Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005 - 302 East Airport Driveam no Tank Closure Assessment J &S Aviation Facility Sebastian Municipal Airport 302 East Airport Drive Sebastian, Florida. DEP Facility I.D. No. 31/8509256 ON Ardaman & Associates, Inc. OFFICES s.. Orlando, 8008 S. Orange Avenue, Orlando, Florida 32809, Phone (407) 855 -3860 Bartow, 1525 Centennial Drive, Bartow, Florida 33830, Phone (863) 533 -0858 Cocoa, 1300 N. Cocoa blvd., Cocoa, Florida 32922, Phone (321) 632 -2503 Fort Lauderdale, 3665 Park Central Boulevard. North, Pompano Beach. Florida 33064, Phone (954) 969 -8788 Fort Myers, 9970 Bavaria Road, Fort Myers, Florida 33913, Phone (941) 768 -6600 Miami, 2608 W. 84th Street, Hialeah, Florida 33016, Phone (305) 825 -2683 Port Charlotte, 740 Tamiami Trail, Unit 3, Port Charlotte, Florida 33954, Phone (941) 624 -3393 Port St. Lucie, 460 Concourse Place NW, Unit 1, Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986, Phone (772) 878 -0072 Sarasota, 2500 Bee Ridge Road, Sarasota, Florida 34239, Phone (941) 922 -3526 Tallahassee, 3175 West Tharpe Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32303, Phone (850) 576 -6131 Tampa, 3925 Coconut Palm Drive, Suite 115, Tampa, Florida 33619, Phone (813) 620 -3389 West Palm -Beach, 2511 Westgate Avenue, Suite 10, West Palm Beach, Florida 33409, Phone (561) 687 -8200 MEMBERS: A. S. F E. American Concrete Institute American Society for Testing and Materials nn Florida Institute of Consulting Engineers Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materia;s Consultants The LPA Group Incorporated 12000 Research Parkway Suite 152 Orlando, Florida 32826 -3287 y Attention: Mr. Mark Jansen Subject: Tank Closure Assessment J & S Aviation Facility Sebastian Municipal Airport 302 East Airport Drive Sebastian, Florida DEP Facility I.D. No. 31/8509256 Dear Mr. Jansen: August 8, 2005 File No. 05 -5426 As requested, Ardaman & Associates, Inc. (A &A) has completed a petroleum storage tank r closure assessment at the subject site. The purpose of this study was to obtain soil and groundwater contamination data at the former above - ground fuel storage tank location on the subject site. This data report documents our field and laboratory programs and presents the results of our assessment. SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The subject site is the J & S Aviation facility located at 302 East Airport Drive in Section 1, Township 31 South, Range 38 East, in Sebastian, Indian River County, Florida. The site location is superimposed on the Sebastian, Florida USGS quadrangle map included as the Site Location Map, Figure 1. The subject site is developed with the former J & S Aviation facility (DEP Facility I.D. No. 3118509256). The closure assessment activities were performed at the location of an former 10,000- gallon above- ground aviation fuel storage tank on the site. FIELD EXPLORATION AND SAMPLING PROGRAM Our field program for this tank closure assessment consisted of: 1) conducting five hand auger borings on the subject site to obtain soil contamination and soil stratigraphy data, 2) performing soil -gas analysis on the soil samples obtained from the borings, 3) installing one shallow 2 -inch diameter PVC temporary groundwater sampling well at the site, and 4) obtaining groundwater samples from the well for laboratory analysis after developing the well. Our field program was conducted on July 20, 2005. The borings conducted on the subject site, A13-1 through AB -5, were conducted at the ,: ,pp ,.. , ornery and pear thp, center of the former, aybave- ground storage tank location a roxi,mate c Ottrces in Barlow. Cocoa, Fort Lauaerdale, Fort Myers, Miami, Orlando, Port Chariolte, Pori St. Luc'< The LPA Group Incorporated File No. 05 -5426 -2- as shown on the Sample Location Plan included as Figure 2. Auger Borings AB -1 through AB -5 were advanced to a depth ranging from 5 to 7 feet below land surface (bls), using a 3- inch diameter, hand -held bucket auger. The boring locations, as shown on Figure 2, were determined in the field by estimating distances from existing site features and should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method of measurement used. Soil samples from the borings for soil -gas analysis were obtained from the auger at approximate two -foot intervals. The samples were placed in new 36 -ounce sample jars (half filled). The gas in the headspace above the soil in the jars was analyzed with and without a carbon filter using a Foxboro Organic Vapor Analyzer (OVA), Model 128, Serial Number 40751. The meter on the OVA was visually monitored and the maximum reading obtained over a 15 -20 second time increment was recorded. While in the survey mode, the OVA is calibrated to 05 parts per million methane in air, and zero air. Representative soil samples were collected during our field operations for visual examination and classification of the soil stratigraphy. The resulting soil descriptions are shown on the Soil Boring Logs included in Appendix I. A soil sample, SS -1 on Figure 2, was obtained from a depth of 2 feet bls at the location of Boring AB -5. The sample was obtained using the syringe method, preserved on ice, and transported to the analytical laboratory for testing. Temporary Monitoring Well TMW -2 was installed in the borehole of AB -5 to obtain groundwater samples for laboratory analyses. TMW -2 was installed to a depth