HomeMy WebLinkAboutWTP Technical InfoSE ASMAM K L6KL #JCJ WTP Lift8
S o IR tFut n1 F f 2E[ i P l"TKTo2 S/ 16( `24
(10#1 (ja.t SttcE WASueNa 00-VJ
wjj rk Ft24 HVS6' ^rO'%%Lj '
SEIIA�Tti1N 1�3�Nt.i�aOC WTP t.. mW
zor--raN►Nc. 'P"cCAeVrhTop— sjt(o/cj4
VIEW %O(DWA#Jd mW63 AT `74% swab%:
jYiA0G1{ P&Pq ►+, . tS pWJKt4Cnt &
wogs tokoarwc,
SE"STIAtj M1GFlL+wDs WTP LlhE
Sp¢"[QJt,j& QRcctpj rA-m* S/l6/4f
vivw t,AAt,-o SbuTtA 4L-36- I,,3FVvt-- T-rAov6K
I"
oft Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
•
.,
oft
PRODUCTION WELL DRILLING
AT
SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 1975 THROUGH JANUARY 1976
•
•
so
OR
Prepared for:
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES, INC.
1111 South Bayshore Drive
Miami, Florida
33131
M
F-
A
,. Prepared by:
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
1675 Palm Beach Lakes Blvc., Suite 403
�+ West Palm Beach, Florida
33401
M
Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
M
PRODUCTION TIELL DRILLING
AT
SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS, FLORIDA
^
DECEMBER 1975 THROUGH JANUARY 1976
INTRODUCTION
During the latter part of 1974, it was determined by
engineers of General Development Utilities that a second pro-
duction well was needed at Sebastian Highlands to supply the
M community's increased water needs. Field investigations and
the preparation of specifications for a second production well
were supervised by Geraghty & Miller, Inc., personnel.
^ The purpose of this report is to furnish the results of
production well drilling, and to give recommendations regard-
ing the pump setting and design for this well. Illustrations
^
and data collected during the production well program are pre-
sented in Appendices A through D.
SUMMARY
^ The Sebastian Highlands project depends upon one artesian
well for its total public water supply. This facility was exam-
ined in the latter part of 1974. Since there was a need to
Oak
M
M
r=,
o.
M
on
F,
M
OR
Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
- 2 -
develop additional water for the community, the possibility
for developing additional water from both artesian and shallow
aquifer systems was considered.
In early 1975, recommendations were made via progress
reports to Messrs. Louis Mendez and Douglas Andrews regarding
a possible shallow aquifer test program and the drilling of a
second production well near the present water -storage facility.
By late 1975 the program had evolved to the drilling of one
new artesian well to act as a standby facility in the event
that pumpage from two wells was necessary to satisfy peak de-
mands.
Production Well 2 was designed to effectively seal the
shallow water -bearing zone, and to produce water from the upper
portion of the Floridan aquifer. A well was drilled to a total
depth of 647 feet and a pumping test was conducted to determine
overall quality and a design yield (see Appendix C).
CONCLUSIONS AND RECO.M➢4ENDATIONS
(1) Production Well 2 is theoretically capable of producing
in excess of 1 mgd (million gallons per day).
., (2) Concentrations of chlorides and total dissolved solids are
at maximum limits.
M
Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
on
- 3 -
(3) Production Well 2 flows an estimated 17.5 gpm (gallons per
.. minute) at ground leAl and at the time of the pumping
.. test had a static water level of 5.70 feet above land
surface.
(4) If the results of a shallow aquifer test program indicate
acceptable water quality, production from shallow wells
and artesian wells could be blended, providing it is cost
r�
effective.
on
(5) It is recommended that a pump be set 50 feet below ground
W level and that a pumping rate of 200 gpm be established.
OR
M
•
(6) Water quality should be monitored on a monthly basis in
order to establish a trend for the chloride concentration.
(7) Measures should be taken to provide an alternate source
of potable water from either the shallow aquifer produc-
tion or by some water treatment means such as reverse
osmosis.
TEST WELL DRILLING
A test drilling program to evaluate the sand and shell
zones overlying the artesian aquifer was outlined and submitted
to General Development Utilities during 1975. Although the
M
exploration for potable water supplies in this aquifer was
M
M
W
Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
- 4 -
deferred in favor of a single artesian well, it might become
practical in the future to consider a test program such as the
one outlined. Several areas within a reasonable distance from
the present storage facility were considered for the location
of small -diameter test wells. These sites are west and south-
west of Production well 1.
A deep production well instead of a test well was drilled
because of the capability of the upper Floridan aquifer to
produce water.
PRODUCTION WELL DRILLING
Production Well 2 was begun in December 1975 and was tes-
ted for yield and quality in March 1976. A 12 -inch -diameter
., steel casing was cemented in place to a depth of 40 feet below
OR
land surface (See Figure 1). This was done in order to prevent
surface cave-ins and potential contamination of the water -table
OR aquifer.
An 8 -inch -diameter casing was set and cemented from 390
s�
feet to the land surface. A 7 7/8 -inch -diameter hole was dril-
led from 390 feet to the total depth of the well at 647 feet.
,. It is interpreted that the base of the Anastasia formation
M
M
Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
— 5 —
occurs at 127 feet below land surface at this site. The
Hawthorn Formation is interpreted as occurring between 127 -and
375 feet below land surface. The upper portion of the Floridan
_ aquifer consists of white to light gray limestone interbedded
with soft clay streaks (See Appendix B).
W
WATER QUALITY
The results of the chemical analysis of a water sample
from the well are attached. The chloride concentration of 250
ppm (parts per million) is at the maximum permissible level,
while the total dissolved solids are only slightly more than
100 ppm below the allowable maximum. Past water -quality rec-
ords for Production Well 1 indicate a similar condition. There-
on fore, we recommend that, at a minimum, these constituents be
monitored on a monthly basis. Over the years, heavy pumpage
from nearby groves, particularly during the winter and spring
dry season, has resulted in a gradual increase in the chloride
content of water from the Floridan aquifer. Monitoring is
necessary to assist in planning for future needs of the commun-
M
PO Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
w
ity and to provide lead time for possible construction of re-
placement and treatment facilities.
M
M
w
no
PR
MR
9 December 1976
M
w
w
M
.o
M
M
M
Respectfully submitted
G�ERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
Lars E. Persson
Vincent P. Amy
Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
m
.,
m
PR
w
m
APPENDIX A
WELL CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAM,
LOCATION SKETCH,
AND
WATER LEVEL DIAGRAM
Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
LAND SURFACE
7,72R, 'Tkww;wA'fW1
-12 INCH DIAMETER STEEL CASING
(ANNULUS CEMENTED TO LAND SURFACE)
390'-
90'-
6 47'-
647'-
8
8 INCH DIAMETER STEEL CASING
(ANNULUS CEMENTED TO LAND SURFACE)
7/.INCH DIAMETER OPEN HOLE
'PT
FIGURE 1
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
OF PRODUCTION WELL 2
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES
SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS, FLORIDA
�rashty & Miller, Inc.
DRAINAGE DITCH
70' DISCHARGE LINE
+PRODUCTION
WELL 2
0
I... u,v AV FNIIF
PRODUCTION
-TWELL 1
&STORAGE
TANK
NOTE:
NOT TO SCALE
w
Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
ON
Oil
so
m
APPENDIX B
w PRODUCTION WELL 2
GEOLOGIC LOG
w
on
w
w
w
Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
ON
•. GEOLOGIC LOG
OF
PRODUCTION WELL 2
DRILLED AT SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS, FLORIDA
JANUARY 1976
w
so
M
M
an
r.
Description
Production Well 2
Sand, very fine to fine, trace silt and
clay, gray
Shells, cemented and uncemented, inter-
bedded with thin beds of clay and
silt, yellow to gray
Clay, gray to green, interbedded with
thin beds of limestone
Limestone, soft, buff, interbedded
with clay, soft, white to green
Limestone, white to light gray, soft,
with clay streaks, white
Total Depth
Depth Interval
(feet) (feet)
0
- 40
40
40
- 127
87
127
- 337
210
337
- 375
38
375
- 647
272
647
94 Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
0
..
ON
APPENDIX C
PRODUCTION WELL 2
PUMPING TEST DATA
00
W
aj
00
PROJECT_
SCREEN
.. r ---
X'DRAWDOWN
PUMPING TEST
FORM
;DC WELL #2 LOCATION
Sebastian
Highlands
PAGE 1 OF3
-- M P Pump Base HT. ABOVE G.S. 0.50'
W.L. MEAS.
W/.M-Scope
PUMPING WELL 2 0 275 qpm
ORIFICE 4"x6"
WEATHER
Clear, 700
3/1/76
12:00 PM
START
_RECOVERY _LOCATION SKETCH
TEST
3/2/76
12:00 PM
END
PROJECT GDC
SCREEN
t
x. DRAWDOWN
PUMPING WELL
RECOVERY
PUMPING TEST FORM
WELL #2 LOCATION Sebastian Highlands PAGE 2 OF 3
M P Pump Base HT. ABOVE G.S. 0.50' W.L. MEAS. W/ M-SCOPe
2 O 275 qpm ORIFICE4"x 6" WEATHER Clear. 700
START 3/1/76 12:00 PM
_LOCATION SKETCH TEST END 3/2/76 12:00 PM
to 275 _j
•
1 1111 __�
• 11 __-®_
..
PROJECT
SCREEN.
GDC
�. r PUMPING WELL
r. X -DRAWDOWN XRECOVERY
PUMPING TEST FORM
WELL $2 LOCATION Sebastian Highlands PAGE 3 OF 3
M P Pump Base HT. ABOVE G.S. 0. 50 1 W.L. MEAS. W/ M -Scope
2 o 275 gpm ORIFICE 4"x 6" WEATHER Clear, 750
START 3/1/76 12.00 PM
_LOCATION SKETCH TEST END 3/2/76 12:00 PM
��
Immmommeie�
��
.n
NR Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
.o
ON
..
m
MR
at
oft
w
04
m
A
n
so
on
•
on
APPENDIX D
PRODUCTION WELL 2
WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS
OR
r
• I r� CHEMICAL WATER AI✓ALYSIS
Results in Parts Per Million
ft Location Sebastian :iighlands Date Collected_
Collector Lars Persson Date Analyze
^
Source of Sample Seoascian Highlands - P.W. 4/2
Rema
^
SUMAIARY OF ANALYSIS
go
Color
Odor
GDU Stock No. CX750312
3/1/76 ?
