HomeMy WebLinkAboutCSA-1=a
SEBASTIAN
HOME OF FEU15!. D
CERTIFICATE OF PROJECT COMPLETION
Date Accepted:
10/23/18
Project Name & #:
Airport Master Plan Update # At 656
Total Project Expenditures:
$ 291,800.00
Project Location:
Airport
Contractor(s):
TKDA / American Infrastructure Development
05A -f
Contract Amount(s):
$ 290,000.00 / $ 1,800.00
Pursuant to the above captioned contract and in compliance of same, we the undersigned do hereby certify
that this project is complete.
Issuance of this certificate releases the contractor from any further responsibility as stipulated in the contract
as it relates to bond performance, payment of subcontractors, release of liens, maintenance and indemnity. All
contractual obligations as to warranty, insurance, indemnification and patents, shall remain in full effect for the
contractually stipulated period of time. In no way does the issuing of this certificate release the Contractor from
all legal obligations as stipulated in Chapter 713 of the Florida Statutes.
Therefore, having reviewed the contract and inspected the work, the undersigned to hereby accept the
segment as being complete.
—s 4/2z/zofy
Project Manager Date
NIA
Building Official (if applicable) Date
city `�tfite& IAJt,Q-P,�.&Md, 4 -z3 -l9
Date
SEBAST"
MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
WORK AUTHORIZATION FORM
Work Authorization #01 — Sebastian Municipal Airport
Airport Master Plan Update (Full) and Airport Layout Plan
City Project # A1656 FDOT 439715-1-94-01 FAA 3-12-0145-012-2016
The City of Sebastian hereby assigns to TKDA, a SMA commissioned consultant,
approval to conduct those studies associated with updating the Airport Master Plan
(Full) and Airport Layout Plan at the Sebastian Municipal Airport as per the attached
Scope of Work.
Description of Assignment: See Attached Scope of Work
Basis of Completion / Period of Services:
Services shall be provided for a payment of: $215,000.00
Work will commence upon execution of this Work Authorization by the parties and
continue in accordance with Exhibit "A" provided in the Scope of Work. Services shall
be completed within 18 -months of the execution of this Work Authorization Form.
AGREED as to scope of services, time schedule and budget this 140 day of September,
2016. Authorized under the terms of our Master Agreement dated October 14, 2015.
CITY OF SEBASTIAN TL
A Florida Municipal Corporation
Joseph f3Jriffin, City Manager ta>Fax#m�x t r4Amatio�>RAax�rxirxg
Jo n W. Ahern, PE; Vice President, Aviation
(seal)
Attest: Approved as to Form and Content for Reliance
By the City of Sebastian only:
ane WIT, MMC, City Clerk Robert A. Ginsburg, City Attorney
Administrative Services/CFO: as to budget
Exhibit "A"
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE
SCOPE OF SERVICES
SEBASTIAN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Sebastian, Florida
PROJECT BACKGROUND:
General: The Sebastian Municipal Airport (X26), which is owned and operated by the
City of Sebastian, is a busy recreational and experimental business aircraft hub located
on the East Coast of Florida between Melbourne International (MLB) and Vero Beach
Regional (VRB) Airports. The Airport which includes two paved runways: Runway 5/23,
which is 4,023 x 75 feet, and runway 10/28, which is 3,199 x 75 feet, hosts a variety of
operations including extensive sky diving operations, experimental and recreational fixed
wing operations, aerial patrol and inspection services as well as flight training. Since
Runway 5/23 is equipped with RNAV(GPS) approaches and is located within close
proximity to VRB, the Airport is heavily used by FlightSafety Academy students
sometimes to the detriment of existing tenants.
The Airport has recently completed a number of pavement and hangar projects, and is
currently completing construction of another corporate hangar facility. Although the
Airport is surrounded by residential communities, conservation, as well as limited light
commercial properties, the Airport maintains a good relationship with the community
which is supportive of the Airport's growth. The Airport is currently home to 38 based
aircraft, and hosts on average more than 100 operations per day.
Master Plan Update Driving Factors and Key Issues: Several elements support an
update to the 2002 master plan including changes to FAA design, funding, sustainability
and operational mandates, including FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 new
guidelines, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) airport operational,
environmental, zoning and land use guidance, as well as the City's need to identify and
quantify airport development that coincides with planned regional growth including
planned road connectivity. As a result, the findings and recommendations outlined in
this master plan update will be incorporated into the City's Comprehensive Plan and
used as the baseline for any required environmental analyses.
The previous Airport vision as illustrated on the 2007 Airport Layout Plan recommended
two parallel taxiways to Runway 5/23, a partial parallel taxiway south of Runway 28,
pavement removal projects and extensive hangar development. However, since the
Airport is surrounded by residential properties and environmentally sensitive lands, the
City and Airport Management is interested in cultivating expanded skydiving operations
as well as similar recreational activity at the Airport while continuing to support
experimental and light aircraft manufacturing operations.
Other concerns and opportunities driving the master plan update include the need to:
+ Designate and protect the Airport Operating Area as well as skydiving landing
areas including:
Sebastian Municipal Airport August 2016
Final Master Plan Update Scope of Services A-1
o Airport safety and security
o Surface access
o Ground operations, etc.
+ Evaluate and implement procedures to integrate various operational procedures
related to: skydiving activities, experimental aircraft, manned balloons, rotorcraft
and other fixed wing operations.
+ Evaluate potential impacts and recommendations related to integration of new
technology (e.g. UAS, light sport, etc.).
+ Identify and evaluate any potential wildlife threats and determine mitigation
options.
+ Consider requirements to support annual and semi-annual special events and
other potential aviation marketing opportunities
+ Evaluate Airport land use including identifying highest and best use for aviation,
semi -aeronautical and non -aviation use for potential revenue diversification.
+ Re-evaluate and/or update the City's short and long-term vision for Airport
development in compliance with City's Comprehensive Plan and federal and
state grant assurance, and regulatory requirements including providing the
Airport with:
o An updated Exhibit 'A' Airport Property Map. And, as part of this update,
an Ownership and Encumbrance report (O&E report) is needed to provide
a baseline for airport development.
o Recommended various safety and security improvements to protect users
and visitors.
o Recommend changes to airport access and roadway realignments, both
on and adjacent to the airport, along with runway protection zone analysis
related to Runways 5 and 10.
o Identify potential gaps and recommend infrastructure improvements
based upon current standards and anticipated demand.
o New and updated NEPA environmental compliance (i.e. solid waste
recycling, battery recycling, water quality, terrestrial concerns, land use,
etc.) and airport sustainability requirements.
o Identify and provide recommendations for implementation and monitoring
of solid waste, battery recycling and other recycling opportunities
compliant with national, state, city and local guidance
o New and updated airport design and safety requirements as well as FAA
Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)
o Recommended changes related to general aviation airport categories and
airport funding requirements
o Recommendations for compatible land use and zoning including
identifying additional land use opportunities compliant with FAA Order
5190.66.
o Review of existing airport lease agreements and on -airport land use
based upon airport grant assurance compliance requirements
o Identifying current and ultimate aircraft demand and design aircraft.
o Identify existing and potential aircraft approach and departure
obstructions, etc.
Project Objective: Since the goal of this master plan is to provide the City of Sebastian
with a cost effective framework of future airport development to satisfy aviation demand
while considering both environmental and socioeconomic impacts, elements of this
Sebastian Municipal Airport August 2016
Final Master Plan Update Scope of Services A-2
master planning process will vary in complexity and level of detail. Further, as part of
continued airport development, approved and recommended sustainability principles (i.e.
economic, community, operational and environmental) will be incorporated into the
planning process in varying degrees based upon need and identified goals to assist
airport sponsors in creating an efficient road map for future development in line with the
City and State's ongoing sustainable efforts.
This project involves the preparation of an Airport Master Plan Update and Airport
Layout Plan (ALP) for the Sebastian Municipal Airport (X26) in accordance with the
requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT) and the needs of the City of Sebastian, the Airport sponsor. The
services described in this scope of work will be conducted by the consultant and its team
of sub consultants in accordance with FAA Advisory Circulars (AC) 150/5070-6B, Airport
Master Plans, AC 150/5300-13A, Airport Design,; FAA Program Guidance Letters, FAA
Standard Operating Procedures, FAA Airport Improvement Handbook and FDOT Airport
Master Planning Guidebook, Airport Sustainable Program Guidebook, FDOT Procedural
Guidance 725-040-100-e, Airport Master Plans, and Procedural Guidance 725-040-040-
h, Aviation Program Management, as well as other relevant guidance as needed.
The master plan project approach is outlined in the following tasks and sub -elements
contained in this Scope of Work. The level of detail associated with each task has and
will be refined to meet the specific needs of the airport, its tenants, the City of Sebastian
and the community as a whole. In conjunction with this approach, a detailed fee
schedule of all AIP eligible master plan elements is provided in Exhibit B, Project Cost
Breakdown, and a preliminary production schedule is provided in Exhibit C.
PROJECT METHODOLOGY:
PHASE 1 — PROJECT FORMULATION
Task 1.1— Project Scope and Schedule
TKDA will coordinate with the City of Sebastian (Sponsor), FDOT and FAA regarding the
eligible project scope, cost and schedule. The Sponsor will obtain an independent fee
review as required under 2 CFR §200.323 and FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5100-
14E, Architectural, Engineering and Planning Consultant Services for Airport Grant
Projects. Following completion of the independent fee review and Sponsor approval, the
final scope and fee estimate will be submitted to FDOT and FAA for approval.
Task 1.2 — Project Specific CIP Updates
TKDA will assist the City of Sebastian with project -specific capital improvement plan
(CIP) updates related to this Master Plan and Airport Layout Plan update.
Task 1.3 — Project Funding Coordination
TKDA will coordinate with FOOT and FAA regarding applicable funding programs for the
Project in order to determine eligible federal share and AIP source of funds.
Task 1.4 — Grant Pre -Application Package
Using guidance provided in FAA Airport Standard Operating Procedures (ARP SOP)
6.00, FAA Review and Approval of an Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Grant
Sebastian Municipal Airport August 2016
Final Master Plan Update Scope of Services A-3
Application, TKDA will prepare and submit to FAA and FOOT the FAA Grant Pre -
Application Package associated with this project.