of approximately 5.5 feet bls and was screened from the ground surface to approximately 5 feet bls. The water table was encountered at a depth of approximately 2.8 feet bls in TMW -2 on the day of our field exploration. Over three well volumes were purged from TMW -2 with a parastaltic pump prior to obtaining groundwater samples. Near- surface groundwater samples were collected from TMW -2 for laboratory analysis of FAC Chapter 62 -770 Table B parameters. A copy of the Groundwater Sampling Log for TMW -2 is included in Appendix 11, TEST RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS The encountered soils and the results of the soil -gas analyses are presented on the Soil Boring Logs in Appendix I. The soils encountered in the borings were primarily gray and brown fine sands. The net OVA reading for each sample shown in Appendix I was obtained by subtracting the OVA reading obtained with the carbon filter (filtered reading) from the unfiltered OVA reading. As shown in Appendix I, no net OVA readings above background levels were exhibited by the soil samples obtained from Borings AB -1 through AB -5. A soil sample (SS -1) was obtained from a depth of 2 feet bls at the location of Boring AB -5. Soil analytical results for SS -1 are included in Appendix III. As shown in Appendix 111, no FAC Chapter 62 -770 Table B parameter concentrations above test detection limits were detected in Sample SS -1. The soil samples obtained from the borings did not exhibit an obvious chemical -type odor or obvious signs of petroleum staining. Groundwater analytical results are also included in Appendix III. No FAC Chapter 62 -770 Table B parameter concentrations above test detection limits, with the exception of lead, The LPA Group Incorporated File No. 05 -5426 -3- were detected in the samples obtained from Well TMW -2. Total lead was detected at a concentration of 6 µg /e, which is below the Groundwater Cleanup Target Level (GCTL) for lead (15 mg /0). In conclusion, no evidence of contamination above cleanup levels was detected in the near- -' surface soil and groundwater samples taken in the vicinity of former above- ground fuel storage tank location on the site. The client or owner's representative should submit this report and any additional pertinent information (removal form from certified petroleum contractor, manifests, etc.) to the Indian River County Health Department and the DEP Central District. CLOSURE This report presents the results of Ardaman & Associates, Inc.'s tank closure assessment, as described herein, and is intended only for use by The LPA Group Incorporated. It was prepared in accordance with our agreement for consulting services. The analyses and conclusions submitted in this report are based on the data obtained from our field program, as discussed in this report. This study is a focus study limited to the specific methods of investigation. Soil and groundwater contamination results would only be applied to the diameters of depths of the boreholes and well on the date tested. Our scope of work for this phase of the project was designed to preliminarily test the site relative to the topic stated above. It has been a pleasure assisting you with this project. Should you have any questions regarding this report, or if we may be of any further assistance, please contact us. Very truly yours, ARDAMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Dan J. Zrall ck P. Ma ning, P.E. Assistant P ect Engineer Branch Manager Florida Registration No. 56265 DJZ/JPM /pt/bah 05 -5426 Tank Closure Assessment (Reports #Z2) an d" pm I r 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 n J d rc a 34 A aseland e 3� \ it :,FLEMIVG' ��:: GRANT FORMER AST LOCATION iii,Y, - _ T 3J S y�.31 S r� C I F� r Rt „� f.�• ti� \t 7� t t i r a , _ tPiluv �� \ r 4p 1 w/ et c t $ y 4Run(E) - i 1 �, Y ` t %�-9y'` �^'3�'��^ •,'�"`�:` . ,y�'! iii � 1 `. 4� � ' � ��'� SITE LOCATION MAP N �� Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants TANK CLOSURE ASSESSMENT FLORIDA SECTION 1 D 20013 302 EAST AIRPORT DRIVE SEBASTVW, 'FLORIDA TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH oMM W. TAT I 00: m en oaf a /s /os �rPawra RANGE 38 EAST OBTAINED FROM U.S.G.S- QUAD MAP: SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 1949 T (PHOTOREVISED 1970) SITE LOCATION MAP N �� Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants TANK CLOSURE ASSESSMENT FLORIDA J&S AVIATION FACILITY D 20013 302 EAST AIRPORT DRIVE SEBASTVW, 'FLORIDA SCALE — 1'•2000' aIiADRANC.LE LOCATION oMM W. TAT I 00: m en oaf a /s /os �rPawra 105-5426 T LEGEND 4[) H AB AUGER BORING LOCATION TMW TEMPORARY MONITOR WELL LOCATION NOT TO SCALE SS SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION 6 D Y 1 APPENDIX I Soil Boring Logs no Florida Department of Environmental Protection - Division of Waste Management - Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems BORING LOG Paae I of 5 Boring /Well Number: Permit Number: FDEP Facility Identification Number: AB -1 31/8509256 Site Name: Borehole Start Date: 07/20/05 Borehole Stan Time: ❑ AM ❑ PM Former J &S Aviation Site End Date: 07/20105 End Time: ❑ AM ❑ PM Geologist's Name: Environmental Technician's Name: Environmental Contractor: Ardaman and Associates, Inc. Tom Taylor Drilling Company: Pavement Thickness (inches): Borehole Diameter (inches): Borehole Depth (feet): 3 6.5 Drilling Method(s): Apparent Borehole DTW (in feet Measured Well DTW (in feet after OVA (list model and check type): Hand Auger from soil moisture content): 4 water recharges in well): Foxboro 128 ❑ FID ❑ PID Disposition of Drill Cuttings [check method(s)]: ❑ Drum ❑ Spread G Backfll ❑ Stockpile ❑ Other (describe if other or multiple items are checked): Borehole Completion (check one): ❑ Well ❑ Grout � I Bentonite r Backfili ❑ Other (describe) rn �' 'C7 p `I C G" Lab Soil and .c, ' _ .