Week of 3/8/76
P.P.M.
None
None
;:Carbon Dioxide, as COp 13
"Bicarbonate, as COCO_q 108
-:Carbonate, as CaCO3 0
Hydroxide, as CaC0.q 0
Temperature at Collection, of am
pH (Field) ND
pH (Laboratory) 7.2
n Uo 7.7
Stability Index (2pHs - pH)= 8.2
■o Probably
Interpretation: Corrosive / Non Corrosive Scale Forming
,,Appearance Clear
:=Calculated /
00ND=Not Done /.
T.G. Hussey '
^ CHEMIST
r
Form #629
P.P.M.
it
Total Dissolved Solids 103 oC
894
Total Hardness, as Ca COB
328
Alkalinity, as CaCO3
108
Non -Carbonates, as Ca COB
220
Bicarbonate, HCO3
132
Iron, Fe
0.0
108
.�
Sulfate, SO4
250
Chloride, Cl
^
Calcium, Ca
62
Magnesium,119
41
^
Fluoride, F.
0x5
go
Color
Odor
GDU Stock No. CX750312
3/1/76 ?
Week of 3/8/76
P.P.M.
None
None
;:Carbon Dioxide, as COp 13
"Bicarbonate, as COCO_q 108
-:Carbonate, as CaCO3 0
Hydroxide, as CaC0.q 0
Temperature at Collection, of am
pH (Field) ND
pH (Laboratory) 7.2
n Uo 7.7
Stability Index (2pHs - pH)= 8.2
■o Probably
Interpretation: Corrosive / Non Corrosive Scale Forming
,,Appearance Clear
:=Calculated /
00ND=Not Done /.
T.G. Hussey '
^ CHEMIST
r
Form #629
EMERGENCY POWER
Emergency power is provided by a 355 KW generator set equipped
with a 55 hp diesel engine. The generator is automatically
activated when the normal power supply is interrupted. The
generator is automatically exercised for 2 hours once per
week. Refer to the manufacturer's manual for specific
details pertaining to maintenance.
OPE-RA— kDnAS KAa"ung
SC�60,S"T1AN k C_HLA+j DS ItiIA—ieC 72CTMQ-N--f PLA*-rr
ScP-i. i9 53
Cu -1 h - 411U1,
GDu4 2-27
Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
m
m
m
w
w
m
APPENDIX A
Geologic Logs of
Production Wells and
Production Zone Monitoring Wells,
Sebastian Highlands
GEOLOGIC LOG
OF
PRODUCTION WELL 1
(PILOT HOLE)
SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Depth
Interval Thickness
Sample Description (Feet) (Feet)
SAND - sand, 100%, clear to frosted, 0- 5 5
very fine- to fine-grained, sub-
angular to sub -rounded, phos-
phatic
SANDY SHELL - shell, 65%, very pale 5-15
orange to medium light brown,
fine to medium fragments; sand,
35%, clear to frosted to grayish
orange, very fine- to medium
coarse-grained, sub -angular to
sub -rounded, phosphatic
M
10
25
23
SILTY SAND - sand, 90%, clear to dark 15-40
yellowish orange, very fine- to
medium -grained, fairly well sorted;
silt, 5 to 10%, pale brown, very
fine-grained; shell, trace, pale
orange, fine fragments
SHELLY SAND - sand, 65%, clear to 40-63
frosted, very fine- to medium -
grained, sub -angular to sub -
rounded, phosphatic; shell,
35%, medium dark gray to very
..
pale orange, very fine to
medium coarse fragments
SANDY CLAY - clay, 50%; medium gray, 63-65
very fine-grained, plastic, soft;
sand, 50%, clear to frosted, fine-
grained, quartzitic
M
10
25
23
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
-2-
Production Well 1
Sample Description
SHELLY SAND - sand, 758, clear to
frosted, very fine- to medium -
grained, sub -angular to sub -
rounded; shell, 258, medium
light gray to very pale orange,
very fine to medium fine
fragments; sandf trace, black,
very fine-grained, phosphatic
SANDY CLAY - clay, 608, light olive
gray, very fine-grained, soft,
plastic; sand, 408, clear to
bluish white, very fine- to
medium fine-grained, quartzitic
TOTAL DEPTH
Depth
Interval
(Feet)
65-95
95-
100
Thickness
(Feet)
30
5+
GEOLOGIC LOG
OF
PRODUCTION WELL 2
(PILOT HOLE)
SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
.. Depth
Interval Thickness
Sample Description (Feet) (Feet)
SAND - sand, 1008, clear to frosted
0-10
10
to moderate brown, very fine -
to medium -grained, phosphatic;
organics, trace
..
SHELLY SAND - sand, 608, clear to
10-20
10
frosted, fine- to medium coarse-
grained, sub -angular, to sub -
rounded; shell, 408, very pale
orange, very fine to medium
fine fragments; silt, trace,
_
light brown; sand, trace, black
very -fine-grained, phosphatic
SHELLY SAND - sand, 908, clear to
20-45
25
dark yellowish brown, medium
fine-grained, sub -angular to
sub -rounded; shell,.108, very
pale orange to medium light
brown, very fine to medium
..
fine fragments; silt, trace,
moderate brown
.,
SHELLY SAND - sand, 858, clear to
45-64
19
frosted to medium light gray,
very fine- to medium fine-
.,
grained; shell, 158, very pale
orange to medium dark gray,
very fine to medium fine frag-
ments; silt, trace, medium
light gray
- 2 -
Production Well 2
Depth
Interval Thickness
Sample Description (Feet) (Feet)
SHELLY, CLAYEY SAND - sand, 708, 64-66
clear to frosted to medium
light gray, very fine-grained;
shell, 208, very pale orange
to medium light gray, very
fine to fine fragments; clay,
108, medium light gray, very
fine-grained, soft, plastic
SANDY SHELL - shell, 708, very pale 66-69
orange to medium dark gray, fine
to medium fragments; sand, 308,
clear to frosted, fine-grained,
sub -angular to sub -rounded
SHELLY SAND - sand, 808, clear to 69-79
00 frosted, very fine -.to fine-
grained, sub -angular to sub -
rounded, phosphatic; shell,
208, very pale orange to
dark gray, very fine fragments
SHELLY SAND - shell, 658, very pale 79-95
orange to medium light gray, very
fine to medium coarse fragments;
sand, 358, clear to frosted,
very fine- to medium fine-
grained; silt, trace, light
gray
.. SANDY CLAY - clay, 808, light.olive 95 -
gray, very fine-grained, soft,
dry in place; sandy (608 fine
quartz grains in matrix and free);
shell, 208, very pale orange to
medium brown, fine to medium
fragments
TOTAL DEPTH
■.
110
E
K,
10
16
15+
Thickness
(Feet)
5
10
30
20
5
GEOLOGIC LOG
OF
MONITORING WELL
M1D
SEBASTIAN'HIGHLANDS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA
�+
Depth
Interval
Sample Description
(Feet)
•
SAND - sand, 1008, clear to medium
0- 5
light brown, very fine- to
•
medium -grained, sub -angular to
sub -rounded
•
SAND - sand, 908, clear to medium
5-10
light brown to frosted, fine-
grained, sub -angular to sub -
rounded; shell, 108, tan
fragments; silt, trace
•
SANDY SHELL - shell, 50 to 608, very
10-20
pale orange, fine to medium fine
fragments; sand, 40 to 508, clear
•
to moderate light brown to frosted,
fine-grained; silt, trace
•
SAND - sand, 80 to 908, clear to
20-50
moderate light and medium dark
brown, fine- to medium -grained;
shell, 10 to 208, bleached, fine
to medium fine fragments; silt,
trace, moderate brown
SAND AND SHELL - shell, 508, bleached,
50-70
to medium dark gray, fine to
medium coarse fragments; sand,
508, clear to frosted, fine- to
medium fine-grained, fairly
well sorted, phosphatic
CLAYEY SHELLY SAND - sand, 608, clear
70-75
to frosted, very fine- to fine-
grained, quartzitic; clay, 208,
grayish green, soft; shell, 208,
very pale orange to moderate
brown, medium to coarse fragments
Thickness
(Feet)
5
10
30
20
5
- 2 -
Thickness
(Feet)
20
5+
Monitoring Well M1D
Depth
Interval
Sample Description
(Feet)
SHELLY SAND - sand, 60 to 70%, clear
75- 95
to frosted, very fine- to
medium fine-grained, sub-
angular to sub -rounded, quartz-
itic; shell, 30 to 40%, very
pale orange to moderate brown
to medium light gray, very
fine -to medium fragments;
silt, trace
CLAYEY SAND - sand, 50%, clear to
95 -
frosted, very fine- to fine-
grained, quartzitic; sandy
clay, 30%, grayish green,
soft, plastic, sandy; shell,
20%, very pale orange to
moderate brown, medium coarse
fragments
TOTAL DEPTH
100
Thickness
(Feet)
20
5+
GEOLOGIC LOG
OF
MONITORING WELL
M2D
SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA
Depth
Interval
Thickness
Sample Description
(Feet)
(Feet)
^
SAND AND LIMESTONE - sand, 50%,
0- 5
5
clear to frosted, fine -
to medium -grained, sub-
angular to sub -rounded, quartz;
limestone, 50%, very pale
^
orange to medium light gray,
fine-grained, granular, medium
porosity; clay, trace
SANDY SHELL - shell, 60%, very pale
5-15
10
orange, fine to coarse frag-
ments; sand, 40%, clear to
frosted, very fine- to medium
fine-grained, quartz
SHELLY SAND - sand, 60%, clear to
15-38
23
grayish orange, very fine- to
fine-grained, sub -angular;
shell, 40%, very pale orange
to medium light gray, very
^
fine to medium fine fragments
CLAYEY SAND - sand, 60%, very fine-
38-45
7
to fine-grained, sub -angular to
sub -rounded; clay, 30%, greenish
gray, soft, plastic, sandy;
shell, 10%, bleached, fine
fragments
^
SHELLY SAND - sand, 60 to 70%, clear
45-55
10
to frosted, very fine- to medium
fine-grained, sub -rounded; shell,
30 to 408, very pale orange to
medium dark gray, very fine to
medium fragments; clay, trace
Monitoring Well M2D
Sample Description
