The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1999 Goals, Objectives and Policies ,.', COMPRE.HENSIVE PLAN: GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES Submitted to: CITY OF SEBASTIAN CITY COUNCIL 1225 Main Street Sebastian, FL 32958 (561) 589-5330 (561) 589-5570 Prepared by: ,f 51 SOLIN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning Consultants 901 Douglas Avenue, Suite 207 Altamonte Springs, Florida 32714 (407) 682-7200 (407) 682-7206 fax Partners with Florida's Communities December 1999 C I T Y o F ., S E B A S T I /A N I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS Pal!e No. CHAPTER 1: LAND USE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1-1 ~p-l FUTURE LAND USE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES .................. 1-1 GOAL 1-1 LAND USE. . . , . , . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1-1 OBJECTIVE 1-1.1 PLAN AND DESIGN FOR RESIDENTIAL QUALITY.. .. ....... . .. 1-1 Policy 1-1.1.1 Provide Access to Goods and Services and Protect Residential Areas from the Adverse Impacts of Transition in Land Use .......... Promote Orderly Land use Transition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Promote Orderly Transition in Residential Densities . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . Reinforce and Enhance Appearance of Residential Areas .........., Encourage Separation of Urban and Rural Land Uses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Policy 1-1.1.2 Policy 1-1.1.3 Policy 1-1.1.4 Policy 1-1.1.5 1-1 1-1 1-2 1-2 1-2 OBJECTIVE 1-1.2 ALLOCATING COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1-2 Policy 1-1.2.1 General Considerations for Locating Commercial Development. . . . . .. 1-2 Policy 1-1.2.2 General Pattern of Commercial Land Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1-3 Policy 1-1.2.3 Improve the Image and Function of the Central Commercial Core Area. 1-3 Policy 1-1.2.4 Prepare Redevelopment Plan for Enhancing the Identity, Design, and Vitality of the City's Central Waterfront Corridor ...., 1-3 Policy 1-1.2.5 Provide Appropriate Locations for Commercial Office Development 1-4 Policy 1-1.2.6 Designate Various Types of Commercial Nodes to Accommodate Diverse Commercial Uses. . . , . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1-4 OBJECTIVE 1-1.3 PLANNING FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ......,.......... 1-5 Policy 1-1.3.1 GeneralConsideratioansforLocatingIndustrialDevelopment........ 1-5 Policy 1-1.3,2 General Pattern ofIndustrial Land Use. . , . . . . . , . . . , . . . . , . . . . . . .. 1-5 Policy 1-1.3.3 Pursue Selective Industrial Expansion Policy ..................... 1-5 Policy 1-1. 3.4 Pursue Nuisance Abatement Standards and Criteria ..... . . . . , . . , 1-6 OBJECTIVE 1-1.4 ACCOMMODATE INSTITUTIONAL FACILITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICES. . . . . . . , . . , . . , . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . .. 1-6 Policy 1-1.4.1 Coordinate Public and Private Investments in Land Improvements. , . .. 1-6 Policy 1-1.4.2 Maintain and Enforce Standards and Specifications for Design and Construction of Public and Semi-Public Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1-6 Policy 1-1.4.3 Provision of On-Site and Off-Site Improvements .................. 1-7 OBJECTIVE 1-1.5 PROMOTE COMMUNITY APPEARANCE, NATURAL AMENITIES AND URBAN DESIGN PRINCIPLES .,.............. 1-7 Policy 1-1. 5.1 Reinforce and Enhance the City's Community Appearance . . , . . . . . . .. 1-7 91-2 FUTURE LAND USE MAP ..........................,................... 1-7 GOAL 1-2: FUTURE LAND USE MAP .,........,.....,........,......,........ 1-7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page No. OBJECTIVE 1-2.1: ALLOCATING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ................ . 1-9 Policy 1-2.1.1 Density Defined. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-9 Policy 1-2.1.3 Low Density Residential Development ..........................1-20 Policy 1-2.1.4 MediumDensityResidentialDevelopment....................... 1-20 Policy 1-2.1.5 High Density Residential Development. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-21 Policy 1-2.1.6 Mobile Home Development. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-21 OBJECTIVE 1-2.2: ALLOCATING COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ................ 1-22 Policy 1-2.2.1 Commercial OtlicetResidential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-22 Policy 1-2.2.2 Limited Commercial Development. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-23 Policy 1-2.2.3 General Commercial Development. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-24 Policy 1-2.2.4 C.R. 512 Commercial. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-24 Policy 1-2.2.5 Marine Waterfront Commercial ............................... 1-25 OBJECTIVE 1-2.3: ALLOCATINGlNDUSTRlALDEVELOPMENT................. . 1-25 Policy 1~2.3.1 IndustrialLandUseDesignation.............................. .1-25 OBJECTIVE 1-2.4: MANAGING AIRPORT LANDS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-26 Policy 1-2.4.1 Airport Land Use Designation .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-26 OBJECTIVE 1-2.5: ALLOCATING INSTITUTIONAL SERVICES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-27 Policy 1-2.5.1 Institutional Land Use Designation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-27 OBJECTIVE 1-2.6: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-27 Policy 1-2.6.1 Planned Unit Development Overlay Designation .... ... .... .... . .. . 1-27 OBJECTIVE 1-2.7: ANNEXATION STUDY .................................... .1-28 Policy 1-2.7.1 Parameter of the Annexation Study ............................1-28 SI-3 LAND USE ELEMENT IMPLEMENTATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-29 GOAL 1-3: IMPLEMENTING LAND USE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ............... 1-29 OBJECTIVE 1-3.1: CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT ............................1-29 Policy 1-3.1.1 ResolvingConcurrencyIssues................................ 1-29 Policy 1-3.1.2 Concurrency Management Monitoring and Evaluation System . . . . . . . . 1-30 OBJECTIVE 1-3.2: MANAGE AND COORDINATE FUTURE LAND USE DECISIONS ..1-31 Policy 1-3.2.1 Future Land Use Map and Related Policies ...................... 1-31 Policy 1-3.2.2 Land Development Regulations ...............................1-31 Policy 1-3.2.3 Standards for Residential Density. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-32 Policy 1-3.2.4 Non-Residential Development Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-32 Policy 1-3.2.5 Performance Standards ..................................... 1-32 OBJECTIVE 1-3.3: ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND RENEWAL ............. 1-33 Policy 1-3.3.1 Code Enforcement Activities ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-33 Policy 1-3.3.2 Public and Private Sector Partnerships. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-33 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page No. OBJECTIVE 1-3.4: PREVENT LAND USE INCONSISTENT WITH CITY'S CHARACTER 1-33 Policy 1-3.4.1 Managing Future Land Use .................................. 1-34 Policy 1-3.4.2 Managing Improvements to Existing Non-Complying Structures ...... 1-34 OBJECTIVE 1-3.5: PROTECTION OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORIC RESOURCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-34 Programming for Archaeological and Historical Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-34 Preventing Adverse Impact of Development on Historic or Archaeological Sites. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-34 Policy 1-3.5. I Policy 1-3.5.2 OBJECTIVE 1-3.6: PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES .....................1-35 Policy 1-3.6.1 Future Land Use Policies for Managing Environmentally Sensitive Lands 1-35 Policy 1-3.6.2 Intergovernmental Coordination and Natural Resource Management ... 1-35 Policy 1-3.6.3 Protecting Flora and Fauna Having Special Status ................. 1-35 Policy 1-3.6.4 Managing Stormwater Run-off. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-35 Policy 1-3.6.5 Conservation of Potable Water Supply. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-35 OBJECTIVE 1-3.7: PREVENT PROLIFERATION OF URBAN SPRAWL AND COORDINATING TIMING AND STAGING OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT ...... .......................1-35 Development Orders and Permitting Process ..................... 1-36 Design of Public Facilities and Utilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-36 Developments Not Served by Public Water and/or Wastewater Systems. 1-36 Accommodating Requisite Infrastructure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-36 Policy 1-3.7.1 Policy 1-3.7.2 Policy 1-3.7.3 Policy 1-3.7.4 OBJECTIVE 1-3.8: CONSIDER APPLICATION OF INNOVATIVE LAND AND WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND ENERGY CONCEPTS . . 1-36 Policy 1-3.8.1 Incorporate Innovative Techniques in the Land Development Regulations .............................................. 1-36 Use of Energy ............................................ 1-36 Energy Efficient Land Development. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-36 Coordination of Energy Management. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-37 Energy Efficiency in Plans ................................... 1-37 EnergyEfficientDesign......................... ........ .1-37 Energy Conservation in Building and Construction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-37 Policy 1-3.8.2 Policy 1-3.8.3 Policy 1-3.8.4 Policy 1-3.8.5 Policy 1-3-8.6 Policy 1-3.8.7 III OBJECTIVE 1-3.9: INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-37 Policy 1-3.9.1 Implementing Intergovernmental Coordination. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-37 OBJECTIVE 1-3.10: CONTINUING LAND USE PROGRAMS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-37 Policy 1-3.10.1 Land Use Information System ................................1-38 Policy 1-3.10.2 Land Use Trends. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-38 Policy 1-3.10.3 Fiscal Management ........................................ 1-38 Policy 1-3.10.4 Administer Land Use Controls. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-38 Policy 1-3.10.5 Public Assistance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-38 Policy 1-3.10.6 Intergovernmental Coordination. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-38 Policy 1-3.10.7 Manage Current Developmental Impacts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-38 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page No. Policy 1-3.10.8 Urban Design and Community Appearance ...................... 1-38 Policy 1-3.10.9 Special Land Use Studies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-38 OBJECTIVE 1-3.11: CONTINUING EVALUATION OF LAND USE ELEMENT EFFECTIVENESS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-38 Policy 1-3.11.1 Review the Impact of Change Indicators on Land Use Policy .........1-38 Policy 1-3.11.2 Schedule, Budget and Implement Programmed Activities... .........1-39 Policy 1-3.11.3 Coordinate with Public and Private Sectors ...................... 1-39 Policy 1-3.11.4 Achieve Effective Resolution of Land Use Goals, Objectives, and Policies .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-39 CHAPTER 2: TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ......................................2-1 g2-1 TRAFFIC CIRCULATION GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 GOAL 2-1: TRAFFIC CIRCULATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 OBJECTIVE 2-1.1 SAFE, CONVENIENT, AND EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 Level of Service Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 Engineered Master Plan for Major Thoroughfare System . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 Criteria for Evaluating Proposed Roadway Improvement ........... 2-2 Review of Pro posed Developments ............................ 2-3 Assessments in New Developments ............................ 2-3 Adequate Facilities Ordinance ................................ 2-3 On-Site Transportation Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-3 Controlled Access ......................................... 2-3 Policy 2-1.1.1 Policy 2-1.1.2 Policy 2-1.1.3 Policy 2-1.1.4 Policy 2-1. 1.5 Policy 2-1.1. 6 Policy 2-1.1.7 Policy 2-1.1.8 OBJECTIVE2-1.2 RIGHT-OF-WAY ACqUISITION........ ...................... 2-3 Policy 2-1.2.1 Traffic Circulation Map ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-4 Policy 2-1.2.2 Standards of Future Road R/W Acquisition ...................... 2-4 Policy 2-1.2.3 Mandatory R/W DedicationlFees in Lieu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-4 OBJECTIVE 2-1.3 FUTURE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2-4 Policy 2-1.3.1 Specific FDOT Planned Roadway Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2-4 Policy 2-1.3.2 Specific Indian River County Planned Roadway Improvements ...... 2-6 Policy 2-1.3.3 Specific Sebastian Planned Roadway Improvements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-6 Policy 2-1.3.4 Other Potential Local and Collector Roadway Improvements to be Evaluated ........................................... 2-6 IV OBJECTIVE 2-1.4 FACILITIES FOR BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN WAYS ...........2-6 Policy 2-1.4.1 Planning for Bicycle and Pedestrian Ways ....................... 2-6 Policy 2-1.4.2 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Required for New Development. . . . .. 2-6 Policy 2-1.4.3 Abandoned Railroad Rights-of-Way. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-10 OBJECTIVE 2-1.5 COORDINATED TRAFFIC CIRCULATION PLANNING ...........2-10 Policy 2-1.5.1 Implementing Traffic Circulation Planning and Coordination ......... 2-10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page No. OBJECTIVE 2-1.6 MANAGING TRAFFIC CIRCULATION AND LAND USE ..........2-10 Policy 2-1.6.1 Integrated Traffic Circulation and Land Use Planning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-10 Policy 2-1.6.2 Traffic Circulation Performance Criteria .........................2-10 Policy 2-1.6.3 Traffic Circulation Site Plan Review Criteria .....................2-10 CHAPTER 3: HOUSING ................................................... 3-1 S3-1 HOUSING GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND IMPLEMENTING POLICIES ........... 3-1 GOAL 3-1: HOUSING.. . ...... .. ....... ..... ...... .. . . . ............... .... . 3-1 OBJECTIVE 3-1.1 PROMOTE AFFORDABLE HOUSING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 3-1 Policy 3-1.1.1 Technical Assistance, Information and Referral Services. . . . . . . . . . .. 3-1 Policy 3-1.1.2 Developing PubliclPrivate Partnerships ........................ 3-1 Policy 3-1.1.3 Affordable Housing for Low and Moderate Income Households. . . . . 3-1 OBJECTIVE 3-1.2 MAINTAIN HOUSING STOCK FREE OF SUBSTANDARD UNITS. . . 3-2 Policy 3-1.2.1 Code Enforcement Activities ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-2 OBJECTIVE 3-1.3 MANUFACTURED HOUSING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-3 Policy 3-1.3.1 Location and Building Code Compliance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-3 OBJECTIVE 3-1.4 PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR GROUP HOMES AND FOSTER CARE FACILITIES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-3 Policy 3-1.4.1 Foster Care Facilities ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-3 Policy 3-1.4.2 Group Homes ........................................ 3-3 Policy 3-1.4.3 Housing for the Elderly ..................................... 3-3 OBJECTIVE 3-1.5 PRESERVE HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT HOUSING ........... 3-3 Policy 3-1.5.1 Promote Identification of the City's Historically Significant Housing Resources ........................................ 3-3 Rehabilitation and Adaptive Re-Use of Historically Significant Housing . 3-3 Grants for Preserving Historically Significant Housing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-4 Assist Sebastian River Historical Society . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-4 Policy 3-1.5.2 Policy 3-1.5.3 Policy 3-1.5.4 OBJECTIVE 3-1.6 RELOCATION HOUSING ....................................3-4 Policy 3-1.6.1 Provate Alternative Housing Sites for Displaced Structures and Residents Thereof .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-4 OBJECTIVE 3-1.7 CONSERVE NEIGHBORHOOD QUALITY AND EXISTING HOUSING STOCK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-4 Policy 3-1.7.1 Promote Maintenance of Housing Stock and Neighborhood Conservation .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-4 Policy 3-1.7.2 Plan Supportive Facilities and Services Necessary for Quality Residential Neighborhoods. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-3 Minimize Potential Blighting Influences .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-4 Coordinate PubliclPrivate Partnerships. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-4 Policy 3-1. 7.3 Policy 3-1.7.4 v I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Policy 3-1.7.5 Policy 3-1.7.6 Page No. Continuing Housing Programs ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-5 Special Housing Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-6 OBJECTIVE 3-1.8 CONTINUING EVALUATION OF HOUSING ELEMENT EFFECTIVENESS ..................................... 3-6 Policy 3-1.8.1 Review the Impact of Change Indicators on Housing Policy. . . . . . . . . . 3-6 Policy 3-1.8.2 Schedule, Budget and Implementing Programmed Activities . . . . . . 3-6 Policy 3-1.8.3 Coordinate with Public and Private Sectors ...................... 3-6 Policy 3-1.8.4 Achieve Effective Resolution of Housing Goals, Objectives, and Policies ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-6 CHAPTER 4: PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . .. . .. . . . .. . .. 4-1 94.1 PUBLIC FACILITY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND IMPLEMENTING POLICIES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 GOAL 4-1: NEEDED PUBLIC FACILITIES ................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 OBJECTIVE 4-1.1: ENSURE AVAILABLE PUBLIC FACILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 Policy 4-1.1.1 Level of Service Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 Policy 4-1.1.2 Compliance with Level of Service Standards ................ 4-3 Policy 4-1.1.3 Demand and Supply Information System ........................ 4-3 Policy 4-1.1.4 Coordination Between Future Land Use and Potable WaterlWastewater System Needs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-3 Policy 4-1.1.5 Areawide Planning for Potable Water and Wastewater Systems and SolidIHazardous Waste Disposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-3 Policy 4-1.1. 6 Available Infrastructure for Developments Approved Prior to Plan Adoption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-3 OBJECTIVE 4-1.2: MAINTAINING A SCHEDULE OF PUBLIC FACILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT NEEDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-4 Capital Improvement Schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-4 Public Facility Evaluation Criteria ............................. 4-4 Policy 4-1.2.1 Policy 4-1.2.2 OBJECTIVE 4-1.3: PROCEDURES AND STANDARDS FOR ON-SITE W ASTEW ATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-5 Use of On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-5 Coordinate with the Indian River County Public Health Unit ......... 4-5 Conditions Governing Development Orders or Permits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-5 Compliance with On-Site Wastewater Treatment and Water Quality Regulations ........................................ 4-5 Policy 4-1.3.1 Policy 4-1.3.2 Policy 4-1.3.3 Policy 4-1.3 .4 GOAL 4-2 PROVIDING FACILITIES TO MEET EXISTING AND PROJECTED DEMANDS ...................................................... 4-6 OBJECTIVE 4-2.la: RECONCILE EXISTING WASTEWATER SYSTEM DEFICIENCIES ......................................... 4-6 VI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page No. Policy 4-2.1a.1 North County Wastewater System Projects ...................... 4-6 Policy 4-2.la.2 General Development Wastewater Services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4-6 Policy4-2.la.3 UseofGraywaterforIrrigation............................... 4-6 Policy 4-2.la.4 Management Criteria for Potential Consolidation of Wastewater Service Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-7 OBJECTIVE 4-2.lb: PLAN AND COORDINATE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES TO MEET EXISTING AND FUTURE SOLID WASTE NEEDS ...................... 4-7 Policy 4-2.lb.1 Solid Waste Projects ....................................... 4-8 OBJECTIVE 4-2.lc: RECONCILE EXISTING POTABLE WATER DEFICIENCIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-8 Policy 4-2. I c.l Potable Water System Projects. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-9 OBJECTIVE 4-2.ld: PREPARE AN ENGINEERED STORMW ATER MANAGEMENT PLAN AND ENSURE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-9 Stormwater Management Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-9 Compliance with Capital Improvements Element .................. 4-10 Priority for Correcting Existing Deficiencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-10 Existing Deficiencies Not to be Increased by New Development. . . . . . . 4-10 Coordinate with Indian River County Hazard Waste Planning Efforts. . . 4-11 Policy 4-2.1d.l Policy 4-2.1.1 Policy 4-2.1.2 Policy 4-2.1.3 Policy 4-2.1.4 OBJECTIVE 4-2.2: MEETING PROJECTED PUBLIC FACILITY DEMANDS .......... 4-11 Policy 4-2.2.1 Coordinate with Capital Improvements Element. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-12 Policy 4-2.2.2 Public Facility Planning and Management Efficiency. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-12 Policy 4-2.2.3 Additions of Public Facility Project Approvals .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-12 OBJECTIVE 4-2.3: MEETING PROJECTED DEMANDS FOR THE YEAR 1996 THROUGH YEAR 2010 ............. ....... ............... .4-12 Policy 4-2.3.1 Scheduling Needed Capital Improvements ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-13 GOAL 4-3: PROVIDE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE .................................4-13 OBJECTIVE 4-3.1: PROTECT NATURAL DRAINAGE FEATURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-13 Policy 4-3.1.1 Ensure that Urban Lands Provide Adequate Drainage and Protection from Flooding and Manage the Retention of Ground and Surface Water at Levels that Enhance Natural Storage Capacity of Watersheds and Promote Aquifer Recharge ...............................4-14 Policy 4-3.1.2 Provide Adequate On-Site Retention and Ground Water Recharge while Directing the Surplus Run-off to Receiving Waterways in a Manner which Prevents Imbalance to their Ecosystems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-14 Policy 4-3.1.3 Pursue the Development of Adequate Off-Site Surface Water Management Facilities .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-14 Policy 4-3. 1.4 Coordinate Watershed Management Plans and Polcies with Appropriate Public Agencies .................................4-15 Policy 4-3.1.5 Buffer Zone Requirements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-15 V11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Policy 4-3.1.6 Policy 4-3.1.7 Policy 4-3.1.8 Page No. Managing Land Use in the Floodplain ..........................4-15 Implementing Stormwater Management Plan .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-15 Inspection and Maintenance of Drainage Systems. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-15 GOAL 4-4: PROTECT FUNCTIONS OF GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE AREAS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-15 OBJECTIVE 4-4.1: COORDINATE ISSUES SURROUNDING AQUIFER RECHARGE . . . 4-15 Policy4-4.1.1 Protect Surficial Aquifer Recharge Areas ........................4-16 Policy 4-4.1.2 Deep Aquifer Water Conservation ...... .......................4-16 Policy 4-4.1.3 Retain Run-off to Maximize Recharge. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-16 Policy 4-4.1.4 Coordinate with Other Recharge Protection Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-16 OBJECTIVE 4-4.2: CONSERVING POTABLE WATER RESOURCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-16 Policy 4-4.2.5 Conservation of Potable Water Supply. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-17 Policy 4-4.2.6 Emergency Conservation of Water Sources. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-17 CHAPTER 5: COASTAL MANAGEMENT .................................... 5-1 S5-1 COASTAL MANAGEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 5-1 GOAL 5-1: COASTAL MANAGEMENT ............ .........,...,...... . 5-1 OBJECTIVE 5-1.1: PROTECT COASTAL RESOURCES, WETLANDS, ESTUARY, LIVING MARINE RESOURCES, AND WILDLIFE HABITATS 5-1 Development Restrictions in Wetlands ..........................5-1 Protect the Indian River Lagoon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-2 Protect, Stabilize, and Enhance the Estuarine Shoreline ............ . 5-2 Protect Living Marine Resources, Coastal Marsh, and Seagrass Beds. " 5-3 Manage Impact of Coastal Development on Tidal Flushing and Circulation Patterns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 5-3 Policy 5-1.1.6 Promote Propagation ofFish and Wildlife ....................... 5-3 Policy 5-1. 1.1 Policy 5-1.1.2 Policy 5-1. 1.3 Policy 5-1. 1.4 Policy 5-1.1.5 OBJECTIVE 5-1.2 SHORELINE USES AND PUBLIC ACCESS TO SHORELINE ....... 5-3 Policy 5-1.2.1(1) Criteria for Prioritizing Shoreline Uses and Public Shoreline Access. . .. 5-3 Policy 5-1.2.1(2) Implementing Policies for Shoreline Land Uses ................... 5-4 OBJECTIVE 5-1.3 LIMITING PUBLIC SUBSIDY OF DEVELOPMENT IN TIffi COASTAL HIGH-HAZARD AREA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-7 Policy 5-1.3.1 Public Investments in Coastal High-Hazard Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 5-7 OBJECTIVE 5-1.4 AVOID POPULATION CONCENTRATIONS IN COASTAL HIGH-HAZARD AREAS ................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-7 Policy 5-1.4.1 Restrict Development in Coastal High-Hazard Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-7 OBJECTIVE 5-1.5 HURRICANE EVACUATION... .......... . ... " '" ... 5-8 viii I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Policy 5-1.5.1 Policy 5-1.5.2 Page No. Hurricane Evacuation Logistical Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 5-8 Future Coordination with the County in Emergency Preparedness ............................................. 5-8 OBJECTIVE 5-1.6 HAZARD MITIGATION AND COASTAL HIGH-HAZARD AREAS. . . 5-8 Policy 5-1.6.1 Coastal High-Hazard Area Defined ............................ 5-8 Policy 5-1.6.2 Coordinate Update of the Hazard Mitigation Plan ................. 5-9 Policy 5-1.6.3 Implementing General Hazard Mitigation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 5-9 OBJECTIVE 5-1.7 POST-DISASTER REDEVELOPMENT ......................... 5-9 Policy 5-1. 7.1 Recovery Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-9 Policy 5-1. 7.2 Post-Hurricane Assessments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-9 Policy 5-1.7.3 Repair and Clean-Up . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-10 Policy 5-1. 7.4 Hazard Mitigation and Comprehensive Plan Amendments ........... 5-10 Policy 5-1. 7.5 Redevelopment Activities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-10 Policy 5-1.7.6 Establish Building Facilities Review Committee ...................5-10 Policy 5-1. 7. 7 Contingency Fund for Disaster Assistance ....................... 5-11 OBJECTIVE 5-1.8 HISTORIC RESOURCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-11 Policy 5-1.8.1 Promote Identification of the City's Historic, Archaeological, and Cultural Resources ............................,........ 5-11 Policy 5-1.8.2 Performance Standards for Protecting Sites of Historic or Archaeological Significance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-11 Policy 5-1.8.3 Alternatives to Preserving Historic or Archaeological Sites .......... 5-11 OBJECTIVE 5-1.9 PUBLIC SERVICES IN COASTAL AREA ....................... 5-12 Policy 5-1.9.1 Ensure Avaialble Infrastructure and Coordinate Timing and Staging of Public Facilities With Private Development ..............5-12 OBJECTIVE 5-1.10 INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION WITHIN THE COASTAL AREA ........................................ 5-12 Policy 5-1. 10.1 Implementing Policies for Intergovernmental Coordination within the Coastal Area ..................................... 5-12 OBJECTIVE 5-1.11 CONTINUING EVALUATION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT EFFECTIVENESS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-14 Policy 5-1.11.1 Review the Impact of Changing Conditions on Coastal Management Policy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. 5-14 Policy 5-1.11.2 Schedule, Budget and Implement Programmed Activities. . . . . . . . . . . . 5-14 Policy 5-1.11.3 Coordinate with Public and Private Sectors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-14 Policy 5-1.11.4 Achieve Effective Resolution of Coastal Management Goals, Objectives and Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-14 CHAPTER 6: CONSERVATION ELEMENT.............. ..................... 6-1 96-1 CONSERVATION GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES. .. 6-1 GOAL 6-1 CONSERVATION.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6-1 ix I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page No. OBJECTIVE6-U PROTECT AIR QUALITY ....................................6-1 Policy 6-1.1.1 Combat Erosion and Generation of Dust Particles ................. 6-1 Policy 6-1.1.2 Air Pollution and Land Use Regulations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1 OBJECTIVE 6-1.2 WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY. " .................. .. '" 6-1 Policy 6-1.2.1 Water Quality, Surface Water Management and Land Use. . . . . . . . . .. 6-2 Policy 6-1.2.2 Regulate Agricultural Activities to Preserve Water Quality. . . . . . . . . . . 6-3 Policy 6-1.2.3 Regulate Wastewater Treatment Discharge to Preserve Water Quality. . 6-4 Policy 6-1.2.4 Preserve and EnhanceLagoon and Canal Shoreline ................ 6-5 Policy 6-1.2.5 Protect Deep and Surficial Aquifer Recharge Areas .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-5 Policy 6-1.2.6 Deep Aquifer Water Conservation ............................. 6-5 Policy 6-1.2.7 Protection and Conservation of Potable Water Supply. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-5 Policy 6-1.2.8 Emergency Conservation of Water Sources ...................... 6-6 Policy 6-1.2.9 Managing Land Use Surrounding Water Well Cones of Influence . . . . . . 6-6 Policy 6-1.2.10 Protect and Conserve Lakes and Estuarine Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-6 OBJECTIVE 6-1.3 MAINTENANCE OF FLOODPLAIN. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6-6 Policy 6-1.3.1 Enforce Policies to Maintain Floodplain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6-6 Policy 6-1.3.2 Purchase of Floodplain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6-6 OBJECTIVE 6-1.4 PROTECT AND PRESERVE WETLANDS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " 6-6 Policy 6-1.4.1 Wetland Development Restrictions .............. ,..............6-7 Policy 6-1.4.2 Protection of Wetland Transition Areas ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-7 Policy 6-1.4.3 Required Dedication of Conservation Easements ..................6-7 OBJECTIVE 6-1.5 COMBAT SOIL EROSION ................................... 6-7 Policy 6-I.5.l Implementing Erosion Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-8 OBJECTIVE 6-1.6 PREVENTING POTENTIAL ADVERSE IMPACTS OF FUTURE MINING OF l'vITNERALS AND MINERAL EXCAVATION ACTMTIES . . . . . . . 6-8 Policy 6-1.6.1 Prohibition Against Mining Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-8 OBJECTIVE 6-1.7 PROTECT NATIVE VEGETATION AND MARINE HABITATS. . . . . . 6-8 Policy 6-1.7.1 Implementing Protection of Vegetative Communities and Marine Habitats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-8 Preservation of Native Plant Communities .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-8 Removal of Undesirable Exotic Vegetation ...................... 6-9 Removal of Trees Causing Safety Hazard. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-9 Protection of Manatee Habitats ............................... 6-9 Policy 6-1.7.2 Policy 6-1.7.3 Policy 6-1.7.4 Policy 6-1.7.5 OBJECTIVE 6-1.8 PROTECT FISHERIES, WILDLIFE AND WILDLIFE HABITATS. . . . .6-10 Policy 6-1.8.1 Manage the Impacts of Development on Fisheries .................6-10 Policy 6-1.8.2 Protect Wildlife and Wildlife Habitats. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-11 OBJECTIVE 6-1.9 PROTECT CONSERVATION LAND RESOURCES ............... .6-11 Policy 6-1.9.1 Designation of Environmentally Sensitive Areas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-11 x I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page No. OBJECTIVE 6-1.10 HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , .6-11 Policy 6-1.10.1 Managing Hazardous Waste ,.......,..."....,...."..,..,.. .6-11 OBJECTIVE 6-1.11 INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION FOR MANAGING CONSERVATION ACTIVITIES.. .......,....... ,6-12 Policy 6-1.1 1.1 Implementing Policies for Intergovernmental Coordination in ManagingConservationActivities ...............,........,... .6-12 OBJECTIVE 6-1.12 CONTINUING EVALUATION OF THE CONSERVATION ELEMENT EFFECTIVENESS ........,.....,.............. .6-12 Policy 6-1.12 1 Review the Impact of Changing Conditions on Conservation Policy . . . .6-12 Policy 6-1.12.2 Schedule, Budget and Implement Programmed Activities . . , . , . . . . . . .6-12 Policy 6-1.12.3 Coordinate with Public and Private Sectors .,.,......."...,.....6-12 Policy 6-1, 12,4 Achieve Effective Resolution of Conservation Goals, Objectives and Policies ......,........ ...................... .6-12 CHAPTER 7: RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT .................... 7-1 97-1 RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND IMPLEMENTING POLICIES. , . . , . . . . . . . . . , . , . . . . . . , , . , . . . . . . . . 7-1 GOAL 7-1 PROVIDE ADEQUATE RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE..... ... , .. ,.. . 7-1 OBJECTIVE 7-1.1 SYSTEM OF PARKS AND RECREATION. , . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . , . 7-1 Policy 7-1.1.1 Level of Service Standards for Parks and Recreation Facilities ....... 7-1 Policy 7-1.1.2 Monitor and Update Recreation Demand and Supply Analysis. . . . , . , . 7-1 Policy 7-1.1.3 Mandatory Land Dedication or Fees In Lieu Thereof. . . . . . . . . . , . . . . 7-1 Policy 7-1.1.4 Future Recreation Capital Improvements . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , 7-1 Policy 7-1.1.5 Maintenance of Existing Recreation Land and Facilities ...........,.7-4 Policy 7-1.1.6 Utilize Creative Concepts of Urban Design and Conservation of Environmentally Sensitive Open Space. . , . , , . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-4 Promote Environmental Concern as Part of Recreational Programs ., 7-4 Designation or Acquisition of Natural Reservations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-4 Policy 7-1.1,7 Policy 7-1.1.8 OBJECTIVE 7-1.2 PROTECT OPEN SPACE SYSTEMS .,.,...........,..,.,...,.. 7-4 Policy 7-1.2.1 Implementing Land Development Code ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . , . 7-5 Policy 7-1.2,2 Standards for Review and Maintenance .., . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . .. 7-5 OBJECTIVE 7-1.3 ACCESS FACILITIES ......,.......... . , . . . . . . . . . . , . , . . . . . , . 7-5 Policy 7-1.3.1 Right-of-Way Improvements .........., . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . 7-5 Policy 7-1.3.2 Design of Access Facilities. . . , . , . . . . . . . , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 7-5 Policy 7-1.3.3 BicycIeIPedestrian Accessways ,.........,...,....,..,........ 7-5 Policy 7-1.3.4 Parking Areas and Bicycle Accommodations ..........".,..,.... 7-5 Policy 7-1.3.5 Facilities for Handicapped and Eldelry .... . . , . . . . . . . . , . . . . , . . . .. 7-5 OBJECTIVE 7-1.4 ACCESS TO INDIAi.'\' RIVER LAGOON AND TRIBUTARIES ...,... 7-5 Policy 7-1.4.1 Require Access Points be Provided as Needed. . . . . . . . . , . . . . , . . . . . 7-5 Xl I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page No. OBJECTIVE 7-1.5 PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COORDlNATION IN PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTlNG RECREATION IMPROVEMENTS. . . . . . . . . . 7-6 Policy 7-1.5.1 Joint School-Park Concept. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-6 Policy 7-1.5.2 Public Participation in Recreation Improvements .................. 7-6 Policy 7-1.5.3 Coordinate with the Private Sector .............................7-6 Policy 7-1.5.4 Evaluate Lands for Open Space Potential. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-6 Policy 7-1.5.5 Utilize Grantsmen and Other Appropriate Fiscal Advisors ........... 7-6 Policy 7-1.5.6 Improve Coordination With Other Human Service Planning Efforts . . . . 7-6 Policy 7-1.5.7 Inform Citizens of Existing Recreation Opportunities and Issues ...... 7-6 Policy 7-1.5.8 Cooperative Programs ......................................7-7 Policy 7-1.5.9 Review Plans and Policies ................................... 7-7 Policy 7-1.5.10 Fiscal Management ........................................ 7-7 CHAPTER 8: INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT. . . . . . . . . . .. 8-1 98-1 INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDlNATION GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND IMPLEMENTING POLICIES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-1 GOAL 8-1: PROVIDE MECHANISMS FOR IMPROVED INTERGOVERNMENTALCOORDlNATION ...........................8-1 OBJECTIVE 8-1.1: INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION AND COORDINATION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WITH INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, THE REGION AND THE STATE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-1 Responsible Entity for Intergovernmental Coordination . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-1 Coordination with Adjacent Jurisdictions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-1 Coordination of Development and Growth Management Issues ....... 8-1 Coordinating Provision Services and Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-2 Policy 8-1.1.1 Policy 8-1.1.2 Policy 8-1.1.3 Policy 8-1.1.4 OBJECTIVE 8-1.2: CONFLICT RESOLUTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-2 Policy 8-1.2.1 Informal Mediation Process .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-3 Policy 8-1.2.2 Mechanisms for Intergovernmental Coordination Review. . . . . . . . . . . . 8-3 Policy 8-1.2.3 Coordination with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. 8-3 OBJECTIVE 8-1.3: INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS... ................. .. .... .. . .. .. ....... .. 8-3 Policy 8-1.3.1 Coordinate Regional/Sub-Regional Infrastructure Issues .......... 8-3 Policy 8-1.3.2 Cooperation with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council ..... . 8-3 Policy 8-1.3.3 Capital Improvement Program Coordination ..................... 8-3 OBJECTIVE 8-1.4: MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES .......... 8-4 Policy 8-1.4.1 Liaison with Permitting Agencies........ .. .. ....... .. ... ... . . . 8-4 Policy 8-1.4.2 Management of Water Quality and other Resource Management Issues Impacting the City and the Indian River Lagoon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-4 OBJECTIVE 8-1.5: DATABASE MANAGEMENT AND COORDlNATION . .. ........ . 8-4 Policy 8-1. 5.1 Generate Necessary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-4 Policy 8-1.5.2 Consideration of Areawide Data Resources ...................... 8-4 xu I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page No. CHAPTER 9: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT......................... 9-1 S9-1 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND IMPLEMENTING POLICIES. . . . . . . . .. .................................................. 9-1 GOAL9-l: MANAGEMENT OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ......................9-1 OBJECTIVE 9-1.1: RATIONALE FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ................. 9-1 Policy 9-1.1.1 Intent of Capital Improvement Program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-1 Policy 9-1.1.2 Capital Improvement Program ................................ 9-1 Policy 9-1.1.3 Capital Improvement Program and Budget as a Plan Implementation Device. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-3 Fiscal Implications of Proposed Engineered Master Plans. . . . . . . . . . . . 9-3 . Availability and Scheduling of Capital Improvements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-4 Priorities in Allocating Capital Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-4 Planning and Zoning Board to Draft and Rank Capital Improvement Priorities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-4 Policy 9-1.1.8 Capital Improvement Project Evaluation Criteria .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-4 Policy 9-1.1.4 Policy 9-1.1.5 Policy 9-1.1.6 Policy 9-1.1.7 OBJECTIVE 9-1.2 LIMITATION ON PUBLIC INVESTMENTS IN THE COASTALHIGHHAZARDAREA ...........................9-5 Policy 9-1.2.1 Public Improvements in the Coastal Preservation Zone. . . . . . . . . . . . .. 9-5 OBJECTIVE 9-1.3: FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS TO BEAR COSTS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPACTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-5 Policy 9-1.3.1 New Techniques for Funding Traffic and Stormwater Drainage Improvements Generated by New Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-5 Policy 9-1.3.2 Recreation Impacts .................................... 9-6 OBJECTIVE 9-1.4: FISCAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT .................... 9-6 Policy 9-1.4.1 Availability of Adequate Public Facilities ................... 9-6 Policy 9-1.4.2 Limitation on Indebtedness. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-6 Policy9-1.4.3 CapitalImprovementsProgram.......................... 9-6 Policy 9-1. 4.4 Master Drainage Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-6 Policy 9-1.4.5 Grantsmanship..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-6 Policy 9-1.4.6 Replacement and Renewal of Capital Facilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-7 OBJECTIVE 9-1.5: CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT ............................9-7 Policy 9-1.5.1 Res01vingConcurrencyIssues................................ 9-8 OBJECTIVE 9-1.6: COORDINATION OF LAND USE DECISIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-9 Policy 9-1.6.1 Level of Service Standards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-9 Policy 9-1.6.2 Adequate Facilities Ordinance..... .. ......... ..... . .... . .. ...9-10 Policy 9-1.6.3 Evaluation Criteria for Plan Amendments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9-13 S9-2 IMPLEMENTING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ........ ......................9-13 Policy 9-2.1 Five Year Schedule ofImprovements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-13 X111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page No. 99-3 MONITORING AND EVALUATING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9-13 CHAPTER 10: GENERAL MONITORING AND REVIEW CRiTERIA ............. 10-1 910-1 GENERAL MONlTORINGAND EVALUATION CRITERIA ...................10-1 910-1.1 ROLE OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD IN PLAN EVALUATION AND UPDATES ................. .......................10-1 910-1.2 CRITERIA FOR CONTINUING EVALUATION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ELEMENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10-1 XIV I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 1: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT CHAPTER 1: LAND USE ELEMENT (reference 99J-5.006(3), FAC.) ~1-1 FUTURE LAND USE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES. This section stipulates goals, objectives, and implementing policies for the Land Use Element pursuant to 9163.3177(6)(3), F.S., and 99J-5.006(3), FAC. GOAL 1-1: LAND USE. INSURE THAT THE CHARACTER AND LOCATION OF LAND USES INCORPORATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND PRINCIPLES OF RESOURCE CONSERVATION, PROMOTE ORDERLY LAND USE TRANSmON, AND MINIMIZE THREATS TO HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE WIDCH MAY BE ENGENDERED BY INCOMPATIBLE LAND USES, ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION, HAZARDS, AND NUISANCES. OBJECTIVE 1-1.1: PLAN AND DESIGN FOR RESIDENTIAL QUALITY. Sufficient space shall be provided for residential development and required community facilities to adequately meet the housing needs of the present and expected future population. Residential development shall be planned and designed to create and perpetuate stable residential neighborhood and implement policies stipulated below. Policy 1-1.1.1: Provide Access to Goods and Services and Protect Residential Areas from the Adverse Impacts of Transition in Land Use. Stable residential areas and projected future residential areas as delineated on the Land Use Map shall be protected from encroachment by incompatible nonresidential development. This objective does not preclude necessary community facilities from locating within residential areas when such activities satisfy established criteria of this plan and the City's Land Development Code. Any potential adverse impacts caused by different land uses located adjacent to each other shall be minimized by landscaping, including vegetated berms with tree canopy, and other appropriate screening and buffering techniques. These landscaping techniques shall be incorporated into the design of new or redeveloping nonresidential projects located adjacent to existing or planned residential development. Similarly, perimeter landscaping techniques shall be applied in multiple family residential developments in order to appropriately screen and buffer existing and planned single family home sites from residential development having differing structure types. In addition, land development regulations shall incorporate standards and/or review criteria for mandating retention of open space and for regulating building design, including setbacks, building placement on site, and building orientation. These provisions shall be directed toward protecting privacy, as well as to light, air and open space. Other reasonable design principles shall be included in the zoning code in order to alleviate adverse impacts of potentially incompatible land uses. Policy 1-1.1.2: Promote Orderly Land Use Transition. Where it is infeasible to separate residential from nonresidential land uses, buffering shall be required to promote a smooth land use transition. Buffering may take the form of: 1) physical barriers, such as vegetative berms, hedges or other landscape cover; walls or fences aesthetically designed for screening purposes; and open space systems with dense native vegetation and tree canopy; and/or 2) the development of a transitional use between the incompatible uses (such as low intensity office development between general retail commercial centers and residential areas). Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121/99 1-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 1: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Policy 1-1.1.3: Promote Orderly Transition in Residential Densities. Highest residential densities shall continue to be allocated to sites accessible to major thoroughfares or collector streets as identified on the City's Major Thoroughfare Plan (Map II-I) as well as adjacent to existing development with the same or higher density or less restrictive zoning districts. Residential densities shall be allocated in a manner compatible with available public services, natural features of land as well as existing and anticipated future development. Policy 1-1.1.4: Reinforce and Enhance Appearance of Residential Areas and Provide Amenities. The City together with the private sector shall consider enhancing preservation of open space for scenic vistas, especially along transportation corridors and along the Indian River, the Sebastian River, Schumann Lake, as well as along the Schumann, Elkcam and Collier Creek Waterways or other similar aesthetic corridors adjacent to transportation facilities. Such enhancement shall include application of community appearance criteria which reinforces good principles of design. Policy 1-1.1.5: Encourage Separation of Urban and Rural Land Uses. Although the City contains no agricultural lands, the land development code shall incorporate performance standards, urban service availability standards, and other similar incentives and disincentives which encourage a separation of urban and rural land uses. This is necessary in order to maintain responsive land management policies along the outer suburban fringe where urban development within the City could potentially impact unincorporated agricultural lands. OBJECTIVE 1-1.2: ALLOCATING COMMERCIAL DEVELOP:MENT. Commercial development shall be comprised of a wide range of business uses. The City shall promote the image and function of the central business district, the area generally located as the City's center for commerce as well as civic and cultural enrichment. In this pursuit the City shall enhance the identity, design, and vitality of the waterfront corridor which provides a unique waterfront activity center within the central core area of the City. The allocation of land resources shall consider the location and space requirements of commercial activities and potential fiscal and environmental impacts on the City of Sebastian. Policy 1-1.2.1: General Considerations for Locating Commercial Development. The location and distribution of specific types of commercial activities shall be determined based on the following considerations: a. Trip generation characteristics, impact on existing and planned transportation facilities and ability to achieve a functional internal circulation and off-street parking system, with landscaping amenities; b. Location and site requirements based on specific needs of respective commercial activities, their market area, anticipated employment generation and floor area requirements; c. Compatibility with and impact on other surrounding commercial activities; d. Relationship to surrounding land uses and natural systems; e. Impact on existing and planned community services and utilities. Policy 1-1.2.2: General Pattern of Commercial Land Use. In order to promote efficient flow of traffic along major thoroughfares cited in the Traffic Circulation Element, achieve orderly development and minimize adverse impact on residential quality, commercial development shall be concentrated in strate- gically located areas having location characteristics which best accommodate specific land, site, public facilities and market location requirements of their respective commercial uses. Similarly, proliferation of strip commercial development shall not be extended. The existence of commercial areas on one corner of an intersection shall not dictate the development of all corners with the same or similar use; nor does the existence of commercial development on a major thoroughfare dictate that all frontage must be similarly used. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121/99 1-2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 1: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Policy 1-1.2.3: Improve the Image and Function of the Downtown as the Central Commercial Core Area. Commercial development decisions shall promote the function of the Downtown central commercial core area as a center for government and institutional services as well as a focal point for retail trade, business and professional offices, and civic and cultural enrichment. Land development regulations shall be directed to achieving a mix of land use activities consistent with Future Land Use Map policies. The City shall coordinate with the residents, Chamber of Commerce and the private sector interest groups concerned with enhancing the Downtown in order to direct efforts to achieve a public and private partnership in improving the image and function of the Downtown central commercial core area, including the waterfront corridor. Design strategies shall provide a physical theme for development and redevelopment opportunities which reinforces the unique waterfront setting of the Downtown area, along the Indian River Dr. and U.S. I corridors, spanning north from Fellsmere Road (CR 512) to Oyster Bay Pointe and west on Main Street to the Post Office. Policy 1-1.2.4: Prepare a Redevelopment Plan for Enhancing the Identity Design, and Vitality of the City's Riverfront Corridor. The Riverfront corridor shall be the subject of periodic special planning and management studies as determined by the City Council which shall be coordinated closely with the residents, Chamber of Commerce and other interest groups concerned with promoting improvements along this waterfront corridor (Cross-reference Objectives 1-1.2 and 1-3.2). The Riverfront shall be defined as the area of the City east of the railroad tracks from the north City limit to the south City limit on US 1. These studies shall investigate actions deemed to be necessary by the City Council to achieve: . Improvements in architectural design of the Riverfront corridor which enhance the identity of this unique resource; . Private sector investment in improvements which further the City's waterfront corridor redevelopment objectives; . Public sector plans for generating incentives for realizing a meaningful public-private partnership in waterfront corridor redevelopment; . A market sensitive and economically feasible redevelopment plan, management strategy, and regulatory performance criteria for inrplementing these redevelopment objectives and policies; and . Design alternatives for accommodating pedestrian user needs, including a circulation system which facilitates pedestrian mobility. Vehicular traffic should be directed along U.S. 1 and parking areas should be developed. Policy 1-1.2.5: Provide Appropriate Locations for Office Development. Office development shall be encouraged to locate on accessible sites on US 1 and CR 512. Office development may serve as a transitional use separating more intensive commercial uses from residential development. Office development shall also locate along the outer fringe of the Downtown area where such development may encourage reinvestment in declining residential areas surrounding the business district. Policy 1-1.2.6: Designate Various Types of Commercial Nodes to Accommodate Diverse Commercial Uses. A variety of commercial development designations shall be provided in order to adequately assure availability of sites that accommodate the varied site and spatial requirements for such activities as: professional and business offices, limited commercial activities, and general retail sales and services. The allocation of commercial uses shall recognize that respective commercial activities frequently have different site, spatial, and market area characteristics and generate significantly different impacts. Similarly, the commercial development designations on the Land Use Map shall be complemented by zoning, performance standards, and site plan-review requirements which shall regulate development on such land. These regulations shall assure that the proposed development of commercially designated sites is appropriate and can be adapted to the proposed site. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies . 09/21/99 1-3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 1: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT For instance, the land development regulation shall address issues surrounding: . Intensity of use . Floor area . Natural constraints to development . Perimeter and internal landscape requirements . Availability of public facilities at adequate levels of service . Concurrency management . Controlled access and egress . Off-street parking with safe and convenient internal vehicle and pedestrian circulation. . Open space preservation . Adequate building setbacks . Urban design and required amenities, including, but not limited to, signage controls, pedestrian amenities, building height, and orientation, and other similar design features. OBJECTIVE 1-1.3: PLANNING FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT. Sufficient land shall be allocated to accommodate industrial development. Policy 1-1.3.1: General Considerations for Locating Industrial Development. The allocation of/and resources for industrial development shall be responsive to the location and space requirements of industrial activities and potential fiscal and environmental impacts on the City of Sebastian. The location and distribution of specific types of industrial activities shall be determined based on the following considerations: a. Trip generation characteristics and impact on existing and planned transportation systems, including dependency on rail, air, or trucking for distribution of material and goods; b. Anticipated employment generation, floor area requirements, and market area; c. Ability to meet established performance standards for preventing or minimizing nuisance impacts, such as emission of air pollutants, glare, noise or odor, or generation of hazardous by-products; d. Impact on established as well as anticipated future development and natural systems; and e. Impact on existing and planned public services, utilities, water resources, and energy resources. Policy 1-1.3.2: General Pattern of Industrial Land Use. The City of Sebastian Airport and environs contains the principal area for future industrial activity. A secondary industrial concentration is situated along the FEC Railroad at CR 512. Lesser concentrations of industrial development are situated along other segments of the FEC Railroad. A high priority shall be given to reserving strategically located lands adaptive to the unique location requirements of industry. Industrial sites shall generally be allocated in areas accessible to rail corridors or near airport facilities. Policy 1-1.3.3: Pursue Selective Industrial Expansion Policy. The City shall pursue a strategy of selective expansion of its industrial base. The City shall encourage industries that contribute optimally to the City's economy and that of the Treasure Coast and Space Coast. Highest priority shall be directed toward recruiting industries which: a. Generate high levels of employment together with higher than average wage and salaries; b. Promote an industrial mix to connterbalance the impact of cyclical economic changes; c. Produce services andlor products which complement the needs and resources of existing industry within City and the region. d. Provide industry and service activities required to support and attract prime industrial land uses which are compatible with the City's growth management and resource conservation goals, objectives and policies; e. Contribute a net revenue to the City of Sebastian and thus enhancing the fiscal capacity of the City; and f. Do not adversely impact the City's natural resources including groundwater quality; infrastructnre; and public facility improvement needs. The City shall seek to work in partnership with industrial development interest groups to achieve competitive amen.ity packages including: . Reqnisite transportation system improvements and other on- or off-site improvements; . Access to public potable water and wastewater services; . Efficient stonnwater management systems; and . Maintenance of adopted levels of services for infrastructnre systems. Comprehensive Plan G.oals. Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 1-4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 1: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Policy 1-1.3.4: Pursue Nuisance Abatement Standards and Criteria. The City shall prevent nuisance impacts frequently associated with industrial activities by maintaining performance standards for managing emission of noise, air pollutants, odor, vibration, fire or explosive hazard, and glare. Similarly land shall be allocated to industrial uses in a manner which allows for separation and co- location of industrial activities capable of complying with the most restrictive performance standards and exhibiting minimal adverse impacts on surrounding development. OBJECTIVE 1-1.4: ACCOMMODATE INSTITUTIONAL FACILITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICES. The City shall assure that needed public services and facilities are developed concurrent with new development, including adoption of an adequate facilities ordinance within the City's land development code. In addition, the City shall use the capital improvement program and budget process to pursue advance acquisition of land required to provide recreation, conservation, and related public benefits and promote multiple use of public lands. Policy 1-1.4.1: Coordinate Public and Private Investments in Land Improvements. The location, scale, timing, and design of necessary public and semi-public services and utilities shall be closely coordinated with development activities in order to promote more effective and efficient delivery of requisite services and utilities. Policy 1-1.4.2: Maintain and Enforce Standards and Specifications for Design and Construction of Public and Semi-Public Services. The City shall maintain and enforce appropriate standards and specifications for the design and construction of public and semi-public services in order to promote cost effectiveness and quality control consistent with all applicable federal, state, regional, and local standards. Community facilities include police and fire protection, public schools, health care, emergency services, storm drainage and water and wastewater facilities. Policy 1-1.4.3: Provision of On-Site and Off-Site Improvements. Prior to receiving a development permit, plans for all new development shall be evaluated by the City. Similarly, prior to receiving a development permit, the applicant's plans must incorporate necessary on- and off-site improvements or equitable contributions in lieu thereof which are required as part of a development application pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan or any other requirement of the Code of Ordinances, as exists or as may hereinafter be amended. In cases involving unpaved roads adjacent to a proposed development, the applicant shall be required to pave the portion of the road which the development will be utilizing. The applicant shall not be required to pave adjacent unpaved roads if the development will not be accessing those roads. In cases of insufficient rights-of-way adjacent to a proposed development, the applicant shall be required to donate the land necessary to make the rights-of-way compliant with the requirements of the Land Development Code. Supportive facilities, services, or other improvements (or equitable contributions in lieu thereof), as required by ordinance, shall be agreed to by the applicant prior to City approval of a development petition and facilities shall be constructed as agreed upon prior to issuance of a development permit. The intent of this policy is that all development applications include a satisfactory plan providing for the development of required on-site and off-site improvements, or equitable contribution in lieu thereof, in order to assure that the City of Sebastian does not assume unanticipated fiscal liabilities for supportive facilities and services which may be expressly attributed to new development. Comprehensive Plan Goals. Objectives and Policies 09121/99 1-5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i II I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 1: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OBJECTIVE 1-1.5: PROMOTE COMMUNITY APPEARANCE, NATURAL AMENITIES AND URBAN DESIGN PRINCIPLES. The appearance of major transportation corridors serving as gateways into the City, as well as major activity centers such as the Downtown, the Indian River and St. Sebastian River shoreline, public parks and other public grounds and institutions shall be managed and enhanced through application of the site plan review process. Policy 1-1.5.1: Reinforce and Enhance the City's Community Appearance. Major attributes shall be preserved through application of design review standards and management of signs, landscaping, open space, tree protection, and other urban design amenities. Special emphasis shall be placed on preserving and/or improving the character of major natural and man- made corridors, including the intercoastal shoreline, the estuarine and riverine systems, major drainage corridors, and major transportation corridors which serve as a focal point for the motoring public and an inviting gateway to visiting tourists. ~1-2: FUTURE LAND USE MAP. GOAL 1-2: FUTURE LAND USE MAP. CONTINUE TO :MAINTAIN AND MANAGE A FUTURE LAND USE MAP. THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES, MAPS I-I THROUGH 1-8 HEREIN, REFLECT CITY POLICY FOR MANAGING THE ALLOCATION OF FUTURE LAND USE. THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES (BASE YEAR 2010) IS SUPPORTED BY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DATA INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS (1988) AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT (1988). LAND USE DESIGNATIONS ON THE FUTURE LAND USE MAPS HAVE BEEN ALLOCATED PURSUANT TO GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES STIPULATED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLA1'l, TOGETHER WITH ANALYSIS OF POPULATION, HOUSING AND LAND RESOURCES. THE PROCESS OF ALLOCATING THESE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS HAS CONSIDERED THE NEED TO CONSERVE NATURAL RESOlJRCES INCLUDING WETLANDS, THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON SHORELINE, THE SEBASTIAN RIVER SHORELINE, FLOODWAYS, FLOOD PLAINS, WATER RECHARGE AREAS, FISH AND WILDLIFE, CONSIDERATION OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT NEEDS, AND CONSERVATION OF FISCAL RESOURCES. THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES SHALL DESIGNATE AREAS FOR THE FOLLOWING USES: LAND USE RESIDENTIAL DENSITY (Units per Gross Acre) Residential Low Density Medium Density Mobile Home Development High Density Riverfront Mixed Use LAND USE Commercial (Total) Limited Commercial, including offices Less than 5 acres 0.35 FAR 5 to 20 acres 0.50 FAR General Commercial, including offices More than 20 acres 0.75 FAR Riverfront Mixed Use . residential uses: 25%; institutional/recreational uses: 20%; and commercial uses: 55%. up to 5 u/a up to 8 u/a np to 5 u/a up to 12 u/a un to 8 u/a I MIX OF LAND USES I LAND USE INTENSITY (Floor-ta-Area Ratio) Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21199 1-6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Industrial CHAPTER 1: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT MIX OF LAND USES LAND USE INTENSITY (Floor-to-Area Ratio) Less than 20 acres 0.50 FAR More than 20 acres 0.75 FAR .50 FAR .35 FAR CITY OF SEBASTIAN LAND USE AirPort Institutional Agricultural None within City THIS SECTION OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT SHALL DEFINE THE NATURE, DENSITY AND INTENSITY OF THE ALLOW ABLE USES FOR EACH OF THE DESIGNATIONS REPRESENTED ON THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP. NOTHING IN" THIS SECTION SHALL PRECLUDE NECESSARY COMMUNITY FACILITIES FROM LOCATING WITHIN ANY FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION WHEN SUCH ACTIVITY SATISFIES ESTABLISHED CRITERIA OF THIS PLAN AND THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDIN"ANCES. THE FUfURE LAND USE MAP SERIES SHALL BE MAPS I-I THROUGH 1-6. THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP: LAND USE POLICY DESIGNATION, MAP I-I, SHALL DEPICT THE PROPOSED DISTRIBUTION, EXTENT AND LOCATION OF LAND USES FOR THE YEAR 2010. THE OFFICIAL FUTURE LAND USE MAP IS ON FILE IN CITY HALL. THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP ILLUSTRATED HEREIN (MAP I-I) IS ONLY A GENERALIZED FUTURE LAND USE MAP DETAILIN"G THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP LEGEND AND ALLOCATION OF FUTURE LAc'ill USE. MAPS 1-2 THROUGH 1-6 OF THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES SHALL DENOTE NATURAL RESOURCES TO BE CONSERVED THROUGH PLAN IMPLEMENTATION. MAP 1-7 SHALL lNDICATE CITY RECREATION RESOURCES. MAP 1-8 AND TABLE 1-1 DENOTE THE HISTORICALLY AND ARCHAEOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT SITES INCLUDED IN THE STATE MASTERPLAN. THE CITY HAS NO AGRICULTURAL LANDS. OBJECTIVE 1-2.1: ALLOCATING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. Map I-I, identifying future land use policy, shall allocate residential density based on the following considerations: past and projected future population and housing trends and characteristics; provision and maintenance of quality residential environments; protection of environmentally fragile natural systems; the need to plan for smooth transition in residential densities; and provision and maintenance of traffic circulation and multiple-family improvements. Redevelopment, rehabilitation, and/or renovation of existing structures shall also be required to meet acceptable level as indicated in the Land Development Code. This objective shall be measured through implementation of the following policies. Policy 1-2.1.1: Density Defined. Maximum gross residential density shall be determined by dividing the "maximum allowable units" by the "gross land area" (i.e., dwelling units/gross land area). All residential densities denoted on the Future Land Use Map stipulate the maximum gross densities permitted for development on the land. Gross land area shall be defined as those contiguous land areas under common ownership proposed for residential development. In cases where residential land abuts waters of the State, the boundary shall be delineated as established by the State and no density credit shall be granted for waters of the State. In cases where residential land abuts other natural floodplains or wetlands, the land development regulations shall provide performance standards and/or criteria which may further restrict the character of land for which density credit may be granted. The intent is to allocate density credits only to those lands which are buildable pursuant to urban design criteria. These criteria shall be incorporated within the land development regulations. Density is expressed in terms of a range up to a specified maximum. Where so stated as a range, the maximum' density is not guaranteed by right. Subdivision, zoning and site plan review criteria and procedures shall assure that specific density assigned to new development is compatible and consistent Comprehensive Plan Goals. Objectives and Policies 09121/99 1-7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 1: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT with established residential development patterns and provides equitable use of the land. Criteria to be considered in allocating density shall include, but not be limited to, the following: a. Protect the integrity and stability of established residential areas; b. Assure smooth transition in residential densities; c. Require application of sound landscaping and urban design principles and practices; d. Protect environmentally sensitive areas; e. Minimize the impact of flood hazards; f. Coordinate with Indian River County as well as appropriate state and regional agencies charged with managing land and water resources; and g. Provide reasonable use of the land Policy 1-2.1.3: Low Density Residential Development (LDR). Areas delineated on the Future Land Use Map for low density residential development shall accommodate residential development with a maximum density of up to five (5) dwelling units per acre and shall be comprised primarily of single family detached homes on individual lots. Specific densities will be determined by such factors as natural features of the land, density and/or intensity of developed and/or undeveloped land surrounding development, level of accessibility, housing supply and demand, adequacy of public facilities, consumer preference and other factors which may be identified in the land development regulations. Supportive community facilities and accessory land uses may be located within areas designated for single family low density residential uses. The land development regulations shall provide regulatory procedures for considering such uses. The low density designation is established to protect: . the quality and character of existing low density single family neighborhoods; . preserve open space; . encourage densities which are compatible with existing and anticipated future developments; . promote compatibility with natural features of the land: and, . minimize burden on existing and projected supportive public services and facilities within the area Policy 1-2.1.4: Medium Density Residential Development (MDR). Areas delineated on the Future Land Use Map for medium density' residential development shall be developed, redeveloped and/or maintained as stable medium density residential neighborhoods. Medium density residential development ranges up to a maximum of eight (8) units per acre and generally averages six (6) units per acre. The City shall allow a duplex to be constructed on any undeveloped 10,000 square foot lot existing on March 4, 1998 which is indicated as Medium Density Residential on the Future Land Use Map. The medium density designation is intended to provide sufficient land area for developments of medium density residential development adequately supported by public services and facilities and compatible with existing and anticipated future land uses. The medium density policy designation includes a mixture of single and multiple family structure types. Supportive community facilities and accessory land uses may be located within areas designated MDR. The City land development regulations shall provide regulatory procedures for considering such uses. Review of specific densities of developments shall be directed toward preserving stability of established residential areas. Sites for medium density residential developments should be located so that they provide a smooth transition between lower density residential areas and areas developed andlor designated for other more intense uses. Generally, medium density areas should be located between the perimeter oflow density residential areas and areas of high density residential concentrations. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121199 1.8 MAP I-I FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES Policy Designations I , o SCALE I I t 1~ 1/23", 1 MILE t I I I I I - . > a: I c . . . ~ . <n I I I LOR I "~""''' 1'1.. .h~J fl ." :H ;;I, ", : ':\, :,.u.h......u INS^ W y, < !!. I UtI'lIrI".... /.~lN~ E t~~ \,.> .: : tllIlIlI..."I""..... = rUIIII"..,..... ,i...nnl I Comofled b: eft Qf Sebast.fan and Solin to AssQclates. Inc. A . Exlll. h lhO C Hon . Rc:sideridil !.e~9nd , , Land U~C Intelt."lily in AvcuCC Weekday Vehidc Trir 8r<cW24 Hnur rericx.l COR CoTmnctdal, OrflC('l Reddendal Ur 10 4' Tr;p#I000~. ~ a~ Cmnmc,ci:ll, Umi<al Up In 14f) Tlirml000 ~q. fl. INS Imlilut/orul Up 10 71] TripS/Urn sq. o. (Tndudea R<<lation lid Open Sf'lIa:: PlVb . Up 10 27 T1ips/lICTc Gole Coune . Up 10 45.] Trlptmlcl I -.&I I~D Jlld'v:lIrinl Up to 1 TrlfJ'llOOO sq. A. LOR tnw Dcn..ity. n~id<:nti:ll Ur In j: un;I~/llO'c I MOR MOI:diurn Ccl1llity. Rc:oidcnt;:ol Ur In ~ uniW~ TlOR IIip Dcruily. Rc:ldenl;al U1' to .12 unilshcre co.t. Commerci:d. Gena"l 012 Up 10 1<10 TtirstUm l:<f. CI. I Mn """nile ITollle Up 1" Sunitmlc:re CW Commerd:". "''''rine Wllllc,f,e>n1 V"tu4~r.mrlllus 14lJ T1iP'iIOOOrq. rt. , If' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I "' MAP 1-2 FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES Soils and Topography .''''": SCALE '1 l I I o 114 1/23/4 1 MILE ~ . ~ "' .-: 0~ ~ f~'U"'''i'''''''''''''' ;. ...... \ .~ . ~ ""-:... ~ '-,- -.,.. ~... ;. ..~.. ~ ~..\ ~~ ..~.. .0 0:. a~ ....-:...-::. ....II~II....IIIIII....... ~ OtJ (:) LEGEND iIa Astalula-An:!llbold-SC I.OOe -=. ~ Boca_Wabas$O~RMera . Myakka-lmmokalee III!Il EauGaJ6e-OIdsmat-WabOSSO o Immokallo-Myaldca-S...... # Elevation in feet abOV8 sea !e\iel SCURre Indian River County Soi $urtey OA TE; November 24, 1987 1 MAP 1-3 FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES Estuarine Shoreline and Wetland Areas 1 1 SCALE I I I I o 114 1/23/4 1 MILE ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 c " 1 1 1 1 '. '. ~'IIIJ1 ~....... ,... . n o c .. 1 1 111111.......... . . S ~. .. ...IIIU....III1..: r..U.......11111 t.......i .~'" , ~.c' Stratton Ave. ..^"^ '\ ~IIU'II"~. , . x-~ = " , . : '.... n ," \) : '", "- ~CJ: \" :.....: \" . -' " r..'; Annul! ,~ '" 1 1 LEGEND B lletland ~ Estuarine Shoreline The City of Sebastian has no beaches. 1;-- SOURCE: Indian River County Planning and Zoning Department DATE: November 24, 1987 I MAP I-IV FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES Generalized Aoodplain Areas I SCALE I I I I o 114 1/2 314 1 M1L.E t I I ~ ..<: 0~ ~ I I . > " < -" . . ~ '''II.n~''IIII1'''''' ;. ""'" "\ -~ ':0 ~ -::. ~ '\ 'J" " '. ;. \. (,.,\ "'\.."" \:\ a ~ '::,~ . ' !1I"1I~'IIII....nll"'''' ~ o~ o I I I I I I I I I ",'lIlllllllt.. ~ ; - - .nUlt"~:: r.1I ,;..nu'l I I LEGEND I bi 100YearF1oodplain . Areas Between 100 and SOCI Year Flood o Ar153s 0( Minimal Flooding fZ:J Higl1 Hazard Coastal Area ~e Zone. FlAM Maps) I SOURCE: Flood Inslnnca Rate Map (Communily Number 120123. May 4, 1989) DATE; August 1989 1.1". I MAP 1-5 FUTURE lAND USE MAP SERIES Surficial Aquifer Recharge Areas and Waterwells I I =....1.1. , o SCALE I I I 114 1/2 314 1 MILE ~ I I ~ ."'" 0% "?t. I I I I I I I General Deve[opment Utllltfes Water Well I Whispering Palms Water Well I ~'8 /" .,. ~~ . r.,.e :; o o " ;; I " -- -f".., ;............ .<f:'. f "'II'....'II',! : : : : 11'1"'''''" E filll......I..u. ,i,uI"ll I I LEGEND I lEEr Goad to Excellent Recharge Potential g Moderate to Good Recharge Potential c:J Poor to Moderate Recharge Potential . tlater Wells ( I'fQ data" delineating the cones of inOuence for" these shallow aquifer wells is currently available. ) SOURCE: Indian River County Soil Survey DATE: November 24, 1987 I I MAP 1-6 FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES Major Undeveloped Lands with Upland Vegetation I I SCALE o ,4 ,i2 34 , MilE ~ I ~ I I I I I . .? '" I c . . . .0 . .", I I I I ... m o o ~ ;; I ;"11111111111 ~ U....I.II.II~ - - ~ :: '"" IlIlUI.....: ;.....1111..111.. .i,..II..i I SOURCE: Indian River County Tax Assessor's Aerial Maps I LEGEND I 1. S ~R. 512,oSW City Limits 2. S::In -5<:bas.ti:;m Springs 3. CollicrPI::ace: 4. Airport NE S. SL Scf:t:lSti::m 6. N FEe Corridor WC::;lside 7. N FEe Corridor E:L;;tsidc 8. NE of City HalllW oC FEe 9. S oC Main StreettW of Louisinllll Ave 10. Scb:.utian Green 11. W FECJW Whispering Palms 12 Chesser Gap (OIC:sscr Gap PUD(q) 13. Indian River Estuarine and Grassbcds (Indicated on Map 1) Solin & Associates, Inc. Date: May 1991 I SOURCE: Indian Ri....er County Tax Assessor's Aerial Maps "'0:: I MAP 1-7 FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES City Recreation Resources I I ',~ ~ SCALE I I I l o 14 112 3.14 1 MILE t I I I ...., 0~ ~ ....II......,.II...r~___0 " '" ~ ~ :t.. ~ c I I I I I I I Lnllllllllll.. .. : . :: :: - . :: fllntll"II.... ~ "" .......f;.~ \: ~ "'.,t,", : \"' ;........II~ , E' '\ .,}. '\ ~ .", ~(l '\ tratton Ave. ~-i..,:l '\ ~""'" ~ "- ....II! :: ~ "- -.. .. ,~ " no"", " 0 f'" "' .-V-V: '" ::..~:: \' in";: lllllllln \ '\. I I I Compiled by: Cfty of Sebastian and Solin t AssGc1ates,Inc. I LEGEND (1) ll:1v!!rfront Park (~l AShford T. Jordan Park (JJ Sl:.bast14n COlllllun; ty Center ('J COll111unit:t Park East of City Hal! (51 Sebas~i.Jn Ya~tlt Club (6) Riverfl'"Ont Park. at Fel1smel"'e Ilo.d (7) Riveniew Park. (8i VFW Social Center 19) Easy Street Park (to) Barber Stret!t Soorts Comple:c. (It.) SchurR;!,nn Drive N~;ghborhood Park (12) Hardee Park . (13] Sebastian Municioal Gol f Course DATE: ftu,ust, 1989 I I~u I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I J MAP I - 8 FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES Historic Resources I o SCALE I I . 114 1/2 3/4 1 MILE ." 0,. c.. ~ ~'tJ'l ~ \; ~ ~~ " ,,~11 ~-/. ."" ........ ~ ~: ~~" .~; ',,,,,''''~ ~C''- ", '" ",' .:."\.. ", ~..~, "'" ", Q)/.i:" " '" '" ", ...:"oo;~, ..... "...""" :t, -I.~'" .... ~!"- "- "'" ,,,...,, "',... A" V-\ ' , .." " "J' ......... 3 Vocelle Avenue ~ LEGEND FEC ~at1road ( J Appn>>jmate Boundary of Historic Site Are. ....... Ci ey SC'undary #1-12 Crossreferenee TabJe r -1: H"1Storic Site3. 'Mtich Identifies speeific ~tes within the re:spediw areas Sou"",: Sectetaty 01 Stal., 0M0i0n 01 HiotcricaJ Resources. BtJreau of HistoricaJ Preservation 1-17 t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1,- MAP 1-9 FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES Areas Reserved for Conservation or Restricted Development SCALE ", I I l I o 114 11:2 314 1 MILE ~ . ~, ~ > "' < ~ ;; c -" ~ '" ~: ~...... Ullln,lIlInl ~ ! - - :11111"":: rn........" ;.......1 Compiled by: City of Sebastian and Solin l. Associates, Inc. LEGEND _ Restricted DevelOpment (Clossreferenca Tabla 1-1 defirttion) _ Conservation Areas Source: Softn & Associates, Inc. and City of Sebastian Date: May 1991 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .,.0'_.-;"-'-- ~- ~i"~'":-.- . . u - o o . . ~ u - o ~ .0 ~o N 1'", ~C- -:?: . - .- ::l .. we - ~ ~ Z'- W w ~~ . mo~ -< -" ~.~ .~ =>~ '00 . w>- uw ..- _u o - a. I' . 0> .:: ~ . ';;; w << << << << .. << .. << << . . . . . . . . . <<0 : 0 <<'" << << ~ << . << - << u << << << Ul << ~ << ~ . e . . w << ~ << w . << << . . . . . << << . << << << << << << ~ << c- << c- << ~ << << ~ << . << - << u << -< . << '0 . . . << . . e . << ~ . ~ << w . . . << . . . . . . . << .0 . c- . c- . . . . . " . - . u . -< . . '0 . " . ~ . .. << e . << w . . << w . . . . . << . . . . . . . . . . << '. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . << . . . << << << << << . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . << .. .. << . << .. << . .... '0 8- o . ~> .. ~I' -<=> 0"'''' "'....0 -"'~ u -<< "'~ ~ 'llC d. ._ 0 -- w. w> .. ~o "'0 '" '" '0 8- o . w> ". ~I' -<=> ...."'... "'....0 "''''- u ~-< "'- 'O'C t~ -0 -- ~ . .> . " ~o ~o ... '" '0 . a. o . ~> "" ~I' -<=> ...."'... ~....o "''''- u ~-< w 'Oe ~[ ._ 0 -- w. ~> " . ~o ~o '" e ~ -< ~ o 0- "'N... "'....0 ..."'- - .... ~ '" " => ~ ~ '?~'( --- - '" . . ~ ;; ~e . w - . ~u_ "E~.~ ~~~ u=> 8 u " . .:: '8.1' .......... = In ca >_ IV t~~~ ~:::l:C....J > ........... . . . . . . o. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~. "'. . << << << . . << . << . . . . . . . o. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~. N' . . << . . . . . << << . << << . << << 0<< . . << . . . << . . . . . << . ~, N' , , , . , . << . . -. -<< ~. ~, << ~. N<< . << << << << << << . . . ~ U"I ~ ~: -. . . . . . . . . . . - ~. ~ '" ~: << . . . .. .. u. -. o. o. .. .. ~ ... . _ u. c.. 11:I ._<< ~ :!. ~: ~. ::l 0 IIHr 0" Q ._. "" .- :c. . .......... ~ -0 o ~ -0 o ~ '" o € ~ '" . e . - o .c ~ . c - ~ ~ ~ w w .... '" o .... '" "' '" ~ -0 ... ~ '" ~ 00 .... .... ~ ... ~ -0 .... ~ ~ c- o -0 .... ~ .... ~ ... ~ o .... '" ~ .... .... . . - '" . 0> - . .c u . ~ c . 0.. '0 o o . '0 . U . - . 0.0 a. -......cnlh u~. - c SllE8. 8%: ~ ~ 0 ca~UUlh _.::::c..1..1G o..~. ....- c: . l..... QI......_ C .~ ca L..~ ~.~ ::"Et0,-~ o Ill'::: (,II oW U ..... Q,l.... u ..0 ""'..... 0'1 ...ca _<II(\,! ca Q,l Cut.:::> _0 W -g<c.."Girn'E >......::l- oU (g L..a:lu............ <<1_ U c- c.. USl..,Ql1lcn;::li .~ '0 l-Ul......___ Q.::l_ \It ca 0 11l"E~E'ZQ.I .Q_w cu -.c .............-"'C ca ..... L.. C lG_ C .O! W. ..c a. ..... 4.1'" 11I'- oc..1: _ 0 .._ 5""-;~l5~ .- >-> Q,l c: .........uu U <<1--0 l...-"..... ~U,,8..-;g cnlVQ,I ~ Q,I..c:..... >>_'- >....u....oc.. "'C ::~~..... Cc....u...."..... ltI:::llh No_ --'o..4l. J: g.c CIl: ~rE IV l'CI ..... ca U "0-- Q,I.- 8.:; ~ <Il ~ ti ~~ g-g llE Q,I QlU 0 o;/l 0.. >~ ~ QI _.... C III I'.;-o~ 8.:= ::Jcnc_Ot- << . . . . . . . .,. "'. ,,.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~. ~. o. -. ~. . . . . . . . . . . . . . "'. .... ~. -. ~. . . . . . . . . . . . . . -. ~. "'. , . . . . . . . . . . . :~ . "'. ~. "'. -, -. . . . . . . . . . . o. .... -0' . . . . << . . . . . . . . ..... 00' 00' -. -. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . ... ~. "'. ~, 0<< ~. ~ . . . W " ~ W " ~ . .c ~ - W. -01' 0'- ~~ - ,. -. ".c w~ c ~5 -- ,. "'~ CIloj"O... u J: ~~u "8~. III _ '- c--- as W.........N U U G UI 0..... <10_ L..'1j"t:l u iI'\-lU 0_'__ c.... ~ In lIS_'_ <1.10:: C 100 41...._'O<a taU a:l ~::2.%t:w+<, ~~ a:l:;E:w .... lUX lU _! ~ CHlIQ.,W ~ UL..L..C _.:.c a. 4100'-~C:Q.L....:>t 0 L..~~ ~:;{5 ~ ~ :;-g-; L.. L.. e...-a.. L..("J Q. ell > CIJ L.. 1..._ 0.... CIJ _ 0 00 CIJ -:r"'C I:; ::J: C"'C '-("JiU_"'C _OGllU i}iUU <1l-;"E~.;:>'=-g r.tl llIWW'= '- O_l... L.. III'" lU 1.I.........w__~Glll:lUCIJ 8. >~_>>.jJ_L.. . ......._ fA llI"_'_ ~ L.. IU z:z:=e:::<a:lo::c:a:::<n_ o ~ ~~~"E~NM";~-<i~ >~I-< . "E<aiu => ~ " 'll > - . W . '- a. .8 " : - . - o C" ~ . .c ~ - o " "" W w c ! o .. > . '0 'll ~ u - ~ . .. -I' ,.. c- oc ::: ::c . '" - . >-"" -u c. 0_ 'ii 2"8 .0 >- .~ I'~ 00 e _ -. r~ - . . -0 - . .c. ~"" w W >-0 . 0 ~ "8!; o u _u ~ 0 ~ ~ .~ ""'" ~.. -< ~ ~.. Gl" Q,I..... _c CIJ ::I ~:::.~ :~,~~ Ill....... oC: CIJ ~ro;a ~ "E -1"5 :; UcC C <<I ~CIJ [~ ~ ..~+<' g iIn _ :>.......0 L c::"E] ....~::~ 8,.<<It:n _OL..U o~-c ~7:a~ .....c Q<ll:l "'_<a 0 '- U~ L..N~CIJ _~C: 4.1 u_ '- .. 0 .... e.__ ......,.,.,_ ll:lO~::I ~Z=~~-~~z:l~c~~~~ 3~~i CUU'T]._lU. ..L..........O_QO'- ..U"" lIJ:o' 8..~ Z'5~~ ~ C1~ e::: ~ a N w~ ~~'C-; a:lOllS~CIJ N OCUa:lUClJCC_a:l~ _ II 0_<1.1 C:Z:-L.. V-C-OO lU"'C<J e...CO"'C..04.lCO _ gcn-c...- '" uc- G2+<'lUO~2~U~;L..4.I:~~€~~~a:l~ ~~c~iut~9~~-g~~~:;~~;~~~ ....CIJlCI -c::w..... U:I_Gccn C ..X-..... - c:~;~a..-t:ne~..L..~;~~8~~e...~u~~ _LLa:lCIJa:lIla..~<I.I4IO_ L-C4I......U +<'-- .c o..;3..c >-~ ......ca.J:: L.. 41 c...~4.J L..N...... g:>.... .~ CIJ u:l 'in ~ u "'2 ~ ~ ~ 8::oc.e.... ~ 4. 0:: ~ +<' ; U :lucc...c....L..a:loca lU" lIS_'1j..... COllS& ....5~o~~~c7C1J~u6~~~i<~~~~~ C~a:li~u:~~~C~=N=..c::2~"t:IouO"L.. :!!<II"O''''g..u ....NL- ".J::a:l"O'Glct)o L..e...uCU'l ~L..C~~U"U <au:l :>ce...C-'.~llJC_"" ~_=~uC5~5~~~~=~~~5~~~ ~ ~1lIC::llJ ~_O_~_~<I.I_cn....~_~:~i_ :>~= u~....~_u'-e~~ =_...0 __~ ~~_~~OG~U ~ e...___OU ~CIJ_= -0 ~ 0.. ~ .... 't ~ C ~~... "fi 0.. C 0 ~k: ~ 5.~ ~ &..c: ] c ~,~-= 8.~G U -g cn":C 8~ g~ <II ~=:::: = ~ ....o-w ~_U~~%=__ cu~.....o~_ u...rn "'O':>.e...a..c:-u a.0"'~'-C:>1lI'-..c..... IV CIV~e...a.. u_e..._~~uu~~~....y III Q~~;~S~~;~5oc::~~~~;~~o=c a.~ ~~::~ ~~':; c:a~ 8.5 e z t;'t ~8~~-g ~~UC:::I~~~_e...Ga_o..~w~a..=<~~ --La'-~C) ~iui~~~B ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ . '0 e _ v -5"'0 "E ~= 'l1 ~ "'O-,==~'J.l =....<II~ 0 ~...._.c... _._ L.. <13 .... 0:... U 0. .... E C::;:I >l: U_lV<nO Q.I'-~ '0 '-;:o~1J~ 38.u:lC~1O ... u:l L.. Q.I '"'2 0 ~.- '" a1~u~ <<I~""-ggg e...u rlI.....<I.I rA......::: ~~-I ==ga.~ <<lCUVa;l.. ..88.~::~ ~~lj"uu:i' L..!.G_.. ...c a.ca L..+<'..... ::::"'E~c8...~ O~'1j~~~ a:l cae...o _ .....c:: IJ oil lIf140 .c 8. '83:U->.....~ - III~ ]1Q~9:O-8~.e...~< ],::.~:<I.IO ....zo;:oi~ . " u '" ~ c ;; a. "8 o - c 'll "3 u c ~ . ~ w W ~ . " U 0> o o . . .c u - . '" C ~ i u . > . ~ . O>~ . . >. - c< . ~O> m_ . " ..c _u u. ,,~ ~ - .c. ~- . 0- ~ u W . - u " C o ~ w . '0 o z a. " " . u C . - . - . ~ . . o - u -~ o C" -< . 81' ~" -0 r::: ~ e - . o I > 0 _ tn'_... 01 .~ C lQ -0 '- ii..8'o; ......v......c::: III o +<' c: <1.1_ C +<'lOge..._l'CI oU2-a.2-~ e > <J 0 (5 0l1I Q.I ._.__ U ..._ <II ~._ =C>41C..c a;~:~~ ~ ca. c 0- U U = ::J '- e..._Qt C'l~ GO .....~o OC~<I.I ~c...~ GI 41q1 ~+<'L.. "3.8 c- !c_ ~ _ ra ~ III <IJ U ~ ~ L.. C c>w.-o::sc: _GL.___.....~ o.c~<<J~~ ...e... "CQI Gl o QI L......"'O'__ N.r::U- .......0 'E.~23"'EG~ llJu~'C~~g .c" . ll\u",o,....q1C1JV &:c~~-:.:L.. _::IU~ lC<<l _c_> L..!IlL-OC C .e ~ t; t,).... --g'- '-lVUC:CO<l.l ....::::lL.....QtJ .... eo..... c..c !CIlIll_ C 0 C) III ____ L-ca _L- a -.c- u ....._ (O-GC>- 41 ca." '-~.... ~s8."5~-~ ."....O_ClClJQ. lG_.c C'l~ 0 "C~3: ...e... Q.I :> GJ Q. ...._ iU ~~ IV uo-oc_>u ._ 0 L...... l..iJt(l_ .<Ul'CI ..... <U..o.... C <1.1 > lIS L.. 1CI1ll q1._ Q.t U 0-- r...e... a:.a:l....~Q.a.a. N ~ W " . - . I' " ~ . :> c '0 . "3 u C . . . - . . e - . ~ w W W c- W " . - " I' " ~ .c ~ 'll > - . W . - 0. ~ I' " 8. o . > . '0 0> C .8 - 'i " w o ~ ~ . " . - o . - . . . u - , o W . ~ u - o w . : ~ _c ~! ~ 0 N_ . -> -. ~'O . -'0 U . .~ u .....- -0 _ ~~ ~ . ~ ~~ .- . ~I' wO '" ~ 8: u C . 2 . u o ~ ~ -< .. c -0 .. I' . e " ~ W . -" . ~ - o >- ~ u "' u ~ i3 ~ l-lY I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 1: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Policy 1-2.1.5: High Density Residential Development (HDR). High density residential development ranges up to a maximum twelve (12) units per acre and generally averages ten (10) units per acre. The high density policy designation is intended to provide sufficient acreage for high density residential development which shall be adequately supported by public services and facilities, and maintain compatibility with the surrounding area. The specific areas designated for high density development shall be accessible to existing or anticipated future major thoroughfares and requisite utilities. In addition, these areas generally shall be highly acces- sible to commercial services. Specific density of future development proposals within these areas shall provide for smooth transition in residential density, preserve stability of established residential areas, and shall include sufficient open space, parking and landscaping to reinforce goals and objectives for quality living areas. Policy 1-2.1.6: Mobile Home Development. Mobile home residential development shall be permitted on sites appropriately zoned for mobile home development. The density of the mobile home parks or subdivisions shall be permitted up to a maximum of five (5) units per acre; however, specific site densities must be consistent with the policy, map and standards of the Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code. The more restrictive density provision shall rule where any inconsistency may exist. Review of specific densities shall be directed toward preserving the established residential development. Replacement of existing mobile homes in existing mobile home plats and sites of record, as of the effective date of this ordinance, shall be permitted and shall not be deemed inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Mobile homes shall be reviewed as reasonable development options but the applicant shall provide plans for mobile home development which assure that the development contains a significant open space buffer. Natural landscaping, including a landscaped berm where appropriate, upper story tree canopy and lower story shrubbery, and/or an aesthetic decorative wall or fence to effectively screen the mobile home development from adjacent residential development which exists or may potentially exist in the future. OBJECTIVE 1-2.2: ALLOCATING COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. The Future Land Use Map shall identify the allocation of commercial land for: 1) limited commercial development, including offices; 2) general commercial development, including offices; and 3) Riverfront mixed use. The allocation of land for commercial development shall be compatible with goals and objectives identified in the Comprehensive Plan and consistent with supportive research and analysis. The policies stated below provide an explanation of the purpose, intent and character of the commercial land use designations. POLICY 1-2.2.2: LIMITED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. Limited commercial development is allocated to commercial sites accessible to major thoroughfares near residential neighborhoods. The maximum intensity oflimited commercial development measured in floor-to-area ratios is 0.35 for sites 5 acres or less; 0.5 for sites over 5 to 20 acres; and 0.75 for sites more than 20 acres. Sites within this designation are intended to accommodate shops with limited inventory or goods as well as transient lodging facilities meeting performance standards of the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning code. This designation is intended to accommodate residential development only as a special use. Duly approved residential uses existing at the effective date of the Comprehensive Plan shall be deemed permitted uses. Limited Commercial activities shall include shops catering to the following markets: · Neighborhood residential markets within the immediate vicinity as opposed to county-wide or regional markets; or · Specialized markets with customized market demands. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121199 1-18 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 1: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Commercial development within the limited commercial district shall generally be restricted to any uses permitted in the commercial office district as well as the following uses: . Neighborhood convenience stores; . Small limited item shops and stores restricted to retail sales of convenience items and services including barber, beauty care, and other personal services; . Small scale drug stores, laundry and dry cleaning pick-up stations; . Specialty shops; and . Motels or other living accommodations for transient residents generally residing on a seasonal basis. Areas designated for limited commercial development are not intended to accommodate large scale retail sales, service, and trade activities, generally serving a county-wide or regional market. Such stores usually differ from limited commercial shops since the former usually require a larger floor area, carry a relatively larger inventory, and require a substantially greater parking area. Uses, which are not intended to be accommodated within the limited commercial area include the following: large scale discount stores, health spas; supermarkets; department stores; full service hardware stores; wholesale and warehousing activities; general appliance shops; printing shops; sales, service or repair of motor vehicles, machine equipment or accessory parts, including tire and battery shops; gas and automotive service centers; commercial amusements; fast food establishments primarily serving in disposable containers and/or providing drive-in facilities, and other similar services to be expressly defined in the zoning ordinance. Policy 1-2.2.3: General Commercial Development (CG). The general commercial (CG) areas are designated on the Future Land Use Map for purposes of accommodating general retail sales and services; highway oriented sales and services; and other general commercial activities defined in the land develop- ment regulations. The general commercial land use designation is intended to include the hub of retail sales and services within the downtown as well as within the outer environs of the downtown. General commercial designations also are located in highly accessible areas adjacent to major thoroughfares which possess necessary location, site, and market requirements. Zoning policy shall stipulate provisions regulating specific land uses. The maximum intensity of general commercial development measured in floor-to-area ratios is 0.35 for sites 5 acres or less; 0.5 for sites over 5 to 20 acres; and 0.75 for sites more than 20 acres. This area is not intended to accommodate manufacturing, processing, or assembly of goods, sales and service of heavy commercial vehicle and equipment, or related services or maintenance activities; warehousing; uses requiring extensive outside storage; or other activities which may generate nuisance impacts, including glare, smoke or other air pollutants, noise, vibration or major fire hazards, or other impacts generally associated with more intensive industrial uses. The areas designated for general.commercial development are specifically not adaptive to permanent residential housing and such uses shall be located in other areas designated for residential development. On the other hand, transient residential facilities including hotels and motels, or residential complexes, or other transient quarters should be located in areas designated for general commercial use. Policy 1-2.2.4: C.R 512 Commercial (C-512). The general commercial C.R. 512 corridor is designated on the Future Land Use Map for purposes of accommodating retail sales and services and other commercial activities and community facilities defined in the land development regulations which are compatible with nearby residential areas. This land use designation expressly excludes vehicular sales and Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 0912l/99 1-19 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 1: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT services; bars and lounges; parking garages; enclosed and unenclosed commercial amusements; indoor theaters; merchandising of second-hand goods, including flea markets, wholesale trades and services; industrial uses or outside storage activities, or any other activities which may generate nuisance impacts such as glare, smoke, other air pollutants, noise, vibration, fire hazard, or other adverse impacts associated with more intense commercial and industrial activities. Land development regulations shall stipulate provisions regulating specific land uses. The maximum intensity of commercial development measured in floor-to-area ratios is 0.35 for sites 5 acres or less; 0.5 for sites over 5 to 20 acres; and 0.75 for sites more than 20 acres. Policy 1-2.2.5: Riverfront Mixed Use (RMU). The Riverfront Mixed Use designation is intended to provide a mixture of residential, commercial, recreational, and institutional uses in the Riverfront District. The City anticipates by 2020, the mix of uses in RMU shall be residential uses: 25%; institutional/recreational uses: 20%; and commercial uses: 55%. The allowable residential uses are single family, duplexes, multiple-family up to eight (8) units per acre, and commercial resort residential uses. Model homes and home occupations should be allowed as conditional uses. Institutional uses are child care services and facilities, marine related educational institutions, cultural or civic activities, public protective and emergency services, places or worship, public or not-for-profit administrative services, public and private utilities, public parks and recreation. Nursing homes such as rest/convalescent homes should be permitted as a conditional use outside of the flood zone. Commercial uses include business and professional offices, medical services, wet or dry storage of boats, boat sales and rentals, marine power sales, marine fuel sales, bait and tackle shops, restaurants (excluding drive-ins and fast food services), fish markets, rnsrine related specialty retail sales and service, marine accessory uses, farmer's markets, yacht clubs, bars and lounges, waterfront general commercial activities, indoor theaters and other enclosed commercial amusements, plant nurseries, hotels, motels, transient quarters, and parking lots without a building on the lot. Drive-ins and fast food services, vehicular service and maintenance, retail gasoline sales, veterinary services, funeral homes, drive-through facilities and general retail sales and services should be allowed as conditional uses. These uses would be required to be located on a parcel adjacent to US1. Parking garages would be allowed as a conditional use west of US 1. The maximum intensity for commercial development and institutional/recreational uses shall be measured in floor-to-area ratios: as follows: 0.35 for sites 5 acres or less; 0.5 for sites over 5 to 20 acres; and 0.75 for sites more than 20 acres. OBJECTIVE 1-2.3: ALLOCATING INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT (IND). The Future Land Use Map shall allocate land resources for existing and anticipated future industrial needs and requisite support services. Policy 1-2.3.1: Industrial Land Use Designation. The allocation of land use designations should provide a high priority to industry's frequent need for strategically located lands which are accessible to air, rail and highway transport facilities,. as well as labor markets and necessary urban services. The industrial (lND) designation is intended to provide strategically located sites principally within the airport environs. The City shall work with industrial interest groups to pursue selective industrial expansion policy set forth herein in Policy 1-1.3.3. The maximum intensity of industrial development measured in floor-ta-area ratios is 0.50 for sites 20 acres or less; and 0.75 for sites more than 20 acres. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 1-20 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 1: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Industrially designated areas are not adaptive to residential use and as such industrial activities shall not be located in areas designated for residential development. This provision shall not prohibit residences for night watchmen or custodians whose presence on industrial sites is necessary for security purposes. Such a use may be permitted as a conditional use through appropriate zoning procedures. The industrial land use designation shall be allocated to industrial sites accessible to airport facilities, rail facilities, and/or major thoroughfares. The sites shall be buffered from residential neighborhoods. Industrial uses include: manufacturing, assembling and distribution activities; warehousing and storage activities; general commercial activities; and other similar land uses which shall be regulated through appropriate zoning procedures. Heavy metal fabrication, batch plants, salvage yards, chemical or petroleum manufacturing or refining, rubber or plastics manufacturing, or other use generating potentially harmful environmental or nuisance impacts shall be prohibited. These uses typically generate heavy truck traffic, require significant acreage, are difficult to screen and buffer from residential areas, and therefore, should be located in more sparsely developed unincorporated areas. Based on the extensive impacts which industrial development frequently generates, industrial development requiring future plan amendment or rezoning shall be encouraged to develop under provisions of a planned unit development petition in order to allow maximum flexibility in design to the applicant and to avoid any major adverse impacts which may not be anticipated during a less in-depth plan review. The zoning code performance standards for regulating the nuisance impacts sometimes associated with intense commercial and industrial development shall be enforced to promote nuisance abatement. OBJECTIVE 1-2.4: MANAGING AIRPORT LANDS. The Future Land Use Map shall incorporate land use management policies which: a. Foster use of Sebastian Municipal Airpcrt lands io a manner which contributes to the development of the City's economic base through selective pursuit ofiodustry consistent with Policy 1-1.3.3 of this Chapter. b. Assure safe operation of aircraft through: . Efficient use of air space io relation to the Municipal Airport and surrounding airports and airways. . Maiotenance and improvement of the aircraft operational ground environment. . Developing a design plan at the Municipal Airport which will accommodate operationally compatible aircraft. c. Achieve Municipal Airport and iodustrial development which is compatible with the adopted City of Sebastian Municipal Airport Master Plan and mutual environmental constraiots through: . Proper on- and off-Municipal Airpcrt land use which protects the operationally sensitive areas and reduces noise impact near the airport. . Preserving the ecologically unique areas on the property. . Encouraging aviation activity compatible with community needs and characteristics. d. Promote contioued financial iodependence of the Sebastian Municipal Airpcrt through: . Prepariog periodic updates to the Municipal Airport development plan io order to maximize land resources withio the constraints imposed by changing conditions; markets for land, goods and services; as well as constraiots imposed by other goals, objectives and policies of the City. . Development of a long-range capital improvements program consistent with financial capacity. . Development of an operations and maiotenance program compatible with financial resources. Policy 1-2.4.1: Airport Land Use Designation. The Airport (A) land use designation is intended to accommodate lands comprising the Sebastian Municipal Airport. The Airport (A) land use designation is intended to accommodate airport terminal, fixed base operators, airport hangars, landing, take-off or surface maneuvering of aircraft, including, but not limited to, requisite airport infrastructure such as Comprehensive Plan Goals. Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 1-21 . . . . . . . . ,. . . . . . . . . . . CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 1: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT runways, taxiways, ramps and aprons. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Regulations shall govern placement and specifications of structures within this area. The land development regulations shall establish the permitted uses and applicable restrictions within the air operations area. The maximum intensity of airport activity measured in floor-to-area ratio is 0.50 FAR. The intensity of airport related commercial or industrial activities shall be measured as other similar commercial or industrial uses, respectively. OBJECTIVE 1-2.5: ALLOCATING INSTITUTIONAL SERVICES (INST). The Future Land Use Map shall allocate land resources for institutional facilities and services as specified in the policies stipulated below. The sites shall be compatible with adjacent land uses to the greatest practical extent. The sites shall also fulfill the unique site location requirements included in respective functional plans and shall be responsive to the needs identified in related demographic and supportive needs analysis. Policy 1-2.5.1: Institutional Land Use Designation (INST). The institutional (INST) land use designation is intended to accommodate existing public and semi-public services including: governmental administration buildings; public schools and not-for-profit educational institutions; hospital facilities and' supportive health care units; arts and cultural or civic facilities; essential public services and facilities; cemeteries; fire and emergency operation facilities; public and private parks and recreation areas; utilities; extensive open areas comprising major committed public and semi-public open spaces, including the Municipal Golf Course; and other similar activities as shall be identified in the land development regulations. Lands designated for institutional services shall contain sufficient acreage and open space and be properly screened and buffered in order to minimize potential adverse impacts on adjacent land uses. The maximum intensity of institutional activity measured in floor-to-area ratio is 0.3 5 FAR. The City shall monitor the need for increased land area for institutional uses and shall assure that the institutional land use designation on the Future Land Use Map is expanded to accommodate the development of public and semi-public facilities such as governmental administration buildings; fire, police and rescue services; educational institutions and similar public uses. Land uses such as places of worship, cultural or civic centers, and other similar public or private not-for- profit uses may be included within this land use designation or within other land use designations as provided for in the zoning regulations. OBJECTIVE 1-2.6: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. The City shall promote innovative development concepts and shall maintain, and improve as necessary, procedures for resolving conflict through use of the planned unit development. Policy 1-2.6.1: Planned Unit Development Overlay Designation. The City hereby establishes a planned unit development overlay designation in order to provide a voluntary management framework for coordinating objectives of developers with those of the City Council. The planned unit development overlay designation shall provide a management strategy for negotiating innovative development concepts, design amenities, and measures intended to encourage unique planning concepts not attainable with certainty under conventional zoning or to protect natural features of the land. The management process shall promote public and private coordination and cooperation. The detailed regulations, standards, and procedures for implementing the planned unit development overlay designation shall be incorporated in the land development code. These provisions shall address issues surrounding due process and equitable procedures for revocation of approved planned unit developments in cases where the applicant fails to commence performance pursuant to the conditions set forth in the approved planned unit development. Comprehensive Plan Goals. Objectives and Policies 09121/99 1-22 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 1: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT The City Council shall reserve the authority to invoke new conditions in extending development rights based on: . Changes in conditions surrounding the impacted land use conditions in the vicinity; . Evolving issues surrounding infrastructure levels of service; . Impacts on natural resources; and/or . Other related issues impacting the nature of the proposed planned unit development. The planned unit development overlay designation shall be available as a voluntary approach for managing specific development characteristics and project amenities to be incorporated in residential, commercial, industrial or mixed use development options. Developers who voluntarily participate in the process shall bind themselves as well as those who may be their successors in title to the subject land. OBJECTIVE 1-2.7: MANAGING CONSERVATION RESOURCES. The Future Land Use Map shall identifY lands that are environmentally fragile natural resources for long term preservation by designating them as "Conservation." Environmentally fragile natural resources shall be referred to as conservation resources, which are defined in S9J-5.003(30), FAC. The protection and preservation of conservation resources shall be achieved through the implementation of the following policies: Policy 1-2.7.1: Conservation Designation (CON). The Future Land Use Map (FLUM) shall designate lands that are conservation resources as "Conservation." It is the intent of the "Conservation" land use designation to provide for the long term protection and preservation of environmentally sensitive natural resource systems. If it is impractical to designate the area containing conservation resources as Conservation due to size, location, or other factors, the City shall have the option of obtaining a conservation easement from the property owner(s) to protection the area. Areas covered by a conservation easement shall be treated the same as areas designated as Conservation on the FLUM. No development is permitted within "Conservation" designated areas, except where State and/or federal agencies having jurisdiction allowing development rights. The applicant shall bear the burden of proof in determining that development shall not adversely impact conservation resources. Site alteration, where allowed, shall be limited to ten (10) percent of the entire site. OBJECTIVE 1-2.8 ANNEXATION STUDY. The City of Sebastian acknowledges a need to prevent urban sprawl and disjointed urban service delivery systems. In addition, the City desires to develop a plan for managing annexation of unincorporated enclaves as well as fringe areas adjacent to the City, especially potential industrial expansion areas adjacent to planned industrial centers within the incorporated area. Therefore, by December 31, 2000 the City of Sebastian shall prepare an annexation study which analyzes development potential within the City of Sebastian urban area, including the unincorporated enclaves and the unincorporated urbanizing fringe. The study shall document issues surrounding potential development within the unincorporated urban area. Policy 1-2.8.1 Parameter of the Annexation Study. The City of Sebastian annexation study shall include: 1. Review and evaluation of Indian River County land development forecasts within the unincorporated urban area together with supportive documentation. 2. Analysis of unincorporated enclaves and subareas within the unincorporated urban area, including: . Population and housing . Traffic circulation system . Water and wastewater service . Drainage and natural water basins . Natural features restricting development Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121/99 1-23 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 1: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT 3. Protect urban population and employment trends and estimate land area required to accommodate projected residential and nonresidential activities. 4. Analyze infrastrncture issues, including improvement needs based on development forecasts. 5. Determine subareas and unincorporated enclaves which shall logically be serviced by the City of Sebastian. Identify relative advantages and disadvantages. 6. Recommend a strategy for planning and managing development within the unincorporated urban area, including annexation alternatives. The recommendations shall include but not be limited to: . Procedures for intergovernmental coordination of land use policy governing development within unincorporated urban areas (including isolated enclaves) which are logical targets for incorporation into the City of Sebastian; and . Policies and or actions for developing efficient systems for: I) delivering municipal services; 2) achieving diversification of the municipal tax base. ~1-3 LAND USE ELEMENT IMPLEMENTATION. GOAL 1-3: IMPLEMENTING LAND USE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES. CONTINUE TO MONITOR AND EVALUATE DEVELOPMENT AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION WITHIN THE CITY PURSUANT TO GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND CARRY OUT AN EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM AS HEREIN ESTABLISHED. OBJECTIVE 1-3.1: CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT. By December 31, 1998, the City shall have adopted a concurrency management program pursuant to Ch. 163, F.S., and g9J-5, F.A.C. Beginning January 1, 1998, the City of Sebastian shall issue no development order or permit for development unless the applicant provides narrative and graphic information demonstrating to the satisfaction of the City that public facilities required by the subject development shall be in place concurrent with the impacts of development. Furthermore, the applicant shall assure that the facilities operate at or above adopted levels of service standards. The applicant's narrative and graphic information shall also demonstrate that the subject development shall not reduce the levels of service (LOS) associated with public facilities serving the development below adopted LOS standards. Policy 1-3.1.1: Resolving Concurrency Issues. In order to implement the above measure, the City shall require that all developments requiring a development permit (as defined in g163.3l64 F.S., including comprehensive plan amendments) shall, at the time the subject permit application is filed, submit information which demonstrates that all urban services needed by the proposed development can and will be provided concurrent with the new development. In order to establish an orderly review process, the City shall refine the Land Development Code by stipulating specific narrative and/or graphic data and information required at the time a comprehensive plan amendment or zoning code amendment is filed with the City. As a minimum, the information shall include the following: · The specific land users) and the proposed density and/or intensity of the users); · Estimated trips per day generated by the proposed land users) together with anticipated on- and off-site improvements necessitated to accommodate the traffic impacts generated by the development including, additional R1W, roadway improvements, additional paved laneage, traffic signalization, proposed methods for controlling access and egress, and other similar improvements; · Planned improvements in potable water and/or wastewater systems required to establish and/or maintain adopted water and wastewater levels of service. System improvements and proposed funding resources required for implementing any improvements required to establish and/or maintain adopted potable water and wastewater system level of service standards. Comprehensive Plan Goals. Objectives and Policies 09121199 1-24 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 1: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT . Conceptual plan for accommodating stormwater run-off and demonstrated evidence that the proposed drainage improvements shall accommodate stormwater nm-off without adversely impacting natural systems or the City's adopted level of service for stann drainage; . In cases where residential development is proposed, information shall be submitted descnlJing plans for accommodating recreational demands generated by the development, including demonstrated evidence that the City's adopted level of service for recreation shall not be adversely impacted; . Projected demand generated by the development on the solid waste disposal system and assurances that the City's adopted level of service for solid waste disposal shall not be adversely impacted; . Other information which the City detennines is necessary to assure that the concurrency requirement shall be satisfied without adversely impacting existing levels of service or the City's ability to adequately service anticipated developments which are consistent with adopted plans and policies of the City. All such information submitted pursuant to this 'subsection shall incorporate proposed funding sources, including any identification of improvements which the applicant anticipates shall be funded by the City or other public or private entity other than the applicant. Policy 1-3.1.2 Concurrency Management Monitoring and Evaluation System. The City shall incorporate a monitoring and evaluation system in the adopted land development regulations in order to ensure that the City maintains a continuing record of available capacity provided by infrastructure systems, including roadways, water and sewerage systems, drainage systems, solid waste system, and recreation and open space systems. The City's monitoring and evaluation system shall include a record of current estimates for demand on the designed capacity of each system. In addition, the City shall include a record of committed developments together with the projected increment of demand placed on each infrastructure component. This concurrency management tracking system shall provide a balance sheet noting current supplies capacity available to service future development and redevelopment. OBJECTIVE 1-3.2: MANAGE AND COORDINATE FUTURE LAND USE DECISIONS. Beginning in January 1998, the City of Sebastian shall maintain land development regulations, including performance standards which ensure that land development activities, resource conservation, and infrastructure issues are managed in a manner that includes timely coordination with County, regional, and State agencies having jurisdictional authority. Management of land and physical improvements iden- tified on the Future Land Use Map will be regulated (especially lands identified in the land use element analysis of vacant lands) in order to protect and/or conserve natural systems, including topography, soil conditions, vegetation, natural habitat, public potable water wellfields, and other environmentally sensitive land and water resources. Land use shall also be predicated on availability of man-made infrastructure and service systems required to support respective land use activities. Policy 1-3.2.1: Future Land Use Map and Related Policies. The Future Land Use Map and related policies identified in section 1-2 "Future Land Use Map," provide definitions ofland use designations and qualitative standards which shall be applied in allocating future land uses. Policy 1-3.2.2: Land Development Regulations. The City's existing land development code governing zoning; subdivision; signage; landscaping and tree protection; and surface water management shall be revised as needed in order to: 1) effectively regulate future land use activities and natural resources iden- tified on the Future Land Use Map; 2) adequately protect property rights; and 3) implement the goals, objectives, and policies stipulated in the Comprehensive Plan. The land development regulations shall continue to be applied to: a. Regulate the subdivision of land; Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21199 1-25 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER I: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT b. Regulate the uses on land and in water consistent with this Element, ensure the compatibility of adjacent land uses, and provide for open space; c. Protect the environmentally sensitive lands designated in the Comprehensive Plan, especially wetlands which shall be identified based on presence of hydric soils including but not limited to: Chobee loamy fine sand, Pineda fine sand, Floridana sand, Malabar fine sand, Myakka fine sand depressional, Holopaw fine sand, Pompano fine sand, and Riviera fine sand. In addition, wetlands may be identified by wetland vegetative species as presented in Rule 17-4.022, FAC, or as may hereafter be amended. d. Regulate areas subject to seasonal and periodic flooding and provide for drainage and stormwater management; e. Protect potable water wellfields and aquifer recharge functions and areas; f. Regulate signage; g. Ensure safe and convenient on-site and off-site traffic flow and vehicle parking needs and plan for dedication, acqnisition and development of future rights-of-way as identified in the programmed engineered master plan for the City's Major Thoroughfare. h. Provide that development orders and pennits shall not be issued which result in a reduction of levels of services for impacted public facilities below the levels of service standards which shall be adopted by the City Council. Policy 1-3.2.3: Standards for Residential Density. Existing land development regulations shall be applied for purposes of implementing this Comprehensive Plan. Residential development standards shall be based on and be consistent with the following standards for residential densities as indicated below and as elaborated in gl-2, Policies 1-2.1.1 through 1-2.1.6, herein: RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS . Low Densitv Residential (LDR) . Mobile Home Development (MH) . Medium Densitv Residential (MDR) and Riverfront Mixed Use . High Density Residential (HDR) GROSS DENSITY UP to 5 units/acre up to 5 units/acre up to 8 units/acre up to 12 units/acre Policy 1-3.2.4: Non-Residential Development Standards. Land development regulations addressing the location and extent of non-residential land uses shall continue to be enforced in a manner with the Future Land Use Map and the policies and descriptions of types, sizes, and intensities of land uses con- tained in this Element. Policy 1-3.2.5: Performance Standards. The following performance standards incorporated in the land development code shall be updated and refined as needed to reflect best management principles and practices. Plan review functions shall be carried out by the Department of Growth Mimagement and the City Engineer, using as needed other professionals with demonstrated expertise in the issue under review. a. Provide criteria for protecting wetlands; b. Establish open space requirements; c. Provide criteria for protection of potable water wellfields d. Provide criteria for drainage and stormwater management; e. Incorporate criteria for requiring off-street parking and managing internal traffic circulation as well as access to and egress from the street system; f. Mandate availability of requisite services and infrastructure; g. Stipulate criteria for perimeter screening and buffering land uses and facilities which may otherwise adversely impact development of adjacent land use; h. Establish standards for erosion and sedimentation control; i. Address historically sigoificant properties meriting protection. j. Require an assessment of the environmental impact of development during major site plan review and stipulate appropriate petformance criteria in the Land Development Code. OBJECTIVE 1-3.3: ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND RENEWAL. The portion of the City along the Indian River has a unique history, style, and look which the City seeks to preserve. By January, 1998, the City of Sebastian shall adopt amended land development regulations for the Riverfront area, including performance standards which ensure that land development activities, resource Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09n1/99 1-26 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 :1 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 1: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT conservation and infrastructure issues are managed in a manner that will consider the needs of all the citizens of Sebastian -- youth, seniors, residents, businessmen, sportsmen, etc.; develop a mixture of uses and a variety of opportunities for recreational, residential and commercial uses; encourage progress while protecting property rights; protect the environment while fostering compatible uses. The City shall maximize the use of what already exists by protecting, restoring and enhancing the existing assets, including historical structures, found in the Riverfront area. It is the intention of the City to preserve those things that brought our citizens to Sebastian. The City will preserve Riverfront access. River and ocean access is a treasure to be enjoyed by all of the citizens of Sebastian. Policy 1-3.3.1: Code Enforcement Activities. Code enforcement activities shall be continued as an integral part of the City's regulation programs. The code enforcement program shall preserve and protect structurally sound land improvements and land uses consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Policy 1-3.3.2: Public and Private Sector Partnerships. , The City shall coordinate redevelopment issues with the private sector in promoting mobilization of public and private resources necessary to effectively carry out redevelopment efforts, especially along the Indian River Drive corridor which borders the Indian River Lagoon. (Cross-reference Policy 1-1.2.4), Policy 1-3.3.3: Riverfront District. The Riverfront District is described as that part of the City of Sebastian located from the Florida East Coast Railroad east to and including the Indian River Lagoon north of the city limits general located at the south section line of section 6, township 31S, range 39E. Policy 1-3.3.4: Waterfront Theme. The overall theme of the Riverfront District is an "Old Florida Fishing Village," All City facilities and projects shall compliment that theme in term of design. The City shall develop by January, 1999, procedures and ordinances, including architectural standards, urban design standards, sign regulations and landscape requirements, to implement the theme through the Land Development Code in all development activities. Policy 1-3.3.5: Preserving Riverfront Access. River and ocean access is a treasure to be enjoyed by all of the citizens of Sebastian. Access can be provided directly through boat ramps, docks and piers. Access can also be provided visually through walkways, control of exotic vegetation, open space, scenic easements, and breezeways. The City shall develop by January, 1998, procedures and ordinances to protect and provide for access to the Riverfront District through the Land Development Code. The City by January, 1999, shall develop programs and identify funding sources to acquire access to the Riverfront District. Policy 1-3.3.6: Preservation of Existing Assets. The protection, restoration, and enhancement of existing assets, including historical structures, is important in implementing the "Old Florida Fishing Village" theme. The City shall develop by January, 1998, procedures and ordinances to protect, encourage restoration and to provide for enhancement of existing assets in the Riverfront District through the Land Development Code. The City by January, 1999, shall develop programs and identify funding sources to protect, restore and enhance the historical structures in the Riverfront District. Policy 1-3.3.7: Reinforce and Enhance Appearance of City Gateways along the US 1 and CR 512 Corridors. The City together with the private sector shall consider introducing landscaping and urban design amenities along gateways to the City particularly the US 1 and CR 512 corridors. Such enhancement shall include application of community appearance criteria which reinforces good principles of design as well as preserving unique characteristics and open space for scenic vistas. The gateway improvements shall also address the implementation of uniform streetscape amenities, enhanced signage and intersection improvements. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 0912l/99 1-27 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 1: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OBJECTIVE 1-3.4: PREVENT LAND USE INCONSISTENT WITH CITY'S CHARACTER OR INTERAGENCY HAZARD MITIGATION REPORTS AND COORDINATE COASTAL AREA POPULATION DENSITIES WITH HURRICANE EVACUATION PLANS. Beginning in January 1998, the City of Sebastian shall maintain land development regulations which ensure that future land uses shall be compatible with the Future Land Use Map, and other applicable laws, ordinances, and administrative rules regulating land and water resource management. Similarly, if improvements are proposed to an existing structure which do not conform or comply with regulations governing use, setbacks, size, dimensions, height, density, or other location criteria, then: 1) in no case shall any existing non-conforming or non-complying structures be increased; and 2) any existing non-complying structures shall be eliminated or reduced to the greatest reasonable and practical extent. The amended land development regulations shall include administrative procedures which ensure that any development order approved by the City impacting population density within the coastal area is coordinated with the Indian River County Hurricane Evacuation Plan and applicable regional or State hurricane evacuation plans. Additionally, the City shall eliminate uses that are inconsistent with any interagency hazard mitigation report deemed appropriate by the City. This objective shall be measured through implementation of the following policies. Policy 1-3.4.1: Managing Future Land Use. The Future Land Use Map and related policies together with the Land Development Code (which shall be updated and adopted by September 1990) shall be applied as a planning and management tool in order to prevent development of land uses which do not conform to the City's character as reflected in the City's adopted Future Land Use Map. Policy 1-3.4.2: Managing Improvements to Existing Non-Complying Structures and Non- Conforming Uses. The Land Development Code standards regulating improvements to existing non- complying structures as well as changes to non-conforming uses shall continue to be applied. Such standards shall continue to require that plans for alterations to non-complying uses incorporate improve- ments to bring the subject structure into compliance to the greatest reasonable and practical extent. In no case shall any existing non-compliance be increased. Similarly, no non-conforming use may be enlarged without reducing the extent of the non-conformity. Policy 1-3.4.3: Interagency Hazard Mitigation Reports. Interagency hazard mitigation report shall mean the recommendations of a team of federal, state, regional, or local officials which address measures to reduce the potential for future flood losses and which is prepared in response to a Presidential Disaster Declaration. Policy 1-3.4.4: Coordinate Hazard Mitigation Reports with Development and Redevelopment. In the event that Sebastian is included in a Presidential Disaster Declaration, the City shall use the interagency hazard mitigation report as the basis for prohibiting redevelopment of uses which are inconsistent with the report recommendations. Additionally, the City shall use the interagency hazard mitigation report to prevent new uses which are inconsistent . with the report recommendations from locating in the area included in the Presidential Disaster Declaration. Finally, should an interagency hazard mitigation report be issued for Sebastian, the City shall consider adopting a program for eliminating existing uses which are inconsistent with the report recommendations. OBJECTIVE 1-3.5: PROTECTION OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND mSTORIC RESOURCES. Beginning in January, 1998, any development which impacts a historic or archaeological site or structure identified in the adopted Comprehensive Plan shall be required to submit a site plan which illustrates how the applicant will mitigate the adverse impacts. As a minimum, the site plan shall identify precautions to be taken to prevent the following adverse impacts: Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121199 1-28 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 1: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT . Destruction or a1terntion of all or ~ of such site; . Isolation from, or alteration of the '5\mounding environment; . Introduction of visual, audible, or atmospheric elements that are out of character with a property or alter its setting; . Vegetation removal shall not be permitted on a historic or archaeological site unless the vegetation to be removed is a part of a dilly authorized scientific excavation, or is a part of an approved development plan; . Transfer or sale of the site of significance without adequate conditions or restrictions regarding preservation, maintenance, use or re-use; and . Other forms of neglect resulting in'resource deterioration. Policy 1-3.5.1: Programming'for Archaeological and Historic Sites. The City shall coordinate with the State in developing programs for implementing City and State policies for identifYing, preserving, and enhancing sites of historical, and archaeological significance. Programs for identification, evaluation of relative significance, protection, preservation, and enhancement shall be promoted, utilizing available public resources at the local, State, and Federal level as well as available private sector resources. Policy 1-3.5.2: Preventing Adverse Impact of Development on Historic or Archaeological Sites. Development activities shall include precautions necessary to prevent the following adverse impacts to historic or archaeological sites. of significance: I) destruction or alteration of all or part of such site; 2) isolation from or significant alteration to its surrounding environment; 3) introduction of visible, audible, or atmospheric elements that are out of character with the property or significantly alter its setting; 4) transfer or sale of a site of significance without adequate conditions or restrictions regarding preservation, maintenance, or use; and 5) other forms of neglect resulting in its deterioration. OBJECTIVE 1-3.6: PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES. Beginning in January 1998, the City shall maintain land development regulations which ensure. that development and conservation activities shall protect natural resources as directed by the below stated policies. Policy 1-3.6.1: Future Land Use Policies for Managing Environmentally Sensitive Lands. Policies in the Conservation Element for managing environmentally sensitive natural systems, including, but not . limited to, the Indian River Lagoon, the Sebastian River, Schumann Lake, Lake Hardee, Collier Creek, the Elkcam Waterway, and other environmentally sensitive resources shall be carried out through performance standards in the l~nd development regulations. These and other natural resources identified on the Future Land Use Map series shall be protected and/or preserved pursuant to goals, objectives, and policies stipulated in the Conseryation Element. In addition, land development regulations provide more detailed procedures and performance criteria to implement conservation and natural resource protection. . These land development regulations shall also provide for wetland preservation consistent with the requirements and regulation& of the St. Johns River Water Management District, FDEP, and the Corps of Engineers. Policy 1-3.6.2: Intergovernme.ntal Coordination and Natural Resource Management. The City shall coordinate with the State, the SI. Johns River Water Management District, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, Indian River County, state agencies, and other agencies concerned with managing natural resources. Such intergovernmental coordinating activities shall be directed toward protecting the values and functions of respective natural systems. Policy 1-3.6.3: Protect Habitats of Flora and Fauna Having Special Status. The habitat of rare, endangered, and threatened species of flora and fauna and others having special status as identified in the Conservation Element shall be protected. . " Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/2 1199 . . 1-29 . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 1: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Policy 1-3.6.4: Managing Stormwater Run-ofT. The developer/owner of any site shall be responsible for managing on-site run-ofT. Policy 1-3.6.5: Conservation of Potable Water Supply. The potable water supply shall be conserved by enforcing conservation standards to be developed as part of the Land Development Code. OBJECTIVE 1-3.7: PREVENT PROLIFERATION OF URBAN SPRAWL AND DEVELOP EFFICIENT SYSTEMS FOR COORDINATING THE TIMING AND STAGING OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT. By December 31, 1998, the City shall have adopted land development regulations which include performance standards ensuring that the location, scale, timing, and design of development shall be coordinated with public facilities and services in order to prevent the proliferation of urban sprawl and achieve cost effective land development patterns. Performance standards consistent with those listed below shall also be adopted by December 31, 1998, which shall direct future development only to those areas where provision of public facilities necessary to meet levels of service standards are available concurrent with the impacts of the development. . No premature or poorly planned conversion of rural land to other uses; . No areas of urban development or uses which are not fimctiona1Iy related to land uses which predominate the adjacent area; . No areas of urban development or uses which fail to maximize the use of existing public facilities; . No areas of urban development or uses which fail to use areas within which public services are currently provided; . No leapfrog/scattered development or ribbon /strip commercial development patterns; and . Consistent with criteria in Rule 9J-5.006(5). Policy 1-3.7.1: Development Orders and Permitting Process. Development orders and permits for all future development shall be timed and staged to assure that requisite infrastructure and services are available to respective developments concurrent with the impacts of the development. Policy 1-3.7.2: Design of Public Facilities and Utilities. Public facilities and utilities shall be located and designed to: I) maximize the efficiency of services provided; 2) minimize related costs; and 3) minimize adverse impacts on natural systems. Policy 1-3.7.3: Developments Not Served by Public Water and/or Wastewater Systems. All developments in areas not serviced by public water and/or wastewater systems shall be governed by applicable State laws and administrative regulations. Policy 1-3.7.4: Accommodating Requisite Infrastructure. During the subdivision review, site plan review, and permitting processes the City shall insure that respective future developments allocate sufficient land area for infrastructure required to support proposed development. OBJECTIVE 1-3.8: CONSIDER APPLICATION OF INNOVATIVE LAND AND WATER RESOURCE lVIANAGEMENT AND ENERGY CONSERVATION CONCEPTS. Beginning in January 1998, the City of Sebastian shall maintain land development regulations which incorporate concepts for managing land and water resources which are responsive to unique development and conservation issues identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Policy 1-3.8.1: Incorporate Innovative Techniques in the Land Development Regulations. The City's amended land development regulations which shall be adopted by September 1990, shall incorporate land and water resource management techniques which have been demonstrated to be successful and cost effective in resolving development and conservation issues such as surface water Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 1-30 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 1: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT management, soil erosion and sedimentation controL land clearing and excessive tree removal, loss of mature plants and wildlife habitat, and conservation of water supply. Policy 1-3.8.2: Use of Energy. Site planning standards shall be adopted which require and/or provide incentives to developers to incorporate energy conservation measures in site layout and design. Promote practices that ensure that each form of energy is used to do work for which it is best suited. Recognize the energy services provided by natural features of the environment including landscape, sun and wind, and promote site development and resource management that complements or substitutes for energy-intensive technologies. Policy 1-3.8.3: Energy Efficient Land Development. Amended land development regulations shall promote energy efficient land development. Recognize the relative energy dependency of commercial and industrial land uses and consider energy dependency in any policy pertaining to new industry promotion strategies or policy concerning maintenance or expansion of existing industry or commerce. Encourage land use patterns that by location, scale, and design minimize long-term energy commitments to construction, operation, maintenance, and replacement. Encourage natural resource conservation and utilization in ways that are consistent with sound energy management principles. Policy 1-3.8.4: Coordination of Energy Management. The City shall participate in regional, State, or local initiatives directed at coordinating energy management within the public and private sectors. These tasks may include joint formulation of energy related decisions with concerned federal, state, regional, and County agencies as well as with concerned private entities. Such activities shall be directed toward maximizing awareness of energy related problems, issues, alternative techniques for resolving energy related problems and issues, and to identify future areas where joint efforts may enhance mutual goals and objectives. Policy 1-3.8.5: Energy Efficiency in Plans. The City shall promote a systematic approach to the development of pedestrian and bicycle path networks by the public and private sectors in order to improve energy efficient transportation links between maj or activity areas such as residential neighborhoods, employment centers, shopping areas, parks, and schools. Policy 1-3.8.6: Energy Efficient Design. The City's land development code shall include criteria which requires and/or provides incentives for design techniques which reduce demand for artificial heating, cooling, ventilation and lighting. Design factors may include building design, siting and orientation that effectively utilizes natural solar resources, wind conditions, tree canopy, and plant material to reduce the effects of exposure to extreme weather conditions. Energy efficient construction shall be promoted through enforcement of the building and energy codes, through application of new and proven energy- efficient technology and through cooperative efforts with building trades, design professionals, building officials, and county, regional and state agencies concerned with energy conservation. Policy 1-3.8.7: Energy Conservation in Building and Construction. The City shall enforce energy efficient building codes and promote efficient energy conservation in building heating and cooling systems. The City shall promote attendance at regional training workshops in energy efficiency in construction and continue to foster cooperative relationships between building trades, architects, engineers and building officials. OBJECTIVE 1-3.9: INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION. Beginning in January 1998, the City shall maintain land development regulations incorporating administrative procedures to ensure efficient coordination of land and water management issues surrounding proposed development are carried out in a timely manner with all public entities having jurisdictional authority. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 1-31 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 1: FUTIffiE LAND USE ELEMENT Policy 1-3.9.1: Implementing Intergovernmental Coordination. The City shall require that development applications be coordinated, as appropriate, with Indian River County, the Indian River County School Board, other special districts, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC), the St. Johns River Water Management District, as well as applicable State and Federal agencies prior to issuance of a development order or permit. The City shall coordinate with the TCRPC in meeting regional policies contained in the Regional Comprehensive Policies Plan. OBJECTIVE 1-3.10: CONTINUING LAND USE PROGRAMS. The City shall implement land use goals and objectives by carrying out a continuing program ofland use activities below cited. Policy 1-3.10.1: Land Use Information System. Establish, maintain, and periodically update the land use information system, integration of the Tax Appraiser property files, City Planning Department field data, Building and Zoning Department permit files, engineering base maps, and all other relevant land use data fil es. Policy 1-3.10.2: Land Use Trends. Monitor and evaluate population and land use trends. Policy 1-3.10.3: Fiscal Management. Implement fiscal management policies of the capital improvement program and budget. Policy 1-3.10.4: Administer Land Use Controls. Administer adopted land use controls, including the zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations, building regulations, housing code, traffic regulations, and regulations governing streets and sidewalks. Policy 1-3.10.5: Public Assistance. Provide continuing land use information and assistance to the public. Policy 1-3.10.6: Intergovernmental Coordination. Coordinate land development issues where applicable with other public agencies at all levels of government pursuant to the Intergovernmental Coordination Element of this plan. Policy 1-3.10.7: Manage Current Developmental Impacts. Evaluate and manage impacts of proposed development pursuant to existing ordinances, including, but not limited to, public facilities, natural environment, and impact on stable residential neighborhoods. Policy 1-3.10.8: Urban Design and Community Appearance. Good principles of urban design shall be applied through site plan review procedures in order to enhance general community appearance as well as to preserve and enhance open space and landscape. This program shall assist in protecting major natural and man-made resources within the City, including such scenic natural resources as the Indian River Lagoon, the Sebastian River, the Collier Creek natural drainage corridor, Schumann Lake, as well as developing residential neighborhoods and centers of commercial or institutional activity. Policy 1-3.10.9: Special Land Use Studies. In order to maintain land use policies responsive to changing conditions, problems, and issues, the City shall undertake special studies as needed to develop specific local strategies for resolving unanticipated land use problems and issues. OBJECTIVE 1-3.11: CONTINUING EVALUATION OF LAND USE ELEMENT EFFECTIVENESS. The City shall use the following policies as criteria in evaluating the effectiveness of the Land Use Element. Comprehensive Plan Goals., Objectives and Policies 09121/99 1-32 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 ] CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 1: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Policy 1-3.11.1: Review the Impact of Change Indicators on Land Use Policy. Trends in the magnitude, distribution, and characteristics of population and land use shall serve as indicators of possible changes in land use needs. The policy implications of major trends in land use characteristics shall be evaluated on a continuing basis. Land use policy shall be refined as needed in order to remain responsive to evolving problems and issues. Policy 1-3.11.2: Schedule, Budget and Implement Programmed Activities. The timely scheduling, programming, budgeting and implementation of programmed land use activities identified in this Element shall be evidence of the City's effectiveness in carrying out a systematic program for implementing adopted land use goals, objectives and policies. Policy 1-3.11.3: Coordinate with Public and Private Sectors. While continually implementing and evaluating the Land Use Element, the City shall maintain a process of intergovernmental coordination as well as coordination with private sector .groups interested in land use policy and programs. The effectiveness of this approach shall be evaluated by the success of coordination mechanisms in resolving land use problems and issues. Policy 1-3.11.4: Achieve Effective Resolution of Land Use Goals, Objectives, and Policies. The effectiveness of the Land Use Element shall be measured by the City's success in achieving land use goals, objectives, and policies. The Land Use Element incorporates a systematic planning process for identifying land use problems and issues and implementing corrective actions. Comprehensive Plan Goals" Objectives and Policies 09121/99 1-33 - . . . . . . . . . . . '. . . . . . . CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 2: TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT CHAPTER 2: TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT (Reference ~9J-5.019, FAC) ~2-1: TRANSPORTATION GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES. This section stipulates goals, objectives, and implementing policies for the Transportation Element pursuant to 99J-5.019, FAC. GOAL 2-1: ENSURE INTEGRATED MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM. Develop and maintain an integrated multi-modal transportation system in the City of Sebastian which promotes mobility and accessibility to move people and goods in a manner consistent with the local and citywide land use, and environmental protection goals, as well as coordinated with proposed residential and economic developments. Stress multi-modal mobility that offers transportation and transit services to all residents and tourists in the most efficient, convenient, assessable, and affordable manner possible. OBJECTIVE 2-1.1: PROVIDE FOR SAFE, CONVENIENT, AND EFFICIENT MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM. The City of Sebastian shall provide for an integrated multi-modal transportation system that emphasizes safe, convenient, and efficient movement of motorized and non- motorized vehicles as well as pedestrians within Sebastian through the use of management systems as described in the below policies. Policy 2-1.1.1: Establish Level of Service Standards for Major Thoroughfares. Beginning in January 1998, the City shall utilize the following service standards for major thoroughfares: ROADWAY FACILITY MINIMUM LOS STANDARD PEAK HOUR* State Arterials . U.S. Hil!hwav 1 C County Arterials CR 512 (Fellsmere Highwav) I D CR 505 1R0seland Road) I D C~ Collectors Indian River Drive D Schumman Drive D Barber Street rWimbrow Drive to Schumann Drive) D F1eminl! Street (Main Street to CR 512) D Easv Street (Main Street to Schumann Drive) D Vocelle Avenue (CR 505 to Fleming) D Main Street (uS 1 to Wimbrow Drive) D Laconia Street (CR 512 to South City Limit) D Silmificant Local City Streets Shown on the Major Thoroughfare Plan Barber Street Extension (Schumann Dr to US 1) D Enl!lar Avenue (Barber St to Schumann Dr) D Wimbrow Drive (Main Street to East CR 512) D Louisiana AvenuelHil!h Street (Main Street to CR 512) D Local -- All roads not classified as arterials, collectors, or significant local D streets shown on the Maior Thoroughfare Plan. Note: · The peak hours shall be the 30th highest hour established by FDOT. Policy 2-1.1.2: Future Transportation Map Series. Pursuant to Rule 9J-5.019(5), the City of Sebastian Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element hereby includes the Future Transportation Map Series as described below: Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 2-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 2: TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT a, Map II-I: Major Thoroughfares by Functional Classification and Number of Lanes (2020) identifies the 2020 roadway network, including arterial and collector streets, their functional classification, and the number of lanes within each facility, The functional classification system indicates the role of each thoroughfare in meetiog current travel demands, assists in defining laud use relationships, and reveals the jurisdiction responsible for maintenance, b, Map II-2: Future PedestrianlBike Ways (2020) illustrates the major bicycle and pedestrian ways for the year 2020, c, Map II-3: Roadway Improvemeots (2020) indicates the type and location of the roadway improvements planned for the Sebastian area between 1997 and 2020, Policy 2-1.1.3: Establish Transportation Demand Management Programs. By December 2005, the City shall have studied the feasibility of establishing Transportation Demand Management programs to modify peak hour travel demand and reduce the number of vehicle miles traveled per capita within the community and region, This can be done through the promotion of and assistance in the creation of a Countywide system of interconnected designated bicycle ways and the promotion of the Indian River County Bicycle/Pedestrian Plan, Policy 2-1.1.4: Establish Transportation System Management Strategies. By December 1999, the City shall establish Transportation System Management Strategies as appropriate to improve system efficiency and enhance safety, In order to ensure maintenance of adopted level of service standards, the City of Sebastian shall prepare and adopt a Land Development Code which requires that all site plans impacting the multi-modal transportation system as be submitted to the Indian River County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for review and comment prior to City approval of the development. The Land Development Code shall establish criteria to ensure that no development is approved unless such development is found to be consistent with the adopted level of service standards for roads and transit facilities. Policy 2-1.1.5: Controlling Vehicular Accessibility to Major Thoroughfares. By December 1999, the City shall provide an adequate, properly designed and safe system for controlling vehicular accessibility to major thoroughfares through the control of the intersections of access points, including driveways and roads, to connecting roadways, This action shall be facilitated by adopting design standards and procedures as part of the Land Development Code which as a minimum shall address: 1. Adequate storage and turning bays; 4. Spacing and design of median openings and curb cuts; 2, Provision of service roads; 3. Traffic operations. 5. Driveway access and spacing, This control shall be coordinated through the building permit process as provided for in the Sebastian City Code, Policy 2-1.1.6: Concurrency Management System. The City's Land Development Code mandates that physical improvements required to provide adequate roadway capacity be in place prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, In addition, prior to approval of a site plan the developer/applicant shall demonstrate to the City's satisfaction that required on- and off-site roadway and traffic improvements shall be in place concurrent with the impacts of development, Also, the developer shall demonstrate to the City's satisfaction that the proposed development shall not cause the level of service on adjacent public roads to decline below adopted LOS standards established in Policy 2-1,1,1. No development shall be approved that is projected to generate a traffic volume which would decrease the existing LOS below the adopted standard. Policy 2-1.1. 7: On-Site Transportation Improvements and Safe Traffic Flow. The City shall enforce existing development regulations, which require that all developments provide safe and convenient on-site traffic flow considering motorized and non-motorized vehicle parking and internal circulation needs as well as pedestrian flow, Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 2-2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 2: TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Map 2-1: Major Thoroughfares by Functional Classification and Number of Lanes (2020), page 2-3 Map 2-2: Future Pedestrian/Bike Ways (2020), page 2-4 Map 2-3: Roadway Improvements (2020), page 2-5. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121/99 2-3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 2: TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Policy 2-1.1.8: Controlled Access. In addition to the existing ordinance regulating off-street parking and curb cut controls, the City shall adopt land development regulations by December 1999 which incorporate standards for: . Controlling connections and access points of driveways and roadways to existing roadways; . Preventing conflicts between vehicular, pedestrian and rail traffic; and . Providiog a traffic circulation system which is designed to accommodate the demands of emergency service delivery systems. Policy 2-1.1.9: Establish a Multi-Agency Review Process. In addition, the City will establish a multi- agency planning and development review process for proposed public improvement plans for streets, pedestrian and bike ways, as well as any other public improvements which may potentially impact and/or further maintenance of an integrated multi-modal transportation system. In this manner the City will establish and maintain a continuing technical review and coordination mechanism involving the Indian River County MPO and the Florida Department ofTrausportation. This coordinated effort will further the City's objectives, policies, and programs related to maintenance of an integrated multi-modal transportation system consistent with adopted level of service standards. OBJECTIVE 2-1.2: COORDINATE LAND USES AND TRAFFIC CIRCULATION. The City shall coordinate the transportation system with the Future Land Use Map Series and ensure that existing and proposed population densities, housing and employment patterns, land uses, and all other short and long term development plans are consistent with the transportation modes and services proposed. Policy 2-1.2.1: Integrated Traffic Circulation and Land Use Planning. The City shall continually monitor and evaluate the impacts of existing and proposed future land development on the transportation system in order to achieve integrated management of the land use decisions and traffic circulation impacts. Policy 2-1.2.2: Traffic Circulation Site Plan Review Criteria. The City shall enforce traffic circulation site plan review criteria in the Land Development Code. The criteria address such factors as: trip generation; design of efficient internal traffic circulation and parking facilities, including minimizing pedestrian and vehicular conflict, off-street parking, as well as safe and convenient circulation and maneuverability; control of access points; potential need for acceleration/deceleration lanes; adequate surface water management and drainage; and landscaping. Policy 2-1.2.3: Establish Parking Strategies in the Riverfront, CR 512 Corridor, and Major Traffic Generators. By January 2001, the City shall have established parking strategies for the Riverfront area, the CR 512 Corridor, and other major traffic generators in order to promote the transportation goals and objectives set forth in this Plan. The strategies shall be enforced in coordinating ongoing and future transportation projects impacting land use and requiring off-street parking. Policy 2-1.2.4: Establish Land Use, Site and Building Design Standards for Public Transit Corridors. Should exclusive public transit corridors be created in Sebastian, the City shall establish land use, site, and building design standards for development in and along those corridors within six months of the corridors being opened. This will assure the accessibility of existing infill and new development to pub Ii c transit. Policy 2-1.2.5: Coordinate Transit Planning with Land Use Planning Process. The revised Land Development Code shall include a mandatory site plan review during which all development shall be reviewed for impacts on transit. Applicable improvements shall be required to facilitate the movement of Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 2-4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 2: TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT transit users between major activity centers and nearby transit stops. Similarly, the City short and long range planning efforts shall continue to manage new commercial development and redevelopment in the Riverfront area and along the CR 512 corridor so that the City maintains a compact commercial core easily accessible to the Indian River roadway network and transit system. OBJECTIVE 2-1.3 COORDINATE WITH MPO AND FDOT. The City shall coordinate the transportation system services and facilities with the plans and programs of the MFO and FDOT. Policy 2-1.3.1: Coordinate Roadway and Transit Improvements. Beginning in October 1998, the City shall coordinate roadway improvements with future public transit facility improvement as identified by Indian River County. Policy 2-1.3.2: Utilization of County and State Numerical Indicators. Beginning in October 1998, the City shall use County and State numerical indicators for measuring the achievement of City mobility goals. Numerical Indicators shall include: 1) Modal Splits; 2) Annual Trnnsit Trips Per Capita; and 3) Automobile Occupancy Rates. Policy 2-1.3.3: Coordinate with Couuty, MPO and FDOT for Implementation of Elemeut. Beginning in October 1998, Sebastian shall work with Indian River County, the MFa, FDOT, and other pertinent agencies to establish strategies, agreements and other mechanisms that demonstrate the area wide coordination necessary to implement the transportation, land use, parking and other provisions of the transportation element. OBJECTIVE 2-1.4: EFFICIENT PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICE. The City shall coordinate with Indian River County to address the provision of efficient public transit services based upon existing and proposed major trip generators and artractors, safe and convenient public transit, land uses, and accommodation of the special needs of the transportation disadvantaged. Also Sebastian shall coordinate with the County's transit provider to encourage ease of transfer between mass transit and all other modes, where it improves the functioning of the Transportation network. Policy 2-1.4.1: Encourage Land Uses that Promote Transit. The City shall coordinate policies and projects with the future land use element to encourage land uses that promote public transportation in the Riverfront area and along the CR 512 corridor. Policy 2-1.4.2: Provide Linkages between Transit and Significant Attractors. Sebastian shall coordinate with Indian River County to ensure that linkages are provided from the maj or transportation corridors along routes to land uses generating or attracting heavy traffic such as commercial development along CR 512 corridor and in the Riverfront area, institutional uses, and existing and future residential developments. Policy 2-1.4.3: Future Transit Facilities to Provide Ease of Transfer. Future transit facilities in the City of Sebastian shall incorporate provisions to enhance ease of transfer with other modes (e.g., park and ride lots, bicycle lockers and racks, pedestrian walkways, taxi stands). This shall be done in conjunction with the County's transit provider and the MPO. OBJECTIVE 2-1.5: ESTABLISH A TRAFFIC CIRCULATION SYSTEM THAT PROTECTS NEIGHBORHOOD INTEGRITY AND PROMOTES COMMUNITY VALUES. The traffic circulation system will protect neighborhood integrity, while providing a system of arterial and collector streets to direct through traffic away from local residential streets. The City shall coordinate with the Comprehensive Plan Goals. Objectives and Policies 09121/99 2-5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 2: TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT State and the County to ensure that the functional classification system is responsive to both existing development and the City's future land use plans. Sebastian shall work to ensure that the multi-modal transportation system preserves environmentally sensitive areas, conserves natural resources, and promotes connnunity aesthetic values. Policy 2-1.5.1: Traffic Circulation Projects Sensitive to Surrounding Land Use. Beginning in October 1998, the City shall Initiate future traffic circulation and access projects that not only provide connectivity between heavy trip generators and attractors, but also initiate strategies that moderate traffic impacts on residential neighborhoods and/or direct through traffic away from residential neighborhoods that may be impacted. Policy 2-1.5.2: Intrusion of Arterial Roadways into Neighborhoods. The City will, as much as possible, protect the character of existing neighborhoods from the intrusion of arterial roadways. The criteria used to determine whether arterials will be allowed to intrude in existing neighborhoods are whether there are problems maintaining level of service standards on the applicable roadways, whether there are safety problems, right-of-way availability and whether there are viable alternatives to intruding into an existing neighborhood. In areas where arterial roadways intrude into neighborhoods, the City will ensure that the State and/or County provide buffers such as concrete walls, landscaped buffers, berms, and other similar buffers alongside the roadway. The City will coordinate with the State and/or County to review the feasibility of relocating roadways when intrusion is proposed. Policy 2-1.5.3: Minimizing Impact of Arterial Roadways on Adjacent Neighborhoods. Arterial roadways and intersections shall, to the extent possible, be located and designed such as to not adversely affect existing neighborhoods nor produce excessive traffic on local roads through residential areas. The following are some of the characteristics by which the City will determine whether neighborhoods are adversely impacted: severed existing neighborhoods, more traffic other than local traffic using roadways, widening of roadways which result in roadways constructed closer to residential homes, and other similar characteristics. In areas where arterial roadways and their intersections adversely affect existing neighborhoods, the City will coordinate with the County and/or State to provide buffers as stated in the above Policy 2-1.5.2. The City will also review the feasibility of relocating roadways and intersections as well as limiting the number of roadway connections and accesses. Where appropriate, the City will implement traffic calming improvements. Policy 2-1.5.4: Minimizing Adverse Environmental Impacts. Beginning in October 1998, the City shall locate and design roadways to minimize adverse environmental impacts. Where sensitive environmental area will be impacted by roadway construction, the City will mitigate those impacts by taking action as provided for in the Conservation Element of the plan. OBJECTIVE 2-1.6: COORDINATE LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION ELEMENTS. The Transportation Element will continue to be coordinated with the goals objectives and policies of the Future Land Use Element and other elements of the Comprehensive Plan, to maintain internal consistency and ensure that major thoroughfares meet concurrency management level of service standards. Similarly, the City shall review new development and redevelopment to ensure that major traffic generators generally remain in the compact commercial core areas. This objective is also consistent with the objective of maintaining major employment generators in areas accessible to the Indian River County roadway and transit systems. Comprehensive Plan Goals. Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 2-6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 2: TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Policy 2-1.6.1: Element Consistent with City and County Comprehensive Plans. The City shall maintain and enforce a Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element that is consistent with other elements of the City Comprehensive Plan as well as applicable provisions of the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan. Policy 2-1.6.2: FLUM to Guide Transportation Planning. The adopted Future Land Use Map shall be used to guide the planning of future transportation corridors and facilities to ensure the proper coordination between transportation planning and future development patterns. In addition, the Land Development Code shall ensure that site plans for future development and redevelopment are reviewed for impacts of projected vehicle trip generation on existing and planned roadway capacity. The City concurrency management system and adequate facilities ordinance shall assist in avoiding future adverse impacts on roadways. Policy 2-1.6.3: Monitoring of Transportation Element. The City of Sebastian shall continue to provide a safe, convenient and efficient multi-modal circulation system through the on-going monitoring and evaluation of the Comprehensive Plan, especially the Future Land Use and Transportation Elements. OBJECTIVE 2-1.7: RIGHT-OF-WAY PROTECTION. The City of Sebastian shall protect existing and future right-of-way from building encroachment as well as coordinate with Indian River County to ensure that the addition rights-of-way necessary for roadway improvements planned for 2020 are acquired. Policy 2-1.7.1: Continue Acquisition and Preservation of Rights-of-Way. Sebastian shall continue to maintain measures for identifying and protecting existing rights-of-way as part of the City's continuing planning operations. In addition, the City shall continue to maintain the integrity of the Future Land Use Map and the Future Transportation System Map, by monitoring the impacts of development and ensuring consistency of new development with the Future Land Use and Transportation Elements. The City's long range planning activities shall continue to identify possible needs for additional future rights-of-way based on-going analysis of land use and traffic circulation issues. Policy 2-1.7.2: Standards for Road R/W Acquisition. The City hereby adopts minimum standards for road rights-of-way as listed below. The City shall preserve existing rights-of-way and shall enforce standards requiring dedication of roadways, the need for which was generated by new development. The City shall work with the County and FDOT to acquire right-of-way where the master traffic circulation study identifies existing or projected future deficiencies. ROADWAY US 1 Corridor (4 lanes) Minor Arterial ( 4 lanes) Collector Streets Local Streets RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH (in feet) 240 200 80 60' (ifswale drainage) 50' (if curb and gutter) Sources; 1998 Indian River County Transportation Element and Solin and Associates, Inc. 1998 Policy 2-1.7.3: Mandatory R/W Dedication/Fees in Lieu. Beginning in October 1998, the City shall implement a program for mandatory dedication or fees in lieu thereof as a condition of development approval associated with plats, replats, PUDs, or site plans where such developments generate a need for new or improved roadways. The purpose and intent of the program shall be to assure that: 1) adequate road RIW and necessary roadway improvements are dedicated and developed concurrent with the impacts Comprehensive Plan Goals,. Objectives and Policies 09121/99 2-7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 2: TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT of new development; and 2) the cost of such improvements shall be borne by the developer generating the need for the facilities. Policy 2-1.7.4: Provision of On-site and Off-site Roadway Improvements. All plans for all new development shall be evaluated by the City. Prior to receiving a development permit, the applicant's plans must incorporate necessary on- and off-site roadway improvements or equitable contributions in lieu thereof which are required as part of a development application pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan or any other requirement of the Code of Ordinances, as exists or as may hereinafter be amended. In cases involving unpaved roads adjacent to a proposed development, the applicant shall be required to pave the portion of the road which the development will be utilizing. The applicant shall not be required to pave adjacent unpaved roads if the development will not be accessing those roads. In cases of insufficient rights-of-way adj acent to a proposed development, the applicant shall be required to donate the land necessary to make the rights-of-way compliant with the requirements of the Land Development Code. OBJECTIVE 2-1.8 PROMOTE MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION TO IMPROVE ACCESS TO AND FROM SEBASTIAN. The City of Sebastian shall promote multi-modal transportation circulation elements that will improve access to and from Sebastian and other parts of Indian River County from the Intrastate Highway Policy 2-1.8.1: Protect Functions of Intrastate Highway System. Beginning in October 1998, the City shall protect the interregional and interstate functions of the Intrastate Highway System by scheduling improvements to the local traffic circulation system. OBJECTIVE 2-1.9: ENHANCE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION. The City shall carry out the identified capital improvements program and budget that address existing and future traffic improvement needs, including coordinating with other entities. Policy 2-1.9.1: Traffic Control Devices to Encourage Pedestrian Circulation. By December 2000, the City shall develop strategies for providing effective traffic controls, including signage, signalization or other means in high traffic areas of the City. Strategies shall include projects that facilitate safe pedestrian circulation at roadway crossings and in other areas where pedestrian and vehicular conflict may occur. Policy 2-1.9.2: Criteria for Evaluating Proposed Roadway Improvement. Beginning in October 1998, roadway improvement proposals shall be evaluated and assigned a relative priority based on specific criteria below cited: a Whether the project is needed to: . Protect public health and safety; . Fulfill the City's legal commitment to provide facilities and services; or . Preserve or achieve full use of existing facilities. b. Whether the project: . Increases efficiency of nse of existing facilities; . Prevents or rednces futnre improvement cost; . Provides service to developed areas lacking full service; or . Promotes in-fill development. Policy 2-1.9.3: Coordinate With Indian River County on FlemingNocelle. By December 1999, the City shall initiate discussions with Indian River County to develop an interlocal agreement addressing the funding mechanisms for the design and construction ofFleming/V ocelle extension. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies Q9/21/99 2-8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 2: TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Policy 2-1.9.4: Proposed Roadway Capital Improvement Program. The City of Sebastian shall coordinate with FDOT and Indian River County to ensure that the 2020 roadway improvements identified in the table below are completed in a timely and cost efficient manner. The table below also identifies the estimated cost, the timeframe, and the funding of the improvement. This table includes projects listed on the Long Range Transportation Improvement Programs by Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), the City, and the County. ROADWAYILINK IMPROVEMENT SOURCE ESTIMATED TIMEFRAME COST US I: CR 512 to North City Limit Add 2 lanes FDOT 2011-2015 $3,485,000 CR 512: West City Limit to Roseland Rd Add 2 lanes County 1996-2000 $2,500,000 CR 505: CR 512 to North City Limit Add 2 lanes County 2006-2010 $5,981,000 Schumann Drive: South City Limit to US 1 Add 2 lanes County 2001-2005 $3,222,000 Fleming Street extension ROW Acouisition City/County 1996-2000 $100,000 Barber Street: CR 512 to US 1 Add 2 lanes City 2001-2005 $1,261,000 US 1 and Main Street Intersection State 2001-2005 $60,000 Indian River Drive and US 1 Intersection State 2001-2005 $60,000 Source: Indian River County Transportation Element, Indian River County Community Development Department, 1998 Policy 2-1.9.5: Other Potential City Roadway Improvements to be Evaluated. The City of Sebastian shall amend the Capital Improvement Schedule on an annual basis to incorporate improvements to local roadways determined to be necessary in order to maintain level of service and/or improve traffic circulation. Potential road improvements which shall be evaluated in the future include the following: LOCAL STREET SYSTEM POTENTIAL IMPROVEMENTS (1) Easy Street . As stated in the data inventory, in the future South Easy Street shall be resurfaced, and . extended south to Schumann Drive. This improvement will provide more efficient north- south linkage connecting Schumann Drive, C.R. 512, and Main Street. (2) VocelleIFIeming Avenue Vocelle A venue is emerging as an important east-west linkage which currently connects C.R 505 (Roseland Road) with C.R 512. With the proposed commercial development of the Chesser Gap site at the intersection of VocelleJFleming and C.R. 512, traffic patterns within the area will change significantly. Additionally, the extension of VocelleIFleming through the Chesser Gap PUD should be linked with the e.xtension of Easy Street and through to US 1. (3) Wimbrow Drive The eastern segment of the South Wimbrow Drive corridor should be improved to tie into the proposed south extension of Gibson Street, at C.R 512. This improvement would provide substantially enhanced north-south access. The improved corridor would service not oulv the northeast Sebastlan Highlands. . (4) Powerline Road Powerline Road is to be located east of Easy Street and west of Louisiana Avenue between Main Street and CR 512. The proposed corridor would provide access to major undeveloped areas north of C.R 512 as well as safe and adequate collector service for north-south traffic in this older section of Sebastian. (5) Louisiana Avenue Louisiana 1\ venue needs to be improved. The segment of Louisiana A venue between Main Street and C.R 512 serves as an important link between these two roads. The narrow pavement and right-of-way should be improved in order to provide adequate service for future traffic needs. (6) Proposed Orange Orange A venue is proposed as a minor collector street servicing the residential area north A venue Extension of Sebastian Elementary SchooL Under this proposal, Orange Avenue would be extended eastward to tie in with the proposed Powerline Road. This improvement would substantially enhance east-west traffic flow and substantiaJly enhance accessibility to residential areas north of the Sebastian Elementary School. Compreb.ensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 2-9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 2: TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT OBJECTIVE 2-1.10: FACILITIES FOR BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN WAYS. The City shall analyze the feasibility for bicycle and pedestrian ways in planning for transportation facilities. Policy 2-1.10.1: Planning for Bicycle and Pedestrian Ways. The City shall January 1, 2000 prepare a plan for developing bicycle and pedestrian ways which connect residential areas to recreational areas and major activity centers. The plan shall include programs for implementation and anticipated funding sources and shall be consistent with roadway improvement plans identified in the engineered transportation master plan. The City Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan shall be consistent with and further enhance the Indian River County MPO Bicycle and Pedestrian. Policy 2-1.10.2: Facilitate Use of Bicycles and Pedestrian Movement. The City shall provide land use and other strategies to promote the use of bicycles and pedestrian movement within the LDRs by December 1999. The regulations shall require that developments impacting bicycle and pedestrian movement provide improvements that accommodate the safe movement of bicycles and pedestrian. Policy 2-1.10.3: Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Required for New Development. The City shall continue to enforce land development regulations that require: · New subdivisions, replats, planned unit developments, and site plans accommodate bicycle and pedestrian traffic needs; and · New multi-family residences, shopping facilities, recreational areas, schools, and other public uses provide storage areas for bicycles. Policy 2-1.10.4: Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Between Residential Areas and Community Facilities. The City shall adopt land development regulations which ensure that priority for both new and repair of bicycle and pedestrian facilities shall be given to those facilities which link residential areas with schools, shopping, recreation areas, and other community facilities. OBJECTIVE 2-1.11: ADEQUATE AVIATION FACILITIES. Through 2020, the City will ensure that City aviation demand is met. Policy 2-1.11.1: Implement and Enforce Airport Zoning Regulations. The City will continue to implement and enforce its airport zoning regulations. These regulations address height, noise, clear zone and land requirements. Policy 2-1.11.2: Adequate Access to the Sebastian Municipal Airport. The City will continue to ensure that adequate access to the Sebastian Municipal Airports is provided. Policy 2-1.11.3: Transportation Improvements and the Airport Master Plan. The City shall ensure that coordination occurs between the Airport Master Plan and any proposed or future transportation improvements. Comprehensive Plan Goals. Objed:ives and Policies 09/21199 2-10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II II I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 3: HOUSING ELEMENT CHAPTER 3: HOUSING (reference S9J-5.010(3), FAC.) ~3-1 HOUSING GOALS. OBJECTIVES. AND IMPLEMENTING POLICIES. This section stipu- lates goals, objectives, and implementing policies for the Housing Element pursuant to ~163.3177(6)(f), F.S., and S9J-5.01O(3)(a-c), FAC. GOAL 3-1: HOUSING. ALLOCATE LAND AREA FOR ACCOMMODATING A SUPPLY OF HOUSING RESPONSIVE TO THE DIVERSE HOUSING NEEDS OF THE EXISTING AND PROJECTED FUTURE POPULATION AND ASSIST THE PRIVATE SECTOR IN PROVIDING AFFORDABLE QUALITY HOUSING IN NEIGHBORHOODS PROTECTED FROM INCOMPATmLE USES AND SERVED BY ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES. OBJECTIVE 3-1.1: PROMOTE AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND ADEQUATE SITES FOR VERY LOW, LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING. The City projects the total need for low and moderate housing units for the period 1995 through 2010 to be met. The City anticipates surpluses of 1,145 total units in 2000, 1,348 total units in 2005, and 1,549 total units in 2010. In 2000 the City anticipates a deficit of 1,169 units available to very low income households. The City further expects this deficit to increase by 490 households by the year 20 I o. Appendix A provides the specific analysis associated with these figures. The City shall ensure that adequate sites for very-low, low, and moderate income housing units through the implementation of the following policies. Policy 3-1.1.1: Provision of Technical Assistance to the Private Housing Sector. Beginning January I, 1997, the City Growth Management Department shall provide techoical assistance, information and housing data to the private sector in order to maintain a housing production capacity sufficient to meet the projected housing market demand and continue to advance fair housing and elimination of discrimination in housing. Policy 3-1.1.2: Developing Public/private Partnerships. Develop local government partnerships with the private sector in order to improve the efficiency and expand the capacity of the housing delivery system. Actions shall include coordinating with Indian River County in order to promote the timely extension of water and wastewater services to residential areas as necessary. Similarly, the City shall also coordinate the installation of community facilities supportive to housing resources. Policy 3-1.1.3: Affordable Housing for Low and Moderate Income Households. By September 1990 the City shall amend its land development regulations in order to include principles and criteria for locating low and moderate income housing. The City shall continue to promote access to a broad range of housing opportunities with a full complement of urban services through cooperation and coordination with the private sector and Indian River County. The City of Sebastian acknowledges the need for affordable low and moderate income housing and has provided one of the County's largest concentration of affordable homesites. Sites for affordable housing for low and moderate income households shall be approved if such sites have access to the following facilities, services and/or activity cenjers: . Serviced by potable water and central wastewater systems; . Accessible to employment centers, including shopping centers which accommodate stores offering household goods and services needed on a frequent and recurring basis; . Located on a paved street accessible to a major street (i.e., included in the City's major thoroughfare plan); . Accessible to public parks, recreation areas, and/or open space systems; and . Located on sites having adequate surface water management and solid waste collection and disposal. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 0912]199 3-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 3: HOUSING ELEMENT The City shall promote the use of federa~ state, and local subsidy programs, including Sec. 208 funding, to meet the need for affordable housing. The City Growth Management Department shall meet with the Indian River County Planning Director and the Director of the Indian River County Housing Authority and by the end of 1991 draft a program for annual evaluation of affordable housing needs within the incorporated and unincorporated areas. The program shall include annual assessments, including recommended actions for the ensuing year. The annual assessment of affordable housing needs shall be presented to the City Planning and Zoning Board and the City Council for action. Furthermore, the City shall participate in Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council initiatives directed toward educating local governments of new techniques especially programs applicable to the region and/or the County, for promoting affordable housing. In drafting updated land development regulations, the City shall ensure that regulatory techniques and review procedures do not create barriers to affordable housing. The City shall also promote nondiscrimination in access to housing within the City by promoting fair housing laws and practices. Policy 3-1.1.4: Selecting Sites For Affordable Housing For Very Low, Low, And Moderate Income Households. The City of Sebastian is committed to fair, open, and affordable housing and shall approve sites for very-low, low, and moderate income housing units which are consistent with the Land Development Plan. The City shall not approve affordable housing development proposals unless such proposed sites are: 1. Serviced by potable water and central wastewater systems; 2. Accessible to employment centers, iocluding shoppiog centers which accommodate stores offering household goods and services needed on a frequent and recurring basis; 3. Located on a paved street accessible to a major street identified on the City's major thoroughfare plan; 4. Accessible to public parks, recreation areas, andlor open space systems; and 5. Located on sites having adequate surface water management and solid waste collection and disposal. Policy 3-1.1.5: Provision of Diverse Housing Types. The City shall continue to provide land use designations and zoning districts on the Future Land Use and the Official Zoning Maps, respectively, to ensure that single family, duplex, and multi-family housing units are allowed within the City. Policy 3-1.1.6: Housing Location Criteria. The City of Sebastian shall adopt land development regulations by January 1999 which incorporates criteria for locating various housing types including the following issues: · All multi-family developments are serviced by potable water and central wastewater systems; · Convenience access to employment centers and shoppiog areas which accommodate stores offering household goods and services needed on a frequent and recurring basis; · All residential developments shall be located on a paved street accessible to a major street identified on the City's major thoroughfare pian; · Accessible to public parks, recreation areas, andlor open space systems; and · Located on sites having adequate surface water management and solid waste collection and disposal. Policy 3-1.1.7: Economic Solutions to Improve Access to Affordable Housing. By December 31, 2005, the City shall determine the feasibility of using economic solutions to improve the supply of affordable housing units. Economic solutions include federal programs (i.e., Youthbuild) that provide job training/creation by constructing housing units. If Sebastian determines that the feasibility exists, then the City shall apply for at least one of these federal program within three years of the determination. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121199 3-2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 3: HOUSING ELEMENT Policy 3-1.1.8: Barriers Within The Land Development Regulations. All amendments to the City's land development regulations after January 1, 2002 shall be review by the City to ensure that the proposed regulatory techniques and review procedures do not create barriers to affordable housing. In the interim, the City shall review the existing land development regulations for potential barriers and investigative the need for streamlining the regulatory process. The City shall also promote nondiscrimination in access to housing within the City by promoting fair housing laws and practices. Policy 3-1.1.9: Affordable Housing Incentives. By January 1, 1999, the City shall consider an ordinance amending the Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code to provide incentives to developments with affordable housing units that meet all of the location criteria in Policy 3-1.1.4. These incentives shall include, but are not limited to, allowing a maximum residential density of 10 units per acre. OBJECTIVE 3-1.2: MAINTAIN HOUSING STOCK FREE OF SUBSTANDARD UNITS. The City has not identified any substandard housing units. The City shall use the code enforcement program to take necessary actions to correct deficiencies in order to maintain a housing stock free of substandard units, Policy 3-1.2.1: Code Enforcement Activities. The City shall implement code enforcement activities in order to achieve a housing stock free of substandard units, including upgrading the eight (8) substandard units by 1995. OBJECTIVE 3-1.3: MANUFACTURED HOUSING. The City of Sebastian shall allow manufactured housing in all residential districts within the City if the housing meets the below stated policy. Policy 3-1.3.1: Location and Building Code Compliance. Building Codes within the City shall be consistent with State mandated criteria governing construction in coastal areas. The City's land development regulations shall allow manufactured housing in all residential zoning districts provided the manufactured housing complies with building standards of CH. 320 and 553, FS., and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards (i.e., Sec. 320.823, FS.) OBJECTIVE 3-1.4: PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR GROUP HOMES, HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY AND FOSTER CARE FACILITIES. The City of Sebastian shall ensure that opportunities for groups homes and foster care facilities as well as housing for the elderly are provided within the City. This objective shall be measured through the implementation of the following policies. Policy 3-1.4.1: Foster Care Facilities. Beginning in January 1998, the City shall ensure that foster care facilities duly licensed by the Florida Department of Children and Family Services shall be allowed in both single-family and multi-family zoning districts pursuant to Florida Statutes. Additionally, all sites for foster care facilities shall contain requisite infrastructure including: potable water; adequate surface water management; and approved system of wastewater disposal; and an adequate system for solid waste collection and disposal. The sites shall also be free of safety hazards and all structures shall comply with City ordinances and applicable State laws including applicable licensing and program requirements of the State. Policy 3-1.4.2: Community Residential Facilities. Beginning in January 1998, the City shall adhere to the following requirements related to Community Residential facilities pursuant to CH. 419, FS: Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121/99 3-3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 3: HOUSING ELEMENT 1. Group homes of six (6) or fewer residents licensed as community residential homes by Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) shall be deemed a single family unit and shall be allowed in single-family or multi-family zoning districts provided that such homes shall not be located within a radius of one thousand (1,000) feet of another existing duly licensed group home of six (6) of fewer residents. 2. Group homes duly licensed by DCFS as a community residential care fucilities which have from seven (7) to fourteen (14) unrelated residents operating as a family, including supportive staff as defined in ~419.oo1, FS, shall be allowed in multi- family residential districts unless the City fmds that the group home siting as proposed: o Does not otherwise conform to existing zoning regulations applicable to other multi-family uses in the City. o Does not meet applicable licensing criteria established and determined by DCFS including requirements that the home be located to assure the safe care and supervision of all clients in the home. o Would result in excessive concentration of community residential homes. A home that is located within a radius of one thousand two hundred (1,200) feet of another existing community residential home in a multi-family zone shall be an over concentration of such homes that substantially alters the nature and character of the area. A home that is located within a radius of five hundred (500) feet of an area of single-family zoning substantially alters the nature and character of the area. 3. All distance requirements cited in this subsection shall be measured from the nearest point of the existing home or area of single-family zoning to the nearest point of the proposed home. 4. All sites for and group homes shall contain requisite infrastructure including: potable water; adequate surfuce water management; and approved system of wastewater disposal; and an adequate system for solid waste collection and disposal. The sites shall also be free of safety hazards and all structures shall comply with City ordinances and applicable State laws including applicable licensing and program requirements of the State. Policy 3-1.4.3: Housing For the Elderly. The City's Land Development Regulations shall be amended by December 31,2000 to permit development of housing alternatives specially designed for the elderly, including but not limited to adult care living facilities. Sites for housing for the elderly shall be approved if such sites have access to the following facilities, services and/or activity centers: · Serviced by potable water and central wastewater systems; · Accessible to shopping areas which accommodate stores offering household goods and services needed on a frequent and recurring basis; · Located on a paved street accessible to a major street (ie., included in the City's major thoroughfare plan); · Accessible to public parks, recreation areas, and/or open space systems; and · Located on sites having adequate surfuce water management and solid waste collection and disposal. OBJECTIVE 3-1.5: PRESERVE mSTORlCALLY SIGNIFICANT HOUSING. Housing resources identified as historically significant shall be preserved and encouraged for residential uses. This objective shall be measured through the implementation of the following policies. Policy 3-1.5,1: Promote Identification of the City's Historically Significant Housing Resources. The City shall encourage the continued analysis, identification and preservation of the City's historical resources. Such efforts shall include determination of their worth and vulnerability, as well as implementation of preservation management policies as such resources are identified. These efforts shall be coordinated with the Sebastian River Historical Society. Policy 3-1.5.2: Rehabilitation and Adaptive Re-Use of Historically Significant Housing. Assist the rehabilitation and adaptive re-use of historically significant housing through available technical and econOtnic assistance programs. These efforts shall be coordinated with the State Division of Historical Resources. Policy 3-1.5,3: Grants for Preserving Historically Significant Housing. The City shall assist property owners of historically significant housing in applying for and utilizing available State and federal assistance programs. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 3-4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 3: HOUSING ELEMENT Policy 3-1.5.4: Assist Sebastian River Historical Society. The City shall assist the Sebastian River Historical Society in its efforts to provide public information, education, and technical assistance relating to historic preservation programs. OBJECTIVE 3-1.6: RELOCATION HOUSING. Uniform and equitable treatment of persons and businesses displaced by State and local government programs shall be provided consistent with 9421.55, F.S. This objective shall be measured through the implementation of the following policies. Policy 3-1.6.1: Provide Alternative Housing Sites for Displaced Structures and Residents Thereof. Coordinate with the private sector in assuring that alternative sites, in comparable housing facilities are available to persons displaced through public action prior to their displacement. OBJECTIVE 3-1.7: CONSERVE NEIGHBORHOOD QUALITY AND EXISTING HOUSING STOCK. The useful life of the existing housing stock shall be conserved through effective implementation ofregulatory action programs directed toward preserving neighborhood quality, including conservation of natural resources, maintenance of community facilities, and code enforcement activities. Policy 3-1.7.1: Promote Maintenance of Housing Stock and Neighborhood Conservation. Continue to enforce the City's building, housing, plumbing, energy, electrical, and other construction codes in order to promote maintenance of standard housing and to achieve necessary corrective action where noncompliances exist or come into existence in the future. Policy 3-1.7.2: Plan Supportive Facilities and Services Necessary for Quality Residential Neighborhoods. Sufficient systems for delivery of public facilities and services supportive to a quality residential environment shall be planned, designed and implemented. Such facilities shall include, but not be limited to, central water and wastewater services as well as maintenance of the roadway network and surface water management system. A capital improvement program and budget predicated on continuing review and evaluation of evolving housing problems and related infrastructure issues shall be the principal tool for realizing this objective. Policy 3-1.7.3: Minimize Potential Blighting Influences. Potential blighting influences within residential areas shall be minimized by promoting use of best management principles and practices of land use planning, urban design and landscaping in development and site plan review. For instance, adverse impacts of land use transition shall be minimized by managing the location as well as the density or intensity of mixed or conflicting residential and non-residential uses and by requiring adequate screening, landscaping, and other design features which promote land use compatibility and appropriate land use transition. Policy 3-1.7.4: Coordinate PubliclPrivate Partnerships. In addressing housing issues requiring unique partnerships involving the public and private sector, the City shall promote effective communication and innovative approaches which involve partnerships between the public and private sectors. Policy 3-1.7.5: Continuing Housing Programs. The City shall carry out the following housing related programs: a. Population and Housing Research and Data.. Maintain and periodically update the population 3Ild housing data . b. Housing Trends. Monitor and evaluate population and housing trends. Analysis of l3Ild use interrelationships shall be included in the coutinuing evaluation. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 3-5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 3: HOUSING ELEMENT c. Review Plans and Policies. Review and amend as necessary adopted plans and policies based on continuing analysis of problems and issues related to housing and other plan elements. Major shifts in the magnitude. distribution, and demographic charactetistics of the populatiou which are indicative of changes in housing demand shall be analyzed. Similarly, shifts in the magnitude, distribution and structural charactetistics of the City's housing stock shall be analyzed on a continuing basis. d. Fiscal Management. Review and evaluate resideutial development and infrastructure policy, including fiscal implications. Each year fiscal management policies including the capital improvement program and budget shall be reviewed, evaluated and refined to reflect current program priorities. e. Administer Housing Code and Other Related Codes. Administer adopted housing and energy codes and other housing related codes. f. Public Assistance and Information Referral Provide housing information and referral services to the public pursuant to adopted goals, objectives and policies of this Housing Element. g. Intergovernmental Coordination. Coordinate local housing program activities including discussions of related fiscal problems and issoes with other public agencies at all levels of goverrunent pursuant to the Intergovernmental Element of this Plan. h. Manage Cnrrent Developmental Impacts. Evaluate and manage impacts of proposed development pursuant to existing ordinances, including, but not limited to, impacts on residential neighborhoods, local housing supply and demand, public facility impacts, and natural environmental factors. i. Continuing Refinement of Housing Policies. The City shall review and evaluate housing policies as identified in this Element. The report entitled, Comorehensive Plan Data Ioventorv and Analvsis shall be updated on a continuing basis. This aoalysis shall provide a basis for contiouing refinement of housing policies. Where such analysis reveals housing needs, required infrastructure improvements, or other related problems and issues, the City shall coordinate an effective response, including cooperation with the public and private sectors. Policy 3-1.7.6: Special Housing Studies. In order to maintain housing policies responsive to changing conditions, problems, and issues, the City shall undertake special housing studies as needed in order to develop specific local strategies for resolving unanticipated housing problems and issues. OBJECTIVE 3-1.8: CONTINUING EVALUATION OF HOUSING ELEMENT EFFECTIVENESS. The City shall use the following policies as criteria in evaluating the effectiveness of the Housing Element. Policy 3-1.8.1: Review the Impact of Change Indicators on Housing Policy. Major shifts in the magnitude, distribution, and characteristics of population and housing shall serve as indicators of change in various aspects of housing supply and demand. The policy implications of major changes in housing supply and demand shall be evaluated on a continuing basis. Housing policy shall be refined as needed in order to remain responsive to changing problems and issues. Policy 3-1.8.2: Schedule, Budget and Implementing Programmed Activities. The timely scheduling, programming, budgeting and implementation of housing programs identified in this Element shall be evidence of the City's effectiveness in carrying out a systematic program for implementing adopted housing goals, objectives, and policies. Policy 3-1.8.3: Coordinate with Public and Private Sectors. While continually implementing and evaluating the Housing Element, the City shall maintain a process of intergovernmental coordination as well as coordination with private sector groups interested in housing policy and programs. The effectiveness of this approach shall be evaluated by the success of coordination mechanisms in resolving housing problems and issues. Policy 3-1.8.4: Achieve Effective Resolution of Housing Goals, Objectives, and Policies. The effectiveness of the Housing Element shall be measured by the City's success in achieving housing goals, objectives, and policies. The Housing Element incorporates a systematic planning process for identifying housing problems and issues and corrective actions. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 3-6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 4: PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT CHAPTER 4: PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT (reference ~9J-5.011(2), F.A.C.) ~4.1 PUBLIC FACILITY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND IMPLEMENTING POLICIES. This section stipulates goals, objectives, and implementing policies for the Public Facilities Element pursuant to ~163.3l77(6Xc), F.S., and ~9J-5.01l(2)(a-c), F.A.C.. GOAL 4-1: NEEDED PUBLIC FACILITIES. ENSURE AVAILABILITY OF NEEDED PUBLIC FACILITIES IN A MANNER WIDen PROTECTS INVESTMENTS IN EXISTING FACILITIES AND PROMOTES ORDERLY, COMPACT GROWTH. OBJECTIVE 4-1.1: ENSURE AVAILABLE PUBLIC FACILITIES, AND PREVENT URBAN SPRAWL. By December 31, 1998, the City of Sebastian shall have adopted land development regulations which include performance standards requiring that requisite public facilities be provided concurrent with the impacts of new development. A concurrency management program shall also be adopted as part of the land development regulations. The land development regulations shall stipulate that applications for a development permit comply with the concurrency management Objective 9-1.5 and Policy 9-1.5.1. The City shall adopt land development regulations which mandates hook-up to central potable water and wastewater systems for all new development; however, if a central wastewater main is not within five hundred (500) feet of the proposed development, the developer must obtain approval for on site wastewater service from the Indian River County Environmental Health Unit. In this manner, the City's regulatory system shall ensure that existing and planned public facilities shall be used to the maximum feasible extent in order to: . achieve economy of scale; . promote compact growth; and . prevent urban sprawl. POLICY 4-1.1.1: LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS. The following level of service standards are hereby adopted, and beginning in January 1, 1998, these standards shall be included in amended land development regulations at the earliest date possible which shall be used as the basis for determining the availability offacility capacity and the demand generated by a development: Potable Water Systems Indian River County Utility Department Residential Uses ComrnerciallIndustriaJ Uses (1) Equivalmtto twcnty-6ve(25) persansperBCre. Note: gpcpdrepRllont!l"gallonspcrcapitapcrday." LOS Standard 100 gpcpd 2,500 gal per acre' Sanitary Sewer Systems Indian River County Utility Department Residential Uses ComrnerciaJ/Industrial Uses (1) &}uivlllent totwenty-five (25) penons per acre. Note: gpcpd represents "gallons per capita per day.' LOS Standard 100 gpcpd 2,500 gal per acre' Solid Waste: Years 1990-2010: 7.52 pounds per capita per day Drainage: Years 1990-2010 Off-Site: 25-year, 24 hour design storm On-Site: lO-year, 24 hour design storm Ref: ~20A-IO.2(H)6a, City of Sebastian Land Development Code. Post-development conditions shall not increase the amount or rate of run-<tff beyond pre-development conditions. Water quality standards of Chapter 62-25, F.A.C. shall be applied as the quantitative standard. Chapter 62-25 F.A.C., requires the Outstanding Florida Waters (i.e, Indian River Lagoon) to reduce pollution loads by an additional 50 percent prior to discharge. Comprehensive Plan Goals. Objectives and Policies 09121/99 4-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 4: PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT Policy 4-1.1.2: Compliance with Level of Service Standards. As a condition of the issuance of development orders and permits, all public improvements including new facilities or replacements, expansions, or other alterations to public facilities shall be compatible with the adopted level of service standards for the facilities. Issuance of development orders or permits shall be conditioned upon demon- strated compliance with applicable federal, state, and local permit requirements for potable water, wastewater, drainage, and solid waste facilities. Policy 4-1.1.3: Demand and Supply Information System. The City shall coordinate with Indian River County Utilities on a regular basis in order to receive current data on the demand and capacity of County facilities providing service to Sebastian. Policy 4-1.1.4: Coordination Between Future Land Use and Potable Water/ Wastewater System Needs. The City shall coordinate with Indian River County Utilities to ensure that potable water and wastewater system needs, plans and the location and timing of improvements are consistent with land use and conservation resource management policies stipulated in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Policy 4-1.1.5: Areawide Planning for Potable Water and Wastewater Systems. The City amended land development regulations shall not permit proliferation of small fragmented water or wastewater systems except in cases where the City Council determines that the public health and safety is served by such a system and areawide service systems are not available. Policy 4-1.1.6: Available Infrastructure for Developments Approved Prior to Plan Adoption. The City's land development regulations together with the monitoring and evaluation system referenced in Objective 4- L I shall ensure that adequate levels of public services are made available to developments for which development orders were issued prior to the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. The monitoring and evaluation system shall include provisions which establish an early warning system which identifies if and when the designed capacity of infrastructure system components are nearing capacity. The land development regulations as amended shall continue to ensure that developers construct all proposed infrastructure improvements contained in approved plans of developments for which a development order or permit was approved prior to adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. The timing of such infrastructure improvements shall ensure that infrastructure is on line concurrent with the impacts of development. In addition, the land development regulations as amended shall include provisions which ensure that development orders and permits have a specified expiration date. OBJECTIVE 4-1.2: MAINTAINING A SCHEDULE OF PUBLIC FACILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT NEEDS. The City shall develop and maintain a five-year schedule of capital improvement needs for public facilities and shall annually update the schedule as stipulated in the Capital Improvements Element. During the process of programming and budgeting for capital outlays, the City shall investigate new ways to finance public facilities and services, including impact fees. Policy 4-1.2.1: Capital Improvement Schedule. The City Council, after considering the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Board, shall annually evaluate and rank capital improvement projects proposed for inclusion in the five-year schedule of capital improvement needs. Policy 4-1.2.2: Public Facility Evaluation Criteria. Proposed capital improvement projects shall be evaluated and ranked according to the following priority level guidelines: a. "Levell": Whether the project is needed to: . Protect pnblic health and safety. . Fulfill the City's legal commitment to provide facilities and services. . Preserve or achieve full use of existing facilities. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 4-2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 4: PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT b. "LeveI2": Whether the project accomplishes the following: . Increases efficiency of existing facilities. . Prevents or reduces future improvement costs. . Provides service to developed areas lacking full service or promotes in-fill development. c. "Level 3": Whether the project: . Represents a logical extension of facilities and services in a manner consistent with future Land Use Element goals, objectives and policies, inCluding the Future Land Use Map. OBJECTIVE 4-1.3: PROCEDURES AND STANDARDS FOR ON-SITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS. The City shall on a continuing basis assist in assuring implementation of existing State regulations imposing mandated standards for inspections, operation, and maintenance of on-site wastewater treatment systems. Policy 4-1.3.1: Use of On-site Wastewater Treatment Systems. Use of on-site wastewater treatment systems shall be limited to the following conditions: a. Existing septic tanks may remain in service until such time as centralized service is made available. b. Use of septic tank systems for new development shall be restricted to sites on which the Indian River County Public Health Unit renders a finding that the site and facility design is in compliance with State and local regulations governing the same. c. New development shall be required to connect with the central sewer system. Pursuant to the standards established by Indian River County. Policy 4-1.3.2: Coordinate with the Indian River County Public Health Unit. The City's land development regulations shall require that all proposed development which impacts an existing septic tank or generates need for a new septic tank be required to provide evidence of approval by the Indian River County Public Health Unit prior to receiving a development order or permit from the City. Any such approval by the City shall be conditioned upon the applicant's compliance with Indian River County requirements for ongoing facility maintenance and operation. Policy 4-1.3.3: Conditions Governing Development Orders or Permits. Beginning in January 1, 1998, the City shall adopt amended land development regulations at the earliest date possible which include performance criteria stipulating that prior to the issuance of development orders or permits all development shall be found consistent with regulations of all federal, State, and local on-site wastewater treatment systems. The City's performance criteria shall also regulate the location, timing, and scale of development in order to ensure that new development is effectively served by wastewater services. The performance criteria shall discourage the proliferation of permanent package treatment plants. System reviews shall be coordinated with the State Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) in order to promote best management practices and compliance with relevant State permitting procedures. Similarly, through application of the performance criteria the City shall discourage extensive use of septic tanks and wastewater drain fields on areas with characteristics or conditions unsuited for their adaptation. Policy 4-1.3.4: Compliance with On-Site Wastewater Treatment and Water Qnality Regulations. By September 1990 the City shall adopt amended land development regulations which require that performance criteria be incorporated in order to regulate on-site wastewater treatment, including impacts on water quality. The performance criteria shall stipulate that all new or altered on-site wastewater treatment improvements shall be compliant with regulations of federal, State, and County agencies having jurisdiction. The performance criteria shall stipulate that the City shall not issue any permit for new or altered on-site wastewater treatment systems. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21199 4-3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 4: PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT GOAL 4-2: PROVIDING FACILITIES TO MEET EXISTING AND PROJECTED DEMANDS. ASSURE THAT WASTEWATER SYSTEMS, SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL, DRAINAGE AND POTABLE WATER FACILITIES AND SERVICES ARE AVAILABLE TO MEET EXISTING AND PROJECTED DEMANDS IDENTIFIED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. OBJECTIVE 4-2.1a: RECONCILE EXISTING WASTEWATER SYSTEM DEFICIENCIES. Currently, there are no existing wastewater system deficiencies in Sebastian. The City shall coordinate with Indian River County to provide wastewater service which maximizes use of existing facilities and promotes orderly, compact growth As central wastewater service becomes available all new users shall be required to hook up to the central County system. This objective shall be measured through the implementation of the following policies: Policy 4-2.1a.l: North County Wastewater System Projects. The City shall ensure that Indian River County achieves timely construction of the subregional wastewater system proposed to serve the City of Sebastian. The North County subregional wastewater system treatment plant located in the Hobart Road area was constructed in the early 1990's and is operated by Indian River County. Upon adoption of this Plan, new development, shall be required to connect with the central sewer system. Pursuant to the standards established by Indian River County. Policy 4-2.1a.2: Use of Reclaimed Water for Irrigation. By the end of 2001, the City shall initiate conversations with Indian River County and/or with other entities capable of providing reclaimed water to the City and its residents for irrigation purposes. The City shall apply innovative concepts in wastewater collection and disposal, including wastewater reuse through such programs as use of reclaimed water for spray irrigation. System improvements shall integrate proven technological concepts in order to enhance cost effectiveness, conserve natural resources, and promote multiple use of water resources. OBJECTIVE 4-2.1b: PLAN AND COORDINATE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES TO MEET EXISTING AND FUTURE SOLID WASTE NEEDS. The City has not identified any existing solid waste deficiencies. However, the City shall participate on a Joint Task Force or similar committee organized by Indian River County in order to analyze and coordinate new solid waste management directives stipulated in State legislation as cited in the below stated policy. By December 31, 2005 the City shall develop an effective system for monitoring solid waste collection capabilities of private companies having a franchise agreement with the City. This process shall be a subcomponent of the concurrency management process. The procedures shall include working with the private companies to ensure that solid waste collection needs and evolving private market conditions are effectively coordinated so that the City's future population is adequately served by solid waste collection. Policy 4-2.1b.l: Solid Waste Projects. The City shall coordinate with Indian River County's solid waste management program to achieve improvements in hazardous waste collection and disposal. In addition, the City shall coordinate with Indian River County in developing a local response, including recycling of solid waste. The City shall cooperate with county officials and technicians on a Joint Committee or through other appropriate mediums in order to address countywide approaches for achieving access to resource recovery facilities or other alternatives to conventional landfill operations. Other specific issues which shall be addressed include: . Enhancing solid waste collection and transfer operations; . Management strategies for implementing recycling efforts; · Curbing illegal dumping of solid waste as well as disposal activities which adversely impact natural systems; . Developing improved information dissemination regarding hazardous waste generators; . Determining feasibility of hazardous waste storage/transfer facilities; Comprehensive Plan Goals. Objectives and Policies 09/21199 4-4 I I I : I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 4: PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT . Improving management of the collection and disposal of hazardous waste; . Drafting policy for appropriate regulatory measures governing solid waste and hazardous waste inclnding identification of long tenn operating costs and capital improvement needs associated with various policy options. OBJECTIVE 4-2,lc: RECONCILE EXISTING POTABLE WATER DEFICIENCIES. Currently, there are no potable water deficiencies in Sebastian. The City shall coordinate with Indian River County to maximize use of existing facilities to ensure capacity is available for existing and proposed development as well as promote orderly, compact growth. The City shall adopt land development regulations which include performance standards mandating all new users to connect to the central potable water system as the service becomes available. This objective shall be measured through the implementation of the following policies: Policy 4-2.1c.l: Potable Water System Projects. Indian River County is constructing the North County Regional Water Treatment Plant, which is to be completed in 1998. The City will be served by this plant. The City shall work with the County Environmental Health Unit on a case by case basis to undertake periodic monitoring of private wells when a complaint is filed with the City. This activity is desirable since the City relies on private wells draining from the shallow surficial aquifer, on septic tanks for sewage treatment, and has areas of poorly drained soils. The monitoring program will check possible contamination from septic tank leachate. The City shall contact the St. Johns River Water Management District (SIRWMD) on a case by case basis to analyze existing or potential future problems surrounding withdrawal of potable water resources for which SIR WMD has jurisdiction. OBJECTIVE 4-2,ld: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CITY'S STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN. The City has, through Craven Thompson and Associates, Inc., prepared a Stormwater Management System Conceptual Master Plan (SWCMP). The SWCMP was developed to two factors: 1) the City has developed to the point where flooding potential is acute, and 2) public awareness and dissatisfaction with current drainage conditions. The basic finding of the SWCMP is that the Sebastian Highlands subdivision has severe drainage system deficiencies that, in the event of a severe storm, would cause major flooding of streets and homes as well as damage infrastructure. The City shall incorporate the stormwater management system improvements recommended in SWCMP into the Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvement program through the implementation of the following policies. Policy 4-2.1d,l: Stormwater Management Plan Implementation Projects. The City shall work towards implementing over the next 10 years the following projects identified in the City's Stormwater Management Conceptual Master Plan: PROPOSED WORK PHASE EST. TOTAL COST EST. AVGYEARLYCOST Maintenance : $750,000 $75,000 Maintenance: Secondary $770,000 $77,000 Maintenance: Back and Side Ditches $415,000 $41,500 Maintenance: Swales $160,000 $16,000 Capital Improvements: Perimeter Culverts $2.843,000 $284,300 Capital ImProvements: Control Structores $900,000 $90,000 Capital Improvements: Stormwater Pumn Stations $1,500.000 $150,000 Caoital Imorovements: Stormwater Park $2,000,000 $200,000 Capitallrnprovements: Interior Systems North of CR 512 $10,800,000 $1,080,000 Caoitallrnorovements: Interior Systems South of CR 512 $11,200 000 $1,120,000 TOTAL $31,338,000 $3,133,800 Policy 4-2.1.1: Compliance with Capital Improvements Element. All major public facility projects shall be undertaken in accordance with the schedule provided in the Capital Improvements Element of this plan, as may be hereinafter amended. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 4-5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 4: PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT Policy 4-2.1.2: Priority for Correcting Existing Deficiencies. In developing the annual schedule of capital improvement proj ects, the City shall assign highest priority to those projects required for purposes of correcting existing deficiencies. Policy 4-2.1.3: Existing Deficiencies Shall Not Be Increased by New Development. The City shall issue no development order for new development which would result in an increase in demand on deficient facilities prior to completion of improvements needed to bring the respective facility up to standard. The City shall include an adequate facilities requirement as part of the updated Land Development Code. The adequate facilities ordinance shall mandate that future applications for development shall include a written evaluation of the impact of the anticipated development on the levels of services for the water and wastewater systems, solid waste system, drainage, recreation, and the traffic circulation system. The latest point for determining whether public facilities shall be available concurrent with the impacts of development shall be prior to the issuance of a development order or permit which contains a specific plan for development, including the densities and intensities of use. Prior to issuing such development order or permits, the City shall render a finding that the applicant has provided written assurance that the proposed development shall be served with each of the above cited facilities with a level of service at least equal to that level of service stipulated in Policy 4- I .1.1. The developers application shall include written assurances that any required improvements shall be in place concurrent with the impacts of the development (i.e., by the time a certificate of occupancy is granted by the City). The application process shall be consistent with requirements cited in Objective 9-1.5 and Policy 9-1.5.1. Policy 4-2.1.4: Coordinate with Indian River County Hazardous Waste Planning Efforts. The City shall offer assistance to Indian River County as the County assesses and plans for hazardous waste management in a manner consistent with the provisions of 9403.7265, F.S. OBJECTIVE 4-2.2: MEETING PROJECTED PUBLIC FACILITY DEMANDS TO 2002. The City shall plan for projected public facility demands through the year 2002 by undertaking the following projects: a. Wastewater System Projects. b. Solid Waste Projects. c. Drainage Projects. d. Potable Water System. Policy 4-2.2.1: Coordinate with Capital Improvements Element. All public facility projects shall be undertaken in accordance with the schedule provided in the Capital Improvements Element of this Plan. Policy 4-2.2.2: Public Facility Planning and Management Efficiency. In scheduling the location, timing and staging of public facility improvements, the City Council shall use the following criteria: a. Minimize disruption of services; c. Maiotain service levels for all respective facilities. b. Prevent duplication of labor; and Policy 4-2.2.3: Additions of Public Facility Proj ect Approvals. All required federal, State, and County permits shall be obtained before the City undertakes or authorizes contractors to undertake construction and/or operation offacilities. OBJECTIVE 4-2.3: MEETING PROJECTED DEMANDS FOR THE YEAR 2003 THROUGH YR 2010. The City shall meet projected public facility demands between 2003 and 2010 by undertaking the following projects: a Wastewater System Projects. b. Solid Waste Projects. c. Drainage Projects. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 d. Potable Water System. 4-6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 4: PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT Policy 4-2.3.1: Scheduling Needed Capital Improvements. The City Council shall ensure that projects required to meet projected demands through the year 1996 shall be in the Capital Improvements Element of this plan in accordance with the requirements of 9163.3177(3), F.S. GOAL 4-3: PROVIDE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE. PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORMWATER DRAINAGE IN ORDER TO PROTECT AGAINST FLOOD CONDITIONS AND PREVENT DEGRADATION OF QUALITY OF RECEIVING WATERS. OBJECTIVE 4-3.1: PROTECT NATURAL DRAINAGE FEATURES. By September 1998 the City shall adopt land development regulations protecting natural drainage features and ensuring that future development utilizes stormwater management systems consistent with criteria of DEP and SJRWMD as well as the improvements identified in City's Stormwater Management System Conceptual Master Plan (SWCMP). As a minimum the regulations shall include the following: . Establish a coordination mechanism with the Sebastian River Water Control District (SRWCD) for controlling the flow of water through the SR WCD' s radial gate darn io order to protect the natural drainage features io Sebastian; . Establish a buffer zone along all natural drainage features; . Maintaio on-site draioage requirementJ; to ensure that natural draioage features are not overloaded by runoff from adjacent properties (water quantity); . Prohibit direct discharge ofnntreated stormwater into natural draioage features (water quality); . Existiog stormwater engioeeriog, design and construction standards for on -site systems should be evaluated and amended as needed; . Existiog standards for erosion and sedintent controls should be evaluated and amended, if necessary; and . Periodic iospection of on-site systems shall be required to ensure contiouance of system design and ntaiotenance. Policy 4-3.1.1: Ensure that Urban Lands Provide Adequate Drainage and Protection from Flooding and Manage the Retention of Ground and Surface Water at Levels that Enhance Natural Storage Capacity of Watersheds and Promote Aquifer Recharge. Promote the ecological, biological, and hydrological role that surface waters play in sustaining recharge to aquifers and supporting surface vegetation. Manage the location design and intensity of urban development in order to foster continuance of natural hydrological processes, including preserving recharge areas, promoting on-site retention of surface waters and natural return of surface water into the soil, and channelling excess stormwater volume primarily via natural grassy swales. Require the integration of natural storage areas and natural drainage courses into water management plans for new development. Policy 4-3-1.2: Provide Adequate On-Site Retention and Ground Water Recharge while Directing the Surplus Run-ofT to Receiving Waterways in a Manner which Prevents Imbalance to their Ecosystems. Upon adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, the City shall continue to enforce the level of service standards identified for retention/detention in Policy 4-1.1.1. By September 1990 the City of Sebastian shall adopt amended land development regulations which shall include land use controls, such as subdivision regulations, zoning, including site plan review and performance criteria as well as special erosion controls, landscape and flood management ordinances which shall assist in implementing stormwater management and water quality controls. The programs shall be continually updated based on improved knowledge of problems, issues, and best management practices. In FY 1992-93 the City shall commence the engineered stormwater management plan which shall provide recommended regulatory measures designed to protect and preserve water quality, retard runoff, and enhance percolation. By the end of 1994, the Stormwater Management Plan shall be implemented by adopting regulatory ordinances for implementing the Plan. In addition, by the end 1994 the City shall amend the capital improvement schedule by incorporating capital improvement items recommended in the Stormwater Management Plan. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121199 4-7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 4: PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT Policy 4-3.1.3: Pursue the Development of Adequate Off-Site Surface Water Management Facilities. The City shall monitor at regular intervals the performance of existing off-site drainage facilities, evaluate existing and potential future problems or issues, and pursue the funding of necessary structural and non-structural system improvements for effective surface water management. AIl new developments shall provide an equitable contribution for off-site drainage improvements necessitated by the development. No new development shall be allowed which overloads existing off-site facilities or unduly increases the potential for flooding. Policy 4-3.1.4: Coordinate Watershed Management Plans and Policies with Appropriate Public Agencies. Assure coordination of watershed management plans and policies, with appropriate local, regional, state and federal agencies, including Indian River County, the St. Johns River Water Management District, Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, the State Department of Environmental Protection, the Agricultural Extension Service, the United States Army Corps of Engineers, and other appropriate agencies. Policy 4-3.1.5: Buffer Zone Requirements. By December 1998 the City shall amend its land development regulations to include performance criteria which shall require that new development provide buffer zones adjacent to natural drainageways and retention areas. Such regulations shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to adoption by the City Council. Policy 4-3.1.6: Managing Land Use in the Floodplain. By September 1990 the City shall amend its land development regulations to include performance criteria regulating development within floodplain areas. The criteria shall include refinements to the existing stormwater management and floodplain protection ordinance. By 1994 these regulations shall be reevaluated to include regulatory measures recommended in the Stormwater Management Plan scheduled for completion in FY 93-94. These regulations shall address necessary restrictions on encroachment, alteration, and compatible use of the floodplain and major drainage corridors. Policy 4-3.1.7: Implementing Stormwater Management Plan. The Stormwater Management Plan implementation shall commence in FY 1997-98 and shall be completed by FY 2005-06. The City has included a program and funding mechanism in the capital improvement schedule in order to ensure plan implementation. Policy 4-3.1.8: Inspection and Maintenance of Drainage Systems. By September 1990 the City shall develop a program and schedule for the inspection and maintenance of drainage components. As part of the Stormwater Management Plan implementation program the City shall ensure that drainage system components are monitored pursuant to best management practices. The plan shall specify criteria for frequency of inspections and shall develop procedures for perpetual maintenance. GOAL 4-4: PROTECT FUNCTIONS OF GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE AREAS. THE FUNCTIONS OF NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE AREAS WITHIN THE CITY SHALL BE PROTECTED AND MAINTAINED. OBJECTIVE 4-4.1: COORDINATE ISSUES SURROUNDING AQUIFER RECHARGE. The City shall coordinate with Indian River County and the St. Johns River Water Management District in providing for maintenance of aquifer recharge area functions. This objective shall be measured through the implementation of the following policies: Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121/99 4-8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 4: PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT POLICY 4-4.1.1 SURFICIAL AQUIFER RECHARGE AREA PROTECTION. Since the shallow aquifers are the City's chief public and private source for potable water, the purpose and intent of this policy is to protect these areas from impacts that would significantly alter their ability to function. 1. Recharge Area. For the purposes of this regulation, recharge areas shall be defined as those areas that have good to excellent recharge potential as generally identified on map B-5 of the City of Sebastian Comorehensive Plan Goals. Obi ectives. and Policies. The following list, prepared by the Indian River County Soil Conservation District, identifies the specific soil types that provide for aquifer recharge. Recharge areas shall include land identified on referenced map 1-5 which based on field investigations are demonstrated to have any of the following soil types: . PaoIa . St. Lucie . AstatuI . Archbold . Pomello . Orsino . Jonathan . Satellite 2. Restrictions on Development withio Recharge Areas. All development within designated recharge areas shall comply with the following development requirements: a. Development shall be required to be desigoed so as to maximize recharge of the surficial aquifer. The groundwater level and fluctuations shall be no worse than under pre-development conditions. b. Removal of soil from a development site or any portion thereof, which is located above twenty-five (25) feet mean sea level (MSL) is prolnbited except for sand mines operating under duly approved permits. On such sites or portions thereof the reduction of the natural topography shall be limited to six feet above the normal high water table (with the exception of drainage conveyance or retention ponds) or eight (8) feet below existing land surface, whichever is more restrictive. c. No clearing of soil or vegetation may occur before a permit issued. d. No excavation which cuts below the seasonal high water table (this practice lowers the water table level) sball be allowed. This includes but is not limited to excavations for building foundations parking lots, and site drainage. Open drainage conveyances below the normal high water table sball be prohibited. Underground piping of stormwater is required when inverts are lower than the normal high water table. e. Impermeable surfaces of recharge areas shall be regulated as follows: i. Development on sites with any land having an elevation no greater than twenty-five (25) feet above mean sea level (MSL) shall restrict impermeable surfaces to fifty (50) percent of the total area of the site which is twenty-five (25) feet or less MSL. ii. Development on sites with any land exceeding twenty-five (25) feet means sea level (MSL) shall restrict impermeable surfaces to thirty-five (35) percent of the total area of the site which is above twenty-five (25) MSL. 3. Prohibited Land Uses. The following land uses and activities are prohibited within aquifer recharge areas: a. Sanitary landfills; d. Incinerators; b. Wastewater treatmeut facilities; c. Auirual feedlots; e. Petroleum and pesticide storage facilities without proper containment; Also, all other land uses that store, handle, or generate hazardous materials or wastes are prohibited. A hazardous material or waste, as regulated by this section shall consist of the following: . Chapter 38F-4l of the Florida Administrative Code (the Florida Substance List). . Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 261 (Identification and Listing of Hazardous Wastes). . Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regolations Part 302.4 (Table 302.4) (List of Hazardous Substances and Reportable Quantities). . Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations part 355, Appendix A and B (List of Extremely Hazardous Substances). Policy 4-4.1.2: Deep Aquifer Water Conservation. In order to protect the quality and quantity of deep aquifer water resources, the City shall coordinate with the St. Johns River Water Management District and other applicable regulatory agencies in identifying the existence and location of free flowing deep aquifer wells and in requiring corrective measures, including capping, plugging, or installing regulatory devices which control the discharge of water from the deep aquifer pursuant to the St. Johns River Water Management District policies. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121/99 4-9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 4: PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT Policy 4-4.1.3: Retain Run-off to Maximize Recharge. By September 1990 the City shall amend its land development regulations to include performance standards designed to manage stormwater management so that post-development conditions do not increase the amount or rate of runoff beyond pre- development conditions. Similarly, the ordinance shall incorporate minimum level of service criteria of Policy 4-1.1.1 for retention/detention. Policy 4-4.1.4: Coordinate with Other Recharge Protection Programs. The City will coordinate with local, State, and federal agencies to achieve regional aquifer recharge protection objectives. OBJECTIVE 4-4.2 CONSERVING POTABLE WATER RESOURCES. By December 31, 1998, the City shall have adopted land development regulations as cited herein for achieving conservation of potable water, including coordination with Indian River County. Policy 4-4.2.1: Enforcement of Level of Service Standards. By September 1999, the City shall amend its land development regulations and incorporate criteria for enforcing the adopted level of service for consumption of potable water from public wells. Policy 4-4.2.2: Coordination with Other Entities. The City shall distribute material to educate the public on the need to conserve water and function as a information center for other agencies, including the S1. Johns River Water Management District, Indian River County Public Utilities (IRCPU), and others as necessary, to notify residents of any water conservation programs within the City. Policy 4-4.2.3: Use of Reclaimed Water for Irrigation. By December 2001, the City shall begin discussion with IRCPU regarding the possibility of providing reclaimed water to Sebastian businesses and residents for irrigation purposes. The City shall also discuss with IRCPU the potential for applying innovative concepts in wastewater collection and disposal as well as system improvements in order to enhance cost effectiveness, conserve natural resources, and promote multiple use of water resources. Policy 4-4.2.4: Conservation of Potable Water Supply. In order to comply with potable water conservation policies of the St. Johns River Water Management District, and achieve a reduction in the current rates of water consumption, the land development regulations shall incorporate the following performance standards: a. Where reclaimed water is available, potable water supplies may not be used to meet irrigation needs. b. Require the use of water-saving plumbing fixtures on all new development. c. In order to reduce demand for irrigation water (which in turn often plaoes greater demand upon potable water sources), at least thirty (30%) percent of all landscaping material obtained from off-site sources for use on any site should be native plants. Further, at least fifty (50%) percent of all trees used in landscaping shall be native species in order to lessen water demand. The level of service standards herein adopted are predicated on engineered analysis by Indian River County, the County's engineering consultant, and the City's inventory of existing and projected future characteristics surrounding potable water supply and demand. Policy 4-4.2.5: Emergency Conservation of Water Sources. By December 31, 1999 the City shall develop and implement a water conservation program that coordinates water conservation issues with SJRWMD policies and program resources. In addition, the City shall coordinate in disseminating water conservation education literature prepared by the SJRWMD. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 4-10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT CHAPTER 5: COASTAL MANAGEMENT (reference ~9J-5.0l2(3), F.A.C.) ~5-1 COASTAL MANAGEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES. This section stipulates goals, objectives, and implementing policies for the Coastal Management Element pursuant to 11163 .3177(6)(g) and 11163.3178, F.S., and ~9J-5.012(3), F.A.C.. GOAL 5-1: COASTAL MANAGEMENT. RESTRICT DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES THAT WOULD DAMAGE OR DESTROY COASTAL RESOURCES AND PROTECT HUMAN LIFE AND LIMIT PUBLIC EXPENDITURES IN AREAS SUBJECT TO DESTRUCTION BY NATURAL DISASTERS. OBJECTIVE 5-1.1: PROTECT COASTAL RESOURCES, WETLANDS, ESTUARY, LIVING MARINE RESOURCES, AND WILDLIFE HABITATS. Beginning in January 1998, the City shall maintain land development regulations including performance standards designed to protect, conserve, and enhance wetlands and other natural resources, including estuarine environmental quality, by: a.. Preventing potentially adverse impacts of development and redevelopment on wetlands and estuaries; b. Maintaining or improving estuarine environmental quality by improving stormwater management by commencing the stormwater management plan identified in Policy 4-2.ldl. The plan shall provide a basis fQ1' adopting regulatory measures for enhancing estuarine water quality and shall identify capital improvements needed to improve the stormwater management system. The regulatory measures recommended in the stormwater management plan shall be incorporated in the land development regulations and the recommended capital improvements shall be incorporated in the Comprehensive Plan capital improvement schedule. c. Minimizing potential adverse impacts of development along the Indian River Lagoon, including estuarine resources such as living marine organisms, seagrasses, coastal marsh. and mangroves together with adjacent environmentally sensitive transition areas; and d. Regulating the impacts of development on wildlife habitats. These objectives shall be accomplished as herein below cited as well as through coordination with the St. Johns River Water Management District and through the Indian River Lagoon SVlIM program. Policy 5-1.Ll: Development Restriction. in Wetlands. The City shall enforce its wetland protection ordinance which shall restrict development within wetlands and shall require consideration of dedication of conservation easements by applicants for upland development who also own title to adjacent wet1ands. By December 31, 1998, the City shall amend its land development code to include performance criteria which prohibits development of wetlands. Wetlands shall be defined as set forth in Rule 9J-5.003 (149), FAC. Policy 5-1.1.2: Protect the Indian River Lagoon. By December 31, 1998, the City shall adopt amended land development regnlations which include performance criteria mandating that the potential impacts of proposed shoreline development be analyzed as part of the process and prior to approval of a development permit or development order. The applicant shall bear the burdeu of demonstrating that potential adverse impacts on estuarine resources have been or shall be prevented. The review process for all proposed development that fronts on Indian River Drive shall involve all local, State, and regional entities withjurisdictioual authority. Impacts to be considered shall include the following but not be restricted to: . prevent estuarine pollution; . control surface water run-off; . reduce exposure to natural hazards; . ensure adequate public access; and . ensure adequate sites and standards for regulating water-dependent and water-related uses. . protect living marine resources; The City shall not approve a development order or development permit for the area that fronts on Indian River Drive until the City has considered the potential impacts identified by the applicant and other public entities having jurisdiction over the impacted resources. Policy 5-1.1.3: Protect, Stabilize, and Enhance the Estuarine Shoreline. By December 31, 1998, the City shall incorporate criteria within the land development regulations which stipulate that no native vegetation shall be removed from the estuarine shoreline without a duly authorized City land clearing permit. Similarly, criteria shall be included in the land development regulations which require that applicants for development along the estoarine shoreline shall be required to revegetate, stabilize, and enhance damaged estuarine shorelines by planting native vegetation, including mangrove and/or other native estuarine plant species which: a. Contnbute to toarine productivity and water quality; b. Offer protection from erosion and flooding; and c. Contribute to the natural soil building process. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 5-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Hardening of the estuarine shoreline with rip-rap, bulkheads or other similar devices shall not be allowed unless erosion constitutes a critical peril to upland property and the use of vegetation has failed to stabilize the shoreline. Such shoreline hardening sttuctures shall generally not be vertical seawalls or bnlkheads and shall comply with performance standards herein cited in Policy 5-1.2.1(2)(c). The specific location and design of such structures shall be approved by the City as well as by other public entities having jurisdiction in the matter. Land development regulations shall incorporate the following performance criteria governing the location and design of such structures: . comply with best management principles and practices and be accomplished by use of the least environmentally damaging methods and designs possible; . Avoid a vertical slope which generates erosive tendencies, especially to adjacent unprotected shoreline properties. Petvious interlocking tile systems, filter ma.ts. and similar stabilization methods shall be used in lieu of vertical walls whenever feasible~ . Not be located waterward of the mean high water line except when it is shown to be in the public interest; . City approval shall be conditioned upon the applicant receiving approval :from other public agencies having jurisdiction; and . Incorporate a program of shoreline vegetation or revegetation in orderto build, enhance, and stabilize a natural shoreline. Policy 5-1.1.4: Protect Living Marine Resources, Coastal Marsh, and Seagrass Beds. By December 31, 1997 the City shall adopt land development regulations which include performance criteria which shall regulate against adverse impacts of development on seagrass beds and coastal marsh areas. Since these areas are sensitive to increased turbidity and other forms of pollution, water run-off and introduction of nutrients shall be regulated through effective water quality management criteria. The land development regulations shall require that plans for developmeut impacting marine resources be coordinated with state agencies having jurisdiction The City's approval shall be conditioned upon the applicant receiving approval from other public agencies having jurisdiction. Policy 5-1.1.5: Manage Impact of Coastal Development on Tidal Flushing and Circulation Patterns. Tidal flushing and circulation patterns geuerally shall not be altered by development activities. No development shall produce changes in the tidal flushing and circulation patterns unless the City and other public agencies having jurisdiction have granted requisite permits. No such permit shall be granted by the City unless all other agencies having jurisdiction have graoted clearance and the applicant has submitted hydrographic information sufficient to clearly demonstrate that no adverse environmental impacts shall be occasioned by the proposed changes in tidal flushing and circulation patterns. Finally, no alteration in tidal flow shall be pennitted which causes stagnation or siltation. Policy 5-1.1.6: Promote Propagation of Fish and Wildlife. The City shall incorporate criteria in the land development regulations which requires consideration of the impact of development on submerged lands and other habitats for fish and wildlife. The criteria shall be implemented to ensure maintenance of essentially natura1 conditions in order to further the propagatiou of fish and wildlife as well as public recreation opportunities. OBJECTIVE 5-1.2: SHORELINE USES AND PUBLIC ACCESS TO SHORELINE. The City shall maintain land development regulations which include performance criteria ensuring implementation and enforcement of the Comprehensive Plan land use policies for prioritizing shoreline uses. This objective shall be measured through the implementation of the following policies. Policy 5-1.2.1(1): Criteria for Prioritizing Shoreline Uses and Public Shoreline Access. In reviewing applications for shoreline development first priority shall be directed to the following shoreline uses: a. Non-structural shoreline protection uses such as native shoreline revegetation programs; b, Approved water-dependent estuarine shoreline uses such as: pervious accessways and duly pennitted dock facilities and commercial marinas. All such facilities shall satisfY all provisions of the City's land development code and obtain requisite pennits from all environmental pennitting agencies prior to obtaining City approval. Newly proposed marinas shall not be approved unless the applicant demonstrates that the marina site is consistent with the City's conservation and coasta.l. management policies. Priority shall be directed to water dependent uses which are available for public use. These facilities shall demonstrate during site plan review compliance with performance standards stipulated in Policy 5- 1.2.1(2) in order to prevent adverse impacts to natural features. Second priority shall be directed toward water-related uses such as: a Parking facilities for shoreline access; b, Residential structures which comply with the building code for structures within the State coastal building zone; and c. Recreational facilities which comply with applicable codes, The City of Sehastian has no beach or dune system, and therefore, shoreline protection policies apply only to the estuarine shoreline. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21199 5-2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Policy 5-1.2.1(2): Implementing Policies for Shoreline Land Uses. Land development regulations shall stipulate provisions implementing shoreline land use priorities, inclnding criteria for regn1ating water-dependent and water-related shoreline land uses. The regulations shall address the following: a. Protecting Living Coastal Marine Life. The City shall continue to enforce land development regulations which protect species with special status from the adverse impacts caused by development i. AIl applicants proposing development activities along the estuarine shoreline or within submerged areas shall be required to submit a site plan pursuant to site plan review regulations. Such site plan shall provide sufficient information describing marine life potentially impacted by proposed land uses as well as related construction activity. The plan shall stipulate assurances that the proposed project shall not adversely impact marine life or water quality. For instance, water quality control techniques such as the use of weirs for purposes of managing turbidity may be required by the City. In addition. the City shall require surveys of existing conditions, specifications of planned site improvements. and techniques to be used during construction as well as in operating and maintaining the land use in order to prevent damage to living marine organisms. b. Water-Related Uses in State Coastal Building Zone. All water-related uses shall be built on uplands landward of the floodway. Within the State coastal building zone all construction activities shall be predicated on plans compliant with applicable State and local building codes. Dredging and filling of wetlands or open water in order to accommodate water-related uses shall not be permitted unless the City approves such activity pursuant to provisions of the wetland protection ordinance, the stormwater management ordinance, and all other relevant site plan review criteria. c. Estuarine Shoreline Structures/Water-Deoendent Uses. Within the wetland estuarine shoreline, no development other than water dependent native shoreline revegetation programs, approved pervious or elevated accessways, and other uses approved by the Cily pursuant to the Stormwater Management and Flood Protection Ordinance shall be permitted. Hardening of the lagoon shoreline shall not be permitted unless the upland property is critically imperiled and the use of vegetation has failed to stabilize the shoreline. The design specifications of any shoreline hardening structure shall: i. Comply with best management principles and practices and be accomplished by use of the least environmentally damaging methods and designs possible; ii. Avoid a vertical slope which generates erosive tendencies, especially to adjacent unprotected shoreline properties. Pervious interlocking tile systems, filter mats, and similar stabilization methods shall be used in lieu of vertical walls whenever feasible; iii. Not be located waterward of the mean high water line except when it is shown to be in the public interest; iv. City approval shall be conditioned upon the applicant receiving approval from other public agencies having jurisdiction; and v. Inoorporate a program of shoreline vegetation or revegetation in order to build, enhance, and stabilize a natural shoreline. d. Land Use Restrictions in Submerged Lands and Wetlands. No non-water dependent uses shall be permitted on snbmerged lands or wetlands. Development on uplands adjacent to wetlands shall preserve a buffer known as the wetland transition area, as defined in the Stormwater Management and Flood Protection Ordinance. The specific boundary of a wetland transition area shall be established by field investigation. Similarly, no structures which constrict water circnlation in the lagoon shall be permitted. e. Dock Facilities. Docks or marina improvements shall not be approved by the Cily until the applicant demonstrates compliance with all applicable federal and State laws and administrative rules, including ~160.20.04(5), FAC., governing Aquatic Preserves as well as applicable policies of regional agencies. No commercial marina facilities shall be permitted on the Sebastian River. The Cily shall require site plans for all docks and marinas. These plans must demonstrate to the City's satisfaction that the facilities shall not adversely impact natural marine resources, including, but not limited to, seagrasses, estuarine waters, manatees and other living marine organisms. The plans shall indicate: i. Location relative to all impacted natura1 marine resources. ii. Structural specifications. iii. Description of all impacted natural marine resources, including their location and physical characteristics. iv. Multi-slip dock or marina facilities shall be located so as to prevent or minimize dredging and shall not disturb seagrass beds or adjacent wet1ands. v. Availability and location of sewage pump-out facilities. vi. Hurricane contingency plans. vii. Mitigation teclmiques proposed to compensate for any potential environmental disruption. f. Estuarine Water Ona1itv. In order to protect tile water quality of the Aquatic Preserve, no new point source pollution shall be permitted to discharge into the lagoon or into ditches or canals flowing into the lagoon. In addition, in order to reduce non-point source pollutants and comply with the Indian River Lagoon SWIM Plan, Indian River Lagoon Act, and the Indian River Lagoon Comprehensive Conservation and Management Pian, the City shall require the following: i. Surface water management systems shall be designed and constructed to retain or detain with filtration, as a minimum, the stormwater run-off generated from the fust one inch of rainfall over the entire site. TIle stormwater design shall be predicated on the following: Off-site: 25-year, 24 hour design storm On-site: 10 year, 24 hour design storm. C<lmprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21199 5-3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT ii. A vegetated and functionallittoraJ zone shall be established as part of the surface water management system aftakes ocCUlTing on all property. Prior to construction of the surface water management system for any phase of a project, the developer shall prepare a design and management plan fortbe wedandJlittoral zone that will be developed as part of these systems. The plan should: (a) Include typical cross sections of the surface water management system showing the average water elevation and the .3 foot contour (i.e., below average elevation); (b) Specify how vegetation is to be established within this zone, including the e1dent, method, type and timing of any planting to be provided; and (0) Provide a description of any management procedures to be followed in order to assure the continued viability and health of the littoral zone. The littoral zone as established should consist entirely of native vegetation and should be maintained permanently as part of the water management sysl.em As a minimum,. 10 square feet of vegetated littoral zone per linear foot of lake shoreline should be established as part of the surface water management plan. iii. The City shall coordinate with the 81. Johns Water Management District in developing and adopting an ordinance regulating installation of underground storage tanks for petroleum products. iv. The City shall coordinate with the 8t Johns Water Management District in reviewing issues and appropriate enforcement activities SUlTOllOding safe yield for water withdrawals from the surficial aquifers near the Indian River Lagoon in order to avoid impacts on the estuary. g. Shoreline Access. Shoreline access to the Indian River Lagoon shall be promoted in order to maintain accessways at approximately one-half mile intervals along the shoreline. State assistance shall be enlisted to achieve land required to appropriately store vehicles, provide rest room facilities, and accessways designed in a manner compatible with the shoreline ecosystem. The location of access points and related improvements shall be consistent with the City's Riverfront Study as enacted. The City has no beaches and, therefore, beach access policies of the State are not applicable; however, the City sha11 consider as part of the Riverfront Study ways to ensure public access and provide the necessary infrastructure to support waterfront activities. h. Si!!Ila!!e alon!! the Indian River La1!oon. At the time land development regulations are amended in order to comply with the adopted comprehensive plans, the City shall consider restricting commercial signage along the Indian River, to only those signs deemed essential for water dependent facilities. The City shall coordinate with jurisdictional agencies to develop uniform signage and criteria to further this policy. The City's sign regnlations in the area east of the railroad tracks from the north City limit to the south City limit sha11 be consistent with the recommendations in City's Riverfront Study as enacted. OBJECTIVE 5-1.3: LIMITING PUBLIC SUBSIDY OF DEVELOPMENT IN THE COASTAL IDGH-HAZARD AREA. Upon adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, the City shall limit public expenditures that subsidize development permitted in coastal high-hazard areas to restoration or enhancement of natural resources and public services for water dependent uses. Policy 5-1.3.1: Public Investments in Coastal High-Hazard Area. Public funded facilities shall not be built in the coastal high-hazard area, unless the facility is for public access, resource restoration, or service to water dependent activities. OBJECTIVE 5-1.4: AVOID POPULATION CONCENTRATIONS IN COASTAL HIGH-HAZARD AREAS. Beginning in January 1998, the City shall restrict development in Coastal High Hazard Areas (CHHA) in order to minimize danger to life and property occasional by hurricane events. The City shall direct population concentrations away from CHHA. The CHHA shall be defined as those areas located within the Category I evacuation zone established in the Treasure Coast Regional Hurricane Evacuation Study. Policy 5-1.4.1: Restrict Development in Coastal High-Hazard Areas. The City shall incOIporate appropriate policies in the land development regulations in order to direct population concentrations away from known or predicted coastal high- hazard areas which are areas located within the category I evacuation zone established in the Treasnre Coast Regional Hurricane Evacuation Study. The following provisions shall restrict development within the coastal high-hazard area: a. Water and sewer treatment plants, industrial holding ponds and other potential point pollution sources within the coastal high.hazard area are prohibited. b. Require construction within the hurricane flood zone to meet storm and floodproofmg standards exceeding those required for 8. 