MGD was actually much lower than the previous three (3) years. Since flow estimates are not normally projected to decrease, it was difficult to predict the flow projections for the planning period. It appears that rainfall has an affect on the WWTP flows. Since wet or dry years cannot be projected or anticipated, the conservative flow projection values must be assumed. The FDEP regulations which govern the collection and treatment of wastewater, residuals management, and the disposal of effluent are primarily described in the following Chapters of the FAC: 1. 17-600, Domestic Wastewater Facilities. 2. 17-604, Collection Systems and Transmission Facilities. 3. 17-610, Reuse of Reclaimed Water and Land Application. 4. 17-640, Domestic Wastewater Residuals. In addition to the above rules and regulations the City's wastewater treatment and disposal facilities are also governed by Chapter 40, CFR, Part 503 which governs the treatment and disposal of wastewater sludges. The Wastewater System CIP that has been designed consists of a series of programs to be implemented over the next 10 -years to correspond to the City's needs resulting from future GIR/pt/R-S-3/SeclO.rpt HAI #92-023.07 10-2 080594 2. Installation of approximately 6,400 linear feet of 6 -inch DR25 PVC force main from the existing lift station located east of the entrance to Park Place to the 8 -inch force main on Schumann Drive near the Pelican Island Elementary School. This project will complete the interconnection of the Park Place/Palm Lake Club service area to the Sebastian Highlands wastewater system. 3. Construction of a new duplex submersible lift station and the installation of approximately 500 linear feet of 6 -inch DR25 PVC force main along an easement through property along the west side of the FEC railroad right-of-way from the new lift station at the northeast corner of Palm Lake Club to the existing Indian River County force main in the Barber Street right-of-way. The project will re -connect the Breezy Village area to the Indian River County wastewater system. 10.2.2 Wastewater Treatment Facilities Improvements The City of Sebastian's WWTP is an extended aeration, activated sludge facility with a rated capacity of 0.300 MGD. The treatment processes at this facility include screening, aeration, secondary clarification, and chlorination. An aerobic digester is currently used for sludge stabilization and storage with ultimate disposal by land application. The first concern is meeting the new sludge stabilization requirements outlined in Title 40 CFR, Part 503. Chapter 17-600, FAC requires that the permittee provide for the timely planning, design and construction of wastewater treatment facilities necessary to provide proper treatment and reuse or disposal of domestic wastewater and management of wastewater residuals. Under Paragraph 405(8) of this Chapter the following is required: 1. If the permitted capacity of the WWTP will be equaled or exceeded within the next 5 -years planning and preliminary design of the necessary improvements will need to be initiated. GJR/pt/R-S-3/SeclO.rpt HAI #92-023.07 10-7 080594 operating costs necessary to implement lime stabilization improvements at the Sebastian Highlands WWTP. In accordance with the requirements outlined in Title 40 CFR Part 503, facilities improvements (if necessary) must be on-line by March 1995. As a result the design of facilities modifications should be completed by September to October 1994 and construction should begin by November 1994. The total anticipated cost for the lime stabilization facilities is approximately $97,500. 10.2.3 Effluent Disposal Facilities As mentioned in Subsection 8.4.1, the City of Sebastian's WWTP utilizes percolation ponds as its method of effluent treatment and disposal. The present effluent disposal system has a total capacity of 0.142 MGD. Capital improvements to provide additional effluent treatment and disposal capacity should be initiated no later than 1999 to ensure providing the necessary effluent treatment and disposal capacity in anticipation of increased future wastewater flows at the Sebastian Highlands WWTP. 10.2.4 Immediate Wastewater System CIP Scheduling and Costs The proposed improvements to the City's wastewater system will improve the level of service provided to the City's wastewater customers, as well as meet the rules and requirements which govern the treatment and disposal facilities. Based on cost information prepared for the improvements, modifications, and/or up -grades that are required for the existing facilities to collect, transmit, treat and dispose of the wastewater during the immediate planning period, a preliminary capital cost estimate was developed. Presented in Table 10-4 are the costs by category and project as well as the year in which the funds should be allocated. 10.3 1995 TO 1999 WASTEWATER SYSTEM CIP The 1995 to 1999 Wastewater System CIP is the result of our evaluation of the City's wastewater collection and transmission, treatment, and effluent disposal facilities. The Wastewater System CIP recommended improvements and modifications to the existing wastewater system should be implemented during this period to ensure a properly operating system for the projected wastewater flows, and the existing and proposed wastewater treatment GJR/pt/R-S-3/SeclO.rpt HAI #92-023.07 10-12 080594 SECTION 10 WASTEWATER SYSTEM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM 10.1 INTRODUCTION Based on the results of the evaluation of the City's wastewater treatment and effluent disposal facilities presented in Section 4, and the hydraulic analyses of the wastewater collection and transmission system presented in Section 8, a number of deficiencies in the existing system, as well as potential problems which may arise as growth in the City places greater demands on the system were identified. A Wastewater System CIP has been developed, to be implemented over the next 10 -years. The plan addresses existing problems in the near-term, and outlines future needs to provide collection, transmission, treatment, and disposal capacity to meet demands and the required level of service as the City grows. Historically, the average daily flows recorded at the City's WWTP since 1984 have ranged from 0.066 MGD to 0.114 MGD. The maximum month average daily wastewater flows experienced at this facility. have ranged from 0.077 MGD to 0.129 MGD. The greatest historical maximum daily flow ever recorded at the City's WWTP was 0.182 MGD in March of 1993. This extreme flow was coincidental with a large rainfall event. Based on the data reviewed, the maximum day to average day ratio for influent wastewater flow since 1985 was determined to be approximately 1.80 and the maximum month to average day ratio for influent wastewater flow was determined to be 1.2. As previously mentioned, the City of Sebastian acquired the wastewater collection and transmission system that serves the Park Place/Palm Lake Club development. The future interconnect will result in increased wastewater flows at the City's WWTP. Since January 1992, the average daily flows from the Park Place/Palm Lake Club developments ranged from 0.018 MGD to 0.037 MGD, and in 1993 averaged 0.032 MGD. The flows from the Park Place/Palm Lake Club service area are currently pumped to one of Indian River County's WWTP facilities. The wastewater flows from the wastewater service area will therefore result in an increase in flows to the City's WWTP from approximately 12 to 26 percent. As a result, the additional wastewater flows from the Park Place/Palm Lake Club wastewater service area will decrease the available capacity of the City's WWTP by approximately 22 -percent. GJR/pt/R-S-3/Secl0.rpt HAI #92-023.07 10-1 080594 February 28, 1994 Record of Palm Lake Club Wastewater ERU's DATE BLOCK/LOT I ADDRESS ERU'sBALANCE DT(T ltf• -.• 08/16/90 Clubhouse 10/30/90 C-20 10/30/90 C-21 10/30/90 C-22 10/30/90 C-27 10/30/90 C-28 05/17/91 C-18 07/03/91 C-17 08/28/91 0-6 07/13/92 •B-26 12/07/92 C-16 12/07/92 0-4 t 11 ERU's which did not appear on Lori Kowalski's May S. 1993 record of ERU's 39 41 43 45 2 44 35 33 34 4 31 38 23 18 27 30 32 36 42 42 11 1 15 1 17 END OF COUNTY DATA 05/07/93 C-15 29 JUNE 11 1993 BILLING JULY 1. 1993 BILLING AUGUST 1. 1993 BILLING 08/23/93 3-23 10 SEPTEMBER 1, 1993 BILLING OCTOBER 1, 1993 BILLING 10/27/93 29 10/27/93 40 10/27/93 15 NOVEMBER 1. 1993 BILLING 11/02/93 17 11/17/93 2 DECEMBER 1. 1993 BILLING 12/10/93 4 53 JANUARY 1. 1999 BILLING 01/24/94 4 13 FEBRUARY 1. 1994 BILLING 02/04/94 26 02/23/94 55 02/23/94 4 59 MARCH 1. 1991 BILLING Treasure Treasure Treasure Treasure Andros Ln Treasure Treasure Treasure Treasure Andros Ln Treasure Treasure Treasure Abaco Court Treasure Treasure Treasure Treasure Treasure Bimini C1 Bimini Ci Bimini Ci Bimini Ci Treasure Andros Bimini Treasure Treasure Treasure Bimini Treasure Bimini Circle Treasure Treasure Treasure 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I I 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 I8 17 17 16 16 16 16 15 15 15 14 13 12 12 11 10 10 9 9 8 8 7 6 5 5 24 co AA JECZFb 3k Couu�--c-coo -F> t<- T-> LN C -E, G48 LOTS r\) 0 1 m 1: --1 O I IN RA ra CA (A CT) w C" rri N) CA CA (A CD W CT O7 CA ED r\) 0 1 m 1: --1 O I IN RA 0 (A CT) w N) W CT O7 ti ED tT Of a la O W 131) C 71" j � ET) 0 — ;A Lin - y) (am (31 r\) 0 1 m 1: --1 O I IN RA OD N) W CT O7 "i ED N) W CT O7 "i ED la O W 131) C 71" (31 cleared of vegetation and other debris, and excavated to maintain proper side slopes. Estimated capital costs necessary to properly refurbish the sludge ponds are estimated at $3,000. 10.3.3 Effluent Disposal Facilities Capital improvements to provide additional effluent treatment and disposal capacity should be initiated no later than 1999 to ensure providing the necessary effluent treatment and disposal capacity in anticipation of increased future wastewater flows at the Sebastian Highlands WWTP. Since the existing effluent disposal is 0.142 MGD and the flow projections for the planning period estimate this value to be exceeded by this year. If the effluent disposal capacity is not expanded within the immediate improvements period, then the disposal capacity will need to be expanded in the 1995 to 1999 planning period. During the calendar year 1993, the wastewater system treated approximately 0.066 MGD on an average daily flow basis. To provide sufficient effluent disposal capacity throughout the planning period of this master plan, the City of Sebastian should implement one of the effluent disposal systems discussed in Section 8. It is recommended that the City provide the additional effluent disposal capacity by implementing the grove irrigation alternative discussed in Section 8. Grove irrigation would provide the necessary effluent disposal capacity while at the same time being the most effective in terms of capital costs and ease of construction. The grove irrigation system is basically proposed due to the lower costs associated with the overall project. The improvements necessary for the grove irrigation will require a second clarifier, complete filtration and high level disinfection facilities. Effluent pumping facilities will also be required. If negotiations with the grove owner cannot be initiated or finalized, the City has the option of construction an effluent pipeline to the existing City Golf Course for spray irrigation. The tertiary facilities are still required for this method of disposal, since the public access level of treatment is required. In addition, if the City decides at a later date to relocate the entire wastewater treatment facilities to a location at or near the City airport, the effluent main and lift station can be converted to repump raw flow from the Filbert Street site to the new location. It is also recommended that a dividing wall be installed in the 204,000 gallon aeration basin to provide a dual aeration basin as required by EPA for Class I Reliability requirements. In addition, a second clarifier must be constructed to also comply with the Class I Reliability Requirements. The plant improvements will also consist of new filtration and high level disinfection facilities. An effluent lift station will also be constructed to pump to the selected site. Table 10-6 and Table 10-7 list preliminary probable cost estimates for these improvements. GJR/pt/R-S-3/Sec 10. rpt HAI #92-023.07 10-22 080594 TABLE 10-6 CITY OF SEBASTIAN WATER AND WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN GROVE IRRIGATION PRELIMINARY COST SUMMARY Item Descri tion Units No. of Units R) Unit Costs (g) Total Costs ($) Reuse Stora e Gal 150,000 0.30 45,000 Effluent Pum in LS 1 35000W 35,000 Filtration Units SF 105 700 73,500 Chlorine Contact Gal 8,40-0- 2.00 16,800 Electrical/Instrumentation LS 1 10,000 10,000 Site Work LS 1 10,000 10,000 Yard Piping LS 1 10,000 10,000 Distribution Mains LF 13,000 Oi 65,000 Fencing LF 7 900 10.00 79,000 General Requirements LS 1 10 000 40,000 Sub -Total Construction 384,300 Contingency cQ 20% 76,860 En ineerin Q 30% 115 290 Total 576,450 Note: (1) Assumes an effluent transmission main of 3,000 feet and 10,000 feet of distribution mains at the spray irrigation site. GJR/SJR/pt/cl/ 10-6a. tab HAI #92-023.07 10-23 080494 TABLE 10-7 CITY OF SEBASTIAN WATER AND WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN GOLF COURSE SPRAY IRRIGATION PRELUMNARY COST SUMMARY Item Descri tion Units No. of Units R) Unit Costs ($� Total Costs ($� Filtration Units SF 105 700 73,500 Chlorine Contact Gal 8-,40-0- 2.00 16,800 Reuse Storage Gal 150,000 0.30 45,000 Hi h Service Pum in LS 1 35,000 35,000 Effluent Pum in LS 1 15,000 15,000 Electrical/Instrumentation LS 1 10,000 10,000 Site Work LS 1 10,000 10,000 Yard Pi in LS 1 10,000 10,000 Transmission Main LF 14,000 15.00 210,000 O n Cuts, Bore &Jacks EA 20 1 000 20 000 General R uirements LS 1 1 1 70,000 70 000 Sub -Total Construction 495,300 Contingency @ 20% 99 060 Engineering @ 30% 148 590 Total 742,950 SJR/pt/R-S-3/10-7a. tab HAI #92-023.07 10-24 080494 TABLE 10-9 CITY OF SEBASTIAN WATER AND WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN PRELIMINARY CAPITAL COST ESTIMATE 0.500 MGD WWTP Subtotal $ 1,202,400 Permitting, Engineering & Administration ® 20% 240,480 Contingency ® 30% 360.720 TOTAL L-1803.600 SJR/pt/R-S-3/10-9. tab HAI #92-023.07 10-30 080494 Description Cost ($) 1. Sitework Construction $ 180,000 2. Operations Building 120,000 3. Pretreatment a. Structure 60,000 b. Bar Screen 5,000 4. Treatment Unit a. Concrete Tank 100,000 b. Concrete Clarifier Center Support 5,700 C. Concrete WAS and Scum Pit 1,000 d. Air Lifts 2,700 e. Diffusers 10,500 f. Clarifier Mechanism 20,000 g. Sludge Pumps 5,500 h. Weir and Baffles 900 i. Piping 9,500 j. Air Piping 6,200 k. Valves 2,400 1. Painting (Coatings) 10,000 S. Aerobic Digester a. Structure 100,000 b. Aerators 43,000 C. Piping 6,500 d. Painting (Coatings) 13,000 6. Filters 50,000 7. Chlorination a. Storage Structure 20,000 b. Contact Basin 60,000 C. Chlorine Scale 3,000 d. Chlorine Crane 3,500 8. On -Site Wetwells a. Plant Pump Station 8,000 b. Backwash Pump Station 50,000 9. Blowers 40,000 10. Generator Set 40,000 11. Yard Piping 26,000 12. Instrumentation/Electrical 200,000 Subtotal $ 1,202,400 Permitting, Engineering & Administration ® 20% 240,480 Contingency ® 30% 360.720 TOTAL L-1803.600 SJR/pt/R-S-3/10-9. tab HAI #92-023.07 10-30 080494 wastewater treatment facility be on-line by the end of 2000. The planning, design and permitting of these improvements should be initiated in 1999. Based on our analysis of the projected wastewater flows assuming the regulatory requirements remain intact the following items need to be completed during this planning period: 1. Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion. Based on the projected flows to the WWTP the facility should be expanded to treat an average daily flow of 0.5 MGD. The expanded facilities will utilize the same conventional type -extended aeration activated sludge process to treat the wastewater. The 0.5 MGD facility would be located at a site north of the airport near the proposed WTP. The facility would include wastewater flows from the existing Sebastian Highlands WWTP. This would be accomplished by converting the Sebastian Highlands WWTP into a lift station and diverting the flow to the new facility. The 0.5 MGD plant would provide sufficient capacity to meet projected wastewater flows throughout the planning period. The total estimated construction cost for these facilities is estimated to be approximately $1,803,600. As previously mentioned, these facilities should be on-line by the end of 1999 to meet the requirements of 17-600, FAC, as well as the demands of the City's wastewater system. Table 10-9 summarizes the preliminary capital costs for 0.5 MGD WWTP which is to be located near the airport. 2. FDEP Operations Permit Renewal. The operations permit for the existing 0.3 MGD WWTP will expire in September,. 1998. Therefore, the permit should be renewed and submitted by June, 1998. Along with this permit renewal application, the proposed WWTP facility will need a permit application submitted to FDEP so that the WWTP can become operational in the year 2001. The operating permit for the 0.5 MGD facility will cost approximately $19,200, assuming the permit fee remains at $5,000. This includes engineering costs associated with capacity analysis and operation and maintenance performance reports. GJR/pt/R-S-3/SeclO.rpt HAI t/92-023.07 10-29 080594 �.EN\f'l tnwnun . ��- Department of ������y" r FLORIDA . Environmental ' Protection Central District Lawton Chiles 3319 Maguire Boulevard, Suite 232 Virginia B. Wetherell Governor Orlando, Florida 32803-3767 Secretary City of Sebastian 1225 Main Street Sebastian, FL 32958 Attention: Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director Indian River County - PW Sebastian Highlands Park Place/Palm Lake Club Interconnection (156,800 GPD) File Number: WD31-254412 Dear Mr. Votapka: This letter is to advise you that the Department has reviewed your Notice of Intent to Use General Permit as provided in Rule 17-555, Florida Administrative Code (FAC), to construct a water distribution system extension and does not object to your use of such general permit. Please be advised that you are required to abide by all conditions in Rules 17-4.510 through 17-4.540, FAC, the general requirements for general permits; and Rule 17-555.410, FAC. A LETTER OF CLEARANCE MUST BE ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT TO YOU PRIOR TO YOUR PLACING THIS PROJECT INTO SERVICE OR YOU, THE PERMITTEE, SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATE ENFORCEMENT ACTION. To obtain the clearance letter, the engineer -of -record must submit one set of record drawings, a "Request for Letter of Release to Place Water Supply System into Service" (DER Form 17-555.910(9)] (attached to the engineer's copy of this letter), a copy of this letter and satisfactory bacteriological test results (with chlorine residuals indicated) taken on two consecutive days from, or near, the beginning and end of the proposed main and from a point at Tracy Drive. Water sample forms must indicate specific recommended sample locations and file number above. NOTE TO THE UTILITY: Pursuant to 403.859(6), Florida Statutes, do not provide water service to this project (other than for flushing/testing) until the Department of Environmental Protection has issued a letter of clearance or you, the utility, shall be subject to enforcement action. Sincerely, .7' Alexan Distr'ct l( AA: At pp cc: Gary J. ReVoir, II, P.E. P. "Protect, Conserve and Manage Florida's Environment and Natural Resources" Printed an recycled paper. 08/02/94 10:45 $407 839 3790 HARMAN ASSOC [a 001/003 a. - ®® \RTMAN & ASSOC6 'ES, INC. �® engineers, hydrogeolagists, surveyors &management consultants 201 EAST PINE STREET - SUITE 1000 • ORLANDO, FL 32801 TELEPHONE (407) 839-3955 FAX (407) 839-3790 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL TO: 2KFROM: O DATE_ 8 4 RE. -f-&4 In ILA WE ARE SENDING YOU 3 PAGES, INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET. THESE PAGES ARE BEING TRANSMITTED AS INDICATED BELOW: HARD COPY: MESSAGE: AS REQUESTED FOR YOUR USE FOR YOUR COMMENTS FOR YOUR APPROVAL ❑ WILL BE SENT VIA REGULAR MAIL ❑ WILL BE SENT VIA OVERNIGHT MAIL SkWILL BE SENT BY FACSIMILE ONLY 1 �..a�LJ IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS OR PROBLEMS WITH THIS TRANSMITTAL, PLEASE CALL (407) 83.9-3955 08/02/94 10:48 $407 839 3790 9ARTYA1X ASSOC IR002/003 August 2, 1994 Mr. Joseph M. McNamara, P.E., Program Manager Drinking Water Section Department of Environmental Protection Central District 3319 Maguire Boulevard, Suite 232 Orlando, Florida 32803 HAI #92-023.11 Re: City of Sebastian - Sebastian Highlands WTP Ammoniation System PATS Number 254413 Dear Mr. McNamara: With reference to your letter dated July 29, 1994 and in accordance with rule 17-555.520, FAC, the following responses to your comments are submitted for the Department's review and comment: Comment #1: It appears that manual adjustment of the ammonia feed rate is proposed. This plant only requires six hour per day operator staffing and "visits" on each weekend day. Does the plant operate in the absence of operator staffing? If so, does the flow rate vary? If so, describe how the ammonia gas feed rate will be proportioned to the flow for both prefiltration and postfiltration injection points during those periods when an operator is not present. Response #1: The City of Sebastian operates the Sebastian Highlands WTP approximately 8 hours per day (0700 to 1500). During the 8 hour work shift, the potable water supply for each day is produced and stored in the 0.50 MG ground storage tank on- site. Potable water demand to the system is supplied automatically by high service pumps from the ground storage tank during the entire day. Each morning, the operators activate the potable water wells and lime softening plant to refill the 0.50 GST. The tank provides more than sufficient capacity for the demands on the remaining 16 hours. It is anticipated that the operators will manually activate and deactivate the ammoniation system in conjunction with the other treatment facilities during the 8 hour shift. This procedure is anticipated to provide and ensure accurate feed rates and overall system safety_ Since the other treatment facilities are not operated during the un -manned 16 hour period, the ammonia system. It is anticipated that the main feed point will be postfiltration. The prefiltration feed point will be provided to offer system flexibility. Comment #2= Regarding operator safety, describe how the operator will be aware of a leak prior to entering the ammonia storage room. Also, how will the room be ventilated. 09/02/94 10:49 '2407 939 3790 HARTMAN ASSOC 2 003/003 Response #2: The ammonia leak detector indicated on the drawing will be connected to an audible and visual alarm at the storage room. A ventilation fan and several cross vent louvers will be provided in the building to ensure proper ventilation. Comment #3: Rule 17-555.320(1) Florida Administrative Code, requires that a plan be submitted prior to modifications, to include the following: a. An evaluation of the water system for sanitary defects and the source water for bacteriological quality. b_ An evaluation of its treatment practices and the proposed improvements that will minimize disinfectant demand and optimize finished water quality throughout the distribution system. C. Analyses of the heterotropic plate counts, as appropriate, before the modification. d. Assurance that an active disinfectant residual will be present throughout the distribution system during the modification_ Response #3: The City of Sebastian samples for source water quality at the appropriate intervals required by the Department. The proposed improvements will not affect the water quality with respect to sanitary or bacteriological quality. The City currently provides aeration, lime softening, filtration and chlorination treatment of the raw water supply. This process provides a high level of treatment and greatly reduces the disinfectant demand in the water supply. The City peridically flushes the drinking water system via the fire hydrants to eliminate any stagnant water or settled material which may cause disinfectant demand. It does not appear necessary at this time to provide a heterotropic plate count before the modification. The City of Sebastian will monitor the chlorine residual during start-up and continually following the proposed modifications. Comment #4: Describe the plan for notifying residential and commercial customers prior to start-up with respect to owners of aquariums and dialysis machine. Response #4: The City of Sebastian intends to notify the residential and commercial customers through mailing fliers, public notices in the local newspaper and through notices in and at public places. o �* LAW OFFICES OF POTTER, MCCLELLAND, MARES & HEALY, P. A. J: WILLIAM C. POTTER 'i1 �� T" � FIRST UNION BANA BUILDING GLIPTox A. MCCLELLAND, JR. SUITE 400 DOUGLAS D. MARES PATRICK F. HEALY 700 SOUTH BABCOCK STREET PArsxc TIMOTHY M. WILLIAMS pU6 1994 POST OFFICE BOX 2523 LAURA F- FEATHERROFP MEL ouU E, FLORIDA 32902-2523 HARRY A. JONES Received - — OF COUNSEL City MaugeCS (407) 964-2700 Office FAx: (407) 723-4092 August 12, 1994 Mr. Joel L. Koford City Manager City of Sebastian 1225 Main Street Sebastian, FL 32958 Dear Mr. Koford: You have asked this office about the legal standard which a court would apply to review the method of assessment which the City would use to place public water in the Indian River Drive assessment area. The particular basis to be employed and the method of apportioning a special assessment is generally a question of legislative expediency, which is a decision of the City Council. Carr v. Kissimmee, 86 So. 701. The method and propriety of the apportionment is a question of fact to be ascertained and established as any other fact if the matter is challenged. The apportionment of the cost to be assessed against a particular lot must bear a reasonable and fair relationship to the special benefits it actually accrues. Fisher v. Board of County Commissioners of Dade County, 84 So. 2d 572. The Florida Supreme Court in City of Boca Raton v. State, 595 So.2d 25 (Fla. 1992) has held that while the front foot or square foot methodology for apportioning the cost of special improvement projects are more traditional, other methods are permissible. The type of testimony which the City would seek to elicit if the assessments are challenged is expert technical testimony. The expert would need to testify that in his opinion the method of assessment is recognized in the practice of his profession and it has been applied in accordance with the general practices which are used in his profession. An example is the Rinker Materials Coro v. Town of Lake Park case at 494 So.2d 1123 (Fla. 1986) where the project engineer testified that a square foot method was more appropriate than a front foot method. He stated the improvements contemplated by the project which included roadway, drainage, water and sewer facilities resulted in benefits to the property based on its size instead of its frontage. The Court sustained the City's method on the basis that the engineer's testimony showed that the City was not arbitrary or capricious in selecting its method of assessment. Enclosed is the City of Boca Raton decision. If you have any additional questions, please contact me. Respectfully, C� a. 4AL° CW, -P, q, . Clifton A. McClelland, Jr. CAM/tah Enclosure necessary to i intent of the -e hold that ha- rted by sequen- version of the :at the underly - .l offender stat - :)y a sequential agree with the -rent statute is ad contains no cement. Under ourt has no au - i meaning of a -e has unambig- t. Graham v. .985); Jenny v. 384); Carson v. ir9); State v. -3). :ruction of the its plain mean - defendants to 'fenders, result - and thus may the prison pop- :viction require- :erlying reason- iposition of the uggest that the irea of the law statute carries ed, we answer ive, quash the rt, and remand that the trial roes as a habit - ALD, GRIMES -!cially with an T, J., concurs. "n. A Proposal (a q Guidelines (Jan. F la.Sup.Ct.). CITY KOG'N, Judge, specially co Iconcur with the rationale reached by the majority, but only because this particular defendant's felonies arose from two separate incidents. Were this not the case, I would not concur. I do not believe the legislature intended that a de- fendant be habitualized for separate crimes arising from a single incident, and I do not read the majority as so holding. today. Un- der Florida's complex and overlapping criminal statutes, virtually any felony of- fense can give rise to multiple charges, depending only on the prosecutor's creativi- ty. Thus, virtually every offense could be habitualized and enhanced accordingly. If this is what the legislature intended, it simply would have enhanced the penalties for all crimes rather than resorting to a "backdoor" method of increasing prison OF BOCA RATON v. STATE Fla. 25 Cite. 599 Sold 23 (Fla. 1992) ncurring. power; and (3) method of apportionment of and result proposed assessments was valid. sentences. BARKETT, J., concurs. W o Seer nuReu sena+ r CITY OF BOCA BATON, Florida, etc., Appellant/Cross—Appellee, V. STATE of Florida, etc., et al., Appellees/Cross— Appellants. No. 77468. Supreme Court of Florida. Feb. 27, 1992. City appealed from order of the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Edward Fine. J., which declined to validate special assess- ment improvement bonds proposed to be issued by city. The Supreme Court. Grimes, J., held that: (1) special assess- ment was not a tax; (2) special assessment could be made under the city's home rule Reversed and remanded. McDonald, J., concurred in part and dissented in part and filed opinion in which Shaw, CJ., concurred. 1. Municipal Corporations e-64 Under "Dillon's Rule," which was ap- plied to the language of the 1885 Constitu- tion, powers not granted municipality by legislature were deemed to be reserved to the legislature. See publication Words and Phrases for other judicial constructions and definitions. 2. Municipal Corporations a57, 65 Municipality may exercise any govern- mental, corporate, or proprietary power for municipal purpose except when expressly prohibited by law, and municipality may legislate on any subject matter on which legislature may act, except those subjects specifically proscribed by Municipal Home Rule Powers Act. West's F.S.A. § 166.021. 3. Municipal Corporations x+405, 438 Legally imposed special assessment is not a tax; taxes and special assessments are distinguishable in that, while both are mandatory, there is no requirement that taxes provide any specific benefit to the property and they may be levied through- out the particular tax unit for general ben- efit of residents and property; special as- sessment must confer specific benefit upon land burdened by the assessment. 4. Municipal Corporations 05438, 455 Two requirements for imposition of valid special assessment are that the prop- erty derive special benefit from the service provided and that it be fairly and reason- ably apportioned among the properties that receive the special benefit. 5. Municipal Corporations 13=70 Special assessment proposed by city was not a prohibited tax preempted to the State. West's F.S.A. Const. Art. 7, § 1(a). 26 Fla. 595 SOUTI \ REPORTER, 2d SERIES �~ 6. Municipal Corporations 4--406(2) Statute authorizing municipalities to impose special assessments on certain con- ditions did not preempt authority of munici- palities to impose special assessments un- der other circumstances and it is not the only method by which municipalities may levy a special assessment. West's F.S.A. §§ 170.01 et seq., 170.19. 7. Municipal Corporations 6-406(1) City had authority to impose special assessment under its home rule power. West's F.S.A. § 166.011 et seq. 8. Municipal Corporations x465, 503 Apportionment of benefits received from special assessment is a legislative function and, if reasonable persons may differ as to whether land assessed was benefited by the improvement, finding of city officials must stand. 9. Municipal Corporations e-467 Evidence sustained finding that city's allocation of special assessment on the ba- sis of the property values of the various tracts to be benefited was reasonable, and city was not required to specifically itemize dollar amount of benefit to receive by each person. 10. Municipal Corporations 6=465 Front foot or square foot methodolo- gies for apportioning costs of special im- provement projects are more traditional, but other methods are permissible. Peter L. Dame of Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Jacksonville, Griffith F. Pitcher of Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Miami, and Frank Bartolone, City Arty., Boca Raton, for appellant/cross-appellee. David H. Bludworth, State Atty. and Les- lie M. Ritch, Asst. State Atty., John H. Pelzer, Thomas R. Bolf and Nancy W. Gre- goire of Ruden, Barnett, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and Charles F. Schoech of Caldwell & Pa- cetti, Palm Beach, for appellees/cross-ap- pellants. Robert L. Nabors and Thomas H. Duffy of Nabors, Giblin & Nickerson, P.A., and Harry Morrison, Jr., Tallahassee, amicus curiae for Florida League of Cities. GRIMES, Justice. This is an appeal from a final judgment which declined to validate special assess- ment improvement bonds proposed to be issued by the City of Boca Raton. We have jurisdiction under article V, section 3(b)(2) of the Florida Constitution, and chapter 75, Florida Statutes (1989). In an effort to revitalize its downtown area, the City of Boca Raton (the City) determined to construct a wide range of specifically enumerated improvements in the infrastructure. The estimated cost of the improvements was $44,000,000. The City determined to obtain a portion of, the money to pay the cost from the issuance of bonds in an amount not to exceed $21,000,- 000. 21,000;000. The bonds were to be repaid from special assessments levied over a period of years against the downtown property to be benefitted by the improvements. The City's effort to validate the bonds was op- posed by the State pursuant to chapter 75, Florida Statutes (1989), as well as by sever- al property owners. At the trial, the issues devolved into (1) whether the City had the authority to levy special assessments to pay the bonds, and (2) even if such authori- ty existed, whether this proposal met the legal requirements of a proper special as- sessment. Following the presentation of testimony, the trial judge held that the City did not have the authority to impose special assess- ments to fund the bonds. In this respect, the final judgment stated in pertinent part: 12. Boca Raton lacks the power to specially assess without a specific grant of authority from the legislature. Arti- cle rtrcle VII, Section 1(a) has preempted all forms of taxation other than ad valorem taxes to the State. Article VIII, Section 2(b) of the Florida Constitution does not supersede Article VII, Section 1(a) of said Constitution. Chapter 166 of the Florida Statutes does not supersede Arti- cle VII, Section 1(a) of the Florida Consti- tution. Only the State holds the power to impose assessments. By passing Chapter 1 cific statu to levy sl ties have assessme: this pow - municipal ments. today's c: As a footn judge also Other fin affect th significar turned a: A. Th a tax, it B. Th portional provided in excess C. Th treated ments n� adjoining District. D. E: receive fits. E. A: law hav [l) In authority pay off t: count the Florida. I municipal specific dt islature in VIII, sec* provided The Le; tablish, provide scribe t to alter Powers n legislatur the legish ity was 1 pressed iT nicipol C .hassee, amicus of Cities. final judgment special assess- mposed to be a Raton. We :icle V, section nstitution, and s (1989). its downtown tton (the City) wide range of provements in imated cost of ,000,000. The portion of the :he issuance of cceed $21,000,- e repaid from rer a period of property to be ements. The bonds was op - to chapter 75, all as by sever- -ial, the issues City had the ;sessments to ' such authori- posal met the ger special as - of testimony, City did not ;pecialassess- this respect, ertinent part: .he power to ;pecific grant lature. Arti- ,reempted all n ad valorem VIII, Section :ion does not :tion 1(a) of 166 of the persede Arti- orida Consti- Is the power By passing Chapter 166 the State cific statutory authority to municipalities to levy special assessments. Municipali- ties have only been able to pass such assessments when the State which holds this power has specifically authorized municipalities to pass special assess- ments. No such authorization exists in today's case. As a footnote to the judgment, the trial judge also stated: Other findings of the Court which do not affect the outcome but which could be significant if the Court's ruling is over- turned are: CITY OF BOCA RATON v. STATE Cite u 59S Sold 23 (Fla 1992) did not grant spe- Under the 1885 A. The ad valorem assessment is not a tax, it is an assessment. B. The assessments are directly pro- portional to the special benefits to be provided each parcel and the benefits are in excess of the assessments. C. The improvements are properly treated as a single project. Improve- ments need not necessarily be abutting, adjoining or even completely within the District. D. Excluded parcels would at most receive only insignificant special bene- fits. E. All notice provisions required by law have been fulfilled. [1] In deciding whether the City has authority to impose special assessments to pay off the bonds, it is necessary to re- count the history of municipal powers in Florida. Under the constitution of 1885, all municipal powers were dependent upon a specific delegation of authority by the leg- islature in a general or special act. Article VIII, section 8 of the 1885 constitution provided in pertinent part: The Legislature shall have power to es- tablish, and to abolish, municipalities to provide for their government, to pre- scribe their jurisdiction and powers, and to alter or amend the same at any time. Powers not granted a municipality by the legislature were deemed to be reserved to the legislature. This reservation of author- ity was known as "Dillon's Rule" as ex- pressed in John F. Dillon, The Lain of Mit- nicipal Corporations § 55 (1st ed. 1872). Fla. 27 constitution, the Florida courts consistently followed Dillon's Rule. See, e.g., Williams v. Town of Dunnellon, 125 Fla. 114, 169 So. 631 (1936); Heriot v. City of Pensacola, 108 Fla. 480, 146 So. 654 (1933); Amos v. Mathews, 99 Fla. 1, 126 So. 308 (1930); Malone v. City of Quincy, 66 Fla. 52, 62 So. 922 (1913). As Florida's population began to boom after World War II, the legislature was flooded with local bills and population acts designed to permit municipalities to provide solutions to local problems. Thus, when our constitution was amended in 1968, mu- nicipalities were granted broad home .rule powers under article VIII, section 2(b), which provides in pertinent part: (b) POWERS. Municipalities shall have governmental, corporate and pro- prietary powers to enable them to con- duct municipal government, perform mu- nicipal functions and render municipal services, and may exercise any power for municipal purposes except as otherwise provided by law. Talbot D'Alemberte, the reporter for the Constitutional Revision Commission, de- scribed the difference between the above - quoted provisions of the 1968 and the 1885 constitutions as follows: The apparent difference is that under the new language, all municipalities have governmental, corporate and proprietary powers unless provided otherwise by law, whereas under the 1885 Constitu- tion, municipalities had only those pow- ers expressly granted by law. 26A Fla.Stat.Ann. 292 (1970) (Commentary by Talbot "Sandy" D'Alemberte). In the first litigated case involving the scope of municipal powers decided after the adoption of the 1968 constitution, this Court held that the City of Miami Beach had no power to enact a rent -control ordi- nance in the absence of a legislative enact- ment authorizing the exercise of such a power. City of Miami Beach e. Fleetwood Hotel, Inc., 261 So.2d 801 (F1a.1972). Prompted by this decision, the legislature in 1973 enacted the Municipal Home Rule 28 Fla. 595 SOUTH : REPORTER. 2d SERIES � Powers Act,' now codified in chapter 166. Florida Statutes (1989). Thereafter, this Court upheld a subsequent rent -control or- dinance enacted by the City of Miami Beach on the premise that section 166.- 021(l) 66:021(1) now authorized municipalities to ex- ercise any power for municipal purposes except when expressly prohibited by law. City of Miami Beale r. Forte Towers, Inc., 305 So.2d 764 (Fla.1974). Thereafter, we acknowledged the vast breadth of mu- nicipal home rule power when we said: Article VIII, Section 2, Florida Constitu- tion, expressly grants to every municipal- ity in this state authority to conduct mu- nicipal government, perform municipal functions, and render municipal services. The only limitation on that power is that it must be exercised for a valid "munici- pal purpose." It would follow that mu- nicipalities are not dependent upon the Legislature for further authorization. Legislative statutes are relevant only to determine limitations of authority. State v. City of Sunrise, 354 So.2d 1206, 1209 (FIa.1978). Section 166.021 provides in pertinent part: (1) As provided in s. 2(b), Art. VIII of the State Constitution, municipalities shall have the governmental, corporate, and proprietary powers to enable them to conduct municipal government, perform municipal functions, and render munici- pal services, and may exercise any power for municipal purposes, except when ex- pressly prohibited by law. (2) "Municipal purpose" means any ac- tivity or power which may be exercised by the state or its political subdivisions. (3) The Legislature recognizes that pursuant to the grant of power set forth in s. 2(b), Art VIII of the State Constitu- tion, the legislative body of each munici- pality has the power to enact legislation concerning any subject matter upon which the state Legislature may act, ex- cept: (a) The subjects of annexation, merg- er, and exercise of extraterritorial power, which require general or special law pur- 1. Ch. 73-129, § 1, laws of Fla. suant to s. 2(c), Art. VIII of the State Constitution; (b) Any subject expressly prohibited by the constitution; (c) Any subject expressly preempted to state or county government by the con- stitution or by general law; and (d) Any subject preempted to a county pursuant to a county charter adopted under the authority of ss. 1(g), 3, and 6(e), Art VIII of the State Constitution. (4) The provisions of this section shall be so construed as to secure for munici- palities the broad exercise of home rule powers granted by the constitution. It is the further intent of the Legislature to extend to municipalities the exercise of powers for municipal governmental, cor- porate, or proprietary purposes not ex- pressly prohibited by the constitution, general or special law, or county charter and to remove any limitations, judicially imposed or otherwise, on the exercise of home rule powers other than those so expressly prohibited. [2) Thus, a municipality may now exer- cise any governmental, corporate, or pro- prietary power for a municipal purpose ex- cept when expressly prohibited by law, and a municipality may legislate on any subject matter on which the legislature may act, except those subjects described in para- graphs (a), (b), (c), and (d) of section 166: 021(3). The provisions of section 166.