CLAYEY, SHELLY SAND (interbedded) -
sand, 508, clear to frosted,
very fine- to medium fine-
grained, sub -rounded; shell,
258, very pale orange to
medium dark gray, very fine
to medium fragments; clay,
258, greenish gray, soft,
.. plastic, sandy
SAND AND SHELL - sand, 608, clear
to frosted, very fine- to
medium fine-grained, phosphatic,
quartzitic; shell, 408, very
pale orange to moderate brown
and medium light gray, very
fine to medium fragments
CLAYEY SAND - sand, 608, clear,
very fine to fine-grained,
sub -angular to sub -rounded,
quartz; clay, 258, medium
dark gray, soft, plastic,
sandy; shell, 158, very pale
orange, fine fragments
TOTAL DEPTH
W
M
M
Depth
Interval
(Feet)
55- 70
70- 90
100
Thickness
(Feet)
15
20
10+
U-1
GEOLOGIC LOG
OF
MONITORING WELL M3
SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Sample Description
CLAYEY SAND - sand, 658, grayish
orange to clear, fine-grained,
with grayish orange silt;
clay, 308, grayish orange to
medium light gray, soft, plastic,
sandy; silt, 58, medium light
gray
.. SHELLY SAND - sand, 608, clear to
frosted, fine- to medium
coarse-grained, sub -angular
to sub -rounded; shell, 308,
fine to medium fragments;
clay, 108, medium light gray,
.. soft, plastic, sandy
_ SHELLY SAND - sand, 60%, clear to
frosted, fine- to medium -
grained, sub -angular to sub -
rounded, phosphatic; shell,
408, medium dark gray, fine
fragments
SAND - sand, 958, clear to moderate
brown, very fine- to medium -
grained, quartzitic; silt,
58, moderate brown
CLAY - clay, 808, olive black,
soft, plastic; shell, 208,
bleached (very pale orange,
medium coarse fragments)
Depth
Interval
(Feet)
0- 5
5-10
10-25
25-35
35-40
Thickness
(Feet)
5
5
15
lu
5
- 2 -
M Monitoring well M3
Sample Description
SHELLY SAND - sand, 70%, clear to
frosted, fine- to medium -
grained, sub -angular to sub -
rounded, phosphatic; shell,
25%, very pale orange to
medium dark gray, very fine
+� to fine fragments; clay, trace,
medium light gray, sandy
CLAYEY SHELL - shell, 60%, very
pale orange to moderate brown
to medium dark gray, fine to
.. coarse fragments; sand, 20%,
clear, fine-grained, quartzitic;
clay, 20%, dusky yellow green,
soft, slightly sandy
SHELLY SAND - sand, 70%, clear to
■' frosted, very fine- to medium -
grained, sub -angular to sub -
rounded, quartzitic; shell,
■' 30%, very pale orange to
medium dark gray, very fine to
medium fine fragments
CLAY - clay, 80%, dusky yellow,
green to medium light gray,
soft, plastic, sandy; shell,
20%, very pale orange to
moderate brown, coarse frag-
ments
TOTAL DEPTH
am
Depth
Interval
(Feet)
40-60
60-70
70-90
"I
100
Thickness
(Feet)
20
10
10
10+
M
.� GEOLOGIC LOG
OF
MONITORING WELL M4
SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Depth
Interval
�. Sample Description (Feet)
SAND - sand, 95%, clear to light 0- 5
.� brown to frosted, fine- to
coarse-grained, sub -angular
to rounded; shell, trace, gray
SAND - sand, 80%, clear to frosted,
very fine- to medium -grained,
.+ sub -angular, quartz; clay, 15%
very pale orange, soft, plastic;
silt, 5%
SAND -sand, 85%, clear to frosted, 5-10
very fine- to fine-grained, sub-
angular to sub -rounded; shell,
15%, very pale orange, fine
fragments; organics, trace
SAND - sand, 80%, clear, very fine- 10-20
to fine-grained, sub -angular to
sub -rounded; shell, 15%, very
pale orange, fine fragments;
organics, trace
SAND - sand, 80%, clear, fine- to 20-28
medium -grained, sub -angular;
shell, 20%, very pale orange
to medium dark gray, medium
fine fragments
CLAY - clay, 80%, olive gray, soft, 28-40
plastic, sandy; shell, 208, very
pale orange, fine to coarse
fragments
Thickness
(Feet)
5
5
10
0
12
- 2 -
Monitoring Well M4
Depth
Interval Thickness
Sample Description (Feet) (Feet)
CLAYEY SAND - sand, 608, clear, 40-45 5
fine-grained, sub -angular;
., clay, 208, olive gray, soft,
plastic; shell, 208, very
pale orange, fine to medium
fragments
SAND - sand, 60 to 708, clear to 45-55 10
.. frosted, very fine -.to medium -
grained, sub -angular to sub -
rounded; shell, 30 to 408,
.. very pale orange -to medium
dark gray, very fine to
medium fragments
M
M
SAND AND SHELL - sand, 508, clear to 55-65 10
frosted, very fine- to medium -
grained, sub -angular to sub -
rounded; shell, 508, very pale
orange to medium dark gray,
very fine to medium fragments
SAND - sand, 708, clear, fine- to 65-70 5
medium fine-grained, sub-
angular, quartz; shell, 208,
very pale orange to medium
dark gray, fine to medium
fragments; clay, 10%,
medium light gray, soft,
sandy
SHELL - shell, 808, natural colors 70-80 10
to medium dark gray, fine to
medium coarse fragments; sand,
158, clear, fine-grained, quartz;
clay, trace, medium light gray
M
M
- 3 -
Monitoring Well M4
^
Depth
Interval
Thickness
Sample Description
(Feet)
(Feet)
^ SHELL - shell, 70%, natural colors
80-85
5
to medium dark gray, fine to
medium coarse fragments; lime-
stone, 15%, medium dark gray,
fine-grained, soft, sandy;
sand, 15%, clear, fine-grained,
^ quartz
CLAY - clay, 70 to 80%, medium
85-
15+
light gray, soft, plastic,
sandy; shell, 20 to 308,
very pale orange to moderate
brown, medium to coarse
fragments
^ TOTAL DEPTH
100
^
Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
m
m
m
0
m
m
m
w
m
APPENDIX B
Graphed Data and Interpretations
PWI Test
City of Sebastian
1225 MAIN STREET o SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958
TELEPHONE (407) 589-5330 0 FAX (407) 589-5570
DATE: December 20, 1994
TO: Emergency Generator File
FROM: Richard Votapka, Utilities Director it (3\�
SUBJECT: -Capacity of Emergency Generators at the Filbert St.
Water Treatment Plant and Bailey Drive Wastewater
Treatment Plant
1. The Filbert Street Water Plant has a 350 KW diesel generator
2. The Bailey Drive Wastewater Treatment Plant has a 100 KW
diesel generator.
/sg
S E3ks-T % A N.
1=ILBEP—c S;7-
Water plant operation procedures.
Start up.
On control panel.
I. Turn on Slaker.
2. Turn on Lime Panel.
3. Turn on Return Sludge Pump.
4. Turn on wells #1 and #2.
5. Turn on timers.
6. Turn on chlorinator adjust to 60-63.
7. Turn on filters.
!-1l6µ LANDS
8.
Turn on Precipitator Influent. (Full open 10 seconds)
8a.
Down to 1st line.
8b.
30min 2nd line.
8c.
1 hour open 100 percent.
9.
Turn on Timer Switches.
aN
10.
Turn on Polymer. (Plug in)
aFF
11.
Turn on water valve under cones.
12.
Turn on Slaker Switches.�ic�NTfl13.
t(s)
Turn on water valve behind unit.
� V
14.
Set slaker feed rate to 8.
15.
On Prec. Check Polymer Feed rate
(8.5)ml/min.
16.
Check 5gal. Polymer How Full.
17.
Check filter adjustment.
18.
Check slaker adjustment.
19.
Turn off return sludge pump and backwash. (For 10 sec)
20.
Get water sample from precipator
and PLT Effluent.
H93
1�tol3
St^(3AS�T�AN NSC N\A�pS
r-7\LCs�zZ S t, L A--( CI(—caeA7mourT Pk-A,�r
Shut off procedures
1. Shut off return sludge, silo, and lime buttons on control panel.
2. Close precip valve.
3. unplug mf -300
4. Turn off panel and water inside slaker room.
5. Close injector.
6. Flush back blow down line and return sludge line.
7. Turn off wells.
B. Close off filters.
9. Turn off timer switches in# breaker box. CH G �i s c Rvice �w.M
ON a
MANWGRL
oFF P0517- o J
)993
Se6As-T%AN k%6" LA-r4bf
rIL(�erL� ST, (, A -TM -7trATr,ew7 P.n rT
Backwash Procedures.
1. Open drain valve. (Big)
2. Start backwash pump.
3. Close top small valve.
4. Open botton small valve.
5. Help open backwash valve with wrench.
6. Start stop watch.
7. Close bottom small valve.
8. After one minute open surface wash valve.
9. After 6 minutes close surface wash valve.
19
10. After 10 minutes open top small valve. (This closes backwash valve)
11. Shut off backwash pump.
12. Open influent valve.
13. Close drain valve. (Big)
14. Open small drain valve. (Flush for 5 minutes)
15. Close small drain valve.
16. Close influent valve.
Filter is clean and ready for use.
Chlorides
25 m/1 sample.
Few drops of Chromate. (yellow)
Titrate with Silver Nitrate till turns color. (oil)
Multiply reading times 2.
Phenol AIK on precip only.
Add drops of Phenol Ind.
To 25 m/1 sample turns red.
Titrate with Sulfuric Acid till turns clear.
Take reading multiply x 4.
Add few drops of Methol purple turns green. -ToT;9L
Titrate with sulfuric acid till turns purple. ALK y LINiry
Take reading x 4.
Total Hardness
25 m/1 sample add dash of crystal plus total hard Buffer,Turns red.
Titrate with EDTA till turns Blue.
Reading x 4.
Cal Hardness
25 m/1 sample add dash of crystals and Cal. Hard Buffer turns red.
Titrate with EDTA till turns blue. Reading x 4.