� •* eb �.` A °o Sample Description Groundwater � (include grain size based on USCS, odors, staining, w ra Samples (list sample C7 ro „yy O o p .y and Other remarks) 1 n number and depth or h O v temporary screen r' Interval) HA 1 <10 <10 <10 1 Gray Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP D HA 1 Gray Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP D HA 1 20 15 <10 Gray Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP D 3 HA 1 Brown Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP M 4 HA 1 <10 <10 <10 Brown Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP W 5 HA 1 6 7 s 9 10 1] 12 Sample Type Codes: PH = Post Hole; HA = Hand Auger; SS = Split Spoor.; ST = Shelby l'ube; DP = Direct Push; SC = Sonic Core; DC= Drill Cuttings Moisture Content Codes: D = Dry; R1= Moisl; W = Wet; S = Saturated OEM dft om A Florida Department of Environmental Protection - Division of Waste Management - Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems BORING LOG Page 2 of 5 Boring/Well Number: Permit Number: FDEP Facility Identification Number: A13-2 31/8509256 Site Name: Borehole Start Date: 07/20/05 Borehole Start Time: 0 AM G PM Former J&S Aviation Site End Date: 07/20/05 End Time: CAM U PM Geologist's Name: Environmental Technician's Name: Environmental Contractor: Ardaman and Associates, Inc. I Tom Taylor Drilling Company: Pavement Thickness (inches): Borehole Diameter (inches): Borehole Depth (feet): 3 5.5 Drilling Method(s): Apparent Borehole DTW (in feet Measured Well DTW (in feet after OVA (list model and check type): Hand Auger from soil moisture content): 4.1 water recharges in wen): Foxboro 128 ❑ FID ❑ PID Disposition of Drill Cuttings [check method(s)]: CJ Drum r l Spread [%0] Backftll ❑ Stockpile 0 Other (describe iforher or msdliple dents are checked). Borehole Completion (check one): rJ Well ® Grout E Bentonite G Backfill rl Other (describe) sy a Lab Soil and ,. 5 �, „�,� eb Sample Description Z Groundwater N ry yt tp e, O z,. ; (include grain size based on USCS, odors, staining, Samples (list sample number and depth or tv d O �. A v and other remarks) B o t7 temporary screen ea �, A rn �, interval) HA 1 <10 <10 <10 Gray Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP D 1 HA 1 Gray Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP D 2 HA 1 <10 <10 <10 Gray Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP D 3 HA 1 Gray Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP M 4 HA 1 50 50 <10 Brown Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP W 5 G 7 5 9 10 ]1 12 Sample Type Codes: PH = Post liole; HA = l land Auger; SS = Split Spoon; ST = Shelby Tube; DP = Direct Push; SC = Sonic Core; DC= Drill Cuttings Moisture Content Codes: D = Dry; M = Moist; W = Wet; S = Saturated -M Florida Department of Environmental Protection - Division of Waste Management - Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems BODING LOG Page 3 of 5 Boring[Well Number: Permit Number: FDEP Facility identification Number: AB -3 31/8509256 Site Name: Borehole Start Date: 07/20/05 Borehole Start Time: ❑I AM ❑ PM Former J &S Aviation Site End Date: 07/20105 End Time: r AM ❑ PM Geologist's Name: Environmental Technician's Name: Environmental Contractor: Ardaman and Associates, Inc. Tom Taylor Drilling Company: Pavement Thickness (inches): Borehole Diameter (inches): Borehole Depth (feet): 3 7 Drilling Method(s); Apparent Borehole DTW (in feet Measured Well DTW (in feet after OVA (list model and check type ): Hand Auger from soil moisture content): 4,1 water recharges in well): Foxboro 128 AD ❑ PID Disposition of Drill Cuttings [check method(s)]: ❑ Drum ❑ Spread jJ Backfll ® Stockpile ❑Other (describe if other or multiple items are checkcrQ: Borehole Completion (check one): r Well ❑ Grout ❑ Bentonite [VI Backfill ❑ Other (describe) W E ;a a �] E7 C o Lab Soil and V Sample Description (�j c Groundwater C rD 1D j� y C7 iT {include grain size based on USCS, odors, staining, n Samples (list sample ti 'D y n e o a > K and other remark) f) d number and depth or temporary screen m ^, :r ro interval) R HA 1 <10 <10 <10 Gray Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP D HA 1 Gray Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP D 2 HA 1 20 20 <10 Gray Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP D 3 HA 1 Gray Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP Ni 4 HA 1 <10 <10 <10 Brown Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP W 5 HA 1 Brown Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP W G HA 1 <10 <10 <10 Brown Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP W 7 9 10 I1 12 Sample Type Codes: PH = Post Hale; HA = Hand Auger; SS = Split Spoon; ST = Shelby Tube; DP = Direct Push; SC = Sonic Core; DC= Drill Cuttings Moisture Content Codes: D = Dry; M = Moist; W = Wet; S = Saturated A rtr A am ffim Florida Department of Environmental Protection - Division of Waste Management - Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems BORING