PHASE 2 — MASTER PLAN UPDATE
ELEMENT 1 — PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Task 1.1 — Establish of Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
A Technical Advisory Committee will be created to provide technical review of the
working papers and to provide input into the entire master plan process. This committee
will be assembled by Airport Management, and is anticipated to include airport staff as
well as representatives from FAA, FDOT, City of Sebastian (including a representation
for economic development), Indian River County, airport tenants and public/community
representatives.
Task 1.2 — Establish Planning and Sustainable Goals
Effective airport short and long-term planning must evaluate and integrate a number of
requirements to facilitate long-term airport sustainability. Following the financial crisis of
2007 and concerns of global warming, Airports are implementing operational, financial,
environmental and community -supported development. initiation of this Master Plan will
include a meeting with the City of Sebastian Airport Staff, FAA, FDOT and members of
the TAC to identify short and long-term planning and sustainability goals and objectives
to be addressed in the Master Plan Update.
Task 1.3 - Establish Planning and Sustainability Targets and Project
Policy/Mission Statement
As part of these first meetings with the Airport Advisory committee, staff and Agencies,
planning and sustainability targets will be developed using guidance from the update
FDOT and FAA planning and sustainability guidebooks as well as other industry and
local data. From this information, a project and overall Airport mission statement will be
created which will guide not only master planning development but will provide the basis
for airport marketing, financing, environmental and engineering design.
Sebastian Municipal Airport August 2016
Final Master Plan Update Scope of Services A-4
ELEMENT 2 — EXISTING CONDITIONS
Task 2.1 — Background
Historical data and previous reports will be used to provide a complete historical
background of Airport, including its role within the regional and state aviation system as
well as within the regional community. Recent studies will be used for comparative
purposes, thus providing benchmarks for measurement against anticipated activity.
Existing documents including previous planning studies, design drawings, inspection
reports, airfield pavement data, airfield pavement evaluation reports, leases, obstruction
charts, approach plates, and as -built drawings of structures on the Airport will be
obtained and analyzed for their content. Documents to be obtained and reviewed
include, but may not be limited to:
• Previous Airport Master Plan/Noise Compatibility Studies
• Current Airport Layout Plan Drawings (digital required)
• FAA Terminal Area Forecasts
i Florida Aviation System Plan
• FAA 5010 Form (Airport Master Records)
• Area Socioeconomic Data
• As -Built Drawings of Airport Buildings and Facilities
• NOAA Obstruction Chart
• Area Land Use and Zoning Information
• Airfield PCI Study
• Current Capital Improvement Program
• Airport Property Map and Detailed Property Information
• Area Transportation Pians and Existing Traffic Counts, and
• If available:
• City of Sebastian Comprehensive Plan
• Indian River County Comprehensive Plan
• Any airport or local business planning or economic studies, etc.
Task 2.2 - Inventory Airport Physical Facilities
The physical facilities inventory will consist of an on-site review of existing airfield and
landside facilities and infrastructure with attention being paid to their size, condition, use,
configuration, and adequacy under current operating conditions. This information will be
used to evaluate the effectiveness of the individual facility, and any interrelationship
between developed use and associated impacts to operations and capacity.
Additionally, the evaluation of existing facilities will serve to identify inadequate
infrastructure, if any, requiring immediate attention. Key elements to be addressed
include:
Airfield Facilities: Runway/taxiway configuration including dimensions,
pavement strength, and condition (where available); markings; signage;
lighting; navigational aids; imaginary surfaces, safety and protection zones,
magnetic headings; weather reporting facilities; and access to/from the airport
operational areas will be identified.
Aviation Businesses/General Aviation Facilities: Structures devoted on -
airport aviation businesses as well as other general aviation facilities will be
identified and evaluated as to their size, use (i.e. maintenance hangar,
storage hangar, office, etc.), age, and/or condition. Also included in the
Sebastian Municipal Airport August 2016
Final Master Plan Update Scope of Services A-5
inventory will be a description of the services provided by any on -airport
aviation business. General aviation facilities including ramp areas, number of
tie -downs, hangars by type (conventional, T -Hangar, Port -a -Port, etc.) will be
identified and quantified by area or other appropriate measure. Age and
condition of each facility will be identified to the extent feasible as will the
utilization and location of the facility on the airport.
Flight Training Facilities: Structures devoted to use for Flight Training
activities will be identified and evaluated as to their size, use, age and
condition. Number of aircraft, ramp areas, tie -downs, and other facilities will
be evaluated and quantified. The age and condition of each facility will be
identified, where feasible, as will utilization, location and access to the facility
on the airport.
Skydiving Facilities: X26 is home to Skydive Sebastian, which is located on
the northwest portion of the Airport. Skydiving demand and associated
operations are and continue to steadily increase. The City of Sebastian in
conjunction with Skydive Sebastian held their first skydiving festival in
September 2015 as well as participated in the Skydive Sebastian INVASION
4 day event at the Airport. Based upon continued demand, additional
skydiving facilities are needed to support existing and anticipated demand. In
an effort to support Skydiving operations at X26, the City installed a shallow
swoop pond on the Airport for skydiving training and events.
Since skydiving occurs year round at X26, infrastructure and operational
procedures will be reviewed. Due to the high use of X26 by student pilots,
careful consideration of "jump and landing areas" will be evaluated in order to
preserve a safe environment. Skydiving facilities will be identified as to their
location, size, current condition, overall use, as well as local responsibility
(sky diving operator or City of Sebastian/Airport Management). Sky diving
recommendations will be made, which will coordinate with ultimate airfield,
terminal and GA development to maintain continued safe operations. This
information will also be shown on the updated Airport Layout Plan (ALP).
Support Facilities: Airport support facilities to be inventoried will include,
but not necessarily be limited to, airport administration needs, fueling
facilities, airport maintenance facilities and airport equipment, including
security requirements (additional fencing, cameras, gates, etc.) as well as
any specific facility requirements needed to support current or potential
tenant operations.
Landside Facilities and Airport Access: Access to the Airport from the
South and East is provided via Main Street which connects to Airport Drive
East allowing access to the Sebastian Municipal Golf Course and Eagle's
Nest Restaurant as well as Airport Terminal and Corporate Hangar facilities.
The west side of the Airfield, which supports Skydive Sebastian, Velocity and
various aircraft storage facilities may be accessed via Roseland Road and
Central Airport Drive as well as Airport Drive West. Since both Roseland
Road and Airport Drive West intersect the runway protection zones of
Sebastian Municipal Airport August 2016
Final Master Plan Update Scope of Services A-6
Runways 5 and 10, these roads will be evaluated for the highest objects and
use as well as the viability of relocation.
This inventory will concentrate on road access, both on and off airport in
addition to the adequacy/utilization and condition of parking facilities as well
as camping facilities associated with Skydive Sebastian. The existing road
network serving the Airport and adjacent parcels will be identified and
classified by the type (number of lanes and collector, arterial, etc.) and by
linkage to other major roadways or highways. The primary means of
accessing the airport facilities will be identified as well as any potential
impacts to accessibility. The intent of this baseline analysis is to understand
existing development plans in order to determine options for potential airport
alternatives development and evaluation.
Additionally, the transportation improvement plans of the City, County and
State will be reviewed to identify pending roadway improvements that may
impact Airport accessibility. Roadway studies will be requested from both the
City and the County in an effort to identify any connectivity issues as well as
identify existing and potential development which may impede Airport
development. Special attention will be given to the runway safety areas and
protection zones (RSA and RPZ) as well as clear zone requirements. Where
specific data is not available, a general indication of quantity and condition
will be developed through on-site evaluations as well as discussions with City
staff and other significant users on the airport.
Weather Data: Wind rose information required for various analyses as well
as the ALP drawing will be obtained from the National Climatic Data Center
for a historical period of ten years. The cost of this information is factored
into the project budget.
Other Facilities: This subtask includes any and all facilities that have recently
been completed or are in the process of being constructed since the last master
plan update. This section will identify and evaluate any additional aviation and
non -aviation facilities and leaseholds, including currently Agency approved
imminent and concurrent land use (e.g. agricultural, municipal services, through
the fence operations) that exist on the airport property as well as review current
lease agreements and revenue associated with these facilities in order to
determine conformance with regulatory requirements in addition to identifying
when potential properties and facilities may become available for future airport
development. This data will be further evaluated in later sections of the master
plan report including airport alternative development and implementation plan.
Task 2.3 - Airspace/Air Traffic Control/Obstructions
X26 is not equipped with an Air Traffic Control Tower. Therefore, flight service is
provided by the St. Petersburg Flight Service Station (FSS), and Miami Center ARTCC
provides regional air traffic control services. X26 is equipped with a SuperAWOS, which
provides weather and some flight data information. However, due to its age and
condition, Airport Management intends to upgrade to an AWOS II which provides
separate radio frequencies for weather and flight traffic data. As part of the inventory
Sebastian Municipal Airport August 2016
Final Master Plan Update Scope of Services A-7
evaluation, a review of terminal and nearby airways, restricted areas, intersections will
be undertaken to determine if any current or potential obstructions to air navigation.
This task will identify both the equipment that is used by aircraft operating in the airport
vicinity and any operational limitations due to traffic interactions with other airports
and/or specific types of operations, reserved airspace, missed approach courses, noise
abatement procedures, existing or planned airfield facilities, existing or programmed
navigational aids, local topography, etc.
Task 2.4—Vicinity Land Use/Land Use Controls
A review will be conducted of existing land use mapping, updated aerial photography,
comprehensive plans, and zoning controls, and other documentation pertaining to
current and future land use in the vicinity of the airport. Existing zoning districts code will
be reviewed to identify existing and potential incompatible land use areas contiguous to
the airport. Local planning officials will be interviewed to identify the potential for future
residential, commercial, and industrial development in the vicinity of the airport and
particularly along the extended centerline of Runway 5/23 and proposed Runway 10/28.
A review of existing zoning controls and land use management within the vicinity of the
airport will be reviewed in order to determine the potential impact on future airport
development.