Treatment
Chemicals
Sludge Drawoff Ports
SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS WATER TREATMENT PLANT
CITY OF SEBASTIAN
December 30, 1993
The system operates between 62 psi and 52 psi
The plant has a control panel as manufactured by "PROTROL" in
Winter Haven, Florida
There are three (3) pumps in the plant as follows:
A
0
C
1. North Pump Number 1
2. 600 gpm pump
3. Pacific Pump Company (PACO), Milford, Del
4. Catalog No. 29-30146-740001
5. Serial No. DUWF27242A
6. 8" intake
7. 6" discharge pipe
8. TDH 160
9. Imp. Dia. 13.18"
10. 4" inlet
11. 3" outlet
12. Lincoln Electric Motor, Cleveland, Ohio
13. RPM 1765
14. 40 HP
1. Middle Pump Number 2
2. 250 gpm
3. Pump - PACO
4. Catalog No. 29-30145-740001
5. Serial No. DUMF 27241-A
6. 6" intake
7. 6" discharge
S. TDH 160
9. Imp. Dia. 12.42"
10. Lincoln Electric Motor
11. RPM 1750
12. 25 HP
13. Volts 230/460
14. Phase 3
15. Amp 64/32
16. Frame 2847
17. Serial No. 2604167
1. South Pump Number 3
2. 400 gpm pump
3. Pacific Pump Company (PACO), Milford, Del.
4. Catalog No. 29-30146-740001
5. Serial No. DUMP 27243A
6. 8" intake
7. 6" discharge
8. TDH 160
Page 2 of 2
Sebastian Highlands Water Treatment Plant December 30, 1993
9.
Imp. Dia. 12.65
10.
MOTOR
11.
RPM 1755
12.
30 HP
13.
Volts 230/460
14.
Phase 3
15.
Amp 74/37
16.
Frame 2867
17.
Serial No. 261001
-
Table 1
• SUMMARY OF UNIT
CAPACITIES--SESASTIMI HIGHLANDS
NTP
Actual (Installed) or
Item
Rated Capacity
Required Capacity
Well Pump No. 1
600 gpm @ 65 ft
530 gpn
Well Pump No. 2
600 gpm @ 55 ft
550 gpn
Transfer Pumps (2)
700 gpm @ 25 ft
700 gpn
Backwash Pump
- 2,200 gpr., @ 72 ft
2,800-3,000 gpn
High Service Pump No. 1
400 gpm @ 160 ft
400 gpm
NoT'n srro-« _ High Service Pump No. 2
250 gpn @ 160 ft
250 gpm
High Service -Pum p No. 3
600 gpm @ 160 ft
600 gpm
Sludge Pumps (2)
250 gpm @ 65 ft
120 gpmh
Washwater Recovery Pumps (2)
70 gpm @ 16 ft
80 gpm
• Aerator
1,800 gpm
1,800 gpm
Precipitator
- 466 gpn
466 gpm°
Filters (3)
233 gpm
233 gpm
Washwater Holding Pond
510,000 gal
510,000 gal--Volu.^e
for 11 backwashes
Sludge Pond No. 1
310,000 gal
310,000 gal
Sludge Pond No. 2
290,000 gal
290.,000 gal
ClearwelT•
5,000 gal
5,000 gal
. Cround Storage Reservoir. -
500,000 gal
500,000 gal
Flowmeters
- -
-
Raw Water: 6 -in Turbine -
100-900 gpm
100-600 gpm
Precipitator Influent: 6 -in Turbine
100-1,000 gpm
100-700 gpm
Finished Hater: 4 -in Turbine
100-400 gpm
- 100-400 gprx
t
Finished Water: 12 -in Turbine
- 200-2,200 gpm
300-1,900 gpm '
Backwash Water: Orifice
1,000-3,000 gpn
2,000-3,C00
Lime Feed System.
Storage Silo
50 tons
50 tons; 60 days it
.. -
0-67 mgd
Slaker/Feeder
Alum 6aed Syetn
1,000 lb/hr
65-100 lb/hc-
=p-`nom�T
369 �al
360 ga!
-.399 ;99"4s{' cdny
Polymer Feed System
T-1-
,66
a/,,..:,,-_
55 'a;
HoCwri^g n -
Chlorination Systcm
i nn--�'�T
50-70 lb/day
.�
56 lb/day
b8ased on installed pump speed of 1,750 gpm.
Based on modified pump speed of 950 rpm.
ceased on 20-ninute nixing/flocculation time, not the recomacnded 30 ninutes-
�� round
yit
co�Zpit
<I
'I
Fl+er•'wmk
I
w ado/:
Fin ier FIM flier I I
S i a� 'LjI
Renin
i � Limraell
I :.
�� round
I'/7-177
I iil i I 1111 ! !I I II iI I � '
I I l i I I IIII I I
�j li �l Ilei � IIII'I Ijlil I Illi I I
III i I! ii I II I�lllil Itl ;IIII
5fi,lI,
I
ii II IiI.II 1 jli�I jli;I �, I W43el 1S1ui d5ei
I l!li Ili; II
Bed.
!!Illljlll�Il ��1! I I11iIiIII, II'I ifI1II
II !! ill I
111 Illi i I I it I I
I I I I
i Iilll
1 I I I I
I i
I II ljl ,III � Itl j,
! II I 11 it I II I I
, I i II iilllill,
'iii I I Ij Da
I I I!ve �/'y��le i ti U'ti ii ies �hc.:
j 1111,1! !jl P'1 !II is
I jj;! III;i i;lli�
S1�j' Iji
iHL9�I I II !
� I IQs ian,
iII
I I ! I
1.111 I ..i
I I 1!111 li�l jlll 1�/ I I
I..i mqj So �e�irj Wq'�er Treq. m� n
i �Il l y•
,1!1111 Iiil iil illllljli I! lii�l i I
I � i
i'
Pig nI
II
IIIII
I iIi
'll
i
I
IilIlj
I
i
111
1
'
Illli
lil
dill
.
I
III
1
II
I
I
I
i
.I1
I!
,
I
'
I
It
I
1
III
I:.
Ijll
'llillii'II
i
I'/7-177
I iil i I 1111 ! !I I II iI I � '
I I l i I I IIII I I
�j li �l Ilei � IIII'I Ijlil I Illi I I
III i I! ii I II I�lllil Itl ;IIII
5fi,lI,
I
ii II IiI.II 1 jli�I jli;I �, I W43el 1S1ui d5ei
I l!li Ili; II
Bed.
!!Illljlll�Il ��1! I I11iIiIII, II'I ifI1II
II !! ill I
111 Illi i I I it I I
I I I I
i Iilll
1 I I I I
I i
I II ljl ,III � Itl j,
! II I 11 it I II I I
, I i II iilllill,
'iii I I Ij Da
I I I!ve �/'y��le i ti U'ti ii ies �hc.:
j 1111,1! !jl P'1 !II is
I jj;! III;i i;lli�
S1�j' Iji
iHL9�I I II !
� I IQs ian,
iII
I I ! I
1.111 I ..i
I I 1!111 li�l jlll 1�/ I I
I..i mqj So �e�irj Wq'�er Treq. m� n
i �Il l y•
,1!1111 Iiil iil illllljli I! lii�l i I
I � i
i'
Pig nI
II
IIIII
I iIi
'll
i
I
I
i
111
1
'
I
III
1
II
I
I
I
i
.I1
I!
,
I
'
I
It
I
I'/7-177
I iil i I 1111 ! !I I II iI I � '
I I l i I I IIII I I
�j li �l Ilei � IIII'I Ijlil I Illi I I
III i I! ii I II I�lllil Itl ;IIII
5fi,lI,
I
ii II IiI.II 1 jli�I jli;I �, I W43el 1S1ui d5ei
I l!li Ili; II
Bed.
!!Illljlll�Il ��1! I I11iIiIII, II'I ifI1II
II !! ill I
111 Illi i I I it I I
I I I I
i Iilll
1 I I I I
I i
I II ljl ,III � Itl j,
! II I 11 it I II I I
, I i II iilllill,
'iii I I Ij Da
I I I!ve �/'y��le i ti U'ti ii ies �hc.:
j 1111,1! !jl P'1 !II is
I jj;! III;i i;lli�
S1�j' Iji
iHL9�I I II !
� I IQs ian,
iII
I I ! I
1.111 I ..i
I I 1!111 li�l jlll 1�/ I I
I..i mqj So �e�irj Wq'�er Treq. m� n
i �Il l y•
,1!1111 Iiil iil illllljli I! lii�l i I
I � i
i'
Pig nI
0
Well .1
l 6ao r pm I :. Rec-ipitQtor
4E66Fm ..�I-''--
I � j
' I I
I : : :O silo
' I So TOry
... _I .._...__.
I F'it ev.. FI HeI F, flit
l � 1 4.p AddbPm d.'3d bPw
0
, For the Year Ended December 31, 19_
2 Company Name: 4;,e 1/'MAh'am
3
4
S
R
7
a
9
10
I
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
PUMPS ;
Manufacturer and Type (i.e. Date Date of Last
High Service Well Standby, etc.) Capacity Invallrri ?,.r,..,,_ Date of Last
Page W-7
rV, FJ if
.
rw e � Z
1141, Ser -� 3
600 cr
o 6
oo GPv?
,7 o GP
4
1983
I R 83
i 4 83
► R 83
IR83
S - 30- 9A
A.ZIG-iv)AL morU2
- h
7 I ��-
��a s
9��
o2i t}1 L molar-
OQ-,AI P�j , r'
oft 1rs na i �, 0
m(LICrn i uN,
ie'3
O Q. I G-, ✓t ri
oa.IG-, n
WELLS
CITY OF SEBASTIAN LE17M OF WANSA TAI.
1225 MAIN STREET
SEBASTIAN, FL 32958 owe APRIL 11
PHONE (407) 589-5330 wTrewnoe: GARY REVNOIR
FAX (407) 589-5570 T:P• Ci71:tACfTAU TITruT eunc LM AT7DT a Vo
TO: HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES IN
201 E PINE STREET, STE 1000
ORLANDO. FLORIDA 32801
WE ARE SENDING YOU R/ATTACHEO ❑ UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
❑ COPY OF LETTER ❑ COPY OF MEMO ❑ PERMIT APPLICATION ❑ PRINTS
❑ SPECIFICATIONS ❑ CHANGE ORDER ❑ SHOP DRAWINGS ❑ OTHER
COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION
1 BUSINESS ENERGY EVALUATION, CITY OF SEBASTIAN WATER
TREATMENT PLANT, 170 FILBERT STREET, SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW:
❑ FOR APPROVAL ❑ APPROVED AS SUBMITTED
DjrFOR YOUR USE ❑ APPROVED AS NOTED
[—]AS REQUESTED ❑ RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS
❑ FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ❑ OTHER
REMARKS:
COPY TO:
❑ RESUBMIT COPIES FOR APPROVAL
❑
SUBMIT—COPIES FOR DISTRIBUTION
❑ RETURN _ CORRECTED PRINTS
SIGNED: IZ4..d/ K 2
IPEACL0SMSAMAVTASM7T&A =LYAVTIAPUSAT 0AM
Kind of F: pe mved or
(Cast Iron, VCP, PVC, etc.)