- 021(3)(a) 66:021(3)(a) and (d) are irrelevant to the in- stant case. Therefore, it would appear that the City of Boca Raton can levy its special assessment unless it is expressly prohibited by law—section 166.021(1), ex- pressly prohibited by the constitution—sec- tion 166.021(3)(b), or expressly preempted to the state or county government by the constitution or by general law—section 166.021(3)(c). In this respect, those opposing the bond issue make two arguments. First, they contend that the special assessment is real- ly a tax, which the City may not impose because of the language of article VII, section 1(a) of the Florida Constitution, which provides: (a) No tax shall be pursuance of law. No state ad valorem taxes shall be levied upon real estate or tangible personal property. All other forms of taxation shall be preempted to the -state except as provided by general law. [31 However, a legally imposed special assessment is not a tax. Taxes and special assessments are distinguishable in that, while both are mandatory, there is no re- quirement that taxes provide any specific benefit to the property; instead, they may be levied throughout the particular taxing unit for the general benefit of residents and property. On the other hand, special assessments must confer a specific benefit upon the land burdened by the assessment. City of Naples v. Moon, 269 So.2d 355 (F1a.1972). As explained in Klemm v. Dav- enport, 100 Fla. 627, 631-34, 129 So. 904, 907-08 (1930): A tax is an enforced burden of contri- bution imposed by sovereign right for the support of the government, the ad- ministration of the law, and to execute the various functions the sovereign is called on to perform. A special assess- ment is like a tax in that it is an enforced contribution from the property owner, it may possess other points of similarity to a tax but it is inherently different and governed by entirely different principles. It is imposed upon the theory that that portion of the community which is re- quired to bear it receives some special or peculiar benefit in the enhancement of value of the property against which it is imposed as a result of the improvement made with the proceeds of the special assessment. It is limited to the property benefited, is not governed by uniformity and may be determined legislatively or judicially. CITY OF BOCA RATON v. STATE Cita u 59S Sold 25 (Fla 1992) levied except in respects are in [I]t seems settled law in this coun- try that an ad valorem tax and special assessment though cognate in immaterial 2. We also note that the trial judge held that the proposed levy was a special assessment and not a tax. If it is not a tax, it is not preempted to Fla. 29 herently different in their controlling aspects.... [4,5] There are two requirements for the imposition of a valid special assess- ment. First, the property assessed must derive a special benefit from the service provided. Atlantic Coast Line R.R. v. City of Gainesville, 83 Fla. 275, 91 So. 118 (1922). Second, the assessment must be fairly and reasonably apportioned among the properties that receive the special bene- fit. South Trail Fire Control hist V. State, 273 So -2d 380 (Fla.1973). Thus, a special assessment is distinguished from a tax because of its special benefit and fair apportionment. We do not believe that the special assessment proposed by the City constitutes a tax which would be prohibited . by article VII, section 1(a) of the Florida Constitution? [6] As their second argument, the State and the property owners contend that by Virtue of the enactment of chapter 170, Florida Statutes (1989), which authorizes municipalities to impose special assess- ments upon certain conditions, the legisla- ture has preempted the authority of munic- ipalities to impose special assessments un- der any other circumstances. It is con- ceded that the City of Boca Raton did not follow the requirements of chapter 170 in its attempt to impose special assessments in this case. This argument cannot prevail because it is evident that chapter 170 is not the only method by which municipalities may levy a special assessment. Thus, sec- tion 170.19, Florida Statutes (1989), states that "[t]his chapter ... shall be construed as an additional and alternative method for the financing of the improvements referred to herein." Further, section 170.21, Florida Statutes (1989), states that "[t]his chapter shall not repeal any other law relating to the subject matter hereof, but shall be deemed to provide a supplemental, addition- al, and alternative method of procedure for the benefit of all cities, towns, and munici- pal corporations of the state...." a the State under article Vll. section 1(a) of the Florida Constitution. 3. The title assigned to chapter 170 also reflects thic intent. The title reads "Supplemental and A416A AOWN 80 Fla. 595 SOUTHt-...J REPORTER. 2d SERIES This Court has recently construed a pro- vision similar to sections 170.19 and 170.21 to find that counties had sufficient home rule power to issue bonds irrespective of the existence of a statute which authorized counties to issue bonds. In Taylor v. Lee County, 498 So.2d 424 (F1a.1986), the coun- ty sought to issue bonds to finance a new bridge pursuant to its home rule authority. Taylor argued that since chapter 159, Flor- ida Statutes (1985), specifically authorized the county to issue bonds, the county ordi- nance must rely on and conform to that chapter. The Court noted that section 159.- 14, 59:14, Florida Statutes, by its express terms, provided supplemental and additional au- thority to that conferred by other laws. The Court concluded that chapter 125, Flor- ida Statutes (1985) (the county home rule statute) gave the county ample authority to issue the bonds and held that in areas in which a noncharter county has authority to act, it may choose between adopting an ordinance pursuant to its home rule power or adopting it pursuant to another statu- tory authority. In addition, the premise that chapter 170 is not considered the exclusive means of making special assessments was re- affirmed last year when the legislature amended section 197.3631, Florida Statutes (1989), to read in part: "Section 197.3632 is additional authority for local governments to impose and collect non -ad valorem as- sessments supplemental to the home rule powers pursuant to ss. 125.01 and 166.021 and chapter 170, or any other law." Ch. 90-343, § 7, Laws of Fla. [71 We note that chapter 170 was enact- ed in 1923, fifty years before the Municipal Home Rule Powers Act. Therefore, no leg- islative intent that it would be the sole method of passing special assessments can be inferred from its presence. The fact that it was not one of the many statutes repealed by the Municipal Home Rule Pow- ers Act does not evince a similar legislative intent in the absence of language indicating that it is intended to be exclusive. Thus, we hold that the City of Boca Raton had the authority to impose a special assess- ment under its home rule power. [8] We now turn to the legality of the special assessment which underlies the bond issue proposed by the City of Boca Raton. The opponents' primary contention is that the special assessments are not di- rectly proportional to and less than the special benefits to be provided each parcel. They also argue that certain properties are imaroperly excluded from the assessments. At the outset, we note that the City made specific findings that the improvements would constitute a special benefit to the subject property, that the benefits would exceed the amount of the assessments, and that the benefits would be in proportion to the assessments. The apportionment of benefits is a legislative function, and if reasonable persons may differ as to wheth- er the land assessed was benefitted by the local improvement, the findings of the city officials must be sustained. Rosche v. City of Hollywood, 55 So.2d 909 (F1a.1952). [9,10] To better understand the oppo- nents' position, it is necessary to discuss the manner in which the proposed assess- ments will be made. The City's ordinance permits and its resolution provides that the special assessments are to be apportioned among the benefitted properties in relation to the property values of the various tracts as determined by the latest available real property assessment roll prepared by the county tax appraiser. Robert J. Harmon, the City's urban economic consultant, testi- fied that his analysis showed that the sub- ject properties "would at least on a cumula- tive basis receive $7 of benefit for every $1 that they were paying in assessments." He expressed the opinion that the use of ad valorem values in making special assess- ments, which has been nationally recog- nized for at least twenty years, was the most equitable method that could be em- ployed for the City's project. He gave an example of what he called the self-correct- ing mechanism of the ad valorem method when he stated: Alternative Method of Making Local Municipal Improvements." If a prope resented or, base of do would pay ment. If c value of tha not benefit rest of dov the total as: portionally. And the r a property percentage downtown i with partieL their percer increases. He added tha erty owner fa uitable there place by whi, assessment a improved pro proportional explained th would initial: over a penoc ments would vacant prope would ultima due to increa Mr. Harmc number of downtown a: been exclud- cause they w from the prc However, he properties bt they would t ment. The trial opponents or view of the competent s. these finding to specifiical. benefit to be Cape Dev. C So.2d 766 (F the contentit special assess- oower. legality of the underlies the a City of Boca nary contention :nts are not di- less rless than the :ed each parcel. properties are ie assessments. the City made improvements benefit to the benefits would sessments, and n proportion to oortionment of unction, and if =_r as to wheth- nefitted by the ngs of the city Rosche v. City (F1a.1952). :and the oppo- ary to discuss oposed assess- icy's ordinance oxides that the be apportioned ties in relation various tracts available real epared by the .rt J. Harmon, nsultant, testi- i that the sub - it on a cumula- 'it for every $1 assessments." t the use of ad ipecial assess- -ionally recog- ears, was the could be em - He gave an ie selfcorrect- .lorem method CITY OF BOCA RATON v. STATE Cite as 595 Sold 25 (Fla. 1992) If a property, for example, initially rep- be sustained bec resented one percent of the entire tax an ad valorem b base of downtown Boca Raton, they case this Court u would pay one percent of the assess- for local improve ment. If over ten years the assessed value of that particular property, if it did not benefit to the same degree as the rest of downtown, their percentage of the total assessment would go down pro- portionally. And the reverse would be also true. If a property benefitted more in its total percentage of the total assessed value of downtown increased, as will be the case with particularly the large developments, their percentage of the total assessment increases. He added that if in any given year a prop- erty owner felt that his benefit was ineq- uitable there was an appeal process in place by which he could seek to have his assessment adjusted. When asked how an improved property could receive the same proportional benefit as a vacant lot, he explained that while improved property would initially pay a higher assessment, over a period of time the cumulative pay- ments would tend to equalize because the vacant properties as they were developed would ultimately carry higher assessments due to increased construction costs. Mr. Harmon also testified that the small number of residential properties in the downtown area as well as churches had been excluded from the assessment' be. cause they would receive much less benefit from the project than business properties. However, he pointed out that should those properties be changed to a business use, they would then be subject to the assess- ment. The trial court found against the bond opponents on these issues. From our re- view of the record, we conclude there is competent substantial evidence to support these findings. The City was not required to specifically itemize a dollar amount of benefit to be received by each parcel. See Cape Dec. Co. e. City of Cocoa Beach, 192 So.2d 766 (F1a.1966). Moreover, we reject the contention that the assessment cannot Fla. 31 ause it will be applied on osis. In fact, in an early up a special assessment ments which was imposed upon an ad valorem basis. Richardson v. Hardee, 85 Fla. 510, 96 So. 290 (1923); see also City of lvaples v. Moon, 269 So.2d 355 (Fla.I 2) (approving special assessment based in part upon assessed values). As we explained in Aleyer v. City of Oakland Park, 219 So.2d 417, 419-20 (F1a.1969): Many elements enter into the question of determining and prorating benefits in a case of this kind. They are physical condition, nearness to or remoteness from residential and business districts, desirability for residential or commercial purposes, and many other peculiar to the locality where the lands improved are located. As stated by the Court in City of Ft Myers v. State of Florida and Langford 95 Fla. 704, 117 So. 97, 104: "No system of appraising benefits or assessing costs has yet been devised that is not open to some criticism. None have attained the ideal position of exact equality, but, if assessing boards would bear in mind that bene- fits actually accruing to the property improved in addition to those received by the community at large must con- trol both as to benefits prorated and the limit of assessments for cost of improvement, the system employed would be as near the ideal as it is humanly possible to make it." While front foot or square foot methodolo- gies for apportioning costs of special im- provement projects are more traditional, other methods are permissible. As we stated in South Trail Fire Control Dis- trict v. State, 273 SO -2d 380, 384 (F1a.1973): The manner of the assessment is immate- rial and may vary within the district, as long as the amount of the assessment for each tract is not in excess of the propor- tional benefits as compared to other as- sessments on other tracts. We do not believe that Fisher v. Board of County Commissioners, 84 So.2d 572 S2 Fla. 595 SOUTH REPORTER. 2d SERIES /"%, (Fla.1956), mandates a contrary result. In that case, there was no credible evidence that the amount of the benefit was related to the property valuation. We reverse the final judgment and re- mand with directions that the bond issue be approved.' It is so ordered. OVERTON, BARKETT, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur. McDONALD, J., concurs in part and dis- sents in part with an opinion, in which SHAW, CJ., concurs. McDONALD, Justice, concurring in part and dissenting in part I concur with the holding that Florida municipalities possess the constitutional and statutory power to impose special as- sessments by ordinance and that the City of Boca Raton could lawfully impose a val- id special assessment. I part company with the majority and the trial judge where they conclude that the proposal under scru- tiny is a valid special assessment. Review- ing the evidence in the light most favorable to the City, I fail to find any special bene- fits to the assessed properties or its own- ers. There is a general benefit to all the citizens of the City. Hence, I believe that the project can only be paid by taxes, which requires a referendum and assessment against all taxpayers. I would therefore disapprove the bonds. SHAW, CJ., concurs. pAUMA[nFM 4. As in other bond validation rases, we do not pass upon the economic desirability of these Dick LOCKE, Petitioner, V. Paul M. HAWKES. Respondent. FLORIDA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Petitioner, V. Jon I. GORDON, Judge, etc., Respondent. Nos. 76090, 76803. Supreme Court of Florida. Feb. 27, 1992. Candidate who unsuccessfully opposed incumbent for seat in house of representa- tives filed request for production of all records maintained by incumbent relating to expenditures of state tax money allocat- ed for maintenance of office. When incum- bent failed to produce records, candidate brought action to enforce statute requiring disclosure of agency records. The Circuit Court, Citrus County, William F. Edwards, J., dismissed action, and appeal was taken. The District Court of Appeal, 559 So.2d 1202 reversed. In unrelated case, action was filed to compel production of public records of office of different member of house of representatives and house filed petition seeking to prohibit trial court from proceeding with action against representa- tive. The Supreme Court entered order to show cause why petition should not be granted, stayed all Circuit Court proceed- ings and consolidated case. Thereafter, the Supreme Court, Overton, J., held that (1) Supreme Court had power to determine whether statute was applicable to legisla- ture, and (2) statute requiring agencies to open records upon court order did not ap- ply to legislature. Ordered accordingly. bonds but only upon whether they may be legal- ly issued. 1. Constitution: Supreme Cc don of powers statute in main either executive of Supreme Cot tions is to inte: tional provisior Art. 2, § 3. 2. Records 4-5 Statute re records for insy _ not apply to le; of its members; _ intended to app agencies and ( i' governmental :_ West's F.S.A. i= t= ' Kevin X. Crc Tallahassee, fc _ House of Repr Valerie W. I Hawkes Parker D. T) of Thomson P.A., Miami, f, Herald, Talla Press Ass'n, F i Editors and Foundation. I Samuel A. ney of the M Miami, for an T_ aid. 1. Section 119. d vides: (1) When - the provisic - set an imm• ority over (2) When open its rec with this c j with such c wise provid i or unless order with (3) A sta the court d tial probal: inspection F rA . 59 City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 a FAX (407) 589-5570 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: August 18, 1994 TO: Kathryn O'Halloran City Clerk FROM: Bruce Cooper Director of Community Development REFERENCE: Phone Numbers for Utilities u Please be advised that the following are the new numbers for the Utilities Department being located at 700 Main Street: 1. 388-5325 2. 388-5357 3. 388-5536 Thank you. BC/gk phoneno.wp Customer Service Customer Service Private Line for Utilities Director AMA �53V °GA a�®qE„u4�p City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 0 FAX (407) 589-5570 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: August 17, 1994 To: Joel Koford City Manager FROM: Bruce Cooper Director of Community Development REFERENCE: Date Regarding Relocation of Utilities Department Please be advised that I have scheduled the moving of the Utilities Department to the old Teen Center at 700 Main Street on Wednesday, August 24, 1994. This building will be open to the public the following day on Thursday, August 25, 1994. I will be requesting the local newspapers to provide a press release regarding this relocation to help provide for a smooth transition. The following will be the phone numbers for the Utilities Department: 1. 388-5325 (rotary) Customer Service (rotary) Customer Service (private line) Utilities Director 4. 3 8-5141 (phone modem) Attached is the current list of all purchase orders issued for this project. We had projected an approximate $17,000.00 for total costs for this renovation. This did not include phones, computers, furniture, etc. BC/gk locud.wp Attachment cc: Department Heads City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 0 FAX (407) 589-5570 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: August 17, 1994 TO: Kathryn O'Halloran City Clerk FROM: Bruce Cooper Director of Community Development REFERENCE: Phone Numbers for Utilities Please be advised that the following are the new numbers for the Utilities Department being located at 700 Main Street: 1. 388-5325 Customer Service 2. --H-8_-5357 Customer Service �3• 388-535 6 Private Line for Utilities Director Thank you. `�'�i`f� _ �i a BC/gk phoneno.wp r� -DATE: NvG. 2.6,10194 TZt : P RoJ EC T t� FLOW FoR. THE CITY of 5 �3ASilAti1 BVStNCSS � 1 STC2I CT �F, � W E��y THc �:OSZ-['H � SoVTH C\TY L1M1T5 M.�O BiTTWaE,.I U. S, 4-I \GSI-IwMY N—I h+�D TKE IuDlt.1 �tvarz -To7P.t No. OF �FzU ,S Forz EwR'tR£ COe�m:RGwl. Dt3TRAC'C - 7041.109 Mv1 TIPUEn gY 250 GPO ICU Fax wo ret- 07-b.0—IX-19 Z5o °'D/.0 IGO, 422 (APD • 14.40 mw/DA t , 2Z2 GPM S%wi G.c- 'THC J6rsS me-rT ye e»1..L. LS BASGD OW T'te H14xE3T PoSSIst-r USE of SCK PRoPe rt, Re-CPRLo TK, I,ZZ't spm ers P-rwt FLOW C.Rzr,z:2 To Aub. °I,vvt4 Memo F2or\ $Ruee Cg:,O;. .. TD J. voFo2a) Uswc-, TKE STANDARD FL, -IL)Ep"C. of ENV. 'PRO-rVTt00 Fcg.MV A -S, ptvtot -rgi PE'}4C FLOW OF L,ZZ.Z.G-pK a ( Z To DEZ FRMiµ£ TNF' MA><tmum DAtt_Y Ft -ow CaPH (MAY, DAt�-% PLOW) P'EInK Plow Re; ESIL To TAat� 3-Z INDIAN Rivatz �'ovN rY F\rzE rtar Cee -,m%,% " , BP,S mb oa He �o ll.ao ORolr�nucr 1a�axT LaMltmio.� Fib Pr,-¢W%u(, Lit- TAZwo.,S wlZwiN -iK"U D1ST2tCT 9Et.t"c.7- T0.;T (2cm vImc-,tAt_ C low-rTs., W,$, low occ., i CATcGo(LY. -TK,S C,prTcooil.'c Rn -r.. c, po(L FIEc PWw IS I5oo Gpm, AvD Is c.0iuC.iDr,FW-ML. To 1kE a MEDtJa\ DeuSI-N , Mut_TI-FAMtI-,( WWL4 gr -51 OQ Tiat-t%low- 1v^:w./+ l l,c.. OySar- �Ba�1,� UJsfw Po,:.4e.. Co.�yr�x. h Cl4YA 4t -c %�-L Dr low n,,— ql/��4, �^Y ^'a.�.^• ��1ee� -%_ 1 rdto R -i, - Y7�ov svl I4. P13 S Z..1 �r MAGE Z CPF Z - Y2oJ Er -7m- FLOW tN com. v-R,C.tAI. �S—,atLT tW S67MP,SlLAtJ Q c Cort Ke' j fn F�uz-F rL.Ow OF 15p0 GPh wMlc.y ti STILL wITN�M Tue R�'CoMNNDE'a IS C) RAwGc of 1000 'to Z.000 Gpr1 F02 A 3 }-l0ul2. Du2AZtuV . USIN4 A MNYIKVK bAItX FLOJ aF Co lC 4Fn p1.vs a Flea Pt -<)W OF 1500 Gpn Zee-rveKws ToiAl. O6SlG.J rr-L,p t..l, MDF = Flo apK FIRa- FLO.J, 1500 G fin TGTAtL Z l l0 G PM CHECK VELOcl-T'( RND NEHp Lo SS IF -Tt)TkL F=LUW t.vq-S Svpi-i-Im-rKaDVs H A SIN6t.c PiPe 2l.'Tww-,(L -rKR,.I 6etrN6-- LOOpE0 . 5140' PIPs Is 7l4lc Wo12S-r CASE- SC.Z,I o.(Lo. 05t,a-'GF JM Pipe CA -M, -0G PI PL, cwnazs Pott. PvQG D218 PtPE ) A FLow OF ZtlO Gen wtl.l. Gt*-V-A'f'E' A. VEtioCtTY OF lo.3Z F�r 15FC. A*rD IA e" toss OF O. 39 PSI ! ICC F6ri IN P. IZ" 1Dlft-gTav- PIPE. TKE G.Bz- FT/Sec. is SXA4MTVt N1CaH�)2 -TK" -TK,- FJ F'T /Sez. FoR nte.ii nt �.iU t� wn'Td2 atm MS/t.. to TKe PIPs Dvewc- SKVT aPF noNornws CNaCK litrin 1-oss , Use 800o FT Fa20. Polar OF eWT&I -Cb Eik7a+-C' Ti�N1JV3 vIZK 0. Ftli,E F1.0, CA0N0(7Ie■r_FAOM 50074 To Nod-cK C.rn/T1. Baro FTPsil loo/ = 31• Z PSI P2essv2r 02.,0 IF 7Ne NOtLKAI MAtJ 'PILcsSWLC IS S5 PSI S�Q"iQAcrw& p 31.2p51 p{I'Ssv2� nQaP 115 -WS A ZA.0 Psl (Laslou4� 1 40=LAtO- t,., A- IZ" &t4iV jawl'.,�Faq �w TiS Is STILL. +6 PSl GR"Zze'turt., -CWr r -j, jj,�� niY f--DtwA. HowvmI M TFrL L03-1 rv" Ivdi IR4C-r4gM /�ITo T�IIS PA Ge 3oF3 MY Flt C4:,mtAetruhTto l tt:)v,-O a3 To INSTkt,%._ A MRS -r, m ntfL P17 RT GOTH — wt' 1JWL-NA A,,,D S�o\.TTtj Q.1 l i LI Mvri �-r TKi l G WkTea- KktwS �J-OLA-,J Krum (ovr.rT%t w1�t_ INS-r+t_t_ A 1 ZN MAu.1 G:N p�DF�1vR T� tY Sc(Lvt iva �LTY S MNX. 17A1t-Y C=lit6 FWtJ tiwOS I Nuc CL"Ci A,.r'u SLl,ovz.D hlLJ rtYt leJ-mm;=Ace frS A Mu-rvo, t.y i3 t� t u R A Rc+a u 6a.+�-✓T Fu tZ t n�—Ce�tL s u -p p" . S tt o v t o 7Ka C. -r( MffT (;6 AW.0 7o SvPPt.'t 6✓n'C3c OJ4" IT µRS tpipp mra I-rs S73TV�\ -co Se(t vt -(Ki Dour.r m ✓ ✓ A4 ,;71, "'b" (Lt 'm CO. cAv"o Pa4n o a o t cv vp . o SS OF urrra2. Zu Tua= Oa�.r- O" AaeA Cmvl-D dczvr,T F(1utt A "Joe Aa""- oR P Vf'%t $Kp7T Dvw d . S V Gt Covo1T t aV;S cao.%_D htS o k. 63 t7LT Lr-/ 7yt v L01/lr'r i 3 S V S Tv^/1 'co W H alt � Gov ,o VA TU P <Z0 -V 1 O T wf%-rqw. To THe COVIIXTY. City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 o FAX (407) 589-5570 MEMORANDUM DATE: August 30, 1994 TO: Joel L. Koford, City Manager FROM: Richard Votapka,Utilities Director gsvl SUBJECT: Purchase of a Small Portable Electric Generator At present, the Utilities Dept. does not have a small portable electric generator. Our Department would have occasion to use a generator when repairing a water or sewer line at night to operate emergency lights, operate the electric K-60SE portable drain cleaning machine in areas where power is not available, and to operate power tools in areas where power is not accessible. I have obtained price quotes from three sources for a Honda EB3500 KKl 8MP portable electric generator with 3500 watt maximum output as follows: 1. Franke Brothers (Sebastian True Value) $1532 2. Vero True Value $1800 3. Treasure Coast Honda $2000 I have allocated $1480 for an 8MP generator in the 193/1994 Budget Amendment. The difference of $52 in the Franke Brothers quote could come from the 13/4 MP Goulds gun pump which Utilities has elected not to purchase. I have prepared a Purchase Order Requisition for $1532, for the generator offered to the City by Franke Brothers Sebastian True Value Hardware Store. /sg 4 275 Zane Ave. Sebastian, F1. 32958 September 14, 1994 Mr. Joel Koford City Manager Sebastian, Fl. 32958 Dear Mr. Koford- At the present time I am no longer a customer of the City of Sebastian water department, although I am paying a monthly service charge because the water line runs in front of my house. The water line to my house has been disconnected although the meter {which I paid for} still is in place. I have installed a well and pump to provide water to my house. This was approved and permitted by the Indian River County Health Department. Because of a letter written by former City Attorney Thomas Palmer, I question whether or not I should be paying this monthly fee. In this letter he specifically stated that the City could not aid GDU in forcing people to hook up to a private water system. He did not address what the city could do if they owned the water system. Councilman Overbeck has stated publically that he knows of no Florida law that allows a city to force a private party to hook up to a municipal water system. I have neighbors who have City water in front of their house and have never hooked up or paid any fees for the water being there. If I still should be paying a monthly fee, I think this opinion should be backed by competent legal opinion. This was referred to former city attorney Nash, but he did not chose to render an opinion. I have of*Wered to pay the City of Sebastian one quarter in advance but I refuse to pay a billing charge of $2.25 per month when I will not be billed and I have been refused. I personally think this billing charge is a deliberate way to antagonize people. I am sure other utilities figure this charge in on their bills, but they do not itemize it on the actual bill. I am willing to pay 11.25 pluas 1.13 Utility tax in advance quarterly until I hear whether or not I legally have to pay. If it is ascertained that I do not have to pay, I would expect full refund of all my utility payments made to the city of Sebastian. May I hear from you. Sin er , Ed Miqu 1 n City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 a FAX (407) 589-5570 September 15, 1994 Mr. Nelson Hyatt Park Place 2210 E. Lakeview Drive Sebastian, FL 32958 Dear Nelson: The attached letter from Harry E. Asher is self explanatory. Evidently the agreement or understanding that you had with Terry Pinto regarding switching capacity (sewer) from Park Place to Sebastian Lakes is now null and void. Since the County is making demand on us. we in turn are making demand on you. Sincerely, "K5ford; City Manager JLK/jmt Attachment cc: Mayor Arthur L. Firtion & Sebastian City Council Members Harry E. Asher, Assistant Director of Utility Services BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DEPARTMENT OF UTILITYSER VICES 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 FAX (407) 770-5143 September 14, 1994 City Manager Joel Kolford City of Sebastian P.O. Box 780127 Sebastian, Florida 32958 SUBJECT: INTERLOCAL UTILITIES AGREEMENT BETWEEN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND CITY OF SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA AND AGREEMENT BETWEEN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND NELSON HYATT Dear Mr. Kolford: In review of the above -referenced Agreements the County realizes that the anniversary date for Item 6. Impact Fees(copy'attached) - (grace period) of the Nelson Hyatt Agreement occurred on July 11, 1994. The item states as follows: "After five years from the date of the Agreement (July 11, 1989) Seller shall be obligated to pay impact fees to the County, at the rate then current, for each unit which thereafter requires a Certificate of Occupancy." The County fully expects this part of the Agreement to be upheld and expects collection of the current County sewer impact fee in the amount of $2,551.00 for each unit which is sold within the park or requires a Certificate of Occupancy. Thank you for your attention to this matter and advise if I can be of any assistance. Sincer y, Harry Esher Assistat Director of Utility Services HEA:sb cc: Terrance G. Pinto, Director of Utility Services James E. Chandler, County Administrator Charles Vitunac, County Attorney (SEBPPL.HEA)sb 5. WARRANTY OF TITLE; HOLD HARMLESS: SELLER shall warrant title to all the real and personal property in SYSTEM and shall hold the COUNTY harmless from any and all claims for damages from third parties, and in particular for any claims from LAKE DELORES UTILITIES AND CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEMS, INC. 6. IMPACT FEES; After five years from the date of this• agreement SELLER shall be obligated to pay Impact fees to the COUNTY, at the rate then current, for each unit which thereafter-requlyds a Certificate of Occupancy.Units which have had a Certificate of Occupancy Issued to them before five years from the date of this agreement must have an impact fee paid when that unit Is resold, without regard to the five-year SELLER's grace period. At closings on such sales, SELLER or successor in title shall collect the Impact fee and remit It to COUNTY. 7. SURCHARGE ON RATES: COUNTY shall establish a surcharge on water and wastewater rates for customers In the 50 City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET 0 SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 0 FAX (407) 589-5570 MEMORANDUM DATE: September 23, 1994 TO: Joel Koford, City Manager FROM: Richard Votapka, Utilities Director SUBJECT: Comparison of Private vs. Public Water & Sewer Costs Based on a Standard Three Bedroom/Two Bathroom Home As requested by you on September 22, 1994, I have researched information on the above subject which is provided below: A) Installation of a Typical Private Water System 1) 2" Diameter well Approximately 70' Deep $ 500-$ 700 2) 1 HP Centrifugal Pump $ 250-$ 280 3) Small Bladder Tank $ 100-$ 125 4) Water Softener with Brine Tank $800-$2000 Cost Range $1650-$3105 B) 1) Installation of a Typical Septic Tank and Drainfield (minimum of 900 gallon septic tank with 300 square foot drainfield) Ranges from $1000 - $1200 2) Additional Fill for Typical Lot Ranges from $2000 - $2500 Cost Range $3000 - $3700 ( LMA alli If, loW � cfGfo J -v 3µm �'&G, bjof -6 s3gzo Joel L. Koford Page 2 of 2 September 23, 1994 C) Present Cost of Connection to the City of Sebastian Potable Water System based on an existing water service line installed to the right-of-way line or front property line. 1. Water Impact Fee 2. Water Meter Installation Charge (includes the application fee and installation of the 5/8" x 3/4" water meter and check valve) 3. Water Deposit (Refundable after 2 years of good credit history) 4. Water Inspection Fee (after the plumber has made the connection) Subtotal $1,100 $ 130 $ 50 $ 25 $1,305 5. Installation of Water Service on Resident's Property from the R/W line to the House based on 30 feet of 3/4" Sch 40 PVC pipe $ 60 to $ 140 Cost Range $1365 to $ 1445 D) Present Cost of Connection to the City of Sebastian Sewer System based on an existing sewer lateral installed to the right-of-way line or front property line 1. Sewer Impact Fee $1,650 2. Sewer Deposit (Refundable after 2 years of good credit history) $ 60 3. Sewer Inspection Fee (after the plumber has made the connection) $ 25 Subtotal $1,735 4. Installation of Sewer Lateral on Resident's Property From the R/W Line to the House Based on 30 feet of 4" Sch 40 PVC Pipe $180 to $ 240 5. Abandonment of an Existing 950 gallon Septic Tank $200 to $ 300 6. Restoration of an Existing Lawn $ 50 to $ 100 Cost Range $2,165 $2, 375 Joel L. Koford Page 3 of 3 September 23, 1994 My reference sources include City of Sebastian Ordinance 0-93-19, the Indian River County Environmental Health Department and local area plumbers and septic tank companies all within Indian River County. /sg City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET C1 SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 o FAX (407) 589-5570 September 26, 1994 Mr. Al Payne Electrical Coor61ator/Maintenance Indian River County School Board 1990 25th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Re: Pelican Island Elementary School Sewage Lift Station, Sebastian, FL Dear Mr. Payne: I had the occasion to speak with Architect John Schlitt last week in reference to the above. During the course of our discussion, Mr. Schlitt told me that a "water feed" had been installed at the lift station. I assumed that the "water feed" is the automatic flushing device that you told me about in August. If it has been installed, would you please send me a letter to verify the fact. I would greatly appreciate a written confinnation for our files. Sincerely, Richard B. Votapka, P.E. Utilities Director RB V/sg MASTELLER & MOLER, INC. - CONSULTING ENGINEERS - Mr. Harry Asher Indian River County P.O. Box 1750 September 27, 1994 Utilities Department Vero Beach, FL 32960 RE: Amendment to Engineering Work Authorization #1 for Water Projects dated October 11, 1993, concerning the US Highway #1 Water Transmission Main from Route 510 North to the City of Sebastian. Dear Harry: The City of Sebastian and the Indian River County Utilities Department have agreed to amend the referenced work authorization in order to provide for the engineering and construction of a water distribution system to serve city users on the east side of US #1 in the City of Sebastian. The proposed system is shown on the attached "Proposed Water Layout Plan". The funding for the engineering and construction of the proposed City of Sebastian water project would be by the City of Sebastian through reimbursement to the Indian River County Utilities Department. A seperate agreement which addresses the specific terms and conditions of the City of Sebastian reimbursing the Indian River County Utilities Department for engineering and construction expenses in conection with this proposed City of Sebastian water project will be executed. The construction cost, including 10% contingencies, for the proposed City of Sebastian water project is $585,000.00, and it is proposed that this construction amount will be added by change order to the existing contract with Speegle Construction Company to construct the US #1 Water Transmission Main. With respect to our existing referenced Work Authorization #1 for the US #1 Water Transmission Main, the following amendment to the fees will result for our engineering, design, surveying and inspection services in connection with the City of Sebastian Water project: 1623 N. U.S. Highway 1, Suite B2 O 7380 Murrell Road, Suite 106 Sebastian, FL 32958 Melbourne, Florida 32940 (407) 589-4800 (407) 255-1175 (407) 589-2742 Fax (407) 253-4439 Fax Mr. Harry Asher 27 -Sep -94 Page 2 1. Engineering design and permitting lump sum fee $30,900 2. Project inspection services lump sum fee........ $9900 3. Field surveying lump sum fee .................... $8600 In order to provide assurance to you that the City of Sebastian accepts the above fees stated in this letter for our design, permitting, inspection and surveying services, I am requesting the appropriate offical(s) of the City of Sebastian provide you with the appropriate letter of acceptance and/or resolution. Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can be of assistance in expediting this project. Very truely yours, MASTELLER & MOLER, INC. Earl H. Masteller, P.E. President cc: Mr. Joel Kolford, Sebastian City Manager EHM/tb enclosures File #9341 (ir092794) M r y N MCH PIZO19cT TO EXDT. Is, w WSWEJGE MY UTT5 REVISIONS dam` �n �"��i�W14P1 VAK A tvT Iia 4 NOT TO SCALE LEGEND ID Fi2E HYDRANT 02 12' GATE VALVE 03 JACK AND BORE ® 6' CATS VALVE 05 4' GATE VALVE © 4' BLOW—OFF )/M µi1 H. MASTELLER, p. E. TL =26658 ,. w� Dr. Gary W. Norris Superintendent SCHOOLBOARD William L Marine, Jr. Chairman Stanley F. Mayfield Vice-chairman Joe N. ldlcue, Jr. Member Gary Lindsey Member Dorothy A. Talbert Member N September 30, 1994 School District of T 7 a T a /N OCT 0 5 1994 Mr. Richard B. Votapka, P.E. l]L]Tf3l7t.-�:3u u uv Utilities Director ------------------------ City of Sebastian 1225 Main Street Sebastian, FL 32958 Re: Pelican Island Elementary School Sewage Lift Station Dear Mr. votapka In response to your letter dated September 26, 1994, the flushing valve at Pelican Island Elementary is temporary. As soon as we can take care of this situation on a permanent basis, you will be notified. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me. Thank you, Al Payne ��/ Electrical Coordinator/Maintenance "it Takes a Community to Raise a Child! " 1990 25th Street - Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Telephone: (407) 567-7165 - Suncom Number: 257-1011 Equal Opportunity Edueator and Ernploya City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 o FAX (407) 589-5570 September 30, 1994 Mr. Rich Burklew. P.G. Hydrologist St. Johns River Water Management District 305 East Drive Melbourne, Florida 32904 RE: City of Sebastian - Sebastian Highlands WTP Consumptive Use Permit Renewal for CUP No. 2-061-00142UNR Dear Mr. Burklew: This letter is in response to our recent telephone conversation in regard to the Park Place/Palm Lake Club potable water system relative to the current Sebastian Highlands Water Treatment Plant Consumptive Use Permit Renewal. The Park Place treatment/water distribution system currently serves about 225 customers in both the Park Place and Palm Lake club mobile home parks located in the southeastern corner of the City of Sebastian. The Park Place water treatment plant and two 106 foot deep wells were originally permitted and constructed circa 1986 under the ownership of The Village of Lake Dolores. The St. Johns River Water Management District Consumptive Use Permit No. 2- 061-0357N was issued on July 8, 1985. On July 11, 1989, Indian River County, through an agreement with Nelson Hyatt (the owner/developer of the Village of Lake Dolores), took over the operation of the water system which became known as the "Park Place Water System". The St. Johns River Water Management District and Florida Department of Environmental Protection permits were transferred to Indian River County. On May 1, 1993, Indian River County conveyed the Park Place Water System to the City of Sebastian. The county transferred the operating permit for the water system from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection to the City, but never transferred the St. Johns Consumptive Use Permit. In 1993, negotiations were underway between the City of Sebastian and General Development Utilities (GDU) for the City to purchase the GDU Sebastian Highlands Water System. One of the immediate projects to be initiated by the City after the purchase of the Sebastian Highlands Water System was the connection of the September 30, 1994 Letter to Rich Burklew, St Johns River Water Management District Page 2 of 2 Park Place/Palm Lake Club water system with the Sebastian Highlands system. This project would eliminate the Park Place water plant and the two wells at that plant would be abandoned. Water for the Sebastian Highlands and Park Place/Palm Lake Club water system would then be supplied by the wells at the Sebastian Highlands Water Plant. The City was finally able to purchase the GDU system on December 16, 1993, and in January authorized its utilities consultant, Hartman & Associates, to begin engineering and permitting on the interconnection of the water systems between Sebastian Highlands and Park Place. On August 11, 1994, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection issued Permit No. WD31-254412 for construction of the system. Currently, the contract documents for the project are being reviewed by the Sebastian City Attorney and easements are in the process of being procured from the owner of Park Place for a short segment of the water main on the owner's property. By coincidence, in August, 1993, I learned from the Palata office of St. Johns River Water Management District that the consumptive use permit for the wells at the Park Place water plant had expired on July 8, 1992. Indian River County had never renewed the permit and never informed the City of Sebastian about the expiration of the permit. By the time I learned of this fact, the permit had been expired for twelve (12) months. Indian River County should have renewed the permit because an expired permit cannot be transferred from the County to the City. The County should have taken the fiscal responsibility to renew the permit instead of waiting until the City took over the system. Since the City is in the process of eliminating the Park Place water plant and wells, I felt that applying for a new permit was not justified, especially when it was Indian River County's responsibility to renew the permit in 1992. Our consultants, Hartman & Associates, Inc., have indeed taken into account the water consumption for the Park Place/Palm Lake Club developments at full buildout and have included the withdrawal amount in the modelling done for the Sebastian Highlands Plant wells. Sincere1 , Richard B. Votapka, P.E. Utilities Director RBV/jw cc: Bill Wasson, Hartman & Associates, Inc. Attachment! August 11, 1994 FDEP Permit No. WD31-254412 Department of Environmental Protection Central District Lawton Chiles 3319 Maguire Boulevard, Suite 232 Virginia B. Wetherell Governor Orlando, Florida 32803-3767 Secretary City of Sebastian 1225 Main Street Sebastian, FL 32958 Attention: Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director Indian River County.