Task 2.5 - Exhibit'A' Encumbered Airport Property Inventory Title Search
Per ARP Standard Operating Procedures 3.0, October 1, 2013, an Airport Sponsor has
a federal obligation to submit accurate Exhibit'A' Airport Property Inventory Maps
(Exhibit'A') when applying for and prior to execution of certain federal grants. The
Exhibit A provides a snapshot of the current inventory of land parcels that make up the
dedicated airport property, and indicates how the land was acquired, the funding source
for the land and if the land was conveyed as Federal surplus land or Government
Property. Other detached parcels owned by the Airport Sponsor that are dedicated to
airport purposes must also be shown on the Exhibit'A'. The Exhibit'A' must show all
dedicated airport property regardless of the type of funds (AIP, state, local, etc.) used to
acquire that property. All land described in a project application and shown on an Exhibit
'A' constitutes the airport property federally obligated for compliance under the terms
and covenants of a grant agreement'.
Thus, as part of the Exhibit'A' development, a local land services company will provide
an ownership and encumbrance report, which will include historical, existing and future
(as identified in Elements 3, 4 and 5, Facility Requirements and Alternatives Analysis)
property title search, property interest data (i.e. easements, right of first refusal, and
other rights), grant history, in addition to identifying any other property rights that the
Airport has given or is expected to release, non -aeronautical and concurrent uses or
airport property, in addition to historical and likely FAA approval status and next steps.
This data will be provided to TKDA to be incorporated into the Airport Inventory, facility
and alternative development analysis narrative chapters, associated appendices, as well
as the Airport Layout Plan update. This report will conform to the requirements outlined
in ARP SOP 3.00 and FAA Advisory Circular 150/5100-17, Land acquisition and
Relocation Assistance for Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Assisted Projects. TKDA
will work with the fee sponsor to review the ownership and encumbrance report and
determine the appropriate level of effort required. All hard copy documentation received
FAA ARP SOP 3.0, Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for FAA Review of Exhibit'A' Airport Property
Inventory Maps, October 1, 2013
Sebastian Municipal Airport August 2016
Final Master Plan Update Scope of Services A-8
as part of this analysis will be transferred to the client and Regulatory Agencies (FAA
ADO and FDOT) at the completion of this project.
Supporting Sub Consultant: To Be Determined
Task 2.6 — Existing Utility and Drainage Infrastructure
Airport economic growth and associated development (e.g. hangars, on -airport
businesses, airport support infrastructure, etc.) are dependent upon availability and ease
of access to essential on -airport utilities such as water, sewer, electrical,
communications, etc. Utility providers serving the airport will be contacted to identify the
adequacy of the services provided, available capacity, the location of service lines and
their size, as well as other characteristics impacting service to existing or proposed
development areas on the airport.
In addition, a baseline evaluation of existing storm drainage, retention facilities and other
drainage facilities will be developed in order to identify potential outfall limits and as well
as areas where additional drainage may be required to support anticipated facility and
tenant demands over the twenty-year planning period. Both utility and stormwater
requirements will be addressed as part of the facility requirements and alternative
development analyses.
Task 2.7 — Environmental Inventory
The northwest portion of the Airport property is designated as conservation according to
the last master plan update, and the Airport property also includes a 100 foot scrub jay
buffer to the northeast as well as 50 foot vegetated barrier/buffer located within the
airport fenceline to the southwest. Thus, as required by both FAA and FDOT guidance,
a baseline inventory of past, current and potential affected environments on and
adjacent to the airport will be developed that will be used to identify any issues that need
to be resolved as well as determine potential impacts to proposed airport development.
This inventory will include site visits and literature review/research to determine
ownership, ordinances, jurisdiction, and to identify any other regulatory requirements
which may impact existing and future development. This inventory will be coordinated
with federal, state, and local environmental resource agencies, and will consist of the
following items based upon requirements outlined in FAA Order 1050.1E,
Environmental Impacts, Policies and Procedures, Order 5050.48, National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Instructions for Airport Projects, FAA
Advisory Circular 150-5070-6B, Airport Master Plans, Airport Improvement Program
Handbook, FAA Order 5100.38D, etc.:
+ Noise
+ Air Quality
+ Solid waste generation and disposal
+ Prime and unique farmland
+ Water quality and shoreline impacts
+ Land use and construction environmental assessment
+ Cultural Resources
+ Section 4(f) Properties
+ Wetlands and Floodplains
+ Threatened and Endangered Species
+ Biotic Communities
+ Hazardous Materials/Waste Sites
+ Road Plans
Sebastian Municipal Airport August 2016
Final Master Plan Update Scope of Services A-9
+ Clear Runway Protection Zones or impact evaluation, etc.
Task 2.8 — Solid Waste Audit
In addition as required by the FAA Modernization and Reform Act 2012 (Public Law 112-
95), a baseline solid waste audit will be performed which will draw upon information
provided by Airport and City staff as well as be consistent with applicable State and local
recycling laws. This subtask will also include:
• The feasibility of solid waste recycling at the Airport
4 Minimizing the generation of solid waste at the Airport
4 Operation and maintenance requirements
• Review of waste management contracts, and
• The potential for cost savings or the generation of revenue.
It is important to note that the scope of the solid waste audit and recycling plan will
depend upon the following factors:
• Local markets for recycling commodities including batteries
• Local recycling infrastructure
• The Airport's waste stream
• Airport size, location and layout
This data will be used to develop a feasible airport solid waste recycling plan as well as
the potential implementation of other recycling efforts.
Task 2.9 — Wildlife Hazard Site Visit
Per AAS -300, airports with less than 75,000 or 100 based jet aircraft typically only
require a wildlife hazard site visit to determine any potential wildlife impacts to aviation
operations. However, to meet the requirements of FAA Grant Assurance 19, which
includes providing advanced notice of any condition affecting aeronautical use of the
airport, a Wildlife Hazard Site Visit (WHSV) will be performed as part of this master plan
update. This WHSV will be performed by a certified wildlife biologist per FAA AC
150/5200-36A, and this data will provide a baseline of environmental conditions at the
airport as well as identify any future actions that should be discussed in the Master Plan
including necessary projects (e.g. additional fencing, drainage infrastructure,
infrastructure removal, land use, etc.) to be included on the Airport Layout Plan. Any
operational changes (nest removal, mowing, clearing ditches, etc.) recommended will be
provided as part of the Site Visit Analysis (Appendix D of this report).
"As part of a Site visit, the Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist collects and compiles
information on the airport's wildlife hazard history, documented and suspected wildlife
hazards, habitat attractants, control activities, airport operations procedures,
communications of hazards through ATC and pilots, aircraft operations and scheduling.
A Site visit is typically conducted over a period of two to three days during which a
Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist evaluates the habitat on and surrounding the airport
P If a triggering event is proposed in the master plan update, an alternative analysis is required.
The near-term project will require routing to FAA Headquarters while later (mid and long-term)
projects will be coordinated with the FAA Airport District Office only. Technical documentation will
be provided in an appendices to the report with a discussion/overview provided within the report
chapter(s).
Sebastian Municipal Airport August 2016
Final Master Plan Update Scope of Services A-10
and records direct or indirect wildlife observations; and reviews the current Plan, current
wildlife management activities and airport wildlife strike data."3 Based upon this
guidance, an Airport Wildlife Hazard Site Visit checklist is provided in Exhibit A-1 to this
scope of work.
The WHSV upon completion will be submitted to FAA to determine if a Wildlife Hazard
Assessment (WHA) is warranted. If the FAA deems that a WHA is required, it will be a
separate action performed independent of this master plan scope. If, however, the FAA
supports the conclusions that a WHA is not required at this time, a Wildlife Hazard
Management Plan (WHMP) will still be developed as part of this scope of work in
conjunction with Element 5, Refined Analysis and Recommended Development.
Task 2.10 - Airport User Interviews / Questionnaires
Airport users and existing tenants, including Velocity, Skydive Sebastian, Sheltair,
Sebastian Municipal Golf Course, Sebastian Aero Services, LoPresti Aviation, Pilots
Paradise as well as Vero Beach based FlightSafety Academy, local businesses, City
Chamber of Commerce, etc., will either be interviewed and/or requested to complete
questionnaires. The tenants might be reached through one of these communication
means:
+ In person interview
+ Phone interview
+ Electronic or online questionnaire
+ Paper questionnaire
Both the interview and survey will solicit information pertaining to a description of current
facilities, levels of activity conducted from the airport, perceived airport needs, future
plans and contract expansion opportunities, type of aircraft used, and anticipated fleet
additions and changes. A listing of airport tenants, provided by the airport sponsor, will
be used to identify organization contacts for the tenant survey distribution and
interviews. User data will be obtained from the City of Sebastian Airport Management
as well as various online data sources. Results will be tabulated and utilized in
subsequent analyses. Survey instrument(s) will be prepared as part of this task in close
consultation with the City staff. Digital photographs will also be taken of landside and
airside facilities as well as contiguous properties to supplement the data collection effort
and to serve as a resource for subsequent master planning tasks.
Task 2.11 — Prepare and Submit Chapters One, Airport Goals and Objectives, Two,
Airport Existing Conditions, and associated Appendices
As part of this project, TKDA will upload each chapter of the master plan to a designated
password protected FTP site. As draft chapters are updated based upon comments
3 FAA Advisory Circular 150/5200 -XX (Draft), Protocol for the Conduct and Review of Wildlife
Hazard Site Visits, Wildlife Hazard Assessments, and Wildlife Hazard Management Plans, AAS -
300, Pg. 37
Sebastian Municipal Airport August 2016
Final Master Plan Update Scope of Services A-11
received, each chapter will be renamed to identify the update and uploaded to the FTP
site for download. Hard copies of the chapters will be provided if requested. As data
is uploaded to the site, electronic notifications will be sent to the client and all members
of the Technical Advisory Committee.
Chapter One will outline the planning and sustainability goals and objectives of the
master plan as well as participants. Chapter Two will include the issues and findings
identified as part of the inventory analysis, and will present, in narrative and graphic
format, information relating to airport facilities, the access system serving the airport
including existing road and RPZ impacts, historical and existing ownership, easement
and other encumbered property data, environmental features affecting the current airport
property and tracts immediately adjacent to the airport, existing airspace and obstruction
considerations, summary of solid waste recycling and sustainability recommendations in
addition to data related to land use compatibility. Appendices A, B and C, respectively,
will provide a summary of airport tenant and user input, airport property historical land
transfer and ownership data obtained from the ongoing ownership and encumbrance
report, and baseline sustainability and baseline Airport recycling, reuse and waste
reduction audit.