(a)
27 Force: CA, PVC
28 P 6 2 400
29 $•
30 Gravity:
31 ay 9,120 -0- - -
32 PVC 120
33 0- -
34
35
LIFT STATIONS
Location Pumps: Name, Size, Type
COLLECTING SEWERS
Diameter Firn of
Of Pipc Year
3,600
Added r;bandoned End of Year
-0- - 3• o
'36'
Sc !
r C/
(aG L.S'`
/
Go�„� F
- T-✓ .✓rt;f.
37
J8
.C,p,!!j!
Ca a ,JA
a "V" r/
S<ac T
p f ,.S
GJ
CrL
OU
4�Q
u�ort�
O,five
kJf!•L�s10 L.1
'�J
•r —
'� "
H.P. GPM TDH
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES WATER PLANT
August 23, 1993
1. Look at the degasifier. See if it needs to be cleaned and
repaired. The interior is fiberglass, the outside is steel. Look
at the condition of the screens.
2. From the degasifier, water goes to a rectangular clarifier.
GDU is now using polymers. Alum had been previously used, but
didn't work properly. Check the turbidity, it was very high,
between 80-100. The Permutit Rectangular Clarifier never really
has worked well. The polymer is pumped in as a slurry. It has an
automatic piping system to remove sludge, but it doesn't work
correctly. The operator has to keep shutting the clarifier down to
remove sludge build up. This is done about once every two weeks.
It could be that the injecting polymer is in the wrong place (WILL
NEED POLYMER STUDIES) (WILL NEED CORROSION CONTROL STUDIES). There
is a PH problem. It is too basic.
To check for line sludge, open hydrants to see if there is a lot of
residual sludge in the distribution system. The plant is in bad
shape. GDU never cared how it was operated. The lime feeds into
the clarifier.
From the Clarifier water goes to the filters. The filters become
clogged because of the lime carryover. The excess lime should be
pumped to the lagoons.
Look into clarifier. Probably will see a large lime buildup on the
bottom. There is a hydrant at the plant. Open it up to see if you
get white milky or tan water out of it. This will indicate the
buildup of lime in the system.
There are three filters in the system. The filter nearest the
pumping room may be higher in elevation than the other two. The
other two will have to do most of the filtering. The filters have
to be taken out once per year. They should backwash the filter
every 50 hours. They had to backwash every 20 hours because the
lime was sticking to the media. Backwash from the filters goes
into the concrete lined lagoon. The clear water on top (or
supernatant) is reused and goes back into the clarifier. There was
much sludge from the filters in the supernatant. Check the
condition of the lagoon. There should be no growth in it, algae,
cat -o -nine tails.
There are two sludge lagoons for the clarifier (accelerator). One
is for backup. The waste sludge from the clarifier should be
Page 2 of 2
August 23, 1993, GDU Water Treatment Plant
pumped into the lagoon. If it is not working properly, the sludge
goes into the filters and clogs them. Then the sludge enters the
storage tank and spills over into the distribution system.
There are underdrains below the clarifier which are about two feet
below the bottom. They must dig up to check to see if they are
clogged. There is a sludge well by the filters that should be
checked. The pump should pump sludge into the sludge lagoons,
otherwise the sludge goes through the system. Once the sludge is
dried in the lagoon, a contractor can haul it out. Ask GDU what
they do with the sludge.
The pH in the settling unit is out of control. It is extremely
basic. The maximum should be 9.65. Cannot get the 7.6 ph value
that GDU is indicating in the finished water column 39 because the
ph is too high in the settling unit. The free chlorine should be
3.5 minimum at discharge at the plant.
Should check the tank visually to see if there is sludge buildup.
Should check the underground clear well next to the filters to see
if there is a sludge buildup. Will indicate the performance of the
filters.
Check a fire hydrant furthest away from the plant for sludge and
chlorine residual. Check on Wimbrow.
If the plant wasn't in a residential area the chlorine would be so
high once the water was distributed in the mains.
GOUPLAtt
INSPECTION REPORT OF THE GDU WATER TREATMENT PLANT
By Richard B. Votapka, Utilities Director, City of Sebastian
August 31, 1993
Deaasifier
The degasifier (aerator) needs to be painted. There is loose paint
on the underside of the bowl and rust is apparent on the rim just
below the screens. The screens are corroded, especially on the
north side, and should be replaced. The screen access door is
missing entirely. The fiberglass cascade aerator is black from the
formation of sulfide algae growth and must be cleaned.
Hydropneumatic Tank
The hydropneumatic tank is in good condition on the outside. There
is no apparent rust on the tank. I had Ron, the GDU operator flush
the tank. The water was only tan colored for a minute or less,
then it was clear. Tan colored water will indicate lime sludge on
the bottom of the tank.
Precipitator (Clarifier)
The system has a Wallace Tiernan chemical feed pump for injection
of Moor Floc 300 FL polymer into the influent trough on top of the
precipitator. According to Ron, the plant operator, a polymer
study was done and jar tests were run to determine the amount of
polymer needed. The raw water comes in pre -mixed with return lime
sludge which is pumped from the bottom of the precipitator. Also,
introduced into the trough is reclaimed water from the concrete
lined sludge lagoon (pond), lime slurry from the slaker in the
silo, and the polymer which is fed by a chemical feed pump. There
was no supernatant from the backwash lagoon coming into the trough.
The lime softening is operable from 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. during
normal plant operations, seven days per week during which the
500,000 gallon ground water storage tank is filled. The feed rate
for the polymer is 8ml/min. Five (5) gallon Floc 300 FL polymer
containers are used only a couple of times per week. I found high
turbidity (very milky) water in the entire precipitator. There
should be two to three feet of clear wa�e +J the sludge blanket.
The final effluent was not very clear upon leaving the
precipitator.
The cross channel support members were very rusty, rust is scaling.
They need to be repainted. The outside of the tank was in good
condition. I could not determine the condition of the tank
interior because of the turbidity.
Page 2 of 4
Inspection Report of the GDU Water Treatment Plant
Lime Silo
The lime silo has 2 vibrators on the bottom of the hopper. The
control panel is manufactured by Wallace & Tiernan. According to
Ron of GDU, the normal operation uses approximately 150 pounds of
lime per day. A 10% feed rate is maintained to keep the pH around
10 in the precipitator. The fan casing and the base plates are
rusted because of the high humidity inside the silo. The interior
of the silo was clean and the equipment seems to be working
properly. The metal doors on the silo need to be replaced since
they are rusted badly. The electrical control panel for the fan
and dust collector is located outside and is in good condition.
The sludge pit outside of silo is extremely turbid (milky). The
pumps in the sludge pit pump sludge to the sludge lagoon on the
south side of the concrete lined lagoon. The effluent line from
the precipitator goes to a manifold pipe to the filters. Backwash
water for filters comes from the clear well located on the east
side of the filters. There are three (3) filters as follows:
Filter 1 - center filter
Filter 2 - easternmost filter
Filter 3 - westernmost filter
During normal operations only two filters are used at a time. All
three filters were completely filled with water. The water was so
turbid that I wasn't able to see beyond 6" from the surface. Too
much turbidity caused by excessive lime that was not removed by the
precipitator could easily clog the filters if backwashing of the
filters is not done on a frequent basis.
Clear Well
I had the cover removed from the 5,000 gallon clear well but
couldn't see too clearly because of the darkness in the tank.
There are two Peerless pumps which operate on floats which pump
finished water to the ground water storage tank. I was not able to
see into the ground water storage tank because there was no*#
evident access part.
Sludge Lagoons
The sludge lagoons were recently cleaned. It was apparent that the
sludge discharge pipes were totally buried. I couldn't find where
the ends of the pipes were in each lagoon. There was a blowoff at
Page 3 of 4
Inspection Report of the GDU Water Treatment Plant
the east end of the easternmost sludge holding pond. The condition
of the berms was poor. The side slopes of the berms need to be
regraded and stabilized with sod. Algae is very thick in the
Backwash Save All Lagoon. There was much growth and vegetation all
over the bottom.GDU currently uses a lawn service to mow the grass
at the plant.
Chlorine Iniection Points
There are three different points for chlorination:
1. Inject CL= before the ground water storage tank.
2. Inject CL= after the ground water storage tank.
3. Inject CL= at point of entry into the distribution system.
A Cobra air compressor is located in the generator room to
supply air to the hydropneumatic tank. An Onan Generator Model 350
DFN - 12R/18781C, 355 KW can power the entire plant. The date it
was placed in service was October 5, 1982. The diesel generator is
checked constantly to make sure it is running properly. A log is
kept to keep track of the run times. The doors to the generator
room do not close properly and may have to be replaced. The plant
has a control room with a sophisticated control panel - manufactur-
er unknown. There was no name plate on the panel. The elapsed
time meters in the panel for the supernatant pumps in the Backwash
Save All Lagoon both read zero. I asked the operator why both
meters read zero and was informed that the operator manually reads
the hours for which these pumps operate but keeps the records
elsewhere.
There is a laboratory in the main building housing the control
lab. I looked at several daily report logs. I asked if they
checked for color and iron. Ron told me that color and iron is
checked daily but none exists.
I opened a fire hydrant across the street from the plant.
Initially, the water from the hydrant was tan in color. However,
it cleared up shortly, approximately 15 seconds after running the
hydrant.
I was supplied some information on the plant but Buddy
Betschard was not able to give me an annual report. Basically, the
plant appears to be in a good state of repair although the
Page 4 of 4
Inspection Report of the GDU Water Treatment Plant
degasifier and lime silo should be painted to prevent further
rusting. The Backwash Save All Lagoon and lime sludge ponds
indicate to me that the lime sludge has not been properly
discharged during operation. This is more of a problem with
operation. However, all three ponds need to be cleaned out.
According to Buddy Betscherdt the sludge ponds have never been
cleaned out. The would explain the fact that the discharge pipes
are buried below the lime sludge. There had been a thick growth of
vegetation in the ponds as evidenced by grass and weeds growing
through the sludge even though the vegetation ponds had been
cleared recently.