LOG Page 4 of 5 Boring/Well Number: Permit Number: FDEP Facility Identification Number: AB-4 31/8509256 Site Name: Borehole Start Date: 07120/05 Borehole star Time: n AM ❑ PM Former J &S Aviation Site End Date: 07/20/05 End Time: ❑ AM ❑ PM Geologist's Name: Environmental Technician's Name: Environmental Contractor: Ardaman and Associates, Inc. Tom Taylor Drilling Company: Pavement Thickness (inches): Borehole Diameter (inches): Borehole Depth (feet): 3 7 Drilling Method(s): Apparent Borehole DTW (in feet Measured Well DTW (in feet after OVA (list model and check type): Hand Auger from soil moisture content): 4.4 water recharges in well): Foxboro 128 ❑ F!D ❑ P!D Disposition of Drill Cuttings [check method(s)]: Fi Drum [7, Spread [ Backfill r] Stockpile ❑ Other (describe if ocher or multiple items are cheeked): Borehole Completion (check one): ❑ Well © Grout ri Bentonite (J Backfill ❑ Other (describe) rn ,y p m ^ co C d y Loh Sail and 9 .0 Zy �, H r 2 b Sample Description a Groundwater eo *� e� tr '�S7 Y. Co •t ft ro fl. O C (include grain size based on USCS, odors, staining, rn 't m Samples (list sample Q ro ro V ° is Q 0 C :., and other remarks) � f] 7 number and depth n temporary screen 13 ro < t1ii Interval) HA 1 <10 <10 <10 Gray Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP D HA 1 Gray Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP D 2 HA 1 20 20 <10 Gray Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP D 3 HA 1 Gray Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP M 4 HA 1 <10 <10 <10 Brown Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP W 5 HA 1 Brown Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP W G HA 1 <10 <10 <10 Brawn Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP W 7 J t0 II 12 Sample Type Codes: FH = Post flole; HA = Hand Auger; SS = Split Spoon; ST = Shelby Tube; DP = Direct Push; SC = Sonic Core; DC =Drill Cuttings Moisture Content Codes: D = Dry; N1= Moist; W = Wet; S = Saturated go me om On am am Florida Department of Environmental Protection - Division of Waste Management - Bureau of Petroleum Storage Systems BORING LOG Page 5 of 5 Boring/Well Number: Permit Number: FDEP Facility Identification Number: AB -5 3118505256 Site Name: Borehole Start Date: 07/20105 Borehole Stan Time: Ci AM I� 1 PM Former J &S Aviation Site End Date: 07/20/05 End Time: ❑ AM r.- PM Geologist's Name: Environmental Technician's Name: Environmental Contractor: Ardaman and Associates, Inc. Tam Taylor Drilling Company: Pavement Thickness (inches): Borehole Diameter (inches): Borehole Depth (feet): 3 6 Drilling Method(s): Apparent Borehole DTW (in feet Measured Well DTW (in feet after OVA (list model and check type): Hand Auger from soil moisture content): 4.5 water recharges in well): Foxboro 128 U FID ❑ PID Disposition of Drill Cuttings [check method(s)]: f7— Drum Spread r Backfill [1 Stockpile [] Other (describe ijorher or multiple items are checked): Borehole Completion (check one): [l Well Grout ❑ Bentonite G Backitll Q Other (describe) W ,. p, Z, C p Lab Soil and Sample Description n c Groundwater n K tsy Z ra C- [} (include grain size based on USCS, odors, staining, W (n n Samples (list sample j tv er y ee'i ti c n S H C Q O Y .. and other remarks) '! c number and depth or temporary screen O R = 7 e " Cr Inlenal) HA 1 <10 <10 <10 1 Gray Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP D HA 1 Gray Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP D SS -1 @ 2' Z HA 1 <10 <10 <10 Gray Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP D 3 HA 1 Gray Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP M 4 HA 1 <10 <10 <10 Brown Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP W 5 HA 1 Brown Fine Sand, no obvious odor or staining SP W G 7 8 y 10 II 12 Sample hype Codes: PH = Post Hole; IIA = Hand Auger; SS = Split Spoon; ST = Shelby Tube; DP = Direct Push; SC = Sonic Core; DC = Drill Cuttings Moisture Content Codes: D = Dry; N1 = Moist, W = Wet; S = Saturated APPENDIX II Groundwater Sampling Log FLOR A _r �- ON t. a NOTE: this does not constitute all the information required by Chapter 62 -160, F.A.C. DEP Forma 62-770900(3) Form Tidr: Pcirolcum or Petrokum ProduM Water Sarmline I.oe E(I'ecfive Date: Scgctnt Cr 23. 1997 Petroleum or Petroleum Products Water Sampling Log FDEP FACILITY NO.: 31/8509256 WELL NO.: TMW -2 SAMPLE ID: TMW -2 DATE: 7120105 SITE NAME: J &S Aviation SITE LOCATION: 302 East Airport Drive, Sebastian, Florida PURGE DATA WELL DIAMETER to : 2 TOTAL WELL DEPTH (ft): 55 DEPTH TO WATER (ft): 2.8 WELL CAPACITY al/ft : 0.163 1 WELL VOLUME (gal) = (TOTAL WELL DEPTH - DEPTH TO WATER) x WELL CAPACITY = _ ( 5.5 - 2.8 ) x .163 = 0.44 PURGE METHOD: Peristaltic Pump PURGING INITIATED AT: 11:15 am PURGING ENDED AT: 11:50 am WELL VOLS. PURGED CUMUL. VOLUME PURGED al 1l TEMP. COND. mhos PURGE RATE m : varies TOTAL VOLUME PURGED (Sal: 2.2 COLOR ODOR APPEARANCE OTHER 0.5 gal 0.5 gal 7.2 32 286 Yellowish None Yellowish - - I gal 1.5 gal 7.5 33 289 Yellowish to clear None Yellowish to clear — 0.7 gal 2.2 gal 7.5 33.3 289 Yellowish to clear None Yellowish to clear — .W SAMPLING DATA SAMPLED BY / AFFILIATION Tom Taylor / Ardaman and Associates, Inc. _ SAMPLER(S) SIGNATURE (S) SAMPLING METHOD(S): Peristaltic um - bacldlow method SAMPLING INITIATED AT: 11:51 am SAMPLING ENDED AT: 12:13 m FIELD DECONTAMINATION: Yes FIELD- FILTERED: No DUPLICATE: No SAMPLE CONTAINER SPECIFICATIONS SAMPLE