Electronic copies will initially be submitted to City of Sebastian staff for review
approximately two weeks prior to distribution to the Technical Advisory Committee
(TAC). Following the client's approval, electronic copies will be submitted to the
Technical Advisory Committee, which will include FAA ADO and FDOT personnel, for
review and comments. A comment period of approximately two to three weeks is
requested in an effort to keep the project moving forward and on -schedule.
ELEMENT 3 - AVIATION ACTIVITY FORECASTS AND CRITICAL DESIGN
AIRCRAFT
Task 3.1 - Inventory Historical and Current Air Traffic Activity
Historical and current air traffic activity at X26 will be obtained from various known and
approved sources to provide a baseline for aviation activity demand forecasts.
Information concerning the level of activity for any general aviation operation (both local
and itinerant as well as skydiving, flight training, ultralight, and potentially experimental
operations), any military operations as well as fuel sales and based aircraft (by aircraft
type) will be sought. Peak hourly operations, daily, monthly, and annual activity will be
quantified from site visits, survey data and interviews, previous planning documentation,
airport management data, and tenant information as described in the previous section.
Any other pertinent data will be obtained from Airport records, local management, the
FAA, FDOT and any other legitimate sources of data.
Task 3.2 — Identification of Factors or Opportunities Affecting Activity Levels
A key element in the forecast process is the identification of potential for new or
expanded activity by existing airport users, as well as the potential for the airport to
secure new services and operators. This task will analyze potential changes that could
impact the level or type of activity at the Airport, and will identify potential niche markets
that could be the basis for either expanding existing activity or initiating new activity at
X26.
Sebastian Municipal Airport August 2016
Final Master Plan Update Scope of Services A-12
In addition, economic, social, political and industry trends, such as impacts of global
terrorism, fluctuating fuel prices, fluctuating interest rates and other financial indicators,
along with new technology, rules and changes to the general aviation fleet mix with
regard to the historical and future impacts on operations will be evaluated. These
factors along with the recently updated FAA Aerospace Forecasts, FDOT State Aviation
System Plan, FAA Terminal Area Forecast, Bombardier and Boeing Aircraft forecasts as
well as the FAA General Aviation Airports Report will be used to forecast likely short,
mid-term and long-term planning activity levels and anticipated fleet mix at the airport
during the twenty -plus planning period.
Task 3.3 — Aviation Activity Forecasts
The purpose of this task is the development of single scenario planning activity level
forecasts (i.e. operations, based aircraft, instrument operations, etc.) reflecting induced
demand conditions. New activity forecasts will be derived utilizing recent historical
demand patterns, trends experienced at the Airport, and the potential range of changes
in aviation activity locally that could occur over the planning horizon (represented by the
2015-2035 timeframe). Forecasts will be prepared using FAA -accepted methodologies
(regression, market share, trend analyses, etc.) and will be compared against other
recently prepared forecasts, such as the 2015/2016 FAA Terminal Area Forecasts (TAF)
and Florida State Aviation System Plan to identify the most realistic scenario forecast of
future aviation demand at X26. Activity projections will be provided using planning
activity levels, such as short (2017-2021), mid (2022-2026), and long (2027 — 2037)
horizons. This will allow the sponsor to focus on the need to plan for aviation activity
levels rather than specific timelines for airport development.
The aviation activity forecasts will comprise projections of annual activity for aircraft
operations. Forecast activity will include:
+ Total Airport Operations
+ Itinerant Air Taxi/Charter, General Aviation and Military Operations
+ Local General Aviation and Military Operations
+ General Aviation Passenger Enplanements
+ General Aviation Operations by Type (i.e. training, skydiving, experimental,
ultralights, gliders, county/law enforcement operations, etc.)
+ Instrument Operations
+ Based Aircraft
+ Aircraft Mix (i.e. single engine, multi -engine, turboprop, jet, helicopter and
experimental)
+ Critical Aircraft demand,
+ Peak Month and Design Hour Operations to determine Aircraft Parking and
Storage requirements, and
+ Fuel flowage demand by type
Forecast data will be compared to FAA TAF and Florida SASP forecasts which may be
adjusted to reflect current base year, 2015, operational data as reflected in the Airporfs
Master Record, Form 5010.
Task 3.4 - Existing and Ultimate Design Aircraft
Using information obtained during interviews and surveys performed as part of the
airport inventory as well as historical operational data, the characteristics of the current
aircraft fleet will be identified, paying particular attention to the number, fleet mixtaircraft
type, and stage length of operations by aircraft. Additionally, using the forecast data and
Sebastian Municipal Airport August 2016
Final Master Plan Update Scope of Services A-13
future fleet mix evaluation, the existing and ultimate design aircraft or family of aircraft
will be determined for the Airport and Runways 10/28 and 5/23. This data will be used in
Element 4 to identify existing and potential facility requirement gaps in the current airfield
design including airfield dimensional requirements and NAVAIDs needed to support
existing and forecast aircraft operations.
Task 3.5 — Forecast Resource Consumption
Using the baseline information obtained in Elements 1 and 2, resource consumption
estimates based upon likely forecast demand will be determined to see where it may be
financially and operationally feasible to decrease solid waste, energy use, water use,
materials as well as potential reuse of construction materials or the use of new and more
efficient structural materials. This section will also consider the high priority sustainable
actions that the City of Sebastian and Indian River County has and is putting in place.
Furthermore, other Airport in the area that host special events and similar operafions will
also be polled to determine typical "hot issue' resource use and what they may be doing
to decrease overall resource consumption.
Task 3.6 — Prepare and Submit Chapter Three, Aviation Activity Forecasts and
Design Aircraft, and Appendices
Chapter Three will address historical and current activity levels, factors impacting X26,
including the analytical portions of the forecast process, as well as identifying the
existing and ultimate design aircraft for the airfield and Runways 10/28 and 5/23. This
task will be developed to be consistent with the FAA recommended guidelines "Review
and Approval of Aviation Forecasts, June 2008".
Summary forecast data will be presented Chapter Three, and the forecast spreadsheets
will be provided in Appendix D as supplemental information. This data along with the
Airport inventory will be used as the baseline for all remaining analysis. As noted in
Task 2.11, electronic copies of Chapter Three will first be provided to the City of
Sebastian Airport Staff for review and approval, and then submitted to the Technical
Advisory Committee for their review and comment. All reports will be submitted
electronically unless requested otherwise, and a two to three week comment period is
requested to receive TAC comments for inclusion into the report. Again, all updated
chapters will be available via the TKDA website until replaced by draft final report.
ELEMENT 4 - FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
This element of the planning study is intended to provide a comparison of existing airport
facilities versus existing and projected demand levels related to the identification of
airside and landside development necessary, if any, to meet forecast demand. To the
maximum extent feasible, future facility requirements will be based upon activity levels or
demand related triggers rather than the use of arbitrary points of time, since actual
needs will be determined by the level of demand rather than the number of years. It
should also be noted that demand may already exceed existing facilities or that new
federal or state requirements will require the immediate construction of new facilities.
These issues will be considered in detail and will provide the foundation for various
airport development alternatives at X26.
Task 4.1 — Airspace and Airfield Capacity and Delay
This study is intended to identify what, if any, of the envisioned airfield improvements at
MKT may be necessary over the course of the twenty-year planning horizon
Sebastian Municipal Airport August 2016
Final Master Plan Update Scope of Services A-14
encompassed in this study, with particular emphasis on those improvements needed in
the 0-5 year horizon and 6-10 year time frame. The FAA's methodology for assessing
airfield capacity and delay as delineated in FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5 is
regularly used to assess airfield capacity. Based on the adjustments made to existing
forecasts as delineated in Task Three, the capacity assessment presented in the
previously approved master plan update will be validated to determine what, if any
modifications to the current Annual Service Volume (ASV) based capacity assessment
may be necessary due to changes in fleet mix as defined by the adjusted forecasts.
Analysis undertaken in this element is intended to support the airfield improvements
identified in the previous airport master plan update.
The result of the capacity assessment will be expressed in terms of the hourly and
annual service volume of the airfield, in minutes of delay per aircraft operation, and total
estimated annual delay per operation.
Task 4.2 - Determine Airfield Facility Requirements
Using all relevant information from previous documentation, the master plan tasks and
airfield planning criteria, a preliminary list of airfield facility requirements necessary to
meet projected levels of demand for the five, ten, and twenty-year time frames will be
prepared based upon FAA and FDOT guidance. These facility requirements will be
based upon accepted airport planning criteria knowledge; the expertise of the Technical
Advisory Committee members and the Consultant; and forecast aviation activity for X26.
At a minimum, the evaluation of airfield facility requirements will include:
+ Runways, and taxiways (length, width, size and/or strength);
+ Airfield lighting and marking;
+ Aircraft parking aprons (size and strength) and facilities (hangars);
+ Aircraft support facilities; and
+ Navigational aids and associated instrument approaches
Airfield facility needs will be identified in terms of linear feet, strength, etc., and will be
compared to existing facilities where possible in order to identify excess or deficient
facility capacity. Airport facility needs, such as apron or hangar space, will be quantified
either by area or total number required. As for any specific recommendations or
requirements or changes related to NextGen and/or RNAV/GPS approach requirements,
TKDA will solicit information from the FAA Airport District Office (ADO) in Orlando. Note
X26 is currently equipped with RNAV approaches to both 5 and 23, but with a minimum
1- mile visibility requirement. It should be noted that the extent of analysis relative to
proposed instrument approach procedures will be limited, and will not be of a level to
definitively determine exact criteria, but may, instead, identify desired approach
enhancements and discuss issues of feasibility in a general nature.