Based on my inspection, I could not determine if there was a
large lime build-up in the filters, clear well, and ground water
storage tank. Flushing the hydrant outside the plant didn't reveal
an excess of lime in the system. However, the fact that the lime
sludge ponds were in very poor condition may indicate that most of
the lime maybe going into the distribution system.
I obtained aerial photographs dated May 1984, February 1988,
and January 1992. The May 1984 aerial shows the Backwash Save All
Lagoon in excellent condition. The southeast sludge lagoon is full
of lime sludge; the southwest lagoon is partially full. The
February 1988 aerial shows the Backwash Save All Lagoon with a
buildup of what appears to be algae in the southeast corner. A
small amount of lime sludge is only apparent in the southeast
sludge lagoon. Vegetative growth appears to cover the majority of
the sludge lagoons. The January 1992 aerial shows no lime sludge
in the sludge lagoons. They are very heavily vegetated. It is my
opinion that the precipitator capacity seems to be unable to handle
the existing flow. The entire unit may have to be replaced.
nol¢o94n
BUSINESS ENERGY EVALUATION
CITY OF SEBASTIAN
WATER TREATMENT PLANT
170 FILBERT ST
SEBASTIAN, FL
FACILITY DESCRIPTION
A Business Energy Evaluation was conducted at 170 Filbert St. at
the City of Sebastian's Water Plant to help identify
opportunities for conserving energy. The majority of the load in
the facility is comprised of motor load and lighting load with
some miscellaneous equipment as well. Motors range in horsepower
from 1 HP to 50 HP while the lighting is comprised of primarily
Mercury Vapor and incandescent exterior lighting and fluorescent
and incandescent interior lighting.
A summary of the major loads begins on the next page.
MOTORS:
PUMP HOUSE•
HIGH SERVICE PUMPS- 1-40 HP
1-25 HP
1-30 HP
AIR COMPRESSOR- 1-5 HP
CHLORINE ROOM
1- 1 HP CHLORINE PUMP MOTOR
WELLS•
1-15HP PUMP (LOCAL TO PLANT SITE)
NOTE: THERE IS AN ADDITIONAL WELL PUMP, BUT IT IS NOT ON THIS
SERVICE.
1- 2 HP PUMP
1 SMALL PUMP FOR THE MF 300
LIME TREATMENT AREA:
2- 1/4 HP MOTORS
1- 1 HP MOTOR
2- 230 V AGITATOR MOTORS
SLUDGE PIT:
2- 2 HP PUMPS
CLEAR WELL•
2- 10 HP PUMPS
1- 50 HP PUMP MOTOR
AERATOR•
HP IS UNKNOWN
LIGHTING
INTERIOR LIGHTING
OFFICE: 6- 3 BULB FIXTURES @ 40 WATT FLUORESCENT EACH
2- INCANDESCENT BULBS IN BATHROOM
PUMP HOUSE: 13- 2 BULB FIXTURES @ 40 WATT FLUORESCENTS EACH
CHLORINE ROOM: 1 -INCANDESCENT BULB
GARAGE: 12- 40 WATT BULBS
EXTERIOR LIGHTING
11-250 WATT MERCURY VAPOR FIXTURES FOR SITE LIGHTING
2 -HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM VAPOR LAMPS LOCATED NEAR GROUND TANK
GARAGE: 4-100 WATT BULBS ON EXTERIOR OF BUILDING
MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT
OFFICE: WALL MOUNTED A/C UNIT
SMALL REFRIGERATOR
VARIOUS WATER TREATMENT RELATED EQUIPMENT
On
Since the majority of the load is made up of lighting and motor
load, the recommendations section will concentrate on these
areas.
f3C�li�I�7:i='f3
The motor load in the plant accounts for the majority of the
electrical usage. An effort should be made to go to high
efficiency motors. These motors do the same amount of work with
less electrical usage. However, do not go out and replace these
motors right away. Replacing an existing motor that is operating
fine is not cost effective due to the long payback. Rather, wait
until the motor fails, and then specify a high efficiency motor
as a replacement. The difference in cost is recovered quickly,
and is helped along by FPL's efficient motors program. I have
included some information on this program.
LIGHTING:
Some opportunity exists in the area of lighting to reduce
electrical demand. Since most of the interior lighting is
comprised of 40 watt fluorescent fixtures, investigate replacing
these with a T-8 system utilizing electronic ballasts.
Historically, the savings created by these systems allow for
short paybacks and they also qualify for an incentive under FPL's
Commercial/Industrial lighting program. I have enclosed some
information that will give you an overview of the program. There
are other options available with your lighting system to reduce
demand, such as replacing with 34 watt energy efficient bulbs or
delamping in overlit areas.
I noticed a small amount of the lighting is accomplished with
incandescent fixtures. These should be replaced with compact
fluorescent bulbs. They are available in a variety of equivalent
lumens at greatly reduced wattages. Not only do they use less
energy, but they also have a longer life, thus reducing
maintenance costs.
The exterior lighting is comprised of mostly Mercury Vapor
lighting. This lighting is inefficient and should be replaced
with either High Pressure Sodium Vapor lighting or Metal Halide
lighting. These again will qualify for FPL's
Commercial/Industrial Lighting Program and will reduce energy
consumption.
f i Wcll I
i z
I I j
i
I
I i i
I
snue I
q11 i
PRTh SLn��Ci Vall• L.11��e A*. d
I S:Ip I i I
w aaar:
I I ! I
I
(�nP F Ijcr, Fihrf., 1 I
R� ILI'
M;r Ra m
,rD1.
I St
!:. I
I I I
i � � � ,yWc�ry'nTFot wrr
I
- !Sludge Slud3t.
Bed Bed
i W.1 _.
l
General.'De'veIc, ent Utilities) Irtc
e6Qstlan i96 ands
0:67%M G: D.'
1/ +
Lim eljSo: ter'in9 WQ.ter Tregtmenl
! p 1c, r'
I
i i � - -
� -
� i' � � �
�
�
i i � i ..
-,
Table 1
.. SUMMARY OF UNIT
CAPACITIES --SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS
WTP
Actual (Installed) or
[ten
Rated Capacity
Required Capacity
Well Pump No. 1
600 gpm @ 65 ft
580 qpm
Well Pump No. 2
600 gpm @ 55 ft
550 gpm,
Transfer Pumps (2)
700 gpm @ 25 ft
700 gpm
_ Backwash Pump
2,200 gpn @ 72 ft
2,800-3,000 gpm
High Service Pump No. 1
400 gpm @ 160 ft
400 gpm
NoT-n srrv��E _ High Service Pump No. 2
250 gpm @ 160 ft_
250 gpm
High Service Pump No. 3
600 gpm @ 160 ft
600 gpm
Sludge Pumps (2)
250 gpm @ 65 fta
120 gpm
Washwater Recovery Pumps (2)
70 gpm @ 16 ft
80 gpm
Aerator
- 1,800 gpm
1,800 gpm
Precipitator
466 gpm
466 gpmC
Filters (3)
233 gpm
233 gpm
Washwater Holding Pond
510,000 gal
510,000 gal--Voiurr_
'
for 11 backwashes _
Sludge Pond No. 1
310,000 gal
310,000 gal
Sludge Pond No. 2
290,000 gal
2907_000 gal
ClearwelT•
5,000 gal
5,000 gal
Cround Storage Reservoir.
500,000 gal
500,000 gal
- Flowmeters
Raw Water: 6 -in Turbine
100-900 gpm
100-600 GPM
Precipitator Influent: 6 -in Turbine
100-1,000 gpm
100-700 gpm
Finished Plater: 4 -in Turbine
100-400 gpm
100-400 gpu
j
Finished Water: 12 -in Turbine
200-2,200 gpm
300-1,900 91sT
" Backwash Water: Orifice
1,000-3,000 gpn
2,000-3,000 _qpm
Lime Feed System
- Storage Silo
50 tons
50 tons; 60 days at
..
0.67 mgd -
Slaker/Feeder
- Al-uA Fead Systsm
1,000 lb/hr
65-100 lb/tr
-11a4e-ap-4enic-
149taF49 pLimp
.;69--gal
361) Gal
Polymer Feed System
Inmio
55 gal
9MQ/,•__
E,5 be!
Chlorination System
50-70 lb/day
56 ib/day
bdasca d on installed pump speed of 1,750 gpm.
Based on :.codified pump speed of 950 rpm.
°Based on 20-ninute nixing/flocculation time, not the recomunded 30 minutes_
TREATMENT PLANT INSPECTION
I am suggesting the following procedures in making you decision.
1. Check clear well,storage tank and system for lime build up.
If there is lime in the clear well this is an indication that
the filters are fouled and allowing lime to enter clear well
and storage tank.
2. Check the sludge drying beds. There should be lime build up
or evidence of cleaning. If not ask where is the lime going
from the treatment unit waste line and where is the lime
going that is reported on the monthly report in column 8.
3. Check filter wash water pond for evidence of large deposits
of lime.
This will help confirm what the monthly report is indicating a
problem with the treatment units.
I
1. Ask about compliance problems with chlorinated water being
blended with the raw water. Organic compounds mixed with
chlorinated water produce compounds known as THM .
2. Ask for state testing requirement permits governing gross
alpha, monitoring wells etc. This testing can get expensive.
3. What are they using for corrosion control in the filters
and supply system ?
4. How often are hydrants flushed and ask to see records.
5. How much cement asbestos pipe do they have in the system,
ask to see the prints.
6. Ask to see bacterial results from state on the system and
then check chlorine residuals at end of system.
7. Ask to see maintenance records on all equipment.
$. T5 /Ma✓IL7 G✓lz- SArc/'�Tt1C �Cn�lC&.Pln lee A
SC! ;C'
CAJfIIIICc- 4i, GJ/Ler y ocARVe
ars cmc oT %c CJo`'1-cr :S1Lv4fC Y r��cS
aj; ✓
�f Cvet c me -
C -3
eG.$ SL'`�cSTcd %iy b/ dQ�tnS
1(, {c0✓ liViO�H�G r C,4K en
/�. Ww Me (glrIPiCLA4
o�lC,-c is �� oOci�lr�*w� 2b a �cec/C4/0
AUGUST, 1993
NOTES ON THE GDU WATER TREATMENT PLANT
Check one of the filters to see if the lime has solidified.