- PW Sebastian Highlands Park Place/Palm Lake Club Interconnection (156,800 GPD) File Number: WD31-254412 Dear Mr. Votapka: This letter is to advise you that the Department has reviewed your Notice of Intent to Use General Permit as provided in Rule 17-555, Florida Administrative Code (FAC), to construct a water distribution system extension and does not object to your use of such general permit. Please be advised that you are required to abide by all conditions in Rules 17-4.510 through 17-4.540, FAC, the general requirements for general permits; and Rule 17-555.410, FAC. A LETTER OF CLEARANCE MUST BE ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT TO YOU PRIOR TO YOUR PLACING THIS PROJECT INTO SERVICE OR YOU, THE PERMITTEE, SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATE ENFORCEMENT ACTION. To obtain the clearance letter, the engineer -of -record must submit one set of record drawings, a "Request for Letter of Release to Place Water Supply System into Service" (DER Form 17-555.910(9)] (attached to the engineer's copy of this letter), a copy of this letter and satisfactory bacteriological test results (with chlorine residuals indicated) taken on two consecutive days from, or near, the beginning and end of the proposed main and from a point at Tracy Drive. Water sample forme must indicate specific recommended sample locations and file number above. NOTE TO THE UTILITY: Pursuant to 403.859(6), Florida Statutes, do not provide water service to this project (other than for flushing/testing) until the Department of Environmental Protection has issued a letter of clearance or you, the utility, shall be subject to enforcement action. ly, k Alexande , P.E. Distr ct Director Date AA:dm':pp 8 I tl 194 cc: Gary J. ReVoir, II, P.E. "Protect, Conserve and Manage Florida's Environment and Natural Resources" Printed on recycled paper. City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 o FAX (407) 589-5570 MEMORANDUM TO: RICHARD VOTAPKA 11 FROM: MARILYN SWICHKOW, CPA I FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE: MARCH 29, 1994 RE: BOXES OF HARTMAN & ASSOC. MATERIAL Please remove the two boxes of miscellaneous correspondence and workpaper files from my office. I have no need for these. You will need to follow public records law requirements and the clerk's instructions on forms, boxes, etc. for storing upstairs or for destruction Thank you for your attention to this matter. i P i c 1wf vv p `iv, b o kcs o� A-pvv) ) 1 9 9 4 4..-4 wwr.� MEMORANDUM DATE: March 30, 1994 TO: Bruce Cooper, Community Development Director FROM: Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director /<13V SUBJECT: Notification to the Utilities Department for Site Plan Review I was recently notified by Dan Preuss, Realtor, that he had sold a piece of property on U.S. Highway 1 to Discount Auto Parts on January 31, 1994. He wanted to know why he was still being billed for sewer capacity reserve (ERU) charges by the City on a monthly basis when he no longer owned the property. He assumed that the City Utilities Department had approved use of a septic tank and drainfield and therefore knew about the change of ownership through the application process. I told Dan that the Indian River County Environmental Health Department approves the septic tanks. The Health Department had not contacted me to inform our department that there was a change of ownership. In fact, I was unaware entirely that Dan Preuss had sold the property. Dan had originally purchased ERU's from Indian River County under the North County Volunteer Assessment Program, such as many other property owners along U.S. 1 and Indian River Drive corridors where the County has installed force mains. These ERU's can be transferred with the land to the new owner. Therefore, in the future, would you please have your Department notify our Department when a new site plan is presented to the City for review. The Utilities Department will then check to see if the existing owner has purchased ERU's from Indian River County, or determine is sewer and/or water is available. We can inform the new owner about receiving a monthly bill for base facility charges when the new owner closes on the property and advise him/her on the procedure for connecting to the County sewer system. MEMORANDUM DATE: June 24, 1994 TO: Dan Eckis, City Engineer/Public Works Director FROM: Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director W SUBJECT: Severe Drainage Problem at Julian Avenue and Lomas Street Ron Briskie, Utilities Plant Supervisor, reported to me that during periods of heavy rain the intersection of Julian Avenue and Lomas Street in the extreme northeast corner of Unit 17 becomes inundated. As a result, there is a manhole at the intersection which is under water at times. Since the Utilities Department does not have amphibious vehicles, it is difficult to ford the area to get to the lift station just around the corner on Crawford Drive. Also, Ron speculates that our manhole may help to drain the area. However, that is not its intended function. Ron said that he will be glad to meet with Jerry Thomas on site to show him the problem. He thinks it will be relatively simple for your Department to fix with a little bit of grading in the area. CC: Ron Briskie City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET 0 SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 o FAX (407) 589-5570 MEMORANDUM DATE July 22, 1994 TO Joel Koford, City Manager FROM Richard Votapka, Utilities Director (QYV SUBJECT Current Status of Master Meters on the City's Water Distribution System As a result of our conversation regarding "master meters" on Wednesday, July 20, 1994, I researched Ordinance 0-93-19, the Utility Rate Ordinance which was adopted by City Council on December 1, 1993. The only reference I find in regard to "master meters" is under Section 3 - Definitions. Definition (19) in the ordinance reads "master meter means a single water serving a multi -family residential or a multi -unit commercial facility. This term includes, but is not limited to, master meters serving condominiums, apartments, mobile home parks, hotels, motels, travel trailer parks, shopping centers and office buildings." I found no other reference to "master meters" in the other sections of the Ordinance. On the July 7, 1994, a letter from the St. Johns River Water Management District was sent to Bill Wasson of Hartman & Associates concerning the City's Consumptive Use Permit Application for our pi7oductive wells. The District wants the City to adopt a conservation related ordinance which will include the prohibition of master meters on new service connections. Also, the District requested a proposed implementation schedule when River Run, Sebastian Lakes and Reflections on the River condominium developments will replace their master meters with cluster meters to provide individual metering. RBV/avr City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 a FAX (407) 589-5570 MEMORANDUM DATE: September 1, 1994 TO: Joel L. Koford, City Manager FROM: Richard Votapka, Utilities Director k5✓ SUBJECT: Leak Detection Equipment Presently the Utilities Department does not possess any leak detection equipment. To pin point a service leak, our personnel have to dig until they find the source of the leak which can sometimes be very time consuming. In the past, our Department has borrowed equipment from the City of Vero Beach Utilities Department but the equipment being quite old did not perform satisfactory and was somewhat cumbersome to use. In scouting through trade journals and magazines, I discovered the Health Consultants Aqua Scope which appears to be the sensitive type of leak detection equipment our Department could most effectively use. Therefore, I am requesting your approval to purchase such equipment. Back up information including three price quotes are attached to this memo. I had budgeted $1,885 for leak detection equipment in the 1993/1994 Budget Amendment Capital Outlay line item. The total cost of the Health Aqua Scope at present would be $1705 from the factory direct. /sg 0 City of Sebastian POST OFFICE BOX 780127 ❑ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32978 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 o FAX (407) 589-5570 DATE: October 14, 1994 TO: Councilmember Carolyn Corum FROM- Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director rw / Cr.sw,.pd: , uc, F: i SUBJECT: Projected Drawdowns and Existing Chloride Levels for the Sebastian Highlands Filbert Street Potable Water Wells and Monitoring Wells As a result of our discussion on October 12, 1994, in reference to a wellhead protection ordinance, I am transmitting the attached booklet prepared by Hartman & Associates. This booklet is the "Response to Request for Additional Information" as required by the St. Johns River Water Management District for the City of Sebastian's Consumptive Use Permit Application No. 2-061-0142 AUNR2 currently in progress. In regard to the drawdown effect that increased well productivity at our water plant will have with three wells (two existing and one proposed), Hartman and Associates ran modelling analyses for Average Daily Flow (ADF) of 1.12 million gallons per day (MGD) and 1.87 MGD for the Maximum Daily Flow. Modelling data and computer printouts simulating the potential drawdown within the wellfield follow the exhibits in Item D. The drawdown contours in 0.100 foot increments for the surficial aquifer and in 1.0 foot increments for the intermediate aquifer are found in Figures D-1 through D-6. The scale of the maps in these exhibits is 1" equals 2,000 feet. As you can see, the drawdowns are relatively small in both aquifers. The surficial aquifer lies from 0 to 60 feet below the top of existing ground. The intermediate aquifer lies between 60 to 100 feet below ground. Most shallow residential wells within one mile of the Filbert Street Water Treatment Plant are approximately 60 feet deep. Pertaining to chlorides in the groundwater, I call your attention to Item E "Sebastian Highland Water Treatment Plant Monitor Well Locations". The first page shows a map identifying where the October 14, 1994 Memo to Carolyn Corum Page 2 of 2 monitoring wells are located. The following pages in Condition 20A are the reports of the chloride levels in potable (PW) water wells Numbers 1 and 2 from July 12, 1993 to June 16, 1994. The MCL (maximum contaminant level) for chlorides is 250 ppm. The highest chloride level recorded between the period of July 12, 1993 and May 27, 1994 was 38 ppm. This is a very low level. In Condition 20B, the chloride levels in the monitoring wells are indicated for the period of January 20, 1993 through June 16, 1994. The highest reported chloride level was 117 ppm in MW 80-3, which is still less than half of the MCL for chlorides. Hopefully, the response booklet will provide you the information you are seeking. If you need further information, I have more data and reports available in my office that I can show you if you desire. Enclosure CC- City Manager Joel Koford City of Sebastian POST OFFICE BOX 780127 ❑ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32978 c c-� TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 ❑ FAX (407) 589-5570 _ Cz r_ J Mf J S1 --A IN J :J -K f c r -- DATE: October 14, 1994 i-° To: Marilyn Swichkow, Finance Director - FROM: Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director ms / SUBJECT: Utilities Department Vehicles Data including Present Worth as of October 1, 1994 The Utilities Department currently has five (5) vehicles as follows: 1) Vehicle No. 800 (Car 800) A) Previous Owners - Sebastian Police Department and Community Development Department B) Year & Model - 1987 Ford Crown Victoria, 4 door sedan C) Present Mileage - 88,280 miles D) Used By: Utilities Director E) Expensed To: 60-533 WATER 0&M F) Present Worth (Book Value) as of October 1, 1994 = $3,800 2) Vehicle No. 801 (Car 801) A) Previous Owner - Sebastian Police Department B) Year & Model - 1988 Ford Crown Victoria, 4 door sedan C) Present Mileage - 81,985 miles D) Used By: Utilities Personnel E) Expensed To: 70-535 SEWER 0&M F) Present Worth (Book Value) as of October 1, 1994 = $5,300 3) Vehicle No. 802 (Boom Truck) ( A) Previous Owner - General Development Utilities until 12/17/93 B) Year & Model - 1987 Ford pickup truck with panel sides with tool b#gs and a hydraulic boom (hoist) with electronic controls C) Present Mileage - 70,509 miles D) Used By: Utilities Personnel E) Expensed To: 70-535 SEWER 0&M F) Present Worth as of October 1, 1994 = $10,075 o� ��U U• — (Retail $7075 w/o boom + $3,000 boom) October 14, 1994 Memo to Marilyn Swichkow Page 2 of 2 4) Vehicle No. 803 (Utility Truck) 4- A) Previous Owner - General Development Utilities untila 12/17/93 B) Year & Model - 1987 Ford Ranger, 2 door pickup C) Present Mileage - 69,393 miles D) Used By: Utilities Employees E) Expensed To: 60-533 WATER 0&M F) Present Worth as of October 1, 1994 = $3,900 5) Vehicle No. 804 (Tractor) A) Previous Owner - General Development Utilities until 12/17/93 B) Year and Model - 1976 Yannar Diesel 155D, 4 wheel drive tractor C) Present Mileage - No odometer D) Used By: Utilities Personnel for tilling the percolation ponds E) Expensed To: 70-535 SEWER 0&M F) Present Worth as of October 1, 1994 = $1,250 RBV/jw City of Sebastian POST OFFICE BOX 780127 ❑ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32978 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 ❑ FAX (407) 589-5570 MMMORAN DDM DATE: November 21, 1994 T0: Ron Briskie, Plant Supt. FROM: Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director 126 ✓ SUBJECT: Proposed Improvements at Water and Wastewater Treatment Plant as a result of Tropical Storm Gordon. Based on our observations during last week's intense rainfall from Tropical Storm Gordon, I recommend that the following improvements be made as soon as possible: 1. Water Treatment Plant - Construct small circular earth berms approximately 3" high around the wet and dry wells for the septic tank lift station. This will prevent stormwater runoff from flooding the system causing it to become saturated to the point where the toilet in the water plant office/lab is rendered inoperable. 2. Wastewater Treatment Plant - a. Grade a swale from the blower/control panel area north towards the chlorine shed and then east towards Lake Schumann to adequately drain the area. b. Construct a wooden platform (pallet type) or raise the existing slab with 3" of concrete overlay. Both A and B will ensure that the area in the immediate vicinity of the control panel and blowers will not be submerged during intense rainfall. As was the case with the blower motor that shorted out because of improper grounding and conduit connections, a short to the conduit could transmit electricity to the water which would electrocute anyone who stepped into the water. City of Sebastian POST OFFICE BOX 780127 ❑ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32978 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 ❑ FAX (407) 589-5570 M MJRAVD:1M DATE: December 1, 1994 T0: Joel Koford, City Manager FROM: Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director /Z is V/ SUBJECT: Proposal from Lightning Technologies, Inc. I have just received a proposal from Lightning Technologies of Pittsfield, Massachusetts, for an investigation and report on improvements to the lightning protection system for the City's Police Station and Communications Tower. Lightning Technologies, Inc. is highly recommended by Garland Thomas, Lightning Specialist for NASA, since the firm has worked extensively at the Kennedy Space Center. The firm has also conducted educational seminars on lightning protection for NASA personnel. Garland personally told me that Lightning Technologies, Inc. solved a problem for a municipality whose police department communications tower had been repeatedly struck by lightning. The strike had damaged electronics equipment in the police station and other municipal buildings linked via electrical and communications cables - a situation very similar to ours. Although the attached proposal is for several thousand dollars, consideration must be given to the fact that Lightning Technologies, Inc. has the reputation of being the leading expert in lightning protection in the United States. This is evidenced by the July, 1993, National Geographic magazine featuring "lightning". Also, this firm is not a manufacturer of lightning protection products and thus will not be promoting its own products such as another firm already has in its proposal to the City. Memo to Joel Koford December 1, 1994 Page 2 of 2 Lightning Technologies may be the firm that would be most cost beneficial in recommending effective, economical enhancements for the existing lightning system. 2 would suggest that you contact President J. Anderson Plumer of Lightning Technologies to discuss his proposal. You may be able to reduce some of the costs, i.e. three engineering days should not be necessary for an investigation. Also, costs for the report for Task 2 as mentioned on Page 2 are in addition to costs for Task 1. The content and cost of the report should be discussed as well. CC: Chief Earle Petty RBV/jw /memo/ko[ord6 I Figure 4 - Reasons for Lightning Damage to Police Radio Equipment and Minicomputer CPU and CRT Units. pr. �':CiGCi6ii • O LIGHTNING ••CC �OCSr. w� 10 DOWNING PARKWAY, PTrTShELD, MA- 01201 I.I I I,.:, IIU11 LIUII I III 111i I EUIIIIUL!IU IE'-. 10 F. n;; LIGHTNING TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 10 Downing Parkway, Pittsfield. Massachusetm01201 • (413)499.2135 30 November 7994 FAX 013) 499-2503 Subject: Lightning Protection Improvements for City of Sebastian communications Facilities. Our ref: Lightning Technologies, Inc City of Sebastian 1225 Main Street Sebastian, FL 32958 Attention: ,Rich Votapka Gentlemen: Quotation LT -94-2238 Lightning Technologies, Inc. is pleased to provide this quotation for lightning protection assistance for the City of Sebastian Police communications facilities. We have experience in this area and are available to assist in diagnosing the specific problems and developing appropriate protective.measures. The specific tasks that we can perform include: The purpose of this task is to establish the specific cause(s) of the lightning -related problems experienced at the facility and plan an approach leading to correction of them. This will require a one -day visit of one of our senior engineering personnel to the facility to inspect the communica- tions facilities. We will need to meet with cognizant personnel, inspect the, building, tower, and other electrical/electronic installations, as well as typical interconnecting cables. We may also need to look at interconnect wiring diagrams and equipment circuit diagrams (if available). The latter may require coopera- tion of equipment manufacturers. The outcome of this site inspection will be a short report containing pertinent findings from the site inspection and recommendations for further action leading to correction of the problems (i.e., detailed plans for Task 2) . Development of protection against the harardspl lightning and other electrical phenomena. City of Sebastian - 2 - 30 November 1994 Task 2 - Design of Erotectnts The purpose of this task is to design specific protection measures required to minimize the possibility of recurrences of lightning related.problems at the police facilities. Successful lightning protection for systems of this nature usually requires improvements in the following areas: • Electrical bonding among conducting elements of the system or enclosures to minimize potential differences. • Electromagnetic shielding of interconnecting cables, to minimize lightning -induced transients due to changing mag- netic fields and earth potential difference associated with lightning strikes. • Grounding improvements to provide adequate paths for light- ning surge currents to reach earth. • Surge suppression devices to clamp remaining transients to levels that can be tolerated by the electronic equipment. In most cases, reliance on one of these approaches by itself will not be adequate. Results of Task 2 will be contained in a report in suffi- cient detail for the protection recommendations to be implemented by city maintenance or outside contractor personnel. To the extend possible, protection designs should make use of existing facilities so as to minimize the cost of implementing the protective measures. Where applicable, specific part num- bers, sources of supply and other necessary details of recommend- ed protective devices will be furnished. Costs Costs are billed on a time and expense basis in accordance with the following per diem rates: Chief Engineer - - - - - - - - - - - $995/day Sr. Research Engineer - - - - - - - - 895/day Senior Engineer - - - - - - - - - - 685/day Junior Engineer - - - - - - - - - - 595/day Expenses such as travel, living, film, processing and incidental.'materials are billed at direct cost plus 15%. Invoic- es are issued monthly for work accomplished during a month and payments are due within 30 days of date of each invoice. i -puri LI ill H IHI, ILI:uiu.'L''',IE I City of Sebastian - 3 - 30 November 1994 A service charge of 1.5% per month will be added to balances unpaid within 30 days of date of invoice. All services are offered subject to our "Standard Conditions for Laboratory Testing and Consulting Services," a copy of which is attached. The quoted rates are applicable to work performed prior to 31 December 1994, at which time yearly adjustments to rates may be made. The above rates are applicable for all customers and government agencies. Justamated Costs Based on our present understanding of your problem, we estimate that 3 engineering man days will be required for comple- tion of Task 1. These costs, together with travel, living and other incidental expenses will be as follows: 3.0 days sr. Research Engineer @ $895 - - - - - - - $2,685 Travel,, living, and supplies: Airfare, R -T - - - - - - - - $1,000 Car rental, 2 days @ $60 - - - 120 Hotel, 1 night @ $75 - - - - 75 Meals, 2 days @ $30 - - - - -.- 60 Airport parking, 2 days @ $8 16 Mileage to airport, 110 miles @ .28 - - - - - - - - - - -- 31 Film and development - - - - - _ 40 Subtotal $1,342 15% on travel/living, expenses 201 Total travel/living, expenses $1,543 - - - - - - 1,543 Task 1 total - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - $4,228 Upon conclusion of Task 1 we should be able to furnish you with a cost estimate for Task 2. Costs of previous design tasks of this nature have ranged between $3,000-$10,000. A more precise estimate for Task 2 can be given upon completion of Task 1. Schedule Our Mr. F. A. Fisher can visit your facility on his way home from Brazil on or about 17 December, in which case a significant portion of the travel expense can be saved. This arrangement can be confirmed upon concurrence of the City and receipt of a purchase order. Task 2 can probably be completed within 2- 4 weeks of go-ahead authorization, depending on what specifically has to be done. 25 FF, 011 L115111 H1 146' 1 F C H n 11 L 111, 1 E S 70 F'. 05 City of Sebastian - 4 - 30 November 1994 1 have enclosed some background information on our company. Ir you desire further information or wish to discuss this propos- al, please give me a call. Thank you for your inquiry. We look forward to assisting you with the solution of these problems. Yours truly, V J_ Anderson Plumer, President Lightning Technologies, Inc. JAP : cl.m Enclosures II. JU I`vl les: 1'I±11I'1 LIGHI11111G ILC 111NI 131 ES 1'U ... LIGHTNING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. STANDARD CONDMONS.FOR DESIGN TESTING AND CONSULTING SERVICES Any design, consulting, test or analytical work Performed by Lightning Technologies, Inc. (hereinafter called the Company) at its own facility or any other facility for a Purchaser, Pursuant to the attached quotation, is subject to the following conditions. 1.0 QHJECTiV:- The designs, tests, analytical work, recommendations and reports contemplated by this quotation any order resulting herefrom ate for the sole.purposcs of providing information which will assist the Purchaser in minimizing damage due to lightning or other electro -magnetic effects. The Company will perform this work in accordance with high professional standards. It must be recognized, however, that the possibility of damage from lightning, being a natural phenomenon, may not be wholly eliminated. 2.0 PI;RFORMANCE.OF TESTS. r Following delivery to a designated reception location of material for test (hereinafter rt:ferred to as a "test object'), the test object will be prepared for test, transported into the test area, positioned, mounted and otherwise set up and electrically connected for test. Determination of the tests to be made and the conduct and order of test.procedures will be determined by the Purchaser, subject however to approval of the Company in respect to safety and capability of equipment. The actual conduct of the.tests and the operation of test equipmenr.will be carried out solely by Company employees or employees of another test facility under subcontract from the Company, but Purchaser may at his election, provide a responsible representative to observe the tests and receive test data. Purchaser's representative shall abide by such safety regulations as.the Company,. or other test facility may prescribe. 3.0 WARRANTY. AS TO: MT OR AtIALYSISDATA - Unless otherwise specified in writing, the Company warrants to the Purchaser that the resulting. test or analysis data delivered to the Purchaser is complete as determined by the provisions of the agreed-upon test limitations, within normal or reasonable limitations. Ia the event that Purchaser can establish to. the satisfaction of the Company that the test or analysis data is not complete or accurate to the extent specifietl in the immediately preceding sentence, the Company *01 at its option either (1) retest the test object sufficiently to provide test or analysis data of the aforesaid completeness and accu'racy.oc(Z) refund an amount to be agreed upon by the parties not to exceed the contract price established for such tests. The, foregoing states the entire and sole liability of the Company regarding the supply of test data. 4.0 NO LIABILITY FOR- DAMAGE TO TEST OBJECT OR COMPANY EQUIPii� - Neither the Company, not any other facility when the work is performed under subcontract from the Company, shall be held liable for any damage to the test object resulting from any test work specified or agreed to by the Purchaser. The Purchaser shall not be responsible for damage to Company or other facility equipment resulting from the agreed-upvmtesU, even if this damage is caused by the Purchaser's test object or by the effects of this object, unless otherwise agreed upon is writing. 5.0 ILDYA4NM - The Purchaseragrees to indemnify and save the Company and any other facility where the work is performed under subcontractfrom the Company, harmless from all liability for injury to or death of employees or other representatives of the Purchaser while on the premises of the Company or other facility in connection with this test work. 6.0 DISCLOSURE_ OF INFORMATION - No confidential relationship is to be established or implied as to any design, manufacturing or other. technical information relating to the test objective and which the Purchaser transttiks or otherwise makes available to the Company in connection with the agreed upon tests, or any information regarding the tests and analysis made, the manner of conducting the tests, or the test results. Tho Company will take reasonable precautions to: avoid disclosure of such information to any third party, but the Company will not be liable for any inadvertent disclosure of such information. 7.0 PATENTS _ In the event one or more employees of the Company and one or more employees of the Purchaser make or conceive.any,joint invention which pertains to apparatus which patents of any country issue, the Purchaser shall receive title to such inventions and patents subject to an irrevocable, non- exclusive, royalty -free llcease to the Company and its subsidiaries. If the Purchaser elects not to obtain a patent, the Company shall have the right to do so and the Purchaser shall receive an irrevocable, non- exclusive, royalty-freo license thereunder with title to such patent in the Company. The party acquiring title to such patent shall bear all expenses in the acquisition thereof. Any invention relating to apparatus of the type tested made by an employee or employees of only one of the parties of this agreement shall be and remain the solo property of that party or of such employees, as the case may be and no license to the other party is granted or implied by this agreement. 8.0 USE OF TEST DATA - It is to be understood that, in performing these tests, the Company does not endorse or recommend the object tested or any other product or part thereof made and sold by the Purchaser. The:ptirchaser agrees not to advertise or otherwise use the name of Lightning Technologies, Inc., in connectibn with the sale of any of its products of the type tested except with the written consent of the Company. 9.0 SCHEDULING OF TESTS - Tests shall be conducted and completed upon such dates as may be agreed upon from time to;time by the Company and the Purchaser. In the event of any delay or cancellation of any test or tests by the Company, the Company will use its best efforts to conduct the test at a later date, but shall not be liable to the Purchaser for any damage suffered by such delay or cancellation. 10.0 ALE$ tjD_MMJLAR TA341 The Company's prices do not include sales, use, excise or similar taxes. Consequently, in addition to the price specifi4d herein, the amount of any present or future sale, use. excise, or other similar tax applicable to the sale of set°viecs or apparatus hereunder shall be paid by the Purchaser, or, in lieu thereof, Purchaser shall provide the Company with a tax exemption certificate, accept- able to the taxing-kuthorities. 1I.0 CANCELLATION - The Purchaser may cancel his order only upon written notice and upon payment to the Company of reasonable and proper cancellation charges. 12.0 LIMITATION OF LIABILITY - The Company's Iiability on any claim for loss or damage arising out Of or in eoasectioilwith this contract or the test of any apparatus as provided by this contract (including but not limited to loss or damage arising from breach of contract or negligence) shall in no case exceed the price for the services as set forth in the contract. In no event, whether as a result of breach;of contractor warranty, whether expressed or implied, or alleged negligence, shall the Company be liable for special or Consequential damages, arising out of; 1) any use or representation concerning the designs, recommendations, test or analysis data which may be made by Purchaser, or 2) any sales or use by tho Purchaser or his vendees mediate or immediate, of any apparatus or part thereof designed or warranted by the Purchaser.upon the basis of the designs, recommendations, test or analysis data. NO WARRANTY OR MERCHANTABILITY OF FITNESS FOR PURPOSE SHALL APPLY, NOR SHALL ANY OTHER WARRANTY APPLY, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY SET FORTH IN WRITING IN THIS CONTRACT. 13.0 GENERAL The Company represents that any services hereunder will be conducted in compliance with the requirements of Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 as amended. No waiver, alteration or modification of any of the provisions hereof shall be binding upon the Company unless in writingand signed by a duly authorized representative of the Company. TOTAL P.07 City of Sebastian POST OFFICE BOX 780127 o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32978 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 o FAX (407) 589-5570 M J SSS ,J SZ A A D J S'S DATE: December 1, 1994 TO: Joel Koford, City Manager FROM: Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director /v8V SUBJECT: Investigation of Lightning Protection System at the Police Communications Tower by Representatives from Premier Lightning Protection and Trebor Power Systems I had a lengthy telephone conversation with Dennis Israelson of Premier Lightning Protection, Inc. of Altamonte Springs on November 28, 1994, regarding the lightning system his firm installed at the Police Station. Today he called me to schedule an on-site visit for Thursday. December 8, 1994, at 10:30 a.m., free of charge, to look at the system. He will be bringing Jim Walker of Trebor Power Systems in Orlando, who is extremely knowledgeable in the area of surge suppression. cc: Chief Earle Petty RBV/jw /eeno/kofo:dS M,EK0RA V DVM DATE: December 9, 1994 TO: Nancy Veidt, Finance Department FROM: Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director SUBJECT: ERU Accounts for C & M Braddick, Inc. 0S ✓ In response to your memo of December 5, 1994, referencing the above ERU accounts, I spoke to City Manager Joel Koford about them on December 8, 1994. He recommended that we procure a copy of the original ERU agreement that C & M Braddick, Inc. had with Indian River County and to make sure that the ERU's run with the land and to obtain a copy of the foreclosure action. I am sure the ERU's run with the land and will try to research the files to find a typical County agreement for purchase of ERU's under the North County Volunteer Assessment Program. There should be standard language in this agreement regarding transfer or assignment of ERU's to a new owner. In regard to the foreclosure documents, I would suggest that you call Mrs. Braddick to obtain a copy. She can probably furnish you with a copy of the County agreement as well. Once the documents are in hand, I will meet with Mr. Koford to apprise him. He'll talk with the City Attorney if needed to see if there is any problem in requiring the new owner to pay for the ERU accounts. MEMORANDUM To: Rich Votapka, Utilities Director FROM: Nancy Veidt DATE: December 5, 1994 SUBJ: ERU accounts for C & M Braddick, Inc. # 2270-01, 2280-01, 2300-01, and 2310-01 Mrs. Braddick called the office last month and informed me that the i property for the above reference bills had been foreclosed on in December of 1993. She stated that she did not know the current owner. I called Lisa with Indian River County Utilities. She stated that she did not show a change of ownership on these parcels. She requested that after I get it all straightened out, I call her so that she can update her records. I had Daryl Thompson check with the property appraisers office and the current owner is Mays Marina, PO Box 780277, Sebastian, FL 32978. The accounts are paid through January of 1994. No payments have been received for any charges accrued past that time. Can the balance shown on C & M Braddick's bills be transferred to May's Marina? City of Sebastian POST OFFICE BOX 780127 ❑ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32978 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 ❑ FAX (407) 589-5570 DATE: December 12, 1994 TO: Joel Koford, City Manager '/ FROM: Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director /�/� V SUBJECT: Reimbursement of Overcharges to Palm Lake Club for Sewer ERU Accounts as Requested by Owner, Pierre Paquette This memo is pursuant to our conversation on Friday, December 9, 1994, regarding Pierre Paquette's request for reimbursement for previous incurred sewer overcharges. In checking with Nancy Veidt on the total amount Palm Lake Club is currently owed, she informed me that the City owes $4,469.87 to date. Indian River County Utilities had credited the City on October 11, 1994 for the full amount of the sewer overcharges. After credit was received from Indian River County, Finance Director Marilyn Swichkow authorized payment of the total amount on October 28, 1994. Subsequent to a lengthy processing of the necessary paperwork during November by the Finance Department for the credit adjustment, a check for $4,469.87 to Palm Lake Club was issued this morning and should be on your desk for approval today or tomorrow. Once approved, Pierre Paquette should receive his long overdue credit by the end of this week. RBV/jw I t e @ a I k of 0 ad9 City of Sebastian POST OFFICE BOX 780127 ❑ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32978 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 ❑ FAX (407) 589-5570 MEMORANDUM DATE: December 13, 1994 T0: Joel Koford, City Manager FROM: Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director %ZQ i/ SUBJECT: Vertical Profiles for Well Field Zone of Influence at the Filbert Street Water Treatment Plant Following your recommendation at the November 16, 1994 staff meeting. I contacted Councilwoman Carolyn Corum in regard to vertical profiles for well field zone of influence for the Filbert Street wells. I explained to Mrs. Corum that the September 6, 1994, "Response to Request for Additional Information" as prepared by Hartman & Associates, Inc. for the City's Consumptive Use Permit Application showed circular elevation contours for the drawdown effects of the wells. The circular contours show the drawdown effects in a 360 degree pattern around the wells. I explained to Mrs. Corum that a vertical profile will only be representative of a cross sectional area in one direction only. The zone of influence is better illustrated by the circular contour. Still, Mrs. Corum persisted in her desire to see vertical profiles for at least two directional plains -- North-South and East-West. I called Hartman & Associates, Inc. to discuss the generation of two vertical profiles in the above directions. As a result, I recently received a letter dated December 6, 1994, from Hartman & Associates for an estimated $800.00 to produce the profiles. The justification for the cost is explained in the attached letter. In adhering to proper procedural protocol, I will not notify Hartman & Associates, Inc. to proceed with this additional task unless I receive a written directive from you. Please advise accordingly. RBV/jw /Keno/X10 City of Sebastian POST OFFICE BOX 780127 ❑ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32978 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 ❑ FAX (407) 589-5570 M MJRABD JM DATE: December 14, 1994 TO: All Utilities Employees FROM: Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director E&I SUBJECT: Temporary Suspension of Water and Sewer Service Installation From December 22, 1994 through January 2, 1995 Pay Myers of Treasure Coast Contracting informed me that she and her husband Larry will be out of town from December 22, 1994 through January 2, 1995. All of their employees will also be on vacation during this time. We will not schedule any water and/or sewer service installations during this period. Should an emergency repair be necessary, we can contact Brian Tooker at (407) 984-9898, who is a trusted employee of Treasure Coast Contracting. He will be in charge of emergency operations while Pat and Larry are away. CC: Finance Department - Customer Service Representatives RBV/jw /aeao/ees City of Sebastian POST OFFICE BOX 780127 ❑ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32978 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 ❑ FAX (407) 589-5570 MEMORANDUM DATE: December 29, 1994 0021 Rich Votapka, Utilities Director A!l) Assistant SUBJECT: Water Service Connection Fee Questions from Ameron Homes (Michelle -- 589-1299) FROM: Jackie Watters, Administrative Michelle from Ameron Homes called to get the costs involved in setting up the three homes (paperwork attached) for new service. Bob went out to check to determine if we'd need for Treasure Coast to be involved; his note is also attached. When I showed it to Nancy, she said to include the $400 minimum for the water service connection fee for all three homes, plus I should explain to Michelle that it could cost more if we are charged more than $400 - and that we would bill them for the difference. I called Michelle and passed along the information and explanation. Michelle asked a couple of questions that I did not feel qualified to answer, and when I explained them to Nancy, Nancy suggested I hand this over to you. Michelle wants to know why the cost is now $1705 when not very long ago the cost was only $1255. She also asked what happens if the amount charged by our contractors is less than the $400 we charge them up -front? Is it refunded to them or do we just keep it? I was not sure how to respond to her. Thank you. M c4AcA c„d— 3:0o Pw1 a., iz/z9/44 A a ,rw--e a Lt/ L, CA -h-w . z SIA ", -'- 1-4. 44%^"- a asik � « SL. —.5 2i.�.t(�.� 0. C( �,� 0,1_ cvs s��- K......6.