Task 4.3 - Determine General Aviation Facility Requirements
Using the results of previous tasks and accepted planning criteria, the general aviation
facilities necessary to meet both current and projected levels of demand for the five, ten
and twenty-year planning horizon will be determined. General aviation facility
requirements to be assessed include:
+ Aircraft Ramp and Parking Area (including size and number)
+ Aircraft Storage Hangar Positions (by hangar type)
+ T -Hangar Positions
Sebastian Municipal Airport August 2016
Final Master Plan Update Scope of Services A-15
+ Conventional Hangar Positions
+ Shade Hangars
+ Aviation Terminal Needs and Support Facilities
+ Fixed Base Operator (FBO) Facilities
+ Access Facilities and Vehicle Parking Areas
This assessment will quantify future development items needed to maintain an adequate
level of service, function, and operation at the Airport.
Task 4.4 - Determine Airport Support Facility Requirements
Using information provided by existing studies and aviation planning criteria established
under preceding tasks, a set of facility requirements addressing the Airport facilities
necessary to support the airfield, general aviation areas, and their related activity will be
provided. Requirements for facilities, such as aircraft fueling, safety and security
requirements, and airport maintenance and equipment will be developed under this task.
Task 4.6 — Ground Access, Circulation and Parking Requirements
Based upon discussions with Airport staff and the location of existing facilities on the
Airport, concerns were raised regarding vehicles using the runways and taxiways to
access different portions of the airfield. In addition, vehicle access to different points of
the airfield must be evaluated in order to limit intrusions into the active Airport Operating
Areas (AOA). On-site parking both related to current tenants and visitors as well as
potential needs to support various special events at the Airport will also be reviewed and
recommendations will be made to control unauthorized access to the active airfield
areas.
Task 4.6 - Quantify Land Area and Other Requirements
X26 has committed much of its available land area to the development of either airfield
facilities or general aviation facilities. Remaining areas of land not presently committed
to development will be analyzed for the best -recommended use. Typically, areas
designated on the Airport Layout Plan as conservation must demonstrate that this area
is never needed for aeronautical use and that the cost of relocation is prohibitive. Since
the Northwest portion of the Airport property was designated on the 2007 Airport Layout
Plan as conservation, data will be gathered to determine if this area is needed to support
aviation development and this document will outline the current reasoning for
maintaining the area as a conservation easement as well as the likely costs for
relocation.
Further, based upon existing and forecast facility requirements, land adjacent to the
existing Airport property will be identified for potential acquisition in order to protect the
existing runway protection zones. A Title Search and Ownership report will be executed,
and preliminary discussions may be held with owners at the behest of the City.
Acquisition of land parcels to support long-term aviation development at X26 will be
addressed in Chapters 5, Airport Alternatives, and 6, Alternative Evaluation and
Recommended Development, which will identify the timing and likely cost of acquisition,
either via fee simple or as potential easements.
Task 4.7 — Refine Sustainability Goals and Objectives
The State of Florida continues to take measures and provide funding for projects to
maintain and support Florida's resources. The City of Sebastian in 2015 was recently
awarded $175,000 by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for
Sebastian Municipal Airport August 2016
Final Master Plan Update Scope of Services A-16
stormwater improvements which will reduce nutrients from entering Indian River Lagoon
and St. Sebastian River. The City is actively working with various state and local
agencies in addition to community organizations to identify opportunities to integrate
sustainable practices within the City and County as well as at the Airport. Looking at
"best practices" for similar communities throughout the state as well as nationally,
sustainability options and objectives which could be implemented at the Airport will be
further refined based upon anticipated operations, facility requirements, community
support, financial feasibility as well as potential environmental concerns and
opportunities.
Further, as part of this facility analyses, utility requirements including an extension of
trunk lines to accommodate development will be identified as will the feasibility of
implementing on -airport solid waste recycling measures based upon current recycling
contracts as well as local and State laws. Working with the City's Community
Development staff and Indian River County's Solid Waste/Recycling Department staff,
general recommendations will be provided for minimizing solid waste generation
associated with airport construction, operations and maintenance. Lastly, additional
sustainable airport recommendations will be offered considering both local and regional
recycling and sustainability initiatives as well as the City's and County's planning
priorities. This information will be provided as an appendix to the report for ease of
distribution to tenants and staff.
Task 4.8 - Prepare and Submit Chapter Four, Airport Facility Requirements, and
Appendices
Chapter Four and associated appendices will document the information and evaluations
of the facility requirements process as well as the recommended recycling program.
Information identified within this chapter will be used to determine airport alternative
development as well as project phasing and costs. Again, this chapter will be provided
first to the Sponsor for review and then to the Technical Advisory Committee as
illustrated in Exhibit C, Project Schedule.
ELEMENT 5 - AIRPORT ALTERNATIVES
This phase of the study includes the development of alternative concepts to address
forecast demand, identified facility requirement gaps, as well as likely affected
environmental and land use concerns to meet long-term demand. This process will
begin with a "brainstorming" session with the Client and TAC to generate a broad range
of development possibilities. Initial screening will narrow the range of possibilities to
those reasonable alternatives that meet the planning need for each element, which will
then undergo more intensive development and evaluation.
Specific issues to be considered during development of alternative concepts include:
+ Technical feasibility;
+ Economic and fiscal soundness;
+ Aeronautical utility;
+ Viability of phased development;
4 Environmental factors;
+ Access to the various functional areas of the Airport;
4 Future expansion potential beyond the 20 -year planning horizon, etc.
Sebastian Municipal Airport August 2016
Final Master Plan Update Scope of Services A-17
This task consists of three tiers of analysis: identification, refinement, and selection. As
this process progresses, the number of alternatives will dwindle and the level of layout
detail and analysis will increase a preferred alternative is developed. The functional
areas to be studied include: the airfield, terminal/FBO area and landside including auto
parking, overall airport land use, general aviation, and surface transportation. A
weighted matrix will be created to evaluate each proposed alternative in relation to each
of the factors listed above (e.g. economic, environmental, operational, etc.) in order to
identify viable alternative development options. Ultimately, this program will determine
how best to expand and improve the existing facilities at the airport in terms of overall
efficiency. Its goal is to optimize on -airport land use, maximize the capacity and
economically viability of the existing facilities, and identify the facilities and practical
stages of future development.
Task 5.1 - Airfield Alternatives
On the basis of the airport facility requirements established in preceding elements,
preliminary airfield development alternatives will be formulated to lay the foundation for
future environmental review and to build upon the development of airside facilities at
X26. As illustrated in the 2007 Airport Layout Plan, two roads intersect the runway
protection zones of both Runway 5 and 10. Therefore, based upon these issues, new
regulatory requirements and potential design and environmental impacts identified as
part of the inventory and facility requirements, multiple airfield alternatives will be
considered to varying degrees based upon likely viability using the criteria shown under
Element 5. These airfield alternatives may include, but not be limited to: various runway
length options and alignments to provide the needed length as well as mitigate roadway
impacts within the RPZs; the potential of relocating one of the roads or other options
based upon an runway protection zone analysis; as well as other actions needed to
address existing and potential design -related deficiencies on the Airport.
Instrument procedures including lower minimums at the Airport associated with new
NextGen technology and the requirements that would need to be met associated with
these improvements will be based on runway alignment schemes for development within
existing airport boundaries or within expanded airport boundaries. This task will be
conducted simultaneously with following tasks and will result in a series of overall
development options for the current airport site and adjacent properties. Airfield
alternatives will be analyzed based on their ability to satisfy the identified facility and
infrastructure requirements, environmental considerations, engineering factors, cost,
phasing, land requirements and probability of land acquisition, community and political
support, as well as ease of implementation.
Task 5.2 - General Aviation Alternatives
Based on facility requirements determined under a previous element, preliminary
general aviation area development options will be developed within existing airport
boundaries considering existing and future tenant demand, airport improvements,
environmental consequences, land use, and financial sustainability. These alternatives
will show the necessary development, including potential land acquisition, to
accommodate the demand expected over the 20 -year planning period.
This task will be conducted simultaneously with other tasks in this element and will result
in a series of overall development options. General aviation alternatives will be
evaluated on the basis of their efficiency in meeting identified facility requirements,
engineering factors, ease of implementation, costs, phasing, airside and landside
Sebastian Municipal Airport August 2016
Final Master Plan Update Scope of Services A-18
accessibility, and environmental considerations leading to the selection of the options
best satisfying the identified need.
Task 5.3 — Support Facilities
Based on the ultimate airfield configuration and other changes proposed in the master
plan, there may be a need to reconsider the placement of some support facilities at the
airport. This analysis will identify the key airport support facilities at X26 and define
alternatives to address these and other issues that may arise in the planning process.
Airport support facility alternatives will be evaluated on the basis of their efficiency in
meeting identified facility requirements, engineering factors, impact on other airport
development options, ease of implementation, costs, phasing, airside and landside
accessibility and environmental considerations leading to the selection of the options
best satisfying the identified need.
Task 5.4 — Landside and Land Use Alternatives
As part of the facility requirements evaluation (Element 4), land use and RPZ impacts
were identified. In order to establish the preferred airport development, an expanded
RPZ evaluation will be performed to identify land use impacts and mitigation options.
When comparing existing and planned land uses, recommendations will be made to
ensure that compatibility exists since incompatible land use at or near an airport may
create hazards to air navigation or reduction of airport utility. As part of the analysis,
recommendations may include land acquisition or installation of an easement and
suggestions or refinement of existing land use management techniques as well as an
evaluation of highest and best land use for potential aviation and short-term non -aviation
leaseholds as well as areas of significant environmental concerns.
Task 5.5 - Preliminary Development Costs
Using labor and materials price data from recent construction projects in the airport
vicinity, potential environmental impact costs, recent property value data, and cost
schedules provided by the FAA ORL ADO and FDOT, preliminary cost estimates for
each airport development option, in the various alternatives considered during the
planning process, will be prepared. FAA and FOOT cost schedules consist of specific
costs and funding options provided by the FAA and FDOT to provide a realistic cost
estimate of a project or activity. Cost schedules are based upon probabilistic measures
of cost outcomes based upon historical data and risk. Thus, the alternative concept cost
estimates for the Airport at this point would be calculated as a rough order of magnitude
for comparison purposes only.
Task 5.6 - Prepare and Submit Chapter Five, Airport Alternatives, and Appendices
This chapter will focus on the alternatives developed to address the options associated
with the airfield, general aviation terminal area, and all other airport facilities and uses as
well as considering the interrelationships between the Airport, neighbors and
locallregional plans as well as the impacts that development of individual facilities may
have on other existing facilities and proposed development. As such, this chapter and
associated appendices will present, in narrative and graphic format, various
development alternatives explored for X26.