Go inside the filter to dig around to see if the lime has hardened
the filter media. The lime may just be used now by GDU to control
the pH in lieu of softening the water. A caustic soda tank and
feed should be added prior to the groundwater storage tank and
after the filters to control pH instead of relying solely on the
lime.
The MOR's phenalthaline hardness is very low. The pH in raw
water is fine, about 7.2. The operators are putting too much
polymer MF 300 in the water. Vero Beach uses .08 ppm for 13.5 mgd
to treat 3651 ppm hardness. GDU uses 10-12 ppm for 0.3 mgd to
treat 264± ppm hardness. GDU is using an extreme amount of
polymer, much more than necessary. A polymer study should be done.
The lime is causing high turbidity. If the polymer and lime
wasn't used, the pH would be between 7.2 - 7.0, excellent. The
chlorine and ammonia would reduce it slightly. The operator is
over treating the water with polymer and lime.
The number of meter connections shown on the MOR's is
incorrect. Also, the design flow is incorrect. The two men whose
names appear on the report were trainees as short as a year or two
at most.
GDU is not reporting iron or color. Iron was 0.2 years ago.
Color was 5, but MOR's don't show any color or iron. Magnesium
reporting seems to be too consistent. Several months have "4" ppm
every day of the month. Chlorides are shown at 44 for the finished
water. Chlorides in the raw water vary.
I can bring water samples down to the lab. The City of Vero
Beach does outside analysis of water. Linda Lawson is the Chemist.
Her phone number is 770-6508. D.W. can bring samples down to the
City plant. Call DER to get MOR's on wastewater treatment plant.
D
Florida Department of Environmental Regulation
Central District • 3319 Maguire Boulevard, Suite 232 • Orlando, Florida 3281.13.3767 • 407.894.7555
nub Martinez. Governor Dale 7Wachonann, Secretary
CERTIFIED July 11, 1989
P109 777 888
General Development Utilities, Inc.
5240 Babcock Street, Northeast
Palm Bay, FL 32905
Attention: Jack Reece, Operations Manager
John Shcarcr, Assistant Secretary
Ales Aleunder. Dcputy Asslsunt Wmall,
OCD -PW -89-0457
Ri ev r County -PW /
P ID Number 3311136 / v� 6 ,�%� �� , ` 61+WJ
Dear Mr. Reece: �SCf�TI '
This will confirm a visit to the subject "community" public water system on
June 20, 1989 by Mr. Frank P. Buttner of this office in the presence of you
and Mr. Keith Knight for the purpose of conducting a sanitary survey. A copy
of the results is enclosed for your reference and records. The overall
operation of the facilities appeared to be very good and we will be evaluating
your nonination for the Annual Awards Program.
Deficiencies noted during the survey and/or determined from records on file in
this office are explained below. Please See page Six (6) of the survey report
form which refers to each violation of Chapters 17-16, 17-550, 17-555 and
17-560 of the Florida Administrative Code for each deficiency.
1. A device to sound an alarm outside of the gas chlorine room or
in the office or laboratory of the plant upon the loss of
chlorination capability is required.
2. Generator run time needs to be increased to maintain the minimum
four hours pei month exercise time.
3. VOC/SOC monitoring (each well) must begin this quarter since the
population served now exceeds 3,300.
4. Outside screens are needed on the ground storage tank ventilator
and the well air relief valve outlets.
It will be necessary for you to correct the above -referenced deficiencies for
the subject system; failure to do so will result in the taking of appropriate
enforcement action by the department. A written response will be expected
within fourteen (14) days after your receipt of this certified letter
regarding actions taken, or to bei taken, to correct the above deficiencies
along with an acceptable and reasonable time frame for accomplishing the
tasks. In addition, we will anticipate a written statement that all
deficiencies have been corrected within 60 days of the date of this letter.
General Development Utities, Inc.
Page Two
OCD -PW -89-0457
July 11, 1989
Please provide the information, where available, for items marked unknown
("unk") on the sanitary survey report. When such unknown information is not
readily available, please note this as "N.A."
The following reference materials are available upon telephone request to Mrs.
Patty Pittman at (407)894-7555, extension 204.
1. Chapter 17-16, Florida Administrative Code.
2. Chapters 17-550, 17-555 and 17-560, Florida Administrative Code.
3. "How Does One Initiate a Cross Connection Control Program."
4. "Be a Cross Connection Expert."
5. "What are Cross Connections?"
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Mr. Frank P.
Huttner at (407)894-7555.
Sincerely,
Jose M. Mc���P.E.
Manager, Drinking Water Program
JMMc:fhp
cc: Indian River County Health Department
DER Melbourne
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION
Sanitary Survey Report
Plant Name SEBASTM" H16NLAND.S' County =ND1A1VR , PWS ID 33 / //3&1,
Plant Address /70F/LBnP7-57-. sF6115nANZip Code 329513 Plant Phone (`o9)J89-03 f0
Owner Name �:;,FHEP.AL 17EVFLor14r1VT &"L/77ES' Owner Phone (3x-) 35a-/33/
Owner Address //// S.SAYSHp!?C D.e, City /h/il l State F -L Zip Code 33131
Date of this Insp. e-20-99Date of last. Insp. b-2 79 Person Contacted YE1714 M16H7
Certified Operators Certified Operators Numbers TA CA-' R,EECE
IcFl77-1 KN/6HT S71,�0-C
ROacr-r C. FLOOD N/SE-EZS
81LL 1GFIh1IN4F? 5'%17'/--C
Population served 3'42 Service Connections 979 % metered l00
Design Capacity 617/ Design Storage Capacity , 505146 Average output .2S0
Maximum Hour — Maximum Day , -67 0IGD Rac,r �rlf.P
4'7or6;,-YOb
CS /1'/617 %sea/eL �' �� h7 n4
Approval Number & Date WC31-2D26B Type meter & copy /7'7,•-t;,C-/906CP."tl,.
RAs.✓ -�"%u rG,:,. COO 6rm
Service area characteristics: (check all that apply) X COMMUNITY/_ NON -COMMUNITY
_ Airport_ Institution
_ Bathing area _ Interstate Carrier
_ Campground _ Lodge
_ Company Town _ Marina
Indian Reservation Motel
Emergency Water Source A1017e—
Type of Standby %yr�brryir<n <m�
v
Sources of Raw Water: x Ground*
How many
wells? 2
_ Recreation area
_ Residential
_ Rest area
_ Restaurant
School
L Subdivision
_ Trailer Park
_ Visitor Center
Other
Emergency Power Source
Capacity of Standby
Surface**
Identify
Source:
Treatment in use at this plant: (check all that apply)
�K Aeration E.D. X Lime Softening
X Chlorination Filtration _ Recarbonation
_ Chlor. -pre. _ Filt.hi-rate _ Reverse Osmosis
Chlor. -post Fluoridation _ pH adjustment
Coagulation _ Iron Removal T & 0 control
What, if any, additional treatment is needed?
For the control of what deficiencies?
*Use Page 2 (Ground)
**Use Page 2 (Surface)
***Page 2 not required
DER Form Perm 13-24 (August, 80)
Purchased***
Identify supply
system:
_ Settling
Zeolite Soft.
)( Other (specify)
A (u vv->_
Sanitary Survey (Groundwater)
Page Two
PWS ID: .33)1136
Well Number*
r
2-
ear Drilled
.
/98/
198/
Dept Dri e
/1
00
/
Length
(outside casing)
CSS
CS
Diameter
(outside casing)
/0
/0'
Materia
(outside casin )
0,, S.
B,S.
ept to static
Water level
76-1
L.S'
Normal suction
lift (wkn level)
23.T
Norma , GPM
5$0
550
Test yie , GPM
Type of grout
Drilling method
Type o strainer
Depth to top
of strainer
Protection from
surface water?
yGs
'[3
Is inundation of—
well possible?
Sa t intrusion
noted in past?
Has the well ever
been contaminated?
"
Pump manufacturer's
2sHv
/S v/
name
Aeee'/
Ss
Model number
Capacity
600
6100
Check valve present
in line?
Date of last servicing
Maintenance Schedule ay mo.
COMMENTS (conditional):
Attach additional s of copies this a
p p ge, as needed.
DER Form Perm 13-24 (August, 80)
Sanitary Survey (Surface Water)
Page Three
PLANT EQUIPMENT
CHLORINATOR:
PWS ID: 33///3
Make of chlorinator _ A.lr',e..:rr Zoo �ZZ Capacity, lb./24 hr. 141915-0
Dual system? 31C-s�' Backup macnine operative ,/ Gas or hypo used CRS ChloriiTe
feed rate 3y Evidence of leaks No Reserve supply 7 -,5-'� ib,
Condition o —equipment quipment Automatic switchover +✓ Air-pac or respirator
adequate i/ Ammonia sme is fresh Ne More capacity needed Residual
at plant 2,2 Residual at remote tap 0_22 ,,;�plgments on chlorination
AERATOR:
Type of aerator C<iSCfJIJE Tray area or weir length /800 6;rwL
Condition of screens Bloodworms present Ivo Condition o
aerator ,/ Adequate for Fe, H23 control J/
COAGULATION:
Chemical used Purpose
Blanket visible Flocculation good or poor Settling goodY
Carryover
LIME SOFTENING:
Quicklime or hydrated Quicklir e- Name of unit PewmU�iZ`T✓r/ i�tiarHu/L //
Size and type yCG 6,-,Y. Any chemicals use 4 _i _ �;,>.,•
Points of application kin unit .Z/✓FL. Nature and abundance o
floc — Appearance of sludge
blanket _ Is settling good ,/
Excessive carryover Son -'F' Tur i ity in c earwell — Secon a3 ry
precipitation — Any filter cementation A/o Effluent staab'.Ii[y —
Recarbonation type wbn/E Slu gee recirculation used Syllr �N7TA11—
FLUORIDATION: // A.