�.s- cc: Nancy Veidt, Finance Department PRESS RELEASE Some City of Sebastian Utilities Water Bills to be Estimated for December Due to the intense rainfall on December 21, 1994, City Utilities Personnel were unable to read all the water meters because the meter boxes were flooded. The majority of flooded meter boxes were in Unit 17. Other flooded meter boxes were randomly located throughout the service area. In locations where the meter boxes were flooded, the customer will receive an estimated utility bill for December based on average usage. c: NMO 51\y r e 6 re ll M /m%, MASTELLER & MOLER, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS - Mr. Joel Koford City Manager City of Sebastian P.O. Box 127 Sebastian, FL 32958 n October 4, 1994 34566 OCT 1994 Received City manapes RE: Engineering and Surveying Services in Connection with the City of Sebastian Water System Located East of US #1. Dear Joel: Confirming our telephone conversation of this afternoon, please be advised that we are commencing our services relative to the referenced project. We will "fast track" our services on your behalf with the knowledge that time is of the essence. Thank you office will expectations. EHM/tb cc: Mr. Terry Mr. Harry File #9459LA (ir100494) for this assignment. You can be sure that our do our very best to meet or exceed your Pinto, IRCUD Asher, IRCUD Sincerely, MALER & MOLER, INC. Earl H.asteller, P.E. President W 1623 N. U.S. Highway 1, Suite B2 O 7380 Murrell Road, Suite 106 Sebastian, FL 32958 Melbourne, Florida 32940 (407) 589-4800 (407) 255-1175 (407) 589-2742 Fax (407) 253-4439 Fax CITY OF SEBASTIAN UTILITIES DEPARTMENT DATE: October 14, 1994 TIME: 9:15 a.m. [ ] CONFERENCE WITH [X ] TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH Bill Wasson & Bruce LaFrenz of Hartman & Associates, Inc. SUBJECT: Response to the St. Johns River Water Management District Request for Additional Information Consumptive Use Permit RESUME OF CONVERSATION: I called Bill Wasson in reference to the Request for Additional Information regarding the surficial and intermediate aquifers, and drawdowns in each. Bill informed me that the surficial aquifer ranged from 0 to 60 feet deep while the intermediate aquifer ranged from 60 to 100 feet deep. Bill mentioned that he believed that the intermediate aquifer was located in the Anastasia formation but he would have to do some further checking on this. Bill said that most residential wells within a one (1) mile radius of the Filbert Street Water Plant are about 60 feet deep. The production wells No. 1 and No. 2 have a screened depth from 65 feet to 95 feet which is within the intermediate aquifer. The scale on the maps used in "Exhibit D" is 1" = 2,000 feet. On Exhibit D-1, the first contour for 0.2' of drawdown is 0.42 miles from the Filbert Street wells; the second contour is 1.05 miles for 0.1' of drawdown. Drawdown contours are determined from a 100 X 100 point matrix which generates 10,000 data points. Hartman & Associates, Inc. can do three (3) dimensional analysis and print out a three (3) dimensional flow net. The contours can also be plotted on a two (2) dimensional scale projection as is shown on the "D" Exhibits. Bruce LaFrenz told me that the data following Exhibit D is based on an arbitrary elevation - say 15.00 feet - above mean sea level -0.0 Datum. The elevation of 14.99 indicates a drawdown on only 0.01 feet from the arbitrary elevation. The contours in Exhibit D are based on a proposed new 10" or 12" well. A 12" well would be more practical to use. The stress rate on the data page preceding the iterations generated relates to the pumping or withdrawal rate. (-) = volume coming out of the ground. 49,911 = cf per day = 374,000 gals/day/well = 1.12 gpd for 3 wells. ADF - 1.12 gpd, MDF = 1.87 gpd. Originated by: Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director � City of Sebastian POST OFFICE BOX 780127 ❑ SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32978 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 ❑ FAX (407) 589-5570 MIEMORANDUM DATE: October 14, 1994 'l=ilt. 54. Jvl,MI amt -aha Co S"Y" Ust 9- I., bl: F+......., r TO: Councilmember Carolyn Corum FROM: Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director fwf SUBJECT: Projected Drawdowns and Existing Chloride Levels for the Sebastian Highlands Filbert Street Potable Water Wells and Monitoring Wells As a result of our discussion on October 12, 1994, in reference to a wellhead protection ordinance, I am transmitting the attached booklet prepared by Hartman & Associates. This booklet is the "Response to Request for Additional Information" as required by the St. Johns River Water Management District for the City of Sebastian's Consumptive Use Permit Application No. 2-061-0142 AUNR2 currently in progress. In regard to the drawdown effect that increased well productivity at our water plant will have with three wells (two existing and one proposed), Hartman and Associates ran modelling analyses for Average Daily Flow (ADF) of 1.12 million gallons per day (MGD) and 1.87 MGD for the Maximum Daily Flow. Modelling data and computer printouts simulating the potential drawdown within the wellfield follow the exhibits in Item D. The drawdown contours in 0.100 foot increments for the surficial aquifer and in 1.0 foot increments for the intermediate aquifer are found in Figures D-1 through D-6. The scale of the maps in these exhibits is 1" equals 2,000 feet. As you can see, the drawdowns are relatively small in both aquifers. The surficial aquifer lies from 0 to 60 feet below the top of existing ground. The intermediate aquifer lies between 60 to 100 feet below ground. Most shallow residential wells within one mile of the Filbert Street Water Treatment Plant are approximately 60 feet deep. Pertaining to chlorides in the groundwater, I call your attention to Item E "Sebastian Highland Water Treatment Plant Monitor Well Locations". The first page shows a map identifying where the October 14, 1994 Memo to Carolyn Corum Page 2 of 2 monitoring wells are located. The following pages in Condition 20A are the reports of the chloride levels in potable (PW) water wells Numbers 1 and 2 from July 12, 1993 to June 16, 1994. The MCL (maximum contaminant level) for chlorides is 250 ppm. The highest chloride level recorded between the period of July 12, 1993 and May 27, 1994 was 38 ppm. This is a very low level. In Condition 20B, the chloride levels in the monitoring wells are indicated for the period of January 20, 1993 through June 16, 1994. The highest reported chloride level was 117 ppm in MW 80-3, which is still less than half of the MCL for chlorides. Hopefully, the response booklet will provide you the information you are seeking. If you need further information. I have more data and reports available in my office that I can show you if you desire. Enclosure CC: City Manager Joel Koford CCT 24 '94 10:42AM I R CO UTILITIES PRINCIPALS; )amts E. Chrimpha,, PE, engineers, Charles W. DmkS P.G. Gerald C. Hartman, P.E. Mark 1. Luke P.L.S. Mark A. EYAm Rg. P.E. H=1d E. Schmidt,)r., P.E. Mr, Terrance R Pinto Director of Utilities Indian River County 1940 25th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Subject: Park Place/Palm Lake Pump Station and For Dear Mr. Pinto: P.2 INC. surveyors & management consultants October 19, 1994 HAI #92-023.10 U 1 t 2 4 !N4 �. V:1 - Sebastian Highlands iin Interconnect ASSOCLITEB: WIIIhue D, Muasct P.E. SCOtt C. Quiman, P.E. ru UMY A. HOahuli, P.E. Moto H. RO=a, C.M.C. ktgmald L. Ti C, P.E. John w.%p. PE. The purpose of this letter is to provide y�u with an update on the status of the above -referenced project and to request design information necessary to complete the project. Also, I have included a copy of the latest construction drawings for your preliminary review. Based on our discussions with various I than River County Utilities (IkCU) personnel, it is our understanding that there is currently on (1) submersible wastewater pump station servittg Park Place, Palm Lake Club, New Horizons, aid Breezy Village, and these four (4) subdivisions are the only wastewater contributors to the pump station's gravity collection system. This existing pump station is currently pumping to the IRCU wastewater system along U.S. 1. The objective of this project is to tra contribution (approximately 784 mobile the City of Sebastian (COS) wastewater wastewater system at Pelican Island Els serve New Horizons and Breezy Villagt will function properly following the information: 1, The build -out flow (or number Horizons. 2. The minimum and maximum U.S. 1 at Barber Street. 201 EAST PINE S1 TELEPHONE sfer the Park Place and Palm Lake Club wastewater tome connections = 653 equivalent residential units) to ystem by rerouting the existing pump station to the COS ientary School and constructing a new pump station to Therefore, in order for us to ensure that both systems proposed rerouting, we will require the following connections and unit flow) for Breezy Village and New pressure in the 24 -inch IRCU force main along • SUITE 1000 • ORLANDO, PL 32801 839-3955 • PAX (407) 839-3790 ORLANDO PORT MYERS I JACKSONVILLE TALLAHASSEE CCT 24 '94 10:42RM I R CO UTILITIES Mr. Terrance R. Pinto October 19, 1994 Page 2 To date, we have been unable to obtain based on discussions with Mr. Bill McC and Effluent Reuse and Disposal Master by Brown and Caldwell Consultants, tha and is currently equipped with ABS Mo TDH. We would assume that design of t previously mentioned four (4) subdivisio be available. However, we have bee information and/or record drawings for t Inc. who was the design consultant. Th existing pumps or to obtain the required Based on the design information that we: existing station are substantially larger tt Club, and we have recommended to thi appropriately sized pumps as part of this fact that the receiving force main system It may be possible to install these puml Horizons, however, we can not evaluate station without the required information 1 P.3 this information from IRCU. It is our understanding, n of IRCU and our review of the "Water, Wastewater, Ian" for Indian River County prepared in January, 1993 the existing pump station has been upgraded recently .el AF -360-4-6" pumps rated at 1,000 gpm at 98 feet is pump upgrade would have been based on serving the Therefore, design flows for these subdivisions should unable to obtain copies of the background design is upgrade from either IRCU or Masteller and Mohler, 'efore, we have been unable to verify the sizing of the ;sign information listed above. ave been able to obtain, it appears that the pumps in the Ln is necessary to serve just Park Place and Palm Lake City of Sebastian that these pumps be replaced with xoject. (This recommendation is based partially on the ischarges into a manhole and gravity collection system.) in the new station to serve Breezy Village and New this option or proceed further with the design of this ;ted above. At this time, we would like to request yo r review of information presented in this letter and the attached construction drawings. Also, we would like to formally request the information noted above which is necessary to complete the design of the new pump station to serve Breezy Village and New Horizons which will be conveye I to IRCU upon completion of the project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to cc ntact me. cc: Richard B. Votapka, P.E. - City Frank A. Brinson, E.I. - HAI FAB/ GJR/mg/c-7/pinto, gj r Very truly yours, Hartman & Associates, Inc. G . Re r, E. Project Manager Sebastian ft r., City of Sebastian t_ 1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 a FAX (407) 589-5570 October 20, 1994 Mr. James Chandler Indian River County Administrator 1840 25th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Dear Jim: The City Council has authorized me to contact Indian River County and determine whether or not the County would be amenable to a proposal from the City of Sebastian. This proposal is in regards to the water distribution and wastewater collection systems of the City utility system. Our proposal includes the sale and transfer of all the assets of the City utility system and establish a thirty (30) year franchise arrangement with the Indian River County Utility Department to provide potable water distribution and wastewater collection for the City of Sebastian. As you know, the City recently purchased the General Development Utility (GDU) which consists of water and wastewater treatment facilities. However, the County, because of the size of its utility system can obtain economies of scale which are not available to the City. It is our opinion, that the future needs of the citizens of Sebastian and the North County area can best be served by a common single managed utility. In this regard, we propose the following: (1) Transfer of Current Assets: $ 3,650,000 (2) Transfer Indian River Drive Water Distribution Project Estimated Value: $ 750,000 (3) Cash Contribution: $ 600,000 TOTAL $ 5.000.000 OWN This proposal is subject to arrangements being formalized whereby the City can defease the utility bond issue and the agreement reduced to writing and obtaining the approval of the City Council, City Attorney and Bond Counsel. The City requests that if you are interested in this proposal that you also consider the possibility of maintaining a satellite office within the City for customer service functions. Additionally, we currently have six (6) employees that would be effected by the transfer, and could be available for employment with the County. My staff and I are available to provide the supporting documentation necessary for your review or to meet with you and your staff. I am also enclosing a copy of the current final year budget for our Utilities. Thank you for your interest in this matter of mutual concern. Sincerely, Joel L. Koford City Manager JLK/jmt Enclosure City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET 11 SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 o FAX (407) 589-5570 MEMORANDUM DATE: October 21, 1994 TO: Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director FROM: Joel L. Koford, City Managers SUBJECT: Transfer of City Utility System to Indian River County Until such time as a final decision is reached regarding the transfer (sale) of our utility system to Indian River County, do not incur any additional expenses or debt except to maintain current operations funded by the current budget appropriations. The final decision should be known before Thanksgiving. /jmt cc: Marilyn Swicldcow, Finance Director PRINC.IPAIS: Ames E. Chrismphcr. RE Charles W DrIke, PG. Gcvld C. liar...... P.E. Mark I. In kc. PIS. Mark A. RYnning. EE. li.mid E. Schmidt Jr.. P.E. _x'I -'*IAN & ASSOCIA'T'ES, INC. engineers, hydrogeologists, surveyors & management consultants Mr. Rich Burklew Hydrologist Department of Resource Management St. Johns River Water Management District 305 East Drive Melbourne, Florida 32904 October 21, 1994 HAI992-023.14 Subject: Consumptive Use Permit Application No. 2-061-0142AUNR2 City of Sebastian - Sebastian Highland WTP Response to Second Request for Additional Information Dear Mr. Burklew: ASSOCIATES: William D Music[ RE. scow C. Quinlan. P.F:. Truth, A. Ilochull. P.F.. Marro II. Rnuca. C.M.C. RaRi,Wd l.. l'isJalc, P.F.. John W. Vogt P.E. The following is the response to your letter dated October 4, 1994, requesting additional information (RAI) to aid in the evaluation of the City of Sebastian's consumptive use permit application, No. 2-061-0142AUNR2. We have reprinted the question from your letter and provided the response below the question. We trust that the information presented is sufficient for you to complete your review and recommend approval of the City's permit. 1. For the area in which the model has predicted that an additional drawdown of at least 0.25 feet will occur to the water table, please provide aerial photos (County blue -line aerials or similar format will be sufficient] with the following information: a) Drawdown contours (including 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 foot contours) b) the boundaries and acreage of the wetland(s) c) existing and proposed well locations 201 EAST PINE STREET • SUITE 1000 • ORLANDO, FL 32801 TELEPHONE (407) 839-3955 • FAX (407) 839-3790 ORLANDO FORT MYERS JACKSONVILLE. TALLAHASSEE Mr. Rich Burklew October 20, 1994 Page 2 As discussed in your October 13, 1994 phone conversation with Mr. Bruce Lafrenz of Hartman & Associates, Inc., after further review of Figure D-5 (attached) from the first RAI response dated September 6, 1994, the illustrated contour interval for the difference in drawdown in the surficial aquifer between the permitted amount and the requested amount is set at 0.100 feet, not 1.00 feet as previously thought. Based on that contour, the 0.25 foot contour interval will be no more than 200 feet from either well and, therefore, no adverse impacts to the surficial aquifer are anticipated. We appreciate your assistance in completing the permit application. If you have any questions, please call either me or Bruce Lafrenz. Very truly yours, Hartman & Associates, Inc. William I asson Project Hydrogeologist WJW/dt/C3/Burklew.wjw cc: Richard Votapka, P.E., City of Sebastian Harold Schmidt, P.E., HAI Gary ReVoir, P.E., HAI Bruce Lafrenz, P.G., HAI FAX: (407) 770-5143 October 25, 1994 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DEPARTMENT OF UTILITYSER VICES 1840 25t1- Street, Fera Beach, Florida 32960 ryN T OCT 1994 Reeeived City Manager's Office Cliffton A. McClelland, Attorney Potter, McClelland, Marks & Healey First Union Bank Building 700 South Babcock, Suite 400 Melbourne, Florida P.A. SUBJECT: SEBASTIAN LAKES SERVICE AREA AGREEMENT Dear Mr. McClelland: I reviewed the above referenced agreement with Mr. Terry Pinto, Director of Utility Services, on October 24, 1994 and he suggested the addition of the following at the end of Item 2. Tenn of Agreement : "and shall automatically renewed for a period of thirty (30) years unless a Notice of Termination is given by either party eighteen (18) months prior to the ending date of the Agreement." Upon receipt of the Agreement in final form, I will schedule it for the Board of County Commissioners Agenda for approval. I discussed the need for as -built lift station information for Sebastian Lakes with Barbara Hall on October 24, 1994. As soon as this information is received, the Department will review the information and advise of what actions are necessary to complete the connection to the County wastewater system. Please advise if I can be of further assistance in this matter. Sinc ely, Harry EAsher Assistant Director of Utility Services HEA:sb cc: Terrance G. Pinto, Director of Utility Services Charles Vitunac, County Attorney Joel Kolford, City Manager (SEBLKS.HEA)sb f 2' Jet ri City of Sebastian 7225 MAIN STREET n SEBASTIAN. FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5390 m FAX (407) 589-5570 FAX TRANSMITTAL SHEET FAX # — %o? 3 - yo 9 DELIVER TO: FROM: DATE: /U/2 p/9cf TIME SENT: TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET) If— IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE CALL (407) 589-5330 WHU 6 A T T 0 a A 6 T 9 A T L A M I8flUflI6 Transmittal Cover Sheet TO Mr. Joel Koford, City Manager Company City of Sebastian Fax Number 407-589-5570 Phone Number 407-589-5330 FROM Barbara A. Hall, Esq. File Number 15330.0101 Comments Date October 19, 1994 No. Pages Including this cover sheet 4 Please notify us immediately if not received properly at 305-765-0500 or 305-768.8236. The Information contained In this tfansmleelan Is attorney privileged and confidential, it Is Intended only for the use of the IndNidual or entity named above. it the reader of this message Is not the Intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this communication Is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication In error, plesse notify us Immediately by telephone collect and return the original message to us at the address below via the U.B. Postal Service. We will reimburse you for your postage. Thank you. 616 EAA tate 0100 Boulovard. Sutra 1600. Fat Lauderdale, FWda 33MI Telephone: 9g6.7e64g6e0 Fac 3067661477 T00 9Ianual 9b31HN3389 SS:LT V6/6T/0T 6flEIMH A 'r T n K N r. Y n A r L A W If1flU IG Barbara A. Hall (305) 768-8236 October 19, 1994 Mr. Joel Koford City Manager City of Sebastian 1225 Main Street Sebastian, Florida 32958 Re: Sebastian Lakes Utilities Dear Mr. Koford: After consultation with my client, and in preparation for Friday's meeting, it was determined to be necessary that we outline the client's concerns regarding the Sebastian Lakes Utility issue. On Friday, September 30, 1994, 1 received from the City Clerk a copy of Ordinance 0-94-04 adopted by the City on March 9, 1994. That Ordinance repeals the Sebastian Lakes Utility Company's Franchise to operate a utility in the City of Sebastian. Neither I nor my clients, Sebastian Lakes Utility Company and Sebastian Lakes Associates, were aware that the Ordinance had been adopted until you advised me of its passage on Friday, September 30, 1994. As a matter of law, by virtue of Ordinance 0-94-04, Sebastian Lakes Utility is no longer authorized to operate the Sebastian Lakes Utility. The City is the only utility provider with the authority to operate In Sebastian Lakes. If as you have stated the Water and Wastewater Service and Contribution Agreement ("Utility Agreement") is null and void, then the passage of Ordinance 0-94-04 would result in notice of the termination of the Franchise in accordance with Section 102-58 of the City of Sebastian Code of Ordinances. The operation of the Wastewater Treatment Plant requires a DEP Permit and requires the presence of a Class C operator. I am enclosing a copy of the permit for the operation of that plant. We have received the attached notice from DEP which requires that an application for the renewal of that permit be filed with DEP 60 days before expiration. Since Sebastian Lakes Utility no longer has a franchise, we are not an rn... . ....... � GKECNaCKC.TNAU RIC. nOVr MAN. I. UPOFF, ROSEN & QUENTEL, Y.A. 515 EAsr LAS OL.NS BOULEVARD FnKr LAUDERDALE, rl,OarDA 33301 305765 0500 FAX 10S-766-1477 MIAMI Gnar l.ArinFgDAr.E WEST PALM BEACII JACKSONYILLE TALLAHASSEE. Z00 9IN uNi 9N39N33N9 ss:LT V6/6T/OT Mr. Joel Ko£ord October 19, 1994 Page 2 appropriate permittee to apply for the renewal of a permit to operate the wastewater treatment plant. Unless you are confident that the treatment plan will be taken out of service by December 15, 1994, the City may need to arrange for the immediate transfer of that permit. On September 27, 1994 when I wrote you a letter requesting that Sebastian Lakes be placed within the County service area, I and my client, based upon our numerous conversations with the City and County and the provisions of the Utility Agreement, understood that the City would be taking over operation on the onsite water and sewer system and would be the billing entity for Sebastian Lakes. You recently have indicated that the City may be unwilling to take over the onsite system. In addition, you and I have both received correspondence form Indian River County which states that Indian River County will not take over the onsite system and that pursuant to the County's interlocal agreement with the City, the City should be responsible for that function. As we have discussed with the City from the time we began negotiations on the Water and Wastewater Service and Contribution Agreement, the desire of my clients is to complete the orderly transfer of the utility to the City and to accomplish the transfer in a manner that does not jeopardize service to the existing customers. Every action we have taken, we have taken in good faith directed toward that goal. For that reason, my client, Sebastian Lakes Utility Company, will not be seeking reinstatement of the franchise and pursuant to Section 102-56(b) of the City Code, does not intend to accept a new franchise. To recap, we are now left with a situation where: 1. Sebastian Lakes Utility, which owns and has operated the utility with Sebastian Lakes, including the lines and treatment plant, which receives water from the City to sell to its customers and which bills its customers for water and sewer service, no longer has a franchise to operate. 2. The City is the only authorized provider of service in Sebastian Lakes. 3. The City has expressed an unwillingness to operate the onsite utility although it is the only entity which as a matter of law may do so. 4. The permit for the wastewater treatment plant expires on December 15, 1994 and applications for renewal are required to be submitted 60 days before expiration. mVYugfeu..a\.e/u/f. GIt LLNU LItt% 'CR(,URIC 200 siNnuai Sa3HN33t19 9S:6T VG/6T/0T Mr. Joel Koford October 19, 1994 Page 3 As you can see, we are in an emergency situation where, for the interest of all parties concerned, these issues need to be resolved. We look forward to our meeting with you on Friday with the hope of working toward an immediate solution. BAH/amc cc: Ms. Elizabeth Simonson Mr. Peter Hoelzle Cliff McClelland, Esq. mye�u�wnbsuona�w Yours truly, Barbara A. Hall GRC6NRP.11fi TRAURIC 700 gninodi 9aMN332E 99:LT 76i6Ti0T .................................................................................... MEMORY STORAGE REPORT ........................(NOV 01 '94 08:51AM).................. CITY OF SEBASTIAN .................................................................................................................................................................................. (AUTO) FILE FILE TYPE OPTION 006 MEMORY TX TEL NO. PAGE 7234092 05 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ FAX if FROM: REMAINING CALL CAPACITY 298 City of Sebastian 1275 MAIN STREET a SEBASTIAN. FLORIDA 32M TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 n FAX (407) 589.5570 ...................................................................................... MEMORY STORAGE REPORT ........................ (NOV 01 '94 08 0 45AM ).................. CITY OF SEBASTIAN ............................................................................................................................................................................... (AUTO) ...................... FILE FILE TYPE OPTION TEL NO. PAGE 004 MEMORY TX 7234092 05 1-0 Wj FAx ......................................................................................................... REMAINING CALL CAPACITY 299 .................................. J� City of Sebastian 7225 MAIN STREET a SEBASTIAN FLORIDA 3295B TELEPHONE (407) 589-533D m FAX (,4M 589-5M FAX # DELIVER TO: L. FROM: 3 - yo City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET 13 SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 o FAX (407) 589-5570 MEMORANDUM DATE: October 28, 1994 TO: Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director FROM: Joel L. Koford, City Managev SUBJECT: Service Area Agreement for Sebastian Lakes The attached is for your information. According to the "Agreement" the City held a public hearing under FS 180, and the City agreed to maintain the interim collection system. Why - I do not understand ! /jmt Attachment LAW OPPIGES OP POTTER, MCCLELLAND, MARKS & HEALY, - P. A. WILL]AT] C. POTTER FIRST UNION BANE BIIILDINO CLIFTON A. MCCLELLAND. JR. SUITE 400 Dovo"s D. MARES PATRICE F. HEAL 700 SOUTH BAHCOCE STREET TIMOTHY M. WnL xs ry� R POST OFFICE BOX 2523 LAURA K BETTEN n] j, - MELBOURNE. FLORIDA 32902-2523 HARRY A. JONES �^p ed (407) 984-2700 OF COUNSEL C 1. eNv vkeV,xanke?t F.Y. (407) 723-4092 o 1 �K)ce 8 9L 5L 6L £I,Zti` October 26, 1994 Mr. Harry E. Asher Assistant Director of Utility services Indian River County 1840 25th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Dear Mr. Asher: Please find enclosed the Service Area Agreement for Sebastian Lakes. The Agreement has been revised to include the comments from the parties. If you have any questions about the agreement, please contact me. Very truly yours, Gc — C . JACe Cj,, — . � . Clifton A. McClelland, Jr. CAM/tah Enclosure cc: Joel Koford, City Manager Mayor and City Council i �' T.V t�4� WO This Agreement made this day of October, 1994 by and between the CITY OF SEBASTIAN, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, public water is furnished to the Sebastian Lakes area by the City of Sebastian; and, WHEREAS, wastewater service was provided to the Sebastian Lakes area by the Sebastian Lakes Utility Company; and, WHEREAS, Sebastian Lakes Utility Company desires to cease providing wastewater service to the Sebastian Lakes area; and, WHEREAS, the County and the City find it is in the public interest for the County to provide wastewater service to the Sebastian Lakes area. IT IS, THEREFORE, agreed as follows: 1.. Service Area. The County shall provide all wastewater service which is required or needed to the area described in Schedule "A" and shown on the map designated as Schedule "Al." 2. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall be for a period of thirty (30) years from the date of this Agreement and shall automatically be renewed for a period of thirty (30) years unless a Notice of Termination is given by either party eighteen (18) months prior to the expiration of this Agreement. 3. Rates Impact and Connection Fees. The County shall charge the wastewater customers in the service area a reasonable rate for the wastewater service which shall be set by the County in accordance with and consistent with the rates, impact and connection fees which it charges all other customers of its wastewater utility system. 4. Payment of Connection Fees. The County on the execution of this Agreement will be paid the sum of ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY-EIGHT THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED SEVENTY DOLLARS ($178,570.00) by Sebastian Lakes Utility Company for the wastewater capacity used by the existing customers in the service area. Any new customers in the service area must pay the rates, impact and connection fees, if any, charged by the County. 5. Maintenance. The County shall provide for the maintenance, operation and repair of the lift station and extension of the line from the lift station to the force main for the wastewater system in the service area. 6. Service Standards. The County agrees to comply with all applicable State, Regional and Federal requirements and rules applicable to the provision of wastewater services to the public. 7. Notice Provision. All notices, requests, consents, and other communication required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be (as elected by the person giving such notice) hand delivered by messenger or courier service, or mailed by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid) return receipt requested, addressed to: IF TO THE CITY: IF TO INDIAN RIVER COUNTY: City of Sebastian Attn: Joel Koford, City Manager 1225 Main Street Sebastian, Florida 32958 Indian River County Attn: County Administrator Indian River County Commission Vero Beach, FL 32960 8. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable by a Court of competent jurisdiction, the other provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 9. Entirety: This Agreement represents the entire understanding and agreement between the parties and no other agreements, either oral or written, exist between the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have set their hands and seals the day and year first written above. ATTEST: Kathryn M. O'Halloran CMC/AAE, City Clerk CITY: THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN By: Name: Title: Approved as to Form and Content: Clifton A. McClelland, Jr. City Attorney ATTEST: County Clerk Approved as to Form and Content: County Attorney COUNTY: THE COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER Name: Title: Schedule "A" Service Area: All the real property located within the area which is bounded on the northwest by County Road #512 (Fellsmere Road), on the East by Laconia Street from County Road #512 to Granduer Avenue, on the South by Granduer Avenue from Laconia Street to Larkspur Street, on the East by Larkspur from Granduer Avenue to Genesee Avenue, and Genesee Avenue on the South from Larkspur extending West in a straight line from Genesee Avenue to County Road 512 (Fellsmere Road). The Sebastian Lakes Service Area is depicted in the map which is attached as Schedule "Al." •rte.::: La,iluu Cliilrn Florida Department of Environmental Prote G -1111 -al Dish irl 3319 Maouirc Boulevard. Suite 232 Orlando, Florida :321103-3767 NOV 0 4 1994 nalz5l . F 3 a 9S8 tt II p Attention: i PW PWS ID Number 331 1136 Lead and Conner Tan Sampling Dear i1'1v• )J6 41e, • 0� 0 7 IM „uun It,.�1�gLon•II 1 OCD -PW -CE- I!f 44-3 4 - This 134 - This letter will acknowledge receipt of your letter of request and revised sampling plan to reduce the number and frequency of lead and copper tap samples. The Department has reviewed the tap sample results of the previous two consecutive six month monitoring periods and your revised tap sampling plan. We have no objections to your proceeding with the reduced plan to annual collection until such time as the action level for lead and copper is exceeded or you can further reduce the frequency of sampling. A system which samples annually shall conduct the lead and copper tap sampling during the months of June, July, August or September beginning (99S You may contact Ms. Mary Pace at (407) 894-7555 if you have any questions. Thank you for your cooperation in the drinking water program. Sincerely, W.E. Dar Drin ater Compliance/Enforcement WED:mp/mlk cc: HRS- S -hg+•' �, re.r County Public Health Unit I'rinl rvl on mr�rlyd pnp��r. City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET u SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 o FAX (407) 589-5570 October 28, 1994 Mrs. Mary Pace Drinking Water Compliance Section Florida Department of Environmental Protection 3319 Maguire Boulevard, Suite 232 Orlando, Florida 32803-3767 RE: Lead and Copper Monitoring for Sebastian Highlands PWS ID No. 331-1136 and Park Place PWS ID No. 331-4181 Dear Mrs. Pace: Please find enclosed the City of Sebastian's "Request for Reduced Lead and Copper and Water Quality Parameter Tap Sampling" and revised "Sampling Plan for Lead and Copper Tap Samples and Water Quality Parameters" for the Sebastian Highlands and Park Place water distribution systems. The City is requesting that lead and copper samples be taken only once per year and that the number of samples originally taken be reduced by one half since both prior samplings yielded test results below the action levels for lead and copper. Also, included with this letter are copies of the "Lead and Copper Certification of Homeowner Training for Sample Collection" for both the Sebastian Highlands and Park Place water distribution systems based on samples previously collected. Should you need further information or have any additional questions, please contact me at (407) 388-5536. Sincerely, /�c V� L Richard B. Votapka, P.E. Utilities Director Florida Department of Environmental Regulation Twin Taw, Of m Bldg. 26W BI,4 Sa Rod TJI,Au , Florid, 32790.1100 Request For Reduced Lead and Copper and Water Quality Parameter Tap Sampling Water System Name: Sebastian Highlands Contact person: Rich Voi-az ka System type (circle one):COor NTNC Identification Number (PWS -ID): 331-1136 System Size (circle one): Sma Medium Large Contact phone number: (407) 388-5536 Mailing address: 700 Main Street City, State ZIP Sebastian, T. 32958 CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE AND REQUEST FOR A REDUCTION OF SAMPLING, This statement certifies that in the -monitoring periods beginning (add the appropriate dates) July. 1994 , and ending .T77np, 1 995 r , the above named (check the requested reduction below): X Small or medium system has not exceeded the lead or copper action level for two successive six-month monitoring periods. The system requests to: 1. X_ extend the monitoring period from six to 12 months, and 2. X— reduce the number of lead and copper tap sampling sites to the reduced number of sites listed in Rule 17-551.440(3), F.A.C. _ System.has installed optimal corrosion control and has maintained the range of values for water quality parameters (WQPs) that reflect optimal corrosion control in accordance with the requirements of Rule 17-551.450(5)(b)j2), F.A.C. The system requests to: 1. extend the monitoring period from six to 12 months, and to 2._ reduce the number of lead and copper tap sampling sites by one-half. System is in compliance with the requirements of Rule 17-551.450(5)(c), F.A.C., and requests to continue lead and copper tap monitoring at the reduced number of sites and extend the monitoring frequency from annual to once every three years. _ System is in compliance with Rule 17-551.470(5)(a), F.A.C., and requests to reduce the number of WQP distribution system tap sample sites to the reduced number listed in Rule 17-551.460(3), F.A.C. _ System is in compliance with Rule 17-551.470(5)(b), F.A.C., and requests to extend the monitoring frequency for the reduced number of WQP distribution system tap sample sites from once every six -months to annually. _ System is in compliance with Rule 17-551.470(c), F.A.C., and requests to extend the monitoring frequency for the reduced number of WQP distribution system tap sample sites from annually to every three years. The above named system will continue monitoring in each subsequent monitoring period. A revised Sampling Plan and the results of all water quality parameter samples and lead and copper samples collected during each of the monitoring periods are attached. G _ SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Richard B. Votapka Utilities Director 1Q 9a/o4 NAME (please print) TITLE DATE DER Fao d I7-551.MA) F.. Tld R,a , F Reflood L�1N Co ,b W,,,, 01o1" (S .m Ta Lioli. Fff.. Dm 1991 DER Appiio6oe 11w Mkd le by DER) Request For Reduced Lead and Copper and Water Quality Parameter Tap Sampling Water System Name: Sebastian Highlands Contact person: Rich Voi-az ka System type (circle one):COor NTNC Identification Number (PWS -ID): 331-1136 System Size (circle one): Sma Medium Large Contact phone number: (407) 388-5536 Mailing address: 700 Main Street City, State ZIP Sebastian, T. 32958 CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE AND REQUEST FOR A REDUCTION OF SAMPLING, This statement certifies that in the -monitoring periods beginning (add the appropriate dates) July. 1994 , and ending .T77np, 1 995 r , the above named (check the requested reduction below): X Small or medium system has not exceeded the lead or copper action level for two successive six-month monitoring periods. The system requests to: 1. X_ extend the monitoring period from six to 12 months, and 2. X— reduce the number of lead and copper tap sampling sites to the reduced number of sites listed in Rule 17-551.440(3), F.A.C. _ System.has installed optimal corrosion control and has maintained the range of values for water quality parameters (WQPs) that reflect optimal corrosion control in accordance with the requirements of Rule 17-551.450(5)(b)j2), F.A.C. The system requests to: 1. extend the monitoring period from six to 12 months, and to 2._ reduce the number of lead and copper tap sampling sites by one-half. System is in compliance with the requirements of Rule 17-551.450(5)(c), F.A.C., and requests to continue lead and copper tap monitoring at the reduced number of sites and extend the monitoring frequency from annual to once every three years. _ System is in compliance with Rule 17-551.470(5)(a), F.A.C., and requests to reduce the number of WQP distribution system tap sample sites to the reduced number listed in Rule 17-551.460(3), F.A.C. _ System is in compliance with Rule 17-551.470(5)(b), F.A.C., and requests to extend the monitoring frequency for the reduced number of WQP distribution system tap sample sites from once every six -months to annually. _ System is in compliance with Rule 17-551.470(c), F.A.C., and requests to extend the monitoring frequency for the reduced number of WQP distribution system tap sample sites from annually to every three years. The above named system will continue monitoring in each subsequent monitoring period. A revised Sampling Plan and the results of all water quality parameter samples and lead and copper samples collected during each of the monitoring periods are attached. G _ SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Richard B. Votapka Utilities Director 1Q 9a/o4 NAME (please print) TITLE DATE ea DEA Ti, Florida Femrk s orWnral. atm. Department of Environmental Regulation E��D.. SvebWW.rQ.IN.t7Vin Tom.. Olrm BWL S NW, 3,. Ned T.BJ...... Fl. i 31034 DEB A,,B bn Ne. (F11W3 L y DEBT Sampling Plan for Lead and Copper Tap Samples and Water Quality Parameters GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS: Complete all parts of this form, attach any maps and written narrative describing the sampling plan and submit to the Department 30 days prior to the beginning of a six-month monitoring period for lead and copper in drinking water. The Department will notify a system of approval of a Sampling Plan in writing which will provide the system notice to proceed. Submit a revised Sampling Plan using this form if any - changes in the selection of sampling sites must be made. When no changes have been made, no resubmission is necessary prior to sampling during the next six-month sampling period. The last part of this form includes a certification within which a system's authorized representative attests to the accuracy of the information used in preparing these plans and its conformance with the requirements of Chapter 17-551, Florida Administrative Code, to identify sampling sites for lead and copper that are at the highest risk level for exposure to lead and copper in drinking water. Submission of any false statement of representation in this form is a violation of the law. Attach additional sheets as necessary. PART I WATER SYSTEM INFORMATION Water System Name: Sebastian Highlands Contact person: Rich Votapka System type (circle one): CWS or NTNC Contact phone number: Identification Number (PWS -ID): -2-t1-11 3.6 Mailing address: Population served: 3186 (est.) Population Interval (circle one): A S C D OF G 407) 388-5536 700 Main Street Sebastian, FL 32958 Estimating Population Served, Population Interval and the Number of Sampling Sites. The minimum number of tap sample sites for lead and copper (LC) and water quality parameter{WQP) distribution system sample sites is based on a system's population served interval which is selected from the table below. For the purposes of Chapter 17-551, F.A.C., the population served is the sum of the number of permanent residents and the number of additional non -transient persons to whom the system is available, such as school children, office and commercial employees and seasonal residents. POPULATION SERVED POPULATION INTERVAL LC SITES WQP SITES A greater than 100,000 100 25. 