Sebastian Municipal Airport August 2016
Final Master Plan Update Scope of Services A-19
ELEMENT 6 - REFINED ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDED DEVELOPMENT
Task 6.1 Refined Alternatives Analyses
Based on input from the Airport Sponsor, Technical Advisory Committee, regulatory
agencies and the public including adjacent property owners, refinements to the analysis
of alternatives will be made to address any issues raised or direction received during the
review process. City and Airport staff as well as the regulatory agencies will meet with the
consulting team, consider the stakeholder input, and identify the "best" components of all
alternatives. A meeting summary will be prepared following coordination with City and
airport staff members to document decisions and directions, which will be included in an
appendix to the master plan report.
The final concept may consist of one of the alternatives developed in the previous tasks
or more likely a combination of options employing elements of various alternatives into a
single development concept. This single hybrid concept will be reviewed using the same
criteria that were employed in the previous tasks.
Alternative refinement criteria will include, at a minimum:
+ Ability to meet short- and long-range facility requirements;
+ Ease of implementation;
i Capital costs;
+ Constructability/phasing;
+ Flexibility and future expansion potential; and,
+ Public and tenant operational impacts during construction improvements.
Task 6.2 - Environmental Action Plan
According to the individual airport and project within the master plan, the FAA's Airports
District Office (ADO) Environmental Program Manager will work with the consultant and
Sponsor to determine the level of documentation for each project in accordance with
FAA Order 1050.1 E. For each project identified within the preferred alternative concept,
the following information will be provided:
+ Potential environmental impacts to natural resources;
+ Environmental documentation required based on FAA Order 1050.E. If a project
will most likely require a categorical exclusion, an environmental assessment, or
an environmental impact statement level of documentation.
+ Anticipated state and federal regulatory requirements;
+ Potential mitigation measures or options for associated environmental impacts
for the proposed project.
Task 6.3 —Land Use Compatibility and Mapping
The Sebastian Municipal Airport is surrounded by land designated as residential,
industrial, institutional and conservation. Therefore, as part of planned development,
compatible land use recommendations for development contiguous to the airport will be
provided in addition to identifying on -airport development that will avoid any negative
impacts to existing land use, specifically residential and conservation. This data in
Sebastian Municipal Airport August 2016
Final Master Plan Update Scope of Services A-20
conjunction with the encumbered land use report will be incorporated into the Airport's
land use map and Exhibit 'A' Property Map data.
Task 6.5 - Recommended Development/Preliminary Capital Improvement Plan
Using an evaluation matrix to consider operational performance, environmental factors,
fiscal factors as well as input from the City of Sebastian, the Technical Advisory
Committee and the general public, the final recommended alternative for airport
development will be identified. This matrix will identify why this is the preferred
alternative for future development at the Sebastian Municipal Airport. The preferred
alternative development will be graphically presented in the airport layout plan and
associated projects will be implemented into the Airport's capital improvement program.
The recommendations from this alternative analysis will be closely coordinated with the
City, as well as representatives of FDOT and the FAA, to ascertain funding viability and
overall viability of the Airport development needs. Once refined alternatives have been
approved by the Airport Sponsor, they cannot be revised without additional scope and
fee.
Based upon the recommended Airport development, a list of capital improvements
including environmental, design, land acquisition, mitigation, support facilities, etc. will be
identified. This will allow both the consultant and the City to obtain a "snapshot" of all
proposed projects in conjunction with anticipated order of magnitude costs in 2015/2016
dollars. It is important to note that these costs will differ to some degree with the costs
provided in the Financial Feasibility section of this report, but their use is primarily to
identify all potential projects associated with the preferred development option.
Task 6.6 - Prepare and Submit Chapter 6, Recommended Development, and
Appendices
A draft report of the refined development alternatives will be created in both narrative
and graphic forms to document the final recommended airport alternatives including
identifying parcels for potential land acquisition or disposal, summary of sustainability
initiatives and preliminary project cost estimates and phasing. This chapter will also
include a separate section, which provides the results of any land use and zoning
considerations identified as well as environmental impacts and ultimate recommended
development.
ELEMENT 7 - AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN DRAWINGS
An approved Airport Layout Plan serves as the blueprint for future airport development
and is necessary for the airport to receive financial assistance under the terms of the
Airport and Airway Improvement Act. All components of the Airport Layout Plans Set
described herein will be developed in accordance with the provisions of AC 150/5070-
66, Airport Master Plans, the FAA ALP Checklist provided by the current standard
operating procedure ARP SOP 2.00 and 3.00, and FDOT ALP Preparation (January 18,
2005) submittal guidelines. All graphics and the airport layout plan drawing set will use
existing photographic and photogrammetry data unless the client specifically requests a
new aerial background.
Sebastian Municipal Airport August 2016
Final Master Plan Update Scope of Services A-21
Task 7.1 - Draft Airport Layout Plan Set
Title Sheet
A title sheet will be updated, and information concerning the airport including project
number, client name and location maps will be included on this sheet.
Airport Layout Plan
The ALP will be updated to reflect the recommended development of future needs as
identified in this study. Information on this portion of the ALP set will include, but not be
limited to, the physical layout of the airport and of the physical facilities developed
thereon. Also to be incorporated on the ALP sheet will be the building and facilities data,
runway protection zones, taxiway systems, navigational aid critical areas, building
elevations, topography, roads and parking areas, wind rose/wind coverage, declared
distances table, and the airport boundary. Object, building, and any other obstruction
heights will be taken from existing sources of information.
Existing and proposed modifications to FAA design standards will be identified and
delineated in a table, along with either the waiver allowing the modification, or the
proposed method of addressing the modification. A table listing any modifications
(existing and proposed) along with their proposed disposition will be incorporated onto
the ALP and in the narrative chapter. The scale of the drawing will be defined at the
time the ALP set is commenced and will be determined so as to provide a clearly legible
drawing. Information that cannot be included on the ALP sheet due to sheet size and
scaling limitations shall be incorporated onto a separate Airport Layout Plan Data sheet.
This may include Airport Data, Runway Data, Wind Roses, notes, etc.
Terminal Area Plan
At least one terminal area plan for the airport will be updated to reflect existing and
recommended development of future general aviation needs as identified in this study.
The terminal concept will focus on flexibility for future expansion. The plan will include
recommendations for access and parking, buildings, hangars, FBOs, and entrance
roads, as well as necessary security access to the airfield.
Inner Portion of Approach Surface Drawings
An Inner Portion of the Approach Surface Drawing will be prepared for each runway end
(four runway ends) depicting the area out to where the approach surface reaches a 100 -
foot height above the runway end. The drawings will depict the airport property, location
of roadways, structures, natural ground elevations and other artificial or natural features
within the limits of inner portion of the approach surface. The drawings will also detail
objects that penetrate approach surfaces or violate obstacle clearance criteria.
Obstructions will be listed numerically in an obstruction table for each approach with
data describing the obstruction type, top elevation, allowable elevation, amount of
penetration, and proposed dispositions. Additionally, the drawings will depict the
configuration of required safety areas off each runway end. Plan views will be
superimposed on aerial photos or a detailed line drawing.
Runway Departure Surfaces Drawings
The Runway Departure Surfaces Drawing will depict the plan and profile views of the
departure surfaces for each runway end that is designated primarily for instrument
departures. Currently only Runways 5/23 are equipped with instrument capabilities.
However, if it is recommended as part of this master plan that Runways 10/28 also be
equipped with some type of instrument approach and departure surface, this will be
Sebastian Municipal Airport August 2016
Final Master Plan Update Scope of Services A-22
incorporated in the drawing set. The drawings will detail objects that penetrate
departure surfaces or violate obstacle clearance criteria. Obstructions will be listed
numerically in an obstruction table for each departure surface with data describing the
obstruction type, top elevation, allowable elevation, amount of penetration, and proposed
dispositions. Plan views will be superimposed on aerial photos for base maps.
Airport Airspace Drawings
Per FDOT ALP Preparation and Submittal Guidelines, January 18, 2005, it is
recommended for clarity to separate the state and federal standards to create a more
useful ALP. Thus, two airport airspace drawing sheet(s) will be developed: one
illustrating all 14 CFR Part 77 surfaces and one for all FDOT surfaces. The Airport
Airspace Drawings will depict all obstacle clearance surfaces associated with the
ultimate airport configuration, and approaches will be generated and superimposed on
mapping. Fifty (50) foot contour intervals will be shown for all sloping imaginary
surfaces. These sheets will depict objects that violate the obstacle clearance surfaces
that have not been identified on the ALP or approach sheets. The top elevation of each
obstruction will be identified on each sheet as will the disposition of the obstruction. The
dimensions of the approach surfaces and transitional surfaces will be charted. The
Airport Airspace drawings will depict, in plan and profile view, the full length of all
approach surfaces including runway protection zones without the use of match lines or
truncated depictions.
On and Off Airport Land Use Plan
Again, per FDOT ALP requirements, the Airport's existing land use plan will be updated
to provide details associated with current and future property use within and surrounding
the airport boundaries. The purpose of this sheet is to assist communities to insure that
growth around the airport will be compatible use and not impede future aeronautical
expansion. Included in the drawing will be the identification of existing and future
aviation related (including runway protection zone (RPZ), non -aviation related,
environmental, industrial, commercial, or other uses as required. Information developed
as part of Tasks 2, 4, 5, and 6 will be incorporated into this drawing. This sheet will also
depict recommended development including recommended land acquisition generated
as part of Tasks 5 and 6 to help to guide the long-term development of the airport.