PRESERVATION INTENDED ANALYSIS AND /OR METHOD NO MATERIAL CODE VOLUME PRESERVATIVE USED TOTAL VOLUME ADDED IN FIELD nil FINAL H REMARKS: MATERIAL CODES: AG = AMBER GLASS; CG = CLEAR GLASS; li D P = HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE; O=OTHER(SPECIM WELL CAPACITY: 0.06 al /ft; 2" 0.16 a[ /ft; 4" = 4.fi5 rallft; 6" -1.47 al/ft; S" = 2.61 al/ft; 12" = 5.88 allft .W APPENDIX III Sail and Groundwater Analytical Results PC &B Environmental Laboratories, Inc. - 210 Park Road, Oviedo, Florida 32765 Phone: 407-359-7194 Fax: 407-359-7197 08 -05 -2005 Dan Zrallack Ardaman & Associates 1300 N. Cocoa Blvd. Cocoa, FL 32922- Dear Dan Zrallack: Enclosed are the results of the analysis of your samples received 07/26/2005 Our laboratory is NELAP certified by the Florida DOH (Lab #E83239) and operates under an NELAP approved Quality Assurance Plan. Unless otherwise noted, all results are reported as received. All data were determined in accordance with published procedures (EPA - 600/4- 79 -020), Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, Revised March 1983, or later and /or Standard Methods for the examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th Edition 1999, or later and/or Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste (EPA -SW -846, Revised January 1995, or later), unless stated otherwise in our ComQapp under method modifications. Test results meet all of the requirements of the NELAC Standards. —^ If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Sincerely, W. uds Rogerslll Quality A urance Officer PC &B Environmental Laboratories, Inc. PC &8 210 Park Road, Oviedo, Florida 32765 Phone: 407-359-7194 Fax: 407-359-7197 Client: Ardaman & Associates Contact : Dan Zrallack 1300 N. Cocoa Blvd. Phone : (321) 632 -2503 Cocoa, FL 32922 - Laboratory Reference Number : 205070222 r Project Name : SEB Airport Project Number : 05 5426 Chain of Custody: Sample temperature at time of receipt: 3 degrees C Laboratory ID Matrix Client ID Status Date/Time Sampled 205070222 -2 Water TMW -2 RUN 07/20/2005 205070222 -4 Soil AB ��Sf �! RUN 07/20/2005 Number Parameter Description 2 Group Test FAC 62 -770 Table B 2 EPA 5041504.1 EDB /DBCP 2 EPA 8310 PAH's by HPLC 2 FL -PRO Petroleum Hydrocarbons 2 EPA 8021 by 8260 Volatile Organics 2 EPA 6010/200.7 Lead by ICAP PC &B Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 210 Park Road Oviedo, FL 32765 -8801 407 -359 -7194 - (FAX)407-359-7197 Case Narrative Dan Zrallack Ardaman & Associates 1390 N. Cocoa Blvd. -- Cocoa, FL 32922- CASE NARRATIVE for Work Order: 205070222 Project Number: 05 5426 Project Name: SEB Airport This Case Narrative is a summary of events and/or problems encountered with this Work Order. For samples requesting EPA 601/602/8021 analysis, the GGMS method EPA 624/8260 was substituted in order to generate the highest quality data possible at no additional cost. Definition of Flags A = Value reported is an average of 2 or more determinations DL = No surrogate result due to dilution or matrix interference. H = Value based on field kit determination, results may not be accurate I = The reported value is between MDL and PQL J = Estimated Value, value not accurate. A = Estimated value surrogate limits have been exceeded J4 = Estimated value matrix interference K = Off scale low L = Off -scale high. Actual value is greater than value given. Above calibration curve. M = Presence of material is verified but not quantified. Should be lab PQL N = Presumptive evidence of presence of material Q = Sample analyzed beyond the accepted holding time. T = Value less than the lab MDL T2 = Analysis from an unpreserved or improperly preserved sample V = Analyte was both detected in the method blank and sample. Y = Analysis from an unpreserved or improperly preserved sample 1-0 P" A" PC &B Environmental Laboratories, Inc. Report of Analysis CLIENT NAME: Ardaman & Associates 210 Park Road Volatile Organics PROJECT NAME: SEB Airport Oviedo, FL 32765 -8801 U PROJECT NUMBER: 05 5426 PHONE: 407- 359 -7194 128 DATE RECEIVED: 07/26/2005 FAX: 407- 359 -7197 ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL: EPA 8021 by 8260 Lab Reference Number 205070222 -2 Client Sample ID TMW -2 DatelTime Sampled 07/20/2005 Date/Time Extracted 07/26/2005 Date/Time Analyzed 07/26/2005 15:00 Sample Matrix (as Received) Water Analysis Confirmed OCMS Dilution Factor Result Units MTBE m & p- Xylene 1,2- Dibromoethane o- Xylene (Sure) 1,2- Dichloroethane -d4 (%) (Surr) Toluene -d8 ( %) (Surr) 4- Bromofluorobenzene ( %) U = Undetected. The value preceeding the'U' is III Reviewed by :Aa 1 ug/l 5.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 74 128 89 , based on dilution. Results reported on a Wet Weight basis. OH Certification # E83239 s ON PC &B Environmental Laboratories, Inc. Report of Analysis CLIENT NAME: Ardaman & Associates 210 Park Road Volatile Organics PROJECT NAME: SEB Airport Oviedo, FL 32765 -8801 PROJECT NUMBER: 055426 PHONE: 407 -359 -7194 DATE RECEIVED: 07/26/2005 FAX: 407- 359 -7197 ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL: EPA 8021 by 8260 Lab Reference Number 205070222 -2 Client Sample ID TMW -2 DaterTime Sampled 07/2012005 Date/Time Extracted 07/26/2005 Date/Time Analyzed 07/26/2005 15:00 Sample Matrix (as Received ) Water Analysis Confirmed GCMS Dilution Factor 1 Result Units ug11 Benzene 1.0 U Bromobenzene 1.0 U Bromochloromethane 1.0 U Bromodichloromethane 0.3 U