8 50,001 to 100,000 60 10 C 10,001 to 50,000 60 10 D 3,301 to 10,000 40 3 01 to 3,300 C 20, Q) F 101 to 500 10 1 G less than 101 5 1 Page 1 of 7 SAMPLING PLAN FOR LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLES AND WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS DER F. 017.511.9AII F. Thk S—,I Pkn fn Isd W rave T Su, W W,sr fla4n Anncicn FAe — 0.r lyq� DEA AFFIk.Jm No. PART II RECORDS REVIEW (FJ 1,M DFAI Locate and review existing plans, drawings and reports of the water system and also those kept by county or municipal building departments or code enforcement offices to Identify the required number of sampling sites and the total number of lead service lines in the distribution system. Identification of Interior Plumbing Material Types. Identify single family and multiple family residences and buildings that have interior plumbing containing lead pipe, solder containing lead and built before January 1, 1983 and after December 31, 1982; and structures with brass faucets and those with point -of -entry or point -of -use devices. Required sources of review to determine the composition of interior plumbing materials 1. Plumbing or building codes. 2. Plumbing or building permits. 3. Contacts within the building department, municipal clerk's office, or state regulatory agencies for historical documentation of the service area development. 4. Review of drinking water sampling results,such as those from lead testing in schools. Optional sources to determine the composition of interior plumbing materials. Check the ones that have been utilized. Interviews with building inspectors. Survey of service area plumbers about when and where lead solder was used from 1983 to present. Survey of residents in the sections of the service area where lead pipe and/or copper pipe with lead solder is suspected to exist. Interview of local contractors and developers Identification of Lead Service Lines and Components with Lead Content. Review available records and conduct interviews to determine the number and location of lead service lines and water distribution system components that contain lead. Required sources of review. 1 . Distribution system maps and record drawings 2. Information collected on the presence of lead and copper require under 40 CFR 141.42 (special monitoring for corrosivity). 3. Capital improvement plans and/or master plans for the distribution system development. 4. Current and historical standard operating procedures or operation and maintenance (O&M) manuals for the type of materials used to install service connections. 5. Utility records including meter installation records, customer complaint investigations and all historical documentation which -indicate and/or confirm the location of lead service connections. 6. Drinking water sampling results that indicate that a structure is susceptible to lead in drinking water. Optional sources of review. Indicate by a check mark which of the sources listed below were used. Interviews with utility employees familiar with past construction practices. Service line sampling where lead service lines are suspected to exist but their presence was not otherwise confirmed. Review of permit files. A community survey was performed. Interviews of pipe suppliers, contractors, and/or developers were conducted. Page 2 of 7 Interview of local contractors and developers Other, please attach written narrative. SAMPLING PLAN FOR LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLES AND WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS DER FormF,7.SSi,M. 1 F. Tile S^, row Pon r- Ls W G...r Tee Sumo W WreerOvlirr hrerwen EReeJw ,qW PART III MATERIALS SURVEY DER A,1' e� X,. fFub! h y DER, Fill out the following Materials Survey table to summarize the results of the records review performed under Part II of this Form to identify a sampling pool of lead and copper tap sampling sites. Enter the number of single family residences (SFR), multiple family residences (MFRI and other buildings (BLDG) by site type that have been identified in the system's sampling pool. In A show the interior plumbing characteristics by structure type. Show in B, the number of known lead service lines in the entire distribution system. Show in C, the number of connections that are affected by lead components. The total number of sites in the sampling pool is listed in D by type of structure. The total number of connections in the distribution system is listed by type of structure in E. MATERIALS SURVEY SUMMARY TYPE OF STRUCTURE SFR MFR BLDG NUMBER OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS A. INTERIOR PLUMBING MATLRIAL SITE TYPES „ ..� ». - §p"""aw Lead Pipe 0 0 Copper Pipe With Lead Solder Installed After 1982 343 3 50 Copper Pipe With Lead Solder Installed Before 1983 439 0 0 Brass Faucets (After 1985) 471 Point -of -Use or Point -of -Entry Treatment Devices 0 0 0 Lead -Lined Water Coolers 0 0 0 Other Lead Plumbing Components 0 0 0 B. SERVICE LINE SITE TYPES ws 1400 Es i�fc' e'A'^ Lead Service Lines t Total Initial Number of Lines That Are Entirely Lead and Subject to Replacement 0 0 0 Partial Lead Lines Goosenecks Pigtails 0 0 0 C. DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SITE TYPES?'''a� Connections Within 100 ft. of Lead Components 0 0 0 D. TOTAL NUMBER OF SITES 15 0 0 .,_ .., x:'?•A' ..y.F � ... '. ' .. ,�" ;3:ai:>'�'.ri,,�-.�'. ,. E. TOTAL NUMBER OF CONNECTIONS 1253 3 50 Page 3 of 7 SAMPLING PLAN FOR LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLES AND WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS DEF F./n.131.0..WI Fern Th S -n t H.n I IanA W re,"n l Surae, .,.1 W.xr Or"Ixv hrvucn • Flimi.e 0.re I W, PART IV LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLING PLAN DER Appliation N. (F11W 1. by DEF) After completing the Materials Survey, develop a Lead and Copper Tap Sampling Plan by establishing a pool of potential sampling sites. Each plan must include, at least, the minimum number of sites as shown in the table in Part I of this form. It is recommended that a system establish a sampling pool equal to 150 percent of the minimum number required to be sampled to secure a list of optional sites that can be sampled as replacement sites or as additional samples. List all identified sampling sites in the table included in this part. Use additional copies of page five as necessary. ID COLUMN. To complete the first column, enter a site IDentification number of up to three digits. TIER COLUMN. Enter the TIER number of each site in column two. Lead and copper tap sampling sites are categorized as tier 1 for the highest risk, to 2, 3 or 4 for successively lower risks. The tier categories are different for community and non -transient non -community systems. For community public water systems, tier 1 sites are single family residences or child care facilities that contain either: copper pipes with lead solder installed after December 31, 1982, lead pipes, or a lead service line. Multi -family residences are tier 1 when they comprise at least 20 percent of the structures served by the system. A system with lead service lines in its distribution system must target a minimum of 50 percent of their samples from taps served by lead service lines sites and the remainder from sites with lead pipes or copper pipes with lead solder. Tier 2 sites include buildings and multi -family residences that contain: copper pipes with lead solder installed after December 31, 1982, or lead pipes, or a lead service line. Tier 3 sites consist of single family residences that contain copper pipes with lead solder installed before January 1, 1983. Tier 4 sites are those that are identified as susceptible to lead or copper contamination as detailed in Rule 17-551.410(2)(e), F.A.C. For non -transient non -community public water systems, tier 1 sites are buildings that contain: copper pipes with lead solder installed after December 31, 1982, or lead pipes, or a lead service line. Tier 2 sites are buildings that contain copper pipes with lead solder installed before January 1, 1983. Tier 3 sites are those identified as susceptible to lead or copper contamination and are the same as community water system tier 4 sites. When too few tier 1 sites are identified, tier 2 sites must be located to develop the sampling plan and so on through tiers 3 and 4. TYPE, LOCATION and CONTACT COLUMNS. Enter the TYPE of structure in the third column. Site types are identified as a single family residence (SFR), a multi -family residence (MFR) or a building (BLDG). Enter the street address of the site in the column entitled LOCATION and the name and phone number of the building or residence owner in the QONTACT PERSON column. LSL and HOME PLUMBING MATERIAL COLUMNS. Enter a "Y" in the LSL column to identify a site with a lead service line. The HOME PLUMBING MATERIAL must be identified for each site in this column. Enter one of the following: Pb1 to identify a site with lead solder installed after December 31, 1982, Pb2 to identify a site with lead solder installed before January 1, 1983, LP to identify a site with lead pipe. BF to identify tier 4 sites (tier 3 for NTNC systems) that have brass faucets. WC to identify tier 4 sites that have water coolers with lead content. POE or POU to Identify tier 4 sites that have a point -of -entry or use treatment device, respectively. LC to identify a tier 4 site within 100 feet of a lead component in the distribution system. FIELD VERIFIED and STATUS COLUMNS. Show if the site's home plumbing or service line material has been FIELD VERIFIED by a "Y" in this column. Sites selected for sampling should be indicated by entering an "S" in the SITE STATUS column. Optional sites are identified by an "0". To be a selected site, there must be an agreement with the site building owner to sample himself or to have the site sampled by the system. All homeowners who will sample at the selected sites must receive training in sampling procedures. Indicate which homeowners have received training by a "Y" in the TRAINING STATUS column. Page 4 of 7 SAMPLING PLAN FOR LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLES AND WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS PART IV LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLING PLAN Y *SFR = Single Family Residence DER Form . F 11551.950111 F... Title Plm" Ld v Ca,r T.n S.mh. nd W.mr Q-1iw P,.—.. Eff ii.. D.b 19IJ DER A,Iiwlim Ne. (Find i. by DER) ID TIER TYPE LOCATION CONTACT PERSON LSL YIN HOME PLUMBING MATERIAL FIELD: VERIFIED YIN SITE STATUS S/0 TRAINING STATUS YIN NAME PHONE 1 3 SFR 1074 Barber Street Paul Neff 589-8214 N Copper w/lead y S Y 2 1 SFR 115 Crawford Drive William Munro 589-5393 N ec y S y 3 1 SFR 282 Delmonte Road Anna Mortenson 589-7483 N " y S y 4 1 SFR 147 Mabry Street Ronald J. Lasky 388-0370 N y S y 5 1 SFR 101 Thunderbird Drive Jose A. Velasz ez 388-28 6N y S y 6 1 SFR 197 Delmonte Road Edith M. Wilkes 589-6318 N" 7 3 1 SFR 123 Landover Drive R.Donald Herring 589-299 N y S y 8 1 SFR 182 Delmonte Road John King 589-4364 N y S y 9 1 SFR 101 Filbert Street Peter Lentini 589-9615 N Y S y 10 1 SFR 1172 Schumann Drive Frank Winters 589-8743 N Y S Y Total Selected Sampling Sites With Lead Service Lines N/A .. Percentage of Sampling Sites With Lead Service Lines N/A -- _ - .. .,. Tier 1' Sltea 8 Total Tier 2 Silas ETotal Total Tier 3 Sites 2 Total Tier 4 Sites Page 5 of 7 SAMPLING PLAN FOR LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLES AND WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS PART IV LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLING PLAN DER F. P 17JSI9SN11 �- Fonn liik Snmluv Pl— fm led ml a., , T.P 5,ka . d W.¢r Omliw P.nmenn Elf4ii.. D.. I Wi DER AP Hl dm No. 1Filld M M DIiRI ID TIER TYPE LOCATIONPLUMBING CONTACT PERSON LSL YIN HOME MATERIAL FIELD, VERIFIED YIN SITE STATUS S/O TRAINING STATUS Y/N NAME PHONE 11 1 SFR 125 Capri Avenue Ronald Briskie 589-0479 N copper lead y O y 12 1 SFR 105 Kildare Drive Arthur Mantz 589-1114 N y O y 13 1 SFR 242 Dickens Avenue Doris Borden 589-8810 N y O y 14 1 SFR 109 High Court Albert Winfiel 589-233 N y O y 15 3 SFR 914 Canal Circle J.E. Christena 589-3319 N n y 0 y Total Selected Sampling Sites With Lead Service Lines N/A .. Percentage of Sampling Sites With Lead Service Lines N/A Total Tier I Sites 4 Total Tier 2 Sites Total Tier 3 Sites 1 Total Tier 4 Sites Pape 5 of 7 SAMPLING PLAN FOR LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLES AND WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS PART V WATER QUALITY PARAMETER SAMPLING PLAN DER Frwm I IL}q.9.'MII Fw TRB s riN Plan fm I..e I C T.e Su W uA W,w 0u1h, P.... Ertmi. Du 1991 DER A,11mO Ne. Iraw F by DER, Fill out the following table to identify water quality parameter (WOP) sampling sites. The total number of sites identified must equal the total number of entry points or, for consecutive systems, the total number of interconnection points, to the distribution system. Distribution system sampling sites may be selected from among the system's microbiological sampling sites. Use a two -digit number as an identification number. The street address should be given as the site location. List target sampling dates for the two required sampling rounds to demonstrate how sampling will evaluate seasonal water quality differences. ENTRY POINT SAMPLING SITES DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SAMPLING SITES ID NUMBER LOCATION TARGET DATES ID NUMBER LOCATION TARGET DATES 10 Filbert St. WaterT�reatmenf= Plant June 1495 11L June, 1995 15 Sebastian Highlands—N rth End of So. Wimbrow Dr,(East) 12 Lot 9 Block 412 D i Sebastian Highlands— Ea TOTAL SAMPLING SITES AT ENTRY POINTS: 1 TOTAL SAMPLING SITES IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM: 1 Page 6 of 7 SAMPLING PLAN FOR LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLES AND WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS t PART VI SAMPLING PLAN CERTIFICATION DER Fmn FIT-]11.�Vf1II Fern Tnk Sumlin, Fl.w Irt I�.A W Cm.r Tar S-41 W W.wr Owl: Pnn m DER Ap{.Iiu,ion No. IFlk M b, DERI Site Selection Criteria. Whenever possible lead and copper tap sample plans must include tier 1 sites exclusively. Explain the selection of other than tier 1 sites and, if sites were changed from one monitoring period to another, why this was necessary (attach additional pages if necessary). Tier 3 sites were inclnrlarl haranaa they were on th nr; ct; nal lis Lead Service Line Sites. When lead service line sites are identified they must comprise at least fifty percent of the selected samples. Explain why the percentage of lead service line sites is not at least fifty percent of the required number of sampling sites (attach additional pages if necessary). There are no existing lead service lines in the system. Water Quality Parameter Sampling Plan. If any WQP sampling sites are not also microbiological sampling sites, explain how the selected distribution system water quality parameter sampling sites represent water quality throughout the distribution system based on the distribution of population, the different sources of water and treatment methods, and an even distribution of sampling throughout the six-month sampling period (attach additional sheets as necessary). Not Applicable Certification of Compliance I certify that the information listed and checked in Part II of this form was used to perform the materials survey in order to identify the total number of lead service lines in this water system and to establish the sampling pool and sampling plans. I further certify that the number of lead service lines reported in Part III of this form is the total known number of lead service lines in this water system and that the selected sampling sites in Part IV are the highest risk sites available. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Richard B. Votapka Utilities Director 10/25/9 NAME (please print) TITLE DATE Page 7 of 7 La'Vim ( :illi" Gm rrnur Floc-ida Department of Environmental Protee Central District 3319 Ma;{uirc Boulevard. Suite 232 Orlando, Florida 32803-3767 NOV U 4 1994 Attention: K r CJ 4, >. I�n t o v Iia Q E _ County - PW .rc { lace PWS ID Number 331 LI ISI Lead and Copper Tap Sampling Dear rl�r• X)o±LkvYw OCD -PW -CE- '4/33 This letter will acknowledge receipt of your letter of request and revised sampling plan to reduce the number and frequency of lead and copper tap samples. The Department has reviewed the tap sample results of the previous two consecutive six month monitoring periods and your revised tap sampling plan. We have no objections to your proceeding with the reduced plan to annual collection until such time as the action level for lead and copper is exceeded or you can further reduce the frequency of sampling. A system which samples annually shall conduct the lead and copper tap sampling during the months of June, July, August or September beginning .11)9S- You 1195 You may contact Ms. Mary Pace at (407) 894-7555 if you have any questions. Thank you for your cooperation in the drinking water program. Sincerely, r W.E.2,Su rvia <b n xg-dT er Compliance/Enforcement WED:mp/mlk ;}• cc: HRS- Lnet. 1'�,u-�r County Public Health Unit '- - r, .r i .•rev - n 1 Florida OakF....I D.,.artment of Environmental Regu' 'Ion r.. rr 7.6'r w. ofrw tw,. `Z0 t4., S.er/ D.d T.DJ...r, rlo.d! )JW'.JJ N.v„�w fN,r.tiw IAM _ ER�ni:� bu )wn 1 DEX AAife.i., N. (rdWwyD =rtification of Training for Homeowners - Collecting Tap Samples ij PWS NAME: V4 -r S ` , PWS -ID:, �. - ✓t I Q 1 PWS PHONE b: ��O`7 FART I SAMPLING INSTRUCTIONS Samples are being collected to determine the contribution of faucet fixtures and household pipes and/or sr to the lead and copper levels in tap water. This sampling effort is required by the Florida Department of Environm Regulations, and is being accomplished through the cooperation of homeowners and residents. A sample is to be collected after an extended period of stagnant water conditions (i.e.; no water use durir period) within the interior piping. Due to this requirement, either early mornings or evenings upon returning from are the best times for collecting samples. The collection procedure is described in more detail below, 1. Prior arrangements will be made with the customer to coordinate the sample collection event. Dates t set for sample kit delivery and pick-up by water department staff. 2. A minimum of 6-8 hour -period which there is no water use must be achieved prior to sampling. The department recommends that either early mornings or evenings upon returning home are the best saml times to ensure that the necessary stagnant water conditions exist. 3. A kitchen or bathroom cold -water faucet is to be used for sampling. Place the sample bottle (open) the faucet and gently open the cold watentap. Fill the sample bottle to the line marked '1000 -ml' and off the water. 4. Tightly cap the sample bottle and place in the sample kit provided. Please review the sample kit lal this time to ensure that all information contained on the label is correct. 5. IF ANY PLUMBING REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT HAS BEEN DONE IN THE HOME SINCE YOUR PREVI SAMPLING EVENT, NOTE THIS INFORMATION ON THE LABEL AS PROVIDED. 6. Place the sample kit outside of the residence in the location of the kit's delivery in order that water staff may pick up the sample kit. 7. Results from this monitoring effort will be provided to participating customers when reports are gen for the State unless excessive lead and/or copper levels are found. In those cases, immediate noufic will be provided (usually 10 working days Vom the time of sample collection). CALL: Uro -Se cv cis \12�ro - �oL.�� �j�sy�u�n at (IUvI-S'bR- �`� if you have any questions regarding these instructions. If you fully understand the sample collection procedure, certification on - , of this form. PART II CERTIFICATION OF TRAINING AND SAMPLING (TO BE COMPLETED BY RESIDENT) Water was last used: Sample Was collected: Sample tap location: t\ 0 i / L� Tme4 U 0 & FAr\ Time Date Date_ Florida D�,artment of Environmental Reg u' h Twin T.. Olrw 11%, :000 Sul, U. R",NY . F" 3:3w--* DEA /..n i 11•Sal d'O' tw,n T"Y Gnif f A.,:wi�� Sample was collected: Time % o A M FlYa:y ba. Iwn 1� Sample tap location: fC• i G �r =,j fr0Y0 Y y DI Certification of Training for Homeowners Collecting Tap Samples \ 7 L' , 3�► PWS NAME: t<C 1 �t P 5���• PWS -ID: PWS PHONE A: FART I SAMPLING INSTRUCTIONS Samples are being collected to determine the contribution of faucet fixtures and household pipes and/or sc to the lead and copper levels in tap water. This sampling effort is required by the Florida Department of Environmi Regulations, and is being accomplished through the cooperation of homeowners and residents. A sample is to be collected after an extended period of stagnant water conditions (i.e.; no water use durir period) within the interior piping. Due to this requirement, either early mornings or evenings upon returning from v are the best times for collecting samples. The collection procedure is described in more detail below. 1. Prior arrangements will be made with the customer to coordinate the sample collection event. Dates v set for sample kit delivery and pick-up by water department staff. 2. A minimum of 6-8 hou.-period which there is no water use must be achieved prior to sampling. The department recommends that either early mornings or evenings upon returning home are the best samp times to ensure that the necessary stagnant water conditions exist. 3. A kitchen or bathroom cold -water faucet is to be used for sampling. Place the sample bottle (open) I the faucet and gently open the cold watentap. Fill the sample bottle to the line marked '1000-m1" and off the water. 4. Tightly cap the sample bottle and place in the sample kit provided. Please review the sample kit Ial: this time to ensure that all information contained on the label is correct. 5. IF ANY PLUMBING REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT HAS BEEN DONE IN THE HOME SINCE YOUR PREVI SAMPLING EVENT, NOTE THIS INFORMATION ON THE LABEL AS PROVIDED. 6. Place the sample kit outside of the residence in the location of the kit's delivery in order that water staff may pick up the sample kit. 7. Results from this monitoring effort will be provided to participating customers when reports are gen, for the State unless excessive lead and/or copper levels are found. In those cases, immediate nofific: will be provided (usually 10 working days from the time of sample collection). �r.'t ♦.11.�At��i , G7li� :l i- f LV 6MF / t ♦ s"L!_� if you have any questions regarding these instructions. If you fully understand the sample collection procedure, certification on of this form. PART II CERTIFICATION OF TRAINING AND SAMPLING (TO BE COMPLETED BY RESIDENT) Water was last used: Time Date/✓F✓ c �7 Sample was collected: Time % o A M Date Jv N 2 Sample tap location: fC• i G �r =,j Florida l ment of Environmental Reg, ' 'Si' TvY. I..wn off. 111t. U0 Sul, S.— MA T.11.I....... rl Ad T- Certification of Training for Homeowners - 1 Collecting Tap Samples PWS NAME: pn � \--- l a C l �4- PWS -ID: PWS PHONE!!: _ C�k.y 1� 1-mn FART I SAMPLING INSTRUCTIONS Samples are being collected to determine the contribution of faucet fixtures and household pipes and/or s to the lead and copper levels in tap water. This sampling effort is required by the Florida Department of Environrn Regulations, and is being accomplished through the cooperation of homeowners and residents. A sample is to be collected after an extended period of stagnant water conditions (i.e., no water use duri period) within the interior piping. Due to this requirement, either early mornings or evenings upon returning from are the best times for collecting samples. The collection procedure is described in more detail below. 1. Prior arrangements will be made with the customer to coordinate the sample collection event. Dates set for sample kit delivery and pick-up by water department staff. 2. A minlinum of 6-8 hour -period which there is no water use must be achieved prior to sampling. The department recommends that either early mornings or evenings upon returning home are the best sam times to ensure that the necessary stagnant water conditions exist. 3. A kitchen or bathroom cold -water faucet is to be used for sampling. Place the sample bottle (open) the faucet and gently open the cold watentap. Fill the sample bottle to the line marked '1000-m1" anc off the water. 4. Tightly cap the sample bottle and place in the sample kit provided. Please review the sample kit la this time to ensure that all information contained on the label is correct. 5. IF ANY PLUMBING REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT HAS BEEN DONE IN THE HOME SINCE YOUR PREV SAMPLING EVENT, NOTE THIS INFORMATION ON THE LABEL AS PROVIDED. 6. Place the sample kit outside of the residence in the location of the kit's delivery in order that wale staff may pick up the sample kit. 7. Results from this monitoring effort will be provided to participating customers when reports are ger for the State unless excessive lead and/or copper levels are found. In those cases, immediate notific will be provided (usually 10 working days from thetimeof sample collection). CALL: ��o-SreevLC S e `iQyo �oL�cG_ �J�y�V�n at L1Dn_S(0R- if you have any questions regarding these instructions. If you fully understand the sample collection procedure, certification on - , of this form. PART 11 CERTIFICATION OF TRAINING AND SAMPLING (TO BE COMPLETED BY RESIDENT) Water was last used: Time �//I Ui %�i�% Date Co Sample Was collected: Time Date Sample tap location: (/ I ( / f h C 4,1 - City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET 11 SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 u FAX (407) 589-5570 October 28, 1994 Mrs. Mary Pace Drinking Water Compliance Section Florida Department of Environmental Protection 3319 Maguire Boulevard, Suite 232 Orlando, Florida 32803-3767 RE: Lead and Copper Monitoring for Sebastian Highlands PWS ID No. 331-1136 and Park Place PWS ID No. 331-4181 Dear Mrs. Pace: Please find enclosed the City of Sebastian's "Request for Reduced Lead and Copper and Water Quality Parameter Tap Sampling" and revised "Sampling Plan for Lead and Copper Tap Samples and Water Quality Parameters" for the Sebastian Highlands and Park Place water distribution systems. The City is requesting that lead and copper samples be taken only once per year and that the number of samples originally taken be reduced by one half since both prior samplings yielded test results below the action levels for lead and copper. Also, included with this letter are copies of the Lead and Copper Certification of Homeowner Training for Sample Collection" for both the Sebastian Highlands and Park Place water distribution systems based on samples previously collected. Should you need further information or have any additional questions, please contact me at (407) 388-5536. Sincerely, Richard B. Votapka, P.E. Utilities Director DER Farm I I7.l51.M4) Florida Fum Tile R,u ( Fn R,d.,,d L d •M Cm Department of Environmental Regulation .M W.. Qmhn F, .Tm UnJim Eff�/ T.in T. DR B14. 3600 B1* Sm Rud TMW .. amide )209?1d00 DER rve a� No. 199, o ,pq IFilkd In M DER) I/'D7 0f Ram Request For Reduced Lead and Copper and Water Quality Parameter Tap Sampling Water System Name: Park Place Contact person: Richard B. Votapka System type (circle one): CO or NTNC Contact phone number: (407) 388-5536 Identification Number (PWS -ID): 331-4181 Mailing address: 700 Main Street System Size (circle one): Small Medium Large City, State ZIP Sebastian, FL 32958 CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE AND REQUEST FOR A REDUCTION OF SAMPLING. This statement certifies that in the monitoring periods beginning (add the appropriate dates) June, 1994 , and ending June, 1995 ? , the above named (check the requested reduction below): X Small or medium system has not exceeded the lead or copper action level for two successive six-month monitoring periods. The system requests to: 1. X extend the monitoring period from six to 12 months, and 2. X reduce the number of lead and copper tap sampling sites to the reduced number of sites listed in Rule 17-551.440(3), F.A.C. _ System.has installed optimal corrosion control and has maintained the range of values for water quality parameters (WQPs) that reflect optimal corrosion control in accordance with the requirements of Rule 17-551.450(5)(b)(2), F.A.C. The system requests to: 1. extend the monitoring period from six to 12 months, and to 2._ reduce the number of lead and copper tap sampling sites by one-half. _ System is in compliance with the requirements of Rule 17-551.450(5)(c), F.A.C., and requests to continue lead and copper tap monitoring at the reduced number of sites and extend the monitoring frequency from annual to once every three years. System is in compliance with Rule 17-551.470(5)(a), F.A.C., and requests to reduce the number of WQP distribution system tap sample sites to the reduced number listed in Rule 17-551.460(3), F.A.C. _ System is in compliance with Rule 17-551.470(5)(b), F.A.C., and requests to extend the monitoring frequency for the reduced number of WQP distribution system tap sample sites from once every six -months to annually. System is in compliance with Rule 17-551.470(c), F.A.C., and requests to extend the monitoring frequency for the reduced number of WQP distribution system tap sample sites from annually to every three years. The above named system will continue monitoring in each subsequent monitoring period. A revised Sampling Plan and the results of all water quality parameter samples and lead and copper samples collected during each of the monitoring periods are attached. /-1- SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Richard R_ Vntapka litilitipq llirartnr 10194; 94 NAME (please print) TITLE DATE Florida DFA Fa - i n-Ss1.9A(P Pone TiJ S.,vl PY Iw Ls "taw•. Department of Environmental Regulation M0.T.,S—.1~'^ W..,0 1H,N app. Jv Taaa,. O? BML ][00 bi.ir S,— Ned T.b.i....e. FM,M. 3MM21W DFA Apptie Na. (F1W 6 by DFA) Sampling Plan for Lead and Copper Tap Samples and Water Quality Parameters GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS: Complete all parts of this form, attach any maps and written narrative describing the sampling plan and submit to the Department 30 days prior to the beginning of a six-month monitoring period for lead and copper in drinking water. The Department will notify a system of approval of a Sampling Plan in writing which will provide the system notice to proceed. Submit a revised Sampling Plan using this form if any - changes in the selection of sampling sites must be made. When no changes have been made, no resubmission is necessary prior to sampling during the next six-month sampling period. The last part of this form includes a certification within which a system's authorized representative attests to the accuracy of the information used in preparing these plans and its conformance with the requirements of Chapter 17-551, Florida Administrative Code, to identify sampling sites for lead and copper that are at the highest risk level for exposure to lead and copper in drinking water. Submission of any false statement of representation in this form is a violation of the law. Attach additional sheets as necessary. PART I WATER SYSTEM INFORMATION Water System Name: Park Place System type (circle one): CWS or NTNC Identification Number (PWS -ID): 331-4181 Population served: 393 (Est.) Population Interval (circle one): A B C D E 19 Contact person: Rich Votapka Contact phone number: (407) 388-5536 Mailing address: 700 Main Street Sebastian, FL 32958 Estimating Population Served, Population Interval and the Number of Sampling Sites. The minimum nember of tap sample sites for lead and copper (LCI and water quality parameter JWQP) distribution system sample sites is based on a system's population served interval which is selected from the table below. For the purposes of Chapter 17-551, F.A.C., the population served is the sum of the number of permanent residents and the number of additional non -transient persons to whom the system is available, such as school children, office and commercial employees and seasonal residents. POPULATION SERVED POPULATION INTERVAL LC SITES WQP SITES A greater than 100,000 100 25. B 50,001 to 100,000 60 10 C 10,001 to 50,000 60 10 D 3,301 to 10,000 40 3 E 501 to 3,300 20 2 �<--i-61 to 500 10 G less than 101 5 1 Page 1 of 7 SAMPLING PLAN FOR LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLES AND WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS PART II RECORDS REVIEW DER Fern / n.ssl.oJIXli Fa TNM S -n A',c Pl.n la Led od f, T.p S.npb .rd W.,er Ou4n Arvn+cn FilMl,e 0.,. IVW DEIt Appl"L6n Ne. (rubel Y M DER) Locate and review existing plans, drawings and reports of the water system and also those kept by county or municipal building departments or code enforcement offices to Identify the required number of sampling sites and the total number of lead service lines in the distribution system. Identification of Interior Plumbing Material Types. Identify single family and multiple family residences and buildings that have interior plumbing containing lead pipe, solder containing lead and built before January 1, 1983 and after December 31, 1982; and structures with brass faucets and those with point -of -entry or point -of -use devices. Required sources of review to determine the composition of interior plumbing materials 1. Plumbing or building codes. 2. Plumbing or building permits. 3. Contacts within the building department, municipal clerk's office, or state regulatory agencies for historical documentation of the service area development. 4. Review of drinking water sampling results,such as those from lead testing in schools. Optional sources to determine the composition of interior plumbing materials. Check the ones that have been utilized. Interviews with building inspectors. Survey of service area plumbers about when and where lead solder was used from 1983 to present. Survey of residents in the sections of the service area where lead pipe and/or copper pipe with lead solder is suspected to exist. V/ Interview of local contractors and developers Identification of Lead Service Lines and Components with Lead Content. Review available records and conduct interviews to determine the number and location of lead service lines and water distribution system components that contain lead. Required sources of review. Optional sources of review. Indicate by a check mark which of the sources listed below were used. 1. Distribution system maps and record drawings. 2. Information collected on the presence of lead and copper requireff-under 40 CFR 141.42 (special monitoring for corrosivity). 3. Capital improvement plans and/or master plans for the distribution system development. 4. Current and historical standard operating procedures or operation and maintenance (O&M) manuals for the type of materials used to install service connections. 5. Utility records including meter installation records, customer complaint investigations and all historical documentation which indicate and/or confirm the location of lead service connections. 6. Drinking water sampling results that indicate that a structure is susceptible to lead in drinking water. Interviews with utility employees familiar with past construction practices.. Service line sampling where lead service lines are suspected to exist but their presence was not otherwise confirmed. Review of permit files. A community survey was performed. Interviews of pipe suppliers, contractors, and/or developers were conducted. V Interview of local contractors and developers Page 2 of 7 Other, please attach written narrative. SAMPLING PLAN FOR LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLES AND WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS PART III MATERIALS SURVEY DER F. 1 11•]11SX(If F. TlJ S cyMr FW fm Leal W Cm t T,n L..9.� .,d W.r•. P.li.r Ara�rm Ellaauw 0.r 1901 DER A,11.1'm N0. fFOW w by DERI Fill out the following Materials Survey table to summarize the results of the records review performed under Part II of this Form to identify a sampling pool of lead and copper tap sampling sites. Enter the number of single family residences (SFR), multiple family residences (MFR) and other buildings (BLDG) by site type that have been identified in the system's sampling pool. In A show the interior plumbing characteristics by structure type. Show in B, the number of known lead service lines in the entire distribution system. Show in C, the number of connections that are affected by lead components. The total number of sites in the sampling pool is listed in D by type of structure. The total number of connections in the distribution system is listed by type of structure in E. MATERIALS SURVEY SUMMARY TYPE OF STRUCTURE SFR MFR I BLDG NUMBER OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS A. INTERIOR PLUMBING MATERIAL SITE TYPES Lead Pipe y 0 0 0 Copper Pipe With Lead Solder Installed After 1982 0 0 0 Copper Pipe With Lead Solder Installed Before 1983 0 0 0 Brass Faucets 246 0 0 Point -of -Use or Point -of -Entry Treatment Devices 0 0 0 Lead -Lined Water Coolers 0 0 0 Other Lead Plumbing Components 0 0 0 B. SERVICE LINE SITE TYPES RN ' ON 4.y. j ... �yMvt". z ..d`, Quo' sa�wry�+10 � M ,v ^ f�Y::°?,.^� N`t 0 0.. Lead Service Lines Total Initial Number of Lines That Are Entirely Lead and Subject to Replacement Partial Lead Lines Goosenecks 0 0 0 Pigtails 0 0 0 C. DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SITE TYPES xK < a. - Connections Within 100 ft. of Lead Components 0 0 0 D. TOTAL NUMBER OF SITES 8 0 0 E. TOTAL NUMBER OF CONNECTIONS 246 0 0 Page 3 of 7 SAMPLING PLAN FOR LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLES AND WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS DER F.in.yll,M. 1I F. Tf k Sm lw E fe L" W Cm , 1m U,*_ W W.., D,"Ilw Annacn EI(mirvs D.0 100, DER AFOliet N0. PART IV LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLING PLAN fF11W 4n br DER) After completing the Materials Survey, develop a Lead and Copper Tap Sampling Plan by establishing a pool of potential sampling sites. Each plan must include, at least, the minimum number of sites as shown in the table in Part I of this form. It is recommended that a system establish a sampling pool equal to 150 percent of the minimum number required to be sampled to secure a list of optional sites that can be sampled as replacement sites or as additional samples, List all identified sampling sites in the table included in this part. Use additional copies of page five as necessary. ID COLUMN. To complete the first column, enter a site IDentification number of up to three digits. TIER COLUMN. Enter the TIER number of each site in column two. Lead and copper tap sampling sites are categorized as tier 1 for the highest risk, to 2, 3 or 4 for successively lower risks. The tier categories are different for community and non -transient non -community systems. For community public water systems, tier 1 sites are single family residences or child care facilities that contain either: copper pipes with lead solder installed after December 31, 1982, lead pipes, or a lead service line. Multi -family residences are tier 1 when they comprise at least 20 percent of the structures served by the system. A system with lead service lines in its distribution system must target a minimum of 50 percent of their samples from taps served by lead service lines sites and the remainder from sites with lead pipes or copper pipes with lead solder. Tier 2 sites include buildings and multi -family residences that contain: copper pipes with lead solder installed after December 31, 1982, or lead pipes, or a lead service line. Tier 3 sites consist of single family residences that contain copper pipes with lead solder installed before January 1, 1983. Tier 4 sites are those that are identified as susceptible to lead or copper contamination as detailed in Rule 17-551.410(2)(e), F.A.C. For non -transient non -community public water systems, tier 1 sites are buildings that contain: copper pipes with lead solder installed after December 31, 1982, or lead pipes, or a lead service line. Tier 2 sites are buildings that contain copper pipes with lead solder installed before January 1, 1983. Tier 3 sites are those identified as susceptible to lead or copper contamination and are the same as community water system tier 4 sites. When too few tier 1 sites are identified, tier 2 sites must be located to develop the sampling plan and so on through tiers 3 and 4. TYPE, LOCATION and CONTACT COLUMNS. Enter the TYPE of structure in the third column. Site types are identified as a single family residence (SFR), a multi -family residence (MFR) or a building (BLDG). Enter the street address of the site in the column entitled LOCATION and the name and phone number of the building or residence owner in the gONTACT PERSON column. LSL and HOME PLUMBING MATERIAL COLUMNS. Enter a "Y" in the LSL column to identify a site with a lead service line. The HOME PLUMBING MATERIAL must be identified for each site in this column. Enter one of the following: Pb1 to identify a site with lead solder installed after December 31, 1982, Pb2 to identify a site with lead solder installed before January 1, 1983, LP to identify a site with lead pipe. BF to identify tier 4 sites (tier 3 for NTNC systems) that have brass faucets. WC to identify tier 4 sites that have water coolers with lead content. POE or POU to Identify tier 4 sites that have a point -of -entry or use treatment device, respectively. LC to identify a tier 4 site within 100 feet of a lead component in the distribution system. FIELD VERIFIED and STATUS COLUMNS. Show if the site's home plumbing or service line material has been FIELD VERIFIED by a "Y" in this column. Sites selected for sampling should be indicated by entering an "S" in the SITE STATUS column. Optional sites are identified by an "0". To be a selected site, there must be an agreement with the site building owner to sample himself or to have the site sampled by the system. All homeowners who will sample at the selected sites must receive training in sampling procedures. Indicate which homeowners have received training by a "Y" in the TRAINING STATUS column. Page 4 of 7 SAMPLING PLAN FOR LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLES AND WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS PART IV LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLING PLAN DER Fnm l 11.131.ml) F.. Tlda S+ Mling r1.. W 1<ad M C,,<, T, S.nwlu MWuu Dml'n r... r Etl..6D.