Exhibit 'A' Airport Property Map
An airport property map(s) will be prepared in accordance with AC 150/5100-17, Land
Acquisition and Relocation Assistance for Airport Improvement Program Assisted
Projects, to allow incorporation of the data acquired as part of the Exhibit'A' Ownership
and Encumbrance Property search. The airport property map(s) will depict the various
tracts of land that were acquired to develop the airport, and the method of acquisition
including any associated obligations stemming from Federal grant or FAA -administered
land transfer program. The airport property drawing and data sheet will also reflect
parcels acquired either through fee simple purchase, or easements purchased by the
airport with both federal and state funds, as well as, with local sources of funding
beginning from the original property transfer to the County for the airport. In addition, the
property map will also identify additional property required to meet the demands
identified in this master plan. Data used to develop the Exhibit'A' Map and data tables
will be obtained from the Ownership and Encumbrance report which identified existing
and future property needs as well as any additional data provided by the airport, City of
Sebastian Community Development and Public Works departments, Indian River County
Sebastian Municipal Airport August 2016
Final Master Plan Update Scope of Services A-23
Assessor's and Planning and Zoning departments. This sheet(s) will conform to ARP
Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) 3.00 Exhibit "A" requirements.
Draft Deliverables
• Draft Chapter Seven, Airport Layout Plan, narrative report
• Thirteen (13) sets of draft ALP for review and distribution as follows:
• Deliverable 1 (initial submittal): One (1) set Sponsor, One (1) set FDOT, and
Two (2) sets FAA
• Deliverable 2 (updated submittal): One (1) set FDOT, Two (2) sets FAA ADO,
and six (6) sets for FAA Regional Offices for circulation and review
Task 7.2 - Development of Final Airport Layout Plans Set
TKDA will revise the ALP drawing set and narrative report to reflect final review
comments received by the City, FAA and FDOT, as appropriate.
• Final Chapter Seven, Airport Layout Plan narrative report.
• Seven (7) full-size, to scale sets and three (3) 11 x 17 inch set of final ALP (Client
and Agency changes incorporated) for FAA conditional approval and distribution,
as follows:
• Two (2) full-size, to scale, signed sets of the final ALP for FAA and one 11 x
17 inch reduced, signed set
• Two (2) full-size to scale, signed sets of the final ALP for FDOT and one 11 x
17 inch reduced, signed set
• Two (2) full-size to scale, signed sets of the final ALP for the Sponsor and
one 11 x 17 inch reduced, signed set
• One (1) full-size, to scale, signed set of the final ALP for Consultant
• In addition, PDF copies will be provided to FAA, FDOT and the Sponsor.
ELEMENT 8 — IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Task 8.1 — Facilities Implementation Plan
The facilities implementation plan will provide a proposed schedule and timing for key
projects along with project descriptions, estimated development costs and special
project considerations. This data will be used to formulate the updated airport capital
improvement program.
Refine Airport Development Phasing Schedule
An initial development schedule will be prepared based upon the demand
requirements. A priority system will be developed and adopted for use in this study
considering the urgency of need, triggering events, ease of implementation, logic of
sequence including linking compatible projects together, and economic viability
considering previous federal and state funding on similar projects as well as local
funding strategies. The objective is to establish an efficient order for project
development and implementation. Recommended airport development over the 20 -
year planning period will be classified in three general development phases. These
phases represent the short, intermediate, and long-term planning periods.
Sebastian Municipal Airport August 2016
Final Master Plan Update Scope of Services A-24
Particular focus will be given to detailing estimated costs for short-term (2017-2021)
and intermediate-term (2022-2026) development projects. Development costs will be
shown on a year-to-year basis and prepared at a level of detail consistent with
master planning in order to develop a 20 -Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
Projects relating to capacity enhancement will be highlighted in the phased
development plan. Development phasing will provide a general understanding of the
financial requirements by phase over the 20 -year planning period. However, by
linking development projects to future demand levels, an added degree of
implementation flexibility will be achieved.
Refine Airport Development Cost Estimates
Based upon the selected alternatives, cost estimates will be created for each of the
airport development projects. Cost estimates will be based on a variety of sources,
including actual project estimates, published engineering indices, government
agencies, and similar airport construction projects in the area. In addition to the
actual construction costs, financial consideration must be given to the engineering
and design work, plus minor construction items and contingencies, which have not
been specifically enumerated. For planning purposes, the base construction cost has
been increased to reflect the anticipated engineering, testing, survey, and inspection
costs, as well as for unknown contingencies. Project phasing and associated cost
estimates will be provided in the current CIP format, which includes a description and
cost estimate for each project within the CIP of airport development.
Task 8.2 — Financial Feasibility Analysis
One of the major indicators of success of any master plan is its ability to be implemented
from a financial perspective. Financial considerations of the Master Plan development
program will be analyzed, and a realistic financial plan will be developed based upon
historic and current funding precedents and local funding strategies.
The financial plan will address historical revenues and expenses to determine the
Airport's ability to support the capital development program as outlined in the Master
Plan Update. Projected operating revenue and expenses will be developed according to
growth and the realization of additional revenues and expenses as facilities come on-
line.
The feasibility analysis will assess the financial implications of undertaking the proposed
development plans. In this analysis, the Airport's ability to generate future revenues
sufficient to cover future expenses of maintenance, operation, administration, and debt
service will be assessed. An output of the plan will be an annual cash flow analysis
through the years 2016 in addition to short (2017-2021), intermediate (2022-2026) and
long-term demand (2027-2037). A failure to adequately cover operating costs and debt
service payments will trigger further examination of airport revenues and expenses, or
the capital program itself. The process will be repeated until a financially feasible
development program is established.
Task 8.3 - Prepare and Submit Chapter 8, Airport Implementation Plan, and
Appendices
Chapter Eight will present the results of the preceding analyses, outlining the overall
Airport capital improvement program, and ordering projects numerically based on the
Sponsor's order of priority for individual annual planning periods over the first two years.
Sebastian Municipal Airport August 2016
Final Master Plan Update Scope of Services A-25
Projects for the three to ten year period, and the ten to twenty year horizon, will be
consolidated and linked where fiscally feasible. These projects will be prioritized by their
importance, as identified in the Master Plan Update, and through the refinement
process, and the anticipated sources of funding for the elements of the selected airport
master plan concept will be identified. This will include the identification of local, state,
and federal funds, as well as potential sources of private investment for airport
improvements. General estimates of equipment costs and operation, and maintenance
costs associated with the airport, will be factored into the financial program. The
ultimate product will be a realistic and financially viable, twenty-year Airport capital
improvement program.
ELEMENT 9 — PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND COORDINATION MEETINGS
Task 9.1 -Technical Advisory Committee Meetings
Members of the Technical Advisory Committee should include major airport tenants
and/or tenant representative, City/County Economic Development, City Planning and
Environmental personnel, airport management, FAA and FDOT environmental, planning
and program specialists, community business leaders, as well as local community
representatives. The committee should be limited to no more than 12 individuals unless
a larger group is warranted in order to keep the process moving and on -budget.
Meetings with the Technical Advisory Committee will include a brief review of data
provided to date as well as obtaining input with regard to next steps (i.e. alternative
development options). Comments received prior to these meetings will be implemented
into the report and TAC presentation. Any additional comments received during the
meeting will be reviewed and incorporated into the final report.
Four (4) TAC meetings, including the project kick-off meeting, were budgeted over the
course of the study.
+ The Kick -Off TAC Meeting will introduce participants to the process, explain their
role as well as provide data regarding current conditions at the airport,
preliminary forecasts of demand as well as planning goals for future
development.
+ The second Technical Advisory Committee workshop will be held approximately
two to three weeks following distribution of Chapters 2, Existing Conditions, and
3, Aviation Activity Forecasts and Critical Design Aircraft. The purpose of this
meeting is to present anticipated demand, preliminary capacity and facility
requirements needed to support planned development as well as to get input
from the TAC regarding what they would like to see at X26. The third TAC
workshop will occur approximately three to four weeks following the distribution
of Chapter 4, Facility Requirements, and preliminary discussion of proposed
development. This workshop will occur just prior to the first Public Meeting in
order to allow users, neighbors and other interested individuals to provide input.
During the workshops, the TKDA team will explain how we will evaluate
proposed development and potential impacts.
3 The third TAC workshop will occur approximately three to four weeks following
the distribution of Chapters 5, Airport Alternatives, and 6, Refined Alternatives.
This meeting will be held in a roundtable/charrette format in order to gain insight
and recommendations with regard to the preferred airport development as well
Sebastian Municipal Airport August 2016
Final Master Plan Update Scope of Services A-26
as potential financial feasibility and implementation. A comparison matrix of
proposed options will be provided including rough order of magnitude costs,
potential impacts and mitigation options, land use requirements, etc. From this
information, recommended development will be determined for the next twenty
years at the airport.
Task 9.2 — Public and City Commission Workshops
The interim submittals under the master plan study will be presented to the general
public and City Commission during two (2) separate meetings over the course of the
study.
i The first meeting will be held following the third planned Technical Advisory
Committee (TAC) meeting in order to allow potentially impacted neighbors and
the general public and other interested parties to provide input with regard to
future airport development.
+ The second proposed Public Workshop will likely be held in concert with a City
Commission meeting, following submittal and approval of Chapters 5 and 6,
Alternatives Evaluation and Recommended Development. The team will present
the recommended development as well as preliminary Capital Improvement
Program to the City Commission members, airport neighbors and the general
public. This meeting will be used to obtain comments with regard to proposed
development.
Advertising for these meetings will be done by the City, and may be accomplished using
press releases and direct mailings to interested public groups.
Task 9.3 — Client Coordination Meetings
Client coordination meetings are planned approximately two weeks following submittal of
each chapter of the master plan update in order to obtain comments and input from the
Sponsor. Additional coordination meetings will likely be required through the course of
this study. Typically, these meetings are during such milestones as the preparation of
the aviation activity forecasts, the alternatives analysis/refined alternatives process, and
during the preparation of the capital improvement program and financial plan.
Coordination meetings will be held via conference call as well as before or after
Technical Advisory Committee, Public or City Commission meetings in order to keep the
costs to a minimum.
Task 9.4 — Regulatory Agency Coordination Meetings
In an effort to streamline the review process as illustrated in Exhibit C, the consultant
and sponsor representative will have regular conference calls with FAA Airport District
Office, FOOT Aviation and other regulatory (i.e. US Fish and Wildlife, Florida
Department of Environmental Protection, Florida Department of Natural Resources, St.