Bromoform 1.0 U Bromomethane 1.0 U n- Butylbenzene 1.0 U sec- Butylbenzene 1.0 U tert- Butylbenzene 1.0 U Carbon tetrachloride 1.0 U Chlorobenzene 1.0 U Chloroethane 1.0 U Chloroform 1.0 V Chloromethane 1.0 U 2- Chlorotoluene 1.0 U 4- Chlorotoluene 1.0 U Dibromochloromethane 0.2 U Dibromomethane 1.0 U 1,2- Dichlorobenzene 1.0 U 1,3- Dichlorobenzene 1.0 U 1,4- Dichlorobenzene 1.0 U Dichlorodifluoromethane 1.0 U 1,1- Dichloroethane 1.0 U 1,2- Dichloroethane 1.0 U 1,1- Dichloroethene 1,0 U cis -1,2- Dichloroethene 1.0 U trans -1,2- Dichloroethene 1.0 U 1,2- Dichloropropane 1.0 U 1,3- Dichloropropane 1.0 U 2,2- Dichloropropane 1.0 U 1,1- Dichloropropene 1.0 U Mw 1,3- Dichloropropene (cis) 0.2 U 1,3- Dichloropropene (trans) 0,3 U Ethylbenzene 10 U Hexachlorobutadiene 0.5 U Isopropylbenzene 1.0 U p- Isopropyltoluene 1.0 U Methylene chloride 1.0 U Naphthalene 10 U n- Propylbenzene 1.0 U Styrene 1.0 U 1,1,1,2- Tetrachloroetharne 0.2 U 1,1,2,2- Tetrachloroethane 02 U i Tetrachloroethene 1.0 U Toluene 1.0 U 1,2,3 - Trichlorobenzene 1.0 U 1,2,4 - Trichlorobenzene 1.0 U MR 1,1,11 - Trichloroethane 1.0 U 1,1,2- Trichloroethane 1.0 U Trichloroethene 10 U Trichlorofluoromethane 1.0 U .� 1,2,3- Tiichooropropane 0.2 U 1,2,4- Trimethylbenzene 1.0 U 1,3,5- Trimethylbenzene 1.0 U Vinyl chloride 1.0 U ON Quality Control Report for Spike /Spike Duplicate Analysis Quality Control Limits Lower Volatile Organics Matrix: Water Limit Limit RPD Analysis Date: 07/26/2005 63 Lab Sample ID: MW -MS 14 Carbon tetrachloride 59 Preparation Date: 07/2.612005 14 QC Batch ID: 200507MS2047 66 136 13 Method: EPA 8260 66 Spike Units: tag /I 18 1,1 -D ichloroethene 51 Analyst: KN 15 Ethylbenzene 66 133 15 Spike MSD 64 137 Spike Sample Spike Percent MSD Percent 17 Analyte Amount Result Result. Recovery Result Recovery RPD ® Benzene 50.0 0.0 45.0 90 45.6 90 0 Carbon tetrachloride 50.0 0.0 44.0 88 44.0 88 0 Chlorobenzene 50.0 0.0 48.0 96 48.0 96 0 1,4- Dichlorobenzene 50.0 0.0 48.0 96 49.0 98 2 1,1- Dichloroelhene 50.0 0.0 47.0 94 48.0 96 2 Ethylbenzene 50.0 0.0 52.0 104 53.0 106 2 Toluene 50.0 0.0 48.6 96 49.0 98 2 Trichloroethene 50.0 0.0 49.0 98 48.0 96 2 -� m & p- Xylene 100.0 0.0 107.0 107 1040 104 3 o- Xylene 50.0 0.0 53.0 106 52.0 104 2 Quality Control Limits -" PC &B Environmental Laboratories, Inc. LabForms LIMS Lower Upper Analyte Limit Limit RPD Benzene 63 141 14 Carbon tetrachloride 59 142 14 Chlorobenzene 66 136 13 1,4- Dichiorobenzene 66 137 18 1,1 -D ichloroethene 51 142 15 Ethylbenzene 66 133 15 Toluene 64 137 16 Trichloroethene 61 143 17 m & p- Xylene 62 135 17 '- o- Xylene 56 139 15 -" PC &B Environmental Laboratories, Inc. LabForms LIMS PC &B Environmental Laboratories, Inc, Report of Analysis CLIENT NAME: Ardaman & Associates 210 Park Road Volatile Organic Aromatics PROJECT NAME: SEB Airport Oviedo, FL 32765 -8801 PROJECT NUMBER: 05 5426 PHONE: 407- 359 -7194 DATE RECEIVED: 07/26/2005 _FAX: 407 - 359 -7197 ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL: VOA BY EPA 8260 Lab Reference Number 205070222 Client Sample ID AB -j Ar- Date/Time Sampled 07/20/2005 Date /Time Extracted 07126 /2005 Date/Time Analyzed 07/2612005 14:12 Sample Matrix (as Received) Soil Analysis Confirmed GCMS Dilution Factor .51 Percent Moisture 19.0 Result Units ugfkg Benzene 3 U +� Chlorobenzene 3 U 1,2- Dichlorobenzene 3 U 1,3- Dichlorobenzene 3 U 1,4- Dichlorobenzene 3 U Ethylbenzene 3 U MTBE 3 U Toluene 3 U Xylenes, Total 3 U (Surr) 1,2- Dichloroethane -d4 ( ° %} 100 (Surr) Toluene -d8 (%) 66 (Surr) 4- Bromoffuorobenzene (°6) 106 U =Undetected. The value Reviewed by: the 'U' is the RL for the anal e, based on dilution. Results reported on a Dry Weight basis. A NELAP- FDQH Certification # F-83239 Quality Control Report for Spike /Spike Duplicate Analysis .�, PCR® Environmental Laboratories, Inc. LabForms LIMS Aromatic Volatile Organics Matrix: Soil Analysis Date: 07126/2005 Lab Sample ID: SOIL -MS Preparation Date: 0712612005 QC Batch ID: 200507MS3048 Method: EPA 8260 Spike Units: uglkg Analyst: KN Spike MSD Spike Sample Spike Percent MD Percent Analyte Amount Result Result Recovery Result Recovery RPD Benzene 50 0 59 118 58 116 2 — Ethylbenzene 50 0 56 112 55 110 2 MTBE 50 0 51 102 51 102 0 Toluene 50 0 57 114 57 114 0 Xylenes, Total 150 0 163 109 161 107 1 Quality Control Limits Lower Upper Analyte Limit Limit RPD Benzene 54 142 6 Ethylbenzene 64 137 g MTBE 56 144 10 Toluene 56 143 8 Xylenes, Total 68 134 7 .�, PCR® Environmental Laboratories, Inc. LabForms LIMS PC &B Environmental Laboratories, Inc. Report of Analysis CLIENT NAME: Ardamarr & Associates 210 Park Road PAH °s by HPLC PROJECT NAME: SEB Airport Oviedo, FL 32765 -8801 PROJECT NUMBER: 05 5426 PHONE: 407- 359 -7194 DATE RECEIVED: 0712612005 FAX: 407 -359 -7197 ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL: EPA 8310 Lab Reference Number 205070222 -2 Client Sample ID TMW -2 Date/Time Sampled 0712012005 Date/Time Extracted 07127/2005 DatelTime Analyzed 07/28/2005 14:17 Sample Matrix (as Received) Water M" Analysis Confirmed No Dilution Factor 1 Result Units ugh Acenaphthene 0,52 U +, Acenaphthylene 0,45 U Anthracene 0.02 U Benzo(a)anthracene 0.02 U Benzo(a)pyrene 0,03 U Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.01 U Benzo(ghi)perylene 0.05 U Benzo(k)ftuoranthene 0.02 U Chrysene 0.03 U Dibenzo(ah)anthracene 0.20 U Fluoranthene 0.03 U Fluorene 0.14 U lndeno (1,2,3 -c,d) pyrene 0.04 U Naphthalene 0.29 U 