1 DO-year storm. c. Residential development and/or redevelopment in the CHHA shaH not exceed existing residential densities for that property. OBJECTIVE 5-1.5: HURRICANE EVACUATION. The City shall coordinate with Indian River County in attaining a hurricane evacuation time of less than twelve (12) hours. Policy 5-1.5.1: Hurricane Evacuation Logistical Support. In order to prevent unnecessary evacuees crowding roads and shelters, the City shall coordinate with Indian River County in disseminating information concerning the need of residents to evacuate at various hurricane threat levels. The City shall coordinate with the County and the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 5-4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Emergency Management Director in assisting the implementation of the County's campaign to educate the general citizemy regarding emergency preparedness plans, including specific citizen directives. Policy 5-1.5.2: Future Coordination with the County in Emergency Preparedness. In order to provide for safe and efficient evacuation of the residents of the City of Sebastian and other communities in the event of a hurricane, the City shall continue to coordinate with Indian River County in annual updates of the County Peacetime Emergency Plan. This update shall enable the County and incorporated municipalities to plan for future population densities which will neither adversely impact the efficiency of the evacuation plan nor increase evacuation times. In order to ensure that future developments are consistent with the Peacetime Emergency Plan and amendments thereto, the City's land development regulations shaH mandate that new development maintain a density threshold which is consistent with the Peacetime Emergency Plan lhis stipulation will assure that future density thresholds may be accommodated without adversely impacting hurricane evacuation time. The City shall also coordinate with the County in updating hurricane evacuation shelter assignments as weH as other policy formulation surrounding land use and emergency preparedness. OBJECTIVE 5-1.6: HAZARD MITIGATION AND COASTAL mGR-HAZARD AREAS. Begimring in January 1998, the City shall maintain land development regulations which contain performance standards regulating development activities in a manner which minimizes the danger to life and property occasioned by hurricane events including: 1. Stonn and Floodproofing Standard for Non-residential Structures. Non-residential construction within the coastal high hazard area shall meet storm and floodproofing standards exceeding those required for a one hundred (100) year stonn. 2. Restrlct101l8 of Redevelopment. If a structure located within the high hazard area receive storm damage in excess of fifty (50) percent of its appraised value. all such damaged structures shall be required to meet all current laws and ordinances, including those enacted since construction of the subject structure. Policy 5-1.6.1: Coastal High-hazard Area Defmed The coastal high hazard area (CHHA) consists of the Category I evacuation zone established in the Treasure Coast Regional Hurricane Evacuation Study. The ouly areas within the City limits identified in the Category I evacuation zone are the City's mobile home parks. The City shall enforce development restrictions, identified in Policy 5- 1.4 .1, within the CHHA and any area found to have historicalJy experienced destruction or severe damage from storm driven wind, water, or erosion. The City has identified the high velocity storm surge area as indicated on the Federal flood insurance rate maps as the ouly such area. Policy 5-1.6.2: Coordinate Update of the Hazard Mitigation PIau. The City shall coordinate with the County in updating the hazard mitigation annex of the Local Peacetime Emergency Plan pursuant to the five (5) year interval schedule adopted by the County. Updates of the Plan shaII identify specific actions that may be implemented to reduce exposure to natural hazards. The current Plan contains no inter-agency hazard mitigation component The Comprehensive Plan shaIl incorporate interagency hazard mitigation reports as such reports are generated in the future. Policy 5-1.6.3: Implementing General Hazard Mitigation. By December 31, 1998 the City shall adopt land development regulations which require that no development other than shoreline stabilization activities and water dependent recreation activities shaIl be alJowed within the coastal high hazard area. The ouly exception to this regulation shall be that existing mobile homes within the CHHA shall be grandfathered in, thereby may be repaired and/or replaced as long as the density does not increase. The performance criteria shall stipulate the need to reduce exposure of human life and property to natural hazards. Policy 5-1.6.4: Existing Infrastructure in the CHHA. The City shall establish by January 1999 a priority list of infrastructure facilities located in the CHHA which could be relocated, mitigated or replaced should state funding become available for such activities. OBJECTIVE 5-1.7: POST-DISASTER REDEVELOPMENT. Beginning in January 1998, the City shall continue to coordinate with the County in providing inunediate response to post-hurricane situations pursuant to policy directives cited below. Policy 5-1.7.1: Recovery Operations. The City shaH coordinate with Indian River County in modifying the Local Peacetime Emergency Plan in order to establish compliance with this objective. The update of the Plan shall include strategies for post-disaster recovery operations. Policy 5-1.7.2: Post-Hurricane Assessments. By December 31, 1998 the City Council shaIl appoint a Recovery Task Force comprised of the City Manager, the Building Official and others as determined by the City Council. The Recovery Task Force shall be responsible for assessing the conditions foHowing a hurricane or other similar disaster and shall propose strategic actions necessary to establish order and re-establish communication and basic service delivery systems necessary for Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21199 5-5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT health, safety, and welfare. Within ninety (90) days after appointment of the Recovery Task Force, the Task Force shall meet to determine a management framework for resolving issues confronted in times of a natural disaster. The management framework shall be reviewed with the County Civil Defense Officer for compliance with the Local Peacetime Emergency Plan and shall be presented to the City Council for review and approval. The management plan should provide a basis for executing the following activities during times of natural disaster. a. Establishing a temporary moratorium on building activity; b. Reviewing and deciding upon emergency building permits; c. Coordinating with State and Federal officials to prepare disaster assistance applications; d. Analyzing and recommending to the City Council hazard mitigation options. including reconstruction or relocation of damaged public facilities; e. Developing a redevelopment plan including limitations on redevelopment in areas of repeated damage; and f Recommending amendments to the Local Peacetime Emergency Plan and other appropriate policies and procedures. Policy 5-1.7.3: Repair and Clean-up. In planning post-disaster redevelopment activities, factors to be considered in order to protect the public health and safety shall include: a. Repairs to potable water, wastewater and power facilities; b. Removal of debris; c. Stabilization or removal of structures in a perilous condition; and d. Minimal repairs to make structures habitable. These considerations shall receive first priority in detennining the appropriateness of emergency building permits. Long term redevelopment activities shall be postponed until the Recovery Task Force has coordinated immediate repair and clean- up operations. Policy 5-1.7.4: Hazard Mitigation and Comprehensive Plan Amendments. The Recovery Task Force shall propose any needed Comprehensive Plan amendments which reflect the recommendations contained in any iuter-agency hazard mitigation reports or other reports prepared pursuant to ~406, Disaster Relief Act of 1974 (pL 93-288), Policy 5-1.7.5: Redevelopment Activities. Beginning in Jannary 1998, the LDRs shall require the redevelopment of any structure within the City that received storm-damage in excess of fifty (50%) perceut of its appraised value to meet all current laws and ordinances, including those enacted since construction of the subject structure. Policy 5-1.7.6: Establish Public Facilities Review Committee. By December 31, 1998. the City Council shall designate the Recovery Taskforce as the City's designated Public Facilities Review Committee charged with the responsibility for reviewing available alternatives for managing damaged public facilities following a hurricane event. The Committee shall evaluate future options for such facilities, including, but not limited to, abandonment, repair in place, relocation, and reconstruction with structural modifications. The Committee shall consider these options based on the following considerations: a. Cost to construct; e. hnpacts on the envirownent; b, i Cost to maintain; Public sector; and c. Recurring damages; g. Other relevant factors. d. Impacts on land use; OBJECTIVE 5-1.8: HISTORIC RESOURCES. The City shall assure !hat there shall be no loss of historic resources on City owned property and land development regulations shall assure that historic resources on private property shall be protec- ted, preserved, or re-used in a manner sensitive to the historic properties of the site and/or structure. The City's Historic Resources are listed in Appendix B of the Housing Element. Policy 5-1.8.1: Promote Identification of tbe City's Historic, Archaeological, and Cultural Resources. The City shall coordinate with the State Division of Historic Resources and the Sebastian River Historical Society in continning to identify, protect, analyze, and explain the City's historical, archaeological, and cultural resources. Such efforts shall include determination of their worth and vulnerability, as well as determination of specific applicable preservation management policies. Policy 5-1.8.2: Performance Standards for Protecting Sites of Historic or Archaeological Siguificance. Land development regulations shall include precautions necessary to prevent the following adverse impacts to historic or archaeological sites of significance: a. Destruction or alteration of all or part of such site; b. Isolation from, or alteration of the surrounding environment; c. Introduction of visual, audible, or atmospheric elements that are out of character with a property or alter its setting; d. Transfer or sale of the site of significance without adequate conditions or restrictions regarding preservation, maintenance, use, or re-use; Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121/99 5-6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 5: COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT e. Vegetation removal shall not be permitted on a historic or archaeological site unless the vegetation to be removed is a part of a duly authorized scientific excavation, or is a part of an approved development plan; and f. Other forms of neglect resuhing in resource deterioration. Policy 5-1.8.3: Alternatives to Preserving Historic or Archaeological Sites. As an alternative to preserving historic or archaeological sites, the owner of impacted lands may allow excavation of the site by the Division of Historic Resources or another State approved entity prior to development. Should a site be scientifically excavated in this manner, development may proceed foIlowing completion of the scientific excavation by the approved entity. OBJECTIVE 5-1.9: PUBLIC SERVICES IN COASTAL AREA. The level of service standards, service areas, and proposed phasing stipulated in other elements of the Comprehensive Plan for facilities in the coastal area and additional standards under this objective shaIl be applied whenever development orders or permits are requested. This objective shalI be measured through the implementation of the following policies. Policy 5-L9.1: Ensnre Available lnfrastmcture and Coordinate Timing and Staging of Public Facilities witb Private Development By December 3 I, 1998, the City shall have adopted land development regnlations which shall ensure that future development is directed only to those areas where public facilities which meet the City's adopted level of service standards are available concurrent with the impacts of the development. In order to assure appropriate timing and staging no occupancy permit sball be granted until infrastructure and services required by respective developments are in place and available for use concurrent with the impacts of development. The infrastructure shall be designed in a manner consistent witb the existing and projected future demands generated by development projected in the future land use element. The infrastructure sball also be consistent with applicable local, regional and State coastal resource protection policies. OBJECTIVE 5-1.10: INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION WITHIN THE COASTAL AREA. Establish an intergoverrnnenta1 coordination mechanism in order to manage coastal resources withio the jurisdiction of more tbau one local govermnent or public agency and assist in implementing appropriate portions of existing multi-jurisdictional resource planning and management plans addressing the coastal area, including the Indian River Lagoon and other natural systems witbin the City. POLICY 5-1.10.1: IMPLEMENTING POLICmS FOR INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION WITHIN THE COASTAL AREA. The City shall coordinate with Indian River County and appropriate regional, State, and federal agencies in managing coastal resources. Management activities sball include, but not be limited to, the folIowing: a. The City shall coordinate the folIowing coastal resource management issues with Indian River County: i. Participate in County forums and technical review concerning emergency preparedness and hunicane evacuation issues and update of the Peacetime Emergency Plan, including hurricane evacuation plans. ii Participate in technical review and in formulation ofpoJicies concerning the U.S. 1, C,R. 512, and Roseland Road (C.R. 505) corridors, including stormwater management policies within these corridors. This activity shall also be coordinated with the State DOT. iii. Public access issues shall be coordinated with Indian River County, including issues surrounding maintenance and improvements. iv. Issues SUlTounding conservation of the shorelines of the Indian River and St. Sebastian River shall be coordinated with Indian River County, and the State DEP as appropriate. v. The City shall coordinate resource management within the Indian River Lagoon with Indian River County. b. Major issues to be coordinated with Indian River County in order to assure that all future development shall be timed and staged to assure that requisite infrastructure and services are available to respective developments concurrent with the impacts of the development. c. Major issues to be coordinated with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) as may be appropriate in managing the following activities, which are occurring within the area that fronts on Indian River Drive, excluding improved open space: i. The City shall coordinate all development and resource conservation measures impacting the Aquatic Preserve with the DEP as well as other applicable public agencies. These activities shall include, but not be limited to, review of proposed development potentially impacting natural resources, including development petitions for docks, shoreline stabilization, dredging, or other alteration of natural resources under the State's jurisdiction. ii. All applications for development activity impacting waters of the State as well as tidally influenced coastal marsh, . or other lands under the jurisdiction of the State shall be coordinated with agencies having appropriate jurisdiction. iii. The City shall coordinate with teclurica1 staff within DEP .and SJRWMD in order to assure implementation of sound principles and practices of coastal resource management during the development review process as well as in the formulation of policies impacting coastal resource management. iv. The City shall coordinate with the SJRWMD as well as other appropriate State agencies in matters surrounding stormwater management, drainage, water quality and quantity, and consumptive use permitting. d. The City Growth Management Department shall coordinate with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) in preparing the Comprehensive Plan and amendments thereto in order to assure consistency with the Treasure Coast Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 5-7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN Regional Planning Council Comprehensive Plan. significance with the TCRPC. CHAPTER 5: COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT In addition, the City shall coordinate other planning issues of regional The City shall forward copies of development proposals within the area that fronts on Indian River Drive to public agencies having jurisdiction in the management of potentially impacted natural resources. OBJECTIVE 5-1.11: CONTINUING EVALUATION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT EFFECTNE- NESS. The City shall use the following policies as criteria in evaluating the effectiveness of the Coastal Management Element. Policy 5-1.11.1: Review the Impact of Changing Conditions on Coastal Management Policy. The City shall monitor and evaluate significant changes in the characteristics of natural coastal resources. Policy implications of such changes shall be examined and corrective measures shall be pursued. Coastal management policies shall be refined as needed in order to remain responsive to evolving problems and issues. Policy 5-1.11.2: Schedule, Budget and Implement Programmed Activities. The timely scheduling, programming, budgetiug and implementation of programmed coastal management activities identified in this Element shal1 be evidence of the City's effectiveness in carrying ont a systematic program for implementing coastal management goals, objectives, and policies. Policy 5-1.11.3: Coordinate with Public and Private Sectors. While continually implementing and evaluating the Coastal Management Element, the City shall maintain a process of intergovernmental coordination as well as coorcliuation with private sector groups interested in coastal management policy and programs. The effectiveness of this approach shall be evaluated by the success of coorcliuation mechanisms in resolving coastal management problems and issues. Policy 5-1.11.4: Achieve Effective Resolution of Coastal Management Goals, Objectives and Policies. The effectiveness of the Coastal Management Element shall be measured by the City's success in achieving coastal management goals, objectives and policies. The Coastal Management Element incorporates a systematic planning process for identifying coastal management problems and issues and implementing corrective actions. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121/99 5-8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 6: CONSERVATION ELEMENT CHAPTER6: CONSERVATION ELEMENT (reference ~9J-5.013(2), F.A.C.l ~6-1 CONSERVATION GOALS. OBJECTIVES. AND IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES. This section stipulates goals, objectives, and implementing policies for the Conservation Element pnrsuant to 'II163.3177(6)(d), F.8., and ~9J- 5.013(2), F.AC. GOAL 6-1: CONSERVATION. THE COASTAL COMMUNITY OF SEBASTIAN SHALL CONSERVE, PROTECT, AND APPROPRIATELY MANAGE THE CITY'S NATURAL COASTAL RESOURCES IN ORDER TO ENHANCE THE QUALITY OF NATURAL SYSTEMS WITHIN THE COMMUNITY. OBJECTIVE 6-1.1: PROTECT AIR QUALITY. Beginning in Janumy 1998, the City shall maintain land development regulations inclnding performance standards which ensure that development meets or exceeds the minimum air quality standards established by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and shall establish regulatory programs to prevent anclfor minimize non-point sonrces of air pollntion (note: the City has no point sonrces of air pollution). Policy 6-1.1.1: Combat Erosion and Generation of Dust Particles. Land development regulations shall incorporate performance standards which combat erosion and generation of fugitive dust particles. The regulations shall reqnire that measures be taken on building sites or cleared areas which assure that exposed, destabilized, or other altered soil is expeditionsly covered with an acceptable erosion control material. Policy 6-1.1.2: Air Pollution and Land Use Regulations. The City's adopted land development regulations, inclnding adopted soil erosion and sedimentation controls as well as nuisance abatement standards shall continue to protect against loss of air quality by maintaining land use controls which promote only activities compatible with existing land uses and natural systems and prohibit activities which generate air pollutants and other adverse impacts on the environmentally fragile coastal ecosystem. OBJECTIVE 6-1.2: WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY. Beginning in Janumy 1998, the City shall maintain land development regulations which address water quality and quantity throngh the implementation of the following policies. Policy 6-1.2.1: Water Qnality, Snrface Water Management and Land Use. Land development regulations shall incorporate the following performance standards in order to protect the quality of the City's water resonrces and to conform with policies of the Indian River Lagoon SWIM, DEP, and SJRWMD: a. Surface water management systems shall be designed and constructed to retain or detain with filtration, as a minimum the stonnwater run..off generated from the first one-inch of rainfall over the entire site. The stormwater design standard shall be predicated on the following: Off-site: 25-year, 24 hoW" design storm On-site: IO-year, 24 hour design storm. b. A vegetated and functiona11ittoral zone shall be established as part of the surface water management system oflakes occurring on all property. Prior to construction of the surface water management system for any phase of a project, the developer shall prepare a design and management plan for the wetland/littoral zone that will be developed as part of these systems. The plan should: i. Include typical cross sections of the surface water management system showing the average water elevation and the -3 foot contour (i,e., below average elevation); ii. SpecifY how vegetation is to be established within this zone, including the extent, method, type and timing orany planting to be provided; and iii. Provide a description of any management procedures to be followed in order to assure the continued viability and health of the littoral zone. The littoral zone as established should consist entirely of native vegetation and should be maintained permanently as part of the water management system. As a minimum. 10 square feet of vegetated littoral zone per linear foot ofJake shoreline should be established as part of the surface water management system. o. Class II Waters (i.e., coastal waterbodies which culTently do or have potential for supporting shellfish harvesting. That portion of the Indian River within the City's corporate limits has been classified by DEP as a Class II waterbody) shall be protected by incorporating the following provisions into the City's land development regulations: i. Dredging activities shall be limited to approved maintenance dredging and shall minimize adverse impacts on shellfLSh propagation or harvesting. ii. Ensure good water quality by coordinating with the DEP and the SJRWMD in monitoring the quality of stormwater runoo01I and all discharge processes where these agencies have jurisdiction. The City shall notify the appropriate agency with jurisdiction as potential issues or problems are identified by the City. The City's amended land development regulations shall provide performance criteria designed to ensure that new development provides effective and adequate stann-water management improvements concurrent with the impacts of new development. iii. Limit 1he use ofCJass II waters to water dependent activities that are not contrary to the public interest and satisfY a community need. iv. Limit modification of grassbeds only to those cases involving overriding public interest. v. Where modification of grassbeds is permitted the City shall assure that: (a) A determination of overriding public interest has been demonstrated prior to modification of grassbeds. (b) Project run-off and nutrient introduction shall be controlled to prevent an increase in water turbidity. (c) Projects damaging grassbeds during construction shall incorporate mitigative techniques which re-establish benthic conditions favorable to natural regeneration. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 6-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 6: CONSERVATION ELEMENT (d) Special attention shall be given to stipulations cited in (a) through (0) above during the development review process. The City shall coordinate closely with State and federal agencies during the pennitting processes to insure that the intent of these policies is carried out Policy 6-1.2.2: Regulate Agricultural Activities to Preserve Water Quality. Land development regulatioos shall include stipulations requiring that agricultural activities shall: a. Not be conducted adjacent to existing waterways and surface water management activities and shall comply with all applicable policies of DEP, SJRWMD, and other agencies having appropriate jurisdiction as well as State laws, including administrative roles governing the Indian River Lagoon Aquatic Preserve. Such activities shall not threaten the water quality of the Indian River Lagoon; b. Maintain natural drainage patterns; c. Promote the use of surface water supplies for irrigation purposes; d. Prohibit the expansion of agricultural activities into wetland areas; and e. Use best management principles and practices in order to reduce pesticide and fertilizer run-off. prevent soil erosion. and preserve water quality. Policy 6-1.2.3: Regulate Wastewater Treatment Discharge to Preserve Water Quality. Land development regulations shall incorporate the following performance standards in order to protect water quality: a. All new residential subdivisions, excluding individual single family houses in existing subdivisions, as well as multiple family and non-residential development within the established service area of the major public wastewater system shall be required to connect to the Indian River County wastewater system pursuant to ~20A-17.2(p) of the Land Development Code of the City of Sebastian In areas where developments cannot be connected to the public sewer, the development may be allowed to use septic tanks provided that the County Heatll Department approves and the developer agrees to install dry sewer lines in the development for connection at a later date. The City Council may waive the requirement to install dry lines. Policy 6-1.2.4: Preserve and Enhance Lagoon and Canal Shoreline. In order to stabilize areas susceptible to shoreline erosion, such as shorelines along canals aud the Indian River Lagoon wltich are susceptible to erosion, land development regulations shall require that all new development preserve shoreline native vegetation aud revegetate areas along shorelines demonstrating ltistorically erosive tendencies. Policy 6-1.2.5: Protect Deep and Surficial Aquifer Recharge Areas. The City has no prime deep aquifer recharge areas wltich have been identified by the St. Johns River Water Management District. However, stipulations for protecting surficial aquifer recharge areas shall be incorporated into the City's laud development regulations which require retention of open space for all development in order to: . Preserve the quality and quantity of water resources within the surficial aquifer. . Promote improved surface water management; and . Create natural or landscaped urban green space for enhanced community aesthetics and passive pedestrian activities. Policy 6-1.2.6: Deep Aquifer Water Conservation. In order to protect the quality and quantity of deep aquifer water resources, the City shall coordinate with the St. Johns River Water Management District aud other applicable regulatory agencies in identifying the existence and location of free flowing deep aquifer wells and in requiring corrective measures, including capping, plugging, or installing regulatory devices wltich control the discharge of water from the deep aquifer pursuant to the St. Jolms River Water Management District policies. Policy 6-1.2.7: Protection and Conservation of Potable Water Supply. By December 31,1998, the City shall amend the land development regulations by incorporating performance criteria for public potable water wel1field protection. In addition, administrative procedures shall require applicants for development to coordinate with the St. Johns River Water Management District in obtaining consumptive use permits. In order to comply with potable water conservatioo policies of the St. Johns River Water Management District and achieve a reduction in the current rates of water consumption, the land development regulations shall incorporate the following performance standards: a. Where reclaimed water is available, potable water supplies may not be used to meet irrigation needs. b. Require the use of water-saving plumbing fixtures on all new development. c. In order to reduce demand for irrigation water (which in turn often places greater demand upon potable water sources). at least thirty (30%) percent of all landscaping material obtained from off.site sources for use on any site should be native plants. Further. at least fifty (50%) percent of all trees used in landscaping shall be native species in order to lessen water demand. Policy 6-1.2.8: Emergeucy Conservation of Water Sources. The City shall coordinate with the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWIvlD) in implementing emergency water conservation measures based on the SJRWIvlD plans for management of the region's water resources. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121199 6-2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 6: CONSERVATION ELEMENT Policy 6-1.2.9: Managing Land Use Surrounding Water WeD Cones of Influence. By December 31, 1998 the City shall adopt amended land development regulations which contain performance criteria designed to protect potable water supply and quality by restricting land development within public water well cones of influence in order to avoid potential adverse impacts on potable water resources. Policy 6-1.2.10: Protect And Conserve Lakes And Estuarine Areas. In order to protect Jakes and estuarine areas, such as the Indian River Lagoon, and the St Sebastian River, the City's land development regulations shall include performance criteria designed to regulate against land development activities which adversely impact water quality, contribute to shoreline erosion and sedimentation, or otherwise threaten the long term existence of lakes and estuarine areas. The intent of the regulatory measures shall be to conserve the lakes and estuarine areas and protect these coastal resources from detrimental impacts of development. Policy 6-1.2.11: SWIM Program Coordination. Beginning in January, 1998, the City shall continue to coordinate with the St. Johns River Water Management District for purposes of using resources available through the Surface Water Improvement Management (SWIM) program and Indian River Lagoon Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan in order to enhance water quality especially surface waters w!rich are directed to the Indian River Lagoon. OBJECTIVE 6-1.3: MAINTENANCE OF FWODPLAIN. Beginning in January 1998, the City shall maintain land development regulations w!rich include performance criteria designed to protect the natural functions, including flood- carrying and flood storage capacity, of the lOa-year floodplain. Policy 6-1.3.1: Enforce Policies to Maintain Floodplain. The City shall continue to enforce its surface water management and flood damage prevention regulations, ~2aA-IO.2(1I), Land Development Code of the City of Sebastian (as currently exists and as may hereinafter be amended). New development encroaching into the floodplain shall incorporate flood protection measures sufficient to protect against the lOa-year flood. The City's Stormwater Management and Flood Protection Ordinance shall maintain consistency with program policies of the Federal Insurance Administration. The City shall monitor new cost effective programs for minimizing flood damage. Such programs may include modification to construction setback requirements or other site design techniques, as well as upgraded building and construction techniques. Policy 6-1.3 .2: Purchase of Floodplain. The City shall identify and recommend to the State and the St. Johns River Water Management District purchase of floodplains that would comply with program guidelines established under the Conservation and Recreation Lands (CARL) Program or the Save Our Rivers (SOR) Program. OBJECTIVE 6-1.4: PROTECT AND PRESERVE WETLANDS. Beginning in January 1998, the City shall maintain land development regulations which include performance criteria designed to protect and preserve wetlands from physical and hydrologic alterations as well as specifically direct incompatible land uses away from wetlands. This objective shall be measured through the implementation of the following policies. Policy 6-1.4.1: Wetland Development Restrictions. Wetlands, as defined in Policy 5-1.1.1 of the Coastal Management Element, shall be protected from physical or hydrologic alterations in order to maintain natural functions. Wetlands have the following functions: Wetlands serve important natural biological functions, including food chain production; and general habitat; and nesting, spawning, rearing, and resting sites for aquatic or land species; . Wetlands are an integral part of natural drainage systems impacting sedimentation patterns, salinity distribution, flushing characteristics, current patterns, and other environmental characteristics; . Wetlands can be significant in shielding other areas from wave action, erosion, or storm damage; . Wetlands serve as valuable storage areas for stonn water and flood waters; . Wetlands can be prime natural recharge areas; and . Wetlands provide natural water filtration processes which serve to purify water. No development shall be pennitted in wetlands other than approved passive recreation, open space, restricted accessway, bird sanctuary, natural stormwater retention/detention, natural preserve, or other similar approved uses pursuant to the City's Flood Prone Land and Wetland Preservation Ordinance, ~20A-IO.2(G), Land Development Code. Policy 6-1.4.2: Protection of Wetland Transition Areas. Transition areas shall be defined as the area separating wetland and upland areas and in w!rich development activities may be regulated to protect wetlands. The transition zone is an area having a direct groundwater or surface water influence. The transition area provides a buffer between wetlands and upland development or other land alteration activities. This area shall meet the minimum size requirements established by SJRWMD for wetland buffers. The purpose of the transition zone is to ensure the continuing function of respective wetland Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 6-3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 6: CONSERVATION ELEMENT communities. The City shall retain the right to prohibit development within the wetland transition area The boundary of a wetland tnmsition area shall be established by field investigation. At a minimum the following uses shall be prohibited within the wetland transition areas: . All industrial uses; . Wastewater treatment facilities; . Animal feedlots~ . Sanitary landfills; . Above-ground or below-ground pipes for pollutants or contaminants; . Incinerators; . Petroleum or pesticide storage facilities; . Any land use that stores, handles, or generates hazardous material or waste. Policy 6-1.4.3: Required Dedication of Conservation Easements or Reservations. By December 31, 1998 the City shall amend the land development regulations to include performance criteria designed to protect and preserve wetlands and wetland transition areas. The City shall amend the Subdivisiou Ordinance and the Wetland Preservation Ordinance to provide for the dedication of conservation easements or reservations where the City finds that the dedication is reasonable in order to protect the value and function of a wetland Policy 6-1.4.4: Wetland Delineation (Establishing the Wetland Line). Beginning in January 1998, the City shall inclnde in the LDC a requirement that any development that meets the criteria in Policy 6-1.4.1 conduct a wetland delineation. A delineation of the upland wetland boundary shall be established based upon an on-site field survey by a professional biologist or registered engineer provided by the applicant and coordinated with the St. Johns River Water Management District, the Department of Environmental Protection, and/or the US Corps of Engineers. Furthermore, the development shall through a comprehensive planning process identify the types, values, functions, size, conditions, and specific locations of the wetlands on the site. Policy 6-1.4.5: Administration of Wetland Development Restrictions. By December 1999, the City shall have adopted land development regulations which implement the following: 1. Review Process. The City shall coordinate with the jurisdictional agencies for purposes of rendering legal, equitable, and environmentally sensitive determinations oftbe development rights to be permitted on such wetlands and/or lands under the jurisdiction of the State or Federal government. The developer of a parcel of environmentally sensitive land shall be responsible for obtaining pennits or exemptions from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and from the Army Corp of Engineers, as may be appropriate, prior to obtaining a development order or development plan review approval from the City. Regardless of permitting by Federal or State permitting agencies, the City shall reserve the right to detennine the appropriate land use, density/intensity, and special mitigation measures including, but not limited to, the construction of culverts or other means. 2. Burden on the Applicant. The applicant -shall bear the burden of proof in determining that development shall not adversely impact wetlands, transitional wetlands, and other environmentally fragile natural systems. The applicant shall prove that the type, value, function, size, and condition of the wetland will not be adversely impacted, Such determinations shall be based on physical and biological data obtained from specific site investigations by a biologist, an engineer or by an other professional competent in producing data and analysis necessary to support impact assessments. 3. Coordination with Other Agencies. The urban forester, the Indian River County Soil Conservationist as well as representatives of the State Department of Environmental Protection, U. S, Army Corps of Engineers the St Johns River Water Management District, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service may be included during the development review process to assist in identifYing and delineating wetlands. Applicants shall have an opportunity to so demonstrate that any wetland designations within the confines of their property no longer function as wetlands as defined above. 4. Waiver for Marginal Wetlands Ir Mitigated.. For small isolated marginal wetlands that the developer is providing viable compensatory preserve areas which mitigate against a loss of viable wetland systems, the City may waive the preservation requirements, in and only in, the case of an overriding public interest. OBJECTIVE 6-1.5: COMBAT SOn.. EROSION. Beginning io January 1998, the City shall maintain land development regulations which include performance criteria designed to reduce the incidence of soil erosion caused by land clearing, breaches in stabilized shorelines, and lands having exposed soil withont vegetative cover. Policy 6-1.5.1: Implementing Erosion Control. Land development regulations shall require that appropriate measures be taken during land clearing and building operations to assure that exposed, destabilized or otherwise altered soil is expeditiously covered with an acceptable erosion control material. These provisions shall be iocorporated in the Subdivision and Tree and Landscape Ordinances. OBJECTIVE 6-1.6: PREVENTING POTENTIAL ADVERSE IMPACTS OF FUTURE MINING OF MINERALS AND MINERAL EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES. No mining activities, including sand mining, shall be permitted witlrin the City since the City is characterized by natural systems which would potentially receive irrettievable losses from the impacts of such operations. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121/99 6-4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER6: CONSERVATION ELEMENT Policy 6-1.6.1: Prohibition Against Mining Activities. Land development regulations shall prolubit mining of minerals, except for existing sand mining operations, based on the irretrievable losses which such inteose activities may potentially impose on the City's fragile coastal ecosYstem as documented in the Comprehensive Plan Data Inventory and Analvsis. OBJECTIVE 6-1.7: PROTECT NATIVE VEGETATION AND MARINE HABITATS. Beginoing in January 1998, the City shall maintain land development regulations which include performance criteria designed to protect and retain major vegetative communities and marine habitats. Policy 6-1.7.1: Implementing Protection of Vegetative Communities and Marine Habitats. Land development regulations, including the adopted Tree Protection and Landscape Regulations of the City's Land Development Code, shall be used in managing and protecting the impacts of development on major vegetative communities and marine habitats. These regulations shall mandate restoration in order to compensate for unanthorized removal of vegetation and to enhance stabili- zation of fragile slopes and/or shorelines impacted by development. By December 31, 1998 the City shall amend its adopted land development regulations by mandating any wetlands mitigation shall include minimum performance standards in order to enhance regeneration of viable wetlands and wetland vegetative communities. Policy 6-1.7.2: Preservation of Native Plant Communities. The City shall amend the adopted land development regulations to ensure compliance with Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Regional Comprehensive Policy Plan (policy 10.1.2.2) mandating that new development set aside, as a minimum 25 percent of each native plant community (as identified in the Comprehensive Plan Data Inventory and Analvsis. Conservation Element Chapter 6). The ordinance shall provide incentives for increased conservation of native plant communities determined by the Treasure Coast Regional P1anntng Council to be "regionally rare or endangered." Such an incentive program may include, for instance, an exchange which sets aside one (1) unit of "regionally rare or endangered upland" in exchange for two units of common habitat Such "set asides" of habitat shall be preserved in a viable condition with intact canopy, understory, and ground cover. Pursuant to the Treasure Coast Regional P1anntng Council policy cited above, the City may require payment of a fee in lieu of the above described mandatory "set aside" of habitat. Such cash payment may be in the form of an impact fee in lien of habitat preservation to be accumulated from development for the purchase of upland habit preservation off-site rather than on-site. Other adjustments may only be granted where compensatory mitigation is provided through revegetation with native plant species compatible with existing plant communities. Where payment of an impact fee in lieu of preservation is an allowable option, the impact fee paid should be at least equivalent to: (the average assessed value of one acre of the particular habitat type under consideration within the County the development occurs in) (the number of acres of that habitat type the development was required to set aside bnt elected to contribute toward preservation off-site). Such impact fees shall be payable to the City prior to commencement of development on-site. POLICY 6-1.7.3: REMOVAL OF UNDESIRABLE EXOTIC VEGETATION. The City shall amend the adopted Tree Protection Ordinance to require that, prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a new development, the owner/applicant shall remove all nuisance and invasive exotic vegetation on the subject property. Policy 6-1.7.4: Removal of Trees Causing Safety Hazard. The City shall amend its land development regulations to require that trees, such as Australian Pines, wltich are prone to wind damage and blockage of evacuation routes be removed from areas deemed by the City to be critical corridors for evacuation purposes. This policy shall be implemented concurrent with the above stated policy 6-1.7.2. In addition, the City shall consider the feasibility of imitating a similar program to remove any trees on public property which impose a critical hazard to evacuation routes. Policy 6-1.7.5: Protection of Manatee Habitats. The City shall promote protection of manatee habitats in a manner consistent with guidelines of the Marine Research Institute of the State Department of Environmental Protection. For instance, the City shall comply with the following State Guidelines: . The City of Sebastian shall assist Indian River County, the Department of Environmental Protection, the u.s. Fish and Wildlife Service, and other State and federal agencies, in developing an areaMspecific manatee protection plan and marina siting plan in order to ensure long.range manatee and habitat protection. . Permit applications for all boating facilities, including single family docks and dry storage, shall be evaluated in the context of cumulative impacts on manatees and marine resources. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 6-5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 6: CONSERVATION ELEMENT . Construction and expansion of multi-slip docking facilities and boat ramps shall be directed to locations where there is quick access to deep, open water, where the associated increase in boat traffic will be outside the areas of high manatee concentration, and where wetlands supporting manatee habitat will not be disturbed . The City sball assist DEP in distributing State publications and educational materials on coastal and marine resource conservation, and manatees in particular, to boaters, and assist the display of such materials. . Slow or idle speed zones shall be adopted, with or without channel exemptions as appropriate, in areas frequented by manatees. Enforcement of speed zones should be improved. . The City shall assist DEP in protecting manatees from injury and disturbance resulting from aqWLtiC commercial and recreational activities. . Manatee food requirements shall be taken into account in all aquatic plant management activities where manatees may occur. . The City shall assist DEP in ensuring the protection of habitat of special significance to manatees. OBJECTIVE 6-1.8: PROTECTING FISHERIES, WILDLIFE AND WILDLIFE HABITATS. By December 31, 1998 the City shall have adopted land development regulations which include performance criteria which limits disturbance of seagrass beds, wetlands, habitats of endangered or threatened species. The performance criteria shall protect fisheries, wildlife, and wildlife habitats from the adverse impacts of development by regulating the location, density, and intensity of those activities which cause the adverse impact The City shall enforce these land development regulations and shall coordinate with Indian River County, the SJR WMD, and the State in promoting protection of fisheries, wildlife, and wildlife habitats. In order to prevent "taking" of private property rights, the City's land development regulations shall provide for flexible development alternatives, including planned unit developments which shall mandate conservation of said resources while allowing more flexible development options on developable portions of the site. This Objective shall be measured through the implementation of the following policies. Policy 6-1.8.1: Manage the Impacts of Development on Fisheries. The City shall incorporate procedures for coordinating with the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission, and DEP, as appropriate, in reviewing the implications of development proposals, including proposed subdivisions and site plan review petitions. Such coordination shall be designed to assist in identifying potential adverse impacts of proposed development on marine habitats and fisheries. The City shall incorporate performance standards into land development regulations which are designed to preserve the water quality within the Indian River Lagoon and which protect marine grassbeds, coastal marshes, and mangroves in order to preserve marine habitats and fisheries. Policy 6-1.8.2: Protect Wildlife and Wildlife Habitats. By September 1990 the City shall amend the land development regulations to incorporate provisions which restrict development activities lmown to adversely impact endangered, threatened, or rare wildlife and wildlife habitats as well as wildlife and wildlife habitats of special concern as defined in Table VI-I of the Conservation Element data inventory and analysis. The City shall further protect wildlife and wildlife habitats by promoting the dedication of conservation easements or reservations as specified herein in Policy 6-1.4.3. Policy 6-1.8.3: Protection of Living Marine Resources. The City shall have adopted by December 31, 1997 land development regulations which require estuarine shoreline developments to avoid adverse impacts of development on seagrass beds and coastal marsh. Since these areas are sensitive to increased turbidity and other forms of pollution, water run-off and introduction of nutrients shall be regnlated through effective water quality management criteria. Plans for development impacting marine resources shall be coordinated with state agencies having jurisdiction prior to the City granting plan approval and/or prior to release of any permit for construction. Compensatory mitigation may be permitted in cases of overriding public benefit where State agencies having appropriate jurisdiction approve the mitigation measures proposed by the developer. Any such development shall ensure continuance and maintenance of essentially natural conditions in order to further propagation of fish and wildlife as well as public recreation opportunities. Policy 6-1.8.4: Site Plans Required For Developments in Estuarine Shoreline Areas. The City shall have adopted by December 31, 1997 land development regulations which require all applicants proposing development activities along the estuarine shoreline or within submerged areas to submit a site plan pursuant to site pian review regulations. Such site plan shall provide sufficient infonnation describing marine life potentially impacted by proposed land uses as well as related construction activity. The plan shall stipulate assurances t1mt tile proposed project shall not adversely impact marine life or water quality. For instance, water quality control techniques such as the use of weirs for purposes of managing turbidity may be required by the City. In addition, the City shall require surveys of existing conditions, specifications of planned site improvements, and techniques to be used during construction as well as in operating and maintaining the land use in order to prevent damage to living marine organisms. Policy 6-1.8.5: Uses Within the Estuarine Shorelines. The City shall have adopted by December 31, 1997 land development regulations which prohibit any development within the wetland estuarine shoreline, other than water dependent native shoreline vegetation programs, approved pervious or elevated accessways, or other uses approved by the City pursuant to other City regulations shall be permitted No structures which constrict water circulation in the lagoon shall be permitted. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121199 6-6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 6: CONSERVATION ELEMENT OBJECTIVE 6-1.9: PROTECT CONSERVATION LAND RESOURCES. By December 31, 1998 the City shall have adopted land development regulations which include performance criteria designed to ensure that designated conservation land resources, are protected based on locally determined criteria which further the goals, objectives and policies of the Conservation Element. This Objective shall be measured through the implementation of the following policies. Map 1-9 specifically includes areas reserved for conservation uses or restricted development Table I-I in the land use element provides a tabular sununary of existing and projected future use of natural and historical resources. This table includes areas reserved for conservation uses or restricted development. Table I-I, footnote #1, incorporates a list of existing land development regulations that presently regulate and shall in the future continue to regulate use of natural resources. All natural and historic resources identified in Map 1-9 and Table I-I shall either remain undeveloped or shall undergo "restricted development" "Restricted development" shall be regulated through performance criteria within the amended Land Development Regnlations and through objectives and policies contained in the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Policy 6-1.9.1: Designation of Environmentally Sensitive Areas. In Policies 6-1.8 and 6-1.9 estuarine shoreline resources, wetlands, and upland habitats are addressed including the regulatory framework through which the City intends to manage, protect and preserve the resources. The Future Land Use Map series identifies these environmentally sensitive systems. Other lands shall be subject to restricted development as defined in Objective 6-1.9. OBJECTIVE 6-1.10: HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT. The City shall coordinate with Indian River County as well as appropriate State and regional agencies in developing effective plans for managing hazardous waste (Note, No hazacdou, wa"e pollutant' or ,jtes currently exi" within the City). Beginning in January 1998, the City shall maintain land development regnlations which prohibit the following land uses and activities within wellfields and aquifer recharge areas as well as any area where it would adversely impact natural resources: a. Sanitary landfills; b. Animal feedlots; c. Incinerators d. Wastewater treatment facilities; e. Petroleum or pesticide storage facilities; f Above-ground or below-ground pipes for pollutants or contaminants. g. All other land uses that store, handle, or generate hazardous materials or wastes. Hazardous materials or wastes, as regulated by this section shall consist of the following: . Chapter 38F-41 of the Florida Administrative Code (the Florida Substance List). . Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 261 (Identification and Listing of Hazardous Wastes). . Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 302.4 (Table 302.4) (List of Hazardous Substances and Reportable Quantities). . Title 40 of the Code ofFedera1 Regulations part 355, Appendix A and B (List of Extremely Hazardous Substances). Policy 6-1.10.1: Managing Hazardous Waste. The City shall continue to enforce land development regulations which incorporate development restrictions directed toward preserving natural systems and accommodating ouly low intensity land use activities identified in the Land Use Element. Therefore, the City does not anticipate that hazardous waste shall threaten the City's natural resources. Nevertheless, the City shall continue to work with the County and appropriate State and regional agencies in developing an improved areawide solid waste management program which includes more innovative solid waste management technologies that save energy and/or produce renewable energy and effectively manage hazllrdous waste. OBJECTIVE 6-1.11: INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION FOR MANAGING CONSERVATION ACTIVITIES. Establish an intergovernmental coordination mechanism in order to manage natural resources and assist in implementing appropriate laws, ordinances, and plans of existing State, regional and local agencies sharing responsibilities for managing natural resources within the City. Policy 6-1.11.1: Implementing Policies for Intergovernmental Coordination in Managing Conservation Activities. The Coastal Management Element identifies policies for coordinating planning issues surrounding natural resources within the City. These policies shall be applied in managing intergovernmental activities associated with protecting, conserving, and preserving natural resources within the City. OBJECTIVE 6-1.12: CONTINUING EVALUATION OF THE CONSERVATION ELEMENT EFFECTIVENESS. The City shall use the following policies as criteria in evaluating the effectiveness of the Conservation Element. Policy 6-1.12.1: Review the Impact of Changing Conditions on Conservation Policy. The City shall mortitor and evaluate significant changes in the characteristics of natural resources within the City. Policy implications of such changes shall be examined and corrective measures shall be pursued. Conservation policies shall be refined as needed in order to remain responsive to evolving problems and issues. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121/99 6-7 I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 6: CONSERVATION ELEMENT Policy 6-1.12.2: Schedule, Budget and Implement Programmed Activities. The timely scheduling, programming, budgeting and implementation of programmed conservation activities identified in this Element shall be evidence of the City's effectiveness in canying out a systematic progrnm for implementing conservation goals, objectives, and policies. I I Policy 6-1.12.3: Coordinate with Public and Private Sectors. While continually implementing and evaluating the Conservation Element the City shall maintain a process of intergovernmental coordination as well as coordination with private sector groups interested in conservation policy and programs. The effectiveness of this approach shall be evaluated by the success of coordination mechanisms in resolving conservation problems and issues. I Policy 6-1.12.4: Achieve Effect Resolution of Conservation Goals, Objectives and Policies. The effectiveness of the Conservation Element shall be measured by the City's success in achieving conservation goals, objectives and policies. The Conservation Element incorporates a systematic planning process for identifying conservation problems and issues and implementing corrective measures. I I OBJECTIVE 6-1.13: ESTUARINE SHORELINE PROTECTION. The City shall have adopted land development regulations which protect the water quality of the estuary by protecting the shoreline. Tbis objective shall be implemented through the following policies. I Policy 6-1.13.1: Protection Against Potential Adverse Impact on Estoarine Shoreline. By December 31, 1997, the City shall adopt land development regulations which require applicants for development along lakes, natural waterways, or the estuarine shoreline to submit as part of the development review process plans which demonstrate how the development sball incorporate feature designed to protect against potential adverse impacts to: Shoreline vegetation and stabilization; Water quality; Native habitat; Living marine resources; and Shoreline access. No shoreline development shall be approved until the applicant has demonstrated that potentially adverse impacts shall be prevented or that compensatory mitigation sball occur. I I Policy 6-1.13.2: Shoreline Vegetation and Stability. By December 31, 1997, the City shall adopt land development regulations which require a duly authorized permit to remove vegetation from a shoreline. Where the City approves shoreline alterations, the applicant shall be required to Ie-vegetate, stabilize, and enhance damaged estuarine shorelines by planting native vegetation, including mangrove and/or appropriate native estuarine plant species which: I I L Contribute to marine productivity and water quality; ii Offer protection from erosion and flooding and Hi Contribute to the natural soil building process. I Policy 6-1.13.3: Hardening of Shoreline. By December 31, 1997, the City shall adopt land development regulations which prohibit the hardening of the Indian River Lagoon shoreline or the shoreline of the St Sebastian River with rip.rap, bulkheads or other similar devices, except where erosion constitutes a critical peril to upland property and the use of vegetation has failed to stabilize the shoreline. Such shoreline hardening structures sball generally not be vertical seawalls or bulkheads. The specific location and design of such structures shall: I 1. Comply with the best management principles and practices and be accomplished by use of the least envirorunentally damaging methods and designs possible; ii. Avoid a vertical slope which generates erosive tendencies, especially to adjacent unprotected shoreline properties. Pervious interlocking tile systems, filter mats, and similar stabilization methods shall be used in lieu ofvcrtica1 walls whenever feasible; iii. Not be located waterward of the mean high water line except: when it is shown to be in the public interest; iv. Approval conditioned upon receiving approval from other public agencies having jurisdiction;. and v. Incorporate a program. of shoreline vegetation or revegetation in order to build, enhance. and stabilize a. natural shoreline. I I I I I I Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 6-8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 7: RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT CHAPTER 7: RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT (Reference S9J-5.014(3), FAC.) S7-1 RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND IMPLEMENTING POLICIES. This section stipulates goals, objectives, and implementing policies for the Recreation and Open Space Element pursuant to ~163.3177(6)(e), F.S., and S9J-5.014(3), FAC. GOAL 7-1: PROVIDE ADEQUATE RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE. INSURE PROVISION OF AN ADEQUATE COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEM OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE SITES WIDCR MEET THE NEEDS OF EXISTING AND PROJECTED USER GROUPS. OBJECTIVE 7-1.1: SYSTEM OF PARKS AND RECREATION. The City shall on an annual basis and prior to adoption of the annual capital budget, review the need for new recreation sites and facilities. The analysis shall be predicated on data, standards, and policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan. The analysis shall be directed toward maintaining a system of recreational sites and facilities which is responsive to user needs. Policy 7-1.1.1: Level of Service Standards for Parks and Recreation Facilities. The City shall promote development of undeveloped and underdeveloped park land resources identified in the recreation and open space inventory and analysis contained in the Comprehensive Plan: Data Inventorv and Analysis. The park development plans shall be programmed and scheduled in the capital improvement program and budget. System improvements, including the characteristics of sites and facilities shall be based on the level of service standards cited in Tables VII-l.l.l(l) and VII-1.l.1(2) of this section which are hereby adopted as the level of service standards for recreation sites and facilities. TABLE VII-1.1.1(1): LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS FOR RECREATION SITES PARK LOCATION 1,000 POPULATION AREA FACILITIES FACILITY PEOPLE SERVED Neighborhood Neighborhood 2.0 acres up to 5,000 Minimum Play apparatus areas, recreation building, area, adjacent to of 2 acres sports fields, paved multi -pwpose courts, elementary schools senior citizens area, picnic area, open or when feasible free olav area, and landscaoiDl!: Community Serves residents of 2.0 acres up to 25,000 Minimum All facilities found in a neighborhood a group of of 20 park plus facilities to service the entire neighborhoods, acres family. Pools, softballlbaseball fields, adjacent to Jr or Sr teunis courts, play areas, picnic areas, High schools when passive and active recreation areas, multi- feasible purpose courts, and recreatiou bnilding, Shoreline N/A") N/A N/A N/A N/A Access (1) Shoreline Access Standard: access point per 3,000 1inearfeet of shoreline Source: Adopted from Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Outdoor Recreation In Florida - 1994 Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 7-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 7: RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT Policy 7-1.1.2: Monitor and Update Recreation Demand and Supply Analysis. The City shall update on a continuing basis the recreation land and facility demand/supply analysis contained in Tables VIT-2 and VII-3 of the ComDrehensive Plan: Data Inventory and Analvsis. The ComDrehensive Plan: Data Inventory and Analvsis indicated that existing recreational lands and facilities identified in Table VIT-l satisfy the existing demand. Policy 7-1.1.3: Mandatory Land Dedication or Fees In Lieu Thereof. The City shall enforce provisions for the mandatory dedication of land for parks and recreation or fees in lieu thereof contained in S20A-17.1(H) of the Subdivision Regulations. These regulations are intended to assure that new development provides necessary recreation lands, facilities, and/or fees in lieu thereof in order to accommodate the demands generated by new development. Policy 7-1.1.4: Future Recreation Capital Improvements. If in the future the City identifies recreation improvements for which public funds are needed, as opposed to developer financed improvements, the City shall schedule and incorporate such projects costing $25,000.00 or more in the Capital Improvements Element. Policy 7-1.1.5: Maintenance of Existing Recreation Land and Facilities. The City shall maintain existing recreation and facilities through the use of proper management and funding techniques. The City shall assure that recreation facilities are well managed, well maintained, and that quality recreation programs are available to all residents. This shall be partially achieved by continuing efforts toward collecting, maintaining, and updating data concerning public and private resource inventory, recreation improvement, and demand factors, and by improving design criteria and evaluation to attain a high quality park and recreation system. Policy 7-1.1.6: Utilize Creative Concepts of Urban Design and Conservation of Environmentally Sensitive Open Space. All plans for development or redevelopment of park land resources shall incorporate creative concepts of urban design and landscape. The plans shall be designed to enhance controlled access along the shoreline of the ocean and estuary systems. Active and passive recreation areas shall be planned in a manner compatible with unique natural features of the site. Park development plans shall be designed to preserve environmentally sensitive features of the site. The design shall provide a circulation system to minimize conflict between pedestrians and vehicles. Adequate landscape and screening shall be integrated into park development plans to minimize land use conflicts, protect stability of established residential areas, and enhance community appearance. Policy 7-1.1.7: Promote Environmental Concern as Part of Recreational Programs. The City shall promote environmental education and management as an integral part of park and recreation policies and programs. Support for cooperative programming between resource agencies and local educational advisors will provide park and recreation resources as an instrument for environmental teaching, and as a means for accomplishing this objective. The City shall promote development of nature trails at Schumann Lake Park and at Blossom Drive Park to provide opportunities for environmental education. Policy 7-1.1.8: Designation or Acquisition of Natural Reservations. "Natural reservations" are areas designated for conservation purposes, and operated by contractual agreement with or managed by a federal, state, regional or local government or nonprofit agency such as: national parks, state parks, lands purchased under the Save Our Coast, Conservation and Recreation Lands or Save Our Rivers programs, sanctuaries, preserves, monuments, archaeological sites, historic sites, wildlife management areas, national seashores, and Outstanding Florida Waters. The City has several natural reservations including The St. Sebastian Buffer Preserve, the AGe Industrial property, and St. Sebastian PUD. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121199 7-2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 7: RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT As part of the City's annual review of needs for recreational sites and facilities (See Objective 7.1.1), the City shall consider waterfront redevelopment improvement needs, particularly the potential for new access points to the Indian River, including areas to support parking demands generated by shoreline access improvements. As such land, facility, and improvement needs are identified, the City shall investigate the potential of funding such conservation programs through use of public or private not-for- profit agency resources. OBJECTIVE 7-1.2: PROTECT OPEN SPACE SYSTEMS. Beginning in January 1998, the City shall maintain land development regulations which include performance criteria designed to protect lands designated as open space from incompatible land uses and such designated lands shall remain functionally intact. Policy 7-1.2.1: Implementing Land Development Code. In addition to the subdivision ordinance mandatory park and recreation land and facilities regulation, the City shall enforce land development regulations which include specific open space definitions and standards addressing protection of open space, natural vegetation, landscape, and signage. Regulations shall include stipulations governing the provision and use of open space for buffering, protection of natural corridors, including drainageways, as well as other commonly accepted uses. Policy 7-1.2.2: Standards for Review and Maintenance. Within one (1) year after the adoption of a master drainage plan, the City shall adopt criteria which shall be used to review all proposals for development in existing and proposed areas designated as open space on the master drainage plan map or map series as well as on the Future Land Use Map. OBJECTIVE 7-1.3: ACCESS FACILITIES. After January 2004, all public parks and recreational facilities shall have operational automobile, bicycle and pedestrian access facilities. Policy 7-1.3.1: Right-of-Way Improvements. The City has established vehicle access facilities serving all public and private recreational sites. As future roadway improvements are analyzed, the City shall provide for nonmotorized transportation needs using FDOT design standards for bicycle facilities. No new roadway improvements are currently scheduled by the City. Policy 7-1.3.2: Design of Access Facilities. Public parks and facilities shall be designed and constructed with accessways which are compatible with the character and quality of on-site natural resources. No new land acquisitions are scheduled. Policy 7-1.3.3: BicycIe!Pedestrian Accessways. All neighborhood parks are provided with bicycle and pedestrian accessways. In planning and designing these accessways, the City shall remove barriers limiting access to the physically handicapped. Policy 7-1.3.4: Facilities for Handicapped and Elderly. The City shall assure that public and private facilities including recreation improvements are designed in a manner which incorporates facilities accessible to the handicapped and the elderly. OBJECTIVE 7-1.4: ACCESS TO INDIAN RIVER LAGOON AND TRIBUTARIES. By December 31,2001 the City shall adopt amended land development regulations which include performance criteria designed to preserve access points to the Indian River Lagoon, St. Sebastian River, and their tributaries. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 7-3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 7: RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT Policy 7-1.4.1: Require Access Points to be Provided as Needed. By September 1990 the City shall adopt amended land development regulations which include performance criteria designed to ensure that public access is maintained to the Indian River Lagoon. Currently, the City has two accessways to the Indian River. The accessways provide a public point of entry approximately every 3,000 linear feet. OBJECTIVE 7-1.5: PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COORDINATION IN PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTING RECREATION IMPROVEMENTS. During its annual review of recreation site and facility needs (See Objective 7-1.1.), the City shall coordinate planning for recreation improvements with each level of government, including the Indian River County School Board, the Audubon Society, and the private sector in order to promote recreational opportunities, including environmental education activities, in a cost effective manner. Policy 7-1.5.1: Joint School-Park Concept. The City shall promote the implementation of the joint school-park concept by working with the Indian River County School Board. The City shall attempt to maximize joint use of the land resources at Pelican Island and Sebastian Elementary Schools for both school and recreational activities. This concept promotes economy and efficient use of potential park and recreation resources centrally located to potential user groups. Policy 7-1.5.2: Coordinate with the Private Sector. On a continuing basis through the subdivision administration process the City shall coordinate with the private development sector in providing needed improvements in recreation facilities by enforcing the recreation land and facility dedication or fee in lieu ordinance. Policy 7-1.5.3: Evaluate Lands for Open Space Potential. As part of the scheduled stormwater management plan in FY 1992 - 93 and 1993 - 94 the City shall utilize the possible use of drainage easements as public passive recreation and open space. During FY 1991 - 92 and 1992 - 93 the City shall examine all lands currently used as open space but not currently owned by the City for feasibility of purchase, or purchase options. Policy 7-1.5.4: Utilize Grantsmen and Other Appropriate Fiscal Advisors. The City shall assure that the advantages of all appropriate local and non-local sources of financial and technical assistance are sought and received. Alternative funding sources and impacts must be monitored continually so that appropriate evolving State and federal assistance programs shall be aggressively pursued to ensure the attainment of recreation objectives in a cost effective and fiscally equitable manner. Policy 7-1.5.5: Improve Coordination With Other Human Service Planning Efforts. The City shall ensure realistic plans and responsive action to meet identified needs in a cost-effective and fiscally equitable manner by encouraging the use of local park and recreation resources for a wider range of human delivery services (i.e., health information, consumer protection, nutrition, bookmobiles, etc.). Coordination should include planning activities to provide a hike and bike trail system throughout the City within open space, park and street corridors. All future recreation facilities shall be designed for multi-purpose use where appropriate. Policy 7-1.5.6: Inform Citizens of Existing Recreation Opportunities and Issnes. The City shall coordinate with the local press in order to advise local residents of activities and special events taking place at City parks. Out reach efforts shall target residents such as the handicapped or economically disadvantaged who do not regularly participate in recreation programs, as well as more traditional user groups. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121/99 7-4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 7: RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT Policy 7-1.5.8: Cooperative Programs. Park and recreation resources shall be used by the City as an instrument for environmental education as well as other adaptive educational programs. This effort shall facilitate the use of local parks as year round community education and recreation facilities for all age groups. Policy 7-1.5.9: Review Plans and Policies. Review and amend as necessary existing plans and policies based on continuing analysis of problems and issues related to parks, recreation and open space. These analytical efforts shall include evaluation of major shifts in the indicators of supply and demand and shall be reviewed on a continuing basis. Identified future land and capital improvements shall be scheduled and programmed in the capital improvement program and budget. Policy 7-1.5.10: Fiscal Management. Review and evaluate park land acqUIsition proposals and recreation development programs to determine changing fiscal implications. Each year fiscal management policies including the capital improvement program and budget shall be reviewed, evaluated, and refined to reflect current program priorities for parks, recreation and open space. The capital improvement program shall reflect changes in recreation needs based on consumer demands and the impact of development trends and shifts in population magnitude and distribution. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121199 7-5 I I I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 8: INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT CHAPTER 8: INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT (Reference: S9J-5.015(3), FAC.) ~8-1 INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND IMPLEMENTING POLICIES. This section stipulates goals, objectives, and implementing policies for the Intergovernmental Coordination Element pursuant to 1I163.3177(6)(h), F.S., and 99J-5.015(3), FAC.. GOAL 8-1: PROVIDE MECHANISMS FOR IMPROVED INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION. THE CITY SHALL UNDERTAKE ACTIONS NECESSARY TO ESTABLISH GOVERNMENTAL RELATIONSHIPS DESIGNED TO IMPROVE THE COORDINATION OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ENTITIES INVOLVED IN DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES, GROWTH MANAGEMENT, AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION. OBJECTIVE 8-1.1: INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION AND COORDINATION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WITH INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, THE REGION AND THE STATE. Beginning in January 1998, Sebastian shall continue to coordinate amendments to and implementation of the City's Comprehensive Plan with the plans ofIndian River County, Indian River County School Board, and other units of local government through the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan Technical Committee. Additionally, the City shall work with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) to coordinate amendments to and implementation of the City's Comprehensive Plan with the plans of the TCRPC and the State. Policy 8-1.1.1: Responsible Entity for Intergovernmental Coordination. The City Council shall be responsible for ensuring an effective intergovernmental coordination program for the City. The City's Director of Community Development or his designated representative shall represent the City on the Indian River County Technical Coordination Committee. Policy 8-1.1.2: Coordination with Adjacent Jurisdictions. The City shall file a written request with Indian River County to receive copies of proposed comprehensive plans as well as future amendments for the City's review for purposes of intergovernmental coordination and to promote consistency with the City's adopted Plan. Policy 8-1.1.3: Coordination of Development and Growth Management Issues. The City shall pursue resolution of development and growth management issues with impacts transcending the City's political jurisdiction, by participating in the Indian River County Technical Coordination Committee. Issues of regional and state significance shall be coordinated with the regional or State agencies having jurisdictional authority. Issues to be pursued include but are not limited to the following: o Impacts of development proposed in the Comprehensive Plan on Indian River County, the region or the State. o Indian River County land development activities adjacent to the City's corporate limits. o City of Sebastian land development activities adjacent to the unincorporated area of the County. o Potential annexation issues. o Proposed North County central water and wastewater systems. o Areawide drainage and stonnwater management master plan, proposed improvements, and implementing programs. o Solid waste disposal, especially improvements required in order to comply with the 1988 Solid Waste Recovery Act. o Transportation improvements impacting the City and adjacent areas (especially designated arterials and major collector streets). o Level of service standards for infrastructure system impacting the City and adjacent unincorporated areas. o Natural resource conservation, including the Indian River Lagoon, the Sebastian River, and Collier Creek. o Coordination and implementation of the F-DOT 5-year Transportation Plan and County road improvement strategies managed through the Indian River County Joint Transportation Coordinating Comntiltee. o Implementation of the SJRWMDIDER SWIM Prognun for restoring the Indian River Lagoon. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 8-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 8: INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT Policy 8-1.1.4: Coordinating Provision Services and Information. The City shall provide information and services concerning impacts of the Comprehensive Plan on development and resource conservation activities. Such coordination shall involve Indian River County through the Indian River Technical Coordination Committee and shall involve public agencies in the region and the State by effectively interacting with such agencies as the respective agencies carry out their functions. Such information shall include providing information and services needed from the City to efficiently execute the respective programs of regional and State agencies. Policy 8-1.1.5: Coordination of Development Approvals. Beginning in January 1998, the City shall maintain land development regulations which include administrative and site plan review criteria that require applicants for development approval to obtain permits from County, regional and State agencies having jurisdiction prior to granting a final development order from the City. OBJECTIVE 8-1.2: CONFLICT RESOLUTION. As meetings are convened by Indian River County, the City shall participate on the Indian River County Technical Coordinating Committee, using this Committee as an informal forum for resolving conflicts among Indian River County, municipalities within the County, the School Board, and other special purpose districts or entities which provide services but do not have regulatory authority over the use of land. Policy 8-1.2.1: Informal Mediation Process. The City shall work with and support Indian River County efforts to establish an informal mediation process for solving intergovernmental coordination problems among local governments and other units of local governments providing services but not having regulatory authority over the use ofland. Policy 8-1.2.2: Mechanisms for Intergovernmental Coordination Review. The City shall use the Indian River County Technical Coordinating Committee structure as an informal conflict resolution forum to assist resolution of intergovernmental coordination problems. Policy 8-1.2.3: Coordination with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. Where the City is unable to resolve intergovernmental conflicts through the Indian River County Technical Coordinating Committee structure, the City Council shall use informal mediation processes provided by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. OBJECTIVE 8-1.3: INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS. By December 31, 1998, the City shall have adopted a concurrency management program (refer to Objective 9-1.5) that requires specific issues surrounding level of service standards for existing and proposed public facilities within the City and adjacent areas be coordinated with all State, regional, or local agencies or private entities having existing or proposed future responsibility for the operation and maintenance of such facilities. This objective shall be measured through the implementation of the following policies. Policy 8-1.3.1: Coordinate Regional/Sub-Regional Infrastructure Issues. The City shall work with various Indian River County Special Committees, including the North County Water and Wastewater District, the North County Fire District, the Joint Transportation Committee, and other similar committees in addressing issues surrounding regional or sub-regional infrastructure systems. Issues which shall be coordinated include, but shall not be limited to, wastewater and potable water systems improvements within the North County area; maintenance of the fire protection and emergency medical service in the North County area; improvements to several State Roads and County Roads; solid waste and hazardous waste disposal; and plans for "district" or "urban" parks in the North County area. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 8-2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 8: INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT Policy 8-1.3.2: Cooperation with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. The City shall cooperate with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council in the review of regional policies and standards which require coordination with local governments. Foremost, among such issues shall be assessment of standards for adequate levels of service for regional transportation facilities. However, the City of Sebastian shall coordinate with the TCRPC in all matters of regional significance in which the TCRPC desires City input, including but not limited to, development of regional impact (DRI's), Comprehensive Plan review, Intergovernmental Coordination review of project of regional significance (ICR projects). Policy 8-1.3.3: Capital Improvement Program Coordination. During preparation of the annual capital improvements program, the City shall evaluate all applicable State, regional, and local programs proposed for funding in order to promote consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. OBJECTIVE 8-1.4: MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES. As a minimum, twice annually the City shall coordinate with the Indian River County Technical Coordinating Committee and/or other similar organization established by the County to ensure consistent and coordinated management of multi-jurisdictional environmental issues. The City shall similarly coordinate annually with the East Central Florida Marine Resources Council on matters surrounding preservation of the Indian River Lagoon, the Sebastian River, water quality, and other development issues impacting marine resources. Policy 8-1.4.1: Liaison with Permitting Agencies. Establish formal liaison with County, State, and federal agencies which have permitting responsibility within the City of Sebastian. Policy 8-1.4.2: Management of Water Quality and Other Resource Management Issues Impacting the City and the Indian River Lagoon. In order to effectively manage the impacts of development on natural resources, the City shall coordinate with the SJRWMD in using the resources of the Surface Water Improvement (SWIM) program. The City will also coordinate issues impacting the Hutchinson Island Planning and Resource Management Plan. The City shall continue to participate in the Marine Resources Council and in the implementation of the Council's Management Plan for the Indian River Lagoon. OBJECTIVE 8-1.5: DATA BASE MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION. The City annually shall develop and update an appropriate data base in order to further the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Policy 8-1.5.1: Generate Necessary Data. The City shall predicate growth inanagement policies and land development strategies upon quantifiable data, where appropriate, that are consistent with recognized areawide projections and forecasts. Policy 8-1.5.2: Consideration of Areawide Data Resources. The City shall collect and analyze data developed by Indian River County, Indian River County School Board, and other public entities providing services but not having regulatory authority over the use of/and. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 8-3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 9: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CHAPTER 9: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (reference g9J-5.016(3), F.A.C.) ~9-1 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND IMPLEMENTING POLICIES. This section stipulates goals, objectives, and implementing policies for the Capital Improvements Element pursuant to gI63.3177(3Xa), F.S., and g9J-5.016(3), F.A.C. GOAL 9-1: MANAGEMENT OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS. THE CITY SHALL UNDERTAKE ACTIONS NECESSARY TO ADEQUATELY PROVIDE NEEDED PUBLIC FACILITIES WITHIN THE CITY'S JURISDICTION IN A MANNER WIDCH PROTECTS INVESTMENTS AND EXISTING FACILITIES, MAXIMIZES THE USE OF EXISTING FACILITIES, AND PROMOTES ORDERLY COMPACT GROWTH. OBJECTIVE 9-1.1: RATIONALE FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS. Based on the scheduled timeframe in Table IX-2.1, the City shall commit necessary resources for capital improvements needed to implement goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The fiscal commitment is stipulated in Table IX-2.1 and is predicated on the analysis of capital improvement needs within the Traffic Circulation, Public Facilities and Recreation and Open Space Elements together with level of service standards established and adopted pursuant to Policy 9-1.6.1 of the Capital Improvement element. Capital improvements will be provided for purposes of correcting existing deficiencies, accommodating desired future growth, and replacing worn-out or obsolete facilities. TABLE IX-2.1: FIVE YEAR SCHEDULE OF IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT TIMING COST 1997-99 $105,510 1997-99 $184,350 1997-98 $70,000 1997-2000 $25 000 1997-99 $39,000 1997-99 $24,000 1997-98 $18,000 1996-98 $42,843 1996-98 $230,994 1997-2001 $1,140,000 1998-2001 $650,000 1999-2001 $750,000 1999-2001 $763,000 1997 $300,000 1996-97 $275,000 1997-99 $294,500 1999 $1,500 1996-97 $140,500 1999 $40,000 1997 $4,000 ro'eel) Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121199 9-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 9: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Policy 9-1.1.1: Intent of Capital Improvement Element. The City is committed to growth management which incorporates appropriate fiscal management practices and procedures. The City shall consider the use of all legal and equitable fiscal management techniques to achieve delivery of public services and facilities needed by existing and anticipated future populations. The capital improvement program presented herein identifies capital improvements needed by the existing population to satisfy levels of service standards incorporated within this Comprehensive Plan. The City shall consider performance standards as well as legal and equitable impact fees, where appropriate, to ensure that new developments provide in advance of development a sufficient level of public facilities and services (or fees in lieu thereof) in order to cover the costs of needed facilities and services, the demands for which are specifically attributable to such new development. This element shall provide a basis for estimating fiscal impacts required by capital improvements included in the Comprehensive Plan. The capital improvements program and budgeting process provides an on- going process for continuing planning and review of the City's capital outlays, including their location, timing, estimated cost, relative priority, and potential funding sources. The capital improvement program and budget process is an advisory planning function. Capital outlays are fixed only by the City Council. Policy 9-1.1.2: Capital Improvement Program. A capital improvement project is defined as a project that is self-contained and that will usually be constructed or purchased as a unit. A capital improvement generally includes only those items constructed or purchased that have a useful life extending beyond a ten year period following their acquisition, and usually involve a cost in excess of $10,000 or involve the acquisition or disposal of land regardless of cost. Minor recurring annual expense items, including routine maintenance and repairs, are excluded. All projects that are to be financed from bond funds are included. Similarly, preliminary engineering studies for public facilities such as the design of improvements to the transportation, water, wastewater and drainage systems are generally itemized as capital expenditure items due to their significant cost and their impact on the capital improvement program. The capital improvement program and budget is concerned with the assessment of need, assignment of priorities, and efficient allocation of the City's existing and potential fiscal resources for major community improvements or acquisitions over a five to ten year period. The fundamental purposes of the capital programming process are as follows: a. To consolidate and coordinate all the various depamnental requests by taxing district with the hope of redncing delays and coordinating individual improvement programs. b. To establish a system of procedures and priorities by which each proposal can be evaluated in terms of public need, long range development plans, and short and long tenn fiscal management impacts. c. To schedule future capital outlay projects pursuant to identified needs and priorities. d. To set forth a financing program that identifies potential funding sources, including but not limited to ad valorem taxes/general obligation bonds; user fees/revenue of excise tax bonds; grant programs; equitable contributions or exactments; as well as perfonnance standards and other components of growth management which may be used as a fiscal strategy for obtaining needed capital improvements in developing areas. e. To coordinate joint projects involving participation by one or more local governments, as well as regional, state, or federal agencies. Policy 9-1.1.3: Capital Improvement Program and Budget as a Plan Implementation Device. The capital improvements program shall be used for achieving orderly urban growth and development. By providing a planned and reasonably reliable schedule of public projects, the capital improvement program and budget shall provide a guide for both public and private capital investment decisions affecting community development patterns. The capital improvement programming and budgeting process is a primary tool for closely coordinating land use planning and fiscal management required to successfully carry out the Comprehensive Plan. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121/99 9-2 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 9: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Policy 9-1.1.4: Fiscal Implications of Proposed Engineered Master Plans for Public Facilities. The City has no engineered master plans identifYing preliminary costs for improvements to the transportation, or drainage systems. Updated engineering estimates also are needed to determine cost impacts for potential improvements to the water, wastewater systems - either operated by the General Utilities Company or currently being planned by Indian River County. Needed engineering infrastructure improvement plans including cost and estimates are identified in the capital improvement program as needed preliminary engineering capital outlays. Policy 9-1.1.5: Availability and Scheduling of Capital Improvements. The City shall include within the five-year schedule of capital improvements contained within this Element all capital improvements which are identified in any of the respective elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Capital improve- ments with an estimated cost of less than $10,000.00 shall be included in the six-year capital improvements program and annual capital budget. Also, the capital improvement program and budgeting process shall be used to plan for needed infrastructure improvements to serve projects for which development orders were issued prior to plan adoption. The City shall also promote code enforcement as a means to assure availability of such services as deemed appropriate. Policy 9-1.1.6: Priorities in Allocating Capital Improvements. In allocating priorities for scheduling and funding capital improvement needs, the City shall assign highest priority to capital improvement projects in the five-year schedule of improvements which are designed to correct existing deficiencies. Policy 9-1.1.7: Planning and Zoning Board to Draft and. Rank Capital Improvement Priorities. The Planning and Zoning Board shall have the authority and responsibility to eValuate and recommend a ,ank order of priority for capital improvements which is .proposed for inclusion in the five-year schedule of capital improvements. The City Council shall review and retain its authority to adopt the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Board with or without modifications in the proposed five- year schedule of improvements. Policy 9-1.1.8: Capital Improvement Project Evaluation Criteria. Proposed capital improvement projects shall be evaluated and ranked according to the following priority level guidelines: a. "Levell": Whether the project is financially feasible and is needed to: . Protect public health and safety. . Fulfill the City's legal commitment to provide facilities and services. . Preserve or achieve full use of existing :facilities. . Maintain compliance with plans of state agencies or the St Johns River Water Management District that provide pnblic facilities within the City of Sebastian. b. "Level 2": Whether the project accomplishes the followiog: . Increases efficiency of existing facilities. . Prevents or reduces futnre improvement costs. . Provides service to developed areas lacking full service or promotes in-fill development or redevelopment c. "Level 3": Whether the project: . Represents a logical extension of facilities and services for new development in a manner consistent with Futnre Land . Use Element goals, objectives and policies, inclnding the Futnre Land Use Map. OBJECTIVE 9-1.2: LIMITATION ON PUBLIC INVESTMENTS IN THE COASTAL ffiGH HAZARD AREA. The Public expenditures that subsidize development in the Coastal High Hazard Area shall be limited to improvements included in the Coastal Management Element and Public Facilities Element. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121/99 9-3 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 9: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Policy 9-1.2.1: Public Improvements in the Coastal Preservation Zone. The City of Sebastian shall not use public funds to subsidize development within the coastal high hazard area. However, this provision shall not preclude planned water wastewater infrastructure investments for purposes of improving water quality and sanitary conditions along major floodways and the Indian River Lagoon where current septic tank usage constitutes potential health and water quality hazards, including possibly effluent leaching into the Indian River Lagoon and floodway within residential areas. Similarly, drainage improvements may be recommended as part of a proposed city-wide drainage improvement plan for purposes of managing stormwater runoff and improving water quality controls. No other infrastructure improvements shall be undertaken excepting facilities required to enhance shoreline access, resource restoration, or traffic improvements designed to promote and further public safety within developed high hazard areas. OBJECTIVE 9-1.3: FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS TO BEAR COSTS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPACTS. All development after January 1, 1998 shall be required to fund a pro rata share of all needed improvements which are directly attributed to the impact generated by the proposed development. A concurrency management system (CMS) shall be adopted before December 31, 1997 by the City of Sebastian (refer to Objective 9-1.5). The CMS shall mandate that applicants for development or redevelopment be required to provide a pro rata share of all capital improvements necessitated by the impact generated by the proposed development. The applicant/developer shall meet their pro rata share of the capital improvements either by constructing the necessary components or by providing funds in-lieu-of construction. This objective shall be measured through the implementation of the following policies. Policy 9-1.3.1: New Techniques for Funding Traffic and Stormwater Drainage Improvements Generated by new Development. As part of the proposed drainage and road improvement master plans, during FY 1992 through FY 1994 the City shall investigate effective measures for funding projected future infrastructure needs for drainage and road improvements. The City's planning effort shall investigate municipal taxing districts and other approaches which are to be used in assessing new development a pro-rata share of costs necessary to fund drainage improvement needs. By the end of 1990 the City shall adopt an ordinance which assesses new developments, a pro rata share for the necessary public facilities needed to maintain adopted level of service standards. Policy 9-1.3.2: Recreation Impacts. The City shall continue to implement its program for mandatory dedications for recreational open space or a fee in lieu thereof as a condition of approval. OBJECTIVE 9-1.4: FISCAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT. The City shall manage fiscal resources to ensure provision of needed capital improvements for previously issued development orders and for future development and redevelopment. Policy 9-1.4.1: Availability of Adequate Public Facilities. The City shall issue no development order or development permit for new development for which development orders were previously issued unless the concurrency management requirements cited in Objective 9-1.5 and Policy 9-.5.1 has been satisfied pursuant to requirements of ~9J-5.0055 (2) F.A.C. The adequate facilities ordinance shall mandate that future applications for development shall include a written evaluation of the impact of the anticipated development on the levels of services for the water and wastewater systems, solid waste system, drainage, recreation, and the traffic circulation system. Prior to issuing a development order or permit the City shall ensure that provisions of concurrency management established in Objective 9-1.5 and Policy 9-1.5.1 have been met. The developer's application shall demonstrate that the proposed development shall include all requisite improvements and that the improvements shall be in place concurrent with the impacts of Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21199 9-4 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 9: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT development as defined in and pursuant to Objective 9-1.5 and consistent with 99J-5.0055, F.A.C. The final point for determining concurrency must be prior to the issuance of a development order or permit which contains a specific plan for development, including the densities and intensities of use. Policy 9-1.4.2: Limitation on Indebtedness. In funding capital improvements, the City shall limit the maximum ratio of outstanding indebtedness to no greater than fifteen (15%) percent of the property tax base. The City shall restrict the maximum ratio of total debt service to total revenue to a ratio of eighty- five (85) percent. The City shall limit the use of revenue bonds to forty-five (45) percent of total debt." Policy 9-1.4.3: Capital Improvements Program. The City shall prepare and adopt a six-year capital improvement program and annual capital budget as part of its budgeting process. Policy 9-1.4.4: Master Drainage Plan. As part of the drainage improvement plan the City shall investigate the desirability of enacting a special district(s) as a mechanism for managing and funding needed drainage improvements through the year 2010. These improvement needs shall be identified in the drainage improvement plan. Policy 9-1.4.5: Grantsmanship. The City shall pursue available grants or private funds in order to finance the provision of needed capital improvements. Policy 9-1.4.6: Replacement and Renewal of Capital Facilities. The City shall annually analyze public facility needs prior to adopting a capital improvement budget for the next fiscal year. The analysis shall include review of the public facilities and infrastructure improvement needs identified in the Comprehensive Plan together with any new engineered assessment of infrastructure components in order to identify needed replacement or renewal of capital facilities. The City shall annually prepare a fiscal management strategy which is directed toward ensuring that needed replacement or renewal of capital facilities are identified, prioritized, and scheduled in a manner consistent with the existing and projected fiscal resources of the City. OBJECTIVE 9-1.5: CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT. Pursuant to Ch. 163, F.S., and 99J-5.0055 F.A.C., the City shall ensure that facilities and services needed to support development are available concurrent .with the impacts of such development. Beginning in January 1, 1998, no final development order shall be issued which would result in a reduction of adopted levels of service. In order to prevent a reduction in level of service, the City shall issue no fmal development order unless the applicant provides narrative and graphic information demonstrating to the satisfaction of the City that adopted level of service standards for public facilities, including roads, water and wastewater services, drainage, solid waste, and recreation will be maintained and that improvement needs shall be in place concurrent with the impacts of development. This objective shall be implemented through the following policy: Policy 9-1.5.1: Resolving Concurrency Issues. In order to implement 99J-5.0055 and Objective 9-1.5, the above measure, the City shall require that all developments requiring a development order as part of the review process (as defined in SI63.3164 F.S., including comprehensive plan amendments, rezoning amendments, subdivision approvals, site plan approvals, or building permit approvals) shall, at the time the subj ect application is filed, submit narrative and graphic information which demonstrates that all urban services needed by the proposed development can and will be provided concurrent with the new development. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121/99 9-5 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 9: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT In order to establish an orderly review process, the City shall refine the Land Development Code by stipulating specific narrative and/or graphic data and information required at the time an application for comprehensive plan amendment or zoning code amendment, subdivision or replat approval, site plan approval, or building permit approval is filed with the City. As a minimum, the information shall include the following: . The specific land use(s) and the proposed density andlorintensity of the use(s); . Estimated trips for the peak hour generated by the proposed land use(s) together with anticipated on- and off-site improvements necessitated to accommodate the traffic impacts generated by the development including, additional RfW, roadway improvements, additional paved laneage, traffic signalization, proposed methods for controlling access and egress, and other similar improvements; . Planned improvements in potable water and/or wastewater systems required to establish andlor maintain adopted water and wastewater levels of service. System improvements and proposed funding resources required for implementing any improvements required to establish andlor maintain adopted potable water and wastewater system level of service standards. . Conceptual plan for accommodating stormwater run-off and demonstrated evidence that the proposed drainage improvements shall accommodate stormwater run-off without adversely impactiug natura1 systems or the City's adopted level of service for storm drainage; . In cases where residential development is proposed, information shall be submitted describing plans for accommodating recreational r1"",.nrl. generated by the development, including demonstrated evidence that the City's adopted level of service for recreation shall not be adversely impacted; . Projected demand generated by the development ou the solid waste disposal system and assurances that the City's adopted level of service for solid waste disposal shall not be adversely impacted; . Other information which the City determines is uecessary to assure that the concurrency requirement shall be satisfied without adversely impacting existing levels of service or the City's ability to adequately service anticipated developments which are consistent with adopted plans and policies of the City. All such information submitted pursuant to this subsection shall incorporate proposed funding sources, including any identification of improvements which the applicant anticipates shall be funded by the City or other public or private entity other than the applicant. Policy 9-1.5.2: Concurrency Management System. The City's Concurrency Management System is hereby included by reference and appears in the Appendix. OBJECTIVE 9-1.6: COORDINATION OF LAND USE DECISIONS, PUBLIC FACILITIES LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS, AND FISCAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT. The City shall ensure that land use decisions and fiscal decisions are coordinated with the adopted schedule of capital improvements to maintain adopted level of service standards and meet existing and future needs. This oj)jective shall implemented through the following policies. Policy 9-1.6.1: Level of Service Standards. Prior to issuing a development order the City shall review all proposed development to ensure consistency with adopted LOS standards. No development shall be approved that is projected to decrease the existing LOS below the adopted standard, unless those are mitigated by the developer. The City shall use the following LOS standards in reviewing the impacts of new development and redevelopment upon public facilities: Concurrencv Facilitv Sanitary Sewer Potable Water Solid Waste: Citv of Sebastian Adonted Level of Service Standard 250 ga1lons per day per equivaleut residential unit 250 ga1lons per day per equivalent residentia1 unit 7.52 pounds per day per capita Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121/99 9-6 CITY OF SEBASTIAN Drainage Facilities Water Quantity Standards: CHAPTER 9: CAPITAL lMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Water Quality Standards: Off-Site Standard: Post development runoff shall not exceed the pre-deve1opment runoff rate for a 25-year, 24 hour design stonn. On-Site Standard: Post development runoff shall not exceed the pre-development runoff rate for a lO-year, 24 hour design stonn. Water quality standards of Chapter 17-25, FAC, shall be applied as the quantitative standards. Chapter 17-25, F AC, requires Outstanding Florida Waters (i.e., Indian River Lagoon) to reduce pollution loads by an additional fifty percent (50%) prior to discharge. Recreation: PARK CLASSIFICATION Neighborhood Park Community Park ACREAGE OF RECREATION AREASIPOPULATION 2.0 per 1,000 2.0 per 1,000 Roads: ROADWAY FACllJTY MINIMUM WS STANDARD PEAK HOUR" C D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D Policy 9-1.6.2: Adequate Facilities Ordinance. The City shall issue no development order or development permit for new development for which development orders were previously issued unless the concurrency management requirements cited in Objective 9-1.5 and Policy 9-.5.1 has been satisfied pursuant to requirements of g9J-S.0055 (2) FAC. The adequate facilities ordinance shall mandate that future applications for development shall include a written evaluation of the impact of the anticipated development on the levels of services for the water and wastewater systems, solid waste system, drainage, recreation, and the traffic circulation system. Prior to issuing a development order or permit the City shall ensure that provisions of concurrency management established in Objective 9-1.5 and Policy 9-1.5.1 have been met. The developer's application shall demonstrate that the proposed development shall include all requisite improvements and that the improvements shall be in place concurrent with the impacts of development as defined in and pursuant to Objective 9-1.5 and consistent with g9J-S.OOS5, FAC. The final point for determining concurrency must be prior to the issuance of a development order or permit which contains a specific plan for development, including the densities and intensities of use. Comprehensive Plan Goals. Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 9-7 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 9: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Policy 9-1.6.3: Evaluation Criteria for Plan Amendments. Proposed Plan amendments and requests for new development or redevelopment shall be evaluated according to the following guidelines: a. Does the proposed action contribute to a condition of public hazard as described in the Public Facilities and/or Coastal Maoagemeot Etements; b. Does the proposed action exacerbate any existing condition of public facility capacity deficits, as described in the Transportation Circulation, Public Facilities, and/or Recreation and Open Space Elements; c. Does the proposed action generate public facility demands that may be accommodated by capacity increases ptanoed in the Five-Year Schedule of Improvements; d. Does the proposed action conform with the future land uses designated on the Future Land Use Map within the Future Land Use Element; e. Does the proposed action comply with and accommodate pnblic facility demands based on the adopted level of service standards contained herein; f. If the proposed action requires that any public facilities be provided by the City, there shall be a demonstration of financial feasibility; and g. Does the proposed action impact facility plans of any State agencies or facility plans of the S1. Johns River Water Maoageroent District. ~9-2 IMPLEMENTING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS. This section stipulates a five year schedule of Capital Improvements together with criteria for monitoring and evaluating the Capital Improvements Element. Policy 9-2.1: Five Year Schedule of Improvements. Table IX-2.I "Five Year Schedule of Improvements: 1996-2001, contained herein, establishes the estimated projected cost, and potential revenue sources for each of the Capital Improvement needs identified within the respective comprehensive plan elements. These programs are scheduled in order to ensure that the goals, objectives, and policies established in the capital improvements element shall be met. ~9-3 MONITORING AND EVALUATING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT. The Capital Improvements element shall be reviewed on an annual basis in order to insure that the required fiscal resources are available to provide adequate public facilities needed to support future land use consistent with adopted level of service standards. The annual review of the Capital Improvements Element shall be the responsibility of the Planning and Zoning Board. Findings and recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Board shall be considered by the City Council at a public meeting. At such time the City Council shall take action as it deems necessary in order to refine/update. the Capital Improvements Element. The monitoring and evaluation procedure shall incorporate the following considerations: 1. Data Uodate and Refinements. Determine if any corrections, updates, and/or modifications should be undertaken, such considerations shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following: . Estimated costs . Revenue sources .. Recently constructed capital improvements . Dedications . Scheduled dates of improvements projects 2. Consistencv Review. Determine whether changes to the Capital Improvements Element are necessary in order to maintain consistency with other elemeuts of the Comprehensive Plan. .3. Imolications of Scheduled Master Plans. The five-year schedule of improveroents shall be updated as necessary in order to reflect new projects identified in the proposed improvement plans for drainage and traffic circulation improvements. 4. Priority of Scheduled Imorovemeuts. The cited improvement plans for traffic circulation and drainage shall assess existing deficiencies and recommend a schedule of priorities fur public improvemeuts. 5. Caoital Imorovement Evaluation Criteria. Annually, the Department of Community Development shall review the criteria used to evaluate capital improvement projects in order to insure that the projects are being ranked in their appropriate order of priority and incorporate any needed changes in order to upgrade and facilitate the evaluation process. 6. Level of Service Standards. Annually, the Departmeut of Community Development shall evaluate the City's effectiveness in maintaining the adopted level of service standards and recommend any needed action to address problem areas. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121/99 9-8 CITY OF SEBASTIAN CHAPTER 9: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT 7. County. State and Regional Inmrovement Prol!l'a1l1S. The Department of Community Development shall annnalIy review the effectiveness of program coordination in resolving multi-jurisdictional issues surrounding the plans and programs of County, State and Regional agencies, as well as private entities, such as the General Development Utilities Company, that provide public facilities within the City's jurisdiction. For instance, consider the effectiveness of intergovernmental coordination surrounding improvements to County Road 512 corridor, progress in improvements to water and wastewater systems, and other similar infrastructure improvements needed. 8. Private Sector Imorovements. Dedications or Fees in Lieu Thereof. The Department of Community Development shall evaluate the effectiveness of provisions requiring mandatory dedications or fees in lieu thereof, as well as progress toward incorporating other programs for assessing new development a pro-rata share of the improvement costs generated by the respective developments. 9. Imoact of Other Jurisdictions in Maintaining Level of Service Standards. The Department of Community Development shall coordinate with the City Engineer in evaluating the success and failme of intergovernmental coordination in achieving an areawide approach to achieving central water and waste water systems, areawide transportation improvements, as well as drainage improvements, which may be reqnired to maintain levels of service standards. 10. Outstarlli;n" Indebtedness. Annually the City Manager's Office shall evaluate the ratio of outstanding indebtedness to the property tax base. II. Grantsmanshio. The Department of Community Development shall evalnate efforts made to secure available grants or private funds in order to finance the provision of capital improvements. 12. Fiscal Management. The Department of Community Development shall evaluate the City's progress in finding effective funding mechanisms for promoting road and drainage improvements as well as other capital improvement needs identified in the scheduled drainage, traffic circulation, water, and wastewater improvement plans. 13. Evaluation Criteria. The Department of Community Development shall evalnate the nsefulness of criteria used to evalnate plan amendments as well as reqnests for new development/redevelopment 14. Undate Schedule of Imorovements. The Department of Commnnity Development shall review the City's success in implementing the five-year capital improvement program and refine the schedule to include any new projects required to support any development during the latter part of the five-year schedule. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and_ Policies 09121199 9-9 CITY OF SEBASTIAN APPENDIX 9A: CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT APPENDIX 9-A: CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SECTION 1: PURPOSE AND INTENT Concurrency is a finding that public facilities and services necessary to support a proposed development are available, or will be made available, concurrent with the impacts of the development. This Article is intended to provide a systematic process for the review and evaluation of all proposed development for its impact on concurrency facilities and services, as required by the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulations Act, Chapter 163, Part II, FS, and Rule 9J-5.0055, Florida Administrative Code. Facilities in Sebastian that are subject to these regulations include: - Potable Water - Recreation - Sanitary Sewer -Solid Waste -Drainage - Roads The purpose of this Article is to ensure that development orders and permits are conditioned on the availability of concurrency facilities and services which meet adopted level of service requirements identified in this Article. This Article is also intended to describe the requirements and procedures for determining consistency of proposed development with the City of Sebastian's Comprehensive Plan. SECTION 2: CONSISTENCY WITH CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN All development applications shall demonstrate compliance with the City of Sebastian Comprehensive Plan as well as with all applicable provisions of the City Land Development Regulations. Further, development applications shall demonstrate that specified concurrency facilities shall be available at prescribed levels of service concurrent with the impact of the development of those facilities. SECTION 3: DEFINmON OF CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT TERMS The following defmitions shall apply to concurrency management rules and regulations: Appeal: A request for a review of an administrative interpretation of any provision of this Article, or a review of a decision made by any administrative official or board or commission. Building Permit: For purposes of the concurrency management ordinance, a permit which authorizes the construction of a new building, or the expansion of floor area, or the increase in the number of dwelling units contained in an existing building, or change in use shall qualify as a building permit. Capacity: Refers to the availability of a public service or facility to accommodate users, expressed in an appropriate unit of measure, such as gallons per day or average daily trips. Capacity, Available: Capacity which can be reserved or committed to future users for a specific public facility. Capacity, Committed: The amount of capacity which has been committed to accommodate existing developments, developments which have been issued a final development order, committed development, and vested developments. Capacity, Reserved: Capacity which has been removed from the available capacity pool and allocated to a particular property for a set period of time.o Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121199 9A-l CITY OF SEBASTIAN APPENDIX 9A: CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT Certificate of Occupancy: A document issued by the proper authority allowing the occupancy or use of a building and certifying that the structure or use has been constructed or will be used in compliance with all the applicable municipal codes and ordinances. Concurrency Certificate: An authorization to reserve capacity for concurrency facilities. Concurrency Certificate, Conditional: A conditional authorization to reserve capacity for concurrency facilities. Concurrency Facilities: Public facilities and services for which a level of service must be met concurrent with the impacts of development or an acceptable deadline, as mandated in the Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Chapter 163, ES, and 9J-5.0055, Florida Administrative Codes, shall include: . Potable Water '. Recreation . Sanitary Sewer . Solid Waste . Drainage . Roads Concurrency Management Monitoring System: The data collection, processing and analysis performed by the City Community Development Department to determine available capacity for concurrency facilities. Data utilized shall be the most current reliable information available to the City. Concurrency Management System: The procedure and process that the City uses to ensure that no development order or building permit is issued by the City unless the necessary concurrency facilities are available or are assured to be available consistent with the City of Sebastian Comprehensive Plan. The procedure and process is also intended to ensure that sufficient capacity for concurrency facilities is available to meet and maintain adopted levels of service. As part of the concurrency management system the City shall operate and maintain a concurrency management monitoring system. Concurrency Review: Evaluation by the Growth Management Department based on adopted level of service standards to ensure that public facilities and services needed to support development are available concurrent with the impacts of such development as defined in this Article and if such facilities are not available, that the developer of a proposed development bear a cost of providing public services and facilities at a level of service defined by the Comprehensive Plan and concurrent with the impacts of a proposed development, Concurrency Status Report: A status report prepared by the City identifying available concurrency facility capacity: The status report shall be produced, modified and adjusted from time-to-time as a result of the reservation of capacity or other act which alters the availability of concurrency facility capacity. Design Capacity: The potential or suitability for holding, storing or accommodating the demands upon a concurrency facility. Developer's Agreement: An agreement between the City and another party associated with the development of land pursuant to Article ill. Development Order: Any order or permit granting, denying or granting with conditions an application for a preliminary development order, a final development order, a development permit or any other official action of the City having the effect of permitting the development ofland. Development Order, Final: This shall mean the last discretionary act of the City before development can commence. The last discretionary act shall occur through an act of official authorization and with recorded documentation from the City of Sebastian thereby approving the final development plans for a Comprebensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121/99 9A-2 CITY OF SEBASTIAN APPENDIX 9A: CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT proposed development project. The issuance of a final development order after the effective date of the ordinance adopting the Comprehensive Plan shall only occur if the final development plan complies with the goals, objectives, and policies established in the Comprehensive Plan. Final development orders shall include the City's final approval of the following development procedures: . Construction permit; . Certificate of Occupancy; . Building 't pemn, . Developments of Regional Impact (DR!) approval; and . Site plan approval. Level of Service: An indicator of the operational efficiency of service provided by a concurrency facility. Level of Service Standard: The adopted volume of demand required for each concurrency facility in order to achieve acceptable operational efficiency. Pool, Available Capacity: The total unused capacity of concurrency facilities existing at any point in time. "Proceeding in Good Faith": Tangible and continuing actions taken by an applicant of an approved final development order to perform actual project construction and implementation leading to completion of a final development plan within a reasonable period of time. More over, a certificate of completion for the development of infrastructure must be received within the time frame established in the applicable fmal development order. This provision can only be modified through a development agreement approved by the City Council. Vested Rights: A development order shall be deemed "vested" and not subject to requirements of concurrency management if development circumstances meet criteria for common law or statutory vesting, as defined below. All "non-vested" development or development orders are subject to all requirements of this Article. Vested Rights, Common Law: A right not created by statute or the provisions of the City of Sebastian Comprehensive Plan which would authorize the development of real property or the continued development of real property notwithstanding the provisions of the City of Sebastian Comprehensive Plan. The City may find such vesting to exist whenever the applicant proves by a preponderance of evidence that the real property owner, acting in good faith upon some act or omission of the City has made a substantial change in the position or has incurred such extensive obligations and expenses that it would be highly inequitable and unjust to destroy the right to develop or to continue the development of the real property. The assignment of the particular zoning classification or the assignment of a particular land use designation to parcel ofreal property does not guarantee or vest any specific development rights to any person or entity as to said real property. Vested Rights, Statutory: A statutory right to develop or to continue the development ofreal property pursuant to the provisions of S 163.3187(8), FS, or its successor provisions. Such vesting may be found to exist if a valid and unexpired final development order was issued by the City prior to the effective date of this Code, if construction has commenced on the subject development and the development is in the process of being completed or further development is continuing in good faith. Statutory vesting does not occur unless all material requirements, conditions, limitations and regulations of the development order have been met and are being maintained. The Land Development Regulations shall not apply to developments which have commenced duly approved construction prior to the effective date of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 9A-3 CITY OF SEBASTIAN APPENDIX 9A: CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SECTION 4: APPLICABILITY AND EXEMPTIONS All applications for final development orders shall be subject to concurrency review unless specifically exempted below. However, in no case shall a development order be issued for a minimum threshold project which would impact a concurrency facility for which a moratorium or deferral on development has been placed. A. Projects Below the Minimum Threshold. The following development shall be exempt from concurrency review: 1. Residential projects that entail structural alterations, including room additions to single family structures--which do not change the land use; 2. Construction of residential or non-residential accessory buildings and structures which do not create additional public facility demand. 3. Actions administered through development orders and other developments which do not increase demand on concurrency facilities, such as grading or land excavation or structural alterations which do not include a change of use and satisfy provisions of (1) and (2) above. B. Vested Projects. Projects which have valid final development orders or building permits prior to the effective date of this Code, shall be considered to be vested and therefore exempt from concurrency management. This shall include the following: 1. Any project for which a valid building permit has been issued and has not expired; and 2. All vacant lots in single-family detached, single family attached and two-family subdivisions which were lawfully platted in accordance with the City Land Development Regulations and recorded prior to the effective date of this Article; and 3. Approved developments of regional impact with a development order that has not expired; and 4. Any project which has obtained a determination of vested rights upon appeal to City Council. C. Redevelopment Projects. Proposed redevelopment shall be credited for the existing demand on available capacity. If a redevelopment project generates demand in excess of the existing demand which it is replacing, a concurrency review shall be required; however, the concurrency review shall only address the amount by which the proposed demand generated exceeds the demand of existing development. The development plan for redevelopment must be submitted no more than one (I) year after the prior use is discontinued in order to qualify for a concurrency credit. If the proposed redevelopment generates equal or less demand than the existing project, the applicant shall be given a concurrency credit enabling the applicant to reserve the unused capacity. The concurrency credit will expire within five (5) years of the change or discontinuance ofthe use. The applicant's submission of an application for a demolition permit shall also initiate a concurrency review for the express purpose of issuing credits for redevelopment. D. Public Facilities. Public facilities necessary to ensure the protection of the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Sebastian, including public schools (pre-kindergarten through 12th grade), shall be exempt from concurrency review. This shall include all public facility Comprehensive Plan Goal~ Objectives and Policies 09121/99 9A-4 CITY OF SEBASTIAN construction projects included in the City's adopted level of service standard. APPENDIX9A:CONCURRENCYMANAGEMENT Capital Improvements Program required to meet any SECTION 5: CRITERIA FOR CONCURRENCY AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT ORDERS A final development order shall not be granted for a proposed development unless the City finds that adequate capacity for concurrency facilities exists at or above adopted level of service in order to accommodate the impacts of the proposed development, or that improvements necessary to bring concurrency facilities up to their adopted level of service will be in place concurrent with the impacts of the development. A. Sanitary Sewer, Potable Water, Solid Waste, and Drainage. For sanitary sewer, potable water, solid waste, and drainage facilities, the City shall find that the following criteria have been met in order for a proposed development to be found in compliance with concurrency management requirements: 1. A final development order is issued subject to the condition that, at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent, the necessary facilities and services are in place and available to serve the new development; or 2. At the time the fioal development order is issued, the necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant to 9163.3220, FS, or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, FS, to be in place and available to serve new development at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. B. Parks and Recreations. For parks and recreation facilities, at a minimum, the City shall fmd that the following criteria have been met in order for a proposed development to be found in compliance with concurrency management requirements: 1. At the time the final development order is issued, the necessary facilities and services are in place or under actual construction; or 2. A final development order is issued subject to the condition that, at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the acreage for the necessary facilities and services to serve the new development is dedicated or acquired by the City, or funds in the amount of the developer's fair share are committed; and a. A final development order is issued subject to the conditions that the necessary facilities and services needed to serve the new development are scheduled to be in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy as provided in the City's adopted Five Year Capital Improvements Program; or b. At the time the finaI development order is issued, the necessary facilities and services are the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the necessary facilities and services to serve the new development to be in place or under actual construction not more than oue year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy; or c. At the time the final development order is issued, the necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant to ~163.3220, FS, or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, FS, to be in place or under actua1 construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy. C. Transportation Facilities. For transportation facilities, the City shall find that the following criteria have been met in order for a proposed development to be found in compliance with concurrency management requirements: Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121~9 9A-5 CITY OF SEBASTIAN APPENDIX 9A: CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT 1. At the time the final development order is issued, the necessary facilities and services are in place or under actual construction; or 2. A final development order is issued subject to the conditions that the necessary facilities and services needed to serve the new development are scheduled to be in place or under actual construction not more than three years after issuance of a certificate of occupancy as provided in the City's adopted Five Year Capital Improvements Program (CIP). The CIP may recognize and include transportation projects included in the first three years of the adopted Florida Department of Transportation Five Year work program. The Capital Improvements Element must include the following policies: a. The estimated date of commencement of actnal construction and the estimated date of project completion; and b. A provision that a plan amendment is required to eliminate, defer, or delay construction of any road or mass transit facility or service which is needed to maintain the adopted level of service standard and which is listed in the Five Year Capital Improvements Program. 3. At the time the final development order is issued, the necessary facilities and services are the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the necessary facilities and services to serve the new development to be in place or under actual construction not more than three years after issuance of a certificate of occupancy; or 4. At the time the final development order is issued, the necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant to 9163.3220, FS, or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, FS, to be in place or under actual construction not more than three years after issuance of a certificate of occupancy; or 5. For the purpose of issuing a final development order, a proposed development may be deemed to have a de minimis impact and may not be subject to the transportation concurrency requirements, only if all the following conditions are met: a. The development proposal is for an iocrease io density or iotensity of less than or equal to twice the density or iotensity of the existing development, or for the development of a vacant parcel of land at a residential density of less than four dwelling units per acre or, for non-residential uses, at an iotensity of less than 0.1 floor area ratio. Isolated vacant lots io predominantly built residential areas where construction of a siogle family house wonld be the most suitable use, may be developed for siogle family residential under the de minimis exception even if smaller than one quarter acre io size. b. The transportation iotpact of the proposed development alone does not exceed 0.1 percent of the maximum service volume at the adopted level of service standard for peak hour of the affected transportation facility. c. The cnmnlative total transportation impact from the de minimis exemptions does not exceed three percent (3%) of the maximum service volume at the adopted level of service standard of the affected transportation facility if the facility does not meet the minimum level of serve standard. d. The City has adopted withio its Comprehensive Plan policies for grantiog such exemptions. SECTION 6: CONCURRENCY ADMINISTRATION The Growth Management Department shall be responsible for concurrency reviews as required by this Article. The Growth Management Department in consultation with City staff shall determine whether adequate capacities for concurrency facilities are available to satisfY the demands of each proposed development. Refer to Figure 1, Concurrency Management Flow Chart, for a graphic summary of the administrative process. A Application for Concurrency Review. Concurrency review shall be initiated upon submission and acceptance of an application for a site plan approval, subdivision construction permit, subdivision plart, certificate of occupancy, or a building permit, whichever first occurs. At the request of the Comprehensive Plan Goals. Objectives and Policies 09121199 9A-6 CITY OF SEBASTIAN APPENDIX 9A: CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT applicant and pursuant to payment of a concurrency review fee as may be established by resolution of the City Council, the Growth Management Department in consultation with City staff may render concurrency findings. B. Project Impact Assessment. The Growth Management Department shall use the best available information to establish and evaluate existing capacities for concurrency facilities. The applicant shall be responsible for supplying the anticipated land uses, densities and/or intensities, of a proposed development together with the anticipated date of completion of proposed development, and provide an analysis of the impacts on concurrency management facilities. The Growth Management Department shall review the anticipated impacts of the proposed development on concurrency facilities. C. Project Phasingffiming of Improvements. Concurrency facilities associated with a phased development may also be phased. However, all concurrency facilities necessary to accommodate the impacts of each phase must be available or a schedule for the acquired improvements must be approved prior to the issuance of a final development order. The schedule of facility improvements shall ensure that all facility improvements necessary to accommodate the impacts of the development (or portion thereof) for which a certificate of occupancy has been applied, shall be in place prior to the issuance of the certificate. Under no circumstances shall the final certificate of occupancy be issued for a project unless all required facility improvements required by the development order or development agreement have been completed. D. Development Agreements. If the minimum requirements for concurrency cannot be met, concurrency may be achieved by guaranteeing necessary facility improvements in an enforceable development agreement. Said development agreement may include guarantees to construct required facility improvements or to provide funds equivalent to the cost of providing such facility improvements. E. Concurrency Review Determination. Upon the conclusion of the concurrency review, the Growth Management Department shall prepare a written determination concerning the proposed development. This determination shall address, but is not limited to: 1. The anticipated public facility impacts of the proposed development; 2. The ability of existing facilities to accommodate the proposed development at the adopted level of service standards; 3. Any existing facility deficiencies that will need to be corrected prior to the completion of the proposed development; 4. The facility improvements or additions necessary to accommodate the impact of the proposed development at the adopted level of service standards and the entities responsible for the design and installation of all required facility improvements or additions; and 5. The date such facility improvements or additions will need to be completed to be concurrent with the impacts on such facilities created by the proposed development. F. Actions by the Growth Management Department. In the event that the City's concurrency review reveals that the proposed development would generate public facility impacts which can be absorbed by the existing available capacity with or without developer funded improvements, the Growth Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121>99 9A-7 CITY OF SEBASTIAN Management Department shall issue concurrency as may be applicable. APPENDIX 9A: CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT a certificate of concurrency or a conditional certificate of In the event that the City's concurrency review reveals that the proposed development would generate public facility impacts beyond that which can be absorbed by. available capacity, the City shall determine whether there is a financial or other legally binding commitment to ensure that public facilities necessary to correct the anticipated deficiency will be in place concurrent with the impacts of the proposed development. If the City and/or a developer are unable to provide such assurances, the project shall be denied. G. Concurrency Resolution. If the Growth Management Department determines that an application for concurrency review cannot be supported by sufficient concurrency facility capacity, the applicant may fIle an application for concurrency resolution and pay the requisite filing fee as shall be established by resolution of the City Council. The purpose for the concurrency resolution process shall be to enable an applicant to negotiate a development agreement which identifies terms for resolving the capacity deficiency. The development agreement shall be consistent with g163.3220, ES., and applicable City ordinances. If the applicant successfully resolves capacity deficiencies, the applicant may reserve capacity pursuant to the terms of the development agreement. If the issues cannot be resolved, the application shall be deemed to be denied and, at any time, the applicant may resubmit the concurrency review application to the Growth Management Department. SECTION 7: CAPACITY RESERVATION A. Reservation of Capacity. Following receipt of an approved final development order, the capacity demand of the approved development shall be considered to be reserved. The time frame of the concurrency reservation shall be based on the time frame of the final development order or development agreement. If the time frame of the final development order and/or the development agreement lapses, the available capacity assigned to the development order shall be returned to the available capacity pool. B. Conditional Concurrency Certificate. A conditional concurrency certificate shall not vest the applicant for concurrency facility capacity; rather the applicant shall provide any required concurrency facility improvements or insure that the requisite improvements either are in place or shall otherwise be in place compliant with the provision of 95. C. First-Come-First-Served. Capacity shall be reserved on a first-come-fust-served basis by the Growth Management Department. Such reservation shall be valid only for the specific final development order and for the specified land uses, densities, intensities, construction and improvement schedules contained in the approved fmal development order. Reservation of capacity runs with the land and is transferable to a successor in ownership. Reservation of capacity for concurrency shall expire if the underlying final development order or development agreement expires or is revoked. The final development order shall state the terrns of the concurrency reservation, including the allocation of available capacity, the time-frame for the allocation, and other appropriate legal assurances. D. Project DeferralslDevelopment Moratoriums. If at any time the City's inventory of the capacity of concurrency facilities indicates that concurrency facilities have dropped below its adopted level of service standard, the City shall cease to issue development orders for projects which would impact the Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121/99 9A-8 CITY OF SEBASTIAN APPENDIX 9A: CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT deficient facilities or the area impacted by the deficient concurrency facilities, as defined within this Ordinance. Such a suspension or moratorium on the issuance of development orders shall continue until such time as the adopted level of service standard is re-established, the Comprehensive Plan is amended to reflect an acceptable level of service standard for the facilities in question, or alternative arrangements are made to ensure capacity will be available, consistent with Section 5. SECTION 8: ADOPTED LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS Prior to issuing a development order the City shall review all proposed development to ensure consistency with adopted LOS standards. No development shall be approved that is projected to decrease the existing LOS below the adopted standard, unless those are mitigated by the developer. Level of service standards for those public facilities for which concurrency is required are set forth below: Concurrencv Facilitv Sanitary Sewer Potable Water Solid Waste: Drainage Facilities Water Quantity Standards: Water Quality Standards: Recreation: Citv of Sebastian Adopted Level of Service Standard 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit 7.52 pounds per day per capita OjJ-Site Siandard: Post development runoff sball not exceed the pre-development runoff rate for a 25-year, 24 hour design storm. On-Slte Standard: Post development runoff shall not exceed the pre-development runoff rate for a 10-year, 24 hour design storm. Water quality standards of Chapter 17-25, F AC, shall be applied as the quantitative standards. Chapter 17-25, F AC. requires Outstanding Florida Waters (i.e., Indian River Lagoon) to reduce pollution loads by an additional fifty percent (50"10) prior to discharge. PARK CLASSIFICATION Neighborhood Park Community Park Roads: ACREAGE OF RECREATION AREASIPOPULATION 2.0 per 1,000 2.0 perl,OOO ROADWAY FACll,ITY MINIMUM LOS STANDARD PEAK HOUR. State Arterials U.S. Hil!b.wav 1 C County Arterials CR 512 CFellsmere Hil!b.wav) D CR 505 (Roseland Road) D Citv Collectors lndian River Drive D Schumman Drive D Barber Street (Wimbrow Drive to Schmnann Drive) D Flenrin2 Street tMain Street to CR 512) D Easv Street (Main Street to Schumann Drive) D Vocelle Avenue (CR 505 to Flemiru!) D Main Street (US 1 to Wimbrow Drive) D Laconia Street (CR 512 to South Citv Limit) D Si<mificant Local Streets Shown on the Maior Thoroul!hfare Plan Barber Street Extension (Schumann Dr to US 1) - City D En2lar Avenue"lBaIber St to Schumano Dr) - Citv D Wimbrow Drive (Main Street to East CR 512) - Citv D Louisiana Avenue tMain Street to CR 512) -- Citv D Local All roads not classified as arterials, collectors, or significant D local streets shown on the Maior Thoroughfare Plan. Note: * The peak hours shall be the 30th highest hour established by FOOT. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121199 9A-9 CITY OF SEBASTIAN APPENDIX 9A: CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SECTION 9: METHODOLOGY FOR DETERMINING DEMANDS ON CONCURRENCY FACILITIES A. Roads. In determining demand for available capacity for roads, the following criteria shall be used: 1. Residential Development. For proposed residential development (except within mixed use developments), the following trip generation rates shall be used to calculate the impact of the proposed development: Land Use Tvoe Single-Family Multiple-Family Trios Per Dav Per Unit 10 8 2. Non~Residential Development and Mixed-Use Development. For all other development categories allowed within the Future Land Use Element, the impacts of development shall be measured by utilizing the average peak trip generation rate associated with the land use designation in which the proposed development shall occur, using the most recent published edition of the Institute of Traffic Engineers' Trip Generation Manual. Internal capture rates may be considered in determining traffic volumes for mixed use developments; however, the applicant shall bear the burden of demonstrating any internal capture rates of the total nonresidential trips. 3. Other Methods and Procedures. If the preliminary level of service information indicates a deficiency in capacity based on adopted level of service standards (reference Section 8 for adopted level of service standards for roads), the developer may at his option, prepare a more detailed alternative Highway Capacity Analysis as described in the Highway Capacity Manual (Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, 1985); or conduct a travel time and delay study following professional standards and procedures contained in the Florida Department of Transportation, Traffic Engineering Office in its Manual for Uniform Traffic Studies. If the alternative methodology, after review and acceptance by the Growth Management Department, indicates no deficiency in the capacity based on the adopted level of service standard, notwithstanding that the comprehensive plan indicates a deficiency in capacity based on the adopted level of service standard, the results of the alternative methodology will be used. However, the City shall, at its discretion, reserve the option to have the methodology reviewed by a professional transportation engineer or transportation planner prior to accepting the methodology. The cost for such review shall be borne by the applicant. a. Required Trafftc Ana(vsis. For all new developments which are required to follow the site plan review process, the applicant/developer shall be reqnired to submit a traffic analysis which identifies the developmenfs impact on the City's transportation system. The Growth Management Department may also reqnire the submission of a traffic analysis for developments if the site location, anticipated total trip generation, circulation patterns or other such factors warrant a more extensive review of traffic impacts. b. Trafftc Analysis Methodology. The impact area for the traffic analysis shall inclnde adjacent and connected roadway segments as detennined by the Growth Management Department The applicant may apply alternative trip allocations together with a statement of trip allocation methodology consistent with professional standards established in one (I) or more of the following docnments: . Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, Natioual Research Council, 1985. . Florida Highway System Plan, "Traffic Analysis Procedures," Florida Department of Transportation, Bureau of Multi-Modal Systems Planning, 1987. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121199 9A-IO I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF SEBASTIAN APPENDIX 9A: CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT . Florida Highway System Plan, "Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manual," Florida Department of Transportation,. . Trip Generation, Institnte of Transportation Engineers (latest edition). . Transportation and Land Developmen~ Stover, Virgil G., Institnte of Transportation Engineers, 1988. c. Traffic Analysis Requirements. The traffic analysis shall include the following: i. Total projected average weekday trips for the proposed development . Pass-by capture rate (commercial land uses only); . Internal capture rate (planned development only); . Peak external trips based on ITE Trip Generation Manual, 5th (or most recent) Editioo; and . Peak hour directional projected vehicle trips on all segments of the arterial and collector street system which are adjacent to the development project or as determined necessary by the Planner. ii. Design capacily of the accessed road(s). iii. Analysis of traffic distribution on the road network including all links impacted by more than ten percent (10%) of project traffic. The trip distribution shall be consistent with the "presets" contained in the approved trip generation model. The Growth Management Department shall determine the approved trip generation model. iv. Necessary operational improvements to the Cily, Counly, or State maintained transportation system in order to maintain the adopted level of service for the roadway. v. Other related information as required by the Cily. vi. Justification, including appropriate references, for the use of any trip generation rates, adjustments factors or traffic assignment methods not previously approved by the Cily. vii. The latest editioo of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (!TE) Trip Generation manual shall be nsed to calculate these estimates. Adjustments to these estimates may be made, based on special trip generation information supplied by the applicant. B. Other Facilities. The level of service standards for all concurrency facilities are listed in Section 8. The applicant shall provide the Growth Management Department with the information required to apply the adopted level of service standard as cited below. The demand on concurrency facilities generated by the applicant's development shall be determined as cited below. 1. Solid Waste. The demand for solid waste collection and disposal capacity shall be determined by multiply the total number of persons served times 7.52 pounds. 2. Potable Water. The demand for potable water capacity shall be determined by multiply the total number of equivalent residential units served times 250 gallons. 3. Sanitary Sewer. The demand for sanitary sewer capacity shall be determined by multiply the total number of equivalent residential units served times 250 gallons. 4. Drainage. The applicant shall provide evidence demonstrating that the proposed project shall meet the LOS established in Section 7 for drainage facilities. 5. Recreation Area. The demand for recreation area shall be determined by multiplying the City's recreation area level of service standard (4.0 acres per 1,000 population or .01 acre multiplied by each person served by the development). SECTION 10: DETERMINATION OF AVAILABLE CAPACITY For purposes of these regulations, the available capacity of a facility shall be determined by adding the cumulative total supply for each public facility component as cited in Step 1 and subtracting cumulative total demand for each infrastructure component as cited in Step 2. Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 09121/99 9A-ll CITY OF SEBASTIAN APPENDIX 9A: CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT A Step 1: Add the Indicators of Available Facility Capacity: 1. Capacity of Existing Facilities. The total capacity of existing facilities operating at the required levelofse~ce;and 2. Capacity of Committed Potable Water, Sewer, Solid Waste and Drainage Facilities. The total capacity of committed new facilities, if any, that will become available on or before the date a certificate of occupancy is issued for the development. The capacity of concurrency facilities may be counted and deemed concurrent only if the following standards are met: a. For Potable Water, Sewer, Solid Waste and Drainage: The standards identified in Section SeA) shall be met. b. For Parks and Recreation Facilities: The standards identified in Section S(B) shall be met. c. For Roads: The standards identified in Section S(e) shall be met. B. Step 2: Subtract the Committed Capacity: 1. Existing Demand Based on Existing Development. The demand for se~ces or facilities created by existing development as provided by the City. 2. Demand to be Generated by Vested Development, Valid Capacity Reservation Certificates, and Valid Certificates of Concurrency. The demand for the service or facility created by the anticipated completion of other vested and/or approved developments. Comprehensive Plan Goals,. Objectives and Policies 09/21/99 9A-12