¢ 1991 DER Ary "li6n W, (Fiead in by DEA) -5r'x=6ingle k'am3.ly Residence 4 1 SFR 1018 W. Lakeview Dr, Robert Borgyon 589-1314 N BF Y S Y `>" > n iW'k's'<,'� M NY.z e CONTACT PERSON LSL IIOhiE FIEI D ': SITE TRAINING D ER TYPE LOCATION >>` i x , �: BF PLUM ING VERU IED STATUS STATUS r> Yn x x`k yw E M�PIIONE 4 4 SFR 2110 E. Lakeview Dr. Raymond Worzell 589-3120 < �; •<°' .{• Y S MATERIAL :. 4 SFR 2071 E. Lakeview Dr. Robert Schlosse 388-5334 N BF Y S y YIN .,.' ..S10 YIN 1 4 SFR 3614 W. Derry Drive ILarry Morris 589-0080 O Y 7 4 SFR 2205 E. Lakeview Dr. George Shaul 388-1953 N BF Y 0 Y 8 N BF Y S Y 2 4 1 SFR 1018 W. Lakeview Dr, Robert Borgyon 589-1314 N BF Y S Y 3 4 SFR 2121 E. Lakeview Dr. William Dahlqui 3t88-3935 N BF Y S Y 4 4 SFR 2110 E. Lakeview Dr. Raymond Worzell 589-3120 N BF Y S y 5 4 SFR 2071 E. Lakeview Dr. Robert Schlosse 388-5334 N BF Y S y 6 4 SFR 2204 E. Lakeview Dr. Ron Campbell 589-8148 N BF Y O Y 7 4 SFR 2205 E. Lakeview Dr. George Shaul 388-1953 N BF Y 0 Y 8 4 SFR 1016 W. Lakeview Dr. Charles Burkeen 589-2274 N BF Y O Y Total Tier 1 Sites 0. Total Selected Sampling Sues With Lead Service Lines Total Tier 2 Sites rz . zs. r mow. t t r ' xv� i;' rF.?e;>?; Percenla ,y' a , j. ', ge DI Sampling Sites With Lead Service Lines 0 Total Tier 3 Sites 0 I Total Tier 4 Sites $ Paps 5 of 7 `ynnlr LIN(; f'LAN FOR LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLES AND WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS PART V WATER QUALITY PARAMETER SAMPLING PLAN DER ram I n.SN.P. 11 F— T4k S. IW Plu In LoQ W T., Su W Yd W..., D-di.r P. ,. Efe 1. D.k 1W DER Amlk lkm Ne. Irlw : y nk:fo Fill out the following table to identify water quality parameter (WOP) sampling sites. The total number of sites identified must equal the total number of entry points or, for consecutive systems, the total number of interconnection points, to the distribution system. Distribution system sampling sites may be selected from among the system's microbiological sampling sites. Use a two -digit number as an identification number. The street address should be given as the site location. List target sampling dates for the two required sampling rounds to demonstrate how sampling will evaluate seasonal water quality differences. Page 6 of 7 ENTRY POINT SAMPLING SITES DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SAMPLING SITES ID NUMBER LOCATION TARGET DATES ID NUMBER LOCATION TARGET DATES 10 Park Place Water Trea June, 1995 Park Place Clubhouse I 00=1 W. Takevlew Dr.Ph June, 1995 1000 Barber St. Sebastian, FL TOTAL SAMPLING SITES AT ENTRY POINTS: 1 TOTAL SAMPLING SITES IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM: 1, Page 6 of 7 SAMPLING PLAN FOR LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLES AND WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS DEN F— ,17.531.1-AXII F. Ti,¢ S—m4m PW fr Lad "Cam, T.v S.,r..l.• W W.r• Q.lin P.,.navn Flkaai.e U.v IOL DER Apo",o Ne. PART VI SAMPLING PLAN CERTIFICATION IFR 6 b DERI Site Selection Criteria. Whenever possible lead and copper tap sample plans must include tier 1 sites exclusively. Explain the selection of other than tier 1 sites and, if sites were changed from one monitoring period to another, why this was necessary (attach additional pages if necessary). or bronze fittings, with compression fittings. ** Lead Service Line Sites. When lead service Line sites are identified they must comprise at least fifty percent of the selected samples. Explain why the percentage of lead service line sites is not at least fifty percent of the required number of sampling sites (attach additional pages if necessary). There are no existing lead service lines; they are all polybutylene, Water Quality Parameter Sampling Plan. If any WQP sampling sites are not also microbiological sampling sites, explain how the selected distribution system water quality parameter sampling sites represent water quality throughout the distribution system based on the distribution of population, the different sources of water and treatment methods, and an even distribution of sampling throughout the six-month sampling period (attach additional sheets as necessary). Not applicable. Certification of Compliance I certify that the information listed and checked in Part II of this form was used to perform the materials survey in order to identify the total number of lead service lines in this water system and to establish the sampling pool and sampling plans. I further certify that the number of lead service lines reported in Part III of this form is the total known number of lead service lines in this water system and that the selected sampling sites in Part IV are the highest risk sites available. ** The mobile homes have all been manufactured after 1986. Therefore, all home sites are Tier 4 sites. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Richard B. Votapka Utilities Director NAME (please print) TITLE Page 7 of 7 10/28/94 DATE SAMPLING PLAN FOR LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLES AND WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS PART IV LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLING PLAN DER Fam _�' r rn6 s r . �.,, �a< �<.a ..,a c. T.n Sum4+ ud W.�c. Qwi:v Arr.w+. DER Appteti No. (Fi 6 b1 DCRI n...... C . r '7 DRAFT January 19, 1993 SAMPLING PLAN FOR LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLES AND WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS PART IV LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLING PLAN ID TIER TYPE LOCATION . SITE STATUS TRAINING STATUS SPA i. 0evj a,,, R o11 I lvccUuv2 CIV -i( - 3`. 3 4ea vwa ! b} L 012. 1 SK— 01 -K 51=1L or a I I 'sr� It loci ► 1 5 r- (L 133t 1,e -v. -S-1, DER Farm Fear Tilk S ^gl' • PI,n far lud W L T,n S " N SV,1,r Qv16Y N - ER i a ILk , 1w, DEA A,01k Ne. (Rl iby DEP1 SON LSL HOME FIELD!.. VERIFIED . SITE STATUS TRAINING STATUS PLUMPING PHONEYIN MATERIAL .YIN S/o YIN 0-31, 3� I L4 n% {= 0 {✓ ccs _��ro A) PF 0 A Pane 5 of 7 0 DRAFT January 19, 199: Florida L :artment of Environmental Reg u' Von T.:. T"..+., Off. lw,.:Ow NUI, S'.tJ T.14}....a, ilald! 7`J�. b Certification of Training for Homeowners - Collecting Tap Samples PWS NAME:po :C�� �� u c _ 5� s=j ; • • PWS -ID: PWS PHONE #: ��-7�� o C't —1Z FART I SAMPLING INSTRUCTIONS Samples are being collected to determine the contribution of faucet fixtures and household pipes and/or s to the lead and copper levels in tap water. This sampling effort is required by the Florida Department of Environrr Regulations, and is being accomplished through the cooperation of homeowners and residents. A sample is to be collected after an extended period of stagnant water conditions (i.e.; no water use dur) period) withiri the interior piping. Due to this requirement, either early mornings or evenings upon returning from are the best times for collecting samples. The collection procedure is described in more detail below. 1. Prior arrangements will be made with the customer to coordinate the sample collection event. Dates set for sample kit delivery and pick-up by water department staff. 2. A minimum of 6-8 hour -period which there is no water use must be achieved prior to sampling. Thr department recommends that either early mornings or evenings upon returning home are the best sam times to ensure that the necessary stagnant water conditions exist. 3. A kitchen or bathroom cold -water faucet is to be used for sampling. Place the sample bottle (open) the faucet and gently open the cold water,tap. Fill the sample bottle to the line marked "1000-m1" an off the water. 4. Tightly cap the sample bottle and place in the sample kit provided. Please review the sample kit Iz this time to ensure that all information contained on the label is correct. 5. IF ANY PLUMBING REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT HAS BEEN DONE IN THE HOME SINCE YOUR PREF SAMPLING EVENT, NOTE THIS INFORMATION ON THE LABEL AS PROVIDED. 6. Place the sample kit outside of the residence in the location of the kit's delivery in order that wate staff may pick up the sample kit. 7. Results from this monitoring effort will be provided to participating customers when reports are ge for the State unless excessive lead and/or copper levels are found. In those cases, immediate nofifi will be provided (usually 10 working days from the time of sample collection). CALL: at(W)-S'Ioq if you have any questions regarding these instructions. if you fully understand the sample collection procedure certification on - , of this form. PART II CERTIFICATION OF TRAINING AND SAMPLING (To BE COMPLETED BY RESIDENT) Water was last used: Sample was collected: Sample tap location: Time -S ,'04 /b"t�> Time Date �- Date Lvcxx:=�_ Ww 6.IYI i, y D Certification of Training for Homeowners - Collecting Tap Samples PWS NAME:po :C�� �� u c _ 5� s=j ; • • PWS -ID: PWS PHONE #: ��-7�� o C't —1Z FART I SAMPLING INSTRUCTIONS Samples are being collected to determine the contribution of faucet fixtures and household pipes and/or s to the lead and copper levels in tap water. This sampling effort is required by the Florida Department of Environrr Regulations, and is being accomplished through the cooperation of homeowners and residents. A sample is to be collected after an extended period of stagnant water conditions (i.e.; no water use dur) period) withiri the interior piping. Due to this requirement, either early mornings or evenings upon returning from are the best times for collecting samples. The collection procedure is described in more detail below. 1. Prior arrangements will be made with the customer to coordinate the sample collection event. Dates set for sample kit delivery and pick-up by water department staff. 2. A minimum of 6-8 hour -period which there is no water use must be achieved prior to sampling. Thr department recommends that either early mornings or evenings upon returning home are the best sam times to ensure that the necessary stagnant water conditions exist. 3. A kitchen or bathroom cold -water faucet is to be used for sampling. Place the sample bottle (open) the faucet and gently open the cold water,tap. Fill the sample bottle to the line marked "1000-m1" an off the water. 4. Tightly cap the sample bottle and place in the sample kit provided. Please review the sample kit Iz this time to ensure that all information contained on the label is correct. 5. IF ANY PLUMBING REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT HAS BEEN DONE IN THE HOME SINCE YOUR PREF SAMPLING EVENT, NOTE THIS INFORMATION ON THE LABEL AS PROVIDED. 6. Place the sample kit outside of the residence in the location of the kit's delivery in order that wate staff may pick up the sample kit. 7. Results from this monitoring effort will be provided to participating customers when reports are ge for the State unless excessive lead and/or copper levels are found. In those cases, immediate nofifi will be provided (usually 10 working days from the time of sample collection). CALL: at(W)-S'Ioq if you have any questions regarding these instructions. if you fully understand the sample collection procedure certification on - , of this form. PART II CERTIFICATION OF TRAINING AND SAMPLING (To BE COMPLETED BY RESIDENT) Water was last used: Sample was collected: Sample tap location: Time -S ,'04 /b"t�> Time Date �- Date Florida LRFDepartment of Environmental RegulationSU,.t=HV1,S,. Nd TJW. . FWA 3:3i 2-M , 14 Certification of Training for Homeowners Collecting Tap Samples . PWS NAME: ` CxY� C ��C 2 _ PWS -ID: 33 1 PWS PHONE k: L4 D'Z - 5 ��L- ►d c"� $� ZEART I SAMPLING INSTRUCTIONS Samples are being collected to determine the contribution of faucet fixtures and household pipes and/or solder to the lead and copper levels in tap water. This sampling effort is required by the Florida Department of Environmental Regulations, and is being accomplished through the cooperation of homeowners and residents. A sample is to be collected after an extended period of stagnant water conditions (i.e., no water use during this period) within the interior piping. Due to this requirement, either early mornings or evenings upon returning from work are the best times for collecting samples. The collection procedure is described in more detail below. 1. Prior arrangements will be made with the customer to coordinate the sample collection event. Dates will be set for sample kit delivery and pick-up by water department staff. 2. A minimum of 6-8 hour -period which there is no water use must be achieved prior to sampling. The water department recommends that either early mornings or evenings upon returning home are the best sampling times to ensure that the necessary stagnant water conditions exist. 3. A kitchen or bathroom cold -water faucet is to be used for sampling. Place the sample bottle (open) below the faucet and gently open the cold water,tap. Fill the sample bottle to the line marked "_1000-m1" and turn off the water. 4. Tightly cap the sample bottle and place in the sample kit provided. Please review the sample kit label at this time to ensure that all information contained on the label is correct. 5. IF ANY PLUMBING REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT HAS BEEN DONE IN THE HOME SINCE YOUR PREVIOUS SAMPLING EVENT, NOTE THIS INFORMATION ON THE LABEL AS PROVIDED. 6. Place the sample kit outside of the residence in the location of the kit's delivery in order that water system staff may pick up the sample kit. 7. Results from this monitoring effort will be provided to participating customers when reports are generated for the State unless excessive lead and/or copper levels are found. In those cases, immediate notification will be provided (usually 10 working days from the time of sample collection). GALL: Uro-veCC'c V'Q__ro ^ m\J�vv "iu1,n at 4 U-1--3 -t- if you have any questions regarding these instructions. If you fully understand the sample collection procedure, si n the certification on of this form. PART II CERTIFICATION OF TRAINING AND SAMPLING (TO BE COMPLETED BY RESIDENT) Water was last used: Time 11:30 ? M Date /a - 7- f 3 Sample Was collected: Time 7. 3 D /1J Date /9 - ly i �5 Sample tap location:_ La t 'V 1 C th( - 1 �' 1✓ Florida X G Department of Environmental Regulation T.A" Te.. 00— BU[.'-� 56"" Red T.IW.. ' FbH• 7��� �a ff JI.d N k DEAL Certification of Training for Homeowners Collecting Tap Samples PWS NAME: \�N P �� C_s` PWS -ID: 33A `'l l 0 k PWS PHONE #: L4 tM - 5 LOQ- �L'd$y 3 FART I SAMPLING INSTRUCTIONS Samples are being collected to determine the contribution of faucet fixtures and household pipes and/or solder to the lead and copper levels in tap water. This sampling effort is required by the Florida Department of Environmental Regulations, and is being accomplished through the cooperation of homeowners and residents. A sample is to be collected after an extended period of stagnant water conditions (i.e., no water use during this period) within the interior piping. Due to this requirement, either early mornings or evenings upon returning from work are the best times for collecting samples. The collection procedure is described in more detail below. 1. Prior arrangements will be made with the customer to coordinate the sample collection event. Dates will be set for sample kit delivery and pick-up by water department staff. 2. A minimum of 6-8 hour period which there is no water use must be achieved prior to sampling. The water department recommends that either early mornings or evenings upon returning home are the best sampling times to ensure that the necessary stagnant water conditions exist. 3. A kitchen or bathroom cold -water faucet is to be used for sampling. Place the sample bottle (open) below the faucet and gently open the cold water[tap. Fill the sample bottle to the line marked "_1000 -ml" and turn off the water. 4. Tightly cap the sample bottle and place in the sample kit provided. Please review the sample kit label at i this time to ensure that all information contained on the label is correct. ; 5.. IF ANY PLUMBING REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT HAS BEEN DONE IN THE HOME SINCE YOUR PREVIOUS SAMPLING EVENT, NOTE THIS INFORMATION ON THE LABEL AS PROVIDED. 6. . Place the sample kit outside of the residence in the location of the kit's delivery in order that water system' staff may pick up the sample kit. 7. Results from this monitoring effort will be provided to participating customers when reports are generated for the State unless excessive lead and/or copper levels are found. In those cases, immediate notification will be provided (usually 10 working days from the time of sample collection). CALL: V` �o-Sevv�c�s cSc -- at (4l), -T q-A`� if you have any questions regarding these instructions. If you fully understand the sample collection procedure, si]n the certification on of this form. PART II CERTIFICATION OF TRAINING AND SAMPLING (TO BE COMPLETED BY RESIDENT) Water was last used: Time Date -/ Sample Was collected: Time Date — . Sample tap location:_ 2Z0 `i ERST L RrtV I E W' JR 1 V Florida Department of Environmental Regulation Tale T'+ DIBs BNL UW Bbv Aon Real Iu1q n!Mr Fem.TnA G i� OFJI MViietion l:e. Certification of Training for Homeowners Collecting Tap Samples PWS NAME: C cx Y \ t PWS -ID: PWS PHONE 9: l4b`1 - 5 tool- 8y 42ART I SAMPLING INSTRUCTIONS 3l - U1$l Samples are being collected to determine the contribution of faucet fixtures and household pipes and/or solder to the lead and copper levels in tap water. This sampling effort is required by the Florida Department of Environmental Regulations, and is being accomplished through the cooperation of homeowners and residents. A sample is to be collected after an extended period of stagnant water conditions (i.e., no water use during this period) within the interior piping. Due to this requirement, either early mornings or evenings upon returning from work are the best times for collecting samples. The collection procedure is described in more detail below. 1. Prior arrangements will be made with the customer fo coordinate the sample collection event. Dates will be set for sample kit delivery and pick-up by water department staff. The water 2. A minimum of 6-8 hour -period which there is no water use must be achieved prior to sampling. department recommends that either early mornings or evenings upon returning home are the best sampling times to ensure that the necessary stagnant water conditions exist. is e used 3. the faucet and gently open the old wateertt pt Fill ethe samople bottlet o thechline sample 1000 -mi" and ottle (open) turn off the water. 4. Tightly cap the sample bottle and place in the sample kit provided. Please review the sample it label at this time to ensure that all information contained on the label is correct. 5. IF ANY PLUMBING REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT HAS BEEN DONE IN THE HOME SINCE YOUR PREVIOUS SAMPLING EVENT, NOTE THIS INFORMATION ON THE LABEL AS PROVIDED. 6. Place the sample kit outside of the residence in the location of the kit's delivery in order that water systei -staff may pick up the sample kit. 7. Results from this monitoring effort will be provided to participating customers when reports are generated for the State unless excessive lead and/or copper levels are found. in those cases, immediate notification will be provided (usually 10 working days from the time of sample collection). CALL: ��o Se��vcws �o>ro �«v� d�•r��• at 4u'1-S'bR-����L_ if you have any questions regarding these Instructions. If you fully understand the sample collection procedure, sign tl certification on - , of this form. PART 11 CERTIFICATION OF TRAINING AND SAMPLING (TO BE COMPLETED BY RESIDENT) T7 Wa/ter was last used: Time 7' Date �y� Sample Was collected: Time , J f�j Date OV 7 Sample tap location: 2121 EAST LA1_EVIEW 1Ji21lTE Florida DER i.....I It•SSI.�SD21 Department of Environmental Regulation T..i Twn 0%. Ri1[• ZdW Rhl, s,a R.d WW" . FWJ.. )"WUM 0.0 DEI�� um Ka (FdW w W DERI Certification of Training for Homeowners Collecting Tap Samples - PWS NAME: PCxY� C ��C2 _ PWS -ID: PWS PHONE /1: U D`1 - 5 to°l- �. a 8�A C BART I SAMPLING INSTRUCTIONS 3k - yl�� Samples are being collected to determine the contribution of faucet fixtures and household pipes and/or solder to the lead and copper levels in tap water. This sampling effort is required by the Florida Department of Environmental Regulations, and is being accomplished through the cooperation of homeowners and residents. A sample is to be collected after an extended period of stagnant water conditions (i.e., no water use during this period) within the interior piping. Due to this requirement, either early mornings or evenings upon returning from work are the best times for collecting samples. The collection procedure is described in more detail below. 1. Prior arrangements will be made with the customer to coordinate the sample collection event. Dates will be set for sample kit delivery and pick-up by water department staff. 2. A minimum of 6-8 hour -period which there is no water use must be achieved prior to sampling. The water department recommends that either early mornings or evenings upon returning home are the best sampling times to ensure that the necessary stagnant water conditions exist. 3. A kitchen or bathroom cold -water faucet is to be used for sampling. Place the sample bottle (open) below the faucet and gently open the cold watentap. Fill the sample bottle to the line marked "1000 -ml" and turn off the water. 4. Tightly cap the sample bottle and place in the sample kit provided. Please review the sample kit label at this time to ensure that all information contained on the label is correct. 5. IF ANY PLUMBING REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT HAS BEEN DONE IN THE HOME SINCE YOUR PREVIOUS SAMPLING EVENT, NOTE THIS INFORMATION ON THE LABEL AS PROVIDED. 6. Place the sample kit outside of the residence in the location of the kit's delivery in order that water system staff may pick up the sample kit. 7. Results from this monitoring effort will be provided to participating customers when reports are generated for the State unless excessive lead and/or copper levels are found. in those cases, immediate notification will be provided (usually 10 working days from the time of sample collection). CALL: cSc `i0?ro ^ at 4U1I-SeR-�`a��l if you have any questions regarding these instructions. If you fully understand the sample collection procedure, si n the certification on of this form. PART II CERTIFICATION OF TRAINING AND SAMPLING (TO BE COMPLETED BY RESIDENT) Water was last used: Time_ nn4� Date/O e-�f Sample was collected: Time �(J /f14 Date /off Sample tap location: 3(vl)4 kQEST BERRY D21v'� Certifica^on of Training fo•f`iomeowners Collecting Tap Samples PWS NAME: C .Ck r Q PWS -I D: l I E PWS PHONE N: � 40•7� -L L a —� 74 _ FART I SAMPLING INSTRUCTIONS Samples are being collected to determine the contribution of faucet fixtures and household pipes and/or s to the lead and copper levels in tap water. This sampling effort is required by the Florida Department of Environrr Regulations, and is being accomplished through the cooperation of homeowners and residents. A sample Is to be collected after an extended period of stagnant water conditions (i.e.; no water use duri period) within the interior piping. Due to this requirement, either early mornings or evenings upon returning from are the best times for collecting samples. The collection procedure is described in more detail below. 1. Prior arrangements will be made with the customer fo coordinate the sample collection event. Dates set for sample kit delivery and pick-up by water department staff, 2. A minimum of 6-8 hour -period which there is no water use must be' achieved prior to sampling. Thi department recommends that either early mornings or evenings upon returning home are the best sarr times to ensure that the necessary stagnant water conditions exist. 3. A kitchen or bathroom cold -water faucet is to be used for sampling. Place the sample bottle (open] the faucet and gently open the cold watentap. Fill the sample bottle to the line marked '1000-mI' an off the water. 4. Tightly cap the sample bottle and place in the sample kit provided. Please review the sample kit I; this time to ensure that all information contained on the label is correct. 5, IF ANY PLUMBING REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT HAS BEEN DONE IN -THE HOME SINCE YOUR PRE\ SAMPLING EVENT, NOTE THIS INFORMATION ON THE LABEL AS PROVIDED. B. Place the sample kit outside of the residence in the location of the kit's delivery in order that watt staff may pick up the sample kit. 7. Results from this monitoring effort will be provided to participating customers when reports are ge for the State unless excessive lead and/or copper levels are found. In those cases, immediate nofifi will be provided (usually 10 working days ffom the time of sample collection). CALL: �` �o-5LrN)ScS_s at 4B`1-S'IoR-c�'a if you have any questions regarding these instructions. If you fully understand the sample collection procedure certification on • - of this form. PART II CERTIFICATION OF TRAINING AND SAMPLING (TO BE COMPLETED BY RESIDENT) Water was last used: Sample Was collected: Sample tap Time_/D.• -�6-) /114-7 Time_ �•`�. �y� Date_ Date_, 1 fwt d nolo I Jut IUB Dex r"m.• n•,i.a artment of Environmental Regu ron F.Tk%. TvL, T.... 0(r . lw,. : Nut, S a %.A T.11.>r•+. n -a " _-A _ ilr.wl;w N. Iw.+ orx AWImkls X. li.o.1 w A Certification of Training for Homeowners Collecting Tap Samples PWS NAME: V.CX (IctL2 Seo 5�1�� PWS -ID: J 3. 1 dam^ tv PWS PHONE #: _ BART I SAMPLING INSTRUCTIONS Samples are being collected to determine the contribution of faucet fixtures and household pipes and/or to the lead and copper levels in tap water. This sampling effort is required by the Florida Department of Environs Regulations, and is being accomplished through the cooperation of homeowners and residents. A sample is to be collected after an extended period of stagnant water conditions (i.e.; no water use du period) withiri the interior,piping. Due to this requirement, either early mornings or evenings upon returning fron are the best times for collecting samples. The collection procedure is described in more detail below. 1. Prior arrangements will be made with the customer to coordinate the sample collection event. Date., set for sample kit delivery and pick-up by water department staff. 2. A minimum of 6-8 ho-jr-period which there is no water use must be achieved prior to sampling. TY department recommends that either early mornings or evenings upon returning home are the best sar times to ensure that the necessary stagnant water conditions exist. 3. A kitchen or bathroom cold -water faucet is to be used for sampling. Place the sample bottle (oiler the faucet and gently open the cold wateritap. Fill the sample bottle to the line marked "1000-m1' al off the water. 4. Tightly cap the sample bottle and place in the sample kit provided. Please review the sample kit this time to ensure that all information contained on the label is correct. 5. IF ANY PLUMBING REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT HAS BEEN DONE IN THE HOME SINCE YOUR PRE SAMPLING EVENT, NOTE THIS INFORMATION ON THE LABEL AS PROVIDED. 6. Place the sample kit outside of the residence in the location of the kit's delivery in order that wai staff may pick up the sample kit. 7. Results from this monitoring effort will be provided to participating customers when reports are g for the State unless excessive lead and/or copper levels are found. In those cases, immediate notil will be provided (usually 10 working days from the time of sample collection). CALL: ��o- S2�vtc�S c �i2yo �oLWG_ �����ti at 40"1-T(A- na 'i if you have any questions regarding these instructions. If you fully understand the sample collection procedur certification on * , of this form. PART II CERTIFICATION OF TRAINING AND SAMPLING (TO BE COMPLETED BY RESIDENT) Water was last used: Time //*U O p� Date / (o -.2 %-911 Sample Was collected: Timer 7; o O/!/ Date Co - ag- -9Sl Sample tap location:_ Florida Department of Environmental Regulation -r tn-r " . On. amt. 2M tlki, S. %l & raw.. F.U.. 32349.:..00 DER F..m r fl.7�f'F� N w'ni,.e fn Fe.m Th fiL�— N CNM". Me.Fd. Ffk T D•r DE% � ,ion t:e. Certification of Training for Homeowners - Collecting Tap Samples PWS NAME: y cx.y )�, 9 \,CA -0-v- , — PWS PHONE #: U D`7 - 5 tact- td `a 8y SRART I SAMPLING INSTRUCTIONS PWS-ID:33 1- L\ k d k Samples are being collected to determine the contribution of faucet fixtures and household pipes and/or solder to the lead and copper levels in tap water. This sampling effort is required by the Florida Department of Environmental Regulations, and is being accomplished through the cooperation of homeowners and residents. A sample is to be collected after an extended period of stagnant water conditions (i.e., no water use during this period) within the interior piping. Due to this requirement, either early mornings or evenings upon returning from work ___ .� . t,......i.,,ne rnr enliaminn sarnnIP_,. The collection procedure is described in more detail below. 1. Prior arrangements will be made with the customer to coordinate the sample collection event. Dates will be set for sample kit delivery and pick-up by water department staff. 2. A minimum of 6-8 hou.-period which there is no water use must be achieved prior to sampling. The water department recommends that either early mornings or evenings upon returning home are the best sampling times to ensure that the necessary stagnant water conditions exist. 3. A kitchen or bathroom cold -water faucet is to be used for sampling. Place the sample bottle (open) below the faucet and gently open the cold water,tap. Fill the sample bottle to the line marked "1000 -ml" and turn off the water. `' 4. Tightly cap the sample bottle and place in the sample kit provided. Please review the sample kit label at this time to ensure that all information contained on the label is correct. 5. IF ANY PLUMBING REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT HAS BEEN DONE IN THE HOME SINCE YOUR PREVIOUS .SAMPLING EVENT, NOTE THIS INFORMATION ON THE LABEL AS PROVIDED. 6. Place the sample kit outside of the residence in the location of the kit's delivery in order that water system staff may pick up the sample kit. 7. Results from this monitoring effort will be provided to participating customers when reports are generated for the State unless excessive lead and/or copper levels are found. In those cases, immediate notification will be provided (usually 10 working days from the time of sample collection). CALL: Udo- ».vva �.5 c� v�ro -��-• v-,- cv..� if you have any questions regarding these instructions. If you fully understand the sample certification on of this form. PART II CERTIFICATION OF TRAINING AND SAMPLING (TO BE COMPLETED BY RESIDENT) Water was last used: Time / / 3 o P /) � Date U c _ %, / 9 93 Sample was collected: Time 7, 30?I>1 Date �p� R. Sample tap location: 2071 EAST LA V_EY) 1 ERNE Florida DERFmm/ Department of Environmental Regulation FmmT;,4 a==--- T.�;n Te+sn OR,s RMS. `a10 9hi, Her Red T.141e.we, _ FJ4n:N 0.v lw�• 'w, DER, Applie.,Im �a �— (Fy.! Certification of Training for Homeowners Collecting Tap Samples PWS NAME: ` CxY P �� C 2 PWS -ID: 33 1 �A k p PWS PHONE 0/: L4b`1 - ! laq- �. a.$t-\ �:RART I SAMPLING INSTRUCTIONS Samples are being collected to determine the contribution of faucet fixtures and household pipes and/or solder to the lead and copper levels in tap water. This sampling effort is required by the Florida Department of Environmental Regulations, and is being accomplished through the cooperation of homeowners and residents. A sample is to be collected after an extended period of stagnant water conditions (i.e., no water use during this period) within the interior piping. Due to this requirement, either early mornings or evenings upon returning from work are the best times for collecting samples. The collection procedure is described in more detail below. 1. Prior arrangements will be made with the customer to coordinate the sample collection event. Dates will be set for sample kit delivery and pick-up by water department staff. 2. A minimum of 6-8 ho -,;7 period which there is no water use must be achieved prior to sampling. The water department recommends that either early mornings or evenings upon returning home are the best sampling times to ensure that the necessary stagnant water conditions exist. 3. A kitchen or bathroom cold -water faucet is to be used for sampling. Place the sample bottle (open) below the faucet and gently open the cold watentap. Fill the sample bottle to the line marked "1000-m1" and turn off the water. 4. Tightly cap the sample bottle and place in the sample kit provided. Please review the sample kit label at this time to ensure that all information contained on the label is correct. 5. IF ANY PLUMBING REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT HAS BEEN DONE IN THE HOME SINCE YOUR PREVIOUS .SAMPLING EVENT, NOTE THIS INFORMATION ON THE LABEL AS PROVIDED. 6. Place the sample kit outside of the residence in the location of the kit's delivery in order that water system staff may pick up the sample kit. 7. Results from this monitoring effort will be provided to participating customers when reports are generated for the State unless excessive lead and/or copper levels are found. In those cases, immediate notification will be provided (usually 10 working days f(om the time of sample collection). CALL: ��o- Servs cS c `i�� ^ �a..r` ���r���n at 4U"1-T(oq- n�:3�1 if you have any questions regarding these instructions. If you fully understand the sample collection procedure, si n the certification on of this form. PART II CERTIFICATION OF TRAINING AND SAMPLING (TO BE COMPLETED BY RESIDENT) Water was last used: Sample was collected: Time Time S X17.1 Date Date Sample tap location:_ 2Z0G t`A5T LAK—VIEW i7�tVtr Florida R Fm"/ 1'I I.VO 1 Tirk G'f Department of Environmental {ReguatonORwsBW{.=84;, S,. Rsd T�Ikhu.ac. ,Aplw.tien Certification of Training for Homeowners Collecting Tap Samples PWS NAME: C COY P �u C 2 PWS -ID: PWS PHONE A': L4 b'l - 5 (aci- �L c'i$y ')FART I SAMPLING INSTRUCTIONS Samples are being collected to determine the contribution of faucet fixtures and household pipes and/or solder to the lead and copper levels in tap water. This sampling effort is required by the Florida Department of Environmental Regulations, and is being accomplished through the cooperation of homeowners and residents. A sample is to be collecte8 after an extended period of stagnant water conditions (i.e., no water use during this period) within the interior piping. Due to this requirement, either early mornings or evenings upon returning from work are the best times for collecting samples. The collection procedure is described in more detail below. 1. Prior arrangements will be made with the customer to coordinate the sample collection event. Dates will be set for sample kit delivery and pick-up by water department staff. 2. A min)inum of 6-8 hour -period which there is no water use must be achieved prior to sampling. The water department recommends that either early mornings or evenings upon returning home are the best sampling times to ensure that the necessary stagnant water conditions exist. 3. A kitchen or bathroom cold -water faucet is to be used for sampling. Place the sample bottle (open) below the faucet and gently open the cold water -tap. Fill the sample bottle to the line marked "1000 -mi" and turn off the water. 4. Tightly cap the sample bottle and place in the sample kit provided. Please review the sample kit label at this time to ensure that all information contained -on the label is correct. 5. IF ANY PLUMBING REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT HAS BEEN DONE IN THE HOME SINCE YOUR PREVIOUS SAMPLING EVENT, NOTE THIS INFORMATION ON THE LABEL AS PROVIDED. 6. Place the sample kit outside of the residence in the location of the kit's delivery in order that water system staff may pick up the sample kit. 7. Results from this monitoring effort will be provided to participating customers when reports are generated for the State unless excessive lead and/or copper levels are found. In those cases, immediate notification will be provided (usually 10 working days ftom the time of sample collection). CALL: U' \0-Sy--rv�,q A- QQ_'*c -- -,:Kca_,,� \'l�•r\u�A at 4p'1-51aq- WIZ$ if you have any questions regarding these instructions. If you fully understand the sample collection procedure, sign the certification on of this form. PART II CERTIFICATION OF TRAINING AND SAMPLING (TO BE COMPLETED BY RESIDENT) Water was last used: Time 1,5� , 20 /"I' M Date.- /�/, / Z 9 Z? Sample Was collected: Time %," y N% Date 4� % / 3 Sample tap location: 2115 EPs LAt�l�'VIEW_ DR1Va Florida Del F. n•a: �z5 D Irtment of Environmental Regu' �n r."T. Rs.j ioW...w. 11—r 313' 3 r r DFA N.r doe X. JGrr G ftoR� Certification of Training for Homeowners Collecting Tap Samples PWSNAME: 2_r R`Q.G"G o17�s�fGr�' PWS-ID:_�� ►� �qi PWS PHONE k: yl- LQ. 5L, `�11 FART I SAMPLING INSTRUCTIONS Samples are being collected to determine the contribution of faucet fixtures and household pipes and/or to the lead and copper levels in tap water. This sampling effort is required by the Florida Department of Environ Regulations, and is being accomplished through the cooperation of homeowners and residents. A sample is to be collected after an extended period of stagnant water conditions (i.e.; no water use du period) within the interior piping. Due to this requirement, either early mornings or evenings upon returning iron are the best times for collecting samples. The collection procedure is described in more detail below. 1. Prior arrangements will be made with the customer to coordinate the sample collection event. Date. set for sample kit delivery and pick-up by water department staff. 2. A minimum of 6-8 hour -period which there is no water use must be achieved prior to sampling. T1 department recomm6nds that either early mornings or evenings upon returning home are the best sai times to ensure that the necessary stagnant water conditions exist. 3. A kitchen or bathroom cold -water faucet is. to be used for sampling. Place the sample bottle (opei the faucet and gently open the cold watentap. Fill the sample bottle to the line marked "1000-m1e a off the water. 4. Tightly cap the sample bottle and place in the sample kit provided. Please review the sample kit this time to ensure that all information contained on the label is correct. 5. IF ANY PLUMBING REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT HAS BEEN DONE IN THE HOME SINCE YOUR PRE SAMPLING EVENT, NOTE THIS INFORMATION ON THE LAPEL AS PROVIDED. 6. Place the sample kit outside of the residence in the location of the kit's delivery in order that wa staff may pick up the sample kit. 7. Results from this monitoring effort will be provided to participating customers when reports are g for the State unless excessive lead and/or copper levels are found. In those cases, immediate noir will be provided (usually 10 working days from the time of sample collection). CALL: V\o- vt,g 5 c>c ` Qo m -- _-`A7 ')�s-.r\Uvn at 4Uh-5 (oR- n�) if you have any questions regarding these instructions. If you fully understand the sample collection procedur certification on • , of this form. PART ll CERTIFICATION OF TRAINING AND SAMPLING (TO BE COMPLETED BY RESIDENT) Water was last used: Sample Was collected: Sample tap location: Time 0 Q�t\ Time A �TL Date �� 7 j Date Florida Department of Environmental Regulation T..^ Trn offs "'. � vwl, S.w fFiW :. w' DERI Certification of Training for Homeowners �g�� ���� ; Collecting Tap Samples PWS NAME: T=IC f PWS-ID:�s, PWS PHONE 14 D1 - 5-La't-d PART I SAMPLING INSTRUCTIONS Samples are being collected to determine the contribution of faucet fixtures and household pipes and/or solder to the lead and copper levels in tap water. This sampling effort is required by the Florida Department of Environmental Regulations, and is being accomplished through the cooperation of homeowners and residents. A sample is to be collected after an extended period of stagnant water conditions (i.e., no water use during this period) within the interior piping. Due to this requirement, either early mornings or evenings upon returning from work are the best times for collecting samples. The collection procedure is described in more detail below. 1. Prior arrangements will be made with the customer to coordinate the sample collection event. Dates will be set for sample kit delivery and pick-up by water department staff. 2. A minimum of 6-8 hour -period which there is no water use must be achieved prior to sampling. The water department recommends that either early mornings or evenings upon returning home are the best sampling times to ensure that the necessary stagnant water conditions exist. 3. A kitchen or bathroom cold -water faucet is to be used for sampling. Place the sample bottle (open) below the faucet and gently open the cold watentap. Fill the sample bottle to the line marked ".1 D00 -ml' and turn off the water. 4. Tightly cap the sample bottle and place in the sample kit provided. Please review the sample kit label at this time to ensure that all information contained on the label is correct. 