1- Methyl naphthalene 0.12 U 2- Methyl naphthalene : 0,17 U Phenanthrene 0.06 U Pyrene 0.08 U (Surr) Decafluorobiphenyl ( °6} 83 ONO a U = Undetected. The value preceeding the'U' is the RL for the analyte based on dilution. Results_ reported on a Wet Weight basis NELAP- FDOH Certification # E83239 Reviewed by Quality Control Report for LCS Analysis PAH's by HPLC Matrix: Water Analysis Date: 07/2812005 Lab Sample ID: LCS Preparation Date: 0712712005 QC Batch ID: 200507PAH089 Method: EPA 8310 LCS Units: ugll Analyst: RM Lower Upper LCS LCS Percent Control Control Analyte Conc Result Recovery Limit Limit .., Acenaphthene 50.0 48.0 96 21 130 Acenaphthylene 25.0 25.3 101 28 129 Anthracene 1.0 0.7 74 30 135 Senzo(a)anthracene 2.5 2.2 88 40 127 .., Benzo(a)pyrene 2.5 2.5 100 23 135 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1.0 1.0 100 22 141 Benzo(ghi)perylene 4.0 3.9 98 25 135 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1.0 0.9 92 27 136 Chrysene 2.5 2.5 100 29 131 Dibenzo(ah)a nth racene 10.0 9.7 97 19 143 Fluoranthene 2.5 1.9 75 33 127 Fluorene 5.0 4.1 81 26 131 -� Indeno (1,2,3 -o,d) pyrene 2.5 2.9 115 28 140 Naphthalene 25.0 27.5 110 18 137 Phenanthrene 2.5 2.4 96 24 134 Pyrene 5.0 4.4 88 24 138 �" PC&S Environmental Laboratories, Inc. LabForms LIMS PC &B Environmental Laboratories, Inc. Report of Analysis CLIENT NAME: Ardaman & Associates 210 Park Road Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarb PROJECT NAME: SEB Airport �. Oviedo, FL 32765 -8801 PROJECT NUMBER: 055426 PHONE: 407- 359 -7194 DATE RECEIVED: 07126/2005 FAX: 407- 359 -7197 ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL: EPA 8100 Lab Reference Number 205070222 Client Sample ID ABfS$ -� Date/Time Sampled 07120/2005 Date/Time Extracted 08101/2005 Date/Time Analyzed 08/01/2005 09 :45 Sample Matrix (as Received) Soil Analysis Confirmed No Dilution Factor 1 Percent Moisture 19.0 Result Units upg Acenaphthene 86 U Acenaphlhylene 86 U Anthracene 86 U Benzo(a)anthracene 86 U Benzo(a)pyrene 86 U Benzo(b)fluoranthene 86 U Benzo(ghi)perylene 86 U Senzo(k)fluoranthene 86 U Chrysene 86 U Dibenzo(ah)anthracene 86 U Fluoranthene 86 U Fluorene 86 U Indeno(123- cd)pyrene 86 U Naphthalene 86 U 1- Methyl naphthalene 86 U 2- Methyl naphthalene 86 U Phenanthrene 86 U Pyrene 86 U (Suer) 2- Fluorobiphenyl ( %) 100 U = Undetected. The value preceeding the 'U' is the RL for the analyte, based on dilution. Results reported on a Dry Weight basis. NELAP- FDOH Certification # E83239 i Reviewed by: \ ww Quality Control Report for Spike /Spike Duplicate Analysis Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Matrix: Soil Lower Upper Analysis Date: 08/0112005 Limit Lab Sample ID: 205070294 -2 RPD SS_2- Fluorobiphenyl 50 Preparation Date: 08101/2005 15 QC Batch ID: 200508PAH003 30 148 10 Method: SPA 8100 30 Spike Units: uglkg 12 Anthracene 25 Analyst: RM 15 Benzo(a)anthracene 30 153 15 Spike MSD 40 162 Spike Sample Spike Percent MSD Percent 13 Analyte Amount Result Result Recovery Result Recovery RPD (Burr) 2- Fluorobiphenyl 100 0 55 55 58 58 5 Acenaphthene 50 0 56 112 57 113 1 Acenaphthylene 50 0 54 108 54 109 1 Anthracene 50 0 35 72 36 71 1 Benzo(a)anlhracene 50 0 43 85 45 90 6 Benzo(a)pyrene 50 0 44 87 44 88 1 Senzo(b)fluoranthene 50 0 45 90 46 92 2 Benzo(ghi)perylene 50 0 46 92 47 93 2 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 50 0 45 90 46 92 2 Chrysene 50 0 51 102 49 97 5 Dibenzo(ah)anthracene 50 0 45 91 46 92 2 Fluoranthene 50 0 51 101 51 102 1 -- Fluorene 50 0 56 112 55 109 2 Indeno(123- cd)pyrene 50 0 45 91 46 92 2 Naphthalene 5o 0 52 104 52 105 1 Phenanthrene 50 0 55 109 56 112 2 Pyrene 50 0 50 101 51 102 1 Quality Control Limits PC&S Environmental Laboratories, Inc. LabForms LIMS Lower Upper Analyte Limit Limit RPD SS_2- Fluorobiphenyl 50 157 15 Acenaphthene 30 148 10 " Acenaphthylene 30 138 12 Anthracene 25 169 15 Benzo(a)anthracene 30 153 15 Benzo(a)pyrene 40 162 12 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 40 163 13 Benzo(ghi)perylene 35 169 14 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 30 155 15 Chrysene 35 155 12 Dibenzo(ah)anthracene 40 157 10 Fluoranthene 45 146 15 Fluorene 30 140 12 Indeno(123- cd)pyrene 35 156 14 Naphthalene 35 138 15 Phenanthrene 40 144 15 Pyrene 45 146 15 PC&S Environmental Laboratories, Inc. LabForms LIMS PC &B Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 210 Park Road �+ Oviedo, FL 32765 -8801 PHONE: 407- 359 -7194 FAX: 407- 359 -7197 Report of Analysis Petroleum Hydrocarbons CLIENT NAME: Ardaman & Associates PROJECT NAME: SEB Airport PROJECT NUMBER: 055426 DATE RECEIVED: 07/26/2005 ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL: FL -PRO Lab Reference Number 205070222 -2 Client Sample ID TMW -2 Date/Time Sampled 07/20/2005 Date/Time Extracted 07/27/200511:10 Date/Time Analyzed 071281200517:46 Sample Matrix (as Received) Water Analysis Confirmed No Dilution Factor 1 Result Units mg/1 Total PHS 0,3 U (Surr) C -39 {96) 50 (Surr) OTP { %) 64 J1 om Om L:a-] No U = Undetected. The value preceeding the'U' is the RL for the analyte, based on dilution. Results reported on a Wet Weight basis. NELAP- FDOH Certification # E83239 Reviewed by: ... PC &B Environmental Laboratories, Inc. LabForms LINES Quality Control Report for LCS ,Analysis Petroleum Hydrocarbons Matrix: Water Analysis Date: 0810112005 Lab Sample ID: LCS Preparation Date: 0810112005 QC Batch ID: 200507FLROO88 Method: FL -PRO