Chemical used Strength if acid Is dilution used (acid) Corrosion
noted a11ing or plugging Fe3er make and model
Split sameagreement Su iHF cient analyses Feeder condition
STABILIZATION: Ni A ,
Stability ind of effluent
Chemicals used
DER Form Perm 13-24 (August, 80) •�
Is pH control practiced
Sanitary Survey (Surface Water)
Page Four
FILTRATION AND FILTRATION:
PWS ID: 33/ //36/1
Type of filters PCRMUTI-r (5,vlimy SgA!_D
Size and number 3 e ?3.s GPM ea.'Length of filter runs y,�
Can you see filter media Is it c can after backwash — Are mCu balls visible—
Is there air -binding — W at is the normal filter rate What is the usual
backwash rate 20 Capacity of filtersZ 33 GP ez. Are i ters overloaded —
Loss in head ga. present — At what head loss is BW done Cracks and Channel=
ing — Has cementation ever occurred NO Where in relation to filtration is sta-
bilization done N.A, If high rate; w -Sat is turbidity at interface —
Range of turbidity sn eMuent c /.D Can you observe algae in fi terT—s Yes-;,. o,.,,
Distance from top of media to trough over ow
REVERSE OSMOSIS: N.111
Make and type of units
Auxiliary chemicals uses --
streams
Stabilization
Type of membranes
Pressure required
Proportion of waste to product
osteXpump Type of pre-treatment
ZEOLITE SOFTENING: 111q, /
Unit manufacturer and model Resin capy
Disinfection of beds Grade of salt for regen.
Stability of effluent Resin prevented from escaping
In the space below, give a rough sketch of the flow diagram of the plant showing all
important parts of the plant (not to scale):
Sem A47'zrA,cV_ Ala,.f 1 -lot, �iagrar�
DER Form Perm 13-24 (August, 80)
LocnTVo V
I aIUD�
TeY HUK
Sanitary Survey
Page Five
NTCN SFRVTCF
PWS ID: 33///36
Pump Number
2
3
TRRN
SFErL
FW&w
-))'l
Manu acturer name
Pump Cype and motor NP
BJH/
Model number
500 ODb
5, 000
C, 000
Date installed
Capacity
'00
254
`0O
700
700
Maintenance Sc)e u e
Date Last Service
Comments:
STORAGE FACILITIES: (X) ground; (X) hydropneumatic; ( ) elevated;
(X) clearwell.
Tank Number
Capacity
500 ODb
5, 000
C, 000
Material
CAnGC�
!lnrr-�L
S><<L L
Gravity drain capacity
Bypass capacity
Covered/screenedCovered/screened openings
/
Date of last cleaning
Pressure Gauge
Site Glass
On pressure
Height to bottom of el. tan
—
Height to Maximum water level—
COMMENTS: SOL N/--iVT s/e�Fvs n iJsiy�
DER Form Perm 13-24 (August, 80)
Sanitary Survey
Page Six
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM:
Material of mains U/✓K
PWS ID: 331,11.3G
System Looped Operation pressure d{ Z - G ?.-Maximum pipe diameter UN/'
Minimum pipe diameter ✓NK Num erb of dea�ends 194le- How often flus
Number of fire hydrants UN/C Known cross -connections witE private supplies
Blowoff lines below grade IVVK Routine cross -connection control program
PLANT LABORATORY CAPABILITY:
Bacteriological
—/Marble tests
vl�Chlorides
✓ Chlorine: type
Turbidity
Radiological
=1�pH
Jar tests
Iron
Stability
Organics
Alkalinity
_ Fluorides
Inorganics
Color
�. Hardness
Complete
Person in charge of laboratory and credentials: AC/7N K.14 / 7 -
COMPLIANCE
COMPLIANCE MONITORING: (System is in full compliance with which requirements? Check.)
Bacteriological Secondaries 2,2. THM
Radiological Inorganic chemical V' Other: V. 0. c. A0. G•
Turbidity Organic chemical Nee_17�& , /_ f /Jxy✓!o.>.+�r A,lfYe+r
Violations of sampling requirements: NONE
Violations of maximum contaminant levels: IVON,c
The following deficiencies are noted with recommended corrective action: (if none,
write "none" in this space)
DEFICIENCY FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RECOMMENDED
REGULATION PERTAINING ACTION
�c
Inspector's Signature:
Title: Approved
DER Form Perm 13-24 (August, 80)
s
','Manager, Drin ing Water Program
Date:
Date:
2
/ r�j
0
m �Sp 5'
- G
0
z
0
U 4
-�Glz
M
t
t
SLUDGE
LAGOON
� 777
k
K I
P� I i��vrLl
BH I B I H
10 10 II
1
6 D Uma \ TO SLUDGE
C C C C� C C 1 LAGOONS
F
7 � -
E E
FLOW DIAGRAM
N. T. S.
10 .
n u�•_11 I
General Devel
U ti Vies, enc.
,
�cjbasTiart 'HiA i
9
Wgfer TreAllent Flant
Flow Dia rare.
r09 G.
D.
9
t Ato r
466 GPM
0 S o TGf�
li
1 r,I+cv
"mat,"h•,{
� I r
5UuC> G
,
�re,11 Ee-iUrri
700 GPrn
Gro unJ S+orcq,3e.
500000 Ga Ito ns_ -
oPmenl
an
ml
A
L�
i
�cL �i�iri5
unit
LimE
cti<rn „ilp
PUMP Filler F Ikr iillcr I�
^ L
J
aooM
Clcr+r will
G1-0u„j
>,4 b
( 5t° r R y..
P`L,JT ,nc[cr mcr
SIvdy
Bed
SILA
rcd
General Development Uti lilies, I rlr,.
Sekasfiart Hi9kicAs
46gg9.PD.
Lime ScFteni nS Wa Icr. Tregtme nt
Plant
Table 1
' •• SUMMARY OF UNIT CAPACITIES --SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS WTP
ItemActual
Rated Capacity
(Installed) or
_ Required Capacity
Well Pump No. 1
600 gpm @ 65 ft
580 qPM
Well Pump No. 2
600 gpm @ 55 ft
550 gpm
Transfer Pumps (2)
700 gpm @ 25 ft
700
gpm
Backwash Pump
2,200 gpm @ 72 ft
2,800-3,000 gpm
High Service Pump No. 1
400 gpm @ 160 ft
400
-
qPM
High Service Pump No. 2
250 gpm @ 160 ft
250
qpm
High Service Pump No. 3
600 gpm @ 160 ft
600
qPM
Sludge Pumps (2)
250 gpm @ 65 fta
120 gpmb
Washwater Recovery Pumps (2)
70 gpm @ 16 ft
80
gpm
Aerator -
1,800 gpm
1,800 gpm
Precipitator _
466 gpm
466 gpmc
Filters (3)
233 gpm
233 gpm
Mlashnater Holding Pond
510,000 gal
510,000 gal --Volume
for 11 backwashes
Sludge Pond No. 1 .'
310,000 gal
310,000 gal
Sludge Pond No. 2
290,000 gal
290 000 al
5,000 gal
5,000 gal
Cround Storage Reservoir..
500,000 gal
500,000 gal
Flowmeters
Raw Water: 6 -in Turbine
100-900 gpm
100-600
gpm
Precipitator Influent: 6 -in Turbine
100-1,000 gpm
100-700
gpm
r Finished Water: 4 -in Turbine
_'100-400 gpm
100-400
gpm
Finished Water: 12 -in Turbine
200-2p200 gpm
300-1,900 gpm
Backwash Water: Orifice
1,000-3,000 gpm
2,000-3,000 gpm
Lime Feed System
Storage Silo -
50 tons
50 tons; 60 days at
0.67 mgd
Slaker/Feeder
1,000 1b/hr
65-I00 lb/hr
Alum Feed System
Hake -up Tank
3GO gal
360 gal
Metering Pump
500 gal/day
300-500 gal/day
Polymer Feed System
Make-up Tank
55 gal
55 gal
Metering Pump
1,000 gal/day
50-100 gal/day
Chlorination System
50-70 1b/day
56 Ib/da Y
b8ased on installed pump speed of 1,750 gpm.
cBased on modified pump speed of 950 rpm.
Based on 20 -minute miring/flocculation time,
not the recomarnded 30
minutes.
SErrtrAsrnN 1-11vu1,H+Os
("-rpn...r 6 DV � Wcit✓Zwrlw..,"f
Table 1 P1"
SUMMARY OF UNIT CAPACITIES --SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS WTP
Actual (Installed) or
_Rat_d Capacity Required Capacity
Well Pump No. 1
600 gpm @ 65 ft
530 gpm
Well Pump No. 2
600 ;pm @ 55 ft
550 gpn
Transfer Pumps (2)
Backwash Pump
High Service Pump No. 1
/-
High Service Pump No. 2 C T -N o P.�
High Service Pump No. 3
Sludge Pumps (2)
700 gpm @ 25 ft
2,20 gpm @ 72 ft
400 gpm @ 16o f`
-
250 gpm @ 16o ft
600 gpm @ 160 ft
250 gpm @ 65 fta
700 gpm
2,800-3,000 gpm
400 9P^m
250 gpm
600 gpM
120 gpmb
Washwater Recovery Pumps (2)
' Aerator � - _
Precipitator
+
Filters (3) .,
Washwater Holding Pond
70 gpm @ 16 ft
1,800 qpm
466 9Pm
.� 233 gpm
510,000 gal
80 Q
- qP
1,800 qpm
466 gpme
.- 233 gpn
510 000 gal --Volume
.
for 11 backwashes
Sludge Pond No. 1 .'
310,000 gal
310,000 gal
Sludge Pond No. 2
290,000 gal
290.,000 gal - -
ClearwelT•.
5,000 gal
5,000 gal
Ground Storage Reseryoir.
500,000 gal
500,000 gal
. Flowmeters
.. -
Raw Water: 6 -in Turbine -
_ _ Precipitator Influent: 6 -in Turbine
J Finished Water: 4 -in Turbine
Fitrished Water: '12 -in Turbine
Backwash Water: Orifice
Lime Feed System
100-900 913m
100-1,000 gpm
-100-400 gpn
200-2;200 gpm
1,000-3,000 gpn
100-600 qpm -
100-700 gpm -
100-400 gpn
300-1,900 gpn
2,000-3,000 gpm
Storage Silo
50 tons
50 tons; 60 days at
0.67 mod
Siaker/Feeder
1,000 lb/hr
65-700 7b/hr
Alum Feed System`,.
fake -up Tank
3GO gal
360 gal
Petering Pump
500 gal/day
300-500 gal/day,
Polymer Feed System
Fake -up Tank
55 gal
55 gal
Metering Pump
Chlorination System
1,000 gal/day
50-70 lb/day
50-700 gal/day
56 lb/day
blia=cid on installed pump speed of 1,750 g?a.
0ased on modified pump speed of 950 rpm,
e Based on 20-ninute miring/flocculation tire,
not the rccorrended
30 minutes-