5. IF ANY PLUMBING REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT HAS BEEN DONE, IN THE HOME SINCE YOUR PREVIOUS SAMPLING EVENT, NOTE THIS INFORMATION ON THE LABEL AS PROVIDED. 6. Place the sample kit outside of the residence in the location of the kit's delivery in order that water syster staff may pick up the sample kit. 7. Results from this monitoring effort will be provided to participating customers when reports are generated for the State unless excessive lead and/or copper levels are found. In those cases, immediate notification will be provided (usually 10 working days from the time of sample collection). CALL: C%c QIQ_M -' if you have any questions regarding these insti cenification on of this form. ...cam \j" �J �Ur at 4U"I-T loo(- D,4- 14 Ifyou fully understand the sample collection procedure, sign th PART 11 CERTIFICATION OF TRAINING AND SAMPLING (TO BE COMPLETED BY RESIDENT) #7 Water was last used: Time y3= A/ 1 Date /2 93 Sample was collected: Time Date /z_ /� 9�yF y. 7 , Sample tap location:_ 'f�% 22�r4L-1 d,> 1 r try, OF 1%011 l Florida D `artment of Environmental Rep on Tvin T.+.. off. ae,,.:" Sul, &— Re./ T.It.lw . rlerid. 3n] -� - DER r.m, / 11. q �• DER MIIvJ^^ R. (row 1 y Certification of Training for Homeowners Collecting Tap Samples Aj PWS NAME: o 1'1��\� n r- 10 -A.bc�<tt1,, rt'• PWS -ID: -3 - PWS PHONE BART I SAMPLING INSTRUCTIONS Samples are being collected to determine the contribution of faucet fixtures and household pipes and/or to the lead and copper levels in tap water. This sampling effort is required by the Florida Department of Environ( Regulations, and is being accomplished through the cooperation of homeowners and residents. A sample is to be collected after an extended period of stagnant water conditions (i.e., no water use du period) within the interior piping. Due to this requirement, either early mornings or evenings upon returning frorr are the best times for collecting samples. The collection procedure is described in more detail below. 1. Prior arrangements will be made with the customer t.o coordinate the sample collection event. Date: set for sample kit delivery and pick-up by water department staff. 2. A minimum of 6-8 hour -period which there is no water use must be' achieved prior to sampling. Tt department recommends that either early mornings or evenings upon returning home are the best sat times to ensure that the necessary stagnant water conditions exist. 3. A kitchen or bathroom cold -water faucet is to be used for sampling. Place the sample bottle toper the faucet and gently open the cold water,tap. Fill the sample bottle to the line marked "1000-m1' a off the water. 4. Tightly cap the sample bottle and place in the sample kit provided. Please review the sample kit this time to ensure that all information contained on the label is correct. 5. IF ANY PLUMBING REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT HAS BEEN DONE IN -THE HOME SINCE YOUR PRE SAMPLING EVENT, NOTE THIS INFORMATION ON THE LABEL AS PROVIDED. 6. Place the sample kit outside of the residence in the location of the kit's delivery in order that wa' staff may pick up the sample kit. 7. Results from this monitoring effort will be provided to participating customers when reports are g for the State unless excessive lead and/or copper levels are found. In those cases, immediate noG will be provided (usually 10 working days i(om the time of sample collection). CALL: ��o- Se vLcE� c \ 02-io — il�y��vn at LID`1-S (oR- if you have any questions regarding these instructions. If you fully understand the sample collection procedur certification on - • of this form. PART II CERTIFICATION OF TRAINING AND SAMPLING (TO BE COMPLETED BY RESIDENT) Water was last used: Time i" /r i Date Sample Was collected: Time Date y� Sample tap location:_ /// Florida Department of Environmental Regulation ,_ T,, ort— am,.: vk;, S Rid T.IY,......, rb:e. =tea Certification of Training for Homeowners Collecting Tap Samples PWS NAME: \ (Zy_\r V� P �c�C f PWS -ID: - -_� ` PWS PHONE k: Li D`1 - 7 L-cl- �'4'8 y 9 PART 1 SAMPLING INSTRUCTIONS Samples are being collected to determine the contribution of faucet fixtures and household pipes and/or solder to the lead and copper levels in tap water. This sampling effort is required by the Florida Department of Environmental Regulations, and is being accomplished through the cooperation of homeowners and residents. A sample is to be collected after an extended period of stagnant water conditions (i.e., no water use during IN! period) within the interior piping. Due to this requirement, either early mornings or evenings upon returning from work are the best times for collecting samples. The collection procedure is described in more detail below. 1. Prior arrangements will be made with the customer to coordinate the sample collection event. Dates will be set for sample kit delivery and pick-up by water department staff. 2. A minimum of 6-8 hour period which there is no water use must be achieved prior to sampling. The water department recommends that either early mornings or evenings upon returning home are the best sampling times to ensure that the necessary stagnant water conditions exist. 3. A kitchen or bathroom cold -water faucet is to be used for sampling. Place the sample bottle lopen) below the faucet and gently open the cold water.tap. Fill the sample bottle to the line marked "_1000-m1" and turn off the water. 4. Tightly cap the sample bottle and place in the sample kit provided. Please review the sample kit label at this time to ensure that all information contained on the label is correct. 5. IF ANY PLUMBING REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT HAS BEEN DONE, IN THE HOME SINCE YOUR PREVIOUS SAMPLING EVENT, NOTE THIS INFORMATION ON THE LABEL AS PROVIDED. 6. Place the sample kit outside of the residence in the location of the kit's delivery in order that water syste staff may pick up the sample kit. 7. Results from this monitoring effort will be provided to participating customers when reports are generated for the State unless excessive lead and/or copper levels are found. In those cases, immediate notification will be provided (usually 10 working days from the time of sample collection). CALL: Qq_�Co -- -o`ur` �J�v�uv at if you have any questions regarding these instructions. If you fully understand the sample collection procedure, sin it certification on of this form. PART II CERTIFICATION OF TRAINING AND SAMPLING (TO BE COMPLETED BY RESIDENT) Water was last used: 1 �. V 1!b"�r +.` N �n.we IrCNM� RZ M.VN, Sample Was collected: Time / ? O t l Date /2 (�du w y DEAL Certification of Training for Homeowners Collecting Tap Samples PWS NAME: \ (Zy_\r V� P �c�C f PWS -ID: - -_� ` PWS PHONE k: Li D`1 - 7 L-cl- �'4'8 y 9 PART 1 SAMPLING INSTRUCTIONS Samples are being collected to determine the contribution of faucet fixtures and household pipes and/or solder to the lead and copper levels in tap water. This sampling effort is required by the Florida Department of Environmental Regulations, and is being accomplished through the cooperation of homeowners and residents. A sample is to be collected after an extended period of stagnant water conditions (i.e., no water use during IN! period) within the interior piping. Due to this requirement, either early mornings or evenings upon returning from work are the best times for collecting samples. The collection procedure is described in more detail below. 1. Prior arrangements will be made with the customer to coordinate the sample collection event. Dates will be set for sample kit delivery and pick-up by water department staff. 2. A minimum of 6-8 hour period which there is no water use must be achieved prior to sampling. The water department recommends that either early mornings or evenings upon returning home are the best sampling times to ensure that the necessary stagnant water conditions exist. 3. A kitchen or bathroom cold -water faucet is to be used for sampling. Place the sample bottle lopen) below the faucet and gently open the cold water.tap. Fill the sample bottle to the line marked "_1000-m1" and turn off the water. 4. Tightly cap the sample bottle and place in the sample kit provided. Please review the sample kit label at this time to ensure that all information contained on the label is correct. 5. IF ANY PLUMBING REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT HAS BEEN DONE, IN THE HOME SINCE YOUR PREVIOUS SAMPLING EVENT, NOTE THIS INFORMATION ON THE LABEL AS PROVIDED. 6. Place the sample kit outside of the residence in the location of the kit's delivery in order that water syste staff may pick up the sample kit. 7. Results from this monitoring effort will be provided to participating customers when reports are generated for the State unless excessive lead and/or copper levels are found. In those cases, immediate notification will be provided (usually 10 working days from the time of sample collection). CALL: Qq_�Co -- -o`ur` �J�v�uv at if you have any questions regarding these instructions. If you fully understand the sample collection procedure, sin it certification on of this form. PART II CERTIFICATION OF TRAINING AND SAMPLING (TO BE COMPLETED BY RESIDENT) Water was last used: Time Date Sample Was collected: Time / ? O t l Date /2 / 2 3 Sample tap location: %": -tea - � � // 97 19A 4dr n N Florida G ,lartment of Environmental Regu' 'pn '[ v;. T►.. ort. %W,.:KV 14:, U. R -A T.1�. r . = -40 Valk r— / n• ALX'. Fv Thl. 5,..,Ir,,.;,.. 9...'.4 FJr..v.w D.Y IW DUX A"r Son X. 691.1 w Yr L Certification of Training for Homeowners Collecting Tap Samples \, r G't\y o. PWS NAME: 0.1 Q C- U� %a - • PWS -ID: 3 I — 4A I PWS PHONE b:, C I-- I Z (i Lf FART I SAMPLING INSTRUCTIONS Samples are being collected to determine the contribution of faucet fixtures and household pipes and/or to the lead and copper levels in tap water. This sampling effort is required by the Florida Department of Environr Regulations, and is being accomplished through the cooperation of homeowners and residents. A sample is to be collected after an extended period of stagnant water conditions (i.e.; no water use dur period) within the interior piping. Due to this requirement, either early mornings or evenings upon returning from are the best times for collecting samples. The collection procedure is described in more detail below. 1. Prior arrangements will be made with the customer to coordinate the sample collection event. Dates set for sample kit delivery and pick-up by water department staff. 2. A minimum of 6-8 hour -period which there is no water use must be achieved prior to sampling. Th department recommends that either early mornings or evenings upon returning home are the best san times to ensure that the necessary stagnant water conditions exist. 3. A kitchen or bathroom cold -water faucet is to be used for sampling. Place the sample bottle (open the faucet and gently open the cold water. tap. Fill the sample bottle to the line marked ".1 000 -ml' an off the water. 4. Tightly cap the sample bottle and place in the sample kit provided. Please review the sample kit I this time to ensure that all information contained on the label is correct. 5. IF ANY PLUMBING REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT HAS BEEN DONE IN THE HOME SINCE YOUR PRE1 SAMPLING EVENT, NOTE THIS INFORMATION ON THE LABEL AS PROVIDED. 6. Place the sample kit outside of the residence in the location of the kit's delivery in order that wau staff may pick up the sample kit. 7. Results from this monitoring effort will be provided to participating customers when reports are ge for the State unless excessive lead and/or copper levels are found. In those cases, immediate notifi will be provided (usually 10 working days f(om the time of sample collection). CALL 'U\o- c—N his¢ tr -- a1-4 1) 1-5 (04,' ei �4- if you have any questions regarding these instructions. If you fully understand the sample collection procedure certification on _ of this form. PART II CERTIFICATION OF TRAINING AND SAMPLING (TO BE COMPLETED BY RESIDENT) Water was last used: Time Date Sample Was collected: Time .� r !n �� (� Date Sample tap location: /( f -P r t f •r' - i LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLE RANKING REPORTING FORMAT System Name: Park Place PWS ID: 331-4181 Laboratory Name: Bio -Services of Vero. Inc Lab -ID: 8301.2 Contact Person: Jane Burton Phone: (407)569-2284 Date Submitted To Lab 06/28/94 Analysis Date: 07/09/94 Lab Analysis Method: EPA 239.2 & EPA 220.1 Method Detection Limit 1 lig/L & 5 ug/ 90 d, Percentile Figure = 0.0077 Page 1 of 1 A RANK (ascending) LOCATION NO CODE TIER LAB SAMPLE ID DATE SITE SAMPLED LEAD (mg/1) COPPER (mg/l) 2115 FLakcvicwDr 010 1 10827) 06/28/94 0.0048 1026 W Lakeview 007 1 10827G 06/28/94 0.0053 1016 WLakevicwDr 002 1 10827B 06/28/94 0.0068 2205 ELakeviewDr 009 1 10827I 06/28/94 0.0069 2204 ELakeviewDr 003 1 10827C 06/28/94 0.0070 2071 ELakeviewDr 008 1 10827H 06/28/94 0.0074 2110E Lakeview Dr 006 1 10827F 06/28/94 0.0076 2121 ELakeviewDr 004 1 10827D 06/28/94 0.0076 101.8WLakcview Dr 001 1 10827A 06/28/94 0.0077 3614 W Derry DR 005 1 10827E 06/28/94 0.0077 CERTIFICATION: The tap samples used for lead and copper analyses were submitted by the above PWS. Each sample container had one liter of solution (=100ml). All samples were taken properly by the above system and analyzed in accordance with the requirements in Chapter IOD -41, F.A.C. The sampling dates were reported for each sample received I hereby certify that all data submitted are correcL SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED LABORATORY REPRESENTATIVE NAME: (Please Print): ]ane Burton TITLE and DATE: Laboratory Director 07/14/94 LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLE RANKING REPORTING FORMAT System Name: Park Place PWS ID: 331-4181 Laboratory Name: Bio Services of Vero Inc Lab -ID: 83012 Contact Person: Jane Burton Phone:_ (407)569-2284 Date Submitted To Lab 06/28/94 Analysis Date: 07/12/94 Lab Analysis Method: EPA 239.2 & EPA 220.1 Method Detection Limit 1 uWL & 5 ug/ 90 tb Percentile Figure=_ 0.16 Page I of I LOCATION CODE A RANK (ascending) NO TIER LAB SAMPLE ID DATE SITE LEAD COPPER 2205 ELakcvicwDr 009 SAMPLED ] 2115 FLakevicwDr 010 ] 0827I 06/28/94 0.02 1 2204 ELakeviewDr 003 1 ] 0827J 10827C 06/28/94 0.03 1026 Lakeview Dr 007 1 10927G 06/28/94 06/28/94 0.04 1016' WLakeviewDr 002 1 1082713 06/28/94 0.04 2121 ELakcviewDr 004 1 10827D 06/28/94 0.07 3614 W Derry Ln 005 ] 10827E 06/28/94 0.07 101.8 WL tkcviewDr 001 ] ] 0827A 06/28/94 0.07 2071E Lakeview Dr 008 ] 10827H 06/28/94 0.08 2110 ELakcviewDr 006 1 ] 0827F 06/28/94 0.14 0.17 CERTIFICATION: The tap samples used for lead and copper analyses PWS. Each sample container had one liter of solution (--I00m1). were submitted by the above All samples were taken properly by the above system and analyzed in accordance with the requirements dates were reported for each sample received. I hereby in Chapter IOD -41, F.A.C. The sampling certify that all data submitted are correct. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED LABORATORY REPRESENTATIVE NAME: (Please Print): Jane Burton TITLE and DATE:_ Laboratory Director 07/14/94 LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLE RANKING REPORTING FORMAT System Name: Park Place PWS ID: 331-4181, Laboratory Name: Bio -Services of Vero_ Inc Lab -ID: 83012 Contact Person: Jane Burton Phone: (407)569-2284 Date Submitted To Lab 12/08/93 Analvsis Date: 12/11/93 Lab Analysis Method: EPA 239.2 & EPA 220.1 Method Detection Limit l ug/L & 5 u 90 m Percentile Figure = 0.12 Page 1 of 1 A RANK (ascending) LOCATION NO CODE TIER LAB SAMPLE ID DATE SITE LEAD SAMPLED (mg/1) COPPER (mg/1) 2204 ELakcviewDr 003 1 9702C 12/08/93 0.03 2071 ELakeviewDr 008 1 9702F 12/08/93 0.06 2121 ELakcviewDr 004 1 9702D 12/08/93 0.07 45 Treasure Circle 012 1 97021 12/08/93 0.08 2205 ELakevicwDr 009 1 9702G 12/08/93 0.08 2115 ELakeviewDr 010 1. 9702H 12/08/93 0.08 119; Brigadoon Dr 014 1 9702) 12/08/93 0.11 1018 WLakeviewDr 001 1 9702A 12/08/93 0.11 361.4 W. Dcrrt Dr. 005 1 9702E 12/08/93 0.12 1016 WLakevicwDr 002 1 9702B 12/08/93 0.14 b LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLE RANKING REPORTING FORMAT System Name: Park Place PWS ID: 331-4181 Laboratory Name: Bio -Services of Vero Inc Lab -ID: 83012 569-2284 Contact Person: Jane Burton Phone: (407)569-2284 Date Submitted To Lab 12/08/93 Analysis Date• 12/31/93 Lab Analysis Method: EPA 239.2 & EPA 220.1 Method Detection Limit 1 ug/L & 5 us/ 90 u, Percentile Figure = 0.0055 Page _Lof 1 A RANK (ascending) LOCATION CODE NO TIER LAB SAMPLE ID DATE SITE SAMPLED LEAD COPPER (M) 1) (rug/,) 2204 ELakcviewDr 003 1 9702C 12/08/93 6.9996 w 0 ool 45 Treasure Circle 012 ] 97021 12/08/93 0.0013 2071 ELakcvicwDr 008 1 9702F 12/08/93 0.0015 1016 WLnkcvicwDr 002 1 9702B 12/08/93 0.0017 2205 ELakcvicwDr 009 ] 9702G 12/08/93 0.0017 1018 WLakcvicwDr 001 1 9702A 12/08/93 0.0018 1193 Brigadoon Dr 014 1 9702) 12/08/93 0.0023 2115 ELakeviewDr 010 1 97021-1 ] 2/08/93 0.0041 3614 W. Derry Dr 005 1 9702E 12/08/43 O.U055 2121 E.LakeviewDr 004 ] 9702D 12/08/93 0.0070 e CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD `a BIO -SERVICES OF VERO, INC, PROJECT NAMIC (ptAAsi PRINT OMRMATIorr 250127TH AVENUE A-6 P VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 ) r\ (4VW9-2284 FAX (407)M2-1125 SAMPLER a E TMLOCATION NOM GLASS PLAS RIMAR1<S c SAMPLE SAMPLED cora TIC PACK W. ey eve 3 2 �12 \4 r VJ 2V •e J l RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE) RECEIVED BY: RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE) RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) j. 0$11 DATFJTIME PdE /cl�� DA DATE(TIME 41� mmml•TdIAM �Yd Ju� S SWM axon AODW R2LLrI Q�'Id1l'VS IdNYS Uva SZ[1-Z b XVg KZZ-6 096Z£ VGJHOjA `HOV3H OII3A 9-Y 3 NIAV HJ,LZ IOSZ 'OAiI `OZi3A AO MIAng-019 gg1�'�S NOLLV"ow wua ■ yna) y Rrotia (11():)U AQOJM AO WAD Lawton Chiles Governor Florida Department of 1 Environmental Protection Central District 3319 Maguire Boulevard, Suite 232 Orlando, Florida 32803-3767 March 1, 1994 CERTIFIED P 365 365 730(9) Bio -Services of Vero, Inc. 2501 27th Avenue A-6 Vero Beach, FL 32960 Attention: Ms. Jane Burton Indian River County - PW Park Place PWS ID No. 3314181 Dear Ms. Burton: F in"inia 13. Wolwrrll Srr rrlar)' OCD -PW -CE -94-0546 This letter will acknowledge receipt of the test results of the lead and copper monitoring period July - December 1993. The results indicate that the action level at the 90th percentile was not exceeded for lead or copper. The lead and copper Rule 17-551, Florida Administrative Code, states that small systems shall collect samples for two consecutive six-month monitoring periods. Your samples were collected in December 1993, therefore, they shall be collected again and tested during the months of January -June 1994. Samples should be collected from the same addresses as the first monitoring period. You may contact Mrs. Mary Pace at (407) 894-7555 if you have any questions. Your cooperation in the drinking water program is appreciated. Sincerely, i a�D Compliance/Enforcement WED:I,P/tw cc: HRS -Indian River County Public Health Unit Mary Pace, Drinking Water Compliance/Enforcement Primed.'. r','d d paper. 9A; o 7671 r of peace om iSAMPLING PLAN FOR LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLES a s.eFh l±.". w .m w.r .14AND WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS D. 149) hone usb �l' LLb' `� k+am f+o. IFY1dN N DFJtI PART lV LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLING PLAN °"" tj6 ( m n m m s - FIELD.. SfTE TRAINING Ll i {s ;' r�ty �lTACT PCR$ W LSL Ito;�fs vExlmeo srA'rus srnrus PLUMBING 'LOCATION t k `� t4 +gf� troet >1 {f e, :Sf ;Nro - MATP.RIAL .SIG YIN N TIER TYPE, s e r 10' a a{ aF P ONE- YIN ..:YIN u ..: .., a 9.e. .: :' .. .: ,,:i. r•. .£�. .. _< r m 0o I SPQ ,,��f�f t �. o� s -13r4 N 6F U. 1,4 e G 0v 'L 5 ,z�} r3 F S bl6 W. ;1�tL ems; e w F2" /q� p 1 5E& ;UO4 `E /i¢t.J Q1/ m ti 5�1 if{i !,r 0 S o O 5F(L a1�1 �, i�kev'eas W, rnr t S N F m 1)01 0 Do R LS y &l4 W f L.mo./v�s 55`1•vaYD 11 BF ooro 1 F 36.11 .{Deur Yet. S. S j SFQ f0,T6 41,1-akev efa Qa 1r 3 i 1 S (3F S 00� 5F12 (0 '5he u t 35K-1553 N � � �l- S6,9.X3110 OF Y s t ��. arts E. r.�ke�,a�• , .+f. Ta bS;Sre{ra1Kc� �or+0 CAllAl Total Solocted SampllnD Silos With Lend Service Linea Total Tier I Sites percentage of Sampling Silas With Lead Service Lines Total Tier 2 Sites Total Tier 3 Slles Total Tier 4Siles Iq of '7 DRAFT January 19, 1993 SAMPLING PLAN FOR LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLES AND WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS PART 1V LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLING PLAN naAr-T Annua(V 19, 199 W O V 0 N I1FA Pomn r IFs7I.Mtll Pa.m sNs.. s % f lud ud Ctaaw T ! rd W WN H'M�1 ptf'1� oElt nPW:�� Nu. iFllbd Y b/ O�Ji� o m naAr-T Annua(V 19, 199 W O V 0 N REVir:�V CHECKLIST LEAD an. 'COPPER RULE Form 17-551.950(1), Sampling Plan for Lead and Copper Tap Samples and Water Quality Parameters ` PWSID:n� Pop. Served (� ) ea Floe �G Sc PwS Type: ew or NTNC PWS Name: -rte eF pu3 /rim Consecutive Yes / No a Consolidated )'as / o Mailing Address: �ap1 Q7 Required q of Samples: ` City, State Zip: Ilse v a F D LC Tap Samples ( 1 6 ) I wQPs: ( ( ) REVIEW ITEM DATE Yes/No 1. The PWS submitted a Sampling Plan and supporting Materials Survey and Records Rev: -_%v. 2. The Plan was submitted using Form 17-551.950(1). Y 3. The Plan is consolidated with that of another system (if yes go to 28). Part Z CYfater Sy�fem <nformatt IM , r ." 4. All Part I information is complete. 1 5. The Population Served includes seasonal and other additional non -transient population such. as employment and school population. \; r 6. The population interval is correctly identified. 7. The optional review methods have been checked by the system. (b) The system's authorized representative certified on Page 7 that the \, Records Review was completed and used to identify sampling sites. r "A,.r �� .K. `J. `�'S`u 2,'ywW , •hfy�f . g, Un'h>'�'takY`�: gY `3 -- k' " p y` �G�mi Tl�l�l tertals surae r 3 Sf 4°.....�...k` ht )> < 8. The Type of Structure is shown for :he sites summarized in Part III. 9. The Plan identifies the total number of lead service lines (J—SL) in Part B. od> 10. Each site is assigned a three -digit ID number and a tier number. 11. The Plan identifies a sampling pool of sampling sites that exceed the required minimum number to allow for replacement contingencies. A 50 percent buffer is recommended. 12. The Plan shows the (s)elected and (o)ptional sampling sites. 13. The number of selected sites equals or exceeds the required minimum �J number. I Page 1 of 3 REVIEW ITEM Yes/No 14. A contact person, address and phone number has been listed for each selected site. 15. The site structure type, home plumbing material and whether the site is served by an LSL has been listed. 16. (a) All sampling sites are tier 1 sites, or (b) The system selected some tier 2 sites, and documented that it had reviewed all service connections to identify all tier 1 sites and contacted all tier 1 site owners or occupants and selected tier 2 sites because there are too few available tier 1 sites to select the required minimum number of sampling sites, or (c) :'he system selected some tier 3 cites, and documented that it had reviewed all service connections to identify all tier 1 and tier 2 sites and contacted the owners and occupants cf all tier 1 and tier 2 sites and selected tier 3 sites because there were too few available tier 1 and tier 2 sites to select the minimum number of available sampling sites, or (d) The system selected tier 4 sites, and documented that it had followed the protocol in (a) through (c) above and selected tier 4 sites only after reviewing.all service connections and finding that there are too few available tier 1, 2 or 3 sites to select the required minimum number of sampling sites. 17. If LSLs are piesent, the system has targeted all of these sites up to a maximum of 50 % of the minimum number of sampling sites. /V 18. The Plan identifies the number and percentage of selected sampling sites served by LSLs. �f R 19. (a) The percentage of selected LSL sampling sites does not exceed 50 percent, or /t % (b) Exceeds 50 % only if a sufficient number of tier 1 sites with lead pipe or lead solder in their home plumbing are not available. a '. 1 or inedttimsystei 1 mai delaycompletutgt3uS�part >. CL C 2 e2�tplln; pei10�S�lf3$ E7.{eeSl an 3CIIOr1 ieVB1� txi 20. The WQP Plan identifies the required minimum number of distribution system sampling sites based on the population interval. 21. The WQP Plan identifies a sampling site at each entry point. 22. The WQP Plan assigns each site an ID number. 23. The WQP Plan provides a location description or street address for each sampling site. 24. The WQP Plan's target sampling dates show a seasonal distribution of sampling of the two samples taken at each site. Page 2 of 3 REVIEW ITEM Yes/No 25. The WQP Plan identifies which approved analytical methods will be used. 26. The system's authorized representativ„ stated (see form, page 7) that the WQP Plan represents the entire distribution system, reflects all treatment types, all sources of water, and the distribution of the population served.. 27. For consecutive systems, all WQP entry point samples are at the interconnection points with the supplying system. �/ 1 CttnsolrtatedMP ohsete�,ystems fmayrnsohdate, samplg plans ,th s�a supplytng systems M ��Ra'i`My� � 28. An agreement among the consolidated systems was submitted. 29. Initial monitoring is complete for all systems. 30. None of the systems exceed an action level. 31. There are at least five samples per system in the proposed Plan. 001 gvrsed SampLng Puns All systems mustsubmt# a ze�lsed sampling pl<r prior to zeduced ��mQn�#�oring plan! ar ea sampi� tg 3 be changed, yon,oOiatmg ymust 32. Replacement sites are as close as possible to dropped sites. 33. (a) Replaced sites have become unavailable, or (b) Tier change due to LSL, plumbing modifications, or (c) Prior measurements are under the lead action level. 34. All sites are the highest tier level. 35. For reduced monitoring, all LC tap sampling sites have been field verified. 36. Reduced monitoring, LC Samples are scheduled in June - September. CERICATION OF REVIEW i have reviewed the Sampling Plan for Lead and Copper Tap Samples and Water Quality Parameters, and I find the Plan described therein is sufficient to meet the requirements of Rule 17-551.400(2), F.A.C. and 40 CFR 141.86. The system listed above is advised to commence the monitoring described herein. O The Plan is not satisfactory. The following review items are insuffreient and need,to be corrected: Please revise and resubmit for additional review by the Department before the beginning of any monitoring. Reviewer Reviewer Page 3 of 3 rogram Office: &-4) /171 Date: 1 the Water Quality Parameter Plan was not included in this submittal. If your tap samples exceed the action, level for lead or copper, you will then need to test the water quality parameters. Please submit the plans for hater Qualitv Parameters to DER for approval before proceeding with that portion of the testing. DER F. I17 -551.9W] I Y Form Mdc Su lw PW ro, L.7Z W C Florida T.y Sum &M W." 0.1j" Arvrcrn ERcnDcic 1005 ' S Department of Environmental Regulation DER AR,r�,;n, No. ! Trip Tmn ORio AWL. X Bla' Ao c Rod T,11- a. Flw:d. 3nvFZa00 (Fllbd .n by DERI fvf Qf RWM Sampling Plan for Lead and Copper Tap Samples and Water Quality Parameters GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS: Complete all parts of this form, attach any maps and written narrative describing the sampling plan and submit to the Department 30 days prior to the beginning of a six-month monitoring period for lead and copper in drinking water. The Department will notify a system of approval of a Sampling Plan in writing which will provide the system notice to proceed. Submit a revised Sampling Plan using this form if any changes in the selection of sampling sites must be made. When no changes have been made, no resubmission is necessary prior to sampling during the next six-month sampling period. The last part of this form includes a certification within which a system's authorized representative attests to the accuracy of the information used in preparing these plans and its conformance with the requirements of Chapter 17-551, Florida Administrative Code, to identify sampling sites for lead and copper that are at the highest risk level for exposure to lead and copper in drinking water. Submission of any false statement of representation in this form is a violation of the law. Attach additional sheets as necessary. PART I WATER SYSTEM INFORMATION J� Water System Name: em k PL4,e/c,4-y Of St6rs�F;� Contact person: SaW C (0 do - rzprJ System type (circle one): CWS or NTNC Contact phone number: Identification Number (PWS -ID): 33 , %4 (8'1 Mailing address: 61'bspvatcq ✓W o� r Population served: 3'�Q-35`0 .20 ( z � �A,,t A -,L Population Interval (circle one): A 6 C D E© G ✓tv'o Qe" f�L?_d" p Estimating Population Served, Population Interval and the Number of Sampling Sites. The minimum number of tap sample sites for lead and copper (LC) and water quality parameter (WQP) distribution system sample sites is based on a system's population served interval which is selected from the table below. For the purposes of Chapter 17-551, F.A.C., the population served is the sum of the number of permanent residents and the number of additional non -transient persons to whom the system is available, such as school children, office and commercial employees and seasonal residents. POPULATION SERVED POPULATION INTERVAL LC SITES WQP SITES A greater than 100,000 100 25 6 50,001 to 100,000 60 10 C 10,001 to 50,000 60 10 D 3,301 to 10,000 40 3 E 501 to 3,300 20 2 101 to 500 10 1 G less than 101 5 1 Page 1 of 7 DRAFT January 19, 1993 ,LING PLAN FOR LEAD A'COPPER TAP SAMPLES .J WATER QUALITY PARANic ERS DEN Fw I11.551.951MI1 Fw Tirk S. lir P1 rw lc.d W C�, T.P • Sumk. W W.icr Ou.lin P.rurcrn Eff.i a Dt. 1995 DER Appliulkn Nw PART II RECORDS REVIEW (Fi1Wi b, DEX, Locate and review existing plans, drawings and reports of the water system and also those kept -by county or municipal building departments or code enforcement offices to Identify the required number of sampling sites and the total number of lead service lines in the distribution system. Identification of Intericr Plumbing Material Types. Identify single family and multiple family residences and buildings that have interior plumbing containing lead pipe, solder containing lead and built before Ja6uary 1, 1983 and after December 31, 1982; and structures with brass faucets and those with point -of -entry or point -of -use devices. Required sources of review to determine the composition of interior plumbing materials 1. Plumbing or building codes. 2. Plumbing or building permits. 3. Contacts within the building department, municipal clerk's office, or state regulatory agencies for historical documentation of the service area Optional sources to determine the composition of interior plumbing materials. Check the ones that have been utilized. Interviews with building inspectors. Survey of service area plumbers about when and where lead solder was used from 1983 to present. development. Survey of residents in the sections of the service area where lead pipe and/or copper pipe with 4. Review of drinking water sampling results,such as lead solder is suspected to exist. those from lead testing in schools. ^'14Nv'Ca C -f u rtV" Interview of local contractors and developers �_. B)%-.5 ¢e- ltvvec4j oe�) Identification of Lead Service Lines and Components with Lead Content. Review available records and conduct interviews to determine the number and location of lead service lines and water distribution system components that contain lead. Required sources of review. 1. Distribution system maps and record drawings 2. Information collected on the presence of lead and copper required under 40 CFR 141 .42 (special monitoring for corrosivity). 3. Capital improvement plans and/or master plans for the distribution system development. 4. Current and historical standard operating procedures or operation and maintenance (O&M) manuals for the type of materials used to install service connections. 5. Utility records including meter installation records, customer complaint investigations and all historical documentation which indicate and/or confirm the location of lead service connections. 6. Drinking water sampling results that indicate that a structure is susceptible to lead in drinking water. Optional sources of review. Indicate by a check mark which of the sources listed below were used. Interviews with utility employees familiar with past construction practices. Service line sampling where lead service lines are suspected to exist but their presence was not otherwise confirmed. Review of permit files. A community survey was performed. Interviews of pipe suppliers, contractors, and/or developers were conducted. Interview of local contractors and developers Other, please attach written narrative. Page 2 of 7 DRAFT January 19, 1993 aD WATER QUALITY PAR. ETERS DER Fmn n1C,, Ir11 F. Tisk Suml'w P1.fm Isd W Cwosr TR Su k. W W.., Q.Hry lh..r ERmiw N. 1993 PART III MATERIALS SURVEY DEN AWIi lion No. (Filkd N by DEN) Fill out the following Materials Survey table to summarize the results of the records review performed under Part II of this Form to identify a sampling pool of lead and copper tap sampling sites. Enter the number of single family residences (SFR), multiple family residences (MFR) and other buildings (BLDG) by site type that have been identified in the system's sampling pool. In A show the interior plumbing characteristics by structure type. Show in B, the number of known lead service lines in the entire distribution system. Show in C, the number of connections that are affected by lead components.' The total number of sites in the sampling pool is listed in D by type of structure. The total number of connections in the distribution system is listed by type of structure in E. Page 3 of 7 DRAFT January 19, 1993 TYPE OF STRUCTURE MATERIALS SURVEY SUMMARY SFR MFR BLDG NUMBER OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS A. INTERIOR PLUMBING MATERIAL SITE TYPES Lead Pipe 19- 9 Copper Pipe With Lead Solder Installed After 1982 Copper $- 4 Copper Pipe With Lead Solder Installed Before 1983 -0- 0 Brass Faucets Brass $ Point -of -Use or Point -of -Entry Treatment Devices 4t; 8 Lead -Lined Water Coolers 6 Other Lead Plumbing Components...... �,F ... 3 a .... B. SERVICE LINE SITE TYPES n s Lead Service Lines Total Initial Number of Lines That Are Entirely Lead and Subject to Replacement Partial Lead Lines Goosenecks 8 Pigtails B C. DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SITE TYPES �j $ Connections Within 100 ft. of Lead Components D. TOTAL NUMBER OF SITES 11 WN E. TOTAL NUMBER OF CONNECTIONS�— Page 3 of 7 DRAFT January 19, 1993 Florida. Department of EnViron.nzenta.l Reptlation 'Irvin Towers Office Bldg. 0 3600 131a6r Sone lk)ac1 0 T lahassce. Fh ida 42390 -2 -it)() Public Drinking Water System Laboratory Analysis Reporting Format for Lead and Copper Tap Samples CERTIFIED LABORATORY NAME: HRS CERTIFICATION NUMBER: Bio -Services of Vero Inc. LABORATORY CONTACT Jane P. Burtcn AND PHONE NUMBER: SUBCONTRACTORS NAME, CERTIFICATION NUMBER, AND PHONE NUMBER The attached sampling analytical results were submitted by the following public water system. Each sample container contained one liter of solution (±10oml). All samples were to the best of our knowledge taken properly by the following system and analyzed in accordance with the requirements listed on page 26560 of the June 7, 1991 Federal Register. Tap sampling dates were reported for each sample received. PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM'S DER I.D. NUMBER: .331- lIOI PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM'S NAME: 10" JOALci- (MUST BE INCLUDED WITH SAMPLE SUBMITTAL) I do HEREBY CERTIFY that aa�l�l data submitted are correct. SIGNATURE ` NAME(PRINT) jane F. LABORATORY3316- ces -5T Vero, Inc. DATE DER/ACPHU REVIEWING OFFICIAL: DATA SUBMITTAL (CHECK ONE) SATISFACTORY ( ) UNSATISFACTORY ( ) NOT PROPERLY IDENTIFIED( ) Format. 17-551.950(10) June 1992 LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLE RANKING REPORTING FORMAT System Name: Park Place PWS ID: 331 -4181 - Laboratory Name: Bio -Services of Vero. Inc Lab -ID: 8301.2 Contact Person: Jane Burton Phone: (407)569-2294 Date Submitted To Lab 12/08/93 Analysis Date: 12/31/93 Lab Analysis Method: EPA 239.2 & EPA 220.1 Method Detection Limit I uPJL & 5 up-/ 90 th Percentile Figure = 0.0055 Page _Lof 1 A RANK (ascending) LOCATION NO CODE TIER LAB SAMPLE ID DATE SITE SAMPLED LEAD COPPER (mg/1) (Mg/1) 2204 ELakcvicwDr 003 1 9702C 12/08/93 u0.001 45 Treasure Circle 012 1 9702I 12/08/93 0.0013 2071 ELakcvicwDr 008 1 9702F 12/08/93 0.0015 1016 WLakevicwDr 002 1 9702B 12/08/93 0.0017 2205 ELakevicwDr 009 1 9702G 12/08/93 0.0017 1018 WLakeviewDr 001 1 9702A 12/08/93 0.0018 1193 Brigadoon Dr 014 1 9702J 12/08/93 0.0023 2115 ELakeviewDr 010 1 97021- 12/08/93 0.0041 3614 W. Derry Dr 005 1 9702E 12/08/93 0.0055 2121 E.LakeviewDr 004 1 9702D 12/08/93 0.0070 1 LEAD AND COPPER TAP SAMPLE RANKING REPORTING FORMAT System Name: Park Place PWS 1D: 331-4181 Laboratory Name: Bio -Services of Vero Inc Lab -ID: 83012 Contact Person: Jane Burton Phone:— (407)569-2284 Date Submitted To Lab 12/08/93 Analysis Date: 12/11/93 Lab Analysis Method: EPA 239.2 & EPA 220.1 Method Detection Limit 1 u & 5 ugh 90 m Percentile Figure = 0.12 Page 1 of I A RANK (ascending) 2204 ELakeviewDr 2071 ELakevicwDr 2121 ELakevicwDr 45 Treasure Circle 2205 ELakevicwDr 2115 ELakeviewDr0.08 1193 Brigadoon Dr 1018 WLakevicwDr 3614 W. Derrt Dr. 1016 WLakeviewDr LOCATION NO 003 008 004 012 009 0I0 014 001 005 002 CODE TIER 1 l l 1 ] 1 l l ] I LAB SAMPLE ID 97020 9702F 9702D 9702I 9702G 9702H 9702) 9702A 9702E 970213 DATE SITE SAMPLED 12/08/93 12/08/93 12/08/93 12/08/93 12/08/93 12/08/93 12/08/93 12/08/93 12/08/93 12/08/93 LEAD (mg/1) COPPER (mg/l) 0.03 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.11 0.12 0.14 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD Project Name 7 y/fsi QcAv Sampler (Signature) •of Date Sam Time Sam Location' No. of Cont. Type Container lass Plastic/ hirl ack Remark W. 1'aLV,*\J1rw Dr. � /L ? J A W , l «v„� ;� L o�. 1.2 bo -1- 'y Y C 3u1 OQvr V) y, 5 idle &05 Elbe (B 75 rre.�lre�i.r.��e. 7 /-?g/ IIS L.Lrkkpv;�e,v Or. r2/ GID Relinquished By:(signature) Date/Time BIO -SERVICES OF VERO, INC., 2501 27th Avenue A-6 Vero Beach,Fla. 32960 Phone: (407)569-2264 Received By:(signature) Date/Time Relinquished By:(signature) Date/Time By:(signature Received Date/Time 9 ) City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET 11 SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 a FAX (407) 589-5570 November 9, 1994 Mr. Harry E. Asher Assistant Director Indian River County Utilities Department 1840 25th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Dear Mr. Asher: In response to your letter of November 2, 1994, the following information is provided to you. Please note that the City does not bill its water and sewer customers based on ERU's. The City bills customers based upon the meter size, as did General Development Utilities (GDU). Since Indian River County transferred the Park Place/Palm Lake Club system to the City, we have full accounting of the ERU's in the system and are therefore listed below. WATER - GDU SYSTEM Number of bills per month (most recent billing period) 1313 Number of ERU's per month (most recent billing period) Volume - Total volume billed for previous 12 months 70,718,000 (Actual - previous 10 months) WATER - PARK PLACE/PALM LAKE CLUB Number of bills per month (most recent billing period) 248 Number of ERU's per month (most recent billing period) 248 Volume - Total volume billed for previous 12 months 7,713,000 WASTEWATER - GDU SYSTEM Number of bills per month (most recent billing period) 587 Number of ERU's per month (most recent billing period) Volume - Total volume billed for previous 12 months 29,264,000 (Actual - previous 10 months) Letter to Mr. Harry E. Asher November 9, 1994 Page 2 of 2 WASTEWATER - COUNTY TREATMENT Number of bills per month (most recent billing period) 26 Number of ERU's per month (most recent billing period) 188 Volume - Total volume billed for previous 12 months 11,691,000 Should you need additional information, please contact me at 388-5536. Sincerely, Richard B. Votapka, P.E. Utilities Director CC: Joel Koford, City Manager RBV/jw/countyl IiVV I-1,: :i.:I b !: ,_btl iI 1 I �_u 1.1111-1. 11L_i BOARD OF CO UNTY COMMISSIONERS DEPARTMEN'T' OF UTILITYSER VICES 1840 25th Sim t, Vero Baach, Florida 32966 FAX:(407) 770.5143 c o k�j d K November 2, 5994 Mr. Joel Roford, City Manag 0jjj04' Ci Sebastian Post office Box780127 uoi 5 ^+ Lh<N�, d,> z.; r1�,,, M, . Se an, orida 32958 RE: WATER AND SEWER - SALES Dear Joel: As you are aware, the Board Department's review of the utilities. To proceed with the fina_n_cia following information WATER - aD-U SYSTEM Number of bills per mon Number of ERUs per mont Volume - Total volume b WATER - PARK PLACE. P Number of bills per m Number of ERUs per mo volume - Total volume County Commissioners approved the hase of the City of Sebastian the County will need the /�1Jt.<1 ,R��,- nv.-. �2�r' ev 4.^.oi -4-t.3 I✓tf( (most recent billing period) (most recent billing period) led for previous 12 months 0.1.1 k,_<. {:,,...., V'-' 1113 (most recent billing period) (most recent billing period) led for previous 12 months u4 WASTEWATER - GDU SYSTEM Number of bills per mont (most recent billing period) Number of ERUs per month (most recent billing period) volume - Total volume bi led for previous 12 months WAST_ MATER - T . .. Number of bill s per mont (most recent billing period) Number of ERUs per month (most recent billing period) volume - Total volume bi led for previous 12 months Sincerely,. Harry E. Asher Assi tant Director of Utility HEA/aa cc: Terrance G. Pinto, File Services of Utility Services Nov 02 '94 04:201-11 I R Co uI1L111LS BOARD OF CONTY COMMISSIONERS DEPARTMENT OF UTILITYSER VICES 1840 25th S1 t, Vem Beach, Flurida 32960 FAX; (407) 770-5143 November 2, 1994 Mr. Joel Koford, city Manag lQjtW City of Sebastian Post Office Box 780127 Sebastian, Florida 32958 RE: WATER AND SEWER - SALES Dear Joel: As you are aware, the Board Departments review of the utilities. To proceed with the financia_ following information WATER - DU SYSTEM Number of bills per mon Number of ERUs per mont. Volume - Total volume b IJ f� �� i. 14 County Commissioners approved the base of the City of Sebastian the County will need the /-Afttil �,t l v o.