LCS Units: mgll Analyst: DN Lower Upper LCS LCS Percent Control Control Analyte Conc Result Recovery Limit Limit —. (Surr) C -39 100.0 51.0 51 42 193 (Surr) OTP 100.0 84.0 84 82 142 Total PHS 50.0 57.0 114 55 118 PC &B Environmental Laboratories, Inc. LabForms LINES 0� PC &B Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 210 Park Road ^`• Oviedo, FL 32765 -8801 PHONE: 407 -359 -7194 FAX: 407 -359 -7197 Report of Analysis Petroleum Hydrocarbons CLIENT NAME: Ardaman & Associates PROJECT NAME: SEB Airport PROJECT NUMBER: 05 5426 DATE RECEIVED: 07/26/2005 ANALYTICAL. PROTOCOL: FL -PRO Lab Reference Number 205070222 - o, Client Sample ID AB/ S —r Date/Time Sampled 07/20/2005° DatefTime Extracted 08101/2005 15:30 Date/Time Analyzed 08/0112005 19:08 Sample Matrix (as Received) Soil Analysis Confirmed No Dilution Factor i Percent Moisture 19.0 Result Units mgfkg Total PHS 4.9 U (Burr) C-39 ( %) 37 J1 (Surr) OTP ( %) 57 J1 MM �—, am U = Undetected. The value preceeding th_e'U' is the RL for the anal e, based on dilution. Results reported on a Dry Weight basis. NELAP- FDOH Certification # E83239 Reviewed by -M Quality Control Report for Spike /Spike Duplicate Analysis Quality Control Limits Petroleum Hydrocarbons Matrix: Soil Analysis Date: 08101/2005 Lab Sample ID: 205070222 -3 'Preparation Date: 08/01/2005 QC Batch ID: 200507FLR0001 Method: FL -PRO Spike Units: mg/kg Analyst: DN — Spike MSD 50 Spike Sample Spike Percent MSD Percent Analyte Amount Result Result Recovery Result Recovery RPD ,x (Surr) C -39 100.0 0.0 21.0 21 31.0 31 38 (Surr) OTP 100.0 0.0 98.0 98 14&0 148 41 Total PHS 50.0 0.0 44.3 89 66.6 133 40 PC &B Environmental Laboratories, Inc. LabForms LIMB Quality Control Limits Lower Upper Analyte Limit Limit RPD SS C-39 50 118 25 SS_OT'P 42 120 25 Total PHS 40 204 25 PC &B Environmental Laboratories, Inc. LabForms LIMB PC &B Environmental Laboratories, Inc. 210 Park Road Oviedo, FL 32765 -8601 PHONE: 407 -359 -7194 FAX: 407 -359 -7197 Report of Analysis EDBIDSCP CLIENT NAME: Ardaman & Associates PROJECT NAME: SEB Airport PROJECT NUMBER: 055426 DATE RECEIVED: 07/2612005 ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL: EPA 5041504.1 Lab Reference Number 205070222 -2 Client Sample tD TMW -2 """ Date/Time Sampled 07120/2005 DaterTime Extracted 07127/2005 Date/Time Analyzed 07/2712005 16:27 Sample Matrix (as Received) Water Analysis Confirmed No Difution Factor 1 Result Units u9A Ethylene dibromide (EDB) 0.01 U .. 1,2- Dibromo- 3- chloropropane 0,02 U (Surr) BFB (%) 82 0" am U = Undetected. The value preceeding the 'U' is the R for the analyte, based on dilution. Results reported on a Wet Weight basis. NELAP- FDOH Certification # E63239 Reviewed by: NJ Quality Control Report for Spike Analysis EDBIDBCP Matrix: Water Analysis Date: 07127/2005 Lab Sample ID: 205070158 -2 Preparation Date: 07/27/2005 QC Batch ID: 200507EDB007 Method: EPA 504 Spike Units: ug /I Analyst: RM Lower Upper Spike Sample Spike Percent Control Control Analyte Amount Result Result Recovery Limit Limit (Burr) BFB 100.0 0.0 86.0 86 65 136 Ethylene dibromide (EDB) 1.00 0.00 0.80 80 62 140 1,2- Dibroma- 3- chloropropane 1.0 0.0 0.8 80 52 145 �^ PC &13 Environmental Laboratories, Inc. LabForms LIMS .o. r= PC &B Environmental Laboratories, Inc. Report of Analysis CLIENT NAME: Ardaman & Associates 210 Park Road PROJECT NAME: SEB Airport Oviedo, FL 32765 -8801 PROJECT NUMBER: 05 5426 PHONE: 407 - 359 -7194 DATE RECEIVED: 07/26/2005 Lab Reference Number 205070222 -2 Client Sample ID TMW -2 Date, Time Sampled 0712012005 Sample Matrix (as Received) Water EPA 60101200.7 Lead, Total ug/l 6 U = Undetected. The value Reviewed by : the'U' is the RL for the analyte. Results reported on a Wet Weight basis. 4 NELAP- FDOH Certification # E83239 Quality Control Report for Spike Analysis INORGANICS PC&B Environmental Laboratories, Inc. LabForms LIMS Lower Upper ^ Spike Sample Spike Percent Control Control Analyte Amount Result Result Recovery Limit Limit Method: EPA 601012007 QC Batch: 200507RC158 Sample ID: 205070229 -1 Date Prep: 0712712005 Date Anal: 07127/2005 Analyst GG Lead, Total 100 ug1l 0 99 99 80 110 PC&B Environmental Laboratories, Inc. LabForms LIMS PC&B Environme ntal 210 Park Road, Oviedo, FL 32755 407- 359 -7194 (FAX) 407- 359 -7197 Chain Work Order: Date- .. r° i.`s Pare r,f COMPANY: - , 11.• :. ANALYSIS REQUESTED ADDRESS: f 1"7 tj �l SAMPLED BY : SIGN: PiLt PHONE: "�.1� FAX: - + # SAMPLE ID DATE /TIME MATRIX 3 3 LF ESERVATI DN Z 2 - 3 4 � �-' p �Yr w 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 RELINQUISHED DATEITIME RECEIVED BY DATEITIME PRO ]IwCT INFORMATION SAMPLE RECEIPT - �Z " f — '9� t ROJET NAME: i 71 To- tal # of Containers 7 1 0.., PROJECT #: 0!;; -S 412— 6, Chain of Custody Seals Fa , 1: 3: rDDRESS: ���/ ��_� Recv'd in Good Conditian �� ! VKUJtl:l MANAUIN: INVOICE TO: CollF {� �F 61FrCAfWFROMADOVE lei Ire"/ (Ile QUOTEICONTRACT #: WHITE: Project Fife YELLOW: Lstarstwy . PINK: 34M1pMf f f t f f f v 6 F F r L N u N s c _0 O n GJ N p CO 00 (h t J N - t �t O i °v 3 -: 0 z D v y U1 c0 -4� � i z t 41b 0 �t 3 (� 1 42 0 rr ` Z. CD .�. LA O 7 m l-a a �0y� W •r VI n m y M06 `r C m ri wares 3 n y SLWCe saLnwc oac uouo 4 Ft., f l� m s m 0 � .o 2 m Q m > rn m 40 a tr n rm Z N A 3 n � m ♦ �' m O 1 rn y CL � z 0, m N m tf► 0 a m ° cz Z N a O rl A 0 -E rn d m s o at < a w o C G? 0 D G O ' -0 CL N iD a m m v v �' n P5 o H m .� C -w Isk Number of Container: r ' V