Johns River Water Management District, and US Corps of Engineers) personnel. These
meetings are planned to occur not earlier than two (2) weeks after a meeting date is
established, agreed upon, and meeting materials were distributed to all parties. The
regulatory coordination meetings will occur following review by the Sponsor but before
meetings with the Technical Advisory Committee. Conference calls/meetings will also
occur prior to all public and city commission meetings. The purpose of these meetings is
to coordinate efforts, obtain critical information and avoid any potential issues that may
delay the project
Sebastian Municipal Airport August 2016
Final Master Plan Update Scope of Services A-27
Deliverables: Deliverables include meeting minutes, public input and regulatory agency
comments provided in appendices within the Master Plan narrative report. This
information will be incorporated into the final draft master plan report.
ELEMENT 10 - DELIVERABLES AND FINAL DOCUMENTATION
Task 10.1 - Draft and Final Master Plan Update Report
Revisions to Draft Chapters: This task includes revisions to the draft working
papers provided in previous tasks to reflect comments received during the
coordination and review process.
Prepare Draft Master Plan Report: This task includes providing copies of the final
draft to the City of Sebastian staff, FDOT and FAA for final review and approval prior
to publication of the final report, which will include all appendices. Five (5) copies of
the draft Master Plan Update technical report, including color exhibits, and eleven
(11) hard copies of the airport layout plan set will be prepared and submitted for
review. One (1) final draft will be delivered to the FAA, two (2) to FDOT, and two (2)
to the City for a final review.
Publish Final Master Plan Report and Final Deliverables: The final Master Plan
Update technical report will be published in an electronic format and five (5) hard
copies of the narrative report and two hard copies of the ALP set will be provided to
the City of Sebastian. Two (2) hard copies and electronic copies of both the
Narrative Report and ALP will be provided to the FDOT, and 11 hard copies of the
ALP, one GBC bound copy of the narrative report and two PDF copies of both will be
provided to the FAA. Reproduction of the document with offset lithographic printing
and laser color copy process will be completed as appropriate.
Additional deliverables include electronic copies of the title search and encumbered
airport property data as well as any data obtained from the wildlife hazard site visit.
PHASE 3 — PROJECT CLOSE OUT
Task 3.1 — Basic Services
Upon project completion and approval, TKDA will prepare FAA Grant Closeout Report
and submit to FAA and FDOT for approval.
Sebastian Municipal Airport August 2016
Final Master Plan Update Scope of Services A-28
EXHIBIT B
Sebastian Municipal Airport
TimA Final Enhanced Master Plan Update Fee Estimate
ELEMENT
Task 0&,W=
Eslmated Persm lours
VP -Senior
VP
Engvlees
Sr
PlanwEm
Spetia8sl
Re9deeI[
Engineer 11
Planner
Speadasl DD Surveying
SpeoaSpuWizt
Toam
Fours
ToW Cost
PHASEI:
PROJECT FORMULATION
1.1 ProW Scone ad Schedule
i 121
121S 1.740
1.2P wlc CLP Updates
1 121
1
121S 1.740
1.3 Pmjacl Fundcq Caadnabon
1 121
1215 1.740
1.4 Graf PWAMbCaWn PaCkar
121
1
12
5 1.740
SUBTOTAL PHASE 1 • Project Formulation
48
48 S 6.960
PHASE 2:
NA5TE0. PIAN UPDATE
Elamem l: PrclatGoalswvdOblecfivas
1. t Esmblah Technkal Adnsa/Ccmm;nde
4
415 580
1.2 EstabSsh Plannmo and SusUaab1t Goats
4
4
S 580
1,3 EstalSh Sustalnab:h, T t4 and lass.cn StTsmpnt
4
4 5 500
SUBTOTALEIEMENT I
12
12
1,740
Elema dL Usting Cmdklons
2.1 Backgrund
2
2
S 250
2.2 InvaVyAipal Physcal Fwude
24
28 S 3.780
23 AispadaWf Trafk ConoWObsbucbons
2
2 S 290
2.4 V&dy Land Usatand Use Cmb&
4
4
S Sea
2.5 ExhbdW AiPWI PvdqWy Omerio and Enctaftance
24
1
24
5 3.460
2.6 Exis*q Utifty ad Drainage IntasbucWre
81
5 1.160
27 Enuiommaal lnm sub ESA
2.8 Sold Wute Ad&
12
5 1,740
2.9W,6A Hazard See Veit
24
5 3.480
2.10 Aipm User lnlervimASUxKtionna'aes
16
3A80
2.11 Prepae and Submt ChapbnOne and Tao
4
4,940
SUBTOTAL ELEMENT 2
16 8
23.220
P24
Element 3: Avia0m AcUvl Forecasts and CdUul Design Aircraft
3.1 Ines of Hzmrical and CunenlAi Wad
6
5 870
321daddratim of Fades a tip AffectingLevels
1
5 145
3.3 SinoScrao Aviation in Faeasls
12
S 1,740
3.4 Exal and Fomust AmaN
4
S 580
3.5 Foreusl Resourt Consumption
6
B S 1,160
36 Prepae and Subldd ChalaThree. Ava6on AcOv4y Fp z
16
20 S 2320
SUBTOTAL ELEMENT 3
47
51
5 6.615
Elamam 4: AirponCa ad ad Faclily Requirmaus
4.1 Aaapaca 6 Arald Capaclly ad Daley
5
5 5 725
42 Kv%$d Facifty Rmwements
16
18 5 2,610
4.4 Detamme Ce lAvabun FamMy Rebuiemenb
19
10 5 2.610
4.5 Decamine Aspat Suppat Facifty Repusertenls
12
12 S 1.740
4.6 G=ad A=3. Cam:Mton ad P&Wg Raduiements
8
8 3 1.160
47 Our' Lad Area aU Oder Rmuyann6s
8
8 5 1.160
4a Refine Sustainabity Gazes
1 1 21
21S 290
4.9 P1eaam ad Submit CkipW For. AkvW Facdtv RegurwnedK
24
4 81
361S 4.080
SUBTOTAL ELEMENT 4
95
8
107 5 14.375
Omani 5: Airpdd AAemavas
5.1 AAfeld Atemauves
24
16
40 S 4.680
52 Gema Av4don Alw%mies
16
12
20
5 3.220
53 SUWal FacJd=
15
4
19 5 2.475
54 Landzide and Land Use Albmases
12
12
24 5 2.640
55 Prearury Demdonlent Costs
ifi
12
28 S 3.916
S6 Prepae ad SubrM Chaaa Flue, AipdnAMmaaes
24
8
36 5 4.080
SUBTOTAL ELEMENT 5
1 1071
12 52
175
$ 21.011
Elwem 6: AllemaUves Rermemesn
6.1 ReFned Ahmnatws Analyse
ifi
12
28 S 3,220
6.2 Em nunvtal kfim Fon
16
16 S 2321
6.3 lad Use CamgaadSyad Mappnp
16
4;
32 S 3.520
64 Susbuinabidy Imam and Mwdaing Recouvedaons
16
16
5 2.321
6S Re os mended A -Pm Oevemmad and Pselimury Roject
Costs ad Phased
16
4
20 5 2.852
fib Prepare and Subml ChaorerSm. Rec nvmnded Devep rd
24
32 5 4.312
SUBTOTAL RIME 1: 6
104
144
$ 18.544
EXHIBIT B
1 Sebastian Municipal Airport
TKDA Final Enhanced Master Plan Update Fee Estimate
:m
\TENT
lazeOeiffiplLn
�.� Sr R.e9aRred
gegaten.M Planner,£. _
Eng'reer 6s: a's1 g -neem
Estmated Person lbws
GISCADD Surveying
planner
Spaxwell Specurit
Tole Work
Hours
Toth Coit
Element 7: AI wt Layout Plan Drawings
7.1 DomWwt of DraftA'irDen LayoutPlans Set
12
110 180
336 $
18.576
7.2 Dermlepment of Fsal A'ryM Layout Plans Set
I.
2: 24
fib 5
4,556
SUBTOTAL ELEMENTS
144 204
405 S
27.132
Element 8: Implementation Plan
8.1 Project Pleasng awl FacLOesl Iementation Plan
40
16
56 5
7,928
82 Financial FeasibAfty and Cash He.Anas's
40
16
56 5
7,920
8.3 PmPam and SubrrA Chapter 7. Arend Layout Plan Summary.
and B. Imelemnualim Plan
24
2
26 5
3,746
SUBTOTAL ELEMENT 9
104
34
1
138 5
19.602
Element 9: Public Involvement art Coordination Meetings
9.1 TeNncal Admery CmmaRe Meetings )4)
a
22
66 S
8,030
92 Pudic Inlormationrah, Commascn Mee- (2)
30
22
52 S
6.000
9.3 Client Copahna en Meetam
40
40 5
5.600
94 FAA and FOOT CoortmaOon Meetings
24
24 S
3,480
SUBTOTAL ELEMENT IO
138
44
1821$
23.310
Element 10: Final Documentation
10.1 Prepare Draft and Final Master Plan Update Rep
40
24
641$
7.600
SUBTOTAL ELEMENT 11
40
24
64 1 S
7,600
1
PHASE 2- Mester Plan Wort, Hors
827
78
768 372
7.465
SUBTOTAL PHASE 2-MmtwPlan
f S 719.]75 S 10,]71 IS 12.6011111 27.9001S
S
159,249
PHASE3:
PROJECTCLOSEOUT
3.1 FPA GrentChsuwtReport 1
1 161
1 1
1
1 1615
2320
SUBTOTAL PHASE 3-Closemat 1
1 Hit
I I
1
1 1513
2.320
PHASE 4:
DIRECT EXPENSES
inial and Su6satmce
4,000
FitldEaperses
4.U00
Repoduclins and Reprographics
2.000
SUBTOTAL PHASE 4 - Direct Eapensm, 1
f
10.000
PRASE 5:
SUBCONSULTANTS
Enveprvie�dal Overviw
S 15,000.00
Advanta Cpnsubn LLC
5 3.000.00
14k Senh Company-E.hmilA Property Map Re0udenents
5 15.000.00
TKDA Mark-Up 10%
5
3.30D.00
SUBTOTAL PHASE S - Subconsulbnts I
S
26,300
MASTER PLAN UPDATE S
214,929
ROUNDED S
215.000
-May use local surveyor i14i"di a