- Ci+n ,-4 (most recent billing period) nost recent billing period) 3d for previous 12 months o..t.1 k...<. O,.- . I '19 3 WATER - PARK PLA= PALM LAKE CLUB Number of bills per mont (most recent billing period) Number of ERUs per month (most recent billing period) volume - Total volume bi Ied for previous 12 months u,... WASTEWATER - GDU SYSTEM Number of bills per Mont (most recent billing period) Number of ERUs per month (most recent billing period) Volume - Total volume bi led for previous 12 months WASTEWATER - COUNTY TRE Number of bills per moat. Number of ERUs per month Volume - Total volume bi Sincerely, Harry Asher Assi tant Director of Utility NEA/aa cc: Terrance G. Pinto, File (most recent billing period) most recent billing period) ed for previous 12 months Services of Utility Services November 8, 1994 In response to the request from the County: WATER - GDU SYSTEM Number of bills per month (most recent billing period) 1313 Number of ERU's per month (most recent billing period) Volume - Total volume billed for previous 12 months 70,718,000 (Actual - previous 10 months) WATER - PARK PLACE/PALM LAKE CLUB Number of bills per month (most recent billing period) 248 Number of ERU's per month (most recent billing period) 248 Volume - Total volume billed for previous 12 months 7,713,000 WASTEWATER - GDU SYSTEM Number of bills per month (most recent billing period) 587 Number of ERU's per month (most recent billing period) Volume - Total volume billed for previous 12 months 29,264,000 (Actual - previous 10 months) WASTEWATER - COUNTY TREATMENT Number of bills per month (most recent billing period) 26 Number of ERU's per month (most recent billing period) 188 Volume - Total volume billed for previous 12 months 11,691,000 RBV/jw/countyl ivi, i_h: JAI tIIs,J-d I 1 I•: UJ 11111_L1A—, BOARD OF COIVNTY COMMISSIONERS DEPARTMENT- OF UTILITY SERVICES 1840 25th Silt, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 FAX- (407) 770-5143 CO ,�fMd November 2, 1994 Mr. Joel Koford, City Manag pglpA Ci r S astian I Post Office Box 780127 - lloi Seb�s�3an— ,, Z'lorida 32958 RE: WATER AND SEWER - SALES Dear Joel: As you are aware, the Board Department's review of the pi utilities. To proceed with the finan_cia. following information ION County Commissioners approved the base of the City of Sebastian the County will need the W. A ER - -DU SYSTEM "V1111 j"1- i. 'A Number of bills per mont (most recent billing period) ✓ Number of ERUs per month (most recent billing period) volume - Total volume billed for previous 12 months o..ty n«.1�n3 \ WATER —PARK PLACE. LAR UUB /7nC0J Number of bills per mont (most recent billing period) Number of ERUs per month (most recent billing period) volume - Total volume bi led for previous 12 months u. WASTEWATER - GDU SYSTEM Number of bills per mont ✓ Number of ERUs per month Volume - Total volume bi WASTEWATER - COUNTY TRE Number of bills per mont Number of ERUs per month Volume - Total volume bi (most recent billing period) (most recent billing period) led for previous 12 months TMENT - k.p %%- (most recent billing period) (most recent billing period) Zed for previous 12 months Sinc rely, Harry E. Asher Ass, tant DiXector of Utility Services HEA/aa cc: Terrance G. Pinto, File of Utility Services NOV 02 '94 04:20PM I R CO UTILITIES BOARD OF l DEPARTM 1840 25th FAX: (407) 770-5143 November 2, 1994 NTY COMMISSIONERS OF UTILITYSERYICES Vero Beath, Flarida 92960 P.1 Mr. Joel Roford, City Manag (QRIV City of Sebastian Post Office Box 780127 Kai, sq -- Sebastian, Florida 32958 RE: WATER AND SEWER - SALES Dear Joel: As you are aware, the Board Departmentfs review of the, utilities. To proceed with the following informati County Commissioners approved the hase of the City of Sebastian the County will need the WATER - GDU SYSTEM �r�.d 3+� � "�6. . - �4 Number of bills per mont (most recent billing period) Number of ERUs per month (most recent billing period) Volume - Total volume bi led for previous 12 months 0»I.3ti 0...... I '19 3 WATER - PARK PLAC M LAR Number of bills per mont (most recent billing period) Number of ERUs per month (most recent billing period) Volume - Total volume billed for previous 12 months W WASTEWATER - GDU SYSTEM Number of bills per month (most recent billing period) Number of ERUs per month (most recent billing period) Volume - Total volume billed for previous 12 months WASTEWATER - Q0UNTY TRE Number of bills per moat. Number of ERUs per month Volume - Total volume bi Sinc rely,/ Harry As5�L— Assij0ant Director of Utility HEA/aa cc: Terrance G. Pinto, File (most recent billing period) host recent billing period) ed for previous 12 months services of Utility Services 13i3 10/27/94 1356 BILLS SENT # ERU'S 1301 5/8 X 3/4 METER 5 1" METER 1 1 1/2" METER 3 3" METER 3 COMPOUND METERS 10/27/94 587 SEWER ACCOUNTS # ERU'S 586 5/8 X 3/4 METER 1 3" METER VOLUME GDU SYSTEM WATER SEWER READ DATES 10/27/94 6698 2871 10/20/94 09/28/94 7167 2912 09/21/94 08/30/94 6551 3000 08/23/94 07/29/94 7068 2603 07/25/94 07/08/94 7633 3319 06/27/94 05/31/94 4531 1619 05/23/94 05/13/94 9007 3569 05/06/94 04/12/94 6829 3183 03/30/94 03/10/94 5751 2461 03/04/94 02/14/94 9483 3727 02/05/94 12/23/94 WATER • ; WASTEWATER October, 1994 645 248 248 848 26 188 September, 1994 477 246 246 1002 26 188 August, 1994 617 243 243 1089 26 188 July, 1994 431 240 240 942 22 183 June,1994 665 240 240 1205 22 183 May, 1994 336 237 237 565 22 183 April, 1994 953 234 234 1393 22 183 March, 1994 751 225 225 908 22 183 February, 1994 596 219 219 837 21 183 January, 1994 750 219 219 1127 21 183 December, 1993 804 217 217 964 22 183 November, 1993 688 214 214 811 22 183 October, 1993 652 209 209 1056 22 183 WATER WASTEWATER • October, 1994 645 248 248 848 26 188 September, 1994 477 246 246 1002 26 188 August, 1994 617 243 243 1089 26 188 July, 1994 431 240 240 942 22 183 June,1994 665 240 240 1205 22 183 May, 1994 336 237 237 565 22 183 April, 1994 953 234 234 1393 22 183 March, 1994 751 225 225 908 22 183 February, 1994 i 219 219 F37 21 183 January, 1994 750 219 219 1127 21 183 December, 1993 804 217 217 964 22 183 November, 1993 688 214 214 811 22 183 October, 1993 652 209 209 1056 22 183 OCTOBER 28, 1994 BILLING DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC USAGE BILLING TOTAL LF01 12 12 156.00 $44.66 $45.00 $245.66 LF02 4 8 104.00 312.00 $133.98 0 $15.00 $252.98 LF03 4 12 156.00 468.00 $210.54 0 $15.00 $381.54 LF06 1 6 78.00 208.00 $114.84 0 $3.75 $196.59 LF11 1 11 143.00 195.00 $188.21 0 $3.75 $334.96 LF14 1 14 182.00 156.00 $628.43 0 $3.75 $814.18 LF18 2 36 468.00 117.00 $344.52 0 $7.50 $820.02 LF89 1 89 1157.00 130.00 $1,039.94 0 $3.75 $2,200.69 TOTALS 26 188 $2,444.00 312.00 $2,705.12 0 $97.50 $5,246.62 SR14 1 14 182.00 0 $3.75 $185.75 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC 416.00 0 BILLING TOTAL SR01 35 35 455.00 0 $131.25 $586.25 SR02 12 24 312.00 0 $45.00 $357.00 SR03 12 36 468.00 0 $45.00 $513.00 SR04 4 16 208.00 0 $15.00 $223.00 SR05 3 15 195.00 0 $11.25 $206.25 SR06 2 12 156.00 0 $7.50 $163.50 SR09 1 9 117.00 0 $3.75 $120.75 SR10 1 10 130.00 0 $3.75 $133.75 SR12 2 24 312.00 0 $7.50 $319.50 SR14 1 14 182.00 0 $3.75 $185.75 SR16 2 32 416.00 0 $7.50 $423.50 SR18 2 36 468.00 0 $7.50 $475.50 SR20 3 60 780.00 0 $11.25 $791.25 SR21 1 21 273.00 0 $3.75 $276.75 SR22 1 22 286.00 0 $3.75 $289.75 SR26 1 26 338.00 0 $3.75 $341.75 SR42 1 42 546.00 0 $3.75 $549.75 TOTALS 84 434 $5,642.00 $0.00 $315.00 $5,957.00 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC USAGE BILLING TOTAL SW01 248 248 $3,224.00 $1,942.39 $930.00 $6,096.39 TOTAL ERU'S 870 $10,413.90 COUNTY 870 $11,310.00 CITY $896.10 ;ONSUMPTION GALLONS -EXCESS= GALLONS AMT IRC WATER SEWER SEWER BILLED ESTIMATE SW01 (SEWER) 645 645 $1,942.39 $2,057.55 (over 10,000 - not billed) 32 613 $1,955.47 LIFT STATION 848 848 $2,705.12 $2,705.12 TOTAL 1493 1493 $6,602.98 $4,762.67 SEPTEMBER 28, 1994 BILLING DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC USAGE BILLING TOTAL LF01 12 12 156.00 $3,196.38 $44.00 1479 $45.00 $245.00 DESCRIPTION LF02 4 8 104.00 $88.00 TOTAL $15.00 $207.00 LF03 4 12 156.00 SR01 $173.25 35 $15.00 $344.25 $131.25 LF06 1 6 78.00 24 $90.75 $3.75 $45.00 $172.50 $357.00 LFI 1 1 11 143.00 $176.00 $45.00 $3.75 $513.00 $322.75 4 LF14 1 14 182.00 $15.00 $530.75 $223.00 $3.75 3 $716.50 195.00 LF18 2 36 468.00 $206.25 $368.50 2 $7.50 156.00 $844.00 0 LF89 1 89 1157.00 1 $1,284.25 117.00 $3.75 0 $2,445.00 TOTALS 26 188 $2,444.00 $2,755.50 $1,521.63 $97.50 1002 $5,297.00 $2,755.50 $2,755.50 $3,196.38 TOTAL 1479 1479 $4,032.30 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC BILLING TOTAL SR01 35 35 455.00 0 $131.25 $586.25 SR02 12 24 312.00 0 $45.00 $357.00 SR03 12 36 468.00 0 $45.00 $513.00 SR04 4 16 208.00 0 $15.00 $223.00 SR05 3 15 195.00 0 $11.25 $206.25 SR06 2 12 156.00 0 $7.50 $163.50 SR09 1 9 117.00 0 $3.75 $120.75 SR10 1 10 130.00 0 $3.75 $133.75 SR12 2 24 312.00 0 $7.50 $319.50 SR14 1 14 182.00 0 $3.75 $185.75 SR16 2 32 416.00 0 $7.50 $423.50 SR18 2 36 468.00 0 $7.50 $475.50 SR20 3 60 780.00 0 $11.25 $791.25 SR21 1 21 273.00 0 $3.75 $276.75 SR22 1 22 286.00 0 $3.75 $289.75 SR26 1 26 338.00 0 $3.75 $341.75 SR42 1 42 546.00 0 $3.75 $549.75 TOTALS 84 434 $5,642.00 $0.00 $315.00 $5,957.00 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC USAGE BILLING TOTAL SW01 246 246 $3,198.00 $1,276.80 $922.50 $5,397.30 TOTAL ERU'S 868 $10,389.96 COUNTY 868 $11,284.00 CITY $894.04 :ONSUMPTION GALLONS -EXCESS= GALLONS AMT IRC WATER SEWER SEWER BILLED ESTIMATE SW01 (SEWER) 477 477 $1,311.75 $1,276.80 $1,521.63 LIFT STATION 1002 1002 $2,755.50 $2,755.50 $3,196.38 TOTAL 1479 1479 $4,032.30 $4,718.01 13 556 AUGUST 31. 1994 BILLING DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC USAGE BILLING TOTAL LF01 12 12 156.00 $33.00 $45.00 $4,614.03 $234.00 LF02 4 8 104.00 $151.25 $15.00 $270.25 LF03 4 12 156.00 $156.75 $15.00 $327.75 LF06 1 6 78.00 $71.50 $3.75 0 $153.25 LF11 1 11 143.00 $167.75 $3.75 0 $314.50 LF14 1 14 182.00 $528.00 $3.75 0 $713.75 LF18 2 36 468.00 $76.50 $7.50 0 $552.00 LF89 1 89 1157.00 $1,804.00 $3.75 0 $2,964.75 TOTALS 26 188 $2,444.00 $2,988.75 LIFT STATION $97.50 $5,530.25 $2,994.75 $2,988.75 $3,473.91 TOTAL 1706 1706 $4,614.03 $5,442.14 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC BILLING TOTAL SR01 34 34 442.00 0 $127.50 $569.50 SR02 12 24 312.00 0 $45.00 $357.00 SR03 12 36 468.00 0 $45.00 $513.00 SR04 4 16 208.00 0 $15.00 $223.00 SR05 3 15 195.00 0 $11.25 $206.25 SR06 2 12 156.00 0 $7.50 $163.50 SR09 1 9 117.00 0 $3.75 $120.75 SR10 1 10 130.00 0 $3.75 $133.75 SR12 2 24 312.00 0 $7.50 $319.50 SR14 1 14 182.00 0 $3.75 $185.75 SR16 2 32 416.00 0 $7.50 $423.50 SR18 2 36 468.00 0 $7.50 $475.50 SR20 3 60 780.00 0 $11.25 $791.25 SR21 1 21 273.00 0 $3.75 $276.75 SR22 1 22 286.00 0 $3.75 $289.75 SR26 1 26 338.00 0 $3.75 $341.75 SR35 1 35 455.00 0 $3.75 $458.75 SR42 1 42 546.00 0 $3.75 $549.75 TOTALS 84 468 $6,084.00 $0.00 $315.00 $6,399.00 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC USAGE BILLING TOTAL SW01 243 243 $3,159.00 $1,625.28 $911.25 $5,695.53 TOTAL ERU'S 899 $10,761.03 COUNTY 899 $11,687.00 CITY $925.97 GONSUMPHUN UALLUNS-tAGtbZ"= UALL.UNA /troll IM, WATER SEWER SEWER BILLED SW01 (SEWER) 617 617 $1,696.75 $1,625.28 $1,968.23 LIFT STATION 1089 1089 $2,994.75 $2,988.75 $3,473.91 TOTAL 1706 1706 $4,614.03 $5,442.14 19L ;m JULY 29, 1994 BILLING 6e DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC USAGE BILLING TOTAL LF01 9 9 117.00 $19.25 $33.75 $170.00 LF02 3 6 78.00 $41.25 $11.25 $130.50 LF03 4 12 156.00 $140.25 $15.00 $311.25 LF06 1 6 78.00 $68.75 $3.75 $150.50 LF11 1 11 143.00 $154.00 $3.75 $300.75 LFI 4 1 14 182.00 $536.25 $3.75 $722.00 LF18 2 36 468.00 $145.75 $7.50 $621.25 LF89 1 89 1157.00 $1,485.00 ' $3.75 $2,645.75 TOTALS 22 183 $2,379.00 $2,590.50 $82.50 $5,052.00 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC BILLING TOTAL SR01 34 34 442.00 0 $127.50 $569.50 SR02 12 24 312.00 ' 0 $45.00 $357.00 SR03 12 36 468.00 0 $45.00 $513.00 SR04 4 16 208.00 0 $15.00 $223.00 SR05 4 20 260.00 0 $15.00 $275.00 SR06 2 12 156.00 0 $7.50 $163.50 SR09 1 9 117.00 0 $3.75 $120.75 SR10 1 10 130.00 0 $3.75 $133.75 SR12 2 24 312.00 0 $7.50 $319.50 SR14 1 14 182.00 0 $3.75 $185.75 SR16 2 32 416.00 0 $7.50 $423.50 SR18 2 36 468.00 0 $7.50 $475.50 SR20 3 60 780.00 0 $11.25 $791.25 SR21 1 21 273.00 0 $3.75 $276.75 SR22 1 22 286.00 0 $3.75 $289.75 SR26 1 26 338.00 0 $3.75 $341.75 SR31 0 0.00 $0.00 SR35 1 35 455.00 0 $3.75 $458.75 SR42 1 42 546.00 0 $3.75 $549.75 SR80 0 TOTALS 85 473 $6,149.00 $0.00 $318.75 $6,467.75 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC USAGE BILLING TOTAL 240 240 TOTAL ERU'S 896 $10,725.12 COUNTY 896 $11,648.00 CITY_ $922.88 SW01 (SEWER) 431 LIFT STATION 942 TOTAL 1373 $3,120.00 $1,153.60 $900.00 $5,173.60 = GALLONS AMT IRC SEWER BILLED E 431 $1,185.25 $1,153.60 $1,374.89 942 $2,590.50 $2,590.50 $3,004.98 1373 $3,744.10 $4,379.87 JULY 7, 1994 BILLING LF01 LF02 9 9 117.00 $30.25 $33.75 $181.00 LF03 3 4 6 78.00 $52.25 $11.25 $141.50 LF06 1 12 156.00 $203.50 $15.00 $374.50 LF11 1 6 78.00 $74.25 $3.75 $156.00 LF14 1 11 143.00 $250.25 $3.75 $397.00 LF18 2 14 182.00 $671.00 $3.75 $856.75 LF89 1 36 468.00 $170.50 $7.50 $646.00 89 1157.00 $1,861.75 $3.75 $3,022.50 TOTALS 22 183 $2,379.00 $3,313.75 $82.50 $5,775.25 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC BILLING TOTAL SR01 36 36 468.00 0 $135.00 $603.00 SR02 SR03 12 24 312.00 0 $45.00 $357.00 SR04 12 4 36 468.00 0 $45.00 $513.00 SR05 4 16 208.00 0 $15.00 $223.00 SR06 3 20 260.00 0 $15.00 $275.00 SR09 1 18 234.00 0 $11.25 $245.25 SR10 1 9 10 117.00 0 $3.75 $120.75 SR12 2 24 130.00 312.00 0 0 $3.75 $7.50 $133.75 $319.50 SR14 SR16 1 2 14 182.00 0 $3.75 $185.75 SR18 2 32 36 416.00 468.00 0 0 $7.50 $7.50 $423.50 $475.50 SR20 SR21 3 60 780.00 0 $11.25 $791.25 SR22 1 1 21 273.00 0 $3.75 $276.75 SR26 1 22 286.00 0 $3.75 $289.75 SR31 26 338.00 0 $3.75 $341.75 SR35 1 0 35 0.00 455.00 0 $0.00 $3.75 $458.75 SR42 1 42 546.00 0 $3.75 $549.75 SR80 1 80 1040.00 0 $3.75 $1,043.75 TOTALS 89 561 $7,293.00 $0.00 $333.75 $7,626.75 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC USAGE BILLING TOTAL SW01 240 240 $3,120.00 $1,752.80 $900.00 $5,772.80 TOTAL ERU'S 984 $11,778.48 COUNTY 984 $12,792.00 CITY $1,013.52 ....va�nr wiv VMLLUIYJ-ChUC55 = (jALLUN5 AMT IRC WATER SEWER SEWER BILLED ESTIMATE SW01 (SEWER) 665 665 $1,828.75 $1,75280 $2,121.35 LIFT STATION 1205 1205 $3,313.75 $3,313.75 $3,843.95 TOTAL 1870 1870 $5,066.55 $5,965.30 INVOICE FOR BULK RATE WASTEWATER BILLING FOR REGISTER DATED MAY 31, 1994 BILLING ANALYSIS REPORT BY BOOK IRC DATA.WK4 14 -Jun -94 DESC ACCTS ERU'S SFC USAGE BILLING * TOTAL LF O1 9 9 121.50 36.00 18.00 175.50 LF 02 3 6 81.00 40.75 6.00 127.75 LF 03 4 12 162.00 108.25 8.00 278.25 LF 06 1 6 81.00 34.50 2.00 117.50 LF 11 1 11 148.50 131.00 2.00 281.50 LF 14 1 14 189.00 335.75 2.00 526.75 LF 18 2 36 486.00 191.75 4.00 681.75 LF 89 1 89 1201.50 622.75 2.00 1,826.25 TOTAL 22 183 2,470.50 1,500.75 44.00 4,015.25 DESC ACCTS ERU'S BFC BILLING TOTAL SR O1 36 36 486.00 45.00 72.00 603.00 SR 02 12 24 324.00 '9.00 24.00 357.00 SR 03 12 36 486.00 3.00 24.00 513.00 SR 04 4 16 216.00 (1.00) 8.00 223.00 SR 05 5 25 337.50 (3.75) 10.00 343.75 SR 06 3 18 243.00 (3.75) 6.00 245.25 SR 09 1 9 121.50 (2.75) 2.00 120.75 SR 10 1 10 135.00 (3.25) 2.00 133.75 SR 12 2 24 324.00 (8.50) 4.00 319.50 SR 14 1 14 189.00 (5.25) 2.00 185.75 SR 16 2 32 432.00 (12.50) 4.00 423.50 SR 18 2 36 486.00 (14.50) 4.00 475.50 SR 20 3 60 810.00 (24.75) 6.00 791.25 SR 21 1 21 283.50 (8.75) 2.00 276.75 SR 22 1 22 297.00 (9.25) 2.00 289.75 SR 26 1 26 351.00 (11.25) 2.00 341.75 SR 31 1 31 418.50 (13.75) 2.00 406.75 SR 35 1 35 472.50 (15.75) 2.00 458.75 SR 42 1 42 567.00 (19.25) 2.00 549.75 SR 80 1 80 1080.00 (38.25) 2.00 1,043.75 TOTALS 91 597 $8,059.50 (139.25) 182.00 8,102.25 DESC ACCTS ERU'S SFC USAGE BILLING TOTAL SW O1 237 237 3,199.50 1,155.52 474.00 4,829.02 TOTAL ERU'S 1,017 CONSUMPTION GALS WATER SW 336 SEWER LF 565 LIFT STATION TOTAL 901 , FOR BULK RATE WASTEWATER BILLING IRC AP.WK4 REGISTER DATED MAY 13, 1994 14 -Jun -94 .1LLING ANALYSIS REPORT BY BOOK BASE CALCULATIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER RATE NO AMOUNT 434 536 496 2.00 1 2.00 BASE FEE 434 536 497 11.97 183 2,190.51 LF 434 536 498 11.97 597 7,146.09 SR 434 536 496 11.97 237 2,836.89 SW (ERU'S) 1,017 '12,175.49 SUB TOTAL CONSUMPTION CALCULATIONS ACCOUNT NUMBER RATE NO AMOUNT 434 536 496 3.19 336 1,071.84 SW 434 536 497 3.19 565 1.802.35 LF 901 2,874.19 SUB TOTAL CITY OF SEBASTIAN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 15,049.68 TOTAL 15,049.68 TOTAL VARIANCE 0.00 APRIL BILLING (MAY REPORTS) DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC USAGE BILLING TOTAL LF01 9 9 117.00 $44.00 $33.75 $194.75 LF02 3 6 78.00 $74.25 $11.25 $163.50 LF03 4 12 156.00 $244.75 $15.00 $415.75 LF06 1 6 78.00 $82.50 $3.75 $164.25 LF11 1 11 143.00 $228.25 $3.75 $375.00 LF14 1 14 182.00 $484.00 $3.75 $669.75 LF18 2 36 468.00 $448.25 $7.50 $923.75 LF89 1 89 1157.00 $2,224.75 $3.75 $3,385.50 TOTALS 22 183 $2,379.00 $3,830.75 $82.50 $6,292.25 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC BILLING TOTAL SR01 36 36 468.00 0 $135.00 $603.00 SR02 12 24 312.00 0 $45.00 $357.00 SR03 12 36 468.00 0 $45.00 $513.00 SR04 4 16 208.00 0 $15.00 $223.00 SR05 5 25 325.00 0 $18.75 $343.75 SR06 3 18 234.00 0 $11.25 $245.25 SR09 1 9 117.00 0 $3.75 $120.75 SRI 1 10 130.00 0 $3.75 $133.75 SRI 2 24 312.00 0 $7.50 $319.50 SRI 1 14 182.00 0 $3.75 $185.75 SRI 2 32 416.00 0 $7.50 $423.50 SR18 2 36 468.00 0 $7.50 $475.50 SR20 3 60 780.00 0 $11.25 $791.25 SR21 1 21 273.00 0 $3.75 $276.75 SR22 1 22 286.00 0 $3.75 $289.75 SR26 1 26 338.00 0 $3.75 $341.75 SR31 1 31 403.00 0 $3.75 $406.75 SR35 1 35 455.00 0 $3.75 $458.75 SR42 1 42 546.00 0 $3.75 $549.75 SR80 1 80 1040.00 0 $3.75 $1,043.75 TOTALS 91 597 $7,761.00 $0.00 $341.25 $8,102.25 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC USAGE BILLING TOTAL SW01 234 234 $3,042.00 $2,474.30 $877.50 $6,393.80 APRIL BILLING - PAGE 2 TOTAL ERU'S 1014 $12,137.58 COUNTY 1014 $13,182.00 CITY $1,044.42 CONSUMPTION GALLONS -EXCESS= GALLONS AMT IRC WATER SEWER SEWER BILLED ESTIMATE SW01 (SEWER) 953 953 2621 $2,474.30 $3,040.07 LIFT STATION 1393 1393 3831 $3,830.75 $4,443.67 TOTAL 2346 2346 $6,305.05 $7,483.74 MARCH BILLING (APRIL REPORTS) DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC USAGE BILLING TOTAL LF01 9 9 117.00 $38.50 $33.75 $189.25 LF02 3 6 78.00 $46.75 $11.25 $136.00 LF03 4 12 156.00 $244.75 $15.00 $415.75 LF06 1 6 78.00 $66.00 $3.75 $147.75 LF11 1 11 143.00 $189.75 $3.75 $336.50 LF14 1 14 182.00 $632.50 $3.75 $818.25 LF18 2 36 468.00 $286.00 $7.50 $761.50 LF89 1 89 1157.00 $992.75' $3.75 $2,153.50 TOTALS 22 183 $2,379.00 $2,497.00 $82.50 $4,958.50 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC BILLING TOTAL SR01 36 36 468.00 0 $135.00 $603.00 SR02 12 24 312.00 0 $45.00 $357.00 SR03 12 36 468.00 0 $45.00 $513.00 SR04 4 16 208.00 0 $15.00 $223.00 SR05 5 25 325.00 0 $18.75 $343.75 SR06 3 18 234.00 0 $11.25 $245.25 SR09 1 9 117.00 0 $3.75 $120.75 SRI 1 10 130.00 0 $3.75 $133.75 SR12 2 24 312.00 0 $7.50 $319.50 SRI 1 14 182.00 0 $3.75 $185.75 SRI 2 32 416.00 0 $7.50 $423.50 SRI 2 36 468.00 0 $7.50 $475.50 SR20 3 60 780.00 0 $11.25 $791.25 SR21 1 21 273.00 0 $3.75 $276.75 SR22 1 22 286.00 0 $3.75 $289.75 SR26 1 26 338.00 0 $3.75 $341.75 SR31 1 31 403.00 0 $3.75 $406.75 SR35 1 35 455.00 0 $3.75 $458.75 SR42 1 42 546.00 0 $3.75 $549.75 SR80 1 80 1040.00 0 $3.75 $1,043.75 TOTALS 91 597 $7,761.00 $0.00 $341.25 $8,102.25 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC USAGE BILLING TOTAL SW01 225 225 $2,925.00 $1,974.76 $843.75 $5,743.51 APRIL BILLING - PAGE 2 TOTAL ERU'S 1005 $12,029.85 COUNTY 1005 $13,065.00 CITY $1,035.15 ,ONSUMPTION GALLONS -EXCESS= GALLONS AMT IRC WATER SEWER , SEWER BILLED ESTIMATE SW01 (SEWER) 751 751 2065 $1,974.76 $2,395.69 LIFT STATION 908, 908 2497 $2,497.00 $2,896.52 TOTAL 1659 1659 $4,471.76 $5,292.21 ADJUSTED ERU'S FOR ACCOUNTS TURNED OVER TO THE CITY DELINQUENT DELINQUENT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC ERU'S BILLING TOTAL SR01 34 34 459.00 2 68 $573.50 SR02 11 22 297.00 2 22 $348.00 SR03 12 36 486.00 0 24 $552.50 SR04 2 8 108.00 8 4 $224.00 SR05 4 20 270.00 5 8 $278.00 SR06 2 12 162.00 6 4 $249.00 SR09 1 9 121.50 0 2 $123.50 SR10 1 10 135.00 0 2 $137.00 SR12 2 24 324.00 0 4 $328.00 SR14 1 14 189.00 0 2 $191.00 SR16 2 32 432.00 0 4 $436.00 SR18 0 0 0.00 36 0 $490.00 SR20 3 60 810.00 0 6 $816.00 SR21 1 21 283.50 0 2 $285.50 SR22 1 22 297.00 0 2 $299.00 SR26 0 0 0.00 26 0 $353.00 SR31 1 31 418.50 0 2 $420.50 SR35 1 35 472.50 0 2 $474.50 SR42 1 42 567.00 2 $569.00 SR80 0 0 0.00 80 0 $1,082.00 TOTALS 80 432 $5,832.00 165 $160.00 $8,230.00 FEBRUARY BILLING (MARCH BILLS) DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S CONSUMPTION LF01 8 8 12 LF02 3 6 18 LF03 4 12 102 LF06 1 6 25 LF11 1 11 90 LF15 1 15 238 LF18 2 36 92 LF89 1 89 257 TOTALS 21 183 834 t, eO5 1 5 SR01 37 37 SR02 12 24 SR03 12 36 SR04 4 16 SR05 4 20 SR06 3 18 SR09 1 9 SR10 1 10 SR12 2 24 SR14 1 14 SR16 2 32 SR18 2 36 SR20 3 60 SR21 1 21 SR22 1 22 SR26 1 26 SR31 1 31 SR35 1 35 SR42 1 42 SR80 1 80 TOTALS 91 593 Cum DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S CONSUMPTION SW01 219 219 599 BILLING #1 10 13 BILLING #2 140 410 BILLING #3 69 176 G� FEBRUARY BILLING PAGE 2 TOTAL ERU'S ADJUSTED FOR DELINQUENT ERU'S 995 $11,910.15 COUNTY $0.00 993 $13,405.50 CITY BILLE 0 $0.00 CONSUMPTION GALLONS -EXCESS= GALLONS SEWER AMOUNT IRC WATER SEWER SEWER BILLED BILLED SW01 (SEWER) LIFT STATION TOTAL 750 34 1127 ) L , 1877 716 609 $2,038.81 $2,392.50 1127 958 $3,209.13 $3,595.13 1843 1567 $5,247.94 $5,987.63 ,DIAN RIVER COUNTY STIMATED BILLING VS. CITY OF SEBASTIAN ACTUAL BILLING MARCH 29, 1993 BILLING PERIOD ESTIMATED VOLUME ESTIMATED AMOUNT ACTUAL VOLUME ACTUAL AMOUNT DIFFERENCE 61-71 2039 $6,504.41 1 63 4,666.97 1,8 7.44 8/1-9/1 1946 $6,206.68 1875 $5,981.25 $225.43 9/1-10/1 1946 $6,207.74 1344 $4,287.36 $1,920.38 1/1-2/1 1770 $5,646.30 1877 $5,987.63 - 341.33 2/1-3/1 1770 $5,646.30 1433 $4,571.27 $1,075.03 TOTAL VOLUME CHARGES OVERPAID $4,716.95 BY THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN TO INDIAN RIVER COUNTY JANUARY BILLING (FEBRUARY BILLS) DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC USAGE BILLING TOTAL LF01 8 8 108.00 -$124.00 $16.00 SR01 LF02 3 6 81.00 $74.00 -$87.00 $6.00 12 LF03 4 12 162.00 $348.00 -$170.00 $8.00 36 LF06 1 6 81.00 SR04 -$83.00 $2.00 216.00 LFI 1 1 11 148.50 4 -$150.50 $2.00 0 LF15 1 15 202.50 18 -$204.50 $2.00 $6.00 LF18 2 36 486.00 121.50 -$490.00 $4.00 $123.50 LF89 1 89 1201.50 0 -$1,203.50 $2.00 SR12 TOTALS 21 183 $2,470.50 $4.00 -$2,512.50 $42.00 $0.00 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC BILLING TOTAL SR01 37 37 499.50 0 $74.00 $573.50 SR02 12 24 324.00 0 $24.00 $348.00 SR03 12 36 486.00 0 $24.00 $510.00 SR04 4 16 216.00 0 $8.00 $224.00 SR05 4 20 270.00 0 $8.00 $278.00 SR06 3 18 243.00 0 $6.00 $249.00 SR09 1 9 121.50 0 $2.00 $123.50 SR10 1 10 135.00 0 $2.00 $137.00 SR12 2 24 324.00 0 $4.00 $328.00 SR14 1 14 189.00 0 $2.00 $191.00 SR16 2 32 432.00 0 $4.00 $436.00 SR18 2 36 486.00 0 $4.00 $490.00 SR20 3 60 810.00 0 $6.00 $816.00 SR21 1 21 283.50 0 $2.00 $285.50 SR22 1 22 297.00 0 $2.00 $299.00 SR26 1 26 351.00 0 $2.00 $353.00 SR31 1 31 418.50 0 $2.00 $420.50 SR35 1 35 472.50 0 $2.00 $474.50 SR42 1 42 567.00 0 $2.00 $569.00 SR80 1 80 1080.00 0 $2.00 $1,082.00 TOTALS 91 593 $8,005.50 $0.00 $182.00 $8,187.50 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC USAGE BILLING TOTAL SW01 219 219 $2,956.50 -$3,394.50 $438.00 DECEMBER BILLING (JANUARY REPORTS) LF01 9 9 6 LF02 3 4 12 LF03 1 6 LF06 1 11 LFI 1 1 14 LF14 2 36 LF18 1 89 LF89 2 24 TOTALS 22 183 SR01 37 37 24 SRO2 12 12 36 SR03 4 16 SR04 4 20 SR05 3 18 SR06 1 9 SR09 1 10 SRI 2 24 SRI 1 14 SRI 2 32 SRI 2 36 SRI 3 60 SR20 1 211 SR21 432.00 22 SR22 1 26 SR26 1 31 SR31 1 35 SR35 1 42 SR42 1 80 SR80 $2.00 $353.00 TOTALS 91 593 SW01 217 217 LL T 121.50 0 $48.41 $18.00 $6.00 $187.91 $146.79 81.00 162.00 $24.00 $59.79 $253.38 $8.00 $423.38 81.00 $224.00 $71.18 $2.00 $2.00 $154.18 $728.44 148.50 189.00 270.00 $577.94 $219.22 $2.00 $410.22 486.00 0 $296.09 $4.00 $2.00 $786.09 $2,422.02 1201.50 $2.00 $1,218.52 135.00 0 $2,470.50 $2,744.53 $44.00 $5,259.03 499.50 0 $74.00 $24.00 $573.50 $348.00 324.00 0 0 $24.00 $510.00 486.00 0 $8.00 $224.00 216.00 0 $8.00 $278.00 270.00 0 $6.00 $249.00 243.00 0 $2.00 $123.50 121.50 0 $2.00 $137.00 135.00 0 $4.00 $328.00 324.00 0 $2.00 $191.00 189.00 0 $4.00 $436.00 432.00 0 $4.00 $490.00 486.00 0 $6.00 $816.00 810.00 0 $2.00 $285.50 283.50 0 $2.00 $299.00 297.00 0 $2.00 $353.00 351.00 0 $2.00 $420.50 418.50 0 $2.00 $474.50 472.50 0 $2.00 $569.00 567.00 0 $2.00 $1,082.00 1080.00 $8,005.50 $0.00 $182.00 $8,187.50 $2,929.50 $2,068.57 $434.00 $5,432.07 C2127 Op 99D&aUZaM TUUKIZUT DZE&Zfl6 TOM Tam Tmc5iT.%m r9im, MONTH �)CCP YYl be 1— 9 I �Q Yl. q `A cepc)r--� S J NUMBER OF SWO1 ACCOUNTS (RESIDENTIAL) (BILLING ANALYSIS REPORT) DUPLICATE ACCOUNTS I AC ca uI99 Iaa a I10 01 .40 a a991091 T9 AHS Bac a IVI IO pIa -aA 930 31449 1 9 }aa 3Aa1 Aa 019991 (BILLING JOURNAL) TOTAL RESIDENTIAL ACCOUNTS LIFT STATION ERU'S SEWER RESERVE ERU'S TOTAL ERU'S DELINQUENT SEWER RESERVE ERU'S ADJUSTED TOTAL ERU'S 421 -2-19 SWO1 CONSUMPTION TOTAL (RESIDENTIAL) 8U (BILLING ANALYSIS REPORT) LFO1 CONSUMPTION TOTAL (LIFT STATIONS)+ Ci(p (BILLING ANALYSIS REPORT) TOTAL CONSUMPTION @100% USAGE _ CO EXCESS CONSUMPTION (OVER 13,000 GAL) — (CONSUMPTION REPORT) BILLABLE CONSUMPTION )r-7 O 2 - TOTAL BILLED CONSUMPTION @85% HH 9 NOVEMBER BILLING (DECEMBER REPORTS) DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC USAGE BILLING TOTAL LF01 9 9 121.50 0 $48.40 $18.00 $187.90 LF02 3 6 81.00 $24.00 $56.94 $6.00 $143.94 LF03 4 12 162.00 $510.00 $256.24 $8.00 $426.24 LF06 1 6 81.00 SR05 $62.63 $2.00 $145.63 LFI 1 1 11 148.50 3 $429.90 $2.00 $580.40 LFI 4 1 14 189.00 9 $244.84 $2.00 $435.84 LF18 2 36 486.00 135.00 $335.94 $4.00 $825.94 LF89 1 89 1201.50 0 $874.03 $2.00 $2,077.53 TOTALS 22 183 $2,470.50 $2.00 $2,308.92 $44.00 $4,823.42 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC BILLING TOTAL SR01 37 37 499.50 0 $74.00 $573.50 SR02 12 24 324.00 0 $24.00 $348.00 SR03 12 36 486.00 0 $24.00 $510.00 SR04 4 16 216.00 0 $8.00 $224.00 SR05 4 20 270.00 0 $8.00 $278.00 SR06 3 18 243.00 0 $6.00 $249.00 SR09 1 9 121.50 0 $2.00 $123.50 SRI 1 10 135.00 0 $2.00 $137.00 SRI 2 24 324.00 0 $4.00 $328.00 SRI 1 14 189.00 0 $2.00 $191.00 SR16 2 32 432.00 0 $4.00 $436.00 SR18 2 36 486.00 0 $4.00 $490.00 SR20 3 60 810.00 0 $6.00 $816.00 SR21 1 21 283.50 0 $2.00 $285.50 SR22 1 22 297.00 0 $2.00 $299.00 SR26 1 26 351.00 0 $2.00 $353.00 SR31 1 31 418.50 0 $2.00 $420.50 SR35 1 35 472.50 0 $2.00 $474.50 SR42 1 42 567.00 0 $2.00 $569.00 SR80 1 80 1080.00 0 $2.00 $1,082.00 TOTALS 91 593 $8,005.50 $0.00 $182.00 $8,187.50 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC USAGE BILLING TOTAL SW01 214 214 $2,889.00 $1,859.30 $428.00 $5,176.30 Post -It'" brand fax transmittal memo 7671 a ar Pages . FT.. _ 1 _ 1, ' From NOVEMBER BILLING - PAGE 2 TOTAL ERU'S 990 $11,850.30 COUNTY 990 $13,365.00 CITY BILLE ADJUSTED FOR DELINQUENT ERU'S 829 $9,923.13 829 $11,191.50 CONSUMPTION GALLONS -EXCESS = GALLONS SEWER AMOUNT IRC WATER SEWER SEWER BILLED BILLED SW01 (SEWER) 688 36 652 554 $1,856.57 $2,194.72 LIFT STATION 811 811 689 $2,309.32 $2,587.09 TOTAL 1499 1463 1244 $4,165.89 $4,781.81 ADJUSTED ERU'S FOR ACCOUNTS TURNED OVER TO THE CITY DELINQUENT DELINQUENT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC ERU'S BILLING TOTAL SR01 34 34 459.00 3 68 $573.50 SR02 11 22 297.00 2 22 $348.00 SR03 12 36 486.00 0 24 $552.50 SR04 2 8 108.00 8 4 $224.00 SR05 4 20 270.00 0 8 $278.00 SR06 2 12 162.00 6 4 $249.00 SR09 1 9 121.50 0 2 $123.50 SR10 1 10 135.00 0 2 $137.00 SR12 2 24 324.00 0 4 $328.00 SR14 1 14 189.00 0 2 $191.00 SR16 2 32 432.00 0 4 $436.00 SR18 0 0 0.00 36 0 $490.00 SR20 3 60 810.00 0 6 $816.00 SR21 1 21 283.50 0 2 $285.50 SR22 1 22 297.00 0 2 $299.00 SR26 0 0 0.00 26 0 $353.00 SR31 1 31 418.50 0 2 $420.50 SR35 1 35 472.50 0 2 $474.50 SR42 1 42 567.00 2 $569.00 SR80 0 0 0.00 80 0 $1,082.00 TOTALS 80 432 $5,832.00 161 $160.00 $8,230.00 OCTOBER BILLING --- PAGE 2 TOTAL ERU'S 988 $11,826.36 COUNTY 988 $13,338.00 CITY ADJUSTED FOR DELINQUENT ERU'S 827 $9,899.19 827 $11,164.50 CONSUMPTION GALLONS -EXCESS = GALLONS SEWER AMOUNT IRC WATER SEWER SEWER BILLED BILLED SW01 (SEWER) 652 34 618 525 $1,759.76 $2,079.88 LIFT STATION 1056 1056 898 $3,006.96 $3,368.64 TOTAL 1708 1674 1423 $4,766.72 $5,448.52 ADJUSTED ERU'S FOR ACCOUNTS TURNED OVER TO THE CITY DELINQUENT DELINQUENT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC ERU'S BILLING TOTAL SR01 34 34 459.00 3 68 $573.50 SR02 11 22 297.00 2 22 $348.00 SR03 13 39 526.50 0 26 $552.50 SR04 2 8 108.00 8 4 $224.00 SR05 4 20 270.00 0 8 $278.00 SR06 2 12 162.00 6 4 $249.00 SR09 1 9 121.50 0 2 $123.50 SRI 1 10 135.00 0 2 $137.00 SRI 2 24 324.00 0 4 $328.00 SRI 1 14 189.00 0 2 $191.00 SRI 2 32 432.00 0 4 $436.00 SRI 0 0 0.00 36 0 $490.00 SR20 3 60 810.00 0 6 $816.00 SR21 1 21 283.50 0 2 $285.50 SR22 1 22 297.00 0 2 $299.00 SR26 0 0 0.00 26 0 $353.00 SR31 1 31 418.50 0 2 $420.50 SR35 1 35 472.50 0 2 $474.50 SR42 1 42 567.00 2 $569.00 SR80 0 0 0.00 80 0 $1,082.00 TOTALS 81 435 $5,872.50 161 $162.00 $8,230.00 October Billing (November Reports) LF01121.50 LF02 3 6 499.50 $65.49 $18.00 LF03 4 12 81.00 $59.79 $6.00 LF0 1 SR04 162.00 $264.77 $8.00 LF 1 6 81.00 $62.63 $2.00 LF14 1 11 148.50 $313.17 $2,00 LFI 2 14 189.00 $381.50 $2.00 LF89 1 36 486.00 $367.26 $4.00 SRI 1 89 1201.50 $1,491.83 $2.00 $204.99 $146.79 $434.77 $145.63 $463.67 $572.50 $857.26 $2,695.33 TOTALS 22 183 $2,470.50 $3,006.44 $44.00 $5,520.94 SR01 SR02 37 12 37 499.50 0 $74.00 $573.50 SR03 13 24 39 324.00 0 $24.00 $348.00 SR04 4 16 526.50 0 26.00 $$8.00 $552.50 SR05 4 20 216.00 0 $224.00 SR06 3 18 270.00 0 $8.00 $278.00 SR09 1 9 243.00 SRI 1 10 121.50 0 $2.00 $123.50 SR12 2 24 135.00 0 $2.00 $137.00 SRI 1 324.00 0 $4.00 $328.00 SR16 2 14 32 189.00 0 $2.00 $191.00 SRI 2. 36 432.00 0 $4.00 $436.00 SR20 3 60 486.00 0 $4.00 $490.00 SR21 1 21 810.00 0 $6.00 $816.00 SR22 1 22 283.50 0 $2.00 $285.50 SR26 1 26 297.00 0 $2.00 $299.00 SR31 1 31 351.00 0 $2.00 $353.00 SR35 1 35 418.50 0 $2.00 $420.50 SR42 1 42 472.50 0 $2.00 $474.50 SR80 1 80 567.00 0 $2.00 $569.00 1080.00 0 $2.00 $1,082.00 TOTALS 92 596 $8,046.00 $0.00 $184.00 $8,230.00 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNTS ERU'S BFC USAGE BILLING TOTAL i SW01 209 209 $2,821.50 $1,719.59 $418.00 $4,959.09 BILLING PERIOD BILLING CHARGE BASE FACILITY FEES VOLUME CHARGES @ 100% SUBTOTAL IRC BILLING DIFFERENCE CUM. DIFFERENCE BILLING PERIOD BILLING CHARGE BASE FACILITY FEES VOLUME CHARGES @ 100% SUBTOTAL IRC BILLING DIFFERENCE CITY FIGURES IF 06/01/93 07/01/93 08/01/93 09/01/93 10/01/93 11/01/93 UNITS AMOUNT UNITS AMOUNT UNITS AMOUNT UNITS AMOUNT UNITS AMOUNT UNITS AMOUNT $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 970 $11,610.90 970 $11,610.90 976 $11,682.72 980 $11,730.60 983 $11,766.51 988 $11,826.36 1964 $6,265.16 1463 $4,666.97 1834 $5,850.46 1875 $5,981.25 1344 $4,287.36 1708 $5,448.52 $17,878.06 $16,279.87 $17,535.18 $17,713.85 $16,055.87 $17,276.88 $18,117.46 $18,356.71 $17,714.73 $18,070.95 $18,072.01 $17,300.82 $239.40 $2,076.84 $179.55 $357.10 $2,016.14 $23.94 $239.40 $2,316.24 $2,495.79 $2,852.89 $4,869.03 $4,892.97 ESTIMATED ESTIMATED 12/01/93 01/01/94 02/01/94 03/01/94 04/01/94 05/01/94 UNITS AMOUNT UNITS AMOUNT UNITS AMOUNT UNITS AMOUNT UNITS AMOUNT UNITS AMOUNT $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 990 $11,850.30 993 $11,886.21 995 $11,910.15 1000 $11,970.00 1499 $4,781.81 1768 $5,639.92 1877 $5,987.63 1433 $4,571.27 $16,634.11 $17,528.13 $17,899.78 $16,543.27 $16,800.90 $17,605.70 $17,700.12 $17,764.45 $166.79 $167.57 -$199.66 $1,221.18 $5,059.76 $5,227.33 $5,027.67 $6,248.85 AMA MASTELLER & MOLER, INC. M - CONSULTING ENGINEERS - i November 21, 1994 0�e o bets Mr. Joel Koford City Manager City of Sebastian Post Office Box 127 Sebastian, FL 32958 RE: Water System to Serve Lhe City of Sebastian Invoice #9459LA-1 Design Services and Invoice #9459LC-1 Surveying Services Dear Joel: Enclosed for your information and files are invoices for the above referenced project covering the surveying and design services associated with the water system to serve the designated area in the City of Sebastian. We hope that an agreement can be expedited by the City of Sebastian and Indian River County for this project as soon as possible. If you have any questions or we can provide you with additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, MASTELLER & MOLER, INC. I&JL Earl H. Masteller, P.E. President EHM/vk Enclosures cc: Terrance G. Pinto File #9459LA (jk112194) py 1623 N. U.S. Highway 1, Suite B2 O 7380 Murrell Road, Suite 106 Sebastian, Fl 32958 Melbourne, Florida 32940 (407) 589-4800 (407) 255-1175 (407) 589-2742 Fax (407) 253-4439 Fax i'►, Masteller & Moler,'Inc. 1623 N. U.S. Highway #1, Suite B-2 Sebastian, Florida 32950 (407) 589-4500 **INVOICE FOR SERVICES** Attn: Terrance G. Pinto Proj Name: CR 510/US#1 Amendment Terms: Net 30 Days Proj Code: 9459LA PO#: Proj Desc: CR 510/US#1 Amendment to Work Authorization #1 (Sebastian Riverfront Water Project) Terrance G. Pinto Invoice Number 9459LA-1 Indian River County Dated October 31, 1994 P.O. Box 1750 Vero Beach, FL 32960 Page 1 Professional Engineering Services For the Billing Period from October 1, 1994 to October 31, 1994 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Description of Work Performed: Professional Engineering Services associated with Design Services for the extension of the water main along U.S. Highway #1 from C.R. 510 to the City of Sebastian. IRC Project #UW -93 -30 -DS i Amendment to Work Authorization #1. Professional Engineering Services Fee: 3 30,900.00 Fee for Professional Engineering Services through 10/31/94: $ 30,900.00 X 40 % Complete S 12,360.00 Total Professional Engineering Services ------------- $ 12,360.00 Total Amount Due This Invoice ------------- b 12,360.00 Masteller & Moler, Inc. 1623 N. U.S. Highway #1, Suite B-2 CSebastian, Florida 32958 (407) 589-4800 Attn: Terrance G. Pinto **INVOICE SCR SERVICES** Proj Name: CR 510/US#1 Amendment Terms: Net 30 Days Proj Code: 9459LC PO#: Proj Desc: CR 510/US#1 Amendment to Work Authorization #1 (Sebastian Riverfront Water Project) Terrance G. Pinto Invoice Number 9459LC-1 Indian River County Dated October 31, 1994 P.O. Box 1750 Vero Beach, FL 32960 Page 1 Professional Engineering Services _ For the Billing Period from October 1, 1994 to October 31, 1994 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Description of Work Performed: Professional Engineering Services consisting of Survey Services for the extension of the water main along U.S. Highway #1 from CR 510 to the City of Sebastian. IRC Project #UW -93 -30 -DS Amendment to Work Authorization #1. C. professional Engineering Services Fee: $ 8,600.00 Ic Fee for Professional Engineering Services through 10/31/94: $ 8,600.00 X 80 / Complete I Total Professional Engineering Services Total Amount Due This Invoice $ 6,880.00 ------------- $ 6,880.00 ------------- 3 " 6,680.00 CITY OF SEBASTIAN UTILITIES DEPARTMENT DATE: November 23, 1994 TIME: 4:35 p.m. [ ] CONFERENCE WITH [X ] TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH Grace Treadway, Environmetrics SUBJECT: Tests for Water and Sewer Samples and Related Costs RESUME OF CONVERSATION: After I reviewed the bid that I received from Grace Treadway regarding unit prices for Indian River County's water and sewer tests, I noticed that we were being charged more for ours. I called Grace to find out why. Grace said she had noticed the same thing and wanted to know when we had the discussion concerning piggy -backing off Indian River County's bid. I told Grace that it must have been in January, 1994, since the City acquired the GDU system on December 16, 1993. Grace said she would have a member of her staff pull all of the bills to the City and give us credit for all of the tests taken going back to January on a month -by -month basis. c:\wp51\telecon\treadway 2 3 M 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 .,UNTY jN INVITATION TO BID mch FL 32960 . 1407) 507.6000 a*t. 416 COPY VENDOR INFORMATION AVIRONMETRICS 683 S.W. 27TH AVENUE VERO BEACH, FL 32968 -------------- CLASS-tTEM DESCNPIION Landfi analysis one (1) omplete set per guar r as per monit Ing plan for the contra period Landfill ;ampl complete set pe contract period Landfill varaxI quarter for e for one (1) r for the t, one per t period Landfillend Report, on'"I) per contrac period _ SUBMI9910N INFOPMA—TION IMVITA TION R: 2101 PID OPENING DATE: 09/09/92 TIME: 2:00 P.M. LOCAL TIME LOCATION: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PURCHASING 2625 19TH AVENUE VERO BEACH. FL 32960 ISSUANCE DATE: 09 / 09 / 92 PAGE A 1 nEGUISmON r UTIL-3-101 suYEm FRAN BOYNTON QUANTITY ----4 UNIT UNIT PRICE EXTENSION see SET 413926.25 a 55705.0 back 41SET Ie 600.00in 2400.0 41SET Irl 25.001m WATER AND SEWER TREATMENT PLANT Total f items ANALYSIS 6 th 20 Total cost for MLSS samples analysis Total cost for MLVSS sample analysis Total cost for Influent BOD analysis�i Total cost for Influent TSS sample analysis r� "t Total cost for Effluent BOD sample`" analysis Total cost for effluent TSS sample analysis 11YEARId 75.0010 100. 75. V 304.50 111 56171.0 468 EA Irl K 468 1EA to fib 292 IEA Its !ID 292 EA d ils0 903 EA d -T nnl– 2i -7r, In 5.00 " 2340. 10.00 Its 2920. 5.00 u 1460. 10.00Itl 9030.09 1-0 903 IEA Id r_nn1D 4515-nr –_ t—THE SECTION BELOW MUST BE COMPLETED IN FULL AND SIGNED T DELIVERY -pp0r '1_OUr instry�r�d 61qmalter receipt of order. PROMPT PAYMENT DISCOUNT: 5 %—_15 _ dnyo in proposal outline The undersigned hereby certifies that they hale read and understand the contents of this solicitation and agree to furnish at the prices shown any or all of the Items above, subject to all Instructions, conditions, specifications and attachments hereto. Failure to have read all the provisions o+ it Tlicitallon shell not be taus to alter any, r7Aesulling cnntract or request additional compensation. Authorized Signature: _._%~ `� N—� Company Name:.J NLVJ Typed/Prinled Name:-_ Grace Treadway_ Date: President 407 562-1968 Title:._ . _--------_--.. --.-----_---- _.._-- Telephone Number. .3 14 15 16 17. 18 20 LINTY N — INVITATION TO BID .,ch FL 32980 . (407( 5878000 nxt. 418 VENDOR INFOnwTION XIRONMETRICS j83 S.W. 27TH AVENUE VERO BEACH, FL 32968 DEscmrnON Fecals test analysis 15, Nitrates Test analysis 4 Monitor well sample analysis with the contractor providing the field testing, performing the sampling and collecting the samples 1� Sludge Testing sample analysis, " jam TRN sample analysis cf' / NO3 sample analysis NH3 Sample analysis Monitoring well sample analysis with the County delivering the collected samples to the pick up point. SUBMISSION INFORMATION INVITAtION N: 2101 810 OPENING DATE: 09/09/92 TIME: 2:00 P.M. LOCAL TIME LOCATION: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PURCHASING 2823 19TH AVENUE VERO REACH, FL 32960 ISSUANCE DATE: 09 / 09 / 92 PAGE 42 nF.OUIsmONI: UTIL-3-101 BuYEn: FRAN BOYNTON OVANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE EXTENSION 966 EA q 7.50 q 7245.0 324IEA Iq 10.00 In 3240.0 15 Mor{itor 969 17S 19 300 a( 300 JEA -V 312 EA '(jS 240 EA 11 campa analys 50.00 1 750.0 q 125/00 q 2375.0 ri 15.00 q 4500.0i t10-00 q 3000.01 q 10.00 n 3120.0( q 35.00 ri 8400.0[ THE SFC IION BELOW MUST BE COMPLETED IN FULL AND SIGNED DFuvenvin your instruct ons - -- --- i n- proposal— ou t.jItqj@ days alter rer.Np1 el erdnr., -- PROMPT PAYMENT DISCOUNT! --.day The undersigned hereby certifies thel they have rend and unrinmtnnd the contents of this solicitation and agree to furnish At the prices shown nr or all of the Items above, subject to all Inslruclionv, condilionq• npecllicallons and attachments hereto. Failure to have read all the provisions p oficilalion shall not be Cain to alter any r . Ulling collfrnrl or request additional compensation. Authorized Signature! .-__riJ/' tf /� -- Company Name: ENVIRONMETRIC$ Typed/PrintedName: __Grace Treadway V President - Date: 9-4-92 Title:._.- 407 562-1968 ----- - Telephone Number: _- City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 0 FAX (407) 589-5570 MEMORANDUM DATE: December 7, 1994 TO: Richard B. Votapka, Director of Utilities FROM: Joel L. Koford, City Manager W% SUBJECT: New Regulations - USEPA Mhr. S ... I understand that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has issued the new regulations designed to strengthen protection against microorganisms and carcinogens in drinking water. Please let me know your cost estimate for our system upgrade to satisfy the new rules and the date of enforcement. I would like to have this information before January 7, 1995. /jmt cc: Arthur L. Firtion Mayor & Sebastian City Council City of Sebastian 1225 MAIN STREET 0 SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 o FAX (407) 589-5570 December 12, 1994 I am in receipt of the following documents, picked up at Sebastian City Hall, 1225 Main Street, Sebastian, FL 32958 on Monday, December 12, 1994. 1. City of Sebastian, Florida Water and Wastewater Rate Study November, 1993 Prepared By: Hartman & Associates, Inc. 2. General Development Utilities, Inc. Sebastian Highlands Division City of Sebastian Rate Case Test Year Ending December 31, 1991 3. GDU Rate Increase Request Package Rates Confidential General Development Utilities, Inc. Water and Sewer System GDU Rate Increase Request - Rachlin & Cohen, CPA - Exhibit Presented @ 9/1/93 By Melson (GDU) - Exhibit #2 Presented 8/18/93 - Exhibit #3 Presented 8/18/93 - Exhibit #4 Presented 8/18/93 - Exhibit #6 Presented 8/18/93 - Exhibit #5 Presented 8/18/93